310124_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20210827

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - )Z 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:® Departure Time: County: a, ) Region: W-12D
l (�� �,, ,, � • \ ,,
Farm Name: l ��� L�nICJ/��L.0 W \ J..1�,.,LI-- Owner Email:
"/��qq
Owner Name: e�' 'n• ��131.A.V l Phone:: 916 -ZFq -1652
Mailing Address: 323 (.: A2.r4. u,-q)1" r mc, f L4to(
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: _�Q,�} 1C&jcn
�)� tJe * Title: ()f sJ(W.1 Phone: "IIO ZU-1 /lD5I
Onsite Representative: `�$ � Oa'�Pnr�Integrator: rnS-lfd4LA"?yQlrJ(
Certified Operator: t�tQf\ l gp,)'e01 Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
to
Other
Other
�1Ceerrrtification Number: (�'] w�
Latitude: e TJ.JI.IJ Longitude: �t ongo3CO
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La) eNon-Layer er
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pop.
La ers
Non -La ers
Pullets
Turke s
Turke Pouets
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
EQ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
['4
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
wl No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
C!�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[8 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 2141201S Continued

Facili Number:
Date of lns Lion:
-Z
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) leas than adequate?
❑ Yes
/r�l
W1 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
IN No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Stmclure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):_
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental
threat,
notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
h11 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
f5d No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
171 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
I t�
��
p
r 1 V
�A
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17, Does the facility tack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Renuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
rf�
wl No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
[A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[:]Yes
E] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfalt ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a min gauge?
❑ Yes
[A No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain minbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of
21412015 Continued

Facility Number: Date of ins ectlou:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? []Yes ®No
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes W No
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List strncture(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No
27. Did the facility fail in secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ® No
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. Al the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any
se drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as nen
! e&J3 lco1C c , vay well (061(t 01 ned
Wage lavralc�s�s � 5/ J2 1 2. y2 i. 5L5
amid 2.3Z 0.05
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
ons or any other
1 Tea' 03,o5/Zo
(N-b,'$Jcn $ -13-21 u256-W
51UC�sx'l e 2�, Sc"[j a'
1,r Zbw(d aTQ_AAQ1( Go pkk + eofrV%904 W1 I<fl�(a�o ,
Reviewedlnspector Name: eye 1 1 Phone: "ppII--Q�i9
,,..[.lJ "lY1Tl
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: :� I Date: t p' 2l _Zl
Page 3 of 3 21412015