20211413 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20210927

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
June 1, 2021 Ver4.1
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
✓ No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
✓ Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20211413 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
✓ No payment required
✓ Fee received
✓ Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office *
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
What amout is owed?*
✓ $240.00
✓ $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Colleen Cohn:eads\cmcohn
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Project Eagle
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Eric Evans - Edgecombe County Manager
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
9/27/2021
Nearest Body of Water
Walnut Creek
Basin
Tar -Pamlico
Water Classification
WS-IV;NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.92656
Longitude:
-77.66653
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
A. Processing Information
u
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Edgecombe
Is this a NCDMS Project
✓ Yes r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
✓ Yes r No
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
17 Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*

C Yes
( No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
7 Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
C Yes ( No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
Note that we are not requesting a NWP for this project, as no Waters of the US are to be impacted. The e-PCN form requires boxes in la and 1 b to be checked for submittal.
Id. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
I— 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
17 Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
lf. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
CYes (No
I— 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
I— Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
( Yes CNo
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
CYes CNo
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
C Yes (No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
C Yes ( No
B. Applicant Information
Id. Who is applying for the permit?
17 Owner r Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
( Yes C No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Edgecombe County
2b. Deed book and page no.:
1580/0247
2c. Contact Person:
2d. Address
Street Address
PO Box 10
Address Line 2
(Sty State/ Bovine/ Region
Tarboro NC
Fbstal / Zlp Code Country
27886 USA
2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
✓ Yes ( No
( Yes C No

4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Phil May
4b. Business Name:
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
4c. Address
Street Address
3040 NC I -My 42 West
Address Line 2
aty
Clayton
Rzstal / Zip Code
27520
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
State / Province / legion
NC
aunty
USA
4e. Fax Number:
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if apprgxiate)
lc. Nearest municipality/ town:
Tarboro
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
3799-45-7509; 3799-74-7201
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Leonard Wiggins Parkway
Address Line 2
0ty
Tarboro
Rtstal / Zip Code
27886
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Walnut Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
WS-IV;NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Tar -Pamlico
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030201010904
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
110
State / Province / legion
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
Project Eagle is the proposed development of Pad C of the Kingsboro Business Park. The property is currently a mix of timbered and forested land, with recent construction of Leonard
Wiggins Parkway along its northern extents. General land use within the vicinity of the project includes primarily agricultural operations with other manufacturing and distribution facilities
in the area.
The proposed project has an existing Approved Jurisdictional Determination (SAW-2021-01227) that shows the wetlands that are to be impacted as (b)(1) non -adjacent waters. This
permit application is to request approval from NCDEQ under 15A NCAC 02H .1300 as Isolated Wetlands. See cover letter for additional details.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:

1.62 (within 110 acre limit of disturbance)
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
0 (within 110 acre limit of disturbance)
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
Edgecombe County, as the current site owner, is applying for a permit for the construction of a manufacturing facility and warehouse on Pad C of the Kingsboro Business Park. The
manufacturing and warehouse facilities would then be constructed in two phases, both of which are shown in this application. Due to the processes involved in the County's economic
development efforts, the eventual owner and user of the site is currently withheld until agreements are finalized, and the site development is named Project Eagle. This project would
bring economic benefit to Edgecombe County including 510 newjobs with approximately $105,000,000 dollars in corporate investment.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
Project Eagle would entail the clearing and grading of an approximately 110 acre area and the construction of a 603,200 square foot manufacturing and 539,400 square foot
warehouse facility, along with associated transport, parking, and ancillary features such as stormwater management devices. The project would also involve the construction of a 12"
gravity sanitary sewer line east of the facility. This utility would then be bored under Walnut Branch and its associated wetlands in order to connect to existing infrastructure on the site.
A rail spur would be constructed from the southeast edge of the site to the facility. Site grading would require typical equipment such as dump trucks, excavators, and graders.
Installation of the proposed sanitary sewer line would involve the use of excavators and drilling/boring equipment.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
c Yes
r No O Unknown
Comments:
Potential jurisdictional features shown outside the proposed limits of disturbance are based on prior
delineations.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? *
0 Preliminary F Approved r Not Verified 0 Unknown f N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2021-01227
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
John Davis
Soil Horizons
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
The Approved JD (SAW-2021-01227) was issued on 07/19/2021.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
C Yes ( No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
While the project is proposed to be developed in two phases, both are provided in this application. No additional impacts to Waters of the State or Waters of the US are proposed with
the future expansion. Grading and final design of the proposed site have not been completed at this time. Ultimate limits of disturbance are provided on the attached plans and
adjustments of final designs will be made to ensure grading does not impact other identified Waters of the US.
The site is part of the Kingsboro Business Park, formerly known as the Kingsboro CSXSelect Site or Industrial Park. The park's transportation and utility infrastructure were initially
developed in conjunction with the Triangle Tire facility and R-5868, which were issued an Individual Permit, Individual Water Quality Certification, and Major Buffer Variance in 2017. No
additional impacts to Waters of the US or State riparian buffers are proposed for the development of Project Eagle, and therefore no modification to the prior permits are required.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
17 Wetlands r Streams -tributaries
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
❑ Buffers
2a. Site #*(?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type* (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name*
2e. Forested*
2f. Type of
Jurisdicition*(?)
2g. Impact
area*
1
Fill
P
Isolated Wetlands
Wetland 2
No
DWR
0.520
(acres)
2
Fill
P
Isolated Wetlands
Wetland 3
No
DWR
0.500
(acres)
3
Fill
P
Isolated Wetlands
Wetland 4
No
DWR
0.050
(acres)

4
Fill
P
Isolated Wetlands
Wetland 5
No
DWR
0.550
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.000
2g. Total Wetland Impact
1.620
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
1.620
2i. Comments:
All features were determined to be non-federal jurisdiction in the July 2021 AJD. The features have been assessed and lack connectivity to
downstream waters (i.e. significant nexus) using standard methodology in place prior to the 2020 Navigable Waters Protection Rule. Therefore, we
consider these features to be Isolated under the 1300 rule. See cover letter for additional details.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Although this proposed project will permanently impact 1.62 acres of isolated wetlands, it has been designed to avoid impacts to all Section 404
jurisdictional wetlands and streams on the property. Avoidance of the isolated wetland features would result in Pad C being unusable for a large
business or industry. Other uses, such as residential development are not appropriate within the business park. Final design of the facility and
associated grading plans wiIl be developed after the agreement for the site is finalized and prior to construction commencing, and will ensure that no
impacts to WOTUS occur.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
The sewer connection will utilize subsurface construction techniques (directional drill or bore) to avoid impacts to the stream and wetland east of the
construction site. All un-impacted resources will be clearly marked with tree protection or other high visibility fencing to ensure encroachment into
those areas does not occur. Sediment and erosion control measures will be constructed, inspected, and maintained throughout construction, and will
not be located in jurisdictional areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
( Yes r No
2c. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
17 DWR r- Corps
2d. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this project?
n Mitigation bank 17 Payment to in -lieu fee r Permittee Responsible
program Mitigation
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
✓ Yes r No
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
(linear feet)
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only): 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(square feet) (acres)
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
1.62
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
(acres)
4h. Comments
DMS has proposed to provide mitigation in adjacent HUCs if none are available in the site's HUC at the time of payment. See attached conditional
acceptance.
6. Buffer mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWR
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? If yes, you must fill out this entire form - please contact DWR for more
information.
C Yes r No
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR) L)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r: Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?

r Level Spreader
r Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
r Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
7 Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
(7 Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
✓ Yes rNo
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
✓ Yes r No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state -approved local government stormwater
program?
✓ Yes r No
✓ N/A - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
17 Local Government r State
Local Government Stormwater Programs
r Phase II fJ NSW r USMP 17 Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.
Edgecombe County
Comments:
A stormwater management plan for the project will be developed by the project end -user's engineer, and submitted for approval to the County. Preliminary stormwater management
device locations are provided on the attached plans.
LG. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
✓ Yes C No
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? *
✓ Yes rNo
Comments:*
County funds are being used to assist in the initial development of the site and preliminary plans and permits. No State or Federal funding has been
provided for this site.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
✓ Yes rNo
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
✓ Yes ( No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
All phases of the proposed project have been included in this permit application, and no additional development is anticipated on the site.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r No r WA
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Sewage from the facility will be sent to existing sewer infrastructure via the proposed sanitary sewer service line. Adequate capacity is available in the
existing sewer infrastructure and at the County WWTP.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
✓ Yes ( No

5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
( Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
✓ Yes
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
✓ Yes G No
r No r Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
( Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
✓ Yes G No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
✓ Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
6. Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper. https://wnw.habitat.noaa.gov/apps/efhmapper/?page=page_8
Most of the site is already timbered, and the remaining forested areas are younger growth due to previous timber management activities.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
✓ Yes ( No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
USFWS IPaC for Edgecombe County. https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/JUAG7GVXQNFKNBKSJLDJU4B4UA/resources
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
( Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
There is one historical site approximately 1 mile east of the proposed project (Site ID: ED1024) that has a status of Surveyed Only. The site has been
disturbed by timbering and past borrow activities for highway construction.
NC State Historic Preservation Office. https://nc.maps.arcgis.comfapps/webappviewer/index.html?id=79ea671ebdcc45639f0860257d5f5ed7
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
✓ Yes ( No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Floodplain Map Service. https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search#searchresultsanchor
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one
file when possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
dick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
ProjectEagle_EPCN_Attachments.pdf 33 48MB
Fie mist be FCF or KvE
Comments
Please see cover letter for additional details.
Signature
*
17 By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.

Full Name:
Philip May
Signature
Date
9/27/2021

OCAROLINA
ECOSYSTEMS
3040 NC 42 West, Clayton NC 27520
P:919-359-1102 — F:919-585-5570
September 27, 2021
Mr. Rick Trone
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
NC Department of Environmental Quality
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: Pre -Construction Notification for Section 1300 Isolated Wetland Permit
Project Eagle
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Trone,
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc. (CEI), in conjunction with Appian Engineers, has prepared the
associated electronic Pre -Construction Notification (e-PCN) for Edgecombe County in order to
acquire an Isolated Wetlands Permit for the above -referenced project. This e-PCN is being
submitted for the project along with the following exhibits:
1. Figure 1: Vicinity Map
2. Figure 2: USGS Map
3. Figure 3: NRCS Map
4. Figure 4: Impact Location Map
5. Figure 5: LiDAR Map
6. IPaC Report
7. Approved JD
8. Preliminary Construction Plans
Project Eagle is an economic development effort by the County to attract and secure industry
investment in the Kingsboro Business Park. At this time the proposed user is considering two
sites, one of which is this project, but has not made a final selection. Therefore, the end -user of
the site has been withheld from the application at this time, and the County is applying for this
permit as the site owner. Preliminary plans have been developed to provide sufficient
documentation that the site can be developed without impacts to Waters of the US (WOTUS).
The isolated wetlands are located in the center of the site, and avoidance and minimization of
impacts to those features is not practical due to this location. Final plans will be developed by the
user's engineers and reviewed/approved by the County prior to construction. A final
construction plan set, including approved stormwater management plan, can be provided if
requested to ensure compliance with issued approvals.
Note that this site is Pad C of the Kingsboro Business Park, formerly known as the Kingsboro
CSX Select Site or Industrial Park. Initial development of the park infrastructure (transportation
and sewer) were permitted in conjunction with the Triangle Tire facility being constructed to the
east of this site. The Park's Individual 404 Permit (AID SAW-2008-02741), Individual Water

Mr. Rick Trone
Project Eagle
Page 2 of 2
September 27, 2021
Quality Certification (DWR# 20180133v3), and Major Buffer Variance (DWR# 20180133v2) do
not require modification for the development of Project Eagle, as only Isolated Wetlands are
proposed to be impacted.
The USACE issued an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AID 2021-01227) for this site on
July 19, 2021. The proposed wetland impacts are classified as (b)(1) Non -Adjacent Waters
under this AJD. After issuance of the AJD, Carolina Ecosystems staff reviewed the site (August
16, 2021), and it is our professional opinion that the wetlands proposed for impact are Isolated
and subject to 15A NCAC 02H.1300. All wetlands were assessed on foot and any potential
connection or drainage to downstream waters was evaluated in the field and using GIS
information. As can be seen in the enclosed LiDAR map (Figure 5), there is no evident
connection to downstream waters. One small ditch was evident in the center of the wetland areas
using GIS data, but in the field was not connected to any of the wetland features. Some
anecdotal evidence suggests that at least portions of the wetland areas were affected or created
by borrow activities associated with the adjacent US 64 Highway construction. However,
documentation of these activities is not available, therefore we are considering the wetlands as
Isolated, and classified as Basin Wetlands under the NC Wetland Assessment Method, for the
processing of this permit application.
This information, along with the associated e-PCN are being submitted for your review of this
project. Note that the US Army Corps of Engineers is also copied on this submittal, and a
Nationwide Permit is "checked" on the e-PCN as the submittal process seems to require selection
of an NWP. A note was added regarding this in the e-PCN, and we are not requesting
authorization to impact any WOTUS.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at your earliest
convenience at [phone] or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
Philip May
Senior Environmental Scientist
Cc: Billy Standridge, USACE — Wilmington District
Eric Evans, County Manager - Edgecombe County
David Revoir, Appian Engineers

Pkwy
Lat: 35.9252 / Long: -77.6650
Project Location:
Edgecombe County, NC
OCAROLINA
VECOSYSTEMS
4244
Miles
0 1 2
Project Boundary
Named USGS Streams
Project Eagle
Edgecombe County, NC
September 2021
Figure 1: Vicinity Map

OCAROLINA
ECOSYSTEMS
Feet
0 300 600
Project Boundary
Hartease (2019) USGS 1:24,000 Topographic Quadrangle Map
Revised:
suNpo/nr3
Project Eagle
Edgecombe County, NC
Figure 2: USGS Map

�R a J�
MCAROLINA
VECOSYSTEME
Feet
0 300 600
Project Boundary
Edgecombe County NRCS Soil Survey Sheets 13 and 17
Map Date: September 2021
Revised:
Revised:
Revised:
Project Eagle
Edgecombe County, NC
Figure 3: NRCS Map

OCAROLINA
ECOSYSTEMS
Feet
0 100 200
Project Boundary
2017 NC Statewide Aerial Photography
Map Date: September 2021
Revised:
Revised:
Revised:
Project Eagle
Edgecombe County, NC
Figure 4: Impact Location Map

OCAROLINA
ECOSYSTEMS
Feet
0 75 150
Project Boundary
112' msl 1M
2017 NC Statewide Aerial Photography
68' msl
Map Date: September 2021
Revised:
Revised:
Revised:
Project Eagle
Edgecombe County, NC
Figure 5: LiDAR Map

9/20/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
IPaC
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat
(collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood
and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional
site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of
proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS
office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section
that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for
additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Edgecombe County,
North Carolina ‘4&\'
U5 54-AL CP
«Gg6tx
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
k. [phone]
fi [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/C3BTSATFYVB3BN26EM6O2RVQVI/resources
1/12

9/20/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487
•cb-s\c'
Gios"�
,� FOB
�O
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/C3BTSATFYVB3BN26EM6O2RVQVI/resources
2/12

9/20/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of
project level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of
the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a
dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move,
and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near
the project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and
project -specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area
of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any
Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can
only be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in
IPaC (see directions below) or from the local field office directly.
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, please return to the IPaC website
and request an official species list by doing the following:
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Login (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
Listed species and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA Fisheries ).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this
list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
1. Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows
species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
2. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:
Amphibians
NAM E
STATUS
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/C3BTSATFYVB3BN26EM6O2RVQVI/resources 3/12

9/20/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
Threatened
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
Wherever found
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the
critical habitat is not available.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Clams
NAME
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of th
critical habitat is not available.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Tar River Spinymussel Elliptio steinstansanaa
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1392
Insects-4°C°
NAME
Nonarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Critical habitats
Endangered
STATUSN.
'
Proposed Threatened
Endangered
STATUS
Candidate
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered
species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/C3BTSATFYVB3BN26EM6O2RVQVI/resources 4/12

9/20/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act' and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act2.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing
appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/managed-species/1
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-gui n\O
conservation-measures.php
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds jic
http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/management/nationwidestandardconservationmeasures.pdf
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds
of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn
more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ
below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on
this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general
public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip:
enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the
Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird
species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and
other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to
reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at
the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your
project area.
NAME BREEDING SEASON (IFA
BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED
FORA BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE
BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
PROJECT AREA SOMETIME WITHIN
THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED,
WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL
ESTIMATE OF THE DATES INSIDE
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS
ACROSS ITS ENTIRE RANGE.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/C3BTSATFYVB3BN26EM6O2RVQVI/resources 5/12

9/20/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
"BREEDS ELSEWHERE" INDICATES
THAT THE BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY
American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird
Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA
http://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9587
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its
the continental USA and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina
range in
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Probability o(Presence Summary
BREED IN YOUR PROJECT AREA.)
Breeds Apr 1 to Aug 31
Breeds Apr 20 to Aug 20
Breeds May 1 to Jul 31
31
Breeds Apr 1 to jul 31
Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the FAQ
"Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to
interpret this report.
Probability of Presence ( )
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week months.)
A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see below) can be
used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher confidence in the
presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
1. The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in the
week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for that
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/C3BTSATFYVB3BN26EM6O2RVQVI/resources 6/12

9/20/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee was
found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is 0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of presence
is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum probability of presence
across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence in week 20 for the Spotted
Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12 (0.25) is the maximum of any
week of the year. The relative probability of presence on week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is
0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the probability of
presence score.
To see a bar's probability of presence score, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
Breeding Season ( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across its
entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project area.
Survey Effort (I)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
To see a bar's survey effort range, simply hover your mouse cursor over the bar.
01101
No Data ( ) •..i
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on all
years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
• probability of presence
breeding season I survey effort no data
SPECIAL. JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
American Kestrel i + +�'— ++ "" 111
BCC - BCR (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC) only
in particular Bird
Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in
the continental
USA)
mnnnn
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/C3BTSATFYVB3BN26EM6O2RVQVI/resources 7/12

9/20/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
Kentucky Warbler ---- ---- ---- Al 1111 IIII----
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
Prairie Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
Prothonotary
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
rige in the
contineri I USA
and Alaska.)
Wood Thrush
BCC Rangewide
(CON) (This is a
Bird of
Conservation
Concern (BCC)
throughout its
range in the
continental USA
and Alaska.)
1111--------------------
1111 1111 1111 IIF
I F+ ■��- �'#-+ +
f
cQ 1111 nnnnn
-II- -111 1111 1111 1111---------
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at
any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to
occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/C3BTSATFYVB3BN26EM6O2RVQVI/resources 8/12

9/20/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to
occur and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or
permits may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or
bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) and other species
that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network
(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is
queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project
intersects, and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that
area, an eagle (Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore
activities or development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not
representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially
occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the
Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen
science datasets . 'woo
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To
learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the
Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or
year-round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or
(if you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of interest there), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds
guide. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated with it, if that bird does occur
in your project area, there may be nests present at some point within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds
elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of
the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from
certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to
avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For
more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/C3BTSATFYVB3BN26EM6O2RVQVI/resources 9/12

9/20/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
impacts and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of
bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal
also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.
Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year,
including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on
marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam
Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avclating 11‘1411'e
Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
°Cil)b%
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority
concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be
in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring
in my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10
km grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no data" indicator (a
red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort is high, then the probability of
presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack
of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting
point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to
confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or
minimize potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about
conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize
impacts to migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
Facilities
National Wildlife Refuge lands
Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refuge system must undergo a
'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to
discuss any questions or concerns.
THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS AT THIS LOCATION.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/C3BTSATFYVB3BN26EM6O2RVQVI/resources 10/12

9/20/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
Fish hatcheries
THERE ARE NO FISH HATCHERIES AT THIS LOCATION.
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
11
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update
our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual
extent of wetlands on site.
This location overlaps the following wetlands: #cb° N°
1113\111.
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
PFO1 /2F
PFO1 A
RIVERINE
R4SBC r OS
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
Data limitations Ili _alF
." ka.___41 ik
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level
information on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high
altitude imagery. Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error
is inherent in the use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in
revision of the wetland boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image analysts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conducted.
Metadata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any mapping problems.
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or field work. There may be
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and
the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/C3BTSATFYVB3BN26EM6O2RVQVI/resources 11/12

9/20/2021 IPaC: Explore Location resources
Data precautions
Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner than that used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to define the limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish
the geographical scope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in
activities involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal,
state, or local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may
affect such activities.
00:s\CP‘
fioN4s\'‘f
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/C3BTSATFYVB3BN26EM6O2RVQVI/resources 12/12

SAW-2021-01227
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2021-01227 County: Edgecombe U.S.G.S. Quad: NC-Hartsease
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: Edgecombe County
Mr. Eric Evans
Address: 201 St. Andrews Street
Tarboro, North Carolina 27886
Telephone Number: [phone]
Size (acres) 127.4 Nearest Town Rocky Mount
Nearest Waterway Tar River River Basin Pamlico
USGS HUC 03020101 Coordinates Latitude: 35.92544
Longitude: -77.66564
Location description: The review area for this Jurisdictional Determination is located north of HWY 64 and approximately
2,000 feet east of Kingsboro Road in Kingsboro, Edgecombe County, North Carolina. The review area totals 127.4 acres and
consists of a portion of a 302.45-acre parcel (parcel # 3799-45-7509).
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated . Therefore this
preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory
mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection
measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any
way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may
request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
There are waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.

SAW-2021-01227
❑ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated . We strongly suggest
you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified,
this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is
no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
v:4
The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and are accurately depicted on the attached Wetland and
Tributary exhibits dated May, 2021. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination
may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑X There are also waters present on the above described project area/property which are not subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Billy W. Standrid2e at [phone] or
Billy.w.standrid2e(a,u sace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: See the approved jurisdictional determination form dated 7/19/2021.
D. Remarks: The review area contains jurisdictional waters and non-jurisdictional/excluded waters. The
waters are depicted on the attached exhibits entitled Kinjsboro — Pad C — Project X — Maps 1-3 dated
May, 2021. This determination does not relieve the property owner/applicant of the responsibility to
obtain any other required Federal, State or local approvals/permits
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed
you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr. Philip A Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Floor M9
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
AND
[e-mail]
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the :.�eatigsill�yr�/20/2021.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the f iv.sioi ffice `you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date of JD: 7/19/2021 Expiration Date of JD: 7/18/2026

SAW-2021-01227
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete our Customer Satisfaction Survey, located online at
https://regulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/.
Copy fumished:
Agent: Soil Horizons
Mr. John R. Davis
Address: P.O. Box 1063
Youn2sville, North Carolina 27596
Telephone Number: [phone]
E-mail: soilhorizons(a,gmail.com

PROJECT is
TOTAL:
ORIGINAL POTENTIAL WETLANDS ACREAGE = AC.
UPDATED WATERS AREA = ( SF) Ac.
WATERS LENGTH = FT.
ADJUSTED POTENTIAL WETLANDS ACREAGE = Ac.
.C74 Nos
o
N
M'1
00
D
A
N
a
0
V
0
co
c
L_
0
N
I
b
0
N
c
L
0
L
0
0
a
0
rn
0
}
H
ca
z
J
0
fY
0
LJ
QVC
DISTRIBUTION
CENTER
1/4
LEGEND
WALNUT CREEK /r
,-• .•
�
1
PROJECT X
PROPERTY
POTENTIAL WETLANDS
BUFFER LINE
0 POTENTIAL WETLANDS
iinininir
CIIEI El CI
AREA A •�
APPIAN CONSULTING
ENGINEERS, P.A.
P.O. Box 79661 Rocky Mount, N.C. 27804
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]B
Web: htlp:llwww.appianengineers.00m
At
N 0 R TH
Prepared By:
SOIL HORIZONS
PO Box 1063 I Youngsville, N.C. 27596
Phone: [phone]
Web: htlp:Ilhltpllwww.soilhorizons.net
Email. soilhorizx,s@gmail,com
KINGSBORO - PAD C
PROJECT X
Edgecombe County, N.C. May, 2021
(INDEX) MAP 1 of
POTENTIAL WETLAND +
WATERS DELINEATION
Project X Review
Area is shaded and
has 127.41 Acres
SCALE IN FEET:
400
Prepared for:
600
800
1,000
lin CAROLINAS GATEWAY
PARTNERSHIP
427 Falls Fd. I Rocky Mount N.C. 27604
Phone. [phone] / (W0) 550-6151
Web: htlp I/www.econdev.org
Email: [e-mail]

PROJECT u KINGSBORO - PAD C
LEGEND
WETLANDS
BUFFER LINE
► WETLANDS AREA
t
NORTH
PROJECT X
Edgecombe County, N.C. May. 2021
MAP 2of
WETLAND AND TRIBUTARY
Springtime culvert flow
from Tributary 1.
.' / / / r �..-..mil'///fr rF.— --� �\1111 1 I
11 1 I
cr. 2 1 ■ ■ ■ �r76— ■ 1 i 1 l / $
n , 1 i f 1■ — 84---, l'■ �/.,.__76 . 1 I I l l '
o/ -,/ .-., •, / f
•
N f } / / 6 Or'? tyA � �1 1 a° ���9��- _ l` I
MAR 1
y__!!/f/�— _F Y1g5 l���� ..' �I t. t��1A- 98 �_
I _ J
_g1 ?��r ) + r Data t�b��l�,. i. t r ry e' r— \� `L`� r �' Beta F�qt 5,215 sq. ft. - — ` 1 \
o J/// / — \ \,� !'f �/ / / / + l `��� 0.119 Ac. r 1 1 1 1 1 I
o J �I �I� �-= \\ �:1 Tribu.27 .q74 .1 ll l l V 7/
/. v \\ //— \\N,.•\ „ %
,:\ \ \ • \ Jr/—'''L--'\--•' 1_1 {Ill t °- -, .' )/ /
\�V'L \
N `'" \ \= \\ 9 ` = — r/ : - )/j )I r 1' iii 1//
05\ \\\r,J- 5 \ = _ —_„`--ova/) 7 ij/-
\N \ /°'\ -/ 1
N l �
z
J
\ \'
, /
SCALE IN FEET:
0
200
linininir APPIAN CONSULTING
El ID El ENGINEERS, P.A.
s iv P.C. Box 7966 I Rocky Mount, N.C. 27804
g Phone: [phone]
Fax:[phone]
Web: htlp:llwww-appianengineers-com
Prepared By:
1111. SOIL HORIZONS
PO Box 10631 Yaungsnille, N.C. 27596
Phone: [phone]
-. Web: http:llwww.soilhorizons.net
Email: soithorizons©gmail-com
Prepared For:
■
300
400
500
CAROLINAS GATEWAY
PARTNERSHIP
427 Falls Rd. 1 Rocky Mount, N.C. 27804
Phone:[phone](801) 550-6151
Web: http:/lwww.econdev.org
Email: ogp©ecandev-org

PROJECT u
LEGEND
WETLANDS
BUFFER LINE
► WETLANDS AREA
f
NORTH
KINGSBORO - PAD C
PROJECT X
Edgecombe County, N.C. May, 2021
MAP 3 of
WETLANDS
MAP 3
� �1 11
—415 5Q'. FT.
•
—:a.01 ACES
—144 ?IQ. FT.
—0.O6 ACRES f
!7 1
/— _7
./�� _ _`_ ▪ Toy_ V , .../��� 1
I Q \ I� , • IG5 % I /c/
,v r \ \ //( 29 1
( r , \/'-- \ -- --\\\ r
_ ,.,(- ... ,..,4„..\--,____.--\=--=-L,_----,.\- ___..,„-- ____,_
_...
`� "22,-5.97 S'Q. FT. gr r
0'5 � .es - ` /—Data Poiryf 4/b
4 21; sQs _,Sf Fir.
EX )BORROW PIT
J I 0.50 ACRES
W/ STANDING u - Ex BORROW'RIT W/
4VA ER r aTAND(NG\W1ATER 2
1 ,9f76 \SQ. FT.
O.05 ACRES ll
EX BIQRRO'W PIT W
STANDING) WATER )
f- 1 (
23,885 Sq. FT.
O./55—ACRS
•
--`ems
loa•
•
•
7
' —708
Irlog
TY/
-rfl�c�_., N 1�
s
)74
SCALE IN FEET:
0
200
300
400
500
c iinininir APPIAN CONSULTING
Prepared Hy:
ENGINEERS, P.A. SOIL HORIZONS
P.O. Box 79661 RocPO Boky Mount, N.C. 27804 x 10631 Youngsville, N.C. 27596
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Web: http:llwww.soilhorizons.nel
Web: htlpilwww-appianengineers-cam Email: soilhorizons©gmail-cam
Prepared For:
CAROLINAS GATEWAY
PARTNERSHIP
427 Falls Rd. l Rocky Mount, N.C. 27804
Phone: [phone](800)550-6151
Web: hkp:llwwww.econdev.org
Email: ogp©ecandev-org

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Edecombe County, Mr. Eric Evans File Number: SAW-2021-01227 Date: 7/19/2021
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
x
SECTION
Additional
or the
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal
information may be found at or http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits.aspx
E
of the above decision.
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for fmal
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED
•
signature
rights
•
this
PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit
to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional
permit.
APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal
it to the district engineer for fmal
your work is authorized. Your
in its entirety, and waive all
determinations associated with the
certain terms and conditions therein,
Process by completing Section II of
the division engineer within 60 days
form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
Administrative Appeal Process by
must be received by the division
D: APPROVED
information.
•
•
JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the
ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all
APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form
approved JD or provide new
the Corps within 60 days of the
rights to appeal the approved JD.
the Corps of Engineers
to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the
review of the administrative record,
the Corps memorandum for the
officer has determined is needed to
or analyses to the record.
is already in the administrative
information that the review
Corps may add new information
the location of information that
However, you may provide additional information to clarify
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Billy W. Standridge
Washington Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
MR. PHILIP A. SHANNIN
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REVIEW OFFICER
CESAD-PDS-O
60 FORSYTH STREET SOUTHWEST, FLOOR M9
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8803
PHONE: [phone]; FAX [phone]
EMAIL: [e-mail]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15-day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Billy W. Standridge, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Philip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
I. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
Completion Date of Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD): 7/19/2021
ORM Number: SAW-2021-01227
Associated JDs: SAW-2008-02741
Review Area Location': State/Territory: City: Rocky Mount County/Parish/Borough: Edgecombe
Center Coordinates of Review Area: Latitude 35.92544 Longitude
II. FINDINGS
A. Summary: Check all that apply. At least one box from the following list MUST be selected. Complete the
corresponding sections/tables and summarize data sources.
❑ The review area is comprised entirely of dry land (i.e., there are no waters or water features, including
wetlands, of any kind in the entire review area). Rationale: N/A or describe rationale.
❑ There are "navigable waters of the United States" within Rivers and Harbors Act jurisdiction within the
review area (complete table in Section II.B).
❑x There are "waters of the United States" within Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area
(complete appropriate tables in Section II.C).
Cx� There are waters or water features excluded from Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area
(complete table in Section II.D).
B. Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 Section 10 (§ 10)2
§ 10 Name
§ 10 Size
§ 10 Criteria
Rationale for § 10 Determination
I`'
I`' ' N/A
C. Clean Water Act Section 404
Territorial Seas and Traditional Navigable Waters ((a)(1) waters):3
(a)(1) Name
(a)(1) Size
(a)(1) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(1) Determination
Tributaries ((a)(2) waters):
(a)(2) Name
(a)(2) Size
(a)(2) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(2) Determination
SAW-2021-
01227 Trib 1A
linear
feet
(a)(2) Intermittent
tributary
contributes
surface water
flow directly or
indirectly to an
(a)(1) water in a
typical year.
The tributary was flowing at time of field visit, which
was during a time of drier than normal conditions,
and there are abutting wetlands adjacent to the
reach of the tributary. The tributary flows directly to
Walnut Creek, which flows to the Tar River, which is
a Section 10 Navigable Water.
1 Map(s)/figure(s) are attached to the AJD provided to the requestor.
' If the navigable water is not subject to the ebb and flow of the tide or included on the District's list of Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 navigable waters list, do
NOT use this document to make the determination. The District must continue to follow the procedure outlined in 33 CFR part 329.14 to make a Rivers and Harbors
Act Section 10 navigability determination.
3 A stand-alone TNW determination is completed independently of a request for an AJD. A stand-alone TNW determination is conducted for a specific segment of river
or stream or other type of waterbody, such as a lake, where upstream or downstream limits or lake borders are established. A stand-alone TNW determination should be
completed following applicable guidance and should NOT be documented on the AJD Form.
Page 2 of 2 Form Version 10 June 2020 updated

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
Tributaries ((a)(2) waters):
(a)(2) Name
(a)(2) Size
(a)(2) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(2) Determination
SAW-202'i
01227 Trib 1 B
linear
feet
(a)(2) Intermittent
tributary
contributes
surface water
flow directly or
indirectly to an
(a)(1) water in a
typical year.
i he tributary was flowing at time of field visit, which
was during a time of drier than normal conditions,
and there are abutting wetlands adjacent to the
reach of the tributary. The tributary flows directly to
Walnut Creek, which flows to the Tar River, which is
a Section 10 Navigable Water.
Lakes and ponds, and impoundments of jurisdictional waters ((a)(3) waters):
(a)(3) Name
(a)(3) Size
(a)(3) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(3) Determination
N/A.
N/A N/A.
N/A.
N/A.
Adjacent wetlands ((a)(4) waters):
(a)(4) Name
(a)(4) Size
(a)(4) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(4) Determination
SAW-2021-
01227
Wetland 1
G
acre(s)
(a)(4) Wetland
abuts an (a)(1)-
(a)(3) water.
he wetland directly abuts SAW-2021-01227 Trib 1A
and 1B, which are (a)(2) waters.
D. Excluded Waters or Features
Excluded waters ((b)(1) — (b)(12)):4
Exclusion Name
Exclusion Size
Exclusions
Rationale for Exclusion Determination
SAW-202'.
01227 Wetland 2
l
acre(s)
(b)(1) Non-
adjacent wetland.
The wetland is surrounded by uplands and does
not meet any of the adjacency criteria.
SAW-2021-
01227 Wetland 3
0.5
acre(s)
(b)(1) Non-
adjacent wetland.
The wetland is surrounded by uplands and does
not meet any of the adjacency criteria.
SAW-2021-
01227 Wetland 4
0.05
acre(s)
(b)(1) Non-
adjacent wetland.
The wetland is surrounded by uplands and does
not meet any of the adjacency criteria.
SAW-2021-
01227 Wetland 5
0.5r
acre(s)
(b)(1) Non-
adjacent wetland.
The wetland is surrounded by uplands and does
not meet any of the adjacency criteria.
III. SUPPORTING INFORMATION
A. Select/enter all resources that were used to aid in this determination and attach data/maps to this
document and/or references/citations in the administrative record, as appropriate.
Information submitted by, or on behalf of, the applicant/consultant: AJD request received June 30,
2021
This information sufficient for purposes of this AJD.
Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: Title(s) and/or date(s).
❑ Photographs: fitle(s) and/or date(s).
❑x Corps site visit(s) conducted on: April 29, 2021
Some excluded waters, such as (b)(2) and (b)(4), may not be specifically identified on the AJD form unless a requestor specifically asks a Corps district to do so.
Corps districts may, in case -by -case instances, choose to identify some or all of these waters within the review area.
5 Because of the broad nature of the (b)(1) exclusion and in an effort to collect data on specific types of waters that would be covered by the (b)(1) exclusion, four sub-
categories of (b)(1) exclusions were administratively created for the purposes of the AJD Form. These four sub -categories are not new exclusions, but are simply
administrative distinctions and remain (b)(1) exclusions as defined by the NWPR.
Page 2 of 2 Form Version 10 June 2020 updated

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
❑x Previous Jurisdictional Determinations (AJDs or PJDs): SAW-2008-02741
❑x Antecedent Precipitation Tool: provide detailed discussion in Section III.B.
❑x USDA NRCS Soil Survey: Soil Web Layer- Google Earth
❑ USFWS NWI maps: Title(s) and/or date(s).
❑x USGS topographic maps: National Regulatory Viewer
Other data sources used to aid in this determination:
Data Source (select)
Name and/or date and other relevant information
USGS Sources
N/A.
USDA Sources
N/A.
NOAA Sources
N/A.
USACE Sources
N/A.
State/Local/Tribal Sources
N/A.
Other Sources
LiDAR
B. Typical year assessment(s): The site was drier than normal during the time of the site visit. The tributary
within the review area was flowing, which is indicative of at least intermittent flow.
C. Additional comments to support AJD: N/A
Page 2 of 2 Form Version 10 June 2020 updated

© Copyright 2020 Appian Consulting Engineers, P.A. These drawings have been prepared as instruments of service for a particular site or building improvement and remains the property of the Engineer for use under his supervision. No reproduction or other use is allowed without his permission.
GENERAL NOTES
Last Revised 7/12/21
1. The purpose of these plans is to show layout of buildings, parking, truck yards and access for the proposed 1,655,000 sf±
manufacturing) warehouse facility. These plans are preliminary and NOT for construction, and are intended to demonstrate general
compliance with the Edgecombe County Unified Development Ordinance. Final site design is contingent upon final building footprints
to be provided by the industry and shall meet Edgecombe County requirements. Edgecombe County site plan and stormwater
management approval is required prior to final site plan approval and construction.
2. Boundary information shown obtained from boundary survey performed by Joyner-Keeny, PLLC, dated 6/19/12. Topographical
information and existing waterline location obtained from actual field survey performed by Joyner-Keeny, PLLC, dated 5/12/21.
Horizontal Datum is NAD '83/2011 NC State Plan Coordinates. Vertical Datum is NAVD 1988. Land disturbance within any existing
utility and other easements shall be secured by Owner prior to construction.
3. All materials, construction, workmanship shall meet Edgecombe County, NCDOT, NC Building Code and NCDEQ requirements.
4. The Contractor shall be responsible for all work zone traffic control, which shall conform to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (MUTCD) and NCDOT standards. All methods, signs, pavement markings and other traffic control devices shall conform to
the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), City and NCDOT standards, and are the Contractor's responsibility.
5. Contractor shall comply with all pertinent provisions of the "Manual of Accident Prevention in Construction" issued by AGC of
America, Inc., and the Safety and Health Regulations for Construction issued by the U.S. Department of Labor.
6. This project will be served by municipal water and sewer.
7. EXISTING UTILITIES
a. The Contractor shall be responsible for reviewing and verifying all existing site conditions. Any adverse existing conditions
affecting work shown shall be brought to the attention of :he Engineer for possible clarification or reconciliation.
b. The Contractor shall be responsible for the repair of any pavement or existing utilities that may be damaged due to construction
activity. Exercise caution.
c. Existing utility locations shown are approximate and shall be verified in the field by Contractor prior to beginning work.
Contractor shall contact the 311 One Call Center at least 72 hours prior to beginning construction.
d. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFICATION OF THE LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL
UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES WHICH CROSS THE WORK SITE OR WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY HIS OPERATIONS.
e. Contractor is responsible for determination or discovery of existing underground storage tanks (UST), septic tanks, abandoned
utility lines, graves, cemeteries, debris and unclassified fill that may exist on the site.
f. Contractor shall exercise extreme caution when working under, around, and/or adjacent to existing power lines.
8. ENVIRONMENTAL
a. FLOODPLAIN: Property is NOT located in the Floodplain or Flood Hazard zone per FEMA Map 3720.3799.00J, dated 11/3/04.
The area generally drains to the north into unnamed tributaries of Walnut Creek, which is part of the Tar River Basin.
b. Wetlands shown have been delineated and confirmed by the US COE per SAW-2008-02741. Tar -Pam riparian buffers shown
have been verified by NCDEQ DWR per TBRRO#18-005 (2/15/18). No disturbance of wetland, stream or riparian buffers is
allowed without permits from COE/DWR.
c. STORMWATER: Site disturbance exceeds 0.5 acre, therefore Edgecombe County stormwater management requirements
apply. The site is in the Tar -Pamlico Watershed. Prior to final site plan approval, detailed stormwater management plan with
supporting calculations will be required demonstrating compliance with nutrient management and peak flow attenuation
requirements.
9. EROSION CONTROL:
a. The disturbed area for this project is greater than 1 acre. Therefore, a formal Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan and permit
is required prior to any grading or construction on the site. Contractor is responsible for containing all erosion and sedimentation
within the project limits.
b- Erosion control is under the jurisdiction of NCDEQ Raleigh Regional Office (permit approval pending). Conditions of NCDEQ
Erosion Control Permit (EDGEC-2021-009) and NCG010000 shall be met.
10. NCDOT Driveway Permit: Conditions of approved NCDOT Driveway Permit D-0410332100008 (6/7/21) shall be met. Final site
plans will necessitate a permit modification prior to construction.
11. RAIL: Preliminary alignment of proposed industrial rail sidetrack is shown and must be approved by CSX. No work or entry into CSX
Transportation right-of-way is permitted without explicit permission from CSX Transportation.
PROJECT
EAGLE
KINGSBORO BUSINESS PARK (PAD C)
EDGECOMBE COUNTY, N.C.
NORTH CAROLINA
NOT TO SCALE
Edgecombe County
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
Nash
County
Wilson
County
Halifax
County
t
NORTH
1
33 4e'
Pitt
County
NOT TO SCALE
PROJECT CONTACTS
NAME/ TITLE
ENTITY
PHONE
MAIL/EMAIL
Eric Evans
County Manager
Edgecombe County
252.641.7834
[e-mail]
Mike Matthews
Assistant County Manager
Edgecombe County
252.641.7833
[e-mail]
Katina Braswell
Planning Director
Edgecombe County
252.641.7802
[e-mail]
Andrew Nash
Geotechnical Engineer
Terracon
919.873.2211
[e-mail]
Nils W. Joyner, PIS
Surveyor
Joyner-Keeny
252.977.3124
[e-mail]
Bobby L. Joyner, PE
President
Appian Consulting Engineers
252.972.7703
[e-mail]
David C. Revoir, PE
Project Engineer
Appian Consulting Engineers
252.972.7703
[e-mail]
OHDEK
CCM=d
CSC-2
CSC-3 p
REILER OHAR'Y PROPS T7 HnhP
MMILUMUK&RV Z ©©E 22 ©RU W 2
SITE INFORMATION
LOCATION INFORMATION
Address:
City:
County:
State:
Tract Acreage:
Zone:
Leonard Wiggins Parkway
Tarboro
Edgecombe
NC
324.3+/- ac
M2
Minimum Building Setback:
Front:
Side:
Rear:
35'
10'
20'
Edgecombe County PIN:
3799.4575.0900
3799.7472.0100
Deed Book/ Page:
DB 1580/ PG 0247
DB 1633/ PG 0519
Latitude/ Longitude:
River Basin:
35.929258, -77.659943
Tar Pamlico
BUILDING INFORMATION
Pro. Manufacturing Building:
Pro. Warehouse Building:
TOTAL BUILDING:
603,200 SF±
539,400 SF±
1,142,600 SF±
PARKING INFORMATION
Req. No. of Parks'
(23,700 sf± + 1/250 sf office):
(300 + 2/3 emp warehouse2):
(300 + 2/3 emp manufacturing1):
TOTAL REQUIRED PARKS:
95
200
200
495
Pro. Parking Spaces provided:
Pro. Accessible Spaces provided:
TOTAL PARKING SPACES:
597
12
609
'Based on preliminary information
"On the largest shift plus 1/vehicle used in the operation
'On the largest shift plus 1/200 sf of retail/cust- services plus 1/vehicle used
LEGEND (EXISTING SITE)
B
Adjacent Property Lines
Building Outline (bldg)
Buffer Easement
Buffer Easement (duke)
Centerline (as Noted)
Chain
Ex. Curb & Gutter
Ex. Contour
x erev Topographic Elevation
Ditch
Drainage Structures (as Noted)
Easement (esm't)
Floodway Line
500 Yr Flood
100 Yr Flood
X Fence (as Noted)
Edge Gravel / Soil
lmlmnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnli II
Min. building Setback (mbl)
Paint Stripe
Edge Pavement (ep)
Right-of-way
Right-of-way (duke)
Shrub Limits
Tree/woods Limits
Train Tracks
Train Tracks
C - - 2 Retaining / Wing Wall
Edge Water
Edge Wetlands
Zoning Line
ex mail box
ex mb ri
ex. sign Zl-
ex sign (as noted)
LEGEND (EXISTING UTILITIES)
CRTV
FO
FM
0
OHE
UBE
5S
T
UGT
NORTH CAROLINA
ANE-CALL CENTER
www.ncocc-org
UKN
W
ex
Pp
ex guy
7—
ex fp . j
ex up 0
ex fom
ex fp
ex fh
.--�
ex w.m.�WM.;
ex wv
ex piv 6
55 Plug
/55' / ./I- Encasement
Gas Valve
r PERMIT APPROVALS:
SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM:
NCDEQ PERMIT NO:
DATE:
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM:
NCDEO PERMIT NO:
DATE:
APPIAN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.A.
154 Roundabout Ct., Rocky Mount, N.C. 27804
[phone]
BLN = C0562
admingappianengineers-com
www.appianengineers.com
ilninlnlr
Cl C7 C7 CAI
ex gv
ex mhj� r�}
\�yy
ex co 0
Manhole (As Noted)
Cleanout
Cable TV
X Fence (as Noted)
Fiber Optics Line
Force Main
Gas
O.H. Power
Guy Wire
O.H. Electric
U.G. Electric
San Sewer (As Noted)
Telecommunications
U.g. Telecommunications
Utility (as Noted)
Unknown Utility Line
Water Line
Power Pole
Guy Wire
Light Pole
Utility Pole
Fiber Optic Monument
Telecommunications Pedestal
Fire Hydrant
Water Meter
Water Valve
Post Indicator Valve
Plug With Blocking
oAZI
LEGEND (CONSTRUCTION)
FUTURE OBJECTS (AS NOTED)
CENTERLINE (SEE PLANS)
— DITCH
EASEMENT (AS NOTED)
L D
LOD
N33-33'33"E 333'
SIDEWALK W/ SCORE JOINTS
EXPANSION JOINT
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (ALT.)
PROPERTY LINE (NO SURVEY)
PROPERTY LINE (SURVEYED)
RIGHT-OF-WAY
PAVEMENT STRIPING (AS NOTED)
CENTERLINE (AS NOTED)
CURB & GUTTER
C&G SPILL LIP
ELEV. CONTOUR (ELEV. AS NOTED)
• SPOT ELEVATION
SLOPE
ELEV.
CAUTION: GAS IN AREA
DO NOT CUT VEGETATION
REFER TO PHOTO
DO NOT DISTURB
A
CONCRETE
FLARED END
LIGHT
SIGN
• STOP SIGN
• STREET NAME SIGN
EDGE WATER BODY
CH. LK. FENCE (AS NOTED)
CAUTION: POWER IN AREA
SPECIAL SURVEY INFO
CAUTION: POISON
PICNIC/PARK AREA
CAUTION: HIGH REPAIR COST
IMPORTANT INFORMATION
1
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PA
CIVIL, MUNICIPAL 8 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTALOARVICES
p�ij
R
REVISIONS
NO. A
DATE:
DESCRIPTION:
BY:
CAD:
A
21-083 / PROJECT - EAGLE (KINGSBORO PARK PAD-C)
z
w
U
E: \Mike/21083—Project—Eagle—Kingsboro—Pod—C/CAD/21083—Project—Eagle—sl.dwg <COVER> 09/14/2021 — 10: 38: 53 AM

© Copyright 2011 Appian Consulting Engineers, P.A. These drawings have been prepared as instruments of service for a particular site or building improvement ❑nd remains the property of the Engineer for use under his supervision. No reproduction or other use is allowed without his permission.
I f
1
I
1
r I 1 +
r/ 1 1
/1/I I
I
1
r
rr I
+ 1 I
r+1 1
1
r
1-- r1
il ir —.—iii r
rrr.r-
.r--�•
r 7 ) li
iiII,l !:— — :
.,...-
LONG HENRY 8 e1 al
DB 1569, PG 797
PIN: 378986712200
AC. = 151.58
_
•
Nfi
EASTERN PETROLEUM
CORPORATION
D8 1725, PG 35
PC 13, Slide 100
PIN: 379925273300
AC. = 70
Nl
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
DB 1725, PG 35
PC 73, Slide 700
PIN: 379925228300
AC = 4.87
mom
•
------
•
•
•
•
1 \
1
' • ' _ - ti 11•
•
•
•
•
•
--_
N
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
DB 1580, PG247
PIN: 379945750900
AC. = 302.45
(TO BE SUBDIVIDED)
TAR-PAM RIPARIAN BUFFERS
SHOWN HAVE BEEN VERIFIED
BY NCDEQ DWR PER
TBRRO#18-005 (2/15/18)—\
1
•_ •_
•_ ._
- •
J
NORTH CAROLINA
ONE -CALL CENTER
www.ncocc.org
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
These plans are for bidding purposes only and
are not to be used as Construction drawings
unless initialed and dated as approved for
Construction below by the Engineer.
Approved for Construction:
Date:
BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION SHOWN
IS NOT FOR RECORDATION.
RECORD DRAWINGS:
These drawings are believed to be a correct
representation of actual field conditions but
are not warranted as such.
By:
Date:
- -
OVC ROCKY MOUNT INC
DB 1249, PG 610
PIN: 379913017400
AC. = 293.42
CONSTRUCTION SAFETY
These drawings do not contain the requirements for
job safety. All provisions for safety shall be the sole
responsibility of the contractor.
EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The contractor shall be responsible for reviewing all
existing job conditions. Any adverse existing conditions
affecting work shown on these drawings shall be
brought to the attention of the engineer for possible
clarification or reconciliation.
•
•
•
•
•
\-•
PENELO LLCI HWY 4 ALT �_-- -
DB 1688, PG 711 US
PIN: AC38904s 08750D0 R/W WIDTH VARIES
- - - r_ - - .�..�..�--�--
ex dew
eosin Y
dek°L
r•
J •
r ..
1111(---Irtii
s r _ R0 � =ter=� pG 29 - --
11.03n A_�}. - 1
dscaPe esn' tT ❑ y���O 35' FRONT M9L ........,
-�- % + ex 0. 40' act) es H Owy Dp�CA J` - f � 70 is scaP�srerot �I EDGECOMBE COl1NiY
� Y i 3p' d&u DB 1SS3. PG 519
SNpWN .- ex PIN: 37497a720100
RQ A� AC. _ 227, 58
y f� (To BE SUBDIVIDED)
TO BE SUBDIVIDED OUT FOR
PROJECT EAGLE = 188.6± Ac.
\ \\\\ \ \
\- ' ------ —•.-7_,, -----;----...6/Z
—.451,„.;\ \ \ \ r v \
. ,;:' ii
40i / //' \.'',‘, ••
. ...." - - EDGEcoktgE couNry N (/) \ \ \N._ \
0.13 n WETLANDS
- SHALL NOT BE
DISTURBED
•
LCOUNTY
11
ilk
0.52 AC EXCLUDED
WETLANDS
SHALL NOT BE
DISTURBED UNTIL
PERMIT APPROVED
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
EEY?ECOM)3E COUNTY
DB 1494, PG 172
PIN: 3799428754X
•
•
1.1 AC EXCLUDED
WETLANDS SHALL NOT
BE DISTURBED UNTIL
PERMIT APPROVED
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
N.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
WETLANDS SHOWN HAVE BEEN
DELINEATED AND CONFIRMED BY
THE COE PER SAW-2008-02741
PROJECT — EAGLE
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
N.
•
•
•
•
•
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
DB 1539, PG 877
PIN: .379961899800
•
•
•
fir7
1111-'-i91'
•
•
NORTH
•
•
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
DB 1676. PG 755
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
= 324.3± AC.
•
•
izs
0
‘"
,)\
0 ›-
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
DB 1677, PG 488
//
•
TRIANGLE TYRE USA TECHNOLOGIES LLC
DB 1678, PG 502
•
•
DESIGN: Bobby Joyner
cn
Mike Galling
DRAWN BY:
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTIO
ADI El El El
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.A.
CIVIL, MUNICIPAL &
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
P.O. Box 7966
Rocky Mount, N.C. 27804
[e-mail]
THESE PLANS WERE
PRINTED USING COLOR.
IF THIS NOTE IS NOT SHOWN
IN RED, PLEASE REFER TO
ORIGINAL PLANS
0
•
(3. u
•
w Ir%
CC < fl-
0 0
0 ui
CC Z
cc 0 cc' 0
cc 0 (e)
Z O. mull
0 (-9
co
cc a
21-083
D-0000
CE-1

© Copyright 2011 Appian Consulting Engineers, P.A. These drawings have
been
prepared as instruments
of
service
for ❑
particular site or building improvement
and
remains the
property of the Engineer for
use
under his supervision.
No reproduction or
other use is allowed
without his permission.
L
~
0
� 1 1
•
•
•
•
•
1-21 I `"0
1•
I
r•
•
N/F
EASTERN FETROLEUM
CORPORATION
TION
De 1725. PG 35
PC 13, Slide 700
PIN: 379925273300
N/F
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
D8 1725. PG 35
PC 14 Slide 700
PIN: 379925228300
•- _
1•
1 I
1 1
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
11 \1
11 11
1
--_11
1
-11 11
-11 It
i• 1 —
•
•
..... •-_••_-
••- •�_
• •• m
•
—
_ •x
_ • _ Cro
�_ �• CO
N/F
EDGECOMBE COUNTY
DB f580, PG247
P rN: 379945750900
C. = 302 45
(TO BE SUBDIVIDED)
1-
- 11 11 ---
71 11
11 11.1
11 11
11
1
1 1
1
1 1
1 1
•1
1
1
NORTH CAROLINA
ONE -CALL CENTER
www.ncocc.org
• s
These plans are for bidding purposes only and
are not to be used as Construction drawings
unless initialed and dated as approved for
Construction below by the Engineer.
Approved for Construction:
Date-
BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION SHOWN
IS NOT FOR RECORDATION.
RECORD DRAWINGS:
These drawings are believed to be a correct
representation of octual field conditions but
are not warranted as such.
By:
Date:
1
CONSTRUCTION SAFETY
These drawings do not contain the requirements for
job safety. All provisions for safety shall be the sole
responsibility of the contractor.
EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The contractor shall be responsible for reviewing all
existing job conditions. Any adverse existing conditions
affecting work shown on these drawings shall be
brought to the attention of the engineer for possible
clarification or reconciliation.
_____
r
1 I
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
,1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
\1
1
•
•
•- •_ ..
• �11
a - _
IN'V=74.73 �• •-
•
•
1
1
[ 1
1 1 o
1
1
1
•
1
■ ■.
•
■
♦
•
•
•
APPROXIMATE OVERALL
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
•
--
—
•
• ♦.
..o
•%
\\ %
. ♦♦
'4.
/2> N.
♦.
"4
• %
�-, r.FE•En•.i
Rocky Mount
west
Edgecombe
Bullocks
Crossroads
112431
•
•
49'z
Toa ,ya/N v
•
•
VICINITY MAP
to1rINV. =94. 4
"'ll
eft
U
—_� -4 A-
ovy
- - 64 ►vim_
'gSS
-
pG��IC
Wo yrG AR�eS hqY
>L.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
LogsbO'o
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
SfP,q CE5 . .
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
NOE-
water on site
•
•
•
•
•
•
PLLIAIIIVAR
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
existing ah.
power on site
EDGECOMBE COUAITY
PIN: 379974720100
(TO BE SUBDIVIDED)
GRAVITY SS
(77
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
PROPOSED 12" SS
(HDD BORE UNDER
BUFFERS)
11
- El El El
•
existing 18" son_
sewer front site
1-.1—APPROXIMATE OVERALL
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
et
ex ol
VEHICLE COUNT:
Proposed:
Docks = 138±
Future:
200 400 500 600
700
800
--CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.A.
— CIVIL, MUNICIPAL &
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
P.O. Box 7966
Rocky Mount, N.C. 27804
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]
THESE PLANS WERE
PRINTED USING COLOR.
IF THIS NOTE IS NOT SHOWN
IN RED, PLEASE REFER TO
ORIGINAL PLANS.
igt
v2 d
z
< LLI cc IN
MI
iu < Z
0
(7) ' w
›- u
cc ill CO CO
0:t
z 0 cci 0
Ec. 0
n cc t
uj 0 n
CC Ca MI
a. co —
D-0000
CE-2
CD
cy
0)
CD
0
CD
0

© Copyright 2011
Appian Consulting Engineers, P.A. These drawings have been prepared
as instruments of service
for a particular site or building improvement ❑nd remains the property of the Engineer for
use under his supervision. No reproduction
or other use is allowed without
his
permission.
•
•
\
voi • • 5 5 •
♦
I I
1
1 1 1
1 I I
"ad
.___ __
/ f
_� ��.�.- rap_
..�\ --▪ �����•
k/:.: I I
1.35
•
•
•
•
•
41(
NORTH CAROLINA
&NE -CALL CENTER
co
•
These plans are for bidding purposes only and
are not lc be used as Construction drawings
unless initialed and dated as approved for
Construction below by the Engineer.
Approved for Construction:
Date:
BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION SHOWN
IS NOT FOR RECORDATION.
RECORD DRAWINGS:
These drawings are believed to be a correct
representation of actual field conditions but
are not warranted as such.
By:
•
\
•
1
•
•
\
\N
1
rr
r
- J
■
r .
• \
F
J
•
l
J•r J ,3
_
bG. —
•7-
� Rr I _ -
1
•
J
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
{
J
1
•
J
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
CONSTRUCTION SAFETY
These drawings do not contain the requirements for
job safety. All provisions for safety shall be the sole
responsibility of the contractor.
EXISTING CONDMONS:
The contractor shall be responsible for reviewing all
existing job conditions. Any adverse existing conditions
affecting work shown on these drawings shall be
brought to the attention of the engineer for possible
clarification or reconciliation.
r
■
•
J
•
/
I
/
r
/
/
,
/
buffer
J r
J
•-. n1 1Eu F A51
snit
West
west
Edgecnmbe
Bullucks
Crossroads
PAD C
Logshoro
VICINITY MAP
/
r /
J /
' r
' J
J r
■
J•
/
/
cA
•
/
/ / / / / J.' 1.77,, , _____ . ▪ -; .. ---- - ..--.\------4-..-2-4i4-. \ \.): ... .--.. .. . .. • .. i f'.' I 1 --------7/
/ /
/ /
, F /. ...... .... 7
„ . ,...,:.,.„ . 7, . „, . :-: ............... _____„.
/..._
, „
---._ .. F.....:: .,,,-- . '''.------2- .. ' / ------"-/
ex
•
_ _ . " 4tAsu4IRWE,ATE-R c1-ge,47-10N __„,
NTRoi
IL
IL
•
•
•
•
•
0
to
/
Xr
/
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• /
•
. 1 ..... . -...! .---________ :,,,,/ •
•
/ . I I ..r-------_ ..,
f '''' ..' ''' ''' / \
/
•
•,/,
•
• / ▪ ---'\-------\ --
•
-Nt•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
„, 1;111 t
•
•
•
•
•
La _95
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1 / •
•
•
•
•
-------j\IS7, ......... -•:'1-ir-i) I F\ 11 1t S. :.. ...
•
/
•
•
•
01
II n
1
1
r
1
If
/
/ i ! .1 ; 1 i
co
NrRot
•
•
tr. •
•
•
R.
•
1 • /-
• / •
•
/ •
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
N.
•
•
•
•
•
•
__-
.• 11 ti 1. r. /.
_ _ /
+ / 1 I �/ J� �' .-ram
1 / / /! I' r/ i / // // //
1 11 /I I / I / // r' // I / J/ -.-
1 ///
l\�Y\ / // // I/ /.
' / I / / // I / / _
I / I / / ,/ / / I // . _
! . . 1_ 1
I / / / 1 / / r / F' 1
1 / ' I {� ---f '/ / 11 Jr 1
•
•.�'.N'G -THE
\
\ 1 1 r
1 \ 1 1 /
1 l 1 1 /
1 1/
1 1 1
t
•
•
WIEPS ORE.
E-1"-----.2.----3±1- -5- ----15---:92-7-1111:71.11:::21111,1::;:::::::-CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.A.
P.O. Box 7966
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
1:- -Rocky Mount, N.C. 27804
Mike Galling
0
•
/./.'/-C / ///
•
• ' •• i ----7_17/ "
cri
•
•
•
•
•
0
-o
0
-92-
0
-
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
-
•
if- -7or
60 120 150 180 210 240
DI El El El
•
[e-mail]
THESE PLANS WERE
PRINTED USING COLOR.
IF THIS NOTE IS NOT SHOWN
IN RED, PLEASE REFER TO
ORIGINAL PLANS
21-083
<DOT —ACCESS —ROADS]
co
0
0
\M