20070081 Ver 2_401 Application_20070707

P ~
KELLER ENVIRONMENTAL
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
7921 Haymarket Lane, Raleigh, NC
{919)844-7437
Fax [phone]
~X.p ~`1- ufl$I V
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
TO: NC Division of Water Quality
DATE: July 9, 2007
ATTENTION: DWQ 401 EXPRESS
RE: Cedar Ridge PCN Submittal
WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING:
® Pre-construction Notification (PCN) ®Plans ®Maps
® Documents ^ OQier
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW:
® For approval ®As requested ®For review & comment
® Please reply ^ See belo~r ® For your files
^ Regular Mail ^ Fed-Ex ®Delivered by KE
® Specifications
^ Picked Up
COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION
5 PCN Submittal Package
Remarks:
THANK YOU!
Recd By: Sigied

To: US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Office
Attn: Jamie Shern
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road
Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Re: Cedar Ridge Subdivision PCN Submittal
Wake County, North Carolina
July 9, 2007
KELLER ENVIRONMENTAL
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
7921 Haymarket Lane, Raleigh, NC
[phone]
Fax [phone]
NC Division of Water Quality
401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: EXPRESS REVIEW STAFF
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260
~xp ~1-008 1 V~ .: ~° ~.I.
..
On behalf of the applicant, Robert Polanco, please find attached a complete application and supplemental
information requesting written concurrence from the United States Army Corps of Engineers (COE) and the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality (DWQ) that the activities proposed below may precede utilizing Nationwide Permit 29. We are
requesting to place a culvert and headwalls in one (1) stream and a bottomless arched culvert in two (2) streams for the
purpose of building Virginia Water and Irina Drives. 108 homesites are also proposed for this subdivision. These proposed
impacts are contained in the attached packet of information.
PRn.IFC:T 411MMARY
Pro'ect Name CEDAR RIDGE
Pro'ect T e SUBDIVISION
Owner / A licant Robert Polanco
Count Wake
Nearest Town Rolesville
Waterbod Name Harris Creek
Basin /Sub-basin Neuse 03-04-02
Index Number 27-26
Class C; NSW
innpnrT CI InnnnnRY
Stream Im act acres 0.06 acres
Neuse River Buffer Im acts acres 0.87 acres ermanent; 1 acre tem ora
Wetland Im acts acres 0
Total Im act to Waters of the State acres 0.06
Total Stream Im act linear feet 220 linear feet ermanent; 160 linear feet tem ora
Please contact me at [phone] (office) or [phone] (cell) or Layt~kellerenvironmental.com if you have any
questions or require any additional information.
Sincerely,
KELLER ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC
~~~
Jay Keller
Principal
o++~..ti..,o.,+~
$3000 Check for A lication Fee Bioretention Worksheets 13 & si ned & notarized 0 & M A reement
PCN A lication Form H dro ra h Plots
A ent Authorization Wake Count GIS Pro ert Ma ,Streams, & Aerial
Cedar Rid a Subdivision Site Plans & CD's Ma 9, 2007 EEP Acce tance Letter
USGS Ma June 22, 2007 Photo ra hic Record
Janua 19, 2007 DWQ Stream Evaluation & Ma s uMe ~g ,~ 00'7 "Tow+ o o •i u; ~ t t~

Office Use Only: Form Version March 05
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. ~X.Q O~ ' ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~•
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
PAIi1
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ® Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 29
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Mana~gen0~n;L...~~ea of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details) ,~hec`~h~re•' ,~ ' •.
,,
~, ~ ....
II. Applicant Information '`'` ;~ ~~ , tat''
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Robert Polanco
~' - r '~tq~~'aiq;ti
:~,,,. s' :. ..
Mailing Address: 8804 Albright Road;
Raleigh, NC 27612
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Jay Keller
Company Affiliation: Keller Environmental
Mailing Address: 7921 Haymarket Lane; Raleigh, NC 27615
Telephone Number: (919 844-7437 Fax Number: [phone]
E-mail Address: jav(a~kellerenvironmental.com
Page 1 of 10

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Cedar Ridge Subdivision Phase I I
2. T.LP. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 1768-07-3234
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Rolesville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Cedar Ridge
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): Site is located on
Rolesville Road approximately'/4 mile south of downtown Rolesville and US401.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.5474 °N 78.2746 °W
6. Property size (acres)
70.07 Acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Harris Creek
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Site is comprised of an existing subdivision (phase 1)
adjacent to Rolesville Road and a pond on the east side of Phase I. Harris Creek
was determined to be a perennial stream below the pond on Phase I. No subject
streams were evident above the pond. Remaining Phase II is mostly wooded with
Page 2 of 10

one pond, Harris Creek, and its tributaries. Adjacent land uses include residential,
forested and aaricultural areas.
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Three
road crossings are proposed to access upland areas at the rear of the property and
provide connectivity to the northern parcel. The Irina Drive and Virginia Water
Drive East crossings will utilize Con-Span Bridges. A 60-inch RCP with headwall is
proposed for the Virginia Water Drive West crossing. All lots to have county water
and sewer. Equipment to be used includes cranes, trackhoes, bulldozers, and other
land grading equipment.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The proposed impacts to the stream buffer
area will be necessary to complete the subdivision, thus sustaining the development
of the proposed residential area. Extending Virginia Water Drive across Harris
Creek and its tributary will also provide connectivity to the adjacent parcels and
existing neighborhoods.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. December 6, 2006: Keller Environmental (KE), on behalf of Mr.
Robert Polanco, submitted a PCN application to the US Army Corps of Engineers and
NC Division of Water Quality.
January 16, 2007 Conducted an on-site stream determination with DWQ staff Lia Myott
and Dr. Cynthia Van Der Wiele.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
Page 3 of 10

should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: The eastern Virginia Water Drive
stream crossing will involve 94-feet of a single 60-inch diameter RCP. To facilitate
aquatic passage, 30-inches of the RCP will be buried. Please refer to the profile
view of the Virginia Water Drive Eastern Crossing.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due t~ hnth structure and flnnrlinu
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland vLocated within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year Nearest Impact
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) Floodplain Stream (acres)
( es/no) (linear feet)
None
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 2 Acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must he included. Tn calcnlnte acreage mnltinly length X width then rl;v;rle by d'~ SF(1
Stream Impact Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
(indicate on ma) Before Im act (linear feet) (acres)
Virginia

Water Drive
Harris Creek Culverts &
Perennial
6
94
0
013
East headwalls .

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 94 0.013
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredgine. flooding. drainage. bulkheads. etc.
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
(indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)

Total Open Water [mpact (acres) 0
Page 4 of 10

6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the nroiect:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.013
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.02
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 94
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. The proposed Virginia Water
Drive Extension crossings were strategically placed to connect with the subdivision to
the west and the large upland area between it and Phase I. The Irina Drive Extension
will provide access to the upland areas to the area north of Harris Creek. The crossings
were also placed perpendicular in fairly linear stream corridors and Con-Span
bottomless arched culverts (CSBACI will be utilized on two of the aeoloaically suitable
streams to avoid stream impacts.
The Irina Drive CSBAC and headwalls will span 78 linear feet of stream and the 12-foot
swan will clearly span the entire 4-feet wide stream bed and bank. Also, it was evident
during our January 16, 2006 site visit that the crossing area appeared to be a historic
stream crossing for agriculture and silvaculture activities. Our perennial stream
Page 5 of 10

determination was conducted within and immediately upstream of the proposed
crossing area. Please refer to Sheet 6 on the attached CD for details.
The eastern Virginia Water Drive 60-inch RCP is 96 linear feet and the RCP will be
buried 30-inches to facilitate aquatic passage. During our perennial stream
determination, we entered the subject riparian corridor from the existing Virginia Water
Drive end of pavement and walked upstream via the existing sewer line on the west
side to the existing pond and sewer crossing area. It was evident during our analysis
that the stream in the proposed crossing area is slightly incised. Please refer to Sheet 7
on the attached CD and plan sheet for details.
The western Virginia Water Drive CSBAC and headwalls will span 78 linear feet of
stream and the 25-foot span will clearly span the entire 6-feet wide stream bed and
bank. The CSBAC will also include one slight turn to avoid impacting any stream bank.
This crossing area is also being utilized for utilities (i.e. sewer, etc.) to avoid additional
impacts. Similar to the aforementioned CSBAC's and evident on the Overall Site Plan,
this stream crossing is being placed in a fairly linear stream section. It will provide
connectivity to the existing Virginia Water Drive and the Village of Rolesville (Phase II)
Subdivision on the west side. Please refer to Sheet 9 on the attached CD and plan
sheet for details.
The wide spans will be placed by using a crane and bridge footings will be placed
outside of the stream banks. Since all of the proposed crossing areas have direct road
access, temporary impacts to the streams will also be avoided.
This proposed Phase (II) of Cedar Ridge will also use an existing sewer line that
parallels Harris Creek and the two ponds. Durinq initial construction of Phase II, a
sanitary sewer line will be installed near and parallel to the southern property line. As
mentioned in the previous paragraph, this new sewer line will utilize the Virginia Water
Drive CSBAC area to gain access to the existing sewer line on the west side of Harris
Creek.
An aerial sewer crossing is proposed south of Irina Drive between Lots 61 and 67. This
proposed line will satisfy the City of Raleigh's criteria for a gravity driven sanitary sewer
line. The crossing will be eight (8)-feet above the stream channel for maximum
clearance of the 20-feet wide stream/pond area. The casings will be constructed
outside of the jurisdictional stream/pond areas.
Also evident on the Site Plan, there will be minimal grading conducted on the residential
lots throughout this phase. This should maximize nutrient removal through the rag ssed
and landscaped areas.
15.78 Acres will be permanently preserved along Harris Creek and its tributaries. This
includes the large pond at the rear of lots 72-88. Moreover, areas adjacent to the
stream crossings will be in the dedicated open space area. This will prevent homes
from encroaching into the riparian buffer areas. Examples include areas west of Lots
103 & 118.
Page 6 of 10

VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The proposed project should not be required to provide mitigation for the proposed
impacts. This is due the efforts of the developer's team to avoid Lrisdictional areas
to the maximum extent possible. As shown in the attached Engineering Plans, the
properties adjacent to the stream will not encroach into the vegetated buffers to
protect open waters along Harris Creek and its tributaries. Moreover, areas adjacent
to the stream crossings will be in the dedicated open space area. This will prevent
homes from encroaching into the riparian buffer areas. Examples include areas
west of Lots 103 & 118. 15.78 Acres will be permanently preserved along Harris
Creek and its tributaries. This includes the large pond at the rear of lots 72-88.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Page 7 of ] 0

Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): n/a
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 40,458 SF
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
IX.
X.
Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether aNEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(s uare feet) Miti ation
1 8,044 3 (2 for Catawba) 24,132
2 5,442 1.5 16,326
Total I 13,486 I I 40,458
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260. Riparian buffer impacts associated with
Page 8 of 10

the second Harris Creek road crossing is required per conversations with Amy
Chapman. Please refer to the attached May 9, 2007 Ecosystem Enhancement
Program letter. $38,840 will be paid to compensate for the 40,458 SF of Neuse
River Riparian Buffer impacts.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss stormwater
controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from the property. If
percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations demonstrating total proposed
impervious level.
Quantity Area Area Proposed
s uare feet acres) Im envious
Roadways 230,622 5.29
Lots * 117 3, 500 9.40
Sidewalk 39'995 0
92
7,999 x 5) .
Total 117
680 15.61 22'23%
Im envious Area , 15.61 / 70.07
Open Space 16.00
Total Tract Area 70.07
* Lot SF based on 2200 SF Footprint, 1300 SF in Deck, Drive, & Sidewalk
Please refer to "Site Plan Information" for details and the Table on Overall Site Gradin
and Drainage Plan. While under construction, temporary, custom sedimentation basins
will be installed outside of the wetlands and streams to protect them against
sedimentation along with other appropriate sedimentation and erosion control measures
in compliance with the DWQ and Wake County Sedimentation and Erosion Control
requirements. As seen on the Site Grading and Drainage Plan, site grading will be
minimal. This will maximize the penetration of surface water into the ground. Thirteen
bioretention areas will be utilized to pre-treat the Nitroaen prior to release from the
stormwater discharae areas
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
To City of Raleigh Walnut Creek Waste Water Treatment Plant.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (1 SA NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Page 9 of 10

r
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.em~.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
The proposed Cedar Ridge Subdivision proposes using bottomless culverts on the Irina
Drive and downstream Virginia Water Drive West stream crossings to avoid impacts to
Waters of the US. It is unlikely that the proposed project should result in cumulative
stream impacts and degrade downstream stream quality. To illustrate avoidance of the
stream and wetland areas on the parcel north of Irina Drive, please refer to the attached
road corridor plan.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
~~~~
July 9, 2007
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

KELLER ENVIRONMENTAL
ENVfRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
7921 Haymarket Lane, Raleigh, NC
[phone]
Fax (919)$44-7438
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Name: I o~Cr^-~ ~0~~,v~~c~
Address: ~J~U9" ~ I ~ r' c~Vt~t ~ C`
-7 to i Z
Phone: ~ ~ ~ " ~P~ g ~ ~ 3!~ •.•
Project Name/Description; ~ C? G~rnr' {2~ Cl c} ~
Dare: i2. + 5 ~ U ~
,-
To: US Army Corps of Engineers NC Division of Wa#er Quality
Raleigh Regulatory Office 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Staff Attn: Staff
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road 2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Suite 120 Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260
To Whom It May Concern:
As a representative concerning the subject site, I do hereby authorize and give
permission for Keller Environmental to represent or act as agent on my behalf and allow
the COE or any other regulatory agency to go on the property with art Keller
Environmental representative for such purposes as necessa to . erform the job tasks.
~~"7 I- r
Print Property Ov~mer's Name Property Owner's Signature
Jay Keller
Keller Environmental, LLC
Preliminary Wetland & Stream Assessments-Jurisdictional Wetland Delineations-Neuse & Tar River Stream Buffer
Evals & Coordination-409!404 Water Quality Permitting-Stream & Wetland Res#oration-Threatened & Endangered
Species Surveys-Benthic Macroinvertebrate Sampling~Phase 1-IV Environmental Site Assessments^~Tree Surveys

,,
;, ,,;
..r, .
~`~~,, , ,
---N353.55'r -/
~~~~ ~A:..,^~. :. ~i`~~ 'E~~~ .--=-. .. irk
`~ 389, -~ f ~ ~^e ~ i. ~ ~, .: p
~ ~ ~ I ~ S~ - , I ~~~t-
.-, t ~ ~! i ~t 1~ --fi rr
..~'~.. , ~. , .~j k. , ' ' ,/,lit t,t~.~~ - .. _ ' ii
3-D TopoQuads Copyright ©1999 DeLorme Yarmouth, ME 04(196 So
i

' `
'
\ ' „
~
~ ~~
~' ~ = ~
,.
~~
~~ -__, ~y
~-
_ _....
~ K=; , .
_...
~---

It ~ ~\-
{'
}. ~ `
~-
`
' ~

It: rc r ~ ` ~ f ~'~~ --.
; ,3~~~ ,

IJr ~(~ '~ ~

~1 ;
,.,1 `J
\ 1 M' ~
~
C~m.i. 7 i ~ ~ %
ft Scalc 1:24,0011 Detail: 13.1 Datum: WCS84

o~~~ WAr~9Qt:
r
y
Gl 'C
Mr. Harold Yelle
3755 Benson Drive
Raleigh, NC 27609
Subject Property:
Micbael F. Easlcy, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Depardnent of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Watcr Quality
January 19, 2007
DWQ EXP# 07-0081
Wake County
Cedar Ridge Site
On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Neese Riparian Area Protection Rules (15A NCAC 2B
.0233}-EXPRESS REVIEW PROGRAM
On January 16, 2407, at the. request of Mr. Jay Keller,. an on-site determination was conducted to review two
stream features located on the subject property for applicability to the Neese Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233).
The. features are labeled as "1"and " 2" on the attached map, initialed by Lia Myott and. Cynthia Van Der Wiele
on January 19, 2007. The Division of Water Quality (DWQ} has determined that the following:
• Feature "1" is subject to the Neese Buffer Rule at the pond outlet (Pond 1), but is not subject upstream of
the pond. Stream 1 is a perennial stream and rated a score of 36 on the DWQ Stream Identification Form.
Pand 1 is also subject to the Neese Buffer Rule.
• Feature " 2" is subject to the Neese Buffer Rule orr the property and rated a score of 35.75 on the DWQ
Stream Identification Form.
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter,
Landowners or affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWQ that a surface water exists and that
it is subject to the buffer rule may request a determination by the Director. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Cyndi Karoly, DWQ 401 Oversight/Express Review
Permitting Unit, 2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260. You must act within 60 days of the date that you
receive this letter. Applicants are hereby notified that the 60-day statutory appeal time does not start until the
affected party (including downstream and adjacent landowners} is notified of this decision. This determination is
final and binding unless you ask for a hearing within 60 days.
This letter only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules of the stream features listed above and does. not
approve any activitywithin the buffers or address features that were not observed during the site visit. Nor does
this letter approve any activity within Waters of the United States or Waters of the State. If you have any
questions, please contact Lia Myott at 919.733.9502.
Sincerely,
Alan W. imek, P.E.
AWIVcbk/lem
Attachments: NRCS Soil Survey Map, USGS Topo Quad Map
cc: Jay Keller, 7921 Haymazket Lane, Raleigh, NC 27615
File Copy
Central Files
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit ;
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1b50
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / PAX 919-733.6893 / ]ntemet: httti•//h24,~r-t tate,nc.us/ncwet~ds
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycledlll?% Post Consumer Paper
NQ,~Cam na
~vatura~ly
~.

.~
.f th.f `i y~, w? .. ~a'~ a b. c~-d ~:, ,.. ~..Y,.~s~ r',~.. .. 4'A
~S ~. t ~~ ~5ii~k
6w pr~.•~i ,~~.
3

fi t i 3 ;°3 1
j ~ 5 { 4..f ~e.1
w ~t ~.

~: ^... .. x.1...3..,, ... ,.
~' ~ <
4 ~~: .._ <.. .c
jw~: it
ai :> N
f'° ~
°'` ~ a
i

North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: ~ ~ Project: ~ Latitude:
Evaluator: ,~ ~+ v~ Site: Longitude:
Total Points: ~ Other
Stn3am /s at leas( /ntermlftent County: (.'\„ e.g. Quad Name:
If z 19 or erennlel ll a 30 ~~"
A. Geomor holo subtotal = I ~ ~ '~
. <..
1a. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2
2. Sinuosit 0 1 2
3. In-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1 2 3
4. Soli texture orstream substrate sorting 0 1 3
5. Activelrelic fioodplain 0 1
8. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel , 0 1 2 3
8. Recent alluvial de osit5 1 3
9' Natural levees 1 2 3
10. Headcuts 1 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural yells or drainagevvay 0 0.5 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No ~
~./ -
Yes = 3
- nnan-mane a~tcnes are not retea; see aiscussions in manual
S. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = ~ )
14. Groundwater flowldischarge 0 1 3
15. Water in channe! and > 48 hrs since rain, car
Water In channel -- d or rowan season 0 1 2
16. Leatlitter, 1.5 1 ~ 0. 0
17. Sediment on lants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5
18.Organic debris lines or plies (Wrack Ilnes} 0 0.5 1 1.5
19. H dric soils redoximo hic features) resent? No = 0 Yes 1.5
C. Biola0v fSubtotal _ ~ )
20 . Fibrous roots In channel 3 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 2 1 0
22. Crayfcsh 0.5 1 .1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0.5 1 1.5
26. Macmbenthos (note diversity ~d abundance) 0.5 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton 0 1 3
28. iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. 0 0.5 1.5
28 . Wetland plants fn streambed FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
"Items 20 and 21 focus on the presence of uplarSd plants, Item 29 focuses on the presents of aquatic or wetland plant.
Notes: (use bade side of this form for addftional notes.) Sketch:

Version 3.9

A. Geomo hoto .subtotal = •~
Aialrii~
tilleak
.o~atta. ..
, .#r#~ii
1'. Continuous bed and bank 0 1 2
2. Sinuosity 0 1 3
3. ln-channel structure: riffle-pool sequence 0 1
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting 0 1 2 3
5..Active/relic tloodplain 0 1 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3
7. Braided channel 0 2 3
t3. Recent alluvial depostts 0 2 3
9' Natural levees 2 3
10. Headcuts 0 2 3
11. Grade controls 0 0.5 1 1.5
12. Natural valley oi- drainageway 0 .5 1 1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on e" xistinQ
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No~
Yes = 3 _
i+nan-maae aitcnes are not rated; see aiscussians in manual
B. HydroloAV (Subtotal = -I . ~)
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 1 2
15. Wafer in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel -- d or rowin season 0 1 2
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1 0.5
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1.5
18.Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 A.5 1.5
19. H dric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0 Yes 1.5
C. Biolog Subtotal =
20 . Fibrous roots in channel 3 2 1 0
21 . Rooted plants in channel 3 1 0
22. Crayfish 0 0. 1 1.5
23. Bivalves 1 2 3
24. Fish 0.5 1 1.5
25. Amphibians 0 1 1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periph on 0 1
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria/fungus. p ,5
29 . Wetland plants in sireambed FAC = 0.5; FACW 0:75, BL =1.5 SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
items zu ana z~ rocus on the presence of upland plants, Item 29 focuses on the pre~ice of aquatic or wetland plants.
Sketch:
~q~'~t+~
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.)
North Carolina Division of Water Quality -Stream Identification Form;

_ ,~
a
,~
~:
~,~ ;,_
WAKE
z. ,;~
Cedar Ridge 2005 Aerial
C
t
e
r
4
Q
0
a
,., mU..~
0044829
.R1: CEDAR RIDGE LAND
DEVELOPMENTLLC
1: 8804 ALBRIGHT RD
2: RALEIGH NC 27612-7445
3:
BOOK:
PAGE:
DATE:
ACRES:
VAL:
VAL:
IG CLASS:
RIPTION:
JAME:
JM:
{T:
JURIS:
(SHIP:
BUILT:
'RICE:
)ATE:
USE:
3N STYLE:
CLASS:
1G:
ARCEL NUMBER:
ESS
M:
3C:
3EFIX:
ME:
PE:
JFFIX:
Page 1 of 1
10492
2120
10/13/2003
71.28
0
489668
CORPORATE LISTING
PROMINENCE HOMES
BM2003-1771
176809
1768073234
000
ROL
RO
WAKE FOREST
0
0
Vacant
0
VACANT
R-I
610
ROLESVILLE
RD
Streat~
Parcels
Securify Screen
2{tQ5 Colas flrtlws;
Caunty~wride
2Q©5 Coior C7Ttho -
tile
^ Wake CounRy
BaunxTa ry
^ Adjacent Counties
http://imaps.co.wake.nc.us/imaps/printmap.asp?pin=1768073234&pinext=&minX=2157989.5375294&mint=786065.882304674&maxX=216... 12/6/2006
~.c,cyrg^r 2^vu6. City o' Raleah, Wake GcunT;. C 995

Pane 1 of 1
u
~,
-._,
,,
;:
~~; ~ ~ ~ W/~~~
~~1~ Cau'~a~r~~,~1~~a 1µ ~~"~~„" ~~ 1~aa~~~1~ Ctl11E~tTl'
Cedar Ridge Streams
. ~:_ ., .~..._~7
REID: 0044829
`',.~"/
OWNERI: CEDAR RIDGE LAND
DEVELOPMENT LLC
-°ADDR1: 8804 ALBRIGHT RD
ADDR2: RALEIGH NC 27612-7445
ADDR3:
DEED BOOK: 10492
DEED PAGE: 2120
DEED DATE: 10/13/2003
DEED ACRES: 71.28
BLDG VAL: 0
LAND VAL: 489668
BILLING CLASS: CORPORATE LISTING
DESCRIPTION: PROMINENCE HOMES
BM2003-1771
MAP NAME: 176809
PIN NUM: 1768073234
PIN EXT: 000
-CITY: ROL
PLAN JURIS: RO
TOWNSHIP: WAKE FOREST
YEAR BUILT: 0
SALEPRICE: 0
SALEDATE:
TYPE USE:
DESIGN STYLE:
-UNITS:
LAND CLASS:
ZONING:
=OLD PARCEL NUMBER:
ADDRESS
ST NUM:
'' ST MISC:
DIR PREFIX:
ST NAME:
ST TYPE:
4 DIR SUFFIX:
Vacant
0
VACANT
R-I
610
ROLESVILLE
RD
Greeks and Rivers
Streets
Lakes
ParceBs
Corporate Limit
8rnrnstary
dtlG~1"i
n Pt3(
,;~. CdRY
t1{1R}4AA1
cvaunYVw~ra
ceaxa
N~.LY SPR3tJGfi
XtllG11TDAL[
" ;-, aac~sztsva, ~ r
': RfSt CRifY ~[
,u,+ac~ ~c~csr
W EtIDfLi
zc®uLt~
P1a nning
Jurisdiction
Bau nda rY
~.::
,~:at=x
', caaY
fuouaYVA~:ar~a
.. GARflf32
NOIY SP`RitIGS
!(NiGfiTDALE
MtYfCRtBVfLtE
R,k;#.L3GSi
Ri}il
http://imaps.co.wake.nc.us/imaps/printmap.asp?pin=1768073234&pinext=&minX=2157989.5375294&mint=786065.882304674&maxX=216... 12/6/2006
Coiyrg:^:f X006. Ci±y of Rale`ch, ih1aka Gounty. G 995 ,

' ' Page 1 of 1

1t,~P1~k: G+~L1NT'f,AN E3 "~"N C#°i°'Y ~~` fY`;#~G1•# t„«1fti"TY

Cedar Ridge Property Map Rolesville
r-, 1
J' r-
ti
r 's '•.s '~
ti '`~
t r
`ti
fr,~i
f~
S L,~~' f,~
Ii .F y"t`
F', \.( ~~:. ,~ ~ \...~i.,-''` 555.
~.1 ,,ti r' r
,ti
.
~ ~ I
~ ':_. ,... .,..,.7:3:3?
•~~
~~.
REID
0044829
Streets
~
~ r
_ t
s ', ~. +z ~
r
~
" t
~
.
^ Parcels
~'
,
+ } ~
`~ f:. ~'*~ ,~ .^ ~4 w ~
~ ~
` ~
,/r
~'
~" ~ 55~ ~;~ OWNERI: CEDAR RIDGE LAND
DEVELOPMENT LLC
Gorpnrate t_imit
~
`~---~
s

~ -
-' St ~
` ~
t,L
~ '';~` ~
^ „
s,
''~
~-''
~ _
'`±~
ADDR1:
8804ALBRIGHTRD
13ou#tdary
.
~ ~ ~,. 1 _ ~ 1
~
`
~ ~' ~
r`
' ~
~
F 1
{
~ •. ~,
5
~ ~ ~ ,
~" `~
~ ~
~ ADDR2: RALEIGH NC 27612-7445
h
~ ~~''+.
5v`,
g
~v..
•G ~
\ 1
~ ,
,t ~.~
-~ 't.
' ,
t 4 ~
~ `'`. ~
~r°~• .,
Yt~` `h
~
f ~
F f
t
} ''t
~.r~ 'y
f f
~
~ ADDR3: ANGt[~e
lr
~
i 5
.+, ~'
~ '
t
r ~
'~
~ ~ y
l
'j
t
,{'
`~
t
5~ /~
~n
~ I

' '~
I DEED BOOK:
10492 APEX
l
i;~ ~.•--
a
t
.-~,. ^"`~ ,~ ~ ~. "*.,~ ' ~
,. ,
`
~~-` w, t~ • ~L t ~
.~ :.~ ~;-^ ~ t rf
-~,~.,,
.,'~ ;._,
l
f
~ y 1
_~, DEED PAGE:
DEED DATE: 2120
10/13/2003
GARY
"r
~,1 { ~, ff f, - -~:; ~.... f~.,• ~ ~ ti tr ° ` {~-5( l i
c
i' `
hr
~ DEED ACRES: 71.28 DuRt#A~r
~,y tirl .~
''
{ ~`' ''k y \ -. ~
' Y{
-~` ~
'''t ~~
, ~ BLDG VAL: 0 Fi1t3UAVYAUitIA
~y,'~
~ "~~
~
"
~ ~ s~
\Y-.
~`' `;~ t'1-'~.
~ ` \
f LAND VAL: 489668
~~~~
~, ..~'
~,,.'~ r ., BILLING CLASS: CORPORATE LISTING
r
~ `
~ ~ 4 t
` ~'•
±'~' .~~
r- ~' '~~~
'•,
,- ~~
DESCRIPTION: PROMINENCE HOMES ##f?LtYSPR.iNGB
~
~ r •,,
'~ ~~,~ ''.5
-
'
'`
' ~~
•
'
~
~ ,
t ,,
• BM2003-1771 #t1e1MHT1aALE
%" '
"
"
x~ y
'r,
.,
5
,mot-
~ `
~'E;'~~ ~ 'ti
~~
`~'~~ -
,
~~ MAP NAME:
PIN NUM 176809
a
~~~'~~~~E
,~ e
~;
_
~~
"' rl " :
~:
~ 1768073234 ~ ~.AL#
w ~;•ti
=
r' ~,
.`
'
' { ~,.,~
~ PIN EXT: 000 ,~
t «':
_ •"` ~ ",
,~
~, f~ ' ~
5 Vii.} -CITY:
~
~ ROL ~~ ttc~LCSVaLL
~t J". rf
~' r~ ~r
~~
~4. ~`
i `•,~
+t
`~
~ '"
,;~;`1~~
PLANJURIS:
- ~-~. ~,~',~'`~ `~ ~,- t, TOWNSHIP:
, ~ f+ ~ ,-t7' '`, '' , YEAR BUILT:
i RO
WAKE FOREST
0 ~
~~~ wAK[~c7R[Si

-vi:3#UELt
~ ~ ~ 7t~`• •~
` `~~ SALEPRICE: 0 z~vLe»#
r
1 S , ~ ~ rf ~ i ,~
,trF' SALEDATE:
r Planning

.-
~
+ i
- ,
~ r ~- tiw ~~~~
rl TYPE USE:
~ / r~ ^~tii 'ti ' I ~
~ Vacant
Jurisdictian

~ j
~ ~ ~ ~ ~-DESIGN STYLE:
~:
h { ~undary
;'
_~ ~

~~y r
~//,~ ~ ~5' i'' yr '~ ~TJ~-1-_._~-~--_-=r UNITS:
r LAND CLASS:
t~
~`~! ~~'' ZONING: 0
VACANT

R-I
AHG#ER
~ k ~~1 ~ ,~-~
~ _ -"~ \`•,, OLD PARCEL NUMBER: --
__-fT, ~ J
-.,'-~!~ . ~ '\~ ADDRESS CORY
r'- - 3 ~ ~ ~, ST NUM: 610
Fut;}UUAx YA#2H#A
~ ::
~
1-
5 ~ ~ _ ~~ DIR PREFIX:
ST NAME:
~ ROLESVILLE
1
~ ~`_>"~;st ~-
~~~STTYPE:
~~ RD KNIGiiTfiALE
r,.-
~ri ~ 1 ~ i=
~~~
5
~-~,~`~'-''-~
~r'~'
~DIR SUFFIX:
"~
M(3f{#2#SYtLLE
~ T-. f ~ r ~!
f
t lyyr. +
' RO{1
ti
i
gr -ti r `
S ~

_ , i .~ ~ <.. . ti ~ ~-:~u^ay. G 995'.
http://imaps.co.wake.nc.us/imaps/printmap.asp?pin=1768073234&pinext=&minX=2157989.5375294&minY=786065.882304674&maxX=216... 12/6/2006

os~stem .
_~ Ill 1~I '~',I~.1~.'~~~
PROGRAM
May 9, 2007
~x.~ o~ - vo $ t V` Z
Robert Polanco
8804 Albright Road
Raleigh, NC 27612
Project: Cedar Ridge (Rolesvtlle}
County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved,
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. )(f we have not received a copy of
the issued 404 Permit/401 CerNfication/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the
applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice
will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized
work. The amount of the In Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and
policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
followin table.
Neuse Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
(Sq. Ft.) Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Ri arian Non-Ri arian Coastal Marsh
Impacts 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,500 3,000
re t s 1 4,500
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies
require mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional
mitigation, the applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at (919} 716-1921.
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Jamie Shern, USACE- Raleigh
Ian McMillan, DWQ-Raleigh
Jay Keller, agent
File
Sincerely,
.`~~
Wi m D. Gilmore, PE
Director
RP~tOYl.GC9... ~h~ZA,GG!,GK~... PYDt6~ Ou,Y .TtA,t"P~
~~F--ww"~'
1~~~
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 1919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net

~x.p o~-oogt v~
CEDAR RIDGE SUBDIVISION
ROLESVILLE, NC
CLIENT: KE PROJECT DATE: June 22, 2007
Robert Polanco NUMBER: 0647
SITE LOCATION: Cedar Ridge Subdivision, East Young Street, Rolesville, NC
PHOTOGRAPH ~.' ~ ~ ,T .. ~ ~- ::~ , ~=~ * ! - .

. _ . -~:r_
PHOTOGRAPH
NUMBER: 2
_ _ __..
. ,~~„
._ .~~,z. ~.--
y '~~. ...~ ;fir -_.. ~. -
~. -" ...
i,. _
'. ~. ,.
.~
$ f + 'rya ~{ d~+ 6R ,p
+t > v '

CEDAR RIDGE SUBDIVISION
ROLESVILLE, NC
CLIENT: KE PROJECT DATE: June 22, 2007
Robert Polanco NUMBER: 0647
znro ~~ ,~•`Fr'~` ~~ ate' s , +': a;~. ,''' ,.~:°4'"~ 'R*tr~.
PHOTOGRAPH
NUMBER: 4
COMMENTS:
Southern view of
proposed
bioretention pond 1
from existing sewer
line area.
r
>:y . -`
"si` ,~ ,~ ~; ;
S:
~ '•~
'w, ~ ~
,~; /'.
o-,:,.
,Y ~~'~~
~:>' , -
.i~ t
.~o
f$~EC. .fir'/

CEDAR RIDGE SUBDIVISION
ROLESVILLE, NC

CLIENT: KE PROJECT
DATE: June 22
2007
Robert Polanco NUMBER: 0647 ,

SITE LOCATION: Cedar Ridge Subdivision, East Young Street, Rolesville, NC

PHOTOGRAPH
~ ~ ~~
~ _*
'~
t
~
NUMBER: 5
~~
r x `
^~.:',*
~ ~
a , n~~~ ; `"~
,,
~
`
, _ ~ra,:~ ~ ~,~
f t~ ~~
~`'
i ,C y
:
COMMENTS: ± ~``~- ~~
~
Z, S
f
Lr C ~:~
°~
11M
~~
;i ~
.
1t
t~;~ ~
~
b ~ . ~ R' F
~
~
Southern view of
d ~ ~
- ~ ~4 "' ~ ~ ~~;` ~
~ ~ ~
_
` "~ 4~^ ~
~~ ~
~~ M
propose
bioretention pond 4 r ~~ ~
~.a-,
:
~~.
~
'
at rear of Lot 100. ~ } ' ;
'` ~ ' } ~'`- """~
~
Hams Creek to the n ~,~ ''
~:
"~~
right.
,._ 4 _
'; ~" - ~' ~.

~.~ ~ t
~ - ,-

'
~ ~`
4 ~
~~ ,'
"~+
~
'd
- ~
+ ~ R
- .da
'~'~" ~
~
am
te, ~.- ~'~!~. ~ x+ t a $
hh
v
e
4
~ rn .~ ~ !. ~
,
$

a
u
~
~ ,
~ 7f
d
~
.~~„~„~'~ ° ~' ~ aid ~~ ~ .
~.
4 ,,. r
_sI~Il~ .'e ,
~.~ y

PHOTOGRAPH ~; ~ ~~.: ~ ~
~
- ~ -K ~~ "

NUMBER: 6 ^
z ~
~:~~ ~ ~ .,
~. ,~ ~- _~. ' ' .:~. ~,~ '._
~
~
: ~ r~
.

COMMENTS: ~ ~ `~ - ~' °~
Proposed Western ` ~~~ M .w -,~, ~, -~.-=~~- ~ ~$,~,'
Virginia Drive ~ ~~
~-,- a z „
Stream Crossing ~~
-~~ ~ ~,~. ~
~ `
_ .~
~ .~,

Area. 4
~
.. ~' ~' ..~ ~ ~, ,
~
,
Y ~ .,~=~~w` -. ~-. ' '~~

•'fiN'rt ~~ar ~' ~ ~ rE "~ ~ P
f
f'
i y~i~: a,~"~_' '^' ~{ i ~. a1V' "~S~FY?'"3~
C.~4Fr _ ~~'
+
~
~
,y x
,
.
,g `r' --.°r
..ra''
~''d
.
~
-
. ~f y`w
7E`C' ''°+'r ; +
~~~ A: ~ ~~~.'
~
,
`I~
-
~
s
~.
p,.
g
~
,
A
'
q; ~' ~~
~~¢6 ,
,.?'e'tt '"
+
'
~,:ey- R ~
SS
.. ~iPf :'
n
# , ~ ~~~ R
~i
v
'~•
~~~
~'
te.
<^"'
• ~ ~ ~

CEDAR RIDGE SUBDIVISION
ROLESVILLE, NC

CLIENT: KE PROJECT
DATE: June 22
2007
Robert Polanco NUMBER: 0647 ,

SITE LOCATION: Cedar Ridge Subdivision, East Young Street, Rolesville, NC

PHOTOGRAPH ,,, a R~ ~. ~~~, , ,, ~ ~ ~
~..,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i
° ,~

NUMBER: 7 ~ :°r
'', ~ .~~ ~, ...~ k '- ~
: % .
j r
~° ~ -
: ~ '~ dri. a .5: ~° '~ 1 f ~i'
y
~
COMMENTS: ~` T~. ~.;~ r
'.:
.,~ a.. ~
~ ~~ ~ ,
~ ~
~
~~ ~ c
_ ~
Westem view of ~ ~~ ~
'~~'° ~
~
~ ~~'~
~
proposed }' ~~ ~
~~ ~' ~
~
~
5~ ^~ `~`~
,~~
~ ~ y
~
bioretention pond 2 ~~~
p
~
;~~`~ `~ o
z ;~ ~'.
` ~ -
below Lot 103 area. ~
~ ~~';-""Y ~~b ~ %~ °
~
- K '
~~
i
fie; .yp-. T
sail'' p
r
~ i.,e~,y ~P
,~,
e
~
i f
'
x
i1~
~
~4` ~1C
'~1
? t N 4 .
a
~
!
t
'F' .'` _ Tom,
~' , y~. ~' ~ t 'FF`
i ~ ~ ~ Gi "mod ~
A
~
p~ S
~ ~ ' ..'.~ k ' '+~.`-i' .~ 4~
>,~y~~j~r,,~. r
° ~
'~ a
~
i y ~ t 'T^ is
~
'
{
r
.. '~ , ~~ ~% ~
ors
.~. Y ~ ! s 4 E. ~'a~yS
~ + ~~ . -.
R
p
~
~7 ~a
~
~ ~ ff
~
g
C~e„y~'Y ~
~
~
.
p~ . .~„y
~ ~'
.. ^
o
~ly
a
N
~ / !'
RA,•.l~iy
PHOTOGRAPH ~ c ~ ~~ ~~ °,` °.
NUMBER: 8 '~`: 1 '~° .~°~
', COMMENTS:
Westem view of
proposed bioretention
3 below Lot 118 ~~°
area.
~.~;~. .
,.
_ :Vi`i' `.

CEDAR RIDGE SUBDIVISION
ROLESVILLE, NC
CLIENT: KE PROJECT DATE: June 22, 2007
Robert Polanco NUMBER: 0647
COMMENTS:
Southem view of
proposed bioretention
pond 13 below Lot
121 area. UT to
Hams Creek below.
PHOTOGRAPH
NUMBER: 10
COMMENTS:
Southern view of
proposed bioretention
pond 12 below Lot
156 area.
~;

CEDAR RIDGE SUBDIVISION
ROLESVILLE, NC
CLIENT: KE PROJECT
DATE: June 22
2007
Robert Polanco NUMBER: 0647 ,
SITE LOCATION: Cedar Ridge Subdivision, East Young Street, Rolesville, NC
PHOTOGRAPH
y"y~ .Z- 'j~ ~.
~? ~} > ~ ~~ ~ >b ~.
f
NUMBER: 11
9
`'
?
~ ~ I~
y
! ~
~'
~y
k
"S
~~
t` ~ iF
5 f 9 ~ ~~'~+
.
"~ ~
, ~
COMMENTS: ~ i ,~
` i
~ ~ '~8 ~
~ ~ ,.
4 ~ArU C ~ ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ ..
'
Southern view of ~ ,~ ~ ,~
~"~`~ ' ~ k; r~ ~~ '~:'
proposed bioretention . -. ~ ~ °~ °'{
t_;~ ~~ ~ ~
'`,,
~ ~ ~
pond 11 below Lot 66 .
,
~
, ~~y
t; ~ ~f ~fy,. - ~
,
. ~
area. Pond in ~
~,
i
a
; ~~
`~ ~ , ~ ~;
~~ ~ ~ -~
~
~

background. ~ N- ~
, E
~
~
~ ,
~~
~ _ ~ '` ,

/
$ ~
~~
~` .
~ k '1 ,y,
Y'
~+x ~ r ~~ ~~
, ,~
t
`~
} eye ~ ,~~S ra 'I~i. ~`~ ~ ^ _
.
~ Y q ~
~~' ~ ~ ~
- i
~
$
y
..
i Y
L ~Kl ~~, 31 ~ ~~ ~ ~ « ~ Y.~
~ ~ ~} ~
""
~'
# y
~ ~
~
~
,4
~
dl
["P<~~ td
°~,~.L
,~y
~ 5+x"4. +,~a, 4y '~ t ~ ~»a~,a.t. ,~. .po-
{
]
'
M
~ ~ ~
S
1
TY~~~ '.
~'
y
i
~
~$~
,~ Yiw p } ~ ~f, rv 'Yu aMS~ f
'kT ~" ~

CEDAR RIDGE SUBDIVISION
ROLESVILLE, NC

CLIENT: KE PROJECT DATE: June 22, 2007
Robert Polanco NUMBER: 0647

SITE LOCATION: Cedar Ridge Subdivision, East Young Street, Rolesville, NC

PHOTOGRAPH ~" a ~ ~6' g9 ~` ~ t s
~' v
~~ ~ ~` k ~ ,~ ~~ ,. ~;~ .~~ .-
~

NUMBER: 13 ~ ~ a,
~ ~
~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~

COMMENTS: Ry t 7
~~ R ~ ~~~`~
°{
~
~
~._
r~~:
eW ~ y A~= 7
i
'~'
x ' ~ ~
x ~
>
~
'' ~ ~p
~~ ~ ~
'
Northeastern view of ¢
~ ~
°~
proposed bioretention
.
= . a '~~ j ~ ~~ ~
~
E
°
~ ~
~' '
'
pond 8 from existing ~`
~`
`
~
~

sewer line area. ,
''p *~~~t
~
~. ~.
,;~
e
~ 9~ ~e~ L~ r ~ N 'kl
~
'
~.. ~
~ g;'.6~4' . 1 a
a
ti ~ ~; r '~.rl h/
'~k"d` ~ ~'''~ '- °+,' `'~f19/*l i G•
~ ~ `~ r ~ k t
p
b
u
`
.
^.
a' '~
d
~~4~ ~~
P
~.
,
at ~~ x; ,~~ ~:
;~~'
~` g~~ ~y '~ ~::~, ,
p
* e ~ b '~19~ ey ~ ~ d _ ~. d
~ a+T.." °'~ e ~L r i # ~ r ~ .c ~ y„~' rf 'a ~ y y,
~ ~ ~~ ~,, ~ ~ ~ .yrWy„y!„r
~
..

PHOTOGRAPH ~~ :}~ ~~~~ ~ ;. ~~
~ ~6~ ;,~
NUMBER: 14 4
~ ~ ~..t ~~ =~ ,, h~~~`' ,

~~
~~
~
COMMENTS: ~
`
~
:~1
~~
~`
~, ts
~~
,~.
"~ / ~ ;,
,,
~ ~'~
Southern view of ~~;~`~~ ~:a
~ ~'_ '~ }~~
f
,l ~°~ ~~ ~~
proposed bioretention i
~
y
~ b : ~. `~ =`
~
pond 10 below Lot ~ ~
~ ~~' ~ ~ r~.
' ~~
~- ~
~
~

60 area ~
~
.~
~ ,
~
~
~
~
'
. 4 ~
..
_
~
;
~ `
~
a ~~~
#
~
~~
, ~„
~
~
, , ~

_
E
~* ~r"~_
1.. y
~ ~
~
~
~~+#'
a ~ y ~ v ~: 1) ~'"' i 's ~ . 7
'
~
v s s -~;~c 4 ~ ~.'''~,,
q~3 f.
tK,. _ t~' 4~ 4 ~ ~ r c 4 .
~ ~
~
y 1, l

~`
y
`
~ ~
,~
~
~„ wy< ~~
c
.,# '~ '~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ y'~F'~2; ~ ~' ''~ .
°
~ ,,gi :,
N ~ ~~' -4 ~
r
: ~ •f't
~~Nf to
2
.
~
qs f:
'~
_.
~yy~~ r+ 1`. Fi ., ys iF ~
~ t
T 2 ~

PpL Vl MC i
~, '~_
,`1Q ~YN
~9~~OHPOP~'~O 8 OiSJS ' GP/ ~ ~t
ti~lator Nanct' :'u"L E:(cZ~•tly (/
t'onunixsioner Ronnie 1- C'urrin
OLESYILLE' Tirst Incorpcn'vied 183!
/~`{,~cy~.rvrrt~ ~eyWerv~
C:'onunissioner C'. [-rank 1=:a~;les. ~lav<n- }>ro- I eml>ore
(_'ottunissioner \t'. 1=rank }I<td~e
C~onuni~sioner f3i•ttc P. \\"hit.akcr
Coitunissirn~ier Jo~e~hh \~A', " ~,ck~~ \~1'ikon
Jtme 28, 2007
NC Department of Envn•onment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
512 North Salisbury Stxeet
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re~erence: Cedar Lakes Subdivision Virginia Water Drive Crossing
To Whom It i~4ay Concern:
)O0 Fast 1'oun~ Strut
Post QIl`tce F3o1 2 ~C}
Role-sGille. Norih (;arolina :37571
Phonce: `)19.5-E.ii>1
1=acsint ile,: 91 `).'> 5e,. i55 ~2
tvtt-te. ci . rol ea v i I k.. n<~. u s
The town staff has reviewed the construction plans for Cedar Lakes Subdivision and Virginia Water Drive. The
Town needs the interconnectivity of this street for the efficient delivery of municipal services between this Cedar
Lakes Subdivision and the Villages at Rolesville Subdivision.
The construction plans show the use of an arch bridge for this crossing and the Town has approved this concept
because it will have less impact on the stream. The developer will need to supply the detail construction plans
from the supplier for final approval prior to starting any construction.
Due to the rock conditions in the Rolesville area the Town has approved the concept of using the arch bridge for
Vu•~inia Water Drive and is requesting the State's approval for this project as well.
If you should have any questions, feel fi•ee to contact me at 554-6517.
With re pect,
Br Hicks
Director of Planning