Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20061804 Ver 7_Site Work Calculations_20130819OLD - 80AVI Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA 11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: (919) 846 -5900 • Fax: (919) 846 -9467 www.SandEC.com August 16, 2013 S &EC Project # 6658.P6 To: N.C. Division of Water Resources Water Quality Programs- WeBSCaPe Unit Attn: Karen Higgins 512 N. Salisbury Street -9`h floor Raleigh, NC 27603 Re: The Village at Flowers Plantation Stormwater Management Plan -POD NW-8 (Phase II) DWQ Project #20061804, Ver.3 /Certification No. 3766 Johnston County, NC On behalf of Mrs. Rebecca Flowers, please find the attached Stormwater Management Plan for POD NW-8 (Phase II). According to the Individual 401 Water Quality Certification Approval Certification No. 3766, Condition No. 9, "a final, written stormwater management plan for each phase of this project shall be submitted to the DWQ 401 Oversight/Express Permitting Unit for review and approval". Therefore, please see attached Stormwater Management Plan for your review and anticipated Approval. Please contact me at DShirlev(aD_SandEC.com or (919) 846- 5900 if you have any questions. Sincerely, D Soil & Environmental Consultan s, PA 4,,J, e2- AUG 1 9 2013 Deborah Edwards Shirley Environmental Specialist Attachments: 1) Flowers Plantation Pod NW -8 (Phase IIA) Sitework Calculations 2) Bioretention Operations & Maintenance Agreement- signed and notarized 3) Overall POD map (east side of Buffalo Rd.) 4) POD -NW -8 (Phase II) Runoff Maps -C -1 & C -6 5) POD NW-8 (Phase II) Overall Site Plan -C -1 6) POD NW-8 (Phase II) Street Plan & Profiles -C -2 & C -3 7) POD NW -8 (Phase II) Bioretention Details -C-4 8) POD NW -8 (Phase II) Master Grading Plan -C -5 9) POD NW-8 (Phase II) Erosion & Sediment Control Plan -C-6 10) POD NW -8 (Phase II) Erosion & Sediment Details -D -01 11) POD NW -8 (Phase II) Utilities Details -D -02 & D -03 Flowers Plantation Pod NW 8 Phase IIA Owner /Developer: Rebecca Flowers 4880 NC 42 East Clayton, NC 27520 aE� AUG 1 9 2013 Phone: (800) 343 -0659 Am 0,,%IM$ still �I �•P�N CAgO�'•. �O� o�ESSlpy.��y9 i 4Q SEAL 9rt� 19843 g / =' lc r STOCKS ENGINEERINQ P.A. 1100 Eastern avenue Phone: 252.459.8196 PO Box 1108 Fax: 252.459.8197 Nashville, NC 27856 Mobile: 252.903.6891 Email: mstocks@stocksengineering.com Stocks Engineering, PA. 1100 Eastern Avenue PO Box 1108 Nashville. NC 27856 Project: Flowers-Pod NW 8 Phase 2A Date: August 1, 2013 page: I of I Post - Development TO W 6f.4) 5 la 0.77 0.75 7.40 4.27 5 Ila 0.95 0.42 7.40 2.95 5 Ilb 0.09 0.95 7.40 0.63 5 11C 0.22 0.95 7.40 1.55 5 lid 4.34 0.39 7.40 12.53 1 1 1 1 Total 1 6.37 1 - 7.40 I Post - Development Runoff Computations 10-Year Storm 25-Year Storm W 6f.4) 5 la 0.77 0.75 8.40 4.85 5 Ila 0.95 0.42 8.40 3.35 5 Ilb 0.09 0.95 8.40 0.72 5 11C 0.22 0.95 8.40 1.76 5 lid 4.34 0.39 8.40 14.22 1 1 1 1 Total 1 6.37 1 - SAO I Runoff Computations 10-Year Storm 25-Year Storm Permit Number (to bep byDINO) OF WA7� A $ V� 9� O Y HC OM STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM 401 CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FORM BIORETENTION CELL SUPPLEMENT This form must be fulled out, printed and submrted. The Required Items Check&t (Part III) must be printed, tilled out and submitted along with ak of ft required kdonnation. �A. " -';YU _ `"!„-%,l'.,� "xL�- !� »ir' •.".: � ��cc- � - Y,' -.�� - _ ,_ -tit 4� - •, Y, �- _- ...,_,., _ _ _ 1= E �iRMATtON� - - _- _ r�;: -�..�: �= �-- :F.��..y�;� :a.,� ;, >- _��'•_ :� :.;7;. "� - _ „ °.,,>;• __ ";c - :. : =: , Project name Fbwers Plantation - Pod NW 8 (Phase 2) Contact name Kevin Vamell Phone number 252.459.8196 Date July 22, 2013 Drainage area number 1 !l :�Q�SIGN�Nt~O1�MATl0�1 ” -- �'� : - _ - - - - = w -t'Y• - •h h - -; - - - _ _ ,t >: -- - - _ •:_ ;; Site Characteristics Drainage area 361,981 ft= Impervious area 130,500 ft2 Percent impervious 36.1% % Design rainfall depth 1.0 inch Peak Flow Calculations Is pro/post control of the 1 -yr, 24-hr peak flow required? Y (Y or N) 1 -yr, 24-hr runoff depth 3 In 1 -yr, 24-hr intensity 0.12 Irllhr Pre-development 1 -yr, 24-hr peak flow 0.668 ft%w Post - development 1 -yr, 24-hr peak flow 0.491 fekm Pm/Post 1 -yr, 24 -hr peak control -0.177 ft %sc Storage Volume: Non-SA Waters Minimum volume required 11,297.0 ft' Volume provided 12,146.0 fit OK Storage Volume: SA Waters 1.5" nm ff volume ft2 Pre - development 1 -yr. 24-hr runoff ft� Post - development 1 -yr, 24-hr runoff ft2 Minimum volume required 0 ft Volume provided fe Cell Dimensions Ponding depth of water 12 inches OK Ponding depth of water 1.00 ft Surface area of the lop of the biorelention cell 14,485.0 ft2 OK Length: ft Width: It -or- Radius ft Media and Soils Summary Drawdown time, ponded volume 6 hr OK Drawdown time, to 24 inches beim surface 18 hr OK Drawdown time, total: 24 hr In -situ soil.• Soil permeability 010 In/hr Insufficient. Increase infiltration rate or include underdrains. Planting media soil: Soil permeability 2.00 IrAr OK Soil composition % Send (by volume) 86% OK % Fines (by volume) 10% OK % Organic (by volume) 4% OK Total: 100% Phosphorus Index (P- Index) of media 30 (unitless) OK Form SW401- 131oreter►tion•Rev.e June 25, 2010 Pans 1 and II. Design Summary, Page 1 of 2 Permit Number-_. (to be pruvrded by DWQ) Basin 13evations Temporary pod elevation Y 248.00 fmsl OK Type of bioetention cep (answer'Y' to only one of the two following questions): Y (Y or N) OK Is this a grassed cell? Y (Y or N) OK Is this a cell with treestshrubs? N (Y or N) OK Ranting elevation (top of the mulch or grass sod layer) 247 fmsl Depth of mulch him OK Bottom of the planting media soil N 245 frost OK Planting media depth 2 ft Depth of washed sand below panting media soil N 0.33 ft OK Are underdrains being installed? Y (Y or N) OK How many dean out pipes are being installed? 20 OK What factor of safety is used for sizing the underdrains? (See BMP Manual Section 12.3.6) 2 OK Additional distance between the bottom of the planting media and 1 R the bottom of the cell to aocourd for underdrains OK Bottom of the cell required 243.67 fmsl SHK elevation 240 fmsl Distance from bottom to SHWT 3.67 It OK IMemal Wrier Storage Zone (MI5) Does the design include IWS N (Y or N) Elevation of the top of the upturned elbow fmsl Separation of IWS and Surface 247 it Planting Plan Number of tree species 0 Number of shrub species Number of herbaceous groundcover species Addigonal Information Does volume in excess of the design volume bypass the Y (Y or N) OK bioretention cell? Does volume in excess of the design volume flow evenly distributed N (Y or N) Excess volume must pass through filler. through a vegetated filer? What is the length of the vegetated fitter? it Does the design use a level spreader to evenly distribute flow? N (Y or N) Show how flow is evenly distributed. Is the BMP located at least 30 feet from surface waters (50 feet if Y (Y or N) OK SA waters)? Is the BMP localed at least 100 feet from water supply wells? Y (Y or N) OK Are the vegetated side slopes equal to or less than 3.1? Y (Y or N) OK Is the BMP located in a proposed drainage easement with access Y (Y or N) OK to a public Right of Way (ROW)? Inlet velocity (from treatment system) 0.22 fVsec OK Is the area surrounding the cell likely to undergo development in N (Y or N) OK the future? Are the slopes draining to the bloretention cep greater than 20%? N (Y or N) OK Is the drainage area permanently stabilized? Y (Y or N) OK Pretreatment Used (Indicate Type Used with an ')C in the shaded cell) Gravel and grass (flinches gravel followed by 3.5 it of grass) Grassed swale OK Forebay X Other Form SW401431oretantion -Rev.8 June 25. 2010 Parts 1 and II. Design Summary, Page 2 of 2 Permit No: & be a&*wdbyOWQ) i11.:�RUIRED �i�BIS:�MEC�I�ST�.- - - - - _,° - _ ,5= •t.= _ ,,,` Y _ _ _ � - _ =� =� - Please indicate the page or plan sheet numbers where the supporting documentation can be found. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for additional fnfonrivitlaiL This will delay final review and approval of the project. Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met. If the applicant has designated an agent, the agent may initial below. If a requirement has not been met, attach justification. Paget Plan Initials Street No. C- -1 1. Plans (1' - 50' or larger) of the entire site showing: Design at ultimate build -oul, Off-site drainage (if applicable), - Delineated drainage basins (include Rational C coefficient per basin), - Celt dimensions, - Pretreatment system, - Hgh flow bypass system, - Maintenance access, - Recorded drainage easement and pubic right of way (ROW), - Clean out pipe locations, - Overflow device, and - Boundaries of drainage easement. 2. Plan details (1" = 30' or larger) for the bioretention cep showing: - Cell dimensions - Pretreatment system, - Hgh flow bypass system, - Maintenance access, - Recorded drainage easement and public right of way (ROW), - Design at ultimate buffd -out, - Off -efte drainage (if applicable), - Clean out pipe locations, - Overflow device, and - Boundaries of drainage easement. - Indicate the P -Index between 10 and 30 3. Section view of the bioretention cell (1" = 20' or larger) showing: Side slopes, 3:1 or lower - Underdrain system (if appOcabie), and - Bioretenlion cell layers [ground level and slope, pre - treatment, pondfng depth, mulch depth, fill media depth, washed sand, filler fabric (or choldng stone if applicable), #67 stone, underdrains (if applicable), SHWT level(s), and overflow structure] 4. A sods report that is based upon an actual fold investigation, soil borings, and infiltration tests. The results of the soils report must be verified in the field by DWO, by completing & submitting the soils investigation request form. County soil maps are not an acceptable source of soils information. All elevations shall be in feet mean sea level (fmsl). Results of soils tests of both the planting sal and the in situ soil must include: Soil permeability, - Soil composition (% sand, % fines, % organic), and - P- index. 5. A detailed planting plan (1' = 20' or larger) prepared by a qualified individual showing: - A variety of suitable species, Saes, spacing and locations of plantings, - Total quantity of each type of plant specified, A pianlmg detail, The source nursery for the plants, and - Fertilizer and watering requirements to establish vegetation. C 6. A construction sequence that shows how the bioretention oell will be protected from sediment until the entire drainage area is statifted, C4LCS 7. The supporting calculations (including underdrafn calculations, if applicable). D A 8. A oopy of the signed and notarized inspection and maintenance (I &M) agreement 14A 9. A copy of the deed restriction. Form SW401- BkweWntbn -Rev.7 Part III, Page 1 of 1 ,\N DQ N v _w • Im w fl - In Do W w 00 Q-39)y - ) -$ 3�b 1 Tj:�, 't s,o Scic> ' O 110• o �c SS'1 C£ ;Q Hydraflow Plan View c6 9 1 -- . outfaii I Project File: Pod NW8 Phase 2 Pipes 8 -9.stm I No. Lines: 1 08 -01 -2013 J "As && sbrm SWAWS zoos Storm Sewer Summary Report Page 1 Line No. Line ID Flow rate 0%) Line size (in) Line length (ft) Invert EL Dn (ft) Invert EL Up (ft) Line slope N HOL down (ft) HOL up (it) Minor loss (ft) HOL Junct (ft) Dns line No. 1 FES 8 to CB 9 4.27 15 c 54.0 290.00 292.70 5.000 290.83 293.53 Na 294.111 End Project File: Pod NW8 Phase 2 Pipes 8-9 stm Number of lines: 1 Run Date- 08-01 -2013 NOTES: c = cir, e = ellip; b = box; Known Qs only ; i - Inlet control. Hydmlow Slam SwMe 2005 Hydraulic Grade Line Computations Page 1 Une Sipe (in) Q (cfs) Downstream Len (ft) Upstream Check JL coeff Minor loss (ft) Invert elev (ft) HGL elev (ft) Depth (ft) Area (sgh) Vol (file) Vol head (ft) EGL elev (ft) Sf N Invert elev (ft) HGL elev (ft) Depth (ft) Area (sgft) Vel (ft's) Vol head (ft) EGL elev (ft) Sf Ave Sf Enrgy loss (ft) (K) 1 15 4.27 290.00 290.83 0.83 0.86 4.96 0.38 291.21 n/a 54.0 292.70 293.53 0.83" 0.86 4.96 0.38 293.911 n/a n/a n/a 1.00 n/a Project File; Pod NW8 Phase 2 Pipes 8 -9.stm Number of lines: 1 Run Date: 08-01 -2013 Notes: ; "" Critical depth. Hydreflow Sh ml Saws 2005 ��■�� i���mmlmmm?w-- _low r Storm Sewer Profile Proj. file: Pod NW8 Phase 2 Pipes 3 -7.stm Hydrefiow Storm Sewers 2005 _y id 1 1 • 1 / - - -11 III I - -� - - -- ' / 1 1 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 I 11 Hydrefiow Storm Sewers 2005 VLbwgi s Ww 8 !?Kmr -'¢ Cvtzj pc N vv�f>&e- ►i. (`�•3t Ac k ss� '/• 8.31 4e f KpSe u t c0u S 3. oc • C- k 9 8� -� � 6. 31 Pte. 31 o4c Ul = 7q Watershed Model Schematic 1 - Pre Development Project: Pre vs Postgpw Hydrallow Hydrographs by IntelWve v9.22 2 - Post Development 3 - Outflow vp Monday, Aug 5, 20'13 Hydrograph Return Period Recap HydraflowHydrographsbylMelisolvev9 .22 Hyd. Hydrograph Inflow Peak Outflow (cfs) Hydrograph No. type Hyd(s) description (origin) 1 -Yr 2 Yr 3-Yr 5-Yr 10 Yr 25-Yr 50-Yr 100-Yr 1 SCS Runoff 0.668 -- -- ----- —_ — Pre Development 2 SCS Runoff ---- -- 11.76 — — — — — — Post Development 3 Reservoir 2 0.491 ---- — -- -- — --- — Outflow Proj. file: Pre vs Postgpw Monday, Aug 5, 2013 Hydrograph Summary Report Hydrafiow Hydrographs by Intelisohre v9.22 Hyd. No. Hydrograph type (origin) Peak flow (cts) Time interval (min) Time to peak (min) Hyd. volume (cult) Inflow hyd(s) Maximum elevation ('10 Total strge used (cuff) Hydrograph description 1 SCS Runoff 0.668 2 720 4,710 — — - -- Pre Development 2 SCS Runoff 11.76 2 718 23,733 — — -- Post Development 3 Reservoir 0.491 2 834 10,435 2 248.04 13,899 Outflow Pre vs Post.gpw Return Period: 1 Year Monday, Aug 5, 2013 Pre Development Q (Cft) Hyd. No. 1 —1 Year 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 000 Q WS) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 000 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 ® Hyd No. 1 Time (min) 4 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisohre v9.22 Monday, Aug 5, 2013 Hyd. No. 1 Pre Development Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 0.668 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 720 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 4,710 cuft Drainage area = 8.310 ac Curve number = 55 Basin Slope = 8.0% Hydraulic length = 1200 ft Tc method = KIRPICH Time of conc. (Tc) = 4.85 min Total precip. = 2.89 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Pre Development Q (Cft) Hyd. No. 1 —1 Year 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 000 Q WS) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 000 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 ® Hyd No. 1 Time (min) Q (cis) 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 200 Post Development Hyd. No. 2 —1 Year Q (cfs) 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 It, Kill] 2.00 0.00 ' ' r 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time (min) ® Hyd No. 2 5 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisohm v9.22 Monday, Aug 5, 2013 Hyd. No. 2 Post Development Hydrograph type = SCS Runoff Peak discharge = 11.76 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 718 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 23,733 cuft Drainage area = 8.310 ac Curve number = 74 Basin Slope = 8.0% Hydraulic length = 1200 ft Tc method = KIRPICH Time of conc. (Tc) = 4.85 min Total precip. = 2.89 in Distribution = Type II Storm duration = 24 hrs Shape factor = 484 Q (cis) 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 200 Post Development Hyd. No. 2 —1 Year Q (cfs) 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 It, Kill] 2.00 0.00 ' ' r 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time (min) ® Hyd No. 2 Storage Indication method used. Q (Cfs] 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 0 (cfs) 12.00 10.00 8.00 O 1, 4.00 KI.X 0.00 ' I F I ' 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time (min) --- Hyd No. 3 - Hyd No. 2 RTUTTU Total storage used = 13,899 tuft 6 Hydrograph Report Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.22 Monday, Aug 5, 2013 Hyd. No. 3 Outflow Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 0.491 cfs Storm frequency = 1 yrs Time to peak = 834 min Time interval = 2 min Hyd. volume = 10,435 cuft Inflow hyd. No. = 2 - Post Development Max. Elevation = 248.04 ft Reservoir name = <New Pond> Max. Storage = 13,899 cuft Storage Indication method used. Q (Cfs] 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 0 (cfs) 12.00 10.00 8.00 O 1, 4.00 KI.X 0.00 ' I F I ' 0.00 0 120 240 360 480 600 720 840 960 1080 1200 1320 1440 1560 Time (min) --- Hyd No. 3 - Hyd No. 2 RTUTTU Total storage used = 13,899 tuft Pond Report ' Hydraflow Hydrographs by Intelisolve v9.22 Monday, Aug 5, 2013 Pond No. 1 - <New Pond> Pond Data Contours - User - defined contour areas. Conic method used for volume calculation. Begining Elevation = 247.00 It Stage / Storage Table Stage (ft) Elevation (ft) Contour area (sgft) Incr. Storage (cuft) Total storage (cuft) 0.00 247.00 12,146 0 0 1.00 248.00 14,485 13,297 13,297 1.75 248.75 16,880 11,749 25,046 Culvert I Orifice Structures Weir Structures [A] [B] [C] [PI'Marl [A] [B] [C] [Dl Rise (in) - 24.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest Len (ft) = 14.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Span (in) = 24.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crest a. (ft) = 248.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. Barrels = 1 0 0 0 Weir Coeff. = 3.33 3.33 3.33 3.33 Invert El. (ft) = 242.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Weir Type = Riser - -- -- Length (ft) - 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Multistage = Yes No No No Slope (%) = 10.00 0.00 0.00 Na N -Value = .013 .013 .013 n/a Orifice Coeff. = 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 Exfil.(in/hr) = 0.000 (by Contour) Multistage = n/a No No No TW Elev. (ft) = 0.00 Mole. Culver cWms are analyzed under Mtm (Ic) and audel (oc) oonbol Weir rfcros checked for orifice corWllWS (b:) and submer8enoe (s) stage (ft) Stage I Discharge Elev (ft) 2.00 249.00 1.80 248.80 1.60- 248.60 1.40 248.40 1 •20 248.20 1.00 248.00 0•80 247.80 0.60 247.60 0•ag 247.40 0.20 247.20 0•00 247.00 0.00 3.00 6.00 9.00 12.00 15.00 18.00 21.00 24.00 27.00 30.00 33.00 - Total 0 Discharge (cfs) Channel Report Hydraflow Express by InbeGsolve Friday, Aug 2 2013 Temporary Diversion Behind Lots 31 -33 - Bare Soil Triangular Highlighted Side Slopes (z:1) = 3.00, 3.00 Depth (ft) = 0.80 Total Depth (ft) = 1.00 Q (cfs) = 7.330 Area (sqft) = 1.92 Invert Elev (ft) = 100.00 Velocity (ftJs) = 3.82 Slope ( %) = 1.00 Wetted Perim (ft) = 5.06 N -Value = 0.020 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.83 Top Width (ft) = 4.80 Calculations EGL (ft) = 1.03 Compute by: Known Q Known Q (cfs) = 7.33 Elev (ft) 102.00 = 101.50 101.00 100.50 145 I� �l Section 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Reach (ft) Depth (ft) 2.00 1.50 1.00 i 0.50 0.00 -0.50 Channel Report Hydraflow Express by intellsoNe Friday, Aug 2 2013 Temporary Diversion Behind Lots 31 -33 - Vegetated Triangular Highlighted Side Slopes (z:1) = 3.00, 3.00 Depth (ft) = 0.98 Total Depth (ft) = 1.00 Q (cfs) = 7.330 Area (sqft) = 2.88 Invert Elev (ft) = 100.00 Velocity (ft/s) = 2.54 Slope ( %) = 1.00 Wetted Perim (ft) = 6.20 N -Value = 0.035 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 0.83 Top Width (ft) = 5.88 Calculations EGL (ft) = 1.08 Compute by: Known Q Known Q (cfs) = 7.33 Elev (ft) 102.00 —, 101.50 101.00 100.50 100.00 99.50 Section D 1 2 3 4 5 Reach (ft) 6 7 Depth (ft) 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 L-- -0.50 8 i i Channel Report Hydraflow Express by IntellsolVe Friday, Aug 2 2013 Temporary Diversion Along Road - Bare Soil Triangular Highlighted Side Slopes (z:1) = 3.00, 3.00 Depth (ft) = 0.66 Total Depth (ft) = 1.00 Q (ds) = 12.28 Area (sgft) = 1.31 Invert Elev (ft) = 100.00 Velocity (ft/s) = 9.40 Slope ( %) = 8.00 Wetted Perim (ft) = 4.17 N -Value = 0.020 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 1.00 Top Width (ft) = 3.96 Calculations EGL (ft) = 2.03 Compute by: Known Q Known Q (cfs) = 12.28 Elev (ft) 102.00 101.50 101.00 100.50 100.00 99.50 Section 1 2 3 4 Reach (ft) 5 6 7 Depth (ft) 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 1 -0.50 8 Channel Report Hydraflow Express by Intermolve Friday, Aug 2 2013 Temporary Diversion Along Road - Vegetated Triangular Highlighted Side Slopes (z:1) = 3.00, 3.00 Depth (ft) = 0.81 Total Depth (ft) = 1.00 Q (cfs) = 12.28 Area (sgft) = 1.97 Invert Elev (ft) = 100.00 Velocity (ftts) = 6.24 Slope ( %) = 8.00 Wetted Perim (ft) = 5.12 N -Value = 0.035 Crit Depth, Yc (ft) = 1.00 Top Width (ft) = 4.86 Calculations EGL (ft) = 1.42 Compute by: Known Q Known Q (cfs) = 12.28 Elev (ft) Section 102.00 101.50 101.00 100.50 100.00 99.50 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Reach (ft) Depth (ft) 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 -0.50 Skimmer Sediment Basin Worksheet (Drainage Area Must be Less Than 10 Acres) Area Disturbed = 2.93 Acres Runoff Area = 2.83 Acres Q10 =CXIXA = .3Sx74x2 -S _ 7 33 cfs Basin Volume Calculation: Volume of Sediment = ( 2 -83 Ac.) x (1800 cf sed. /year) x (1 year) o cf Assume Z foot of basin depth, therefore area of the pit Z—% Square Feet Try ( 3& wide) x (Z long) x ( Z foot deep) Sediment Basin Surface Area Calculation: Surface Area (SF) = Qjo x 325 sf /cfs 7 33 x 325 sf/cfs = 2 38 Z sf = 2 Z '> Zf 3� Z Surface Area - e& Use ( wide) x ( long) x ( foot deep) Sediment Basin Surface Area — Weir Design and Velocity Check: Q10 = 7. 33 cfs; Q = CLH3'2; H = [Q /CL]2/3 _ [ 33 / (2.68)( g' )12/3 Z feet Velocity Check 4 ( 7.33 )/( l5" ) ( 0.37- )= , $ fps, OK �/� 4W a `t 4sre $q (=J Skimmer Sediment Basin Worksheet (Drainage Area Must be Less Than t0 Acres) Area Disturbed = _ .�, g Acres Runoff Area =_ 2. Acres Qio = C x -I x A = .__3Sx _7.W x*.J?. tfZ. = 21-01 cfs Basin Volume Calculation: Volume of Sediment = La. (o$ Ac.) x (1800 cf sed. /year) x (1 year) cf Assume .foot of basin depth, therefore area of the pit _ Square Feet Try ( wide) x ( long) x ( - foo t deep).Sediment Basin Surface Area Calculation: Surface Area (SF) .= Qio x 325 sf /cfs = 21.8!J x 325 sf /cfs OS sf ON ? j"N S u rf a ce. Area — oil VISE f Z. 000 e F SM!p. -p6,e pt-Ad Use ( wide) x ( _ long) x (jam foot deep) Sediment Basin =1� Surface Area — O Mir Desinn and Velocity Chem Q10 = Z!. Of cfs; Q = CLH312 ; H = [Q /CL]2r3 2�-- 1'$ f / (2.68)( qg )i" _. 3 Z feet Velocity Check 4 ( ?f.61 1/( ) (0•32- ) _ /. $2 fps, OK d3"A✓ C M o VI Rl h � N � a O c � m N y r 0 N_ LI STAEDTLER® No. 937 811 E Engineer's Computation Pad O T a a C N Pr ' N r1l ,� N t11 d o Iii ---. fr f �'b fk i5 N C P r �9 16 C� 0 0 km 1 h v O T a n d� n 10 z N w N d .9 STigEDTLER9 No. 937 811 E Engineer's Computation Pad j 1 u � � J A N n Permit Number: (to beprov(ded byDWQ) Drainage Area Number. Bioretention Operation and Maintenance Agreement I will keep a maintenance record on this BMP. This maintenance record will be kept in a log in a known set location. Any deficient BMF elements noted in the inspection will be corrected, repaired or replaced immediately. These deficiencies can affect the integrity of structures, safety of the public, and the removal efficiency of the BUR Important operation and maintenance procedures: - Immediately after the bioretention cell is established, the plants will be watered twice weekly if needed until the plants become established (commonly six weeks). - Snow, mulch or any other material will NEVER be piled on the surface of the bioretention cell. - Heavy equipment will NEVER be driven over the bioretention cell. - Special care will be taken to prevent sediment from entering the bioretention cell. - Once a year, a soil test of the soil media will be conducted. After the bioretention cell is established, I will inspect it once a month and within 24 hours after every storm event greater than 1.0 inches (or 1.5 inches if in a Coastal County). Records of operation and maintenance will be kept in a known set location and will be available upon request. Inspection activities shall be performed as follows. Any problems that are found shall be repaired immediately. BMP element: Potential problems: How I will remediate the blew: The entire BMP Trash debris is present Remove the trash debris. The perimeter of the bioretention cell Areas of bare soil and /or erosive gallies have formed. Regrade the soil if necessary to remove the gully, and then plant a ground cover and water until it is established. Provide lime and a one -time fertilizer applkation. The inlet device: pipe, stone verge or swale The pipe is clogged (if a licable ). Unclog the pipe. Dispose of the sediment off -site. The pipe is cracked or otherwise damaged (if Replace the pipe. a likable). Erosion is occurring in the Swale (if applicable). Regrade the Swale if necessary to smooth it over and provide erosion control devices such as reinforced turf matting or riprap to avoid future problems with erosion. Stone verge is dogged or covered in sediment (if Remove sediment and clogged scone and replace with dean stone . applicable). Form SW401 Bioretention O&M -Rev.3 Page 1 of 4 BMP element: Potential problems: How I will remedlate the problem: The pretreatment area Flow is bypassing Regrade if necessary to route all pretreatment area and /or flow to the pretreatment area. gullies have formed. Restabilime the area after Sediment has accumulated to Search for the source of the a depth greater than three sediment and remedy the problem if inches. possible. Remove the sediment and 1 P1 labilize the pTebreat meirt area. Erosion has occurred. Provide additional erosion protection such as reinforced turf matting or Aprap if needed to prevent future erosion problems, Weeds are present. Remove the weeds, preferably by hand. The bloretention cell: vegetation Best professional practices show that pruning is needed Prune according to best professional practices. to maintain optimal plant health. Plants are dead, diseased or dying. Determine the source of the problem: soils, hydrology, disease, etc. Remedy the problem and replace plants. Provide a one -time fertilizer application to establish the ground cover if a soil test indicates it is Tree stakes /wires are present Remove tree stake /wires (which six months after planting. can kill the tree if not removed ). The bloretention cell: souls and mulch Mulch is breaking down or has floated away. Spot mulch if there are only random void areas. Replace whole mulch layer if necessary. Remove the remaining much and replace with triple shredded hard wood mulch at a maximum depth of three inches. Soils and /or mulch are clogged with sediment. Determine the extent of the clogging - remove and replace either just the top layers or the entire media as needed. Dispose of the spoil in an appropriate off -site location. Use triple shredded hard wood mulch at a maximum depth of three inches. Search for the source of the sediment and remedy the problem if asible. An annual soil test shows that pH has dropped or heavy Dolomitic lime shah be applied as recommended per the soil test and metals have accumulated in toxic soils shall be removed, the soil media. disposed of properly and replaced with new Lknhn media. Form SW401 Hioretention O&M -Rev.3 Page 2 of 4 BMP element: Potential Problems: How Y will remediate the blew The underdrain system if a licable clogging has occurred. Wash out the underdrain system. The drop Inlet Clogging has occurred. Clean out the drop inlet. Dispose of the sediment off -site. Thedrop inlet is damaged Repair or replace the drop inlet. The receiving water Erosion or other signs of Contact the NC Division of Water damage have occurred at the Quality 401 Oversight Unit at 919. outlet. 733 -1786. Form SW401- 13ioretedion O&M -Rev.3 Page 3 of 4 Permit Number. (to be provided by DWQ) acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of the maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any problems with the system or prior to any changes to the system or responsible party. Project name:Flowers Plantation Pod NW 8- Phase 2 BMW drainage area number:NA Print name:Rebecca Flowers Title:Owner / Developer Address:4880 NC 42 East. Clayton, NC 27520 Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless more than 50'/0 of the lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been named the president. I, //? a Notary Public for the State of �a44. Cara 1; .,,c• , County of A A s (, , do hereby certify that FA(o,e c r s F /a'.3 'r s personally appeared before me this 7 day of &G x + , 201 3. and ackmowledge the due execution of the forgoing bioretention maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and official seal, ;00 JOIA 0- .mot•, � �� SEAL My commission expires /-z / s Form SW401- Bioreimfion I&M -Rev. 2 Page 4 of 4