20091155 Ver 2_401 Application_20130813

mates C�esi n Inc.
00ronment;ol Qesign & Consulting
August 12, 2013
Ms. Jennifer Burdette
N.C. Division of Water Quality
Wetlands and Stormwater Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC, 27699 -1617
RE: Non- 404 Isolated Wetland Permit Renewal
Birmingham 54 acre Parcel
6701 Old Plank Rd.
Charlotte NC 28216
Dear Ms. Burdette,
Lo9 -k\ss v a-
et ► -- -!
Due to the recent economic conditions these impacts did not occur during the permit
period.
I have enclosed 5 copies of a PCN Application Form along with 5 copies of plan
sheets (2ea full size and 3ea 11x17), exhibits, maps and a check for $240.00.
This is a non -404 renewal application for 0.275 acres of impacts to isolated wetlands.
I spoke with Mr. Alan Johnson who is familiar with the project and is expecting the
application package
If you have any questions, please contact me at 704.841.1779, or cell 704.400.1483.
Sincerely,
Christopher J. Estes, RLA, ASLA AUG 1 3 2013
President.
• P.O. Box 79133 Charlotte, N.C. 28271 -7050 • Phone [phone] Fax [phone] •

o�ot WAr�
O�
o <
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑ Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number. NA or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ® Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment Into a mitigation bank or in4leu fee program proposed for
mitigation of Impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or In -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project
Birmingham Parcel
2b. County:
Mecklenburg County
2c. Nearest municipality /town:
Charlotte
2d. Subdivision name:
NA
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
NA
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Bill Birmingham
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
26-156
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC If
applicable):
Bill Birmingham
3d. Street address:
6 Rosemary St
3e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh NC 27607
3f. Telephone no.:
919 -832 -1308
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form -Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Owner same as above
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. Cfty, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Christopher J. Estes
5b. Business name
(If applicable):
Estes Design Inc.
5c. Street address:
515 Pembroke Dr.
5d. City, state, zip:
Waxhaw NC 28173
5e. Telephone no.:
704.841.1779
5f. Fax no.:
704.841.1842
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

S. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
03512116
1b. Site coordinates (In decimal degrees):
I Latitude: 35.29 Longitude: 80.91
1c. Property size:
54 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Gum Branch tributary to Lake Wylie
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
Catawba
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use In the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site has been logged in the past 10 years. The site is zoned Industrial surrounded by commercial and residential
3b. Ust the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.275 isolated & 0.09 U.S
3c. Ust the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 2,840
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
site grading in preparation for development at an undetermined time In the future
3e. Describe the overall project In detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
bulldozer, tradchoe. Mass grading.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
ro ect (Includina all prior phases) In the past?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ preliminary ® Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (If known):
Agency /Consultant Company:
Other. Estes Design Inc.
4d. If yes, listthe dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Site was reviewed by Alan Johnson on 09.16.09 for isolated wetland status
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) In the past?
L Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to 'help file" instructions. p _ 1 ` 5 5
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
Currently the site is only being graded. No development plan has been done at this time
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland Impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland Impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
Impact
(acres)
W 1 P
Fill
Seep
Yes
DWQ
0.257
W2 P
F01
Seep
Yes
DW4
0.018
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
YeslNo
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
YeslNo
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
YeslNo
-
VV6 -
Choose one
Choose one
YeslNo
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.275
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream Impacts (including temporary Impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
Intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g•
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S 1 -
Choose one
-
-
S2 -
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
31. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed Impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then Individually list all open water Impacts below.
4a.
Open water
Impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of Impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of Impact (acres)
O1 -
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If Pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
51. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will Impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then Individually list all buffer Impacts
below. If any Impacts require mitigation. then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Nauss ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other.
6b.
Buffer Impact
number—
Permanent (P) or
Tom porary (T)
6c.
Reason for Impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
Impact
(square
feet )
6g.
Zone 2
Impact
(square
feet
B1
Yes/No
B2 -
YesMo
B3 -
YeslNo
B4 -
YeslNo
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
61. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed Impacts in designing project
Grading limits remain outside all of the stream buffers. AD streams have been avokied.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed Impacts through construction techniques.
A sediment and erosion control plan has been developed. Sediment basins will be installed prior to any major grading.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation Is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete If Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete If Maki na a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in4leu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete If Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. WIII the project result In an Impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identity the square feet of Impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for Impact
6d.
Total Impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation Is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
pennittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment Into an approved In4leu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project Include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers Identifled
❑ Yes
® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent Imperviousness of this project?
na %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes
❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Currently no formal deve4 ment plan is anticipated in the near future.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. CertMed Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local ovemment's iurisdieflon is this project?
® Phase 11
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally - Implemented stonnwater management programs
USMP
apply (check all that apply):
Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other.
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes
❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HOW
4a. Which of the following state- Implemented stormwater management programs apply
ORW
(check all that apply):
HSesslon Law
2006 -246
❑Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes
❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes
❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project Involve an expenditure of public (federallstatellocal) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
Oyes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA /SEPA)?
1c. If you answered 'yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetiand Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ® No
2c. If you answered `yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future Impacts) result in
Oyes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative Impact analysis In accordance with the
most recent DWO policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
MunAple
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
© Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes 0 No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes Q No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
CAS DOS
i / 3
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
A ' nt/ gent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

Agh
NCDETJR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
November 10, 2009
DWQ# 09 -1155
Mecklenburg County
John D. Birmingham
3636 Green Farm Lane
Wake Forest NC 27587
Subject: Birmingham Parcel, Tax ID #03512116
APPROVAL of Isolated Wetlands Permit with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Birmingham:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place permanent fill in 0.275
acre of isolated wetland in Mecklenburg County, as described in your application received by the Division of
Water Quality on October 28, 2009. Please note that you should get any other federal, state or local permits
before proceeding with your project, including those required by (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion
Control, Non - Discharge, and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you
change your project, you must notify us in writing, and you may be required to send us a new application for a
new certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the Certification and
approval letter; and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions.
In addition to the requirements of the certification, you must also comply with the following conditions
1. The Mooresville Regional Office shall be notified in writing once construction at the approved impact areas
has commenced.
2. Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained jurisdictional wetlands, waters and
protective buffers in order to assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer impact. These
mechanisms shall be put in place at the time of recording of the property, or of individual lots, whichever is
appropriate. A sample deed notification can be downloaded from the 401/Wetlands Unit web site at
http:// h2o.enr.state.nc.us /ncwetlands. The text of the sample deed notification may be modified as
appropriate to suit to this project.
3. Storm water discharge structures at this site shall be constructed in a manner such that the potential
receiving streams (of the discharge) will not be impacted due to sediment accumulations, scouring or
erosion of the stream banks.
4. Prior to construction of any buildings/facilities, a final written storm water management plan (including
a signed and notarized Operation and Maintenance Agreement) shall be submitted to the 401 Oversight
Mooresville Regional Office One
Location: 610 East Center Avenue, Sude 301, Mooresville, NC 28115 NO Carolina
Phone: [phone]Fax: [phone] Customer Service: 1 -877- 623 -6748. atura!!�
Internet: www.ncwateraualitv.org

and Express Permitting Unit (2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250, Raleigh, NC, 27604 or local governing
authority) . The storm water management plans shall be approved in writing by this Office (or local
delegated authority, copy of plan and approval letter submitted to DWQ). You have the option of using the
Express Review Program for expedited approval of these plans. If you propose to use the Express Review
Program, remember to include the appropriate fee with the plan. The storm water management plan must
include construction plans, specifications, storm water BMP worksheets, and supporting calculations. The
storm water best management practices are required to be appropriate for the surface water classification
and designed to remove at least 85% TSS according to the most recent version of the NC DENR Storm
water Best Management Practices Manual. These facilities must be designed to treat the runoff from the
entire project, unless otherwise explicitly approved by the Division of Water Quality. Also, before any
permanent building is occupied at the subject site, the facilities (as approved by this Office or local
delegated authority) shall be constructed and operational, and the storm water management plan (as
approved by this Office or local delegated authority) shall be implemented. The structural stone water
practices as approved by this Office as well as drainage patterns must be maintained in perpetuity. No
changes to the structural storm water practices shall be made without written authorisation from the
Division of Water Quality.
5. No waste, spoil, solids, or till of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the
footprint of the impacts depicted in the Preconstruction Notification application. All construction activities
associated with this project shall meet, and/or exceed, those requirements specified in the most recent
version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual and shall be conducted so that no
violations of state water quality standards, statutes, or rules occur.
6. Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum extent
practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable,
they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within two months of the date the Division of Land
Resources has released the project.
7. Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certificate of-
Completion" form to the 401NVetlands Unit of the NC Division of Water Quality.
8. Continuing Compliance. The applicant (John D Birmingham) shall conduct all activities in a manner so as
not to contravene any state water quality standard (including any requirements for compliance with section
303(d) of the Clean Water Act) and any other appropriate requirements of state and federal law. If DWQ
determines that such standards or laws are not being met (including the failure to sustain a designated or
achieved use) or that state or federal law is being violated, or that further conditions are necessary to
assure compliance, DWQ may reevaluate and modify this certification to include conditions appropriate to
assure compliance with such standards and requirements in accordance with 15 A NCAC 2H.0507(d).
Before codifying the certification, DWQ shall notify the applicant and the US Army Corps of Engineers,
provide public notice in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0503, and provide opportunity for public hearing in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0504. Any new or revised conditions shall be provided to the applicant in
writing, shall be provided to the United States Army Corps of Engineers for reference in any permit issued
pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and shall also become conditions of the 404 Permit for the
project.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing.
You must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written
petition that conforms to Chapter 1508 of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699 -6714. This certification and its conditions are final
and binding unless you ask for a hearing.

This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
If you have any questions, please telephone Mr. Alan Johnson in the Mooresville Regional Office at 704 -663-
1699 or Ms. Cyndi Karoly in the Central Office in Raleigh 919 - 733 -9721.
Sincerely,
forColeen H. Sullins
Attachments
cc: Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville
Ian McMillan, Wetlands Unit
Chris Estes, Estes Design

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. 200901980 County: Mecklenburg U.S.G.S. Quad: Charlotte West
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner /Agent: Mr. John D. Blrmingham
Address: 3636 Green Farm Ln.
Wake Forest. NC 27587
Telephone No.:
Property description:
Size (acres) ?4 Nearest Town Homestead community: near Charlotte
Nearest Waterway Gum Branch River Basin Catawba
USGS HUC Coordinates N 35.2919 W - 80.9067
Location description Birmingham 54 acre Parcel located at 6701 Old Plank Road
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetland on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified
by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed
and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA
jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed five years.
X The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on H/164009. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.

The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Washington, NC, at (252) 946 -6481 to determine
their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Steve Chapin at (8281271 -7980 x224.
C. Basis For Determination
Gum Branch >Lake Wylie which is a Section 10 navi¢ able -in -fact waterway.
D. Remarks
Please note that impacts to isolated waters on the property must be approved by the NCDENR - Division of Water
Ouality. Please contact Mr. Alan Johnson at (7041663 -1699 to obtain that approval
E. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn:Steve Chapin, Project Manager,
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 -5006
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 1/1612010.
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence."
Corps Regulatory Official: 5 "�
Date 11/16/2009 Expiration Date 11/1612014
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to
do so, please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit
hgR://www.saw.usace.army.mil/WETLANDS/index.htmi to complete the survey online.

ESUM Des1 n Inc.
«�PbrQi1$:A11�J1f�11q�
Agent Certification Of Authorization
Of Address:
•
do hereby certify that 1 have authorized Estes Design Inc. environmental design and
consulting to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing,
Issuance and acceptance of the Mecklenburg Co. parcel 003512116 Project 404 permit
and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
This form is a requirement of the USACE for requesting a USACE Jurisdictional
Determination and 404 application.
We hereby certify the above infotmahon submitted in this tion is true and accurate to Me
best of our knowledge.
AIN
plicant's signature s gnature
D -t .l t
Date Date
• P.O. Box 79133 Chw1otte, N.C. 28271 -7050 • Phone / Fax [phone] •

Location Map
Estes Design Inc.
cavi(oalmoutal Qviksa & Coaaulting
POB 79133 Charlotte NC, 29271
Office 704.841.1779 Fax [phone]
Birmingham Parcel
Charlotte, NC
Scoping Exhibits

GIS Aerial
Estes Des an M.
Euviiu wMeatat Uesiun & consulting
POB 79133 Charlotte NC, 29271
Office 704.841.1779 Fax [phone]
Birmingham Parcel
Charlotte, NC
Scoping Exhibits

Mecklenburg County GIS
Water Quality Buffers
Estes D i n Inc,
nvirQnmeatal Qesi�n & CQnstt100940%%
POB 79133 Charlotte NC, 29271
Office 704.841.1779 Fax [phone]
Birmingham Parcel
Charlotte, NC
Scoping Exhibits

z
a
J
ao.S W aD.iLylw — A.11M1w RRU.tnW ML.JnW
84550 w 8454450 W 804440 w 80.5430 w 8654 -20 w 845410 W
Estes �1 111,
Eaviroawntal Oesigu & @vnsultin�
POB 79133 Charlotte NC, 29271
Office 704.841.1779 Fax [phone]
National Wetlands Inventory Map
Birmingham Parcel
Charlotte, NC
Scoping Exhibits
t
=
Ohb rwl scan
u.
..1
,� Inbntate
Major Roads
0m.r wow
A,. Imr.Y[.
r
if3t
-'
/8
Ijjl
r USGSOuad Mlda.24K
L—, as w.11.M PoyO
f.—.4 MarM De. .
N
GlunMw .nd M..1ne YNl d
r...R.r.r.[m«a..l vwn a,. ea
North
Car a
-- FneaaaMr.ena
Z
MDUnta'
Island
11
in R « r
LOMI IS Avsil.Ol. wetbnd DFb
%w'aN .l
0ia..1
ji
I
y
a""
NMD Streams
ZCw.ti.s
100K
rued%
�•
0 Stal.. 100K
1
�. NoIM Anwnu
99i
n � i
l
= I
84550 w 8454450 W 804440 w 80.5430 w 8654 -20 w 845410 W
Estes �1 111,
Eaviroawntal Oesigu & @vnsultin�
POB 79133 Charlotte NC, 29271
Office 704.841.1779 Fax [phone]
National Wetlands Inventory Map
Birmingham Parcel
Charlotte, NC
Scoping Exhibits
=
Ohb rwl scan
..1
,� Inbntate
Major Roads
0m.r wow
A,. Imr.Y[.
r
r USGSOuad Mlda.24K
L—, as w.11.M PoyO
f.—.4 MarM De. .
N
GlunMw .nd M..1ne YNl d
r...R.r.r.[m«a..l vwn a,. ea
M?, F�..M.MI ForNwdlSlrnA w .d
-- FneaaaMr.ena
Z
Y lab
4° Olh«
in R « r
LOMI IS Avsil.Ol. wetbnd DFb
%w'aN .l
0ia..1
lle 0.n
y
a""
NMD Streams
ZCw.ti.s
100K
0 Stal.. 100K
❑ South Am4rlu
�. NoIM Anwnu
84550 w 8454450 W 804440 w 80.5430 w 8654 -20 w 845410 W
Estes �1 111,
Eaviroawntal Oesigu & @vnsultin�
POB 79133 Charlotte NC, 29271
Office 704.841.1779 Fax [phone]
National Wetlands Inventory Map
Birmingham Parcel
Charlotte, NC
Scoping Exhibits

NC NHP Quad Search Results
New Search
Returned Elements: 13 using: LAKE WYLIE
[Animal Assemblage 1 ] [Natural Community 51 [Vascular Plant 71
Maior Group
Animal
Scientific Name
Colonial Wading Bird Colony
Common Name
None
Assemblage
Quad Status
M--
Natural
Basic oak — hickory forest
None
Community
-
Habitat
Natural
Dry -mesic oak— hickory forest
None
Community
Lake Wylie- Currend
Link
Natural
hfesic mixed hardwood forest (piedmont
None
Community
subtype)
Link
Natural
None
S5
Community
Wand depression swamp forest
None
Natural
None
S4
Community
Xeric hardpan forest
None
Vascular Plant
Acmispon helien
Carolina Birdfoot- trefot
Vascular Plant
Cirsium carolinianum
Carolina Thistle
Vascular Plant
Echinocea loevigato
Smooth Coneflower
Vascular Plant
Helianthus schweinitni
Schweintz's Sunflower
Vascular Plant
Pseudognaphahum helleri
Heller's Rabbt- Tobacco
Vascular Plant
Silphium terebinthrnaceum
Prairie Dock
Vascular Plart
Symphyotrichum georgianum
Georgia Aster
INC NHP database updated on: Sunday, August 2nd, 2009.
Search performed on Friday, 4 September 2009 @ 10:58 00 EDST
Explanation of Codes
Estes Deli Ina.
avir�nmeatal t]�sign & Consulting
POB 79133 Charlotte INC, 29271
Office 704.841.1779 Fax [phone]
State
Federal
state
Global
Quad Status
M--
2d a
Bak
1321:111
-
Habitat
None
None
S3
05
Lake Wylie- Currend
Link
None
None
S3
G4
Lake Wylie- Current
Link
None
None
S5
G5
Lake W"e- Current
Link
None
None
S4
GSTS
Lake Wylie - Current
Link
None
None
S3
03
Lake Wylie- Current
Link
None
None
S3
G3G4
Lake Wylie- Current
Link
SR -T
FSC
S3
03
Lake Wylie- Current
Link
SR -P
None
S2
05
Lake Wylie- Current
Link
E -SC
E
S1
0203
Lace Wylie - Curren
Link
E
E
S3
G3
Lake Wylie- Current
Link
SR -P
None
S3
0304
Lake Wylie - Current
Link
SR -P
None
S2
G405
Lake Wylie - Historical
Link
T
C
S2
02G3
Lace Wylie - Current
Link
NC Natural Heritage
Threatened and Endangered Species
Birmingham Parcel
Charlotte, NC
Scoping Exhibits

x
Hey (t?C+F3
�F ,✓' Ge1)2 ,
EnB Ce0 r t7 ,t r, ` File
Wk
r � LL
1 ! ^V
i 1
t
co
tti
t;t*D
s ,..
CL
mac' u. C
C ', C'%fittrt'rltf('
CUB � � Efib fit- "Nc1`11r .1Ir
HeD M0 v
y eB2
Qf f
Ur Eni, cof-3 water
4
Y p
_ -
Oki 7 -
_. �i.. He 1-1) l.tr.# TTT
Map Unit Legend (Birmingham Parcel j
Soil Survey of Mecklenburg County North Carolina
USDA, 1977
Estes Oes1a� ne. Birmingham Parcel
Charlotte, NC
EnvirQnmental Qeaisn & Consulting
POB 79133 Charlotte NC, 29271 Scoping Exhibits
Office 704.841.1779 Fax [phone]
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (NC119)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Ce82 Cecil sandy clay foam, 2 to 8 percent 24.6 45.9 °r6
slopes, eroded
CeD2 Cecil sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 8.4 15.7%
percent slopes, eroded
MO Monacan loam 5.6 10.59+0
PaF Pacolet sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent 4.8 8.9%
slopes
VJ Water 1.8 3.3 °!°
VVkD Wilkes loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes 1.8 3.3%
VI'kF Wilkes
loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes
6.6
12.3%
Totals for Area of Interest
53.6
100.0%

-�r
•.I
[L C.ir
Identify A Map Layer
tF :eV o� +.:f� -..��
Pick a map layer from the drop-down
box below. Their click on the map to obtahj�,
specific point.
t
� ...xt
�Nll--lj}}��l §i �� CQ> � ��t♦
�
�,
� ` ���� ■spy,
y _
--
/
s�Apys. t r. �.,. —'m'� �✓,�• :�,J.µJI+
rlrA/R IF
rIQ ON
Estes Desion Irm
Birmingham Parcel
i
Charlotte, NC
/;
POB 79133 Charlotte NC, 29271
Regulated
• - 1 1•

Estes Qesi ln(x
P* r F- e . , PqW n Consuiunp,
Project Name: Birmingham Parcel - 6701 Old Plank Rd. - # 03512116
Project No.: 0904 Sample No.: I
Date: 9.14.2009 By: CJE
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Do Normal Circumstances exist on site? ® No Community 1D:
Upland of WA
Have vegetation, sods, or hydrology been disturbed? Yes Field Map No.:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
'EGETATION (Note those species observed to have momholoeical adaptations to wetlands with a *
Dominant Plant Species Stratum
Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum t
FAC
9.
2. Ligustrum inensis s
FAC
10.
3. Liriodendron tulipifera t
FAC
11.
4. Liquidambarstyriciflua t
FAC+
12.
5. Corpus Florida t
FACU
13.
6. Rubus sps h
NA
14.
7.
15.
8.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(except FAC -). Include species noted ( *) as showing
morphological adaptations to wetlands. 3/6 = 50%
Describe Morphological Adaptations:
Remarks:
No Saturated soils present
HYDROLOGY
_Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
-x—Aerial Photographs
_ Other
No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: 0 -6" (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.)
Remarks:
Dry
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water- Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Other (Explain in Remarks)

SOILS
Map Unit Name:
Pacelot - PaE
Drainage Class:
B
Taxonomy
Field Observations
(Subgroup):
Clayey, kaolinitic, thermic Typic
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes: No: X
Hapludults
Profile Descnotion:
Matrix Color
Mottle Colors
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Depth (mcbes)
Honzon
(Munsell Moist)
(Munsell Moist)
Abundance /Contrast Rhizospheres. etc.
0-3
Al
IOYR 3/2
none
none
3 -12
B3
2.5YR 4/6
2.5YR 4/8
common
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Concretions
Histic Epipedon
High Organic Content in Surface Layer
Sulfidic Odor
Organic Streaking
Aquic Moisture Regime
Listed in Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions
Listed on National Hydric Soils Lists
Gleyed or Low -Chroma Colors
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
No hydric indicators
LVAallIlWXIQi]ailliAa to- Y 11Z
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ® No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes Ed
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Rd
It
Remarks:
This sample was taken in an upland

Estes files[ ' Inca, Project Name: Birmingham Parcel – 6701 Old Plank Rd. - # 03512116
FUMM Mental "Itp 4 Comultlnq Project No.: 0904 Sample No.: 1
Date: 10.27.2009 By: CJE
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Do Normal Circumstances exist on site? ® No Community ID: Wetland WA
Have vegetation, soils, or hydrology been disturbed? Yes Field Map No.: 1
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ® Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
V L' UL l A 1 JUN (Note those species observed to have morphological adaptations to wetlands with a
Dominant Plant Species
Stratum
Indicator
1. Alnus Serrulata
s
FACW
2. Acer rubrum
t
FAC
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
t
FACW
4. Carex sp
h
FAC
S. Microstegium vimineum
h
FAC+
6. Liquidambar styriciva
t
FAC+
7. Quercus phellos
t
FACW-
8.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(except FAC -). Include species noted (') as
showing
morphological adaptations to wetlands.
100%
Describe Morphological Adaptations:
Remarks:
AYDROLOGN
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
_Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
_x_Aerial Photographs
—Other
No Recorded Data Available
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 inches
X Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: 0 -6" (in.)
X Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
X Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.)
Water- Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: (in.)
X Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Water is visible in the many crayfish chimneys that range from 4 " -8" in height

SOILS
Map Unit Name.
Pacelot - PaE
Drainage Class:
B
Taxonomy
Field Observations
(Subgroup):
Clayey, kaolinitic, thermic
Typic
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes: No: X
Hapludults
Profile Description:
Matrix Color
Mottle Colors
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Depth (inches)
Horizon
(Munsell Moist)
(Munsell Moist)
Abundance /Contrast Rhizosoheres. etc.
0-3
Al
10YR 4/2
7.5 YR 6/5
Common Distinct
3 -12
B3
2.5YR 4/4
7.5YR 7/3
Many /Prominent
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
X
Concretions
Histic Epipedon
High Organic Content in Surface Layer
X
Sulfidic Odor
Organic Streaking
X
Aquic Moisture Regime
Listed in Local Hydric Soils List
X
Reducing Conditions
Listed on National Hydric Soils Lists
X
Gleyed or Low - Chroma Colors
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Saturated soils
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ® No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ®e No
Hydric Soils Present? ® No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ® No
Remarks:

Estes Design lncL
gnvlmnmenW p"p 4 Consulting
Project Name: Birmingham Parcel — 6701 Old Plank Rd. - # 03512116
Project No.: 0904 Sample No.: 6
Date: 9.12.09
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
By: cje
Do Normal Circumstances exist on site? Yes ® Community ID: Upland WB
Have vegetation, soils, or hydrology been disturbed? ® No Field Map No.: 1
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ® Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION (Note those species observed to have morphological adaptations to wetlands with a *)
Dominant Plant Species Stratum
Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Smilax h
fac
9.
2. Sedge sp. IT
fac
10.
3. Rubus Species h
fac
11.
4. Solidago sp. h
facu
12.
5.
13.
6.
14.
7.
15.
8.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(except FAC -). Include species noted ( *) as showing
morphological adaptations to wetlands. 0/4
Describe Morphological Adaptations:
Remarks:
The area has been logged
HYDROLOGY
_Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
X Aerial Photographs
_Other
No Recorded Data Available
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: (in.)
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >15
Water - Stained Leaves
fin.)
Local Soil Survey Data
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 15 (in.)
Remarks: This sample was taken above the upper limits of the wetland. The area has been logged with woody debris scattered about the sight.

SOILS
Map Unit Name:
Cecil Clay Loam
Drainage Class:
good
Taxonomy
Field Observations
(Subgroup):
Typic Kanhapludults
Confirm Mapped Type? ye j: No:
Profile Description:
Matrix Color
Mottle Colors
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Depth (inches)
Horizon
(Munsell Moist)
(Munsell Moist)
Abundance/Contrast Rhizospheres, etc.
4
A
2.5YR 4/8
NA
4 -20
B
2.5YR 4/6
7.5YR 6/8
Common /distinct
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Concretions
Histic Epipedon
High Organic Content in Surface Layer
Sulfidic Odor
Organic Streaking
Aquic Moisture Regime
Listed in Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions
Listed on National Hydric Soils Lists
Gleyed or Low -Chroma Colors
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Little mottleing but not Hydric.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Remarks:
Sample was taken in an upland area.

Estes Ian n lnc.
piwo in"tal Qesign 8ygonsulting1 wk-w
Project Name: Birmingham Parcel – 6701 Old Plank Rd. - # 03512116
Project No.: 0904 Sample No.: 5
Date: 9.12.09
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
By: cje
Do Normal Circumstances exist on site? Yes ® Community ID: Wetland WB
Have vegetation, soils, or hydrology been disturbed? Ye No Field Map No.: I
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ® Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION (Note those species observed to have morphological adaptations to wetlands with a
Dominant Plant Species Stratum
Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
I . Asclepias incarnate s
obl
9.
2 Eupatorium h
facw-
10.
3 Juncus effusus h
facw
11.
4. Sedge sp. h
facw
12.
5 Rubus Species h
fac
13.
6.
14.
7.
15.
8.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(except FAC -). Include species noted ( *) as showing
morphological adaptations to wetlands. 515 =100%
Describe Morphological Adaptations:
Remarks:
The area has been logged.
HYDROLOGY
_Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
X Aerial Photographs
—Other
— No Recorded Data Available
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: (in.)
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 9" (in.)
Water- Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 2" (in.)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: This area is catching surface flow from the surrounding logged landscape

SOILS
Map Unit Name:
Cecil Clay Loam
Drainage Class:
good
Taxonomy
Field Observations
(Subgroup):
Typtc Kanhapludults
Confirm Mapped Type? ®: No:
Profile Descrinnon:
Matrix Color
Mottle Colors
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
,QUth (inches)
Horizon
( Mansell Moist)
(Mansell Moist)
Abundance /Contrast Rhizowheres. etc.
6
B2
2.5YR 4/6
7.5 YR 6/5
Common/distinct
6-12
B3
2.5YR 4/4
7.5YR 7/3
Many prominent
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Concretions
Histic Epipedon
High Organic Content in Surface Layer
Sulfidic Odor
x
Organic Streaking
x
Aqutc Moisture Regime
Listed in Local Hydric Soils List
x
Reducing Conditions
Listed on National Hydric Soils Lists
x
Gleyed or Low -Chroma Colors
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION

Estes Oesign ln(,
Owlionmental P"gn & Con9uM
Project Name: Birmingham Parcel – 6701 Old Plank Rd. - # 03512116
Project No.: 0904 Sample No.: 2
Date: 9.14.2009 By:
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Do Normal Circumstances exist on site? Yes ® Community 1D: Upland WC
Have vegetation, soils, or hydrology been disturbed? ® No Field Map No.: I
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ® Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
VEGETATION (Note those species observed to have morphological ada tauons to wetlands with a
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Smilax h fac
9.
2. Sedge sp h fac
10.
3. Rubus Species h fac
IL
4.
12.
5.
13.
6.
14.
7.
15.
8.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(except FAC -). Include species noted ( *) as showing
morphological adaptations to wetlands.
Describe Morphological Adaptations:
Remarks:
The area has been logged
HYDROLOGY
_Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
X Aerial Photographs
—mar
No Recorded Data Available
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: (in.)
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >15
Water - Stained Leaves
iin.)
Local Soil Survey Data
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 15 (in.)
Remarks: This sample was taken above the upper limits of the wetland. The area has been maintained as a power right -of -way and is adjacent to Lake
Norman.

SOILS
Map Unit Name:
Cecil Clay Loam
Drainage Class:
good
Taxonomy
Field Observations
(Subgroup):
Typic Kanhapludults
Confirm Mapped Type? ®: No:
Profile Description:
Matrix Color
Mottle Colors
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
DMAh (inches)
Horizon
(Munsell Moist)
(Mansell Moist)
Abundance/Contrast Rhizospheres. etc.
4
A
2.5YR 4/8
NA
4-20
B
2.5YR 4/6
7.5YR 6/8
Common /distinct
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Concretions
Histic Epipedon
High Organic Content in Surface Layer
Sulfidic Odor
Organic Streaking
Aquic Moisture Regime
Listed in Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions
Listed on National Hydric Soils Lists
Gleyed or Low -Chroma Colors
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Little mottleing but not Hydric.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes
Hydric Soils Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Remarks:
Sample was taken in an upland area.

Estes Qesl - n tn(L
fnvimnmental Pesip &Consulting
Project Name: Birmingham Parcel – 6701 Old Plank Rd. - # 03512116
Project No.: 0904 Sample No.: 3
Date: 9.14.2009 By: cje
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Do Normal Circumstances exist on site? ® No Community ID: Wetland WC
Have vegetation, soils, or hydrology been disturbed? Yes Field Map No.: 1
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes ® Plot ID:
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
V VUL I A l WIN ( Note those species observed to have morphological adaptations to wetlands with a
Dominant Plant Species Stratum
Indicator
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Juncus effasus h
FACW
9.
2. Sedge sp. h
FACW
10.
3. Rubus Species h
FAC
11.
4. Alnus Serrulata t
FACW
12.
5. Liquidambar styriciva t
FAC+
13.
6. Onclea sensibilis L h
FACW
14.
7.
15.
8.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC
(except FAC -). Include species noted ( *) as showing
morphological adaptations to wetlands.
5/6 = 83%
Describe Morphological Adaptations:
Remarks:
The area is located adjacent to an upland Pond
ff"RM.mv
_Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
_Stream, Lake, or Tide Gage
X Aerial Photographs
—Other
No Recorded Data Available
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Inundated
X Saturated in Upper 12 inches
X Water Marks
X Drift Lines
X Sediment Deposits
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water: (m.)
7C Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 9" (in.)
Water - Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 2" (in.)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Areas within the delineated boundary are inundated. This sample was taken at the upper limits of the wetland. The area has been maintained as
a power right -of -way and is adjacent to Lake Norman. There are drainage patterns within the wetland that drain to the lake and mouth of Reed's Creek

SOILS
Map Unit Name:
Cecil Clay Loam
Drainage Class:
good
Taxonomy
Field Observations
(Subgroup):
Typic Kanhapludults
Confirm Mapped Type? ©: No:
Profile Description:
Matrix Color
Mottle Colors
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
Depth (inches)
Horizon
(Mansell Moist)
( Munsell Moist)
Abundance /Contrast Rhizospheres. etc.
6
B2
2.5YR 416
7.5 YR 6/5
Common/distinct
6-12
B3
2.5YR 4/4
7.5YR 7/3
Many prominent
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Concretions
Histic Epipedon
High Organic Content in Surface Layer
Sulfidic Odor
x
Organic Streaking
x
Aquic Moisture Regime
Listed in Local Hydric Soils List
x
Reducing Conditions
Listed on National Hydric Soils Lists
x
Gleyed or Low -Chroma Colors
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

h
0
y
� BAAy o
3 Ate
V
a�
!b
N
✓cmll Mo
D
0
35' SAM BUFFER ZONE
\
NOT TO
l
LINE TABLE
NOTES
20'
St.
7js� \
\
\
\
15'
1 HAD D/1001 GRD COORDNAMT BASED ON On / DK NETWORK MEASUREMENTS ICOMBl4® SCME
C
f
0096 AC
i
'Na
AAC10R W428ol F, AsrI To
S 1
PUHJSNfD 190,5. TTT DETERMINATION SECTION 404
$7
\
I
I
B E>•56528507 E.14307"93
\
F \ A
O - DKnp Wt
. P kt
S
MADE UTILIZING IM 1967 CORPS a CNGNEERS WETLANDS
L3
2 BEARNGS AND DISTANCFS M PAREM UB ARE TAKEN FROM MB 26 PAGE 516 SEARNM AND
I
a \
$7�5\
s
/
N8r3�'2TW (se7tYMp 9
06TANCEs NOT N PARENTHESES ARE NC GRID HAD ITI
2689
\
(TvgrJ
\
]BdINDARYNFORMATO" TAKEN FROM MB 26 PAGE 316
(0RE,1_ —
TW
b u
n
-
�w\
(OA 1FJ___
THE PURPOSE Of Ills MA° 6 TO LOCALE ME WBUNDS MA1 WERE DENTMED BY OTHERS
SIT`
\
\
\
D PIA
USE VACANT
ISOLATED
WETLAND WB ZONED 1 -1
L7
\ '
\
NK ROAD
L77
25M
0018 AC
A• t;
"
\ TOP OF BANK (TYP)
>• %
\
L78
\
lE
\
\
S73� \
E
JAMES NEAL BRASWELI
L79
Q
OF STREAM (TYP)
'
\ 75750 M7 \
DB 090
PTO/ 03512124
035121
\ \ \
LBO
2138
SPRATT k BROOKS' THIS MAP Is Nor ,TENDED
\ \I7aP \ \
ZONED R -4
USE SINGLE FAMILY
\ \
N
LEFT
2317
\ \
\
\
5909
\
L82
USE WARLH.SC
\ \ \
\ PEREM/8AL CHANNEL 13
40.15
\ \ ?\
L83
2059
171695 V
1.14
951
1.841
w
n
%g41
ISOLATED
I I
1878
'1 '
V
INTERMITTENT
I� 8
CHANNHANN EL L 8
a1
IN
2531
133'43'E,
L17
\
ZONED
R -4
'7917 (fMnmj�
\ \
\ \
IY •
\ e !`
R
2
1
�$.
\
\
ISOLATED
7L WC
1735
N70'49
L20
7113
ry ISOLATED
MMRMIr �T CHANNEL B
35 09
36 37
L21
35' SAM BUFFER ZONE
SARAH G DA'S O 3 A
NOT TO
l
LINE TABLE
20'
20'
DB 04174 -468
PID6' 035121'_7
70NED I -3
USE SINGLE FAMILY
\
\
\
15'
CERTIFIES 9111 THIS COPY OF MIS
OEMC75 THE BOUNDARY OF THE JANSMCiNON ff SECTION 104
C
0 EPHEMERAL CHANNEL B
`r' 174 SJ lF
0096 AC
i
'Na
1.71
S 1
PUHJSNfD 190,5. TTT DETERMINATION SECTION 404
$7
\
I
I
PON FER O O
JIRISDICIIVE MAY BF R I S DA T A POA00 NOT ro
H MAY
IZI GEMS IRaM 1,15 SAFE n93 DfTEPYMAIN WAS'
\
1589
O - DKnp Wt
. P kt
S
MADE UTILIZING IM 1967 CORPS a CNGNEERS WETLANDS
L3
JOHN DAMS BIRMINGHAM AND
WILLIAM CLAY BIRMINGHAM 111
I
•�
/
/
N8r3�'2TW (se7tYMp 9
AND ANN BIRMINGHAM HIPP
DB 01198 -58
2689
35ND ETalb7
(TvgrJ
\
DB 01578 -042
DB 7242 -286
PID/ 0351 2116
(0RE,1_ —
TW
b u
n
-
\ \
(OA 1FJ___
SIT`
\
\ \
L76
USE VACANT
ISOLATED
WETLAND WB ZONED 1 -1
L7
\ '
M
L77
25M
0018 AC
A• t;
"
\ TOP OF BANK (TYP)
>• %
MNITI
L78
2811
lE
L9
28.33
L79
Q
OF STREAM (TYP)
'
L10
30.15
N3619'24W
LBO
2138
SPRATT k BROOKS' THIS MAP Is Nor ,TENDED
JAMES ALLAN BEATV AND TERRI M BEATY
Or
5557
N
LEFT
2317
DB 5
PID/ 35121 8
0 @
\
5909
\
L82
USE WARLH.SC
1.13
40.15
a'
L83
2059
1.14
951
1.841
w
L15
%g41
N -W
I I
1878
'1 '
Y ,
1354
a1
IN
2531
SOB!rB WE
L17
Il 97
L87
1895
L18
I
IY •
LBB
2008
2
1
1-19
\
ISOLATED
7L WC
1735
N70'49
L20
7113
OAND
L%
36 37
L21
H 00
e
26421
PERENNIAL CHANNEL A\ \
L22
\ DONALD N LOSITO AND EILEEN F LOSITO
DB 10361 -273
7t
L92
')
\
\ \ PI 03512122 _
='• `�
L93
29 24
I'
\
TONED 121
Z
USE WAREHOUSE
N1 •4'
I '
3185
N
\
5182
L95
33 44
N
L26
4930
/
L%
1868
.9Fa RAF \ ? .j•
T '
//
2753
Y ' -W
or I
m ,-�
2631
1.28
6188
4- \
s A
B
3139
N41•H' '
L29
4146
N 1
L%
4919
\ \
3538
P
L100
36 71
131
5468
Llm
N61
15D K1�, NgLt,
5513
L102
a
D 1n1� .� \
L33
4642
'W
L103
2314
l34
32 47
{a'W
1.104
16 54
l
L35
6977
L1D5
1{93
L36
7191
'W
Ll%
3697
✓/
5005
L107
NTERM1ITENT CHANNEL
A \
< /r
L35
3608
35' SAM BUFFER ZONE
42 08 LF
\ EPHEMERAL CHANNEL B
NOT TO
SCALE
LINE TABLE
20'
20'
'THIS PLAT ACCURATELY
TH LENG
15'
15'
CERTIFIES 9111 THIS COPY OF MIS
OEMC75 THE BOUNDARY OF THE JANSMCiNON ff SECTION 104
C
\
0096 AC
MOD
ON 1/NF CLEAN UNLES ACT M IS A CHANGE 8V NTH UAWORaUR
QY THIS DAIS UNLESS TITERS IS plAT M THE LAW M OW
'Na
1.71
S 1
PUHJSNfD 190,5. TTT DETERMINATION SECTION 404
$7
\
I
I
PON FER O O
JIRISDICIIVE MAY BF R I S DA T A POA00 NOT ro
H MAY
IZI GEMS IRaM 1,15 SAFE n93 DfTEPYMAIN WAS'
\
1589
O - DKnp Wt
. P kt
S
MADE UTILIZING IM 1967 CORPS a CNGNEERS WETLANDS
L3
Kl� 11r�osuli l F9R �'
AUSTIN PARKS INC
D8 02246 -180
PID/ 03507105
ZONED 1 -1/R -4
USE VACANT
i
42 08 LF
\ EPHEMERAL CHANNEL B
LEGEND
LINE TABLE
5639 LF
'THIS PLAT ACCURATELY
TH LENG
BEARNC
WETUND WA
CERTIFIES 9111 THIS COPY OF MIS
OEMC75 THE BOUNDARY OF THE JANSMCiNON ff SECTION 104
C
\
0096 AC
MOD
ON 1/NF CLEAN UNLES ACT M IS A CHANGE 8V NTH UAWORaUR
QY THIS DAIS UNLESS TITERS IS plAT M THE LAW M OW
'Na
1.71
S 1
PUHJSNfD 190,5. TTT DETERMINATION SECTION 404
$7
\
I
I
PON FER O O
JIRISDICIIVE MAY BF R I S DA T A POA00 NOT ro
H MAY
IZI GEMS IRaM 1,15 SAFE n93 DfTEPYMAIN WAS'
\
1589
O - DKnp Wt
. P kt
S
MADE UTILIZING IM 1967 CORPS a CNGNEERS WETLANDS
L3
4653
I
DIUU . MN TA
pEUNEARW YAN /AL'
\
A \
N8r3�'2TW (se7tYMp 9
U
2689
35ND ETalb7
(TvgrJ
\
RAC FORD C LOW AND VERNA P
I3 LONE AND L 11 GRADING CO INC
(0RE,1_ —
\
n
-
DB 1349; -809
(OA 1FJ___
\
1
PID/ NEED 1-
ZONED 602
10.76
-W
L76
USE VACANT
I Richard Boyd Brooks, Certify that 11Th plat was drawn under my supervMon from an
actual survey pedortned under my supemsbn (deed tlesalptbn recorded 118001
PT 1651, that the Dourldales not surv...d ae deal•A trwkotetl ai drown
from the deeds shown hereon that the Giobal Positbnin System (GPSI ObservatgM
tare performed to Me Geospotiol Positioning ACCU"Cy ondads. Pat 2 Standards
for Geodetic Networks of Me 54ARmeter accuracy classification (95% confidence)
using RTK Network Thaf it16 piot was pprepaed M occadartce vnM GS 1730 m
amendetl I rho tteroby cedNy Mat this survey Is of on esdsryrynnpp Patel of property This
proper, h sublet, to Underground utBmes and a any dghtol ays .11.. tl Nea
by CoadklofIT Method Copying this dot Could be a violation of copyright lows
Witness my aiglnol slpnoture and seal this the I IT day of October 2009
RICHARD BOYD BROOKS
1200 JENKINS DRIVE
CHARLOTTE N C 28212
[phone]
SIGNED
Plol -knd told SUrveM L•2689
iss
N
Z V N
Z 00
LAJ N
O 0 NW
Q LL
F, 01
^ � r
Q 04 I
GO
�x
0 Z L0
�O o
a
a� v
•I.v
O
0 O zi
v
0 `e
QL
V
c �
n\ W
W
r3,
a�
�O m
IT6WN S E S
o—En R B B
OAtL 10-01 -09
swl 1' =100'
Im / 090237
I\
LINE TABLE
LEGEND
LINE TABLE
Ep E+IBfhp b- Ph
LNE
TH LENG
BEARNC
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
L1
1501
N 1
1.71
3990
N 4'
L2
2686
"16'27'40"W
L72
1589
O - DKnp Wt
. P kt
L3
4653
a
L73
1507
NSY41I
U
2689
1.74
5,89
❑ .lee. ww
1.5
3182
L75
16 84
L6
10.76
-W
L76
2682
NQ9107 WIT
L7
3312
M
L77
25M
0
"
LB
>• %
MNITI
L78
2811
lE
L9
28.33
L79
35.65
oMerc. GRAPHIC SCALE
'
L10
30.15
N3619'24W
LBO
2138
SPRATT k BROOKS' THIS MAP Is Nor ,TENDED
Or
5557
N
LEFT
2317
1.12
5909
4
L82
2589
1.13
40.15
a'
L83
2059
1.14
951
1.841
21
L15
5441
N -W
L851
1878
'1 '
LI6
1354
a1
L85
2531
SOB!rB WE
L17
Il 97
L87
1895
L18
5912
IY •
LBB
2008
1-19
7924
L89
1735
N70'49
L20
7113
N4324'4 2'W
L%
36 37
MOSIS WE
L21
H 00
LM
26421
L22
1687
7t
L92
3978
L23
3118
L93
29 24
L24
4980
N1 •4'
L94
3185
N
L25
5182
L95
33 44
N
L26
4930
'W
L%
1868
T '
L27
2753
Y ' -W
L97
2631
'
1.28
6188
'1
B
3139
N41•H' '
L29
4146
N 1
L%
4919
L50
3538
L100
36 71
131
5468
Llm
N61
L32
5513
L102
2213
L33
4642
'W
L103
2314
l34
32 47
{a'W
1.104
16 54
l
L35
6977
L1D5
1{93
L36
7191
'W
Ll%
3697
L37
5005
L107
4292
L35
3608
N 1 'W
LI05
1470
L39
1916
Lt
3482
110
318
r4
1.110
2197
'17-
L41
3650
NOI
Lill
2686
sooI
1.42
2642
N 'W
L112
22.16
TN' '
L43
3953
4281
1.113
2506
L44
1091
L114
1937
'W
L45
2343
L115
2416
'
L46
7609
N4
1.116
3681
4 "
L47
3223
4 49
L117
1255
S15U 4Y
L48
2691
1.118
1693
NlOI
V""��1411
29 50
T
Me
26 68
150
3188
1
1.120
2613
1.51
24.15
L121
2800
/ 'W
L52
31 48
1.122
27 21
N
53
MIT
`w
1.123
3361
434*57`057
L54
2963
NUHITOI
L124
2158
'
L55
35,04
N T1
L125
1483
M1759-26
1.56
3369
'N'
L126
2117
1 •11"
L57
3362
114 '
L127
1991
7 '
1.58
54 24
4
L128
1493
L59
2'12
L129
2888
1.60
2100
11' 1
1.130
2379
N
Let
5326
N
L131
1130
1.62
2340
t
L132
28
1.83
2820
1.133
40.77
L64
4177
4
L134
28.59
N 4
L65
4651
N 1 "W
L135
1243
N
L65
2466
L136
3913
L67
50.08
L137
3108
'
L68
4650
1-13111
3976
'
L69
3332
4'
L139
3165
L70
4639
1.110
72.59
NU 48 WIT
iss
N
Z V N
Z 00
LAJ N
O 0 NW
Q LL
F, 01
^ � r
Q 04 I
GO
�x
0 Z L0
�O o
a
a� v
•I.v
O
0 O zi
v
0 `e
QL
V
c �
n\ W
W
r3,
a�
�O m
IT6WN S E S
o—En R B B
OAtL 10-01 -09
swl 1' =100'
Im / 090237
I\
LEGEND
Ep E+IBfhp b- Ph
NIP O . N.. Am Ph
PRELIMINARY: FOR
AIRS) . N. Petit SO
R/W Riot OI Wey
h� �9
�. -
S.UH,0 Lh.
REVIEW ONLY, NOT FOR
®': Sl—A* y� ;�
SALES, CONVEYANCE OR
O - DKnp Wt
. P kt
POE
CB _ C.tM Bmh
RECORDING
D4 - Gw 14vHr
❑ .lee. ww
pd . ter. vWw
O
0
M
0
Z
A.
W
D:
oMerc. GRAPHIC SCALE
THIS CERTIFIES TO THE SURVEYING LOCATIONS OF
am
THE WETLANDS AND STREAMS AS DETERMINED By
SPRATT k BROOKS' THIS MAP Is Nor ,TENDED
TO CERTIFY BOUNDARY / TITLE LINES AND IS NOT
TO BE USED FOR SALES, CONVEYANCE OR
( IN FEET )
RECORDATION 1 loch . 100 Ill.
iss
N
Z V N
Z 00
LAJ N
O 0 NW
Q LL
F, 01
^ � r
Q 04 I
GO
�x
0 Z L0
�O o
a
a� v
•I.v
O
0 O zi
v
0 `e
QL
V
c �
n\ W
W
r3,
a�
�O m
IT6WN S E S
o—En R B B
OAtL 10-01 -09
swl 1' =100'
Im / 090237
I\

ZZ
gig°
�- --
' ;' -�.• �71,
___ CH' ? ' '11,1 ••_ -_` - _ - -_____ �:'�'' ''-BBL ` \`Ii `I \ - i''YVi /'; ', iy' /,_ -__ ' `1`` X11 ,1 j', 'x',,
` '�'' y 1y'y1 ' 1',' \ •`` - `• -- 111; I -Y - ,'�;l %��''1 ll'i � � '
\ qp° , y' `• �`� ••,\``� _ _- - `Iii ,,'', %,': / -•' ,'`, - l�'��iii'i� 1, ,__I 'i'
„✓/ r -�Z ^ -__ -� �:� , ' � -' - _ - 1' � 1, / � i"' 1 I
- / - - -- -
zzzz
\'- s
_
•� `\ _ _ -s{_ _` -� =;; `• � \� _ � - \Z�� tom'_ _— ,!� -'s -� _� "__'`, '/ .,< •�,?__ '�_ / ' ------------
- - - - - - --
- ----- - - -- -- - I - ',
EYE
- - -- _
\ � � � : -- - - - - -- ' "� ' ' `k1' is ' - �� �' �, -� •' ' �, ` ``� ``
' /. % %s�, /��./ :lam " = •-•-\ r %','' �/ -''- �\ 1��,�' '// �-R ,.'� �ff- :;'L� -`'`, .-! ,.:.J'�".✓ � �Y- ,
ti C 0
Y,
m �� _ € � E a .. RIM 5 � � �� �I �� _ €����g��� � � � caw 1
w 8 "'gyp ° E z. 8 > a
a I 1 9 A �Jjjg � § Z
0.
fit
z 8 , 11 1 M1,111
0 011M 118m UP HIP
MIN
>s N
lie _ ' ��
0
l p H H L1 yp Q >
"�� cis 1 III m JAI = e� $3 N+ m
mom O I I I 11 11 m $8$* C �9® e Nz ICI I I Go
�C O ' I 1 1 1 1 3 0 '^ �1 zz
�iN�Z CO I I I I I III g°� IRR 00 Z
�x GG F epA z
9