20211409 Ver 1_AR19-05-0013NoSitesPresent_20210921

Project Tracking No.:
“NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT”
form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
1 of 13
19-05-0013

NO NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES
PRESENT FORM
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not
valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the Historic
Architecture and Landscapes Group.

PROJECT INFORMATION

Project No: U-6223 County: Johnston
WBS No: 48332.1.1 Document: CE
F.A. No: na Funding: State Federal
Federal Permit Required? Yes No Permit Type: NWP

Project Description:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Division 4 intends to extend NC 42
East to connect to State Route (SR) 1563 (Little Creek Church Road) and improve the intersection
of SR 1563 (Little Creek Church Road) and SR 1560 (Ranch Road) in Clayton, Johnston County.
For the purposes of the archaeological survey and evaluation, the study area was considered to be
the project Area of Potential Effects (APE) and estimated to encompass 69.5 acres (nearly 28.13
hectares) (Figures 1 and 2). The project extends approximately 4,890 linear feet from the
intersection of Ranch Road and Grant Street (southern terminus) and follows Little Creek Church
Road until it veers off-road before following Rose Street and joining NC 42 at the intersection of
NC 42 and US 70 Business (northern terminus). Based on the probability for archaeological
resources and presence of an unnamed cemetery (identified herein as the Hogg-Jones Cemetery,
31JT640), the NCDOT required an archaeological survey for the project (Petersen 2019). One
registered prehistoric site (31JT92) is situated within the APE. Several registered archaeological
sites, including prehistoric resources, are proximate to the APE. The Hogg-Jones Cemetery
(31JT640) is situated within the APE. Richard Grubb and Associates, Inc. (RGA) completed the
archaeological survey and evaluation on behalf of Simpson Engineers and Associates and
NCDOT’s Human Environment Section and Archaeology Group. The APE includes residential
areas, agricultural fields, wooded areas, and disturbed areas related to commercial and industrial
development.

SUMMARY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDINGS
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Archaeology Group reviewed the subject
project and determined:

There are no National Register listed or eligible ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES
present within the project’s area of potential effects. (Attach any notes or documents
as needed)
No subsurface archaeological investigations were required for this project.
Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources.
Project Tracking No.:
“NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT”
form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
2 of 13
19-05-0013
Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological
resources considered eligible for the National Register.
All identified archaeological sites located within the APE have been considered and all
compliance for archaeological resources with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for this project.

Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:

Environmental Setting
The APE is located within the eastern section of the Piedmont Physiographic Province of North
Carolina. The Piedmont is characterized by low ridges and rolling hills. Johnston County straddles
the flat, sandy topography of the Coastal Plain and undulating topography of the Piedmont region.
Elevations in the APE range from about 280 feet to 320 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) (see
Figure 1). The topography is relatively flat with lower elevations associated with watercourses and
wetlands. The APE is situated on a gently sloping knoll and terrace settings that overlook a small
tributary that feeds into Little Creek. The greatest topographic relief is situated at the southern end
of the APE. The bulk of the APE lies in an upland setting.

The APE is located within the Raleigh Belt, a late Proterozoic/ early Paleozoic geological
formation of metamorphosed igneous rocks with ranges of garnet, mica, schist, amphibolite, and
masses of granitic rock (North Carolina Geological Survey 1991). The APE is bisected by an
unnamed tributary of Little Creek (see Figure 1). Though unnamed on current U.S.G.S. maps, the
tributary is historically known as Buckhorn Branch (Commonwealth Heritage Group 2019: 17).
Little Creek is a tributary of the Neuse River. Several ponds are present within and proximate to
the APE and appear to have originated by human alteration of the landscape.

Several soils were mapped within the APE (Figure 3), including Bibb sandy loam (Bb), 0 to 2
percent slopes (approximately 2.1 acres or 3.1% of the APE); Cecil loam (CeB), 2 to 6 percent
slopes (5.3 acres or 7.6%); Cecil loam (CeC), 6 to 10 percent slopes (0.6 acres or 0.9%); Cowarts
sandy loam (CoB), 2 to 6 percent slopes (25 acres or 36.3%); Marlboro-Cecil complex (McB), 2
to 8 percent slopes (16.8 acres or 24.2%); Norfolk loamy sand (NoB), 2 to 6 percent slopes (1.9
acres or 2.8%); Norfolk-Urban land complex (NuA), 0 to 3 percent slopes (14.9 acres or 21.5%);
Rains sandy loam (Ra), 0 to 2 percent slopes (0.2 acres or 0.3%); Toisnot loam (Tn), 0 to 2 percent
slopes (0.5 acres or 0.8%); and Wehadkee loam (Wt), 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
(1.8 acres or 2.6%) (USDA/NRCS 2020). Cecil, Cowarts, Marlboro-Cecil complex and Norfolk
series soils are well-drained and Bibb, Rains, Toisnot and Wehadkee soils are poorly drained (see
Figure 3).

Background Research
Background research was conducted at the North Carolina Office for State Archaeology (OSA) in
March 2020. National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) files and the North Carolina Historic
Preservation Office GIS service were consulted. Online historic atlases and maps, and U.S.G.S.
maps were also reviewed, as were prior cultural resource survey reports (Commonwealth Heritage
Group 2019; Roberts et al. 1993; Kimball 1977) that are pertinent to the current study.

Registered Archaeological Sites
Project Tracking No.:
“NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT”
form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
3 of 13
19-05-0013
Seventeen registered archaeological sites, including prehistoric resources, lie within a one-mile
radius of the APE (Figure 4). One registered prehistoric site (31JT92) is situated within the APE,
and two archaeological sites (31JT91 and 31JT240) are proximate to the APE. None of the sites
were considered eligible for the National Register, although ten sites remain unassessed. Most of
the prehistoric sites were recorded as isolated finds or lithic scatters, while 31JT92, 31JT96,
31JT97, 31JT233, and 31JT239 contained lithic tools. Sites 31JT555-558 are historic and
industrial resources related to the Clayton Cotton Mills and Vinson Planing Mill (Terracon
Consultants, Inc. 2018).
Site 31JT91 is a prehistoric site situated on a knoll west of Little Creek (see Figure 4). Identified
during the surface collection of a plowed agricultural field, the site yielded 13 prehistoric artifacts
including Kirk and Roanoke points, a biface, and bifacial thinning flakes of quartz and felsite.
Comprising a 7,500 square foot area (0.17 acres), the site dates to the Early Archaic and Woodland
periods. The NRHP eligibility of site 31JT91 is unassessed. This multi-component site was
identified during a survey for the Clayton 201 Wastewater Facilities Area and appears to be
situated on the Battle-Horne-Benson House property (Kimball 1977).
Site 31JT92 is a prehistoric site situated on the eastern slope of a knoll overlooking Little Creek
(see Figure 4). The surface collection of a plowed agricultural field yielded nine (9) prehistoric
artifacts including a Guilford point, a biface, primary and bifacial thinning flakes, cores and a plain
ceramic sherd. Scattered over an 11,250 square foot area (0.26 acres), the site dates to the Middle
Archaic and Woodland periods and its NRHP eligibility is unassessed. This multi-component site
was identified during a survey for the Clayton 201 Wastewater Facilities Area (Kimball 1977).
Site 31JT240 is a multi-component site situated in an agricultural field west of Little Creek Church
Road (see Figure 4). The site was identified during a cultural resources reconnaissance survey for
the US 70 Clayton Bypass project (Roberts et al. 1993). The surface collection of a plowed
agricultural field yielded 16 artifacts including a single piece of gray salt glazed stoneware, and
several fragments of quartz debitage (N=15). The site encompasses a 35-meter by 45-meter area,
and was interpreted as a short term limited activity camp. The historic artifact was believed to have
originated from a nearby residence. Site 31JT240 was recommended ineligible for the NRHP
(Roberts et al. 1993).
Historic Properties
No historic archaeological resources eligible for the NRHP were identified within the APE.
However, the Battle-Horne-Benson House (JT0672) lies adjacent to the APE at 6360 Little Creek
Church Road (see Figure 4). The Battle-Horne-Benson House (DOE: 1993) is eligible for listing
in the NRHP. This resource is a residence, also known as “Horne’s Mansion” or “Roxborough
Hall”, that was built between 1909 and 1911.
Prior Cultural Resource Surveys
Sections of the APE were previously surveyed by Kimball (1977) and Roberts et al. (1993). As
discussed above, both surveys identified archaeological sites within or proximate to the APE.

Project Tracking No.:
“NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT”
form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
4 of 13
19-05-0013
An historic structures survey was completed for the NC 42 project (Commonwealth Heritage
Group 2019). The survey evaluated the National Register eligibility of the Ellis Tenant House
(JT2018) which is situated at 6082 Little Creek Church Road (see Figure 4). The Ellis Tenant
house is a 1 1/2-story side gable frame saddlebag house dating to c. 1900. Other buildings on the
property include a c. 1900 2-story frame livestock barn, a c. 1900 frame chicken house and a c.
1960 concrete block well house. It was determined that the property is unlikely to provide any new
information regarding history of building design and technology. The Ellis Tenant House was
assessed as ineligible for listing in the NRHP (Commonwealth Heritage Group 2019).
Cemeteries
Available U.S.G.S. topographic maps (U.S.G.S. 1964, 1973, 1993; Figures 5-8) depict a cemetery
(i.e. Hogg-Jones Cemetery) within the APE. The cemetery is situated on the west side of Little
Creek Church Road (adjacent to 6063 Little Creek Church Road).
Historic Map Review
The APE is situated southeast of the main focus of early settlement at Clayton, a former stagecoach
stop known as Stallings Station. Some of the earliest development proximate to the APE was
industrial. The North Carolina Railroad bisects the APE, and was charted in 1849 and built in
1853. US 70 Business was constructed after 1920 (Terracon Consultants 2018).
A review of early twentieth soil maps indicate that Little Creek Church Road was present by at
least the late nineteenth century. On a 1900 soils map, it appears that the Ellis Tenant House was
the only structure depicted along Little Creek Church Road. By 1911, a few more structures,
including the Battle-Horne-Benson House, are depicted (Figure 9).
The residential development southwest of US 70 Business was in place prior to 1964. A 1953
topographic map depicts mainly agricultural land with few residences (see Figure 5); a 1964 map
depicts the cemetery west of Little Creek Church Road and a water feature in addition to a few
residences (see Figure 6). This map was updated in 1973 and depicts another small water feature,
a farm pond, and encroaching development from the northwest (see Figure 7). The 1993 map
depicts little change to the APE in terms of major development or infrastructure (see Figure 8).
However, moderate development via increased residences are apparent in the APE throughout the
mid- to late twentieth century. Most development includes early to mid-twentieth-century
residences. Between 1993 and 1999, NC 42 was realigned to meet US 70 Business at its current
location (NETR 1993, 1999).
Twenty-first-century development has taken place within the APE. The Boling Townes residential
development, on the east side of Little Creek Church Road, was constructed by 2008 (NETR 2006,
2008). A Sheetz convenience store and gas station was built between 2014 and 2016 on the south
side of US 70 Business and east side of Rose Street (NETR 2014, 2016).

Archaeological Methods and Survey Results
A survey and evaluation of the APE was conducted between April 9-14, 2020 and on July 10,
2020. Modifications to the project plans necessitated the completion of additional archaeological
fieldwork in July 2020. Fieldwork totaled approximately 15-person days. Matthew Harrup, M.A.,
RPA, was the Field Director and Quinn Boykin, Olivia Heckendorf, MA, and William Tsibulsky
were the field archaeologists. Paul J. McEachen, M.A., RPA, was the Project Manager and
Principal Investigator. Mr. McEachen meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional
Project Tracking No.:
“NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT”
form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
5 of 13
19-05-0013
Qualifications Standards for Archaeology (36 CFR Part 61). The archaeological survey has been
performed to meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and
Historic Preservation (1983) and complies with the archaeological survey and reporting guidelines
of the OSA set forth in Archaeological Investigations Standards and Guidelines (2017).

The goal of the archaeological survey was to identify prehistoric and historic period archaeological
resources within the APE, to assess the significance (i.e. National Register eligibility) of identified
resources, if any, and to prepare management recommendations based on the survey results.
Important goals of this work were to determine if site 31JT92 and other sites (i.e. 31JT91 and
31JT240) fall within the APE, identify the map-documented cemetery on the west wide of Little
Creek Church Road, and assess effects of the proposed work on identified cultural resources.
Background research was reviewed prior to initiating archaeological fieldwork.

Fieldwork included subsurface archaeological testing, a pedestrian reconnaissance, photographic
documentation of existing conditions, and mapping. Existing conditions within the APE were
recorded via digital photography and field notes. Areas of obvious disturbance were noted as those
locations were unlikely to retain cultural integrity. A good-faith effort was made to identify
archaeological resources within the APE.

Shovel test pits (STPs) were plotted at 30-meter (98.4-feet) intervals in a linear fashion along
roadways and on a rectilinear grid in the off-road areas (Figures 10-13). A total of 203 STPs were
planned for excavation. However, only 182 STPs were excavated due to disturbances. The STPs
measured 30 centimeters (12 inches) in diameter and were excavated into sterile B-horizon soils.
Each soil stratum was excavated and screened separately. Excavated soil was screened through
one-quarter-inch wire mesh to facilitate artifact recovery. Descriptions of each stratum, including
Munsell color, texture, sediments, and presence or absence of cultural material, were recorded on
standardized STP forms. Notes on the stratigraphic relationship of artifacts, if any, was recorded
for all STPs. Shovel test pits were immediately backfilled upon completion to restore the ground
to its natural contours. Shovel test pits were given consecutive numerical designations. For the
sake of organization, STP designations from July 2020 begin with STP #201. All other
designations began with STP #1.

Areas that have been previously disturbed, fell in wetlands or sloped areas exceeding 15 percent,
were not tested. Disturbances were present in proximity to the railroad bed and adjacent areas,
roadways, driveways in residential areas, commercial grading activities and saturated areas from
a septic system in a commercial lumber yard. In some cases, the STPs produced evidence of prior
disturbance via truncation of the soil profile. A utility mark-out (North Carolina 811) was
completed prior to subsurface testing. Areas containing buried utilities (i.e. electrical, gas and
water lines) were avoided. Limited clearing was performed to access the cemetery on the west side
of Little Creek Church Road, and also to perform excavations in overgrown agricultural fields.

Artifacts were noted when identified at each STP. Cultural material was predominately mid-to-
late twentieth century (i.e. modern) and twenty-first century in origin. Bricks, where present, were
found in secondary contexts and did not appear to be associated with an apparent foundation or
intact structural remnants. None of the material was of sufficient age or integrity to warrant
registration as an archaeological site. No cultural material was retained. No prehistoric artifacts
were identified.
Project Tracking No.:
“NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT”
form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
6 of 13
19-05-0013

The southern end of the APE at Little Creek Church Road had the highest number of STPs (see
Figure 10; Figure 14). Shovel test pits 1-90 were placed in this area. This area was dominated by
abandoned agricultural fields to the northwest of Little Creek Church Road, and a row of single-
family homes and agricultural areas to the southeast (Figure 15). An agricultural field north of
Little Creek Church Road, prior to its junction with Ranch Road, was heavily overgrown with
kudzu. Several abandoned early to mid-twentieth-century residences are situated in this section of
the APE. A concrete foundation (i.e. pad) for a mobile home was observed. In the vicinity of one
of the abandoned homes a scatter of small modern brick and amber bottle glass fragments was
encountered just below the surface (Figure 16). The material was identified in STP 19 and no other
artifacts were encountered in the STP. No foundations were observed. No artifacts were visible on
the surface. Due to the modern date of the material and lack of associated intact structural remains,
the artifacts were not retained. A natural soil profile was observed in STP 19 consisting of a brown
(10 YR 4/4) sandy loam topsoil overlying very pale brown (10 YR 7/4) sandy loam (B1) and
brownish yellow (10 YR 6/6) clay loam (B2) subsoils. Another STP excavated on the property
(i.e. STP 30) contained no artifacts. The entire area, except for the still-occupied dwellings, was
heavily vegetated and overgrown with vines (Figures 17 and 18). Soils in this area were primarily
associated with the Marlboro-Cecil Land Complex (NRCS 2020). A typical soil profile for the
southern end of the APE consisted of a brown sandy loam (10 YR 5/2) grayish brown plow zone
(0-10 cm) overlying a very pale brown (10 YR 8/4) sandy clay subsoil from 10-30 cm (Figure 19).

Archaeological testing then extended north from the split on Little Creek Church Road to the
unnamed tributary of Little Creek (see Figures 11 and 12). Shovel test pits 91-148 were plotted in
this area. This area is a mixture of agricultural fields, commercial farms and grading companies,
and early through late twentieth-century residences (Figures 20-22). Utilities are largely located
on the south side of the road. No archaeological testing was performed at the Ellis Tenant House
(JT2018) property due to the presence of utilities. Drainage ditches bordered the east and west
sides of Little Creek Church Road. Soils in this area were predominantly with the Cowart series
(i.e. Cowart loamy sand [CoB]). The soil profile generally consisted of a dark yellowish brown
(10 Y/R 4/4) sandy loam plow zone (Ap) horizon extending to 18 cm below grade which was
underlain by a sterile yellowish brown (10 Y/R 5/8) sandy clay subsoil (B-horizon) from 18-28
cm below surface (Figure 23).

Subsurface testing along Little Creek Church Road produced no evidence for archaeological site
31JT240 (Roberts et al. 1993). The site is apparently confined to the agricultural field west of Little
Creek Church Road and is situated away from the current ROW and APE.

Archaeological testing was performed within an agricultural field and wooded area east of Little
Creek Church Road and south of the Boling Townes development (see Figures 12 and 20). Site
31JT92 is proximate to this area, but no evidence for its presence was identified. A natural A/B
horizon was consistently observed in this area. It is believed that the archaeological site may have
been compromised during the construction of the Boling Townes development. Alternatively, site
31JT92 may be situated in the forested area between the development and Little Creek. Since the
site was identified in an agricultural field in the 1970s (Kimball 1977) and the area appears to have
remained agricultural until the development, it is suspected that the site is more likely to have been
situated within the townhouse development footprint. No prehistoric artifacts related to site 31JT92
were identified in the APE.
Project Tracking No.:
“NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT”
form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
7 of 13
19-05-0013

A single transect of STPs was placed along the southern edge of the Battle-Horne-Benson House
(JT0672) property (see Figure 12). No foundations or structural remains were observed. A modern
trash dump with potato chip bags, beer bottle glass, plastic and other refuse, was observed
proximate to planned STP 210. Similar late twentieth-century refuse was present in STPs 211 and
212 indicating that the edge of the Battle-Horne-Benson House property was used for the disposal
of household waste. No historic archaeological resources that contribute to the significance of the
Battle-Horne-Benson House were identified. Additionally, no prehistoric artifacts were identified.
As such, prehistoric site 31JT91 does not fall within the APE. If still extant, it is possible that the
site falls north of the APE.

The Hogg-Jones Cemetery (31JT640) was documented by RGA on the west side of Little Creek
Church Road, bordered by a medium-sized brick residence, an agricultural field, and part of a
grading company yard (see Figure 11). The cemetery is not enclosed by a physical boundary and
has fallen into disrepair. The cemetery is discussed further below.

The final testing area was centered on the NC 42 and US 70 Business intersection (see Figure 13;
see Figures 24 and 25) Shovel test pits 149-185 were plotted in this area. The north side of the
intersection was largely unsuitable for STP excavation, as the majority of the area was disturbed
as a result of proximity to a railroad bed associated with the North Carolina Railroad, large
commercial yard (Guy C. Lee Building Materials) and wetlands. No railroad-related structures or
foundations were observed. The area on the south side of the intersection includes a sizeable Sheetz
convenience store and gas station. Between the Sheetz store and Little Creek are several twentieth-
century residences along Rose Street, Tulip Street, and Iris Street (see Figure 2). Soils in this area
were primarily Norfolk-Urban land complex (see Figure 3). A typical STP profile consisted of a
brown (10 YR 4/4) sandy loam plow zone or A-horizon extending to 17 cm below grade overlying
a mixed brownish yellow (10 YR 6/8) and red (2.5 YR 4/8) clay subsoil (B-horizon) with pebbles
and rocks (17-30 cm). Other STPs in this area exhibited two subsoil horizons with an increased
clay content with depth. No archaeological sites were identified.

Hogg-Jones Cemetery

Resource Name Hogg-Jones Cemetery
Site Number 31JT640
Location West side of SR 1563 roughly 0.75-miles south of NC 42
PIN 166810-45-3018
Date(s) Circa 1920-1941

The Hogg-Jones Cemetery is situated on the west side of Little Creek Church Road (SR 1563)
south of NC 42 in Clayton (see Figure 11; Figures 26-37). The 0.01-acre legal parcel PIN (166810-
45-3018) measures roughly 21 feet by 20 feet and lies about 35 feet west of the roadway (Figure
38). The Hogg-Jones Cemetery is surrounded by Little Creek Church Road and the Ellis Tenant
House (JT2018) to the west, a brick single-family dwelling to the south, an agricultural field to the
west, and a grading company yard to the north. The cemetery is not enclosed by a fence or wall
but is surrounded by mature trees and vines, which are now severely overgrown. The visible
gravemarkers are concentrated in the approximate center of the small parcel. A Trimble was used
to map the gravemarkers.
Project Tracking No.:
“NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT”
form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
8 of 13
19-05-0013

Three electronic cemetery databases (www.findagrave.com, www.cemeterycensus.com, and
www.interment.net) were consulted for the Hogg-Jones Cemetery. The Cemetery Survey Reports
compiled by the Works Progress Administration (WPA) in the 1930s are available through the
North Carolina State Archives digital collections (https://digital.ncdcr.gov/digital/custom/family-
records).

Physical Description
Although a definitive number could not be determined, the Hogg-Jones Cemetery is estimated to
have at least nine interments based on visible gravemarkers (see Figures 26-37). The entrance to
the cemetery is accessible via Little Creek Church Road by way of a gravel driveway that connects
to the brick house south of the cemetery parcel. A narrow pathway between the trees leads to the
small but overgrown clearing. Burials are oriented east-west, as is typical in Christian graveyards.
A 1993 property boundary map shows the location of the Hogg-Jones Cemetery relative to the
Little Creek Church Road right-of-way (see Figure 38).

The individual gravemarkers come is several shapes and sizes (Table 1). The most common are
tab and socket and die on base. These typically have arched tops. There is at least one tab
gravemarker that was cast from concrete. Other stone materials are primarily granite but there is
one marble gravemarker. The earliest gravemarker observed is that of John A. Hogg who died in
1920. Based on field observation, the oldest graves are towards the back (west) side of the lot. The
newer graves are closer to the entrance.

The overall condition of the cemetery is poor. In addition to being overgrown and unmaintained,
only three of the gravemarkers remain standing. There are several detached tops and bases, as well
as stones trapped beneath tree roots, broken tablets, and a lone footstone. Due to the overgrown
nature of the cemetery, the detached tops and bases, and broken tablets, it is not possible to locate
the burials by way of surface observation.

Table 1: Hogg-Jones Cemetery (31JT640) Data
Name(s) on
Marker Birth Date Death Date Marker
Type
Material/
Condition Inscription Notes
Lillie E. Jones;
Dallie D. Jones
2/15/1889;
11/8/1885
3/31/1941;
N/A
Die on
base
Granite/
Good
None ---
DONNIE A.
JONES
12/29/1876 3/27/1940 Double die
on base
Granite/Fair He has faded away to
shine/brightly in
heaven.
Shares base with
Carrie Parrish;
broken vase in
between
CARRIE
PARRISH /
WIFE OF /
D.A. JONES
5/12/1877 11/19/1935 Double die
on base
Granite/Fair Remember friends as
you/pass by./As you
are now so once
was./As I am now
you soon must
be./Prepare for death
and follow me.
Shares base with
Donnie A. Jones;
broken vase in
between
Project Tracking No.:
“NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT”
form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
9 of 13
19-05-0013
Name(s) on
Marker Birth Date Death Date Marker
Type
Material/
Condition Inscription Notes
THOMAS
HOGG / Son
of John &
Emma Hogg
6/20/1917 5/1/1934 Tab and
socket
Marble/Fair He was the
sunshine/of our
home.
---
N/A N/A N/A Tab and
socket
Granite/
Poor
… / faithful… / gone
but not forgotten.
Most of
inscription is
illegible
Infant
[illegible]
N/A N/A Tab and
socket
Granite/
Poor
None Trapped beneath
tree root
Arther Hogg N/A N/A Tab Concrete/
Poor
None Gravemarker is
laying on ground
John A. Hogg 8/14/1859 6/1/1920 Tab Granite/
Poor
None Gravemarker is
laying on ground
N/A N/A N/A Tab and
socket
Granite/
Poor
None Broken tablet that
is illegible
B N/A N/A Footstone Concrete/
Good
None Footstone without
a visible
headstone

History
The Hogg-Jones Cemetery is no longer active and has not been maintained for some time. At the
turn of the twentieth century, the land on which the cemetery sits was owned by James Lofton Ellis
who received 75 acres on the Buckhorn Branch from his father, Lofton Ellis (JCDB Y5:528). In
the 1900 census, James L. Ellis was listed as a farmer (1900 US Census). A soil map from 1900
indicates the house across the street, the Ellis Tenant House (JT2018), was already constructed but
according to a deed, was not the Ellis’ primary residence (Commonwealth Heritage Group
2019:17).

In 1909, James L. Ellis sold the subject parcel to Charles W. Horne, a prominent Clayton
businessman and son of well-known merchant and politician Col. Ashley Horne. This purchase
was likely for the agricultural value of the land and he continued to use the tenant house as James
L. Ellis had previously. In 1927, Horne filed for bankruptcy and his holdings were sold to repay
his debts (Commonwealth Heritage Group 2019:17). In turn, Horne’s lands were purchased by
N.J.G. Jones at public auction in 1936 (JCDB 352:122; Commonwealth Heritage Group 2019:17).

It is likely around the time of Horne’s purchase of the property that the tenants could have been
the Hogg and later Jones families. Both names appear in the census records from 1910 through the
1940s (US Census 1910; US Census 1920; US Census 1930; US Census 1940). Based on a search
through the Johnston County Deed Books, there were no landholders with names that matched
those found in the cemetery. Based on available resources, there was not a relationship between
N. J. G. Jones and the Jones family buried in the Hogg-Jones Cemetery.

A survey of Johnston County cemeteries was conducted in September 1968 by Carmine Shields
and Virginia Lee Satterfield. This was later updated in 1994 by Elizabeth E. Ross. Although there
are only seven gravemarkers with legible inscriptions, the earlier survey suggests that there are
Project Tracking No.:
“NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT”
form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
10 of 13
19-05-0013
possibly 19 burials within the Hogg-Jones Cemetery and include members of the Benson, Ellis,
Hogg, and Jones families.

Research was conducted on those individuals whose names appear on six gravemarkers. These
legible gravemarkers include John A. Hogg, Arther Hogg, Thomas Hogg, Carrie Parrish and D.
A. Jones, and Lillie E. and Dallie D. Jones. Census records suggest that the John A. Hogg family
was living in Clayton in a rented house between 1900 and 1920 (US Census 1900; US Census
1910; US Census 1920). Additionally, the Jones family was likely in the vicinity. Census records
also indicate that the Jones family was renting their home. According to available research, no
members of the Hogg or Jones family were of transcendent importance to the local, state, or
national historic contexts.

The property was purchased in August 1947 by Raymond and Daisy Pounds, which included 78
acres (JCDB 466:427). The land has stayed in the family since this time and the small cemetery
plot is under Daisy S. Pounds’ ownership, though she is deceased.

Integrity
The Hogg-Jones Cemetery has a low level of integrity. Only three gravemarkers remain standing,
while the rest are either separated from their base or broken. In addition to the lack of maintenance
of the gravemarkers, the area has become overgrown with invasive plants. Because most of the
gravemarkers are no longer intact and the vegetation has become overgrown, the Hogg-Jones
Cemetery fails to convey its original design and materials of construction, decoration, and
landscaping. For these reasons, the Hogg-Jones Cemetery fails to convey overall setting from its
period of use.

National Register Evaluation
Graves and cemeteries are not typically considered eligible for the NRHP. Under National Register
Criterion C, an eligible grave must be of an individual who was of outstanding importance in the
history of the local area, state, or nation. An individual who was one of several people active in
some aspect of the history of a community would not be considered eligible for the NRHP. It
appears that the individuals interred within the Hogg-Jones Cemetery do not meet a level of
importance to satisfy Criterion C.

Under Criterion D, a cemetery is eligible if it derives its primary significance from graves of
persons of transcendent importance, from age, from distinctive design features, or from association
with historic events. The cemetery does not contain burials of individuals of outstanding
importance to the developmental history of the community. In addition, the cemetery, which dates
to the early to mid-twentieth century, is not reflective upon a unique period in local history. It does
not embody distinctive design values nor is the cemetery associated with historic events important
to the history of the region. Therefore, based on field observations and research, the Hogg-Jones
Cemetery is considered ineligible for listing in the NRHP.

Project Tracking No.:
“NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT”
form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
11 of 13
19-05-0013
Recommendations

In sum, a total of 182 STPs were excavated within the APE. No archaeological sites were
identified. Archaeological site 31JT92 was mapped within the APE and no prehistoric resources
were recovered proximate to the site location. It is suspected that site 31JT92 may have been
impacted during the construction of the Boling Townes residential development. No remains of
sites 31JT91 and 31JT240 were identified within the APE. Archaeological resources contributing
to the National Register-eligible Battle-Horne-Benson House (JT0672) were not present. No
National Register-eligible archaeological resources are situated within the APE. No further
archaeological survey is recommended.

The Hogg-Jones Cemetery (31JT640), situated within the APE northwest of Little Creek Church
Road, is a small family burial plot that dates to the early twentieth century. The cemetery is
recommended not eligible for listing in the NRHP. Avoidance of the Hogg-Jones Cemetery is
recommended.

SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: Map(s) Previous Survey Info Photos Correspondence
Signed:

December 31, 2020

NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST Date

References Cited:
Commonwealth Heritage Group, Inc.
2019 Extend NC 42 East to Connect to SR 1563 (Little Creek Church Road) and Improve
Intersection of SR 1563/SR 1560 (Rand Road) in Johnston County, North Carolina.
Historic Structures Survey Report. On file, North Carolina Department of Transportation,
Raleigh, North Carolina.

ESRI
2019 World Street Map. Web Map Service, http://www.esri.com/data/free-data/index.html,
accessed June 15, 2020.

Johnston County Deed Books (JCDB)
n.d. Johnston County Register of Deeds. Retrieved from
https://erec.johnstonnc.com/recorder/eagleweb/customSearch.jsp?pageId=DeedRecords.

Kimball, Larry R.
1977 An Archaeological Survey of the Clayton 201 Wastewater Facilities Area. On file, North
Carolina Historic Preservation Office, Raleigh, North Carolina.

Project Tracking No.:
“NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT”
form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
12 of 13
19-05-0013
Lewis & Associates Surveyors, PA
1993 Boundary Survey for Victor Lee Pounds, Clayton Township, Johnston County, NC. On
file, Johnston County Register of Deeds, Smithfield, North Carolina.

Nationwide Environmental Title Research (NETR)
1993 Historic Aerial Photographs. Electronic Document, http://historicaerials.com. Accessed
April 2020.
1999 Historic Aerial Photographs. Electronic Document, http://historicaerials.com. Accessed
April 2020.
2006 Historic Aerial Photographs. Electronic Document, http://historicaerials.com. Accessed
April 2020.
2008 Historic Aerial Photographs. Electronic Document, http://historicaerials.com. Accessed
April 2020.
2014 Historic Aerial Photographs. Electronic Document, http://historicaerials.com. Accessed
April 2020.
2016 Historic Aerial Photographs. Electronic Document, http://historicaerials.com. Accessed
April 2020.

Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
2020 Web Soil Survey http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/ Accessed July 8, 2020.

North Carolina Geological Survey
1991 Generalized Geological Map of North Carolina. Electronic Document,
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Energy%20Mineral%20and%20Land%20Resources/Geologica
l%20Survey/NC_Generalized_Geologic_Map.pdf, accessed December 30, 2018.

Petersen, Shane C.
2019 Request for Proposal, Archaeological Survey and Evaluation, Extension of NC 42 East and
Improvements to the Intersection of SR 1563 and SR 1560, Johnston County, North
Carolina (TIP No. U-6223; WBS No. 48332.1.1; PA 19-05-0013). North Carolina
Department of Transportation (NCDOT), Human Environment Section (HES),
Archaeology Group. Copies available from NCDOT HES, Raleigh.

Roberts, Marian D., C.S. Butler and A. Lee Novak
1993 Cultural Resources Reconnaissance Survey of Three Alternate Corridors for US 70 Clayton
Bypass, TIP R-2552, Wake and Johnston Counties, North Carolina. An Archaeological
Survey of the Clayton 201 Wastewater Facilities Area. On file, North Carolina Department
of Transportation, Raleigh, North Carolina.

Terracon Consultants, Inc.
2018 Phase I Archaeological Survey of 32.04 Acres at the Proposed Spinning Mill Lofts at East
Village Project, Johnston County, North Carolina. On file, North Carolina Historic
Preservation Office, Raleigh, North Carolina.

United States Bureau of the Census (US Census)
1900 United States of America, Bureau of the Census, Twelfth Census of the United States,
1900. On file, National Archives, Washington, D.C.
Project Tracking No.:
“NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT”
form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
13 of 13
19-05-0013
1910 United States of America, Bureau of the Census, Thirteenth Census of the United States,
1910. On file, National Archives, Washington, D.C.
1920 United States of America, Bureau of the Census, Fourteenth Census of the United States,
1920. On file, National Archives, Washington, D.C.
1930 United States of America, Bureau of the Census, Fifteenth Census of the United States,
1930. On file, National Archives, Washington, D.C.
1940 United States of America, Bureau of the Census, Sixteenth Census of the United States,
1940. On file, National Archives, Washington, D.C.

United States Geological Survey (U.S.G.S.)
2019 7.5’ Quadrangle: Clayton, NC.
2019 7.5’ Quadrangle: Powhatan, NC.
1993 7.5’ Quadrangle: Clayton, NC.
1973 7.5’ Quadrangle: Clayton, NC.
1964 7.5’ Quadrangle: Clayton, NC.
1953 7.5’ Quadrangle: Clayton, NC.
ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENT 1: FIGURES
Figure 1: U.S.G.S. Map
(2019 U.S.G.S. 7.5’ Quadrangles: Clayton, NC and Powhatan, NC).
WAKE
JOHNSTON
WAYNE
NASH
HARNETT
WILSON
SAMPSONCUMBERLAND
FRANKLIN
0
Feet
2000-
Project Location
Hogg-Jones Cemetery(31JT640)
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 2: County Map
(World Street Map, ESRI 2020).
WAKE
JOHNSTON
WAYNE
NASH
HARNETT
WILSON
SAMPSONCUMBERLAND
FRANKLIN
0
Feet
1000-
Project Location
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 3: Soils Map
(2020 Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resource Conservation Service, United States Department of
Agriculture. Soil Survey Geographic [SSURGO]).
CoB
McB
PaD Wt
NuA
NoB
McB
NoB
CeB
NuA
CoB
CoB
PaD
CeB
McB
Ra
Ra
MaB
NoB
CeB
Tn
CoB
PaD
W
CeC
PaD
NoB
Ud
Ra
CeC
PaD
PaD
MaB
MaB
Wt
Bb
W
AmB
PaD
Bb
GeB
W
PaD
PaD
Ra
CeB
WoB
VrA
0
Feet
700-
Project Location
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 4: Aerial map showing select archaeological sites and architectural resources within a
1-mile radius of the APE
(ESRI World Base Map).E Front StUS 70 Bus H
wy W
N C 4 2 H w y EE Mai
n St
N C 4 2 H w y W
Little

C
r
e
e
k
C
h
u
r
c
h

R
d
P o n y F a rm R d
D urham S tRanch RdJohn StCHAMPION STPeele Rd
E S
econ
d St
U
S 70 H
w
y
W
Io
w
a Dr Deer Trl
Vogue St Walden WayS Fayetteville StDai
r
y RdS Smith StS Barbour StCanyon RdS Tech Park LnS Page StAvondale DrWildwood DrCrooked Creek RdS Lom bard StB r itta n y D r Pond St
Tulip St
Westminster DrPecan Ln
Grant StHobbs StE Stallings StIllinois Dr Cardinal DrOhara StRegency Dr
Glenn St
C e n tra l S tN o r w ic h D r
K e r r ia n n L n
A v e r a s b o r o D r Dove LnRowan DrHIGHLAND RHODES DRPenny LnHardee StHolding St
P ly m o u t h D r
N S m ith S tPar
k Pl
Bald DrHardee LnJohnson DrW ren LnCrescent DrM ill S tR o b in L n
Astor StFalcon CtE Joyner
St
Oxford CtE quine LnWall StAmos St
Yadk
i
n StONYX CTUS 70 Hwy W
U
S 70 H
w
y
W
US 70 Bus H
wy W
US 70 Hwy W S Lombard St#
#
#
##
#
#
#
31JT95
JT2018
(Ellis Tenant House)31JT240
31JT233
31JT97
31JT96
31JT98
31JT99
31JT239
31JT241
31JT92
31JT91
JT0672
(Battle-Horne-Benson House)
31JT558
31JT556
31JT55731JT555
0
Feet
2000-
#Prehistoric Site
Study List Determination
of Eligibility
Surveyed Only
Project Location
Historic Site
#
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 5: 1953 U.S.G.S. 7.5’ Quadrangle: Clayton, NC.
0
Mile
1-
Project Location
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 6: 1964 U.S.G.S. 7.5’ Quadrangle: Clayton, NC.
0
Feet
1000-
Project Location
Hogg-Jones Cemetery(31JT640)
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 7: 1973 U.S.G.S. 7.5’ Quadrangle: Clayton, NC.
0
Feet
1000-
Project Location
Hogg-Jones Cemetery(31JT640)
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 8: 1993 U.S.G.S. 7.5’ Quadrangle: Clayton, NC.
0
Feet
1000-
Project Location
Hogg-Jones Cemetery(31JT640)
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 9: 1911 Johnston County, North Carolina Soil Map (North Carolina State Archives).
0
Feet
2000-
Project Location
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
!(!(!C!(!(!(!(!(!(!C!(!C!(!(!(!(!(!(!!E(!C!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!C!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(98765432186858483828180797877767574737271706968676665646362616059585756555453525150494847464544434241403938373635343332313029282726252423222120191817161514131211100Meters30-Study Area/APESTP - Modern Material Not Retained STP - No Cultural MaterialSTP - Not ExcavatedFigure 10: Aerial Map showing Shovel Test Pit Locations at the southern end of the APE.RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!!O!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!!O!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!C!C99989796959493929190898887868584832162151061051021011001041030Meters30-Study Area/APESTP - Modern Material Not Retained STP - No Cultural MaterialSTP - Not ExcavatedHogg-Jones Cemetery(31JT640)Figure 11: Aerial Map showing Shovel Test Pit Locations at the central section of the APE.RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!((!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!C!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!!O!(!(!!O!O!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!C!C!C2182172142102112122132092082072062052042032022011171161151141131121111101091081071061671661641631621611601591581571561551541531511501491481471461451441431421411401391381371361351341331321311301291281271261251241231221211201191181041711701690Meters30-Study Area/APESTP - Modern Material Not Retained STP - No Cultural MaterialSTP - Not ExcavatedFigure 12: Aerial Map showing Shovel Test Pit Locations at the central-northern section of the APE.RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
!(!(!(!(!C!(!C!(!(!(!(!(!C!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!C!(!C!(!(!(!C!(!C!(1821811801791851841781771831761721711701691681671661751651641631741621611601591581731571561551541521510Meters30-Study Area/APESTP - Modern Material Not Retained STP - No Cultural MaterialSTP - Not ExcavatedFigure 13: Aerial Map showing Shovel Test Pit Locations at the northern end of the APE.RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 14: Agricultural Field from Little Creek Church Road, facing North
(photo: Matt Harrup).
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 15: Little Creek Church Road, facing West
(photo: Matt Harrup).
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 16: Little Creek Church Road, facing West
(photo: Matt Harrup).
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 17: Overgrown Area, Little Creek Church Road, facing West
(photo: Matt Harrup).
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 18: Overgrown Area, Little Creek Church Road, facing East
(photo: Matt Harrup).
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 19: Representative soil profile, southern end of APE
(photo: Quinn Boykin).
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 20: Agricultural Field south of Boling Townes Development, facing East
(photo: Matt Harrup).
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 21: Residential Area on west side of Little Creek Church Road, facing Southeast
(photo: Matt Harrup).
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 22: Little Creek Church Road, facing South
(photo: Matt Harrup).
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 23: Representative soil profile, central portion of APE
(photo: Quinn Boykin).
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 24: Commercial Area including the Sheetz Convenience Store and Gas Station, facing South
(photo: Matt Harrup).
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 25: Forested Area south of NC 42 and across US 70 from the Commercial Area, facing
Southwest (photo: Matt Harrup).
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 26: Plan Map of the Hogg-Jones Cemetery (31JT640).
Thomas Hogg
John A. Hogg
Arthur Hogg
Infant
Donnie A. and
Carrie Jones
Lillie E. and
Dallie D. Jones
GG
GG
GG
0
Feet
Headstone
Blank Tablet, Broken Marker orFootstone
Approximate Cemeter y Boundary
10-
GG
Cemeter yLocation
GG
GG
GG
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 27: Cleared path into the Hogg-Jones Cemetery, facing West
(photo: Olivia Heckendorf).
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 28: View of the grave markers within the Hogg-Jones Cemetery, facing West
(photo: Olivia Heckendorf).
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 29: View looking towards Little Creek Church Road from the cemetery, facing East
(photo: Olivia Heckendorf).
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 30: View of the thick vines growing in the cemetery, facing West
(photo: Olivia Heckendorf).
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 31: View of the Lillie E. and Dallie D. Jones grave marker, facing West
(photo: Olivia Heckendorf).
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 32: View of the Donnie A. and Carrie Parrish Jones grave marker, facing West
(photo: Olivia Heckendorf).
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 33: View of the Thomas Hogg grave marker, facing West
(photo: Olivia Heckendorf).
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 34: View of a broken grave marker and base, facing Northwest
(photo: Olivia Heckendorf).
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 35: View of an infant grave marker, facing West
(photo: Olivia Heckendorf).
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 36: View of the Arther Hogg grave marker, facing West
(photo: Olivia Heckendorf).
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
Figure 37: View of the John A. Hogg grave marker, facing West
(photo: Olivia Heckendorf).
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
.
Hogg-Jones Cemetery(31JT640)Little CreekChurch Road ROW
Figure 38: 1993 Boundary Survey for Victor Lee Pounds depicting the Hogg-Jones Cemetery (31JT640) and Little Creek Church Road Right-of-Way
(Lewis & Associates Surveyors, PA 1993).
RICHARD GRUBB & ASSOCIATES
ATTACHMENT 2: SHOVEL TEST PIT LOG
SHOVEL TEST PIT LOG
STP DEPTH*STRATUM MUNSELL SOIL TYPE COMMENTS/ARTIFACTS
1 0-36 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
36-46 B 5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
2 0-32 Ap 10YR 5/4 Sandy Loam NCM
32-41 B 10YR 6/6 Clay Loam w/rocks NCM
3 Not excavated due to backyard/disturbance
4 0-6 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
6-16 B 5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
5 0-25 A 10YR 5/4 Sandy Loam w/pebbles NCM
25-35 B 10YR 7/6 Clay NCM
6 0-28 A 10YR 5/4 Sandy Loam w/pebbles NCM
28-40 B 10YR 7/4 Clay NCM
7 0-23 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
23-33 B 10YR 7/6 Clay Loam w/rocks NCM
8 0-29 Ap 10YR 5/4 Sandy Loam w/rocks NCM
29-42 B 10YR 6/8 Clay Loam w/rocks and roots NCM
9 0-14 Ap 10YR 5/4 Sandy Loam NCM
14-31 B 10YR 7/6 Clay Loam NCM
10 Not excavated due to slope
11 0-25 A 7.5YR 8/4 Loamy Sand NCM
25-35 B 5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
12 Not excavated due to disturbed/yard
13 0-32 A 10YR 6/8 Sandy Loam NCM
32-42 B 10YR 8/4 Sandy Clay NCM
14 0-12 A1 10YR 6/4 Sandy Loam NCM
12-42 A2 10YR 7/6 Sandy Loam NCM
42-50 B 5Y 8/6 Clay NCM
16 0-5 A 10YR 4/6 Sandy Loam NCM
5-15 B 5Y 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
17 0-32 A 10YR 4/6 Sandy Loam NCM
32-40 B 5Y 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
18 0-31 A 7.5YR 8/4 Loamy Sand NCM
31-41 B 5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay w/10% Cobbles NCM
19 0-27 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NR: brick and amber glass
27-59 B1 10YR 7/4 Sandy Loam NCM
59-67 B2 10YR 6/6 Clay Loam NCM
20 Not excavated due to driveway
21 0-26 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
26-34 B1 10YR 6/8 Clay Loam w/rocks and roots NCM
34-37 B2 5YR 5/8 Clay w/rocks and roots NCM
1
STP DEPTH*STRATUM MUNSELL SOIL TYPE COMMENTS/ARTIFACTS
22 0-36 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam w/rocks NCM
36-47 B 10YR 6/8 Clay Loam w/rocks and roots NCM
23 0-28 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
28-40 B 7.5YR 5/4 Sandy Clay NCM
24 0-29 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Clay NCM
29-40 B 7.5YR 5/4 Sandy Clay NCM
25 0-28 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
28-40 B 7.5YR 5/4 Sandy Clay NCM
26 0-5 A 10YR 5/6 Sandy Loam NCM
5-15 B 10YR 4/6 Sandy Clay NCM
27 0-14 A 10YR 7/6 Sandy Loam NCM
14-30 B 10YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
28 0-5 A 10YR 4/3 Sandy Loam NCM
5-15 B 5Y 8/6 Sandy Clay NCM
29 0-11 A 7.5YR 8/4 Loamy Sand NCM
11-20 B 5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
30 0-22 Ap 10YR 5/4 Sandy Loam NCM
22-40 B 10YR 6/8 Clay Loam w/charcoal NCM
31 0-8 A 10YR 5/2 Sandy Loam NCM
8-22 B 10YR 8/4 Sandy Clay NCM
32 0-20 A 10YR 5/2 Sandy Loam NCM
20-32 B 5YR 5/8 Clay NCM
33 0-15 A 10YR 6/4 Sandy Loam NCM
15-25 B 10YR 8/4 Sandy Clay NCM
34 0-33 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
33-43 B 7.5YR 5/4 Sandy Clay NCM
35 0-17 A 7.5YR 8/4 Clay Loam NCM
17-28 B 7.5YR 5/6 Clay Loam NCM
36 0-10 Fill 7.5YR 8/4 m/w 7.5YR 5/4 Clay Loam NCM
Stopped due to possible utility
37 Not excavated due to slope
38 0-8 A 10YR 7/5 Sandy Loam w/rocks NCM
8-25 B 10YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
39 0-10 A 10YR 7/6 Sandy Loam w/rocks NCM
10-30 B 5Y 8/6 Sandy Clay NCM
40 0-10 A 7.5YR 8/4 Clay Loam NCM
10-21 B 5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
41 0-32 A 10YR 5/2 Sandy Loam NCM
32-44 B 10YR 8/4 Sandy Clay NCM
2
STP DEPTH*STRATUM MUNSELL SOIL TYPE COMMENTS/ARTIFACTS
42 0-27 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
27-36 B 5YR 5/8 Clay w/rocks and roots NCM
43 0-27 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
27-37 B 7.5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay w/20% rocks NCM
44 0-8 A 10YR 7/5 Sandy Loam w/pebbles NCM
8-25 B 10YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
45 0-12 A1 10YR 7/6 Sandy Loam NCM
12-30 A2 10YR 5/6 Sandy Loam NCM
30-40 B 5YR 7/6 Sandy Clay NCM
46 0-7 A 5YR 3/2 Clay Loam NCM
7-17 B 5YR 5/6 Clay Loam NCM
47 0-10 A 10YR 6/4 Sandy Loam w/rocks NCM
10-32 B 10YR 8/4 Sandy Clay NCM
48 0-40 A 10YR 5/2 Sandy Loam NCM
40-52 B 10YR 8/4 Sandy Clay NCM
49 0-29 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
29-38 B 5YR 5/8 Clay w/rocks and roots NCM
50 0-18 A 7.5YR 8/4 Clay Loam NCM
18-29 B 7.5YR 5/6 Clay Loam NCM
51 0-21 A 7.5YR 8/4 Clay Loam NCM
21-31 B 7.5YR 5/6 Clay Loam NCM
52 0-11 Fill 7.5YR 8/4 m/w 7.5YR 5/4 Clay Loam w/50% gravels NCM
Stopped due to disturbance
53 0-23 A 5YR 3/2 Sandy Loam NCM
23-33 B 5YR 3/6 Sandy Clay NCM
54 0-6 A 5YR 3/2 Clay Loam NCM
6-16 B 5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
55 0-32 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
32-43 B 7.5YR 5/4 Sandy Clay NCM
55 0-32 Ap 10YR 5/4 Sandy Loam NCM
32-46 B 10YR 6/8 Clay w/few pebbles NCM
56 0-23 A 7.5YR 8/4 Clay Loam NCM
23-33 B 5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
57 0-13 A 7.5YR 3/2 Clay Loam NCM
13-23 B 7.5YR 5/4 Clay Loam NCM
58 0-24 A 7.5YR 8/4 Clay Loam NCM
24-34 B 5YR 5/6 Clay Loam NCM
59 Not excavated due to drainage ditch
60 0-10 Fill 5YR 3/2 Clay Loam NCM
Stopped due to possible utility
3
STP DEPTH*STRATUM MUNSELL SOIL TYPE COMMENTS/ARTIFACTS
61 0-29 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
29-40 B 5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
62 0-27 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
27-38 B 5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
63 0-17 A 7.5YR 8/4 Clay Loam w/roots NCM
17-28 B 5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay w/roots NCM
67 0-3 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
3-10 B 5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
68 0-4 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
4-14 B 5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
69 0-13 A 7.5YR 8/4 Clay Loam w/roots NCM
13-23 B 5YR 8/4 Sandy Clay w/roots NCM
70 0-10 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
10-27 B1 10YR 5/4 Sandy Loam w/roots and rocks NCM
27-36 B2 5YR 5/8 Clay NCM
71 0-19 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
19-31 B 5YR 5/8 Clay w/roots and rocks NCM
72 0-22 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
22-32 B 5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
73 0-10 Fill 7.5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
Disturbed -Adjacent to power line
Stopped due to disturbance
74 0-10 A 7.5YR 8/4 Clay Loam w/roots NCM
10-20 B 5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay w/10% rocks NCM
75 0-17 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
17-33 B 10YR 6/8 Clay NCM
76 0-17 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
17-33 B 10YR 6/8 Clay Loam w/rocks and roots NCM
77 0-26 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
26-38 B 10YR 5/6 Clay Loam w/rocks and roots NCM
78 0-4 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
4-14 B 5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
79 0-29 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
29-40 B 5YR 5/4 Sandy Clay NCM
80 0-24 A 7.5YR 8/4 Clay Loam NCM
24-35 B 5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
81 0-27 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
27-36 B 10YR 6/6 Clay Loam w/roots NCM
82 0-29 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
29-40 B 5YR 5/4 Sandy Clay NCM
83 0-13 A 7.5YR 3/2 Clay Loam NCM
13-24 B 5YR 5/6 Clay Loam NCM
4
STP DEPTH*STRATUM MUNSELL SOIL TYPE COMMENTS/ARTIFACTS
84 0-12 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
12-26 B1 10YR 5/6 Clay Loam w/rocks NCM
26-37 B2 10YR 7/6 Clay Loam w/roots NCM
85 0-34 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
34-44 B 5YR 5/4 Sandy Clay NCM
86 0-7 Fill 5YR 5/6 Clay Loam NCM
Stopped due to disturbance
87 0-18 A 7.5YR 5/4 Sandy Loam NCM
18-30 B 5YR 5/6 Clay Loam NCM
88 0-29 A 7.5YR 5/4 Sandy Loam w/5% gravel NCM
29-40 B 5Y 8/4 Sandy Clay NCM
89 0-11 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
11-25 B1 10YR 6/4 Clay Loam w/rocks NCM
25-33 B2 10YR 6/8 Clay NCM
90 0-24 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NR: modern glass and iron
24-40 B 10YR 5/6 Clay Loam NCM
91 0-31 A 7.5YR 5/4 Sandy Loam w/50% gravel NCM
31-42 B 5Y 8/4 Sandy Clay w/50% gravel NCM
92 0-36 A 7.5YR 5/4 Sandy Loam NCM
36-46 B 5Y 8/4 Sandy Clay w/20% gravel NCM
93 0-22 Ap 10YR 3/3 Sandy Loam NCM
22-36 B 10YR 5/8 Clay NCM
94 0-23 A 7.5YR 5/4 Sandy Loam NCM
23-33 B 7.5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
95 0-28 A 7.5YR 3/2 Sandy Loam NCM
28-38 B 7.5YR 5/4 Sandy Clay NCM
96 0-9 Ap 10YR 3/3 Sandy Loam NCM
9-17 B1 10YR 5/6 Sandy Loam NCM
17-25 B2 10YR 5/4 Clay Loam NCM
25-31 B3 10YR 5/8 Clay NCM
97 0-12 A 7.5YR 3/2 Sandy Loam NCM
12-23 B 7.5YR 5/4 Sandy Clay NCM
98 0-7 Ap 10YR 3/3 Sandy Loam NR: modern flower pot
7-25 B 10YR 5/6 Clay Loam NCM
99 0-19 A 7.5YR 5/4 Sandy Loam NCM
19-30 B 5Y 8/4 Sandy Clay NCM
100 0-8 Fill 7.5YR 5/6 Clay Loam NCM
Stopped due to disturbance
101 0-10 A 7.5YR 5/4 Loamy Sand NCM
10-17 B 5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
102 0-22 A 7.5YR 5/4 Loamy Sand NCM
22-32 B 5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
5
STP DEPTH*STRATUM MUNSELL SOIL TYPE COMMENTS/ARTIFACTS
103 0-7 Ap 10YR 3/3 Sandy Loam w/rocks NCM
7-25 B1 10YR 5/6 Clay Loam NCM
58-33 B2 10YR 5/8 Clay Loam NCM
104 0-8 Ap 10YR 3/4 Sandy Loam NCM
8-10 B1 10YR 5/8 Clay Loam NCM
10-24 B2 10YR 5/6 Clay Loam w/rocks NCM
105 0-20 A 7.5YR 5/4 Loamy Sand NCM
20-31 B 5YR 5/6 Sandy Loam NCM
106 0-18 Ap 10YR 6/6 Clay Loam NCM
18-32 B 10YR 5/8 Clay NCM
107 0-10 Fill 5Y 8/4 m/w 5YR 5/6 Sandy Loam NCM
Stopped due to disturbance
108 0-15 A 7.5YR 5/4 Loamy Sand NCM
15-26 B 5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam w/roots NCM
109 0-22 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
22-37 B 10YR 6/6 Clay Loam NCM
110 0-10 Fill 7.5YR 5/4 m/w 5Y 5/6 Loamy Sand NCM; On push pile
Stopped due to disturbance
111 0-32 A 5YR 3/1 Loamy Sand NCM
32-42 B 5Y 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
112 0-34 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
34-52 B 10YR 7/6 Clay Loam NCM
113 0-15 A 7.5YR 5/4 Loamy Sand NCM
15-27 B 5Y 8/4 Sandy Loam w/roots NCM
114 0-30 Ap 10YR 5/3 Sandy Loam NCM
30-37 B 10YR 6/6 Clay Loam NCM
115 0-14 A 7.5YR 5/4 Loamy Sand NCM
14-25 B 5YR 5/6 Sandy Loam NCM
116 0-24 Ap 10YR 5/3 Sandy Loam NCM
24-35 B 5YR 5/6 Clay Loam NCM
117 0-11 A 7.5YR 5/4 Loamy Sand NCM
11-21 B 5Y 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
118 0-26 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
26-36 B 7.5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
119 0-25 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
25-35 B 7.5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
120 0-38 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
38-48 B 7.5YR 5/4 Sandy Clay NCM
121 0-34 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
34-44 B 7.5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
122 0-23 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
23-33 B 7.5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
6
STP DEPTH*STRATUM MUNSELL SOIL TYPE COMMENTS/ARTIFACTS
123 0-24 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
24-35 B 7.5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
124 0-30 A 10YR 4/3 Sandy Loam NCM
30-40 B 10YR 6/5 Sandy Clay NCM
125 0-11 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
11-27 B1 10YR 5/6 Clay Loam NCM
27-34 B2 10YR 5/8 Clay NCM
126 0-10 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
10-25 B1 10YR 6/6 Clay Loam NCM
25-37 B2 10YR 5/8 Clay NCM
127 0-8 A 10YR 4/3 Sandy Loam NCM
8-18 B 5YR 5/8 Clay NCM
128 0-14 Ap 10YR 3/3 Sandy Loam w/pebbles NCM
14-23 B 10YR 6/6 Clay Loam NCM
129 0-8 A 10YR 4/3 Sandy Loam NCM
8-18 B 5YR 5/8 Clay NCM
130 0-12 A1 10YR 4/3 Sandy Loam NCM
12-38 A2 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
38-45 B 5YR 5/8 Clay NCM
131 0-20 A 10YR 4/3 Sandy Loam w/pebbles NCM
20-30 B 5YR 5/8 Clay NCM
132 0-12 Ap 10YR 3/3 Sandy Loam NCM
12-19 B1 10YR 4/4 Clay Loam w/pebbles NCM
19-25 B2 10YR 6/6 Clay Loam NCM
133 0-27 A 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
27-36 B 10YR 6/5 Sandy Clay NCM
134 0-18 A 10YR 4/4 Sandy Clay Loam NCM
18-28 B 10YR 5/8 Sandy Clay NCM
135 0-32 A 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
32-45 B 10YR 6/5 Sandy Clay NCM
136 0-40 A 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
40-50 B 10YR 6/5 Sandy Clay NCM
137 0-20 A 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
20-32 B 10YR 6/5 Sandy Clay NCM
138 0-22 A 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam w/pebbles NCM
22-32 B 10YR 6/5 Sandy Clay NCM
139 0-15 A 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam w/pebbles and roots NCM
15-25 B 5YR 5/8 Clay NCM
140 0-29 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
29-38 B 10YR 6/6 Clay Loam w/pebbles NCM
141 0-19 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
19-31 B 10YR 5/8 Clay w/pebbles NCM
7
STP DEPTH*STRATUM MUNSELL SOIL TYPE COMMENTS/ARTIFACTS
142 0-25 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
25-29 B1 10YR 6/6 Clay Loam w/pebbles NCM
29-35 B2 10YR 5/8 Clay NCM
143 0-30 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
30-35 B1 10YR 6/6 Clay Loam NCM
35-44 B2 10YR 5/8 Clay w/pebbles NCM
144 0-26 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
26-39 B 10YR 5/8 Clay w/pebbles NCM
145 0-28 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
28-36 B 10YR 6/6 Clay Loam NCM
146 0-37 Ap 10YR 5/4 Sandy Loam NCM
37-44 B 10YR 5/8 Clay NCM
147 0-14 Ap 10YR 6/6 Clay Loam NCM
14-22 B 10YR 5/8 Clay w/pebbles NCM
148 0-34 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
34-42 B 10YR 6/6 Clay Loam w/pebbles NCM
149 0-5 A 7.5YR 3/2 Sandy Loam NCM
5-15 B 7.5YR 5/8 Sandy Clay NCM
150 0-28 A 7.5YR 3/2 Sandy Loam NCM
28-38 B 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Clay NCM
151 0-6 A 7.5YR 3/2 Sandy Loam NCM
6-16 B 7.5YR 5/4 Sandy Clay NCM
152 0-37 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
37-47 B 7.5YR 5/4 Sandy Clay NCM
153 0-13 A 7.5YR 3/2 Sandy Loam NCM
13-23 B 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Clay NCM
154 0-5 A 7.5YR 3/2 Sandy Loam NCM
5-15 B 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Clay NCM
155 0-26 A 7.5YR 3/2 Sandy Loam NCM
26-36 B 7.5YR 5/4 Sandy Clay NCM
156 Not excavated due to dwelling
157 0-10 Fill 7.5YR 5/6 m/w 7.5YR 3/2 Sandy Loam NCM
Stopped due to pet cemetery
158 0-17 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
17-27 B 7.5YR 5/4 Sandy Clay NCM
159 0-17 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
17-30 B 10YR 6/8 m/w 2.5YR 4/8 Clay w/rocks and pebbles NCM
160 0-10 Fill 7.5YR 8/4 m/w 7.5YR 5/4 Sandy Clay NCM
Edge of driveway
Stopped due to disturbance
161 0-36 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
36-49 B 10YR 6/6 m/w 10YR 6/8 Clay Loam w/pebbles NCM
8
STP DEPTH*STRATUM MUNSELL SOIL TYPE COMMENTS/ARTIFACTS
162 0-6 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
6-22 B 10YR 6/6 Clay Loam w/pebbles NCM
163 0-8 Ap 10YR 3/3 Sandy Loam NCM
8-29 B1 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam w/pebbles NCM
29-36 B2 10YR 6/6 Clay Loam w/pebbles NCM
164 0-9 Ap 10YR 3/3 Sandy Loam NCM
9-23 B1 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam w/pebbles NCM
23-30 B2 10YR 6/6 Clay Loam NCM
165 0-10 Fill 7.5YR 8/4 m/w 7.5YR 5/4 Sandy Clay NCM; Parking area
Stopped due to disturbance
166 0-12 Ap 10YR 3/3 Sandy Loam NCM
12-21 B1 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam w/pebbles NCM
21-39 B2 10YR 6/8 Clay Loam w/pebbles NCM
167 0-23 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam w/pebbles NCM
23-38 B 10YR 6/6 Clay Loam NCM
168 0-7 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
7-17 B 7.5YR 5/4 Sandy Clay NCM
169 0-32 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
32-44 B 10YR 6/8 Clay w/pebbles NCM
170 Not excavated due to slope/pavement
171 0-15 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
15-25 B 7.5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
172 0-11 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
11-34 B1 10YR 6/6 Clay Loam w/pebbles NCM
34-42 B2 10YR 6/8 Clay NCM
173 Not excavated due to backyard/disturbance
174 Not excavated due to drainage ditch
175 0-6 Fill 7.5YR 5/6 Sandy Clay NCM
Stopped due to disturbance
176 Not excavated due to railroad
177 Not excavated due to railroad
178 0-36 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
36-52 B 10YR 6/6 Clay Loam w/few pebbles NCM
179 Not excavated due to railroad
180 Not excavated due to fence/inside business property
181 Not excavated due to buisness property/equipment
182 0-39 Ap 10YR 4/4 Sandy Loam NCM
39-51 B 10YR 6/6 Clay Loam w/few pebbles NCM
183 0-38 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
38-48 B 7.5YR 5/4 Sandy Clay NCM
9
STP DEPTH*STRATUM MUNSELL SOIL TYPE COMMENTS/ARTIFACTS
184 0-40 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
40-50 B 7.5YR 5/4 Sandy Clay NCM
185 0-36 A 7.5YR 8/4 Sandy Loam NCM
36-46 B 7.5YR 5/4 Sandy Clay NCM
201 0-28 Ap 10YR 8/4 Sandy Loam w/pebbles NCM
28-35 B 10YR 7/4 Sandy Clay NCM
202 0-15 Ap 10YR 8/4 Sandy Loam w/pebbles NCM
15-25 B 10YR 7/4 Sandy Clay NCM
203 Not excavated due to garbage/disturbance
204 0-17 Ap 10YR 5/4 Sandy Loam NCM
17-25 B 10YR 7/4 Sandy Clay NCM
205 0-22 Ap 10YR 7/4 Sandy Loam NCM
22-30 B 10YR 6/8 Sandy Clay NCM
206 0-28 Ap 10YR 7/4 Sandy Loam NCM
28-32 B 10YR 8/4 Sandy Clay NCM
207 0-35 Ap 10YR 7/4 Sandy Loam NCM
35-40 B 10YR 8/4 Sandy Clay NCM
208 0-34 Ap 10YR 7/4 Sandy Loam w/pebbles NCM
34-42 B 10YR 8/4 Sandy Clay NCM
209 0-18 Ap 10YR 7/4 Sandy Loam NR: wrappers, brown and green bottle
glass (modern), can frags, brick frags,
wire nails
18-30 B 10 YR 8/4 Sandy Clay NCM
210 Not excavated due to recent trash dump
211 0-27 Ap 10YR 7/4 Sandy Loam NR: modern bottle glass, plastic and
concrete
27-35 B 10YR 8/4 Sandy Clay NCM
212 0-20 Ap 10YR 5/4 Sandy Loam NR: can tab, modern bottle glass, plastic
20-27 B 10YR 6/4 Sandy Clay NCM
213 0-25 Ap 10YR 5/4 Sandy Loam NCM
25-30 B 10YR 8/4 Sandy Clay NCM
214 0-1 Ap 10YR 5/4 Sand NCM
1-11 B 10YR 6/8 Sandy Clay NCM
215 Not excavated due to utilities
216 Not excavated due to utilities
217 Not excavated due to driveway
218 Not excavated due to driveway
Key:
*Depth in centimeters below ground surface
m/w = Mottled with
NCM = No Cultural Material
NR = Not retained
STP = Shovel Test Pit
10