20191692 Ver 5_BPDP_20210924

ID#* 20191692 Version* 5
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 09/24/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal - 9/24/2021
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* O Yes a No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands W Buffer W Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Raymond Holz
Project Information
...................................................................................
ID#:* 20191692
Existing IDY
Project Type:
Project Name:
County:
r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Raleigh Farm Phase B-C
Wake
Document Information
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version: *5
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: 2019-1692 V5 Phase B-C Raleigh
56.77MB
Farm BPDP_2021-09-20_.pdf
Rease upload only one RDFcf the corrplete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Raymond Holz
Signature:*

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#*
20191692
Select Reviewer:*
Version* 5
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 09/21/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal - 9/20/2021
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?*
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands 17 Buffer IZ Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Raymond Holz
Project Information
I D#: *
20191692
Existing IIY
0Yes 0No
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version: *5
Existing Version
Project Type: r DMS C Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Raleigh Farm (Phase B-C)
County: Wake
Document Information
..................................................................................................................................................................
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload:
Signature
Print Name:*
Signature:*
2019-1692 V5_Phase B-C_Raleigh
Farm_BPDP_2021-09-20_.pdf
Rease upload only one R]Fof the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Raymond Holz
56.77MB

Bank Parcel Development Package
RALEIGH FARM — PHASE B-C
NUTRIENT OFFSET AND BUFFER MITIGATION BANK PARCEL
Neuse River Basin
DWR ID#: 2019-1692 V5
Bank Parcel Sponsor
Restoration Systems, LLC
POC: Barrett Jenkins
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
[e-mail]
919.755.9490
September 20, 2021

Table of Contents
1.0
Introduction.....................................................................................................................................1
1.1 Bank Sponsor........................................................................................................................
2
1.2 Project Location & Fee -Simple Ownership...........................................................................2
1.3 Directions to Parcel from Raleigh: ........................................................................................
3
1.4 Parcel Overview....................................................................................................................3
1.5 Historic Land Use..................................................................................................................6
2.0
Project Area - Current Conditions...................................................................................................7
2.1 Physiography........................................................................................................................7
2.2 Soils.......................................................................................................................................7
2.3 Existing Vegetative Communities.........................................................................................8
2.4 Parcel Design and Implementation Constraints...................................................................9
2.4.1 Threatened and Endangered Species.....................................................................11
2.4.2 Cultural Resources..................................................................................................11
3.0
Restoration Plan.............................................................................................................................12
3.1 Project Schedule.................................................................................................................13
3.2 Permitting...........................................................................................................................13
3.3 Planting Plan.......................................................................................................................14
3.3.1 Permanent Seed Mix..............................................................................................15
3.4 Parcel Protection & Easement Boundaries........................................................................15
3.5 As -Built Report...................................................................................................................16
4.0
Monitoring and Maintenance Plan................................................................................................16
4.1 Monitoring Protocol & Success Criteria.............................................................................16
4.2 Parcel Maintenance............................................................................................................16
4.3 Maintenance Areas............................................................................................................16
4.4 Long Term Management Plan............................................................................................17
5.0
Financial Assurance........................................................................................................................17
6.0
Mitigation Potential.......................................................................................................................17
7.0
References.....................................................................................................................................18
Tables
Table 1. Bank Parcel Easement Tracts..........................................................................................................1
Table 2. Bank Parcel Fee Simple Ownership (Project Parcels)......................................................................3
Table 3. Phase B Project Features Descriptions............................................................................................3
Table 4. Phase C Project Features Descriptions............................................................................................5
Table5. Timeline of Land Use.......................................................................................................................7
Table6. Parcel Soils.......................................................................................................................................7
Table 7. Reference Forest Ecosystem...........................................................................................................9
Table 8. Documented and Recorded Parcel Constraints & Design Avoidance.............................................9
Table 9. USFWS Federally Protected Species List.......................................................................................11
Table 10. Restoration Plan Activities..........................................................................................................12
Table 11. Phase B-C Project Schedule.........................................................................................................13
Table 12. Phase B Proposed Hardwood Bare Root Planting Plan by Species.............................................14
Table 13. Phase C Proposed Hardwood Bare Root Planting Plan by Species.............................................15
Table 14. Phase C Proposed Hardwood Bare Root Planting Plan by Species.............................................16
Table 15. Raleigh Farm Bank Parcel - Phase B-C, 2019-1692v5, Project Credits........................................19
Raleigh Farm - Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Table of Contents
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

Appendices
Appendix A: Figures & Photos
Figure 1—
Parcel Location and Service Area
Figure 2 —
Parcel Easements and Features
Figure 3 —
USGS Topography
Figure 4 —
NRCS Soil Survey
Figure 5 —
Current Conditions
Figure 6 —
NRRRF & Proposed Project Footprint
Figure 7A—
Phase B Biosoild Application Fields
Figure 7B
— Phase C Biosoild Application Fields
Figure 8A
— Phase B Restoration Plan
Figure 8B
— Phase C Restoration Plan
Figure 9 —
Phase B Credit Determinations
Figure 10—
Phase C Credit Determinations (A-C)
Figure 11A— Phase B Monitoring Plan
Figure 11B — Phase B Monitoring Plan
Existing Conditions Photos
Appendix B: DWR Correspondence
Appendix C: USDA, NRCS Web Soil Survey Report
Appendix D: EDR Report
Appendix E: USFWS Report
Appendix F: NC NHP and NC SHPO Correspondence
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Table of Contents
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

Bank Parcel Development Package
Raleigh Farm Phase B-C — Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Wake County, NC — Neuse River Basin
1.0 Introduction
The Raleigh Farm Phase BC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel ("Parcel" or "Site") is
proposed under the terms and conditions of the Raleigh Farm Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset
Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument, made and entered into on , 20_, by Restoration
Systems, LLC (RS), acting as Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ), Division of Water Resources (DWR). The Parcel shall be planned and designed according
to the MBI, the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295, which became effective on
November 1, 2015, and the Nutrient Offset Credit Trading Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
Located in Wake County, the Parcel encompasses 107.9 acres of agricultural land and forests. The primary
purpose of the Parcel is to provide Riparian Buffer Credit (RBC) and Nutrient Offset Credits (NOC) for
stormwater and wastewater permitting requirements within the United States Geological Survey (USGS)
Cataloging Unit 03020201 — RBC and NOC are available for offsets within the Cataloging Unit, excluding
the Falls Lake Watershed (Appendix A, Figure 1). The Site will restore 55.123 acres and preserve 41.372
acres of riparian area, measured perpendicularly 200 feet off the top of bank, from 11 unnamed
tributaries, the Neuse River, two (2) in -line ponds, and one (1) agricultural ditch (Site Features)(Figures 2-
5, Appendix A). An additional 11.405 acres will be permanently protected within the conservation
easement but will not generate credit. The 11.405 acres consist of areas beyond 200-feet from Site
Features, the footprint of Site Features, non -credited areas, and non -credited access/maintenance areas
within the conservation easement.
The Site is situated on four tracts of land (Project Parcels), owned by the City of Raleigh (City). Project
Parcels are part of the City's Neuse River Resource Recovery Facility (NRRRF) and managed by the City of
Raleigh Public Utilities Department, also known as Raleigh Water. Due to the Site's total size, the Parcel is
divided into two Phases, "B" and "C" — implementation, management, and reporting will be conducted as
one single Bank Parcel, Phase B-C.
The Parcel's Site Features drain directly to and includes the Neuse River. Proposed Parcel easement tracts
will provide permanent protection to restored and preserved riparian buffers —Table 1 details the Site's
Easement Areas, by Phase, with individual and total acreages.
Table 1. Bank Parcel Easement Tracts
Phase
Easement
Tract No.
Acreage
Total Phase
Acreage
Phase B
8
3.86
33.94
9
7.51
10
6.46
11
8.60
12
4.93
13
2.58
Total Parcel Acreage = 107.90
Phase
Easement
Tract No.
Acreage
Total Phase
Acreage
Phase C
14
1.28
73.96
15
5.41
16
25.13
17
12.37
18
2.15
19
16.94
20
10.68
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Page 1 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

The City began residual biosolid application on portions of the Project Parcels in 1980 and currently has
1,439 acres permitted for land application of biosolids on the larger farm. Land application of biosolids
has occurred on the parcels since acquired by the City except for the 10-year moratorium between 2003
and 2013. The Site, and proposed easement areas, are located away from fixed infrastructure associated
with the application of biosolids (i.e., application piping and wellheads). In addition to biosolid
applications, the property is managed for hay and row crop production. A review of aerial photography
indicates agricultural areas of the property were converted from forest to agricultural before 1993, with
no significant changes to land use since.
Phase B-C will have its own credit release schedule for milestones met in accordance with the Raleigh
Farm Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument for Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Credits (UMBI).
DWR representatives conducted onsite determinations for the applicability and suitability of Site Features
on June 2 and 8, 2020. Stream Determination letters for both Phase B and C were provided on August 17,
2020, and Site Viability letters were provided on September 24, 2020 (Phase B) and September 25, 2020
(Phase C). All letters are provided in Appendix B.
IRS will secure a conservation easement to preserve the Site in perpetuity, restricting any development
that would impair or interfere with the Site's conservation values. City allowance of a conservation
easement is further described in Section 3.4 (Parcel Protection & Easement Boundaries) of this document.
Per the referenced Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument (UMBI) above, IRS will arrange the transfer of
the conservation easement and its interests in perpetuity to a qualified holder under NC. General Statute
("GS") 121-34 et seq. and 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code before the approval of the As -Built Report
by DWR. The holder shall be a land trust or stewardship program accredited by the Land Trust
Accreditation Commission and/or approved by DWR. A land trust must be certified under 501(c) (3) of the
Internal Revenue Code and must have the qualifications outlined in GS 105-130.24 and GS 105-151.12.
1.1 Bank Sponsor
The Site is proposed by Restoration Systems, LLC (IRS). Information for IRS is provided below;
Restoration Systems, LLC
Attention: Barrett Jenkins
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
[e-mail]
919.755.9490
1.2 Project Location & Fee -Simple Ownership
The Parcel is located approximately three miles northwest of Clayton, five miles east of Garner, and seven
miles southeast of Raleigh in Wake County, NC. The City is the current fee -simple owner of tracts
associated with the Bank Parcel. The Parcel is within the Neuse River Basin 14-digit USGS Cataloging Unit
03020201100030 of the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain (North Carolina Division of Water Resources [DWR]
Sub -basin Number 03-04-02) (Figure 1, Appendix A). Fee simple ownership and Project Parcel details are
provided in Table 2.
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Page 2 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

Table 2. Bank Parcel Fee Simple Ownership (Project Parcels)
Owner Name
D.B/Pg.
NC PIN#
Acreage
City of Raleigh
9885/449
1751047213
1462.55
City of Raleigh
12203/2060
1751110436
47.86
City of Raleigh
4890/535
1751625844
211.53
City of Raleigh
15585/445
1751449602
127.97
1.3 Directions to Parcel from Raleigh:
- Head South on N. Blount St.
- Turn left onto Martin Luther King Jr Blvd. (1.1 mi)
- Turn right onto Rock Quarry Rd. (0.2 mi)
- Keep right to stay on Rock Quarry Rd. (7.4 mi)
- Turn left onto Old Baucom Rd. (1.8 mi)
- Latitude, Longitude: 35.707071°,-78.479510'
1.4 Parcel Overview
The Site's footprint totals 107.9 acres over four tracts of land. Current land use is a mixture of managed
fields for biosolid applications from the City's NRRRF, row crop agriculture, and unmanaged hardwood
forests (Figure 5-7, Appendix A). The Site will provide riparian area restoration and preservation along 11
unnamed tributaries, the Neuse River, two (2) in -line ponds, and one (1) agricultural ditch (Site Features).
All Site Features drain directly to the Neuse River.
Site Features are devoid of woody vegetation outside of forested areas due to historic and active
agricultural practices. Managed features are maintained (mowed/brush hogged) to keep woody
vegetation from establishing.
DWR representative conducted onsite stream determinations and site viability assessments for mitigation
potential on June 8, 2020 (Phase B) and June 2, 2020 (Phase C). A summary of applicable Parcel Features,
by classification and Phase, is provided in Tables 3 and 4 and graphically depicted in Figures 2-5 of
Appendix A.
Table 3. Phase B Project Features Descriptions
Classification
1Subject
s
Riparian Land uses
Buffer
a
Nutrient Offset
Feature
onsite
to Buffer
adjacent to Feature (0-200')
Credit
Viable
Rule
Viable
1A
Ephemeral
No
Combination of non -forested agricultural
2,7 Yes
Yes (non -
fields and mature forest
forested areas only)
Combination of non -forested agricultural
1B
Stream
Yes
fields and mature forest
z Yes
Yes (non -
forested areas only)
Utility line is present
2A
Combination of non -
Yes (non -
(ends at confluence
Ephemeral
No
forested agricultural fields and mature
z,' Yes
w/ 2C)
I
I
I forest
forested areas only)
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Page 3 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

Table 3. Phase B Project Features Descriptions (Continued)
Classification
1 Subject
s
Riparian Land uses
Buffer
a
Nutrient Offset
Feature
onsite
to Buffer
adjacent to Feature (0-200')
Credit
Viable
Rule
Viable
213
(ends at confluence
Ephemeral
No
Combination of non -forested agricultural
1,7 Yes
Yes (non -forested
w/ 2C)
fields and mature forest
areas only)
Mostly mature forest with some
2C
Stream
Yes
agricultural field
z Yes
Yes (non -forested
areas only)
Utility line and a greenway are present
Combination of non -forested agricultural
fields and mature forest
Yes (non -forested
3A
Stream
No
' Yes
areas only)
Trash is located in the stream and needs
to be removed where possible
Combination of non -forested agricultural
fields and mature forest
46
A gas line is proposed to impact stream;
(starts above pond
Stream
Yes
existing utilities are present (see map)
' Yes
Yes (non -forested
& continues to
areas only)
Main tributary 4)
A force main was located along this
stream; A utility line is present through
the pond.
6A
Ephemeral
No
Mostly mature forest with some adjacent
1,7 Yes
Yes (non -forested
agricultural field
areas only)
Table 3. Phase B footnotes:
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated August 17, 2020
using the 1:24,000 scale quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed
version of the soil survey map prepared by the NRCS .
'The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent
(25%) of the total area of buffer mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site
cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3 NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions
associated with Riparian Buffer Establishment
' Landuses may also include the application of bio-solids associated with the NRRRF
'The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent (25%) of
the total area of buffer mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Page 4 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

Table 4. Phase C Project Features Descriptions
Classification
1Subject
s Riparian Land uses
Buffer
a
Nutrient Offset
Feature
onsite
to Buffer
adjacent to Feature (0-200)
Credit
Viable
Rule
Viable
1A
Forested above the pond and mostly non-
Yes (non -forested
(includes Pond 1 &
Ephemeral
No
forested agricultural fields around and
27 Yes
areas only)
ends at 16)
downstream of pond
Combination of non -forested agricultural
16
(begins at DWR
Stream
Yes
fields and mature forest
z Yes
Yes (non -forested
E/I flag)
areas only)
A greenway is present downstream
2A
Stream
Yes
Combination of non -forested agricultural
z Yes
Yes (non -forested
fields and mature forest
areas only)
26
Wetland
No
fully forested with adjacent agricultural
No
No
(ends at DWR flag 2C)
fields
2C
Stream
Yes
Combination of non -forested agricultural
z Yes
Yes (non -forested
fields and mature forest
areas only)
2D
Wetland
No
fully forested with adjacent agricultural
No
No
(ends at DWR flag 2E)
fields
2E
Stream
Yes
Combination of non forested agricultural
z Yes
Yes (non -forested
fields and mature forest
areas only)
Combination of non -forested agricultural
fields and mature forest
3A
Stream
Yes
z Yes
Yes (non -forested
There is an access crossing present across
areas only)
the stream and a greenway located
downstream
4A
Ephemeral
No
Combination of non -forested agricultural
z-� Yes
Yes (non -forested
fields and mature forest
areas only)
Combination of non -forested agricultural
46
Stream
Yes
fields and mature forest
z Yes
Yes (non -forested
areas only)
A greenway is present downstream
56
Mature forest along both sides of channel
Yes (non -forested
(includes Pond 5
Stream
*No
with non -forested agricultural located along
z Yes
areas only)
left bank
Mature forest along both sides of channel
Yes (non -forested
Pond 5
In -line Pond
Yes
with non -forested agricultural located along
z Yes
left bank
areas only)
Mature forest along both sides of channel
5C
with non -forested agricultural located along
Yes (non -forested
(starts below
Stream
Yes
left bank
z Yes
areas only)
Pond 5)
utility line present downstream
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Page 5 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

Table 4. Phase C Project Features Descriptions (Continued)
Classification
1Subject
a
Riparian Land uses
Buffer
a
Nutrient Offset
Feature
onsite
to Buffer
adjacent to Feature (0-200)
Credit
Viable
Rule
Viable
Ditch
narrow forested fringe and non -forested
6A
No
No
Yes (fields only)
> 3' depth
agricultural fields
Table 4. Phase C footnotes:
' Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated August 17, 2020
using the 1:24,000 scale quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed
version of the soil survey map prepared by the NRCS .
'The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent
(25%) of the total area of buffer mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site
cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3 NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions
associated with Riparian Buffer Establishment
4 Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures
submitted with the request.
s All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset, must have a conservation easement
established that includes the tops of channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward
from the banks, even if no credit is viable within that riparian area.
' Land uses may also include the application of bio-solids associated with the NRRRF
' The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent (25%) of
the total area of buffer mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).
* Per 2021-09-10 conversation with DWR, agricultural pond and exempt from Buffer Rule. Meeting Notes
are provided in Appendix B
1.5 Historic Land Use
City of Raleigh's Neuse River Resource Recovery Facility (NRRRF)
The City began biosolid residuals application in 1980 and currently has 1,439 acres permitted for land
application. Land application of biosolids has occurred on Site since the City's acquisition of Project Parcels
except for a 10-year moratorium between 2003 and 2013. Several areas in the Site's proposed footprint
are subject to biosolids application. Specific field boundaries and active biosolid application areas are
further detailed in Figures 6-7, Appendix A. The property is currently managed for hay and row crop
production.
Table 5 details a review of the City's Parcels with aerial photography beginning in 1969.
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Page 6 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

Table 5. Timeline of Land Use
Period
Arial Photo
Land Use
Date
02/9/1969
Fragmented agricultural within forested lands, progressively more land clearing for
1969-89
12/7/1989
agricultural purposes
Evidence of final forest to agricultural conversion
Early 90's
02/18/1993
Phase B, Features 4 and 6 (easement areas 11 and 12)
Phase C, Features 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (easement areas 15, 16, 17, and 19)
02/21/1999
01/03/2005
Established City agricultural fields with no substantial difference observed to land
1999 —
07/25/2010
use activities.
Present
05/19/2015
_ 2014-2015, Phase B—failure of an in -line agricultural pond along Feature 4 (area
02/04/2019
outside of proposed Parcel footprint).
2.0 Project Area — Current Conditions
2.1 Physiography
The Site encapsulates heavily modified headwater stream systems within the Middle Atlantic Coastal
Plain. Specifically, Ecoregion IV-45f Northern Outer Piedmont, located within the eastern portion of the
Piedmont, to the Coastal Plain Fall Line, in northern North Carolina (the transition between North
Carolina's Piedmont and Coastal Plain). This ecoregion consists of dissected irregular plains, rounded hills
and ridges, and low to moderate gradient streams with mostly cobble, gravel, and sandy substrates
(Griffith et al. 2002).
The watershed is dominated by agricultural land, fringe forests, and impervious surfaces associated with
single-family homes and roads. Surrounding area land use is primarily row -crop agriculture, with some
low -density residential housing, cattle pasture, and forested lands.
2.2 Soils
A detailed soil report for the Site was produced using the Natural Resource Conservation Service's (NRCS)
Web Soil Survey (USDA 2019)(Appendix C). Based on the custom report, the Bank Parcel contains the soil
series outlined in Table 6.
Table 6. Parcel Soils
Map Unit
Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in
Parcel
Percent of
Parcel
Hydric
Soil Rating
AaA
Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes, rarely flooded
8.4
7.8%
No*
AuA
Augusta fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded
0.6
0.6%
No
ChA
Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
17.5
16.2%
Yes
FrB
Fuquay loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
12.2
11.3%
No
GrC
Gritney sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
7.6
7.1%
No
HeB
Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
1.7
1.6%
No
LyA
Lynchburg sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
1.6
1.5%
No*
RgC
Rawlings -Rion complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes
10.4
9.6%
1 No
RgD
Rawlings -Rion complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes
12.3
11.4%
1 No
*May contain inclusions of hydric soils
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5)
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201
Page 7 of 19

Table 6. Parcel Soils (Continued)
Map Unit
Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in
Parcel
Percent of
Parcel
Hydric
Soil Rating
RkA
Riverview fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally flooded
5.7
5.2%
No*
WaD
Wake-Rolesville complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes, very rocky
2.9
2.6%
No
WaE
Wake-Rolesville complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, very rocky
17.8
16.5%
No
WeB
Wedowee sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
3.1
2.9%
No
WeC
Wedowee sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
1.2
1.1%
No
WfB
Wedowee -Saw complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes
0.8
0.7%
No
NA
Open Water
4.1
3.9%
NA
Totals
107.9
100.0%
*May contain inclusions of hydric soils
2.3 Existing Vegetative Communities
Of the Site's 107.9-acre footprint, 57.265 acres are in managed agricultural fields or pasture (Phase B =
11.043 acres, Phase C = 46.222 acres). Typical crops grown include corn and soybeans, though individual
fields are often subject to other crops like sunflowers. Pasture areas are comprised predominantly of
Bermuda and fescue (Festuca sp.) gasses. Pasture fields are cut/managed throughout the year. In general,
Site Features are subject to agricultural impacts in the upper half of each individual watershed. As the
Features migrate downstream, they typically enter disturbed fringe forests, which expand as Site Features
move down valley.
Site Features drain to the Neuse River. To the south of the Parcel and abutting the City's property is the
Clemmons Educational State Forest and other lands managed by the State of North Carolina (NHP Report
Appendix F). Existing hardwood forests of these managed properties are consistent with Piedmont mesic
forests, which occur on moist portions of upland habitat, steep north -facing slopes, lower slopes, along
ravines, high sections of outer floodplains, and stream bottoms. The most common subtypes in the
Piedmont are Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest and Basic Mesic Forest (Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley.
2012).
Proposed Parcel easements connect proposed riparian buffer restoration and preservation areas to
existing fringe forests along the Neuse River. Phase B and the upper extent of Phase C's vegetation
community is consistent with a dry Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype). Lower portions of
Phase C are located in the Neuse River's floodplain. Observed species within the Neuse floodplain are
consistent with Schafale and Weakley's Piedmont Bottomland Forest (2012).
Given the Parcels physiography, IRS has determined a mix of Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont
Subtype) and Piedmont Bottomland Forest is the most appropriate reference forest (Schafale, M.P. and
A.S. Weakley. 2012). Table 7 outlines the species included in these reference forest ecosystems.
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Page 8 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

Table 7. Reference Forest Ecosystem
Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) and Piedmont Bottomland Hardwoods
(Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 2012)
Understory/Shrub Species
Deerberry (Vaccinium stamineum)
Red maple (Acer rubrum)
Downy arrowwood (Viburnum rafinesquianum)
Flowering dogwood (Cornus florida)
American strawberry bush (Euonymus americana)
American holly (Ilex opaca)
American hophornbeam (Carpinus caroliniana)
Papaw (Asimina triloba)
Southern sugar maple (Acerfloridanum)
Canopy Species
Tulip (Liriodendron tulipifera)
Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda)
American sweetgum (Liquidambarstyraciflua)
Shagbark hickory (Carya ovata)
Cherrybark oak (Quercus pagoda)
Bitternut hickory (Carya cordiformis)
Swamp chestnut oak (Quercus michauxii)
American beech (Fagus grandifolia)
American elm (Ulmus americana)
Northern red oak (Quercus rubra)
Southern hackberry (Celtis laevigata)
Red maple (Acerrubrum)
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
Sugar maple (Acersaccharum)
2.4 Parcel Design and Implementation Constraints
The presence of conditions or characteristics that have the potential to hinder restoration activities on
the Site were evaluated. The evaluation focused primarily on the presence of hazardous materials,
utilities, restrictive easements, rare/threatened/endangered species or critical habitats, the potential for
hydrologic trespass, and existing NRRRF infrastructure. Existing information regarding Site constraints was
acquired and reviewed, including an Environmental Records Report developed by Environmental Data
Resources Inc., which located no evidence of environmental risk associated with the Parcels (Appendix D).
A North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Report was conducted and concluded three known historic
locations within the area, but all are located outside the proposed footprint (Appendix F).
Site conditions (existing or future) that have the potential to restrict the restoration, implementation and
long-term protection of the Site were documented digitally and during the field investigation. A summary
of findings and design avoidance is detailed in Table 8.
Table 8. Documented and Recorded Parcel Constraints & Design Avoidance
Constraint
Subject to
Phases
Design Avoidance
Duke Power (Formally
Progress Energy of the
Carolinas, and Carolina
RS reviewed subject parcels and identified recorded deeds that reference the
Power & Light Co.)
B & C
establishment of the easement in 1981. Subject records place the easement
at 200 feet. The Site's proposed easements are located outside of the utility
200-foot, Richmond -Wake,
easement.
500 KV Overhead
Transmission Line
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Page 9 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

Table 8. Documented and Recorded Parcel Constraints & Design Avoidance (Continued)
Constraint
Subject to
Design Avoidance
Phases
Duke Power (Formally
Progress Energy of the
Carolinas, and Carolina
RS reviewed subject parcels and identified recorded deeds that reference the
Power & Light Co.)
B
establishment of the easement in 1966. Subject records place the easement
at 90 feet. The Site's proposed easements are located outside of the utility
90-foot, Richmond -Wake,
easement.
230 KV Overhead
Transmission Line
Beginning construction in 2020 with an expected completion date in 2021,
Dominion Energy's T-030 Gas Pipeline Extension Project will maintain a 50-
Dominion Energy's T-030
foot utility easement over Project Parcels associated with Phases A. The new
Gas Pipeline Extension
easement abuts and runs parallel along Duke Power's 200-foot overhead
Project (Franklin and Wake
B
transmission line easement. The Sponsor accessed the digital file of the
County) DWR Project ID No.
permanent and temporary construction easements for the T-030 Gas
2019-0828 V2
Pipeline. Site design avoids all temporary and permanent easements
associated with the T-030 Gas Pipeline. The Site's proposed easements are
located outside the T-030 Gas Pipeline easement (permanent and temporary).
An existing City of Raleigh greenway trail (Neuse River Trail) meanders near
City of Raleigh & Wake
portions of Phase B (Easement Areas 10, 11, 12, and 13) and Phase C
County Greenway
B & C
(Easement Areas 14, 16, 17, and 19). The average width of the greenway
easement is 50-feet (25' on either side of the greenway's centerline). The
Site's footprint is outside of all greenway easements and footprints.
A digital and physical review of active and inactive NRRRF infrastructure was
completed as part of the Site's design. NRRRF conducts surface water testing
in pre -defined locations along Site Features and within proposed conservation
NRRRF biosolid application
easements. These activities are consistent with allowable activities of the
& ground water monitoring
B, & C
proposed conservation easement.
infrastructure
Appendix B includes written confirmation outlining DWR's allowance for the
the City to place a conservation easement over the subject parcels including
fields currently permitted for the application of biosolids. Areas historically
used for biosolid application will be removed from the City's NPDES permit.
Phase B — No constraints, all NRRRF infrastructure is located outside of the
Parcel's footprint.
Phase C—Two in -line ponds are within the proposed Phase C footprint—
NRRRF existing agricultural
Feature 1A (Pond 1) and Feature 5A/5B (Pond 5). Both ponds have outfalls
ponds & BMP infrastructure
C
connecting them to downstream waters. The proposed conservation
easement includes the earthen dams and their outlets. Easement areas over
the dams and outlets are designated as Maintenance Easements and allow for
access and maintenance. No RBC or NOC will be generated within designated
Maintenance Easements.
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Page 10 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

Table 8. Documented and Recorded Parcel Constraints & Design Avoidance (Continued)
Constraint
Subject toPhases
Design Avoidance
Dilapidated and abandoned agricultural infrastructure items are detailed in
the Restoration Plan (Section 3)
Dilapidated/
Earthen roads (farm paths) exist throughout the Site and are typically found
abandoned agricultural
B & C
along forest edges — Section 3, Restoration Plan, details the removal and
infrastructure and earthen
restoration of farm paths. The Phase B Conservation Easement Area 16 will
farm roads
include the gravel road which crosses Feature 1A, below Pond 1. The path and
the culvert that carries Feature 1A under the path within the conservation
easement will ensure perpetual protection and hydrologic connection of
Feature 1A with Feature 16.
Table 8 Note: All utility easements will be shown on the Conservation Easement Plat & Parcel's As -Built Survey and
sealed by a licensed surveyor of North Carolina.
2.4.1 Threatened and Endangered Species
Species with the classification of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or officially Proposed (P) for such listing
are protected under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended (16 USC 1531 et seq.). Six
species, listed in Table 9, are federally listed within Wake County by the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) (USFWS 2020) (Appendix Q.
Table 9. USFWS Federally Protected Species List
Common Name
Scientific Name
Status
Cape Fear shiner
Notropis mekistocholas
Endangered
Red -cockaded Woodpecker
Picoides borealis
Endangered
Dwarf Wedgemussel
Alasmidonta heterodon
Endangered
Tar River Spinymussel
Parvaspina steinstansana
Endangered
Yellow lance
Elliptio steinstansana
Threatened
Michaux's sumac
Rhus michauxii
Endangered
The biological conclusion is no effect on the species listed above, and proposed mitigation activities will
result in positive benefits for these species through improved habitat and water quality.
2.4.2 Cultural Resources
The term "cultural resources" refers to prehistoric or historic archaeological sites, structures, or artifact
deposits over 50 years old. "Significant" cultural resources are those that are eligible or potentially eligible
for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. Evaluations of site significance are made with
reference to the eligibility criteria of the National Register (36 CFR 60).
Field visits were conducted in June 2020 to ascertain the presence of structures or features that may be
eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. No structures were found. An online search using the
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office's (SHPO) Web GIS Service (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb1)
and the National Register of Historic Places GIS Search
(https://www.nps.gov/maps/full.html?mapld=7ad17cc9-b808-4ff8-a2f9-a99909164466) identified zero
structures within the Parcel boundaries or within 1 mile of the Parcel (Appendix F).
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Page 11 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

3.0 Restoration Plan
The primary goals associated with the restoration of riparian areas within the Bank Parcel will focus on
improving water quality, enhancing flood attenuation, and restoring wildlife habitat. These goals will be
achieved by restoring and preserving forested riparian areas adjacent to stream channels, in -line ponds,
ephemeral channels, and an agricultural ditch (Figures 8A and 8B, Appendix A).
Goals will be accomplished by the following:
1. Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agricultural production, including;
a. Ceasing the broadcast application of class B biosolids, fertilizer, pesticides, and other
agricultural materials into and adjacent to Parcel Features.
b. Providing a restored buffer to filter runoff from adjacent lands.
2. Reducing sedimentation within onsite and downstream receiving waters by reducing bank
erosion, vegetation maintenance, and agricultural land disturbances by ceasing agricultural and
current land use activities.
3. Promoting floodwater attenuation by increasing frictional resistance of floodwaters crossing
Parcel floodplains.
4. Improving aquatic habitat by enhancing stream bed shading and natural detritus input.
5. Providing a terrestrial wildlife corridor and refuge in an area extensively disturbed by agricultural
practices.
6. Restoring and re-establishing natural community structure, habitat diversity, and functional
continuity.
7. Protecting the Parcel's riparian buffer functions and values in perpetuity.
Primary components of the Restoration Plan include:
1. Removal of dilapidated/abandoned agricultural infrastructure within forested areas where
feasible.
2. Removal of existing compacted earth roads associated with agricultural use,
3. Parcel -wide soil preparation & herbaceous vegetation treatment,
4. Riparian area restoration (replanting) extending from the top of bank (TOB) out 200' where
applicable and,
5. Parcel protection in perpetuity through a permanent conservation easement.
Table 10 details the Restoration Plan activities.
Table 10. Restoration Plan Activities
Restoration
Plan Activity
Phase Specific Actions
The City, who actively self -manages the farm operations, will treat fescue within the Parcel ahead
Herbaceous
of planting efforts. Treatment will consist of a broadcast application using Roundup Custom
Treatment
(Glyphosate) at rate of 3% and a surfactant of AgriDex at a rate of 1% mixed with water.
Remove existing farm paths located within the proposed easements by deep ripping to break
soil compaction associated with historic farm equipment and vehicle use. NRRRF will
Removal of
establish new roads dependent on future use and need outside of the Site's proposed
Existing
easements.
Infrastructure
- Remove large debris from the easement as is feasible and without damaging the existing
riparian buffer Feature 3A, Phase B.
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Page 12 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

Table 10. Restoration Plan Activities (Continued)
Restoration
Plan Activity
Phase Specific Actions
Within the Site's proposed conservation easements:
Treat Bermuda and fescue grass species within active pasture areas (see Herbaceous
Treatment note above).
Site -wide discing of agricultural and pasture areas ahead of planting — discing will occur
parallel to the Site Features, promoting floodwater attenuation by increasing frictional
Riparian
resistance of floodwaters crossing Parcel floodplains.
Restoration
- Establishment of a native herbaceous community via site -specific seed mix (See Planting Plan
— Section 3.3.1)
- Establishment of a native hardwood forest via the planting of bare -root saplings from the top
of bank out a maximum of 200' along Parcel Features — Section 3.3 Planting Plan
3.1 Project Schedule
Project restoration activities, milestones, and anticipated completion dates are outlined in Table 11.
Table 11. Phase B-C Project Schedule
Activity / Milestone
Completion Date
Site Mitigation Banking Instrument and Bank Parcel Development Package Approval
Q4 2021
Acquisition of Conservation Easement
Q4 2021
Removal of Existing Infrastructure & rubble within easement (as feasible)
Q1 2022
Planting
Q1 2022
As -Built & Assignment of Conservation Easement
Q2 2022
Year 1 monitoring
Q4 2022
Year 2 monitoring
Q4 2023
Year 3 monitoring
Q4 2024
Year 4 monitoring
Q4 2025
Year 5 monitoring
Q4 2026
Closeout
Q1 2027
3.2 Permitting
Restoration activities requiring heavy equipment include:
1.) Remove existing, earthen farm paths within the proposed easements by deep ripping with
agricultural equipment to break up soil compaction associated with historic farm equipment and
vehicle use. The main gravel road, which runs east -west through Phase C (easement area 16), will
remain.
2.) Remove reinforced concrete pipes & other debris located within the proposed easement as feasible
without damaging existing forest/vegetation.
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Page 13 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

Construction activities will not require permitting or authorization from federal, state, or county agencies
for impacts to regulated waterways or ground -disturbing activities.
3.3 Planting Plan
Restoration of the riparian area allows for recolonization and expansion of characteristic species across
the landscape. The riparian areas will be restored according to the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (November 1, 2015). The planting plan for the entire riparian restoration area
(Phases B and C combined) includes planting 34,500 native bare root hardwood saplings across 57.265
acres are in managed agricultural fields or pasture (Phase B = 11.043 acres, Phase C = 46.222 acres) at a
density of +/-600 stems per acre (Figures 8A and 8B, Appendix A). Community associations utilized in the
proposed planting plan include Schafale and Weakley's (2012) Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont
Subtype) and Piedmont Bottomland Hardwoods, as detailed in Section 2.3, Existing Vegetative
Communities. Species composition includes native species known for fruit production.
Tree species will be mixed thoroughly before planting to provide a diverse and random plant across the
Site. Planting density is set to ensure sufficient diversity and density of planted stems outlined in Rule 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 of 260. No one tree species will be greater than 50% of the established stems — Tables 12
and 13 detail tree species reserved by the Sponsor for planting. The final planted species is subject to final
species availability. The Sponsor will note any changes to the planting list in the Site's Baseline Document
and As -built Survey.
Table 12. Phase B Proposed Hardwood Bare Root Planting Plan by Species
Common Name
Scientific Name
Tree/Shrub
Phase B (11.043 Ac.)
Species % of Total
River birch
Betula nigra
Tree
1,000
15%
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
Tree
800
12%
Tulip poplar
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tree
800
12%
Red mulberry
Morus rubra
Tree
500
7%
Black Gum
Nyssa sylvatica
Tree
400
6%
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
Tree
400
6%
White Oak
Quercus alba
Tree
400
6%
Water oak
Quercus nigra
Tree
900
13%
Cherrybark oak
Quercus pagoda
Tree
700
10%
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
Tree
800
12%
Total
10 Species
6,700
100%
Space Pursefully Left Blank
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Page 14 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

Table 13. Phase C Proposed Hardwood Bare Root Planting Plan by Species
Common Name
Scientific Name
Tree/Shrub
Phase C (46.222 Ac.)
Species % of Total
River birch
Betula nigra
Tree
4,000
14%
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
Tree
3,000
11%
Tulip poplar
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tree
3,200
12%
Red mulberry
Morus rubra
Tree
2,200
8%
Black Gum
Nyssa sylvatica
Tree
1,600
6%
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
Tree
1,800
6%
White Oak
Quercus alba
Tree
2,000
7%
Water oak
Quercus nigra
Tree
3,600
13%
Cherrybark oak
Quercus pagoda
Tree
3,000
11%
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
Tree
3,400
12%
Total
10 Species
27,800
100%
3.3.1 Permanent Seed Mix
The Sponsor will broadcast a permanent seed mix over all riparian restoration areas. The seed mix will
include native grasses and forbs, with a variety of annual and perennial plants known to benefit wildlife
and pollinators. The grass seed component will focus on low -growing species that favor establishing the
target forest community, particularly species such as purpletop (Tridens flavus) and bentgrass (Agrostis
hyemalis). The forb component will include a diverse mixture of native and naturalized forbs and
wildflowers, including fifteen or more species.
3.4 Parcel Protection & Easement Boundaries
Before the release of any credits, RS will record a permanent conservation easement at the Wake County
Register of Deeds sufficient to ensure protection, operation, and maintenance of restored riparian buffers
and other riparian areas in perpetuity.
The form of the conservation easement shall be consistent with the standards employed by the State of
North Carolina in the protection of restored riparian buffers and riparian areas and shall be approved by
the DWR before the release of any credits.
Appendix B includes written confirmation from NCDWR approving of the implementation of this plan on
portions of fields currently permitted for the application of biosolids under NCDWR permit WQ0001730 -
City of Raleigh. Fields currently permitted for the application of biosolids will be removed from the City
of Raleigh's above referenced permit after the conservation easement is recorded and prior approval of
this Bank Parcel's As -Built report by NCDWR.
Parcel easement boundaries will be identified in the field to ensure a clear distinction between the Parcel
and adjacent properties/land uses. The Sponsor will install marking and signage of the easement boundary
adjacent/close to utility and greenway easements to ensure the clear designation of the easement.
Boundaries may be identified by cattle fence, marker, bollard, post, tree -blazing, or other means as
allowed by Site conditions and/or conservation easement requirements and will be installed before the
As -Built Site visit by DWR. Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or
replaced on an as -needed basis. The easement boundary will be checked annually as part of monitoring
activities and reported to DWR.
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Page 15 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

3.5 As -Built Report
A Baseline Monitoring Document and As -Built Survey will be submitted to DWR documenting the
completion of the Site's Restoration Plan and in accordance with the MBI.
4.0 Monitoring and Maintenance Plan
4.1 Monitoring Protocol & Success Criteria
Restoration monitoring procedures for vegetation will monitor plant survival and species diversity.
Quantitative sampling will include forty-nine (49) [Phase B = 12, Phase C = 37) permanent 10 x 10-meter
vegetation plots as outlined in the CVS Level 1-2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al.
2008) and will occur no earlier than Fall of each year (Figures 11A and 1113 - Monitoring Plan). Vegetation
plot placement will adequately represent riparian buffer credit and nutrient offset credit areas. A
reference photo will be taken from the origin point of each plot. All planted stems in the plots will be
marked with flagging tape and recorded. Data collected will include species, height, vigor, and planting
type (planted stem and/or volunteer). Monitoring of the restoration efforts will be performed for five
years or until success criteria are fulfilled. The Sponsor shall submit to DWR annual monitoring reports no
later than December 31 of each year. Each report will document the success of the vegetation and any
maintenance, supplemental planting, or encroachment within the easement areas. Success criteria within
the riparian restoration areas will be based on the survival of planted species at a density of 260 stems
per acre after five years of monitoring.
The first annual monitoring activities will commence at the end of the first growing season, at least six
months after planting has been completed.
4.2 Parcel Maintenance
A remedial action plan will be developed and implemented with the approval of DWR in the event the
Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve success criteria as outlined above. Other
vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. If exotic
invasive plant species require treatment, such species will be controlled by mechanical (physical removal
with the use of a chainsaw) and/or chemical methods (aquatic approved herbicide) in accordance with
North Carolina Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations.
If mowing is deemed necessary by the Sponsor during the monitoring period, the Sponsor must receive
approval from DWR prior to conducting any mowing activities within Neuse Buffer Zones 1 and 2 to ensure
that no buffer violations have occurred.
4.3 Maintenance Areas
City of Raleigh actively manages the larger surrounding property, including the monitoring of
groundwater. Several groundwater monitoring wells are located within the Site footprint, which Raleigh
is required to monitor under NCDWR biosolids application permit WQ0001730. Raleigh will retain rights
to passive access of this monitoring infrastructure, which excludes land clearing or the use of motorized
vehicles. The well reference numbers and locations within the Site footprint are as follows:
Table 14. Phase C Proposed Hardwood Bare Root Planting Plan by Species
Project Phase
Well Label
Adjacent Parcel
Feature
Conservation
Easement Area
Phase B
MW-55
Main Trib. 4
13
Phase C
MW-53R
Neuse River
14
Phase C
GP-12R
Feature 2E
17
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Page 16 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

Additionally, maintenance areas will be delineated on the final survey to be included in the conservation
easement footprint, and excluded from nutrient offset and riparian buffer credit generation. These areas
are reserved for infrastructure maintenance such as earthen dams, culverted crossings, and piped
discharges. Land clearing and vehicular traffic in these areas necessary for infrastructure maintenance is
allowed.
4.4 Long Term Management Plan
The conservation easement will preserve all areas and prohibit all use of the property inconsistent with
its use as a nutrient offset and riparian buffer mitigation property, including any activity that would
materially alter the biological integrity of the Site/Parcel. IRS will transfer or assign the conservation
easement and its interests in perpetuity to a qualified holder under NC General Statute ("GS") 121-34 et
seq. and 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code prior to the submittal of the As -Built Report. The holder
shall be a land trust or stewardship program that is accredited by the Land Trust Accreditation Commission
and/or has been approved by DWR. A land trust must be certified under 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue
Code.
5.0 Financial Assurance
As required by the UMBI, the Sponsor will secure all financial assurances according to the UMBI. No
bond shall be less than $150,000 to cover costs of construction and no less than $100,000 to cover
monitoring expenses.
Monitoring bonds shall be renewed with confirmation of renewal provided to DWR with each annual
monitoring report. DWR reserves the right to alter the credit release schedule if monitoring reports
are submitted without proof of bond renewals.
6.0 Mitigation Potential
The Parcel will generate Neuse River Riparian Buffer Credits (RBC) and Nutrient Offset Credit (NOC,
nitrogen) on restored riparian areas measured from the top of bank out perpendicularly 200-feet on
subject Features (streams, ephemeral channels, a ditch, and in -line ponds). Per the Consolidated
Mitigation Buffer Rule, the Parcel will generate RBC via allowed activities under Section (n), Non -forested
Areas [Restoration Site] and (o), Alternative Buffer Mitigation Options. Specifically, RBC is to -be generated
from sub -sections (o)(4), (o)(5), & (o)(7). Parcel compliance with these sub -sections is detailed below.
(o)(4) — Preservation of Buffer on Non -Subject Streams: Preservation of buffers on intermittent or
perennial streams that are not subject per 15A NCAC 02B .0233 are proposed via the permanent
protection under a perpetual conservation easement from cutting, clearing, filling, grading, and similar
activities that would affect the functioning of the buffer. Features proposed under (o)(4) were confirmed
as intermittent or perennial streams by DWR representatives during the June 2-3, 2020 site visit for
applicability and suitability (Appendix B). The area of preservation credit is capped at 25 percent of the
total area of buffer mitigation.
(o)(5) — Preservation of Buffers on Subject Streams: Buffer preservation is proposed on streams that are
subject per 15A NCAC 02B .0233 to permanently protect the buffer from cutting, clearing, filling, grading,
and similar activities that would affect the functioning of the buffer beyond the protection afforded by
the existing buffer rules on sites that meet the definition of a preservation site. The area of preservation
credit is capped at 25 percent of the total area of buffer mitigation.
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Page 17 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

(o)(7) — Mitigation on ephemeral channels: The Parcel will generate riparian buffer credit on "ephemeral
channels" as defined as a "natural channel exhibiting discernible banks within a topographic crenulation
(V-shaped contour lines) indicative of natural drainage on the 1:24,000 scale (7.5 minute) quadrangle
topographic map prepared by the US Geologic Survey, or as seen on digital elevation models with contours
developed from the most recent available LiDAR data" (15A NCAC 02B .0295). Appendix A Figures depict
the delineated watershed draining to each ephemeral channel proposed for RBC (Features 1A, 2A, 3A, 4A,
and 6A). The entire area proposed for RBC from ephemeral channels is within the contributing drainage
area. All subject ephemeral channels are directly connected to an intermittent or perennial stream, are
contiguous with the Site and are proposed for permanent protection under the Site's conservation
easement. The RBC derived from ephemeral channels will not total more than 25 percent of the total area
of buffer mitigation. The proposed buffer credit areas meet all applicable requirements of Paragraph (n)
of Rule [15A NCAC 02B .0295] for restoration or enhancement, and all applicable requirements of
Subparagraph (o)(4) or (o)(5) of Rule [15A NCAC 02B .0295] for preservation. Ephemeral features were
confirmed DWR representatives during the June 2, 2020 and June 8, 2020 site visit for the applicability
and suitability of Site Features (Appendix B).
DWR has determined the nitrogen abatement of restored riparian areas on this Bank Parcel to be 2,273.02
lbs. per acre as agreed to in the Raleigh Farm MBI. RBC will be measured to the nearest whole square foot.
Riparian buffer restoration credits can be converted and transferred to NOC upon approval from DWR.
However, conversions of NOC from widths 101'-200' (measured from top of bank) to RBC will not occur.
Provided in Appendix B is a complete DWR Credit Determination Table, which details the individual
components, generated credit, and which features generating RBC credit comply with criteria to also be
convertible to NOC. The Sponsor must request and receive written approval of the conversion and transfer
of any mitigation credits from DWR prior to adding or removing credits from the ledgers.
The Sponsor will maintain three individual ledgers, one to account for riparian buffer restoration credits,
one to account for riparian buffer preservation credits, and one to account for NOC. All credit assets shall
be accurately depicted on these credit ledgers. All accounting will be in accordance with DWR's Clarified
Procedures for Calculating Buffer Mitigation Credits and Nutrient Offset Credits (November 2019) (link in
UMBI). The complete DWR Mitigation Credit Table is shown on the following page, Table 13.
7.0 References
Griffith, G.E., JM Omernik, J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat, T.F. MacPherson, J.B.
Glover, and VB Shelbourne. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and South Carolina. US Geological
Survey, Reston, Virginia.
Schafale, M. P. and Weakley, 2012. A Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation.
US Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2019. Web Soil Survey (online). Available:
https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm [Accessed July 19, 2020].
US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2020. Endangered Species, Threatened Species, and Candidate Species,
Wake County, North Carolina (online). Available:
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/wake.html (Accessed July 19, 2020)
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Page 18 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

oo
zo
§)§)§/) §
\\ \
--
§) !-
)\
IT mm
oo
lo
\{ \ff a f
2«! �/# -�
;!E f!)
»}Z\}��}Z������������\
\\
{2
JIm
)) � \§
\\
/23
))\\
)))))\\\\
k
k
\])
?
{{}?!!{/?
f {{???{{//??
/\/§{\\\/§
/{{{
!
-
- §Q®:/5 }
_
::
_
----
---------
_----------- -
\ �I.=.k�:)�
\\\
k
0
/

Appendix A: Figures and Photos
Figure 1 —
Parcel Location and Service Area
Figure 2 —
Parcel Easements and Features
Figure 3 —
USGS Topography
Figure 4 —
NRCS Soil Survey
Figure 5 —
Current Conditions
Figure 6 —
NRRRF & Proposed Project Footprint
Figure 7A—
Phase B Biosoild Application Fields
Figure 7B
— Phase C Biosoild Application Fields
Figure 8A
— Phase B Restoration Plan
Figure 8B
— Phase C Restoration Plan
Figure 9 —
Phase B Credit Determinations
Figure 10—
Phase C Credit Determinations (A-C)
Figure 11A— Phase B Monitoring Plan
Figure 11B — Phase B Monitoring Plan
Existing Conditions Photos
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

2§kf\
=k» z
LLLLM
�W
§m
<
)
\
>
±
,a
< LL
\\
§ §�
»LL
\
r
a�§§
2230m
§2k <
<
$m
/
)§
�z�/
ol
\ k
\
�kk�
}
ra §k
a
k
-
\
}
: �-
y
3!|{
5
\ fa)
§|/\/
/
}
v)E
| \
(
m
z
)
]//{/
\
®
)
)
�m3.
o
�
\
\
LU
a_
°
_
.\
y
z
<
:
.
z:
z {
�
/�
^:
_
o
z
/
_
\
L
LU
\o
_
>
~
_
,
\
:
/
f
y
-
_
\
\
\
»
/
Z
j
>
)
g°g:
<
§
\0001

`1 f]
w .o �NLL,Z z WZ = o o >
0 m R R�aO+ Q LL LL m J T T ci U)w N c0 a,w
W a 10/1 O �� R LL OLLZ W m aFK d c0
aZ0 CD
RyJQZ Q WLL LLOLLZ7a In
ET
N U U U —_
\ K Z
Maw
w a a w a
m C5U
U Cj
a a?
1
{
.1
♦ U
LL
Y a
� a
1
( U
aaa° a i
{♦ ''pa a J - � m
U
1 mN C5 �� m
♦ � m

vzM
�m��
Y
W
o°
c,c o
m�,2f m
QwwmJ
"O�zw
m
c
Ng
.pow
�;���
a
2�m0U
�zm��
w
N
o
UO
�a
��
���
w
..m
C7 M
U�
z
J z a
=
U
=
N
z
m p
m
-° o
o �aN
¢�¢�
a
y
Lt_
2
a
'E
a
Z
F
N o
o
O
m
in
'o
Im
41
d °
N
n (7
N a
LL
l
.D
z
N
N
m
N
N
w 9
._
oo
a` 'n
`a °
d d .,
I
mN
a�
n
m°
•,
n
m°
•,
n
m°
•,
n
m°
•,
m°n
LL •,
m N
d
cc
U
N
LL
U N
LL
U N
LL
U N
LL
U
U
N
N
N
M �

N N w Y U x o >
0
N W
o� �m�� QiwmJ U > N o rn r.F
�oo °��� xUz)0U m Ly U�
�LU
L) ���`o wLu E of Q U z� moo^ N o� iD
J OQa 2 z�°m a zo
Q�QH d 0 Y c L.L
a a z F N o ET c
It u
o In c-
z
m a
v a �
�z z w
d U Z = K Z 9 z
�o �o �o
T
aN tititi�
5 N
rr m .
a Q Z N a N a N a N a N a N
- PfPl4p
a 1 P
I p r� U.
r m a
PPP■■■___ f m n
� o z
� Y aN 10N Q
U Z
� d N
JL }, d Z
m d
a } aN
F. a <n
s o ��
a s O
EIL
r
f y •°l d N
al
Ad
YY ti i a
ow N
rn a ,4 h - �N m? op LLT goo
NJ
..Cc
gal gal U C m • L Lam. d gal rLi rr{ ~
n n m 2
mw
pOF wo

aNi N w Z U = N o j
o m� ° Q�wm� U T zz o o rn LU
Co m�,2fm "O�zw m wLu w m Q'
woN o� x x U w o ff z 1/1
�U >Y ��m`o wwmOQ Q U �z oo i� mil!
�zp� -°o� -j a UO z Q ?N LL
n d m of
mo °� E m mo
D- a` z F - o o
�m
N� 9
€a¢ mz
m I U shi
-
a ti1D - ti ti ti ti ti
,..6� ri
m
LL
as u
a Y�
\ U
t/
m
t �
x
` / r
J Q
c)sM L 1 /
a
iD
IN
awa
�:-
N
m�>
a d �♦
U ' 1
m 1
m \
LEJ
E E
o T = a 7575
a
0 0 - co
m '^ m . 80, Q
22222
o o m m m m m m m m
m U m a U m m m U U o_ n m o oa
O
00 , 1 1 1 ° o 0 0 0 0 a a b 2
a O
J N W Z _ �

0
m
0
CO J
of
N
w
C p
p �n
'in
o
N 'NO E
x x U
Z
w
O
rc
w
m
o
zO°1
,E9
C7 coO
V1
2
..
z
m m
o aV1
o
J�z�a
QHQ�
x
CL
y
m
z
i�
c
0
LL
'E
m
m
m
'o
2
a
a z
F
o
o
N
-
m a�
U
_
E 0 _
w i U
CA
77
m
1 \
O: 9
�7io m m NB
i
oll
If
a
V o
co w
O �!•./ \ i N LL
m r m
UIg-
a o
3 3
in �' ;' c a 'c a 'm — c c m z w v a
H a E c t E C7 v -o A 7.5
N N N N
N N N C \
> > > > > > > c c _U u E u = Y 'o
Ti E"i u n a m m m o. '� ar o m
¢ 4 a ¢ a ¢ ¢ a 4 ¢ c c c= O¢ iL U d a ?i d w
a-i

U do V1(Yz z z z of 0 0
O 7 m� Q��[0� U >+ co 20� N rn rn W
c o a m O w z w m w J Q
o n o x x U w c nO a
E CD �U>� ���`o wwmOQ Q U xO-i � o�
m to UIa CD En LL
Q HQ to Q U c N N
'o Z) m 'o
m
Q ti 3 v �
E % i ♦ a
mm m
3
a
i m
Q N ♦ ` \
a _ m
Q `\
o a
o ` \
m 'o ���� �� �♦ '� v
m
♦ z vlz
m N
a°
l e`
o ♦ �
♦r
i
1
it
77
w_a �
lil � I 1
m \ �
1 a m m
%
1
0 — -
wa �
- - l
1
1
o �
n ♦
1
m 1
E
m 4 M
o m
a o
m p' m t 11
E f el p
0 O ®
Al 000 m 1 1 1 z s,
1 1 1 Q a
y'.

o 0
O 7 m� Q��CO J U >+ UO�� N m rn W
c O 2o2f m '-`O�Zw m wJQp - H co
o n o x Z) U w c V)O J a
U >� c `o ww0OQ Q U x0 o
zO o� :: J�z�a a y En �' ? LI_
m to UI a Q
'oIt
m 'o
a a z F o o N a
CD
ask&
4�
m
U �
U d \
-
m \
m -
1
1
LL Ad, 4: Jef4 p N _ /
a N c ti
a a J m N o
♦
1 U U U
� a?
a a a
1 �
1.
♦ U w /
1 ® /
1 a o m
I /
/ " a
t asp � LL M
1 O
1 O�
a
a a
01
1
m
o U `1
�1
¢1>a a
c 1
ca
10
o
d U U d N
m �
O ci N '�
N o m
' O � i.+ r r r r r
a a w a c c
a ° �
1 1 1
1 1 1 0 O ®Q O y�
nvo
m
Q
m
�
C
M
O
M
M
N
M
E
z
a
o �
m�
Q
m
uq
m
LL
co
m
N
W
N
M
a
-
0
�
m
y
O
N
fL �
y
N
N
M
M
a

`
\
=f
)
§
�
E00
))\)
CO /
»~ ®
o±§/ \
$}J
2 '
`
/
.._):
'RL) ;ƒ!r
/LLJ \ G
`/2
t
2 CO
2
b2\� !
�6
J
=
0 »:E\
±
j§«( 3
~ (
\
Z
Z
:
3
-
/
/
:- -
. IBII+ + + +
\/ 2 +
!
()
\OM
E ƒ
;7§: ±
3r
3!!!

O
� Y
W U T
�
U O z
O
O
w
0 0 t9
C O ��� t 9
o
Q L� CO J
L� D I Wi z W m C
W Q z
o n
� L) N� � `o
x x U w
wLLco J Q U
cnof¢
=P-a
a
LLJ
V)
orn
M
W
m o �av7
¢Q� a °
�
`
'o
It
m
'o
R
m r
NU
o¢
� ? U
U
�Na
�a z°
U
z
E m
m
Yf
N
o �
U N
cc
>
m
E Y
m
o
l
�
00
U
— n •, `oo
d o m U c
'-
d
—
cm T LL
m
a0
� �z
a �
1

o m° Q w CO J U z m H Q o cn
W
O'C0 zw m wpz z H co
p oar) °;�� � x�x0U w Lo a T
U>ry o2f m o w LLJ co of Q U 2 L) �, V1 0 o
m z0� �o� :: J�z CD a y a H z z"� LL
m t9 UIa Q HQ t9 w m C N N
2 o N a
a Em °rti 3t0 � i
EO ��
° 01 ° m m 0 t w ¢
m o o m
o m .n rti C m z'T' m
C)U
m
om Eta Eo
C7 m E
mx
69
WO
i
Fe
°gyms
MW
n ,
p I1
f
I
_ MW
/ N
O m H
3 - � O a�sP m a F
o LL m �Ioo N
c7 °o a
0-0,
f, as
0ME- w f` ia0
0 0 -
0 0
- - - - - - �
m
a c ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ a` o O O� O� O� 2F w
O �

O
>
0 7
C p
t 9�
t9
Q L � W co _j
L� 0 IWi Z W
U
m
T
UCH
W— Q
-
v
N
H
V
O
O
w O
. 0 O d
o VI Q'
E
a m E
2��QU
Zm—Q'
W
V1
o
In OZ
Q f)f
K
w
.. O
ZD
=
y
Of
aUW
z'
0
z
LL
m m
O
o �aN
::
�Q'ZC7a
QHQflf �
a
m
wET
ai
It
a
a
Z
F
o
m
� LL
U
/
T_
and
t �
77
-
9J . lPl4p/
U U
d d
U
d
p
O 9 U m C O U
m oz°
" CCU
piao c
moc
a °
d Z
m m !
3
0
°
_
-
a
m
o
-
c U
O U j
a°
ti
o 0 0 0�
N W
d
U
Om U Z d K K
1 1 1
11 1 1 1
O
m
l I
z
U
a
mi

u a Y o V Q Z z O z o
o m� Q w w CO U T UCH t N N W
�co o?°2f� "O�zw m wOz v a co 0 O
0 o a� N x�Z)OU w o Lo - w
o �nry a m C7 Z[0—of V) Q�� rc z > o o :: ��z�7a = y aUw z' z LL
m m Nam Q HQOf
ET It
� d w U ai
a a Z F o o N a z-
- % %
m `
1
1 �U
� l °
�o
\ ♦ mu f 1
T 1
♦Va°
♦ Paz° 1 U
♦ 1 z
U
I
QQ
m m �• a 1
i
as l
zo
O
U
k
MOda ♦ °od
O 9 U
1 �oz
i ! U
1
1
1
i -
O
U
O`
03
cc
m E �m
O
rti
O
o
m°
o
`<0
v
c7
mE
o
3
U
w
m9
am
9m�
rv°.3
-
�O
IT
OZ;
m
m
m
_
m
m o
0
0 a S m
C
`mom
o m
Via` �°+.3¢
.0zo
. . .o

N i w Y U Z 2 0 > M
W
o� �m�� Q�wmJ U T UCH t N N W
�co o?°2f� �`OI"izw m woz v a co O
0° a) N =HmOU w o Nw— - w
o in2 a m C7 LLJ Zm-2 V1 Q�� rc z > o :: ��zC7a = y aUw z' z LL
m m Nam Q HQ� d wET U ai
a a Z F o t
N
a
U
Mug
c m
\ `
1pl
te
♦ N r !
r
�o C)�U
I
_ I I
!
K U I
N m N
L:
�aa i
® -`--
-
O
U
0
0
O`
0
oc
0 ca
� `
rti`
m
m
H
-
C
o
K LL y
xm
K
a v
`
m
c o n€
° m
�C)
tC)
oN C N O U
m
U I d' N U ` m `
m m m m m m v E E 'E E
U U ti ff U - a .55 a w
a v v °
`
o
.. °
—
wI_ t0
m O ..
� o
..,
z 0 U ® Q aOL 0 1,o N
o
0� I I I a „L I. .,�
O
K�
�`om
Ka°3?
zzoM

ago
of ofV)Ofz z
w U
z
N
�
W
0 7 m
coo o?°2f�
Q L L m_j T
�LO�zw m
U L
woz v
a
N
a
co
U
0 a� � E
o in2 a m E
=HmOU w o
C7 Zm-2 V1
c/�w- -
Q�� rc
w
O
z0
a = y
Of
aUw z'
v)..
z
LL
o
_jF) Cz
QHQ� a m
w U
c
ai
a
a Z
F
o
o
N
a
z-
\\
\ ♦ bm Em
\ �O U
U O, �9
0 3
o o m 3 O
m
\ o `�°9,_ ro U U u \ orYE o�
E o E \ c `Q 1`o H
r ` z
\ o x m K x
of
m° a �rY ° N U ua
�O 3Oo LLOmw�
d ♦\ ¢ � mo.a U �S �
li0 ♦ W Q` m — a .�.�
O`mom c m
77
_��� •_
o"
o o
. . . l I I I I
o _
lo
•
`m _ • _ i�
-
690®a00L®�� -
' lP
U GNU
. ` Qo dz
o � �
� U �
�oz° a Paz°
m z
\ '
`�
\ \ ♦-
� M
/�' `

O
O
O 7
t9O
�?� to
¢ Lbw CO Jcn
L�
U
co
_T
mz
OfZ
Q'
Hcil
w
�' C O
o
�
0 L
O¢
a
—
oU>
m
wmO
Qax
¢
U
=
d za
av
z rn
o0
(LLoN.
��z
ET
Q
¢Of
m
m
E2
It
2
-
co
as
o a
m
- a
a
~
�13
i
V � m
c U
ASP m a o
a4 ooz a i D�rs:
mz c c
m
o�

N N
U a YIO
o � � m� �
w Y U
NQ'z z
¢�wm_j U >
U' z
Uz
x
p
N
v
>
W
O o
oN o �'
w m E-�
x x0 U w .
wOfz
NO¢
a
>� � c
wLu Q U
=za
o�
C7
�zo mo
J�z�a x y
a0
a
?�
Lt
a
'o
a z
1=
o
It
o
m
u
in
'o
c-
-
m
U
a
;
1
NN
I
J
oo�
N d
I
U
Paz°
Ic
a
f
1
1
1
m
_.0
a
Paz° LL �
U U /
d
c
U
_
-
-
o
m
�
o
z
ao
s
oo
o
❑O ®o
m

Raleigh Farm Bank Parcel — Neuse 01; Wake County
Image 1: Phase B — Feature 3A, historic ag. equipment — to -be removed as appropriate
Image 2: Phase C — Feature 2A and B
Photo Date:09/29/2020

Jon,
. -> I - Ff
r.
R,
2v
FwP
Mi R
filfm
T
m
JIM
441
IT k,
-e

Appendix B: DWR Correspondence
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

DocuSign Envelope ID: ACF875FD-8AA5-41A1-BD65-22AF9AA50486
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
Barrett Jenkins
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
August 17, 2020
Project 2019-1692 V2
Wake County
Subject: On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules 15A NCAC 02B .0714
Project Name: Raleigh Farm Site Phase B
Address: 8599 Old Baucom Rd., SR 2542, Raleigh, NC 27610
Location: 35.703464,-78.485697, (north of the road)
Site Inspection Date: 6/8/20
Dear Mr. Jenkins:
On June 8, 2020, Shelton Sullivan of the Division of Water Resources (DWR) conducted an on -site review
of features located on the subject property at the request of Barrett Jenkins with Restoration Systems,
LLC to determine the applicability to the Neuse Riparian Area Protection Rules, Title 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code 02B .0714.
The enclosed map(s) depict the feature(s) evaluated and this information is also summarized in the table
below. Streams were evaluated for being ephemeral, at least intermittent, and subjectivity to the Neuse
Riparian Area Protection Rules. Streams that are considered "Subject" have been located on the most
recently published NRCS Soil Survey of Wake County and/or the most recent copy of the USGS
Topographic (at 1:24,000 scale) map(s), have been located on the ground at the site, and possess
characteristics that qualify them to be at least intermittent streams. Features that are considered "Not
Subject" have been determined to not be at least intermittent, not present on the property, or not
depicted on the required maps.
This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity
within buffers or within waters of the state. There may be other streams or features located on the
property that appear or do not appear on the maps referenced above. Any of the features on the site
may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and subject to the Clean
Water Act.
The following table addresses the features observed and rated during the DWR site visit:
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NORTH c ROLINA
OepartmeM of Environmental Quality /`� 919.707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID: ACF875FD-8AA5-41A1-BD65-22AF9AA50486
Project 2019-1692V2, Raleigh Farm Phase B
Wake County
Page 2 of 3
Feature
Feature Type
Subject to
Start @
Stop @
Depicted on
Depicted on
Point ID
(stream/pond/ E/I/Pl)
Buffer
Soil Survey
USGS Topo
(ditch/wetland/other)
Rules
1A
Ephemeral
No
1A
1B
Yes
No
113
Stream - At least
Yes
1B
Confluence with Neuse
Yes
No
intermittent
River
2A
Ephemeral
No
2A
2C, Confluence with 2B
No
No
and becomes
Intermittent
2B
Ephemeral
No
2B
2C, Confluence with 2A
Yes
No
and becomes
Intermittent
2C
Stream - At least
Yes
2C
Confluence with Main
Yes
No
intermittent
Tributary 4
3A
Stream - At least
No
3A
Confluence with Main
No
No
intermittent
Tributary 4
4A
Ephemeral
No
4A
4B
Yes
Yes
4B
Stream - At least
Yes
4B, Continues
Confluence with Neuse
Yes
Yes
intermittent
as Main
River
Tributary 4
5A
Not Present
No
See site map
See site map
No
No
5B
Not Present
No
See site map
See site map
Yes
No
5C
Stream - At least
Yes
5C
Confluence with Main
Yes
No
intermittent
Tributary 4
6A
Ephemeral
No
6A
Confluence with Main
No
No
Tributary 4
1 E: Ephemeral, I: Intermittent, P: Perennial
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute this determination made by the DWR may request an appeal determination by the
Director of Water Resources. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) calendar days of the
date of this letter to the Director in writing, as per 15A NCAC 02B .0714 (4).
If sending via U.S. Postal Service:
Paul Wojoski - DWR 401 & Buffer
Permitting Branch Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
Paul Wojoski - DWR 401 & Buffer
Permitting Branch Supervisor
512 N Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27604

DocuSign Envelope ID: ACF875FD-8AA5-41A1-BD65-22AF9AA50486
Project 2019-1692V2, Raleigh Farm Phase B
Wake County
Page 3 of 3
This determination is final and binding as detailed above, unless an appeal is requested within sixty (60)
calendar days.
This letter only addresses the features on the subject property and within the proposed project easement
boundary and does not approve any activity within buffers or within waters of the state. If you have any
additional questions or require additional information, please contact Shelton Sullivan at
[e-mail] or 919-707-3636. This determination is subject to review as provided in
Articles 3 & 4 of G.S. 150B.
Sincerely,
DOCUSigned by:
W, � e
949D91BA53EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski
Supervisor, DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting
Attachments: Site Map with labeled points, NRCS Soil Survey, USGS Topographical Map
cc: Raymond Holz via email [e-mail]
Barrett Jenkins via email [e-mail]
Katie Merritt via email [e-mail]
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch files
Filename: 20191692v2_RaleighFarmPhaseB_StreamCalls.docx

2 0
z o
Z J
=r
x �
aoa
?ter
m
m
o
w
LDww
J�U)
� N
��F
co
C3)
N
r�
r
a
�z
o
aka
LL
O
d
@ U
O 0 N
H
-6� %
I )
A -%
�r , �1r 1: r s
z
O LL
N
o
O o
Y� MIA&
o
L y •'!
IL w
c by �y
m I
C _m % •• ti
N
a7
j • � r

DocuSign Envelope ID: ACF875FD-8AA5-41A1-BD65-22AF9AA50486
Phase B: Wake County Soil Survey for Reference
Cm ApC2 y ,
! +` ``WMC2 WmC2
- ; Aga ..Ch
ApI3 WMB? w
� AfA
Fag
GZ _ Cr
f ApB2 r 1NmC�
Go
CeB2
Ilk
IM
'�.
1F3 --- wm82
W mC
DuBZ APB F
CnI — -`
A$ F3__ f WmC2 _ - Fa�B
_ r
ApB ApB�_ WmC2 '.
e _oN u B A pg2

elope ID: ACF875FD-8AA5-41A1-BD65-22AF9AA50486
NS. 44tt1/4
Atik10 i ,
:03
- 4 • • • k , , , . . .
rt. . :
iNt :
i
0

DocuSign Envelope ID: C059370B-B39D-46D5-82D4-8741163F88E3
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
September 24, 2020
Barrett Jenkins DWR# 2019-1692v2
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
(via electronic mail: bienkins(a,restorations ystems.com)
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset — Raleigh Farm Phase B Site
Near 8599 Old Baucom Rd. (SR 2542), Raleigh NC 27610
Lat., Long. 35.703464,-78.485697 (north of the road)
Neuse 03020201
Dear Mr. Jenkins,
On February 11, 2020, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a
request from you on behalf of Restoration Systems, LLC (RS) for a site visit near the above -
referenced site in the Neuse River Basin within the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201. The site
visit was to determine the potential for riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset within a
proposed Easement Boundary, which is more accurately shown in the attached map labeled
"CORPUD-Site Features Phase B" prepared by RS and edited by DWR. On June 2, 2020 and June
3, 2020, Ms. Merritt performed site assessments of the subject site and identified the following site
constraints:
• UTILITIES: Gas lines are being proposed on parts of the site where streams are located.
Existing powerline easements are also present. Specific locations and associated
easements of gas lines were unknown at the time of the DWR site visit, but the attached
CORPUD figure details where the proposed and temporary easements will be located.
• PERMITS: State, Federal and/or Local permits may be associated with this property.
Wetland delineation flagging and other stream call determinations were observed on the
site.
• EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE: The City of Raleigh owns the property on the site
and has used the land for applying biosolids associated with the Neuse River Resource
Recovery Facility (NRRRF). Existing underground and above ground infrastructure is
present for purposes of irrigating the property. The City of Raleigh Public Utilities
Department (CORPUD) manages the property. Existing dirt paths, culverted crossings,
deeded access roads and greenways are present throughout and are adjacent to ditches
and streams onsite where mitigation would be proposed. Some Groundwater Monitoring
Wells were located onsite, but their locations are not depicted on any maps attached to
this correspondence. All existing infrastructure within the proposed conservation
easement shall be delineated and included as part of the site's restoration plan along with
specific details on management and maintenance and what will be included or excluded.
o Application of bio-solids will not be permitted within a conservation easement.
D EQ �� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
NORTH CAROLINA
Department or enmronmemai Quail /`� 919.707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID: C059370B-B39D-46D5-82D4-8741163F88E3 Raleigh Farm Phase B Site
Restoration Systems, LLC
September 24, 2020
o Impervious surface will not be permitted within a conservation easement unless it
is an access easement or located outside of creditable areas for mitigation or
nutrient offsets.
o Disruption in connectivity between top of bank and adjacent riparian areas will
not be permitted within a conservation easement.
o Monitoring wells must remain fully functional and shall be allowed to be
maintained and accessed as needed.
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
and landward 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
Feature
Classification
'Subject
6Riparian Land uses
Buffer
3Nutrient
4,5Mitigation Type Determination
on site
to
w/inrinarian areas
adiacent to Feature
Credit
Offset
Buffer
(0-200'1
Viable
Viable
Rule
I
Ephemeral
No
Combination of non-
2 7yes
Yes (non-
Non -forested areas - Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7)
and mature forest
areas only)
Forested Areas - Preservation Site per
15ANCAC 0213.0295 (o)(4)
113
Stream
Yes
Combination of non-
eyes
Yes (non-
Non -forested areas - Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
and mature forest
areas only)
Forested Areas - Preservation Site per
Utility line is present
15ANCAC 02B .0295 (o) (5)
2A
Ephemeral
No
Combination of non-
2' Yes
Yes (non-
Non -forested areas - Restoration Site
(ends at
forested agricultural fields
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7)
confluence
and mature forest
areas only)
w/ 2C)
Forested Areas - Preservation Site per
15ANCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4)
2B
Ephemeral
No
Combination of non-
2, 'Yes
Yes (non-
Non -forested areas - Restoration Site
(ends at
forested agricultural fields
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7)
confluence
and mature forest
areas only)
w/ 2C)
Forested Areas - Preservation Site per
15ANCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4)
Page 2 of 5

DocuSign Envelope ID: C059370B-B39D-46D5-82D4-8741163F88E3 Raleigh Farm Phase B Site
Restoration Systems, LLC
September 24, 2020
Feature
Classification
'Subject
6Riparian Land uses
Buffer
3Nutrient
4,5Mitigation Type Determination
onsite
to
w/inrinarian areas
adiacent to Feature
Credit
Offset
Buffer
(0-20011
Viable
Viable
Rule
2C
Stream
Yes
Mostly mature forest with
Yes (non-
Non -forested areas - Restoration Site
some agricultural field
zYes
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
areas only)
Utility line and a greenway
Forested Areas - Preservation Site per
are present
15ANCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)
All areas within existing or proposed
easements must be excluded from the
Restoration and Preservation Site.
3A
Stream
No
Combination of non-
zYes
Yes (non-
Non -forested areas - Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3)
and mature forest
areas only)
Forested Areas - Preservation Site per
Trash is located in the
15ANCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4)
stream and needs to be
removed where possible
4A
Ephemeral
No
non- oreste agricu tur
*see note
see note
fields
*Note: Agas line is proposed to impact
most of this channel and therefore this
existing utilities are present
reach may not be present after
(see map)
construction;
4B
Stream
Yes
Combination of non-
2Yes
Yes (non-
Non -forested areas - Restoration Site
(starts above
forested agricultural fields
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
pond&
and mature forest
areas only)
continues to
Forested Areas - Preservation Site per
Main
A gas line is proposedto
15ANCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)
tributary 4)
impact stream; existing
utilities are present (see
All areas within existing or proposed
map)
easements must be excluded from the
Restoration and Preservation Site
A force main was located
along this stream; A utility
Cannot be used as a Restoration Site until
line is present through the
after gas line is constructed &
pond.
construction easements are no longer
needed
5A
Not Present
No
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Page 3 of 5

DocuSign Envelope ID: C059370B-B39D-46D5-82D4-8741163F88E3 Raleigh Farm Phase B Site
Restoration Systems, LLC
September 24, 2020
Feature
Classification
1Subiect
6Rinarian Land uses
Buffer
3Nutrient
4,SMitiaation Tyne Determination
onsite
to
w/in riparian areas
adjacent to Feature
Credit
Offset
Buffer
(0-20011
Viable
Viable
Rule
513
Not Present
No
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5C
Stream
Yes
Mature forest except along
zyes
No
Preservation Site per 15ANCAC 02B
maintained utility line
.0295 (o) (5)
(p ower line)
All areas within existing or proposed
Utility line is present along
easements must be excluded from the
the entire reach to its
Restoration and Preservation Site
confluence with Feature 4.
Must include top of bank within easement
to be creditable.
6A
Ephemeral
No
Mostly mature forest with
z es
Y
Yes (non-
Non -forested areas - Restoration Site
some adjacent agricultural
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o) (7)
field
areas only)
Forested Areas - Preservation Site per
15ANCAC 02B.0295 (o)(5)
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated August 17, 2020 using the 1:24,000 scale
quadrangle topographic map preparedby USGS andthe most recent prmtedversionofthe soil survey map preparedby theNRCS
2The area of Preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise. of no more than 25 percent (25%).of the total area. of
buffermrtigafpon per 15ANCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation my site to comply with this
rule.
'NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian
Buffer Establi§hment
a Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
5 All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset must have a conservation easement established that includes the top s of
channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks, even if no credit is viable within that riparian area.
6 Landuses may also include the application of bio-solids associated with the NRRRF
71he area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer mitigation
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).
Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas shown in Figure 1 and the CORPUD map. Maps representing the proposal
for the Site are attached to this letter and are initialed by Ms. Merritt on September 24, 2020.
Substantial changes to the proposed easement boundary as well as site constraints identified on page 1
of this letter could affect the Site's potential to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface
waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a proposed
nutrient load -reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for approval prior
to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian restoration,
enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to be eligible for
buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being viable for nutrient
offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting calculations and
sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to determine viability
for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.

DocuSign Envelope ID: C059370B-B39D-46D5-82D4-8741163F88E3 Raleigh Farm Phase B Site
Restoration Systems, LLC
September 24, 2020
This viability ass essmentwill expire on September 24, 2022 or upon approval of a mitigation
plan by the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset,
buffer, stream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site.
Please contact Katie Merritt at [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
DocuSig�n�e/d by:
W02
949D91BA53EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
PW/kym
Attachments: Phase B-Figure 1, CORPUD-Site Features Phase B
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
Page 5 of 5

•Z.T.11E.9[:. III II • II: :R • Il , • 11 :BAl:ASfi[:icl�:I; ?

y
N
~��
�_�_
liy G
Q r
G
C
t�
A
0•._�'0 U� � I
����
-- -- =.
i
__ __ .,
;,>
:� f,:
` �"
„ � i"
.; ,

DocuSign Envelope ID: ACF875FD-8AA5-41 Al -BD65-22AF9AA50486
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
Barrett Jenkins
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
[e-mail]
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
August 17, 2020
Project 2019-1692 V3
Wake County
Subject: On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules 15A NCAC 02B .0714
Project Name: Raleigh Farm Site Phase C
Address: 5619 Mial Plantation Road, Raleigh, NC 27610
Location: Lat., Long. 35.708058,-78.475047
Site Inspection Date: 6/2/2020
Dear Mr. Jenkins:
On June 2, 2020, Shelton Sullivan of the Division of Water Resources (DWR) conducted an on -site review
of features located on the subject property at the request of Barrett Jenkins with Restoration Systems,
LLC to determine the applicability to the Neuse Riparian Area Protection Rules, Title 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code 02B .0714.
The enclosed map(s) depict the feature(s) evaluated and this information is also summarized in the table
below. Streams were evaluated for being ephemeral, at least intermittent, and subjectivity to the Neuse
Riparian Area Protection Rules. Streams that are considered "Subject" have been located on the most
recently published NRCS Soil Survey of Wake County and/or the most recent copy of the USGS
Topographic (at 1:24,000 scale) map(s), have been located on the ground at the site, and possess
characteristics that qualify them to be at least intermittent streams. Features that are considered "Not
Subject" have been determined to not be at least intermittent, not present on the property, or not
depicted on the required maps.
This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity
within buffers or within waters of the state. There may be other streams or features located on the
property that appear or do not appear on the maps referenced above. Any of the features on the site
may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and subject to the Clean
Water Act.
The following table addresses the features observed and rated during the DWR site visit:
D Q
�� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NQRTH CA�An' INA
OapaNnenl pf Ennlrpnmental quallry 919.707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID: ACF875FD-8AA5-41A1-BD65-22AF9AA50486
Project 2019-1692V3, Raleigh Farm Phase C
Wake County
Page 2 of 3
Feature Type
Subject to
Feature
Depicted
Depicted on
(stream/pond/ E/I/P)
Buffer
Start @
Stop @
Point ID
Soil Survey
y
USGS Topo
(ditch/wetland/other)
Rules
Includes Pond 1
1A
Stream - Ephemeral
No
1A
Yes
Yes
and ends at 113
Continues to the
Stream - At least
Yes
1B
Yes
1B
confluence with
Yes
intermittent
Neuse River
Stream - At least
2A
Yes
2A
2B
Yes
No
intermittent
2B
Wetland
No
2B
2C
Yes
No
Stream- At least
2C
Yes
2C
2D
Yes
No
intermittent
2D
Wetland
No
2D
2E
Yes
No
Continues to the
Stream - At least
2E
Yes
2E
confluence with
Yes
No
intermittent
Neuse River
Continues to the
Stream - At least
3A
Yes
3A
confluence with
Yes
No
intermittent
Neuse River
4A
Stream - Ephemeral
No
4A
4B
No
No
Continues to the
Stream - At least
4B
Yes
4B
confluence with
No
No
intermittent
Neuse River
4C
Ditch — Not connected
No
See site map
See site map
No
No
5A
Stream - Ephemeral
No
5A
5B
Yes
Yes
Includes Pond 5
and continues
Stream - At least
5B
Yes
5B
to confluence
Yes
Yes
intermittent
with Neuse
River
Continues to
Stream - At least
5C
Yes
5C
confluence with
Yes
Yes
intermittent
Neuse River
5D
Not Present
No
See site map
See site map
Yes
No
Continues to
6A
Ditch
No
6A
confluence with
No
No
Neuse River
7
Not Evaluated
See site map
See site map
Yes
No
Evallo ted
* E: Ephemeral, I: Intermittent, P: Perennial
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute this determination made by the DWR may request an appeal determination by the
Director of Water Resources. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) calendar days of the
date of this letter to the Director in writing, as per 15A NCAC 02B .0714 (4).
If sending via U.S. Postal Service:
Paul Wojoski - DWR 401 & Buffer
Permitting Branch Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
Paul Wojoski - DWR 401 & Buffer
Permitting Branch Supervisor
512 N Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27604

DocuSign Envelope ID: ACF875FD-8AA5-41A1-BD65-22AF9AA50486
Project 2019-1692V3, Raleigh Farm Phase C
Wake County
Page 3 of 3
This determination is final and binding as detailed above, unless an appeal is requested within sixty (60)
calendar days.
This letter only addresses the labeled features on the subject property and within the proposed project
easement boundary and does not approve any activity within buffers or within waters of the state. If you
have any additional questions or require additional information, please contact Shelton Sullivan at
[e-mail] or 919-707-3636. This determination is subject to review as provided in
Articles 3 & 4 of G.S. 150B.
Sincerely,
r7DocuS/ig�neeld by:
W, 4A4
949D91BA53EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski
Supervisor, DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting
Attachments: Site Map with labeled points, NRCS Soil Survey, USGS Topographical Map
cc: Raymond Holz via email [e-mail]
Barrett Jenkins via email [e-mail]
Katie Merritt via email [e-mail]
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch files
Filename: 20191692v3_RaleighFarmC_StreamCalls.docx

m«.... . ..
. as ..
«�
�
/
\
<\
\
-
)
d\
\�
K
f
°
i
!
)}
§�
LU
)a.
°
�\
\
�
�
j
\
r
>
ww
\
)
,
§
/
f
/
\
\
>
ED
®
-
/
a)
\
7\
t>
--
/o
j/
a
e
f
2
»)
§
\ )
\
}}
-
\
\
\ a_
\
)
\ «
\
4
�`
_
\ 0
e��
/ �[
q
�
|
| |\
G
|
/\
}co
zo/ /
M
.
.._,.

CD
U =
o z z J
=r xcli z
U w
z Fr
o Wes~ ° N �gW U) 00 ? N
Jry U J r m ('
T LU
w �wz z Y a 0 �0 LL
a
a a o o J) F-
Z —„ate Pr • pr- rr
_ 4
uy
1 u =
6
I
CDf
0
C
O

DocuSign Envelope ID: ACF875FD-8AA5-41A1-BD65-22AF9AA50486
Phase C: Wake County Soil Survey for Reference
1
Lod i
Cn •�
ApD
NCO •.
WaE
Cm
' ApC2
1
r uR
r, A tA1
AfA
4 FaB
Cn
B
Wn
Ai
J
err•

CD z CD >-
CIJ z
cli C) LU
z z
LD w w Cl)
z W a
w 0 04 LU U) 0') Z:)
• _j C) :122 F m Cf) 0) C14 Ulie
< , LU 0 (D —
2 w z jL 0-
a.
.6 bj m Z)
10- la_ I cl 1 0 U) F-
N
NO

DocuSign Envelope ID: 3BE18B63-D93F-4C3A-9DF5-5719BC4437E1
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
September 25, 2020
Barrett Jenkins DWR# 2019-16920
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
(via electronic mail: bienkinsgrestorationsystems.com)
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset — Raleigh Farm Phase C Site
Near 5619 Mial Plantation Road, Raleigh, NC 27610
Lat., Long. 35.708058,-78.475047
Neuse 03020201
Dear Mr. Jenkins,
On February 11, 2020, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a
request from you on behalf of Restoration Systems, LLC (RS) for a site visit near the above -
referenced site in the Neuse River Basin within the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201. The site
visit was to determine the potential for riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset within a
proposed Easement Boundary, which is more accurately shown in the attached map labeled
"CORPUD-Site Features Phase B" prepared by RS and edited by DWR. On June 2, 2020, Ms.
Merritt performed a site assessment of the subject site and identified the following site constraints:
UTILITIES: Gas lines are being proposed on parts of the site where streams are located.
Existing powerline easements are also present. Specific locations and associated
easements of gas lines were unknown at the time of the DWR site visit, but the attached
CORPUD figure details where the proposed and temporary easements will be located.
PERMITS: State, Federal and/or Local permits may be associated with this property.
Wetland delineation flagging and other stream call determinations were observed on the
site.
EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE: The City of Raleigh owns the property on the site
and has used the land for applying bio-solids associated with the Neuse River Resource
Recovery Facility (NRRRF). Existing underground and above ground infrastructure is
present for purposes of irrigating the property. The City of Raleigh Public Utilities
Department (CORPUD) manages the property. Existing dirt paths, culverted crossings,
deeded access roads and greenways are present throughout and are adjacent to ditches
and streams onsite where mitigation would be proposed. Some Groundwater Monitoring
Wells were located onsite, but their locations are not depicted on any maps attached to
this correspondence. All existing infrastructure within the proposed conservation
easement shall be delineated and included as part of the site's restoration plan along with
specific details on management and maintenance and what will be included or excluded.
o Application of bio-solids will not be permitted within a conservation easement.
D EQ �� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
NORTH CAROLINA
Department at Environmental Quail /`� 919.707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID: 3BE18B63-D93F-4C3A-9DF5-5719BC4437E1 Raleigh Farm Phase C Site
Restoration Systems, LLC
September 25, 2020
o Impervious surface will not be permitted within a conservation easement unless it
is an access easement or located outside of creditable areas for mitigation or
nutrient offsets.
o Disruption in connectivity between top of bank and adjacent riparian areas will
not be permitted within a conservation easement.
o Monitoring wells must remain fully functional and shall be allowed to be
maintained and accessed as needed.
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
and landward 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
Feature
Classification
'Subject
6Riparian Land uses
Buffer
3Nutrient
4,5Mitigation Type Determination
onsite
to
adjacent to Feature
Offset
w/in riparian areas
Credit
0-200'
Buffer
Viable
Viable
Rule
IA
Ephemeral
No
Forested above the pond
'=Yes
Yes (non-
Non -forested areas - Restoration Site
(includes
and mostly non -forested
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o) (7)
Pond 1 &
agricultural fields around
areas only)
ends at 113
and downstream of pond
Forested Areas - Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4)
Non -forested areas - Restoration Site
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7)
Must include all of Pond 1 to 113 to be
creditable
The dam needs to have controlled
access by RS and should be deeded
along with Conservation Easement so
that dam integrity is maintained. No
trees can be planted & no credit
obtained along the dam or within
controlled access area.
113
Stream
Yes
Combination of non-
zYes
Yes (non-
Non -forested areas - Restoration Site
(begins at
forested agricultural fields
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
DWR
and mature forest
areas only)
E/I flag)
Forested Areas - Preservation Site per
A greenway is present
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)
downstream
2A
Stream
Yes
Combination of non-
zYes
Yes (non-
Non -forested areas - Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
and mature forest
areas only)
Forested Areas - Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)
Page 2 of 5

DocuSign Envelope ID: 3BE18B63-D93F-4C3A-9DF5-5719BC4437E1 Raleigh Farm Phase C Site
Restoration Systems, LLC
September 25, 2020
Feature
Classification
'Subject
6Riparian Land uses
Buffer
3Nutrient
4.5Mitigation Type Determination
onsite
to
w/in riparian areas
adjacent to Feature
Credit
Offset
Buffer
(0-200'3
Viable
Viable
Rule
2B
Wetland
No
fully forested with adjacent
No
No
N/A
(ends at
agricultural fields
DWR flag
2C)
2C
Stream
Yes
Combination of non-
zYes
Yes (non-
Non -forested areas - Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
and mature forest
areas only)
Forested Areas - Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)
2D
Wetland
No
fully forested with adjacent
No
No
N/A
(ends at
agricultural fields
DWR flag
2E)
2E
Stream
Yes
Combination of non-
zYes
Yes (non-
Non -forested areas - Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
and mature forest
areas only)
Forested Areas - Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)
3A
Stream
Yes
Combination of non-
zYes
Yes (non-
Non -forested areas - Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
and mature forest
areas only)
Forested Areas - Preservation Site per
There is an access crossing
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)
present across the stream
and a greenway located
Credit is not viable within access crossing.
downstream
4A
Ephemeral
No
Combination of non-
z•IYes
Yes (non-
Non -forested areas - Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o) (7)
and mature forest
areas only)
Forested Areas - Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4)
4B
Stream
Yes
Combination of non-
zYes
Yes (non-
Non -forested areas - Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
and mature forest
areas only)
Forested Areas - Preservation Site per
A greenway is present
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)
downstream
4C
Ditch
No
N/A
No
No
Not hydrologically connected to a
stream
5A
Ephemeral
No
Mature forest along both
z 'Yes
Yes (non-
Non -forested areas - Restoration Site
(ends at
sides of channel with non-
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o) (7)
DWR flag
forested agricultural located
areas only)
5B
along left bank
Forested Areas - Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4)
Page 3 of S

DocuSign Envelope ID: 3BE18B63-D93F-4C3A-9DF5-5719BC4437E1 Raleigh Farm Phase C Site
Restoration Systems, LLC
September 25, 2020
Feature
Classification
'Subject
6Riparian Land uses
Buffer
3Nutrient
4,SMitigation Type Determination
onsite
to
adjacent to Feature
Offset
w/in riparian areas
Credit
0-200'
Buffer
Viable
Viable
Rule
5B
Stream
Yes
Mature forest along both
zYes
Yes (non-
Non -forested areas - Restoration Site
(includes
sides of channel with non-
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
Pond 5
forested agricultural located
areas only)
along left bank
Forested Areas - Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)
Pond 5
In -line Pond
Yes
Mature forest along both
zYes
Yes (non-
Non -forested areas - Restoration Site
sides of channel with non-
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
forested agricultural located
areas only)
along left bank
Forested Areas - Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)
5C
Stream
Yes
Mature forest along both
zYes
Yes (non-
Non -forested areas - Restoration Site
(starts below
sides of channel with non-
forested
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
Pond 5)
forested agricultural located
areas only)
along left bank
Forested Areas - Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)
utility line present
downstream
5D
Not Present
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
6A
Ditch
No
narrow forested fringe and
No
Yes fields
Non -forested areas - Restoration Site
>3' depth
non -forested agricultural
only)
per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
fields
7
Not Evaluated
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated August 17, 2020 using the 1:24,000 scale
quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by the NRCS .
zThe area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment
4 Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
s All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset, must have a conservation easement established that includes the tops of
channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks, even if no credit is viable within that riparian area.
6 Land uses may also include the application of bio-solids associated with the NRRRF
"The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).
Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas shown in Figure 1 and the CORPUD map. Maps representing the proposal
for the Site are attached to this letter and are initialed by Ms. Merritt on September 25, 2020.
Substantial changes to the proposed easement boundary as well as site constraints identified on page
1 of this letter could affect the Site's potential to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Page 4 of 5

DocuSign Envelope ID: 3BE18B63-D93F-4C3A-9DF5-5719BC4437E1 Raleigh Farm Phase C Site
Restoration Systems, LLC
September 25, 2020
This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or
surface waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a
proposed nutrient load -reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for
approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
This viability assessment will expire on September 25, 2022 or upon approval of a mitigation
plan by the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset,
buffer, stream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site.
Please contact Katie Merritt at [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
DocuSeig�n�e/d by:
E
dwG W02�
949D916A53EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
PW/kym
Attachments: Phase C-Figure 1, Phase C-Figure 2, CORPUD-Site Features Phase C
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
Page 5 of 5

NbL.
m
10
4M jr
as ria

41h -11lTqdG9 i dqAllljw .-

U
W

DocuSign Envelope ID: 3BE18B63-D93F-4C3A-9DF5-5719BC4437E1
Certificate Of Completion
Envelope Id: 95DD3A3lA526497ABC6DB26OE4D88BCA
Subject: Please DocuSign: Raleigh Farm C Figures.pdf
Source Envelope:
Document Pages: 3 Signatures: 0
Certificate Pages: 1 Initials: 3
AutoNav: Disabled
Envelopeld Stamping: Disabled
Time Zone: (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada)
Record Tracking
Status: Original
9/25/2020 1:41:46 PM
Signer Events
Katie Merritt
[e-mail]
DWR
DEQ
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
In Person Signer Events
Editor Delivery Events
Agent Delivery Events
Intermediary Delivery Events
Certified Delivery Events
Carbon Copy Events
Witness Events
Notary Events
Envelope Summary Events
Envelope Sent
Certified Delivered
Signing Complete
Completed
Payment Events
Holder: Katie Merritt
[e-mail]
Signature
EU
Signature Adoption: Pre -selected Style
Using IPAddress: 149.168.204.10
Signature
Status
Status
Status
Status
Status
Signature
Signature
Status
Hashed/Encrypted
Security Checked
Security Checked
Security Checked
Status
DoCu5�".
ii S E C up E D
Status: Completed
Envelope Originator:
Katie Merritt
217 W. Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27699
[e-mail]
IP Address: 149.168.204.10
Location: DocuSign
Timestamp
Sent: 9/25/2020 1:41:56 PM
Viewed: 9/25/2020 1:42:03 PM
Signed: 9/25/2020 1:42:29 PM
Freeform Signing
Timestamp
Timestamp
Timestamp
Timestamp
Timestamp
Timestamp
Timestamp
Timestamp
Timestamps
9/25/2020 1:41:56 PM
9/25/2020 1:42:03 PM
9/25/2020 1:42:29 PM
9/25/2020 1:42:29 PM
Timestamps

Docu5�".
ii S E C up E D
Certificate Of Completion
Envelope Id: 3BE18B63D93F4C3A9DF55719BC4437E1
Status: Completed
Subject: Please DocuSign: Raleigh C Viability to Sign.pdf
Source Envelope:
Document Pages: 9 Signatures: 1
Envelope Originator:
Certificate Pages: 1 Initials: 0
Katie Merritt
AutoNav: Enabled
217 W. Jones Street
Envelopeld Stamping: Enabled
Raleigh, NC 27699
Time Zone: (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada)
[e-mail]
IP Address: 149.168.204.10
Record Tracking
Status: Original
Holder: Katie Merritt
Location: DocuSign
9/25/2020 1:47:37 PM
[e-mail]
Signer Events
Signature
Timestamp
Paul WojoskiSent:
by:
9/25/2020 1:48:36 PM
[e-mail]
[D—Sig"el
��.e�o
Viewed: 9/25/2020 1:56:26 PM
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
949D91EA53EF4Eo
Signed: 9/25/2020 1:56:31 PM
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Signature Adoption: Pre -selected Style
Using IPAddress: 149.168.204.10
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
In Person Signer Events
Signature
Timestamp
Editor Delivery Events
Status
Timestamp
Agent Delivery Events
Status
Timestamp
Intermediary Delivery Events
Status
Timestamp
Certified Delivery Events
Status
Timestamp
Carbon Copy Events
Status
Timestamp
Witness Events
Signature
Timestamp
Notary Events
Signature
Timestamp
Envelope Summary Events
Status
Timestamps
Envelope Sent
Hashed/Encrypted
9/25/2020 1:48:36 PM
Certified Delivered
Security Checked
9/25/2020 1:56:26 PM
Signing Complete
Security Checked
9/25/2020 1:56:31 PM
Completed
Security Checked
9/25/2020 1:56:31 PM
Payment Events
Status
Timestamps

Barrett Jenkins
From: Saunders, Erickson G <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 11:14 AM
To: Barrett Jenkins
Cc: Merritt, Katie; Thornburg, Nathaniel; Dalton, Marla
Subject: RE: [External] RE: WQ0001730 - City of Raleigh RLAP Additional Information Request
Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Barrett,
The project is still in house with us at the moment, I believe we are still waiting on one more thing from the additional
information request not related to the buffer restoration project.
You are right, the permit will reference this project and have a condition that a permit modification shall be submitted
to formally remove the sections that are a part of the buffer project. I don't know if we necessarily have authority to
provide the approval for the implementation of the plan, but we have no objections to the implementation as long as it
is removed from the permit and the final easement is sufficient. Katie mentioned that our office and hers would work
internally to provide you with assistance with the easement language that we would require.
As for what we might need from you, the only other comment I had for the CoR's response was that there was not an
updated acreage table for the residuals land application fields after the conservation easement goes into effect. I see
that there are certain amount of acres that are considered overlap on the maps, but I would still want the post -
easement acres in a nice table to put into our permit. I know Marla had also mentioned that some of the fields would be
too small and would be removed altogether, so CoR should propose which of those fields should be removed altogether.
Let me know if you have any other questions.
Erick Saunders
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Permitting
[phone] Office
[e-mail]
From: Barrett Jenkins [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 6:26 PM
To: Saunders, Erickson G <[e-mail]>
Cc: Merritt, Katie <[e-mail]>; Thornburg, Nathaniel<[e-mail]>; Dalton, Marla
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: WQ0001730 - City of Raleigh RLAP Additional Information Request
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Erick,

I am working on a final draft for our buffer restoration/nutrient offset project on Raleigh's NRRRF property and wanted
to check in with you to see if Raleigh had completed their biosolids application permit renewal and if that renewal
mentioned future plans to implement the buffer restoration project as discussed?
We are looking for written approval from you to allow us to implement our restoration plan and then have Raleigh apply
for a permit modification to formally update the spray field maps after our conservation easement is recorded.
Please let me know where things stand from your end and if I can provide anymore information.
Katie Merritt, who is permitting our restoration project is cc'd as well as Marla Dalton with Raleigh Water.
Thanks,
Barrett Jenkins
Restoration Systems
512.230.0424
From: Saunders, Erickson G <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 3:16 PM
To: Merritt, Katie <[e-mail]>; Barrett Jenkins<blenkin s@restoratio nsystems.com>
Cc: Thornburg, Nathaniel<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: WQ0001730 - City of Raleigh RLAP Additional Information Request
Katie, it's kind of my fault, my additional information asked for them to provide a draft excerpt of the future
conservation easement. I'm not familiar with how your process works so I threw it back on the City of Raleigh to provide
it to me. I didn't ask for anything final regarding the easement, just a draft to ensure the easement would fall within the
scope of our rules. We won't approve anything based on what we receive, it was kind of meant to be a launching point
to make sure it was known that the easement would need special considerations and language to address the
requirements of our program.
Mr. Barrett,
We recognize that whatever maps you send aren't finalized at the moment. I expect we will issue the permit with a
condition for Raleigh to provide a permit modification to formally remove those areas from the permit to get the
finalized version. We just want to anticipate the removal of certain land application areas now so that we have
something concrete in place to help formalize their removal later on. Just to be clear though, Raleigh should be
providing this information to me, so you may want to provide this information to them because they are supposed to
provide a "Post -buffer mitigation map" which shows what land application areas will still be permitted after this action is
done.
As for the language you provided, it'll probably need to get edited to conform with our rules, but this can be done down
the line if needed. It looks to be missing provisions allowing for the State to enter the site for groundwater monitoring
and remediation activities, which is a requirement in the 02L .0107 groundwater rules. The bolded language only
appears to grant Raleigh that kind of access. Again, that's just off the top of my head and is in no way comprehensive,
and we'll discuss with Katie and probably the Groundwater Section to determine what all needs to be included in the
final easement. We'll also discuss your other final questions regarding the level of restriction and specific easement
language.
Regards,
Erick Saunders
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources

Water Quality Permitting
[phone] Office
[e-mail]
From: Merritt, Katie
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 2:30 PM
To: Barrett Jenkins <[e-mail]>; Saunders, Erickson G <[e-mail]>
Cc: Thornburg, Nathaniel<[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [External] RE: WQ0001730 - City of Raleigh RLAP Additional Information Request
Hey Barrett,
Just as a side note, I will be taking the lead on providing RS with language for the conservation easement
associated with the Proposed Mitigation Bank. Therefore, Erick, Nathanial and I will work internally together
on what that language needs to be before sending anything to RS. Then, I will contact RS directly with the
suggested language to include and we can discuss. At this time, DWR is not ready to engage in assistance with
the conservation easement since there is not yet an MBI or Plan approved for the Bank yet. Once we get those
documents finalized, DWR staff will meet to go over the necessary changes to the current easement template.
Unless I have misunderstood, I don't believe Raleigh is required to have a conservation easement recorded to
get the permit renewed.
Let's plan to talk more about this next week at our teams meeting.
Thank you,
Katie
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Barrett Jenkins <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 11:24:51 AM
To: Saunders, Erickson G <[e-mail]>
Cc: Merritt, Katie <[e-mail]>; Thornburg, Nathaniel<[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] RE: WQ0001730 - City of Raleigh RLAP Additional Information Request
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Erick,
Please find attached two draft maps showing areas in which the proposed conservation easement overlaps with existing
fields approved for residuals application. At this point our conservation easement is in draft form and we don't
anticipate finalizing until later this year. Is it okay to provide you updated maps of the changes in the residual
application field boundaries after the Conservation Easement Survey is finalized? This may not coordinate with Raleigh's
permit renewal schedule exactly. I'm asking to make sure I understand what we need to do but also when. Are these
maps sufficient for Raleigh residuals permit renewal that is in process?
Also attached is the draft conservation easement which already includes the below language:
"ARTICLE IV.
GRANTEE'S RIGHTS

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
November 21, 2019
To:
N.C. Division of Mitigation Services, Private & Public Mitigation Banks, other Interested Parties
Subject: Clarified Procedures for Calculating Buffer Mitigation Credits & Nutrient Offset Credits for
Riparian Projects Regulated under 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and 15A NCAC 02B .0240
This letter, and the included attachments, outlines procedures and provides guidance for calculating
buffer mitigation credits and nutrient offset credits for projects submitted to the Division of Water
Resources (DWR) for review. In March 2019, the DWR established a small Work Group ("Group")
consisting of 7 people to discuss crediting inconsistencies for nutrient offset and buffer mitigation
projects. The Group consisted of 3 staff members from DWR, two staff members from the Division
of Mitigation Services, and one representative from each of two private mitigation banks. The
procedures and guidance provided in this letter were made by consensus from the Group for
implementing 15A NCAC 02B .0295 ("Rule .0295") and 15A NCAC 02B .0240 ("Rule .0240).
These procedures are for implementing buffer mitigation or nutrient offset projects where a
draft mitigation plan or a draft Bank Parcel Development Plan (BPDP) is submitted to the
DWR for review after the date of this letter. All other projects must comply with mitigation
plans and BPDPs submitted to DWR for review prior to the date of this letter.
A summary of the issues resolved by the Group and associated guidance for credit calculations are
detailed in Attachment A "Issues and Resolutions Ver 1.0 — Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset".
For further information regarding this correspondence, please contact Katie Merritt with DWR at
katie.merrittAncdenngov or by phone at 919-707-3637.
Attachments: A, B, C, and D
Sincerely,
Jim regson
Deputy Director, Division of Water Resources
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617

Attachment A
Issues and Resolutions Ver 1.0 - Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset November 21, 2019
Issue #1: Procedure for crediting mitigation activities within riparian areas for buffer
mitigation and nutrient offsets.
Applying ratios and reductions under 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (m) and (n) respectively for buffer
mitigation credit, while also applying the DWR-Methodology and Calculations for determining
Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer Establishment
https: /f les. nc.Qov/ncdeq/Water%20QualitylPlanninQ/NPU/Nutrient%200ffset%20Rule/A-BBuLfer-
Credit. d often leads to differences in measuring and accounting. Establishing procedures on how
credits are measured, calculated, converted and presented in mitigation plans involved addressing
inconsistencies and creating guidance on rounding, significant digits, units of measurement, as well
as developing credit ratios and conversion ratios.
Resolution: Established (a) guidance for rounding & decimal places, (b) guidance for physical
measurements, (c) buffer mitigation credit ratios, (d) credit conversion ratios, (e) formula for credit
conversions, and (f) a format for presenting credits.
a) Established guidance for rounding and decimal places. See Table 1.0
Table 1.0 — Guidance for Roundine
Physical
Measurements
Credit Ratios &
Credit Conversion
Ratios
Credits
'Nutrient Effectiveness for
Phosphorus & Nitrogen
Round to nearest whole
Round to 5 decimal
Round to 3 decimal places
Round to 2 decimal places
number
places
Example:
Example:
Example:
Nitrogen: 2,273.02 lbs/ac/30yrs
1,452.6424 ft2 = 1,453 ft2
6.06061444 = 6.06061
49,625.4876 ft2 = 49,625.488 ft2
Phosphorus:146.40 lbs/ac/3 0yrs
'D WR-Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment https:Ilfiles.nc.Qoilncdeg/Water%200uality/PlanningINPUINutrientVo2OOffset%2ORulelAe-Buffer-
Credit. d
b) Established guidance for physical measurements. See Table 2.0
Table 2.0 — Guidance for Physical Measurements
Credit Type
'Mitigation Activity
Unit of
Guidance
Measurement
Riparian Buffer
Riparian R/E/P/Ex
Square Foot
Measure area and
round to the nearest
whole number
Nutrient Offset
Riparian R/E
Square Foot
Measure area and
(Nitrogen)
round to the nearest
whole number
Nutrient Offset
Riparian R/E
Square Foot
Measure area and
(Phosphorus)
round to the nearest
whole number
'R= Restoration, E= Enhancement (not cattle exclusion), Ex=Enhancement for permanent
exclusion of grazing livestock, P= Preservation
Page 2 of 8

Attachment A
Issues and Resolutions Ver 1.0 - Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset November 21, 2019
c) Established a buffer mitigation credit ratio for each scenario under 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(m) and (n). See Table 3.0
Table 3.0: Buffer Mitigation Credit Ratio
Location
Stream Buffer
Subjectivity
'Mitigation
Activity
Z'4Min-Max
Buffer Width
00
3Initial
Unit
Ratio
(x:1)
4%
Full
Credit
'Final Credit
Ratio (x:1)
Riparian
Buffer Credit
(ftz )
N/A
N/A
R,E and P
<20
0
0
0
N/A
N/A
R
20-29
1
75%
1.33333
N/A
N/A
R
30-100
1
100%
1.00000
N/A
N/A
R
101-200
1
33%
6.06061
N/A
N/A
E, Ex
20-29
2
75%
2.66667
N/A
N/A
E, Ex
30-100
2
100%
2.00000
Credits (ftz)
N/A
N/A
E, Ex
101-200
2
33%
6.06061
rounded up to
Rural
Subject
P
20-29
10
75%
13.33333
3 decimal
Rural
Subject
P
30-100
10
100%
10.00000
places
Rural
Subject
P
101-200
10
33%
30.30303
Rural
Non -Subject
P
20-29
5
75%
6.66667
Rural
Non -Subject
P
30-100
5
100%
5.00000
Rural
Non -Subject
P
101-200
5
33%
15.15152
Urban
Subject or Non-
Subject
P
20-29
3
75%
4.00000
Urban
Subject or Non-
Subject
P
30-100
3
100%
3.00000
Urban
Subject or Non-
Subject
P
101-200
3
33%
9.09091
' R= Restoration, E= Enhancement (not cattle exclusion), Ex=Enhancement just for permanent exclusion of grazing livestock, P=
Preservation,
tall minimum physical measurement ranges of riparian widths are measured landward and perpendicular from top of bank and
assumed to be continuous with top of bank without breaks
3 Derived from 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (m)
'Derived from 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n).
' Combining initial ratios in Rule .0295 (m) with physical measurements and corresponding credit reductions in Rule .0295 (n)
Page 3 of 8

Attachment A
Issues and Resolutions Ver 1.0 - Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset November 21, 2019
d) Established credit conversion ratios for Nitrogen and Phosphorus to simplify the conversion
of buffer mitigation credits (square feet) into nutrient offset credits (pounds) where credits
are deemed by DVWR as being eligible for either credit type. See Tables 4a and 4b.
Table 4a: Nutrient Offset Credit Conversion Ratio (CCR) in Square Feet per Pound without Delivery Factors
'Service Area
z Mitigation
'Min -Max
3Initial
Unit
'Nitrogen
QPhosphorus
Nutrient
Offset Credits
River Basin/WS and Hydrologic
Activity
riparian
Ratio
CCR
CCR
(lbs)
Unit Code
Width (ft)
(ftZ/pound)
(ft'/pound)
(x:1)
Cape Fear — Randleman
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Catawba
R & E
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Neuse- 03020201 (Lower Falls
Credits (lbs)
Lake, Upper Falls Lake, Outside
50-200
1
rounded up to
Falls Lake), 03020202, 03020203,
R
19.16394
N/A
3 decimal
50-200
2
Neuse 03020204
places
E
9.58197
N/A
Tar -Pamlico- 03020101, 03020102,
R
50-200
1
19.16394
297.54099
03020103,03020104,03020105
E
50-200
2
9.58197
148.77050
Yadkin — Goose Creek
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
i service area is defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0240 and G.S. 143-214.26
2R= Restoration, E= Enhancement (not cattle exclusion)
2All minimum physical measurement ranges of riparian widths are measured landward and perpendicular from top of bank and
must be contiguous with top of bank
4DWR-Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer Establishment
https: 1/files. nc.go v/ncdeg/Water%20Quality/Planning/NPU/Nutrient %200fifset%20Rule/Ag-Buffer- Credit. pdf
Page 4 of 8

Attachment A
Issues and Resolutions Ver 1.0 - Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset November 21, 2019
Table 4b: Nutrient Offset Credit Conversion Ratio (CCR) with Delivery Factors
Credit Generated Ibs/30
Jordan Subwatershed
Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
2,249.360
143.810
Cape Fear - Jordan Upper New Hope
2:11,9!260
143.810
Cape Fear -Jordan Lower New Hope
2,273.0201
146.400
Rounded Up to Sth decimal
Jordan Subwatershed
Watershed ID
Delivery
Factors
TN
Delivery
Factors
TP
Nitrogen
CCR
(sf/pound)
Phosphoms
CCR
(sf/pound)
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002010010
25%
10%
77.46201
3,028.9966
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002010020
37°h
36%
52.3392
841.3879
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002010030
44%
40%
44.0125
757.2491
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002010040
49%
44%
39.52141
688.4083
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002010050
55%
48%
35.2100
631.0409
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002020010
15%
4%
129.1033
7,572.4914
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002020020
22%
12%
88.0250
2,524.1638
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002020030
48%
43%
40.3448
704.4178
Cape Fear - Jordan Haw
03030002020040
32%
33%
60.5172
917.8777
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002020050
32%
32%
60.5172
946.561
Cape Fear - Jordan Haw
03030002020060
47%
42%
41.20324
721.1896
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002020070
54%
47%
35.8620
644.4673
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002030010
6D%
56%
32.2758
540.8922
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002030020
44%
31%
44.0125
977.0956
Cape Fear - Jordan Haw
03030002030030
25%
8%
77.4620
3,786.2457
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002030040
42%
30%
46.1083
1,009.6655
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002030050
64%
1 62%
1 30.2586
488.547
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002030060
39%
19%
49.6551
1,594.2087
Cape Fear - Jordan Haw
03030002030070
36%
18%
53.7930
1,682.7758
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002030080
73%
64%
26.5281
473.2807
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002040010
30%
14%
64.5517
2,163.5690
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002040020
28%
14%
69.1625
2,163.5690
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002040030
1 71%
63%
27.2753
480.7931
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002D40040
32%
is%
1 60.5172
2,019.3310
Cape Fear - Jordan Haw
03030002040050
52%
50%
1 37.2413,605.7993
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002040060
54%
51%
35.8620
593.9209
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002040070
67%
60%
28.9037
504.8327
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002040080
53%
51%
36.5387
593.9209
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002040090
54%
51%
35.8620
593.9209
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002040100
75%
1 65%
25.8206
465.9994
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002040110
66%
60%
29.3416
504.8327
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002050010
74%
68%
1 26.1696
445.4406
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002050020
81%
74%
23.9080
409.3238
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002050030
42%
17%
46.1083
1,781.7627
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002050040
80%
73%
24.2068
414.9310
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002050050
71%
67%
27.2753
452.0890
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002050060
79%
73%
24.5133
414.9310
Cape Fear - Jordan Haw
03030002050070
78%
72%
24.8275
420.6939
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002050080
80%
73%
24.20681
414.9310
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002050090
79% 1
73%
24.5133
414.9310
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002050100
81%
75%
23.9080
403.8662
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002060010
81%
74%
23.9080
409.3238
Cape Fear - Jordan Haw
03030002060020
95%
97%
20.3847
312.2676
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002060030
88%
91%
22.0062
332.8567
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002060040
97%
98%
19.9644
309.0812
Cape Fear -Jordan Haw
03030002060050
92%
95% 1
21.0494
318.8417
Cape Fear - Jordan Haw
03030002060062
98%
99%
19.7607
305.9592
Cape Fear -Jordan Upper New Hope
03030002060070
40%
19%
50.2014
1,594.2087
Cape Fear -Jordan Upper New Hope
03030002060080
59%
45%
34.0348
673.1103
Cape Fear - Jordan Upper New Hope
03030002060100
69%
63%
29.1023
480.7931
Cape Fear -Jordan Upper New Hope
03030002060110
61%
58%
32.9189
522.2408
Cape Fear -Jordan Upper New Hope
03030002060120
69%
63%
29.1023
480.7931
Cape Fear - Jordan Upper New Hope
03030002060140
85% 1
89%
23.6242
340.3367
Cape Fear - Jordan Upper New Hope
03030002060130
69% 1
63%
29.1023
480.7931
Cape Fear -Jordan Lower New Hope
03030002060160
85%
90%
22.5458
330.6011
Cape Fear -Jordan Upper New Hope
03030002060090*
92%
94%
21.8267
322.2336
Cape Fear -Jordan Lower New Hope
03030002060090*
92%
94%
20.8303
316.5329
Cape Fear - Jordan Upper New Hope
03030002060060*
94%
96% 1
21.36234
315.5204
Cape Fear -Jordan Lower New Hope
03030002060060*
94%
96%
20.3871
309.9385
Cape Fear - Jordan Upper New Hope
03030002060150*
88%
91% 1
22.8188
332.8567
Cape Fear -Jordan Lower New Hope
03030002060150* 1
88% 1
91% 1
21.7772.Q
326.9681
Page 5 of 8
* Watershed is located in both the Upper New Hope (UNH) and Lower New Hope (LNH) Subwatersheds.

Attachment A
Issues and Resolutions Ver 1.0 - Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset November 21, 2019
e) Establish a formula for credit conversions. See Table 5.0
Table 5.0 Calculation Formula for Credit Conversions
Credit Type
'Mitigation
2Credit Conversion Formula
Final Project
Activity
(Quantity/Credit Conversion Ratio=X)
Credits
Riparian Buffer
Riparian
Creditable Area (ftz) _ Final Buffer Credit Ratio = X
R/E/P/Ex
ftz buffer credits
Nutrient Offset
Riparian R/E
Total Area (ftz) _ Credit Conversion Ratio ftz/ lb-N =
rounded up to
(Nitrogen)
X lbs-N
3 decimal
places
Nutrient Offset
Riparian R/E
Total Area (ftz) _ Credit Conversion Ratio ftz/ lb-P =
(Phosphorus)
X lbs-P
'R= Restoration, E= Enhancement (not cattle exclusion), Ex=Enhancement just for permanent exclusion of grazing
livestock, P= Preservation
z A user-friendly tool has been developed in conjunction with this memo to assist in entering a project's credits.
This tool is referenced in Issue #1 (f) of this memo.
f) Developed a format f'or presenting credits in project plans submitted to the DWR. The
"Project Credit Table" template is a user-friendly "calculation tool" to calculate a project's
riparian buffer and nutrient offset credits and is designed to comply with Rule .0295, Rule
.0240, and the guidance provided in this letter. The calculation tool is useful and
recommended, and is intended to increase efficiency in the review process. A link to the
most up-to-date calculation tool is found at htti)s:Hdeg.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-
resources/water-quality-oermittinu/401-buffer-oermittiniz-branch/nutrient and a screenshot is
included in Attachment B. A set of instructions f'or using the calculation tool is included in
Attachment C.
Page 6of8

Attachment A
Issues and Resolutions Ver 1.0 - Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset November 21, 2019
EXAMPLES
Example A- Calculating Buffer Credits on Agricultural land within 0-100' riparian width: Using
Tables 1.0-5.0 included in this memo, and the Project Credit Table referenced in (f) below, the
following example is provided:
A total creditable area of 2.2 acres (95,832 ft2) of agricultural land within top of bank to 100 feet
adjacent from the Neuse River is approved for riparian restoration ("R"). The site will yield the
following buffer credits:
Proiect Credit Table
Neuse 03020201-0utride Fella lake
. Vice Area
N Oedit Ratio (sf/credit)
P Credit Ratio (sf/vedk)
1
I
19.16394
N/A
Credit Tv.
Location
SAJ-ff
(enter 110N
a
Feabee TYpe
Mid WWO ActMq
Widdl[Ft)
Feature
TOW A—(af)
IIObI
iCrediable)
initial Credit
%Full Credit
Final Credt
Corverdbte
to R�arwn
RlpBuff
R Bdkr
d11M
A—WBulfer
M nM
Retio(n1)
Ratio(n1)
Cry
Buffer
Rural
Yes
1/P
Renovation
0-10D
Na.. River
95,932
95,932
1
100N
1.00000
Yea
95.832.000
Instead of using the Project Credit Table above, one can enter the formula from Table 5.0 as follows:
Creditable Area (ft2) _ Final Credit Ratio = X ft2 buffer credits
95,832 ft2 _ (1.0 x 100%) = 95,382.000 ft2 buffer credits
Example B- Calculating, Nutrient Offset Credits from Example A
Using Tables 1.0-5.0 included in this memo, and the Project Credit Table referenced in (f), the
following example is provided:
Project Credit Table
Neuse 03020201- Outside Fells lake Service Area
19.16394 N CreSe Ratio (st/ttMb)
14"A P credit Ratio (sr/credit)
iubjectY Total
&.*,TV" tewden lamer rloe Fealueiype AWystien Ardviry Feanee Nave 7oW Area isli ICredioelel ketlalCredit MiWl Gedt meiA.nw � mNubiart Nobsewt
ePOerrterd er 1eMRb(Id Aro of BuAer Mi0{c1{ Ratiojni{ Tdfei C-00 lleMti 016aa11'R1y
.ar.�e h l.e
Renee i- 1 0.100 1 Neu. River
Instead of using the Project Credit Table above, one can enter the formula from Table 5.0 as follows:
Total Area (ft2) _ Credit Conversion Ratio ft2/ lb-N = X lbs-N
95,832 ft2 - (19.16394 ft2 /lb-N) = 5,000.642 lbs-N nutrient offset credits
Page 7 of 8

Attachment A
Issues and Resolutions Ver 1.0 - Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset November 21, 2019
Issue #2: Clarifications to DWR response to Item 1. of the March 10 2017 memorandum to
DMS from DWR titled "DWR Responses to Questions from DMS rewarding implementation of
the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule (15A NCAC 02B) " provided in Attachment D.
DWR issued a memo to DMS on March 10, 2017. Item I of this memo clarifies how to calculate the
25% of the total area of buffer mitigation cited under 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4), (o)(5) to achieve
the allowed amount of preservation area. Examples on how to calculate the Total Area of Buffer
Mitigation (TABM) and the Eligible Preservation Area (EPA) are included. However, the memo
does not address when applicable credit ratios and credit reductions provided in 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (m) and (n) should be applied to the TABM to achieve the EPA.
Clarification: To achieve the EPA, the TABM is calculated by measuring the area of Restoration
(R) and Enhancement (E) be ore applying any credit ratios and credit reductions provided in 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 (m) and (n).
Example: [2 acres (R) + I acre (E)J / 0.75 = 4 acres (TABM)
4 acres (TABM) * 0.25 = I acre (EPA)
I acre (P) + 3 acres (RIE) = 4 acres total
Page 8 of 8

W
z
9
m
Y
u K
W
V
a
0=
e yR
_ q S '-2
F
V a m Y
r.
5 a
o'
> r
u
i E
z
i
m> 'r
o
3
f
a
9p
d
a
�T
C
9
u
m
of of ololZl,��,l bolo

°
E
>
o
m
°
°
%
a ^ °
o
c
aai
E
°
c
p v
-0
O
a
0
a t
$
v
E tp^
° c a
m W
3
w
CL
W
N
O i
` j L
E
yj
w
'6
'v c
c
m
a
F
C
0 70
•c
w
Y
W
W
E
_g
N +' C
O
l]
w
4
Z
v
-Z,
�o
> >
In
u
c a
t
o
Ui
c
v
E
N o
t L
m
C
m
>
a>i
>
n
0
m
y
00
CEO
H
=u_�
e
N
�$
0
O
O
C
7
C
y
K
h
a
N p C
N m
N 8
.° U
O
O
m
CL
a w
N u y
O p 7
p i'p
N j
(7
Q' °
a0
m
=
c m>
c° o
m
o m
y o
Si
m e
m°
u
a
n
cl
m
H
a .yE
N
6.C—
L
Y
v
m
-p
a
W
m
E
'v v
x
y
E `�
N
L 7
c
U
z
>
-
w
y
b
c
m o v
M
m°
a
3 0
o
+s
Y m
o
:c u
y c
m
o a w
.o
m
a
m Z
D
o
"
y
u
3 r
E c
4 o m
0
w
m n
:
° 3
•�
a
m
c
Y
y
E
-
W .c
E Y
a c
v
v
w _c °
m
c
°�
a>
a
•0
0.
7 >
—
E
7
o
c7
7
m E
u
`u
vi
.�
o
cj
a
c
E
v E
> E
7
E a
`m
o
0 'y
E
v
u
,� c
E
+
m
w
a
CC
$' O
0 Y
a
u
y
`1 -O
Q
O
0
j a w
D
O
.O 'O
m
p
L "
CL
y +'
E
O m
fy0
M
m
c
m ,uJ u
y
iv
$
v
u E
a
N
v
c °/
o u
o
u
w
a
v m
a w
a
.'_' Y
v E
3
>
c
fv
a
W
y-E
Y
u
m m o
o
m
E
a E
o
m z
v
z°
o
0
3
w
c W>
o
$
s-. a as
c
dci o
c
p
E=
y
m y
.n'
>
a a
m
n
d
>> o
u
>
a"
m o
a
v
v d
o
n
°°
c
E
°>
v 7
a w
o
e
c
a
:
u
z
N
t
° r
-0 U
u m
a
°oS w m
c
V
m
o
m
m
m y m
:'
Ln S
a
o
m
3
c
+`- E a
v
v p
N`o
a
s
dy —V
��
o>
� 3 `m
u>
w a
m
v
o
b a
a
> c
�
£
c w at
E
m
a
�O m
a �°
v a
•�`�,
u°
vi
°'
m
a
C m
.E
O a
>
'^
O E
C
h W
N
'4)
d
0 E
m
L Cp
E
L
NO
•O
in
y` `°
.r..
Y
W
v
y m
b'
m
(9
\�p M
3
O
>
m
m O
-p
pd V
m p
C
N
N
C N
E
N u
O.
m
O p
m y
vYm
m
m
E
o
E m
or
m m
u o.
V C O
a
�p
C
a
�j•
`�
a
O _
E
C
V
> 0
p
a
1n
0
a
+
°
r m u
r •� ,�
m
L
�>,
7
c0
c
m
c
v
m>
m m
7 v
w v
._
°
'�
v
Y
U
Z
m o
a
a
r:
a
m
_
E Y o
w
y
z
m
a Y u
"
C u
O
a
m
E
c7
o c
a
to M
E
m
Q
v
N�
N
a oo
� w
do
a
a
E
o w
r
o
a
°'
v °
w a �v
'E
^
v
a
c
_ _
__
o
m w v
7
8
u�
M
E
>
7 E
— o '�
>
m
O
�y
r
aE,
H
j
°
3
E Y
.c
E L
m a
y
s
o sm
7 n_ -0
m
m
r
D
c ai c
r
E—-0
°i
7
0
o
m o
—`
0
4`
°
c
u
a
r
o
c
m e
m .m
=
s
O
u
m Y 3
d O
r
c$
O G
m
c
m
a
u
'n
a
Q E
41
n O
41
>
w
O
'm
U``
7 Z
Y
W O Y
}
41 =
C w a'
m t
E
41 Y
O
Y
O y
C
N
-
m
Z
Z
N
'O
C
(
'�
>
m C
L
m
O.
a
O
j O/
m
y C
Y
G C
m
61
v p
,� a, o
C
E N
Oa
m
W
r
:_' v
o.
•�
Y
c
E
a
a
y
a 'v
'^ o
o
o
'v\i
'..
m
t
o
p c
>
y
v
S o
o
-
i+
- F�@
y
o
v
v
c
Y
m
°
3
0 0
C
13
$
°°
°°
ro
m
°_
m z"
v 0
°
t0
d
$
w
m
c
0
m c
o
a ry a
co
c
m
w
ar
c
7
Yo
an
7=
0
c
ry ^
Yo
w
rm
m
vozw
`
w
o`
a
`
E
$ 0
c
�
oo
owa
°
Y
v
o
c
m
°
c
o
o
E
a c
>c s
3
d
v
° 0
°
d
E
a
E
a m
m E
c c
m o •0
E
t
c E
v
u
a U m
0
O
r
'o m
a u
w
y a>
o
c
0-0
o v
,0 m
c 3
'x
4N
—
a
L
�°
c
O c _ E
.m E
$
n
0-
v m
v� 7.
=° v
7
m c"
_
m
-
v
N
°
- Y
m
H C
v m
m 41
m-0 o
m
E
'-
a
Y
7
17 u
o
w
^
y c Y
a
v 7
o
a r—
m
E m
c
g
a
p
v
o
Y o>
y m E
c
o
o
m7
c-
v
y
m
v 0
° 0 •� .y
4E
E
i+
W
u w
c
u c L
a 3
m
0
a E
2
a
m
Y
>
v u
a
v Y
C
a E E
0 c
°
c
v c
'�
m
E
c n w
n
m
p
�o m
Y
m
u
a$
L.
v
-—
w m
v"
c
M
7 o c
o
�n
o
E
m
o
m
a
c
°'-
u a
E— y
o
E
w 1O
a E
E
m m
a
'o
�i
0
0. c
m a
E m E
E
>
v
w-
z a
o
y$ a°
y o 3 m
s
O
p u
a 2>
z
m Q
O
r
a
c
o-
m E
E m
a
E
E
c
o
o` o
_m
p
ar
4/
y
L
m
w L
`/
c
N
c
41
c
O
E
7 o
p
41 'C
TiN
N
C
u1
m
r
C
C p
0
7
"
�n
y •i✓
c
7 Y m m
p Y
m
O
w
w umi
,L.
'0 m
y-
m
yo O
ai
ai
`�
w
a+
°
•_ `
'^
Q u
^-
£ y
`p
pC
3 p• 3
`° E
'E
w
c
c
o
o£
°'
V
7
°
x L K
_ w
m
C
m O
U o Y
F
m
m
m
C=
E
`
m
N
a
p•LAJ
�J
w
s
oho
c
`
`
y
3
,p O
41 _ �+ N
O
O
>
w `/
iy
G
C r
-
a
-
F.._
O
`�
�
m N
E
O
y m
m
C
ul
u
m
a
s 40
w
Y
C
O o
a 4^
E °
c
a+
v
h u
•� v
u u Y
v a
a
a E
m
s
m
4�
^
C
v
u
u y
3
.n
n 7
n
m y
O`
a m
m c
7—
E
m
m
O
> m
o
0
�-�
E
_>
x
u
C v0f
m
to N1 ii
FT
IT
w
_
d
41
7
ym
t
at.. 4!
'u 4'
3
a N •�
t
L
W
m ul y E
w
4! t
-um $
O
u
to
m>
3
�
c m m
u
y
7
-
7
Z
P
° u o¢
N
m v n
r'.
oo
m
H
I
I I
I 1
0:2
a w
o
w
p
Z

Attachment D
ROY COOPER
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Water Resources
ENVIRONYEWAL OUALI I V S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
March 10, 2017
MEMORANDUM
To: N.C. Division of Mitigation Services
From: S. Jay Zimmerman, N.C. Division of Water Resources Director -: �
Subject: DWR Responses to Questions from DMS regarding implementation of the
Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule [15A NCAC 02B .0295]
On November 8, 2016, the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) met with the Division of Water
Resources (DWR) to discuss questions they had regarding implementation of the Consolidated
Buffer Mitigation Rule [15A NCAC 02B .0295]. Below is a short summary of each question and
DWR's response.
I. Calculation of "25% of the Total Area of Buffer Mitigation"
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o) (4) and (5) state "The area of preservation credit within a buffer
mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent of the total area of buffer mitigation."
DMS believes the following calculations should be used to determine the area eligible for
preservation:
Restoration (R) + Enhancement (E) + Preservation (P) = Total Area of Buffer Mitigation (TABM)
TABM * 0.25 = Eligible Preservation Area (EPA)
Example: 2 acres (R) + 1 acre (E) + 7 acres (P) =10 acres (TABM)
10 acres (TABM) * 0.25 = 2.5 acres (EPA)
Response:
In the example above, 45% of the area of the site would come from preservation, with the
remaining 55% coming from restoration/enhancement:
2.5 acre (P) + 3 acres (R/E) = 5.5 acres total
Based on a review of the language in the rule, the documents throughout the rulemaking
process, including correspondence with OSBM on the fiscal note, areas where buffer
mitigation credits are not being generated should not be used to calculate the "total area of
buffer mitigation."
The restoration or enhancement area shall be at least 75% of the area generating buffer
mitigation; the remaining 25% of the area generating buffer mitigation can be preservation:
75% (R/E) + 25% (P) =100% TABM
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1617
919 807 6300

Page 2 of 3
To calculate the area eligible for preservation:
[Restoration (R) + Enhancement (E)] / 0.75 = Total Area of Buffer Mitigation (TABM)
TABM * 0.25 = Eligible Preservation Area (EPA)
Example: [2 acres (R) + 1 acre (E)] / 0.75 = 4 acres (TABM)
4 acres (TABM) * 0.25 = 1 acre (EPA)
1 acre (P) + 3 acres (R/E) = 4 acres total
If. Definine Breaks Between Restoration and Enhancement Areas
DMS asked for clarification on how DWR defines the breaks between restoration, and
enhancement'. Specifically, DMS asked whether drip lines were still used and whether
individual trees were excluded from restoration sites.
Response:
DWR has not considered the drip line to represent the outer edge of a wooded area for
several years. This was clarified in a memo from DWR to DMS in August 2013. Individual
trees do not need to be delineated and removed from the restoration area, rather DWR
looks for areas or zones when determining restoration, enhancement or preservation areas.
For example:
Restoration
Enhancement
P Preservation
' characterized by an absence of trees and by a lack of dense growth of smaller woody stems or
are characterized by scattered individual trees such that the tree canopy is less than 25% of the
cover and by a lack of dense growth of smaller woody stems
2 characterized by conditions between that of a restoration site and a preservation site such that
the establishment of woody stems will maximize nutrient removal and other buffer functions

Page 3 of 3
Ill. Prior Grazing
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6) describes enhancement of grazing areas adjacent to streams. It
states that the applicant or mitigation provider shall demonstrate that grazing was the
predominant land use since the effective date of the applicable buffer rule. DMS asked
when is the predominance of grazing demonstrated?
Response
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (1) states that the authority shall issue a mitigation determination that
specifies the area, type and location of the mitigation and the water quality benefits to be
provided by the mitigation site. During the on -site evaluation, DWR looks at existing
conditions to determine whether grazing has been a continuous land use in the proposed
mitigation area (e.g. hoof shear, manure, cattle fencing, etc.) since the effective date of the
applicable buffer rule. DWR also evaluates satellite imagery. If it is not clear to DWR that
grazing has been the predominant land use since the effective date of the applicable buffer
rule, DWR will ask for additional documentation (e.g. landowner documentation, photos,
maps, etc.).
If the grazing site is proposed for retroactive credit as described in 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(o)(1), additional documentation of the pre-existing conditions may be required.
If there is a disagreement regarding the documentation requested by DWR, the request will
be elevated to the Water Quality Permitting Section Chief.
IV. Clarification of Use of 8-19-08 Diffuse Flow Clarification Memo
DMS asked for verification that the Buffer Interpretation Clarification Memo #2008-019,
issued August 19, 2008, was still eligible for use, and whether that method or an alternative
method as provided for in the rule could be used at the discretion of the project proponent.
Response:
The Buffer Interpretation Clarification Memo #2008-019, issued August 19, 2008, is still
eligible for use to comply with 15A NCAC 026.0295 (1)(3).

From:
Merritt, Katie
To:
Ray Holz
Subject:
Buffer Subjectivity-Ag Ponds -Raleigh Farms
Date:
Friday, September 10, 2021 11:42:57 AM
Attachments:
20191692 Ver 4 Draft BPDP-Raleioh 20201224.odf
Hey Raymond,
This email serves to acknowledge that two (2) in -line ponds associated with the Raleigh Farms A Site
& Raleigh Farms B-C Site are considered "not subject" to the Neuse Buffer Protection Rules due to
the fact that they are agricultural ponds and are therefore "exempt" from that Rule under Session
Law 2013-413 Section 52 . Pond 5 on the Raleigh Farm B-C site and Pond 2 on the Raleigh Farm
A site are both "not subject" and therefore shall be referred as such in any Bank Parcel Development
Plans (BPDP) and corresponding Figures/Credit Tables submitted with the Plans. A site plan attached
to this email shows the ponds referenced above.
Thank you for you attention to this matter,
Katie

Appendix C: USDA, NRCS Web Soil Survey Report
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
N RCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Wake County,
North Carolina
Raleigh Farm: Phase B-C
June 1, 2021

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https:Hoffices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.

Contents
Preface...........................................................................................................
SoilMap.........................................................................................................
SoilMap.......................................................................................................
Legend.........................................................................................................
MapUnit Legend.........................................................................................
MapUnit Descriptions.................................................................................
Wake County, North Carolina...................................................................
AaA—Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes, rarely flooded
AuA—Augusta fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded
ChA—Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes,
frequentlyflooded..........................................................................
FrB—Fuquay loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes .................................
GrC—Gritney sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes ...............................
HeB—Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes .................................
LyA—Lynchburg sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ............................
RgC—Rawlings-Rion complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes ........................
RgD—Rawlings-Rion complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes ......................
RkA—Riverview fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally
flooded...........................................................................................
W—Water.............................................................................................
WaD—Wake-Rolesville complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes, very rocky
WaE—Wake-Rolesville complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, very rocky
WeB—Wedowee sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes ...........................
WeC—Wedowee sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes .........................
WfB—Wedowee-Saw complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes .........................
References.....................................................................................................
.2
.5
A
..7
.8
.8
11
11
12
13
15
16
17
19
20
22
24
25
25
27
29
31
32
35

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.

A
ds
Ave
LL/
ci*mu, c
ZZ-

a) '0 a)
oU)
_
U
N
U) U)
m p a)
i cn
a) �
u
a)
Oa)
O `
m
CO
V 2
U
2 N U O
U
a)30
p
a)
m O O
E
O
a) 6 U) 6
.92
+
U)
O)om
O
C
Z
m
E
a)
O
O_
O if
N `' N a
O m
(n
E
N
U
N-0 O
a) U)
O
a)
(6
U
m
CL m
m E c
a)
s
m W
Q U) 7 2
U
O
O
a)
y
E m y
y
a) CJ
O N
Z
m
n
, E u)i
Q
O C:==
m
O IL
UM) U) U)m
Q
UON
O
_0
N
O
_
a) 3
E
U w
m Q 0 w
ch
m
Q
O
Q
U m a)
L
U)
C U) m
O C
a)
m
0 a) Q
y
mUO
Oa)
mO
a)
U)
>
—O>
0 O
O
E
U)OT
U)
LE
yLL
E a)Z
m O
2
L Um
O
0-0
O
m
p_
a
USm
CL
O
O'
a7
Q
O
a) y
Q
O
U
m
O
O N OE Om
0Q
t'a0Tam))
E
mo
�
m�
Q
a)
a)m
O pi
U)
Q
m
E
a)
a) O
aaj
(
m
E
N-E
O
a)
p 'O
a)
U)
U)
O '6
m OOC_
Ca) U)
a) NE o)
O
mU
U)
'U.O C
O
NO
L O EU
Q m
U)
E ac
EU°EOCm
0= m
O C
O p
Upm
aa)
m 0
a)
m
O 6
OOCa)6my
U) O
E
m a
7
rn
O U
E O
'QNQ
O)
o
LH N
'ENm
OU)
O U
a)
pap
OnU
Q-0
0
O 1p
tEU
p
S
W—Un
a E
U
Q m
o
U U
U
U. U)
Q
y
d y
R O
Li U
R
L
L
Q
>.
0
0
L
d )
Q
0
0 J N
° m E
U)CL
O
m o M
O
� a
0 O
U U
Z
>
N L_ y
O U U
�
O
°
a)
S Z) :E
R m
U
3) .a Q
0
R
N
R
O
C
p
O
Z
WR
< a
fVn
4
�
R
F
5 R
m
W
J
y
a
Q
0CL
y
o
o
)
w
o
a
o
a
N
y
Q
E
R
y
Q
a
o
a
U
C
>
C C a)
> >
Q Q
a w
3 R
3 y
O >
a >
°
w o
O`
o w
2,
Q
_
o
o
a R
R
R R w
LL 3
CL`o
3
o T
a
w >
=
E
O
a)
o `o
U)
y
Q
0
cn
0 0 o
cn cn p m
o R
m U
o
U (7 (7
> R E
J J
Mn a)
a
O m
U
R a)
U U
a
in in
O
U
w
a
�
R ❑
R +Vy�
■
y0 ❑ a i/
®
�ap�
<> { �
y�p�
"V
`}
!
o o
}�
�O
V)
Q
M
ro

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
AaA
Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 4
8.4
7.8%
percent slopes, rarely flooded
AuA
Augusta fine sandy loam, 0 to 2
0.6
0.6%
percent slopes, rarely flooded
ChA
Chewacla and Wehadkee soils,
17.5
16.2%
0 to 2 percent slopes,
frequently flooded
FrB
Fuquay loamy sand, 0 to 6
12.2
11.3%
percent slopes
GrC
Gritney sandy loam, 6 to 10
7.6
7.1 %
percent slopes
HeB
Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6
1.7
1.6%
percent slopes
LyA
Lynchburg sandy loam, 0 to 2
1.6
1.5%
percent slopes
RgC
Rawlings -Rion complex, 6 to 10
10.4
9.6%
percent slopes
RgD
Rawlings -Rion complex, 10 to
12.3
11.4%
15 percent slopes
RkA
Riverview fine sandy loam, 0 to
5.7
5.2%
2 percent slopes,
occasionally flooded
W
Water
4.1
3.8%
WaD
Wake-Rolesville complex, 10 to
2.9
2.6%
15 percent slopes, very rocky
WaE
Wake-Rolesville complex, 15 to
17.8
16.5%
25 percent slopes, very rocky
WeB
Wedowee sandy loam, 2 to 6
3.1
2.9%
percent slopes
WeC
Wedowee sandy loam, 6 to 10
1.2
1.1 %
percent slopes
WfB
Wedowee -Saw complex, 2 to 6
0.8
0.7%
percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
107.9
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named

Custom Soil Resource Report
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into Iandforms or
Iandform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.

Custom Soil Resource Report
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
Wake County, North Carolina
AaA—Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes, rarely flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2xh95
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Altavista, rarely flooded, and similar soils: 95 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Altavista, Rarely Flooded
Setting
Landform: Stream terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Old loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: fine sandy loam
E - 8 to 12 inches: fine sandy loam
BE - 12 to 15 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt - 15 to 35 inches: clay loam
BC - 35 to 42 inches: sandy loam
C - 42 to 80 inches: coarse sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 4 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 18 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Roanoke, occasionally flooded, undrained
Percent of map unit. 2 percent
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
Landform: Stream terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Chewacla, frequently flooded
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Augusta, rarely flooded
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Stream terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
AuA—Augusta fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2spph
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Augusta, rarely flooded, and similar soils: 95 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Augusta, Rarely Flooded
Setting
Landform: Stream terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Riser, tread
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Old loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Typical profile
A - 0 to 12 inches: fine sandy loam
Btg - 12 to 50 inches: sandy clay loam
Cg - 50 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 12 to 24 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Altavista, rarely flooded
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Stream terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Riser, tread
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
ChA—Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently
flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2gwpj
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained and either protected from flooding
or not frequently flooded during the growing season
Map Unit Composition
Chewacla, frequently flooded, and similar soils: 50 percent
Wehadkee, frequently flooded, and similar soils: 45 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Chewacla, Frequently Flooded
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
A - 0 to 4 inches: loam
Bwl - 4 to 26 inches: silty clay loam
Bw2 - 26 to 38 inches: loam
Bw3 - 38 to 60 inches: clay loam
C - 60 to 80 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 6 to 24 inches
Frequency of flooding: NoneFrequent
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 10.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Wehadkee, Frequently Flooded
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: silt loam
Bg - 7 to 49 inches: clay loam
Cg - 49 to 80 inches: clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: FrequentNone
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 11.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Minor Components
Riverview, frequently flooded
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
FrB—Fuquay loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2xn6k
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Fuquay and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Fuquay
Setting
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 28 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 28 to 44 inches: sandy clay loam
Btv - 44 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 48 inches to plinthite
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 34 to 40 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Dothan
Percent of map unit. 6 percent
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Gritney
Percent of map unit. 4 percent
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
GrC—Gritney sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2xh9x
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Gritney and similar soils: 94 percent
Minor components: 6 percent
it.

Custom Soil Resource Report
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Gritney
Setting
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 5 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 5 to 43 inches: clay
BC - 43 to 50 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 50 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 6 to 10 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 18 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Dothan
Percent of map unit: 6 percent
Landform: I me rfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
HeB—Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2gggq
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Helena and similar soils: 92 percent
Minor components: 8 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Helena
Setting
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from granite and gneiss
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 12 inches: sandy loam
BE - 12 to 19 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt1 - 19 to 39 inches: clay
Bt2 - 39 to 43 inches: clay loam
BCg - 43 to 46 inches: clay loam
C - 46 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately
low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 18 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Vance
Percent of map unit. 8 percent
Landform: I me rfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
18

Custom Soil Resource Report
LyA—Lynchburg sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 2ggm9
Elevation: 30 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Lynchburg and similar soils: 92 percent
Minor components: 8 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Lynchburg
Setting
Landform: I me rfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
Btg - 6 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 12 to 18 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 6.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Rains, drained
Percent of map unit. 8 percent
19

Custom Soil Resource Report
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, carolina bays on marine terraces, broad
interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
RgC—Rawlings-Rion complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2xhbb
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Rawlings and similar soils: 55 percent
Rion and similar soils: 35 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Rawlings
Setting
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from granite
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 8 to 20 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 20 to 40 inches: gravelly sandy loam
R - 40 to 80 inches: bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 6 to 10 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to lithic bedrock
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately
low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Low (about 4.7 inches)
20

Custom Soil Resource Report
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Rion
Setting
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt1 - 8 to 17 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt2 - 17 to 38 inches: sandy loam
C - 38 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 6 to 10 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Helena
Percent of map unit. 7 percent
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Saw
Percent of map unit. 3 percent
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
21

Custom Soil Resource Report
Hydric soil rating: No
RgD—Rawlings-Rion complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2xhb8
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Rawlings and similar soils: 55 percent
Rion and similar soils: 35 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Rawlings
Setting
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from granite
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 8 to 20 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 20 to 40 inches: gravelly sandy loam
R - 40 to 80 inches: bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 10 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to lithic bedrock
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately
low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Low (about 4.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
22

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Rion
Setting
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt1 - 8 to 17 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt2 - 17 to 38 inches: sandy loam
C - 38 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 10 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Helena
Percent of map unit. 7 percent
Landform: Imerfluves
Saw
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Percent of map unit. 3 percent
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
23

Custom Soil Resource Report
RkA—Riverview fine sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, occasionally
flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 2xhbc
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Riverview, occasionally flooded, and similar soils: 82 percent
Minor components: 18 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Riverview, Occasionally Flooded
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 18 inches: fine sandy loam
Bw - 18 to 46 inches: loam
C1 - 46 to 55 inches: sandy loam
C2 - 55 to 80 inches: clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 39 to 60 inches
Frequency of flooding: NoneOccasional
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 11.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
24

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Wehadkee, frequently flooded
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Chewacla, frequently flooded
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
W—Water
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2ggjv
Elevation: 70 to 450 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 51 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Water.- 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Water
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8
Hydric soil rating: No
WaD—Wake-Rolesville complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes, very rocky
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2xhbf
25

Custom Soil Resource Report
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Wake, very rocky, and similar soils: 50 percent
Rolesville, very rocky, and similar soils: 40 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Wake, Very Rocky
Setting
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from granite and gneiss
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 7 inches: gravelly loamy coarse sand
C - 7 to 11 inches: gravelly loamy sand
R - 11 to 80 inches: bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 10 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 10 to 20 inches to lithic bedrock
Drainage class: Excessively drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to low (0.00 to
0.01 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Very low (about 1.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Rolesville, Very Rocky
Setting
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from granite and gneiss
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 12 inches: loamy sand
Bw - 12 to 26 inches: loamy sand
W

Custom Soil Resource Report
C - 26 to 32 inches: loamy coarse sand
Cr - 32 to 38 inches: bedrock
R - 38 to 80 inches: bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 10 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to paralithic bedrock; 20 to 80 inches
to lithic bedrock
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to low (0.00 to
0.01 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 6.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Ashlar, very rocky
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Rock outcrop
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
WaE—Wake-Rolesville complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes, very rocky
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2xhbg
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Wake, very rocky, and similar soils: 50 percent
Rolesville, very rocky, and similar soils: 40 percent
27

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Wake, Very Rocky
Setting
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from granite and gneiss
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 7 inches: gravelly loamy coarse sand
C - 7 to 11 inches: gravelly loamy sand
R - 11 to 80 inches: bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 25 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 10 to 20 inches to lithic bedrock
Drainage class: Excessively drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to low (0.00 to
0.01 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Very low (about 1.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Rolesville, Very Rocky
Setting
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from granite and gneiss
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 12 inches:
loamy sand
Bw - 12 to 26 inches: loamy sand
C - 26 to 32 inches:
loamy coarse sand
Cr - 32 to 38 inches:
bedrock
R - 38 to 80 inches:
bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 25 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to paralithic bedrock; 20 to 80 inches
to lithic bedrock
Drainage class: Well drained
28

Custom Soil Resource Report
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to low (0.00 to
0.01 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 6.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Ashlar, very rocky
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: I me rfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Rock outcrop
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Hydric soil rating: No
WeB—Wedowee sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2xn40
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Wedowee and similar soils: 94 percent
Minor components: 6 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Wedowee
Setting
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
29

Custom Soil Resource Report
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite residuum weathered from granite and gneiss and/or
saprolite residuum weathered from schist
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 4 inches: sandy loam
E - 4 to 7 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 7 to 23 inches: clay
BC - 23 to 35 inches: clay loam
C - 35 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately
low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Appling
Percent of map unit. 4 percent
Landform: I me rfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Helena
Percent of map unit. 2 percent
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
30

Custom Soil Resource Report
WeC—Wedowee sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2xn41
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Wedowee and similar soils: 94 percent
Minor components: 6 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Wedowee
Setting
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite residuum weathered from granite and gneiss and/or
saprolite residuum weathered from schist
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 4 inches: sandy loam
E - 4 to 7 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 7 to 23 inches: clay
BC - 23 to 35 inches: clay loam
C - 35 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 6 to 10 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately
low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Hydric soil rating: No
31

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Appling
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Pacolet
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
WfB—Wedowee-Saw complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2xn42
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Wedowee and similar soils: 60 percent
Saw and similar soils: 35 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Wedowee
Setting
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite residuum weathered from granite and gneiss and/or
saprolite residuum weathered from schist
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 4 inches: sandy loam
E - 4 to 7 inches: sandy loam
32

Custom Soil Resource Report
Bt - 7 to 23 inches: clay
BC - 23 to 35 inches: clay loam
C - 35 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately
low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Saw
Setting
Landform: I me rfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from granite and gneiss
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 8 to 20 inches: clay
BC - 20 to 26 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 26 to 29 inches: sandy loam
R - 29 to 80 inches: bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to lithic bedrock
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to low (0.00 to
0.01 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Low (about 3.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
33

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Wake
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
34

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/n ati o n a I/s o i Is/?cid = n res 142 p2_0 54262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepastu re/?cid=stelprdb1043084
35

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/so i Is/scie ntists/?cid=n res 142 p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid = n res 142 p2_05 3624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:H
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl 42p2_052290. pdf
WV

Appendix D: EDR Report
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

Raleigh Farm Bank Parcel
8300 State Rd 2542
Raleigh, NC 27610
Inquiry Number: 6199177.2s
September 21, 2020
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
(rEDW Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
FORM-LBE-CCA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
Executive Summary-------------------------------------------------------
ES1
Overview Map
2
Detail Map
3
Map Findings Summary----------------------------------------------------
4
Map Findings
8
Orphan Summary---------------------------------------------------------
33
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking
GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum------------------------------------------
A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary
A-2
Physical Setting Source Map
A-7
Physical Setting Source Map Findings----------------------------------------
A-8
Physical Setting Source Records Searched------------------------------------.
PSGR-1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC6199177.2s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
8300 STATE RD 2542
RALEIGH, NC 27610
COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
35.7028150 - 35' 42' 10.13"
78.4870050 - 78' 29' 13.21 "
Zone 17
727365.8
3953698.5
198 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 5947400 CLAYTON, NC
Version Date: 2013
West Map: 5948594 GARNER, NC
Version Date: 2013
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from: 20140611
Source: USDA
TC6199177.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

F_ MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
8300 STATE RD 2542
RALEIGH, NC 27610
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP
RELATIVE
DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID
SITE NAME
ADDRESS
DATABASE ACRONYMS
ELEVATION
DIRECTION
Reg
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER
NC HSDS
Same
4463, 0.845, North
1
REGGIE'S SELF SERVE
SR1533(SHOTWELL RD)@
IMD
Lower
938, 0.178, SSE
2
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER
BATTLE RD (SR 2552)
SEMS-ARCHIVE, RCRA NonGen / NLR
Lower
1622, 0.307, NNE
3
CITY OF RALEIGH - NE
BATTLE BRIDGE ROAD
IMD
Higher
1703, 0.323, NW
A4
RALEIGH,CITY OF-NEUS
8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD
IMD
Higher
1833, 0.347, NNW
A5
RALEIGH, CITY OF-NEU
8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD
IMD
Higher
1833, 0.347, NNW
A6
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FA
8500 BATTLE BRIDGE R
RCRA-VSQG, LUST, UST, IMD, FINDS, AIRS, Financial...
Higher
1833, 0.347, NNW
A7
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER
8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RO
IMD
Higher
1833, 0.347, NNW
A8
CITY OF RALEIGH WWTP
8500 BATTLE BRIDGE R
LUST TRUST, NPDES
Higher
1833, 0.347, NNW
B9
MATERIAL RECOVERY/ B
SR 2553/ BROWNFIELD
HIST LF, Financial Assurance
Higher
1896, 0.359, WNW
B10
BROWNFIELD ROAD C&D
2600 BROWNFIELD ROAD
SWF/LF
Higher
1896, 0.359, WNW
11
MATERIAL RECOVERY C&
BROWNFIELD ROAD
DEBRIS
Higher
2605, 0.493, WNW
12
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER
BATTLE -BRIDGE RD SR
SHWS
Lower
4689, 0.888, North
6199177.2s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL___________________________ National Priority List
Proposed NPL________________ Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS -------------------- Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL__________________ National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY__________ Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS_________________________ Superfund Enterprise Management System
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS------------------ Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF------------------ RCRA- Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG------------------- RCRA- Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG------------------- RCRA- Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG----------------- RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS_________________________ Land Use Control Information System
US ENG CONTROLS_________ Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS_________________________ Emergency Response Notification System
TC6199177.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
OLI____________________________ Old Landfill Inventory
LCID__________________________ Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST__________________________ Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
INDIAN LUST_________________ Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST____________________ Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST___________________________ Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST___________________________ AST Database
INDIAN UST__________________ Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP__________________ Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
VCP___________________________ Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS______________ Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS----------- A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY_______________________ Recycling Center Listing
INDIAN ODI___________________ Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
DEBRIS REGION 9----------- Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
ODI___________________________ Open Dump Inventory
IHS OPEN DUMPS___________ Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL_________________ Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL_______________________ National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Land Records
LIENS 2_______________________ CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS________________________ Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
TC6199177.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SPILLS________________________ Spills Incident Listing
SPILLS 90____________________ SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80____________________ SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS_________________________
Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD__________________________
Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS_______
State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR_______________
Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST____________
EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA_________________________
Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS__________________________
Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS--------------------------
Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD__________________________
Records Of Decision
RMP__________________________
Risk Management Plans
RAATS________________________
RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP___________________________
Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS_________________________
PCB Activity Database System
ICIS___________________________
Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS__________________________
FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS_________________________
Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA______________
Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER _ _ _ _
_ _ _ PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO ---------------------
Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS____________________
FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS_____________________
Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT____________________
Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV_____________
Indian Reservations
FUSRAP______________________
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA_______________________
Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS____________
Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS______________________
Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES____________________
Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES ---------
Abandoned Mines
FINDS -------------------------
Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
ECHO -------------------------
Enforcement & Compliance History Information
UXO ---------------------------
Unexploded Ordnance Sites
DOCKET HWC----------------
Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
FUELS PROGRAM___________
EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRS__________________________
Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS___________________
ASBESTOS
COAL ASH____________________
Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS______________
Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance -----------
Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES------------------------
NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC----------------------------
Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP---------------------------
Animal Operation Permits Listing
CCB___________________________
Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
PCSRP------------------------
Petroleum -Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
SEPT HAULERS______________
Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
TC6199177.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
MINES MRDS----------------- Mineral Resources Data System
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP_____________________ EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto ----------------- EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner_____________ EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
4Q:aNxd0P/=IN=IeZrZeP/=IN.1ky,I=I.r&1:0]:119�I
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS____________________ Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF_______________________ Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST____________________ Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on
a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been
differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed
data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE: SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no
further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly
known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of
assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes
available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status
indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has
determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless
information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for
listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a
given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential
NPL site.
A review of the SEMS-ARCHIVE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/29/2020 has revealed that there
is 1 SEMS-ARCHIVE site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER BATTLE RD (SR 2552) NNE 114 - 112 (0.307 mi.) 2 9
TC6199177.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Site ID: 0403167
EPA Id: NCD991278920
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS: The Hazardous Substance Disposal Sites list contains locations of uncontrolled and
unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file contains sites on the national priority list as well as the state
priority list. The data source is the North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis.
A review of the NC HSDS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/09/2011 has revealed that there is 1
NC HSDS site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
Direction / Distance Map ID Page
N 1/2 - 1 (0.845 mi.)
SHWS: The State Hazardous Waste Sites records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state
funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by
potentially responsible parties. The data come from the Department of Environment & Natural Resources'
Inactive Hazardous Sites Program.
A review of the SHWS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 05/11/2020 has revealed that there is 1 SHWS
site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER BATTLE -BRIDGE RD SR N 1/2 - 1 (0.888 mi.) 12 32
Facility Id: NCD991278920
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF: The Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites records typically contain an inventory of solid
waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. The data come from the Department of Environment
& Natural Resources' List of Solid Waste Facility Contacts in Alpha Order.
A review of the SWF/LF list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/06/2020 has revealed that there is 1
SWF/LF site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation
BROWNFIELD ROAD C&D
Facility Status: InactiveClosed
Facility Status: Open
Permit Num: 9231-CDLF-
Permit Num: 9231-CDLF-2012
Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page
2600 BROWNFIELD ROAD WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.359 mi.) B10 31
TC6199177.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DEBRIS: NCDEQ Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section Temporary Disaster Debris Staging
Site (TDDSS) Locations which are available to be activated in a disaster or emergency.. Disaster Debris Sites
can only be used for temporary disaster debris storage if the site's responsible party activates the site for
use by notifying the NCDEQ DWM Solid Waste Section staff during an emergency
A review of the DEBRIS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/31/2019 has revealed that there is 1
DEBRIS site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page
MATERIAL RECOVERY C& BROWNFIELD ROAD WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.493 mi.) 11 31
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incidents Management Database contains an inventory
of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the Department of Environment, &
Natural Resources' Incidents by Address.
A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/17/2020 has revealed that there is 1 LUST
site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FA
Incident Phase: Closed Out
Incident Phase: Response
Incident Number: 14331
Incident Number: 21011
Current Status: File Located in House
Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page
8500 BATTLE BRIDGE R NNW 114 - 112 (0.347 mi.) A6 17
LUST TRUST: This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for
reimbursements for expenses incurred while remediating Leaking LISTS.
A review of the LUST TRUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/03/2020 has revealed that there is
1 LUST TRUST site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation
CITY OF RALEIGH WWTP
Facility Id: 0-005336
Site ID: 21011
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page
8500 BATTLE BRIDGE R NNW 114 - 112 (0.347 mi.) AS 29
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF: A listing of solid waste facilities.
A review of the HIST LF list, as provided by EDR, and dated 11/06/2006 has revealed that there is 1
TC6199177.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
HIST LF site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page
MATERIAL RECOVERY/ B SR 25531 BROWNFIELD WNW 114 - 112 (0.359 mi.) B9 30
Facility Status: OPEN
Facility Id: P1061
Records of Emergency Release Reports
IMD: Incident Management Database.
A review of the IMD list, as provided by EDR, and dated 05/01/2020 has revealed that there are
6 IMD
sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation
Address
Direction / Distance
Map ID
Page
CITY OF RALEIGH - NE
BATTLE BRIDGE ROAD
NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.323 mi.)
3
12
Facility Id: 86472
RALEIGH,CITY OF-NEUS
8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD
NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.347 mi.)
A4
13
Facility Id: 14331
RALEIGH, CITY OF-NEU
8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD
NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.347 mi.)
A5
15
Facility Id: 21011
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FA
8500 BATTLE BRIDGE R
NNW 114 - 112 (0.347 mi.)
A6
17
Facility Id: 21011
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER
8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RO
NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.347 mi.)
A7
28
Facility Id: 86375
Lower Elevation
Address
Direction / Distance
Map ID
Page
REGGIE'S SELF SERVE
SR1533(SHOTWELL RD)@
SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.178 mi.)
1
8
Facility Id: 21981
TC6199177.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 2 records.
Site Name
AMETHYST RIDGE DRIVE SOLVENTS
NC DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE LF
Database(s)
SHWS
OLI
TC6199177.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10

OVERVIEW MAP - 6199177.2S
IV
Target Property
A
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
1
Manufactured Gas Plants
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
0 1/4 1/2
1 Mlles
Indian Reservations BIA
Hazardous Substance
County Boundary
Disposal Sites
Power transmission lines
Special Flood Hazard Area (1%)
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
■
National Wetland Inventory
0
State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Raleigh Farm Bank Parcel
CLIENT: Axiom Environmental
ADDRESS: 8300 State Rd 2542
CONTACT: Kenan Jernigan
Raleigh INC 27610
INQUIRY #: 6199177.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.702815 / 78.487005
DATE: September 21, 2020 3:49 pm
Copyright �o 2020 EDR, Inc. (,) 2015 TonnTom Rai. 2015.

DETAIL MAP - 6199177.2S
Target Property
A
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
1
Manufactured Gas Plants
i
Sensitive Receptors
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
0 1 /9 1 /4 1 /2 Mlles
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
County Boundary Disposal Sites
Power transmission lines
M Special Flood Hazard Area (1%)
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
■ National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Raleigh Farm Bank Parcel
CLIENT: Axiom Environmental
ADDRESS: 8300 State Rd 2542
CONTACT: Kenan Jernigan
Raleigh INC 27610
INQUIRY #: 6199177.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.702815 / 78.487005
DATE: September 21, 2020 3:50 pm
Copyright �o 2020 EDR, Inc. (,) 2015 TonnTom Rai. 2015.

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database (Miles) Property
< 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Proposed NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
NPL LIENS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
SEMS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.500
0
0
1
NR
NR
1
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
RCRA-SQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
RCRA-VSQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
LUCIS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US INST CONTROLS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal ERNS list
ERNS 0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS 1.000
0
0
0
1
NR
1
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS 1.000
0
0
0
1
NR
1
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF 0.500
0
0
1
NR
NR
1
DEBRIS 0.500
0
0
1
NR
NR
1
OLI 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LCID 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
TC6199177.2s Page 4

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database (Miles) Property
< 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
Plotted
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST 0.500
0
0
1
NR
NR
1
LAST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LUST TRUST 0.500
0
0
1
NR
NR
1
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
AST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
INDIAN UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
VCP 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS
0.500
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF
0.500
SWRCY
0.500
INDIAN ODI
0.500
DEBRIS REGION 9
0.500
ODI
0.500
IHS OPEN DUMPS
0.500
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL
0.001
US CDL
0.001
Local Land Records
LIENS 2
0.001
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS
0.001
SPILLS
0.001
I M D
0.500
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
1
NR
NR 1
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 1
5
NR
NR 6
TC6199177.2s Page 5

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database
(Miles) Property
< 1 /8
1/8- 1 /4
1/4- 1 /2
1/2- 1
> 1
Plotted
SPILLS 90
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SPILLS 80
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
FUDS
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
DOD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US FIN ASSUR
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
EPA WATCH LIST
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
2020 COR ACTION
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
TSCA
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
TRIS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SSTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ROD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
RMP
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
RAATS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
PRP
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
PADS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ICIS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
FTTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
MLTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH DOE
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH EPA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
PCB TRANSFORMER
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
RADINFO
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
HIST FTTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
DOT OPS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
CONSENT
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
INDIAN RESERV
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
FUSRAP
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
UMTRA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LEAD SMELTERS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US AIRS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US MINES
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
ABANDONED MINES
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
FINDS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ECHO
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
UXO
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
DOCKET HWC
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
FUELS PROGRAM
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
AIRS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ASBESTOS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
DRYCLEANERS
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
Financial Assurance
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NPDES
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
UIC
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
AOP
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
CCB
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
PCSRP
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
TC6199177.2s Page 6

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Database (Miles) Property
SEPT HAULERS 0.001
MINES MRDS 0.001
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP
1.000
EDR Hist Auto
0.125
EDR Hist Cleaner
0.125
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt Archives
RGA HWS
0.001
RGA LF
0.001
RGA LUST
0.001
- Totals -- 0
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
< 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
Total
Plotted
0
0
0 0 0 0 NR 0
0 NR NR NR NR 0
0 NR NR NR NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR
0
0 1
11
2
0
14
TC6199177.2s Page 7

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
HSDS
Region
North
1/2-1
4463 ft.
Site
:7AI=IM:I.IMR&I=11111:719=I:ATITIT IILl
,NC
HSDS:
Name:
Address:
City:
Site Type:
Superfun Number:
Total area in coverage units:
Total perimeter in coverage units:
X-value coordinate in feet:
Y-value coordinate in feet:
Sites designated as superfund cleanup sites
Length of feature in internal units:
Area of feature in internal units squared:
MAP FINDINGS
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP
Not reported
Not reported
1
Not reported
726.45898437
95.67377471
2153660.75
718979.75
364
95.6737453897
726.458478116
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
NC HSDS S102442449
N/A
1 REGGIE'S SELF SERVE - FORMER IMD S104547414
SSE SR1533(SHOTWELL RD)@ BRIDGE188 N/A
1/8-1/4 CLAYTON, NC
0.178 mi.
938 ft.
Relative:
IMD:
Lower
Name:
REGGIE'S SELF SERVE - FORMER
Actual:
Address:
SR1533(SHOTWELL RD)@ BRIDGE188
174 ft.
City:
CLAYTON
Region:
RAL
Facility ID:
21981
Date Occurred:
3/31/2000
Submit Date:
7/14/2000
GW Contam:
Yes, Groundwater Contamination has been detected
Soil Contam:
No
Incident Desc:
FREE PRODUCT PRESENT IN WELL.
Operator:
WILLIS ALLEN C/O RON KING
Contact Phone:
9197738575
Owner Company:
Not reported
Operator Address:2834 SHOTWELL ROAD
Operator City:
RALEIGH
Oper City,St,Zip:
RALEIGH, NC 276108575
Ownership:
Private
Operation:
Commercial
Material:
GASOLINE
Qty Lost 1:
Not reported
Qty Recovered 1:
Not reported
Material:
DIESEL
Qty Lost:
Not reported
Qty Recovered:
Not reported
Source:
Leak -underground
Type:
Gasoline/diesel
Location:
Facility
Setting:
Rural
Risk Site:
H
Site Priority:
Not reported
Priority Code:
Not reported
Priority Update:
7/14/2000
Dem Contact:
STF
TC6199177.2s Page 8

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
REGGIE'S SELF SERVE - FORMER (Continued)
Wells Affected: Not reported
Num Affected: Not reported
Wells Contam: Not reported
Sampled By: Other
Samples Include: Groundwater Samples
7.5 Min Quad:
Not reported
5 Min Quad:
Not reported
Latitude:
35.69388888
Longitude:
-78.47972222
Latitude Number:
354138
Longitude Number:
782847
Latitude Decimal:
35.6938888888889
Longitude Decimal:
78.4797222222222
GPS:
7
Agency:
DW M
Facility ID:
Not reported
Last Modified:
Not reported
Incident Phase:
Not reported
NOV Issued:
Not reported
NORR Issued:
Not reported
45 Day Report:
Not reported
Public Meeting Held:
Not reported
Corrective Action Planned:
Not reported
SOC Sighned:
Not reported
Reclassification Report:
Not reported
IRS Designation:
Not reported
Closure Request Date:
Not reported
Close-out Report:
Not reported
2
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP
NNE
BATTLE RD (SR 2552)
1/4-1/2
RALEIGH, NC 27610
0.307 mi.
1622 ft.
Relative:
SEMS Archive:
Lower
Site ID:
Actual:
EPA ID:
160 ft.
Name:
Address:
Address 2:
City,State,Zip:
Cong District:
FIPS Code:
FF:
NPL:
Non NPL Status:
SEMS Archive Detail:
Region:
Site ID:
EPA ID:
Site Name:
NPL:
FF:
OU:
Action Code:
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
S104547414
SEMS-ARCHIVE 1002966362
RCRA NonGen / NLR NCD991278920
0403167
NCD991278920
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP
BATTLE RD (SR 2552)
Not reported
RALEIGH, NC 27610
04
37183
N
Not on the NPL
NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing information
04
0403167
NCD991278920
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP
N
N
00
VS
TC6199177.2s Page 9

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP (Continued)
Action Name:
ARCH SITE
SEQ:
1
Start Date:
Not reported
Finish Date:
1987-09-09 04:00:00
Qual:
Not reported
Current Action Lead:
EPA Perf In-Hse
Region:
04
Site ID:
0403167
EPA ID:
NCD991278920
Site Name:
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP
NPL:
N
FF:
N
OU:
00
Action Code:
IDS
Action Name:
DISCVRY
SEC:
1
Start Date:
1980-08-01 04:00:00
Finish Date:
1980-08-01 04:00:00
Qual:
Not reported
Current Action Lead:
EPA Perf
Region:
04
Site ID:
0403167
EPA ID:
NCD991278920
Site Name:
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP
NPL:
N
FF:
N
OU:
00
Action Code:
PA
Action Name:
PA
SEQ:
1
Start Date:
Not reported
Finish Date:
1987-09-09 04:00:00
Qual:
N
Current Action Lead:
St Perf
RCRA NonGen / NLR:
Date form received by agency:1982-11-15 00:00:00.0
Facility name:
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP
Facility address:
BATTLE RD (SR 2552)
RALEIGH, NC 27610
EPA ID:
NCD991278920
Mailing address:
P O BOX 590 UTILITIES DEPT
RALEIGH, NC 27602
Contact:
BILLY CREECH
Contact address:
BATTLE RD (SR 2552)
RALEIGH, NC 27610
Contact country:
US
Contact telephone:
555-555-5555
Contact email:
Not reported
EPA Region:
04
Land type:
Private
Classification:
Non -Generator
Description:
Handler: Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste
1002966362
TC6199177.2s Page 10

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP (Continued)
Owner/Operator Summary
Owner/operator name:
OWNER NAME
Owner/operator address:
Not reported
NC
Owner/operator country:
US
Owner/operator telephone:
Not reported
Owner/operator email:
Not reported
Owner/operator fax:
Not reported
Owner/operator extension:
Not reported
Legal status:
District
Owner/Operator Type:
Owner
Owner/Op start date:
1982-11-15 00:00:00.
Owner/Op end date:
Not reported
Handler Activities Summary:
U.S. importer of hazardous waste:
No
Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive):
No
Recycler of hazardous waste:
No
Transporter of hazardous waste:
No
Treater, storer or disposer of HW:
No
Underground injection activity:
No
On -site burner exemption:
No
Furnace exemption:
No
Used oil fuel burner:
No
Used oil processor:
No
User oil refiner:
No
Used oil fuel marketer to burner:
No
Used oil Specification marketer:
No
Used oil transfer facility:
No
Used oil transporter:
No
Historical Generators:
Date form received by agency:1982-11-15 00:00:00.0
Site name: RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP
Classification: Not a generator, verified
Hazardous Waste Summary:
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
1002966362
Waste code:
F001
Waste name:
THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS USED IN DEGREASING:
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE, TRICHLORETHYLENE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE,
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, CARBON TETRACHLORIDE AND CHLORINATED
FLUOROCARBONS; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS USED IN DEGREASING
CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF
ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED
IN F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE
SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES.
Waste code:
F007
Waste name:
SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS.
Waste code:
F009
Waste name:
SPENT STRIPPING AND CLEANING BATH SOLUTIONS FROM ELECTROPLATING
OPERATIONS IN WHICH CYANIDES ARE USED IN THE PROCESS.
TC6199177.2s Page 11

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
3
NW
1/4-1/2
0.323 mi.
1703 ft.
Site
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP (Continued)
Violation Status
Evaluation Action Summary:
Evaluation date:
Evaluation:
Area of violation:
Date achieved compliance:
Evaluation lead agency:
MAP FINDINGS
No violations found
2005-06-14 00:00:00.0
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON -SITE
Not reported
Not reported
EPA
Evaluation date:
2005-06-14 00:00:00.0
Evaluation:
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON -SITE
Area of violation:
Not reported
Date achieved compliance:
Not reported
Evaluation lead agency:
State
CITY OF RALEIGH - NEUSE WWTP -
BATTLE BRIDGE ROAD
RALEIGH, NC
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
1002966362
IMD 1006034852
N/A
Relative:
IMD:
Higher
Name:
CITY OF RALEIGH - NEUSE WWTP -
Actual:
Address:
BATTLE BRIDGE ROAD
239 ft.
City:
RALEIGH
Region:
RAL
Facility ID:
86472
Date Occurred:
1/7/2002
Submit Date:
6/11/2003
GW Contam:
Yes, Groundwater Contamination has been detected
Soil Contam:
Not reported
Incident Desc:
OVER -APPLICATION OF BIOSOLIDS RESIDUALS RESULTING IN NUTRIENT
CONTAMINATION OVER AN ESTIMATED 1000+ACRES. FOUR PRIVATE WELLS
IMPACTED WITH NO3 >10 PPM; 26 OTHE
Operator:
DALE CRISP, P.E., H.
Contact Phone:
919-890-3400
Owner Company:
CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC UTILITIES DE
Operator Address:P.O. BOX 590
Operator City:
RALEIGH
Oper City,St,Zip:
RALEIGH 919-890-3400
Ownership:
Unknown
Operation:
Residential
Material:
Not reported
Qty Lost 1:
Not reported
Qty Recovered 1:
Not reported
Source:
Land application
Type:
Other inorganics
Location:
Not reported
Setting:
Not reported
Risk Site:
Not reported
Site Priority:
400
Priority Code:
A
Priority Update:
Not reported
Dem Contact:
REB
Wells Affected:
Yes
Num Affected:
4
Wells Contam:
Not reported
Sampled By:
Not reported
TC6199177.2s Page 12

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
CITY OF RALEIGH - NEUSE WWTP - (Continued)
Samples Include: Not reported
7.5 Min Quad:
Not reported
5 Min Quad:
Not reported
Latitude:
35.713
Longitude:
-78.4895
Latitude Number:
Not reported
Longitude Number:
Not reported
Latitude Decimal:
Not reported
Longitude Decimal:
Not reported
GPS:
EST
Agency:
DWQ
Facility ID:
Not reported
Last Modified:
Not reported
Incident Phase:
Not reported
NOV Issued:
Not reported
NORR Issued:
Not reported
45 Day Report:
Not reported
Public Meeting Held:
Not reported
Corrective Action Planned:
Not reported
SOC Sighned:
Not reported
Reclassification Report:
Not reported
RS Designation:
Not reported
Closure Request Date:
Not reported
Close-out Report:
Not reported
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
1006034852
A4 RALEIGH,CITYOF-NEUSE WWTP-ADMIN.BLDG. IMD S101643595
NNW 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD N/A
1/4-1/2 RALEIGH, NC 27610
0.347 mi.
1833 ft. Site 1 of 5 in cluster A
Relative: IMD:
Higher Name: RALEIGH,CITY OF-NEUSE WWTP-ADMIN.BLDG.
Actual: Address: 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD
235 ft. City: RALEIGH
Region: Not reported
Facility ID: 14331
Date Occurred: 2/6/1995
Submit Date: 7/31/1995
GW Contam: Not reported
Soil Contam: Not reported
Incident Desc: MINOR SOIL CONTAMINATION CONFIRMED FROM LEAKING UST.
Operator: JOHN KIVINIEMIE
Contact Phone: Not reported
Owner Company: Not reported
Operator Address:Not reported
Operator City: Not reported
Oper City,St,Zip: Not reported
Ownership: Municipal
Operation: Public Service
Material: Not reported
Qty Lost 1: Not reported
Qty Recovered 1: Not reported
Source: Not reported
Type: Heating Oil
Location: Facility
Setting: Not reported
TC6199177.2s Page 13

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
RALEIGH,CITYOF-NEUSE WWTP-ADMIN.BLDG. (Continued) S101643595
Risk Site:
Not reported
Site Priority:
20E
Priority Code:
Not reported
Priority Update:
4/16/1998
Dem Contact:
Not reported
Wells Affected:
Not reported
Num Affected:
0
Wells Contam:
Not reported
Sampled By:
Not reported
Samples Include:
Not reported
7.5 Min Quad:
Not reported
5 Min Quad:
Not reported
Latitude:
35.723610999999998
Longitude:
-78.480556000000007
Latitude Number:
Not reported
Longitude Number:
Not reported
Latitude Decimal:
Not reported
Longitude Decimal: Not reported
GPS:
Not reported
Agency:
Not reported
Facility ID:
14331
Last Modified:
10/16/2017
Incident Phase:
Closed Out
NOV Issued:
Not reported
NORR Issued:
Not reported
45 Day Report:
Not reported
Public Meeting Held: Not reported
Corrective Action
Planned: Not reported
SOC Sighned:
Not reported
Reclassification Report:
Not reported
IRS Designation:
Not reported
Closure Request Date: Not reported
Close-out Report:
Not reported
Name:
RALEIGH,CITY OF-NEUSE WWTP-ADM
Address:
8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD
City:
RALEIGH
Region:
RAL
Facility ID:
14331
Date Occurred:
2/6/1995
Submit Date:
7/31/1995
GW Contam:
No Groundwater Contamination detected
Soil Contam:
Yes
Incident Desc:
MINOR SOIL CONTAMINATION CONFIRMED FROM LEAKING UST.
Operator:
MR. DALE CRISP
Contact Phone:
9198574540
Owner Company:
CITY RALEIGH-PUBLIC UTILITIES
Operator Address:219 FAYETTEVILLE ST, SUITE 600
Operator City:
RALEIGH
Oper City,St,Zip:
RALEIGH, NC 27601-
Ownership:
Municipal
Operation:
Public Service
Material:
#2 FUEL OIL
Qty Lost 1:
Not reported
Qty Recovered 1:
Not reported
Source:
Leak -underground
TC6199177.2s Page 14

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
A5
NNW
1/4-1/2
0.347 mi.
1833 ft.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
235 ft.
MAP FINDINGS
Site
RALEIGH,CITYOF-NEUSE WWTP-ADMIN.BLDG. (Continued)
Type: Gasoline/diesel
Location: Facility
Setting: Rural
Risk Site: L
Site Priority: 20E
Priority Code: L
Priority Update: 4/16/1998
Dem Contact: WDP
Wells Affected: Not reported
Num Affected: 0
Wells Contam: Not reported
Sampled By: Not reported
Samples Include: Not reported
7.5 Min Quad:
Not reported
5 Min Quad:
Not reported
Latitude:
35.72333333
Longitude:
-78.48027777
Latitude Number:
354324
Longitude Number:
782849
Latitude Decimal:
35.7233333333333
Longitude Decimal:
78.4802777777778
GPS:
6
Agency:
DWM
Facility ID:
14331
Last Modified:
10/16/2017
Incident Phase:
Closed Out
NOV Issued:
Not reported
NORR Issued:
Not reported
45 Day Report:
Not reported
Public Meeting Held:
Not reported
Corrective Action Planned:
Not reported
SOC Sighned:
Not reported
Reclassification Report:
Not reported
RS Designation:
Not reported
Closure Request Date:
Not reported
Close-out Report:
Not reported
RALEIGH, CITY OF-NEUSE WWTP-FI
8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD
RALEIGH, NC
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
��iG1r[�i�l��l•�
IMD S104483084
N/A
Site 2 of 5 in cluster A
IMD:
Name:
RALEIGH, CITY OF-NEUSE WWTP-FI
Address:
8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD
City:
RALEIGH
Region:
RAL
Facility ID:
21011
Date Occurred:
4/2/1999
Submit Date:
11/23/1999
GW Contam:
Yes, Groundwater Contamination has been detected
Soil Contam:
No
Incident Desc:
ONE 4000 GALLON DIESEL UST REMOVED FROM SITE SOIL CONTAMINATION
DETECTED IN SAMPLE COLLECTED 23000 TPH(EPA 3550) IN SAMPLE S-3 360
TPH(EPA 5030) IN S-3
Operator:
E. MARC FENDER
TC6199177.2s Page 15

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
RALEIGH, CITY OF-NEUSE WWTP-FI (Continued)
Contact Phone:
919-662-5700
Owner Company:
CITY OF RALEIGH
Operator Address:P.
O. BOX 590
Operator City:
RALEIGH
Oper City,St,Zip:
RALEIGH, NC 27602-
Ownership:
Municipal
Operation:
Public Service
Material:
DIESEL
Qty Lost 1:
Not reported
Qty Recovered 1:
Not reported
Source:
Leak -underground
Type:
Gasoline/diesel
Location:
Facility
Setting:
Residential
Risk Site:
L
Site Priority:
Not reported
Priority Code:
Not reported
Priority Update:
11/23/1999
Dem Contact:
WDP
Wells Affected:
Not reported
Num Affected:
Not reported
Wells Contam:
Not reported
Sampled By:
Not reported
Samples Include:
Not reported
7.5 Min Quad:
Not reported
5 Min Quad:
Not reported
Latitude:
35.72361111
Longitude:
-78.48055555
Latitude Number:
354325
Longitude Number:
782850
Latitude Decimal:
35.7236111111111
Longitude Decimal: 78.4805555555556
GPS:
NOD
Agency:
DW M
Facility ID:
21011
Last Modified:
Not reported
Incident Phase:
RE
NOV Issued:
Not reported
NORR Issued:
Not reported
45 Day Report:
Not reported
Public Meeting Held: Not reported
Corrective Action
Planned: Not reported
SOC Sighned:
Not reported
Reclassification Report:
Not reported
RS Designation:
Not reported
Closure Request Date: Not reported
Close-out Report:
Not reported
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
S104483084
TC6199177.2s Page 16

Map ID
MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance
Elevation
Site
Database(s)
A6
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FARM
RCRA-VSQG
NNW
8500 BATTLE BRIDGE RD
LUST
1/4-1/2
RALEIGH, NC 27610
UST
0.347 mi.
IMD
1833 ft.
Site 3 of 5 in cluster A
FINDS
Relative:
AIRS
Higher
Financial Assurance
NPDES
Actual:
235 ft.
RCRA-VSQG:
Date form received by agency:2017-04-10 00:00:00.0
Facility name:
CITY OF RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER FAC. WWTP
Facility address:
8500 BATTLE BRIDGE RD
RALEIGH, INC 27610
EPA ID:
NCD981019300
Mailing address:
PO BOX 590
RALEIGH, NC 27602
Contact:
TIMOTHY WOODY
Contact address:
PO BOX 590
RALEIGH, NC 27602
Contact country:
US
Contact telephone:
919-966-3712
Contact email:
Not reported
EPA Region:
04
Classification:
Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator
Description:
Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendar
month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time;
or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar
month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous
waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or
other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any
land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less
of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting
from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely
hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any
time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of
any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from
the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely
hazardous waste
Owner/Operator Summary
Owner/operator name:
CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
Owner/operator address:
Not reported
Not reported
Owner/operator country:
Not reported
Owner/operator telephone:
Not reported
Owner/operator email:
Not reported
Owner/operator fax:
Not reported
Owner/operator extension:
Not reported
Legal status:
Private
Owner/Operator Type:
Operator
Owner/Op start date:
1601-01-01 00:00:00.
Owner/Op end date:
Not reported
Owner/operator name:
CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
Owner/operator address:
PO BOX 590
RALEIGH, NC 27602
Owner/operator country:
US
Owner/operator telephone:
919-996-3474
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
1000440343
NCD981019300
TC6199177.2s Page 17

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
Site
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FARM (Continued)
Owner/operator email:
Owner/operator fax:
Owner/operator extension:
Legal status:
Owner/Operator Type:
Owner/Op start date:
Owner/Op end date:
MAP FINDINGS
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Private
Owner
1601-01-01 00:00:00.
Not reported
Handler Activities Summary:
U.S. importer of hazardous waste:
No
Mixed waste (haz. and radioactive):
No
Recycler of hazardous waste:
No
Transporter of hazardous waste:
No
Treater, storer or disposer of HW:
No
Underground injection activity:
No
On -site burner exemption:
No
Furnace exemption:
No
Used oil fuel burner:
No
Used oil processor:
No
User oil refiner:
No
Used oil fuel marketer to burner:
No
Used oil Specification marketer:
No
Used oil transfer facility:
No
Used oil transporter:
No
Historical Generators:
Date form received by agency:1989-10-27 00:00:00.0
Site name: CITY OF RALEIGH-NEUSE WTP LABORATORY
Classification: Not a generator, verified
Hazardous Waste Summary:
Waste code: D001
Waste name: IGNITABLE WASTE
Waste code: D002
Waste name: CORROSIVE WASTE
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
1000440343
Waste code:
D003
Waste name:
REACTIVE WASTE
Waste code:
D006
Waste name:
CADMIUM
Waste code:
D009
Waste name:
MERCURY
Waste code:
F003
Waste name:
THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL
ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL
ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT
MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT
NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS
CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED
SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR
MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL
TC6199177.2s Page 18

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FARM (Continued)
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
1000440343
BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT
MIXTURES.
Waste code: F005
Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL
KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE,
2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS
CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF
ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS
LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF
THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES.
Violation Status: No violations found
LUST:
Name:
RALEIGH,CITY OF-NEUSE WWTP-ADMIN.BLDG.
Address:
8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD
City,State,Zip:
RALEIGH, NC 27610-8545
Facility ID:
00-0-000
UST Number:
RA-2257
Incident Number:
14331
Contamination Type:
SL
Source Type:
Leak -underground
Product Type:
P
Date Reported:
02/06/1995
Date Occur:
02/06/1995
Cleanup:
02/06/1995
Closure Request:
Not reported
Close Out:
10/16/2017
Level Of Soil Cleanup Achieved: Soil to Groundwater
Tank Regulated Status:
N
# Of Supply Wells:
0
Commercial/NonCommercial UST Site: COMMERCIAL
Risk Classification:
L
Risk Class Based On Review: L
Corrective Action Plan Type: Not reported
NOV Issue Date:
Not reported
NORR Issue Date:
Not reported
Site Priority:
20E
Phase Of LSA Req:
1
Site Risk Reason:
Not reported
Land Use:
Industrial/commercial
MTBE:
No
MTBE1:
No
Flag:
No
Flag 1:
No
LUR Filed:
Not reported
Release Detection:
0
Current Status:
File Located in House
RBCA GW:
Cleanups to 2L.0202 standards
PETOPT:
4
RPL:
False
CD Num:
Not reported
Reel Num:
Not reported
RPOW:
False
RPOP:
False
Error Flag:
0
Error Code:
N
TC6199177.2s Page 19

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FARM (Continued)
Valid:
True
Lat/Long Decimal:
35.7236-78.4805
Testlat:
Not reported
Regional Officer Project Mgr:
SMJ
Region:
RAL
Company:
CITY RALEIGH-PUBLIC UTILITIES
Contact Person:
MR. DALE CRISP
Telephone:
9198574540
RP Address:
219 FAYETTEVILLE ST, SUITE 600
RP City,St,Zip:
RALEIGH, NC 27601-
RP County:
Not reported
Comments:
Not reported
5 Min Quad:
Not reported
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
1000440343
PIRF:
Facility Id:
14331
Date Occurred:
2/6/1995
Date Reported:
7/31/1995
Description Of Incident:
MINOR SOIL CONTAMINATION CONFIRMED FROM LEAKING UST.
Owner/Operator:
JOHN KIVINIEMIE
Ownership:
1
Operation Type:
1
Type:
4
Location:
1
Site Priority:
20E
Priority Update:
4/16/1998
Wells Affected Y/N:
Not reported
Samples Include:
0
7#5 Minute Quad:
Not reported
5 Minute Quad:
Not reported
Pirf/Min Soil:
Not reported
Release Code:
Not reported
Source Code:
Min Soil
Err Type:
Not reported
Cause:
Not reported
Source:
Not reported
Ust Number:
Not reported
Last Modified:
10/16/2017
Incident Phase:
Closed Out
NOV Issued:
Not reported
NORR Issued:
Not reported
45 Day Report:
Not reported
Public Meeting Held:
Not reported
Corrective Action Planned:
Not reported
SOC Signed:
Not reported
Reclassification Report:
Not reported
IRS Designation:
Not reported
Closure Request Date:
Not reported
Close-out Report:
Not reported
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility
Name:
RALEIGH NEUSE WWTP-FILTER BLDG.
Address:
8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD
City,State,Zip:
RALEIGH, NC 27610-8545
Facility ID:
00-0-000
UST Number:
RA-3220
TC6199177.2s Page 20

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FARM (Continued)
Incident Number:
21011
Contamination Type:
GW
Source Type:
Leak -underground
Product Type:
P
Date Reported:
04/26/1999
Date Occur:
04/02/1999
Cleanup:
04/26/1999
Closure Request:
Not reported
Close Out:
Not reported
Level Of Soil Cleanup Achieved:
Residential
Tank Regulated Status:
N
# Of Supply Wells:
0
Commercial/NonCommercial UST Site:
COMMERCIAL
Risk Classification:
L
Risk Class Based On Review:
I
Corrective Action Plan Type:
D
NOV Issue Date:
Not reported
NORR Issue Date:
11/29/1999
Site Priority:
E
Phase Of LSA Req:
2
Site Risk Reason:
Free product
Land Use:
Industrial/commercial
MTBE:
No
MTBE1:
No
Flag:
No
Flag 1:
No
LUR Filed:
Not reported
Release Detection:
0
Current Status:
File Located in
House
RBCA GW:
Not reported
PETOPT:
4
RPL:
False
CD Num:
Not reported
Reel Num:
Not reported
RPOW:
False
RPOP:
False
Error Flag:
0
Error Code:
N
Valid:
False
Lat/Long Decimal:
35.7236-78.4805
Testlat:
Not reported
Regional Officer Project Mgr:
SMJ
Region:
RAL
Company:
CITY OF RALEIGH
Contact Person:
tim woody
Telephone:
919-662-5700
RP Address:
P. O. BOX 590
RP City,St,Zip:
RALEIGH, NC 27602-
RP County:
Not reported
Comments:
Not reported
5 Min Quad:
Not reported
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
1000440343
PIRF:
Facility Id: 21011
Date Occurred: 4/2/1999
Date Reported: 11/23/1999
Description Of Incident: ONE 4000 GALLON DIESEL UST REMOVED FROM SITE SOIL CONTAMINATION
DETECTED IN SAMPLE COLLECTED 23000 TPH(EPA 3550) IN SAMPLE S-3 360
TC6199177.2s Page 21

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FARM (Continued) 1000440343
TPH(EPA 5030) IN S-3
Owner/Operator:
MR E MARCFENDER
Ownership:
1
Operation Type:
1
Type:
3
Location:
1
Site Priority:
Not reported
Priority Update:
11/23/1999
Wells Affected Y/N:
Not reported
Samples Include:
Not reported
7#5 Minute Quad:
Not reported
5 Minute Quad:
Not reported
Pirf/Min Soil:
Not reported
Release Code:
Not reported
Source Code:
MIN SOIL
Err Type:
Not reported
Cause:
Not reported
Source:
Not reported
Ust Number:
Not reported
Last Modified:
Not reported
Incident Phase:
Response
NOV Issued:
Not reported
NORR Issued:
Not reported
45 Day Report:
Not reported
Public Meeting Held:
Not reported
Corrective Action Planned:
Not reported
SOC Signed:
Not reported
Reclassification Report:
Not reported
IRS Designation:
Not reported
Closure Request Date:
Not reported
Close-out Report:
Not reported
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility
UST:
Name:
CITY/RALEIGH-WASTE TREATMENT PLT
Address:
8500 BATTLEBRIDGE ROAD
City,State,Zip:
RALEIGH, NC 27610
Facility Id:
00-0-0000005336
Contact:
CITY OF RALEIGH
Contact Address1:
500 S SALISBURY ST ATTN:TIM GREENE
Contact Address2:
Not reported
Contact City/State/Zip:
RALEIGH, NC 27601
FIPS County Desc:
Wake
Latitude:
35.71810
Longitude:
-78.48758
Tank Id:
21
Tank Status:
Current
Installed Date:
03/29/1976
Perm Close Date:
Not reported
Product Name:
Gasoline, Gas Mix
Tank Capacity:
2000
Root Tank Id:
Not reported
Main Tank:
No
Compartment Tank:
No
TC6199177.2s Page 22

Map ID
MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance
EDR ID Number
Elevation
Site
Database(s) EPA ID Number
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FARM (Continued) 1000440343
Manifold Tank:
0
Commercial:
Yes
Regulated:
Yes
Other CP Tank:
Not reported
Overfill Protection Name:
Auto Shutoff Device
Spill Protection Name:
Catchment Basin
Leak Detection Name:
Not reported
Decode for TCONS_KEY:
Single Wall FRP
Decode for PCONS_KEY:
Single Wall FRP
Decode for PSYS KEY:
Unknown
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility:
Tank Id:
22
Tank Status:
Current
Installed Date:
03/29/1976
Perm Close Date:
Not reported
Product Name:
Gasoline, Gas Mix
Tank Capacity:
2000
Root Tank Id:
Not reported
Main Tank:
No
Compartment Tank:
No
Manifold Tank:
0
Commercial:
Yes
Regulated:
Yes
Other CP Tank:
Not reported
Overfill Protection Name:
Auto Shutoff Device
Spill Protection Name:
Catchment Basin
Leak Detection Name:
Not reported
Decode for TCONS_KEY:
Single Wall FRP
Decode for PCONS_KEY:
Single Wall FRP
Decode for PSYS KEY:
Unknown
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility:
Tank Id:
23
Tank Status:
Current
Installed Date:
03/28/1982
Perm Close Date:
Not reported
Product Name:
Diesel
Tank Capacity:
10000
Root Tank Id:
Not reported
Main Tank:
No
Compartment Tank:
No
Manifold Tank:
0
Commercial:
Yes
Regulated:
Yes
Other CP Tank:
Not reported
Overfill Protection Name:
Auto Shutoff Device
Spill Protection Name:
Catchment Basin
Leak Detection Name:
Not reported
Decode for TCONS_KEY:
Single Wall Steel
Decode for PCONS_KEY:
Single Wall FRP
Decode for PSYS_KEY:
European Suction
TC6199177.2s Page 23

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FARM (Continued) 1000440343
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility:
Tank Id:
24
Tank Status:
Removed
Installed Date:
03/29/1976
Perm Close Date:
03/13/1995
Product Name:
Diesel
Tank Capacity:
4000
Root Tank Id:
Not reported
Main Tank:
No
Compartment Tank:
No
Manifold Tank:
Not reported
Commercial:
Yes
Regulated:
Yes
Other CP Tank:
Not reported
Overfill Protection Name:
Unknown
Spill Protection Name:
Unknown
Leak Detection Name:
Unknown
Decode for TCONS_KEY:
Single Wall Steel
Decode for PCONS_KEY:
Single Wall FRP
Decode for PSYS KEY:
Unknown
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility:
Tank Id:
25
Tank Status:
Removed
Installed Date:
03/29/1976
Perm Close Date:
04/12/1999
Product Name:
Diesel
Tank Capacity:
4000
Root Tank Id:
Not reported
Main Tank:
No
Compartment Tank:
No
Manifold Tank:
Not reported
Commercial:
Yes
Regulated:
Yes
Other CP Tank:
Not reported
Overfill Protection Name:
Auto Shutoff Device
Spill Protection Name:
Catchment Basin
Leak Detection Name:
Unknown
Decode for TCONS_KEY:
Single Wall FRP
Decode for PCONS_KEY:
Single Wall FRP
Decode for PSYS KEY:
Unknown
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility:
Tank Id:
26
Tank Status:
Temporarily Closed
Installed Date:
01/01/1986
Perm Close Date:
Not reported
Product Name:
Other, Non -Petroleum
Tank Capacity:
550
Root Tank Id:
Not reported
Main Tank:
No
TC6199177.2s Page 24

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FARM (Continued)
Compartment Tank:
No
Manifold Tank:
Not reported
Commercial:
No
Regulated:
No
Other CP Tank:
Not reported
Overfill Protection Name:
Unknown
Spill Protection Name:
Unknown
Leak Detection Name:
Unknown
Decode for TCONS_KEY:
Unknown
Decode for PCONS_KEY:
Unknown
Decode for PSYS KEY:
Unknown
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility:
IMD:
Name:
RALEIGH NEUSE WWTP-FILTER BLDG.
Address:
8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD
City:
RALEIGH
Region:
Not reported
Facility ID:
21011
Date Occurred:
4/2/1999
Submit Date:
11/23/1999
GW Contam:
Not reported
Soil Contam:
Not reported
Incident Desc:
ONE 4000 GALLON DIESEL UST REMOVED FROM SITE SOIL CONTAMINATION
DETECTED IN SAMPLE COLLECTED 23000 TPH(EPA 3550) IN SAMPLE S-3 360
TPH(EPA 5030) IN S-3
Operator:
MR E MARCFENDER
Contact Phone:
Not reported
Owner Company:
Not reported
Operator Address:Not reported
Operator City:
Not reported
Oper City,St,Zip:
Not reported
Ownership:
Municipal
Operation:
Public Service
Material:
Not reported
Qty Lost 1:
Not reported
Qty Recovered 1:
Not reported
Source:
Not reported
Type:
Gasoline/diesel
Location:
Facility
Setting:
Not reported
Risk Site:
Not reported
Site Priority:
Not reported
Priority Code:
Not reported
Priority Update:
11/23/1999
Dem Contact:
Not reported
Wells Affected:
Not reported
Num Affected:
Not reported
Wells Contam:
Not reported
Sampled By:
Not reported
Samples Include:
Not reported
7.5 Min Quad:
Not reported
5 Min Quad:
Not reported
Latitude:
35.723610999999998
Longitude:
-78.480556000000007
Latitude Number:
Not reported
1000440343
TC6199177.2s Page 25

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
Site
MAP FINDINGS
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FARM (Continued)
Longitude Number:
Not reported
Latitude Decimal:
Not reported
Longitude Decimal:
Not reported
GPS:
Not reported
Agency:
Not reported
Facility ID:
21011
Last Modified:
Not reported
Incident Phase:
RE
NOV Issued:
Not reported
NORR Issued:
Not reported
45 Day Report:
Not reported
Public Meeting Held:
Not reported
Corrective Action Planned:
Not reported
SOC Sighned:
Not reported
Reclassification Report:
Not reported
IRS Designation:
Not reported
Closure Request Date:
Not reported
Close-out Report:
Not reported
FINDS:
Registry ID: 110057118523
Click Here:
Environmental Interest/Information System:
ELECTRIC GENERATOR
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
Click this hTnarLak
while viewing on your computer to access
additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report.
Al RS:
Facility ID:
9200852
Name:
NEUSE RIVER RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY
Address:
8500 BATTLEBRIDGE ROAD
Address 2:
Not reported
City,State,Zip:
RALEIGH, NC 27610
Regional Office:
Raleigh Regional Office
SIC Number:
9511
Permit Number:
10622R0l
Permit Class:
Synthetic Minor
Issue Date:
10/11/2019
Expiration Date:
09/30/2027
Technical Permit Contact:
Mr Mark Messere
Contact Address Line 1:
4011 Westchase Boulevard
Contact Address Line 2:
Not reported
Contact City:
Raleigh
Contact State:
NC
Contact Zip:
27607
Contact Phone:
[phone]
Link to Latest Permit:
http://xapps.ncdenr.org/aq/FDocsServlet/l85971
Latitude:
35.6488
Longitude:
-78.6438
NC Financial Assurance 1:
Name: CITY/RALEIGH-WASTE TREATMENT PLT
Address: 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE ROAD
1000440343
TC6199177.2s Page 26

Map ID
MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance
EDR ID Number
Elevation
Site
Database(s) EPA ID Number
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FARM
(Continued) 1000440343
City,State,Zip:
RALEIGH, NC 27610
Facility ID:
00-0-0000005336
Region:
1
Financial Responsibility Desc: Local Gov. Bond Rating Test
Financial Responsibility Name:City of Raleigh
Started Date:
Not reported
Ended Date:
Not reported
NPDES:
Name:
NEUSE RIVER RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY
Address:
8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD
City,State,Zip:
RALEIGH, NC 276020590
Permit Number:
WQ0011583
Permit Status:
Active
Permit Type:
Distribution of Residual Solids (503)
Issue Date:
05/12/1995
Region:
Raleigh
Owner Name:
City of Raleigh
Class:
Not reported
Applied:
Not reported
Drafted:
Not reported
Expires:
Not reported
Subbasin:
Not reported
Receiving Stream:
Not reported
Comments:
Not reported
As -Built Flow (GPD):
Not reported
Domestic %:
Not reported
Industrial %:
Not reported
stormwtr %:
Not reported
Permitted Flow (GPD):
Not reported
Program Category:
Non -discharge
Project Type:
Minor modification
Is Major Permit:
1
Date Assigned:
Not reported
Organization Name:
Not reported
Outfall:
Not reported
Discharge Via:
Not reported
Stream Classification:
Not reported
Regulated Activity:
Not reported
Owner Type:
Not reported
Effective Date:
Not reported
Basin Name:
Not reported
Name:
NEUSE RIVER RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY
Address:
8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD
City,State,Zip:
RALEIGH, NC 276020590
Permit Number:
WQ0011583
Permit Status:
In draft
Permit Type:
Distribution of Residual Solids (503)
Issue Date:
05/12/1995
Region:
Raleigh
Owner Name:
City of Raleigh
Class:
Not reported
Applied:
Not reported
Drafted:
Not reported
Expires:
Not reported
Subbasin:
Not reported
TC6199177.2s Page 27

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
Site
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FARM (Continued)
Receiving Stream:
Comments:
As -Built Flow (GPD):
Domestic %:
Industrial %:
stormwtr %:
Permitted Flow (GPD):
Program Category:
Project Type:
Is Major Permit:
Date Assigned:
Organization Name:
Outfall:
Discharge Via:
Stream Classification:
Regulated Activity:
Owner Type:
Effective Date:
Basin Name:
MAP FINDINGS
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Non -discharge
Renewal with major mod
1
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
1000440343
A7 RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP-MERCU IMD S105586644
NNW 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE ROAD N/A
1/4-1/2 RALEIGH, NC
0.347 mi.
1833 ft. Site 4 of 5 in cluster A
Relative: IMD:
Higher Name: RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP-MERCU
Actual: Address: 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE ROAD
235 ft. City: RALEIGH
Region: RAL
Facility ID: 86375
Date Occurred: 11/10/2002
Submit Date: 1/4/2005
GW Contam: No Groundwater Contamination detected
Soil Contam: Not reported
Incident Desc: MERCURY EXCEEDS SOIL TO GROUNDWATER AT THE FORMER FILTER ROCK PILE.
SOIL EXCAVATED, CLOSED OUT.
Operator: CRISP, DALE
Contact Phone: [phone]
Owner Company: PUBLIC UTILITIES DIRECTOR-RALEIGH
Operator Address:222 WEST HARGETT STREET
Operator City: RALEIGH
Oper City,St,Zip: RALEIGH, NC 919-662-5700
Ownership: Unknown
Operation: Residential
Material: Not reported
Qty Lost 1: Not reported
Qty Recovered 1: Not reported
Source: Stockpile
Type: Metals
Location: Not reported
Setting: Not reported
Risk Site: Not reported
Site Priority: 40
Priority Code: D
Priority Update: Not reported
Dem Contact: J. ROUSH
TC6199177.2s Page 28

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
A8
NNW
1/4-1/2
0.347 mi.
1833 ft.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
235 ft.
MAP FINDINGS
Site
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP-MERCU (Continued)
Wells Affected: No
Num Affected: 0
Wells Contam: Not reported
Sampled By: Not reported
Samples Include: Not reported
7.5 Min Quad:
Not reported
5 Min Quad:
Not reported
Latitude:
35.720277
Longitude:
-78.486388
Latitude Number:
Not reported
Longitude Number:
Not reported
Latitude Decimal:
Not reported
Longitude Decimal:
Not reported
GPS:
GPS
Agency:
DWQ
Facility ID:
Not reported
Last Modified:
Not reported
Incident Phase:
Not reported
NOV Issued:
Not reported
NORR Issued:
Not reported
45 Day Report:
Not reported
Public Meeting Held:
Not reported
Corrective Action Planned:
Not reported
SOC Sighned:
Not reported
Reclassification Report:
Not reported
RS Designation:
Not reported
Closure Request Date:
Not reported
Close-out Report:
Not reported
CITY OF RALEIGH WWTP
8500 BATTLE BRIDGE ROAD
RALEIGH, NC
Site 5 of 5 in cluster A
LUST TRUST:
Name:
Address:
City,State,Zip:
Facility ID:
Site ID:
Site Note:
Site Eligible?:
Commercial Find:
Priority Rank:
Deductable Amount:
3rd Party Deductable Amt:
Sum 3rd Party Amt Applied
NPDES:
Name:
Address:
City,State,Zip:
Permit Number:
Permit Status:
Permit Type:
CITY OF RALEIGH WWTP
8500 BATTLE BRIDGE ROAD
RALEIGH, NC
0-005336
21011
Not reported
True
100% Commercial
Not reported
20000
0
0
NEUSE RIVER WWTP
Not reported
NC
NC0029033
Complete
Municipal, Large
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
S105586644
LUST TRUST S108280799
NPDES N/A
TC6199177.2s Page 29

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
CITY OF RALEIGH WWTP (Continued)
Issue Date:
Not reported
Region:
Raleigh
Owner Name:
City of Raleigh Public Utilities Department
Class:
MAJOR
Applied:
07/25/2012
Drafted:
3/25/2015
Expires:
02/28/2013
Subbasin:
03-04-02
Receiving Stream:
NEUSE RIVER
Comments:
Not reported
As -Built Flow (GPD):
Not reported
Domestic %:
Not reported
Industrial %:
Not reported
stormwtr %:
Not reported
Permitted Flow (GPD):
75000000
Program Category:
Not reported
Project Type:
4/2/2015
Is Major Permit:
Not reported
Date Assigned:
julie.grzyb
Organization Name:
Not reported
Outfall:
Not reported
Discharge Via:
Not reported
Stream Classification:
Not reported
Regulated Activity:
Not reported
Owner Type:
Not reported
Effective Date:
Not reported
Basin Name:
Not reported
B9 MATERIAL RECOVERY/ BROWNFIELD RD C&D LAN
WNW SR 2553/ BROWNFIELD ROAD
1/4-1/2 RALEIGH, NC
0.359 mi.
1896 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster B
Relative:
HIST_LF:
Higher
Facility Type:
CDLF
Actual:
permit_num:
9231
275 ft.
Facility Fax:
[phone]
Contact Name:
WILBUR CARTER
Contact Title:
Not reported
Contact Telephone:
[phone]
Contact Address:
421 RALEIGH VIEW ROAD
Contact City,St,Zip:
RALEIGH, NC 27610
Lined:
False
Facility Id:
P1061
Facility Status:
OPEN
Public/Private:
PRIVATE
Waste Mgmt Specialist:
Dennis Shackelford
NC Financial Assurance 2:
Permit Id:
9231-CDLF-
Facility Type:
CD
Public/Private:
Private
2011 Financial Assurance -FA MECH: Performance Bond
2011 Financial Assurance -FA MECH 2: Not reported
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
S108280799
HIST LF S105805024
Financial Assurance N/A
TC6199177.2s Page 30

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
B10
WNW
1/4-1/2
0.359 mi.
1896 ft.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
275 ft.
11
WNW
1/4-1/2
0.493 mi.
2605 ft.
Relative:
Higher
Actual:
288 ft.
MAP FINDINGS
EDR ID Number
Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
BROWNFIELD ROAD C&D LANDFILL SWF/LF S113718258
2600 BROWNFIELD ROAD
N/A
RALEIGH, NC
Site 2 of 2 in cluster B
LF:
Name:
WAKE RECLAMATION, LLC
Address:
2600 BROWNFIELD ROAD
City,State,Zip:
RALEIGH, NC
Permit Num:
9231-CDLF-
Waste:
CD
Activity:
LF
Contact Name:
Not reported
Contact Telephone:
Not reported
Facility Status:
InactiveClosed
Mailing Address:
Not reported
Mailing City:
Not reported
Name:
BROWNFIELD ROAD C&D LANDFILL
Address:
2600 BROWNFIELD ROAD
City,State,Zip:
RALEIGH, NC
Permit Num:
9231-CDLF-2012
Waste:
CD
Activity:
LF
Contact Name:
John Roberson
Contact Telephone:
[phone]
Facility Status:
Open
Mailing Address:
Not reported
Mailing City:
Not reported
MATERIAL RECOVERY C&D LANDFILL- WCA DEBRIS S122874249
BROWNFIELD ROAD N/A
RALEIGH, NC
DEBRIS:
IDS Number:
Name:
Address:
City,State,Zip:
Size of Site:
Type of Debris:
Contact:
Contact Phone:
Second Contact:
Second Contact Phone:
Confirm Year:
Status:
Latitude:
Longitude:
DS92-012
MATERIAL RECOVERY C&D LANDFILL- WCA
BROWNFIELD ROAD
RALEIGH, NC
20-25 Acres
YW/LC/C&D
Roy Baldwin, Wake Cty, Facilities Mgr
919-669-5443
John Roberson
919-612-9687
2016
Not Active
35.70562
-78.50435
TC6199177.2s Page 31

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
12
North
1/2-1
0.888 mi.
4689 ft.
Site
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP
BATTLE -BRIDGE RD SR 2552
RALEIGH, NC
Relative:
SHWS:
Lower
Name:
Actual:
Address:
159 ft.
City,State,Zip:
EPAID:
Lat/Longitude:
Geolocation Method:
MAP FINDINGS
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP
BATTLE -BRIDGE RD SR 2552
RALEIGH, NC
NCD991278920
35.72498 /-78.48553
On Screen Placement On Georeferenced Map
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility:
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
SHWS 1000202942
N/A
TC6199177.2s Page 32

ca
ca
0
CO
o o
a
LL
w
H
H
U
0 0
w
H 0
z
L _
w
w
CO <
CO ¢
U
H
w
w
w
J J
w0
Q co
w
J =
of
U 0
of w
a 0
w Of
O
H CO
a }
w =
0 w
U �
Z ¢
N LO
O O
(0 Cl)
I- V
M I0
V aO
aO N
O N
U) U)
CO
(M
co
01
a

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 22
NPL Site Boundaries
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 09/03/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Sources:
EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 1
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 3
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 4
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 5
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 10
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 6
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 7
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 8
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 09/03/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
TC6199177.2s Page GR-1

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994
Number of Days to Update: 56
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 22
Federal CERCLIS list
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 09/03/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAG) sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version: 04/03/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/14/2019
Number of Days to Update: 39
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/02/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites,
and remedial activities performed in support of EPA's Superfund Program across the United States. The list was
formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous
waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons,
pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the
sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 22
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/03/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/26/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
TC6199177.2s Page GR-2

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under
the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP,
renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while
it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed
and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge,
assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the
site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or
other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean
that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the
location is not judged to be potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 22
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/03/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/26/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 06/15/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 87
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the
waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 06/15/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2020
Number of Days to Update: 88
Federal RCRA generators list
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate
over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 06/15/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2020
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6199177.2s Page GR-3

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 06/15/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2020
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-VSQG: RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators)
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Very small quantity generators (VSQGs) generate
less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 06/15/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2020
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal institutional controls /engineering controls registries
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version: 05/15/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/18/2020
Number of Days to Update: 30
Source: Department of the Navy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/23/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building
foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 02/13/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/15/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/07/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 02/13/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/15/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/07/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6199177.2s Page GR-4

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 06/15/2020 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2020 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 87 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file includes sites on the National Priority
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version: 08/09/2011 Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2011 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2011 Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2020
Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties. Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 05/11/2020 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/10/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2020 Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 75 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version: 03/06/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/24/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/10/2020 Last EDR Contact: 06/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OLI: Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information. (Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
sites).
Date of Government Version: 08/22/2019 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/19/2019 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 69 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6199177.2s Page GR-5

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DEBRIS: Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
NCDEQ Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section Temporary Disaster Debris Staging Site (TDDSS) Locations
which are available to be activated in a disaster or emergency.. Disaster Debris Sites can only be used for temporary
disaster debris storage if the site's responsible party activates the site for use by notifying the NCDEQ DWM
Solid Waste Section staff during an emergency
Date of Government Version: 10/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/20/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2020
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/28/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LCID: Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
A list all of the Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notification facilities (under 2 acres in
size) in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 09/06/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/09/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2019
Number of Days to Update: 75
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
Date of Government Version: 05/01/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2020 Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2020
Number of Days to Update: 76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/06/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites, as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database. Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTs.
Date of Government Version: 07/17/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/21/2020 Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2020
Number of Days to Update: 1 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version: 04/29/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6199177.2s Page GR-6

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA, Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version: 04/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska
Date of Government Version: 04/15/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version: 04/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs.
Date of Government Version: 04/03/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/08/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/26/2020 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2020
Number of Days to Update: 79 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6199177.2s Page GR-7

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 02/01/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/19/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available
information varies by state program.
Date of Government Version: 05/01/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2020 Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2020
Number of Days to Update: 76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Date of Government Version: 06/09/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/11/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/26/2020 Last EDR Contact: 09/11/2020
Number of Days to Update: 76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/28/2020
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version: 04/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/03/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6199177.2s Page GR-8

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/23/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/29/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property
due to varying levels of cleanup possible, practical, or necessary at the site.
Date of Government Version: 05/11/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/10/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2020
Number of Days to Update: 75
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6199177.2s Page GR-9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 142
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/04/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations.
Date of Government Version: 05/11/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/10/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2020 Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 75 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008
Number of Days to Update: 27
State and tribal Brownfields sites
Source: EPA, Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled, or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment. All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version: 06/24/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/25/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/08/2020 Last EDR Contact: 06/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 75 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/02/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 7
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/28/2020
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
TC6199177.2s Page GR-10

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing
A listing of recycling center locations.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/09/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/25/2020 Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing
A listing of solid waste facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2007 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2009
Number of Days to Update: 17 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County, California.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Source: EPA, Region 9
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Last EDR Contact: 07/14/2020
Number of Days to Update: 137 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Number of Days to Update: 39 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land
A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivices, Indian Health Service
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2020
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
TC6199177.2s Page GR-11

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory
Register.
Date of Government Version: 03/18/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/19/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/19/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/07/2020
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version: 03/18/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/19/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Local Land Records
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/19/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/07/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA ('Superfund') lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 22
Records of Emergency Release Reports
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/03/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2020
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 06/22/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/23/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/23/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SPILLS: Spills Incident Listing
A listing spills, hazardous material releases, sanitary sewer overflows, wastewater treatment plant bypasses and
upsets, citizen complaints, and any other environmental emergency calls reported to the agency.
Date of Government Version: 03/10/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/18/2020 Last EDR Contact: 09/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 79 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents
TC6199177.2s Page GR-12

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 05/01/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2020 Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2020
Number of Days to Update: 76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
Date of Government Version: 09/27/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch
Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that
are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80.
Date of Government Version: 06/14/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Other Ascertainable Records
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Date of Government Version: 06/15/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2020
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 05/13/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/13/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/30/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
TC6199177.2s Page GR-13

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps
of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,
Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019
Number of Days to Update: 574
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency: N/A
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,
Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/05/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/23/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post -closure care of their facilities.
Date of Government Version: 06/15/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a "Watch List' to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and
local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/06/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6199177.2s Page GR-14

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/18/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/28/2020
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2020
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/14/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/30/2020
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all
registered pesticide -producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/21/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/15/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 22
RMP: Risk Management Plans
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/03/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/14/2020
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC6199177.2s Page GR-15

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program
Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing
industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst -case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee
training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.
Date of Government Version: 01/31/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/13/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/06/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 34
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/03/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 10/09/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2019
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6199177.2s Page GR-16

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
MILTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MILTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 10/25/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/25/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/15/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
COAL ASH DOE: Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/04/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/15/2020
Number of Days to Update: 42
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/04/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/14/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019
Number of Days to Update: 251
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/14/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 96
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/06/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
TC6199177.2s Page GR-17

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2019
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/24/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA
(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA
regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some
EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
Date of Government Version: 01/02/2020 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2020 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2020
Number of Days to Update: 80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2020 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/15/2020 Telephone: Varies
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/21/2020 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2020
Number of Days to Update: 6 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2017
Number of Days to Update: 218
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
TC6199177.2s Page GR-18

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 546
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where
radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations.
Date of Government Version: 08/08/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2018
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/28/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills
shut down, large piles of the sand -like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2020
Number of Days to Update: 74
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Date of Government Version: 07/29/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/21/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/30/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/03/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: American Journal of Public Health
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS)
The database is a sub -system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants,
steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action,
air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
TC6199177.2s Page GR-19

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data
Mines violation and assessment information. Department of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration.
Date of Government Version: 05/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/28/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/10/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/14/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 05/01/2020 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/21/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020 Last EDR Contact: 08/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/07/2020
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing
This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron
ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such
as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/27/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/28/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/07/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing
Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team
of the USGS.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/28/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/07/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines
An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide
information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory
contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated
with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE
program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing
problems are reclaimed.
TC6199177.2s Page GR-20

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 06/22/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Interior
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 02/03/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/28/2020
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/14/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.
Date of Government Version: 04/04/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/26/2020
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/02/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/26/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2018
Number of Days to Update: 71
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/19/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/07/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: Department of Defense
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/26/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels
Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.
Date of Government Version: 05/18/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2020
Number of Days to Update: 76
AIRS: Air Quality Permit Listing
A listing of facilities with air quality permits.
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/30/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6199177.2s Page GR-21

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 06/08/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/21/2020 Last EDR Contact: 09/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 73 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ASBESTOS: ASBESTOS
Asbestos notification sites
Date of Government Version: 04/30/2020 Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/14/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2020 Last EDR Contact: 07/28/2020
Number of Days to Update: 81 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites
A listing of coal combustion products distribution permits issued by the Division for the treatment, storage,
transportation, use and disposal of coal combustion products.
Date of Government Version: 03/06/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/24/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/05/2020 Last EDR Contact: 06/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 73 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites, active and abandoned, that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
knowledge of and entered into this database.
Date of Government Version: 05/31/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/09/2020 Last EDR Contact: 09/16/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/28/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended
to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures
if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 05/01/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2020 Last EDR Contact: 08/04/2020
Number of Days to Update: 76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available
to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated
facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012 Source: Department of Environmental & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2012 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2012 Last EDR Contact: 09/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 23 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/04/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information
Hazardous waste financial assurance information.
TC6199177.2s Page GR-22

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 06/04/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/17/2020 Last EDR Contact: 09/02/2020
Number of Days to Update: 73 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing
General information regarding NPDES(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permits.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/15/2020 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing
A listing of uncerground injection wells locations.
Date of Government Version: 06/03/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/04/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020 Last EDR Contact: 08/26/2020
Number of Days to Update: 70 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/14/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AOP: Animal Operation Permits Listing
This listing includes animal operations that are required to be permitted by the state.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2020
Number of Days to Update: 1
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/11/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEPT HAULERS: Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
This list of all active and permitted Septage Land Application Site (SLAS) and Septage Detention and Treatment
Facility (SDTF) sites in North Carolina. The purpose of this map is to provide the public and government entities
a visual overview of the businesses that manage septage and septage facilities throughout the state.
Date of Government Version: 01/07/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/10/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/16/2020
Number of Days to Update: 66
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCS INACTIVE: Listing of Inactive PCS Permits
An inactive permit is a facility that has shut down or is no longer discharging.
Date of Government Version: 11/05/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 120
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
CCB: Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
These are not permitted Coal Ash landfills A list all of the now closed Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) in North
Carolina, in point data form. The purpose is to provide the public and other government entities a visual overview
of coal ash structural fills throughout the state and increase public awareness of their current locations.
Date of Government Version: 01/23/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/08/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6199177.2s Page GR-23

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
PCSRP: Petroleum -Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
To treat petroleum -contaminated soil in order to protect North Carolinaa??s environment and the health of the
citizens of North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 04/03/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/08/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System
Mineral Resources Data System
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2019
Number of Days to Update: 3
PCS ENF: Enforcement data
No description is available for this data
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 29
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/28/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/07/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCS: Permit Compliance System
PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES
facilities.
Date of Government Version: 07/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011
Number of Days to Update: 55
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
Source: EPA, Office of Water
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/11/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture
of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited
to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station,
filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
TC6199177.2s Page GR-24

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources
that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were
not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived
from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled
from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 196 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North
Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 172 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6199177.2s Page GR-25

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version: 05/12/2020 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/12/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/27/2020 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/23/2020
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2019 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2019 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2019 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2020 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2020
Number of Days to Update: 72 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2019 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 53 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/26/2020
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Management
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/10/2019 Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2020
Number of Days to Update: 69 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/30/2020
Data Release Frequency: Annually
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/03/2019
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 09/02/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC6199177.2s Page GR-26

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: Endeavor Business Media
Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty
Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases
(Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information
is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its
fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business
Media.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: Endeavor Business Media
This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best
effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any
particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media.
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: [phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals.
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: [phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: [phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
TC6199177.2s Page GR-27

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6199177.2s Page GR-28

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
RALEIGH FARM BANK PARCEL
8300 STATE RD 2542
RALEIGH, NC 27610
Ira:zC]=1192:z•»a:4r-«•191N Ql,Fit 9*1
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator:
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Target Property Map:
Version Date:
West Map:
Version Date:
35.702815 - 35' 42' 10.13"
78.487005 - 78' 29' 13.22"
Zone 17
727365.8
3953698.5
198 ft. above sea level
5947400 CLAYTON, NC
2013
5948594 GARNER, NC
2013
EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
geologic strata.
TC6199177.2s Page A-1

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site -specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
General Topographic Gradient: General East
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
M
North
TIP
N
South
N
� V N �
W W j
W - - - - - - - - - - - - - A- W -A - .W ��
�O 00
West I East
TIP
0 1/2 1 Miles
Target Property Elevation: 198 ft.
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified.
TC6199177.2s Page A-2

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
and bodies of water).
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property
3720175100K
Additional Panels in search area:
3720174100J
3720174000J
3720175000K
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Quad at Target Property
CLAYTON
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
FEMA Source Type
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA Source Type
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA FIRM Flood data
NWI Electronic
Data Coverage
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION
MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW
Not Reported
TC6199177.2s Page A-3

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
move more quickly through sandy -gravelly types of soils than silty -clayey types of soils.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT
GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era: Paleozoic Category: Plutonic and Intrusive Rocks
System: Devonian
Series: Middle Paleozoic granitic rocks
Code: Pzg2 (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps.
The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data.
Soil Component Name: CECIL
Soil Surface Texture: sandy clay loam
Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained. Soils have intermediate water holding capacity. Depth to
water table is more than 6 feet.
Hydric Status: Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil.
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: HIGH
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 60 inches
Depth to Bedrock Max: > 60 inches
TC6199177.2s Page A-4

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
Permeability
Soil Reaction
Rate (in/hr)
(pH)
1
0 inches
7 inches
sandy clay loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 2.00
Max: 6.50
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 0.60
Min: 4.50
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
2
7 inches
11 inches
sandy clay loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 2.00
Max: 5.50
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 0.60
Min: 4.50
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
3
11 inches
50 inches
clay
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 2.00
Max: 5.50
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 0.60
Min: 4.50
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit 50% or
200), Clayey
more), Elastic
Soils.
silt.
4
50 inches
75 inches
variable
Not reported
Not reported
Max: 0.00
Max: 0.00
Min: 0.00
Min: 0.00
OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA
Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data, the following additional subordinant soil types may
appear within the general area of target property.
Soil Surface Textures: sandy loam
loam
clay loam
silt loam
very channery - silt loam
gravelly - sandy loam
Surficial Soil Types: sandy loam
loam
clay loam
silt loam
very channery - silt loam
gravelly - sandy loam
Shallow Soil Types: sandy clay
silt loam
silty clay loam
clay
very channery - silt loam
loam
Deeper Soil Types: silty clay loam
weathered bedrock
fine sandy loam
unweathered bedrock
sandy clay loam
TC6199177.2s Page A-5

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE
SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)
Federal USGS
1.000
Federal FRDS PWS
Nearest PWS within 1 mile
State Database
1.000
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
1 USGS40000889563 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSW
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No PWS System Found
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
2 NC3000000005439 1/2 - 1 Mile SSE
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
TC6199177.2s Page A-6

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 6199177.2s
County Boundary
N Major Roads
N Contour Lines
OO Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater
® Water Wells
© Public Water Supply Wells
® Cluster of Multiple Icons
0 1/4 1/2 1 Miles
Groundwater Flow Direction Wildlife Areas
e I Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location Natural Areas
c v Groundwater Flow Varies at Location o Rare & Endangered Species
SITE NAME: Raleigh Farm Bank Parcel
CLIENT: Axiom Environmental
ADDRESS: 8300 State Rd 2542
CONTACT: Kenan Jernigan
Raleigh INC 27610
INQUIRY #: 6199177.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.702815 / 78.487005
DATE: September 21, 2020 3:50 pm
Copyright �o 2020 EDR, Inc. (,)2015 TonnTom Rel. 2015.

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
1
SSW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
Organization ID:
Organization Name:
Monitor Location:
Description:
Drainage Area:
Contrib Drainage Area:
Aquifer:
Formation Type:
Construction Date:
Well Depth Units:
Well Hole Depth Units:
2
SSE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
Database EDR ID Number
FED USGS USGS40000889563
USGS-NC
USGS North Carolina Water Science Center
WK-225
Type:
Well
Not Reported
HUC:
Not Reported
Not Reported
Drainage Area Units:
Not Reported
Not Reported
Contrib Drainage Area Unts:
Not Reported
Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline
-rock aquifers
Felsic Metaigneous Rock
Aquifer Type:
Not Reported
Not Reported
Well Depth:
145
ft
Well Hole Depth:
Not Reported
Not Reported
PWD ID:
NC0351477
System Name:
PWS Type:
Non Community Transient
Primary Source
Water Type:
Ground Water
Facility Name:
Facility Type:
Well
Well Depth:
Owner:
TIPPETTS CHAPEL FWB CHURCH 351477
NC WELLS NC3000000005439
TIPPETTS CHAPEL FWB CHURCH
Ground Water
WELL #1
180
TC6199177.2s Page A-8

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance Database EDR ID Number
NC_SNHA NC10001865
Acres:
21.92
Sitename:
NEUSE RIVER (CLAYTON) FORESTS
Quality type:
Not Reported
Sig:
D
Site id:
1865
Edr id:
NC10001865
NC_SNHA NC10001877
Acres:
48.09
Sitename:
NEUSE RIVER (CLAYTON) FORESTS
Quality type:
Not Reported
Sig:
D
Site id:
1877
Edr id:
NC10001877
TC6199177.2s Page A-9

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
AREA RADON INFORMATION
State Database: NC Radon
Radon Test Results
Num Results Avg pCi/L Min pCi/L Max pCi/L
19 2.34 0.5 7.3
3 7.97 14.5 6.7
Federal EPA Radon Zone for WAKE County: 2
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
Zone 2 indoor average level — 2 pCi/L and — 4 pCi/L.
Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code:
27610
Number of sites tested: 1
Area
Average Activity
% <4 pCi/L
% 4-20 pCi/L
Living Area - 1 st Floor
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
Living Area - 2nd Floor
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
Basement
2.300 pCi/L
100%
0%
°/ >gn nC.i/I
Not Reported
Not Reported
0%
TC6199177.2s Page A-10

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOWR Information System
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC6199177.2s Page PSGR-1

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
North Carolina Wildlife Resources/Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Natural Heritage Occurrence Sites Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites).
NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic) that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site's significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or high quality natural communities, or
other important ecological features.
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC6199177.2s Page PSGR-2

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6199177.2s Page PSGR-3

Appendix E: USFWS Report
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

.:.,.
Mal s WIIJJUrV.
United States Department of the Interior`"
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: September 22, 2020
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-1951
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-04278
Project Name: Raleigh Buffer Site
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

09/22/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-04278
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratory birds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/
comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

09/22/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-04278
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

09/22/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-04278
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

09/22/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-04278 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-1951
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-04278
Project Name: Raleigh Buffer Site
Project Type: LAND - RESTORATION / ENHANCEMENT
Project Description: Proposed Riparian Buffer Restoration Site
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www.google.com/maps/place/35.700263293374874N78.49942422607029W
Counties: Wake, NC

09/22/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-04278 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Amphibians
NAME
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME
STATUS
Endangered
STATUS
Proposed
Threatened
STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Endangered
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528

09/22/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-04278 4
Clams
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Threatened
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Endangered
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

Appendix F: NC NHP and NC SHPO Correspondence
Raleigh Farm — Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V5) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

MEN Roy Cooper. Governor
•s ; NC DEPARTMENT OF Susi Hamilton, Secretary
■■ ■■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
013
0 Walter Clark, director, Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-12821
September 4, 2020
Allison Keith
Axiom Environmental
218 Snow Ave
Raleigh, NC 27603
RE: Raleigh Farm Nutrient Site; 20-021
Dear Allison Keith:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water
Management Trust Fund easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented
near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butlerCo�ncdcr.aov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPAR7HEN7 OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1691 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27609
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

N
(1) n
o
a N
O
CO a
M
M
M
N
N N
n
CO
n
n
n
n
n n
M
T
Z
mo
E
M
M
M
Ln
O
_
LL
=
Z
O
N
o Z
U
�n
C
fo
C
�
C
N
�
CO
CO fo
(n
CO
N
N C
Q O
fo
N
E
Co
CO
N
N ON
U
Q
cn u
° oN
W
O
N
O
co
o
a 4
a o
+
CC3
+
° 0
a n
�
W
0 T
E
E
E
E
E E
E
N
o -0 z
�.° U
u
CO
CO
E
�� oz
a)
N
N
N
N
N N
N
N
N
>
>
o
Cl)U
�
�
�
�
� �
�
O
~
o 0
N
QM
M
M
M
M M
M
N
N
N
c
Q
+
CC3
+
U CO
+
CO
o
a�
a
u
CJ
O (n
O
J (n
(n
O T
fo
co W
LL
LL
LL
W m
m
O T
c
Co (n
u
i
0
N ON
O
+
U
—
o
O O N
o 0
C NCO
O
E
O
�} a)
E
� 7 N N
a
M
Ln
LLLL
c
�o Z O W
0
N
N
N
N N
N
0 6
E
E Z 0
+ CON
>
+
C9
N
C9
MO
N M
O
M
O
CO c
-0
o
Q E
CO
co
O
O
-
O
}
CO
o
O Z
— W N U
N
Q
0p
C9
O
ob
O
N
O
N
O
O
O
a s
O Q Z
O
N
O
N
O O
O
c
T
N
CL
O
N
N
N N
N
+
Q
CO
Q
CON (n
CO
rOo
o�
rNo
z
n
_
N
>
N
O
+CO
O
}
o 0
U N
o
0
u
—
u�
Q
O
a
a
E
E
v
E
z
N
E
a
in
E
co
J
co _
U
a U 6
-z
u
CO
�CO
o
Q
E
c
°�
c
Cl
v
CO
OL
O
W
n
CO
O
O
O
N O
0 Z
N O
o o a
O
CO
O
N
J
C
W
m
Q
>
U
U
>-0
a
(�
U 1�
� a 4 o
+-+
c
E
E
O
c
N
Z nC�ZWZ(n
_
�� m�
N
Q
CO
Co
to
N
N
in
CO
f6 N cn
W
C�
J
CO
CO
o> 4
W
o
-0
cn
CO
a)
0
a U
N
CO
O
CL
n
o
N
O
N
Q
CO
E 3
LL
U
T
N
�
N
>
Q O O
J
N
N
O
N
O
�7
E�
0 0
_
E
D
O
CO
D
>, +
Q O U
N
> Q
O
a
C
N
U o
o o
fo
fo
Co
a--+
C
CO
ul
CO
N
fo Co Cl
N >,
J
> W
+,
O
a
CO
O
n
0
>>
E
_
to
N
to
N
cn
CO
z
c
Q
5 O +
Q in
N n
QO
>
}
O
LL
D
LLO
N 0
cn
D-COE
E
°
Q
z E
�
�w
CO
cn
CO
co
O D
N
Q
W
J
J
J CL
LL (n
CL
i
a
E
CO
o a)
C9
C
LL
E 6
> CO
CO
U
O a
.O
N
CO
O
C9
r-I
L
r-I
E
c
D a) c
U
c
c
O=
a
o
M
CO
CO
O
Ln O-)
O-)
CJ
O
E O
+
N rp
O
+
-0
c .O
N
I,
N
Ln N
N
O
CO>
Z
C�
�
a
U
CCO
�
CO CO
CCO
N
0 Z
O �a7
(1)
LL
N N W
0) r0
W�
a
rOo c
N
N
N
N
N
>_
N
Q Q o
to N
a
CO
CO
CO
co
co
c
c
Q E
�
O
O CL
6 0
T
D- �°>>>�°>��E
—
�E
—
�z�
a) a)
��E
o��E�w�°
E
U
E
Xo
>_
>_
>_
>_
E
E
c c
> O
+
N
�a
O Z
E�
�(7 LLmLLmLLmLLmLLzu
co
O
ro
zu
O
o+
Z(nZ
N
o o
��C�
U
5z0-
co
z.
o°
r
N
a

CO CO
n
n
n
n
n n
n
M
r
-0 E
LnLn
(�
M
M
M
O f0
_
U
M
CJ
CJ
CJ
CJ
CJ M
U
M
CJ
CO
�
(3
0
0
0
�
N
Q
>
>
u
Ln D
N
N
0
N
O
COCC3
CCO
0
CCO
�
0 CON
O
CO
j
Cl0
CO
N
CO
CL
O7
O7
ul
U
(n
(n
W
W
O
COco
CO
W �
N
E
E
E
E
E E
E
E
N
O
CO
>
>
D
—
D
D
D
D D
D
D
CO +
o� 2
O
DCO
i 0>
D N
N
N
N
N N
N
N
I
J
N N
u
c
u�
N
U U
CO
a
C �
E
C r
co T
r
=
W
W
W
W
C.)
w m
C.)
m
C.)
m
W
T
Q
u
O
N
W U
N
O O N
N CO
N
z. 1
C
O
cc)0)
N
m
m
COC
N
N
N
N
N
N
Z N(:)
m
a
9
N
Ln
Ln
>
o
O
O
O
O
O
OT
O
E
o LL ZQ
O
O
CC)
Cp
_Ln
�
Cp O�
N
NLn
4U
OO
_
O
O
OOOO
O
O
O D-Z
u CDL
CO N
N�
OO
N
N
N
N
N
N
NNO
N
O
N
O
N
CO
+r0
Q
O
N
�E�
o
—
in
Q
Q
O
O
D
E
CO
�c
z
o
E
�
E
J
o
o
Dcn
N
E
o
a
E
a
c>
u
-0z
E
W
(n
Co
CO
0
n
CO
E 0
CO
c
0
m
Q
E
—
o
D-
O
O
N N
—
COCo
uE
O
N
O
O
CCO
N
O
O
u
Q�
u
Q�
W
J
(n
Co
O
E
CO
OLn
E
Co
CO
in
°
E
COO
in
E
.a
c
�
�
Q�0
0
�
W
CO
—
�
N
H
W
}
E
CO
C
D
CO
>
E
J
>
��
Q
CO
O
O
O
c
CO
CO
O
.0
a
J}
O co
U
CO
O
CO
Z
in
u
E
CO O
CO
O
Ln
CO
E
N N
CO x
Co
>+
coN
o
CO
+
U
CO
0
o -0
-
0
+ a
N
a
"
N
a
n
ro
T
a
a
o�E
�°-�
a
E
au�
E�
E.5
E
cn
o
O°
6
=
co
o
CO o
o
u
a
+
00
n
un
O7 Q
W
J
J
J LL
(n CL
LL
(n CL
CL CL
(n
O
CO
z
C)
C
LL
LnN
CO
Il
QO
O
_
CD
C�0
rl
CD
E
C
0
O
O
n
n
N
M
n
O O
n
n
O
CD
D
O
W
N
M
LIB
CO
Fn
CD
M m
m
m
0
O
>
M
M
N
rl
N
Ln M
N
N
M
O
CO
+
U
U
CO
COO
0
O
O
>
>
>, >
CO
O
N
N
N
N
N
CL
E
°
°�
CC3
°�
CO
CO
CO
CO
`D
f6
Cl
o
o
>
>
>
> ° E
°
E
°
E ° E
z a)
E
x o
E
E
� cn�
cn�
cn�
c E
E
E E
n
a
N
o
ro
>—
>—
>—
>— ro O
ro
O
m
O m O
m
CO
+ N
W
(3
mi C) C)
LL
m LL
m LL
Co LL
m LL Z U
Z
U
Z
U Z U
i
Z
(n Z
r
M
N
a

/
\
\
±
\
z
_
/
_
\
6
\
f
\\
32
3§
t
t t t t t t
G}
e
a a a a a a
\_
E
E E E E E E
%/
\
\
\ \ \ \ \ \
\
e
e
3
3 3 3 3 3 3
> s
a a
° 3
&\
4//
CO°`
a a a a a a
O c
c s
\
2
2
\ \ \ \ \ \
\ ±
\
\
%\
/
\
\
\
\
\.z
\
ƒ/
LL
/
/
/
/
\
CO
>D
E
zCO
2
ss
2\
§
CO
\ \
\ 2
\
CO u
u
E2
2
3\
\
/
<
CO
CO
<
0 \
/ \
\ 2
0
y y
\ \
\
g
/
/
O O
j
\ =
E
s e
= »
e
y
e
» » > > > >
-
\\
c 2//
/©
/
tttttt
\
a =
co y
±
y
=
\
_ _ _ _ _ _
/ / / / / /
\ \
/
e
mg
e
e
zt
o\e u
0 Z
u
/
\
% /\/\O/\/LLZ(n
\\\
\\
CO
CO
\
\ \
\ \
\
E
2
2
\
\ \
/
:
e
c
c
CO\
%
\ CO
\
g
e e
a)(
O
\
\
D
/ /
\
CO CO/
/
/
/ y
)
)
/
e e
\ /
\ i
\ \
0 0
\ \
t \
\ \
\ E
E
\
/ »
\
\
\
a)
\
\
/ / t t t t
/
co/
a)=
e\>
z
=/
CO
=
e e e e
\ \ \
( \
\ /
/
\
y y / / / /
\ \
\ \ \ \
/ \ 7
%
/
/ � �
\ \
± ± z
\ /
s %
%
/
% y y y y y y
g
4 4 w
e z
y
i = _ _ _ _ _
:
\ \ ?
a =
m
2 /
/
(
E \
e o
E
7
t 7
t E±
/ / / / / /
\
e e e e e e\
\\\\\
\\
O\6\6\\\\\\\\
IF,
§
/

(D
U)
E
$
_
Z
E
�
@
U-
�
0)
.�
e
ry
�
N
00
N
�
W
�
2
Z
U
Z
s
§
_
\
c

00
.,-;jlr - " !.( - E u5
*
L9
I A p N
U)
LU
ti
z
10 f U
cn
LO
c:)
LU
O
LU
0
C)
1p
LU
*N.
IF 0
U)
p
*lw
0
Ap 2-
lip
L)
06
.,pip
0
LLI
kp
ry 7,
2 -E
0
0
U) U)
IL
Z
0
ZI
o co c
L) L)
Al 0 0
0
U)
0
U) 2
L)
06
0 U)
04 -0 a)
2
0
L) U) E
C-4 Uc) LO) o
04
L)
0