20210719 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20210922

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
June 1, 2021 Ver4.1
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20210719
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Winston-Salem Regional Office - (336) 776-
9800
Information for Initial Review
1a. Name of project:
Abington Drive Outfall Replacement
1a. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Lynda Jensen
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
9/22/2021
Nearest Body of Water
Belews Creek
Basin
Roanoke
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Version#*
1
What amout is owed?*
r $240.00
IT $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Sue Homewood:eads\slhomewood
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
Latitude: Longitude:
36.163331-80.094621
Processing Information u
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Forsyth
Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes IT No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
Is this a courtesy copy notification?*

r Yes r No
ID#
20210719
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date
4/8/2021
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:
Gick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
Abington DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form.pdf
File type rust be FCF
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
r Yes
r No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
Version
1
52.17KB
58 - Utility Line Activities for Water and Other Substances (frequently used)
13 - Bank Stabilization
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
W Owner 9 Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Carolina Water Services Inc. of NC (current and proposed easements)
2b. Deed book and page no.:
r Yes r No
r Yes r No

2c. Contact Person:
Travis Dupree, P.E.
2d.Address
Street Address
4944 Parkway Plaza Blvd
Address tine 2
Suite 375
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28217
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
Travis. Dupree@corixcom
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
See owner - also applicant for proposed easements
3b. Business Name:
3c.Address
Street Address
See owner
Address Line 2
City
See owner
Postal / Zip Code
See owner
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
Travis. [e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Philip May
4b. Business Name:
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
4c.Address
Street Address
PO Box 41
Address Line 2
City
Lewisville
Postal / Zip Code
27023
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
phil. may@carolinaeco.00m
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Kernersville
Slate / Rmwe / Region
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
State / R-mince / Region
See owner
Country
See owner
3e. Fax Number:
Slate / Firmwe / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:

2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
See attached plans
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Abington Drive
Address Line 2
City
Kernersville
Fbstal / Zip Code
27284
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Belem Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Roanoke
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030101030303
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
1.3
State / Rovince / Fbgion
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The site is an existing sewer outfall within a built -out residential development. Adjacent land is primarily residential yards along with areas of thin wooded corridor. The current sewer
outfall is primarily on the north side of the stream, and portions of the line are exposed in the stream bed. General land use in the vicinity is residential.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r No r Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.92
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
42 I.f. of intermittent stream, 723 I.f. of perennial stream
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The current sewer outfall is in need of replacement. The parallel stream ("SA" - UT to Belews Creek) has incised and migrated over time. Several segments of the existing outfall have
been exposed and the stream bank is eroding behind one manhole. The proposed replacement outfall would be constructed along the south side of the stream, within existing
easement as much as practical, vnth additional easement being acquired where needed. In addition, stormwater drainage currently affecting the stream and banks in several locations is
being addressed through outlet reconfiguration, bank stabilization, and a plunge pool at a pipe outlet under Abington Drive.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The proposed project will replace the existing sewer outfall from Abington Drive to a manhole approximately 760 feet downstream along the UT to Belem Creek (SA). The project will
involve replacing both the existing outfall and several connecting service lines. Existing pipe segments within the stream channel will be cut and removed, while pipe within the stream
bank will be cut, plugged and taken out of service. The project will replace the existing 8 inch pipe with new pipe of the same diameter.
Stabilization, consisting of riprap underlain by filter fabric (see attached plans), is proposed in areas of severe erosion and unstable banks. This includes an existing plunge pool at the
outlet of the pipe under Abington Drive, several segments of stream bank including the confluence of a small intermittent feature (SB) with the UT to Belews Creek (SA). Additional
stabilization is proposed at the utility stream crossings to ensure banks remain in place after construction. Other areas, while consisting of relative steep banks, have some vegetative
stabilization and rooted trees. The project has been designed to minimize tree removal, which would decrease bank stability.
Two existing stormwater outlets from the south would discharge within the proposed utility easement. These outlets will be piped past the proposed corridor in order to avoid future
erosion. Due to the limited distance between the sewer corridor and the stream, the discharges will be routed through riprap directly to the stream. They are currently undermining the
floodplain and banks of the stream.
The proposed project would have 8 stream impacts and one wetland impact. Impact details can be seen on the attached Impact Exhibit. The proposed stream impacts would constitute a
total of 369 linear feet and 5,664 square feet of permanent stream impact, with no loss of stream function. Permanent stream impacts would be a result of rip rap installation belowthe
existing stream grade to protect the sewer lines and prevent scour. The project would also have a total of 0.038 acre of temporary impact and 0.055 acre of permanent wetland impact,
with no loss of Waters of the US. All permanent wetland impacts are associated with the clearing and conversion of forested wetlands into herbaceous wetlands within the proposed
maintenance/access corridors. Forested wetlands within the limits of disturbance but outside of the proposed permanent access corridor would be cleared for construction and then
allowed to regenerate forest vegetation. All impact areas will be returned to existing grade after installation of the waterline with the exception of manholes per the plans attached.
Sediment and erosion control measure would be implemented according to NC requirements, and approved by NCDEMLR prior to implementation. Jurisdictional areas adjacent to
construction areas would be clearly marked with protection fencing or other similar methods to avoid inadvertent encroachment. Copies of permits and impact areas would be provided
to the prime contractor and all subcontractors working in or near jurisdictional areas. Land clearing would take place along with installation of erosion control devices. Construction
would be accomplished using typical equipment including excavators and backhoes for trench construction. Additional standard equipment may be used as required.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes
r No
r Unknown

Comments:
Delineation was performed on 3/12/21. Requesting delineation concurrence in conjunction with this
PCN.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown f N/A
Corps AID Number:
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Preston Butler & Phil May
Agency/Consultant Company: Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes r No
Are anyother NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed projector related activity?
No additional work is planned at this time for the remaining portions of the outfall, but future maintenance/replacement of other segments may be required at some point in the future.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
W Wetlands W Streams -tributaries ❑ Buffers
r Open Waters f Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
P��
2a1 Reason (?) 2b. Impact type * (?) 2c. Type of W.2d. W. name 2e.Forested* 2f.Typeof 2g. Impact
Jurisdicitton*(?) area*
W1
Maintenance Corridor
P
Headwater Forest
WA
Yes
Corps
0.055
(acres)
W1
Construction Access
T
Headwater Forest
WA
Yes
Corps
0.038
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.038
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.093
21. Comments:
Permanent corridor is proposed as 20 ft in width.
3. Stream Impacts
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.055
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type *
3c. Type of impact*
S. name *
3e. Stream Type *
3f. Type of
3g. S. width *
3h. Impact
❑
]3d.
(?)
Jurisdiction*
length*
Unlit Crossing
Y 9P
Permanent
Stabilization JSA
Perennial
Cor s
Average (feet)
(lirearfeet)
Utility Crossing
Y 9P
Permanent
Stabilization JSA
Perennial
Cor s
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeel)
Utility Crossing
Y 9P
Permanent
Stabilization JSA
Perennial
Cor s
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeel)
Unlit Crossing
Y 9P
Permanent
Stabilization JSA
Perennial
Cor s
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeel)
S5
Stabilization
Permanent
Stabilization
SB
Intermittent
Corps6
21
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
Utilit Crossing
Y 9P
Permanent
Stabilization JSA
Perennial
Cor s
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)

Unlit Crossing
Y 9P
Permanent
Stabilization ��SA
Perennial
Cor s
Average (feet)
(lin�rfeet)
S8
Stabilization
Permanent
Stabilization ��SA
Perennial
Corps
P
6
Average (feet)
56
(liriearfeet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
369
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
369
31. Total temporary stream impacts:
3j. Comments:
Streams impacts at sites 4, 6, and 7 are combined NWP 58 and 13 impacts. Stream impacts broken out by NWP at these sites as follows
Site 4: 20 If NWP 58, 77 If NWP 13
Site 6: 20 If NWP 58, 30 If NWP 13
Site 7: 20 If NWP 58, 63 If NWP 13
122 total linear feet utility (MP 58) and 247 total linear feet stabilization (NWP 13).
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation v
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The proposed sewer has been realigned to provide a maximum practical distance from the stream channel, while minimizing encroachment into
adjacent residential lots. The lots on the north side of the stream are very close to the channel. The proposed sewer is designed on the south side of
the stream where additional room is available with less impact to residences. Limits of disturbance of the project are being minimized through
jurisdictional areas, including temporary construction access areas, and the maintained corridor is limited to 20 feet Wide. Stream bank stabilization
measures have been designed to address existing issues, while minimizing the removal of trees in the stream bank.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
A temporary pump -around would be utilized to dewater streams Within proposed impact areas during construction (see attached engineering details).
Best management practices and sedimentation and erosion control methods will be used throughout construction. No equipment or maintenance
activities Will occur adjacent to jurisdictional areas, With the exception of addressing emergency equipment failure. All temporary impacts to
jurisdictional wetlands and streams during construction will be returned to their original configuration and seeded in a timely manner for stabilization.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Total permanent impact to wetlands is less than 0.10 acre and does not typically require mitigation under a NWP 58. The permanent impact will result in conversion rather than loss of
aquatic resources. Stream stabilization is proposed as permanent, with no loss of WOTUS, and therefore not require mitigation.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:
The project is located in the Roanoke River Basin. This basin is not under the jurisdiction of NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
The project is a sewer infrastructure project with impervious areas limited to manholes. No increase of stormwater compared to existing conditions is anticipated. Stabilization along the
stream will be limited to addressing existing stormwater concerns. Two current stormwater outfalls will be piped through the utility corridor and discharged into the stream in areas of
proposed reinforcement. No additional stormwater will be added to these outfalls. Riparian areas Will be stabilized and graded to address current subsiding where the discharges occur
I G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*

r' Yes C No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No additional development is anticipated to result from the project as there is no anticipated change in service area.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
This project is an existing private sewer system and ties into the existing Abington Kenwood sewer system. No additional capacity is required for the
project.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?'
r Yes r No
r Unknown
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation online mapper. Accessed 9/2/2021.
NCNHP Data Explorer online mapper. Accessed 9/2/2021.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
https://w,Aw.fisheries. noaa. gov/resource/map/esse ntia I -fish -habitat -ma ppe r
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
HPOWEB Map Service http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpov4eb/
The project is contained within an existing developed subdivision width residential yards on either side of the stream. Undisturbed wooded areas are
limited.

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year flood plain?*
F Yes f• No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
Forsyth County FEMA GIS floodplain mapping, North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program
http://mwv. ncflood maps. co nd
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one
file when possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
dick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Abington_PCN_CompiledAttachments.pdf 11.46MB
File mist be FCF a IM
Comments
Signature
*
W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Philip May
Signature
CAW6w-1
Date
9/22/2021

ID#* 20210719 Version* 1
Regional Office * Winston-Salem Regional Office - [phone]
Reviewer List* Sue Homewood
Pre -Filing Meeting Request submitted 4/8/2021
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Contact Name* Philip May
Contact Email Address* [e-mail]
Project Name* Abington Drive Outfall Replacement
Project Owner* Carolina Water Service, Inc. of NC
Project County* Forsyth
Owner Address: Street Address
4944 Parkway Plaza Blvd, Ste 375
Address Line 2
aty
State / Province / Pegion
Charlotte
NC
Postal / Zip axle
Country
28217
USA
Is this a transportation project?* r Yes (' No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - F 401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular Express
F- Individual Permit F- Modification
F Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
C Yes (-- No
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Sue Homewood
Please give a brief project description below and include location information.*
Replacement of about 1000 feet of e)asting sewer that is beginning to
fail with some segments now located in the stream due to erosion
located in the stream . Main line will be moved out of the stream with
several tie-ins to e)asting services. See attached preliminary plan -
subject to change and wetlands/stream banks being added.

Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.
4/19/2021
4/26/2021
Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
190039-REV.ESM'T TUCKER PROPERTY.pdf 2.85MB
pdf only
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
1 understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
1 also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature
Submittal Date 4/8/2021

�1CAROLINA
V ECOSYSTEMS P.O. Box 41, Lewisville NC 27023
P:919-606-1065 — F:919-585-5570
September 7, 2021
Ms. Jean Gibby
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
RE: Pre -Construction Notification for Nationwide Permit 13 & 58, and Individual Water
Quality Certification
Abington Drive Outfall Replacement
Forsyth County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Gibby;
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc. (CEI), in conjunction with Davis, Martin, and Powell (DMP), has
prepared the associated electronic Pre -Construction Notification (e-PCN) on behalf of Carolina
Water Services Inc. of NC in order to acquire a Section 404 Nationwide Permit 13 and 58 and a
Section 401 Individual Water Quality Certification for the above -referenced project. The project
consists of a replacement of a failing sewer outfall along a severely incised stream channel.
Additional bank stabilization is proposed to address current erosion, minimize encroachment on
adjacent residences, and prevent future stream migration into the proposed sewer corridor.
This e-PCN is being submitted along with the following exhibits:
1. CEI Agent Authorization
2. DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form
3. Wetland Delineation Information
4. Construction Plans and Impact Exhibit
5. NCNHP Site Report
This information, along with the associated e-PCN, are being submitted for your review of this
project. A copy of this application is also being provided to the NC Division of Water Resources
for their review.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at your earliest
convenience at [phone] or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
l G%
Philip May
Senior Environmental Scientist
Cc: Paul Wcjoski, NC DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Michael Goliber, DMP, PE
Lynda Jensen, Carolina Water Services Inc. of NC

"IMM"Im -WWMCWVWW
Carolina Water Service
May 24, 2021
Mr. Phil May
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
3040 NC-42
Clayton, NC 27520
Dear Mr. May,
Carolina Water Services of NC is undertaking replacement of the existing sewer outfall at Abington Drive
in Kernersville NC. The project will occur within existing easements and new easements to be acquired
on multiple properties as shown in the attached plans and listed below.
Carolina Water Services is coordinating with all owners and will acquire appropriate access for
construction as needed. DMP, Inc. and Carolina Ecosystems, Inc. are working on behalf of Carolina
Water Services to design and permit these projects and are authorized to act as agents in
communication with federal and state agencies as needed.
Affected Properties:
Owner 1, PIN 6878-60-6377
Owner 2, PIN 6878-60-5448
Owner 2, PIN 6878-60-3696
If you have any questions, please contact me at 864-395-3571.
Cc: Lynda Jensen, Project Manager
Sincerely,
Travis Dupree
VP, Project Management & Engineering
Carolina Water Service, Inc. of North
Carolina
Carolina Water Service of North Carolina
4944 Parkway Plaza Blvd, Suite 375 Charlotte, NC 28217 P: 800-367-4314 F: 866-842-8348
www.corix.com

ID#* 20210719 Version* 1
Regional Office * Winston-Salem Regional Office - [phone]
Reviewer List* Sue Homewood
Pre -Filing Meeting Request submitted 4/8/2021
............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Contact Name* Philip May
Contact Email Address* [e-mail]
Project Name* Abington Drive Outfall Replacement
Project Owner* Carolina Water Service, Inc. of NC
Project County* Forsyth
Owner Address: Street Address
4944 Parkway Plaza Blvd, Ste 375
Address Line 2
aty
State / Province / Pegion
Charlotte
NC
Postal / Zip axle
Country
28217
USA
Is this a transportation project?* r Yes (' No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - F 401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular Express
F- Individual Permit F- Modification
F Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
C Yes (-- No
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Sue Homewood
Please give a brief project description below and include location information.*
Replacement of about 1000 feet of e)asting sewer that is beginning to
fail with some segments now located in the stream due to erosion
located in the stream . Main line will be moved out of the stream with
several tie-ins to e)asting services. See attached preliminary plan -
subject to change and wetlands/stream banks being added.

Please give a couple of dates you are available for a meeting.
4/19/2021
4/26/2021
Please attach the documentation you would like to have the meeting about.
190039-REV.ESM'T TUCKER PROPERTY.pdf 2.85MB
pdf only
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
1 understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
1 also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature
Submittal Date 4/8/2021

IN
M.
C.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Abington Drive
City, State:
Kernersville, NC
County: Forsyth
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): Various - Additional easements to
REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Philip M
Mailing Address: 3040 NC Highway 42 W
Clayton, NC 27520
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Carolina Water Services Inc. of NC
Mailing Address: 4944 Parkway Plaza Blvd, Suite 375
Charlotte, NC 28217
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
See Agent Authorization Letter
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner Z Authorized Agents
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 1 • 3 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
36.164260
Longitude:-80.095294
zA legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.almy.mil/Missions/Re ug latory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F4Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
W1 Vicinity Map
zAerial Photograph
z USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
FJ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
8 Please see hM2://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latoiy-Permit-Proaram/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, ifinformation is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Phil May -Carolina Ecosystems, Inc. 3040 NC Hwy 42 W, Clayton, NC 27520
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Forsyth city: Kernersville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 36.163331 Long.:-80.094621
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: UT to Belews Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
SA
36.164106
-80.095110
723
Non -wetland waters
404
S B
36.164353
-80.095182
42
Non -wetland waters
404
WA
36.164621
-80.095905
0.09
Wetland
404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:Vicinity Map
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
■❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: West Belews (2019) 1:24000
FEW Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Forsyth County MRCS Soil Survey (1976), Sheet 19
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
■❑ Photographs: ■❑ Aerial (Name & Date): 2018 NC Statewide Aerial Photography
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
09/07/21
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
t Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

RPf
N
i
t
A�
9�
4
0
y'
y
W al kertown
x
8
m x
C
Q m
a
a
x
rnaL, .V,gy School RU
Latitude: 36.164260 / Longitude:-80.095294
Forsyth County, NC
N
.. AROLINA
�ECOSYSTEMS Miles
0 0.5 1
September 2021
Qa
N
A c,
d
-V G
�6
I
15
I
i
I
I
t
I
lI
i
I
I
I
I
to
to
I�
I �?
I
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
I
I
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
II
I,
I
Kemersyille
tl`
sloes 4?rah?
I
_ O
R
v7 Ir,dus[rial P.vrk pr
I
I
I
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan,.
Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (ThailaV#O}
NC-3LCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Co unity
Abington Drive
Outfall Replacement
Study Area
ESR1 Street Map Basemap
Figure 1: Vicinity Map

■
• }• ■
■
% r .
' rti
:r ■
1' r• •
■
%
•r %
1 1� ■
■ 1
1F
■
■
■
-
1
r ■ ■
•� ■
■
- r•r
■
■ r ■
6 ■
■
N Abington Drive
C)CAROLINA Study Area Outfall Replacement
ECOSYSTEMS Feet Forsyth County, NC
0 100 200
September 2021 West Belews (2019) US Geological Figure 2: USGS Map
Survey 1:24000 Quadrangle Map

nti CARU,iNA
CJECOSYSTEMS Feet Study Area
0 200 400
September 2021 1 - I Forsyth County Soil Survey (1976), Sheet 19
Abington Drive
Outfall Replacement
Figure 4: NRCS Map

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#. 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.•
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph5-2a)
Project/Site: Abington Sewer City/County: Forsyth Sampling Date: 03/30/21
Applicant/Owner: DMP State: NC Sampling Point: WA Wet
Investigator(s): P. Butler Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.164470 Long:-80.095697 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: MaF - Madison fine sandy loam NWI classification: PFO
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
—Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 10
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA Wet
Absolute
Dominant
Indicato
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Acer rubrum
40
Yes
FAC
2. Ulmus americana
10
No
FACW
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
15
Yes
FACW
4.
5.
6.
7.
65
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
33
20% of total cover:
13
Saolino/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
1.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
10
Yes
FACW
2.
Ligustrum sinense
5
Yes
FACU
3.
Fagus grandifolia
2
No
FACU
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
17
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
9
20% of total cover:
4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1.
Rubus argutus
15
Yes
FACU
2.
Lonicera japonica
40
Yes
FACU
3.
Carex lurida
5
No
OBL
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
60
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
30
20% of total cover:
12
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
1.
Smilax rotundifolia
15
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
15
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
8
20% of total cover:
3
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
57.1% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species 5
x 1 = 5
FACW species 35
x 2 = 70
FAC species 55
x 3 = 165
FACU species 62
x 4 = 248
UPL species 0
x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 157 (A) 488 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.11
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
-3 Prevalence Index is :s3.0'
_4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WA Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-1
10YR 4/4
100
Loamy/Clayey
1-6
10YR 5/6
90
5YR 4/6 10 C PUM
Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
6-14
10YR 5/1
85
5YR 4/6 15 C PUM
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1;
_Thick Dark Surface (At 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
—Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control#. 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.•
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR335-15, paragraph5-2a)
Project/Site: Abington Sewer City/County: Forsyth Sampling Date: 03/30/21
Applicant/Owner: DMP State: NC Sampling Point: WA Up
Investigator(s): P. Butler Section, Township, Range: N/A
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 2-4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 36.164319 Long:-80.095465 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: MaF - Madison fine sandy loam NWI classification: -
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
—High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
—Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA Up
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2. Fagus grandifolia
3. Liriodendron tulipifera
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 38
Saolina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Carpinus caroliniana
2. Fagus grandifolia
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Absolute
Dominant
% Cover
Species?
30
Yes
15
Yes
30
Yes
'laicaior
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2 (A)
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
25.0% (A/B)
75 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 15
15 Yes FAC
10 Yes FACU
25 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 13 20% of total cover: 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5
1. Podophyllum peltatum
2. Lonicera japonica
3. Rosa multiflora
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
ii
50% of total cover: 40
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
40 Yes
20 Yes
20 Yes
80 =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
FACU
FACU
FACU
16
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_2 Dominance Test is >50%
_3 Prevalence Index is :s3.0'
_4 Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: WA Up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
5-12 10YR 5/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1;
_Thick Dark Surface (At 2)
_Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
—Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Coast Prairie Redox (At6)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

V
Z
O
z
V
w
z
a�
w
V
—
U
.>
--
QLu
n
d
�
V
w
CD
>
IEI -
c�
ry
Q
ol
o
o
a�
W
LL
0
0 w
(�
�_ U
U
W C/)
�D
�
z �'
O4-1
L
O
o D
IL <
IL a
IL
Q
7
L
0
w
V o
LU
L U
C7 5
AW
a
�
z
0
a
Z
z
-
J
m
Q
O
ry
a
V

u`ro
o'�
o � W$ a ym`o �<gm =21 '2lw
56<
wu=1 v w^5^
a _ �m _ - u�q € _ �40 $do`o= obs a�wY tl�y
wok mom - ado 5_ - - uw� z✓5h-< 5���.a Z N F
__ _ _ d_ '�q w w
z�m a 3o - - _ m�i�` wb`'; �:i e�a~p�0§25 O Z U F
�� - -m�< W dz =o o wso E Hg w G
o o <mp wgw.`w _ d H
o a�� _<i `doe`s `�w�<€NZ Rw�
Emgp-loga Z w Z
USSU
0.
>�S � p - _ - - - `�ma - - <�' 'dda2W� & ss aea F G >
_ ��Yp�d� -&�8 '' � de Y aid_ wpm � ���� e� - - �$ o �3 a� %m�' N Z
o a'o NWk= -% - ��'< o8W - `<$ "- =_boa "-gyp ma - Hinz-&o w s" p 0R44 � 3 o cn
�zl_< mo'=� a� - 68o s g�= ggo _F o g=o pd�y zdW'w - � �
w€gip=a �mwd ��H �tlsgN es Q N > w
�muobLL� - - w€�- m uo- '< - -" F ow��p S€ sg �a < > z
a3 samFo _ o � - u _ w __w = _ =arc you wS � �e
m _ Ou �i m<vVi<ur <oo; usu ✓Ti< <'�'3rmmu win m'�'m�u�iu`o umo—o om� ram Q Q
fmumamu NE ryu 3uma�muamu n<mm Z W
Z
O
O Q Z
g Q N Z
3 U m
a
z
5 ;
aaaa
w IL
z�Qo� V
w w=1M.
oNa�w��w
�U
d
a �, -
a
[> ] O
3IW83W3M 01 r'! <
a3
dW�
-
o
U W
`6 O
p 1�1 W
2
81
s -m - -
€No� asp - - -_
oz
o= "Mop=oo=
W
x T p p- w s�mZW<opw' �p
oz
l o i B bBa ff_H H mN ffi -z�'ffim<m=sa�oWpN;'�oz < gmmw'o Jo C. ®Doo®a0 �'wN<:a ma'
a s a s i s
A®a®caa zee s I QS
g.oIm "m<
_Sp -Sy Wmw
we
mo = _ E=z�wo®®zaoo F
��€ w€�w `m m somam «

S
«o
,im aRPy fS
Woo' mn 3�]rLSC`J
� I
� bWb��o '''yyygyl
2Pm�Mo g�'
quo
I
VE. s6 pW o
win
u tl� �j�MI I o.01 ry3l
J
I
1,W53 Mb3tl -.
c
\
IJ
Nbba
a
I
J � I cis
s
I
8

F--
o�
Cl) Y
0 H w
u
<
3dId ,99 In—
o cl)
—o N ISI— (310— IVNOIIdO HlIM) Lu
401—HOd-1 10 'ldll Xo u [If :�t .... _ .... N 8 NOIIDNnr maims
A 3_� , 5; [--
DN—a allVaNVLS —Old <
cle 3: o
w w , o
Cl)
< <
o
8
ID
u mn
o ��cws .w w� E -
N iM, 5
r-). 7I; I]
IW: uj
Hg1l
g
IE
aN
s "H 'ATINVI" 01 SlAia (310H
tlxnotltlo Xo No
NO—HOd—, IUO 'Ald No 313
N l3Nnr H3NG3
A 3—HP tlOd DINim— avaNVIS —0.
�v
. . . . . . . . .
N . . .
4
TM
Is
fil 3T
_eF
IL
Z.

z
ro �
s y\ �� NJ1JNgV
i,rvs3 unu�
� 3abrvroao , £
I ,ryyll I
l
a
N YD
io
g000z�
II
- I
=I
<� s
M
_s
1
_
�
.a4n
QmR o
z�
�paneeind
w xr
F
.
oa
1,
I
� M
of
i
�
I
I
r
�
I
wl
I
I �
El
U Z
Z W
(n F
m WO H W
1 q zWwJ
w�wo
r I >�d
5; 0
N K Z
w O
N K � O U
Q N j O
_ p >�0
o O
R Z I z w
Z O
� N (7
a z
U Q
IE
o
m
-
- S
0
}
O W
z=
-
• W _
� Z
_ r
� 3
Z
W
z-r I

�A
Iry
_ A
ai 2 N O Z O
8s'
LLi
o
O d J U
> Q
3: O Q
c7
oga V \I �& �k\\ U m
�
1 CONi. ESM'T �em
Ll
i.rvs3 unu� � �
W
g Q a < s .o -
Q w
-� I
1.
d o II/ bONNa mm, W .-.6 0 1
^� O
�Oo�a 9fa1 O� a3ltl9n 0� g0 `. Q " kasp�s'm z — �% !
w
----------- s
Z
2amRho W a }k EJ
<Z .. 7
�o
--' saw
/ems m� Y J1
w =¢o �
z _ -
1

OLL
ao� z W�om
-� o -anz_ _<_ 3 m g
- -op- -W - Is' wa< =�m�No z "% a -w"=mm z w
s-€ate m� 3 <oo«Y m� sPoo�pWo w - _N`6>�< O Z U Q
�� mo Z." � �� amp - - w -
_ w'<zz _ iap F ace u zg�o� Z j w
�m _ohs a< - - _m€ �g'$patl. z w - w o of o
�� - - - - o �� - - _ - z ¢ z� rc<ao4co�w o Z
F< 3kz _<$<6; _Z. 3�`�wc a o y w - `' c) w Q
ego 0 oY' w€e - `: msm;a 3�a J� z a ¢o. - - - a w p H
s� mho eon < <� ;=g w w
o� - oE� �m��N z� womm$LLw u2i a " &o 'o`<'z Q �
m _ 31<aH�"Sa
F _ a a o .�H =_Z.
_mYvW�� <a�opxu3<`�' - psm<m'uu�W;wa w zZ Z Z Z
gg
- m w- os -sad �; _" dN _ - ff =<' o a a
<_«� A Izcsa "x - - gossaNz� �«eaomo a cn Z
m « < u m
a
as
'via 3dld Z/l .rv- ,9 W 3dld Z/l
ry ,f M. S
as IZo€a 31111-II-111IIIIIIIIIN - -- F }
atlo W wir"'s�r�
z� PIPE
QBEMENT - o EwaL. o^
o
_ow_» o
m s z o
--
_ a
z m
�m� m a
Zd
w� o < - m " m
„I,.,dB bNl, m -Prp a a IE - a N W a W W =w I=
�: o$oo Im �N s� Nma�m= -_
J - - - o aam ---QSmo%m6 a
6. 0- m "<g aH oar=8w
gH-
.�as�¢OVEN
H- sow
=a""aFo�s w '�
z
m m
a �p ka o N
'OFF
W.a - = o
. w W n w
z w
p
w V] z
C7 5
- � Z
1
o z
oz
a W
ozw
-m�rcNjz N -
p ° �' \ ° mk' -=z apN� F•o oaf"zeu
��
in >�u - G�
•. 9 x0 m<m�aa FOWm oam Z, way
r x
< 'niry o
_ z m p'
o m< <
a3sla
z z,W "� €� ohs a
�oNo:�N a'p aft
mai3��<bz'
Z.
00
w m" rvaa _ 7 w
ha _5�' ¢
.-M d �� Ilgmz 5o " 5
g �atl=o J p Q -za ad
pQ mW�?z�$��mc�ww mz
" ,q oSmd' 11
o w46e«
=
z
��z z
�
a

C,
OLL
Z
o
n i LL fn E
as �'n Q O W Q J
�_ _W Z w d a
Lu
zkpp - o g s4 Rig Q O
Of
O € F Z w 0 Z
o� rc�?m�_>m_e=as Zg5d N W w U
Of
0
W a Ws.'� �sW$ Q a Z o
3 - w C U
=.0 o 9 ¢ z
a_m�<m_mmm�m�m r U ¢
��
a a n n v iri mn .65 P zsk'
raW
Z 3 v�i
� w
J rc
W rc
D_ oz
_Z.8 _ k 40
m CaC II —I I IIR II 3 s, CL
_ �F IE
E cn�ba „ € w� €x Z -
4tl3 Y j g p V: CD-
h
W W bs 4 Z
Of p _
6 G C G 6 6 off CD 33 tj
N
5gk as Ul
LL �tl'z_.s4 $
UI `!L eY5'"s 'ion W Fy
—11 Sg �� N e EG8 a US 0
I=111,= =I aag �e
�a=�o=1ll�J1=1 k lll a�
III—III—III—III=�=n=11
�W
a- i I I I I—_ I I IE I11=1 ' I I I M w
< = I 1=1 u= I I 1=1 11=1I 1=I 11=1I v� w
-llJ-�U—WEIll=W=
I—III—�W�=III=II—III—III—I N � — r
11=I I�=1=1I I� I1=1I1=1I g
=III=III=III=III=11 � Z
11=1 I L� .1=I l is I EI I —111 A w
1=1 I 1=1 11=111=1 I I-1T1-1T1-11
11=111�11=1
11
i 1�I11-- 111-11=111-111=111-11 a
1 -to
� zY
g: o Y1
ge
J
H 4 U
Z
W tl LW 5� W
J U
FA
UI 3
z i= u
� � e5

]I ■■■
■■ ■ NC DEPARTMENT OF
■■i■i NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
September 7, 2021
Brian Smith
Carolina Ecosystems
3040 NC 42 W
Clayton, NC 27520
RE: Abington Drive Outfall Replacement
Dear Brian Smith:
Roy Cooper, Governor
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Wager Clark
Director, Division of land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-15633
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler�ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPAR7HEN7 OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1691 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27609
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

\
M
\
\
\
\
\
\
2
s
s
7
a
v
e
e
v
r.
\
/
3®
3
3
3
3
e
±
4
\
3
d
\
/
\c
e
e
\
�
\
\
M
\
/
~
®
�
E
s
k
\
u
e
e
e
e
\
\
M
2\\
m
s
s
s
s
g
g
D-
u
§
u
/
\ \
e
/ %
s
/
t
\\
E\
o
e
3
e
42
°/®
\i\®
G
a
§
%
M
\
Q0
/ / /
\
/
/
/
/
/
±
/ -
\\//
e
>
\
\
\
\
z\
2
/}\/
g
\`%/v
v
v
v
\
\
s
\
.
\\
\
Z
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
E
e
\
<
<
<
\
0
±
±
<
\
D
\
_
2
e
<
g
g
e
/
\
\
\
\ � �
e
t
\
t
n
e
\
/
%
\
\ \
--E
Cl
\ \
\
=
3
n
± 3 3
\
o
/ /
/
\
(
\ \
§
/ /
/ \
\
\
/
g
\
E
c
`
® D-
%
�
»
§
e
/
%>
o>-
t
? t
e
t
e
\ t
e
§
§
E
\
2
E
2
\
m
E
\ \
LL
\ \ /
/
/
w
/
§
w®
(
/
cn
\
/
®
®Y
\
/
t
° ®
t
/ °
\
M
/
»
\
u
g
% »
°
o
\
/
2 �.<
\
2
— t
/
\ ^ t
/ \ ^
e
~
.k
t
e
=
/
y
x °
E
}
±
° \ y D-
x y
\ o
e
= ° \ o
e = \
.�
/
0
s
= e.2
°
u
»
2
\ c ®y
9 z
> E.J
/ \ y E.J
/ y
/
r E
u
/
E
/
- e>
\ y
\
/
e>± a
y \ / /
z±
/ /
2 2
/ /
E
/
z.e -o s
/ y / /
E z a
/ / /
4
\
s
\
E$
E /
2
/
y
\
z
m
e
a
/
/ /
\
\ -
-0
%
\
\
®
\
®
®
E
4 %
/
\ /
\
\
\
\
\
z
/
/ y
a
(
/
\
\ /
_
\
\
u
%
t J
}
/ \ \
\
>
>
>
>
>
>
/
% »
<
< — g
2
E
/(0
\\u\2\
\
z
_\_\
2 E
2
E
_\
2 E
_\
2 E
_\
2
E
_\
2
E
2/
7\
»»`
E
E
D E
2
E
D E
D E
D
E
D
E
2
D
//«$
Ea)
e
j/
% o
c
o
% o
% o
%
o
%
o
e»
e.k
a e
e
c e±%/
353
z u
z
u
Ze
Ze
Ze
Ze
Zs42
xxZeco
§
\
c

/
/
ra
s
\
c

>y e
}
01
§
\
/