20191692 Ver 4_Revised BPDP_20210920

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20191692 Version*4
.....................................
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 09/21/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal -9/20/2021
....................................................................................................................................................................................................
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* O Yes fJ No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands 17 Buffer IZ Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Raymond Holz [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#:* 20191692 Version:*4
Existing IDl# Existing Version
Project Type: r DMS 0' Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Raleigh Farm
County: Wake
Document Information
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: 2019-1692 V4 Phase A Raleigh
44.87MB
Farm_BPDP_2021-09-20_.pdf
Rease upload only one R]Fof the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Raymond Holz
Signature:*

Bank Parcel Development Package
RALEIGH FARM — PHASE A
NUTRIENT OFFSET AND BUFFER MITIGATION BANK PARCEL
Neuse River Basin
DWR ID#: 2019-1692 V4
---.__
.�, ;
' 1
� M` z
...*txtroz,,...
x h
" - -- .-1.t..v.,—•,,„_..-.,:4.t17--,,,,,,:.. ,--. ---2.:- - --, _,, , .,, • -?Y. b
"p was r "'
•::,., .. ,,.....,,, , ,,..„,: .
. .,..:,',‘'..t.., :,,-•:.•,,,,,,,, • .,,, ' •, . -
-.
Bank Parcel Sponsor
Restoration Systems, LLC
Y' POC: Barrett Jenkins
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
RRaleigh, NC 27604
RFSTORATk) [e-mail]
SYS'1'LMS I LLC 919.755.9490
September 20, 2021

Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction 1
1.1 Bank Sponsor 2
1.2 Project Location & Fee-Simple Ownership 2
1.3 Directions to Parcel from Raleigh• 3
1.4 Parcel Overview 3
1.5 Historic Land Use 5
2.0 Project Area-Current Conditions 6
2.1 Physiography 6
2.2 Soils 6
2.3 Existing Vegetative Communities 6
2.4 Parcel Design and Implementation Constraints 7
2.4.1 Threatened and Endangered Species 9
2.4.2 Cultural Resources 9
3.0 Restoration Plan 9
3.1 Project Schedule 11
3.2 Permitting 11
3.3 Planting Plan 12
3.3.1 Permanent Seed Mix 12
3.4 Parcel Protection & Easement Boundaries 12
3.5 As-Built Report 13
4.0 Monitoring and Maintenance Plan 13
4.1 Monitoring Protocol & Success Criteria 13
4.2 Parcel Maintenance 13
4.3 Maintenance Areas 14
4.4 Long Term Management Plan 14
5.0 Financial Assurance 14
6.0 Mitigation Potential 15
7.0 References 16
Tables
Table 1. Bank Parcel Easement Tracts 1
Table 2. Bank Parcel Fee Simple Ownership (Project Parcels) 2
Table 3. Phase A Project Features Descriptions 3
Table 4.Timeline of Land Use 5
Table 5. Parcel Soils 6
Table 6. Reference Forest Ecosystem 7
Table 7. Documented and Recorded Parcel Constraints & Design Avoidance 8
Table 8. Restoration Plan Activities 10
Table 9. Project Schedule 11
Table 10. Summary of Temporary Impacts 11
Table 11. Proposed Hardwood Bare Root Planting Plan by Species 12
Table 12. NRRRF Groundwater Monitoring Locations, Within the Site 14
Table 13. Credit Table-Raleigh Farm Bank Parcel - Phase A, 2019-1692v4, Project Credits 17
Raleigh Farm-Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4) Table of Contents
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

Appendices
Appendix A: Figures& Photos
Figure 1—Parcel Location and Service Area
Figure 2—Parcel Easements and Features
Figure 3—USGS Topography
Figure 4—NRCS Soil Survey
Figure 5—Current Conditions
Figure 6—NRRRF & Proposed Project Footprint
Figure 7—Biosoild Application Fields
Figure 8—Restoration Plan
Figure 9—Credit Determinations (Figures 9A-9D)
Figure 10—Monitoring Plan
Existing Conditions Photos
Appendix B: DWR Correspondence
Appendix C: USDA, NRCS Web Soil Survey Report
Appendix D: EDR Report
Appendix E: USFWS Report
Appendix F: NC NHP and NC SHPO Correspondence
Raleigh Farm—Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4) Table of Contents
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

Bank Parcel Development Package
Raleigh Farm Phase A—Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Wake County, NC—Neuse River Basin
1.0 Introduction
The Raleigh Farm Phase A Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel ("Parcel" or "Site") is
proposed under the terms and conditions of the Raleigh Farm Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset
Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument, made and entered into on , 20_, by Restoration
Systems, LLC(RS),acting as Bank Sponsor(Sponsor),and the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality(NCDEQ), Division of Water Resources(DWR).The Parcel shall be planned and designed according
to the MBI, the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295, which became effective on
November 1, 2015, and the Nutrient Offset Credit Trading Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
Located in Wake County,the Parcel encompasses 77.07 acres of agricultural land and forests.The primary
purpose of the Parcel is to provide Riparian Buffer Credit (RBC) and Nutrient Offset Credits (NOC) for
stormwater and wastewater permitting requirements within the United States Geological Survey (USGS)
Cataloging Unit 03020201— RBC and NOC are available for offsets within the Cataloging Unit, excluding
the Falls Lake Watershed (Figure 1, Appendix A). The Site will restore 45.027 acres and preserve 22.856
acres of riparian area, measured perpendicularly 200 feet off the top of bank, from eight (8) unnamed
tributaries and one (1) in-line pond (Site Features)(Figure 2-5,Appendix A).An additional 9.187 acres will
be permanently protected within the conservation easement but will not generate credit.The 9.187 acres
consist of areas beyond 200-feet from Site Features, the footprint of Site Features, and non-credited
access/maintenance areas within the conservation easement.
The Site is situated on two tracts of land (Project Parcels), owned by the City of Raleigh (City). Project
Parcels are part of the City's Neuse River Resource Recovery Facility (NRRRF) and managed by the City of
Raleigh Public Utilities Department, also known as Raleigh Water.
Site features drain directly to Beddingfield Creek, a direct tributary to the Neuse River. Proposed Parcel
easement tracts will provide permanent protection to restored and preserved riparian buffers—Table 1
details the Site's Easement Areas, with individual and total acreages.
Table 1. Bank Parcel Easement Tracts
Phase Easement Acreage Total Phase
Tract No. Acreage
1 2.14
2 8.62
3 24.64
Phase A 4 3.34 77.07
5 28.88
6 3.32
7 6.13
The City began residual biosolid application on portions of the Project Parcels in 1980 and currently has
1,439 acres permitted for land application of biosolids on the larger farm. Land application of biosolids
has occurred on the parcels since acquired by the City except for the 10-year moratorium between 2003
and 2013.The Site, and proposed easement areas, are located away from fixed infrastructure associated
Raleigh Farm—Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4) Page 1 of 17
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

with the application of biosolids (i.e., application piping and wellheads). In addition to biosolid
applications, the property is managed for hay and row crop production. A review of aerial photography
indicates agricultural areas of the property were converted from forest to agricultural before 1993, with
no significant changes to land use since.
Phase A will have its own credit release schedule for milestones met in accordance with the Raleigh Farm
Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument for Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Credits (UMBI).
DWR representatives conducted onsite determinations for the applicability and suitability of Site Features
on June 2-3, 2020. Respectively, a Stream Determination and Site Viability letter were provided by DWR
on August 17, 2020, and September 24, 2020—both letters are provided in Appendix B.
RS will secure a conservation easement to preserve the Site in perpetuity, restricting any development
that would impair or interfere with the Site's conservation values. City allowance of a conservation
easement is further described in Section 3.4(Parcel Protection &Easement Boundaries)of this document.
Per the referenced Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument(UMBI) above, RS will arrange the transfer of
the conservation easement and its interests in perpetuity to a qualified holder under NC. General Statute
("GS") 121-34 et seq. and 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code before the approval of the As-Built Report
by DWR. The holder shall be a land trust or stewardship program accredited by the Land Trust
Accreditation Commission and/or approved by DWR.A land trust must be certified under 501(c) (3)of the
Internal Revenue Code and must have the qualifications outlined in GS 105-130.24 and GS 105-151.12.
1.1 Bank Sponsor
The Site is proposed by Restoration Systems, LLC(RS). Information for RS is provided below;
Restoration Systems, LLC
Attention: Barrett Jenkins
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
[e-mail]
919.755.9490
1.2 Project Location & Fee-Simple Ownership
The Parcel is located approximately three miles northwest of Clayton,five miles east of Garner, and seven
miles southeast of Raleigh in Wake County, NC. The City is the current fee-simple owner of tracts
associated with the Bank Parcel.The Parcel is within the Neuse River Basin 14-digit USGS Cataloging Unit
03020201100030 of the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain (North Carolina Division of Water Resources [DWR]
Sub-basin Number 03-04-02) (Figure 1, Appendix A). Fee simple ownership and Project Parcel details are
provided in Table 2.
Table 2. Bank Parcel Fee Simple Ownership(Project Parcels)
Owner Name D.B/Pg. NC PIN# Acreage
City of Raleigh 9885/449 1751047213 1462.55
City of Raleigh 11304/106 1740999788 44.34
Raleigh Farm—Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4) Page 2 of 17
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

1.3 Directions to Parcel from Raleigh:
- Head South on N. Blount St.
- Turn left onto Martin Luther King Jr Blvd. (1.1 mi)
- Turn right onto Rock Quarry Rd. (0.2 mi)
- Keep right to stay on Rock Quarry Rd. (7.4 mi)
- Turn left onto Old Baucom Rd. (1.8 mi)
- Latitude, Longitude: 35.698851°, -78.494698°
1.4 Parcel Overview
The Site's footprint totals 77.07 acres over two tracts of land. Current land use is a mixture of managed
fields for biosolid applications from the City's NRRRF, row crop agriculture, and unmanaged hardwood
forests (Figure 2, Appendix A). The Site will provide riparian area restoration and preservation along 14
Project Features that drain directly to Bedingfield Creek, a direct tributary to the Neuse River.
Site Features are devoid of woody vegetation outside of forested areas due to historic and active
agricultural practices. Managed features are maintained (mowed/brush hogged) to keep woody
vegetation from establishing.
DWR representative conducted onsite stream determinations and site viability assessments for mitigation
potential on June 2-3, 2020. A summary of Parcel Features by classification is provided in Tables 3 and
graphically depicted in Figures 2-5 of Appendix A.
Table 3. Phase A Project Features Descriptions
Classification 1Subject Buffer s
Feature to Buffer Riparian Land uses Credit Nutrient
onsite Rule adjacent to Feature(0-200') Viable Offset Viable
Mostly non-forested agricultural Zs Yes(non
1A Ephemeral No fields with some mature forest Yes forested areas
only)
Mostly non-forested agricultural 2 Yes(non
1B Stream Yes Yes forested areas
fields with some mature forest
only)
Combination of non-forested Yes(non-
2A Ephemeral No agricultural fields and mature 2.8 Yes forested areas
forest only)
Combination of non-forested Yes(non-
2B Stream Yes agricultural fields and mature 2.6Yes forested areas
forest only)
Combination of non-forested
agricultural fields and mature
2C forest Yes(non-
Main Stream Yes 2Yes forested
Tributary 2 A gas line is proposed to impact areas only)
stream;existing utilities are
present(Appendix A, Figures)
Raleigh Farm—Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4) Page 3 of 17
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

Table 3. Phase A Project Features Descriptions(Continued)
Classification 1Subject Riparian Land uses Buffer Credit 3Nutrient
Feature onsite to Buffer adjacent to Feature(0-200') Viable Offset Viable
Rule
Combination of non-forested
agricultural fields and mature
forest
Yes(non-
Pond 2 in-line pond * No 'Yes forested areas
Permitted BMP is located along only)
left side of pond and shall not be
included in planting efforts or
areas for credit
3A
(ends at Mostly non-forested agricultural Yes(non-
confluence of Ephemeral No fields with mature forest at the 2,8Yes forested areas
2C/Main Trib) top of reach. only)
4A Ephemeral No Mature forest 2'8Yes No
4B
Combination of non-forested Yes(non-
(ends at Stream Yes agricultural fields and mature 'Yes forested areas
confluence of
5A) forest only)
Combination of non-forested
5A agricultural fields and mature
forest Yes(non-
(continues to Stream Yes 'Yes forested areas
confluence of
A gas line is proposed to impact only)
2C/Main Trib)
stream; existing utilities are
present(Appendix A, Figures)
Combination of non-forested Yes(non-
6A Ephemeral No agricultural fields and mature 2'8Yes forested areas
forest only)
Combination of non-forested
agricultural fields and mature
forest Yes(non-
6B Stream Yes 'Yes forested areas
A gas line is proposed to impact only)
stream; existing utilities are
present(Appendix A, Figures)
7A Not Present No N/A N/A N/A
7B Non-forested agricultural
at DWR flag Stream Yes fields Yes Yes
Combination of non-forested Yes(non-
8A Stream Yes agricultural fields and mature 'Yes forested areas
forest only)
Table 3 footnotes below
Raleigh Farm—Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4) Page 4 of 17
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

Table 3 footnotes:
1 Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated August 17,
2020 using the 1:24,000 scale quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent
printed version of the soil survey map prepared by the NRCS.
2 The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25
percent (25%) of the total area of buffer mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295
(o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3 NC Division of Water Resources-Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions
associated with Riparian Buffer Establishment.
6 A small area of the stream has been impacted from sedimentation and riprap which needs to be
removed.
'The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent(25%)
of the total area of buffer mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).
* Per 2021-09-10 conversation with DWR, agricultural pond and exempt from Buffer Rule. Meeting
Notes are provided in Appendix B
1.5 Historic Land Use
City of Raleigh's Neuse River Resource Recovery Facility(NRRRF)
The City began biosolid residuals application in 1980 and currently has 1,439 acres permitted for land
application. Land application of biosolids has occurred on Site since the City's acquisition of Project Parcels
except for a 10-year moratorium between 2003 and 2013. Several areas in the Site's proposed footprint
are subject to biosolids application. Specific field boundaries and active biosolid application areas are
further detailed in Figures 6 and 7 of Appendix A.The property is currently managed for hay and row crop
production.
Table 4 details a review of the City's Parcels with aerial photography beginning in 1969.
Table 4.Timeline of Land Use
Period Arial Photo Land Use
Date
1969-89 02/9/1969 Fragmented agricultural within forested lands, progressively more land clearing for
12/7/1989 agricultural purposes
Early 90's 02/18/1993 Evidence of final forest to agricultural conversion
- Phase A, Features 1,2,3,6,and 7(easement areas 1, 2, and 3)
02/21/1999
1999_ 01/03/2005 Established City agricultural fields with no substantial difference observed to land
07/25/2010
Present 05/19/2015 use activities.
02/04/2019
Raleigh Farm—Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4) Page 5 of 17
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

2.0 Project Area-Current Conditions
2.1 Physiography
The Site encapsulates heavily modified headwater stream systems within the Middle Atlantic Coastal
Plain. Specifically, Ecoregion IV-45f Northern Outer Piedmont, located within the eastern portion of the
Piedmont, to the Coastal Plain Fall Line, in northern North Carolina (the transition between North
Carolina's Piedmont and Coastal Plain).This ecoregion consists of dissected irregular plains, rounded hills
and ridges, and low to moderate gradient streams with mostly cobble, gravel, and sandy substrates
(Griffith et al. 2002).
The watershed is dominated by agricultural land, fringe forests, and impervious surfaces associated with
single-family homes and roads. Surrounding area land use is primarily row-crop agriculture, with some
low-density residential housing, cattle pasture, and forested lands.
2.2 Soils
A detailed soil report for the Site was produced using the Natural Resource Conservation Service's (NRCS)
Web Soil Survey(USDA 2019)(Appendix C). Based on the custom report,the Bank Parcel contains the soil
series outlined in Table 5.
Table 5. Parcel Soils
Map Unit Acres in Percent of Hydric
Symbol Map Unit Name Parcel Parcel Soil Rating
ChA Chewacla and Wehadkee soils,0 to 2 percent slopes, 1.2 1.5% Yes
frequently flooded
DoB Dothan loamy sand,2 to 6 percent slopes 3.0 3.8% No
HeB Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 8.8 11.4% No
RaA Rains sandy loam,0 to 2 percent slopes 0.7 1.0% Yes
RgB Rawlings-Rion complex,2 to 6 percent slopes 4.7 6.2% No
RgC Rawlings-Rion complex,6 to 10 percent slopes 19.2 25.0% No
RgD Rawlings-Rion complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes 26.1 33.8% No
WeB Wedowee sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 2.3 3.0% No
WeC Wedowee sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes 3.0 3.9% No
WfB Wedowee-Saw complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes 5.3 6.9% No
NA Open Water 2.87 3.5% NA
Totals for Area of Interest 77.1 100.0%
*May contain inclusions of hydric soils
2.3 Existing Vegetative Communities
Of the Site's 77.07-acre footprint, 46.51 acres are in managed agricultural fields or biosolid application
pasture.Typical crops grown include corn and soybeans,though individual fields are often subject to other
crops like sunflowers. Pasture areas are comprised predominantly of Bermuda and fescue (Festuca sp.)
gasses. Pasture fields are cut/managed throughout the year. In general, Site Features are subject to
agricultural impacts in the upper half of each individual watershed.As the Features migrate downstream,
they typically enter disturbed fringe forests, which expand as Site Features move down valley.
Site Features drain to Beddingfield Creek before entering the Neuse River, 1.5 miles downstream. The
southern extent of the Site abuts the Clemmons Educational State Forest and other lands managed by the
Raleigh Farm-Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4) Page 6 of 17
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

State of North Carolina (NHP Report Appendix F). Existing hardwood forests of these managed properties
are consistent with Piedmont mesic forests,which occur on moist portions of upland habitat,steep north-
facing slopes, lower slopes, along ravines, high sections of outer floodplains, and stream bottoms. The
most common subtypes in the Piedmont are Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest and Basic Mesic Forest
(Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 2012).
Given the Parcels physiography, RS has determined a mix of Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont
Subtype), and Piedmont Bottomland Forest is the most appropriate reference forest (Schafale, M.P. and
A.S. Weakley. 2012). Table 6 outlines the species included in these reference forest ecosystems.
Table 6. Reference Forest Ecosystem
Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest(Piedmont Subtype)and Piedmont Bottomland Hardwoods
(Schafale, M.P.and A.S.Weakley. 2012)
Understory/Shrub Species
Deerberry(Vaccinium stamineum) Red maple(Acer rubrum)
Downy arrowwood (Viburnum rafinesquianum) Flowering dogwood (Corpus florida)
American strawberry bush (Euonymus americana) American holly(Ilex opaca)
American hophornbeam (Carpinus caroliniana) Pa paw(Asimina triloba)
Southern sugar maple (Acer floridanum)
Canopy Species
Tulip(Liriodendron tulipifera) Loblolly pine(Pinus taeda)
American sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) Shagbark hickory(Carya ovata)
Cherrybark oak(Quercus pagoda) Bitternut hickory(Carya cordiformis)
Swamp chestnut oak(Quercus michauxii) American beech (Fagus grandifolia)
American elm (Ulmus americana) Northern red oak(Quercus rubra)
Southern hackberry(Celtis laevigata) Red maple(Acer rubrum)
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) Sugar maple(Acer saccharum)
2.4 Parcel Design and Implementation Constraints
The presence of conditions or characteristics that have the potential to hinder restoration activities on
the Site were evaluated. The evaluation focused primarily on the presence of hazardous materials,
utilities, restrictive easements, rare/threatened/endangered species or critical habitats, the potential for
hydrologic trespass,and existing NRRRF infrastructure. Existing information regarding Site constraints was
acquired and reviewed, including an Environmental Records Report developed by Environmental Data
Resources Inc.,which located no evidence of environmental risk associated with the Parcels(Appendix D).
A North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Report was conducted and concluded three known historic
locations within the area, but all are located outside the proposed footprint (Appendix F).
Site conditions (existing or future)that have the potential to restrict the restoration, implementation and
long-term protection of the Site were documented digitally and during the field investigation.A summary
of findings and design avoidance is detailed in Table 7 on the following page.
Raleigh Farm—Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4) Page 7 of 17
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

Table 7. Documented and Recorded Parcel Constraints& Design Avoidance
Constraint Design Avoidance
Duke Power(Formally Progress
Energy of the Carolinas,and RS reviewed subject parcels and identified recorded deeds that reference the
Carolina Power&Light Co.) establishment of the easement in 1981.Subject records place the easement at 200 feet.
200 foot, Richmond Wake,500 The Site's proposed easements are located outside of the utility easement.
KV Overhead Transmission Line
RS received a City of Raleigh-approved easement boundary from Duke Energy regarding
Duke Energy—Piedmont the future natural gas line—PNG Line 142.The Site's proposed easements are located
Natural Gas(PNG) Line 142 outside of the utility easement. Construction of the PNG Line 142 will not affect the project
nor its protected resources.
Beginning construction in 2020 with an expected completion date in 2021, Dominion
Energy's T-030 Gas Pipeline Extension Project will maintain a 50-foot utility easement over
Dominion Energy's T-030 Gas Project Parcels associated with Phases A.The new easement abuts and runs parallel along
Pipeline Extension Project Duke Power's 200-foot overhead transmission line easement.The Sponsor accessed the
(Franklin and Wake County) digital file of the permanent and temporary construction easements for the T-030 Gas
DWR Project ID No. 2019-0828
V2 Pipeline.Site design avoids all temporary and permanent easements associated with the T-
030 Gas Pipeline.The Site's proposed easements are located outside the T-030 Gas
Pipeline easement(permanent and temporary).
A digital and physical review of active and inactive NRRRF infrastructure was completed as
part of the Site's design. NRRRF conducts surface water testing in pre-defined locations
along Site Features and within proposed conservation easements.These activities are
NRRRF biosolid application & consistent with allowable activities of the proposed conservation easement.
ground water monitoring
infrastructure Appendix B includes written confirmation outlining DWR's allowance for the City to place a
conservation easement over the subject parcels including fields currently permitted for the
application of biosolids.Areas historically used for biosolid application within the Site
footprint will be removed from the City's NPDES permit.
Phase A—One in-line pond is located along Main Tributary 2 (Pond 2). Pond 2 has a direct
hydrological connection to downstream waters via a stabilized channel which outlets the
pond on its northern side.An existing concrete drop structure is in the southeast corner of
the pond and drains to a constructed wetland located down valley.Water that enters the
constructed wetland is filtered through the facility and outlets through a subsurface pipe.
NRRRF existing agricultural The pipe runs underground,towards the"Main Tributary 2" Feature, and discharges into a
ponds&BMP infrastructure stable outlet before entering the feature(Figure 5 and Photos 5-7,Appendix A).
The proposed conservation easement includes all of Pond 2 and the outlet pipe for the
constructed wetland. Easement areas over these items are designated Maintenance
Easements and allow for access and maintenance. No RBC or NOC will be generated within
designated Maintenance Easements.
Dilapidated and abandoned agricultural infrastructure items are detailed in the Restoration
Plan (Section 3).
Dilapidated/
abandoned agricultural Earthen roads(farm paths) exist throughout the Site and are typically found along forest
infrastructure and earthen
farm roads edges—Section 3, Restoration Plan, details the removal and restoration of farm paths.
Existing culverted farm paths required to maintain hydrologic connectivity on ephemeral
channels and ditches will be identified and protected under the Conservation Easement.
Table 8 Note:All utility easements will be shown on the Conservation Easement Plat& Parcel's As-Built Survey and
sealed by a licensed surveyor of North Carolina.
Raleigh Farm—Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4) Page 8 of 17
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

2.4.1 Threatened and Endangered Species
Species with the classification of Endangered (E),Threatened (T), or officially Proposed (P) for such listing
are protected under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended (16 USC 1531 et seq.). Six
species, listed in Table 10, are federally listed within Wake County by the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) (USFWS 2020) (Appendix E).
USFWS Federally Protected Species List
Common Name Scientific Name Status
Cape Fear shiner Notropis mekistocholas Endangered
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
Dwarf Wedge mussel Alasmidonta heterodon Endangered
Tar River Spinymussel Parvaspina steinstansana Endangered
Yellow lance Elliptio steinstansana Threatened
Michaux's sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
The biological conclusion is no effect on the species listed above, and proposed mitigation activities will
result in positive benefits for these species through improved habitat and water quality.
2.4.2 Cultural Resources
The term "cultural resources" refers to prehistoric or historic archaeological sites, structures, or artifact
deposits over 50 years old. "Significant"cultural resources are those that are eligible or potentially eligible
for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. Evaluations of site significance are made with
reference to the eligibility criteria of the National Register(36 CFR 60).
Field visits were conducted in June 2020 to ascertain the presence of structures or features that may be
eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. No structures were found. An online search using the
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office's(SHPO)Web GIS Service(http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/)
and the National Register of Historic Places GIS Search
(https://www.nps.gov/maps/full.html?mapld=7ad17cc9-b808-4ff8-a2f9-a99909164466) identified zero
structures within the Parcel boundaries or within 1 mile of the Parcel (Appendix F).
3.0 Restoration Plan
The primary goals associated with the restoration of riparian areas within the Bank Parcel will focus on
improving water quality, enhancing flood attenuation, and restoring wildlife habitat. These goals will be
achieved by restoring and preserving forested riparian areas adjacent to stream channels, in-line ponds,
and ephemeral channels (Figure 8, Appendix A).
Goals will be accomplished by the following:
1. Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agricultural production, including;
a. Ceasing the broadcast application of class B biosolids, fertilizer, pesticides, and other
agricultural materials into and adjacent to Parcel Features.
b. Providing a restored buffer to filter runoff from adjacent lands.
2. Reducing sedimentation within onsite and downstream receiving waters by reducing bank
erosion, vegetation maintenance, and agricultural land disturbances by ceasing agricultural and
current land use activities.
Raleigh Farm—Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4) Page 9 of 17
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

3. Promoting floodwater attenuation by increasing frictional resistance of floodwaters crossing
Parcel flood plains.
4. Improving aquatic habitat by enhancing stream bed shading and natural detritus input.
5. Providing a terrestrial wildlife corridor and refuge in an area extensively disturbed by agricultural
practices.
6. Restoring and re-establishing natural community structure, habitat diversity, and functional
continuity.
7. Protecting the Parcel's riparian buffer functions and values in perpetuity.
Primary components of the Restoration Plan include:
1. Removal of dilapidated/abandoned agricultural infrastructure within forested areas where
feasible,
2. Removal of existing compacted earth roads associated with agricultural use,
3. Parcel-wide soil preparation & herbaceous vegetation treatment,
4. Riparian area restoration (replanting) extending from the top of bank (TOB) out 200' where
applicable and,
5. Parcel protection in perpetuity through a permanent conservation easement.
Table 8 details the Restoration Plan activities.
Table 8. Restoration Plan Activities
Restoration
Plan Activity Phase Specific Actions
The City,which actively self-manages the farm operations,will treat Bermuda and fescue grasses
Herbaceous within the Parcel ahead of planting efforts.Treatment will consist of a broadcast application using
Treatment Roundup Custom (Glyphosate)at a rate of 3%and a surfactant of AgriDex at a rate of 1%, per acre,
mixed with water.
- Remove existing farm paths within the proposed easements by deep ripping to break soil
compaction associated with equipment and vehicle use. NRRRF will establish new roads
dependent on future use and need outside of the Site's proposed easements.
Removal of
Existing - Remove rock debris associated with a historic farm path across Feature 2B, and stabilize the
Infrastructure channel with matting,temporary/permanent seeding,and live-stake planting.
- Remove large debris from the easement as is feasible and without damaging the existing
riparian buffer(Main Tributary 2).
Within the Site's proposed conservation easements:
- Treat Bermuda and fescue grass species within active pasture areas(see Herbaceous
Treatment note above).
- Site-wide discing of agricultural and pasture areas ahead of planting—discing will occur parallel
to the Site Features, promoting floodwater attenuation by increasing frictional resistance of
Riparian floodwaters crossing Parcel floodplains.
Restoration
- Establishment of a native herbaceous community via site-specific seed mix(See Planting Plan—
Section 3.3.1)
- Establishment of a native hardwood forest via the planting of bare-root saplings from the top
of bank out a maximum of 200'along Parcel Features—Section 3.3 Planting Plan
Raleigh Farm—Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4) Page 10 of 17
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

3.1 Project Schedule
Project activities, milestones, and anticipated completion dates are outlined in Table 9.
Table 9. Project Schedule
Activity/Milestone Completion Date
Site Mitigation Banking Instrument and Bank Parcel Development Package Approval Q4 2021
Acquisition of Conservation Easement Q4 2021
Removal of Existing Infrastructure& rubble within easement(as feasible) Q1 2022
Planting Q1 2022
As-Built&Assignment of Conservation Easement Q2 2022
Year 1 monitoring Q4 2022
Year 2 monitoring Q4 2023
Year 3 monitoring Q4 2024
Year 4 monitoring Q4 2025
Year 5 monitoring Q4 2026
Closeout Q1 2027
3.2 Permitting
Restoration activities requiring heavy equipment include:
1.) Remove existing, earthen farm paths within the proposed easements by deep ripping with
agricultural equipment to break up soil compaction associated with historic farm equipment and
vehicle use.
2.) Remove rock debris associated with a historic farm path that crosses Feature 2B,and stabilize the
channel with matting,temporary/permanent seeding, and live-stake planting.
3.) Remove reinforced concrete pipes&other debris located within the proposed easement as feasible
without damaging existing forest/vegetation.
Construction activities will not require permitting or authorization from federal, state,or county agencies
for impacts to regulated waterways or ground-disturbing activities. A summary of work is summarized
below in Table 13.
Table 10. Summary of Temporary Impacts
Feature Temporary Stabilization
Activity Location Reasoning
Type Impacts Activities
Removal of Reconnection of upstream and Matting of banks,
Phase A
compacted downstream features by temporary and
Feature 2B
gravel within Intermittent +/-20 I.ft. removal of non-native permanent seed
an existing (35.701112°, material, improvement of establishment, and
-78.501082°)
feature. feature function,and habitat live-stake planting
Raleigh Farm—Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4) Page 11 of 17
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

3.3 Planting Plan
Restoration of the riparian area allows for recolonization and expansion of characteristic species across
the landscape. The riparian areas will be restored according to the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (November 1, 2015). The planting plan for the riparian restoration area includes
planting 28,000 native bare-root hardwood saplings across 46.51 acres at a Parcel density of+/-600 stems
per acre and live stakes for stream bank stabilization where necessary(Figure 8,Appendix A). Community
associations utilized in the proposed planting plan include Schafale and Weakley's (2012) Mesic Mixed
Hardwood Forest (Piedmont Subtype) and Piedmont Bottomland Hardwoods, as detailed in Section 2.3,
Existing Vegetative Communities.Species composition includes native species known for fruit production.
Tree species will be mixed thoroughly before planting to provide a diverse and random plant across the
Site. Planting density is set to ensure sufficient diversity and density of planted stems outlined in Rule 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 of 260. No one tree species will be greater than 50%of the established stems—Table 11
details tree species reserved by the Sponsor for planting. The final planted species is subject to final
species availability.The Sponsor will note any changes to the planting list in the Site's Baseline Document
and As-built Survey.
Table 11. Proposed Hardwood Bare Root Planting Plan by Species
Common Name Scientific Name Tree/Shrub Phase A(46.51 Ac.) Species%of Total
River birch Betula nigra Tree 4,000 14%
Persimmon Diospyros virginiana Tree 3,000 11%
Tulip poplar Liriodendron tulipifera Tree 3,200 11%
Red mulberry Morus rubra Tree 2,400 9%
Black Gum Nyssa sylvatica Tree 2,000 7%
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis Tree 1,400 5%
White Oak Quercus alba Tree 2,000 7%
Water oak Quercus nigra Tree 3,600 13%
Cherrybark oak Quercus pagoda Tree 3,200 11%
Willow oak Quercus phellos Tree 3,200 11%
Total 10 Species 28,000 100%
3.3.1 Permanent Seed Mix
The Sponsor will broadcast a permanent seed mix over all riparian restoration areas. The seed mix will
include native grasses and forbs, with a variety of annual and perennial plants known to benefit wildlife
and pollinators. The grass seed component will focus on low-growing species that favor establishing the
target forest community, particularly species such as purpletop (Tridens flavus) and bentgrass (Agrostis
hyemalis). The forb component will include a diverse mixture of native and naturalized forbs and
wildflowers, including fifteen or more species.
3.4 Parcel Protection & Easement Boundaries
Before the release of any credits, RS will record a permanent conservation easement at the Wake County
Register of Deeds sufficient to ensure protection,operation,and maintenance of restored riparian buffers
and other riparian areas in perpetuity.
Raleigh Farm—Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4) Page 12 of 17
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

The form of the conservation easement shall be consistent with the standards employed by the State of
North Carolina in the protection of restored riparian buffers and riparian areas and shall be approved by
the DWR before the release of any credits.
Appendix B includes written confirmation from NCDWR approving of the implementation of this plan on
portions of fields currently permitted for the application of biosolids under NCDWR permit WQ0001730-
City of Raleigh. Fields currently permitted for the application of biosolids will be removed from the City
of Raleigh's above referenced permit after the conservation easement is recorded and prior to approval
of this Bank Parcel's As-Built report by NCDWR.
Parcel easement boundaries will be identified in the field to ensure a clear distinction between the Parcel
and adjacent properties/land uses.The Sponsor will install marking and signage of the easement boundary
adjacent/close to utility and greenway easements to ensure the clear designation of the easement.
Boundaries may be identified by cattle fence, marker, bollard, post, tree-blazing, or other means as
allowed by Site conditions and/or conservation easement requirements and will be installed before the
As-Built Site visit by DWR. Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or
replaced on an as-needed basis. The easement boundary will be checked annually as part of monitoring
activities and reported to DWR.
3.5 As-Built Report
A Baseline Monitoring Document and As-Built Survey will be submitted to DWR documenting the
completion of the Site's Restoration Plan and in accordance with the MBI.
4.0 Monitoring and Maintenance Plan
4.1 Monitoring Protocol &Success Criteria
Restoration monitoring procedures for vegetation will monitor plant survival and species diversity.
Quantitative sampling will include thirty-seven (37) permanent 10 x 10-meter vegetation plots as outlined
in the CVS Level 1-2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and will occur no
earlier than Fall of each year (Figure 10 - Monitoring Plan). Vegetation plot placement will adequately
represent riparian buffer credit and nutrient offset credit areas.A reference photo will be taken from the
origin point of each plot. All planted stems in the plots will be marked with flagging tape and recorded.
Data collected will include species, height, vigor, and planting type (planted stem and/or volunteer).
Monitoring of the restoration efforts will be performed for five years or until success criteria are fulfilled.
The Sponsor shall submit to DWR annual monitoring reports no later than December 31 of each year. Each
report will document the success of the vegetation and any maintenance, supplemental planting, or
encroachment within the easement areas. Success criteria within the riparian restoration areas will be
based on the survival of planted species at a density of 260 stems per acre after five years of monitoring.
The first annual monitoring activities will commence at the end of the first growing season, at least six
months after planting has been completed.
4.2 Parcel Maintenance
A remedial action plan will be developed and implemented with the approval of DWR in the event the
Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve success criteria as outlined above. Other
vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. If exotic
invasive plant species require treatment, such species will be controlled by mechanical (physical removal
with the use of a chainsaw) and/or chemical methods (aquatic approved herbicide) in accordance with
North Carolina Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations.
Raleigh Farm—Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4) Page 13 of 17
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

If mowing is deemed necessary by the Sponsor during the monitoring period, the Sponsor must receive
approval from DWR prior to conducting any mowing activities within Neuse Buffer Zones 1 and 2 to ensure
that no buffer violations have occurred.
4.3 Maintenance Areas
City of Raleigh actively manages the larger surrounding property, including the monitoring of
groundwater. Several groundwater monitoring wells are located within the Site footprint, which Raleigh
is required to monitor under NCDWR biosolids application permit WQ0001730. Raleigh will retain rights
to passive access of this monitoring infrastructure, which excludes land clearing or the use of motorized
vehicles. The well reference numbers and locations within the Site footprint are as follows:
Table 12. NRRRF Groundwater Monitoring Locations,Within the Site
Project Phase Well Label Adjacent Parcel Conservation
Feature Easement Area
Phase A MW-127 Feature 1A 3
Phase A MW-30 Pond 2 5
Phase A MW-56 Pond 2 5
Additionally, maintenance areas will be delineated on the final survey to be included in the conservation
easement footprint, and excluded from nutrient offset and riparian buffer credit generation. These areas
are reserved for infrastructure maintenance such as earthen dams, culverted crossings, and piped
discharges. Land clearing and vehicular traffic in these areas necessary for infrastructure maintenance is
allowed.
4.4 Long Term Management Plan
The conservation easement will preserve all areas and prohibit all use of the property inconsistent with
its use as a nutrient offset and riparian buffer mitigation property, including any activity that would
materially alter the biological integrity of the Site/Parcel. RS will transfer or assign the conservation
easement and its interests in perpetuity to a qualified holder under NC General Statute ("GS") 121-34 et
seq. and 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code prior to the submittal of the As-Built Report. The holder
shall be a land trust or stewardship program that is accredited by the Land Trust Accreditation Commission
and/or has been approved by DWR.A land trust must be certified under 501(c)(3)of the Internal Revenue
Code.
5.0 Financial Assurance
As required by the UMBI, the Sponsor will secure all financial assurances according to the UMBI. No
bond shall be less than $150,000 to cover costs of construction and no less than $100,000 to cover
monitoring expenses.
Monitoring bonds shall be renewed with confirmation of renewal provided to DWR with each annual
monitoring report. DWR reserves the right to alter the credit release schedule if monitoring reports
are submitted without proof of bond renewals.
Raleigh Farm—Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4) Page 14 of 17
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

6.0 Mitigation Potential
The Parcel will generate Neuse River Riparian Buffer Credits (RBC) and Nutrient Offset Credit (NOC,
nitrogen) on restored riparian areas measured from the top of bank out perpendicularly 200-feet on
Parcel Features (streams, ephemeral channels, and an in-line pond). Per the Consolidated Mitigation
Buffer Rule, the Parcel will generate RBC via allowed activities under Section (n), Non-forested Areas
[Restoration Site] and (o),Alternative Buffer Mitigation Options.Specifically, RBC is to-be generated from
sub-sections(o)(4), (o)(5), & (o)(7). Parcel compliance with these sub-sections is detailed below.
(o)(4) — Preservation of Buffer on Non-Subject Streams: Preservation of buffers on intermittent or
perennial streams that are not subject per 15A NCAC 02B .0233 are proposed via the permanent
protection under a perpetual conservation easement from cutting, clearing, filling, grading, and similar
activities that would affect the functioning of the buffer. Features proposed under(o)(4) were confirmed
as intermittent or perennial streams by DWR representatives during the June 2-3, 2020 site visit for
applicability and suitability (Appendix B). The area of preservation credit is capped at 25 percent of the
total area of buffer mitigation.
(o)(5)— Preservation of Buffers on Subject Streams: Buffer preservation is proposed on streams that are
subject per 15A NCAC 02B .0233 to permanently protect the buffer from cutting,clearing,filling,grading,
and similar activities that would affect the functioning of the buffer beyond the protection afforded by
the existing buffer rules on sites that meet the definition of a preservation site. The area of preservation
credit is capped at 25 percent of the total area of buffer mitigation.
(o)(7)— Mitigation on ephemeral channels:The Parcel will generate riparian buffer credit on "ephemeral
channels" as defined as a "natural channel exhibiting discernible banks within a topographic crenulation
(V-shaped contour lines) indicative of natural drainage on the 1:24,000 scale (7.5 minute) quadrangle
topographic map prepared by the US Geologic Survey,or as seen on digital elevation models with contours
developed from the most recent available LiDAR data" (15A NCAC 02B .0295). Appendix A Figures depict
the delineated watershed draining to each ephemeral channel proposed for RBC(Features 1A, 2A,3A,4A,
and 6A). The entire area proposed for RBC from ephemeral channels is within the contributing drainage
area. All subject ephemeral channels are directly connected to an intermittent or perennial stream, are
contiguous with the Site and are proposed for permanent protection under the Site's conservation
easement.The RBC derived from ephemeral channels will not total more than 25 percent of the total area
of buffer mitigation. The proposed buffer credit areas meet all applicable requirements of Paragraph (n)
of Rule [15A NCAC 02B .0295] for restoration or enhancement, and all applicable requirements of
Subparagraph (o)(4) or (o)(5) of Rule [15A NCAC 02B .0295] for preservation. Ephemeral features were
confirmed by DWR representatives during the June 2-3, 2020 site visit for the applicability and suitability
of Site Features (Appendix B).
DWR has determined the nitrogen abatement of restored riparian areas on this Bank Parcel to be 2,273.02
lbs. per acre as agreed to in the Raleigh Farm MBI. RBC will be measured to the nearest whole square foot.
Riparian buffer restoration credits can be converted and transferred to NOC upon approval from DWR.
However, conversions of NOC from widths 101'-200' (measured from top of bank) to RBC will not occur.
Provided in Appendix B is a complete DWR Credit Determination Table, which details the individual
components, generated credit, and which features generating RBC credit comply with criteria to also be
convertible to NOC.The Sponsor must request and receive written approval of the conversion and transfer
of any mitigation credits from DWR prior to adding or removing credits from the ledgers.
Raleigh Farm—Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4) Page 15 of 17
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

The Sponsor will maintain three individual ledgers, one to account for riparian buffer restoration credits,
one to account for riparian buffer preservation credits, and one to account for NOC.All credit assets shall
be accurately depicted on these credit ledgers. All accounting will be in accordance with DWR's Clarified
Procedures for Calculating Buffer Mitigation Credits and Nutrient Offset Credits (November 2019) (link in
UMBI). The complete DWR Mitigation Credit Table is shown on the following page,Table 13.
7.0 References
Griffith, G.E.,JM Omernik,J.A. Comstock, M.P. Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat,T.F. MacPherson,J.B.
Glover, and VB Shelbourne. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and South Carolina. US Geological
Survey, Reston,Virginia.
Schafale, M. P. and Weakley, 2012. A Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation.
US Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2019. Web Soil Survey (online). Available:
https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm [Accessed July 19, 2020].
US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2020. Endangered Species,Threatened Species, and Candidate Species,
Wake County, North Carolina (online). Available:
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/wake.html (Accessed July 19, 2020)
Space Purposefully Left Blank
Raleigh Farm—Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4) Page 16 of 17
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

Table 13.Credit Table-Raleigh Farm Bank Parcel -Phase A, 2019-1692v4, Project Credits
Neuse 03020201-Outside Falls Lake Project Area
19.16394 N Credit Conversion Ratio(ftz/pound)
N/A P Credit Conversion Ratio(ft2/pound)
Subject? Total(Creditable)) Convertible Delivered Delivered
(enter NO if Min-Max Buffer Initial Credit Final Credit Riparian Buffer Convertible to
Credit Type Location Feature Type Mitigation Activity Feature Name Total Area(ft') Area of Buffer %Full Credit to Riparian p Nutrient Nutrient
ephemeral or Width(ft) i Ratio(x:l) Ratio(x:1) Credits Nutrient Offset?
Mitigation(ft) Buffer? Offset:N(Ibs) Offset:P(Ibs)
ditch')
Buffer Rural No Ephemeral Restoration 20-29 1A,2A 96 96 1 75% 1.33333 N/A 72.000 No - -
Buffer Rural No Ephemeral Restoration 0-100 1A,2A,3A,6A 171,999 171,999 1 100% 1.00000 N/A 171,999.000 Yes 8,975.138 -
Buffer Rural No In-Line Pond Restoration 0-100 Pond 2 43,766 43,766 1 100% 1.00000 N/A 43,766.000 Yes 2,283.768 -
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Restoration 20-29 Main Trib 2,5A 559 559 1 75% 1.33333 N/A 419.251 No - -
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Restoration 0-100 16,26,Main Trib 2, 619,262 619,262 1 100% 1.00000 N/A 519,262.000 Yes 32,313.919 -
46,5A,66,7B,8A
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ephemeral Restoration 101-200 1A,2A,3A,6A 145,204 1 33% No - Yes 7,576.939 Nutrient Offset Rural No In-Line Pond Restoration 101-200 Pond 2 82,505 1 33% No - Yes 4,305.221 -
Nutrient Offset I Rural Yes I/P Restoration 101-200 18,28,Main Trib 2, 892,600 1 33% No - Yes 46,577.061 -
4B,5A,66,7B,8A
Totals(ft2): 1,955,991 835,682 835,518.251 102,032.046 0.000
Total Buffer(ft2): 835,682 835,682
Total Nutrient Offset(ft2): 1,120,309 N/A
Total Ephemeral Area(ft)for Credit: 239,891 239,891
Total Eligible Ephemeral Area(ft2): 278,561 21.5% Ephemeral Reaches as%TABM
Enter Preservation Credits Below Total Eligible for Preservation(ft'): 278,561 25.0% Preservation as%TABM
Total(Creditable)
Min-Max Buffer Initial Credit Final Credit Riparian
Credit Type Location Subject? Feature Type Mitigation Activity Feature Name Total Area(sf) Area for Buffer %Full Credit
Width(ft) i Ratio(x:1) Ratio(x:1) Buffer Credits
Mitigation(ft)
Rural No Ephemeral 20-29 2A 111 0 5 75% -
Rural No Ephemeral 0-100 1A,2A,3A,4A,6A 67,796 67,796 5 100% 5.00000 13,559.200 I
Rural No Ephemeral 101-200 1A,2A,3A,4A,6A 64,518 0 5 33% -
Rural No In-Line Pond 0-100 Pond 2 44,074 44,074 5 100% 5.00000 8,814.800
Rural No In-Line Pond 101-200 Pond 2 3,102 0 5 33% -
Rural Yes I/P 20-29 Main Trib 2,66 883 0 10 75% -
Rural Yes I/P 0-100 18,26,Main Trib 2, 653,677 166,691 10 100% 10.00000 16,669.100
4B,6B,76,8A
Rural Yes I/P 101-200 Main Trib 2,28,48, 152,833 0 10 33% -
66,7B,8A
Preservation Area Subtotals(ftz): 986,994 I 278,561
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION(TABM)
Mitigation Totals Square Feet Credits
Restoration: 835,682 835,518.251
Enhancement: 0 0.000
Preservation: 278,561 39,043.100
Total Riparian Buffer: 1,114,243 874,561.351
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals Square Feet Credits
Nutrient Nitrogen: 58,459.221
1,120,309
Offset: Phosphorus: o.000
Raleigh Farm-Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4) Page 17 of 17
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

Appendix A: Figures and Photos
Figure 1—Parcel Location and Service Area
Figure 2—Parcel Easements and Features
Figure 3—USGS Topography
Figure 4—NRCS Soil Survey
Figure 5—Current Conditions
Figure 6—NRRRF& Proposed Project Footprint
Figure 7—Biosoild Application Fields
Figure 8—Restoration Plan
Figure 9—Credit Determinations (Figures 9A-9D)
Figure 10—Monitoring Plan
Existing Conditions Photos
Raleigh Farm—Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4)
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201 Appendices

NIII
- D.urvill= i4
•
North Caro na ` •
4 e CAMDEN TS
t .. '�l7irl::
PERK N GATES CURRITUCK
VANCE NORTHAMPTON
CASWELL -- - .-— WARREN RESTORATION
I . Id. on HERTFORD Eli hell) SYSTEMS I LLC
k. GRANVILLE HALIFAX
PASQUOTANK
- �� WV iiiiiiVO Prepared for:
PERQUIMANS NC DEQ
Raleigh Farm Nutrient Offset and Division of
Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Water Resources
Burlington ORANGE
FRANKLIN USGS 14-Digit Hydrologic Unit BERTIE CHOWAN 401 & Isolated
ALAMANCE DURHAM , 03020201100030 Wetlands/Waters
Ourh,m, A`. \ ...* .�`4 35.698851, -78.494698 Program & 4 r
� � Stormwater
��� 1
�� TYRRELL DARE Project:
1 WAKE 1 EDGECOMBE ASHINGTON
M'�RTIN RALEIGH FARM
: : / koillk
NUTRIENT OFFSET
4,Ji[_ AND BUFFER
• W,ILSON '� MITIGATION BANK
LAW
CHATHAM —T - �. PITT 141440,airathilaill
PARCEL
14‘. ti reenvill a14p PHASE A
JOHNSTON iii
tea; Wake County, NC
•1nfor l GREENE BEAUFORT -'
Title:
• s4oro � HYDE
iik
HARNETT , ® lie
PARCEL LOCATION
AYNE Pamlico SOu,1 AND SERVICE
MOORE � -- Kin'Aon AREA
• LENOIR , CRAVEN
PAMLICO
CUMBERLAND NNev.. 6 rn ,
HOKE Fayetteville Drawn by:
y
illi Clinton RJH
SAMPSON �
` - � :::
DUPLIN-....4111tE-1 :::
CATHaul :.1.=- J :
� 7]
_Laurin rg Jacksanv Project No.:
• 110.° ONSLOW 2019 1692 V4
Legend it FIGURE
i(D NC County Boundaries Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri,HERE,
DeLorme, USGS,O Neuse River Basin USGS HUG 6-Digit:030202 NRCAN,Esri Japan,METI, increment Esri China(Hong Kong),
O NC River Subbasins:USGS 8-Digit HUCs Esri(Thailand),Mapmylndia,©OpenStreetMap
contributors,and the GIS User Community N
OBank Parcel-Buffer Mitigaiton Service Area:Neuse River Basin USGS Hydrologic Unit 03020201 -Minus Falls Lake Watershed
® Bank Parcel-Nutrient Offset Service Area: Neuse River Basin USGS Hydrologic Unit 03020201 -Minus Falls Lake Watershed 0 15 30 6 Miles
t p f - _./. -mil \/

roject Parcels
w
roposed Easement:77.07 Acres *�:;:::,::-:,,,4,:':00_4:'21F,Pi
ntermittent/Perennial
O, RESTORATION
� Ephemeral SYSTEMS I LLC
-Line Pond/ Right-of-Way�cdsPrepared for:
�,e e� Duke Power-Overhead Transmission Line Easements
Feature3A a 5 eftFeature4A o oo / ( ) TempoConstrEase° ���� at EasemFeature 2B Feature 4B O ��Qom~�`�= oConstrEase4////
asement Area#3
LO
24.64 Acres Permanent Pipeline Easement
F Easement Area#4 ' 7-*it fi : Project:
Feature 2A 11,pIIr_ 3.34Acres
10 , ,/4I###_/
Feature 5A Feature 1Aial
om
Dkd Baoc
�..' ,r"`, �:•
` �; Pond 2 0n-Line Pond)
Feature 1e yT -11:jj-- Wake County, NC
Title:
Main Trib.2 - -
Starts at Confluence 4- v\ +.00 � -
, of1B and 2B • ,,. ` - .4 -, .. % \
Main Trib.2 - - % I I
rEasementArea#2 - - \ =
8.62 Acres
3 '`. •1 Easement Area#7
; '' Main Trib.2 6.13 Acres
•
::::::::
Easement Area#5 I t % 7 Imagery:2017 NC OneMap
it .f;[ ` -
•
_ \ .• Drawn by:
, , - % % RJH
„fir
t Feature 8A Date:
SEPT. 2021
I Easement Area#6 \ Duke Pot~
'` _ ''` - ` - - -` 3.32 Acres `_ er(?N.G)Gas Line 942 ^ - � , Scale: 1:6,500
�, 1 i i' w *- Project No.:
I
�� .. � � ,• . ' � —
� �° �� .. 2019-1692V4
a I -- \ � � ,�'
•
1 \
��..�' \ - Easement Area#1
Feature 7B +' '-' " y: IP '
2.14Acres FIGURE
Beddingfield Creek
- N
0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000
f Feet

\ ---.%\ "IV
p Legend
; ,/'
` ff j:YF
/ , - lit
AcresSite Features By ClassificationNticc:: --- a °+� Intermittent/Perennial
r�a ' - RESTORATION!
���, 285 'k Phase A; Feature 3A Ephemeral SYSTEMS I LLC
} dY �� a.•
(USGS Not Depicted) In-Line Pond
111111111° 0
1 , Prepared for
. Phase A; Feature 4A • I NC DEQ
`• (USGS Not Depicted) ,
■ y� /5�>°� yc���� �- i:L Division of
ti_
cf.
�� Water Resources
� o
I rill- ,h-N. _
Phase A; Feature 2A °-e<<L° 401 & Isolated
(USGS Not Depicted) Phase A; Feature 4B off'. off' Wetlands/Waters
a (USGS Not Depicted) e
Q Program & 401
i • 3. p.' "Eill — 1 - Stormwater
IIIa Phase A; Feature 2B ! l
Bilk - (USGS Not Depicted) �` ., 04 Project:
iii
l e o
11� • T ` Nr. Z
RALEIGH FARM
` Phase A; Feature 5A x A I } (USGS Not Depicted) ��� f of d } ri' NUTRIENT OFFSET
ii/ 4P' ` { f `' Fas AND BUFFER
-,_ L
'i �' MITIGATION BANK
r44- 4 I r PARCEL
lo
t l a G�Q BaU`'om
Phase A; Feature 1A s'' ) IT PHASE A
(USGS Not Depicted) -
_ e Wake County, NC
Phase A; Feature 1 B Ilk _ ` Title:
(USGS Not Depicted) ry +I
40/ Ai
Pi Phase A; Main Trib.2 1 \ • I y
Starts at Confluence of, I - 4 L I� / if . ' .1 USGS
r 1 B and 26
\111 (
—� Phase A; Main Trib.2 TOPO MAP
(USGS Depicted) `~- • ,s (USGS Depicted)
Lai 1 r Phase A;Main Trib.2 •
(USGS Depicted) i i
VIL
Phase A; Feature 6A Phase A; Pond 2
•
(USGS Not Depicted) lilt
(Ag. In-Line Pond) Source:USGS 24k 7.5-minute
(Not Subject) r ; topographic quads;Garner,NC
AV--- _ (USGS Depicted) iik. (1993)and Clayton, NC(1993)
Phase A; Feature 6B
(USGS Not Depicted) * . �• Drawn by.
- N. RJH
T ,.
i .. ,� AApr p ti e Phase A; Feature 8A111111Z Vi„,. N III ' - ,
,' )I I:„71 14 / �l (USGS Not Depicted) Date:
', t AG'''. `�-- il li SEPT. 2021
�uke;Pott er(PNG),Ga`s `
_ Line 142 Scale:
,, 4 --"/ i ..- . 1:6,500
411
11k
r . —,-...... II -r, (
a I Ate '" -- — Project No.:
. r, V �
� , '� � '�' — L=� �_ tit
2019-1692 V4
iriVry
F Phase A; Beddingfield Creek
�� Phase A; Feature 76 w !" "
1 Not Evaluated FIGURE
I12
(USGS Not Depicted) . (USGS Depicted)
oliv.
1 Alltbialillri. if/ , 3
tv..„.. --Ilirif
, 1 •0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000fil\\\\ .
Feet I

..- —,1-. s, . ... e _j_ii • "L- el.. ..._,. 1 ji .1-1 i. I
Legend
5 - 1.
r "" a Project Parcels
louL1ti M .01
.I
IP
ill _ ,_ �P 111 ... ~ 1, Proposed Easement:77.07 Acres Rs
It
r I I
p
Ir 4 t , .—I
Site Features By Classification •
s
ti_ �� / II Intermittent/Perennial
a f _pwre RESTORATION
if
<��' q Phase A;Feature 3A • F a " " Ephemeral SYSTEMS I LLC
. �� •• (Soil Survey Depicted) ' 4 In-Line Pond
- �� ��i 1 r . a r'1®I '' • lurE:rf . r �. - Prepared for:
iii - Phase A; Feature 4A40 .
'"�
.- .��. (11 ,-E—
NC DEQ
i -.-�- 1. (Soil Survey Depicted) •c Division Of
.1 ` I r Water Resources
" • 1
jilt o
Phase A; Feature 2A S '�
` uk•" ti r` 401 & Isolated
(Soil Survey Depicted) t•� Phase A; Feature 4B - Pi r� r m J•1 . Wetlands/Waters
r (USGS Not Depicted) 4 4 Program & 401
-�� ii _ d Stormwater
L" Phase A; Feature 2B til I
• . a f
(Soil Survey Depicted) r• - 11I�,.rl Project:
1( ,_
RALEIGH FARM
.� • ar Phase A;Feature 5A X ' NUTRIENT OFFSET
e' L! ` (Soil Survey Depicted) .' AND BUFFER
7 0 7 6,....
NI
�x .. ��. _. ' ��I:' I.
1 _ J B.
' i ��$ o .I —fr - r MITIGATION BANK
a. y �'` `r� iii,_.,-. , 1.1 1 m r PARCEL
Aco
" ' '`-`_ ` •� II
�1 ' _M " f "'� �. 0/dBau`.27Rd- _ `�� "I III PHASEA
Phase A; Feature 1A �� ` a
(Soil Survey Depicted) • `• •~ iIi
f� # ' �I'
_ ♦�• .„, • ,� L
kF Wake County, NC
Phase A; Feature 1 B 1, 1 - al eL " I••I - h- - :_ + • • Title:
(Soil Survey Depicted) i_ , r•
f .
-1 ■ t, _ r ye _ •-.. �'
Phase A;Main Trib.2 0 4 r FR
Starts at Confluence of ems`% 1 1Illr NRCS
1B and 2B ' IIi. ) _ �'rp % - Phase A; Main Trib.2 " �nF. SOIL SURVEY
(USGS Depicted) I a - • 11 �� ._ . • ♦ (Soil Survey Depicted) r. a f,
Phase A;Main Trib.2 i - ° ' *�� 1
i ♦ .1 (Soil Survey Depicted) Pr-. ♦ I a ili L
Phase A;Feature 6A 1 1." , ,Ni 1 .� •_ Phase A; Pond 2 ♦♦ ;
(Soil Survey Depicted) ♦ (Ag. In Line Pond) Pm A II I d Source:NRCS Soil Survey of
+ a Wake County,NC(1970);
Not Subject) ♦ "
" u (Soil Survey Depicted) - ' 1. , II
sheets 71 and 80
Phase A;Feature 6B 1 Ai��` a5 s _ �� I Drawn by:
1� , Eq.(Soil Survey-. . .4 Depicted) "e r 11jilt RJH
\11111
. �, i - I it- .ii .
ti Phase A; Feature 8A
'il 3f •� 131\e ,.
(Soil Survey Depicted) I Date:
• �r.164,±) �•. . 'i -' i. ,. �._ �" SEPT. 2021
•
6.
3 ._ li
�, r. —' ) _ \ 10.1, �,. III
I - Scale.
—
ej
•'� � --- r � - . �' �° . �� .� Project No.:
1 • 2019-1692 V4
� ram . . I i"' - - -- ♦ _ rdlifi ~•_ ��� — ,�.—� - -
1111 \ ,
et ar.
` _ d
♦ . —^ V • r Phase A; Beddingfield Creek ��
�,�.� i Phase A; Feature 7B r _ � I Not Evaluated f
FIGURE
♦ti (Sot Survey Depicted) - "� iii (Soil Survey Depicted)
r
ri-
I
� ,� r,� � rr , tip- �� 1� � _{ � 4
4 0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000Illir 1 s� '"�� U
1 1 1 Feet .1 I

11 i7:21S
1 I
® :epieLid
3+
/ 19
O NRRRF Infrastructure Ephemeral Drainage Areas
Vi•
illkis, -.Jo , ' a' i eatures By Classification
RESTORATION
���' . 0 SYSTEMS I LLC
1.1
NC DEQ
, N.------v,..,-%............ Division of
:.....: ---.................-..........---_ Water Resources
401 & Isolated
ED A Wetlands/Waters
lik,k .._ . . -- Program &,11 II
1110
P g401
,� Stormwater
„`
1 w RALEIGH FARM
4140
0 NUTRIENT OFFSET
* I 0 AND BUFFER
14 K y ' P` - I 1Eh
� 0 MITIGATION BANK
�. ... �� PARCEL
i \ Oki
-,.,,, " _ Bau`,�Rd PHASE A
-
-.,,,,... ... .. •i ...:__Z-----------N-
11%
. - -•/ 1 % CURRENT
0 Of CONDITIONS
.. -: l
0
/7'; -----------------------------% % I 0
1.1
rii
ONO ill,
,..':VA: ,.,,,,..„,,,......,..„,,,..,, ,, ,,
. .,.. , _, .._____________ . ,
, , ,, : ._. „„,.. r_. .
% -----'"----------\•,%.
.„..,,, , ,,,,....„.„_,,..„..,,i, , 1 ---------- :14,,,,,,IA'
ad
r" _ k V 54^ I t ` Weft \I ., '
it
I
#. fi; / % 6 \� ,G n_ - _ .:. 1,
• y CM.T................ 0 0 . ...., ...-..... .,... I
A •
,,, 'fir 'Y •.� r 1 n4 ' + : a . ,z t` '``••' `. x . . 7 i 1- . , r,.. , ,y.,E• 1* , 1
-''' .1 k ' '-'% 5
i('y ate'.LAt -'e" - »'v. --Jf% # ,tiffs' N
y'

Toot F
�' , .I / � / / Active Hazen and Sawyer Well
' •`
f MW=10�3//2") Active Vadose Zone Monitoring
O Project Parcels Duke Power-Overhead Transmission Line Easements ;b' • /7fl asf ,:; -10
Active Compliance Well r
I. O Proposed Easement:77.07 Acres 'v ,_ 1 in,q2
l ) Temporary Construction Easement 44
//' ltrl ��. Active Monitoring Well
. //7%.`LVV=53- P-1 Active Surface Water
- - - Intermittent/Perennial L. Permanent Easement • -55
>~G Active Remediation Well RESTORATION
Ephemeral '•e• eq- Q SYSTEMS LTC
- - - In-Line Pond � Temporary Construction Easement �':• ,-\ ,; °ry Active USGS Well
t .-,� :y.., � •
511 {E e�9 'mil r A =;:'
i` 0 Permanent Pipeline Easement 15 �fo. 5 6' `' ■ Abandoned Compliance Well
of • Prepared for:
�� ■P ec� Fast Abandoned Monitoring Wel!
1- /7/ .,... ..____• \° 'E y �co 5� elf r Abandoned Surface Water
• - // 'G �a
___/c-. . / je 1 . / ,<- 0°� Inactive Hazen and Sawyer Well -�
! mal
I: �° L a Inactive Stream Gauge it
70 } Feature 3A f — ` e�
520 • ,{ J VZM-45 S'Q°� ,i( • Inactive USG5 Well
- 111
MW-1>22 } ` Feature 4A // . a u
Meuse River Trai l Home
a I Feature 2B P' _Y�'' _
'it\ i ` _ � r .- Outcrop/Boulders
_MW/-122D -. . Feature 4B -< d
! Active Biosolid Application Areas
_ Project:
Feature 2A + 71 / I Field Boundaries(numbered)
,e
N C. I Feature 5A - Constructed Wetlands
Feature 1A �. I 4s
• - , I - © Private Drinking Well r
of
49•
Parcels
•
_ 2 / WAKE HYDRO_LINE
tMW-127 r .r '. - , I ,t TVt7 32_ 1 O/a BOO B U�o y _ Ponds and Streams
/ ' Existing Greenway
Feature 1B �� • % , '-'. /,/a / f , ./f' -. ,,cb,,k.,� ,� i`f/ Wake County, NC
Main Trib.2 ._„� ..S 1... / -(</ 4 r I�/i � and 2(Ag. In-Line Pond) Oa, . .1 •k zt-L0� `- �%*� f,RR n2 •:./1. ; Title:
Starts at Confluence �' E• U-k
.. i y�_ �1 , TW-30 yy^ !*
of1Band2B
MW-106 SW MW 5• kc �,
Feature 6A x 1 502
a• t` f: 20t GP-16 . RW-10 z:
Main Trib.2 X't —{-rya
al:
11: I(\\
I. q Main Tub.2 ti 500 RW 8
N.
Feature 6B1 .\
' Rill►-7 I MW 11
•
:II a NRRRF BMP Wetland Stand Pipe SW-ED Soo
MW 2 J(Photo5APPendixA) \ 'A:- \ M_
CW E ,. f 2016 City of Raleigh NRRRF
g Station ` 1 Mw-111D
MW-204 - . _ NRRRF BMP Wetland -- ri,// Drawn bi sJ ,� Q• p MW-111 y:
_ (Photo 6 Appendix A) -� / .
i . .c,r ? RJH
T I �. P Feature 8A 17 �, =� CaP:1+
f i 1- ,k: Date: SEPT. 2021
/ NRRRF Wetland BMP .. 4
i _, I Outlet Pipe 31 - Duke•P-over" iry �
Photo7-A-Appendix • SW-i9
( pp ) MW-54 (PNG)Gas- GP• Scale:
-� GP-22R- �� _ . MW-125D Line_142 1:6,500
■ I -50 0 MW-54 GP-20) — " '
r0 • 'Ailb,
=iGP-21 °4 , .,______iH. Project No.:
i
-24
2019 1692 V4
i .4, I .. I 7/ I 1
Feature 7B J0. ' .
MW-107 g Ir: ,f2�U1 /n D` FIGURE
SW-24I /�MW-121RN') /�f / /
(_______
`ell - ~� /
MW-121 / � N
0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 / j f 1
/ Feet ����///

/ ni I I
Phase A-Subject Biosolid Application Fields Legend
Subject Biosolid Acreage to-be El) O Project Parcels NRRRF Infrastructure
Existing Acreage Remaining Acreage Q
Fields Removed Proposed Easement:77.07 ti Active Compliance Well
Rs
Field 71 3.052 2.559 0.493 Existing Biosolids Application C Active Hazen adn Sawyer Well
Field 73(A) 0.655 0.655 0 /
Phase A Overlap:Acreage to-be Removed from ® Active Monitoring Well
Biosoild Application RESTORATION
SYSTEMS I LTC
Field 73(B) 2.719 2.511 0.208 Active Remediation Well
Site Features By Classification
Field 501(A) 1.583 0.554 1.029 _ _ A Active Surface Water(Passive Monitoring)
— Intermittent/Perennial
Active USGS Well Prepared for:
Field 501(B) 4.242 0.999 3.243 ® Ephemeral
EQ
Field 602 9.039 1.638 7.401 - — — In-Line Pond NC Division
of
Z _ Water Resources
Feature 3A
401 & Isolated
Feature 4A t:' : ° Wetlands/Waters
Feature 2B ® Program 8� 401
�' Feature 46 = ,� StOrmWater
�� `� Project:
..7.i
Feature 2A ! s �eA „`
1 °�e� ::' RALEIGH FARM
1 Feature 5A 9�
Feature 1A 1 ' ' 'oof , O NUTRIENT OFFSET
'9 ' - Fa O AND BUFFER
" `� ' —.` S�e�� O MITIGATION BANK
• PARCEL
_3 —'�1oida��i •�I FIELD • • ♦ ).1
IE FIE(D) Upam Ra PHASE A
FIELD l 73(A) 501 B
' �71 t FIELD 602 FIELD
Feature 1 B ♦♦ 73(B) ®501 (A) O Wake County, NC
Aft
♦ I Pond 2(Ag. In-Line Pond)
Main Trib.2 — " • —� ��— — ` ��11 „ Title:
Starts at Confluence — — ` ., • �. ��_
of 1B and 2B ♦ — —' 1 1 0 „ BIOSOLID
APPLICATION
Feature 6A ® .2 —1
Gay��oe ��ea� I Main Trib.2 ♦1III
FIELDS
r )
Main Trib.2
Feature 6B O �a • ��
00 °• ♦� • �
v ' �i ��
o� 00
; E - O° fr
� Qo�e %` '. Imagery:2017 NC OneMap
Owe _ ♦ •`•
Illk
1
Drawn by:
Feature 8A •�1
♦ 9 p - . , .. Date: RJH
SEPT. 2021
♦ Ruke.P_o�t er(p`NG t�
♦it )_Gas.L'ine 14. �� •. Scale:
�. • w
` 1 i ♦.. � •• — G - Project No.:
�.r , . ♦ ® � - w - - � f
— � , 1 . • % • %• - - ,.A• e — — — • • 20191692V4
I1 '♦ • -` - - ` ` '- J
I
l 1 •
• •
Feature 7B — ♦ ' Beddingfield Creek FIGURE
A
e 7
N
0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000
Feet

111 N I
/♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ® Legend
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦
�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦i♦�♦�� Maintenance ROW: 0.012 Acres O Project Parcels NRRRF Infrastructure
♦♦♦♦♦♦�♦ Active Compliance Well
MW-127 O Proposed Easement:77.07 Acres P 1
��♦`�� V ♦�♦♦ Planting to Occur,No Credit
/♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦ O Active Hazen adn Sawyer Well
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦ Maintenance ROW(subject to the Conservation Easement) Y
A♦ ♦ ♦♦♦♦♦
,41 ' ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ - Existing Forest ® Active Monitoring Well
��♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Remove rock debris associated with a historic farm path RESTORATION
.�►O♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦
�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ across Feature 2B,and stabilize the channel with matting, -j� Bare-root Planting and Seeding:46.51 Acres . Active Remediation Well SYSTEMS I LLC
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ temporary/permanent seeding,and live-stake planting.
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ (Table 10,Section 3.2) Site Features By Classification A Active Surface Water(Passive Monitoring)
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ • - - - Intermittent/Perennial
/♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Prepared for:
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ e � Active USGS S Well P
/♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Feature 3A - - - Ephemeral
I A /♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ Active Vadose Zone Monitoring Station NC DEQ
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ - -
-.�� - In Line Pond Division of
�a Feature 4A Water Resources
a
�.�`
401 8� Isolated
,,� Wetlands/Waters
io Feature 4B
A Program & 401
rtir
ED
1Z ... . . Feature5A Storm ater
�i
Feature 2A •
v ,4/4- , alli
�� Project:
I •
•
.,: v
•
Feature 2B
��e� lik
.. RALEIGH FARM
Remove reinforced concrete pipes&other 90 fo NUTRIENT OFFSET
Feature 1A debris from the easement along Main Tributary 2 o7
• �/'-. � (Photo8-Appendix A) Fast 0 AND BUFFER
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ i''' -. /it 0 MITIGATION BANK
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦
♦♦♦�♦�♦�♦�♦� _ { Maintenance ROW: 0.276 Acres —ja PARCEL
♦ ♦ 1 MW-56&TW-30 BaU�o�
Insert A Erf.♦♦ ♦ ♦♦ i / . 4
�.�� ♦ ♦: r„ ` Planting to Occur,No Credit feji PHASE A
Feature 1 B �j♦♦♦♦ ♦♦j♦j♦♦♦j♦j♦j ♦♦♦♦♦j♦♦♦♦♦j♦j♦♦♦j♦j�z �i ♦� ��k i♦♦j♦j♦Q�♦� Maintenance ROW: 1.48 Acres 0 Wake County, NC
\�♦♦♦l �♦♦�� ��♦�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦/ � e ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦. ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦• Earthen Dam w♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ,♦♦♦♦�♦♦♦♦♦� ♦♦♦♦♦♦. ..r ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦� ► Title:
♦♦♦♦♦ ♦ ♦♦♦♦♦�♦.♦�♦�♦�� �.♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦� ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ No Planting, No Credit oil
,�
Main Trib.2 ♦♦♦♦ ♦ ♦♦♦♦♦♦.- �/ ♦•
♦♦♦♦♦♦♦�♦�► ♦♦♦♦♦• �A♦♦♦♦♦
Starts at Confluence ♦i�♦�♦�♦Ak 4 dk,�,♦♦♦♦♦♦ . ♦♦.`; n `-♦♦♦:♦.... j`:♦- ♦♦� . ♦♦♦♦♦ ::
• of 1 B and 2B ��♦j ` •.�♦♦♦♦jam : ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦�?+P.c % loi \ ♦♦♦♦� Maintenance ROW: 0.17 Acres �cW
•' x ♦♦♦� ��� ♦����� ����♦♦♦♦�♦�♦ . C ' - 1�♦♦�♦�� No Plant Constructn d No tC ediland Ou tlet �:: �' RESTORATION
Feature 6A ►♦ . Main Trib.2 ♦♦♦♦♦• • •♦♦• g,
♦♦ ♦♦• ® �.♦��i♦i♦i♦i`v.♦, .. �i♦i A PLAN
Feature6B ♦♦♦♦• 1 ,�♦Q� •`♦•♦♦'• —�♦♦•♦�♦♦♦♦���♦♦��1 '��♦♦` ♦ ���
♦♦� * Main Trib.2
4 i
♦♦♦ ♦� Pond 2(In-Line Pond) *4 • ...♦♦♦♦♦�4 Main Trib.2 _, •` ' ��♦��� ��
••♦♦�. ♦ ♦♦A ��fA • * . ♦ .i Ak
♦♦ \ t ♦/ a ExistingEarthen Road(Adjacent to Main Trib 2) •,Q ♦ ♦• :,/,- ♦v411 Imagery:2017 NC OneMap
'b*.4 I ! 5 e' Mechanically removed as necessary within the j•♦♦ ♦ ♦ ►♦♦ • �.�
♦♦♦� 1 a a� conservation easement.Construction activities include ♦♦♦♦ ♦• ♦�� ♦' `
G 5 ♦♦♦ �� Drawn by:
�.�♦�i o \oo� _: deep ripping and soil amendmentMIN ♦j♦.� ♦ ��j�♦: ♦♦��N. ♦ ` !� RJH
0 1 00, ♦ i Feature 8A *♦�♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ :i
\�c. SEPT. 2021
• Oo6 o 6 .♦�,: ice. :::
• DukPower(PNG ' :
1 O♦♦♦♦♦♦`• —
® 1 ♦�♦♦♦��♦♦♦♦♦♦i�® .♦' —♦.., " - r IA - Project No.:
I - ♦ e
l 1 — I "-
Feature 7B - • p - Beddingfield Creek FIGURE
A
e 8
N
0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000
Feet r

II I 1 -Legend
Maintenance ROW: 0.012 Acres O Project Parcels Site Features By Classification
____/
MW-127 O Proposed Easement:77.07 - - - Intermittent/Perennial RS
Planting to Occur,No Credit
Maintenance ROW(Subject to the Conservation Ephemeral
Easement, No Credit) - - - In-Line Pond
TOB Offsets RESTORATION
- Phase A Credit Determination SYSTEMS I LLC
- - G - TOB to 30 Feet
� `:"` No Credit-Less Than 20 Feet
-f',` - - - TOB to 50 Feet
_ Preservation,RBC
Feature 3A - - - TOB to 100 Feet Restoration,RBC Prepared for:
• I A' -- - - TOB to 200 Feet NC DEQ
Restoration,NOC Division of
�a. Feature 4A I No Credit-Maintenance ROW/Beyond 200 feet Water Resources
�a
�\ NOTE ABOUT WIDTHS&CREDITING: 401 & Isolated
�� Wetlands/Waters
0
q. Inset Box- Fig - °A �_ - - —; _ -, Feature 4B �/ Riparian Buffer Credits(RBC) Program & 401
/�/ Restoration Areas TOB to 20-29'qualifies for 75% RBM credit. Stormwater
Feature 5A
Feature 2A TOB-100 ft.=Buffer width is contiguous from TOB,is a minimum Project:
of 30 ft.from the TOB and maximum of 100 ft.from the TOB,
y 1 and qualifies for 100%RBM credit.
Feature 26 1 II RALEIGH FARM
. 117', 1 RBC on Ephemeral Features is within the contributing drainage NUTRIENT OFFSET
Feature 1A I _ Oki
` _ Bau o�Ra area of the ephemeral feature,and will not total more than 25 AND BUFFER
. , - I I 1 I I i percent of the total area of RBC. MITIGATION BANK
1 'I 1 (Appendix B-Credit Determination Table) PARCEL
r i Maintenance ROW: 0.276 Acres ,
- _ ,1 ii 11 _` - / r r MW-56&TW-30 an Nutrient Offset Credit(NOC)
IcnseAL /1, i '' ti�•♦ % Planting to Occur,No Credit , Nutrient Offset Credit is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of PHASE A
1 =•�: ' 4,1 1 -�� ♦ 1 , .f g e •x x �" ,� 101 ft.from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft.from the TOB.
•Feature 1B � . , 1 \ Box Figure 9B V
_ _ `,\ y� Wake County, NC
Maintenance ROW: 1.48 Acres Y
\�- - •••-.\� � ♦1 Earthen Dam
Main Trib.2 = / 1 . • • No Planting,No Credit Title:
Starts at Confluence ° " :%,'
of 1 B and 2B mGe Box Figure f 4;� ` _, \� o
- - — •♦-= -'. ► 1} ' Maintenance ROW: 0.17 Acres QlI Box- Figure CREDIT
�_ t _ i II Constructed Wetland Outlet
r e ����\\ - - - _ No Planting, No Credit `"
DETERMINATION
ri ��` \. Main Trib.2 ♦�' \..-
'Feature 6A I Ss' e� ` 1- ,03oti Pond 2 A In-Line Pond \\Feature6B �.�• •c��� �=�' 00o ( 9 ) � � ti\'� •\, 1 0 ' ecq !�i ♦ Main Trib.2
111 , O Qo� ,' �;� Imagery:2017 NC OneMap
I - '\%' i . Drawn b
• ♦ ` _sw: ♦ RJH
•
Feature 8A
11-----T
� , Date: SEPT. 2021
! , 1
/ ♦ Duke-poser �_
�% 1 y (PNG)-Gas-Line_142 F a Scale:
- i I �♦.._ 1 1 !" Project No.:
0.
`� _ _ _ � .., -, ... _ 20191692V4
Feature 7B '- % Beddingfield Creek FIGURE
r 9
N
0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000
Feet

I _I t 1
I 1 !, .1 I
1 _........
Feature 2A Drainage Area 1 1 '
. . •
' Conservation Easement Offset 1• Feature 4A Drainage Area 11 , I , R
From Project Parcel by 20-Feet V '
• <20-Feet,No Credit i , 1 I 1,
1 \ I Feature 5A
NI 1 \ 1 I I RESTORATION
` .,, ; - Feature 2B 1 \\ - II I I II I. SYSTEMS LLC
i \ # \
, - %\,,___ - - Feature 3A Drainage Area / i I Prepared for:
Feature 2A , �• _ i /
-=� 1 Feature 4A i I ' I \, • .`tie NC DEQ
` Feature 3A - Feature 4B I 1 I, ® Gas Division of
- - i , - <20-Feet,No Credit I I 1 1 1 j °gP Water Resources
•.anumul • _ ••_..,_.
r Feature 1 B G y I ,°o° 401 & Isolated
I/ �
1 ( ( 1 / O° Wetlands/Waters
Feature 1A j/ /j •
,, ; ' ♦ - - - 1- I 1 - - - / ,1 i / i Program & 401
;._t _ I / - Stormwater
;� _ 1 1 •/ I , l 1 I <20 Feet, No Credit
y, 1 1 1 1 I �' 1 Project:
1
<20-Feet, _ 1 1 ' > I - O. Om / / r
No Credit ••• .� 1 �' I v v - ., - - 1 RALEIGH FARM
/ - _ / c 1 , e Conservation Easement Offset From NUTRIENT OFFSET
1 t; All UtilityEasements b 5-Feet
�% 1/ y AND BUFFER
N \ / 1
� • � 1�; ;� MITIGATION BANK
------ : . _ _ _T - - __ - ." %, `�./ 1 ec` PARCEL
/\ PHASE A
1 Maintenance ROW: 0.012Acres �` _ ` .- ` may, �, `� °°° Wake Count NC
1 MW-127 • \ \ -� �! - - °- _ _ y
` Planting to Occur,No Credit ♦ 'ti \ _ _ J - - / ,qo 1 Title:
N , .
CREDIT
• _ - •- - .` _ _ r - •' , '�� DETERMINATION
<20-Feet, No Credit \ - - - - - ♦`
` 1 Feature 1A I - - __ -
MainTrib.2
♦ 1 Drainage Area F - _ -
•
Main Trib.2 . - -- - - ,
- - ! /'N '\ I - / N Imagery:2017 NC OneMap
Feature 6A Feature 6A Drainage Area y:1 - Drawn b RJH
// � - -
//,
• - ® 0 50 100 200 300 400 Date:
lam 1 / ' - Legend m Feet SEPT. 2021
0
/I �� - 0 Project Parcels Site Features By Classification NOTE ABOUT WIDTHS&CREDITING: Scale:
s
I 1 Proposed Easement:77.07 Acres - - - Intermittent/Perennial 1:2,200
1 O Riparian Buffer Credits(RBC)
Feature 6B ! I \\11 Maintenance ROW(Subject to the Ephemeral • Restoration Areas TOB to 20-29'qualifies for 75% RBM credit. Project No.:
y Conservation Easement, No Credit)
r 1 - - - In-Line Pond TOB-100 ft.=Buffer width is contiguous from TOB,is a minimum 2019 1692 V4
1 \ , -I Ephemeral Drainage Areas of 30 ft.from the TOB and maximum of 100 ft.from the TOB,
1 f l \ Phase A Credit Determination
• ( ) Surveyed TOB and qualifies for 100%RBM credit.
1 No Credit-Less Than 20 Feet
.\\,,,,, , ,,,, , ,,,
TOB Offsets RBC on Ephemeral Features(Res.from TOB to 100-Ft. FIGURE
. Preservation,RBC
- - TOB to 30 Feet Preservation from TOB to 200-Ft.).All RBC is within the
4 _ \ - Restoration, RBC contributing drainage area of the ephemeral feature,and
- TOB to 50 Feet will not total more than 25 percent of the total area of RBC. ��
♦\ Restoration, NOC
1 1 \ TOB to 100 Feet (Appendix B-Credit Determination Table)
IID \ \ \, ` % 1 '1 -- -, No Credit-Maintenance ROW/Byond N
I -- - - TOB to 200 Feet • -� 200-Feet Nutrient Offset Credit(NOC)
Nutrient Offset Credit is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of
i % I ,1 // RBC on Ephemeral Features 101 ft.from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft.from the TOB. •:,

Rs
�`
Gas Maintenance ROW: 0.276 Acres
ppp e�� Conservation Easement Offset From MW-56&TW-30
'S' �� All Utility Easements by 5-Feet Planting to Occur,No Credit
O° �ppt`°
Q° r RESTORATION
p�z / - -
SYSTEMS LTC
r _ N Maintenance ROW: 1.48 Acres
�\ Earthen Dam Prepared for:
• ' II• . No Planting,No Credit NC DEQ
Division of
• v ,� N Water Resources
♦ J _ ` r, 401 8� Isolated
- _ • — — — •-•N. N 4'�. Wetlands/VVaters
r _ 1 I =F. Program & 401
_ - - - _ i + f Stormwater
` ` . y i I Project:
Main Trib.2 � -- V� v ' RALEIGH FARM
1\
— - - t ♦ NUTRIENT OFFSET
_ — — _ `' ♦\ '-' - \ Maintenance ROW: 0.17Acres AND BUFFER
♦ \ • Constructed Wetland Outlet MITIGATION BANK
- _ _ , N i 1 • \ No Planting, No Credit
Pond 2 (Ag. In-Line Pond) ` - - - I, ; ; -. PARCEL
v PHASE A
\ ` \ ♦ N N Wake County, NC
NRRRF BMP Wetland Stand Pipe ' \ "' •• N
(Photo 5-Appendix A) . r ' • t Title:
NOTE ABOUT WIDTHS&CREDITING: _ A♦
`
Riparian Buffer Credits(RBC) r \ '♦ \ CREDIT
Restoration Areas TOB to 20-29'qualifies for 75% RBM credit. NRRRF BMP Wetland ` N N
(Photo 6-Appendix A) ` ♦ DETERMINATION
TOB-100 ft.=Buffer width is contiguous from TOB,is a minimum ` ,, N N ♦♦
of 30 ft.from the TOB and maximum of 100 ft.from the TOB,qualifiesN N ♦ \ • N ` Main Trib.2
andfor 100%RBMcredit. ♦ N
NRRRF BMP Wetland N
Outlet Pipe N. N N" ♦ N N
RBC on Ephemeral Features(Res.from TOB to 100-Ft. (Photo 7-Appendix A) - r • N N
Preservation from TOB to 200-Ft.).All RBC is within the - . N ti \ ♦ N
contributingdrainage area of the ephemeral feature,and •, N N ♦ \ 1 <20-Feet, No Credit
9 p \ Imagery:2017 NC OneMap
will not total more than 25 percent of the total area of RBC. _ N
(Appendix B-Credit Determination Table) 111111111111111 \♦ . Drawn by:
— Nutrient Offset Credit(NOC) - ,; ♦ \\N RJH
— Nutrient Offset Credit is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of ♦ N' N
A101 ft.from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft.from the TOB. •\, ♦♦` •- ; Date: SEPT. 2021
<20-Feet, No Credit Scale:
Legend f
, 1:2,200
fl Project Parcels Site Features By Classification K l: 0 % Project No.:
Pro osed Easement:77.07 - - - Intermittent/Perennial Conservation Easement Offset From•:. p All Utility Easements by 5-Feet -N N ♦ -- N \ 2019 1692 V4
Maintenance ROW(subject to the Conservation - - - In-Line Pond , Ntffil ® Easement, No Credit)441 Phase A Credit Determination o `\`O SurveyedTOB 1 - N FIGURE
ft No Credit-Less Than 20 Feet jTOB Offsets • Preservation,RBC ` ^�♦_�♦ II
TOB to 30 Feet 1- Restoration,RBC 1
- TOB to 50 Feet I 1 V 9B
., Restoration,NOC N
— - - TOB to 100 Feet Beddingfield Creek •
No Credit-Maintenance ROW/Beyond 200 feet g
TOB to 200 Feet 0 50 100 200 300 400
Feet

\ _ - - /- / % .- - -— I 1
t \ - Legend
% j \ O EE::: ::Acres
', f O 1/ ' p
- In-Line Pond
\ i '/ - / n Surveyed TOB - - RESTORATION
1 / - / TOB Offsets Phase A Credit Determination
SYSTEMS I LLC
Feature 6A 1 i / / / on. / @ - • — — TOB to 30 Feet No Credit-Less Than 20 Feet
` ! - - /�/ /„/
/ - - - - TOB to 50 Feet Preservation,RBC Prepared for:
}
- TOB to 100 Feet Restoration, RBC NC DEQ
I 1 \ \ Feature 6A Drainage Area Division of
Feature 6B + j 1 -- - - - TOB to 200 Feet Restoration, NOC Water Resources
No Credit Maintenance ROW/Beyond 200 feet
\ - - 401 & Isolated
I I - /// RBC on Ephemeral Features Wetlands/Waters
Program & 401
\ \ Stormwater
% \ - r1 NOTE ABOUT WIDTHS&CREDITING:
Riparian Buffer Credits(RBC) Project:
\ \ \ ���e Restoration Areas TOB to 20-29'qualifies for 75% RBM credit.
RALEIGH FARM
8 \ Q, 5 TOB-100 ft.=Buffer width is contiguous from TOB,is a minimum NUTRIENT OFFSET
I V •�03 5�e� '>. of 30 ft.from the TOB and maximum of 100 ft.from the TOB, AND BUFFER
\�o� ��a and qualifies for 100%RBM credit. MITIGATION BANK
1 °� O�°° RBC on Ephemeral Features(Res.from TOB to 100 Ft. PARCEL
I I �etq' Preservation from TOB to 200-Ft.).All RBC is within the
I 1 Q° contributing drainage area of the ephemeral feature,and PHASE A
! 1 J•e will not total more than 25 percent of the total area of RBC.
1 1 1 (Appendix B-Credit Determination Table)
Wake County, NC
1 • I Nutrient Offset Credit(NOC)
Duke Power(PNG)_Gas.Line •
142 Nutrient Offset Credit is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of Title:
./.."..,,,...- 101 ft.from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft.from the TOB.
I
. ,
<20 Feet,No Credit ',7 -, 'I,s •
-
1
II L_ F f `r +' CREDIT
4 .,,? tig4 'yr �� ,.+ . a DETERMINATION
Conservation Easement Offset From �:
R I 00 All Utility Easements by 5-Feet ,� '
yl
Imagery:2017 NC OneMap
/ Drawn by:
RJH
.../ ry Date:
.�r -- - - SEPT. 2021
% r ' '
' f' / Scale:
b ® 1 r-M'kr . ' /e/.. 1:2,200
44.
- * p11 � , ' • Project No.:
,t f ?.: , , 19 f 2019 1692 V4
' tom r
FIGURE
t 1 ,, 1 . Feature 7B, ,- / / ' 9
I , _
— — ...
_ , / Beddingfield Creek N
0 50 100 200 300 400 \ -
Feet / — -

I 0 50 100 200 300 400
Legend Feet
OProject Parcels Site Features By Classification ® O/aeaUCO
i,Ra
- Intermittent/Perennial0 RS
O Proposed Easement:77.07 Acres - - x t''
Surveyed TOB Ephemeral O r ;
*
TOB Offsets - - - In-Line Pond
TOB to 30 Feet Phase A Credit Determination RESTORATION
"" ,44 SYSTEMS I LLC
- - - TOB to 50 Feet - No Credit-Less Than 20 Feet 0 V.,. alls
- - - TOB to 100 Feet 0 Preservation,RBC }'
-- - - TOB to 200 Feet Restoration, RBC Prepared for:
NC DEQ
Restoration, NOC 0
Division of
• No Credit-Maintenance ROW/Beyond 200 feet Water Resources
NOTE ABOUT WIDTHS&CREDITING: 401 & Isolated
• Wetlands/Waters
Riparian Buffer Credits(RBC) Program & 401
Restoration Areas TOB to 20-29'qualifies for 75% RBM credit. Stormwater
TOB-100 ft.=Buffer width is contiguous from TOB,is a minimum
/
of 30 ft.from the TOB and maximum of 100 ft.from the TOB, ;:D Project:
and qualifies for 100%RBM credit. -
- — 0 ® RALEIGH FARM
.
RBC on Ephemeral Features(Res.from TOB to 100-Ft. '\ NUTRIENT OFFSET
•Preservation from TOB to 200-Ft.).All RBC is within the i - \ AND BUFFER
contributing drainage area of the ephemeral feature,and - '
will not total more than 25 percent of the total area of RBC. I" / / \ \ MITIGATION BANK
(Appendix B-Credit Determination Table) 1 \ 1 \'\ PARCEL
Nutrient Offset Credit(NOC) \ ♦
Nutrient Offset Credit is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of ♦ \ \ o. PHASE A
101 ft.from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft.from the TOB. �♦
` ` \ 4- Wake County, NC
y e
f)1:7" ♦ Title:
Feature 8A
♦ CREDIT
DETERMINATION
,., i, ;; �+ :. . r; rr M ;;fl - x. DETERMINATION
J
0 ..5
\
.fi
Imagery:2017 NC OneMap
..
L �% Drawn by:
?-- r. I 1 Main Trib.2 Duke Power(pNG)Gas Line 14 RJH
..:
2
I I i Date: SEPT. 2021
•
/ i `• Scale:
Project No.:
— ♦ 2019-1692 V4
•
FIGURE
`_ .. _ ... ...
-..
— 9 Beddingfield Creek D
_ _. _.
N
i

- // ! H •:r L., I
Legend
❑ CVS Monitoring Plots-37 Total Bank Parcel Features By Type
• a O Project Parcels - - - Intermittent/Perennial R
OProposed Easement:77.07 Ephemeral
Qa Maintenance ROW(subject to the Conservation - - - In-Line Pond
�a \v Easement, No Credit) RESTORATION
k\ TOB Offsets Phase A Credit SYSTEMS I LLC
c No Credit-Less Than 20 Feet
,co� - - TOB to 30 Feet
Preservation, RBC
- - - TOB to 50 Feet Prepared for:
Restoration,RBC NC DEQ
- - - TOB to 100 Feet
Restoration, NOC Division of
•
o - TOB to 200 Feet
Feature 2A , No Credit-Maintenance ROW/Beyond 200 feet Water Resources
a
Feature 3A o��' `.. . ` `a<11s '�"." ": 401 & Isolated
Feature 4A o MONITORING NOTES: -:1 Wetlands/Waters
Odd
_ ' Quantitative sampling will include thirty-seven(37)permanent Program & 401
�' Feature 4B 10 x10-meter vegetation plots, 2.04%of the Total Riparian Stormwater
Restoration Area(TRRA).
C°' Project:
1 I,-"7"'"7.'S'Si 1, 10 x10-meter vegetation plots= 1,076.39 sq.ft.
TRRA=1,955,991.000 sq.ft.
�� 1 1 1 II ❑ FeatturA RALEIGH FARM
/ Feature 2B 2`)/0 of TRRA=39,119.82 sq.ft./1,076.39 sq.ft.=36.34
41 I I , 4. NUTRIENT OFFSET
Feature 1A \`� ` _ s. II,\. o/d gau�om 36.34 round up=37 vegetation plots accounting for 2.04%of the TRRA. AND BUFFER
1 1 1 Ram MITIGATION BANK
- dBY .. I '1� '
- • \ i li ' " n.�, r ;'a,'' PARCEL
1
— _ ;�.:l / r \\ \ ❑\\� . — , ` /- PHASE A
•; _ - 0 ---- • •a - -\ , \\ \❑, _ _ , Wake County, NC
4
67
Feature 1 B l _ - Title:
-.�.,,_ ❑ - , , - „ —, `J-/ N'h', MONITORING
Feature 6A - p d PLAN
[�// Main \ _ _ -,\ 1 I,
1.1)\\ a5o - _ \\\ 1\\ '` Main Trib.2
� � .. /
``\. o�<G Main Trib.2 \ n%\\ . . ,.
\�. ° ��
of • •
\
, �ry \, �\ i o Pond 2(Ag. In Line Pond) '\ Q - •��\ ' i �\\
. . _, 1 f- co N -, \ • \ ( . Imagery:2017 NC OneMap
Feature 6B 1 II111 Onto \,\`• \\\, '\ \ \\%\\ \
.`' \' - Drawn by:
RJH
t r y444 // Feature 8A Q- ,
:::
• SEPT2021
..
:. :
/ i I ��-� ).Gas
k . • - • •• Project No..
ro'ect
'" A`-- � 2019 1692 V4
'= � Feature 7B / �� Beddingfield Creek FIGURE
10
N
0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 i
�r Feet

Raleigh Farm Bank Parcel-Neuse 01;Wake County Photo Date:09/29/2020
L-— _ _
Image 1: Phase A—Feature 1A&
8`" P'_ r SFr -? r
Y AP4 3
,;71,*:4±, ,,,..0 ...7 ,,_ 7_.
loitIkt
r ir,Ie,iikitt7,t•-
•
/ ldf i yam.' gR •7C' -
-, t4 l'' uteri.W + ` #!ititilrifilw„-f''''',./110441 ,...10 ;.-1,-,..4-7.1 i•-,'",,,,z',A.,..-.-_,-.:..kt.:....""7.11411,t'iii-‘1.,k, :410t4t5-.. - ..-= '-'4.- -
ipi
- _� t y r` - st� . '
IP
lciii
,� "fit li ,4 'a s _, ilk �_----
'Ei "' ' A:,.... 144 . • ,tor -IS.re -'''''' ' A.P 411,-.4 ' ,:-itiltikti-_,�
Image 2: Phase A—Feature 2B, rock in channel
1

Raleigh Farm Bank Parcel—Neuse 01; Wake County Photo Date:09/29/2020
E
ym( } - « ' ,j'{''+ �.r ' op,
4.0
4
S k '
Image 3: Phase A—Feature 5A
t -
Image 4: Phase A—Main Tributary 2

Raleigh Farm Bank Parcel—Neuse 01; Wake County Photo Date:09/29/2020
.. irit..,,,, • ,•;•,:;:..., -"..'.-.,.,..: !. A..,.:4;?•.,,,,..,.. ....:.....i._ .,„,.,,,..,.. ,.:.:,...,„:
•
lips„
� .4 r
"`,fir '^ �+Tt . r ,;
r . :
�� -.-
z�.p ' u. d y a 3�S -' -.,r`.€i` '"r
s mow yt.., e : 3 .,r ie 1 - t yi : ,` �,�, ai. a
'�l + ,-1 r tir a$ .$' g {z: .i:, r�s 1 a �° wy rf+& spa s
,Sfi 4 �h4�es if S.��X�u % I ,yYrda g.��i fia 9 a 4'
"•i?..W..f: ::ei'''''![:.'''1'151?-2".:14-Af gi4V4,0e:r74`,#)1W'.:1:.!'•''',:,.AN•10-';:%".:A":::-'4:: ::`,-;d1:47;k:.‘'7;•'•,444.70::'"3:11'4'.'
,.3!,),1-4', ":..o-;-::44-4-.'.:',.:,.,: ,,-;.: 1,‘-q.lt..z..t.,:,'.:.::.,,.i..—;1,47---x.'14'
Image 5: Phase A—Pond 2, BMP Wetland s4t,
tandpipe
h •
� �*Z } •
ate
Yt 2�r "1 ,w x d t �:
ar f d "P LAf ',d2t J,,� e',y''�
Image 6: Phase A—Main Tributary 2, NRRRF BMP Wetland

Raleigh Farm Bank Parcel—Neuse 01; Wake County Photo Date:09/29/2020
„ .:,,..,
.7::
3,
ey w s
5
i
4ti
9 1
--aw:.d� 'r .' e � ,� 0 �( � ��r"'�t�Dais, + ��,-/'@
'''' rye �\- �' ri � y a L y,.'-.
. .tea - e � � n � ;.'�`<-'�
tfi
ham- j} 1, r� °°'�74.``4, ,
' ^ ' `� k i� ,0 .- ram`...)-_,I.'''' -.,�l
�"_:if. f..n. ..' -w. vr . ._
Image 7: Phase A—Main Tributary 2,wetland BMP outlet through existing buffer(excluded
L.:-
from proposed easement.
s
‘IV
` ' r, -.y. .x ,, .,:::-.2:
' em\\\
a � �y '� mow^
4
atlt;
't 2 s'r , ,i.! � k to r{ a �''` "
Nq4
_szf,, k,!, i t s� , ,a-,,; ,
_.,,,,-_,_..,z,„;,r, -7;,,,,,_,,,,-,....„.„,..._,.2,......,,.4 ,,, ,, .......,..,,,,,,...:,..4.fiv,i,,,..‘„, .. ,1.9, "' 4'.-^
yry ' " jw fi r P F„TIN:, -, h`00,f -T ti -.;-.--1 R
/�" � �` � °�_ -'r a - ;it 4Y t ",'�7: � � �
_ a
Image 8: Phase A—Main Tributary 2, debris in existing buffer

Appendix B: DWR Correspondence
Raleigh Farm—Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4)
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201 Appendices

DocuSign Envelope ID:ACF875FD-8AA5-41A1-BD65-22AF9AA50486
. tK STATE0
ROY COOPER
Governor `
At
MICHAEL S.REGAN * .a,,,, f
Secretary 44` vos°:
S.DANIEL SMITH NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
August 17, 2020
Project 2019-1692 V1
Wake County
Barrett Jenkins
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules 15A NCAC 02B .0714
Project Name: Raleigh Farm Site Phase A
Address: 8599 Old Baucom Rd. (SR 2542), Raleigh, NC 27610
Location: 35.702396, -78.496346 (south of the road)
Site Inspection Date: 6/2/20 and 6/3/20
Dear Mr.Jenkins:
On June 2 and 3, 2020, Shelton Sullivan of the Division of Water Resources (DWR) conducted an on-site
review of features located on the subject property at the request of Barrett Jenkins with Restoration
Systems, LLC to determine the applicability to the Neuse Riparian Area Protection Rules, Title 15A North
Carolina Administrative Code 02B .0714.
The enclosed map(s) depict the feature(s) evaluated and this information is also summarized in the table
below. Streams were evaluated for being ephemeral, at least intermittent, and subjectivity to the Neuse
Riparian Area Protection Rules. Streams that are considered "Subject" have been located on the most
recently published NRCS Soil Survey of Wake County and/or the most recent copy of the USGS
Topographic (at 1:24,000 scale) map(s), have been located on the ground at the site, and possess
characteristics that qualify them to be at least intermittent streams. Features that are considered "Not
Subject" have been determined to not be at least intermittent, not present on the property, or not
depicted on the required maps.
This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity
within buffers or within waters of the state. There may be other streams or features located on the
property that appear or do not appear on the maps referenced above. Any of the features on the site
may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and subject to the Clean
Water Act.
The following table addresses the features observed and rated during the DWR site visit:
Noona pm Enonmental Quality I Division Re
D_E
��vvv,��J// 512 North rthCar SalisburyliDeart Street
ent 1of 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh,North
ofWater Carolinasources 27699-1617
Department or Eewranmeetai aueory 919.707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID:ACF875FD-8AA5-41A1-BD65-22AF9AA50486
Project 2019-1692V1,Raleigh Farm Phase A
Wake County
Page 2 of 3
Feature Feature Type Subject to Start @ Stop @ Depicted on Depicted on
Point ID (stream/pond/E/I/P1) Buffer Soil Survey USGS Topo
(ditch/wetland/other) Rules
1A Ephemeral No 1A 1B Yes No
1B Stream-At least Yes 1B,Above the 2C,Confluence with Yes Yes
intermittent confluence Main Tributary 2
with Main
Tributary 2
2A Ephemeral No 2A 2B Yes No
2B2 Stream-At least Yes 2B 2C,Confluence with Yes No
intermittent Main Tributary 2
Main Stream-At least Yes 2C,Includes Confluence with Yes Yes
Tributary 2 intermittent Pond 2,and Beddingfield Creek
continues to
the easement
and property
line
3A Ephemeral No 3A Confluence with Main Yes No
Tributary 2
4A Ephemeral No 4A 4B Yes No
4B Stream-At least Yes 4B Continues to the Yes No
intermittent confluence with Main
Tributary 2 _
5A Stream-At least Yes 5A Continues to the Yes No
intermittent confluence with Main
Tributary 2
6A Ephemeral No 6A 6B Yes No
6B Stream-At least Yes 6B Continues to the Yes No
intermittent confluence with
Beddingfield Creek
7A Not Present No See site map See site map Yes No
7B Stream-At least Yes 7B Continues to property Yes No
intermittent and easement
boundary
8A Stream-At least Yes 8A 8B Yes No
intermittent
8B Ephemeral No 8B 8C,dissipates within Yes No
the wetlands&
floodplain of
Beddinfield Creek
9 Not Evaluated Not See site map See site map Yes No
Evaluated
10 Not Evaluated Not See site map See site map Yes No
Evaluated
11 Not Present No See site map See site map Yes No
1 E:Ephemeral,I:Intermittent,P: Perennial
2 A small area of the stream below 2B has been impacted from by sedimentation from the adjacent farm field and an
old farm path,however,DWR considers this area to be at least intermittent and subject to the Buffer Rules.
This on-site determination shall expire five(5)years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute this determination made by the DWR may request an appeal determination by the
Director of Water Resources. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) calendar days of the
date of this letter to the Director in writing, as per 15A NCAC 02B .0714(4).

DocuSign Envelope ID:ACF875FD-8AA5-41A1-BD65-22AF9AA50486
Project 2019-1692V1,Raleigh Farm Phase A
Wake County
Page 3 of 3
If sending via U.S. Postal Service: If sending via delivery service(UPS, FedEx, etc.)
Paul Wojoski - DWR 401 & Buffer Paul Wojoski - DWR 401 & Buffer
Permitting Branch Supervisor Permitting Branch Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center 512 N Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Raleigh, NC 27604
This determination is final and binding as detailed above, unless an appeal is requested within sixty(60)
calendar days.
This letter only addresses the features on the subject property and within the proposed project easement
boundary and does not approve any activity within buffers or within waters of the state. If you have any
additional questions or require additional information, please contact Shelton Sullivan at
[e-mail] or 919-707-3636. This determination is subject to review as provided in
Articles 3 &4 of G.S. 150B.
Sincerely,
DocuSSiignn�e/d by:
�GzwG Woio
949D91BA53EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski
Supervisor, DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting
Attachments: Site Map with labeled points, NRCS Soil Survey, USGS Topographical Map
cc: Raymond Holz via email [e-mail]
Barrett Jenkins via email [e-mail]
Katie Merritt via email [e-mail]
401& Buffer Permitting Branch files
Filename:20191692v1_RaleighFarmPhaseA_StreamCalls.docx

Poil
DocuSign Envelope ID:ACF875FD 8AA5 41A1 BD65 22AF9AA50486 , - fir..
", Legend
r • z / O Working Conservation Easement- Post Viability Site Visit: Phase A-81.87 Acres
: '. �„¢ 0 CORPUD - Site Viability Site Visit- Feature Call Pins - Phase A
a %.
� ,. • / I. �) Bank Phase
n Propsoed Gas Line Proposed and Temperary
Easements
" •
_1.
. Existing Utility Easements
_ CORPUD -Post Viability Site Visit Features
q — — — Ephemeral
r---- ------� @ Intermittent@Road C t In-Line Pond
j 1 - Post Viability Site Visit- Mapped, Non-Features
• j w j I {'yI., j
Feature I Ephemeral I j j I
E
0 .. Feature 2'Start � "
Feature 4 —- j •
Ephemeral EQ Property Line
Feature 4 Intermittent '
AG j.
1I Feature 9 Ephemeral ,d o 0 0 0 .. .
CZP o Feature i3 �� ,•,wr �.•
.Ni--• .:
• Feature ii Q ii Ephemeral I I n_ .
Pon
14,
— - -. *) ' ,40_,
d
Feature 6:Start Ephemeral ^�
I
Feature 6 Start Intermittent #< 6
•
-
: ;') li.. ... . - - -•:,%`,',, .4'.- '.:
r
ram; ,,,,, '. 4,......'''' ._,,,:,„:. .);::1'1..."•':'..;,',,,,.:'... .--,,•.•: •'-•• % .,.::
s
Feature Start Irifermlttent
atu. -
.--- --- Feature Intermittent
__ ' k `
1
a•. . -. , � it
•
F'
_
/ I E`. aa=3
,
Feature 7;y ��
-` IntermittentI.--rall -••• $_,`.;, ,,, - ..,.
1t..'.....;..:.,....,,,,,....'.-.., ' ,,.-: V....',i,.d.Zoi:::::,*--;-:..—.1.:..-Z.,-;:a..,4'.11"-:,--I.
y ~� 'AO , 1.''...'. ''''' .r'
r.--", ...., ....:..7- .. tc., „4,0.-„. Atlk. .
-
•
..r..'� • �. � � .fi. '`ia -ram - M• � .:cg �' '} .�
• � .'{ ..'rd�".
-, � - .M.�,. ..:., .: _ _'.. .., 4Q t� • - Arm . L� �
�' "»v a 1,.n V 3. '�,1- !
•
• it •" ,;. .., � .., '�.. , , •, ,: .,w a �
- '.-.. ' SCALE: 1in=SOOft N .
RESTORATION SYSTEMS,LLCS .40
CORPUD -Site Features
-., ` - :_: • r �V 1101 HAYNES ST,SUITE 211 DATE: 06-2020 Phase A
RALEIGH,NC 27604
PHONE: [phone] SITE: CORPUD
FAX: [phone]
_ I. 4 Ths map antl all tlata contamad withn are suppLetl as a wim no wananty rzeet«aren systems uc exprea it Aerial Imagery:
y iRESTORATION
dsGaimsrespo sbltyf«tlamages«lablty rmmanyeiazns hazmaya aaommt neuaenrmaueedmamap.itls Feet (c) services.nconemap.gov
RESTO RATION he sde re pons b ty o the use to tle enn ne f the tlaza on to s map's co pat de w h[he users needs Th's map
was not created as survey d:ta,nor shoultl it be used ae such.It is the user's responsibility to obt ain proper eorvey Coordinate System:
SYSTEMSLLC daze rearedbalicensetlsurveorwh«ereuiredbylaw. 0 125 250 500 750 1,000
NAD 1983_SP_NC_FIPS 3200 Ft.

DocuSign Envelope ID:ACF875FD-8AA5-41A1-BD65-22AF9AA50486
� '-
Legend II f �. `t
I I
Draft Easement 11/L ® 1.
1-i s ,
w,
• ` -
\\ .•
- Axiom EnYM4fl�f'rli8�,Inc.
- ®. c , �
. r�1 1 I • " i "• Prep ared for:
I �
I -- 1 ' I — itistis "
. 1 " illrikir I * , , 4
'��, i "'l ; II : -.,„. RESTORATION
=z. ii
,i ' �� M _ _ SYSTEMS I LLC
IiL , _ IJ �
r .�
L - - - •. J .v. Project:
'•� 1.1
`• �� •
� , 1 2 � _ O/ Banc - ��r RALEIGH
n 1 - I• r °'n'R a NUTRIENT
1 � - •.• .,� I '.• •` ''tii -11.
- SITE
�� r�'ti E 'ti. '•Y �. e fir? ` - ••r Wake County, C
'f nt N
ti I ' ti j- ti Ir 1 *'�'�•
Drawn by:
I� • °•� I. a ►T C 1
51
` MH
� � _ ,.� r'oe
1 11.11 -� I r F fi 1.1',I r Il'i •• Date. 2/10/2020
' I� : I1r _- �•,�� Ir - — I'd. •� Scale
%
4iii
i .
ki%i I J °' q ti i 1}�e ®, 1t ire •� J 4. . ,.� 4 J r .I Title:
- ' Iill
�' , a ''. 'I '�1 d• �'� `� PRELIMINARY
— .I ®' �� I L-4 �.� -\- nu-.
= 'ti POTENTIAL
I .. 4I «. 1!• •'': �•I ; riLL.,6: _l_mmay° .II\ ' y
r % , . r
:I pi! )6Z r` "'
i \ • I Im 1115W
I._ . )1 .
mil g
-_._. A I 1 C.,) rii -, .-- • „, --- -‘,4.
I °� __� — � �61.1.i le ti — I i Phase A
.. 1..1 I I: — — k.-i i r---#r�
om• F..ii "'II •-•___i_iiire_iri-
: - ti..
_ - .11
,lThnst‘ 1980
I. cr-
s.., r' - �� .—- -
:• � • . 111
�r I -� �. I.II
Soil Survey
1 IL rr
(I\ Ft m r- ...-1-- \ 0
Ilk Lill i
- -. }e � r •
aill I ' FIGURE
1� •• a (I.! ..: E _ - NJ
N-1-_-• 'j [ .e l''' 1 II r'' . illi . 5 l• - • . ,. „LI , .
, . 2le I
'-� � — 0 1,000 2,000 4,000
- , / 1i II;I,i = Feet
_ Feet
I ti • ��• -

DocuSign Envelope ID:ACF875FD-8AA5-41A1-BD65-22AF9AA50486
——4--—.) jj A. 4 U"j ( \ ---....„...„
---....._ .440104.011b. \\ \ N 1
Legend 1 s, .:- . r,/ Ad. 46:41 \ ''k
1 4 \Ai\ ss
s '-_......,.-_:,-..,-- -, i_t*-7,._.....1,,,,1.,--_4_
2it1...I[.—_.;____, Bank Phase �' , - �` 0R/i /
Draft Easement i `' '' \ —
2........44.....i.,......... .14'4%'.,..%..,r.""*I/i.-.l1i,
.f.i9rl-)1l N.---...,,,--1-
01i
iooA,7,pi-
irvff-i i or1e.--r-.,L i1Aird1 114irea4d i,1 at4 l%a 11.-l1f1#6k' s
ie
rrAj—i
pshoiilit.iga4frp
�^ "`� '� � � �wmm
� -`-\I _-\--_ m A lucam Enwrron+nenial,InI.
cii
i Prepared for:
, Ill
a il i 116 I
l PI)/
N.\
1 AL1111314 ! I ■ RESTORATION
SYSTEMS I LLC
4...• ' i
iitivi4 L -Al .4... ! ) I j Project:
RALEIGH
\46..
)4464% ji \ 4'01 tie
1 II
' oid B �= i NUTRIENT
o
„, sok ihk Atilio Akii6mor , titi 1 -.4.)
CIL): • �- tit ', Cc:! � SITE
\es 1,\S\j ' :and4ii-iit,,„,__- _,
Wake County, NC
. i -,..........b.„.........„.,.,,b.,_-. -_-- ______ MH
- Drawn by:
4 Date:
/(IrriiiiiiiiHil -, - . 1i- l' 2/11/2020
� � �� � j� Scale:
I
M k ICI I i Al ' IA i Title:
''` il i i PRELIMINARY
{ �'i lb . III
\\ '\ ' P - -1 ...
MITIGATION
1/4'..----,-71,, ili �. Iiiiik)illiF POTENTIAL
\ --rs DIP ie
)....,.. .... . .
' ‘1P\ '4%
\ ii •
..„
.,
t ..---- \I
. ,,,......0), „
1 1 lihN
r, - 1,.,,- 441iii, ___
of
Phase A
i
-------------
.:)., \II, „cumin.1
/ e11 14OWPOih I
.,4
: 1°Ir "
`-- - -----f. - USGS Quad
"``. am-
, _ -6-\--1/4--'.\\.
':'rN I'I,-I-I--I-,I--I-I--,%-,- __11__%- p
r-1
-. 1 ",' # 24k
Arcinallrile . 1 4411.i i • �� FIGURE
� (PAltitl/
t
k. iiiki,,
AillAkill 4111111."11111111k,
Lai& i i 1 4 iiii . it;:::-.)) - 0 1,000 2,000 4,000
1 Feet

o ms)nEnvelope ID:AC geFD-8AA5-41Al ao 5-22 gAAm#B
Phase A: Wake County Soil Su re for Refeence
1.'ilm82 _ .
\2�� j
�E \ C|� I V. � � 2 y�e` 46".
Alm.
n ' . ltsII. .%
,;:ii
® /= Ap B
\ \LIB < .
Cn N \ � i / � . _ _ ,
\ � Cn / / mC2
&, �'
» %g \ . . - . J \ & i
4r - � ¥ 6 : ApB \ Ap§2 \ Wm12 \
i 0 ' a m - w 22 W rC2 I. ~ :
C 4 B2 AEC \ , \f ; ! 82 No B ' ` - ' Ap82
No z ƒ NoB2 A R j IN
III} 2 . ' ° m C � 4a22 - Noe /01-
mAAI ADC
� � , ~ °
o : M e 1 ApC2 AP A p t f \ \ ¥ °c' / 4
A. / Du • • Apg ^ P .}OD Ag
. kE LoC \ ■ %
7.
\ . A' ApC + / 11111 . ' Wac |
* .
'- - B U - ' Apn2 )
Wm F. Cer ^ = \ / :',,
kE
') c-/ - . /`

DocuSign Envelope ID:8DCB19AE-A3A7-43EC-863C-D027560F280D
_—• STATE 0,,,
oi µp 0,' O
4
ROY COOPER �'� a'
_, <2 i
Governor a
MICHAEL S.REGAN * 4,w =,.letrb _`
Secretary ft` ^^O`"
S.DANIEL SMITH NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
September 24, 2020
Barrett Jenkins DWR# 2019-1692v1
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
(via electronic mail: bjenkins@a restorationsystems.corn)
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation &Nutrient Offset—Raleigh Farm Phase A Site
Near 8599 Old Baucom Rd (SR 2542), Raleigh, NC 27610
Lat., Long. 35.702396, -78.496346 (south of road)
Neuse 03020201
Dear Mr. Jenkins,
On February 11, 2020, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a
request from you on behalf of Restoration Systems, LLC (RS) for a site visit near the above-
referenced site in the Neuse River Basin within the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201. The site
visit was to determine the potential for riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset within a
proposed Easement Boundary, which is more accurately shown in the attached map labeled
"CORPUD-Site Features Phase A" prepared by RS and edited by DWR. On June 2, 2020 and June
3, 2020, Ms. Merritt performed site assessments of the subject site and identified the following site
constraints:
• UTILITIES: Gas lines are being proposed on parts of the site where streams are located.
Existing powerline easements are also present. Specific locations and associated
easements of gas lines were unknown at the time of the DWR site visit, but the attached
CORPUD figure details where the proposed and temporary easements will be located.
• PERMITS: State, Federal and/or Local permits may be associated with this property.
Wetland delineation flagging and other stream call determinations were observed on the
site.
• EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE: The City of Raleigh owns the property on the site
and has used the land for applying biosolids associated with the Neuse River Resource
Recovery Facility (NRRRF). Existing underground and above ground infrastructure is
present for purposes of irrigating the property. The City of Raleigh Public Utilities
Department (CORPUD) manages the property. Existing dirt paths, culverted crossings,
deeded access roads and greenways are present throughout and are adjacent to ditches
and streams onsite where mitigation would be proposed. Some Groundwater Monitoring
Wells were located onsite, but their locations are not depicted on any maps attached to
this correspondence. All existing infrastructure within the proposed conservation
easement shall be delineated and included as part of the site's restoration plan along with
specific details on management and maintenance and what will be included or excluded.
o Application of bio-solids will not be permitted within a conservation easement.
D E Q North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
NORTH CAROLINA
OOO 512 North Salisbury Street 11611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 2 76 9 9-1 611
Department of Environmental Quality � 919.707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID:8DCB19AE-A3A7-43EC-863C-D027560F280D
Raleigh Farm Phase A Site
Restoration Systems,LLC
September 24,2020
o Impervious surface will not be permitted within a conservation easement unless it
is an access easement or located outside of creditable areas for mitigation or
nutrient offsets.
o Disruption in connectivity between top of bank and adjacent riparian areas will
not be permitted within a conservation easement.
o Monitoring wells must remain fully functional and shall be allowed to be
maintained and accessed as needed.
• BMP: A constructed wetland is present onsite adjacent to Pond 2 and shall not be
included in planting efforts or as creditable areas for mitigation or nutrient offset.
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
and landward 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
Feature Classification 1Subiect 7Riparian Land uses Buffer 3Nutrient 4'5Mitigation Type Determination
onsite to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset w/in riparian areas
Buffer (0-200') Viable Viable
Rule
1A Ephemeral No Mostly non-forested 2,8yes Yes (non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
agricultural fields with forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(7)
some mature forest areas only)
Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
15ANCAC 02B.0295(o)(4)
1 B Stream Yes Mostly non-forested 2Yes Yes (non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
agricultural fields with forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
some mature forest areas only)
Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
15ANCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
2A Ephemeral No Combination of non- 2,8 Yes (non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields Yes forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(7)
and mature forest areas only)
Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
15ANCAC 02B.0295(o)(4)
2B" Stream Yes Combination of non- 2Yes Yes (non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
and mature forest areas only)
Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
15ANCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
Page 2 of 6

DocuSign Envelope ID:8DCB19AE-A3A7-43EC-863C-D027560F280D Raleigh Farm Phase A Site
Restoration Systems,LLC
September 24,2020
Feature Classification 1Subject 7Riparian Land uses Buffer 3Nutrient 4'5Mitigation Type Determination
onsite to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset w/in riparian areas
Buffer (0-200') Viable Viable
Rule
2C Stream Yes Combination of non- 2Yes Yes (non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
Main forested agricultural fields forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
Tributary 2 and mature forest areas only)
Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
A gas line is proposed to 15ANCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
impact stream;existing
utilities are present(see All areas within existing easements
map) including utilities must be excluded from the
Restoration and Preservation Site.
Cannot be used as a Restoration Site until
after gas line is constructed&
construction easements are no longer
needed
Pond 2 in-line pond Yes Combination of non- 2Yes Yes (non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
and mature forest areas only)
Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
Permitted BMP is located 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
along left side of pond and
shall not be included in The dam needs to have controlled
planting efforts or areas for access by RS and should be deeded
credit along with Conservation Easement so
that dam integrity is maintained. No
trees can be planted&no credit
obtained along the dam or within
controlled access area.
3A Ephemeral No Mostly non-forested Yes (non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
(ends at agricultural fields with 2°8Yes forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(7)
confluence mature forest at the top of areas only)
of 2C/Main reach. Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
Trib) 15ANCAC 02B.0295(o)(4)
4A Ephemeral No Mature forest No Preservation Site per 15A NCAC 02B
2 8
Yes .0295(o)(4)
4B Stream Yes Combination of non- 2YeS Yes (non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
(ends at forested agricultural fields forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
confluence and mature forest areas only)
of SA) Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
15ANCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
Page 3 of 6

DocuSign Envelope ID:8DCB19AE-A3A7-43EC-863C-D027560F280D
Raleigh Farm Phase A Site
Restoration Systems,LLC
September 24,2020
Feature Classification 1Subject 7Riparian Land uses Buffer 3Nutrient 4'5Mitigation Type Determination
onsite to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset w/in riparian areas
Buffer (0-200') Viable Viable
Rule
5A Stream Yes Combination of non- 2Yes Yes (non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
(continues to forested agricultural fields forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
confluence and mature forest areas only)
of2C/Main Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
Trib) A gas line is proposed to 15ANCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
impact stream;existing
utilities are present(see All areas within existing easements
map) including utilities must be excluded from the
Restoration and Preservation Site.
Cannot be used as a Restoration Site until
after gas line is constructed&
construction easements are no longer
needed
6A Ephemeral No Combination of non- zs Yes (non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields Yes forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(7)
and mature forest areas only)
Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
15ANCAC 02B.0295(o)(4)
6B Stream Yes Combination of non- Yes (non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields ZYes forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
and mature forest areas only)
Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
A gas line is proposed to 15ANCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
impact stream;existing
utilities are present(see All areas within existing easements
map) including utilities) must be excluded from
the Restoration and Preservation Site.
Cannot be used as a Restoration Site until
after gas line is constructed&
construction easements are no longer
needed
7A Not Present No N/A N/A N/A N/A
7B Stream Yes Non-forested agricultural Yes Yes Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
at DWR flag fields .0295(n)
8A Stream Yes Combination of non- 2Yes Yes (non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
and mature forest areas only)
Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
15ANCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
8B Ephemeral No Combination of non- No No directly connects to wetlands
(ends at 8C) forested agricultural fields
and mature forest
Page 4 of 6

DocuSign Envelope ID:8DCB19AE-A3A7-43EC-863C-D027560F280D Raleigh Farm Phase A Site
Restoration Systems,LLC
September 24,2020
Feature Classification 'Subject 7Riparian Land uses Buffer 3Nutrient 4,5Mitigation Type Determination
onsite to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset w/in riparian areas
Buffer (0-200'1 Viable Viable
Rule
8C wetlands No fully forested No No N/A
8D not present No N/A N/A N/A N/A
9 not evaluated N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
I 0 not evaluated N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
11 not evaluated N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated August 17,2020 using the 1:24 000 scale
quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared'by the NRCS .
2The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent(25%)of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295(o)(5)and 15A NCAC 0295(o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3NC Division of Water Resources -Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment
4Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
5 All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset,must have a conservation easement established that includes the tops of
channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks,even if no creditst is viable within that riparian area.
6 A small area of the stream has been impacted from sedimentation and rip rap which needs to be removed
7 Landuses may also include the application of bio-solids associated with the NRRRF
8The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent(25%)of the total area of buffer mitigation
per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(7).
Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas shown in Figure 1, Figure 2 and the CORPUD map. Maps representing the
proposal for the Site are attached to this letter and are initialed by Ms. Merritt on September 24, 2020.
Substantial changes to the proposed easement boundary as well as site constraints identified on page 1
of this letter could affect the Site's potential to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface
waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a proposed
nutrient load-reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for approval prior
to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian restoration,
enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to be eligible for
buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being viable for nutrient
offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting calculations and
sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to determine viability
for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.

DocuSign Envelope ID:8DCB19AE-A3A7-43EC-863C-D027560F280D Raleigh Farm Phase A Site
Restoration Systems,LLC
September 24,2020
This viability assessment will expire on September 24,2022 or upon approval of a mitigation
plan by the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset,
buffer, stream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site.
Please contact Katie Merritt at(919) 707-3637 if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
IDocuSigned by:
P .e moo/. ,
949D91BA53EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
PW/kym
Attachments: Phase A-Figure 1, Phase A-Figure 2, CORPUD-Site Features Phase A
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
Page 6 of 6

DocuSign Envelope ID:8DCB19AE-A3A7-43EC-863C-D027560F280D
DS
Phase A Figure 1 C 9/24/2020
44 fi - �ert Ora' tie • cad
i_ • I„ #? i i
iti. .. . .reet --. 2i la (52mfMr - lit 1 1... •
Y /l�
q
Featuors 1 �', r _ `► . .gt •, F ,, fit Not Present 1 t 'Y�
I
4. main Tri. ti _ _ ;, t.,;..�
fFeature 6 St._ I.Er rr+?r ../ i."
• TWA:6
j . ,
rr!.il l-r1 stir! i„1�Kfnilllsntp - - ,F- r —
-.7, itillY.
\ , , ..
r F
i . Not Present --. a...I i#1, 4 ...Y PY ";-"rnil uric' ' .. .
".3rt'fr1=rrvtte
r
r --
•
1F
,ice—: 1

DocuSign Envelope ID:8DCB19AE-A3A7-43EC-863C-D027560F280D
ADS
Phase A - Figure 2 `0 - 9/24/2020
Ire-Lire Pond
- --�-- Post Viab kkly Site Visit - Mapped. Ion-Features
t
t -+ s
1 ii
1
11
a _
/ ,.. ' - .i I,,a . art'Iriterrit 1
=atu r_r!WI.'
iiP
_1) kM
) .- . "'.. ,
__ _ ..�

DocuSign Envelope ID:8DCB19AE-A3A7-43EC-863C-D027560F280D t? r
'ED
a os �, ems`
*%4RitoZA 'foe-- ''A'4, .
11f NN
taps
2 < 9/24/2020 hn al
F
r
+.; t 8
t 1 I I
;.;E @ 1 I,1I w N 8
a; ; /I - -.: I y W
N N c
_ C N
( A
A' _ w N � IS G a
U I
i o
ix
R
mc 'N ar I
ig r
o md `i
I
a . . / o E i
H
Hi
�
m
:moo
HDi!Ii
H0UHhU
is/ /iI iil 1 1
O • '^! O I I I I 11 --' j Q3j;
J - .—. U I if1 J g s)
Ill
a
..".' , l' -'' I * j : : / - ...•-''' 7-''''''';': 1
I-G ill
j
it a
jiC
r
o I �1
\ I
1j I1
$� iLL .su \.\' F: .. -
J -\ y
k x.`t1,: a� Mrw1L
, dig ) , \ �`
'4,i". P. i 1 tt
m II
Ali. "4< _ ;,:. �_ f9� 'o€
1 `
LL n
I
J
g B
N - w Eoir hR,J N
ic, oa° 1 1 11' t_ ,- \''''', -.1,-'------.---r 1 r
/!
1 \ �'
o f ,
w \
N

DocuSign Envelope ID:8DCB19AE-A3A7-43EC-863C-D027560F280D
Docu51.§171.
S ECURED
Certificate Of Completion
Envelope Id:A4D24159DB9F48139B9C2B67134772F7 Status:Completed
Subject: Please DocuSign:Raleigh Farm A Figures.pdf
Source Envelope:
Document Pages:3 Signatures:0 Envelope Originator:
Certificate Pages: 1 Initials:3 Katie Merritt
AutoNav: Disabled 217 W.Jones Street
Envelopeld Stamping: Disabled Raleigh, NC 27699
Time Zone: (UTC-08:00)Pacific Time(US&Canada) [e-mail]
IP Address: 149.168.204.10
Record Tracking
Status:Original Holder:Katie Merritt Location: DocuSign
9/24/2020 1:23:15 PM [e-mail]
Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Katie Merritt DS Sent:9/24/2020 1:23:28 PM
[e-mail] �'Clk'• Viewed:9/24/2020 1:23:35 PM
DWR Signed:9/24/2020 1:24:17 PM
DEQ Freeform Signing
Security Level: Email,Account Authentication Signature Adoption: Pre selected Style
(None) Using IP Address: 149.168.204.10
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
In Person Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Editor Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Agent Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Intermediary Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Certified Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Carbon Copy Events Status Timestamp
Witness Events Signature Timestamp
Notary Events Signature Timestamp
Envelope Summary Events Status Timestamps
Envelope Sent Hashed/Encrypted 9/24/2020 1:23:28 PM
Certified Delivered Security Checked 9/24/2020 1:23:35 PM
Signing Complete Security Checked 9/24/2020 1:24:17 PM
Completed Security Checked 9/24/2020 1:24:17 PM
Payment Events Status Timestamps

Docu51§171.
S ECURED
Certificate Of Completion
Envelope Id:8DCB19AEA3A743EC863CD027560F280D Status:Completed
Subject: Please DocuSign:Raleigh A Site Viability to Sign.pdf
Source Envelope:
Document Pages: 10 Signatures: 1 Envelope Originator:
Certificate Pages: 1 Initials:0 Katie Merritt
AutoNav: Enabled 217 W.Jones Street
Envelopeld Stamping: Enabled Raleigh, NC 27699
Time Zone: (UTC-08:00)Pacific Time(US&Canada) [e-mail]
IP Address: 149.168.204.10
Record Tracking
Status:Original Holder:Katie Merritt Location: DocuSign
9/25/2020 9:44:33 AM [e-mail]
Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Paul Wojoski cDccuBignedbY: Sent:9/25/2020 9:45:17 AM
[e-mail] P""1�0�°' Viewed:9/25/2020 1:56:04 PM
�949D91BA53EF4E0...
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Signed:9/25/2020 1:56:15 PM
Security Level: Email,Account Authentication
(None) Signature Adoption: Pre-selected Style
Using IP Address: 149.168.204.10
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
In Person Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Editor Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Agent Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Intermediary Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Certified Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Carbon Copy Events Status Timestamp
Witness Events Signature Timestamp
Notary Events Signature Timestamp
Envelope Summary Events Status Timestamps
Envelope Sent Hashed/Encrypted 9/25/2020 9:45:17 AM
Certified Delivered Security Checked 9/25/2020 1:56:05 PM
Signing Complete Security Checked 9/25/2020 1:56:15 PM
Completed Security Checked 9/25/2020 1:56:15 PM
Payment Events Status Timestamps

Barrett Jenkins
From: Saunders, Erickson G <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 11:14 AM
To: Barrett Jenkins
Cc: Merritt, Katie; Thornburg, Nathaniel; Dalton, Marla
Subject: RE: [External] RE: WQ0001730 - City of Raleigh RLAP Additional Information Request
Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Barrett,
The project is still in house with us at the moment, I believe we are still waiting on one more thing from the additional
information request not related to the buffer restoration project.
You are right,the permit will reference this project and have a condition that a permit modification shall be submitted
to formally remove the sections that are a part of the buffer project. I don't know if we necessarily have authority to
provide the approval for the implementation of the plan, but we have no objections to the implementation as long as it
is removed from the permit and the final easement is sufficient. Katie mentioned that our office and hers would work
internally to provide you with assistance with the easement language that we would require.
As for what we might need from you,the only other comment I had for the CoR's response was that there was not an
updated acreage table for the residuals land application fields after the conservation easement goes into effect. I see
that there are certain amount of acres that are considered overlap on the maps, but I would still want the post-
easement acres in a nice table to put into our permit. I know Marla had also mentioned that some of the fields would be
too small and would be removed altogether, so CoR should propose which of those fields should be removed altogether.
Let me know if you have any other questions.
Erick Saunders
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Permitting
[phone] Office
[e-mail]
From: Barrett Jenkins [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 6:26 PM
To: Saunders, Erickson G <[e-mail]>
Cc: Merritt, Katie<[e-mail]>;Thornburg, Nathaniel <[e-mail]>; Dalton, Marla
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: WQ0001730-City of Raleigh RLAP Additional Information Request
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify.Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Erick,
1

I am working on a final draft for our buffer restoration/nutrient offset project on Raleigh's NRRRF property and wanted
to check in with you to see if Raleigh had completed their biosolids application permit renewal and if that renewal
mentioned future plans to implement the buffer restoration project as discussed?
We are looking for written approval from you to allow us to implement our restoration plan and then have Raleigh apply
for a permit modification to formally update the spray field maps after our conservation easement is recorded.
Please let me know where things stand from your end and if I can provide anymore information.
Katie Merritt, who is permitting our restoration project is cc'd as well as Marla Dalton with Raleigh Water.
Thanks,
Barrett Jenkins
Restoration Systems
512.230.0424
From: Saunders, Erickson G <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 3:16 PM
To: Merritt, Katie<[e-mail]>; Barrett Jenkins<[e-mail]>
Cc:Thornburg, Nathaniel <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: WQ0001730-City of Raleigh RLAP Additional Information Request
Katie, it's kind of my fault, my additional information asked for them to provide a draft excerpt of the future
conservation easement. I'm not familiar with how your process works so I threw it back on the City of Raleigh to provide
it to me. I didn't ask for anything final regarding the easement,just a draft to ensure the easement would fall within the
scope of our rules. We won't approve anything based on what we receive, it was kind of meant to be a launching point
to make sure it was known that the easement would need special considerations and language to address the
requirements of our program.
Mr. Barrett,
We recognize that whatever maps you send aren't finalized at the moment. I expect we will issue the permit with a
condition for Raleigh to provide a permit modification to formally remove those areas from the permit to get the
finalized version. We just want to anticipate the removal of certain land application areas now so that we have
something concrete in place to help formalize their removal later on.Just to be clear though, Raleigh should be
providing this information to me, so you may want to provide this information to them because they are supposed to
provide a "Post-buffer mitigation map"which shows what land application areas will still be permitted after this action is
done.
As for the language you provided, it'll probably need to get edited to conform with our rules, but this can be done down
the line if needed. It looks to be missing provisions allowing for the State to enter the site for groundwater monitoring
and remediation activities, which is a requirement in the 02L .0107 groundwater rules.The bolded language only
appears to grant Raleigh that kind of access. Again,that's just off the top of my head and is in no way comprehensive,
and we'll discuss with Katie and probably the Groundwater Section to determine what all needs to be included in the
final easement. We'll also discuss your other final questions regarding the level of restriction and specific easement
language.
Regards,
Erick Saunders
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
2

Water Quality Permitting
[phone] Office
[e-mail]
From: Merritt, Katie
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 2:30 PM
To: Barrett Jenkins<[e-mail]>; Saunders, Erickson G <[e-mail]>
Cc:Thornburg, Nathaniel <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [External] RE: WQ0001730-City of Raleigh RLAP Additional Information Request
Hey Barrett,
Just as a side note, I will be taking the lead on providing RS with language for the conservation easement
associated with the Proposed Mitigation Bank. Therefore, Erick,Nathanial and I will work internally together
on what that language needs to be before sending anything to RS. Then, I will contact RS directly with the
suggested language to include and we can discuss. At this time, DWR is not ready to engage in assistance with
the conservation easement since there is not yet an MBI or Plan approved for the Bank yet. Once we get those
documents finalized, DWR staff will meet to go over the necessary changes to the current easement template.
Unless I have misunderstood, I don't believe Raleigh is required to have a conservation easement recorded to
get the permit renewed.
Let's plan to talk more about this next week at our teams meeting.
Thank you,
Katie
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Barrett Jenkins<[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 11:24:51 AM
To: Saunders, Erickson G <[e-mail]>
Cc: Merritt, Katie<[e-mail]>;Thornburg, Nathaniel <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] RE: WQ0001730-City of Raleigh RLAP Additional Information Request
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify.Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Erick,
Please find attached two draft maps showing areas in which the proposed conservation easement overlaps with existing
fields approved for residuals application. At this point our conservation easement is in draft form and we don't
anticipate finalizing until later this year. Is it okay to provide you updated maps of the changes in the residual
application field boundaries after the Conservation Easement Survey is finalized? This may not coordinate with Raleigh's
permit renewal schedule exactly. I'm asking to make sure I understand what we need to do but also when. Are these
maps sufficient for Raleigh residuals permit renewal that is in process?
Also attached is the draft conservation easement which already includes the below language:
"ARTICLE IV.
GRANTEE'S RIGHTS
3

,if1 R
ROY COOPER gxj` '" j
Governor v
MICHAEL S.REGAN .0.,,..�.
Secretary *`4,aw+vv-0
LINDA CULPEPPER NOR THTCAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
November 21, 2019
To:
N.C. Division of Mitigation Services, Private &Public Mitigation Banks, other Interested Parties
Subject: Clarified Procedures for Calculating Buffer Mitigation Credits&Nutrient Offset Credits for
Riparian Projects Regulated under 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and 15A NCAC 02B .0240
This letter, and the included attachments, outlines procedures and provides guidance for calculating
buffer mitigation credits and nutrient offset credits for projects submitted to the Division of Water
Resources (DWR) for review. In March 2019, the DWR established a small Work Group ("Group")
consisting of 7 people to discuss crediting inconsistencies for nutrient offset and buffer mitigation
projects. The Group consisted of 3 staff members from DWR, two staff members from the Division
of Mitigation Services, and one representative from each of two private mitigation banks. The
procedures and guidance provided in this letter were made by consensus from the Group for
implementing 15A NCAC 02B .0295 ("Rule .0295") and 15A NCAC 02B .0240 ("Rule .0240).
These procedures are for implementing buffer mitigation or nutrient offset projects where a
draft mitigation plan or a draft Bank Parcel Development Plan (BPDP) is submitted to the
DWR for review after the date of this letter. All other projects must comply with mitigation
plans and BPDPs submitted to DWR for review prior to the date of this letter.
A summary of the issues resolved by the Group and associated guidance for credit calculations are
detailed in Attachment A `Issues and Resolutions Ver 1.0—Buffer Mitigation &Nutrient Offset".
For further information regarding this correspondence,please contact Katie Merritt with DWR at
katie.merrittO)ncdenr.gov or by phone at 919-707-3637.
Sincerely,
Jim regson
Deputy Director, Division of Water Resources
Attachments: A, B, C, and D
DEQ North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
';) 512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
NORTH CAROLI
Depalmoal d Environmental wrm 919.707.9000

Attachment A
Issues and Resolutions Ver 1.0 - Buffer Mitigation& Nutrient Offset November 21,2019
Issue#1: Procedure for crediting mitigation activities within riparian areas for buffer
mitigation and nutrient offsets.
Applying ratios and reductions under 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (m) and (n)respectively for buffer
mitigation credit, while also applying the DWR-Methodology and Calculations for determining
Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer Establishment
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Water%20Quality/Planning/NPU/Nutrient%200 ffset%20Rule/Ag-Buffer-
Creditpdf, often leads to differences in measuring and accounting. Establishing procedures on how
credits are measured, calculated, converted and presented in mitigation plans involved addressing
inconsistencies and creating guidance on rounding, significant digits,units of measurement, as well
as developing credit ratios and conversion ratios.
Resolution: Established(a) guidance for rounding& decimal places, (b) guidance for physical
measurements, (c)buffer mitigation credit ratios, (d) credit conversion ratios, (e) formula for credit
conversions, and(f) a format for presenting credits.
a) Established guidance for rounding and decimal places. See Table 1.0
Table 1.0—Guidance for Rounding
Physical Credit Ratios& Credits 'Nutrient Effectiveness for
Measurements Credit Conversion Phosphorus&Nitrogen
Ratios
Round to nearest whole Round to 5 decimal Round to 3 decimal places Round to 2 decimal places
number places
Example: Example: Example: Nitrogen: 2,273.02 lbs/ac/30yrs
1,452.6424 ft2= 1,453 ft2 6.06061444=6.06061 49,625.4876 ft2=49,625.488 ft2
Phosphorus:146.40 lbs/ac/30yrs
�D WR-Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment https://f les.nc.gov/ncdeq/Water%20Quality/Planning/NPU/Nutrient%200ffset%2oRule/Ag-Bu_ffer-
Credit.pdf
b) Established guidance for physical measurements. See Table 2.0
Table 2.0—Guidance for Physical Measurements
Credit Type 'Mitigation Activity Unit of Guidance
Measurement
Riparian Buffer Riparian R/E/P/Ex Square Foot Measure area and
round to the nearest
whole number
Nutrient Offset Riparian R/E Square Foot Measure area and
(Nitrogen) round to the nearest
whole number
Nutrient Offset Riparian R/E Square Foot Measure area and
(Phosphorus) round to the nearest
whole number
'R=Restoration,E=Enhancement(not cattle exclusion),Ex=Enhancement for permanent
exclusion of grazing livestock,P=Preservation
Page 2 of 8

Attachment A
Issues and Resolutions Ver 1.0 - Buffer Mitigation& Nutrient Offset November 21, 2019
c) Established a buffer mitigation credit ratio for each scenario under 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(m) and(n). See Table 3.0
Table 3.0:Buffer Mitigation Credit Ratio
Stream Buffer 'Mitigation Z'°Min-Max s UnitP 1 4% 5Final Credit Riparian
Location Subjectivity Activity Buffer Width Full Ratio Credit Ratio(x:1) Buffer Credit
( ) (x:1) (ft2)
N/A N/A R,E and P <20 0 0 0
N/A N/A R 20-29 1 75% 1.33333
N/A N/A R 30-100 1 100% 1.00000
N/A N/A R 101-200 1 33% 6.06061
N/A N/A E,Ex 20-29 2 75% 2.66667
N/A N/A E,Ex 30-100 2 100% 2.00000 Credits(ft2)
N/A N/A E,Ex 101-200 2 33% 6.06061 rounded up to
Rural Subject P 20-29 10 75% 13.33333 3 decimal
places
Rural Subject P 30-100 10 100% 10.00000
Rural Subject P 101-200 10 33% 30.30303
Rural Non-Subject P 20-29 5 75% 6.66667
Rural Non-Subject P 30-100 5 100% 5.00000
Rural Non-Subject P 101-200 5 33% 15.15152
Urban Subject or Non- P 20-29 3 75% 4.00000
Subject
Urban Subject or Non- P 30-100 3 100% 3.00000
Subject
Urban Subject or Non- P 101-200 3 33% 9.09091
Subject
1 R=Restoration,E=Enhancement(not cattle exclusion),Ex=Enhancement just for permanent exclusion of grazing livestock,P=
Preservation,
tall minimum physical measurement ranges of riparian widths are measured landward and perpendicular from top of bank and
assumed to be continuous with top of bank without breaks
3 Derived from 15A NCAC 02B.0295(m)
4 Derived from 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n).
5 Combining initial ratios in Rule.0295(m)with physical measurements and corresponding credit reductions in Rule.0295(n)
Page 3 of 8

Attachment A
Issues and Resolutions Ver 1.0- Buffer Mitigation& Nutrient Offset November 21,2019
d) Established credit conversion ratios for Nitrogen and Phosphorus to simplify the conversion
of buffer mitigation credits (square feet) into nutrient offset credits(pounds) where credits
are deemed by DWR as being eligible for either credit type. See Tables 4a and 4b.
Table 4a:Nutrient Offset Credit Conversion Ratio(CCR) in Square Feet per Pound without Delivery Factors
'Service Area z 'Min-Max 3Initial 'Nitrogen 'Phosphorus Nutrientr
CrCredits
edits
River Basin/WS and Hydrologic Mitigation riparian Unit CCR CCR
Unit Code Activity Width(ft) Ratio (ft2/pound) (ft2/pound) (Ibs)
(x:1)
Cape Fear—Randleman
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Catawba
R&E N/A N/A N/A N/A
Neuse-03020201 (Lower Falls Credits(lbs)
Lake, Upper Falls Lake, Outside 50-200 1 rounded up to
Falls Lake),03020202,03020203, R 19.16394 N/A 3 decimal
Neuse 03020204 50-200 2 places
E 9.58197 N/A
Tar-Pamlico-03020101,03020102, R 50-200 1 19.16394 297.54099
03020103,03020104,03020105
E 50-200 2 9.58197 148.77050
Yadkin—Goose Creek
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
service area is defined in 15A NCAC 02B.0240 and G.S. 143-214.26
2R=Restoration,E=Enhancement(not cattle exclusion)
2All minimum physical measurement ranges of riparian widths are measured landward and perpendicular from top of bank and
must be contiguous with top of bank
4DWR-Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer Establishment
https://files.nc.go v/ncdeq/Water%20Quality/Planning/NPU/Nutrient%200fset%20Rule/Ag-Buffer-Credit.pdf
Page 4 of 8

Attachment A
Issues and Resolutions Ver 1.0 - Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset November 21,2019
Table 4b: Nutrient Offset Credit Conversion Ratio(CCR)with Delivery Factors
Credit Generated(Ibs/30
Jordan Subwatershed Nitrogen Phosphorus
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 2,249.360 143.810
Cape Fear-Jordan Upper New Hope 2,169.260 143.810
Cape Fear-Jordan Lower New Hope 2,273.020 146.400
Rounded Up to 5th decimal
Delivery Delivery Nitrogen Phosphorus
Jordan Subwatershed Watershed ID Factors Factors CCR CCR
TN TP (sf/pound) (sf/pound)
IP
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002010010 25% 10% 77.4620z 3,028.99661
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002010020 37% 36% 52.3392; 841.3879'
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002010030 44% 40% 44.0125; 757.2491'
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002010040 49% 44% 39.52145 688.4083.
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002010050 55% 48% 35.2100; 631.0409;
IP
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002020010 15% 4% 129.10339 7,572.4914'
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002020020 22% 12% 88.02501 2,524.1638
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002020030 48% 43% 40.34481 704.4178
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002020040 32% 33% 60.5172; 917.8777.
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002020050 32% 32% 60.5172; 946.561''
I.
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002020060 47% 42% 41.20321 721.1896
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002020070 54% 47% 35.86206 644.4673
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002030010 60% 56% 32.2758! 540.8922'
Cape Fear-Jordan Flaw 03030002030020 44% 31% 44.0125; 977.0956:
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002030030 25% 8% 77.4620z 3,786.2457
Cape Fear-Jordan Flaw 03030002030040 42% 30% 46.10836 1,009.6655'
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002030050 64% 62% 30.25861 488.547:'
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002030060 39% 19% 49.65515 1,594.2087'
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002030070 36% 18% 53.79306 1,682.7758'
Cape Fear-Jordan Flaw 03030002030080 73% 64% 26.52810 473.2807.
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002040010 30% 14% 64.55170 2,163.56901
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002040020 28% 14% 69.16251 2,163.56901
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002040030 71% 63% 27.27531 480.7931
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002040040 32% 15% 60.5172; 2,019.3310
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002040050 52% 50% 37.2413: 605.7993.
Cape Fear-Jordan Flaw 03030002040060 54% 51% 35.86206 593.9209
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002040070 67% 60% 28.9037! 504.8327
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002040080 53% 51% 36.5387( 593.9209
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002040090 54% 51% 35.86206 593.9209
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002040100 75% 65% 25.82066 465.9994:
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002040110 66% 60% 29.3416E 504.8327
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002050010 74% 68% 26.16961 445.4406:
Cape Fear-Jordan Flaw 03030002050020 81% 74% 23.9080z 409.3238
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002050030 42% 17% 46.10836 1,781.7627
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002050040 80% 73% 24.20689 414.9310'
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002050050 71% 67% 27.2753: 452.0890'
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002050060 79% 73% 24.51331 414.9310'
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002050070 78% 72% 24.8275E 420.6939:
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002050080 80% 73% 24.20689 414.9310'
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002050090 79% 73% 24.51331 414.9310'
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002050100 81% 75% 23.9080z 403.8662.
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002060010 81% 74% 23.90801 409.3238
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002060020 95% 97% 20.3847! 312.2676'
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002060030 88% 91% 22.00626 332.8567
Cape Fear-Jordan Flaw 03030002060040 97% 98% 19.96449 309.0812'
Cape Fear-Jordan Flaw 03030002060050 92% 95% 21.0494: 318.8417'
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002060062 98% 99% 19.76071 305.9592;
Cape Fear-Jordan Upper New Hope 03030002060070 40% 19% 50.20146 1,594.2087
Cape Fear-Jordan Upper New Hope 03030002060080 59% 45% 34.03489 673.1103,
Cape Fear-Jordan Upper New Hope 03030002060100 69% 63% 29.10230 480.7931
Cape Fear-Jordan Upper New Hope 03030002060110 61% 58% 32.9189S 522.24081
Cape Fear-Jordan Upper New Hope 03030002060120 69% 63% 29.1023d 480.7931
Cape Fear-Jordan Upper New Hope 03030002060140 85% 89% 23.6242; 340.33671
Cape Fear-Jordan Upper New Hope 03030002060130 69% 63% 29.10230 480.7931
Cape Fear-Jordan Lower New Hope 03030002060160 85% 90% 22.54581 330.60111
Cape Fear-Jordan Upper New Hope 03030002060090* 92% 94% 21.8267; 322.2336'
Cape Fear-Jordan Lower New Hope 03030002060090* 92% 94% 20.8303: 316.5329
Cape Fear-Jordan Upper New Hope 03030002060060* 94% 96% 21.3623; 315.5204:
Cape Fear-Jordan Lower New Hope 03030002060060* 94% 96% 20.3871i 309.9385
Cape Fear-Jordan Upper New Hope 03030002060150* 88% 91% 22.81885 332.8567.
Cape Fear-Jordan Lower New Hope 03030002060150* 88% 91% 21.77720 326.9681. Page 5 of 8
*Watershed is located in both the Upper New Hope(UNH)and Lower New Hope(LNH)Subwatersheds.

Attachment A
Issues and Resolutions Ver 1.0 - Buffer Mitigation& Nutrient Offset November 21,2019
e) Establish a formula for credit conversions. See Table 5.0
Table 5.0 Calculation Formula for Credit Conversions
Credit Type 'Mitigation 'Credit Conversion Formula Final Project
Activity (Quantity/Credit Conversion Ratio=X) Credits
Riparian Buffer Riparian Creditable Area(ft2) _Final Buffer Credit Ratio=X
R/E/P/Ex ft2 buffer credits
Nutrient Offset Riparian R/E Total Area(ft2) _Credit Conversion Ratio ft2/lb-N= rounded up to
(Nitrogen) X lbs-N 3 decimal
places
Nutrient Offset Riparian R/E Total Area(ft2) _Credit Conversion Ratio ft2/lb-P=
(Phosphorus) X lbs-P
IR=Restoration,E= Enhancement(not cattle exclusion), Ex=Enhancement just for permanent exclusion of grazing
livestock, P=Preservation
2 A user-friendly tool has been developed in conjunction with this memo to assist in entering a project's credits.
This tool is referenced in Issue#1 (f)of this memo.
f) Developed a format for presenting credits in project plans submitted to the DWR. The
"Project Credit Table" template is a user-friendly"calculation tool" to calculate a project's
riparian buffer and nutrient offset credits and is designed to comply with Rule .0295, Rule
.0240, and the guidance provided in this letter. The calculation tool is useful and
recommended, and is intended to increase efficiency in the review process. A link to the
most up-to-date calculation tool is found at https://deg.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-
resources/water-guality-permitting_/401-buffer-permitting-branch/nutrient and a screenshot is
included in Attachment B. A set of instructions for using the calculation tool is included in
Attachment C.
Page 6 of 8

Attachment A
Issues and Resolutions Ver 1.0 - Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset November 21, 2019
EXAMPLES
Example A- Calculating Buffer Credits on Agricultural land within 0-100'riparian width: Using
Tables 1.0-5.0 included in this memo, and the Project Credit Table referenced in(f)below, the
following example is provided:
A total creditable area of 2.2 acres(95,832 ft2) of agricultural land within top of bank to 100 feet
adjacent from the Neuse River is approved for riparian restoration("R"). The site will yield the
following buffer credits:
Project Credit Table
Nelrse 03020201-Outside Falls lake .VIM Area
19.16394 aN Credit Ratio(st/Credit)
N/A P Credit Ratio(sr/credit)
Matta Total
tenter NO if Min-a7r Buller iGaditsble) Initial Credit Firul treat Convertible R BufferCredit Type Location Feature Type Mitigation Activity Fertwe Nana Total Area(18 %fuR CredN to Riparwn
ephemeralor Width(It) Area deulter Ratio(r1) Ratio pall LAW!
ditch') MNtgation(s8
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Restoration 0-100 Neuse River 95,832 95,832 1 1009r 1.00000 Yes 95.832.000
Instead of using the Project Credit Table above, one can enter the formula from Table 5.0 as follows:
Creditable Area (ft2) ± Final Credit Ratio=X ft2 buffer credits
95,832 ft2_ (1.0 x 100%)= 95,382.000 ft2 buffer credits
Example B- Calculating Nutrient Offset Credits from Example A
Using Tables 1.0-5.0 included in this memo, and the Project Credit Table referenced in(f), the
following example is provided:
Project Credit Table
Neuse03020201-Outside Falls Lake Service Area
19.16394 N Credit Ratio(sr/credit)
N/A P Credit Ratio(sr/credit)
iuerertT Toed
Deter NON Coare.d6t. iemwar! Delivered
i[eedloWei Initial Credit Anal Cleat RiparianBul'
Credit Type Lowden eirberraral et Feature AWyatien ArdNtY 1YMMr� Teenee Nave TeelArea(dl Area al Buller Retie bell Mi+dl Gent Rem 6n11 malarial 8ullut CreAb ea Partrimo Nubians
Mal
Offroonlard
dace r) aatiPtion(A
Nutrient O0Nat Rural ear I/P Restoration 0.100 Neese River 95,432 95,832 1 1005k 1 00000 Yea 95,832 015 Yes 5.0006a1
Instead of using the Project Credit Table above, one can enter the formula from Table 5.0 as follows:
Total Area (ft2) _ Credit Conversion Ratio ft2/lb-N=X lbs-N
95,832 ft2 - (19.16394 ft2/lb-N)= 5,000.642 lbs-N nutrient offset credits
Page 7 of 8

Attachment A
Issues and Resolutions Ver 1.0 - Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset November 21,2019
Issue#2: Clarifications to DWR response to Item I. of the March 10, 2017 memorandum to
DMS from DWR titled"DWR Responses to Questions from DMS regarding implementation of
the Consolidated BufferMitiation Rule (15A NCAC 02B)"provided in Attachment D.
DWR issued a memo to DMS on March 10, 2017. Item I of this memo clarifies how to calculate the
25% of the total area of buffer mitigation cited under 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4), (o)(5) to achieve
the allowed amount of preservation area. Examples on how to calculate the Total Area of Buffer
Mitigation(TABM) and the Eligible Preservation Area(EPA) are included. However, the memo
does not address when applicable credit ratios and credit reductions provided in 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (m) and(n) should be applied to the TABM to achieve the EPA.
Clarification: To achieve the EPA, the TABM is calculated by measuring the area of Restoration
(R) and Enhancement(E)before applying any credit ratios and credit reductions provided in 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 (m) and(n).
Example: [2 acres (R) + 1 acre (E)J/0.75 = 4 acres (TABM)
4 acres (TABM) *0.25 = 1 acre (EPA)
1 acre (P) + 3 acres (R/E) = 4 acres total
Page 8 of 8

Sr
il2
' III11 111111 11111 1
k !R
-! III i I 1 I I IIIIIII111
oz/
IV
f , IIIII 72 § K § \ -SEE= =• : , 77 : ;
0 ) ;
/ {k i II i 111r [ ( / : _ � 2 !
/\_ _ ,\ D cr
` \ } � � �
^ - § ( § \k
( ) § 2k ) ( z )
_ _ e 2 � e \
# = : | i-
} z
} - 2 .6. 2s8
72
k 2)
/ _=! - -
2 - - 0 s§)k!
c / })ƒ 13_#af . .
E E y
/ / - ° / Ti \ /
< •— - * - ks »
B • _ 5 ƒ I
E at 5
w ■
2 2 2 2 \ { -
TZ k ) / ƒ j
- 7 \/ \{ � }
} ; ! ; i ! -
2$ . . E \
/ ) ) ) 2 - {
{ ff i { )
! ! $
\
\ \ }
/ g)\e I
=. l2 ` )
y ! )
\ \ u ) )
k k )
2t i
43 k b (

cc o E u
a x ' o"' ° o c % a' E a -0 a a $
c ^ ° a >. o L
ai
E ^tp^. o c a m a 3 a as
o i ` •' L E 'a •N y�'j '6
=w c a C m y -ap
F- C m CU EO p 'c w o
It oo a y c 2 o a m aE'
.i o .` u �
w
U _ `a a- . z a`i ,n ro
.> >
1- r 0 � u c ` -a •c o c v
-� a m r0 o N p a io N ^ m w
aL-. m E U L N L C > > O O� u
0 o u 0 u c E w n + '2 N >
0..
m '^ o Y c •._ o U cE h
a N p C ? y a 8 .a U O O v w
7). 'S v - E 3 a e m v
X 0 O
w w m .'ai . w m w o 0 aai C o a a
•c $ o m m a .c ` - -0 w v o rn m
a H w �I A m x m c CC n a U > o
u r w E ° u E v y °+ E ° v _ c z -VV +s
L u Gl C ; la O ` uu of ' c m y`�,. aw+ 3 O O N Cr.
U 5 w W 7 m " t0 --pp w o
L U J C m a •� m a m Z yw, O w EC u
L E C Y a, CO -- f0 0 a, wm lA Y a ' 2
o a- 3 � E c .- '' •a a'' > c ` �, Y C c°, E - ,^ •D .n
o C O o > 7 V .•-1 C
w c m a - > ° 'o E o E �° >
v' m .0 1 w E v 2 w E a a - o u • v N E
C v E '> a a`, ° o ?i E m -2 -, u �c •c E m "� .w
p - ° o `w Y r v u ,- y a
cs
?N" w rav m -0 'U v o 0 ° o v v m p v Wo m
i H Oi cu ON 7a 2 a Ea. a8 a+ r0 cc c •
ra
aac avm v+, -8 3 a, m a a' o co a o y Z N m YU , 8 N w up - Lu EuEu
.. a) o ° a E m Z _ > Qa+• UW CwO Y r -° w C a) O 1 C > E m N U -0 m
C p N N E > 1 > r. m c c ~ n v • o ` c ^ cN o IIta N m :° g Z r^
E c' TEu 'w va aa' c o p a
a o F., o c N o u u H m Qv °
CO'; ym e w m cn v a> w ` ° 0 pN w - > -o3a u wwmU ~ v a a, Co s > vi `>
as 'a a o a °} b a > c c c y a L E ._ m a a' a v a a' m a a
te 73 m ~ ° . > ', cVI N d o m .Co Lk E ONa., a i -o ' ' c •,Q Cy p '� O aa a) m ( ' m
a, m --- m o > s 0 0o N ' o C rn
Is E u m o c mc °° b m E o ° a
a-+ m vcd '^ c > ^ o. o a, co u c f o
u u a u mm — aa mmy o E ID o ¢ m> 2a "I
� o a + r u _ > > v w ` .0
2Z .o ,0n
w Y a O
, w F- •) vt O m c m
O a E o a a a c u -O w E o am2 wmQ o
aa m k •- wc - aY ow u a c c v ° ° a, ) vzw wE 'Es E ^'a c jw v E 8t
= _ •c " w E ° E - o > wOcca
L a I- > ° c 3 w '. . L au ya m Lo
a n- mc
VI CL
w r c an; ---c L .0 E - L0 o No v 0) C L.) a 4+ O
-a L E o > o 71
C . m Y •C -a tero - 31- c 3 m c a a Qanw Yw0 'w Uam e = + a o • o c m - ZZzv' `
. yY dw = Cw7m t E m 5 (u0 ° Y O Y c N 00
v v m o a mc w a c ocmCU p c r> -2v o N a 0 rr C E .roL .. aa c E a 2 Y -, o CO m m ..0 o c
v ) co 0) y Ym � w a 03 5 o r c u o v , ac C 0 n o n .E. w m m$ v v c Z " - r0 $ `' • c N a ca ° cN O am wa -a> . ao ° and a - w 1 Y . 25Yw2 L1 u'a m ,c a ` c c w w7, a w 2 ; d L ` o d ,2ro E m $ Lcc o o o °. . .4 '^ vo
co
E
E
re _ C o m o � ' _ .= o = E o c c 3 w � ow a - a m a o c w E E .2cea
a = E 7 -0Nv m s 'cb Wa ° ° 0 NOm C '3 • L y ac $ a U C m O O o au2wN - > o CC o , .-
mo N 'o ° _ - E G a o v a v ' u0 two m , > a _0 N E 7 = u C
aN n cu c mI ! U ! H !- !UI
> -owwc m > E W - c m
- v C, O - C o w a ma °'E c n w N. - ° -2 -(7m v o .L ' y
u E - u p E vC wm v aE m EE Ezac �> a
y $ au ms Ow O a aa > Eam d °-o
CO2 : a` oLmuuE •` > Tm y Q cc •c
m -v • Y 3 m v-O p „ : -. z -i o .�w
W C L X w_ wi o m OC > Up L LLG Fm m .
" L a- w . h ra s a�
0
OoE E >v ° civ •z; nu wu au Ym HaaE mm a^
N u E ww $ s U t ":: :
HOto ©aaE £ wp 5 ,aa 2m r E v Cmc >oo` it°,-
-m :2;
Tit
c
Tv
" ^ U ° 0Ea) oo `
T a V c a ` ' 'a V w va° c vaO ` a - m > 0 VI y' a oo oo
w Y a v • s
_om > 3 Z le te'c m m a > bYyoa ° 0 HH - c 'a U o ¢ m N m m• In o N 00 m I I I I I o 72 K o w o cerrczi-

Attachment D
ROY COOPER
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALf TY S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
March 10, 2017
MEMORANDUM
To: N.C. Division of Mitigation Services
From: S.Jay Zimmerman, N.C. Division of Water Resources Director 's
Subject: DWR Responses to Questions from DMS regarding implementation of the
Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule [15A NCAC 02B .0295]
On November 8, 2016,the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) met with the Division of Water
Resources (DWR)to discuss questions they had regarding implementation of the Consolidated
Buffer Mitigation Rule [15A NCAC 02B .0295]. Below is a short summary of each question and
DWR's response.
I. Calculation of"25%of the Total Area of Buffer Mitigation"
15A NCAC 02B.0295 (o) (4)and (5)state "The area of preservation credit within a buffer
mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent of the total area of buffer mitigation."
DMS believes the following calculations should be used to determine the area eligible for
preservation:
Restoration (R)+ Enhancement (E) + Preservation (P) =Total Area of Buffer Mitigation (TABM)
TABM * 0.25= Eligible Preservation Area (EPA)
Example: 2 acres (R)+ 1 acre (E)+ 7 acres (P)= 10 acres (TABM)
10 acres (TABM) * 0.25 =2.5 acres(EPA)
Response:
In the example above,45%of the area of the site would come from preservation, with the
remaining 55%coming from restoration/enhancement:
2.5 acre (P)+ 3 acres (R/E) =5.5 acres total
Based on a review of the language in the rule,the documents throughout the rulemaking
process, including correspondence with OSBM on the fiscal note,areas where buffer
mitigation credits are not being generated should not be used to calculate the "total area of
buffer mitigation."
The restoration or enhancement area shall be at least 75%of the area generating buffer
mitigation;the remaining 25%of the area generating buffer mitigation can be preservation:
75% (R/E) + 25%(P) = 100%TABM
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh.North Carolina 27699-1617
919 807 6300

Page 2 of 3
To calculate the area eligible for preservation:
[Restoration (R) + Enhancement(E)]/0.75 =Total Area of Buffer Mitigation (TABM)
TABM * 0.25 = Eligible Preservation Area (EPA)
Example: [2 acres(R)+ 1 acre (E)]/0.75 =4 acres (TABM)
4 acres (TABM) * 0.25 = 1 acre (EPA)
1 acre (P)+ 3 acres (R/E)=4 acres total
II. Defining Breaks Between Restoration and Enhancement Areas
DMS asked for clarification on how DWR defines the breaks between restoration'and
enhancement2. Specifically, DMS asked whether drip lines were still used and whether
individual trees were excluded from restoration sites.
Response:
DWR has not considered the drip line to represent the outer edge of a wooded area for
several years. This was clarified in a memo from DWR to DMS in August 2013. Individual
trees do not need to be delineated and removed from the restoration area, rather DWR
looks for areas or zones when determining restoration, enhancement or preservation areas.
For example:
r1S-
410
IP
Restoration
4.1 Enhancement
VI P Preservation
- ? ft ip1H
'characterized by an absence of trees and by a lack of dense growth of smaller woody stems or
are characterized by scattered individual trees such that the tree canopy is less than 25%of the
cover and by a lack of dense growth of smaller woody stems
2 characterized by conditions between that of a restoration site and a preservation site such that
the establishment of woody stems will maximize nutrient removal and other buffer functions

Page 3 of 3
III. Prior Grazing
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6) describes enhancement of grazing areas adjacent to streams. It
states that the applicant or mitigation provider shall demonstrate that grazing was the
predominant land use since the effective date of the applicable buffer rule. DMS asked
when is the predominance of grazing demonstrated?
Response
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (I)states that the authority shall issue a mitigation determination that
specifies the area,type and location of the mitigation and the water quality benefits to be
provided by the mitigation site. During the on-site evaluation, DWR looks at existing
conditions to determine whether grazing has been a continuous land use in the proposed
mitigation area (e.g. hoof shear, manure, cattle fencing, etc.) since the effective date of the
applicable buffer rule. DWR also evaluates satellite imagery. If it is not clear to DWR that
grazing has been the predominant land use since the effective date of the applicable buffer
rule, DWR will ask for additional documentation (e.g. landowner documentation, photos,
maps, etc.).
If the grazing site is proposed for retroactive credit as described in 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(o)(1), additional documentation of the pre-existing conditions may be required.
If there is a disagreement regarding the documentation requested by DWR,the request will
be elevated to the Water Quality Permitting Section Chief.
IV. Clarification of Use of 8-19-08 Diffuse Flow Clarification Memo
DM5 asked for verification that the Buffer Interpretation Clarification Memo#2008-019,
issued August 19, 2008,was still eligible for use, and whether that method or an alternative
method as provided for in the rule could be used at the discretion of the project proponent.
Response:
The Buffer Interpretation Clarification Memo#2008-019, issued August 19, 2008, is still
eligible for use to comply with 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (1)(3).

From: Merritt,Katie
To: Rav Holz
Subject: Buffer Subjectivity-Ag Ponds-Raleigh Farms
Date: Friday,September 10,2021 11:42:57 AM
Attachments: 20191692 Ver 4 Draft BPDP-Raleigh 20201224.pdf
Hey Raymond,
This email serves to acknowledge that two (2) in-line ponds associated with the Raleigh Farms A Site
& Raleigh Farms B-C Site are considered "not subject"to the Neuse Buffer Protection Rules due to
the fact that they are agricultural ponds and are therefore "exempt"from that Rule under Session
Law 2013-413 Section 52 . Pond 5 on the Raleigh Farm B-C site and Pond 2 on the Raleigh Farm
A site are both "not subject" and therefore shall be referred as such in any Bank Parcel Development
Plans (BPDP) and corresponding Figures/Credit Tables submitted with the Plans. A site plan attached
to this email shows the ponds referenced above.
Thank you for you attention to this matter,
Katie

Appendix C: USDA, NRCS Web Soil Survey Report
Raleigh Farm—Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4)
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201 Appendices

USDA United States A product of the National Custom Soil Resource
Department of Cooperative Soil Survey,
Agriculture a joint effort of the United Report for
N RCS States Department of
Agriculture and other Wake County,
Federal agencies, State
Natural agencies including the
Resources Agricultural Experiment North Carolina
Conservation Stations, and local
Service participants
Raleigh Farm: Phase A
.=
... frr '
/ }4sii, k ;5. Rig,„
i j .: - • a fd Fk•
iiR LI rti
• .
...
I+ .:..,4,-4-... .. .- . ,;.-a L . 1...11_,_ _ ( - .4.,. .t .:„...
,... ,. .._. ,
•.7. ;;.:t •!.1 -___
� � 1 i
4.
r
..i, .,._
0 2-000 ft
June 1, 2021

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs)or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist(http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice)or(202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3

Contents
Preface 2
Soil Map 5
Soil Map 6
Legend 7
Map Unit Legend 8
Map Unit Descriptions 8
Wake County, North Carolina 11
ChA—Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes,
frequently flooded 11
DoB—Dothan loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes 12
HeB—Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 14
RaA—Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 15
RgB—Rawlings-Rion complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes 17
RgC—Rawlings-Rion complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes 19
RgD—Rawlings-Rion complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes 21
W—Water 23
WeB—Wedowee sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 23
WeC—Wedowee sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes 24
WfB—Wedowee-Saw complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes 26
References 29
4

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
5

Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
a
P
725800 726000 726200 726400 726600 726800 727000 727200 727400 727600 727800 728000
35°42'17'N - 35°42'17'N
8
; N
- -_- e''se River
1
;e-- L-L .
,Wf-�� �-.,. G3 _ _
o-
h ..
R / `HgB.RgCI HeB\ Rgpf6 'I 'ti a
RgB .. y fB , . = Old sat, Ro �- Al
. . • - - HeB RgDP 4
`x '
RgC
' _5 - Y '
� �' f
�' HeB
HeB 1 Rgp W WeC
RgC . . ,
�
WRgC ;I �WfB RgC
._
"
• .
la
fB a;
\R pg RgB RgD
RgB DoB r
V ..-*
v �``
oRgp�0 'RaA_i•`DoB,
D
A 0 . B.RgRgp CA
8 f,Z Ci RgC -
RgB R Rgp
1
8 V ``
a000 Gasp nu-TT(off bQ ec Doc?ail LrMo��aOQo # ~n
35°41'30"N 1 35°41'30"N
725800 726000 r26200 726400 726600 726800 72/W0 r272L'0 727400 727600 727800 728000
3 3
co fn
b Map Scale:1:10,400 if printed on A landscape(11"x 8.5")sheet v
Meters
p. N A0 150 300 600 900
Feet
0 500 1000 2000 3000
Map projection:Web Mercator Corner coordinates:WG584 Edge tics:UTM Zone 17N WG584
6

Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest(AOI) j Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
Area of Interest(AOI) Stony Spot 1:24,000.
SoilstiTi Very Stony Spot
0 Soil Map Unit Polygons Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Wet Spot
P. 0 Soil Map Unit Lines Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
Other misunderstandingof the detail of mapping and accuracyof soil
• Soil Map Unit Points pp 9
Special Line Features line placement.The maps do not show the small areas of
Special Point Features contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
Blowout Water Features scale.
Streams and Canals
14 Borrow Pit
Transportation Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Clay Spot Rails measurements.
1--1--F
• Closed Depression
O.10 Interstate Highways
Gravel Pit Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
w rap US Routes Web Soil Survey URL:
4 Gravelly Spot Major Roads Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857)
•
• Landfill Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Lava Flow Background projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the
Marsh or swamp 1. Aerial Photography Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more
• Mine or Quarry accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
• Miscellaneous Water This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
• Perennial Water of the version date(s)listed below.
Rock Outcrop Soil Survey Area: Wake County, North Carolina
▪ Saline Spot Survey Area Data: Version 20,Jun 3,2020
Sandy Spot Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales
Severely Eroded Spot 1:50,000 or larger.
40, Sinkhole Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Oct 29,2014—Oct
Slide or Slip 19,2019
oa Sodic Spot The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
7

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
ChA Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 1.2 1.5%
0 to 2 percent slopes,
frequently flooded
DoB Dothan loamy sand,2 to 6 3.0 3.8%
percent slopes
HeB Helena sandy loam,2 to 6 8.8 11.4%
percent slopes
RaA Rains sandy loam,0 to 2 0.7 1.0%
percent slopes
RgB Rawlings-Rion complex,2 to 6 4.7 6.2%
percent slopes
RgC Rawlings-Rion complex,6 to 10 19.2 25.0%
percent slopes
RgD Rawlings-Rion complex, 10 to 26.1 33.8%
15 percent slopes
W Water 2.7 3.5%
WeB Wedowee sandy loam,2 to 6 2.3 3.0%
percent slopes
WeC Wedowee sandy loam,6 to 10 3.0 3.9%
percent slopes
WfB Wedowee-Saw complex,2 to 6 5.3 6.9%
percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest 77.1 100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
8

Custom Soil Resource Report
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
9

Custom Soil Resource Report
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
Wake County, North Carolina
ChA—Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently
flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2qwpj
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained and either protected from flooding
or not frequently flooded during the growing season
Map Unit Composition
Chewacla, frequently flooded, and similar soils: 50 percent
Wehadkee, frequently flooded, and similar soils:45 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Chewacla, Frequently Flooded
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional):Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
A -0 to 4 inches: loam
Bw1 -4 to 26 inches: silty clay loam
Bw2-26 to 38 inches: loam
Bw3-38 to 60 inches: clay loam
C- 60 to 80 inches: loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 6 to 24 inches
Frequency of flooding: NoneFrequent
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 10.1 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: No
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Wehadkee, Frequently Flooded
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional):Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
A -0 to 7 inches: silt loam
Bg- 7 to 49 inches: clay loam
Cg-49 to 80 inches: clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: FrequentNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 11.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Minor Components
Riverview, frequently flooded
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional):Toeslope
Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf
Down-slope shape: Concave
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
DoB—Dothan loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2spp1
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Dothan and similar soils: 92 percent
Minor components: 8 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Dothan
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 12 inches: loamy sand
Bt- 12 to 40 inches: sandy clay loam
Btv-40 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 35 to 43 inches to plinthite
Drainage class:Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.60 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 34 to 40 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 6.5 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Fuquay
Percent of map unit:4 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Gritney
Percent of map unit:4 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
HeB—Helena sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2qqgq
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Helena and similar soils: 92 percent
Minor components: 8 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Helena
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from granite and gneiss
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 12 inches: sandy loam
BE- 12 to 19 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt1 - 19 to 39 inches: clay
Bt2-39 to 43 inches: clay loam
BCg-43 to 46 inches: clay loam
C-46 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat):Very low to moderately
low(0.00 to 0.06 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 18 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Vance
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
RaA—Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2qqm0
Elevation: 30 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained
Map Unit Composition
Rains, undrained, and similar soils: 58 percent
Rains, drained, and similar soils:24 percent
Minor components: 18 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Rains, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Carolina bays on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
A -0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
Eg- 6 to 12 inches: sandy loam
Btg- 12 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg- 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: ND
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Rains, Drained
Setting
Landform: Carolina bays on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine
terraces, flats on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Dip, talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
Eg- 6 to 12 inches: sandy loam
Btg- 12 to 65 inches: sandy clay loam
BCg- 65 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.20 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table:About 12 to 36 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Minor Components
Lynchburg
Percent of map unit: 10 percent
Landform: Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional):Talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Pantego, undrained
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
16

Custom Soil Resource Report
Landform: Stream terraces, flats, broad interstream divides
Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread, talf
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Concave
Hydric soil rating: Yes
RgB—Rawlings-Rion complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2xhb9
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Rawlings and similar soils: 55 percent
Rion and similar soils: 35 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Rawlings
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from granite
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt- 8 to 20 inches: sandy clay loam
C-20 to 40 inches: gravelly sandy loam
R-40 to 80 inches: bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to lithic bedrock
Drainage class:Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat):Very low to moderately
low(0.00 to 0.06 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Low(about 4.7 inches)
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Rion
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt1 -8 to 17 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt2- 17 to 38 inches: sandy loam
C-38 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Helena
Percent of map unit: 7 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Saw
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
18

Custom Soil Resource Report
Hydric soil rating: No
RgC—Rawlings-Rion complex, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2xhbb
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Rawlings and similar soils: 55 percent
Rion and similar soils: 35 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Rawlings
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from granite
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt- 8 to 20 inches: sandy clay loam
C-20 to 40 inches: gravelly sandy loam
R-40 to 80 inches: bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 6 to 10 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to lithic bedrock
Drainage class:Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat):Very low to moderately
low(0.00 to 0.06 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Low(about 4.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
19

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Rion
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt1 -8 to 17 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt2- 17 to 38 inches: sandy loam
C-38 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 6 to 10 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Helena
Percent of map unit: 7 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Saw
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
20

Custom Soil Resource Report
RgD—Rawlings-Rion complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2xhb8
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Rawlings and similar soils: 55 percent
Rion and similar soils: 35 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Rawlings
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from granite
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt- 8 to 20 inches: sandy clay loam
C-20 to 40 inches: gravelly sandy loam
R-40 to 80 inches: bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 10 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to lithic bedrock
Drainage class:Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat):Very low to moderately
low(0.00 to 0.06 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Low(about 4.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
21

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Rion
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt1 -8 to 17 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt2- 17 to 38 inches: sandy loam
C-38 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 10 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Helena
Percent of map unit: 7 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Saw
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
22

Custom Soil Resource Report
W—Water
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2qqjv
Elevation: 70 to 450 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 51 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Water: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Water
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8
Hydric soil rating: No
WeB—Wedowee sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2xn40
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Wedowee and similar soils: 94 percent
Minor components: 6 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Wedowee
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
23

Custom Soil Resource Report
Parent material: Saprolite residuum weathered from granite and gneiss and/or
saprolite residuum weathered from schist
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 4 inches: sandy loam
E-4 to 7 inches: sandy loam
Bt- 7 to 23 inches: clay
BC-23 to 35 inches: clay loam
C-35 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat):Very low to moderately
low(0.00 to 0.06 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Appling
Percent of map unit:4 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Helena
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
WeC—Wedowee sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2xn41
24

Custom Soil Resource Report
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Wedowee and similar soils: 94 percent
Minor components: 6 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Wedowee
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite residuum weathered from granite and gneiss and/or
saprolite residuum weathered from schist
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 4 inches: sandy loam
E-4 to 7 inches: sandy loam
Bt- 7 to 23 inches: clay
BC-23 to 35 inches: clay loam
C-35 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 6 to 10 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat):Very low to moderately
low(0.00 to 0.06 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Appling
Percent of map unit:4 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
25

Custom Soil Resource Report
Pacolet
Percent of map unit:2 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
WfB—Wedowee-Saw complex, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2xn42
Elevation: 70 to 560 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 39 to 47 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 63 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 250 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Wedowee and similar soils: 60 percent
Saw and similar soils: 35 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Wedowee
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite residuum weathered from granite and gneiss and/or
saprolite residuum weathered from schist
Typical profile
Ap-0 to 4 inches: sandy loam
E-4 to 7 inches: sandy loam
Bt- 7 to 23 inches: clay
BC-23 to 35 inches: clay loam
C-35 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class:Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat):Very low to moderately
low(0.00 to 0.06 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
26

Custom Soil Resource Report
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Hydric soil rating: No
Description of Saw
Setting
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from granite and gneiss
Typical profile
Ap- 0 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt- 8 to 20 inches: clay
BC-20 to 26 inches: sandy clay loam
C-26 to 29 inches: sandy loam
R-29 to 80 inches: bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to lithic bedrock
Drainage class:Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water(Ksat):Very low to low (0.00 to
0.01 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Low(about 3.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Wake
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Interfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down-slope shape: Convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
27

Custom Soil Resource Report
28

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084
29

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nres/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nres142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nres142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf
30

Appendix D: EDR Report
Raleigh Farm—Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4)
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201 Appendices

Raleigh Farm Bank Parcel
8300 State Rd 2542
Raleigh, NC 27610
Inquiry Number: 6199177.2s
September 21 , 2020
The EDR Radius Map TM Report with GeoCheck®
6 Armstrong Road,4th floor
Shelton,CT 06484
CE DR® Toll Free:800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
FORM-LBE-CCA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary _ ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary _ 4
Map Findings 8
Orphan Summary 33
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary_ A-2
Physical Setting Source Map_ A-7
Physical Setting Source Map Findings_ A-8
Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer-Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources.NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED,IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT.ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES,INC.SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES,INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE.ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER.IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS,NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE,FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE,INCLUDING,WITHOUT LIMITATION,SPECIAL,INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL,OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES.ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES,INC.IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.Purchaser accepts this Report"AS IS".Any analyses,estimates,ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only,and are not intended to provide,nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding,or prediction or forecast of,any environmental risk for any property.Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property.Additionally,the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc.All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format,in whole
or in part,of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc.,or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos(including Sanborn and Sanborn Map)are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc.or its affiliates.All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC6199177.2s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc(EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence:Transaction Screen Process(E 1528-14)or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
8300 STATE RD 2542
RALEIGH, NC 27610
COORDINATES
Latitude(North): 35.7028150-35°42' 10.13"
Longitude (West): 78.4870050-78°29' 13.21"
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 17
UTM X(Meters): 727365.8
UTM Y(Meters): 3953698.5
Elevation: 198 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 5947400 CLAYTON, NC
Version Date: 2013
West Map: 5948594 GARNER, NC
Version Date: 2013
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from: 20140611
Source: USDA
TC6199177.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
8300 STATE RD 2542
RALEIGH, NC 27610
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST(ft. &mi.)
ID SITE NAME ADDRESS DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION
Reg RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER NC HSDS Same 4463,0.845, North
1 REGGIE'S SELF SERVE SR1533(SHOTWELL RD)@ IMD Lower 938,0.178,SSE
2 RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER BATTLE RD(SR 2552) SEMS-ARCHIVE,RCRA NonGen/NLR Lower 1622,0.307, NNE
3 CITY OF RALEIGH-NE BATTLE BRIDGE ROAD IMD Higher 1703,0.323, NW
A4 RALEIGH,CITY OF-NEUS 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD IMD Higher 1833,0.347, NNW
A5 RALEIGH,CITY OF-NEU 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD IMD Higher 1833,0.347, NNW
A6 NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FA 8500 BATTLE BRIDGE R RCRA-VSQG,LUST,UST, IMD, FINDS,AIRS, Financial... Higher 1833,0.347, NNW
A7 RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RO IMD Higher 1833,0.347, NNW
A8 CITY OF RALEIGH WWTP 8500 BATTLE BRIDGE R LUST TRUST, NPDES Higher 1833,0.347, NNW
B9 MATERIAL RECOVERY/B SR 2553/BROWNFIELD HIST LF, Financial Assurance Higher 1896,0.359,WNW
B10 BROWNFIELD ROAD C&D 2600 BROWNFIELD ROAD SWF/LF Higher 1896,0.359,WNW
11 MATERIAL RECOVERY C& BROWNFIELD ROAD DEBRIS Higher 2605,0.493,WNW
12 RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER BATTLE-BRIDGE RD SR SHWS Lower 4689,0.888, North
6199177.2s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF RCRA-Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG RCRA- Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG RCRA-Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG RCRA-Very Small Quantity Generators(Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Federal institutional controls/engineering controls registries
LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
US ENG CONTROLS . Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
TC6199177.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
OLI Old Landfill Inventory
LCID Land-Clearing and Inert Debris(LCID)Landfill Notifications
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST AST Database
INDIAN UST . Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control/engineering control registries
INST CONTROL . No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
VCP Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY Recycling Center Listing
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
DEBRIS REGION 9 .Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
ODI Open Dump Inventory
IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste/Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
TC6199177.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SPILLS Spills Incident Listing
SPILLS 90 .SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80 .SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen/NLR . RCRA- Non Generators/No Longer Regulated
FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR . Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST . EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION .2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA_ Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD Records Of Decision
RMP Risk Management Plans
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS PCB Activity Database System
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System- FIFRA(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, &Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA_ Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA)Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations
FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA_ Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines
FINDS . Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
ECHO Enforcement&Compliance History Information
UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites
DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRS Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS ASBESTOS
COAL ASH Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES . NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP .Animal Operation Permits Listing
CCB .Coal Ash Structural Fills(CCB)Listing
PCSRP . Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
SEPT HAULERS Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
TC6199177.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner . EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt.Archives
RGA HWS . Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES:SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases.
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on
a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been
differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed
data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable(orphan)sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE: SEMS-ARCHIVE(Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive)tracks sites that have no
further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information.The list was formerly
known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of
assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes
available.Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites.Archived status
indicates that,to the best of EPA's knowledge,assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has
determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless
information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for
listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a
given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential
NPL site.
A review of the SEMS-ARCHIVE list,as provided by EDR,and dated 07/29/2020 has revealed that there
is 1 SEMS-ARCHIVE site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Lower Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER BATTLE RD(SR 2552) NNE 1/4-1/2(0.307 mi.) 2 9
TC6199177.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Site ID:0403167
EPA Id: NCD991278920
State-and tribal-equivalent NPL
NC HSDS:The Hazardous Substance Disposal Sites list contains locations of uncontrolled and
unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file contains sites on the national priority list as well as the state
priority list. The data source is the North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis.
A review of the NC HSDS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/09/2011 has revealed that there is 1
NC HSDS site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER N 1/2-1 (0.845 mi.) 0 8
State-and tribal-equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS:The State Hazardous Waste Sites records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state
funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by
potentially responsible parties. The data come from the Department of Environment& Natural Resources'
Inactive Hazardous Sites Program.
A review of the SHWS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 05/11/2020 has revealed that there is 1 SHWS
site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
Lower Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER BATTLE-BRIDGE RD SR N 1/2-1 (0.888 mi.) 12 32
Facility Id: NCD991278920
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF: The Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites records typically contain an inventory of solid
waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state.The data come from the Department of Environment
&Natural Resources' List of Solid Waste Facility Contacts in Alpha Order.
A review of the SWF/LF list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/06/2020 has revealed that there is 1
SWF/LF site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page
BROWNFIELD ROAD C&D 2600 BROWNFIELD ROAD WNW 1/4-1/2(0.359 mi.) B10 31
Facility Status: InactiveClosed
Facility Status:Open
Permit Num:9231-CDLF-
Permit Num:9231-CDLF-2012
TC6199177.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DEBRIS: NCDEQ Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section Temporary Disaster Debris Staging
Site(TDDSS)Locations which are available to be activated in a disaster or emergency.. Disaster Debris Sites
can only be used for temporary disaster debris storage if the site's responsible party activates the site for
use by notifying the NCDEQ DWM Solid Waste Section staff during an emergency
A review of the DEBRIS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/31/2019 has revealed that there is 1
DEBRIS site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page
MATERIAL RECOVERY C& BROWNFIELD ROAD WNW 1/4-1/2(0.493 mi.) 11 31
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incidents Management Database contains an inventory
of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents.The data come from the Department of Environment, &
Natural Resources' Incidents by Address.
A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR,and dated 07/17/2020 has revealed that there is 1 LUST
site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FA 8500 BATTLE BRIDGE R NNW 1/4-1/2(0.347 mi.) A6 17
Incident Phase:Closed Out
Incident Phase: Response
Incident Number: 14331
Incident Number:21011
Current Status:File Located in House
LUST TRUST: This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for
reimbursements for expenses incurred while remediating Leaking USTs.
A review of the LUST TRUST list, as provided by EDR,and dated 04/03/2020 has revealed that there is
1 LUST TRUST site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page
CITY OF RALEIGH WWTP 8500 BATTLE BRIDGE R NNW 1/4-1/2(0.347 mi.) A8 29
Facility Id:0-005336
Site ID:21011
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Lists of Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF:A listing of solid waste facilities.
A review of the HIST LF list, as provided by EDR, and dated 11/06/2006 has revealed that there is 1
TC6199177.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
HIST LF site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page
MATERIAL RECOVERY/B SR 2553/BROWNFIELD WNW 1/4-1/2(0.359 mi.) B9 30
Facility Status:OPEN
Facility Id: P1061
Records of Emergency Release Reports
IMD: Incident Management Database.
A review of the IMD list, as provided by EDR, and dated 05/01/2020 has revealed that there are 6 IMD
sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page
CITY OF RALEIGH-NE BATTLE BRIDGE ROAD NW 1/4-1/2(0.323 mi.) 3 12
Facility Id:86472
RALEIGH,CITY OF-NEUS 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD NNW 1/4-1/2(0.347 mi.) A4 13
Facility Id: 14331
RALEIGH,CITY OF-NEU 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD NNW 1/4-1/2(0.347 mi.) A5 15
Facility Id:21011
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FA 8500 BATTLE BRIDGE R NNW 1/4-1/2(0.347 ml.) A6 17
Facility Id:21011
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RO NNW 1/4-1/2(0.347 mi.) A7 28
Facility Id:86375
Lower Elevation Address Direction/Distance Map ID Page
REGGIE'S SELF SERVE SR1533(SHOTWELL RD)@ SSE 1/8-1/4(0.178 mi.) 1 8
Facility Id:21981
TC6199177.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Due to poor or inadequate address information,the following sites were not mapped.Count:2 records.
Site Name Database(s)
AMETHYST RIDGE DRIVE SOLVENTS SHWS
NC DEPT.OF AGRICULTURE LF OLI
TC6199177.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10

am
;OVERVIEW MAP - 6199177.2S
� • �r ;Vi � A - rW4 .T-
a
iCa‘./ ...MP 7/1. rIvIr:,............0.„
/0 04-4,44,,4N0-Ar_,--rOO4P.,444,1rri,„4, e4„. .7e',_7,,-^
`• A0 ir,7..... 0,l,,L t 7 0_ 'fit _ ,.,i,1,ii„_, Y
s' •
i _ - ), %. Nd f,ca I'
Y
� l� l mot. - 4 (-ft-41.1
Al
L __, '',. :' 06,0: i ,, -.0%-;-
N\ 1 7 ` __---- 1_ A 4-,_ 14 '
k ref
ill
IL `:.X
i
� - — f s/---_ - --/ '+� � '
�� - r , it—---ate.F a
} f
,i
3
I
f.
i
• 5 Pip.‘
,.• r...v.,. .., -,*-: 77 / `,,s4i \
L> 141
Ar ' 1
' ti
l
t
tl
R [� i11
F h
: ,,,i
. ,
fT iN 2 K
/ ., ,
. �..
', i t-f 1 ----------\ p • :7\--,74.,-,-. \ ik);,.
' \--14'- ''
-. 7 / 7 . , \, s
/ =- \-,--;--: ‘ -:.,1,:,s, . , ti, .. : '''r,....' •;-._ ,i
ri, -- .
A/ Target Property 0 1/4 1/2 1 ones
A Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
• Sites at elevations lower than ,A/ County Boundary Disposal Sites
the target property e
d h, Power transmission lines
1 Manufactured Gas Plants
National Priority List Sites �j� Special Flood Hazard Area(1%)
1 Dept.Defense Sites A 0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information.The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Raleigh Farm Bank Parcel CLIENT: Axiom Environmental
ADDRESS: 8300 State Rd 2542 CONTACT: Kenan Jernigan
Raleigh NC 27610 INQUIRY#: 6199177.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.702815/78.487005 DATE: September 21,2020 3:49 pm
Copyright c 2020 EDR,Inc(c 2015 TomTom Rel.2015

DETAIL MAP - 6199177.2S
.t- --<./.„-..,._..
y7 r 1 -:;► ,lit
, - ‘ I
j..7.-i, ,, A..A..(—.0-u r,
A6\.%
////.1
i r 71".Yam,: ''h' - �1 ,r++T` y
.„...._. ;,
i i 411 - 7-2-44-4, y Alli
i ,'
,,,
. II tt.._.,_, ,
/it* ior ,
- /91 _A.'j:.
7414%1 '4: -_k_
k‘
,, , Airtiov,..4.
/ i .-: I .
t Of
lid7 '
- ;. it Ilk . _/;
y 7 'A
yt ifillib'
- '� `ram
•
111411P -Alp"• ari. _ .
It:44 ,1i. 1 1 `� � -� ~ 'P- Q X -
— .0‘041ati
-
-
2., •
T
•
6 I
O ,
a.
e
�240� J�� � 4.4
■
Pc .r.r - ,C' i i F
. w. • i `tom..
0
Al Target Property 0 1re 1i4 lnunes
A Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
• Sites at elevations lower than ,A/ County Boundary Disposal Sites
the target property e
d h, Power transmission lines
1 Manufactured Gas Plants
W Special Flood Hazard Area(1%)
r Sensitive Receptors
�,; 0.2%Annual Chance Flood Hazard
National Priority List Sites
II 11
Dept.Defense Sites National Wetland Inventory
State Wetlands This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information.The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Raleigh Farm Bank Parcel CLIENT: Axiom Environmental
ADDRESS: 8300 State Rd 2542 CONTACT: Kenan Jernigan
Raleigh NC 27610 INQUIRY#: 6199177.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.702815/78.487005 DATE: September 21,2020 3:50 pm
Copyright c 2020 EDR,Inc is 2015 TomTom Rel.2015

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8- 1/4 1/4- 1/2 1/2- 1 > 1 Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
NPL LIENS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
SEMS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.500 0 0 1 NR NR 1
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
RCRA-SQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
RCRA-VSQG 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
Federal institutional controls/
engineering controls registries
LUCIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US INST CONTROLS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Federal ERNS list
ERNS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
State-and tribal-equivalent NPL
NC HSDS 1.000 0 0 0 1 NR 1
State-and tribal-equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS 1.000 0 0 0 1 NR 1
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF 0.500 0 0 1 NR NR 1
DEBRIS 0.500 0 0 1 NR NR 1
OLI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LCID 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
TC6199177.2s Page 4

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8- 1/4 1/4- 1/2 1/2- 1 > 1 Plotted
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST 0.500 0 0 1 NR NR 1
LAST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
INDIAN LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LUST TRUST 0.500 0 0 1 NR NR 1
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
AST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
INDIAN UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
State and tribal institutional
control/engineering control registries
INST CONTROL 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
State and tribal Brown fields sites
BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Local Lists of Landfill/Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF 0.500 0 0 1 NR NR 1
SWRCY 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
INDIAN ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
ODI 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
IHS OPEN DUMPS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
Local Lists of Hazardous waste/
Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
US CDL 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
SPILLS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
IMD 0.500 0 1 5 NR NR 6
TC6199177.2s Page 5

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8- 1/4 1/4- 1/2 1/2- 1 > 1 Plotted
SPILLS 90 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
SPILLS 80 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen/NLR 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
FUDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
DOD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
US FIN ASSUR 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EPA WATCH LIST 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
2020 COR ACTION 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
TSCA 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
TRIS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
SSTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
RMP 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RAATS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PRP 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
PADS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
ICIS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
FTTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
MLTS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH DOE 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH EPA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
PCB TRANSFORMER 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RADINFO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
HIST FITS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
DOT OPS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
INDIAN RESERV 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
FUSRAP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
UMTRA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
LEAD SMELTERS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
US AIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
US MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
ABANDONED MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
FINDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
ECHO 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
UXO 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
DOCKET HWC 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
FUELS PROGRAM 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
AIRS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
ASBESTOS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
COAL ASH 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
DRYCLEANERS 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0
Financial Assurance 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
NPDES 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
UIC 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
AOP 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
CCB 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
PCSRP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0
TC6199177.2s Page 6

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8- 1/4 1/4- 1/2 1/2- 1 > 1 Plotted
SEPT HAULERS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
MINES MRDS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
EDR Hist Auto 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt.Archives
RGA HWS 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RGA LF 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
RGA LUST 0.001 0 NR NR NR NR 0
-Totals-- 0 0 1 11 2 0 14
NOTES:
TP=Target Property
NR= Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC6199177.2s Page 7

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
HSDS RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP NC HSDS S102442449
Region N/A
North ,NC
1/2-1
4463 ft.
HSDS:
Name: RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP
Address: Not reported
City: Not reported
Site Type: 1
Superfun Number: Not reported
Total area in coverage units: 726.45898437
Total perimeter in coverage units: 95.67377471
X-value coordinate in feet: 2153660.75
Y-value coordinate in feet: 718979.75
Sites designated as superfund cleanup sites: 364
Length of feature in internal units: 95.6737453897
Area of feature in internal units squared: 726.458478116
1 REGGIE'S SELF SERVE-FORMER IMD S104547414
SSE SR1533(SHOTWELL RD)@ BRIDGE188 N/A
1/8-1/4 CLAYTON,NC
0.178 mi.
938 ft.
Relative: IMD:
Lower Name: REGGIE'S SELF SERVE-FORMER
Actual: Address: SR1533(SHOTWELL RD)@ BRIDGE188
174 ft. City: CLAYTON
Region: RAL
Facility ID: 21981
Date Occurred: 3/31/2000
Submit Date: 7/14/2000
GW Contam: Yes,Groundwater Contamination has been detected
Soil Contam: No
Incident Desc: FREE PRODUCT PRESENT IN WELL.
Operator: WILLIS ALLEN C/O RON KING
Contact Phone: [phone]
Owner Company: Not reported
Operator Address:2834 SHOTWELL ROAD
Operator City: RALEIGH
Oper City,St,Zip: RALEIGH, NC 276108575
Ownership: Private
Operation: Commercial
Material: GASOLINE
Qty Lost 1: Not reported
Qty Recovered 1: Not reported
Material: DIESEL
Qty Lost: Not reported
Qty Recovered: Not reported
Source: Leak-underground
Type: Gasoline/diesel
Location: Facility
Setting: Rural
Risk Site: H
Site Priority: Not reported
Priority Code: Not reported
Priority Update: 7/14/2000
Dem Contact: STF
TC6199177.2s Page 8

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
REGGIE'S SELF SERVE-FORMER (Continued) S104547414
Wells Affected: Not reported
Num Affected: Not reported
Wells Contam: Not reported
Sampled By: Other
Samples Include: Groundwater Samples
7.5 Min Quad: Not reported
5 Min Quad: Not reported
Latitude: 35.69388888
Longitude: -78.47972222
Latitude Number: 354138
Longitude Number: 782847
Latitude Decimal: 35.6938888888889
Longitude Decimal: 78.4797222222222
GPS: 7
Agency: DWM
Facility ID: Not reported
Last Modified: Not reported
Incident Phase: Not reported
NOV Issued: Not reported
NORR Issued: Not reported
45 Day Report: Not reported
Public Meeting Held: Not reported
Corrective Action Planned: Not reported
SOC Sighned: Not reported
Reclassification Report: Not reported
RS Designation: Not reported
Closure Request Date: Not reported
Close-out Report: Not reported
2 RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP SEMS-ARCHIVE 1002966362
NNE BATTLE RD(SR 2552) RCRA NonGen/NLR NCD991278920
1/4-1/2 RALEIGH,NC 27610
0.307 mi.
1622 ft.
Relative: SEMS Archive:
Lower Site ID: 0403167
Actual: EPA ID: NCD991278920
160 ft. Name: RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP
Address: BATTLE RD(SR 2552)
Address 2: Not reported
City,State,Zip: RALEIGH,NC 27610
Cong District: 04
FIPS Code: 37183
FF: N
NPL: Not on the NPL
Non NPL Status: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing information
SEMS Archive Detail:
Region: 04
Site ID: 0403167
EPA ID: NCD991278920
Site Name: RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP
NPL: N
FF: N
OU: 00
Action Code: VS
TC6199177.2s Page 9

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP (Continued) 1002966362
Action Name: ARCH SITE
SEQ: 1
Start Date: Not reported
Finish Date: 1987-09-09 04:00:00
Qual: Not reported
Current Action Lead: EPA Perf In-Hse
Region: 04
Site ID: 0403167
EPA ID: NCD991278920
Site Name: RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP
NPL: N
FF: N
OU: 00
Action Code: DS
Action Name: DISCVRY
SEQ: 1
Start Date: 1980-08-01 04:00:00
Finish Date: 1980-08-01 04:00:00
Qual: Not reported
Current Action Lead: EPA Pert
Region: 04
Site ID: 0403167
EPA ID: NCD991278920
Site Name: RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP
NPL: N
FF: N
OU: 00
Action Code: PA
Action Name: PA
SEQ: 1
Start Date: Not reported
Finish Date: 1987-09-09 04:00:00
Qual: N
Current Action Lead: St Pert
RCRA NonGen/NLR:
Date form received by agency:1982-11-15 00:00:00.0
Facility name: RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP
Facility address: BATTLE RD(SR 2552)
RALEIGH, NC 27610
EPA ID: NCD991278920
Mailing address: P 0 BOX 590 UTILITIES DEPT
RALEIGH, NC 27602
Contact: BILLY CREECH
Contact address: BATTLE RD(SR 2552)
RALEIGH, NC 27610
Contact country: US
Contact telephone: [phone]
Contact email: Not reported
EPA Region: 04
Land type: Private
Classification: Non-Generator
Description: Handler:Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste
TC6199177.2s Page 10

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP (Continued) 1002966362
Owner/Operator Summary:
Owner/operator name: OWNER NAME
Owner/operator address: Not reported
NC
Owner/operator country: US
Owner/operator telephone: Not reported
Owner/operator email: Not reported
Owner/operator fax: Not reported
Owner/operator extension: Not reported
Legal status: District
Owner/Operator Type: Owner
Owner/Op start date: 1982-11-15 00:00:00.
Owner/Op end date: Not reported
Handler Activities Summary:
U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No
Mixed waste(haz.and radioactive): No
Recycler of hazardous waste: No
Transporter of hazardous waste: No
Treater,storer or disposer of HW: No
Underground injection activity: No
On-site burner exemption: No
Furnace exemption: No
Used oil fuel burner: No
Used oil processor: No
User oil refiner: No
Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No
Used oil Specification marketer: No
Used oil transfer facility: No
Used oil transporter: No
Historical Generators:
Date form received by agency:1982-11-15 00:00:00.0
Site name: RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP
Classification: Not a generator,verified
Hazardous Waste Summary:
. Waste code: F001
. Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS USED IN DEGREASING:
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE,TRICHLORETHYLENE,METHYLENE CHLORIDE,
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE,CARBON TETRACHLORIDE AND CHLORINATED
FLUOROCARBONS;ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS USED IN DEGREASING
CONTAINING, BEFORE USE,A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE(BY VOLUME)OF
ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED
IN F002, F004,AND F005;AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE
SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES.
. Waste code: F007
. Waste name: SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS.
. Waste code: F009
. Waste name: SPENT STRIPPING AND CLEANING BATH SOLUTIONS FROM ELECTROPLATING
OPERATIONS IN WHICH CYANIDES ARE USED IN THE PROCESS.
TC6199177.2s Page 11

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP (Continued) 1002966362
Violation Status: No violations found
Evaluation Action Summary:
Evaluation date: 2005-06-14 00:00:00.0
Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE
Area of violation: Not reported
Date achieved compliance: Not reported
Evaluation lead agency: EPA
Evaluation date: 2005-06-14 00:00:00.0
Evaluation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITE
Area of violation: Not reported
Date achieved compliance: Not reported
Evaluation lead agency: State
3 CITY OF RALEIGH-NEUSE WWTP- IMD 1006034852
NW BATTLE BRIDGE ROAD N/A
1/4-1/2 RALEIGH,NC
0.323 mi.
1703 ft.
Relative: IMD:
Higher Name: CITY OF RALEIGH-NEUSE WWTP-
Actual: Address: BATTLE BRIDGE ROAD
239 ft. City: RALEIGH
Region: RAL
Facility ID: 86472
Date Occurred: 1/7/2002
Submit Date: 6/11/2003
GW Contam: Yes,Groundwater Contamination has been detected
Soil Contam: Not reported
Incident Desc: OVER-APPLICATION OF BIOSOLIDS RESIDUALS RESULTING IN NUTRIENT
CONTAMINATION OVER AN ESTIMATED 1000+ACRES.FOUR PRIVATE WELLS
IMPACTED WITH NO3>10 PPM;26 OTHE
Operator: DALE CRISP,P.E., H.
Contact Phone: [phone]
Owner Company: CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC UTILITIES DE
Operator Address:P.O. BOX 590
Operator City: RALEIGH
Oper City,St,Zip: RALEIGH 919-890-3400
Ownership: Unknown
Operation: Residential
Material: Not reported
Qty Lost 1: Not reported
Qty Recovered 1: Not reported
Source: Land application
Type: Other inorganics
Location: Not reported
Setting: Not reported
Risk Site: Not reported
Site Priority: 400
Priority Code: A
Priority Update: Not reported
Dem Contact: REB
Wells Affected: Yes
Num Affected: 4
Wells Contam: Not reported
Sampled By: Not reported
TC6199177.2s Page 12

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
CITY OF RALEIGH-NEUSE WWTP- (Continued) 1006034852
Samples Include: Not reported
7.5 Min Quad: Not reported
5 Min Quad: Not reported
Latitude: 35.713
Longitude: -78.4895
Latitude Number: Not reported
Longitude Number: Not reported
Latitude Decimal: Not reported
Longitude Decimal: Not reported
GPS: EST
Agency: DWQ
Facility ID: Not reported
Last Modified: Not reported
Incident Phase: Not reported
NOV Issued: Not reported
NORR Issued: Not reported
45 Day Report: Not reported
Public Meeting Held: Not reported
Corrective Action Planned: Not reported
SOC Sighned: Not reported
Reclassification Report: Not reported
RS Designation: Not reported
Closure Request Date: Not reported
Close-out Report: Not reported
A4 RALEIGH,CITY OF-NEUSE WWTP-ADMIN.BLDG. IMD S101643595
NNW 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD N/A
1/4-1/2 RALEIGH,NC 27610
0.347 mi.
1833 ft. Site 1 of 5 in cluster A
Relative: IMD:
Higher Name: RALEIGH,CITY OF-NEUSE WWTP-ADMIN.BLDG.
Actual: Address: 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD
235 ft. City: RALEIGH
Region: Not reported
Facility ID: 14331
Date Occurred: 2/6/1995
Submit Date: 7/31/1995
GW Contam: Not reported
Soil Contam: Not reported
Incident Desc: MINOR SOIL CONTAMINATION CONFIRMED FROM LEAKING UST.
Operator: JOHN KIVINIEMIE
Contact Phone: Not reported
Owner Company: Not reported
Operator Address:Not reported
Operator City: Not reported
Oper City,St,Zip: Not reported
Ownership: Municipal
Operation: Public Service
Material: Not reported
Qty Lost 1: Not reported
Qty Recovered 1: Not reported
Source: Not reported
Type: Heating Oil
Location: Facility
Setting: Not reported
TC6199177.2s Page 13

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
RALEIGH,CITY OF-NEUSE WWTP-ADMIN.BLDG. (Continued) S101643595
Risk Site: Not reported
Site Priority: 20E
Priority Code: Not reported
Priority Update: 4/16/1998
Dem Contact: Not reported
Wells Affected: Not reported
Num Affected: 0
Wells Contam: Not reported
Sampled By: Not reported
Samples Include: Not reported
7.5 Min Quad: Not reported
5 Min Quad: Not reported
Latitude: 35.723610999999998
Longitude: -78.480556000000007
Latitude Number: Not reported
Longitude Number: Not reported
Latitude Decimal: Not reported
Longitude Decimal: Not reported
GPS: Not reported
Agency: Not reported
Facility ID: 14331
Last Modified: 10/16/2017
Incident Phase: Closed Out
NOV Issued: Not reported
NORR Issued: Not reported
45 Day Report: Not reported
Public Meeting Held: Not reported
Corrective Action Planned: Not reported
SOC Sighned: Not reported
Reclassification Report: Not reported
RS Designation: Not reported
Closure Request Date: Not reported
Close-out Report: Not reported
Name: RALEIGH,CITY OF-NEUSE WWTP-ADM
Address: 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD
City: RALEIGH
Region: RAL
Facility ID: 14331
Date Occurred: 2/6/1995
Submit Date: 7/31/1995
GW Contam: No Groundwater Contamination detected
Soil Contam: Yes
Incident Desc: MINOR SOIL CONTAMINATION CONFIRMED FROM LEAKING UST.
Operator: MR. DALE CRISP
Contact Phone: [phone]
Owner Company: CITY RALEIGH-PUBLIC UTILITIES
Operator Address:219 FAYETTEVILLE ST,SUITE 600
Operator City: RALEIGH
Oper City,St,Zip: RALEIGH, NC 27601-
Ownership: Municipal
Operation: Public Service
Material: #2 FUEL OIL
Qty Lost 1: Not reported
Qty Recovered 1: Not reported
Source: Leak-underground
TC6199177.2s Page 14

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
RALEIGH,CITY OF-NEUSE WWTP-ADMIN.BLDG. (Continued) S101643595
Type: Gasoline/diesel
Location: Facility
Setting: Rural
Risk Site: L
Site Priority: 20E
Priority Code: L
Priority Update: 4/16/1998
Dem Contact: WDP
Wells Affected: Not reported
Num Affected: 0
Wells Contam: Not reported
Sampled By: Not reported
Samples Include: Not reported
7.5 Min Quad: Not reported
5 Min Quad: Not reported
Latitude: 35.72333333
Longitude: -78.48027777
Latitude Number: 354324
Longitude Number: 782849
Latitude Decimal: 35.7233333333333
Longitude Decimal: 78.4802777777778
GPS: 6
Agency: DWM
Facility ID: 14331
Last Modified: 10/16/2017
Incident Phase: Closed Out
NOV Issued: Not reported
NORR Issued: Not reported
45 Day Report: Not reported
Public Meeting Held: Not reported
Corrective Action Planned: Not reported
SOC Sighned: Not reported
Reclassification Report: Not reported
RS Designation: Not reported
Closure Request Date: Not reported
Close-out Report: Not reported
A5 RALEIGH,CITY OF-NEUSE WWTP-FI IMD S104483084
NNW 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD N/A
1/4-1/2 RALEIGH,NC
0.347 mi.
1833 ft. Site 2 of 5 in cluster A
Relative: IMD:
Higher Name: RALEIGH,CITY OF-NEUSE WWTP-FI
Actual: Address: 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD
235 ft. City: RALEIGH
Region: RAL
Facility ID: 21011
Date Occurred: 4/2/1999
Submit Date: 11/23/1999
GW Contam: Yes,Groundwater Contamination has been detected
Soil Contam: No
Incident Desc: ONE 4000 GALLON DIESEL UST REMOVED FROM SITE SOIL CONTAMINATION
DETECTED IN SAMPLE COLLECTED 23000 TPH(EPA 3550)IN SAMPLE S-3 360
TPH(EPA 5030)IN S-3
Operator: E.MARC FENDER
TC6199177.2s Page 15

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
RALEIGH,CITY OF-NEUSE WWTP-FI (Continued) S104483084
Contact Phone: [phone]
Owner Company: CITY OF RALEIGH
Operator Address:P.O. BOX 590
Operator City: RALEIGH
Oper City,St,Zip: RALEIGH, NC 27602-
Ownership: Municipal
Operation: Public Service
Material: DIESEL
Qty Lost 1: Not reported
Qty Recovered 1: Not reported
Source: Leak-underground
Type: Gasoline/diesel
Location: Facility
Setting: Residential
Risk Site: L
Site Priority: Not reported
Priority Code: Not reported
Priority Update: 11/23/1999
Dem Contact: WDP
Wells Affected: Not reported
Num Affected: Not reported
Wells Contam: Not reported
Sampled By: Not reported
Samples Include: Not reported
7.5 Min Quad: Not reported
5 Min Quad: Not reported
Latitude: 35.72361111
Longitude: -78.48055555
Latitude Number: 354325
Longitude Number: 782850
Latitude Decimal: 35.7236111111111
Longitude Decimal: 78.4805555555556
GPS: NOD
Agency: DWM
Facility ID: 21011
Last Modified: Not reported
Incident Phase: RE
NOV Issued: Not reported
NORR Issued: Not reported
45 Day Report: Not reported
Public Meeting Held: Not reported
Corrective Action Planned: Not reported
SOC Sighned: Not reported
Reclassification Report: Not reported
RS Designation: Not reported
Closure Request Date: Not reported
Close-out Report: Not reported
TC6199177.2s Page 16

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
A6 NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FARM RCRA-VSQG 1000440343
NNW 8500 BATTLE BRIDGE RD LUST NCD981019300
1/4-1/2 RALEIGH,NC 27610 UST
0.347 mi. IMD
1833 ft. Site 3 of 5 in cluster A FINDS
Relative: AIRS
Higher Financial Assurance
Actual: NPDES
235 ft. RCRA-VSQG:
Date form received by agency:2017-04-10 00:00:00.0
Facility name: CITY OF RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER FAC.WWTP
Facility address: 8500 BATTLE BRIDGE RD
RALEIGH, NC 27610
EPA ID: NCD981019300
Mailing address: PO BOX 590
RALEIGH, NC 27602
Contact: TIMOTHY WOODY
Contact address: PO BOX 590
RALEIGH, NC 27602
Contact country: US
Contact telephone: [phone]
Contact email: Not reported
EPA Region: 04
Classification: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator
Description: Handler:generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendar
month,and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time;
or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar
month,and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous
waste;or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil,waste or
other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any
land or water,of acutely hazardous waste;or generates 100 kg or less
of any residue or contaminated soil,waste or other debris resulting
from the cleanup of a spill,into or on any land or water,of acutely
hazardous waste during any calendar month,and accumulates at any
time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste;or 100 kg or less of
any residue or contaminated soil,waste or other debris resulting from
the cleanup of a spill,into or on any land or water,of acutely
hazardous waste
Owner/Operator Summary:
Owner/operator name: CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
Owner/operator address: Not reported
Not reported
Owner/operator country: Not reported
Owner/operator telephone: Not reported
Owner/operator email: Not reported
Owner/operator fax: Not reported
Owner/operator extension: Not reported
Legal status: Private
Owner/Operator Type: Operator
Owner/Op start date: 1601-01-01 00:00:00.
Owner/Op end date: Not reported
Owner/operator name: CITY OF RALEIGH PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
Owner/operator address: PO BOX 590
RALEIGH, NC 27602
Owner/operator country: US
Owner/operator telephone: [phone]
TC6199177.2s Page 17

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FARM (Continued) 1000440343
Owner/operator email: Not reported
Owner/operator fax: Not reported
Owner/operator extension: Not reported
Legal status: Private
Owner/Operator Type: Owner
Owner/Op start date: 1601-01-01 00:00:00.
Owner/Op end date: Not reported
Handler Activities Summary:
U.S. importer of hazardous waste: No
Mixed waste(haz.and radioactive): No
Recycler of hazardous waste: No
Transporter of hazardous waste: No
Treater,storer or disposer of HW: No
Underground injection activity: No
On-site burner exemption: No
Furnace exemption: No
Used oil fuel burner: No
Used oil processor: No
User oil refiner: No
Used oil fuel marketer to burner: No
Used oil Specification marketer: No
Used oil transfer facility: No
Used oil transporter: No
Historical Generators:
Date form received by agency:1989-10-27 00:00:00.0
Site name: CITY OF RALEIGH-NEUSE WTP LABORATORY
Classification: Not a generator,verified
Hazardous Waste Summary:
. Waste code: D001
. Waste name: IGNITABLE WASTE
. Waste code: D002
. Waste name: CORROSIVE WASTE
. Waste code: D003
. Waste name: REACTIVE WASTE
. Waste code: D006
. Waste name: CADMIUM
. Waste code: D009
. Waste name: MERCURY
. Waste code: F003
. Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS:XYLENE,ACETONE, ETHYL
ACETATE,ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER,METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE,N-BUTYL
ALCOHOL,CYCLOHEXANONE,AND METHANOL;ALL SPENT SOLVENT
MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE,ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT
NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS;AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS
CONTAINING, BEFORE USE,ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED
SOLVENTS,AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE(BY VOLUME)OF ONE OR
MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004,AND F005;AND STILL
TC6199177.2s Page 18

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FARM (Continued) 1000440343
BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT
MIXTURES.
. Waste code: F005
. Waste name: THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS:TOLUENE,METHYL ETHYL
KETONE,CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE,BENZENE,
2-ETHOXYETHANOL,AND 2-NITROPROPANE;ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS
CONTAINING, BEFORE USE,A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE(BY VOLUME)OF
ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS
LISTED IN F001, F002,OR F004;AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF
THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES.
Violation Status: No violations found
LUST:
Name: RALEIGH,CITY OF-NEUSE WWTP-ADMIN.BLDG.
Address: 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD
City,State,Zip: RALEIGH, NC 27610-8545
Facility ID: 00-0-000
UST Number: RA-2257
Incident Number: 14331
Contamination Type: SL
Source Type: Leak-underground
Product Type: P
Date Reported: 02/06/1995
Date Occur: 02/06/1995
Cleanup: 02/06/1995
Closure Request: Not reported
Close Out: 10/16/2017
Level Of Soil Cleanup Achieved: Soil to Groundwater
Tank Regulated Status: N
#Of Supply Wells: 0
Commercial/NonCommercial UST Site: COMMERCIAL
Risk Classification: L
Risk Class Based On Review: L
Corrective Action Plan Type: Not reported
NOV Issue Date: Not reported
NORR Issue Date: Not reported
Site Priority: 20E
Phase Of LSA Req: 1
Site Risk Reason: Not reported
Land Use: Industrial/commercial
MTBE: No
MTBE1: No
Flag: No
FIag1: No
LUR Filed: Not reported
Release Detection: 0
Current Status: File Located in House
RBCA GW: Cleanups to 2L.0202 standards
PETOPT: 4
RPL: False
CD Num: Not reported
Reel Num: Not reported
RPOW: False
RPOP: False
Error Flag: 0
Error Code: N
TC6199177.2s Page 19

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FARM (Continued) 1000440343
Valid: True
Lat/Long Decimal: 35.7236-78.4805
Testlat: Not reported
Regional Officer Project Mgr: SMJ
Region: RAL
Company: CITY RALEIGH-PUBLIC UTILITIES
Contact Person: MR.DALE CRISP
Telephone: [phone]
RP Address: 219 FAYETTEVILLE ST,SUITE 600
RP City,St,Zip: RALEIGH, NC 27601-
RP County: Not reported
Comments: Not reported
5 Min Quad: Not reported
PIRF:
Facility Id: 14331
Date Occurred: 2/6/1995
Date Reported: 7/31/1995
Description Of Incident: MINOR SOIL CONTAMINATION CONFIRMED FROM LEAKING UST.
Owner/Operator: JOHN KIVINIEMIE
Ownership: 1
Operation Type: 1
Type: 4
Location: 1
Site Priority: 20E
Priority Update: 4/16/1998
Wells Affected Y/N: Not reported
Samples Include: 0
7#5 Minute Quad: Not reported
5 Minute Quad: Not reported
Pirf/Min Soil: Not reported
Release Code: Not reported
Source Code: Min_Soil
Err Type: Not reported
Cause: Not reported
Source: Not reported
Ust Number: Not reported
Last Modified: 10/16/2017
Incident Phase: Closed Out
NOV Issued: Not reported
NORR Issued: Not reported
45 Day Report: Not reported
Public Meeting Held: Not reported
Corrective Action Planned: Not reported
SOC Signed: Not reported
Reclassification Report: Not reported
RS Designation: Not reported
Closure Request Date: Not reported
Close-out Report: Not reported
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility:
Name: RALEIGH NEUSE WWTP-FILTER BLDG.
Address: 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD
City,State,Zip: RALEIGH,NC 27610-8545
Facility ID: 00-0-000
UST Number: RA-3220
TC6199177.2s Page 20

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FARM (Continued) 1000440343
Incident Number: 21011
Contamination Type: GW
Source Type: Leak-underground
Product Type: P
Date Reported: 04/26/1999
Date Occur: 04/02/1999
Cleanup: 04/26/1999
Closure Request: Not reported
Close Out: Not reported
Level Of Soil Cleanup Achieved: Residential
Tank Regulated Status: N
#Of Supply Wells: 0
Commercial/NonCommercial UST Site: COMMERCIAL
Risk Classification: L
Risk Class Based On Review: I
Corrective Action Plan Type: D
NOV Issue Date: Not reported
NORR Issue Date: 11/29/1999
Site Priority: E
Phase Of LSA Req: 2
Site Risk Reason: Free product
Land Use: Industrial/commercial
MTBE: No
MTBE1: No
Flag: No
FIag1: No
LUR Filed: Not reported
Release Detection: 0
Current Status: File Located in House
RBCA GW: Not reported
PETOPT: 4
RPL: False
CD Num: Not reported
Reel Num: Not reported
RPOW: False
RPOP: False
Error Flag: 0
Error Code: N
Valid: False
Lat/Long Decimal: 35.7236-78.4805
Testlat: Not reported
Regional Officer Project Mgr: SMJ
Region: RAL
Company: CITY OF RALEIGH
Contact Person: tim woody
Telephone: [phone]
RP Address: P.O.BOX 590
RP City,St,Zip: RALEIGH, NC 27602-
RP County: Not reported
Comments: Not reported
5 Min Quad: Not reported
PIRF:
Facility Id: 21011
Date Occurred: 4/2/1999
Date Reported: 11/23/1999
Description Of Incident: ONE 4000 GALLON DIESEL UST REMOVED FROM SITE SOIL CONTAMINATION
DETECTED IN SAMPLE COLLECTED 23000 TPH(EPA 3550)IN SAMPLE S-3 360
TC6199177.2s Page 21

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FARM (Continued) 1000440343
TPH(EPA 5030)IN S-3
Owner/Operator: MR E MARCFENDER
Ownership: 1
Operation Type: 1
Type: 3
Location: 1
Site Priority: Not reported
Priority Update: 11/23/1999
Wells Affected Y/N: Not reported
Samples Include: Not reported
7#5 Minute Quad: Not reported
5 Minute Quad: Not reported
Pirf/Min Soil: Not reported
Release Code: Not reported
Source Code: MIN_SOIL
Err Type: Not reported
Cause: Not reported
Source: Not reported
Ust Number: Not reported
Last Modified: Not reported
Incident Phase: Response
NOV Issued: Not reported
NORR Issued: Not reported
45 Day Report: Not reported
Public Meeting Held: Not reported
Corrective Action Planned: Not reported
SOC Signed: Not reported
Reclassification Report: Not reported
RS Designation: Not reported
Closure Request Date: Not reported
Close-out Report: Not reported
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility:
UST:
Name: CITY/RALEIGH-WASTE TREATMENT PLT
Address: 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE ROAD
City,State,Zip: RALEIGH, NC 27610
Facility Id: 00-0-0000005336
Contact: CITY OF RALEIGH
Contact Addressl: 500 S SALISBURY ST ATTN:TIM GREENE
Contact Address2: Not reported
Contact City/State/Zip: RALEIGH, NC 27601
FIPS County Desc: Wake
Latitude: 35.71810
Longitude: -78.48758
Tank Id: 21
Tank Status: Current
Installed Date: 03/29/1976
Perm Close Date: Not reported
Product Name: Gasoline,Gas Mix
Tank Capacity: 2000
Root Tank Id: Not reported
Main Tank: No
Compartment Tank: No
TC6199177.2s Page 22

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FARM (Continued) 1000440343
Manifold Tank: 0
Commercial: Yes
Regulated: Yes
Other CP Tank: Not reported
Overfill Protection Name: Auto Shutoff Device
Spill Protection Name: Catchment Basin
Leak Detection Name: Not reported
Decode for TCONS_KEY: Single Wall FRP
Decode for PCONS_KEY: Single Wall FRP
Decode for PSYS_KEY: Unknown
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility:
Tank Id: 22
Tank Status: Current
Installed Date: 03/29/1976
Perm Close Date: Not reported
Product Name: Gasoline,Gas Mix
Tank Capacity: 2000
Root Tank Id: Not reported
Main Tank: No
Compartment Tank: No
Manifold Tank: 0
Commercial: Yes
Regulated: Yes
Other CP Tank: Not reported
Overfill Protection Name: Auto Shutoff Device
Spill Protection Name: Catchment Basin
Leak Detection Name: Not reported
Decode for TCONS_KEY: Single Wall FRP
Decode for PCONS_KEY: Single Wall FRP
Decode for PSYS_KEY: Unknown
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility:
Tank Id: 23
Tank Status: Current
Installed Date: 03/28/1982
Perm Close Date: Not reported
Product Name: Diesel
Tank Capacity: 10000
Root Tank Id: Not reported
Main Tank: No
Compartment Tank: No
Manifold Tank: 0
Commercial: Yes
Regulated: Yes
Other CP Tank: Not reported
Overfill Protection Name: Auto Shutoff Device
Spill Protection Name: Catchment Basin
Leak Detection Name: Not reported
Decode for TCONS_KEY: Single Wall Steel
Decode for PCONS_KEY: Single Wall FRP
Decode for PSYS_KEY: European Suction
TC6199177.2s Page 23

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FARM (Continued) 1000440343
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility:
Tank Id: 24
Tank Status: Removed
Installed Date: 03/29/1976
Perm Close Date: 03/13/1995
Product Name: Diesel
Tank Capacity: 4000
Root Tank Id: Not reported
Main Tank: No
Compartment Tank: No
Manifold Tank: Not reported
Commercial: Yes
Regulated: Yes
Other CP Tank: Not reported
Overfill Protection Name: Unknown
Spill Protection Name: Unknown
Leak Detection Name: Unknown
Decode for TCONS_KEY: Single Wall Steel
Decode for PCONS_KEY: Single Wall FRP
Decode for PSYS_KEY: Unknown
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility:
Tank Id: 25
Tank Status: Removed
Installed Date: 03/29/1976
Perm Close Date: 04/12/1999
Product Name: Diesel
Tank Capacity: 4000
Root Tank Id: Not reported
Main Tank: No
Compartment Tank: No
Manifold Tank: Not reported
Commercial: Yes
Regulated: Yes
Other CP Tank: Not reported
Overfill Protection Name: Auto Shutoff Device
Spill Protection Name: Catchment Basin
Leak Detection Name: Unknown
Decode for TCONS_KEY: Single Wall FRP
Decode for PCONS_KEY: Single Wall FRP
Decode for PSYS_KEY: Unknown
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility:
Tank Id: 26
Tank Status: Temporarily Closed
Installed Date: 01/01/1986
Perm Close Date: Not reported
Product Name: Other, Non-Petroleum
Tank Capacity: 550
Root Tank Id: Not reported
Main Tank: No
TC6199177.2s Page 24

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FARM (Continued) 1000440343
Compartment Tank: No
Manifold Tank: Not reported
Commercial: No
Regulated: No
Other CP Tank: Not reported
Overfill Protection Name: Unknown
Spill Protection Name: Unknown
Leak Detection Name: Unknown
Decode for TCONS_KEY: Unknown
Decode for PCONS_KEY: Unknown
Decode for PSYS KEY: Unknown
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility:
IMD:
Name: RALEIGH NEUSE WWTP-FILTER BLDG.
Address: 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD
City: RALEIGH
Region: Not reported
Facility ID: 21011
Date Occurred: 4/2/1999
Submit Date: 11/23/1999
GW Contam: Not reported
Soil Contam: Not reported
Incident Desc: ONE 4000 GALLON DIESEL UST REMOVED FROM SITE SOIL CONTAMINATION
DETECTED IN SAMPLE COLLECTED 23000 TPH(EPA 3550)IN SAMPLE S-3 360
TPH(EPA 5030)IN S-3
Operator: MR E MARCFENDER
Contact Phone: Not reported
Owner Company: Not reported
Operator Address:Not reported
Operator City: Not reported
Oper City,St,Zip: Not reported
Ownership: Municipal
Operation: Public Service
Material: Not reported
Qty Lost 1: Not reported
Qty Recovered 1: Not reported
Source: Not reported
Type: Gasoline/diesel
Location: Facility
Setting: Not reported
Risk Site: Not reported
Site Priority: Not reported
Priority Code: Not reported
Priority Update: 11/23/1999
Dem Contact: Not reported
Wells Affected: Not reported
Num Affected: Not reported
Wells Contam: Not reported
Sampled By: Not reported
Samples Include: Not reported
7.5 Min Quad: Not reported
5 Min Quad: Not reported
Latitude: 35.723610999999998
Longitude: -78.480556000000007
Latitude Number: Not reported
TC6199177.2s Page 25

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FARM (Continued) 1000440343
Longitude Number: Not reported
Latitude Decimal: Not reported
Longitude Decimal: Not reported
GPS: Not reported
Agency: Not reported
Facility ID: 21011
Last Modified: Not reported
Incident Phase: RE
NOV Issued: Not reported
NORR Issued: Not reported
45 Day Report: Not reported
Public Meeting Held: Not reported
Corrective Action Planned: Not reported
SOC Sighned: Not reported
Reclassification Report: Not reported
RS Designation: Not reported
Closure Request Date: Not reported
Close-out Report: Not reported
FINDS:
Registry ID: 110057118523
Click Here:
Environmental Interest/Information System:
ELECTRIC GENERATOR
Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access
additional FINDS:detail in the EDR Site Report.
AIRS:
Facility ID: 9200852
Name: NEUSE RIVER RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY
Address: 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE ROAD
Address 2: Not reported
City,State,Zip: RALEIGH,NC 27610
Regional Office: Raleigh Regional Office
SIC Number: 9511
Permit Number: 10622R01
Permit Class: Synthetic Minor
Issue Date: 10/11/2019
Expiration Date: 09/30/2027
Technical Permit Contact: Mr Mark Messere
Contact Address Line 1: 4011 Westchase Boulevard
Contact Address Line 2: Not reported
Contact City: Raleigh
Contact State: NC
Contact Zip: 27607
Contact Phone: [phone]
Link to Latest Permit: http://xapps.ncdenr.org/aq/FDocsServlet/185971
Latitude: 35.6488
Longitude: -78.6438
NC Financial Assurance 1:
Name: CITY/RALEIGH-WASTE TREATMENT PLT
Address: 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE ROAD
TC6199177.2s Page 26

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FARM (Continued) 1000440343
City,State,Zip: RALEIGH, NC 27610
Facility ID: 00-0-0000005336
Region: 1
Financial Responsibility Desc: Local Gov. Bond Rating Test
Financial Responsibility Name:City of Raleigh
Started Date: Not reported
Ended Date: Not reported
NPDES:
Name: NEUSE RIVER RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY
Address: 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD
City,State,Zip: RALEIGH, NC 276020590
Permit Number: WQ0011583
Permit Status: Active
Permit Type: Distribution of Residual Solids(503)
Issue Date: 05/12/1995
Region: Raleigh
Owner Name: City of Raleigh
Class: Not reported
Applied: Not reported
Drafted: Not reported
Expires: Not reported
Subbasin: Not reported
Receiving Stream: Not reported
Comments: Not reported
As-Built Flow(GPD): Not reported
Domestic%: Not reported
Industrial%: Not reported
stormwtr%: Not reported
Permitted Flow(GPD): Not reported
Program Category: Non-discharge
Project Type: Minor modification
Is Major Permit: 1
Date Assigned: Not reported
Organization Name: Not reported
Outfall: Not reported
Discharge Via: Not reported
Stream Classification: Not reported
Regulated Activity: Not reported
Owner Type: Not reported
Effective Date: Not reported
Basin Name: Not reported
Name: NEUSE RIVER RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY
Address: 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE RD
City,State,Zip: RALEIGH, NC 276020590
Permit Number: WQ0011583
Permit Status: In draft
Permit Type: Distribution of Residual Solids(503)
Issue Date: 05/12/1995
Region: Raleigh
Owner Name: City of Raleigh
Class: Not reported
Applied: Not reported
Drafted: Not reported
Expires: Not reported
Subbasin: Not reported
TC6199177.2s Page 27

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
NEUSE RIVER SOLAR FARM (Continued) 1000440343
Receiving Stream: Not reported
Comments: Not reported
As-Built Flow(GPD): Not reported
Domestic%: Not reported
Industrial%: Not reported
stormwtr%: Not reported
Permitted Flow(GPD): Not reported
Program Category: Non-discharge
Project Type: Renewal with major mod
Is Major Permit: 1
Date Assigned: Not reported
Organization Name: Not reported
Ouffall: Not reported
Discharge Via: Not reported
Stream Classification: Not reported
Regulated Activity: Not reported
Owner Type: Not reported
Effective Date: Not reported
Basin Name: Not reported
A7 RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP-MERCU IMD S105586644
NNW 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE ROAD N/A
1/4-1/2 RALEIGH,NC
0.347 mi.
1833 ft. Site 4 of 5 in cluster A
Relative: IMD:
Higher Name: RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP-MERCU
Actual: Address: 8500 BATTLEBRIDGE ROAD
235 ft. City: RALEIGH
Region: RAL
Facility ID: 86375
Date Occurred: 11/10/2002
Submit Date: 1/4/2005
GW Contam: No Groundwater Contamination detected
Soil Contam: Not reported
Incident Desc: MERCURY EXCEEDS SOIL TO GROUNDWATER AT THE FORMER FILTER ROCK PILE.
SOIL EXCAVATED,CLOSED OUT.
Operator: CRISP, DALE
Contact Phone: [phone]
Owner Company: PUBLIC UTILITIES DIRECTOR-RALEIGH
Operator Address:222 WEST HARGETT STREET
Operator City: RALEIGH
Oper City,St,Zip: RALEIGH, NC 919-662-5700
Ownership: Unknown
Operation: Residential
Material: Not reported
Qty Lost 1: Not reported
Qty Recovered 1: Not reported
Source: Stockpile
Type: Metals
Location: Not reported
Setting: Not reported
Risk Site: Not reported
Site Priority: 40
Priority Code: D
Priority Update: Not reported
Dem Contact: J. ROUSH
TC6199177.2s Page 28

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP-MERCU (Continued) S105586644
Wells Affected: No
Num Affected: 0
Wells Contam: Not reported
Sampled By: Not reported
Samples Include: Not reported
7.5 Min Quad: Not reported
5 Min Quad: Not reported
Latitude: 35.720277
Longitude: -78.486388
Latitude Number: Not reported
Longitude Number: Not reported
Latitude Decimal: Not reported
Longitude Decimal: Not reported
GPS: GPS
Agency: DWQ
Facility ID: Not reported
Last Modified: Not reported
Incident Phase: Not reported
NOV Issued: Not reported
NORR Issued: Not reported
45 Day Report: Not reported
Public Meeting Held: Not reported
Corrective Action Planned: Not reported
SOC Sighned: Not reported
Reclassification Report: Not reported
RS Designation: Not reported
Closure Request Date: Not reported
Close-out Report: Not reported
A8 CITY OF RALEIGH WWTP LUST TRUST S108280799
NNW 8500 BATTLE BRIDGE ROAD NPDES N/A
1/4-1/2 RALEIGH,NC
0.347 mi.
1833 ft. Site 5 of 5 in cluster A
Relative: LUST TRUST:
Higher Name: CITY OF RALEIGH WWTP
Actual: Address: 8500 BATTLE BRIDGE ROAD
235 ft. City,State,Zip: RALEIGH, NC
Facility ID: 0-005336
Site ID: 21011
Site Note: Not reported
Site Eligible?: True
Commercial Find: 100%Commercial
Priority Rank: Not reported
Deductable Amount: 20000
3rd Party Deductable Amt: 0
Sum 3rd Party Amt Applied: 0
NPDES:
Name: NEUSE RIVER WWTP
Address: Not reported
City,State,Zip: NC
Permit Number: NC0029033
Permit Status: Complete
Permit Type: Municipal,Large
TC6199177.2s Page 29

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
CITY OF RALEIGH WWTP (Continued) S108280799
Issue Date: Not reported
Region: Raleigh
Owner Name: City of Raleigh Public Utilities Department
Class: MAJOR
Applied: 07/25/2012
Drafted: 3/25/2015
Expires: 02/28/2013
Subbasin: 03-04-02
Receiving Stream: NEUSE RIVER
Comments: Not reported
As-Built Flow(GPD): Not reported
Domestic%: Not reported
Industrial%: Not reported
stormwtr%: Not reported
Permitted Flow(GPD): 75000000
Program Category: Not reported
Project Type: 4/2/2015
Is Major Permit: Not reported
Date Assigned: julie.grzyb
Organization Name: Not reported
Outfall: Not reported
Discharge Via: Not reported
Stream Classification: Not reported
Regulated Activity: Not reported
Owner Type: Not reported
Effective Date: Not reported
Basin Name: Not reported
B9 MATERIAL RECOVERY/BROWNFIELD RD C&D LAN HIST LF S105805024
WNW SR 2553/BROWNFIELD ROAD Financial Assurance N/A
1/4-1/2 RALEIGH,NC
0.359 mi.
1896 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster B
Relative: HIST_LF:
Higher Facility Type: CDLF
Actual: permit_num: 9231
275 ft. Facility Fax: [phone]
Contact Name: WILBUR CARTER
Contact Title: Not reported
Contact Telephone: [phone]
Contact Address: 421 RALEIGH VIEW ROAD
Contact City,St,Zip: RALEIGH,NC 27610
Lined: False
Facility Id: P1061
Facility Status: OPEN
Public/Private: PRIVATE
Waste Mgmt Specialist: Dennis Shackelford
NC Financial Assurance 2:
Permit Id: 9231-CDLF-
Facility Type: CD
Public/Private: Private
2011 Financial Assurance-FA MECH: Performance Bond
2011 Financial Assurance-FA MECH 2: Not reported
TC6199177.2s Page 30

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
B10 BROWNFIELD ROAD C&D LANDFILL SWF/LF S113718258
WNW 2600 BROWNFIELD ROAD N/A
1/4-1/2 RALEIGH,NC
0.359 mi.
1896 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster B
Relative: LF:
Higher Name: WAKE RECLAMATION, LLC
Actual: Address: 2600 BROWNFIELD ROAD
275 ft. City,State,Zip: RALEIGH,NC
Permit Num: 9231-CDLF-
Waste: CD
Activity: LF
Contact Name: Not reported
Contact Telephone: Not reported
Facility Status: InactiveClosed
Mailing Address: Not reported
Mailing City: Not reported
Name: BROWNFIELD ROAD C&D LANDFILL
Address: 2600 BROWNFIELD ROAD
City,State,Zip: RALEIGH,NC
Permit Num: 9231-CDLF-2012
Waste: CD
Activity: LF
Contact Name: John Roberson
Contact Telephone: [phone]
Facility Status: Open
Mailing Address: Not reported
Mailing City: Not reported
11 MATERIAL RECOVERY C&D LANDFILL-WCA DEBRIS S122874249
WNW BROWNFIELD ROAD N/A
1/4-1/2 RALEIGH,NC
0.493 mi.
2605 ft.
Relative: DEBRIS:
Higher DS Number: DS92-012
Actual: Name: MATERIAL RECOVERY C&D LANDFILL-WCA
288 ft. Address: BROWNFIELD ROAD
City,State,Zip: RALEIGH,NC
Size of Site: 20-25 Acres
Type of Debris: YW/LC/C&D
Contact: Roy Baldwin,Wake Cty, Facilities Mgr
Contact Phone: [phone]
Second Contact: John Roberson
Second Contact Phone: [phone]
Confirm Year: 2016
Status: Not Active
Latitude: 35.70562
Longitude: -78.50435
TC6199177.2s Page 31

Map ID MAP FINDINGS
Direction -
Distance EDR ID Number
Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number
12 RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP SHWS 1000202942
North BATTLE-BRIDGE RD SR 2552 N/A
1/2-1 RALEIGH,NC
0.888 mi.
4689 ft.
Relative: SHWS:
Lower Name: RALEIGH NEUSE RIVER WWTP
Actual: Address: BATTLE-BRIDGE RD SR 2552
159 ft. City,State,Zip: RALEIGH, NC
EPAID: NCD991278920
Lat/Longitude: 35.72498/-78.48553
Geolocation Method: On Screen Placement On Georeferenced Map
Click here to access the North Carolina DEQ records for this facility:
TC6199177.2s Page 32

Count:2 records. ORPHAN SUMMARY
City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s)
RALEIGH S108437662 NC DEPT.OF AGRICULTURE LF SR 1656/TRINITY RD.,STATE FAI OLI
RALEIGH S122874365 AMETHYST RIDGE DRIVE SOLVENTS AMETHYST RIDGE DR SHWS
TC6199177.2s Page 33

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis,as required.
Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List(Superfund).The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program.NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas.As such,EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC)and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version:07/29/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/03/2020 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:08/25/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/03/2020
Number of Days to Update:22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
NPL Site Boundaries
Sources:
EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center(EPIC)
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6
Telephone [phone] Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7
Telephone [phone] Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8
Telephone [phone] Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9
Telephone [phone] Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 10
Telephone [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register.EPA then accepts public comments on the site,responds to the comments,and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Date of Government Version:07/29/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/03/2020 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:08/25/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/03/2020
Number of Days to Update:22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens.Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980,the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
TC6199177.2s Page GR-1

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/02/1994 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:03/30/1994 Last EDR Contact:08/15/2011
Number of Days to Update:56 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan(NCP)establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e),sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version:07/29/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/03/2020 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:08/25/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/03/2020
Number of Days to Update:22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List(NPL)and Base Realignment and Closure(BRAC)sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,Compensation and Liability Information System(CERCLIS)Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version:04/03/2019 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/05/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:05/14/2019 Last EDR Contact:07/02/2020
Number of Days to Update:39 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS(Superfund Enterprise Management System)tracks hazardous waste sites,potentially hazardous waste sites,
and remedial activities performed in support of EPA's Superfund Program across the United States.The list was
formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015.The list contains data on potentially hazardous
waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities,private companies and private persons,
pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,Compensation,and Liability Act(CERCLA).
This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List(NPL)and the
sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version:07/29/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/03/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/25/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/03/2020
Number of Days to Update:22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/26/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
TC6199177.2s Page GR-2

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SEMS-ARCHIVE(Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive)tracks sites that have no further interest under
the Federal Superfund Program based on available information.The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP,
renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while
it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available.Archived sites have been removed
and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites.Archived status indicates that,to the best of EPA's knowledge,
assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the
site on the National Priorities List(NPL),unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or
other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time.The decision does not necessarily mean
that there is no hazard associated with a given site;it only means that.based upon available information,the
location is not judged to be potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version:07/29/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/03/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/25/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/03/2020
Number of Days to Update:22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/26/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version:06/15/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/22/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/17/2020 Last EDR Contact:06/22/2020
Number of Days to Update:87 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA-Treatment,Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database
includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA).Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle,treat,store,or dispose of the
waste.TSDFs treat,store,or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version:06/15/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/22/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/18/2020 Last EDR Contact:06/22/2020
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG: RCRA-Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system,providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database
includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA).Large quantity generators(LQGs)generate
over 1,000 kilograms(kg)of hazardous waste,or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version:06/15/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/22/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/18/2020 Last EDR Contact:06/22/2020
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
TC6199177.2s Page GR-3

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RCRA-SQG: RCRA-Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database
includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA).Small quantity generators(SQGs)generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version:06/15/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/22/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/18/2020 Last EDR Contact:06/22/2020
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
RCRA-VSQG: RCRA-Very Small Quantity Generators(Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators)
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database
includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA).Very small quantity generators(VSQGs)generate
less than 100 kg of hazardous waste,or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version:06/15/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/22/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/18/2020 Last EDR Contact:06/22/2020
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Federal institutional controls/engineering controls registries
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version:05/15/2020 Source: Department of the Navy
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/19/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:06/18/2020 Last EDR Contact:08/04/2020
Number of Days to Update:30 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/23/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps,building
foundations,liners,and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version:02/13/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:05/15/2020 Last EDR Contact:08/24/2020
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/07/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions,construction restrictions,property use restrictions,and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version:02/13/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:05/15/2020 Last EDR Contact:08/24/2020
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/07/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6199177.2s Page GR-4

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version:06/15/2020 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/22/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/17/2020 Last EDR Contact:06/22/2020
Number of Days to Update:87 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
State-and tribal-equivalent NPL
HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites.The file includes sites on the National Priority
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version:08/09/2011 Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2011 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2011 Last EDR Contact:07/15/2020
Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
State-and tribal-equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites.State hazardous waste site records are the states'equivalent to CERCLIS.These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund)are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties.Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version:05/11/2020 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/10/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/24/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/09/2020
Number of Days to Update:75 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites.SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state.Depending on the state,these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version:03/06/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/24/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:06/10/2020 Last EDR Contact:06/25/2020
Number of Days to Update:78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
OLI: Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information.(Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
sites).
Date of Government Version:08/22/2019 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/19/2019 Last EDR Contact:07/09/2020
Number of Days to Update:69 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6199177.2s Page GR-5

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DEBRIS: Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
NCDEQ Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section Temporary Disaster Debris Staging Site(TDDSS)Locations
which are available to be activated in a disaster or emergency..Disaster Debris Sites can only be used for temporary
disaster debris storage if the site's responsible party activates the site for use by notifying the NCDEQ DWM
Solid Waste Section staff during an emergency
Date of Government Version: 10/31/2019 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/20/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/24/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:66 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/28/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
LCID: Land-Clearing and Inert Debris(LCID)Landfill Notifications
A list all of the Land-Clearing and Inert Debris(LCID)Landfill Notification facilities(under 2 acres in
size)in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version:09/06/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/09/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:03/25/2019 Last EDR Contact:07/09/2020
Number of Days to Update:75 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
Date of Government Version:05/01/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/05/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:07/20/2020 Last EDR Contact:08/04/2020
Number of Days to Update:76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/06/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites,as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database.Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTs.
Date of Government Version:07/17/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:07/21/2020 Last EDR Contact:08/04/2020
Number of Days to Update: 1 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho,Oregon and Washington.
Date of Government Version:04/14/2020 Source: EPA Region 10
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/24/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version:04/29/2020 Source: EPA Region 1
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/24/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6199177.2s Page GR-6

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version:04/14/2020 Source: EPA, Region 5
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/24/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Florida,Mississippi and North Carolina.
Date of Government Version:04/14/2020 Source: EPA Region 4
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/26/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/24/2020
Number of Days to Update:78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona,California, New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version:04/08/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/24/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota,South Dakota,Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version:04/14/2020 Source: EPA Region 8
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/24/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas,and Nebraska
Date of Government Version:04/15/2020 Source: EPA Region 7
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/24/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version:04/08/2020 Source: EPA Region 6
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/24/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs.
Date of Government Version:04/03/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/08/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:06/26/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/07/2020
Number of Days to Update:79 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
TC6199177.2s Page GR-7

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version:02/01/2020 Source: FEMA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/19/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:06/09/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/06/2020
Number of Days to Update:82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks.UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act(RCRA)and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program.Available
information varies by state program.
Date of Government Version:05/01/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/05/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:07/20/2020 Last EDR Contact:08/04/2020
Number of Days to Update:76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Date of Government Version:06/09/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/11/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/26/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/11/2020
Number of Days to Update:76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/28/2020
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6(Louisiana,Arkansas,Oklahoma,New Mexico,Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version:04/08/2020 Source: EPA Region 6
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/24/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7(Iowa, Kansas, Missouri,Nebraska,and 9 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version:04/03/2020 Source: EPA Region 7
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/24/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8(Colorado, Montana, North Dakota,South Dakota, Utah,Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version:04/14/2020 Source: EPA Region 8
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/13/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/24/2020
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6199177.2s Page GR-8

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9(Arizona,California, Hawaii,Nevada,the Pacific Islands,and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version:04/08/2020 Source: EPA Region 9
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/23/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/01/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5(Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version:04/14/2020 Source: EPA Region 5
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/24/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10(Alaska, Idaho,Oregon,Washington,and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version:04/14/2020 Source: EPA Region 10
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/24/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4(Alabama, Florida,Georgia, Kentucky,Mississippi, North Carolina,South Carolina,Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version:04/14/2020 Source: EPA Region 4
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/26/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/24/2020
Number of Days to Update:78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank(UST)database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire,Rhode Island,Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Date of Government Version:04/29/2020 Source: EPA, Region 1
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/24/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
State and tribal institutional control/engineering control registries
INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property
due to varying levels of cleanup possible,practical,or necessary at the site.
Date of Government Version:05/11/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/10/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/24/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/09/2020
Number of Days to Update:75 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
TC6199177.2s Page GR-9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version:07/27/2015 Source: EPA, Region 1
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/29/2015 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/18/2016 Last EDR Contact:09/16/2020
Number of Days to Update: 142 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:01/04/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations.
Date of Government Version:05/11/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/10/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/24/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/09/2020
Number of Days to Update:75 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version:03/20/2008 Source: EPA, Region 7
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/22/2008 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:05/19/2008 Last EDR Contact:04/20/2009
Number of Days to Update:27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency:Varies
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned,idled,or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment.All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version:06/24/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/25/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/08/2020 Last EDR Contact:06/25/2020
Number of Days to Update:75 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property,the expansion,redevelopment,or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance,pollutant,or contaminant.Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped,open land,and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment,Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System(ACRES)stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions.A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community.Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA,as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
Date of Government Version:06/01/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/02/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:06/09/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/15/2020
Number of Days to Update:7 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/28/2020
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
TC6199177.2s Page GR-10

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Local Lists of Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing
A listing of recycling center locations.
Date of Government Version:04/09/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/09/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:06/25/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/22/2020
Number of Days to Update:77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing
A listing of solid waste facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006 Source: Department of Environment& Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/13/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:03/02/2007 Last EDR Contact:01/19/2009
Number of Days to Update: 17 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/24/2008 Last EDR Contact:07/21/2020
Number of Days to Update:52 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County,California.
Date of Government Version:01/12/2009 Source: EPA, Region 9
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/07/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/21/2009 Last EDR Contact:07/14/2020
Number of Days to Update: 137 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version:06/30/1985 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/09/2004 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/17/2004 Last EDR Contact:06/09/2004
Number of Days to Update:39 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land
A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States.
Date of Government Version:04/01/2014 Source: Department of Health&Human Serivces, Indian Health Service
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/06/2014 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/29/2015 Last EDR Contact:07/31/2020
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
Local Lists of Hazardous waste/Contaminated Sites
TC6199177.2s Page GR-11

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory
Register.
Date of Government Version:03/18/2020 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/19/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:06/09/2020 Last EDR Contact:08/19/2020
Number of Days to Update:82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/07/2020
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations.The U.S.Department of Justice("the Department")provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases,the source of the entries is not the Department,and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by,for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version:03/18/2020 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/19/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:06/09/2020 Last EDR Contact:08/19/2020
Number of Days to Update:82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/07/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Local Land Records
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA('Superfund')lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies.These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version:07/29/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/03/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/25/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/03/2020
Number of Days to Update:22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2020
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version:06/22/2020 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/23/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/17/2020 Last EDR Contact:06/23/2020
Number of Days to Update:86 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
SPILLS: Spills Incident Listing
A listing spills,hazardous material releases,sanitary sewer overflows,wastewater treatment plant bypasses and
upsets,citizen complaints,and any other environmental emergency calls reported to the agency.
Date of Government Version:03/10/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/31/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:06/18/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/17/2020
Number of Days to Update:79 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents
TC6199177.2s Page GR-12

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version:05/01/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/05/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:07/20/2020 Last EDR Contact:08/04/2020
Number of Days to Update:76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases.Typically,
they may include chemical,oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
Date of Government Version:09/27/2012 Source: FirstSearch
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/03/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:03/06/2013 Last EDR Contact:01/03/2013
Number of Days to Update:62 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch
Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990.Typically,
they may include chemical,oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990.Duplicate records that
are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80.
Date of Government Version:06/14/2001 Source: FirstSearch
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/03/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:03/06/2013 Last EDR Contact:01/03/2013
Number of Days to Update:62 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen/NLR: RCRA-Non Generators/No Longer Regulated
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act(RCRA)of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments(HSWA)of 1984.The database
includes selective information on sites which generate,transport,store,treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Date of Government Version:06/15/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/22/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/18/2020 Last EDR Contact:06/22/2020
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version:05/13/2020 Source: U.S.Army Corps of Engineers
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/18/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/12/2020 Last EDR Contact:08/13/2020
Number of Days to Update:86 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/30/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands,administered by the Department of Defense,that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico,and the U.S.Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/11/2007 Last EDR Contact:07/09/2020
Number of Days to Update:62 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
TC6199177.2s Page GR-13

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States.Lands included are administrated by:Army Corps
of Engineers,Bureau of Reclamation,National Wild and Scenic River,National Wildlife Refuge,Public Domain Land,
Wilderness,Wilderness Study Area,Wildlife Management Area,Bureau of Indian Affairs,Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service,Fish and Wildlife Service,National Park Service.
Date of Government Version:04/02/2018 Source: U.S.Geological Survey
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/11/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019 Last EDR Contact:07/06/2020
Number of Days to Update:574 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency:N/A
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998,with support from the U.S.EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation.It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs.Currently the member states are Alabama,Connecticut,Florida, Illinois,Kansas,
Minnesota,Missouri, North Carolina,Oregon,South Carolina,Tennessee,Texas,and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version:01/01/2017 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/03/2017 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:04/07/2017 Last EDR Contact:08/05/2020
Number of Days to Update:63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/23/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat,store,or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up,closure,and post-closure care of their facilities.
Date of Government Version:06/15/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/22/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/10/2020 Last EDR Contact:06/22/2020
Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a"Watch List"to facilitate dialogue between EPA,state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority.Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred.Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected,but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA,state and
local agencies-primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
Date of Government Version:08/30/2013 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/21/2014 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:06/17/2014 Last EDR Contact:07/31/2020
Number of Days to Update:88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe.This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action.The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites.Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up.Still others have not been fully investigated yet,and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
Date of Government Version:09/30/2017 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/08/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:07/20/2018 Last EDR Contact:08/06/2020
Number of Days to Update:73 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6199177.2s Page GR-14

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act.TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/10/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/18/2020
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/28/2020
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System.IRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air,water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/05/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:04/24/2020 Last EDR Contact:08/14/2020
Number of Days to Update:79 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/30/2020
Data Release Frequency:Annually
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act,as amended(92 Stat.829)requires all
registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides,active ingredients and devices
being produced,and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version:03/01/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/21/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:07/15/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/21/2020
Number of Days to Update:85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency:Annually
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL(Superfund)site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version:07/29/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/03/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/25/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/03/2020
Number of Days to Update:22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/14/2020
Data Release Frequency:Annually
RMP: Risk Management Plans
TC6199177.2s Page GR-15

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances.The Risk Management Program
Rule(RMP Rule)was written to implement Section 112(r)of these amendments.The rule,which built upon existing
industry codes and standards,requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program,which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release,an accident history of the last five years,and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring,and employee
training measures;and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care,employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies(e.g the fire department)should an accident occur.
Date of Government Version:01/31/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/13/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/03/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/15/2020
Number of Days to Update:82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995,data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version:04/17/1995 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/03/1995 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/07/1995 Last EDR Contact:06/02/2008
Number of Days to Update:35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version:04/27/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/06/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:06/09/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/03/2020
Number of Days to Update:34 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators,transporters,commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 10/09/2019 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2019 Last EDR Contact:07/13/2020
Number of Days to Update:70 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency:Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System(ICIS)supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/10/2017 Last EDR Contact:06/30/2020
Number of Days to Update:79 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
TC6199177.2s Page GR-16

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System-FIFRA(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,&Rodenticide Act)/TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA(Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act).To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version:04/09/2009 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/16/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact:08/18/2017
Number of Days to Update:25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System-FIFRA(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,&Rodenticide Act)/TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System(FTTS)inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version:04/09/2009 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/16/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact:08/18/2017
Number of Days to Update:25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements.To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 10/25/2019 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/25/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/15/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/20/2020
Number of Days to Update:82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Source: Department of Energy
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/04/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/15/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/04/2020
Number of Days to Update:42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/14/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Date of Government Version:01/12/2017 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/05/2019 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019 Last EDR Contact:08/31/2020
Number of Days to Update:251 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/14/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version:09/13/2019 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/10/2020 Last EDR Contact:08/06/2020
Number of Days to Update:96 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database(RADINFO)contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
TC6199177.2s Page GR-17

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version:07/01/2019 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/01/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/23/2019 Last EDR Contact:06/24/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System(FTTS)for all ten EPA regions.The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database(NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA
(Federal Insecticide,Fungicide,and Rodenticide Act)and TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act).Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that,and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records,it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates.This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/01/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:04/10/2007 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Number of Days to Update:40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection&Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System(FTTS)for all ten EPA
regions.The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database(NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,and Rodenticide Act)and TSCA(Toxic Substances Control Act).Some
EPA regions are now closing out records.Because of that,and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates.This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/01/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:04/10/2007 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Number of Days to Update:40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation,Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
Date of Government Version:01/02/2020 Source: Department of Transporation,Office of Pipeline Safety
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/28/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:04/17/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/27/2020
Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
CONSENT: Superfund(CERCLA)Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL(Superfund)sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version:06/30/2020 Source: Department of Justice,Consent Decree Library
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/15/2020 Telephone: Varies
Date Made Active in Reports:07/21/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/06/2020
Number of Days to Update:6 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste.BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators(LQG)
and Treatment,Storage,and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Source: EPA/NTIS
Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/22/2017 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/28/2017 Last EDR Contact:06/22/2020
Number of Days to Update:218 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Data Release Frequency:Biennially
TC6199177.2s Page GR-18

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/14/2015 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/10/2017 Last EDR Contact:07/07/2020
Number of Days to Update:546 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program(FUSRAP)in 1974 to remediate sites where
radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S.Atomic Energy Commission(AEC)operations.
Date of Government Version:08/08/2017 Source: Department of Energy
Date Data Arrived at EDR:09/11/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/14/2018 Last EDR Contact:07/28/2020
Number of Days to Update:3 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs.When the mills
shut down,large piles of the sand-like material(mill tailings)remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however,in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
Date of Government Version:08/30/2019 Source: Department of Energy
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:01/28/2020 Last EDR Contact:08/21/2020
Number of Days to Update:74 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/30/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Date of Government Version:07/29/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/03/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/25/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/03/2020
Number of Days to Update:22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S.where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964.These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
Date of Government Version:04/05/2001 Source: American Journal of Public Health
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Number of Days to Update:36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
US AIRS(AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem(AFS)
The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System(AIRS).AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies.This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution,such as electric power plants,
steel mills,factories,and universities,and provides information about the air pollutants they produce.Action,
air program,air program pollutant,and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
TC6199177.2s Page GR-19

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/03/2017 Last EDR Contact:09/26/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency:Annually
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:02/03/2017 Last EDR Contact:09/26/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency:Annually
MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data
Mines violation and assessment information. Department of Labor,Mine Safety&Health Administration.
Date of Government Version:05/28/2020 Source: DOL, Mine Safety&Health Admi
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/28/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/13/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/10/2020
Number of Days to Update:77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/14/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971.The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version:05/01/2020 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/21/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/13/2020 Last EDR Contact:08/25/2020
Number of Days to Update:84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/07/2020
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing
This map layer includes ferrous(ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals,such as iron
ore or molybdenum)and nonferrous(Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals,such
as gold,silver,copper,zinc,and lead)metal mines in the United States.
Date of Government Version:05/06/2020 Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/27/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/13/2020 Last EDR Contact:08/28/2020
Number of Days to Update:78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/07/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
US MINES 3: Active Mines&Mineral Plants Database Listing
Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team
of the USGS.
Date of Government Version:04/14/2011 Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/08/2011 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/13/2011 Last EDR Contact:08/28/2020
Number of Days to Update:97 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/07/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines
An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining(primarily coal mining)is maintained by OSMRE to provide
information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977(SMCRA).The inventory
contains information on the location,type,and extent of AML impacts,as well as,information on the cost associated
with the reclamation of those problems.The inventory is based upon field surveys by State,Tribal,and OSMRE
program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing
problems are reclaimed.
TC6199177.2s Page GR-20

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version:06/22/2020 Source: Department of Interior
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/22/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/10/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System.FINDS contains both facility information and'pointers'to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS(Permit Compliance System),AIRS(Aerometric
Information Retrieval System),DOCKET(Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS(Federal Underground Injection Control),C-DOCKET(Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS(Federal Facilities
Information System),STATE(State Environmental Laws and Statutes),and PADS(PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version:02/03/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/03/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:05/28/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/15/2020
Number of Days to Update:86 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/14/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
ECHO: Enforcement&Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.
Date of Government Version:04/04/2020 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/07/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:06/26/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/02/2020
Number of Days to Update:80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.
Date of Government Version:05/31/2018 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/26/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2018 Last EDR Contact:08/19/2020
Number of Days to Update:71 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/07/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Source: Department of Defense
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/02/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/17/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/09/2020
Number of Days to Update:77 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/26/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80(Code of Federal Regulations)EPA Fuels
Programs.All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.
Date of Government Version:05/18/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/19/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/03/2020 Last EDR Contact:08/17/2020
Number of Days to Update:76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/30/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
AIRS: Air Quality Permit Listing
A listing of facilities with air quality permits.
TC6199177.2s Page GR-21

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version:06/08/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/09/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/21/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/09/2020
Number of Days to Update:73 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
ASBESTOS: ASBESTOS
Asbestos notification sites
Date of Government Version:04/30/2020 Source: Department of Health&Human Services
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/14/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/03/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/28/2020
Number of Days to Update:81 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites
A listing of coal combustion products distribution permits issued by the Division for the treatment,storage,
transportation,use and disposal of coal combustion products.
Date of Government Version:03/06/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:03/24/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:06/05/2020 Last EDR Contact:06/25/2020
Number of Days to Update:73 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites,active and abandoned,that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
knowledge of and entered into this database.
Date of Government Version:05/31/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/19/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/09/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/16/2020
Number of Days to Update:82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/28/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended
to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care,and corrective measures
if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version:05/01/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/05/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:07/20/2020 Last EDR Contact:08/04/2020
Number of Days to Update:76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Information for solid waste facilities.Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available
to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care,and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated
facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012 Source: Department of Environmental&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2012 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2012 Last EDR Contact:09/17/2020
Number of Days to Update:23 Next Scheduled EDR Contact:01/04/2021
Data Release Frequency:Varies
Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information
Hazardous waste financial assurance information.
TC6199177.2s Page GR-22

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version:06/04/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/05/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/17/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/02/2020
Number of Days to Update:73 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing
General information regarding NPDES(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System)permits.
Date of Government Version:04/01/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/28/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:07/15/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/27/2020
Number of Days to Update:78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing
A listing of uncerground injection wells locations.
Date of Government Version:06/03/2020 Source: Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/04/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:08/13/2020 Last EDR Contact:08/26/2020
Number of Days to Update:70 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/14/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
AOP: Animal Operation Permits Listing
This listing includes animal operations that are required to be permitted by the state.
Date of Government Version:04/01/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/26/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:05/27/2020 Last EDR Contact:09/11/2020
Number of Days to Update: 1 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
SEPT HAULERS: Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
This list of all active and permitted Septage Land Application Site(SLAS)and Septage Detention and Treatment
Facility(SDTF)sites in North Carolina.The purpose of this map is to provide the public and government entities
a visual overview of the businesses that manage septage and septage facilities throughout the state.
Date of Government Version:01/07/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/10/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:03/16/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/07/2020
Number of Days to Update:66 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
PCS INACTIVE: Listing of Inactive PCS Permits
An inactive permit is a facility that has shut down or is no longer discharging.
Date of Government Version: 11/05/2014 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:01/06/2015 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:05/06/2015 Last EDR Contact:07/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 120 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
CCB: Coal Ash Structural Fills(CCB)Listing
These are not permitted Coal Ash landfills A list all of the now closed Coal Ash Structural Fills(CCB)in North
Carolina,in point data form.The purpose is to provide the public and other government entities a visual overview
of coal ash structural fills throughout the state and increase public awareness of their current locations.
Date of Government Version:01/23/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/08/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:06/25/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/07/2020
Number of Days to Update:78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6199177.2s Page GR-23

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
PCSRP: Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
To treat petroleum-contaminated soil in order to protect North Carolinaa??s environment and the health of the
citizens of North Carolina.
Date of Government Version:04/03/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/08/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:06/25/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/07/2020
Number of Days to Update:78 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System
Mineral Resources Data System
Date of Government Version:04/06/2018 Source: USGS
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2019 Last EDR Contact:08/28/2020
Number of Days to Update:3 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/07/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
PCS ENF: Enforcement data
No description is available for this data
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR:02/05/2015 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:03/06/2015 Last EDR Contact:07/01/2020
Number of Days to Update:29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency:Varies
PCS: Permit Compliance System
PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System(NPDES)permit holding facilities.PCS tracks the permit,compliance,and enforcement status of NPDES
facilities.
Date of Government Version:07/14/2011 Source: EPA,Office of Water
Date Data Arrived at EDR:08/05/2011 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/29/2011 Last EDR Contact:09/11/2020
Number of Days to Update:55 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency:Semi-Annually
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants(manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR's researchers.Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel.These plants used whale oil,rosin,coal,or a mixture
of coal,oil,and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar(oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals),sludges,oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment.The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly,serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited
to those categories of sources that might,in EDR's opinion,include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments.The categories reviewed included,but were not limited to gas,gas station,gasoline station,
filling station,auto,automobile repair,auto service station,service station,etc.This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as"High Risk Historical Records",or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
TC6199177.2s Page GR-24

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:Varies
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers.EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources
that might,in EDR's opinion,include dry cleaning establishments.The categories reviewed included,but were
not limited to dry cleaners,cleaners,laundry,laundromat,cleaning/laundry,wash&dry etc.This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as"High Risk Historical Records",or HRHR.EDR's HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns,but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:Varies
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt.Archives
RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived
from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.Compiled
from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment,Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013 Last EDR Contact:06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:Varies
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:01/13/2014 Last EDR Contact:06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 196 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:Varies
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment,Health and Natural Resources in North
Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013 Last EDR Contact:06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 172 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency:Varies
TC6199177.2s Page GR-25

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report,the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example,the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover,the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data.Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version:05/12/2020 Source: Department of Energy&Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR:05/12/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:07/27/2020 Last EDR Contact:08/10/2020
Number of Days to Update:76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/23/2020
Data Release Frequency:No Update Planned
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/10/2019 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:05/16/2019 Last EDR Contact:07/09/2020
Number of Days to Update:36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Data Release Frequency:Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version:01/01/2019 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Date Data Arrived at EDR:04/29/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:07/10/2020 Last EDR Contact:07/31/2020
Number of Days to Update:72 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/09/2020
Data Release Frequency:Quarterly
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version:06/30/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR:07/19/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports:09/10/2019 Last EDR Contact:07/09/2020
Number of Days to Update:53 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/26/2020
Data Release Frequency:Annually
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Management
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/10/2019 Last EDR Contact:08/11/2020
Number of Days to Update:69 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/30/2020
Data Release Frequency:Annually
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version:05/31/2018 Source: Department of Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR:06/19/2019 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports:09/03/2019 Last EDR Contact:09/02/2020
Number of Days to Update:76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency:Annually
TC6199177.2s Page GR-26

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: Endeavor Business Media
Petroleum Bundle(Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals,Gas Liquids(LPG/NGL),and Specialty
Gases(Miscellaneous))N=Natural Gas Bundle(Natural Gas,Gas Liquids(LPG/NGL),and Specialty Gases
(Miscellaneous)).This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media.This information
is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its
fitness for any particular purpose.Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business
Media.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: Endeavor Business Media
This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media.This information is provided on a best
effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any
particular purpose.Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media.
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly,the sick,and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities-schools,daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes-where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source:American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone:[phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals.
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source:Centers for Medicare&Medicaid Services
Telephone:[phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number,produced by Centers of Medicare&Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone:[phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone:[phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics'primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive,annual,national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts,which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone:[phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics'primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers:Child Care Facility List
Source: Department of Health&Human Services
Telephone:[phone]
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer(NFHL)which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map(FIRM)data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source:FEMA
Telephone:[phone]
Date of Government Version:2003,2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data,available in select counties across the country,was obtained by EDR
in 2002,2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data:Wetland Inventory
Source:US Fish& Wildlife Service
Telephone:[phone]
TC6199177.2s Page GR-27

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source:U.S.Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
©2015 TomTom North America, Inc.All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6199177.2s Page GR-28

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
RALEIGH FARM BANK PARCEL
8300 STATE RD 2542
RALEIGH, NC 27610
TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
Latitude (North): 35.702815-35°42' 10.13"
Longitude(West): 78.487005-78° 29' 13.22"
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 17
UTM X(Meters): 727365.8
UTM Y(Meters): 3953698.5
Elevation: 198 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Target Property Map: 5947400 CLAYTON, NC
Version Date: 2013
West Map: 5948594 GARNER, NC
Version Date: 2013
EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
geologic strata.
TC6199177.2s Page A-1

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
should contamination exist on the target property,what downgradient sites might be impacted.
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
General Topographic Gradient: General East
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
N N
NJ NNJ (J1 A N
CO to,
N N N ' 1,3
O 0,
CD T W 8 W W N
North I South
TP
N N
O w N w c N NJ
CO
N N
J N N N
W O
a) OD ODD 00 Oo
W A W W
CO
West I East
TP
0 1/2 1 Miles
Target Property Elevation: 198 ft.
Source:Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
on a relative (not an absolute)basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified.
TC6199177.2s Page A-2

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property,what downgradient sites might be impacted.
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
and bodies of water).
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type
3720175100K FEMA FIRM Flood data
Additional Panels in search area: FEMA Source Type
3720174100J FEMA FIRM Flood data
3720174000J FEMA FIRM Flood data
3720175000K FEMA FIRM Flood data
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Electronic
NWI Quad at Target Property Data Coverage
CLAYTON YES-refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property,what downgradient sites might be impacted.
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION
MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW
Not Reported
TC6199177.2s Page A-3

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era: Paleozoic Category: Plutonic and Intrusive Rocks
System: Devonian
Series: Middle Paleozoic granitic rocks
Code: Pzg2(decoded above as Era,System&Series)
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E.Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale-a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS- 11 (1994).
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's(USDA)Soil Conservation Service(SCS)leads the National Cooperative Soil
Survey(NCSS)and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
for privately owned lands in the United States.A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)soil survey maps.
The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data.
Soil Component Name: CECIL
Soil Surface Texture: sandy clay loam
Hydrologic Group: Class B- Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained. Soils have intermediate water holding capacity. Depth to
water table is more than 6 feet.
Hydric Status: Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil.
Corrosion Potential- Uncoated Steel: HIGH
Depth to Bedrock Min: >60 inches
Depth to Bedrock Max: >60 inches
TC6199177.2s Page A-4

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeability Soil Reaction
Rate(in/hr) (pH)
1 0 inches 7 inches sandy clay loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 6.50
Materials(more SOILS,Sands, Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Silty
Soils.
2 7 inches 11 inches sandy clay loam Silt-Clay COARSE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 5.50
Materials(more SOILS,Sands, Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Sands with fines,
passing No. Silty Sand.
200),Silty
Soils.
3 11 inches 50 inches clay Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 5.50
Materials(more SOILS,Silts and Min: 0.60 Min: 4.50
than 35 pct. Clays(liquid
passing No. limit 50%or
200),Clayey more), Elastic
Soils. silt.
4 50 inches 75 inches variable Not reported Not reported Max: 0.00 Max: 0.00
Min: 0.00 Min: 0.00
OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA
Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data,the following additional subordinant soil types may
appear within the general area of target property.
Soil Surface Textures: sandy loam
loam
clay loam
silt loam
very channery-silt loam
gravelly-sandy loam
Surficial Soil Types: sandy loam
loam
clay loam
silt loam
very channery-silt loam
gravelly-sandy loam
Shallow Soil Types: sandy clay
silt loam
silty clay loam
clay
very channery-silt loam
loam
Deeper Soil Types: silty clay loam
weathered bedrock
fine sandy loam
unweathered bedrock
sandy clay loam
TC6199177.2s Page A-5

GEOCHECK® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
LOCAL/REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE(miles)
Federal USGS 1.000
Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 1 mile
State Database 1.000
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
1 USGS40000889563 1/4-1/2 Mile SSW
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No PWS System Found
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
2 NC3000000005439 1/2- 1 Mile SSE
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
TC6199177.2s Page A-6

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 6199177.2s
r ems, —
^M, 100
zoo� , o ( 1
11 2 b
to
kg--
1� At o �� Q// �
2011,O - O Oi..iii :
.f
req� 11O� �q/24p ,,,, 0 a
�( drill
Q 2 40 i�
I , „,„:,,,,
0,-;---), 4kr
pp ), 4'
r o o ,28a 2°
\I\r � ti
1
.41 A ,,A,
, ifirm
V yep� o °
2 , i o b
Q ti
o
d
zo
' o Q0
0 '
% zoo
o ilk .,'0�24 0 el,
- C.. P
N... ....„„„„lit r ,
/
V\Op , Q �40
a - o / '� �� 0 1 a
4
0
o
2 9 a \ 085� o o - tk.-
,n� 1,olk
Q
',\--7-7 w ,% ' ti �- ) zoo
„44 ,, _
_ ,
+ BQ a
, I Af1,7, '''
''' 011 , . ' •
/.:
,.
an--
, 4.
, isfei
ti Pr
fill
i DWI,' ram. _ � I �i A Ilial
6 l/ 11'
/V County Boundary D 1/4 1/2 1 Miles
N Major Roads
Contour Lines f Groundwater Flow Direction ' Wildlife Areas
(
© Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater ) Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location Natural Areas
(
® Water Wells ) Groundwater Flow Varies at Location o Rare&Endangered Species
© Public Water Supply Wells
• Cluster of Multiple Icons
SITE NAME: Raleigh Farm Bank Parcel CLIENT: Axiom Environmental
ADDRESS: 8300 State Rd 2542 CONTACT: Kenan Jernigan
Raleigh NC 27610 INQUIRY#: 6199177.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.702815/78.487005 DATE: September 21,2020 3:50 pm
Copyright©2020 EDR,Inc.c 2015 TomTom Rel.2015.

1
GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation Database EDR ID Number
1
SSW FED USGS USGS40000889563
1/4-1/2 Mile
Higher
Organization ID: USGS-NC
Organization Name: USGS North Carolina Water Science Center
Monitor Location: WK-225 Type: Well
Description: Not Reported HUC: Not Reported
Drainage Area: Not Reported Drainage Area Units: Not Reported
Contrib Drainage Area: Not Reported Contrib Drainage Area Unts: Not Reported
Aquifer: Piedmont and Blue Ridge crystalline-rock aquifers
Formation Type: Felsic Metaigneous Rock Aquifer Type: Not Reported
Construction Date: Not Reported Well Depth: 145
Well Depth Units: ft Well Hole Depth: Not Reported
Well Hole Depth Units: Not Reported
2
SSE NC WELLS NC3000000005439
1/2-1 Mile
Higher
PWD ID: NC0351477 System Name: TIPPETTS CHAPEL FWB CHURCH
PWS Type: Non Community Transient Primary Source: Ground Water
Water Type: Ground Water Facility Name: WELL#1
Facility Type: Well Well Depth: 180
Owner: TIPPETTS CHAPEL FWB CHURCH 351477
TC6199177.2s Page A-8

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance Database FDR ID Number
NC_SNHA NC10001865
Acres: 21.92 Sitename: NEUSE RIVER(CLAYTON)FORESTS
Quality type: Not Reported Sig: D
Site id: 1865 Edr id: NC10001865
NC_SNHA NC10001877
Acres: 48.09 Sitename: NEUSE RIVER(CLAYTON)FORESTS
Quality type: Not Reported Sig: D
Site id: 1877 Edr id: NC10001877
TC6199177.2s Page A-9

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
AREA RADON INFORMATION
State Database: NC Radon
Radon Test Results
Num Results Avg pCi/L Min pCi/L Max pCi/L
19 2.34 0.5 7.3
3 7.97 14.5 6.7
Federal EPA Radon Zone for WAKE County: 2
Note:Zone 1 indoor average level>4 pCi/L.
:Zone 2 indoor average level>=2 pCi/L and<=4 pCi/L.
:Zone 3 indoor average level<2 pCi/L.
Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 27610
Number of sites tested: 1
Area Average Activity %<4 pCi/L %4-20 pCi/L %>20 pCi/L
Living Area-1st Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
Living Area-2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported
Basement 2.300 pCi/L 100% 0% 0%
TC6199177.2s Page A-10

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5'Digital Elevation Model(DEM)
Source:United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5'Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006.The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000-and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps.The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source:U.S.Geological Survey
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer(NFHL)which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map(FIRM)data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source:FEMA
Telephone:[phone]
Date of Government Version:2003,2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data,available in select counties across the country,was obtained by EDR
in 2002,2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data:Wetland Inventory
Source:US Fish& Wildlife Service
Telephone:[phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOWR Information System
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System(AIS)to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points.EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report,hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source:P.G.Schruben, R.E.Arndt and W.J.Bawiec,Geology of the Conterminous U.S.at 1:2,500,000 Scale-A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M.Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS-11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRCS)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's(USDA)Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRCS)leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey(NCSS)and is responsible for collecting,storing,maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States.A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape.Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed(SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO:Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service,mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360.Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic(SSURGO)database.SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps.This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners,townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC6199177.2s Page PSGR-1

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL/REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells,rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System(SDWIS)after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995,the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System(FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System(NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater.The groundwater data includes information on wells,springs,and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
North Carolina Wildlife Resources/Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Natural Heritage Occurrence Sites Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species,occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems(terrestrial or aquatic),and special animal habitats(e.g.,colonial waterbird nesting sites).
NC Natural Areas:Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites(terrestrial or aquatic)that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site's significance may be due to the presenceof rare species,rare or high quality natural communities,or
other important ecological features.
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source:Department of Environment&Natural Resources
Telephone:[phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source:USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA)and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986-1992.Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC6199177.2s Page PSGR-2

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307&309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S.with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration,800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines,prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
©2015 TomTom North America, Inc.All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6199177.2s Page PSGR-3

Appendix E: USFWS Report
Raleigh Farm—Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4)
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201 Appendices

4 pf r I •a,. \
FISH&WILDLIFE'
IE
United States Department of the Interior '�`"
, , . .&_
.9
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
40
%$ Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
4 �,e Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh,NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: September 22, 2020
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-1951
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-04278
Project Name: Raleigh Buffer Site
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act(Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information.An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally-listed endangered or threatened species.A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally-protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

09/22/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-04278 2
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally-listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species.As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally-protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act(16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html).Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/
comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service.Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

09/22/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-04278 3
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

09/22/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-04278 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

09/22/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-04278 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-1951
Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-04278
Project Name: Raleigh Buffer Site
Project Type: LAND - RESTORATION/ENHANCEMENT
Project Description: Proposed Riparian Buffer Restoration Site
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/place/35.700263293374874N78.49942422607029W
deD
Qt.,/
Re ri :%
Counties: Wake, NC

09/22/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-04278 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheries', as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Amphibians
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.Your location is outside the critical habitat. Threatened
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.Your location is outside the critical habitat. Endangered
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528

09/22/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-04278 4
Clams
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species.Your location is outside the critical habitat. Threatened
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

Appendix F: NC NHP and NC SHPO Correspondence
Raleigh Farm—Phase A Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V4)
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201 Appendices

• ••• Roy Cooper,Governor
•• •• NC DEPARTMENT OF Susi Hamilton,Secretary
■■■■■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
• Pm Walter Clark, Director, Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-12821
September 4, 2020
Allison Keith
Axiom Environmental
218 Snow Ave
Raleigh, NC 27603
RE: Raleigh Farm Nutrient Site; 20-021
Dear Allison Keith:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached 'Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one-mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httos://www.fws.gov/offices/Di rectory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water
Management Trust Fund easement, or an occurrence of a Federally-listed species is documented
near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 W.JONES STREET,RALEIGH,NC 27603 • 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER.RALEIGH,NC 27699
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Raleigh Farm Nutrient Site
Project No. 20-021
September 4, 2020
NCNHDE-12821
Element Occurrences Documented Within Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name mmon Name Ldst Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Rank
Freshwater 25712 Alasmidonta undulata Triangle Floater 2018-06-29 E 3-Medium --- Threatened G4 S3
Bivalve
Freshwater 7828 Elliptio roanokensis Roanoke Slabshell 2016-12-23 E 3-Medium --- Special G3 S3
Bivalve Concern
Freshwater 19137 Lampsilis radiata Eastern Lampmussel 2018-06-29 E 3-Medium --- Threatened G5 S3
Bivalve
Freshwater 28706 Lasmigona subviridis Green Floater 2018-05-11 E 3-Medium --- Endangered G3 S2
Bivalve
Freshwater Fish5501 Lampetra aepyptera Least Brook Lamprey 2018-02-25 E 3-Medium --- Threatened G5 S2
Natural 29776 Piedmont Bottomland --- 2002-05-29 BC 3-Medium --- --- G2? S2
Community Forest (Typic Low
Subtype)
Natural 29775 Piedmont Levee Forest--- 2002-05-29 BC 3-Medium --- --- G3G4 S3S4
Community (Typic Subtype)
Natural Areas Documented Within Project Area
Site Namilllik Representational Rating Collective Rating
Neuse River (Clayton) Forests R2 (Very High) C4 (Moderate)
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area* _
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Clemmons Educational State Forest NC Department of Agriculture, Forest State
Service
City of Raleigh Greenway - Neuse River Greenway City of Raleigh Local Government
NC Clean Water Management Trust Fund Funded NC DNCR, Clean Water Management Trust State
Project Fund
Clemmons Educational State Forest Dedicated NC Department of Agriculture, Forest State
Nature Preserve Service
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve
(DNP), Registered Natural Heritage Area(RHA),or Federally-listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/help. Data query generated on September 4,2020;source: NCNHP, Q3 July 2020. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 5

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Raleigh Farm Nutrient Site
Project No. 20-021
September 4, 2020
NCNHDE-12821
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name 4M' Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Rank 1 d
Dragonfly or 32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner 2004-Pre H? 5-Very --- Significantly G5 S2?
Damselfly Low Rare
Dragonfly or 33753 Somatochlora Coppery Emerald 2004-Pre H? 5-Very --- Significantly G3G4 S2?
Damselfly georgiana Low Rare
Freshwater 25712 Alasmidonta undulata Triangle Floater 2018-06-29 E 3-Medium --- Threatened G4 S3
Bivalve
Freshwater 7828 Elliptio roanokensis Roanoke Slabshell 2016-12-23 E 3-Medium --- Special G3 S3
Bivalve Concern
Freshwater 19137 Lampsilis radiata Eastern Lampmussel 2018-06-29 E 3-Medium --- Threatened G5 S3
Bivalve
Freshwater 28706 Lasmigona subviridis Green Floater 2018-05-11 E 3-Medium --- Endangered G3 S2
Bivalve
Freshwater Fish5501 Lampetra aepyptera Least Brook Lamprey 2018-02-25 E 3-Medium --- Threatened G5 S2
Natural 39081 Mesic Mixed Hardwood--- 2019-01-28 BC 3-Medium --- --- G3G4 S4
Community Forest (Piedmont
Subtype)
Natural 29776 Piedmont Bottomland --- 2002-05-29 BC 3-Medium --- --- G2? S2
Community Forest (Typic Low
Subtype)
Natural 29775 Piedmont Levee Forest--- 2002-05-29 BC 3-Medium --- --- G3G4 S3S4
Community (Typic Subtype)
Natural 39085 Piedmont/Coastal --- 2002-05-29 E 2-High --- --- G3 S3
Community Plain Heath Bluff
Vascular Plant 17830 Scutellaria australis Southern Skullcap 1957-04-29 H 4-Low --- Endangered G4T4? S1
Natural Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
ite Nam Representational Rating = Collective Rating
Neuse River (Clayton) Forests R2 (Very High) C4 (Moderate)
Page 3 of 5

Managed Areas Documented Within a One-mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Nam..411111 . Owner
Conservation Trust for North Carolina Easement Conservation Trust for North Carolina Private
Triangle Land Conservancy Preserve Triangle Land Conservancy Private
Clemmons Educational State Forest NC Department of Agriculture, Forest State
Service
City of Raleigh Greenway - Neuse River Greenway City of Raleigh Local Government
NC Clean Water Management Trust Fund Funded NC DNCR, Clean Water Management Trust State
Project Fund
NC Clean Water Management Trust Fund Funded NC DNCR, Clean Water Management Trust State
Project Fund
Clemmons Educational State Forest Dedicated NC Department of Agriculture, Forest State
Nature Preserve Service
Wake County/City of Raleigh Open Space - OS-062 Wake County; City of Raleigh Local Government
Wake County/City of Raleigh Open Space - OS-062 Wake County; City of Raleigh Local Government
Wake County Easement Wake County Local Government
Wake County Easement Wake County Local Government
Wake County Easement Wake County Local Government
Wake County Easement Wake County Local Government
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/helo. Data query generated on September 4,2020; source: NCNHP, Q3 July 2020. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 4 of 5

NCNHDE-12821 : Raleigh Farm Nutrient Site
` ♦.. .I � �v . ♦_
0o
'' d . :ce:p�f•: ♦i:�i♦i. ���♦:♦i::00:::::ip�::::: /:t,t.*e�-1:Ato:c t� \a r
O, ' .eie��� . ..•.�• ::•:0I.is •
,��o"� .
Bridge d 0�:•� a
Bak 9 R p♦,/
s V
m!k ! i >
LL— 04 i .. ... .....
Q. 0111 i * ".4"- 4,44 0 0
. _:: "4.N.‘ .
(t i 1 I 3n k_j *-ttItte,/
, -au:om Rd i N
v
O;
i
i 's.
,„.
.ttt 06
6 .0h
13
W E arc 4`" ` 04
f n
September 4,2020 1:33,380
❑ Project Boundary 0 0.275 0.55 1� ( ti mi
ti ti ti ti ti ti
❑ Buffered Project Boundary 0 0.45 0.9 1.8 km
Ej NHP Natural Area(NHNA) Sources: Esri,HERE,Garmin,Intermap,increment P Corp.,GEBCO,USGS,
FAO,NPS,NRCAN,GeoBase,IGN,Kadaster NL,Ordnance Survey,Esri Japan,
METI,End China(Hong Kong),(c)OpenStreetMep contributors,and the GIS
Managed Area(MAREA) User Community
Page 5 of 5

NC SHPO - Raleigh Farm Vicinity
■R'
1 •
•
— .1)11)
et
L .0,!1111111.1 4 '• R r t.
�3U�11 -3 •3. C
. pi, , - i .
•
1 . ; 0 ¢�1 U4 O .. WAKE �. . iiiii
.I b . • '
••'ram+ ' 0.'
4.
+4. y a ,,# • r -` i ti#F`k. art_ y•� y r• +• Yy�(. r -;; •
'�i
4P '-4 J L
I.
■ - L
a,4 I*
t JOHNSTON
ip 1. • . I• V . . I- 4..•,.. /kblaht.._ .105_14.1; - ,
. '.I.4i r. 111§PAIIII, pie .0 • 'V 1,47:.r' / . 047...7., • : P.IL+7•i
I' • T • Ilik `Ti'
L.-4?'. lit1/4.11
• , A... -7.....t ,
4.
3 •i r•, 11.7.
ti r
y - # i � .•its` 1 * L L
9/22/2020, 1:44:12 PM 1:18,056
0 0.13 0.25 0.5 mi
■ Surveyed Onlyindividual resources&centerpoints...: Local districts&boundaries Local Landmark,Gone Y � p I I I I 1 f r I �
Local individual resources&centerpoints * Local HD Center Point Surveyed Only 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 km
■ Local Landmark Surveyed in NRHD Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS,
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
City of Raleigh,USDA FSA