20130864 Ver 1_Mitigation Plans_20130814

NO-
os stem
PROGRAM
August 12, 2013
Eric Kulz
Division of Water Resources
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 - 1650
Re: Draft Final Mitigation Plan
Bowl Basin Wetland Restoration Project
EEP Project #: 95721
White Oak 03020106, Onslow County
Dear Eric,
201 30864
Please find enclosed two hardcopies of the draft final mitigation plan for the Bowl Basin wetland
restoration project for your review. This document was posted on the EEP Portal, August 12,
2013. Please forward to the appropriate DWR Field Representative for their review.
If you have any questions or comments, please call Kristin Miguez @ 910 - 796 -7475 or email her
at kristin.miguezna,ncdenr.gov with any questions regarding this plan.
Thank you very much for your assistance.
' Sincerely
,A�
Lin Xu
Attachment: Draft Final Mitigation Plans (2 originals)
1 DENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1652 hail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652 J 919- 715 -4476 % www.nceep.net

MITIGATION PLAN
Bowl Basin Wetland Restoration Site
Onslow County, North Carolina
EEP Contract 005012
EEP Project Number 95721
White Oak River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03020106
2 0 1 3 0 8 6 4
)0
iV.t ��MeWtPi 6GF;.1rt)
Prepared for:
o stem
lar�ement
PROGRAM
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1601
FINAL - JULY 2013
�Ti J

MITIGATION PLAN
Bowl Basin Wetland Restoration Site
Onslow County, North Carolina
EEP Contract 005012
EEP Project Number 95721
White Oak River Basin
Cataloging Unit 03020106
Prepared for:
ortem
t'II1('Ilt
PROGRAM
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1601
Prepared by:
KC GIEs
mmmmmr4b�
K C I EwAK*& ENUI TecmmoGirs
ANO CONSMCIION. INC.
ASsoaAIT> OF NC
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PC
4601 Six Forks Rd, Suite 220
Raleigh, NC 27609
(919) 783 -9214
FINAL - JULY 2013

Mitigation Plan Bowl Bann Restoration Site
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This mitigation plan has been written in conformance with the requirements of the following
• Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal Register Title 33
Navigation and Navigable Waters Volume 3 Chapter 2 Section § 332 8 paragraphs (c)(2) through (c)(14)
• NCDENR Ecosystem Enhancement Program In -Lieu Fee Instrument signed and dated July 28, 2010
These documents govern NCEEP operations and procedures for the delivery of compensatory mitigation
The Bowl Basin Wetland Restoration Site (BBWRS) is a full - delivery mitigation project being developed
for the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) The BBWRS is a former non - riparian
wetland system in the White Oak River Basin (03020106 8 -digit HUC) in northeastern Onslow County,
North Carolina that has been substantially modified to maximize agricultural production The site offers
the chance to restore impacted agricultural lands to non - riparian wetland habitat
The White Oak River Basin Restoration Priorities (WORBRP) state that the goals are to protect and
improve water quality throughout the Basin by reducing sediment and nutrient inputs into streams and
rivers and to support efforts to restore local watersheds (Breeding, 2010) The project goals for BBWRS
are in line with the basin priorities and include the following
- Slow and treat the runoff of upslope agricultural drainage
- Restore a hardwood flats community
- Create additional valuable wetland habitat in the Upper White Oak drainage basin
The project goals will be addressed through the implementation of the following objectives
- Fill field ditches to restore surface flow retention and elevate local groundwater levels
- Alleviate surface compaction and furrow drainage by surface roughening throughout the site
- Redevelop longer wetland flow patterns to increase surface flow retention time
- Restore a native forested hardwood wetland community using native trees and seed mixes
The project watershed is located along the upper boundary of the 14 -digit watershed, is surrounded by
forest on three sides, and is currently used for agriculture The site will be restored to non - riparian
wetland The ditches across the site will be filled to retain and distribute surface flow across the site
Once site grading is complete, the non - riparian communities will be planted as Hardwood Flats
(NCWAM, v 4 1 2010) The site will be monitored for seven years or until the success criteria are met
Bowl Bann Wetland Restoration Site, Onslow County
Mitigation Credits
Nitrogen
Phosphorous
Stream
Riparian
Non - riparian
Buffer
Nutrient
Nutrient
Wetland
Wetland
Offset
Offset
Type
R
RE
R
RE
R
RE�
°'
Acres
117
Credits
117
TOTAL CREDITS
117
R= Restoration RE= Restoration Equivalent of Creation or Enhancement

Mitigation Plan
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
t
J
r -�
_J
r �
1
C
�_l

Mitigation Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
1.0
RESTORATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
..................... ..............................1
2.0
SITE SELECTION ................ ... .. ..............................................
..............................1
2.1
Directions
1
2 2
Site Selection
1
23
Vicinity Map
3
24
Watershed Map
4
25
Soil Survey
5
2 6
Current Condition Plan View
6
2 7
Historical Condition Plan View
7
2 8
Site Photographs
9
3.0
SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT ................................................
.............................10
3 1
Site Protection Instrument Summary Information
10
3 2
Site Protection Instrument Figure
11
4.0
BASELINE INFORMATION ......... .................................................
.............................12
4 1
Watershed Summary Information
13
42
Reach Summary Information
13
43
Wetland Summary Information
13
4.4
Regulatory Considerations
14
5.0
DETERMINATION OF CREDITS ......................................................
.............................15
6.0
CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE ......................................................
.............................16
7.0
MITIGATION WORK PLAN ...........................................................
.............................18
7 1
Target Wetland Types and Plant Communities
18
72
Design Parameters
18
7 3
Data Analysis
19
7.4
Proposed Mitigation Plan View
21
8.0
MAINTENANCE PLAN .......................................................................
.............................22
9.0
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ...... ..............................................
.............................23
10.0
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS .......................................................
.............................24
11.0
LONG -TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN ..................................................
.............................25
12.0
ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN .....................................................
.............................25
13.0
FINANCIAL ASSURANCES ...... ............................... ........................
.............................26
14.0
OTHER INFORMATION ...................................................................
.............................26
141
Definitions
26
142
References
27
14 3
Appendix A. Site Protection Instrument
30
144
Appendix B. Baseline Information Data
44
14.5
Appendix C Mitigation Work Plan Data and Analyses
88
14.6
Appendix D Project Plan Sheets
108

Mitigation Plan Bowl Basin Restoration Site
1.0 RESTORATION PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
EEP develops River Basin Restoration Priorities to guide its restoration activities within each of the
state's 54 cataloging units RBRPs delineate specific watersheds that exhibit both the need and
opportunity for wetland, stream, and riparian buffer restoration These watersheds are called Targeted
Local Watersheds (TLWs) and receive priority for EEP planning and restoration project funds
The 2010 White Oak River Basin RBRP identified HUC 03020106010010 (Upper White Oak River) as a
Targeted Local Watershed (http / /portal ncdenr org/web /eep /rbrps /white -oak) About 79% of the
watershed is forested with impacts to streams including channelization and nonpoint source pollution
The Bowl Basin Wetland Restoration Site ( BBWRS) Project was identified as a wetland opportunity to
improve habitat within the TLW
The project goals address stressors identified in the TLW and include the following
- Slow and treat the runoff of upslope agricultural drainage
- Restore a hardwood flats community
- Create additional valuable wetland habitat in the Upper White Oak drainage basin
The project goals will be addressed through the implementation of the following project objectives
- Fill field ditches to restore surface flow retention and elevate local groundwater levels
- Alleviate surface compaction and furrow drainage by surface roughening throughout the site
- Redevelop longer wetland flow patterns to increase surface flow retention time
- Restore a native forested hardwood wetland community using natives trees and seed mixes
2.0 SITE SELECTION
2.1 Directions
The BBWRS is on a single parcel located off of White Oak River Road approximately 13 5 miles north -
northeast of Jacksonville, North Carolina To reach the site from Raleigh proceed east on 1 -40 for
approximately 10 miles Then travel on US -70 East towards Goldsboro and Kinston for approximately 68
miles Turn right onto NC -58 South Travel for 26 miles and then turn right on Country Road 1119 Take
the first left onto Country Road 1115 Travel approximately 4 miles and then turn left onto White Oak
River Road After approximately two miles, turn right onto Gibson Bridge Road Travel another two miles
and then turn right onto White Oak River Road The site will be approximately two miles ahead on the
left Section 2 3 shows the Vicinity Map for the site
2.2 Site Selection
The site is part of the 03020106 USGS Cataloging Unit (White Oak) The White Oak River Basin as a
whole is experiencing a large amount of habitat alteration due to population growth from Jacksonville,
Beaufort, Emerald Isle, Morehead City, and Newport As a result, some of the objectives in this catalog
unit include mitigating impacts to water quality from nonpoint source pollution and protecting and
restoring existing habitat (NCDENR EEP, 2010)
The project area is bounded by White Oak River Road to the east, a ditch along the property line to the
south, agricultural land to the north and the Hoffman Forest (a research forest managed by North
Carolina State University) to the west The site has a long history of hydrologic modification in order to
1

Mitigation Plan Bowl Basin Restoration Site
allow for farming to take place on the property The existing site conditions are shown in Section 2 6 and
seen in site photographs (Section 2 8) Within the White Oak Watershed, the Upper White Oak drainage
(03020106010010) remains relatively unaffected by urban development The nearest named
downstream water body is the White Oak River (DWQ Subbasin 20 -(1)), which is classified as Class C
This portion of the White Oak River is not listed as impaired under the 2012 303(d) listing
Approximately 79% of the 14 -digit HUC is forested and 19% is considered part of a Significant Natural
Heritage Area (SNHA) (NCDNER EEP, 2010) The project watershed for the BBWRS is comprised of 76 0
total acres Current land use in the project watershed consists of agriculture (93 8%/713 ac), forest
(3 7%/2 8 ac), and low- density residential (2 5%/19 ac) Through a series of man -made ditches, the
project watershed drains to the project area from the north, south, east and west These flows
eventually combine within the site and flow north through the ditch located along the eastern boundary
of the site The impervious surface within the project watershed is limited to the surface of White Oak
River Road and impervious areas within rural residential properties, amounting to approximately 1% of
the total area project drainage area
Historic aerials from Onslow County were examined for any information about how the site hydrology
and vegetation have changed over the last century They were obtained from the USGS EarthExplorer,
USGS DOQQs, and NC OneMap for 1950, 1958, 1964, 1977, 1982, 1993, 1998, and 2008 The reviewed
aerials are found in Section 2 7 Throughout this historic record, the site has remained relatively
unchanged The earliest available aerial photo from 1950 shows that the existing ditch network was
already in place by that time The remaining photos until the present show that the same ditch network
and agricultural land have been maintained at the site Similar to the site itself, the surrounding project
watershed has changed little over the last 60 years The surrounding area is rural with low development
pressure at this time These land use trends indicate that restoring this property back to a forested
wetland will provide an important habitat enhancement in the watershed
The site lies within the Carolina Flatwoods (level IV 63h) ecoregion of the Coastal Plain physiographic
province This low- gradient region generally has fine -loamy and coarse -loamy soils with high water
tables The geology at the site is classified as part of the River Bend formation, which is comprised of
limestone and calcarenite mixed with sand
The soils at the site were also examined for their wetland potential The Soil Survey of Onslow County
has the BBWRS mapped as the Rains fine sandy loam soils series However, detailed soils mapping
performed by a KCI licensed soil scientist confirmed that the primary soil at the site is Pantego loam The
Pantego loam series is described as a very poorly drained soil located on broad, smooth flats on uplands
Pantego is a hydric soil that has been drained through on -site ditching The soil data sheets and a map of
the soil borings are included in Appendix C
Based on these watershed and site - specific attributes, the BBWRS was selected as a candidate for
wetland mitigation The restored site will create forested wetland habitat in an area that has been
actively used for agriculture since at least 1950
2

Mitigation Plan
2.3 Vicinity Map
DUPUN
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
CRAVEN
ONSLOW CARTERET t, 'kR/ i NES COUNTY
PENDER \ / F//-� 1�r�ev waR�'l_
My
Whka Oak Rivx Rd
DING
0
A
a.
Old 30 Rd
PROJECT SITE VICINITY MAP
o.s o 11 Miles BOWL BASIN WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
ONSLOW COUNTY, NC

Mitigation Plan
2.4 Watershed Map
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
41
HUC 030202040I0080
MJC 03020106010010
NI/
X,
L L
7
7-
Jes •
(Lai)
Proposed Easement
Project Watershed (76.0 acres)
N
02 01 0 02 PROJECT SITE WATERSHED MAP S,;s DRG'
NE Quad 1978.
E!%i0T!n BOWL BASIN WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
miles
I ONSLOW COUNTY, NC A
4
4f
f
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
41
HUC 030202040I0080
MJC 03020106010010
NI/
X,
L L
7
7-
Jes •
(Lai)
Proposed Easement
Project Watershed (76.0 acres)
N
02 01 0 02 PROJECT SITE WATERSHED MAP S,;s DRG'
NE Quad 1978.
E!%i0T!n BOWL BASIN WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
miles
I ONSLOW COUNTY, NC A
4

Mitigation Plan
2.5 Soil Survey
Bowl Basin Restoration Site

Mitigation Plan
2.6 Current Condition Plan View
Bowl Basin Restoration Site

Mitigation Plan
2.7 Historical Condition Plan View
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
46
a
to

Mitigation Plan Bowl Basin Restoration Site

Mitigation Plan
2.8 Site Photographs
Bowl Basin Restoration Site

Mitigation Plan
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
3.0 SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT
3.1 Site Protection Instrument Summary Information
The land required for the construction, management, and stewardship of this mitigation project Includes
portions of the following parcel The draft conservation easement plat Is Included In Appendix A
10
'
Landowners
PIN
County
Site Protection
Instrument
Deed Book and
Page Number
Acreage
protected
Parcel
A
Edward G Pridgen, Sr
Dianne C Pndgen
5403 -0021
9097
Onslow
Conservation
Easement
DB 1673 PG 121
117 acres
10

Mitigation Plan
3.2 Site Protection Instrument Figure
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
11

Mitigation Plan
4.0 BASELINE INFORMATION
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
* Items addressed in the Categorical Exclusion in Appendix B
12
Project Information
Project Name
Bowl Basin Wetland Restoration Site
County
Onslow County
Project Area (acres)
it 7 acres
Project Coordinates flat and long)
34 922569 N, -77 319871 W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Coastal Plain
River Basin
White Oak
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
03020106
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit
03020106010010
DWQ Sub -basin
03 -05 -01
Project Drainage Area (acres)
76 0 acres
Project Drainage Area Percentage of
Impervious Area
1%
CGIA Land Use Classification
94% Cultivated, 4% Forest, and 2% Low - Intensity Development
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Wetland Area 1
Size of Wetland (acres)
117 acres
Wetland Type (non - riparian, riparian
riverine or riparian non- riverme)
Non - riparian
Mapped Sod Series
Pantego loam by detailed soil investigation
Drainage class
Poorly drained
Sod Hydnc Status
Drained Hydric
Source of Hydrology
Groundwater/ precipitation
Hydrologic Impairment
Ditching and Crops
Native vegetation community
Crops
Percent composition of exotic
invasive vegetation
o
0 /o
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting
Documentation
Waters of the United States — Section
404
Yes
Applying for NWP 27
Jurisdictional
Determination
Waters of the United States — Section
401
Yes
Applying for NWP 27
Jurisdictional
Determination
Endangered Species Act*
No
N/A
N/A
Historic Preservation Act*
No
N/A
N/A
Coastal Zone Management Act
(CZMA)/ Coastal Area Management
Act (CAMA)
No
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
No
N/A
FEMA Floodplain
Checklist
Essential Fisheries Habitat*
No
N/A
N/A
* Items addressed in the Categorical Exclusion in Appendix B
12

Mitigation Plan Bowl Basin Restoration Site - -
4.1 Watershed Summary Information
The site is within the 03020106 USGS Cataloging Unit (White Oak Basin) The White Oak River Basin as a
whole is experiencing a large amount of habitat alteration due to population growth from Jacksonville,
Beaufort, Emerald Isle, Morehead City, and Newport Onslow County experienced a population growth
of 21% from 2000 to 2010, and additional growth of 14% is expected in the next decade (Office of State
Budget and Management, 2010)
The project watershed for the BBWRS is comprised of 76 0 total acres Current land use in the project
watershed consists of agriculture (93 8 %/713 ac), forest (3 7 %/2 8 ac), and low- density residential
(2 5%/19 ac) The project watershed drains to the west, south, and east into the project site The
impervious surface within the project watershed is limited to the surface of White Oak River Road and
impervious areas within rural residential properties, amounting to approximately 1% of the total area
project drainage area The nearest named downstream water body is the White Oak River The project
area is located in the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Jacksonville NE, NC Quadrangle (2010)
4.2 Reach Summary Information
Not applicable for this project
43 Wetland Summary Information
Currently, there are no existing wetlands present The wetland data forms are included in Appendix B
Based on field topographic survey data and LIDAR elevation data, the contours at the site range from 38
— 43 feet The topography of the site begins with the highest elevations at the southern edge of the site,
and extending from there to the southeastern most corner and up towards the northwestern most
corner The elevation decreases slowly as one moves towards the northeastern corner of the site, with
depressions occurring where ditches have been installed across the site The drained hydric soils at the
site experience approximately a 2 foot change in elevation as the slope grades down slightly from the
center towards the northeastern corner of the site and along the main ditch out of the southern edge of
the site
A jurisdictional determination delineation was completed in which the ditch network installed at the site
was identified as jurisdictional tributaries (see Appendix B for jurisdictional determination plat) The
ditch network consists of channels that generally drain the site from the south to the north Two primary
ditches at the center of the project carry water from the western edge towards the eastern main ditch
The eastern main ditch then carries flow north of the project area A third ditch is essentially flat and
holds water rather than carrying flow across the site
13

Mitigation Plan
4.4 Regulatory Considerations
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
A jurisdictional determination was approved by the US Army Corps of Engineers on April 16, 2013
Following the completion of the mitigation plan, a pre - construction notification (PCN) will be completed
to apply for a Nationwide 27 Permit (NWP) to comply with Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act
with the Wilmington District of the US Army Corps of Engineers and the NCDENR Division of Water
Quality
BBWRS is not located within the FEMA 100 -year floodplain and therefore a flood study is not anticipated
for this project
14

Mitigation Plan
5.0 DETERMINATION OF CREDITS
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
Bowl Basin Restoration Site, Onslow, County
Mitigation Credits
Nitrogen
Phosphorous
Stream
Riparian
Non - riparian
Buffer
Nutrient
Nutrient
Wetland
Wetland
Offset
Offset
Type
R
RE
R
RE
R
RE
'.Tf ti IM
x; >
�` - ��-"�`_
i K
, R. t .y, -2.
Acres
117
Credits
117
TOTAL CREDITS
117
Project Components
Project
Restoration
Component
Stationing/
g
Approach
-or-
Restoration
Mitigation
F000tot agge/
Footage
-or-
Location
(PI, PII etc)
Restoration
Ratio
Acreage
or Acreage
Reach ID
Equivalent
Southeastern
Wetland Area 1
portion of project
117 acres
Restoration
117 acres
1 1
parcel
Component Summation
Buffer
Restoration
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non - riparian Wetland
Upland
(square
Level
(linear feet)
(acres)
(acres)
feet)
(acres)
.,<ivyZftreT�F�
=Jf� -P L'''�
Rivenne
Non-
;.I'jq'`,, ^"`3- r•K "�1���+',
r},�'f:.`�' -? a
"i
Riverine
Restoration
117 acres
Enhancement
Enhancement I
;5 ,�.�y
n a'
3
-
-_ -
flt=
Enhancement II;
Creation
= �
Preservation
.14-
High Quality
Preservation
TOTAL
117 acres
R= Restoration RE= Restoration Equivalent of Creation or Enhancement
15

Mitigation Plan
6.0 CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
All credit releases will be based on the total credit generated as reported by the as -built survey of the
mitigation site Under no circumstances shall any mitigation project be debited until the necessary DA
authorization has been received for its construction or the District Engineer (DE) has otherwise provided
written approval for the project in the case where no DA authorization is required for construction of
the mitigation project The DE, in consultation with the Interagency Review Team (IRT), will determine if
performance standards have been satisfied sufficiently to meet the requirements of the release
schedules below In cases where some performance standards have not been met, credits may still be
released depending on the specifics of the case Monitoring may be required to restart or be extended,
depending on the extent to which the site fails to meet the specified performance standard The release
of project credits will be subject to the criteria described as follows
Forested Wetlands Credits
Monitoring
Credit Release Activity
Interim
Total
Year
Release
Released
0
initial Allocation —see requirements below
30%
30%
1
First year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
40%
standards are being met
2
Second year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
50%
standards are being met
3
Third year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
60%
standards are being met
4
Fourth year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
70%
standards are being met
5
Fifth year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
80%
standards are being met, Provided that all performance standards are
met, the IRT may allow the NCEEP to discontinue hydrologic monitoring
after the fifth year, but vegetation monitoring must continue for an
additional two years after the fifth year for a total of seven years
6
Sixth year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
90%
standards are being met
7
Seventh year monitoring report demonstrates performance
10%
100%
standards are being met, and project has received close -out
approval
Initial Allocation of Released Credits
The initial allocation of released credits, as specified in the mitigation plan can be released by the NCEEP
without prior written approval of the DE upon satisfactory completion of the following activities
Approval of the final Mitigation Plan
Recordation of the preservation mechanism, as well as a title opinion acceptable to the USACE
covering the property
Completion of project construction (the initial physical and biological improvements to the
mitigation site) pursuant to the mitigation plan, Per the NCEEP Instrument, construction means
that a mitigation site has been constructed in its entirety, to include planting, and an as -built
report has been produced As -built reports must be sealed by an engineer prior to project
closeout, if appropriate but not prior to the initial allocation of released credits
16

Mitigation Plan
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
- Receipt of necessary DA permit authorization or written DA approval for projects where DA
permit issuance is not required
Subsequent Credit Releases
All subsequent credit releases must be approved by the DE, in consultation with the IRT, based on a
determination that required performance standards have been achieved For stream projects a reserve
of 15% of a site's total stream credits shall be released after two bank -full events have occurred, in
separate years, provided the channel is stable and all other performance standards are met In the event
that less than two bank -full events occur during the monitoring period, release of these reserve credits
shall be at the discretion of the IRT As projects approach milestones associated with credit release, the
NCEEP will submit a request for credit release to the DE along with documentation substantiating
achievement of criteria required for release to occur This documentation will be included with the
annual monitoring report
17

Mitigation Plan Bowl Basin Restoration Site
7.0 MITIGATION WORK PLAN
7.1 Target Wetland Types and Plant Communities
Wetland plantings shall consist of native species commonly found in the Hardwood Flats Community
(NCWAM, v 4 1 2010) Trees and shrubs will be planted at a density of 968 stems per acre (9 feet x 5
feet spacing) to achieve a mature survivability of 210 stems per acre after seven years Woody
vegetation planting will be conducted during dormancy Species to be planted may consist of the
following consistent with a hardwood flat (NCWAM, v 4 1 2010)
Common Name
Scientific Name
Wetland Indicator
Tag alder
Alnus serrulata
FACW
River birch
Betula n►gra
FACW
American hornbeam
Carp►nus carohn►ana
FAC
Buttonbush
Cephalanthus occ►dental►s
OBL
Pepperbush
Clethra aln►foha
FACW
Green ash
Fraxinus pennsylvan►ca
FACW
Water tupelo
Nyssa aquatic
OBL
Swamp tupelo
Nyssa b►flora
OBL
American sycamore
Platanus occ►dental►s
FACW
Laurel oak
Quercus laur►foho
FACW
Swamp chestnut oak
Quercus m►chaux►►
FACW
Cherrybark oak
Quercus pagoda
FACW
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
FACW
Bald cypress
Taxod►um d►st►chum
OBL
American elm
Ulmus amer►cana
FAC
Red maple
Acer rubrum
FAC
Possumhaw
Viburnum nudum
FACW
An herbaceous seed mix composed of appropriate native species will also be developed and used to
further stabilize and restore the wetland
All of the above options will be marked and surveyed per EEP's requirements contained within
http / /portal ncdenr org/web /eep /fd- forms - templates In addition, the easement boundaries will be
marked with salt- treated wooden posts placed approximately 100 feet apart Each line post will be
marked with a conservation easement placard Corner posts will be marked with signs stating
"Conservation Easement Corner "
7.2 Design Parameters
The mitigation approach for the BBWRS will aim to restore the hydrology and vegetation components to
this non - riparian wetland system The available historic data, detailed soils mapping, and topographic
and geographic positions suggest that a hardwood flat used to exist at the BBWRS (NCWAM, v 4 1
2010) The site will be restored to a condition that resembles the former wetland community A local
comparable reference wetland system was identified approximately 16 miles west of the restoration
site This reference site will be used as a hydrology reference only A suitable vegetative community
reference could not be found within the properties that granted access Please see the mitigation
18

Mitigation Plan Bowl Basin Restoration Site
4
overview in Section 7 4 and the wetland plans included in Appendix D The following elements of
functional uplift are expected from this project
1 Increase in groundwater recharge
2 Increase in sediment trapping and filtration
3 Increase in carbon storage �-
4 Increase in biochemical cycling of nutrients and other pollutants
5 Increase in habitat utilization by wildlife (migrants and residents)
6 Increase in landscape patch structure
Non- Ripanan Wetland Restoration —11 7 acres
This site offers the potential to develop 117 acres of non - riparian wetlands within the Upper White Oak i
Watershed Restoration actions would include filling approximately 3,300 linear feet of drainage ditches
throughout the site Since the entire site is currently used for row crop cultivation, the restoration would -
eliminate field crowning and furrow drainage and alleviate the existing soil compaction through surface
roughening The ditch running located about 160' to the west of the project site will remain open,
however, the ditch will be re- routed to carry water north rather than south A clay ditch plug will be
installed at the northern edge of the site to prevent seepage at the connection to the remaining off -site
ditch Following the completion of site grading, the non - riparian wetland will be planted as Hardwood
Flats Community as described in Section 7 1 Proposed project conditions are shown in Section 7 4
Reference Wetland
A suitable reference wetland was found approximately 16 miles west of the BBWRS adjacent to Jesse
Williams Road A groundwater monitoring well has been installed to document the reference wetland -
hydrology during the course of monitoring
7.3 Data Analysis
In order to model the effect of filling the onsite ditches and grading the wetland restoration areas of
BBWRS, DRAINMOD was used to simulate the before and after conditions DRAINMOD is a computer
simulation water balance model that follows the groundwater elevation in the surface profile using soil
inputs, climatic data, and drainage conditions (NCSU 2013) It was originally developed for agricultural
drainage design, but has been adapted for evaluating wetland hydrology due to its modeling of poorly
drained soils over a time step —_
A DRAINMOD model was developed for the BBWRS using the Pantego soils at the site Climatic data
(daily rainfall and maximum and minimum daily temperatures) were obtained from the New Bern, North
Carolina COOP Station (316108), approximately 18 5 miles from the site and the closest station with at �J
least 50 years of data For the model simulation, 64 years of available data were used (1949 -2012) The ,
daily rainfall was distributed to an hourly increment within the computer program The temperatures
were used in the Thornthwaite potential evapotranspiration calculations The soils data were obtained
from the NRCS parameters and from onsite observations The wetland criteria were set to evaluate the
saturation over the growing period of March 18 — November 16 (243 days) at 9% continuous saturation
(22 days) (NRCS, 2002)
For the existing conditions model, the average drain spacing for this area is approximately 300 feet
between the existing field ditches and the average drain depth is 2 0 feet The proposed conditions
19

Mitigation Plan
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
model has the same drain spacing, but with a drain depth of 0 5 feet to show minor losses to drainage
during the immediate post - restoration period The surface storage was also increased to 2 0 inches to
account for increased surface roughness in the restored wetland Based on these conditions, the existing
conditions model showed that wetland hydrology was achieved 15 out of 64 years, or 23% of modeled
years For the proposed conditions, the site achieved wetland hydrology for 55 out of 64 years, or 86%
See Appendix C for model output
20

Mitigation Plan
7.4 Proposed Mitigation Plan View
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
Proposed Easement Area (11.7 ac)
Stabilized ` — —� project Parcel
rainage Outtall L _
L.
l Nonriparian Wetland Restoration
Ditches to be Filed
0 Disperse Flow from Ditch
10 Ditch Re -Route Path
Pof
PROJECT SITE PROPOSED MITIGATION PLAN VIEW InWeSource: ^2010 N
100 SO 0 100 BOWL BASIN WETLAND RESTORATION SITE Statewide COnanagery
Feet ONSLOW COUNTY, NC I A
21

Mitigation Plan
8.0 MAINTENANCE PLAN
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
The site will be monitored on a regular basis, with a physical inspection of the site conducted a
minimum of once per year throughout the post - construction monitoring period until performance
standards are met These site inspections may identify site components and features that require
routine maintenance Routine maintenance should be expected most often in the first two years
following site construction and may include the following
Component /Feature
Maintenance Through Project Close -Out
Routine wetland maintenance and repair activities may include securing of loose coir
Wetland
matting and supplemental installations of live stakes and other target vegetation within the
wetland Areas where stormwater and floodplam flows intercept the wetland may also
require maintenance to prevent scour
Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted plant
community Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include
supplemental planting, pruning, mulching, and fertilizing Exotic invasive plant species shall
Vegetation
be controlled by mechanical and /or chemical methods Any vegetation control requiring
herbicide application will be performed in accordance with NC Department of Agriculture
(NCDA) rules and regulations
Site boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the
mitigation site and adjacent properties Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker,
Site Boundary
bollard, post, tree - blazing, or other means as allowed by site conditions and /or
conservation easement Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be
repaired and /or replaced on an as needed basis
22

Mitigation Plan
9.0 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
The BBWRS will be monitored to determine if the development of the wetland indicators on site meet
the standards for mitigation credit production as presented in Section 5 0 The credits will be validated --
upon confirmation that the success criteria described below are met The site will be monitored for
performance standards for seven years after completion of construction
Hydrologic Performance
Wetland hydrology monitoring will be conducted to determine if the restored wetland areas meet the
proposed performance criteria for wetland hydrology The site will present continuous saturated or
inundated hydrologic conditions for at least 9 0% of the growing season for the non - riparian mitigation
areas (117 acres) during normal weather conditions based on a conservative estimate A "normal" year
is based on NRCS climatological data for Onslow County, and using the 30th to 70th percentile
thresholds as the range of normal, as documented in the USACE Technical Report "Accessing and Using
Meteorological Data to Evaluate Wetland Hydrology, April 2000 " According to the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, the growing season for Onslow County is considered to extend from March 18th
to November 16th, comprising 243 days (NRCS, 2002)
Section 10 describes the monitoring requirements for the site Monitoring will comply with guidance
included in "Monitoring Requirements and Performance Standards for Stream and /or Wetland
Mitigation" (NCDENR EEP, 2011) Hydrologic performance will be determined through evaluation of
automatic recording gauge data supplemented by documentation of wetland hydrology indicators as
defined in the 1987 US ACOE Wetland Delineation Manual Daily data will be collected from automatic
wells over the 7 -year monitoring period following implementation These data will determine if the
wetland meets the hydrology success criterion of the water table being within 12 inches of the ground
surface continuously for 9 0% or more of the growing season Visual monitoring will also be conducted
two times per year in each monitoring year as per the NC EEP guidance referenced above
Vegetation Success
The vegetation success criteria will comply with guidance included in "Monitoring Requirements and
Performance Standards for Stream and /or Wetland Mitigation" (NCDENR EEP, 2011), which states that
the plots must achieve a stem density of 320 stems /acre after three years, 260 stems /acre after five
years, and 210 live, planted stems /acre after seven years to be considered successful In addition to
density requirements, plant height will be monitored within the monitoring plots to ensure that trees
average 10 feet in height after seven years
23

Mitigation Plan
10.0 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
Annual monitoring data will be reported using the EEP monitoring template The monitoring report shall
provide a project data chronology that will facilitate an understanding of project status and trends,
population of EEP databases for analysis, research purposes, and assist in decision making regarding
project close -out
Required
Parameter
Quantity
Frequency
Notes
Yes
Groundwater
7 -8 gauges distributed
Annual
Groundwater monitoring gauges with data
Hydrology
throughout the restored
recording devices will be installed on site,
wetland
the data will be downloaded on a monthly
basis during the growing season
Yes
Vegetation
10 permanent vegetation
During
Vegetation will be monitored using the
monitoring plots
monitoring
Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) protocols
years 1, 2, 3,
5, and 7
Yes
Exotic and
Annual
Locations of exotic and nuisance vegetation
nuisance
will be mapped
vegetation
Yes
Project
Semi- annual
Locations of vegetation damage, boundary
boundary
I
encroachments, etc will be mapped
The first scheduled monitoring will be conducted during the first full growing season following project
completion Monitoring shall subsequently be conducted annually for a total period of seven years or
until the project meets its success criteria
Groundwater elevations will be monitored to evaluate the attainment of jurisdictional wetland
hydrology Verification of wetland hydrology will be determined by automatic recording well data
collected within the project area and reference wetland Seven to eight automatic recording gauges will
be established within the mitigation areas (see Appendix C for potential gauge locations) Daily data will
be collected from the automatic gauges for a minimum of a 7 -year monitoring period following wetland
construction A nearby reference wetland will also be monitored using the same procedures for
comparative analysis (see Appendix B for reference wetland data sheet and location map)
Beginning at the end of the first growing season, KCI will monitor the planted vegetation in monitoring
years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 or until the success criterion is met The survivability of the vegetation plantings
will be evaluated using ten 100 mZ vegetative sampling plots randomly placed throughout the restored
wetland Permanent monuments will be established at the corners of each monitoring plot and
documented by either conventional survey or GPS These plots will be monitored according to the
current CVS /EEP monitoring protocol The vegetation monitoring will follow the Level 2 method of the
current CVS -EEP protocol (http //cvs bio unc edu /methods htm)
Photograph reference points (PRPs) will be established to assist in characterizing the site and to allow
qualitative evaluation of the site conditions The location of each photo point will be marked in the
monitoring plan and the bearing /orientation of the photograph will be documented
Annual monitoring reports will be prepared and submitted after all monitoring tasks for each year are
completed The report will document the monitored components and include all collected data,
analyses, and photographs Each report will provide the new monitoring data and compare the most
24

Mitigation Plan Bowl Basin Restoration Site
recent results against previous findings The monitoring report format will be similar to that set out in
the most recent EEP monitoring protocol
11.0 LONG -TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon approval for close -out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the site will be transferred to the
NCDENR Division of Natural Resource Planning and Conservation's Stewardship Program This party shall
be responsible for periodic inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation
easement are upheld Endowment funds required to uphold easement and deed restrictions shall be
negotiated prior to site transfer to the responsible party
The NCDENR Division of Natural Resource Planning and Conservation's Stewardship Program currently
houses EEP stewardship endowments within the non - reverting, interest - bearing Conservation Lands
Stewardship Endowment Account The use of funds from the Endowment Account is governed by North
Carolina General Statute GS 113A- 232(d)(3) Interest gained by the endowment fund may be used only
for the purpose of stewardship, monitoring, stewardship administration, and land transaction costs, if
applicable The NCDENR Stewardship Program intends to manage the account as a non - wasting
endowment Only interest generated from the endowment funds will be used to steward the
compensatory mitigation sites Interest funds not used for those purposes will be re- invested in the
Endowment Account to offset losses due to inflation
12.0 ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon completion of site construction KCI will implement the post - construction monitoring protocols
previously defined in this document Project maintenance will be performed as described previously in
this document If, during the course of annual monitoring it is determined the site's ability to achieve
site performance standards are jeopardized, KCI will notify the EEP and the USACE of the need to
develop a Plan of Corrective Action The Plan of Corrective Action may be prepared using in -house
technical staff or may require engineering and consulting services Once the Corrective Action Plan is
prepared and finalized KCI will
1 Notify the EEP and USACE as required by the Nationwide 27 permit general conditions
2 Revise performance standards, maintenance requirements, and monitoring requirements as
necessary and /or required by the USACE
3 Obtain other permits as necessary
4 Implement the Corrective Action Plan
5 Provide the USACE a Record Drawing of Corrective Actions This document shall depict the extent
and nature of the work performed
25

Mitigation Plan
13.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCES
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
Pursuant to Section IV H and Appendix III of the Ecosystem Enhancement Program's In -Lieu Fee
Instrument dated July 28, 2010, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
has provided the U S Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District with a formal commitment to fund
projects to satisfy mitigation requirements assumed by EEP This commitment provides financial
assurance for all mitigation projects implemented by the program
14.0 OTHER INFORMATION
14.1 Definitions
8 -digit Catalog Unit (CU) —The USGS developed a hydrologic coding system to delineate the country into
uniquely identified watersheds that can be commonly referenced and mapped North Carolina has 54 of
these watersheds uniquely defined by an 8 -digit number EEP typically addresses watershed — based
planning and restoration in the context of the 17 river basins (each has a unique 6 -digit number), 54
catalog units and 1,601 14 -digit hydrologic units
14 —digit Hydrologic Unit (HU) — In order to address watershed management issues at a smaller scale, the
U S Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) developed methodology to delineate and uniquely
identify watersheds at a scale smaller than the 8 -digit catalog unit A hydrologic unit is a drainage area
delineated to nest in a multilevel, hierarchical drainage system Its boundaries are defined by
hydrographic and topographic criteria that delineate an area of land upstream from a specific point on a
river, stream or similar surface waters North Carolina has 1,601 14 -digit hydrologic units
DWQ— North Carolina Division of Water Quality
EEP — The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement combines existing wetlands restoration initiatives
(formerly the Wetlands Restoration Program or NCWRP) of the N C Department of Environment and
Natural Resources with ongoing efforts by the N C Department of Transportation (NCDOT) to offset
unavoidable environmental impacts from transportation - infrastructure improvements
Native vegetation community — a distinct and reoccurring assemblage of populations of plants, animals,
bacteria and fungi naturally associated with each other and their population, as described in Schafale,
M P and Weakley, A S (1990), Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Third
Approximation
Project Area - includes all protected lands associated with the mitigation project
RBRP - The River Basin Restoration Priorities are documents that delineate specific watersheds
(Targeted Local Watersheds) within a River Basin that exhibit both the need and opportunity for
wetland, stream and riparian buffer restoration
TLW - Targeted Local Watershed, are 14 -digit hydrologic units which receive priority for EEP planning
and restoration project funds
USGS — United States Geological Survey
26

Mitigation Plan
14.2 References
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
Breeding, Rob 2010 White Oak River Basin Restoration Priorities 2010 Raleigh, NC NCDENR,
Ecosystem Enhancement Program Last accessed 02/2013 at http / /portal ncdenr org /c/
document _li bra ry/get_file ?uuid= 1c0b7e5a- 9617- 4a44- a5f8- df017873496b &groupId =60329
Environmental Laboratory 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report
Y -87 -1 Vicksburg, MS U S Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station
Faber - Langendoen, D, Rocchio, J , Schafale, M , Nordman, C, Pyne, M , Teague, J , Foti, T, Comer, P
2006 Ecological Integrity Assessment and Performance Measures for Wetland Mitigation
NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia
Lindenmayer, D B , and J F Franklin 2002 Conserving forest biodiversity A comprehensive multiscaled
approach Island Press, Washington, DC
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality 2012a Surface Water Classification Last accessed 11/2012 at -
http //portal ncdenr org /web /wq /ps /csu
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality 2012b 2012 Final 303(d) list Raleigh, NC Last accessed 11/2012 at
http / /portal ncdenr org /web /wq /ps /mtu /assessment
NCDENR, Ecosystem Enhancement Program 2011 Monitoring Requirements and Performance
Standards for Stream and /or Wetland Mitigation Last accessed 11/2012 at
http //portal ncdenr org/c/ document _library/get_file ?p_I_id= 1169848 &folderld = 2288101 &nam
e =DLFE -39234 pdf
North Carolina State University, Soil & Water Management Group DRAINMOD Computer Simulation
Program Last accessed 4/2013 at http //www bae ncsu edu /soil_water /drainmod /index html
NC Wetland Functional Assessment Team 2010 NC Wetland Assessment Method (NC WAM) User
Manual, version 4 1 Last accessed 11/2012 at http //portal ncdenr org /c /document_
I i brary/get_fi le ?uui d= 76f3c58b -da b8- 4960- ba43- 45b7faf06f4c &grou pfd =38364
Peet, R K, Wentworth, T S, and White, P S 1998 A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure Castanea 63 262 -274 -
Rosgen, D 1996 Applied River Morphology, 2nd edition, Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO
Schafale, M P and Weakley, A S 1990 Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina,
Third Approximation, NC Natural Heritage Program, Raleigh, NC
Stream Mitigation Guidelines, April 2003 US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District
USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service 2010 Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United
States a Guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils, Version 7 0
USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Water and Climate Center 2012 RUSLE2 Related
27

Mitigation Plan Bowl Basin Restoration Site
Attributes Table for Onslow, North Carolina Last accessed 11/2012 at
http / /soildatamart nres usda gov /Survey aspx ?County =NC133
USDA 1992 Soil Survey of Onslow County, North Carolina United States Department of Agriculture
Young, T F and Sanzone, S (editors) 2002 A framework for assessing and reporting on ecological
condition Ecological Reporting Panel, Ecological Processes and Effects Committee EPA Science
Advisory Board Washington, DC
28

Mitigation Plan
29
Bowl Basin Restoration Site

Mitigation Plan
14.3 Appendix A. Site Protection Instrument
30
Bowl Basin Restoration Site

Mitigation Plan
31
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
1

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ONSLOW COUNTY
SPO File Number 67 -BB
EEP Site Number 95721
Prepared by Office of the Attorney General
Property Control Section
Return to NC Department of Administration
State Property Office
1321 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1321
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
PROVIDED PURSUANT TO
FULL DELIVERY
MITIGATION CONTRACT
THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT DEED, made this day of
, 20_, by Edward G Pridgen and Dianne C Pridgen, ( "Grantor "), whose
mailing address is Post Office Box 233, Maysville, NC 28555, to the State of North Carolina,
( "Grantee "), whose mailing address is State of North Carolina, Department of Administration,
State Property Office, 1321 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1321 The designations of
Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns,
and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of N C Gen Stat § 143 -214 8 et seq ,, the State
of North Carolina has established the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (formerly known as the
Wetlands Restoration Program) within the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
for the purposes of acquiring, maintaining, restoring, enhancing, creating and preserving wetland
and riparian resources that contribute to the protection and improvement of water quality, flood
prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife habitat, and recreational opportunities, and
WHEREAS, this Conservation Easement from Grantor to Grantee has been negotiated,
arranged and provided for as a condition of a full delivery contract between KCI Technologies,
Inc. and the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, to provide
stream, wetland and/or buffer mitigation pursuant to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources Purchase and Services Contract Number 5012.
1
FullDelivei yConservationEasementVersion 12151 1 - Bowl Basin

WHEREAS, The State of North Carolina is qualified to be the Grantee of a Conservation
Easement pursuant to N C Gen Stat § 121 -35, and
WHEREAS, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the North Carolina
Department of Transportation and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
District entered into a Memorandum of Agreement, (MOA) duly executed by all parties in
Greensboro, NC on July 22, 2003, which recognizes that the Ecosystem Enhancement Program
is to provide for compensatory mitigation by effective protection of the land, water and natural
resources of the State by restoring, enhancing and preserving ecosystem functions, and
WHEREAS, the acceptance of this instrument for and on behalf of the State of North
Carolina was granted to the Department of Administration by resolution as approved by the
Governor and Council of State adopted at a meeting held in the City of Raleigh, North Carolina,
on the 8`h day of February 2000, and
WHEREAS, the Ecosystem Enhancement Program in the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, which has been delegated the authority authorized by the Governor and
Council of State to the Department of Administration, has approved acceptance of this
instrument, and
WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying, and being
in White Oak Township, Onslow County, North Carolina (the "Property "), and being more
particularly described as that certain parcel of land containing approximately 63.03 acres and
being conveyed to the Grantor by deed as recorded in Deed Book 1673 at Page 121 of the
Onslow County Registry, North Carolina, and
WHEREAS, Grantor is willing to grant a Conservation Easement over the herein
described areas of the Property, thereby restricting and limiting the use of the included areas of
the Property to the terms and conditions and purposes hereinafter set forth, and Grantee is willing
to accept such Conservation Easement This Conservation Easement shall be for the protection
and benefit of White Oak Creek.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms, conditions, and
restrictions hereinafter set forth, Grantor unconditionally and irrevocably hereby grants and
conveys unto Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity, a Conservation
Easement along with a general Right of Access
The Easement Area consists of the following
Conservation Easement containing a total of 11.74 acres as shown on the plat of survey entitled
"Final Plat, Conservation Easement for North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program,
Project Name Bowl Basin Non - Riparian Wetland Restoration Site, EEP Project # 95721,
SPO# 67 -BB," dated December 20, 2012 by James M. Gellenthin1 PLS Number L -3860 and
recorded in the Onslow County, North Carolina Register of Deeds at Map Book Page
FUII Deli velyConseivationEasementVeision12151 1 -Bowl Basin
2

See attached "Exhibit A ", Legal Description of area of the Property hereinafter referred to as the
"Easement Area"
The purposes of this Conservation Easement are to maintain, restore, enhance, construct,
create and preserve wetland and/or riparian resources in the Easement Area that contribute to the
protection and improvement of water quality, flood prevention, fisheries, aquatic habitat, wildlife
habitat, and recreational opportunities, to maintain permanently the Easement Area in its natural
condition, consistent with these purposes, and to prevent any use of the Easement Area that will
significantly impair or interfere with these purposes To achieve these purposes, the following
conditions and restrictions are set forth
I. DURATION OF EASEMENT
Pursuant to law, including the above referenced statutes, this Conservation Easement and
Right of Access shall be perpetual and it shall run with, and be a continuing restriction upon the
use of, the Property, and it shall be enforceable by the Grantee against the Grantor and against
Grantor's heirs, successors and assigns, personal representatives, agents, lessees, and licensees
II. GRANTOR RESERVED USES AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITES
The Easement Area shall be restricted from any development or usage that would impair
or interfere with the purposes of this Conservation Easement Unless expressly reserved as a
compatible use herein, any activity in, or use of, the Easement Area by the Grantor is prohibited
as inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement Any rights not expressly
reserved hereunder by the Grantor have been acquired by the Grantee Any rights not expressly
reserved hereunder by the Grantor, including the rights to all mitigation credits, including, but
not limited to, stream, wetland, and riparian buffer mitigation units, derived from each site within
the area of the Conservation Easement, are conveyed to and belong to the Grantee Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following specific uses are prohibited, restricted, or
reserved as indicated
A. Recreational Uses. Grantor expressly reserves the right to undeveloped recreational
uses, including hiking, bird watching, hunting and fishing, and access to the Easement Area for
the purposes thereof
B. Motorized Vehicle Use. Motorized vehicle use in the Easement Area is prohibited
C. Educational Uses. The Grantor reserves the right to engage in and permit others to
engage in educational uses in the Easement Area not inconsistent with this Conservation
Easement, and the right of access to the Easement Area for such purposes including organized
educational activities such as site visits and observations Educational uses of the property shall
not alter vegetation, hydrology or topography of the site
D. Vegetative Cutting. Except as related to the removal of non - native plants, diseased or
damaged trees, or vegetation that destabilizes or renders unsafe the Easement Area to persons or
natural habitat, all cutting, removal, mowing, harming, or destruction of any trees and vegetation
in the Easement Area is prohibited
FullDeliveiyConservanonEa ,,ementVeis ton 121511 - Bowl Basin
- 3

E. Industrial, Residential and Commercial Uses. All industrial, residential and
commercial uses are prohibited in the Easement Area
F. Agricultural Use. All agricultural uses are prohibited within the Easement Area
including any use for cropland, waste lagoons, or pastureland
G. New Construction. There shall be no building, facility, mobile home, antenna, utility
pole, tower, or other structure constructed or placed in the Easement Area
H. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails, walkways, or paving '
in the Easement Area }
I. Signs. No signs shall be permitted in the Easement Area except interpretive signs
describing restoration activities and the conservation values of the Easement Area, signs
identifying the owner of the Property and the holder of the Conservation Easement, signs giving
directions, or signs prescribing rules and regulations for the use of the Easement Area
J. Dumping or Storing. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste,
abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery, or any other material in the Easement Area is
prohibited
r
K. Grading, Mineral Use, Excavation, Dredging. There shall be no grading, filling,
excavation, dredging, mining, drilling, removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat, minerals, or
other materials
L. Water Quality and Drainage Patterns. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging,
channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or diverting, causing, allowing or permitting
the diversion of surface or underground water in the Easement Area No altering or tampering
with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored, enhanced, or
created drainage patterns is allowed All removal of wetlands, polluting or discharging into
waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides in the Easement Area is
prohibited In the event of an emergency interruption or shortage of all other water sources,
water from within the Easement Area may temporarily be used for good cause shown as needed
for the survival of livestock and agricultural production on the Property
M. Subdivision and Conveyance. Grantor voluntarily agrees that no subdivision,
partitioning, or dividing of the underlying Property owned by the Grantor in fee simple ( "fee ")
that is subject to this Easement is allowed Unless agreed to by the Grantee in writing, any future
conveyance of the underlying fee and the rights conveyed herein shall be as a single block of
property Any future transfer of the fee simple shall be subject to this Conservation Easement ;
Any transfer of the fee is subject to the Grantee's right of unlimited and repeated ingress and
egress over and across the Property to the Easement Area for the purposes set forth herein
N. Development Rights. All development rights are permanently removed from the
Easement Area and are non - transferrable
Fu1lDeliveiyConservationEasementVeision ]2151 l -Bowl Basin
4

O. Disturbance of Natural Features Any change, disturbance, alteration or impairment of
the natural features of the Easement Area or any intentional introduction of non - native plants,
trees and/or animal species by Grantor is prohibited
The Grantor may request permission to vary from the above restrictions for good cause
shown, provided that any such request is not inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation
Easement, and the Grantor obtains advance written approval from the N C Ecosystem
Enhancement Program, whose mailing address is 1652 Mail Services Center, Raleigh, NC
27699 -1652
III. GRANTEE RESERVED USES
A. Right of Access, Construction, and Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents,
successors and assigns, receive a perpetual Right of Access to the Easement Area over the
Property at reasonable times to undertake any activities to restore, construct, manage, maintain,
enhance, and monitor the stream, wetland and any other riparian resources in the Easement Area,
in accordance with restoration activities or a long -term management plan Unless otherwise
specifically set forth in this Conservation Easement, the rights granted herein do not include or
establish for the public any access rights
B. Restoration Activities. These activities include planting of trees, shrubs and herbaceous
vegetation, installation of monitoring wells, utilization of heavy equipment to grade, fill, and
t- prepare the soil, modification of the hydrology of the site, and installation of natural and
' manmade materials as needed to direct in- stream, above ground, and subterraneous water flow
C. Signs. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors or assigns, shall be permitted
to place signs and witness posts on the Property to include any or all of the following describe
the project, prohibited activities within the Conservation Easement, or identify the project
boundaries and the holder of the Conservation Easement
D. Fences. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors or assigns, shall be permitted
to place fencing on the Property to restrict livestock access Although the Grantee is not
responsible for fence maintenance, the Grantee reserves the right to repair the fence, at its sole
discretion
IV. ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES
A. Enforcement. To accomplish the purposes of this Conservation Easement, Grantee is
allowed to prevent any activity within the Easement Area that is inconsistent with the purposes
of this Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features in the Easement Area
that may have been damaged by such unauthorized activity or use Upon any breach of the terms
of this Conservation Easement by Grantor, the Grantee shall, except as provided below, notify
the Grantor -in writing of such breach and the Grantor shall have ninety (90) days after receipt of
such notice to correct the damage caused by such breach If the breach and damage remains
uncured after ninety (90) days, the Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement by bringing
appropriate legal proceedings including an action to recover damages, as well as injunctive and
5
FullDelt vet yConservationEasementVets ion 12151 1 -Bowl Basin

other relief The Grantee shall also have the power and authority, consistent with its statutory
authority (a) to prevent any impairment of the Easement Area by acts which may be unlawful
or in violation of this Conservation Easement, (b) to otherwise preserve or protect its interest in
the Property, or (c) to seek damages from any appropriate person or entity Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without notice, to obtain a temporary
restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief, if the breach is or would irreversibly or -
otherwise materially impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation Easement, and the
Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that the damage would be irreparable and remedies at law
inadequate The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to,
and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection with this
Conservation Easement
B. Inspection. The Grantee, its employees and agents, successors and assigns, have the
right, with reasonable notice, to enter the Easement Area over the Property at reasonable times
for the purpose of inspection to determine whether the Grantor is complying with the terms,
conditions and restrictions of this Conservation Easement
C. Acts Beyond Grantor's Control. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement
shall be construed to entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change
in the Easement Area caused by third parties, resulting from causes beyond the Grantor's control,
including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, and earth movement, or from any prudent action
taken in good faith by the Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate
significant injury to life; or damage to the Property resulting from such causes
D. Costs of Enforcement. Beyond regular and typical monitoring expenses, any costs
incurred by Grantee in enforcing the terms of this Conservation Easement against Grantor,
including, without limitation, any costs of restoration necessitated by Grantor's acts or omissions
in violation of the terms of this Conservation Easement, shall be borne by Grantor
E. No Waiver. Enforcement of this Easement shall be at the discretion of the Grantee and
any forbearance, delay or omission by Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder in the event of any
breach of any tern set forth herein shall not be construed to be a waiver by Grantee
V. MISCELLANEOUS
A. This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the
Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or
agreements relating to the Conservation Easement If any provision is found to be invalid, the
remainder of the provisions of the Conservation Easement, and the application of such provision
to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is found to be invalid, shall not be
affected thereby
B. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes, assessments, fees, or charges levied upon
the Property Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liability of any kind related to the
ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the Property, except as expressly
provided herein Upkeep of any constructed bridges, fences, or other amenities on the Property
are the sole responsibility of the Grantor Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the
FullDeliveiyConservattonEasei -nentVeision121511 - Bowl Basin
6

obligation to comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits that may apply to
the exercise of the Reserved Rights
C. Any notices shall be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested to the
parties at their addresses shown herein or to other addresses as either party establishes in writing
upon notification to the other
D. Grantor shall notify Grantee in writing of the name and address and any party to whom
the Property or any part thereof is to be transferred at or prior to the time said transfer is made
Grantor further agrees that any subsequent lease, deed, or other legal instrument by which any
interest in the Property is conveyed subject to the Conservation Easement herein created
E. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive
any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Property or any portion thereof
F. This Conservation Easement and Right of Access may be amended, but only in writing
signed by all parties hereto, or their successors or assigns, if such amendment does not affect the
qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable
laws, and is consistent with the purposes of the Conservation Easement The owner of the
Property shall notify the U S Army Corps of Engineers in writing sixty (60) days prior to the
initiation of any transfer of all or any part of the Property Such notification shall be addressed
to Justin McCorkle, General Counsel, US Army Corps of Engineers, 69 Darlington Avenue,
Wilmington, NC 28403
G. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation Easement are in
gross and assignable provided, however, that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees, that in
the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the
interest will be a qualified holder under N C Gen Stat § 121 -34 et seq and § 170(h) of the
Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of the
transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to continue in
perpetuity the conservation purposes described in this document
VI. QUIET ENJOYMENT
Grantor reserves all remaining rights accruing from ownership of the Property, including
the right to engage in or permit or invite others to engage in only those uses of the Easement
Area that are expressly reserved herein, not prohibited or restricted herein, and are not
inconsistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement Without limiting the generality of
the foregoing, the Grantor expressly reserves to the Grantor, and the Grantor's invitees and
licensees, the right of access to the Easement Area, and the right of quiet enjoyment of the
Easement Area
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the said rights and easements perpetually unto the State of
North Carolina for the aforesaid purposes
AND Grantor covenants that Grantor is seized of said premises in fee and has the right to
convey the permanent Conservation Easement herein granted, that the same is free from
Fu 11 Deli veiyConservationEasementVeis ton 12 151 1 -Bowl Basin
7

encumbrances and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the same against the claims of all
persons whomsoever
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day
and year first above written
(SEAL)
Edward G Pridgen
(SEAL)
Dianne C Pridgen
NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF ONSLOW
I, , a Notary Public in and for the County and State
aforesaid, do hereby certify that , Grantor, personally appeared
before me this day and acknowledged the execution of the foregoing instrument
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Notary Seal this the
day of 12011
Notary Public
My commission expires
Fu It Deli veiyConservationEasementVeis ion 12151 1 - Bowl Basin
8

Exhibit A
BOWL BASIN
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
A parcel of land to be used for Conservation Easement purposes located on lands now or
formerly owned by Edward G Pridgen Sr (Deed Book 1673 Page 12 1) located in White Oak
Township, Onslow County, North Carolina and being more particularly described as follows
Beginning at the Southeastern corner of said lands owned by Edward G Pridgen Sr, also being
the Southwestern corner of lands now or formerly owned by Charles Clay Beasley (Deed Book
3674 Page 303), said point having North Carolina State Plane Coordinates of N 430513 29,
E 2504208 74,
Thence S 72'15'40" W on the south line of said Edward G Pridgen Sr land a distance of 647 72
feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set with aluminum cap,
Thence N 29 °23'38" W a distance of 532 88 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set with aluminum cap,
Thence N 31'08'13" E a distance of 650 22 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set with aluminum cap,
Thence N 10 °03'52" E a distance of 118 34 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set with aluminum cap,
Thence N 62'14'57" E a distance of 23 89 feet to a 5/8 inch rebar set with aluminum cap on the
East line of said lands owned by Edward G Pridgen Sr ,
Thence S 27 °45'03" E on the said East line of lands owned by Edward G Pridgen Sr a distance
of 1074 74 feet to the Point of Beginning
Containing 511,300 square feet or 1174 acres
FuII Deli veiyConservationEasementVeision121511 -Bowl Bann
9

{
1
l �
FuII Del ivelyConservationEasementVeiston121511 -Bowl Basin _
10

NOTES t1
row rurvn I' Z1,11, nw,tn Y +
rusty En xr ql rut Mru Psxrl wmnm vw u
rxmr mtma nni4nq uuwnrxrns
mrvuMSNrsrnrvfru nlx nl6nw pI
_ nNl1"rr LS.xou xnluiiinvnaT V.r xrxlnnrnsTSwcs loos viv, LS rLrr V
IHwwm
--- __----- - - - - -- ,xr „rcrnnrnm n +v0uxsm.lrnxn
---------- - - - - -- narwru.nrrsHw lnlsn 4r nlru
— — — . IUH n4va,a tnr rnwn % „s 4
n n n «q.nTE.Y< ,r n.rr argx r.nn R
- - -- --- `--------- - - - - -- r.,r�H,n,,.x,SM +,rvPrrlrxr,,,l .x,.,Mxw,Nrrvan.rnx,lrnl,
----- - -- - -- NIA I_aHnl..nKT,n.L xr., I.Nn „nx r<B.rNn
_ m, xr q. n.9xrt, 1NxErr
ONSIOW CgwrY PECISTER OF OEEOS
� �� �qqq� , 6l,xxrr.x,rNxtNa.w�. ,.ata..,,Nrq,.arxr%�IP.Hn rc Ip,
NOAH TORBERSON
PIN 540300321313 / ran.µ Rr nnarnnw r.rrr.r,rrrn ,omxr: rrm mr. x 1
\ RAY k KENNETH BK 3399 PC 448 \� \\ , Ux uµxn Urlr NSlu,rlw nM<nvrn nuvno sHr.., xsr ,n nn.
HEATH \ \\
PIN 540300338733
\ BK 2319 PC 901
\ / / / / � 7 \� \\; \ \\ nr rnn r, r,usn„ srxnw.mslm,s nxr rrrttucrn tua,vns rnur+nr
\ / EDWARD k SABRINA \ \
/ 8LIZARO \ \
/ PIN 540300219900 \
\ / 8K 1947 PG 279 \ \
/ / W S625DOI -E 88024
S83MG 47-E \ \
124641}.,, g \\ �l-
i HODGES BUILDING
COMPANY \ �r
PIN 540300318 609 /\ ^
TF
EXISTING 3617 PG 767 \ \SO 0 l,^
BUILDING D V•
N621 E
2389 CHRISTOPHER BOWMAN
PIN 540300318593 fA�
BK 3807 PC 273
NIO'03 52'E
MS
11834
r09 9
/4 \ \ d Y
EDWARD C PRIOCEN SR .4.
PIN 540300219097 .> CHARLES CLAY
BK 1673 PG 121 y^ BEASLEY \
AY 'J PIN 540300403906 \\ \
BK 3674 PG 303 \
(NOT TO SCALE)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ONSLOW COUNTY
EWOFFICER
OF ONSLONC = CERTIFY THAT ME MAP
OR MAT WINCH 1H5 CGFMfXG ION IS AFFIx6D
MEETS ALL STAMORY REOUIRFNENTS FOR
RECOROwG
\ \
�CONSERVAAONr
51 / 3LY15F \
"q r ” cnwri 1174 ACRES \
g' 43 r rqn \
ELIZABETH DALRYMPLE
PIN 54200083172
1
BK 3577 PC 80 2� A1PI50 L—
MICHAEL k WANDA
PGNr
TABLE
E STIG
OED IPum
20 1
202
4]051) 29
sJOJ1”.
ra 7.
250]591 BI
CM
EWI CON
203
204
4]0'18023
4313367e
250333021
2WM6549
E9.11 COP
ESMT COR
205
206
1 4 51
43146442
250368717
290]]0031
OUT CON
ESMT G.
\ \
�CONSERVAAONr
51 / 3LY15F \
"q r ” cnwri 1174 ACRES \
g' 43 r rqn \
ELIZABETH DALRYMPLE
PIN 54200083172
1
BK 3577 PC 80 2� A1PI50 L—
MICHAEL k WANDA
U�
ERS NC
ROO P O F1 MORTON
J
�P
PIN 405592
T1 s
/
1
C4 BAT BK '661 1661 PC 669
/
/2
/
/
/
GRAPHIC SCALE
c1sTNArION NwreER aNOSCµ rraS
�AS
ST
161817
a'N MIC HAEL h DANA
SHROUT
_
�
roTNOnr or Awu mu
PIN 540}00306294
r ww =200 REt
BK 2195 PC 300 /
no6TH JAMES A NEGELL ER L -Seen
JANES M miEi+tiliriMB
-
/
/
/
FINAL PLAT
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
MICHAEL MORTON
LEGEND
FOR
PIN 540200185887
\ BK 1]00 PG 673
w EXISTING PK NAIL
NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PRC
PROJECT NAME BOWL BASIN NON-RIPARIAN
artr�vra rlrt EOUOVSxoAe NEgertow0e4iJ01FMr1tL
O EXISTING IRON
WETLAND RESTORATION SITE
O 5/8 REBAR SET W/ 3 25 ALUMINUM
EEP PROJECT 4' 95721
oSwWV oN
CAP WM STATE SEAL
SPO FILE NO 67 BB PROPERTY OF EDWARD A DIANNE
orlrce EraFrxw tomEOrnNmox ac uemvaon
A CALCULATED POINT
WHITE OAK TOWNSHIP ONSLOWCOUNTY NC
❑ EXISTING MONUMENT
DATE SCALE SHEET
DECEMBER 20 2012 I 200
NWTH CAFXU A REGSTRA NUMBER L -3860
JAMES M GELLENTHIN
/
/
/
NEW CONSERVATION EASEMENT FOR
THE STATE OF NC ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
I
KCI ASSOCIATES 0
/
POD PONT OF BEGINNING
ENGINEERS SURVEYORS AND
/ /
KCI
/
4601 SIX FORKS ROAD SUITE
ASSOCIATES OF RALEIGH NC 27609
NORTH CAROLINA PHONE [phone] FAX (919)
C -0764

Mitigation Plan
43
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
f �
}� J
r \

Mitigation Plan
14.4 Appendix B. Baseline Information Data
44
Bowl Basin Restoration Site

Mitigation Plan Bowl Basin Restoration Site
i
45

Mitigation Plan
USACE Wetland Determination Forms
46
Bowl Bann Restoration Site

i
Mitigation Plan Bowl Bann Restoration Site
i
t �
47

I�
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site 90"o., 1 &--"11 City/County Aa0L/1 JZd, / 011 )4210 Sampling Date Z
Applicant/Owner o r ,1 State JI /G Sampling Point F f
Investigator(s) h9 r:d Section, Township, Range
Landform (hdlslope, terrace, etc) %'G; r ! Local relief (concave, convex, none) F/r 7- Slope (° %) t I
Subregion (LRR or MLRV,) L R t� 1" Let 31 - J � r 21"14 Long °' 7 V i V n 4 " Lt/ Datum I M3
Sod Map Unit Name 2i ., NWI classification A/Ortle,
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ' No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation 1/ , Sod or Hydrology ✓ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No ✓
Are Vegetation , Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ✓
Hydric Sod Present? Yes ✓ No is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present') Yes No w
within a Wetland? Yes No 1
Remarks
%.,) le, /r1�,f`b 1's "(�'P,,tI,`,_ 0i1 Gi1', Tr s4- lJt r��14t1JC it$,
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (At) _ Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Moss Trim Lines (816)
_ Water Marks (B1) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (82) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Iron Deposits (B5) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (05)
Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Sphagnum moss (138) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes No
v' Depth (inches)
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point L) P t, 1
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size ) % Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
2
Total Number of Dominant
3 Species Across All Strata t (B)
4
Percent of Donunant Species
5 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
6
7 Prevalence Index worksheet,
8
Total % Cover of, Multiply by
OBL species x 1 =
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 20% of total cover
FACW species x2=
Saplmo/Shrub Stratum
(Plot size )
FAC species x3=
1
FACU species x4=
UPL species x5=
Column Totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
2
3
4
5
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7
_ Z - Dorrunance Test is >50%
8
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover 20% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size
/ % %1 )
'Indicators
of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
1
too X125 rx
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
2
i�
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
3
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
4
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling /Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
then 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb —All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
5
6
7
s
9
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft In
10
11
height
12
j
Total Cover
50% of total cover 56 20% of total cover
Woody Vine Stratum
(Plot size )
1
Hydrophytic
2
3
4
5
= Total Cover
Vegetation
✓
50°x6 of total cover 20% of total cover
Present? Yes No
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0
r
Y

i
SOIL
Sampling Point 1) P , I
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
0 -11 10
014 Es; 'fE Gt � ¢ 10 v —' '1/1 dip �_ � �d 5x 5 cz
t
Hydric Soil Indicators (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted )
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls3
Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,8)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
_ Piedmont Floodplam Solis (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophyhc vegetation and
_ Coest Pre ine Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Umbnc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (84) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplam Sods (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Sods (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type
Depth (inches)
�
d't,.- °i-i
US Army Corps of Engineers
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ti No
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site CitytCounty i�l � -t' � E� +rf �� � %�I SI{?t ! Sampling Date d "(
AppircanVOwner of /r 1 State N:w Sampling Point -
Investigator(s) `�� tE' C °: Section Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc) r /r, ?" Local relief (concave, convex, none) r14 7' Slope ( %) 0-1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) L iR h 1 Let 3y SS 17 21 IV Long 7V/1' 1'y ri W Datum I `)
Sod Map Unit Name _ ,tee``m.,5 NWI classification
Are climatic! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation ✓ , Sod or Hydrology ✓ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No ✓
Are Vegetation , Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ��
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Sod Present? Yes � No
within a Wetland? Yes No ✓
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ti
e
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reaurred)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required, check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (At) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (61) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (82) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Dnft Deposits (B3) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (B5) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
_^ Water - Stained Leaves (69)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations.
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Water Table Presents Yes No
t% Depth (inches) 2-1
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No t-"'
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point f° j3
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size ) Cover Species7 Status
Number of Dominant Species j
1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
2 Total Number of Dominant
3 Species Across All Strata I (B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species
5 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC t� (A/B)
6
7 Prevalence Index worksheet
8
Total % Cover of Multiply by
OBL species x 1 =
= Total Cover
50% of total cover
20% of total cover
FACW species x2=
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size )
FAC species x 3 =
1
FACU species x4=
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
2
3
4
5
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators.
6
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7
_ 2 - Dominance Test is X50%
8
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover
20% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
1 ; J rr L) M
l? d' G f l S,
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
2
i
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
3
4
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
then 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb —All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
5
6
7
6
9
of size, and woody plants less then 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine —AII woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
10
11
height
12
100 = Total Cover
50% of total cover S10 20% of total cover n
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot sue )
1
2
3
'4
5
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover 20% of total cover Present? Yes No
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point 6
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matnx Redox Features
(inche�s/)j Color (moist) 1 % Color (moist) % Tme Loc Texture Remarks
n}.. it
10- ILI 10 la, 1,00 S�
Hydric Soil Indicators (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls'
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (171) (LRR O) _
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Sods (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (1`10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
✓ Umbnc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type
Depth (inches)
Remarks
Hydric Sol[ Present? Yes V"" No
Al r�`,�`. <<a �4v r = ifrM }, v� % jrJ(k'fr �1 :,✓ a t t
G�fd t £ ` ICJ %C 7 }, � /� 1 G `! �), ;'r �•�':'�;°„ j �
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0
r

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site gawJ City /County 121 ,4.., 5Li fc / 6ii5 /0 ui Sampling Date `w i
Appiicant/Owner K. C 41 i5SC.)e,�/� ,fir" a c:1,i:' 4C. State hiC Sampling Point Life '
Investigator(s) S i Secbon, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc) i /,.4 "" Local relief (concave, convex, none) 04) 11 G,,1 i�, - Slope ( %)
�
Subregion (LRR or MLRLA) 1.- P A `) Let ..3SL'�.S.i 20" N Long ?7 a M 0 e,"n/ Datum 14g
Sod Map Unit Name — �t myg. NWI classification M! 61,VC.
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation ✓ , Soil , or Hydrology ✓ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ✓ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes is'° No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No _%
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators.
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two r o fired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
` Surface Sod Cracks (BB)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Mari Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (82)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
— FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (69)
_ Sphagnum moss (138) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations-
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes
No V0' Depth (inches) 117
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point 0 P4*
/0�) =Total Cover —
50% of total cover 20% of total cover —90
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4
5 Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover 20% of total cover Present? Yes No Ve
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2 0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size
Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
2
Total Number of Dominant
3
Species Across All Strata I (B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC ® (A/B)
6
7
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total % Cover of Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
8
= Total Cover
50% of total cover
20% of total cover
FACW species x2=
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size )
FAC species x3=
1
FACU species x4=
UPL species x5=
Column Totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A=
2
3
4
5
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators.
6
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover
20% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size 1^a t )
'Indicators
1 S 0Q
? N.rr
of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
2
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
3
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
4
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb —All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
5
6
7
8
9
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
10
Woody vine —Ali woody vines greater than 3 28 ft In
11
height
12
/0�) =Total Cover —
50% of total cover 20% of total cover —90
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size )
1
2
3
4
5 Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover 20% of total cover Present? Yes No Ve
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point OPW
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2 0
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
10 ya 160
R_ too
► _ 2(o y t 6 R
�V P, rif C► 2.
'Type C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains
2Location PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrnt
Hydric Soil Indicators (Applicable to all
LRRs, unless otherwise noted )
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls3
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Glayed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
,_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mad (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochdc (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron - Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR O, P, T) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) lUmbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
— Reduced Vertic (1718) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
_ Sandy Redox (85)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 'se, No
Remarks
SAC: I't 4.' fit �l Yf- ,'`iIf
,f
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region – Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
l� n
Profecl/Site Ct (.i1G C/� //11 City/County / 4,5 UI %fr^ �f 3i'} ; °�� / Sampling Date .°+ "'�:
Appllcant/Ovmer _K C" , �t� l e �,4;�s Or- .(/(, State /JG Sampling Point QL' 4
Investigator(s) , , :1`41,, S Section, Township, Range
Landform (hilisiope, terrace, etc ) /e 3 y" Local relief (concave, convex, none) 'U h �� / Slope ( %)
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LP i4 I' Lat 3 1 X 55 �k ' hl Long TZ ° 1 ' ,V 9 " i Datum 11793
Soil Map Unit Name k4j.tils NWI classification �JDAtfe-
Are climatic J hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _kr L No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation v' , Soil , or Hydrology ✓ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No '
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No V111 Is the Sampled Area
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes %," No within a Wetland? Yes No
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No V"
r
¢'st�-J?.t +oJ�F7r,�ife lags ter''. <`lf d >4'� � �)rr� � (�,J't �i�2,�Z �•l(,i �c�}r�x.:+R�� -�Yt�J
f
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reguir d)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
_ Surface Sod Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (910)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
— Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (61)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (82)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (02)
_ Iron Deposits (1215)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
, PAC- Neutral Test (135)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (69)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations.
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches) 7' 2 a
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0

I
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants
Sampling Point 1 (',.r(
MO = Total Cover
50% of total cover O 20% of total cover 2-0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size )
2
3
4
5
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover 20% of total cover
Present? Yes No—V--'.
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2 0
Absolute Dominant indicator
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size )
% Coyer 51)ecies? status
Number of Dominant Species
1
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC t) (A)
2
Total Number of Dominant
3
Species Across All Strata ) (B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (MB)
5
6
7
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total % Cover of, Multiply by
OBL species x 1 =
8
= Total Cover
50% of total cover
20% of total cover
FACW species x2=
Saplina /Shrub Stratum (Plot size )
FAC species x3=
1
FACU species x4=
UPL species x5=
Column Totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A=
2
3
4
5
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
6
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7
_ 2 - Dominance Test Is >50%
8
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover
20% of total cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size i vvt )
'Indicators
of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
'ire, / �Ir,
C
� co Off'} Irj � :,+ f� �
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
2 /
T—
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
3
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
4
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub —Woody plants, excluding vines, less
5
6
7
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb —All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
8
9
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
10
Woody vine —Ali woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
11
height
12
MO = Total Cover
50% of total cover O 20% of total cover 2-0
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size )
2
3
4
5
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover 20% of total cover
Present? Yes No—V--'.
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point _ L) P *r
Profile Description* (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators )
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Tvpe, Loc
Texture Remarks
0-2 a 72= 11_ Ion
s�
15 . ZO ID �'
I (7 �s�y_'_ C lei, 5 C• ��
5 �C.
Type C= Concentration, D--Depletion, R M=R educed Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains
Location PL =Pore Lining M =Matrix
Hydnc Soil Indicators (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Glayed Matnx (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
— Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_, Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
— Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (1710) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
e/ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Depleted Ochnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbnc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes V"" No
�y 4 /i)
/}, /! .!T > t - /' A C rfCa'wt 4 %: i�`i�;�+�nF (/ !`t_c<` -�' (
L
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Guff Coastal Plain Region –Version 2 0

Mitigation Plan
r y
Reference Wetland
Bowl Basin Restoration Site

Mitigation Plan
61
Bowl Basin Restoration Site

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site ��E h f,- ��I `a /41 keA% c.'.(.>twe- /JET 1 b,,v City /County hr�iiri +/.`J7�, % t�r1 /r� n) Sampling Date
Applicant/Owner )� d ) " t /'' State _)6 _ Sampling Point 17( 0
Investigator(s) 5.5 L,� e!> F ­ U nl IA NT Section, Township, Range
Landform (hdislope, terrace, eta) f�rL "ni'< Local relief (concave, convex, none) W,1 �i Slope ( %) 0 l
Subregion (LRR or MLRRA) i RR I- L a t !✓ � 0 5'3 r{!o y l i Long 1� 0 rl7 o3(a, 25� " Datum
Soil Map Unit Name / a / _ NWI classification pro/
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓X No (If no, explain in Remarks }
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed') Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Yes
✓
No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes
✓
No
within a Wetland? Yes ✓ No
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
✓
No
_ Water Marks (81) —
Remarks
_ Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (82) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Re /n'rr,.�c ;
/r�'. ,14r
,i w
1
; =' rr' ",", C'tAlA.e' t� 1 -A, t 1 r P ; / d 1 !!'r<{:` F ) , o r,
Algal Mat or Crust (64) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aqwtard (133)
Inundation Visible on Aeral Imagery (67)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (nunnnum of one is iequired, check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B8)
_ Surface Water (A1) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ High Water Table (A2) —
Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
✓Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
✓ Mass Tnm Lures (B16)
_ Water Marks (81) —
Oxidized Rhrzospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry - Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (82) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (83) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (CO)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aqwtard (133)
Inundation Visible on Aeral Imagery (67)
✓FAC- Neutral Test (05)
Water - Stained Leaves (89)
_ Sphagnum moss (138) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water Present? Yes
Water Table Present? Yes
Saturation Present? Yes
gauge,
No Depth (inches)
No ✓ Depth (inches)
No Depth (inches) I Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks -- — - -- - -- __ _- - --- - -- -- - - --
previous inspections),
%J "/iIl(' /. /l(��N�
1
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point DAM /
Absolute
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 ) % Cover
1 tj,;L1[ IL- !':r. , ,. r ^ t rlf, )11 AV0 r JU
Dominant Indicator
ecieso Status
V fife
Dominance Test worksheet
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata rf (e)
Percent of Dominant Species t)
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC O /0 (A/B)
2 CWgJIkr ,ie - t "rY1KS i0e dl'- )rj- ✓ FA<-
3 StaEfT
5140-bt ior�rlr+�btit Syny�ctflr�r� 5 rr�
4 `
5
6
7
Prevalence Index worksheet
Total % Cover of Multiply by
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = 8/A=
8
70 = Total Cover
50% of total cover 35 20% of total cover 14
Saplino/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 301 )
60
2,5tJy�,i1� r�C�c l� ANN V,/f ilr�f'IOR1,-• 2 0 ✓ fi t.
35, 1-M crl% A'rrkb,,S!r9%m,beoi, 14a10 ) ,.rforrs,nsum )5 - uU
4 JCPI�;��llyJ�4 `/ /cch : -,t (? : , 1D f ttf-
d
5 Srafla)'nll {n.- Lirr {«. /rt l,,ti,�i ,S •jrRer r.
Hydmphytic Vegetation Indicators.
v"'1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
✓2- Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 -Prevalence Index is 53 0`
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
6 I U j'itt.ul
7 COt1 \Yt�O�,iV!!E� /cnF ibnm /f3C t, fine-Mr to- rA-'tJ
—LL
8
) 30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover /n h 20% of total cover 2-6
Herb Stratum (Plot size 1 nA )
1 o k:nq rr = `� (�n I i' Sf ti r5 5 ✓ I�fi!_LJ
2 wrE� nFr�1•Erc �) �t.,.' i /rrz� On I'folro
5
✓ fl c+�1
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (1381-1), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb -All herbaceous non -woody) ( ody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
3 )�/!t!t'Pt c,r IAt,eJA 4s 40,> n,osvrn S ✓ rrtcvr
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
50% of total cover i. 5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size )
/ =Total Cover
20% of total cover 3
1
2
3
4
5 Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover 20% of total cover Present? yes ✓� No
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
V � t��`, <,, t�tl.• - 1Jnr -r t��tilrluc��vr.r�� „Ije�a � �
t � ,1
Gr t;

SOIL Sampling Point br, ° i
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type, Loc`
Texture Remarks
too
i
-o r!t Ou r'
21)
.5 f ?l-
J
T
`l'S y�z 'fL 5 C
_MS=
'Type C= Concentrati�etion, RM= ReduceTd Matrix, Masked Sand Gra ins
'Location PL =pore Lining, M =Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators (Applicable to all
LRRs, unless otherwise noted )
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Poiyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Htstic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histtc (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (171) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside M LRA 150A B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Fioodplain Sods (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (FS)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mad (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1)
_ Depleted Ochnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Y" Umbnc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 1153C, 1530)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type
Depth (Inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ter No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2 0

Mitigation Plan
65
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
1

Mitigation Plan
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
Note: This reference site will serve as a hydrology reference only. A suitable vegetative community
reference could not be found in properties that granted access.
..

Mitigation Plan
67
Bowl Basin Restoration Site

Mitigation Plan
f _J
�l
\_ J
� J
i\
l
f
Jurisdictional Determination
68
Bowl Basin Restoration Site

Mitigation Plan
M
Bowl Basin Restoration Site

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW- 2013 -00393 County: Onslow U.S.G.S. Quad: Jacksonville NE
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Property Owner: Edward G. Pridgen, Sr. Agent: ]KCI Associates of NC
Address: P.O. Box 233 attn: Steven F. Stokes
Maysville, NC 28555 Address: Landmark Center II. Suite 220
4601 Six, Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Property description:
Size (acres) =17 Nearest Town Maysville
Nearest Waterway UT to White Oak River River Basin White Oak
USGS RUC 03020106 Coordinates 34.922105 N - 77.319408 W
Location description: The property is located approximately 0.1 mL to the east of White Oak River Road
approximately 1.5 mi. southeast of its intersection with Emmett Lane. near Maysville. Onslow County North
Carolina. The Project Area is located in the southeast corner of Parcel #• 1108 -15
Indicate Which of the Followine AVDIV:
A. Preliminary Determination
_ Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are waters of the U.S. on the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
X The waters of the U.S. on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the Corps.
We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by
the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your
property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to
exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on _. Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at (252) 808 -2808 to
determine their requirements.
Page 1 of 2

Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311) If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Mr. David E Bailey at (910) 251 -4469 /
David.E Bailey2(c�usace armv mil.
C. Basis For Determination
David E. Basle of the US Arm .Cor s of En nee s n 2/20/20131
D. Remarks
2/l/2013.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation /determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act Jurisdiction for the
Particular site identified in this request The delmeation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985 If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Consei vation Service, prior to starting work
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved Jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved Jurisdictional determination for the above described site If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR. part 331 Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn• Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
In ordei for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331 5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by June 15.2013
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence **
Corps Regulatory Official OP
Date Aprd_16_ 2013
Expiration Date ADril 16, 2018
Copy furnished
Joanne Steenhuis , NCDENR -DWQ, 127 Cardinal Drive Extension,
Wilmington, NC 28405

w A s ram m� E�70ETM FFA)m — As
SEAT' AKA AIp . .S"= am
AML41rt morass
Mom
OCLlMM \
N M07 PS MY �\ \\
CHNIrlopm Daum
°�
a \ r
i owaa CLAY \ \
3 '["'!V \
9� n�NAMN&ry MAZY
MR MUECT \
ruwn
i
rassl
is ua rs semis /
A - �.> deal
LuGl� CAO&"C na,.* p Ag.,,k.
O'TE* ,
wawa MA?
N NOT TO SCME
t
RECEIVE
W E Ap,092013
RW, w"
s
LINEAR FEET OF
JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY - 4,192'
JURISDICTIONAL
TRIBUTARY - 20,711 S.F.
(0.48 ACRES)
GR~ SCALE
me
MOI � E00 16i
JURISDICTIONAL TRIBUTARY
DELINEATION MAP
MR
BOWL BASIN WETLAND RESTORATION
WHITE OAK TWP, ONSLOW COUNTY
KCI ASSOCIAMS OF N.C.
ENGR*ZM SURVEMM MM PIAw M
Asw m mm NWA am as
PAUM rNna c«q ° VM
n"m I'M on) r i-.eu

Mitigation Plan
73
Bowl Basin Restoration 51te

Mitigation Plan Bowl Basin Restoration Site
FHWA Categorical Exclusion Form
74

Mitigation Plan
75
Bowl Basin Restoration Site

0
PROGRAM
March 20, 2013
Mr Tim Moms
KCI Associates of NC, PA
Landmark Center H, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh NC 27609
Subject: Categorical Exclusion Form for
Bowl Basin Non - riparian Wetland Mitigation Site
White Oak River Basin — CU# 03020106
Onslow County, North Carolina
Contract No. 005012
Dear Mr. Morris.
Attached please fmd the approved Categorical Exclusion Form for the subject full delivery project. At
this time you may submit your invoice for 5% of your contract for completion of the Task 1
deliverable. Please include a copy of the form in your Mitigation Plan.
If you have any questions, or wish to discuss this matter further, please contact Kristin Miguez or me at
any time. Kristin can be reached at (910) 796 -7475, or email at kristm.miguez(i�ncdenr.gov while I
can be reached at (919) 707 -8308, or email me at Jeff schafferna ncdenr go v.
Sincerely,
91*1144#-
Jeff Schaffer
EEP Eastern Regional Supervisor
cc- file
Kristin Miguez — Project Manager
Y -� � ir• `✓ ,a zJ+'•. _ri i.tX✓'.E,ar'7'�u re. ,. .✓ ''r+�w1.'..Y Li.i {�' ✓� —r iN«L�� sTj
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 165fMail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 21699 -1652 / 90- 115 -0416 / Y#w.nceep net

Categorical Exclusion Form for Ecosystem Enhancement
Program Projects
Version 1.4
Note: Only Appendix A should to be submitted (along with any supporting documentation) as the
environmental document.
Part
Project
1: General .
•
Project Name:
I Bowl Basin Non -ri arian Wetland Mitigation Site
Count Name:
Onslow County, NC
EEP Number:
95721
Project Sponsor:
KCI Technologies, Inc.
Project Contact Name:
Tim Morris
Project Contact Address:
4601 Six Forks Rd, Suite 220, Raleigh, NC 27609
Project Contact E -mail:
[e-mail]
EEP Project Mana er:
Kristin Mi uez
Project Description
For Official Use Only
Reviewed By:
3 � u !3
✓
Dat
/EF roj anager`
Conditional Approved By:
Date
For Division Administrator
FHWA
❑ Check this box if there are outstanding issues
Final Approval By:
}
� --1 )-- /�
, _ -,
Date
For Division Administrator
FHWA
Version 1.4, 8/18/05

Part 2: All Projects
Response
Coastal Zone Management Act CZMA
1. Is the project located in a CAMA county?
N Yes
❑ No
2. Does the project involve ground- disturbing activities within a CAMA Area of
El Yes
Environmental Concern (AEC)?
® No
❑ N/A
3. Has a CAMA permit been secured?
Yes
❑ No
® N/A
4. Has NCDCM agreed that the project is consistent with the NC Coastal Management
Yes
Program?
❑ No
® N/A
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act CERCLA
1. Is this a "full- delivery" project?
® Yes
❑ No
2. Has the zoning /land use of the subject property and adjacent properties ever been
❑ Yes
designated as commercial or industrial?
® No
❑ N/A
3. As a result of a limited Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential
Yes
hazardous waste sites within or adjacent to the project area?
® No
❑ N/A
4. As a result of a Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous
Yes
waste sites within or adjacent to the project area?
❑ No
® N/A
5. As a result of a Phase II Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous
❑ Yes
waste sites within the project area?
❑ No
® N/A
6. Is there an approved hazardous mitigation plan?
Yes
❑ No
® N/A
National Historic Preservation Act Section 106
1. Are there properties listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of
❑ Yes
Historic Places in the project area?
® No
2. Does the project affect such properties and does the SHPO/THPO concur?
Yes
❑ No
® N/A
3. If the effects are adverse, have they been resolved?
LJ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act Uniform
Act
1. Is this a "full- delivery" project?
® Yes
❑ No
2. Does the project require the acquisition of real estate?
® Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
3. Was the property acquisition completed prior to the intent to use federal funds?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
4. Has the owner of the property been informed:
Yes
• prior to making an offer that the agency does not have condemnation authority; and
❑ No
• what the fair market value is believed to be?
❑ N/A
Version 1.4, 8/18/05

Part 3: Ground-Disturbing Activities
Regulation/Question Response
American Indian Religious Freedom Act AIRFA
1. Is the project located in a county claimed as "territory" by the Eastern Band of Ll Yes
Cherokee Indians? ® No
2. Is the site of religious importance to American Indians?
Yes
❑ No
® N/A
3. Is the project listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic
Yes
Places?
❑ No
® N/A
4. Have the effects of the project on this site been considered?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
Antiquities Act AA
1. Is the project located on Federal lands?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Will there be loss or destruction of historic or prehistoric ruins, monuments or objects
El Yes
of antiquity?
❑ No
® N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required?
Ll Yes
❑ No
® N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
Archaeolo ical Resources Protection Act ARPA
1. Is the project located on federal or Indian lands (reservation)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Will there be a loss or destruction of archaeological resources?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
3. Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required?
Yes
❑ No
® N/A
4. Has a permit been obtained?
Yes
❑ No
® N/A
Endangered Species Act ESA
1. Are federal Threatened and Endangered species and /or Designated Critical Habitat
® Yes
listed for the county?
❑ No
2. Is Designated Critical Habitat or suitable habitat present for listed species?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ N/A
3. Are T &E species present or is the project being conducted in Designated Critical
❑ Yes
Habitat?
❑ No
® N/A
4. Is the project "likely to adversely affect" the specie and /or "likely to adversely modify"
Yes
Designated Critical Habitat?
❑ No
® N/A
5. Does the USFWS /NOAA- Fisheries concur in the effects determination?
LJ Yes
(By virtue of no- response)
❑ No
® N/A
6. Has the USFWS /NOAH- Fisheries rendered a "jeopardy" determination?
Yes
❑ No
® N/A
Version 1.4, 8/18/05

Executive Order 13007 Indian Sacred Sites
1. Is the project located on Federal lands that are within a county claimed as "territory"
LJ Yes
by the EBCI?
® No
2. Has the EBCI indicated that Indian sacred sites may be impacted by the proposed
El Yes
project?
❑ No
® N/A
3. Have accommodations been made for access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred
Yes
sites?
❑ No
® N/A
Farmland Protection Policy Act FPPA
1. Will real estate be acquired?
X Yes
❑ No
2. Has NRCS determined that the project contains prime, unique, statewide or local
Yes
important farmland?
❑ No
❑ N/A
3. Has the completed Form AD -1006 been submitted to NRCS?
El Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act FWCA
1. Will the project impound, divert, channel deepen, or otherwise control /modify any
El Yes
water body?
® No
2. Have the USFWS and the NCWRC been consulted?
N Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
Land and Water Conservation Fund Act Section 6
1. Will the project require the conversion of such property to a use other than public,
El Yes
outdoor recreation?
® No
2. Has the NIPS approved of the conversion?
Yes
❑ No
® N/A
Ma nuson- Stevens Fishery Conservation and Mana ement Act Essential Fish
Habitat
1. Is the project located in an estuarine system?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Is suitable habitat present for EFH- protected species?
Ll Yes
❑ No
® N/A
3. Is sufficient design information available to make a determination of the effect of the
Yes
project on EFH?
❑ No
® N/A
4. Will the project adversely affect EFH?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
5. Has consultation with NOAA- Fisheries occurred?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
Migratory Bird Treaty Act MBTA
1. Does the USFWS have any recommendations with the project relative to the MBTA?
Yes
® No
2. Have the USFWS recommendations been incorporated?
Yes
❑ No
® N/A
Wilderness Act
1. Is the project in a Wilderness area?
Ll Yes
® No
2. Has a special use permit and /or easement been obtained from the maintaining
Yes
federal agency?
❑ No
® N/A
Version 1.4, 8/18/05

Mitigation Plan
81
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
1
1
1

Mitigation Plan
FEMA Floodplain Checklist
82
Bowl Basin Restoration Site

Mitigation Plan
83
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
1
i
1
l }
1

r�
Enkoff lestem
ment
PROGRAM
EEP Floodplain Requirements Checklist
This form was developed by the National Flood Insurance program, NC Floodplain
Mapping program and Ecosystem Enhancement Program to be filled for all EEP projects.
The form is intended to summarize the floodplain requirements during the design phase
of the projects. The form should be submitted to the Local Floodplain Administrator
with three copies submitted to NFIP (attn. State NFIP Engineer), NC Floodplain Mapping
Unit (attn. State NFIP Coordinator) and NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
Project Location
Name of project:
Bowl Basin Wetland Restoration Project
Name if stream or feature:
N/A
County:
Onslow
Name of river basin:
White Oak
Is project urban or rural?
Rural
Name of Jurisdictional
municipality /county:
Onslow County
DFIRM panel number for
entire site:
5402
Consultant name:
KCI Technologies, Inc.
Phone number:
919- 783 -9214
Address:
4601 Six Forks Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27609
FEMA_Floodplain_Checklist Bowl Basin.docx Page I of 3

Design Information
Provide a general description of project (one paragraph) Include project limits on a
reference orthophotograph at a scale of 1" = 500"
Summarize stream reaches or wetland areas according to their restoration priority
Example
Reach
Length
Priority
Wetland I
11 7 acres
N/A
Floodplain Information
Is project located in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)?
C Yes E No
If project is located in a SFHA, check how it was determined
Redelineation
r Detailed Study
Limited Detail Study
r Approximate Study
r Don't know
List flood zone designation:
Check if applies
r AE Zone
F loodway
Non - Encroachment
E None
r A Zone
C: Local Setbacks Required
No Local Setbacks Required
If local setbacks are required, list how many feet
Does proposed channel boundary encroach outside floodway /non-
encroac hment/setbac ks?
FEMA_Floodplam_Checklist Bowl Basin docx Page 2 of 3

E: Yes E No
Land Acquisition (Check)
State owned (fee simple)
Ci Conservation easment (Design Bid Build)
r Conservation Easement (Full Delivery Project)
Note. if the project property is state - owned, then all requirements should be addressed to
the Department of Administration, State Construction Office (attn Herbert Neily,
919 807 -4101
Is community /county participating in the NFIP program?
E Yes U No
Note if community is not participating, then all requirements should be addressed to
NFIP attn. State NFIP Engineer, (919 ) 715 -8000
Name of Local Floodplam Administrator
Phone Number
Floodplain Requirements
This section to be filled by designer /applicant following verification with the LFPA
r No Action
No Rise
G Letter of Map Revision
r Conditional Letter of Map Revision
0 Other Requirements
List other requirements
Comments
Project is not located in ajurisdictional floodplain.
Name.
Title
FEMA_Floodplam_Checklist Bowl Basin docx
Signature:
Date -
Page 3 of 3

Mitigation Plan
87
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
� 1
r l

J
r
Mitigation Plan Bowl Basin Restoration Site
14.5 Appendix C. Mitigation Work Plan Data and Analyses
88

Mitigation Plan
89
Bowl Basin Restoration Site

Mitigation Plan
�J
`r
� I
DRAINMOD Modeling
.I
Bowl Basin Restoration Site

Mitigation Plan
91
ti
r '
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
f
i

Bowl_Basin_Existing.WET
* DRAINMOD version 6.1 °
* Copyright 1980 -2011 North Carolina State University
----------------------------------------------- - - - - --
1949 -2012 Bowl Basin Existing
New Bern, NORTH CAROLINA WEATHER DATA
--- - - - - -- -RUN STATISTICS ---- - - - - -- time: 4/29/2013 @ 10:21
input file. C: \DrainMod \inputs \Bowl_Basin_Existing.prj
parameters. free drainage and yields not calculated
drain spacing = 9144 cm drain depth = 61.0 cm
------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - --
DRAINMOD - -- WET PERIOD EVALUATION
Version 6.1 ° °° **
Number of periods with water table closer than 30 00 cm
for at least 22 days. Counting starts on day
77 and ends on day 320 of each year
YEAR Number of Periods Longest Consecutive
of 22 days or Period in Days
more with WTD
< 30.00 cm
------------ - - - - -- --------------- - - - --
1949 1. 31.
1950 0. 15.
1951 0 11.
1952 0. 10.
1953 0. 7.
1954 0. 7.
1955 0. 19.
1956 0. 20.
1957 0. 14
1958 0. 18.
1959 1. 22.
1960 0. 11.
1961 0. 20.
1962 1. 22.
1963 0. 15.
1964 0. 14.
1965 0. 19.
1966 1. 23.
1967 0 16.
1968 0. 9.
1969 0. 15.
1970 0. 18.
1971 0. 16.
1972 0. 8.
1973 0. 14.
1974 1. 24.
1975 0. 17
1976 1. 27.
1977 0. 12.
1978 1. 22.
Page 1

Number of Years with at least one period = 15. out of 64 years.
Page 2
Bowl_Basin_Existing.WET
1979
0.
15.
1980
0.
18.
1981
0.
11.
1982
1.
24.
1983
0.
20
1984
1.
33.
1985
1.
25.
1986
0.
9.
1987
0
11.
1988
0.
10.
1989
1.
22.
1990
0.
12.
1991
1.
32.
1992
0
13.
1993
0
20.
1994
0.
6.
1995
0.
0.
1996
0.
0.
1997
0.
0.
1998
0.
12.
1999
1.
39.
2000
0.
20.
2001
0.
18.
2002
0.
12.
2003
1.
23.
2004
0.
16.
2005
1.
25.
2006
0.
10.
2007
0.
6.
2008
0.
13.
2009
0.
7.
2010
0.
11.
2011
0.
6.
2012
0.
21.
Number of Years with at least one period = 15. out of 64 years.
Page 2

Bowl_Basin_Proposed.WET
-----------------------------------------------------
DRAINMOD version 6.1
Copyright 1980 -2011 North Carolina State University
----------------------------------------------- - - - - --
1949 -2012 Bowl Basin Proposed
New Bern, NORTH CAROLINA WEATHER DATA
•Y sY sY s" sY sY u „ sY sY � k sY •Y av sY k .` •Y •'� sY � � sY sY � •� � •Y sY :Y k •'• sY sY •': sY s'- •'• s'• sY Y s� sY •Y s° •Y Y sY •Y' s`' >` •Y •`� .. .. •� •'� s° � •� •'� � sY •'- k �k'' >v •'�'t s°
--- - - - - -- -RUN STATISTICS ---- - - - - -- time: 4/29/2013 @ 10.19
input file: C: \DrainMod \inputs \BOwi_Basin_Proposed.prj
parameters: free drainage and yields not calculated
drain spacing = 9144. cm drain depth = 15.2 cm
------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - --
DRAINMOD - -- WET PERIOD EVALUATION
version 6.1
Number of periods with water table closer than 30.00 cm
for at least 22 days. Counting starts on day
77 and ends on day 320 of each year
` YEAR Number of Periods Longest Consecutive
of 22 days or Period in Days
more with WTD
< 30.00 cm
- ------------ - - - - -- --------------------
1949 1. 71.
1950 3. 73.
1951 2. 37.
1952 2. 40.
1953 0. 19.
1954 1. 35.
1955 1. 53.
1956 2. 52.
1957 2. 49.
1958 2. 51.
1959 3. 37.
1960 1. 31.
1961 3. 40.
1962 4. 39.
1963 3. 46.
1964 2. 69.
1965 2. 60.
1966 3. 53.
1967 1. 91.
1968 1. 28.
1969 3 34.
1970 3. 34.
1971 2. 92.
1972 2. 41.
1973 1. 22.
1974 2. 63.
1975 4. 31.
1976 3. 67.
1977 2. 36.
1978 1. 35.
Page 1

Number of Years with at least one period =
Page 2
55. out of 64 years.
Bowl_Basln_Proposed.WET
1979
3.
52.
1980
2.
35.
1981
3.
37.
1982
1.
24.
1983
1.
52.
1984
3.
51.
1985
2.
56.
1986
0.
17.
1987
2.
53.
1988
2.
33.
1989
4.
58.
1990
4.
43.
1991
1.
98.
1992
2.
25.
1993
2.
53.
1994
0.
19.
1995
0
0.
1996
0.
0
1997
0.
0.
1998
0.
20.
1999
2.
79.
2000
2.
83.
2001
2.
59.
2002
3.
39.
2003
4
60
2004
2.
55.
2005
4.
42.
2006
2.
87.
2007
0.
12.
2008
2.
52.
2009
3.
34
2010
2
24.
2011
0.
21.
2012
1.
85.
Number of Years with at least one period =
Page 2
55. out of 64 years.

Mitigation Plan
Soil Delineation and Characterization
m
Bowl Basin Restoration Site

Mitigation Plan
97
l `
Bowl Basin Restoration Site --
1
J

Mitigation Plan Bowl Bann Restoration Site
A detailed soils investigation at the BBWRS was conducted by a licensed soil scientist (# 187) to
determine the extent and distribution of the hydric soils and to classify the predominate soils to the soil
series level The investigation consisted of delineating the hydric soil boundaries with pink flagging and
wooden survey stakes in accordance with the US Army Corps of Engineers, Wetland Delineation Manual
(1987) and the USDA Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States A Guide for Identifying and
Delineating Hydric Soils, Version 7 0 (2010) Areas that were identified as possible hydric soil mapping
units were surveyed at a higher intensity until the edge of the mapping unit was identified The
boundary of the hydric and non- hydric soil mapping units were then followed by continual sampling and
observations as the boundary line was identified and delineated In those areas where the boundary was
found to be a broad gradient rather than a distinct break, microtopography, landscape position, soil
textural changes, redoximorphic features, and depleted matrices were additionally considered to
identify the extent of the hydric soils
In developing a detailed soils map, several soil borings were advanced on the site in the general hydric
soil areas identified by landscape position, vegetation and slope Once the hydric soil borings were
identified, the soil scientist marked the points and established a visual line to the next auger boring
where again hydric soil conditions were confirmed by additional borings The soil scientist moved along
the edges of the mapping unit and marked each point along the line To confirm the hydric soil mapping
unit and taxonomic classification, soil borings were advanced to a depth of 50 inches The soil profile
descriptions identified the individual horizons in the topsoil and upper subsoil as well as the depth,
color, texture, structure, boundary, and evidence of restrictive horizons and redoximorphic features
Delineated hydric soils boundaries were in contrast to those mapped in the Soil Survey of Onslow
County, North Carolina The delineated hydric soil boundaries are shown in the following figure, Detailed
Soils Map
Taxonomic Classification
The predominant soils identified on the site were of the Pantego (Fine - loamy, siliceous, semiactive,
thermic Umbric Paleaquults) soil series The Pantego series is listed as a hydric soil in Onslow County,
North Carolina They are defined as hydric due to saturation for a significant period during the growing
season This soil is listed as hydric on the federal, state and local lists The Pantego series is also listed by
the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) as a hydric soil
Profile Description
The Pantego series is described as very deep, very poorly drained, moderately permeable soils that
formed in thick loamy sediments on the Southern Coastal Plain and Atlantic Coast Flatwoods Slopes are
less than 2 percent
98

Mitigation Plan Bowl Basin Restoration Site
Typical Pedon Description of the Pantego mapping unit
PANTEGO SERIES
TAXONOMIC CLASS. Fine - loamy, siliceous, semiactive, thermic Umbric Paleaquults
TYPICAL PEDON: Pantego loam -- cultivated field (Colors are for moist soil, unless otherwise indicated )
Ap - -O to 10 inches, black (10YR 2/1) loam, weak fine granular structure, very friable, many fine roots,
very strongly acid, gradual wavy boundary (0 to 12 inches thick)
A--10 to 18 inches, very dark gray (10YR 3/1) loam, weak fine granular structure, friable, very strongly
acid, clear smooth boundary (4 to 14 inches thick)
Bt - -18 to 27 inches, very dark gray (10YR 3/1) sandy clay loam, weak fine subangular blocky structure,
friable, few faint clay films on faces of peds and in pores, very strongly acid, gradual wavy boundary (0
to 18 inches thick)
Btg1 - -27 to 42 inches, gray (10YR 5/1) sandy clay loam, few fine and medium distinct mottles of
brownish yellow (10YR 6/6), weak fine and medium subangular blocky structure, friable, slightly sticky,
few faint clay films on faces of peds, very strongly acid, gradual smooth boundary
Btg2 - -42 to 55 inches, gray (10YR 6/1) sandy clay loam, few medium and coarse distinct mottles of
yellowish brown (10YR 5/6), weak fine subangular blocky structure, friable, slightly sticky, few faint clay
films on faces of peds, very strongly acid, gradual wavy boundary
Btg3 - -55 to 65 inches, gray (10YR 6/1) sandy clay loam, weak coarse subangular blocky structure, friable,
few faint clay films on faces of peds, very strongly acid (Combined thickness of the Btg horizons is 30 to
more than 60 inches )
TYPE LOCATION: Pitt County, North Carolina, 1/2 mile south of Winterville, North Carolina, on Highway
11, 100 feet west from road
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: Solum thickness is greater than 60 inches The soil is strongly acid, very
strongly acid, or extremely acid except where the surface has been limed
Some pedons have an Oa horizon that has hue of 10YR, value of 2 or 3, and chroma of 1, or it is neutral
and has value of 2 It is less than 8 inches thick
The A or Ap horizon has hue of 10YR or 2 5Y or is neutral, value of 2 or 3, and chroma of 0 to 2 It is
loamy fine sand, loamy sand, fine sandy loam, sandy loam, loam, or mucky analogues of these textures
Some pedons have an Eg horizon that has hue of 10YR or 2 SY or is neutral, value of 4 to 6, and chroma
of 0 to 2 It is loamy sand, loamy fine sand, sandy loam, fine sandy loam, or loam
Some pedons have a BEg horizon that has hue of 10YR or 2 5Y, value of 4 or 6, and chroma of 1 or 2 It is
loam, sandy loam, fine sandy loam, or sandy clay loam
M]

Mitigation Plan Bowl Basin Restoration Site
The Bt horizon, where present, has hue of 10YR or 2 5Y, value of 3, and chroma of 1 or 2 It has the same
textures as the Btg horizon
- The Btg horizon has hue of 10YR to 5Y, value of 4 to 7, and chroma of 1 or 2 with few to common
_ mottles of higher chroma The Btg horizon is sandy clay loam, sandy loam, sandy clay, or clay loam, fine
sandy loam, or sandy loam
Some pedons have a BCg horizon that has hue of IOYR or 2 5Y, value of 4 to 7, and chroma of 1 or 2 It is
` sandy clay loam, clay loam, sandy clay, sandy loam, or fine sandy loam
The Cg horizon, where present, has hue of 10YR or 2 5Y, value of 5 to 7, and chroma of 1 or 2 with
higher chroma mottles It is sandy clay loam, clay loam, sandy loam, fine sandy loam, loamy fine sand,
fine sand, loamy sand, or sand
100

Mitigation Plan Bowl Basin Restoration Site
-�1
101

COMMENTS
The Pantego series is a very poorly drained sod found on nearly level and slightly depressional areas of the Southern Coastal Plain and Atlantic Coast Flatwoods
This Panwp series is a drained hydnc soil by ditching.
This Pantego soil has very slow runoff and moderate permeability
DESCRIBED BY SFS „ R _ DATE 212&'2012
_ KT
ASSOCIAUS OP SOIL PROFILE DESCRIPTION
— rtaam CAROM% va
Client: KCI Associates of North Carolina, P A
f
Date: February 28, 2012 i
Project Bowl Basin
"eel #: 20111232P -WO 06
- County: Onslow,
State: NC
- Location: White Oak River Road
Sitell ot: Boring # I
Soil Series: Pantego
- -- Soil Classification: Fine -loamy, sdtceous, semiactive, thermic Umbnc Paleaquults
- AWT 22' SHWT: 0-12° Slope: 0-0/6
Aspect
Elevation: Drainage: Very Poorly Drained
Permenbility: Moderate f
Vegetation: Com
Borings terminated at 60 Inches
COMMENTS
The Pantego series is a very poorly drained sod found on nearly level and slightly depressional areas of the Southern Coastal Plain and Atlantic Coast Flatwoods
This Panwp series is a drained hydnc soil by ditching.
This Pantego soil has very slow runoff and moderate permeability
DESCRIBED BY SFS „ R _ DATE 212&'2012

KCI
ASSOCIATES
106CAAGWL% ?A
SOIL PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Client: KCI Associates of North Carolina, P A Date: February 28, 2012
Project: Bowl Basin Project H: 201 1 1232P -WO 06
County: Onslow State: NC
Location: White Oak River Road Site/Lot:- Borng # 2
Sou Series: Pantego
Soil CIMIllention: Fine - loamy, siliceous, semiactive, thermic Umbnc Paleaquults
AWT: 21° SHWT• 0-12" Slope: 0-1% Aspect:
Elevation: Drainage: Very Poorly Drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Com
Borings terminated at 60 Inches
COMMENTS
The Pantego series is a very poorly drained soil found on nearly level and slightly depressional areas of the Southern Coastal Plain and Atlantic Coast Flatwoods
This Pantego series is a drained hydnc sod by ditching
This Pantego sod has very slow runoffand moderate permeability
DESCRIBED BY
iATE
2/28/2012

KC I
o ASSOCIATES OPh
SOIL PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Client- KCI Associates of North Carolina, P A Date: February 28, 2012
Project: Bowl Basin Project #: 20111232P -WO 06
County: Onslow State: NC
Location: White Oak River Road Site/Lot- Boring k 3
Soll Series: Pantego
Son Classincatiou: Fine - loamy, siliceous, semiacuve, thermic Umbnc Paleaquults
AVYT: 50" SHI,YT: 0-12" Slope: 0-1% Aspect:
Elevation: Drainage. Very Poorly Drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Com
Borings terminated at 60 Inebes
COMMENTS
The Pantego series is a very poorly drained soil found on nearly level and slightly depressionl areas of the Southern Coastal Plain and Atlantic Coast Flatwoods
This Pantego series is a drained hydnc soil by ditching
This Pantego soil has very slow runoff and moderate permeability
DESCRIBED BY SFS A _ems y` ®1� DATE 2/28/2012
mm
COMMENTS
The Pantego series is a very poorly drained soil found on nearly level and slightly depressionl areas of the Southern Coastal Plain and Atlantic Coast Flatwoods
This Pantego series is a drained hydnc soil by ditching
This Pantego soil has very slow runoff and moderate permeability
DESCRIBED BY SFS A _ems y` ®1� DATE 2/28/2012

KC1 OF
C ASSOCIATES a
SOIL PROFILE DESCRIPTION
Client: KC( Associates of North Carolina, P A Date: February 28, 2012
Project: Bowl Bann Project q: 20111232P -WO 06
County: Onslow State: NC
Location- White Oak River Road Site(Ut: Boring g 4
Soil Series: Pantego
Soil classification: Fine - loamy, siliceous, semiactive, thermic Umbnc Paleaquults
AWT: 23" SHWT: 0-12" Slope: 0-1% Aspect:
Elevation: Drainage: Very Poorly Drained Permeability: Moderate
Vegetation: Com
Borings terminated at 50 Inches
COMMENTS
The Pantego series is a very poorly drained soil found on nearly level and slightly depressional areas of the Southern Coastal Plain and Atlantic Coast Flatwoods
This Pantego series is a drained hydnc sod by ditching
This Pantego sod has very slow runoff and moderate permeability
DESCRIBED BY
TE
2/28!2012

Mitigation Plan
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
106

Mitigation Plan Bowl Basin Restoration Site
107

Mitigation Plan
14.6 Appendix D. Project Plan Sheets
r �
108
Bowl Basin Restoration Site

Mitigation Plan
109
Bowl Basin Restoration Site
�J
J

ON
In
N
0
N
0
U
O
O
O
�I
ti
U
O
U
0
m
O
O
EZ
NC ISO PKa`NERRO o
3m 58
i
17
WHITE OAK RIVER RD
PROJECT \ �` °
LOCATION \ HOFMANN
1
FOREST � p
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
FROM RALEIGH TAKE 1-40 EAST TAKE EXIT 309 TO MERGE ONTO
US -70 EAST FOLLOW US -70 EAST TO KINSTON AT KINSTON TAKE
A RIGHT ONTO NORTH CAROLINA 58 SOUTH AND FOLLOW FOR
APPDX 30 MILES TURN RIGHT ONTO COUNTRY ROAD 1119 / DAVIS
FIELD ROAD TAKE THE FIRST LEFT ONTO STATE COUNTRY ROAD
1115 1POLE POCOSIN ROAD AND FOLLOW FOR 4 MILES TURN LEFT
ONTO STATE ROUTE 1116 / WHITE OAK RIVER ROAD AND FOLLOW
FOR 2 MILES TURN RIGHT ONTO COUNTRY ROAD 1118 / GIBSON
BRIDGE ROAD AND FOLLOW FOR 1 8 MILES TURN RIGHT ONTO
WHITE OAK RIVER ROAD ACCESS TO THE SITE WILL BE 3 MILES
DOWN ON THE LEFT JUST PAST THE DRIVEWAY AT 2457 WHITE OAK
RIVER ROAD
INDEX OF SHEETS
GRAPHIC SCALES
—50 —25 0 50 100
GRADING, PLANTING PLANS,
AND BOUNDARY MARKING
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT DATA
BOWL BASIN
RESTORATION SITE
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
WHITE OAK RIVER BASIN
UPPER WHITE OAK RIVER WATERSHED
03020106010010
SHEET 4, 5, 6, 10 -
'PO
X, >,X / Tim \\
I! >X" \\ NONRIPARIAN
WETLAND
RESTORATION \
j v
""x
� V I III
\ y
\ l
NONRIPARIAN WETLAND RESTORATION = 11 74 ACRES
Prepared In the Office of
KCI Associates
of North Caroliala, P.A.
�� SU1TE 220 LANDMARK CENTER II 4601SIX FORKS RD RALEIGH NC 27609
ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • ECOLOGISTS
GARY M MRYNCZA P E
PROJECT ENGINEER
JOE PFEIFFER
R'EILAND DESIGN
PROJECT ENGINEER
X1111111111111 '
♦��XXtM
CA
qd
SQL
p 32%33
7.
� /r111 11111 \11
TITLE SHEET
2
GENERAL NOTES & PROJECT LEGEND
3
DETAILS
0
GRADING PLAN
5
PLANTING PLAN
6
BOUNDARY MARKING PLAN
7 -10
EROSION CONTROL PLAN
GRAPHIC SCALES
—50 —25 0 50 100
GRADING, PLANTING PLANS,
AND BOUNDARY MARKING
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECT DATA
BOWL BASIN
RESTORATION SITE
ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
WHITE OAK RIVER BASIN
UPPER WHITE OAK RIVER WATERSHED
03020106010010
SHEET 4, 5, 6, 10 -
'PO
X, >,X / Tim \\
I! >X" \\ NONRIPARIAN
WETLAND
RESTORATION \
j v
""x
� V I III
\ y
\ l
NONRIPARIAN WETLAND RESTORATION = 11 74 ACRES
Prepared In the Office of
KCI Associates
of North Caroliala, P.A.
�� SU1TE 220 LANDMARK CENTER II 4601SIX FORKS RD RALEIGH NC 27609
ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • ECOLOGISTS
GARY M MRYNCZA P E
PROJECT ENGINEER
JOE PFEIFFER
R'EILAND DESIGN
PROJECT ENGINEER
X1111111111111 '
♦��XXtM
CA
qd
SQL
p 32%33
7.
� /r111 11111 \11
Prepared for
r�
ledlao&-�"yient
JEFF JUREK
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR
STATF
TITAI
C.
005012
�®
A
SUBIAMEOW HMRIGATIONPIAN
MAY 21313
REVISIONS
Prepared for
r�
ledlao&-�"yient
JEFF JUREK
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR

GENERAL NOTES
BEARING AND DISTANCES:
ALL BEARINGS ARE NAD 1983 GRID BEARINGS
ALL DISTANCES AND COORDINATES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL (GROUND) VALUES.
ALL INFORMATION IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING KCI CONTROL POINTS.
NORTHING EASTING ELEVATION
KCI #1 431663 37 2502919 11 4071
KCI #2 431132 74 2504613 14 4441
KCI #3 430815 65 2504045 12 4200
KCI #4 432506 51 2502946 29 3920
GRADING
- PROPOSED GRADE LINES IN THE PLANS ARE A GENERAL GUIDE FOR GRADING EXACT TIE OUTS FROM THE DITCH TO THE
RESTORED WETLAND SHALL BE GRADED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER.
UTILITY /SUBSURFACE PLANS
-NO SUBSURFACE PLANS ARE AVAILABLE ON THIS PROJECT EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED.
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING A UTILITY LOCATOR AND ESTABLISHING THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY
AND ALL EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE PROJECT REACH.
Ir, Of
tAr
t '
SEAL
32%33
9'
5
a
0
k
m
Z
0
w
o �
U
t=
UV0c
IL r �
PROJECT LEGEND
w �Q
�Z
10
WETLAND MITIGATION TOPOGRAPHY x Z o0
M111 z x
Proposed Filled Ditches ;,�;, Mlnor Contour Line Z e�
Z
w
Proposed Ditch Plug ® Major Contour Line
Proposed Stabilized Drainage Outfall Proposed Contour z
J
LU w
tz Q
U
Z _
MISCELLANEOUS Q o 0
m Z
Existing Woods Line n'�'1 0 o
CO (n U
LU 3
O
J
f�
Z
O
SCALE. N T S
GENERAL
NOTES &
PROJECT
LEGEND

EXISTING DITCH
�B
A - - -- - -- -- fA
A J
4 EXISTING GRADE ELEVATION
---47 EXISTING DITCH BOTTOM
0
SECTION A -A
DITCH PLUG DETAIL
DITCH PLUG o
EXISTING GRADE ELEVATION
VAR EXISTING VAR
DITCH WIDTH
SECTION B -B
DITCH B
PLUG
PLAN VIEW
SCALE NTS
NOTE
SEE PLAN SHEETS FOR LOCATIONS OF DITCH PLUGS
USE SELECT MATERIAL, CLASS I OR SUITABLE
SALVAGED MATERIAL, IF AVAILABLE FOR DITCH PLUGS
FINISHED WETLAND GRADE
SELECT MATERIAL, oo �o
CLASS I o 5' MIN —Q �C� WETLAND OUTFACE TO RECEIVING WATER
j / / / ° o Q� `� �.
�� /�� �/ ,b opO� -- 6 TIE BOTTOM OF STRUCTURE INTO
��� j���o0 Do0 oCPQ c� EXISTING BANKS /OUTFALLATLEAST
po grCoo� ooQ�ppQ 0 5' BELOW GRADE
`doh -,ri.4
�5MIN'
CLASS ISTONE
PROFILE VIEW
STABILIZED DRAINAGE OUTFALL
SCALE NTS
NOTE
IF AVAILABLE SUITABLE SALVAGED MATERIAL
MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR SELECT MATERIAL, CLASS I
�r•' : • i
i• •m
•
• 32733
'y''da�►
*witu.t%��.
g
F
Cai
0
W
k
N
z
0
o �
U
4
ON
N
F
u N
1�1 z W F N
Q
U 5Z
�`s m arc
w
06
41F
O
Z
z a�
z
w
z
O
H a
U
Z U) _
V5 Z
Q o O
CO H zz
�
00 Z Z)
CD N O
W
0
z
0
DETAILS

Igo
380
i�� 3775
�I�C\
\I y o
-80 -40 0 80 160
PROPOSED DITCH
Ny \\ \ RE -ROUTE PATH
GRAPHIC SCALE °m vvvv
,�-
I��I 7N \ 1I
II II vA \ \�\
III \
NOTE SURFACE ROUGHENING WILL
OCCUR THROUGHOUT THE EASEMENT
TO ALLEVIATE SOIL COMPACTION AND
TO ENHANCE SURFACE WATER STORAGE
�) it
0 11
'II
�I II
\ 405 4
405
INSTALL DITCH 7 41-
PLUG (TYP) /
3
I
0
N�
T \
DISPERSE FLOW `\
- - FROM DITCH \
I
N \
\r
i
I
\� \ \\ INSTALL STABILIZED / / \ �O \\ ��9 .•
DRAINAGE OUTFACE \ \� IN
R 38 0 \ �
395 `\ \\ �' �., HAE1. �.•''
!!!1111111111
\
39
\ \
\°O 39 5 \ \I \ \
KCI#2 \
/ O \ \
405 /
yr I
I
40 5
\ 3951 \ \ \
I 1 \
1 \ \
\ ` \
\ 1 DISPERSE FLOW \
\ FROM DITCH \ \
+ \ \
395 39" A
1 9
/�O 35��1
39 5 / \
395 \
` i p /
'1 39 I 405
5 rl /
4 /
/
DISPERSE FLOW /
1 I FROM DITCH
GRADE SWALE
/
2 1 0- I 1 DISPERSE FLOWOFROM
ADJACENT PROPERTY /
A � /
/
AA /
\y �
g
O
x
3
0
E
N
IOI
w
o �
U
f ��g
C
W
w
F
z w
sZ
o N NJ
V
�¢ W
1U
z 0
z O
3 a
z
W
Z
J
O
Lu
I- a
Z Fn L) _
Z H
Q L
m Z
2
J O Z
m W O
O
J
Z
O
wh. MAY 2013
�SCNE GRAPHIC
GRADING
PLAN
I SHEET 4 OF 10 1
` ts1� /1111 /111!1,1
go
\ <\
o
375 S
\ r
r j, _
\
32733 •
\ /
405 /
yr I
I
40 5
\ 3951 \ \ \
I 1 \
1 \ \
\ ` \
\ 1 DISPERSE FLOW \
\ FROM DITCH \ \
+ \ \
395 39" A
1 9
/�O 35��1
39 5 / \
395 \
` i p /
'1 39 I 405
5 rl /
4 /
/
DISPERSE FLOW /
1 I FROM DITCH
GRADE SWALE
/
2 1 0- I 1 DISPERSE FLOWOFROM
ADJACENT PROPERTY /
A � /
/
AA /
\y �
g
O
x
3
0
E
N
IOI
w
o �
U
f ��g
C
W
w
F
z w
sZ
o N NJ
V
�¢ W
1U
z 0
z O
3 a
z
W
Z
J
O
Lu
I- a
Z Fn L) _
Z H
Q L
m Z
2
J O Z
m W O
O
J
Z
O
wh. MAY 2013
�SCNE GRAPHIC
GRADING
PLAN
I SHEET 4 OF 10 1

\ C
/ \\ \\ 'I�IIIII i11j1j M
4
SEAL
\N 32733
t _
-80 -40 0 80 160
GRAPHIC SCALE \\ �hAEI. �'�•
WETLAND PLANTING PLAN
NON - RIPARIAN WETLAND RESTORATION
HARDWOOD FLATS VEGETATIVE COMMUNITY (SEASONALLY SATURATED)
8 53 AC 1,11 /,�
18 -24 BARE ROOT MATERIAL li \�\ ✓ `/� // ��\ \ — \\ `
968 STEMS /ACRE (9 X 5 SPACING) RANDOM SPECIES PLACEMENT
COMMONNAME SCIENTIFIC NAME WETLAND INDICATOR %OFTOTAL #OF PLANTS
SWAMP CHESTNUT OAK QUERCUS MICHAUXII FACW- 20 1700 '\f \�%\
GREEN ASH FRAXINUS PENNSYLNAVICA FACW 20 1 700 II \' / \ / \ / \� °`�� \\ I
WILLOW OAK QUERCUS PHELLOS FACW- 15 1 300 i\�
RIVER BIRCH BETULA NIGRA FACW 20 1 700 I I I\ \/ \ / \ / ' ' / ,/ a oy \
BALD CYPRESS TAXODIUM DISTICHUM OBL 10 900 '1 "A`V �\ \ �` w / N KCI#2 L
RED MAPLE ACER RUBRUM FAC 5 400 �U k`�/ \, \ ���.
LAUREL OAK QUERCUS LAURIFOLIA FACW 5 400
PEPPERBUSH CLETHRAALNIFOLIA FACW 5 400
100 6300
NOTE THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE STEMS MAYBE CHANGED AT THE ENGINEERS
DISCRETION HOWEVER ONE SPECIES MAY OCCUPY NO MORE THAN 25% OF THE / P, /
TOTAL STEMS AND AT LEAST FIVE SPECIES MUST BE USED / I'l ��� �V�� �A
oa
WET LAND PLANTING PLAN v -al v' ,� V/ >< \x/ wo
/ VwvvA �.�`i� 0, i
NON - RIPARIAN WETLAND RESTORATION / / �\\ / \,' \ , / \ .'� / �/ `/ / \ / /\ / \ ' /\ r i 'ice / \ \�\�a I I I� I� Z x _
HARDWOOD FLATS VEGETATIVE COMMUNITY (SEASONALLY INUNDATED)
v A/
18 -24 BARE ROOT MATERIAL V ` v. v V//`.
968 STEMS/ACRE (9 X 5 SPACING) RANDOM SPECIES PLACEMENT
COMMONNAME SCIENTIFIC NAME WETLAND INDICATOR % TOTAL #OF PLANTS
SWAMP CHESTNUT OAK QUERCUSMICHAUXII FACW- 15 500 \/ \ '/X
GREEN ASH FRAXINUS PENNSYLNAVICA FACW 10 400 'v\ �� /x' /\
RIVER
UTTONBUSH EPHALANTHUSOCCIDENTALIS BL� 10 400 �I� Y 1��� '
B C O A�� \/
-SWAMP TUPELO - NYSSABIFLORA
-OBL
10
400
/ . �1 V/ v�A /\
_..
/. / / A�� /
Z
WATER TUPELO NYSSA AQUATICA
BALD CYPRESS TAXODIUMDISTICHUM
RED MAPLE ACER RUBRUM
PEPPERBUSH CLETHRAALNIFOLIA
OBL
OBL
FAC
FACW
15
20
5
5
500
700
200
200
\/V�4� \ /V�,
�N 'C� v / /A / V/ V �� / \��� /
Fp �; ��VA v/
�. v �\v /
°- Av/ /
LU
F_
w
Q
100
3200
v
�' \ /'\/ / / ,�A/ v/ V AAA
% /��� 'V > \
2 \ -� \/ \/\
/
v
/ %VA� / /
Z
�j
Z
V
2
/� / \1 \ \/\
iy \ / \n / \/ �/ /
NOTE THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE STEMS MAY BE CHANGED AT THE ENGINEER S '^F '` / /\ /\%\ /\ / \, / \ / \�\
3Fy/\
\ \ /
/ /�'�\
/I\,�\%\ y
X
<
Q 0
m P
D:
O
Z
DISCRETION HOWEVER ONE SPECIES MAY OCCUPY NO MORE
THAN 25 %OFTHE
/1 '> /Xv"v/A / \/\ �/A
' //
TOTAL STEMS AND AT LEAST FIVE SPECIES MUST BE USED a / A
}
,/��V /A / \ /��\ ,qA
/v 9 /` / V / \/
m
0O
_
���
X\
—
��
\
W
L)
/ //I `yo- / - \ \ W
MBE MAY 2013
SMIE. GRAPHIC
PLANTING
PLAN
b -
/ a\
I SHEET 5 OF 10
/

/
1
i
1
i
EASEMENT BOUNDARY MARKING
THE EASEMENT BOUNDARY WILL BE MARKED
WITH METAL POSTS AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SIGNS AT THE CORNERS AND AT A MINIMUM OF 200'
INTERVALS ALONG THE BOUNDARY
O5/8 REBAR 30 IN LENGTH WITH 3 114 ALUMINUM CAPS
ON ALL EASEMENT CORNERS CAPS SHALL MEET EEP
SPECIFICATIONS ((BERNSTEN RBD5325 IMPRINTED WITH
NC STATE LOGO t1B9087 OR EQUIVALENT) AFTER
INSTALLATION CAPS SHALL BE STAMPED WITH THE
CORRESPONDING NUMBER
•6-FOOT TALL DURABLE WITNESS POST ALONG BOUNDARY
OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT POSTS SHALL BE MADE
OF MATERIAL THAT WILL LAST A MINIMUM OF 20 YEARS
THE PROVIDER SHALL ATTACH A CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SIGN TO EACH WITNESS POST AND PLACE ADDITIONAL SIGNS
AT NO MORE THAN 75 -FOOT INTERVALS ON BOUNDARY LINES
-80 -40 0 80 160
GRAPHIC SCALE
h\ u
92�
/
\�L
\ 16%4 Aro
SEAL
\ \ '�' \ \ p i• 32733
\ 'pO ` �7•
\
KCI #2 `
\
\
/ p /
\
G 1
1 i
111 ➢/ 1 � ` /
a
AA- !
/ \,
5
0
a
E
s
m
y
zl
4
p -,
j n
f
w
N
� om
w N�
~y= Da
S z
LL vOi N J
�s a as
W
o<
Z N F
iliz
z a5
w
z
W w
~ U
Z U _
UJ Z
EEDD O z
H
�
O z
m W O
0
J
N
Z
0
SLNF
BOUNDARY
MARKING
PLAN
% \ \
III
II
\\ \
)\ o
\ \U a\
` \\\ \\
III
\\
1 \w \
11
I
1
\\
ri
y
` \ry�
\
\
C
\
I
1
1
�I
—A'
40 \'
�q
\\A
\
92�
/
\�L
\ 16%4 Aro
SEAL
\ \ '�' \ \ p i• 32733
\ 'pO ` �7•
\
KCI #2 `
\
\
/ p /
\
G 1
1 i
111 ➢/ 1 � ` /
a
AA- !
/ \,
5
0
a
E
s
m
y
zl
4
p -,
j n
f
w
N
� om
w N�
~y= Da
S z
LL vOi N J
�s a as
W
o<
Z N F
iliz
z a5
w
z
W w
~ U
Z U _
UJ Z
EEDD O z
H
�
O z
m W O
0
J
N
Z
0
SLNF
BOUNDARY
MARKING
PLAN

NOTES
1 IT IS THE INTENT OF THESE PLANS THAT AS SOON AS AN AREA OF GRADING
S COMPLETE IT SHALL BE STABILIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EROSION
CONTROL PRACTICES DESCRIBED IN THESE PLANS DUE TO THE ANTICIPATED
DURATION AND SEQUENCE OF THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, THE
CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO MINIMIZE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, THE AMOUNT
OF THE AREA THAT IS DISTURBED AT ONE TIME
2 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE EVERY REASONABLE PRECAUTION
THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT TO PREVENT EROSION
AND SEDIMENTATION EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND
MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT PLANS, NORTH CAROLINA
SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL GUIDELINES AND AS DIRECTED BY
THE DESIGNER
3 ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHALL BE STOCKPILED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE FOR LATER USE AS EMBANKMENT MATERIAL THE CONTRACTOR
IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING APPROPRIATE STABILIZATION MEASURES
AROUND THE STOCKPILE AREA(S) AND ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SPOIL
AND TOPSOIL PILES TO PREVENT EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION
4 IN THE EVENT OF A STORM THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
REMOVAL OR PROTECTION OF ANY EQUIPMENT TOOLS, MATERIALS OR
OTHER ITEMS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE WORK THAT COULD BE AFFECTED
BY STORMWATER
5 AFTER THE WETLAND GRADING CALLED FOR IN THE PLANS IS COMPLETED,
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY INSTALL APPROPRIATE STABILIZATION
MATERIALS AS CALLED FOR IN THE PLANS TO STABILIZE THE SOIL AND PROVIDE
IMMEDIATE SEDIMENT /EROSION CONTROL
6 EACH SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE WILL BE REMOVED AFTER ALL
WORK IN THE CORRESPONDING CONSTRUCTION PHASE HAS BEEN
COMPLETED AND THE AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED
7 THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND STAGING AREA IDENTIFIED ON THE
PLANS PROVIDE THE ONLY ACCESS POINTS INTO THE LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE NO ADDITIONAL ACCESS POINTS SHALL BE USED WITHOUT
APPROVAL OF THE DESIGNER
8 SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE LOW SIDE OF ANY TEMPORARY
OR PERMANENT SPOIL AND TOPSOIL PILES ALL SPOIL MATERIAL SHALL
STAY ON THE SITE AND SHALL NOT BE REMOVED FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
9 ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES WILL BE CHECKED FOR
STABILITY AND FUNCTIONAL OPERATION FOLLOWING EVERY RUNOFF
PRODUCING RAIN EVENT AND /OR AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK ANY NEEDED
MAINTENANCE OR REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY TO MAINTAIN ALL
MEASURES AS DESIGNED ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM
CONTROL MEASURES WHEN THEY REACH APPROXIMATELY 50% OF THEIR
FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY THESE MEASURES SHALL BE REPAIRED IF DISTURBED
DURING MAINTENANCE ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE FERTILIZED, RESEEDED
AND MULCHED AS NECESSARY TO PROMOTE THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
VEGETATION COVER
10 THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND EROSION CONTROL CONTACT FOR THIS SITE
IS TIM MORRIS OFFICE PHONE - 919 - 783 -9214 CELL PHONE - 919- 793 -6886
GROUND STABILIZATION
SITE AREA
STABILIZATION
DESCRIPTION
TIME FRAME
PERIMETER DIKES
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
SWALES, DITCHES
7 DAYS
AND SLOPES
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
HIGH QUALITY
BRIDGE MAT STREAM CROSSING
WATER (HQW)
7 DAYS
ZONES
DITCH PLUG
SLOPES STEEPER
STABILIZED DRAINAGE OUTFALL
THAN 3 1
7 DAYS
SLOPES 3 1 OR
FLATTER
7 DAYS
ALL OTHER AREAS
WITH SLOPES FLATTER
7 DAYS
THAN 4 1
INSPECTIONS
WEEKLY INSPECTIONS REQUIRED
RAIN GAUGE MUST BE PRESENT AT SITE
INSPECTIONS REQUIRED AFTER 0 5" RAIN EVENTS
INSPECTIONS ARE ONLY REQUIRED DURING
"NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS"
INSPECTION REPORTS MUST BE AVAILABLE
ON -SITE DURING BUSINESS HOURS UNLESS A SITE
SPECIFIC EXEMPTION IS APPROVED
RECORD MUST BE KEPT FOR 3 YEARS AND
AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST
ELECTRONICALLY - AVAILABLE RECORDS MAY BE
SUBSTITUTED UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS
SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
RESPONSIBLE FOR FOLLOWING T
THE CONTRACTOR IS HE SEQUENC E OF CONSTRUCTION IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS AS DIRECTED BY THE
DESIGNER CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED IN THE SPECIFIED MANNER UNLESS OTHERWISE
DIRECTED OR APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS, ALONG WITH THE
INSTRUCTIONS CONTAINED IN THE PLANS CONSTITUTE THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION
PHASE 1 INITIAL SITE PREPARATION
A IDENTIFY PROJECT BOUNDARY, LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE, SENSITIVE AREAS STAGING AREAS,
STABILIZED ENTRANCES, AND ACCESS POINTS WITH THE DESIGNER
B CONSTRUCT ENTRANCE AND STAGING AREAS AND THEIR ASSOCIATED SEDIMENT AND EROSION
CONTROL DEVICES IN A MANNER TO SUPPORT EXECUTION OF THE WETLAND RESTORATION IN
PHASES AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS AND AS DIRECTED BY THE DESIGNER
PHASE 2 RE -ROUTE DITCH
A GRADE NEW DITCH DIVERSION LOCATED AT NORTH SIDE OF PROJECT
i CLEAR VEGETATION AS NEEDED TO INSTALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
u COMPLETE DITCH GRADING AS DIRECTED IN THE PLANS
in SEED AND MULCH COMPLETED WORK AREAS
B INSTALL DITCH PLUG LOCATED AT WEST SIDE OF PROJECT TO COMPLETE WATER DIVERSION TOWARDS
NEW RE- ROUTED DITCH ENSURE NEW DITCH IS STABILIZED PRIOR TO INTRODUCING WATER
PHASE 3 WETLAND RESTORATION GRADING (EAST AND SOUTH SIDES)
A FILL EXISTING DITCH AND COMPLETE GRADING (EAST SIDE)
i INSTALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS DEPICTED ON THE PLANS
u FILL DITCH'S' AND'C' AND GRADE AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS USING ADJACENT SPOIL MATERIAL
MAKING SURE TO DEWATER THE EXISTING DITCHES PRIOR TO FILLING
in SEED AND MULCH COMPLETED WORK AREAS THIS SHALL BE DONE WITHIN 72 HOURS OF
REACHING FINAL GRADE WHEN FILLING DITCHES /DEPRESSIONS
B PROPERTY GRADING AND FILLING EXISTING DITCH (SOUTH SIDE)
i INSTALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS DEPICTED ON THE PLANS
u GRADE SOUTHERN PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON PLANS
in USING SPOIL FROM B -u FILL DITCH D' AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS, AND INSTALL ASSOCIATED
DITCH PLUGS MAKING SURE TO DEWATER THE EXISTING DITCHES PRIOR TO FILLING
iv SEED AND MULCH COMPLETED WORK AREAS THIS SHALL BE DONE WITHIN 72 HOURS OF
REACHING FINAL GRADE WHEN FILLING DITCHES /DEPRESSIONS
C FILL EASTERNMOST DITCH
i ONCE PHASE 3 - SECTION A AND B HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND STABILIZED REMOVE THE
SILT FENCE ALONG DITCH W AND FILL IT AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS USING PRIOR STOCKPILED
SPOIL MATERIAL, MAKING SURE TO DEWATER THE EXISTING DITCHES PRIOR TO FILLING
n INSTALL PROPOSED STABILIZED DRAINAGE OUTFALL STRUCTURE LOCATED AT THE END OF DITCH W
in SEED AND MULCH COMPLETED WORK AREAS THIS SHALL BE DONE WITHIN 72 HOURS OF
REACHING FINAL GRADE WHEN FILLING DITCHES /DEPRESSIONS
D FILL EXISTING DITCH AND GRADING (WEST SIDE)
i ONCE PHASE 3 - SECTION A B AND C HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND STABILIZED REMOVE THE
SILT FENCE ALONG DITCH'E' AND FILL DITCHES'E' AND'F' AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS USING
SPOIL MATERIAL MAKING SURE TO DEWATER THE EXISTING DITCHES PRIOR TO FILLING
u SEED AND MULCH COMPLETED WORK AREAS THIS SHALL BE DONE WITHIN 72 HOURS OF
REACHING FINAL GRADE WHEN FILLING DITCHES /DEPRESSIONS
E SURFACE ROUGHENING
i BEGINNING ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE WETLAND RESTORATION AREA AND PROGRESSING
TOWARDS THE SOUTHERN SIDE OF THE SITE ROUGHEN THE SOIL TO AN APPROXIMATE DEPTH OF
8" TO ALLEVIATE COMPACTION AND MIMIC NATURAL WETLAND MICROTOPOGRAPHY THIS WILL
INCREASE THE STORAGE OF SURFACE WATER IN THE WETLAND AND PROMOTE VEGETATION
ESTABLISHMENT
u SEED AND MULCH COMPLETED WORK AREAS THIS SHALL BE DONE WITHIN 72 HOURS OF
SURFACE ROUGHENING
PHASE 4 TREE PLANTING
A PLANTS SHOULD BE PLANTED DURING THE DORMANT SEASON (NOVEMBER 17 - MARCH 17)
B PREPARE AND PLANT TREES IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLAN SHEETS 7 -10 AND AS DIRECTED BY THE
DESIGNER
PHASE 5 COMPLETION OF PROJECT SITE
A PHASE 5 CAN BE INITIATED AFTER THE WETLAND GRADING WORK IS COMPLETED AFTER THE SITE IS
STABLIZED WITH REQUIRED VEGETATIVE COVER AND PRIOR TO PHASE 4
B REMOVE ALL REMAINING WASTE MATERIALS AND THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND RESTORE THE
REMAINING STAGING AND STOCKPILING AREAS AND CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES TO THEIR PRIOR
CONDITION SEED AND MULCH ALL DISTURBED AREAS UTILIZING THE SEED /MULCH MIXES SPECIFIED IN
THE PLANS
SEDIMENTATION & EROSION
56
CONTROL PLAN LEGEND
40
DITCHES TO BE FILLED
40
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
40
SILT FENCE
—SF_
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
_ Loo —
BRIDGE MAT STREAM CROSSING
ROCK SILT SCREEN (STD DRAWING 1636 01)
DITCH PLUG
STABILIZED DRAINAGE OUTFALL
'pf1��/111j
C+
• sm
32733
+III IIIfi�``
TEMPORARY SEED MIX
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UTILIZE THE FOLLOWING SEED /FERTILIZER
MIX IN SEEDING ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS
SUMMER MIX (MAY 15 - AUGUST 15)
GERMAN MILLET SETARIA ITALICA 20 LBS/ACRE
BROWNTOP MILLET UROCHLOA RAMOSA 20 LBS /ACRE
WINTER MIX (AUGUST 15 - MAY 15)
RYE GRAIN SECALE CEREALS
PERMANENT SEED MIX
SUMMER MIX (MAY 15— AUGUST 15)
WINTER MIX (AUGUST 15 — MAY 15)
SPECIES
REDTOP PANICGRASS - PANICUM RIGIDULUM
BEAKED PANICGRASS - PANICUM ANCEPS
RIVER OATS - CHASMANTHIUM LATIFOLIUM
VIRGINIA WILDRYE - ELYMUS VIRGINICUS
SWITCHGRASS - PANICUM VIRGANTUM
LEATHERY RUSH - JUNCUS CORIACEUS
120 LBS /ACRE
APPLICATION RATE (IN MIX)
% OF MIX LBS/ACRE
28
56
20
40
20
40
20
40
10
20
2
04
100
FERTILIZER 750 LBS /ACRE
LIMESTONE 2000 LBS / ACRE
FERTILIZER SHALL BE 10 -10 -10 ANALYSIS UPON SOIL ANALYSIS
A DIFFERENT RATIO OF FERTILIZER MAY BE USED
SEEDBED PREPARATION
THE SEEDBED SHALL BE COMPRISED OF LOOSE SOIL AND NOT
COMPACTED THIS MAY REQUIRE MECHANICAL LOOSENING
OF THE SOIL SOL AMENDMENTS SHOULD FOLLOW THE FERTILIZER
AND LIMING DESCRIPTION IN THE ABOVE SECTIONS FOLLOWING
SEEDING MULCHING SHALL FOLLOW THE BELOW APPLICATION
METHODS AND AMOUNTS AREAS CONTAINING SEVERE SOIL
COMPACTION WILL BE SCARIFIED TO A DEPTH OF 8 INCHES
MULCHING
SEEDED AREAS ARE TO BE PROTECTED BY SPREADING STRAW MULCH
UNIFORMLY TO FORM A CONTINUOUS BLANKET (75% COVERAGE = 2
TONS /ACRE)
20
NOTE FERTILIZER IS ONLY TO BE APPLIED ONCE IF TEMPORARY SEED
AND FERTILIZER IS APPLIED PRIOR TO PERMANENT SEED THEN FERTILIZER
SHALL NOT BE APPLIED WITH THE PERMANENT SEED
z
a
z
c
w
r-
m
h
z
0
w
o �
U
r� J�
f �s
1L QN
m
w oz
o N m J
0K
K/Q m oa
w z
z mF
z e�
w
Q
Z
J
LU w
I— Q
Z U5 U _
U5 Z
Q O O
m H Z
00 � Z
OQ O
W 3
O
cn
Z
O
EROSION
CONTROL
PLAN

NOTES
- MATTING SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR
TO THE INTRODUCTION OF WATER TO
RE- ROUTED DITCH SECTION
- MATTING SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG
BOTH SIDES OF NEW DITCH LENGTH
- MATTING SHALL EXTEND FROM TOE
OF SLOPE TO THE TOP OF BANK
aG c(/ .��e.7', °.PAC
,� h
�x��w+3'i'� of
EXCELSIOR MATTING
UNDERLAIN BY SEED
AND FERTILIZER
GROUND
EXCELSIOR MATTING FOR RE- ROUTED DITCH
SCALE NTS
CLASS'A' STONE
81N MIN DEPTH
(OVER FILTER FABRIC)
NOTES
1 TURNING RADIUS SUFFICIENT TO ACCOMODATE LARGE
TRUCKS SHALL BE PROVIDED
2 ENTRANCE(S) SHOULD BE LOCATED TO PROVIDE FOR UTILIZATION
BY ALL CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES
3 MUST BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT
TRACKING OR DIRECT FLOW OF MUD ONTO STREETS PERIODIC
TOPDRESSING WITH STONE WILL BE NECESSARY
4 ANY MATERIAL TRACKED ONTO THE ROADWAY MUST BE CLEANED
UP IMMEDIATELY
5 GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE LOCATED AT ALL
POINTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS UNTIL SITE IS STABILIZED
FREQUENT CHECKS OF THE DEVICE AND TIMELY MAINTENANCE
MUST BE PROVIDED
6 INSTALL A CULVERT IF NECESSARY TO ACCOMODATE ROADWAY
DRAINAGE
7 SIDE SLOPES FOR ENTRANCE MUST BE AT LEAST 2 1 SLOPE
STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
SCALE NTS
NOTES
USE CLASS I STONE FOR
STRUCTURAL STONE
USE STONE NO 57 FOR
SEDIMENT CONTROL
CONSTRUCT SILT SCREEN A
MAXIMUM OF 1 FT ABOVE
NORMAL FLOW DEPTH
TOP OF BANK
TOP VIEW
TOP OF BANK —
1{ MIN 2 _ �A
r
2 y:
3MAx��5�Y�, a
STONE R57 1 STREAM BED
STRUCTURAL
STONE 1-6 MIN
CROSS SECTION FRONT VIEW
TEMPORARY ROCK SILT SCREEN
SCALE NTS
DITCH CROSSING MAINTENANCE
1 INSPECT TEMPORARY CROSSING
AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT FOR
ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS
BLOCKAGE EROSION OF ABUTMENTS
AND OVERFLOW AREAS DITCH
SCOUR RIPRAP DISPLACEMENT OR
PIPING ALONG CULVERTS
2 REMOVE DEBRIS, REPAIR AND
REINFORCE DAMAGED AREAS
IMMEDIATELY TO PREVENT FURTHER
DAMAGE TO THE INSTALLATION
A]
AJ
PLAN
MAT
"1" STONE
FOR APPROACH
STABILIZATION
EXISTING
DITCH
FILTER FABRIC
FOR DRAINAGE
SECTION AA
NOT TO SCALE
1 BRIDGE LOCATIONS DEPICTED ON SITE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE AND
ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DEPENDING ON THE AREA THAT IS BEING
WORKED UPON
2 WIDTH OF EACH MAT IS DEPENDENT ON THE SIZE OF THE EQUIPMENT
MEANT TO CROSS IT
3 DISTANCE BETWEEN MATS IS DEPENDENT ON THE DISTANCE BETWEEN
TRACKS ON THE EQUIPMENT MEANT TO CROSS IT
4 APPROACH STABILIZATION COMPOSED OF CLASS 1 STONE WILL BE
REQUIRED FOR EACH SECTION OF THE BRIDGE
BRIDGE MAT CROSSING
PLACE AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS AND APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER
ff•/fIN1111111
••'•PZN SRO I
. SEAL
S
p : 32733 • + =
II /11 /l /fffff
s
0
a
F
0
r
h
}
Oct;
�(z zw N
w t,:
n 10
3 y Iw
W mU
z 0
z
z <�
z
w
W
H
Z W
Z
m0
H
00
m�
N
W
Q
Z
O
U
2
H
O
z
z
O
U
O
z
O
EROSION
CONTROL
PLAN
z
0
N
W
8 MAX
METAL POST
12Y2 GAUGE MIN
(1 33 lb PER
MIDDLE AND VERTICAL WIRES
LINEAR FOOT)
10 GAUGE MIN
TOP AND BOTTOM
17 077 77
STRAND
w _
� i iii i i�iii
i-111-1 f l
Li�
i �ili
imJmi�iiIT
I I
—
FILTER FABRIC
I I
—'
WIRE
FILTER FABRIC
NOTES
USE WIRE A MINIMUM OF 32"
COMPACTED FILL
IN WIDTH AND WITH A MINIMUM
OF 6 LINE WIRES WITH 12' STAY
SPACING
_
USE FILTER FABRIC A MINIMUM
OF 36' IN WIDTH AND FASTEN
ADEQUATELY TO THE WIRE AS
DIRECTED BY THE DESIGNER
EXTENSION OF
LL I I
PROVIDE 5' STEEL POST OF THE
FABRIC AND
I STEEL POST
SELF - FASTENER ANGLE STEEL TYPE
WIRE INTO TRENCH
I I 2 -0" DEPTH
I I
SILT FENCE DETAIL
L
NOT TO SCALE
NOTES
USE CLASS I STONE FOR
STRUCTURAL STONE
USE STONE NO 57 FOR
SEDIMENT CONTROL
CONSTRUCT SILT SCREEN A
MAXIMUM OF 1 FT ABOVE
NORMAL FLOW DEPTH
TOP OF BANK
TOP VIEW
TOP OF BANK —
1{ MIN 2 _ �A
r
2 y:
3MAx��5�Y�, a
STONE R57 1 STREAM BED
STRUCTURAL
STONE 1-6 MIN
CROSS SECTION FRONT VIEW
TEMPORARY ROCK SILT SCREEN
SCALE NTS
DITCH CROSSING MAINTENANCE
1 INSPECT TEMPORARY CROSSING
AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT FOR
ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS
BLOCKAGE EROSION OF ABUTMENTS
AND OVERFLOW AREAS DITCH
SCOUR RIPRAP DISPLACEMENT OR
PIPING ALONG CULVERTS
2 REMOVE DEBRIS, REPAIR AND
REINFORCE DAMAGED AREAS
IMMEDIATELY TO PREVENT FURTHER
DAMAGE TO THE INSTALLATION
A]
AJ
PLAN
MAT
"1" STONE
FOR APPROACH
STABILIZATION
EXISTING
DITCH
FILTER FABRIC
FOR DRAINAGE
SECTION AA
NOT TO SCALE
1 BRIDGE LOCATIONS DEPICTED ON SITE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE AND
ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DEPENDING ON THE AREA THAT IS BEING
WORKED UPON
2 WIDTH OF EACH MAT IS DEPENDENT ON THE SIZE OF THE EQUIPMENT
MEANT TO CROSS IT
3 DISTANCE BETWEEN MATS IS DEPENDENT ON THE DISTANCE BETWEEN
TRACKS ON THE EQUIPMENT MEANT TO CROSS IT
4 APPROACH STABILIZATION COMPOSED OF CLASS 1 STONE WILL BE
REQUIRED FOR EACH SECTION OF THE BRIDGE
BRIDGE MAT CROSSING
PLACE AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS AND APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER
ff•/fIN1111111
••'•PZN SRO I
. SEAL
S
p : 32733 • + =
II /11 /l /fffff
s
0
a
F
0
r
h
}
Oct;
�(z zw N
w t,:
n 10
3 y Iw
W mU
z 0
z
z <�
z
w
W
H
Z W
Z
m0
H
00
m�
N
W
Q
Z
O
U
2
H
O
z
z
O
U
O
z
O
EROSION
CONTROL
PLAN
z
0
N
W

VICI-AEL VORTON
SIN °40,001858S7
Eh 1700 PG 673
I
/
4
\ VICHAEL & DANA
SHRr)UT 1
\ PIN 540300306294
BIB 21b5 PG 300 1
/ 1
1 �1
�2
\ VIC'1AEL & WANDA \
VORTON
\ PIN 540300405592 \
\ BIB 16E1 0u E69 \
\ RA" & 12NE1H F-EATH
PIN 5403003_'873_`
V °I. 2319 PC 301
\
SEAL
p 32733
AEL
I
\ I I
PROPOSED I l
STABILIZED \
CONSTRUCTION I 1 1
ENTRANCE
I -
\r\
` PROPOSED I
STAGINGAREA
EDWARD G PRIDC EN SR I I
GIN 540300-19097 /
61. 1 F 73 Pi 131 EXISTING GRAVEL /
ACCESS DRIVE / NOAH TORBERSON
Ills PIN 540300321313 /
ACCESSED / BIv 3599 PC 448 i
hid ,
—
11
EDWARD & SABRINA
ElIZARD
Iilil 0 N 7 'IN 5403002,9000
EIS 1�47 PC, 279
I
I I ✓�� 1
� \i1,3s� 111M
o"
�4
NN ' \0
1
11
it
it
i/
it
t HARLEC CLA'
it
- 6EASLE"
it
PIN `_4030040' °OF
6, 3E74 P9 305
tl
/
-ji
u
11ti
4—,
-100 -50 0 100 200
\ GRAPHIC SCALE
HOD3E' 6UILDINC I \
ISTOPHER HOWVAN COVPAN" \ '
IN 5403003,8593 PIN 540300_'18609
\EI, 3807 PG 273 91. 3677 PG 767 I \
\ �0
\ \ 4
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA = 19 9 AC
I
3
O
F
i
r
3
0
s
h
z
Z
0
W
O a.
r�
�p
r•�
� 00
m N�
W�
w _¢
o U 7Z
v N QOK
W �U
2 F
I[111 Y vim
ww
Z oga
w
z
0
Lu
~
Z U 2
Z
Q O O
m I— z
3 < �
O z
mw o
Of o
z
O
I MTE MAY 2013 1
EROSION
CONTROL
PLAN

I �
PROPOSED p
EXISTING GRAVEL o O STAGING AREA 9�
ACCESS DRIVE
I
PROPOSED II I \ \ \ \\
STABILIZED _
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE I — I LOD 40� LOD
LOD �-
PROPOSED I yI
ACCESS '1380
i�f J 11 \I
III Iq\
I II 14\
-80 -40 0 80 160
GRAPHIC SCALE
eq
o III \U\ INSTALL TEMPORARY
O I� I \111 BRIDGE MAT CROSSING
ICI I 111\ /
III 1 \\ / yFl
14 :\ 101
\ +
405
lil
Iil
I PR(
SP(
II
II
) II INSTALL ROCK 1
I SILT SCREEN (TYP)
OI11
}
+
405 \
/ I
/ III PLUG LL DITCH O •
,I e
it �p2
II
\ 405
405
'Op\ —41 DITCH F
\
\1
N
F� 1
\
UI \
\
\ \ flfflfNlf!!
111,14 CAno
•
SEAL
PROPOSED DITCH
RE ROUTE PATH i 'p A
/\ O \
INSTALL STABILIZED •�� ����
DRAINAGE OUTFALL / \ i ,
\ 1
(NP)
( ( 1 405 I
1
\ 9+ I
\I 39511
1
\ I
I \
i n 395 395
+
OS ,
DITCH C
i/
DITCH E /
ii 1 I
395� 1
395
402 Z 1 4C
+
`moo,
I X11 p� 1
/
I
DITCH A \ Z-A \
KCI #2 \
\
\
_ , \
395
395
DITCH'D / /
l n i
N
405+
NOTE TEMPORARY BRIDGE MAT
CROSSING MAY BE MOVED AS
NECESSARY AND AS APPROVED
BY THE DESIGNER
5
r
x
0
w
i
m
lol
olW
O Q-
U
tom!
F
N
H
0.0 z W F�
�o N QC
W 0V
z mF
[7 a
w
Z
J
W 0'
H U
Z � 2
Z
m O Z
00 }}
� Z
m O
W 3:
O
J
N
Z
O
EROSION
CONTROL
PLAN
\
\
\
DITCH A \ Z-A \
KCI #2 \
\
\
_ , \
395
395
DITCH'D / /
l n i
N
405+
NOTE TEMPORARY BRIDGE MAT
CROSSING MAY BE MOVED AS
NECESSARY AND AS APPROVED
BY THE DESIGNER
5
r
x
0
w
i
m
lol
olW
O Q-
U
tom!
F
N
H
0.0 z W F�
�o N QC
W 0V
z mF
[7 a
w
Z
J
W 0'
H U
Z � 2
Z
m O Z
00 }}
� Z
m O
W 3:
O
J
N
Z
O
EROSION
CONTROL
PLAN