Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20211285 Ver 2_Buffer and/or Stream Determination_20210916KCI ASSOCIATES OF NC I50 9001:2008 CERTIFIED ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS 4505 Falls of Neuse Rd., Suite 400 • Raleigh, NC 27609 • Phone 919-783-9214 • Fax 919-783-9266 September 15, 2021 Ms. Katie Merritt NCDWR — 401 and Buffer Permitting Branch 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Subject: Request for Buffer Determination 20211285v1 Oakley's Bend Restoration Site Person County, North Carolina Dear Ms. Merritt; KCI has completed a delineation of streams and wetlands for the above referenced project. The attached information, including required forms, tables, and figures, is submitted for your review. A preliminary jurisdictional determination request is also being sent to April Norton with the USACE. Project Description & Methodology As shown in Figure 1, the Oakley's Bend Creek Restoration Site is located in Person County, NC within the Tar -Pamlico River Basin (USGS HUC 03020101). This delineation was performed in compliance with methodology set forth in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetland Delineation Manual (USACE 1987) and subsequent guidance including the Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement. Streams were assessed for potential jurisdiction under the CWA using field indications of ordinary high water mark and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11. Wetlands and surface waters were delineated using survey flagging at regular locations along the wetland - upland boundary. All boundaries either form complete polygons, tie to surface water features such as streams or ponds, or tie to the edge of the project area. Streams points were collected using sub -meter GPS technology at representative points to depict center lines. Wetland Determination Forms were completed for each type of wetland community encountered. Delineation Results Figure 2 is presented using the Moriah US Geological Survey 1:24,000 Quadrangle Map. Figure 3 presents the results of the delineation, including streams and wetlands overlaid on 2017 Statewide Aerial Photographs. Figure 4 is presented using the Person County NRCS Soil Survey Map 12. THE MOST INCREDIBLE THING WE'VE ENGINEERED IS OUR TEAM WWW.KCI. COM Table 1 presents detailed information on the potential stream within the project area, including status (ephemeral, intermittent or perennial), length, width, NCDWQ Score, USGS/NRCS mapped, and latitude/longitude. Based on field data, approximately 6,108 linear feet of stream are present within the project area. Table 2 presents detailed information on each potential wetland feature including NC Wetland Assessment Method type, Hydrologic Class, Cowardin Class, size, representative wetland delineation form identification, and latitude/longitude. Based on field data, there are approximately 7.05 acres of wetlands present within the project area. If you have any questions, need additional information, or would like to schedule a site visit, please contact me at your earliest convenience at (919) 278-2517 or joe.sullivan@kci.com. Sincerely, KCI Associates of North Carolina gdL Joseph Sullivan Environmental Scientist Attachments: - Stream Origin/Buffer Applicability Determination - Table 1: Stream Summary Table - Table 2: Wetland Summary Table - Figure 1: Vicinity Map - Figure 2: USGS Map - Figure 3: Potential WOTUS Map - Figure 4: NRCS Soil Survey Map - Stream and Wetland Data Forms - Offers to Purchase Easement Restrictions Cc. April Norton, USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office THE MOST INCREDIBLE THING WE'VE ENGINEERED IS OUR TEAM W W W. KC I. COM Stream Origin/Buffer Applicability Determination Processing Information Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk * below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all mandatory questions are answered. Project Name:* Oakley's Bend Restoration Site Is this a transportation project?* C Yes a No Is this request for a mitigation site?* (• Yes r No What type of request is this?* 17 Buffer rJ IP Stream Determination r Isolated Wetland Check all that apply. Owner/Applicant Information rJ Stream Owner Information Name on the Recorded Deed:* Forest L Oakley Responsible Party : (for LLC, Corporations, businness, agency, etc.) Telephone Number: How would you like to received your determination?* rJ USPS E Email Mailing Address:* Street Address 4201 NC Highway 96 Address Line 2 City State / Rovince / Region Oxford NC Rbstal / Zip Code Country 27565 US Name on the Recorded Deed:* Joshua Bethel Responsible Party : (for LLC, Corporations, businness, agency, etc.) Telephone Number: How would you like to received your determination?* rJ USPS r` Email Mailing Address:* Street Address 331 Latta Dr. Address Line 2 C]ty State / Province / Region Rougemont NC I3stal / Zip Code Country 27572-7144 US Is there an agent or consultant responsible for the request?* r Yes ✓ No Attach agent authorization letter:* Bethel MOC.pdf Oakley MOC.pdf I1F only Agent/Consultant Information 33.81 KB 34.85KB Agent/Consultant Information How would you like to receive your r USPS determination letter?* r: Email Name of Agent:* Company Name:* Email Address:* Joseph Sullivan KCI Technologies joe.sullivan@kci.com Project and Site Information Project Information Has anyone form DWR done a previous site visit?* ✓ Yes ✓ No (' Other RT Site visit is scheduled for 7/27 with Erin Davis Date of Visit: 7/27/2021 Site Information .................................................................. Nearest Highway/Street:* Fitch Oakley Rd Nearest Town:* Nearest Named Stream:* River Basin:* Roxboro Cub Creek Tar -Pamlico County: * Person Please attach a map of the site indicating project boundaries on the USGS 1:24,000 Topo. Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent OakleysBend_Fig02_USGS_Topo.pdf 582.11 KB Rif file type only TOPO map look up: https://viewer.nationalmap.gov/basic/ Please attach a map of the site indicating project boundaries on the NRCS Soil Survey. Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent OakleysBend_NRCS_Soil_Map.pdf 827.3KB RIf file type only Soil Survey Link: https://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/surveylist/soils/survey/state/?stateld=NC Latitude and Longitude Please provide the Latitude and Longitude for physical location for the determination that. If you have a physical address you can look up the Latitude and Longitude by typing in an address or filling out the information manually. Choose below how you would like to r Address Lookup provide this information. r Manually Latitude: Longitude: Misc attachments: 36.3076 -78.8146 Sign and Submit OakleysBend_Stream_Forms.pdf 460.74KB OakleysBend_Fig09_Site_Fldpn_WQ_S... 732.34KB pdf or lace file types only By digitally signing below, I certify that: o I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form; o I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act") o I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act"); o I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND o I intend to electronically sign and submit the "Determination Request" form." Signature * Oakley's Bend Restoration Site Stream and Wetland Tables September 2021 Table 1. Stream Name Stream Status Length (Feet) Width (Feet) NCDWQ Score Mapped Latitude Longitude Oakley's Bend Perennial 2,740 10 - NRCS/USGS 36.3071 -78.8160 T1 Perennial 2,382 5 30 NRCS/USGS 36.3034 -78.8175 T2 Intermittent 245 4 26 - 36.3094 -78.8134 T3 Ephemeral 741 3 16 NRCS/USGS 36.3068 -78.8139 Table 2. Wetland ID NCWAM Hydrologic Class Cowardin Class Size (Acres) USACE WET Forms UP Latitude Longitude Wl Headwater Forest Riparian PEM* 3.86 X X 36.3071 -78.8160 W2 Headwater Forest Riparian PEM* 1.05 WI W1 36.3034 -78.8175 W3 Bottomland Hardwood Forest Riparian PFO 1.17 X W1 36.3094 -78.8134 W4 Headwater Forest Riparian PFO* 0.84 W3 W1 36.3068 -78.8139 W5 Bottomland Hardwood Forest Riparian PEM* 0.13 Wl W1 36.3079 -78.8181 X = Data Forms Completed; PFO = Palustrine Forested; PEM = Palustrine Emergent; * = Vegetation has been disturbed by agriculture Page 1 of 1 Project Location: Person County, NC Peed Rd ✓r i a 1 V tr.I a a m re I IC CC 1 E nU 1 O 3 1 w G 1 1:.) U Get l&ntet' Project Easement Rd Geotge< 0 0.25 0.5 Miles FIGURE 1. PROJECT SITE VICINITY MAP OAKLEY'S BEND RESTORATION SITE PERSON COUNTY, NC %a Data Source: ESRI World Street Map 03020101010010 03020201010040 Project Easement (45.96 ac) Project Watershed (1,243 ac / 1.94 sqmi) 14 Digit HUC Boundary 03020101010020 0 1,000 2,000 Feet FIGURE 2. USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OAKLEY'S BEND RESTORATION SITE PERSON COUNTY, NC Source: USGS National Map, Moriah Quadrangle Project Easement (45.96 ac) Intermittent Streams Perennial Streams Ephemeral Channel Existing Wetlands 0 150 300 Feet FIGURE 3. POTENTIAL WOTUS OAKLEY'S BEND RESTORATION SITE PERSON COUNTY, NC Sources: NC Statewide Orthoimagery, 2017. u J Jr 0 250 500 Feet FIGURE 4. NRCS SOIL SURVEY OAKLEY'S BEND RESTORATION SITE PERSON COUNTY, NC N ASource: NRCS Soil Survey, Person County (1995) Sheet 12 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4 Date: 1 /d f Project/Site: C70,' . 6eA1 Latitude: 3 :, 3(j Evaluator: 3 i clll 1Nfntn County: i5on Longitude: - -], c % ` Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if z 19 or perennial if Z 30* D Stream Detarminatian (circle one) Ephemeral Intermitter Perennial p z Other e.g.Quad Name: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = - -...5 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong la- Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1; 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 JU 2 3 3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence 0 07 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 3) 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 , 3 6. Depositional bars or benches _ 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits fLP1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 2 3 9. Grade control 0 0. 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No -� Yes = 3 racial ditches are not rated; see discu Hydrolo Subtotal = B. 9Y ons in manual 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria Qj 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5C 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris (0) 1 _ 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5) 1 1.5 17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0 (Yes =-3) . Biology (Subtotal = 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 (% 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed () 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 ' 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 1 2 3 22. Fish 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish t 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae S 0.5 1 -; 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5'Other = 0 `perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: I. is, " r1 Sketch: Tl Perenk;ol NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: l /r4 f Project/Site: a Berd Latitude: `- ',?34 Evaluator: J ' Gt', County: ?etc �, Longitude: - 'si'5 Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if z 19 or perennial if 2 30* Stream Determination (c Ephemeral Intermitter) Perennial Other e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 1 ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong la. Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 LP 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2) 3 3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence 0 1 2) 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 ) 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 ) 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 T1A: 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 1 3 9. Grade control 0 0.5 T 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 0.5 ) 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 ;• Yes = 3 artificial ditches are not rated; see dip ussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 d 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria (b) 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter (.1.5) 1 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 , 0.5'' 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5 ,1 , 1.5 17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 C. Biolociv (Subtotal = 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 L2a 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed I:3) 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 ` 2) 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks () 1 2 3 22. Fish 6, 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish 6) 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians c " 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae ; cl 0.5 1 - - _ 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1,5 Other = 0 *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. f---- Notes: Mrs nq 1r-1-') k t� ,. 'Act. Sketch: To, NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: ' J F 4 Project/Site: C),,y_let S13eet) Latitude: 4 Evaluator: • t t t',r County: P e Longitude: _ ii $e,4 Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if z 19 or perennial if 2 30' Stream Dote ' ' circle one) E hemeral Intermittent erennial p Other e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = i 4.7 ) Absent 0 Weak 1 Moderate Strong 3 la. Continuity of channel bed and bank 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 3 3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence 0 1 9. 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 d:, 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 ( 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 2 3 9. Grade control 0 LO 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 5 ' 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel L (' No =1Or Yes = 3 itches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 (2'.,• 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria ,0---0 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1°• 0.5 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.' 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0` 1 1.5 17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0 , Yes = 3, . ttlology (Subtotal = 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 ;2 j 1 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3. 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 ? , 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 01, 1 2 3 22: Fish 0.5 1 1.5 _ 23. Crayfish 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae 0.5 1 --� 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed _ FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0) *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. __ - Notes: a. Ni.,},A.,k-v 1 Sketch: NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: a6 ,1 ,E Project/Site: Ci„1 < .711t Latitude: ''))L 3o Evaluator: �, �� � ��� County: ty ( �,� Longitude: (_ Total Points: Stream is at least intermittent if z 19 or perennial if z 30* Stream-I�etgrmination (circle one) /Ephemeral ntermittent Perennial Other e.g. Quad Name: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ) Absent Weak Moderate Strong 18a Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 ( 1) 2 3 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool, ripple -pool sequence 0 2 3 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1/ 2 3 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 ,1 T 2 3 6. Depositional bars or benches 0. 1 2 3 7. Recent alluvial deposits t7 j 1 2 3 8. Headcuts 0 (1 2 3 9. Grade control 0 ‘,0:) 1 1.5 10. Natural valley 0 k.(1.5'' 1 1.5 11. Second or greater order channel No = () Yes = 3 artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = ) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 ;, 2 3 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria (Dt 1 2 3 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 , 0.5 .. 0 15. Sediment on plants or debris �Qw) 0.5 1 1.5 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 ; 0.51 1 1.5 17. Soil -based evidence of highiwater table? No = 0 ' Yes = 3 Biology (Subtotal = 18. Fibrous roots in streambed . 3 2 '!1`, 0 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed ( 2 1 0 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) r 0-, 1 2 3 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0j 1 2 3 22. Fish C0) 0.5 1 1.5 23. Crayfish ib 0.5 1 1.5 24. Amphibians (0f 0.5 1 1.5 25. Algae (9 0.5 1 ---. 1.5 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0~ *perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. - Notes: Sketch: WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Concave Surface (B8) (B10) (B16) Table (C2) (C8) on Aerial Imagery (C9) Plants (D1) (D2) (D3) Relief (D4) (D5) Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Shallow Aquitard Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 50% of total cover: = Total Cover 20% of total cover: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0' 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Concave Surface (B8) (B10) (B16) Table (C2) (C8) on Aerial Imagery (C9) Plants (D1) (D2) (D3) Relief (D4) (D5) Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Shallow Aquitard Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 50% of total cover: = Total Cover 20% of total cover: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0' 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point: Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Concave Surface (B8) (B10) (B16) Table (C2) (C8) on Aerial Imagery (C9) Plants (D1) (D2) (D3) Relief (D4) (D5) Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Shallow Aquitard Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 50% of total cover: = Total Cover 20% of total cover: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) Prevalence Index = B/A = (B) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0' 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Dark Surface (S7) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136) Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 RI 11111111111i11111111111m Doc No: 392078 Recorded; 02/28/2021 04:11:29 PM Fee Amt: 328.00 Page 1 of 1 Person County North Carolina Tanya R. Wilson, Register of Deeds BK 1069 PG 23 - 23 (1) Memorandum of Contract to Purchase Real Estate Prepared by / return to: Timothy J. Morris, KCI Enviromnental Technologies and Construction Inc., 4505 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 400 Raleigh, NC 27609. Re: Tax Map and Parcel Number: A108-8 Joshua Bethel (collectively and severally, "Seller"), whose address is 331 Latta Drive, Rougemont NC 27572 and KCI Environmental Technologies and Construction, Inc. a Delaware corporation ("Purchaser"), whose address is 4505 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 400 Raleigh, NC 27609, have entered into a contract to sale and purchase easement restrictions on the following property located in Person County, North Carolina: PIN: 0953-00-51- 5174.000. This Memorandum of Contract will terminate 18 months from the date ofthis Memorandum and is recorded at the Register of Deeds in the Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina. Witness our hands and seals thisZ 6 day of afigid72021. shua Bethel STATE OF Nor 4.1 C4.>"olirt ck COUNTY OF peg Sbh I, the undersigned, a Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that Joshua Bethel personally appeared before me this day and aeowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official seal this the day of bruarl/ , 2021. ► . V�GI/VG� l p nt .1 nameOttwom Wa .cLeet, Notary Public My commission expires: D'i--31-2M Document shows proof /acknowledgement before officer authorized to take proof /acknowledgement; acknowledgement includes officer's signature, co Iss10 ratiort,date,official seal, if required. Allis Pe Tanya T y my Register of Deeds VI IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIn1I111111 Doc No: 391999 Recorded: 02123/2021 02:38:17 PM Fee Amt: $26.00 Page 1 of 1 Person County North Carolina Tonya R. Wilson, Register of Deeds BK 1068 PG 394 - 394 (1) Memorandum of Contract to Purchase Real Estate Prepared by / return to: Timothy J. Morris, KCI Environmental Technologies and Construction Inc., 4505 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 400 Raleigh, NC 27609. Re: Tax Map and Parcel Number: A108-6 Forest L. Oakley (collectively and severally, "Seller"), whose address is 4201 NC Highway 96, Oxford, NC 27565 and KCI Environmental Technologies and Construction, Inc. a Delaware corporation ("Purchaser"), whose address is 4505 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 400 Raleigh, NC 27609, have entered into a contract to sale and purchase easement restrictions on the following property located in Person .County, North Carolina: PIN: 0952-00-49- 5345.000. This Memorandum of Contract will terminate 18 months from the date of this Memorandum and is recorded at the Register of Deeds in the Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina. Witness our hands and seals this G�day of cur..} 2021. 4.141Z4e,c, Forest L. Oakley STATE OF ' MAY-4% Vj n-ai n� COUNTY OF VA - c t . I, the undersigned, a Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that Forest L. Oakley personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official seal this the Lday of F.e tcAyii , 2021. name: ;h Notary Public mmission expi . s: L 14 • Document shows proof/acknowledgement before officer authorized to take proof/acknowledgement; acknowledgement includes officers signature, com ssiopIRV° dgte,offfcial seal, if required. 1]'�1 Tonya R. ils, Person o n Register of Deeds c itilfrrl aim • AUBuo 4: 1.4% ,�,/ �` co 'rrrr r n„„0