HomeMy WebLinkAbout20211285 Ver 2_Buffer and/or Stream Determination_20210916KCI
ASSOCIATES OF NC
I50 9001:2008 CERTIFIED
ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SCIENTISTS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
4505 Falls of Neuse Rd., Suite 400 • Raleigh, NC 27609 • Phone 919-783-9214 • Fax 919-783-9266
September 15, 2021
Ms. Katie Merritt
NCDWR — 401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Subject:
Request for Buffer Determination
20211285v1 Oakley's Bend Restoration Site
Person County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Merritt;
KCI has completed a delineation of streams and wetlands for the above referenced project. The attached
information, including required forms, tables, and figures, is submitted for your review. A preliminary
jurisdictional determination request is also being sent to April Norton with the USACE.
Project Description & Methodology
As shown in Figure 1, the Oakley's Bend Creek Restoration Site is located in Person County, NC within
the Tar -Pamlico River Basin (USGS HUC 03020101). This delineation was performed in compliance with
methodology set forth in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetland Delineation Manual
(USACE 1987) and subsequent guidance including the Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional
Supplement. Streams were assessed for potential jurisdiction under the CWA using field indications of
ordinary high water mark and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) Stream
Identification Form, Version 4.11.
Wetlands and surface waters were delineated using survey flagging at regular locations along the wetland -
upland boundary. All boundaries either form complete polygons, tie to surface water features such as
streams or ponds, or tie to the edge of the project area. Streams points were collected using sub -meter GPS
technology at representative points to depict center lines. Wetland Determination Forms were completed
for each type of wetland community encountered.
Delineation Results
Figure 2 is presented using the Moriah US Geological Survey 1:24,000 Quadrangle Map. Figure 3 presents
the results of the delineation, including streams and wetlands overlaid on 2017 Statewide Aerial
Photographs. Figure 4 is presented using the Person County NRCS Soil Survey Map 12.
THE MOST INCREDIBLE THING WE'VE ENGINEERED IS OUR TEAM WWW.KCI. COM
Table 1 presents detailed information on the potential stream within the project area, including status
(ephemeral, intermittent or perennial), length, width, NCDWQ Score, USGS/NRCS mapped, and
latitude/longitude. Based on field data, approximately 6,108 linear feet of stream are present within the
project area.
Table 2 presents detailed information on each potential wetland feature including NC Wetland Assessment
Method type, Hydrologic Class, Cowardin Class, size, representative wetland delineation form
identification, and latitude/longitude. Based on field data, there are approximately 7.05 acres of wetlands
present within the project area.
If you have any questions, need additional information, or would like to schedule a site visit, please contact
me at your earliest convenience at (919) 278-2517 or joe.sullivan@kci.com.
Sincerely,
KCI Associates of North Carolina
gdL
Joseph Sullivan
Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
- Stream Origin/Buffer Applicability Determination
- Table 1: Stream Summary Table
- Table 2: Wetland Summary Table
- Figure 1: Vicinity Map
- Figure 2: USGS Map
- Figure 3: Potential WOTUS Map
- Figure 4: NRCS Soil Survey Map
- Stream and Wetland Data Forms
- Offers to Purchase Easement Restrictions
Cc. April Norton, USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
THE MOST INCREDIBLE THING WE'VE ENGINEERED IS OUR TEAM W W W. KC I. COM
Stream Origin/Buffer Applicability Determination
Processing Information
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk * below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Name:* Oakley's Bend Restoration Site
Is this a transportation project?* C Yes a No
Is this request for a mitigation site?* (• Yes r No
What type of request is this?*
17 Buffer rJ IP Stream Determination
r Isolated Wetland
Check all that apply.
Owner/Applicant Information
rJ Stream
Owner Information
Name on the Recorded Deed:* Forest L Oakley
Responsible Party : (for LLC, Corporations, businness, agency, etc.)
Telephone Number:
How would you like to received your determination?*
rJ USPS E Email
Mailing Address:*
Street Address
4201 NC Highway 96
Address Line 2
City State / Rovince / Region
Oxford NC
Rbstal / Zip Code Country
27565 US
Name on the Recorded Deed:*
Joshua Bethel
Responsible Party : (for LLC, Corporations, businness, agency, etc.)
Telephone Number:
How would you like to received your determination?*
rJ USPS r` Email
Mailing Address:*
Street Address
331 Latta Dr.
Address Line 2
C]ty State / Province / Region
Rougemont NC
I3stal / Zip Code Country
27572-7144 US
Is there an agent or consultant responsible for the request?*
r Yes
✓ No
Attach agent authorization letter:*
Bethel MOC.pdf
Oakley MOC.pdf
I1F only
Agent/Consultant Information
33.81 KB
34.85KB
Agent/Consultant Information
How would you like to receive your r USPS
determination letter?* r: Email
Name of Agent:*
Company Name:*
Email Address:*
Joseph Sullivan
KCI Technologies
joe.sullivan@kci.com
Project and Site Information
Project Information
Has anyone form DWR done a previous site visit?*
✓ Yes
✓ No
(' Other
RT Site visit is scheduled for 7/27 with Erin Davis
Date of Visit: 7/27/2021
Site Information
..................................................................
Nearest Highway/Street:* Fitch Oakley Rd
Nearest Town:*
Nearest Named Stream:*
River Basin:*
Roxboro
Cub Creek
Tar -Pamlico
County: *
Person
Please attach a map of the site indicating project boundaries on the USGS 1:24,000 Topo.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
OakleysBend_Fig02_USGS_Topo.pdf 582.11 KB
Rif file type only
TOPO map look up: https://viewer.nationalmap.gov/basic/
Please attach a map of the site indicating project boundaries on the NRCS Soil Survey.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
OakleysBend_NRCS_Soil_Map.pdf 827.3KB
RIf file type only
Soil Survey Link: https://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/surveylist/soils/survey/state/?stateld=NC
Latitude and Longitude
Please provide the Latitude and Longitude for physical location for the determination that. If you have a
physical address you can look up the Latitude and Longitude by typing in an address or filling out the
information manually.
Choose below how you would like to r Address Lookup
provide this information. r Manually
Latitude:
Longitude:
Misc attachments:
36.3076
-78.8146
Sign and Submit
OakleysBend_Stream_Forms.pdf 460.74KB
OakleysBend_Fig09_Site_Fldpn_WQ_S... 732.34KB
pdf or lace file types only
By digitally signing below, I certify that:
o I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
o I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the
"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act")
o I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes
(the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
o I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written
signature; AND
o I intend to electronically sign and submit the "Determination Request" form."
Signature *
Oakley's Bend Restoration Site
Stream and Wetland Tables
September 2021
Table 1.
Stream Name
Stream Status
Length
(Feet)
Width
(Feet)
NCDWQ
Score
Mapped
Latitude
Longitude
Oakley's Bend
Perennial
2,740
10
-
NRCS/USGS
36.3071
-78.8160
T1
Perennial
2,382
5
30
NRCS/USGS
36.3034
-78.8175
T2
Intermittent
245
4
26
-
36.3094
-78.8134
T3
Ephemeral
741
3
16
NRCS/USGS
36.3068
-78.8139
Table 2.
Wetland
ID
NCWAM
Hydrologic
Class
Cowardin
Class
Size
(Acres)
USACE
WET
Forms
UP
Latitude
Longitude
Wl
Headwater Forest
Riparian
PEM*
3.86
X
X
36.3071
-78.8160
W2
Headwater Forest
Riparian
PEM*
1.05
WI
W1
36.3034
-78.8175
W3
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Riparian
PFO
1.17
X
W1
36.3094
-78.8134
W4
Headwater Forest
Riparian
PFO*
0.84
W3
W1
36.3068
-78.8139
W5
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Riparian
PEM*
0.13
Wl
W1
36.3079
-78.8181
X = Data Forms Completed; PFO = Palustrine Forested; PEM = Palustrine Emergent; * = Vegetation has been disturbed by agriculture Page 1 of 1
Project Location:
Person County, NC
Peed Rd
✓r
i a 1
V tr.I
a
a
m
re I
IC
CC 1
E nU 1
O
3 1
w G 1
1:.)
U
Get
l&ntet'
Project Easement
Rd
Geotge<
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
FIGURE 1. PROJECT SITE VICINITY MAP
OAKLEY'S BEND RESTORATION SITE
PERSON COUNTY, NC
%a
Data Source: ESRI
World Street Map
03020101010010
03020201010040
Project Easement (45.96 ac)
Project Watershed (1,243 ac / 1.94 sqmi)
14 Digit HUC Boundary
03020101010020
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
FIGURE 2. USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
OAKLEY'S BEND RESTORATION SITE
PERSON COUNTY, NC
Source: USGS National Map,
Moriah
Quadrangle
Project Easement (45.96 ac)
Intermittent Streams
Perennial Streams
Ephemeral Channel
Existing Wetlands
0
150
300
Feet
FIGURE 3. POTENTIAL WOTUS
OAKLEY'S BEND RESTORATION SITE
PERSON COUNTY, NC
Sources: NC Statewide
Orthoimagery, 2017.
u
J Jr
0
250
500
Feet
FIGURE 4. NRCS SOIL SURVEY
OAKLEY'S BEND RESTORATION SITE
PERSON COUNTY, NC
N
ASource: NRCS Soil Survey,
Person County (1995) Sheet 12
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4
Date: 1 /d f
Project/Site: C70,' . 6eA1
Latitude: 3 :, 3(j
Evaluator: 3 i clll 1Nfntn
County: i5on
Longitude: -
-], c %
`
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if z 19 or perennial if Z 30*
D
Stream Detarminatian (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermitter Perennial
p
z
Other
e.g.Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = - -...5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la- Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1;
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
JU
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
07
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
3)
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2 ,
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
_
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
fLP1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No -�
Yes = 3
racial ditches are not rated; see discu
Hydrolo Subtotal =
B.
9Y
ons in manual
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
Qj
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5C
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
(0)
1
_
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5)
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
(Yes =-3)
. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
(%
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
()
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1 '
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
t
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
S
0.5
1 -; 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5'Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: I. is, " r1
Sketch:
Tl Perenk;ol
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: l /r4 f
Project/Site: a Berd
Latitude: `-
',?34
Evaluator: J
' Gt',
County: ?etc �,
Longitude: -
'si'5
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if z 19 or perennial if 2 30*
Stream Determination (c
Ephemeral Intermitter) Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 1 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
LP
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2)
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2)
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2 )
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
)
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
T1A:
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
T
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
)
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0 ;•
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see dip ussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
d
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
(b)
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
(.1.5)
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
, 0.5''
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
,1 ,
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biolociv (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
L2a
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
I:3)
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
` 2)
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
()
1
2
3
22. Fish
6,
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
6)
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
c "
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
; cl
0.5
1 - - _
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1,5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. f----
Notes: Mrs nq 1r-1-') k t� ,. 'Act.
Sketch:
To,
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: ' J F 4
Project/Site: C),,y_let S13eet)
Latitude: 4
Evaluator: • t t t',r
County: P e
Longitude: _ ii $e,4
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if z 19 or perennial if 2 30'
Stream Dote ' ' circle one)
E hemeral Intermittent erennial
p
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = i 4.7
)
Absent
0
Weak
1
Moderate
Strong
3
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
9.
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
d:,
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
(
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
LO
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
5 '
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
L
(' No =1Or
Yes = 3
itches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
(2'.,•
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
,0---0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1°•
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.'
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0`
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
, Yes = 3,
. ttlology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
;2 j
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3.
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
? ,
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
01,
1
2
3
22: Fish
0.5
1
1.5
_ 23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1 --� 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
_
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0)
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. __ -
Notes: a. Ni.,},A.,k-v 1
Sketch:
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: a6 ,1 ,E
Project/Site: Ci„1 < .711t
Latitude: ''))L 3o
Evaluator: �, �� � ���
County:
ty ( �,�
Longitude: (_
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if z 19 or perennial if z 30*
Stream-I�etgrmination (circle one)
/Ephemeral ntermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
( 1)
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1/
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
,1 T
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0.
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
t7 j
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
(1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
‘,0:)
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
k.(1.5''
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = ()
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1 ;,
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
(Dt
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
, 0.5 ..
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
�Qw)
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
;
0.51
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of highiwater table?
No = 0
'
Yes = 3
Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed .
3
2
'!1`,
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
(
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
r 0-,
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0j
1
2
3
22. Fish
C0)
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
ib
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
(0f
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
(9
0.5
1 ---.
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0~
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. -
Notes:
Sketch:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(B10)
(B16)
Table (C2)
(C8)
on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D3)
Relief (D4)
(D5)
Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns
Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines
Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water
Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows
Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Shallow Aquitard
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic
Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
50% of total cover:
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist)
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(B10)
(B16)
Table (C2)
(C8)
on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D3)
Relief (D4)
(D5)
Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns
Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines
Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water
Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows
Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Shallow Aquitard
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic
Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
50% of total cover:
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist)
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks
(B6)
Concave Surface (B8)
(B10)
(B16)
Table (C2)
(C8)
on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Plants (D1)
(D2)
(D3)
Relief (D4)
(D5)
Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns
Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines
Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water
Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows
Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Shallow Aquitard
Water -Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic
Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ FAC-Neutral Test
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes
No
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
50% of total cover:
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist)
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0
RI 11111111111i11111111111m
Doc No: 392078
Recorded; 02/28/2021 04:11:29 PM
Fee Amt: 328.00 Page 1 of 1
Person County North Carolina
Tanya R. Wilson, Register of Deeds
BK 1069 PG 23 - 23 (1)
Memorandum of Contract to Purchase Real Estate
Prepared by / return to: Timothy J. Morris, KCI Enviromnental Technologies and Construction Inc., 4505 Falls of
Neuse Road, Suite 400 Raleigh, NC 27609.
Re: Tax Map and Parcel Number: A108-8
Joshua Bethel (collectively and severally, "Seller"), whose address is 331 Latta Drive, Rougemont NC
27572 and KCI Environmental Technologies and Construction, Inc. a Delaware corporation ("Purchaser"), whose
address is 4505 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 400 Raleigh, NC 27609, have entered into a contract to sale and purchase
easement restrictions on the following property located in Person County, North Carolina: PIN: 0953-00-51-
5174.000. This Memorandum of Contract will terminate 18 months from the date ofthis Memorandum and is recorded
at the Register of Deeds in the Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina.
Witness our hands and seals thisZ 6 day of afigid72021.
shua Bethel
STATE OF Nor 4.1 C4.>"olirt ck
COUNTY OF peg Sbh
I, the undersigned, a Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that Joshua Bethel personally
appeared before me this day and aeowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and
official seal this the day of bruarl/ , 2021.
► . V�GI/VG� l
p nt .1 nameOttwom Wa .cLeet, Notary Public
My commission expires: D'i--31-2M
Document shows proof /acknowledgement before
officer authorized to take proof /acknowledgement;
acknowledgement includes officer's signature,
co Iss10 ratiort,date,official seal, if required.
Allis Pe
Tanya
T y my Register of Deeds
VI IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIn1I111111
Doc No: 391999
Recorded: 02123/2021 02:38:17 PM
Fee Amt: $26.00 Page 1 of 1
Person County North Carolina
Tonya R. Wilson, Register of Deeds
BK 1068 PG 394 - 394 (1)
Memorandum of Contract to Purchase Real Estate
Prepared by / return to: Timothy J. Morris, KCI Environmental Technologies and Construction Inc., 4505 Falls of
Neuse Road, Suite 400 Raleigh, NC 27609.
Re: Tax Map and Parcel Number: A108-6
Forest L. Oakley (collectively and severally, "Seller"), whose address is 4201 NC Highway 96, Oxford, NC
27565 and KCI Environmental Technologies and Construction, Inc. a Delaware corporation ("Purchaser"), whose
address is 4505 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 400 Raleigh, NC 27609, have entered into a contract to sale and purchase
easement restrictions on the following property located in Person .County, North Carolina: PIN: 0952-00-49-
5345.000. This Memorandum of Contract will terminate 18 months from the date of this Memorandum and is recorded
at the Register of Deeds in the Roxboro, Person County, North Carolina.
Witness our hands and seals this G�day of cur..} 2021.
4.141Z4e,c,
Forest L. Oakley
STATE OF ' MAY-4% Vj n-ai n�
COUNTY OF VA - c t .
I, the undersigned, a Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that Forest L. Oakley
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the due execution of the foregoing instrument. Witness
my hand and official seal this the Lday of F.e tcAyii , 2021.
name: ;h Notary Public
mmission expi . s: L 14 •
Document shows proof/acknowledgement before
officer authorized to take proof/acknowledgement;
acknowledgement includes officers signature,
com ssiopIRV° dgte,offfcial seal, if required.
1]'�1
Tonya R. ils, Person o n Register of Deeds
c
itilfrrl
aim •
AUBuo 4:
1.4%
,�,/ �` co
'rrrr r n„„0