090165_Routine_20210826

Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
9).ato ai
Arrival Time:
0
TwiN PewKG #a
Departure Time:
Ptlegt S others lipid INg
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Cu 1 1 1 Cj E Q qv I
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
0: 00 County:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Region:
Title: ICCh sp
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
fthfie i
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
PA PP S
1
�D,
ll1i
e
I i
` Wean to Finish -- "�
Layer
Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder !;
Non Layer
((( Dairy Calf
• Feeder to Finish [ &% I, lIVI
l:'
1
E
#{ x '�
„
y Dairy Heifer
t,
Farrow to Wean
g
$ t
��,
`
�
I t •'�,t
i
° Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder --e�
�
I' o
a
Non -Da'
Farrow to Finish
Layers
Beef Stocker
Gilts =
Non -Layers
Beef Feeders'
Boars
Pullets
Beef Brood Co
Turkeys
gw
1
't 1 I��
)
Turkey Puults
Other
y Other
��eff��'tt11�
i It
'�
��3psi
i� � nutjg �ili�@If^ sf t.W +�i =•d�4 tk�t iE=*,�+t�"3. �. ifs
i
e
i I.3��L
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes NINo ❑NA El NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑NA El NE
IVNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes
In Yes
❑ Yes
No
lc No
11 No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: O q
(DS
Date of Inspection: S•?jp -I
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: 3
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
NO
)9
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 5
IN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
klNo ❑NA ID NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes IRNo ❑NA ❑NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes m No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes NNo ❑NA ❑NE
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes C No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable{�jCroop Window p❑ Evidence` off Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): CO Q Grail ail 41C `'k -Ruda, a/ 1/� i 1 «•e
13. Soil Type(s): Gk UN bar, t'tn e J
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes 'c No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 1cl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes CNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑Yes NINo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes 'N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Gj
(pC=1
Date of Inspection: (5 }T)(p • L 1
n in Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: K. c
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 1SR No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: "(
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes NI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
coihnients „(refer'.to question #
Use drawings, of facility,`to bette
plai.
xplai
.S answers and/or anyt
ofS (hse addtionalpage
I I I C� �� /�d/f���/�� ����I a M TN Phone:9i 1 y" S en A�7
s (4),.; - Date: (.CC';L1
Page 3 of 3
2/4/2015