090039_Routine_20210826

Type of Visit: '9 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Q Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
+2 p'at Arrival Time:
ui•00
N\ K goocien fclrrn #-S
Owner Name: N`W1Dafj goodeN
Departure Time:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: CM ttlC 2j0 I C,K Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
same
1: /5
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: al a d e n Region: fro
"ROI OF
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: `J In I th held
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
�1,.:
Wean
to
��`
Finish
�!(((i�
.�_
�
'
--
_
�
II k�jj
a •
Dili
� :
�
r
�
� �jjj(((
�I,
��t t
,ef
�j$@$
;�,
Ull
La er
Da Cow
Wean toFeeder --
Non -La er
Dai Calf
�� Feeder to Finish �.�iiil t.x.iZ
8
[�-
t..#!,'
,.h
y,
�'
e'
,Non
I;E
Dm Heifer
a '
-Da'
Beef
-
iIII Farrow toWean
,.� Farrow to Feeder --
Farrow to Finish --
•
Gilts --
I
Non -La ers
Beef -Feeder
Boars --
Pullets
Beef Brood•
--'
E
t
Other
Turke Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: El Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes a...No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 1No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes '. No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes^QNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 9 - 39
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection: fF5.g(/•2/
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1
,eac t
❑ Yes 4No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
weft
NO Nn
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes [ 4o 0 NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes , No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ©No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? J
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [/J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Winn�doowy 1 V ({ 0 Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): CO a c{tU RAM t I � 1 �.I I�I.I uu e\J e
13. Soil Type(s): N O 1 fO ( K.) q r� � w&j
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination? l\ f'
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists 0 Design ❑ Maps 0 Lease Agreements 0 Other:
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
P"-- ❑NA ❑NE
es ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall 0 Stocking 0 Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes I J'' ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 0 NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: q
Date of Inspection: f • 2(D• a.1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
o
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ElNA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 12 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other cowmen
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
❑ Yes 1314 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Ei24/ ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes ��N/o ❑NA ❑NE
#.j5:- control Off tire O asses IN
e Gnf � your ��r�
f
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Katie co n rein ot c i sL ha vi..J N
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: <a )11`ln �
Phone: 91 '1 . ScRP- -I I) S
Date: 26W
Page 3 of 3
5/12/2020

FACILITY #: tl - 3'1 FARM NAME: N (0 < 90o0e 1
FREEBOARD ACTUAL LAGOON LEVEL
PERMIT (#19)
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS
- EXPERIATION DATE NUMBER OF ANIMALS
- ACTUAL NUMBER OF ANIMAL
- OIC CARD YES OR NO
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES NJOCfDIK 9� ThJOJ
CROP TYPES
THE UTLIZATION PLAN SHOULD HAVE A (-) NEGATIVE NUMBER
ODOR CONTROL CHECK LIST YES OR NO
Irrigation Plan Maps
WASTE REPORT (#21)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER r�
DATE Sit opt NITROGEN LEVEL C. IQ ?' 1JO
SOILREPORT(#21)
EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE VI /9-/2o;o
P-I (NO MORE THEN 400)
PH (Note if 4 or less)
- Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU ZN
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
- MENTAL CHECK OF CROP AND FIELD NUMBERS
ZONE ACRES
FLOW RATESZ
120 Min inspection initialed
IRR2 (#21)
PAN CROP TYPE CS
NITROGEN (N)C VP) •
Weather Codes
Commercial Fertilizer Chicken Litter
CALBRIATION (#24)

- EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED
- DATE DUE EVERY TWO YEARS
- FLOW RATES
IN FALL (#21)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT J
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED
-LOOK FOR BIG NUMBER DIFFERENCES SEE THAT THEY MATCH THE IRR2
FORM
SLUDGE (#21 & 25)
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE
0: P: % RATIO OF SLUDGE
RAIN BREAKER FORM
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21)
CROP YEILDS MORTALITY
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON
SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO
BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) ALIVE CROP HARVESTED
FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED
BINS LAGOON GARBAGE