400162_Inspection_20210826

® Dwisio i of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 17—
Farm Name: at Iir(
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Arrival Time:
d"D
Departure Time:
9: 41
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: Region: i,died
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Phone:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Certification Number: l(� �� q
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Swine
esign Current
Capacity Pop.
x
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
�esigm Current
We`t Poultry -:,Capacity Pop;
Layer
Non -Layer
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
apaci
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes liNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes EfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: Hp - r6,9_
Date of Inspection: ' — l — /91
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1 Structure 2
1.40
Structure 3 Structure 4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
El Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 5
No ❑NA ❑NE
❑No ❑NA ❑NE
Structure 6
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground
El Yes "No El NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [(No ❑ NA El NE
or environmental threat, notify DWR
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
❑ Yes 7No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA
❑ Yes (No ❑ NA
❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
El Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence''of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): �s ll (�/ -Mr /nG �/52 = %a' ; 6 //36
13. Soil Type(s):
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ Yes No El NA
❑ Yes No El NA
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? [✓I ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [ El NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers El Weather Code
El Rainfall El Stocking El Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections El Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections El Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No El NA El NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
El Yes [ No ❑ NA
❑ Yes No El NA

Facility Number: I/Q - lam
Date of Inspection: %—
❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [1INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond D Other:
❑ Yes ® o ❑NA ❑NE
El Yes [i No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Er -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes liNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes I1(No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes l No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
[/No El NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Conan ents (refer to question #): Explain' -any YES answers audtor'auy additional recommendations or Many other cowmen
Use drawings pf°facility fit, better explain situations (use additional pages.as.,necessary)..
aP2P'/
stexite,(62hweee-rfi.
, I _AL.,./a....e......:,1/4,414,-1.74-at."6.,
io/a R1) ° n-Z ;
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
a_ 14-ii e._ /2/
Phone: (9_4:—
Ad/
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
2/4/2015