20190239 Ver 2_Year 1 Monitoring Report_20210913

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#*
20190239
Select Reviewer:*
Version* 2
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 09/14/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal - 9/13/2021
........................................................
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* 0 Yes a No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands 17 Buffer IZ Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Jason Lorch
Project Information
I D#: *
20190239
Existing ID##
Project Type: r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site
County: Johnston
Document Information
............................................................................................................................................................................
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload:
Signature
Print Name:*
Signature:*
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version: *2
Existing Version
Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site-MY1 Report -
17.27MB
DRAFT.pdf
Rease upload only one R]Fof the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Jason Lorch
[Zeds Ctrsog

Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site
DWR ID# 2019-0239v2
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC's Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Report
September 2021
WILDLANDS
PREPARED BY:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]

MONITORING YEAR 1 REPORT
Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION 2
1.1 Project Description 2
1.2 Bank Sponsor 2
1.3 Project History 2
1.4 Project Location 2
1.5 Project Design 2
2 VEGETATION MONITORING 3
2.1 Success Criteria 3
2.2 Description of Species and Monitoring Protocol 4
2.3 Results of Vegetation Monitoring 4
2.4 Parcel Adaptive Management 5
2.5 Conclusions 5
3 REFERENCES 5
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
Project Reporting History
Tree Species Selected for Buffer Restoration
Character/Existing Tree Species
Monitoring Plot Summary — Planting (As -Built)
Monitoring Plot Summary — Year 1
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Project Location Map
Service Area Map
Credit Generation Map
Monitoring Components Map
Appendix B: Bank Credit Ledger
Appendix C: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 6 Vegetation Plot Success Summary
Table 7 Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results
Appendix E: Overview Photos
taw Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site Page 1
Monitoring Year 1 Report

1.0 Introduction
1.1 Project Description
The Moccasin Creek Mitigation Bank Parcel (Parcel) is part of Wildlands Holdings III, LLC, (Sponsor)
Moccasin Creek Mitigation Bank (Bank). The project includes Moccasin Creek and one unnamed
tributary (UT1). Moccasin Creek flows into Holts Pond and eventually into the Neuse River
approximately 12 miles downstream of the Parcel. The Parcel location is depicted in Figure 1. The
purpose of the Parcel is to provide riparian buffer mitigation credits to compensate for buffer impacts
according to the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (effective November 1, 2015)
and development requiring nutrient offset payments according to 15A NCAC 02B .0703 within the
Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03020201 excluding the Falls Lake Watershed. The Bank service area is
depicted in Figure 2.
Prior to construction, the Parcel was an agricultural field used for row crop production. The project
features had little to no riparian buffer, except for one stand of mature trees along the downstream left
portion of Moccasin Creek. The Parcel was restored to provide ecological and water quality
enhancements to the Neuse River Basin by creating a functional riparian corridor. Approximately 16.27
acres have been protected with a permanent conservation easement along Moccasin Creek and UT1. A
conservation easement was recorded on the Parcel in October 2020.
1.2 Bank Sponsor
The Moccasin Creek Mitigation Parcel is a part of the Bank. The Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI) for
the Bank was signed in September 2020.
Wildlands Holdings 111, LLC
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Phone: [phone]
Attn: Shawn Wilkerson
Email: [e-mail]
1.3 Project History
Project history is provided in Table 1.
Table 1. Project Reporting History
Activity
Completion Date
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC MBI
September 2020
Bank Parcel Development Package Approved
October 2020
Conservation Easement
October 2020
Bare Root Planting
February 2021
As -Built & Baseline Monitoring Document
June 2021
Year 1 Monitoring Completed
September 2021
1.4 Project Location
The Parcel is located in central Johnston County within the Town of Pine Level (Figure 1). The Parcel
involves riparian restoration on Moccasin Creek and UT1 in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer
Mitigation Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0295). The Parcel is located within the Neuse River Basin HUC
03020201160010 and North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) Subbasin 03-04-12 and was
taw Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Report
Page 2

restored for riparian buffer mitigation credit and nutrient offset credit in the Neuse River Basin HUC
03020201 (excluding Falls Lake) (Figure 2).
From Raleigh take 1-40 E. Continue for 11.5 miles, then take exit 333 to merge onto US 70 to Buffalo Road.
Follow US 70 S for 15.8 miles then take a right onto W. Noble Steet and continue on this route for 1.4
miles. Turn left onto S. Pollack Street, after 1.0 mile turn right onto W. Anderson Street. The Parcel is
located 2.4 miles down the road on the left (35° 31' 1.488" N, 78° 14' 52.6" W).
1.5 Project Design
Approximately 16.27 acres are protected in a conservation easement. The Parcel will generate 7.02
acres of Neuse riparian buffer credits. Additionally, the Parcel will generate 6.86 acres of nutrient offset
credits, which creates 15,591.88 pounds of nitrogen credits. Credit generation is shown in Figure 3. The
revegetation plan for the Parcel included planting of bare root trees, controlling invasive species growth,
and the application of a native pollinator friendly seed mix (Appendix E). Bare root trees selected for the
Parcel were native bottomland hardwood species typical for Coastal Plain communities as defined by
Schafale (2012). Adjacent forested areas were also used as a reference for the Parcel. Tree species
selected for planting on the Parcel as well as size specifications, planting density, and plant composition
are detailed in Table 2.
Table 2. Tree Species Selected for Buffer Restoration
Scientific Name
Common Name
Size
(feet)
Planting Density
(Stems/Acre)
Planting Composition
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
2-3
111
20%
Betula nigra
River Birch
2-3
111
20%
Populus deltoides
Eastern Cottonwood
2-3
83
15%
Acer negundo
Boxelder
2-3
83
15%
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
2-3
83
15%
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
2-3
83
15%
Totals
554
100%
Natural recruitment of desirable Character Tree species shal be counted towards the survival and
success rate of the restored site. "Character Trees" are defined as planted or volunteer species
identified from a survey of local vegetation on less degraded sections of the specified stream and from
reference literature that details native species. A list of Character Tree species (other than the planted
species) is included in Table 3.
Table 3. Character/Existing Tree Species
Scientific Name
Common Name
Wetland Indicator Status
Acer rubrum
Red Maple
FAC
Liquidambar styraciflua
Sweetgum
FAC+
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip Poplar
FACU
Quercus falcata
Southern Red Oak
FACU
Juniperus virginiana
Eastern Red Cedar
FAC-
Notes: *Source: Schafale & Weakley (1990)
Vegetation Monitoring
2.1 Success Criteria
Buffer vegetative success criteria are based upon the density and growth of species as defined in Tables
2 & 3. Vegetative success criteria is based upon guidelines set forth in the Consolidated Buffer
taw Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Report
Page 3

Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (effective November 1, 2015), and is defined as a success rate
equivalent to 260 live stems per acre at the end of the 5-year monitoring period.
If vegetative success criteria are not achieved based on acreage density calculations from combined
monitoring plots over the entire restoration area, or if an inspection of a buffer restoration site indicates
that portions of the Parcel do not have sufficient stem densities or are otherwise deficient,
supplemental planting shall be performed with tree species approved by NCDWR. Supplemental
planting shall be performed as needed until vegetative success criteria are met. No quantitative
measurements of herb assemblages will be required to meet the vegetative success criteria.
2.2 Description of Species and Monitoring Protocol
The quantity of monitoring plots was determined in accordance with the Carolina Vegetative Sampling
(CVS) Protocol (Level II) such that at least 2 percent of the Site is encompassed in monitoring plots. A
total of 12 plots (10 meters by 10 meters) were established within the credit generation area. PVC pipe
was used to mark the four corners of the plots. Monitoring plot locations are shown in Figure 4. GPS
points were taken at each of the corners. A reference photo was taken from the southwest corner of
each plot (Appendix D). All planted stems within the plots were marked with flagging tape and recorded.
Total numbers of tree species planted within the monitoring plots as well as planting density and plant
composition are detailed in Table 4. Detailed results of the Monitoring Year 1 stem count are
summarized in Appendix C.
Table 4. Monitoring Plot Summary — Planting (As -Built)
Scientific Name
Total Stems
Flagged
Calculated Planting Density
(Stems/Acre)
Planting Composition
Acer negundo
30
100
15%
Betula nigra
40
133
20%
Platanus occidentalis
36
120
20%
Populus deltoides
25
83
15%
Quercus michauxii
28
93
15%
Quercus phellos
25
83
15%
Totals
184
612
100%
2.3 Results of Vegetation Monitoring
The 12 vegetation plots were sampled in September 2021 at the end of the first growing season. A
reference photo was taken from the southwest corner of each plot, which can be found in Appendix D
along with the stem count raw data. Total numbers of tree species identified within the monitoring plots
as well as density and composition are summarized in Table 5. Vegetation result tables with planted
stem density, and stem count by plot and species are summarized in Appendix C.
The 2021 vegetation plot monitoring resulted in stem density ranging from 526 to 809 stems per acre,
with an average of 610 stems per acre. The average stem density of 610 planted stems per acre far
exceeds the final requirement of 260 stems per acre.
taw Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site Page 4
Monitoring Year 1 Report

Table 5. Monitoring Plot Summary —Year 1
Scientific Name
Total Stems Flagged
Calculated Live Stem Density
(Stems/Acre)
Planting Composition
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
125
20%
Betula nigra
River Birch
138
20%
Populus deltoides
Eastern Cottonwood
84
15%
Acer negundo
Boxelder
84
15%
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
91
15%
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
88
15%
Totals
181
610
100%
2.4 Parcel Adaptive Management
Adaptive measures will be developed, or appropriate remedial actions will be implemented in the event
the Parcel, or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve the success criteria outlined in the
BPDP. Parcel maintenance will be performed to correct any identified problems on the Parcel that have
a high likelihood of affecting project success. Such items include but are not limited to; excess tree
mortality caused by fire, flooding, drought, or insects. Any actions implemented will be designed to
achieve the success criteria and will include a work schedule and updated monitoring criteria.
2.5 Conclusions
Overall vegetation is thriving across the site. Each of the 12 vegetation plots exceed the vegetation
success criteria of 260 stems per acre. The Parcel has an average stem density of 610 planted stems per
acre, with plots ranging from 526 to 809 stems per acre. Herbaceous vegetation is establishing across
the Parcel along with several pollinator species. No problems were identified, such as invasive species or
excessive tree mortality, during Monitoring Year 1. Therefore, no corrective actions are required at this
time.
3.0 References
Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration. NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources,
Ecosystem Enhancement Program. October 2004.
Lee, Michael T., Peet, Robert K., Steven D., Wentworth, Thomas R. 2006. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation Version 4.0. Retrieved from
http://www.nceep.net/business/monitoring/veg/datasheets.htm.
Peet, R.K., T.R. Wentworth and P.S. White. 1998. A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274. http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Guide to the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth Approximation.
Schafale, M.P. and Weakley, A.S. 1990. A Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina,
Third Approximation.
Wildlands Holdings III, LLC (2020). Moccasin Creek Mitigation Bank Instrument. NCDWR, Raleigh NC.
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/nutrientbufferbanks
taw Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site Page 5
Monitoring Year 1 Report

Appendix A: Figures

Conservation Easement Boundary
* Moccasin Creek Bank Parcel Location
c)ecOCan�f
2017 Aerial Photography tee;
L
From Raleigh take 1-40 E. Continue for 11.5 miles, then take exit
333 to merge onto US 70 to Buffalo Road. Follow US 70 S for 15.8
miles take a right onto W. Noble Street and continue on this route
for 1.4 miles. Turn left onto S. Pollack Street, after 1.0 mile turn
right onto W. Anderson Street. The project is located 2.4 miles
down the road on the left (35° 31' 1.488" N, 78° 14' 52.6" W).
Bak
a
Cree*
229 tt
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
0 1
2 Miles
I I
Figure 1. Project Location Map
Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Report
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Johnston County, NC

17
e
i sec hi
Sdtsa
ileba
Roxboro
HIIIsbcritI Ih j
40
1
•
Rd
Durham
Apex
J
hs rIi
Rock
State Park
:B-Its,
Creedmoor
• 1„rrl
Wa _I
Raleicih
03020201
Angles
•
/
/
// Buies
/f / Lillinglon Creek Coats
d
/
..�.` '....
/-' Walkertown
�., Coharie .4.../*".a .1*"1'.—.:;;;;i na-e
.•r' Sdt —
s,4r.w. •fie..®'-� rr C
j,-rt Spring Lake e`r
A J
1 ` i
Fort Bragg S
469 ft
F ra:ln
Loud
uuu
j— j County Boundary
HUC 03020201
Service Area - Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Credits
* Moccasin Creek Bank Parcel Location
Louisburg
bulon
u,Ul�li II*
14.
r
Olive
dsbc
7ft
�WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
0 5 10 Miles
I I
Figure 2. Service Area Map
Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Report
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Johnston County, NC

100' Power Line
Easement Break
•.
-44
30' Power Line
Easement Break
50' Access &
Sewer Line
Easement Break
Project Location
r •
1.__I Conservation Easement Boundary
FEProject Streams
nProject Ditches
Riparian Restoration - Buffer Mitigation (16'-100')
IM Riparian Restoration - Nutrient Offset (101'-200')
1111 No Credit (TOB - 15')
►� Diffuse Flow Credit Deduction
Non -Project Streams
-- Sewer Line Easement
-- Power Line Easement
2017 Aerial Photography
110WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
0 200 400 Feet
I
Figure 3. Credit Generation Map
Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Report
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Johnston County, NC

50' Access &
Sewer Line
Easement Break
• W
Project Location
Conservation Easement Boundary
Il.__I
Vegetation Plots
- Project Streams
Project Ditches
.11 Riparian Restoration - Buffer Mitigation (16'-100')
Riparian Restoration - Nutrient Offset (101'-200')
No Credit (TOB - 15')
Diffuse Flow Credit Deduction
Non -Project Streams
Sewer Line Easement
Power Line Easement
2017 Aerial Photography
0411/11/WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
0 200 400 Feet
Figure 4. Monitoring Components Map
Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 Report
Neuse River Basin (03020201)
Johnston County, NC

Appendix B: Bank Credit Ledger

Moccasin Creek Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI)
Moccasin Creek Bank Parcel
Neuse River Basin HUC 03020201
Nitrogen Credit Ledger
Date Last Updated: 09-13-2021
DWR Project #: 2019-0239v2
HOLDINGS
W I
L
D LA
N D
S
wIIIH
Sale/
Release
Date
Purchaser or % Credit Release
Project Name
Credits Released/Available to
Bank
Credits Debited/Sold From Bank
Nutrient Credit Balance
Gov't Requiring
Pounds of
Nitrogen
sq.ft.Pounds
of
Nitrogen
sq.ft
Pounds of
Nitrogen
sq.ft.
11/19/20
Task 1 Credit Release - 25%
3,878.391
74,325.252
3,878.391
74,325.252
NCDWR
12/01/20
Kimberly Development Group, LLC
9650 Brier Creek Pkwy #SPR-0012-2020
536.400
10,279.537
3,341.991
64,045.715
City of Raleigh
12/14/20
Dan Ryan Builders - North Carolina, LLC
Meadow View (Meadowview Subdivision) (JC# 20-070-C)
3,039.600
58,250.712
302.391
5,795.003
Johnston County
01/08/21
Town of Cary
One Walker & One Walnut and The Cary Downtown Park, 352 S. Walker St
St. and 327 S. Academy St., 20-DP-2171 and 20-DP-8793
302.390
5,794.984
0.001
0.019
Town of Cary
06/21/21
Task 2 Credit Release - 20%
3,102.713
59,460.206
3,102.714
59,460.225
NCDWR
07/06/21
Byrd Leasing Commercial Real Estate
533 Dynamic Drive
82.270
1,576.617
3,020.444
57,883.608
Town of Garner
07/13/21
Habitat for Humanity of Wake County, Inc.
Old Poole Rd Subdivision (Trans #SPR-0249-2020)
1,366.750
26,192.315
1,653.694
31,691.293
City of Raleigh
08/03/21
Meritage Homes
Oak Manor Phase 1 & 2 Single Family
358.750
6,875.063
1,294.944
24,816.229
Town of Garner
08/03/21
Meritage Homes
Oak Manor 3 Single Family
1,294.940
24,816.152
0.004
0.077
Town of Garner
09/08/21
Task 3 Credit Release - 10%
1,594.435
30,555.657
1,594.439
30,555.733
NCDWR
Totals
8,575.539
164,341.115
6,981.100
133,785.382
1,594.439
30,555.733

Moccasin Creek Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI)
Moccasin Creek Bank Parcel
Neuse River Basin HUC 03020201
Buffer Credit Ledger
Date Last Updated: 09-13-2021
DWR Project #: 2019-0239v2
HOLDINGS
WILD LANDS
WIIIH
Sale/
Release
Date
Purchaser or % Credit Release
Project Name
Credits Released/Available
to Bank
Credits Debited/Sold From
Bank
Buffer Credit Balance
Gov't Requiring
Square Feet
Acres
Square Feet
Acres
Square Feet
Acres
11/19/20
Task 1 Credit Release - 25%
77,976.250
1.790
-
77,976.250
1.790
NCDWR
1/27/2021
NC DEQ
IFB NO. 16-020320-09
77,976.250
1.790
-
-
NCDWR
6/21/2021
Task 2 Credit Release - 20%
62,381.000
1.432
62,381.000
1.432
NCDWR
7/20/2021
NC DEQ
IFB NO. 16-020320-09
62,381.000
1.432
-
-
NCDWR
09/08/21
Task 3 Credit Release - 10%
27,709.000
0.636
27,709.000
0.636
NCDWR
Totals
168,066.250
3.858
140,357.250
3.222
27,709.000
0.636

Appendix C: Vegetation Assessment Data

Table 6. Vegetation Plot Success Summary
Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1 - 2021
Plot
Year
Northing
Easting
Planted Living Stems
Missing Stems
Volunteer
Stems
Total Living
Stems
Planted Living Stems
per ACRE
Total Living Stems PER
ACRE
# species
Vegetation Threshold Met?*
1
1
677445
196530
15
0
0
15
607
607
6
Yes
2
1
677497
196502
15
0
0
15
607
607
6
Yes
3
1
677613
196424
14
1
0
14
567
567
6
Yes
4
1
677684
196332
13
0
0
13
526
526
6
Yes
5
1
677711
196296
20
0
0
20
809
809
6
Yes
6
1
677744
196212
14
1
0
14
567
567
6
Yes
7
1
677795
196240
15
1
0
15
607
607
6
Yes
8
1
677848
196251
15
1
0
15
607
607
6
Yes
9
1
677923
196271
15
0
0
15
607
607
6
Yes
10
1
678032
196236
15
0
0
15
607
607
6
Yes
11
1
678103
196170
15
1
0
15
607
607
6
Yes
12
1
678182
196108
15
0
0
15
607
607
6
Yes
*Target density is a minimum of 260 planted trees per acre at the end of the five (5) year monitoring period.

Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot
Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Current Plot Data (MY1 2021)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
VP 1
VP 2
VP 3
VP 4
VP 5
VP 6
VP 7
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Acernegundo
Boxelder
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
1
1
1
10
10
10
3
3
3
5
5
5
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
Populus deltoides
Eastern Cottonwood
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Tree
5
5
5
3
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Tree
1
1
1
4
4
4
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
15
15
15
15
15
15
14
14
14
13
13
13
20
20
20
14
14
14
15
15
15
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
607
607
607
607
607
607
567
567
567
526
526
526
809
809
809
567
567
567
607
607
607
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS - Planted Stems Excluding Live Stakes
P-all - All Planted Stems
T - All Woody Stems

Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot
Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 1- 2021
Current Plot Data (MY1 2021)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
VP 8
VP 9
VP 10
VP 11
VP 12
MY1 (2021)
MYO (2021)
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Acer negundo
Boxelder
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
3
3
3
25
25
25
30
30
30
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
4
4
4
3
3
3
41
41
41
40
40
40
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
5
5
5
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
37
37
37
36
36
36
Populus deltoides
Eastern Cottonwood
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
25
25
25
25
25
25
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
27
27
27
28
28
28
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
26
26
26
25
25
25
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
181
181
181
184
184
184
1
1
1
1
1
12
12
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.30
0.30
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
607
607
607
607
607
607
607
607
607
607
607
607
607
607
607
610
610
610
621
621
621
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS - Planted Stems Excluding Live Stakes
P-all - All Planted Stems
T - All Woody Stems

Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 1 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
1
Populus deltoides
0.4
1.1
123
2
Platanus occidentalis
2.1
1.1
97
3
Acer negundo
4.4
1.0
112
4
Betula nigra
6.7
0.9
102
5
Quercus phellos
9.0
0.5
98
6
Platanus occidentalis
8.9
3.8
113
7
Acer negundo
6.9
4.0
137
8
Platanus occidentalis
4.4
4.2
95
9
Quercus michauxii
2.2
4.3
15
10
Quercus michauxii
0.5
4.5
83
11
Quercus michauxii
0.4
8.5
49
12
Populus deltoides
2.9
8.3
122
13
Quercus michauxii
5.2
8.2
44
14
Betula nigra
6.9
7.9
77
15
Quercus michauxii
9.2
7.6
35
Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 2 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
16
Quercus michauxii
0.6
2.1
65
17
Quercus phellos
2.7
2.2
62
18
Platanus occidentalis
4.6
2.0
157
19
Quercus phellos
6.8
1.9
59
20
Quercus michauxii
9.0
1.5
65
21
Quercus michauxii
9.1
4.9
61
22
Quercus phellos
7.2
5.0
28
23
Acer negundo
5.1
5.2
88
24
Populus deltoides
2.7
5.3
119
25
Betula nigra
0.9
5.6
98
26
Platanus occidentalis
1.0
8.3
116
27
Acer negundo
3.2
8.1
76
28
Betula nigra
5.3
7.8
108
29
Quercus phellos
7.0
7.9
35
30
Platanus occidentalis
9.0
7.8
139
Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 3 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
31
Quercus michauxii
1.1
2.0
43
32
Quercus michauxii
3.1
2.0
11
33
Populus deltoides
5.2
2.1
123
34
Betula nigra
7.4
2.0
91
35
Acer negundo
9.2
1.9
121
36
Betula nigra
8.6
5.6
94
37
Quercus phellos
6.7
5.6
17
38
Platanus occidentalis
4.9
5.6
121
39
Acer negundo
2.9
5.5
33
40
Betula nigra
1.1
5.5
69
41
Platanus occidentalis
0.1
9.2
95
42
Quercus phellos
2.5
9.3
91
43
Betula nigra
4.6
9.3
73
44
Acer negundo
6.6
9.3
Missing
45
Platanus occidentalis
8.5
9.4
136
Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 4 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
47
Platanus occidentalis
1.5
1.1
112
48
Populus deltoides
3.5
1.1
100
49
Platanus occidentalis
5.0
1.2
131
50
Platanus occidentalis
9.8
4.2
88
51
Acer negundo
7.0
4.7
37
52
Quercus michauxii
4.9
5.1
57
53
Betula nigra
3.4
5.1
110
54
Quercus michauxii
0.8
5.3
43
55
Acer negundo
0.3
8.9
22
56
Populus deltoides
2.4
8.5
115
57
Quercus phellos
4.2
8.2
41
58
Quercus michauxii
6.5
8.1
40
59
Platanus occidentalis
8.7
8.4
122
WMoccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 5 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
60
Betula nigra
0.7
0.1
93
185
Betula nigra
2.5
0.1
103
61
Betula nigra
4.7
0.1
75
62
Betula nigra
6.7
0.1
81
63
Betula nigra
8.6
0.1
123
64
Acer negundo
8.9
3.3
86
65
Betula nigra
6.8
3.2
90
66
Platanus occidentalis
5.0
3.0
102
67
Populus deltoides
3.1
3.1
120
68
Betula nigra
1.3
3.0
5
69
Betula nigra
1.8
6.2
93
70
Platanus occidentalis
4.2
6.2
124
71
Betula nigra
5.2
6.3
92
72
Platanus occidentalis
6.4
6.4
102
73
Quercus michauxii
8.6
6.3
61
74
Acer negundo
8.9
9.7
93
75
Populus deltoides
6.8
9.7
129
76
Betula nigra
4.9
9.6
100
77
Populus deltoides
2.6
9.5
116
78
Quercus phellos
0.6
9.6
93
WMoccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 6 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
79
Betula nigra
0.7
0.9
93
80
Populus deltoides
3.1
0.6
120
81
Quercus phellos
5.1
0.6
19
82
Quercus phellos
7.1
0.8
67
83
Platanus occidentalis
9.2
0.9
121
84
Populus deltoides
9.4
4.6
133
85
Acer negundo
7.3
4.5
93
86
Quercus michauxii
5.0
4.3
33
87
Acer negundo
2.9
4.2
Missing
88
Betula nigra
0.6
4.2
102
89
Quercus michauxii
1.4
7.3
79
90
Platanus occidentalis
3.2
7.5
83
91
Acer negundo
5.4
7.7
103
92
Betula nigra
7.5
8.1
123
93
Platanus occidentalis
9.9
8.1
116
Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 7 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
94
Quercus phellos
1.1
2.1
52
95
Acer negundo
2.4
1.1
42
96
Betula nigra
3.5
0.5
111
97
Acer negundo
7.2
1.1
Missing
98
Betula nigra
6.1
2.2
101
99
Populus deltoides
4.8
2.7
135
100
Platanus occidentalis
2.5
4.2
131
101
Betula nigra
0.9
5.6
90
102
Betula nigra
1.4
9.5
102
103
Populus deltoides
3.2
8.5
172
104
Quercus michauxii
5.2
7.2
52
105
Quercus phellos
6.5
6.1
89
186
Populus deltoides
8.0
5.3
141
106
Platanus occidentalis
9.9
4.8
112
107
Betula nigra
8.4
8.6
103
108
Quercus michauxii
6.7
9.8
69
WMoccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 8 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
109
Platanus occidentalis
0.4
4.5
113
110
Betula nigra
2.0
3.5
106
111
Acer negundo
3.8
2.4
61
112
Quercus michauxii
5.7
1.4
22
113
Quercus michauxii
7.7
1.0
49
114
Quercus michauxii
9.7
2.9
23
115
Populus deltoides
8.0
3.6
168
116
Betula nigra
6.5
4.8
93
117
Quercus phellos
4.3
5.9
33
118
Populus deltoides
2.4
7.0
129
119
Platanus occidentalis
0.5
8.2
116
120
Quercus phellos
3.2
9.7
89
121
Populus deltoides
5.5
8.9
138
122
Acer negundo
7.4
7.9
18
123
Quercus phellos
8.8
7.3
52
124
Acer negundo
9.9
6.1
Missing
WMoccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 9 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
125
Acer negundo
1.4
0.9
95
126
Betula nigra
3.5
0.8
84
127
Platanus occidentalis
5.2
0.7
89
128
Quercus phellos
7.3
0.6
33
129
Betula nigra
9.1
0.6
101
130
Populus deltoides
8.6
4.1
84
131
Acer negundo
6.7
4.2
72
132
Platanus occidentalis
4.8
4.4
46
133
Quercus michauxii
2.6
4.6
59
134
Platanus occidentalis
0.9
4.9
80
135
Betula nigra
0.8
8.0
85
136
Platanus occidentalis
2.5
7.9
139
137
Acer negundo
4.8
7.9
76
138
Platanus occidentlais
6.8
7.8
116
139
Populus deltoides
9.0
7.8
111
Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 10 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
140
Quercus michauxii
1.5
1.9
49
141
Populus deltoides
3.6
1.7
133
142
Betula nigra
5.4
1.4
84
143
Acer negundo
7.2
1.1
62
144
Quercus phellos
9.0
0.9
63
145
Platanus occidentalis
9.2
4.3
96
146
Betula nigra
7.0
4.7
120
147
Quercus phellos
4.6
4.9
35
148
Quercus michauxii
2.0
4.9
35
149
Platanus occidentalis
0.3
5.0
93
150
Acer negundo
0.4
8.0
69
151
Quercus phellos
2.1
8.0
77
152
Populus deltoides
4.7
8.1
67
153
Platanus occidentalis
6.8
8.2
116
154
Acer negundo
9.1
8.1
53
Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 11- Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
155
Quercus michauxii
1.0
2.3
60
156
Platanus occidentalis
2.7
2.0
169
157
Populus deltoides
4.6
2.1
181
158
Betula nigra
6.4
2.0
91
159
Populus deltoides
8.5
1.9
146
160
Quercus phellos
9.4
3.5
35
161
Acer negundo
9.1
4.6
38
162
Quercus phellos
7.1
4.7
41
163
Betula nigra
5.2
4.8
102
164
Populus deltoides
3.4
4.8
148
165
Quercus phellos
1.4
4.9
87
166
Betula nigra
0.6
7.5
148
167
Platanus occidentalis
2.3
7.4
147
168
Acer negundo
4.4
7.5
Missing
169
Betula nigra
7.8
7.4
137
170
Platanus occidentalis
9.3
7.3
148
WMoccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Veg Plot 12 - Year 1
Tree ID
Species
X (m)
Y (m)
Height (cm)
171
Platanus occidentalis
1.2
1.0
130
172
Quercus phellos
3.4
1.4
24
173
Betula nigra
5.5
6.7
113
174
Quercus michauxii
7.5
2.0
62
175
Populus deltoides
9.4
2.4
140
176
Platanus occidentalis
9.5
5.0
123
177
Betula nigra
7.5
4.9
119
178
Acer negundo
5.6
4.8
29
179
Quercus phellos
3.6
4.7
53
180
Betula nigra
1.6
4.3
131
181
Quercus michauxii
1.3
7.4
57
182
Acer negundo
3.2
7.5
61
183
Platanus occidentalis
5.2
7.7
126
184
Quercus phellos
7.5
7.8
74
185
Acer negundo
9.6
7.9
92
Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results

Appendix E: Overview Photos

Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix E: Overview Photographs

Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix E: Overview Photographs

Moccasin Creek Mitigation Site
Appendix E: Overview Photographs