NC0044725_Pretreatment Inspection_20070105

micnaei r. tasiey, uovemor
• William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department ofEnvironment and Natural Resources '
Alan W. Klimek, PE., Director
Division of Water Quality
January 5, 2007
Ms. Jo Ann Gentry
•
Pretreatment Coordinator
J
Laurinburg-Maxton Airport Commission (LMAC)
P.O. Box 31 •
• LaurinbUrg, NC 28352
SUBJECT: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report
Laurinburg-Maxton Airport Commission (LMAC)
NPDES Permit No. NC0044725
Scotland County.
• Dear Ms; Gentry:
Enclosed you will find a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for
the inspection conducted on December 13, 2006. The report indicates that 'Laurinburg-
Maxton Airport Commission Facility, NPDES Permit No. NC0044725, met the pretreatment
requirements as outlined in 15A NCAC 2H .0900 for the Pretreatment Programs.
We appreciate your cooperation and that of Gary Arnette. If you have any questions,
please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Dale Lopez
Environmental Specialist
Enclosures: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report
EPA Water Compliance Inspection Report
cc: Deborah Gore,'NC Division of Water Quality - PERCS Unit
NorthCarolina Division of Water Quality
Internet: ncwaterquality.org
One
NorthCarolina
NatIrrally
225 Green Street — Suite 714 Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043 Phone [phone] Customer Service
FAX [phone]
•
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
.1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: Laurinburg-Maxton Airport Commission
2. Control Authority Representative: Ms. Jo Ann Gentry
3. Title(s): Pretreatment Coordinator
4. Last Inspection Date: 04/12/06 Inspection Type (Circle One): PCI
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection or Program Info Sheet(s)?
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions?
Order Type And Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met?Yes /.No
Audit
PCS CODING
Trans.Code
INl
Program NPDES Number
JNICIO 1014.14 1712151
(DTIA)
MM/DD/YY
12 /13 /06
(TYPI)
Inspec.Type
LU
(INSP)
Yes
/ No
Yes /
N/A
No
Inspector Fac.Type
(FACC)
7. Current Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
4
SIUS
8. Current Number of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
1
CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected by POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
.
Completed for 2006
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled by POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
Completed for 2006
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10.
0
NOIN
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP or With an Expired IUP?
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs In SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 '
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC).
0
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC for Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi-Annual.Periods.
0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs in SNC for Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual
Periods?
0
SNPS
16. Number of SIUs in SNC for Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods?
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, How Are These Problems Being Addressed?
A TSS violation for October 2006 resulted because the sludge blanket was too high.
Corrected by wasting sludge
YES
NO

18 Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial Discharge
(Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased Sludge
Production, Etc.)?If Yes, How Are These Problems Being Addressed?
19 Which Industries have been in SNC during either of the Last 2 Semi -
Annual Periods? Have any Industries in SNC (During Either of the
Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods) not been Published for Public Notice?
(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs. in SNC)
SNC for Limits: 0
SNC for Reporting: 0.
Not Published: 0
20 Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an Order, Has a
Signed copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21 Are any Permits or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which Ones?
0
YES
IIO
PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW - Please review POTW files and complete the following:
Program. Element
Date of Last Approval
Date Next. Due, If Applicable
Headwork Analysis (HWA)
06/08/06
04/30/11
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
02/03/04
07/30/08
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
06/04/97
06/30/07
Enforcement Response Plan
(ERP)
10/01/96
Will be sent with SUO by 06/30/07
Long Term Monitoring Plan
(LTMP)
09/23/96
Will be sent with SUO by 06/30/07
22. Is the LTMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies?
23. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated From or Added to the LTMP?
If Yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
24. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP Monitoring?
25.. Is the LTMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent?
Is the Table Adequate?
It is entered into the computer
lies
/ No
Yes /
Yes
fYes
Yes
No
/ No
/ No
/ No

u11L vVa....a
26. User Name
_— �- - —,---.
HOR Farms
Scotland Manufacturing
27 IUP Number
006
005
28. Does File Contain Current Permit?
Yes
(04/16/06)
Yes
(04/16/06)
29.
Permit Expiration Date?
04/.16/ 11
04/ 16/ 11
30.
Categorical Standard Applied (I:E. 40 CFR 413, Etc.) or N/A
N/A
433
31. Does the File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One
Year Prior to Permit Issue Date?
Yes
(01/19/06)
Yes
(02/07/06)
•32. Does the File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last
Calendar Year?
Yes
(12/04/06)
Yes
(02/03/06)
33. • a. Does File Contain A Slug Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See -Inspection Form from POTW)
a. No
b. No
a. No
b. No
34. For 40 CFR 413 And 433 TTO Certifiers, Does The File Contain A
Toxic Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
N/A
Yes
35. a. Does the File Contain Current Permit Review Letter from the
Division? •
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. Yes
(05/23/06)
b. Yes
a. Yes
(05/23/06)
b. Yes
36. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW
Complete its Sampling as Required by IUP?
Yes
Yes
37.. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody's?
Yes
• Yes
38. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU
Complete its Sampling as Required By IUP?
Yes
Yes
39. Does Sampling Indicate Flow or Production?
Yes
Yes
40. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW
Identify All Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU •,
Sampling?
Yes
(No Violations)
• Yes
(No Violations)
41. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations
b. Did Industry Resample Within 30 Days?
a. N/A •
(No Violations)
b. N/A'
• a. N/A
(No Violations)
b. N/A
42: Was the SIU Promptly Notified of any Violations (Per ERP)?
N/A
N/A
43. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in
SNC?
No
No

44.
During the Most Recent Semi=Annual Period, Was Enforcement
Taken as Specified in the POTWs ERP?
N/A
N/A
45. .
Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
N/A,'
N/A
46.
Does the File Contain Proof of Penalty Collection?
N/A
- N/A
47.
a. Does the File Contain any Current Enforcement orders?
b. Is SIU in.Compliance with Order?
a. N/A ..
b. N/A
a. N/A
b. N/A
48.
Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining any of
this Requested Information for You?
No
No
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS
PCI COMMENTS:
1. Files were neat and organized..
2. LMAC receives wastewater from the following locations: a section of the Town of Wagram, Scotland
' Correctional Institute, Spring Hill Middle School, and from industries near the airport. LMAC does not receive
any wastewater from the City of Laurinburg.
3. Two of the SIUs, Railroad Friction and Umicore, have their own 24-hour composite sampler.
4. Two of the SIUs, House of Raeford Farms and Scotland Manufacturing, do not have their own 24-hour
composite sampler and they borrow the POTW's 24-hour composite sampler.
5. The POTW requires that each SIU send to the POTW the SIU's monthly flow composite summary sheet that
indicates the flow for each day.
6. The POTW stamps the date that the POTW receives all information, correspondence, laboratory results, etc. for
the pretreatment program.
Recommendations from this PCI :
Requirement from this PCI:
NOD: YES
NOV: YES
QNCR: YES
POTW Rating:
NO
NO
NO
Satisfactory - Marginal Unsatisfact
PCI COMPLETED BY: Dale Lopez, Environmental Specialist y� 0 Date: 01/05/07
Name and Signature of Reviewer , Agency/Office/Telephone
Beli da nson 0
'J'pc-l1''o
Date
NCDENR/Fayetteville/[phone]
)l8/Q7

INDUSTRY INSPECTION CODING:
no industry inspection during this PCI
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac.Type
N j JNICIOIOI 11 I 1 1 _/_/_ �s ( 12 1
(DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC)
1.Industry Inspected:
2.Industry Address:
' 3.Type of Industry/Product:
4. Industry. Contact
Phone:
Fax:
5.Does the POTW use The Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent?
6.Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
Comments:
A. Initial Interview
B Plant Tour
C. Pretreatment Tour
D. Sampling Review
E. Exit Interview
Industrial Inspection Comments:

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C. 20460
E PA
Water,Compliance .Inspection' Report
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98 .
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code , NPDES - yr/mo/day. Inspection
1 1 rrl. 2 15_I . 31 NC0044725 1 11 121 06/12/13 1 17 '
Type Inspector Fac Type
181 pl .19I ;. I 20I I
I I 1 .I I I I I I ,• 11 I 1 1 166
.Remarks
211 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 11.1 I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I
.Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA — — . Reserved---------- ---------
671. ' 2.0 169 ' 70 i 31 . . 711 I ' 721 v lI .. _ 731 I 174 781 I I I I I l 180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW; also include
POTW name and NPDES permit Number) •
Laurinburg Industrial W;ti'i'P
NCSR 1434
Maxton NC 28364
Entry Time/Date
10.00 AN 0;i 2/?=
Permit Effective Date
05/06/1:I '
ExitTime/Date
0200 PM 06/12/13
Permit Expiration Date
09 t)7/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
///
Gary T Arnett/ORC/910-844-5081/
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Paul G Davis, PC) Box 31 Laurinburg NC 28353//910-844-5081/9108449687:
t^JU
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated) •
Pretreatment
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Sign- of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers.
Dale Lopez , FRO.WQ//910-433-3300 Ext.712/
Date
,5 ,
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and'.Fax Numbers e .
`1 . gym!, 1) 4 1 Da�o 7
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
31 111 12, , 17
NC00447?5 0.6/12/13 18121
(cont . )
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
The report indicates that the LaUrinburg-Maxton Airport Commission facility (NC0644725) met the
pretreatment requirements as outlined in 15A NCAC 2H .0900'for the Pretreatment Programs. Files were
neat and organi2ed. ,LMAC receives wastewater from the following locations : a section of the Town of
Wagram, Scotland Correctional Institute; Spring Hill Middle School, ,and from industries near the LMAC
facility. LMAC does not receive any wastewater flow from the City of Laurinburg: Two of the Sills,
Railroad Friction and Umidore, have their own 24-hour composite sampler. Two of the-SlUs, House of
Raeford Farms and Scotland Manufacturing, do not have their own 24-hour composite sampler and they
borrow the 24-hour composite sampler from 'LMAC. The POTW requires that each SIU send to the POTW
the SIU's monthly flow composite summary sheet that indicates the flow for each day. The POTW stamps
the date that the POTW receives all information, correspondence, laboratory results, etc. for the
pretregment program.
Page it 2