20051528 Ver 3_401 Application_20130731

oS- \Gac803
Fie '� 3
0 {eS�i "i CSC
BATEMAN CIVIL SURVEY COMPANY
Bateman Civil Survey Company, PC
200 North Main Street
Holly Springs, NC 27540
July 29, 2013
Karen Higgins
NC DENR -DWQ— WBSCP Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: PNC Buffer Authorization Sunset Point Greenway Boardwalk
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
info @batemancivilsurvey.com
R-Z; ovg
JUL 3 1 2013
Dear Ms. Higgins:
We are working with Cherri Smith on this project. We have enclosed three applications, three
copies of recorded plat Lot 24 Greenway Trail, three copies of Boardwalk plan S1 and three
copies of Boardwalk plan S2. There is no fee required for this application.
If you have any questions, please call Tom Speight, PE, PLS at 910 - 308 -2637 or email
tom @batemancivilsurvey.com.
Sincerely,
jP,td �
Thomas S. Speight, PE, PLS
Bateman Civil Survey Company, PC
BCS Transmittal Sunset Point Lot 24

ot W A
oa rEq�G
y
Q
ID$ - 1519 V3
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑ Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express na Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes Q No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes Q No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Sunset Pointe Subdivision Greenway Boardwalk
2b. County:
Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Holly Springs
2d. Subdivision name:
Sunset Pointe Subdivision
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
? 1XV loll
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Sunset point Homeowners Association
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
BM 2007 page 643 NWF - VVA I 1A1
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
�c Branch
3d. Street address:
5400 Trinity Rd., Suite 107
3e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27607
3f. Telephone no.:
919- 926 -2616
3g. Fax no.:
919- 926 -2616
3h. Email address:
jimmy.gaskins @meritagehomes.com
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Thomas S. Speight, Jr., PE, PLS
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Bateman Civil Survey, PC
5c. Street address:
200 North Main St.
5d. City, state, zip:
Holly Springs, NC 27540
5e. Telephone no.:
919 - 577 -1080
5f. Fax no.:
919 - 5771081
5g. Email address:
tom @batemancivilsurvey.com
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1075826690
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.6799 Longitude: - 78.802
1c. Property size:
0.02 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
UT Middle Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
CNSW
2c. River basin:
03 -04 -07
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Site was cleared when original sewer line was constructed.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.02
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 10.2
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Etablish area for construction of Greenway boadwalk
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Mow and hydro ax
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project includin all prior phases) in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
El Preliminary Q Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency /Consultant Company: S &EC
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
trpEC , �A.4 ou-C6V46 of SEv�fs� G�6f�a6%�S
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
Lot 24 to build walk on its property. Remaining by others
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams —tributaries ❑X Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
0
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 -
Choose one
-
-
0
S2 -
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation. then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico []Catawba ❑ Randleman []Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 -
Greenway Boardwalk
UT Middle Creek
No
60
40
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
60
40
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Mow hydro ax
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
L3DR A'i ft LNt o *-J ? o s-T s
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee ram
y program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
None require
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments: None required
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
Yes X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
None required
6h. Comments: Existing Sewer line was cleared during construction where walkway is proposed. No buffer mitigation is required.
r1
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑X Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Raised Green walkway way above stream. Stormwater plan not needed
❑ Yes Q No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0.4%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
Greenway Boardwalk raised does not inhibit stormwater flow
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
None required
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
None
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Holly Springs
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply):
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
Eg Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes Q No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
[]Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
[]Session Law 2006 -246
❑X Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes Q No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
Q Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes
Q No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered 'yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes
❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
[]Yes
Q No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes
Q No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes Q No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes Q No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Existing sewer crossing was permitted
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes Q No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Previous existing sewer permit
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes *0
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Raised Greenway boardwalk well above stream. Zone X
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA map
Jimmy Gaskins
July 29, 2013
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Appl canUAgent's Signature
Date
( enrs signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

2X6 PT VERTICAL W/
(2) SIMPSON 5DS25912
HDG TO POST TYP_
SX,l PT. POST SPACED
l'-/C ON CENTER MAX.
2X6 PT VERTICAL W/
(3) SIMPSON SD52542 --\
HOG TO POST TYP.
(2) 5/8" THRU BOLTS
HOG POST TO PERP.
BANDS AT ALL RAIL
POST
(2) 5/6" THRU BOLTS
HOG POST TO
CANTILEVER PT
BANDS AT GRADE
POST CONNECTIONS
2X6 PT CAP W/ (2)
SIMPSON SID5254112 HOG
TO POST AND (1)
SIMPSON SD525912 HDO
10 VERTICAL 2X6 PT
TYP_ !COUNTER SINK
SCREWS IF DESIRED)
2X2 PT PICKET SPACED
PER NCSBC WITH (2)
SIMPSON SDS25212 HOG
SCREW E.E. TO 2X6 FT
z
2X6 PT 0­K.
ATTACH W/ 3" 5/8" THROU"'iLl
DECK SC js BOLT HDC�
(2) 2XI0 P-1- EACH JOIS-1 _'P. SPACED `1­0"
BUTT AT O'C' AND
CENTER FROM Eta DS
(2) 2XIO PT BLOCKING -XIO PT 5 12"
t AT ALL RAIL POST
r I— _�,_ (STAGGER
(W) f2) SIMPSON NO OVER ' LAP
S )
5D525212 HDG E.E. (STAGGER
/_ -,.T GIRDERS)
(2) 3/1" THR;_
BOLTS HOG
EACH BAND -D
POST TYP.
6X6 PT POST TYP,
PEON 1­12.5
G EACH
ST TO BA
2X6 PT
BRACIN- W/ d) 5/8"
HRU -, T HOG
SIMPSON H2.5
OC LAP AND
NAIL
E- ING CROSS
)I TOGETHER W/
BRACT, - R E O'D IF
NAILS EXCEPT
LESS 7 -AN 18"
END JOISTS
(2) 5/8" THRU BOLTS
EXISTING ORA E TALL F-�OM GRADE)
HOG POST TO
CANTILEVER I-,
X OPTION 131-
<
BANDS AT GRADE
POST CONNECTIONS
4X4 MAY BE
ENCASED 1'-8"
61A. X 2'-0"
DEEP CONCRETE
LIJ
F TG.
0
Ci
Z
LU
<
Z,
4
U5 REBAR BY
LONG DRILLED
4, THROUGH CAN =R
J
<
OF PT 6X6
u
CENTER HEIGH
OF FOOTING E'..:.
(PAINT TO
PROTECT PRIG;
TO POURING)
DIA.
ALK
BOARDWALK T ON
SECTION CUT
iol-00 -00
10+31
9+86A3 ST ART 11+01,21
NH!tH I APPROX r-!.ull
�TE: GUARDRAILS
PI QUIRED WHERE
,_5
F3ARDS WALK IS MORE
-IAN 211" FROM GRADE=,
5JNIP; Q BLOCK OPTION
0E_ V1. WHERE BOARD
ld l --K'-') ARE LESS THAN
r, N -FIGHT FROM GRADE
'IX6 PT BY 8'-0" LONG
MIN, SPLICE OVER
SPACER BLOCK S WITH
BOLT 9" FROM END, TYP
9X6 FT BY 29•
LONG SPACED
J 9­0• ON CENTER
& AT BOLTS
(2) 2XI0 PT
BUTT
A1"
CENTER
100 YEAR FLOOD
388,0 ELFVATION PER
CIVIL
ENGINEER. (VE-e, FY)
T_
2X!2 PT EACH
SIDE 0= POST
TYP,
X! uj
_T
Lu 0
co z
z 1:
in iTj
0
UJI
----- co
LOWEST GRADE
3811,0 ELEVATION PER
CIVIL ENGINEER (VERIFY)
OPTION t12:
X6 MAY BE PILE
DRIVEN TO A
CAPACITY OF
5,000 LEIS MIN.
5C ALE: 3/-'l" = 1•0"
STAR T 11+99,82
AlF PROX I lHais
12+00
'l, ­
2X( 1 PT CAP W/ (7 SIMPSON
SDS,25112 HOG TO �'OST AND (1)
SIMPISON SDS259I2 -IDG TO
VERITICAL 2X6 PT TYP. (COUNTER
5INKII SCREWS IF DE SIRED)
0 (2) 5 THRU BOLTP 0
HOG ='OST TO PERF
BANC 5 AT ALL R.4(
POST
(2) 3/9 " T!,
BOLTS HD
EACH BANDTO
POST TYP.
2XI2 PT EO- H
SLDE OF P_FT
W/ 3/9 Mh:",
BEARING T" P�
9'-0" TYPICAL
1'_4"
SPLICE AT GRADE
SUPPORTS ONLY
TYPICAL
2X2 PT PICKET SPACED
PER NCSBC WITH (2)
SIMPSON SDS25212 HOG
SCREW E,E, 1-0 2X6 PT
(OMITTED FOR Cl ARITY
OPPOSING SIDE)
1XI PT, POST SPACED-
I'-C' ON CENTER MAX.
2X6 PT VERTICAL W/
(3) SIMPSON SDS25412 --\
HDG 1-0 POST TYP_
EXISTING GRADE
OPTION al-
6X6 MAY BE
ENCASED l'-s"
DIA. X .2'-0"
DEEP CONC ETE
FTG_ OPTION a2
XX ,
7-1 MAY BE PILE
,
DRIVEN TO I 6X6
CAPACITY OF
4 5.000 LBS MIN_
4
4
QI
2XI0 PT @ 12"
SIMPSON H2.5
OC LAP AND
NAIL
HDG 1015T TO:�i
B AND ONE SIDE
)I TOGETHER W/
('l) 10d HOG
NAILS EXCEPT
y
END JOISTS
(2) 5/8" THRU BOLTS
WHICH BUTT
AT SUPPORT
HOG POST TO
CANTILEVER I-,
BANDS AT GRADE
POST CONNECTIONS
EXISTING GRADE
OPTION al-
6X6 MAY BE
ENCASED l'-s"
DIA. X .2'-0"
DEEP CONC ETE
FTG_ OPTION a2
XX ,
7-1 MAY BE PILE
,
DRIVEN TO I 6X6
CAPACITY OF
4 5.000 LBS MIN_
4
4
QI
l-`Tj
I ON
B01ARM NALK SD-,
I
ELEVTION
WI-00
13 +32. /1
MHU16
11,14-00
SCALE;3 /9" = 1'-0"
15+00
lo,-O.. Lu
Al .1
cn o umj E� (C9
TEEL. OU
BOSLLAR-D ILI/ 8" co
6" STEEL BOLLARD < 0. uj
W/ 8­ SO, X /I'. C' STEEL 50, X /1" THK� z
REMOVABLE STEEL PLATE
--TI-4K. STEEL PLATE 7
BOLLARD WELDED TO
WELDED '10 BOTTOM ui
BOTTOM cn — m
fr
LOCK `[ PIN cn uj
Z° c) x
0 Lij
CONCRETE /SIDEWALK' G R A D E F-
Lu
CC
CONC.
CC
ujo
CONC. <)o
cc 2 tt co
LU 00 M
4 co
1 INSET o
T_ ,EL
SLEEVE m
C3 (D
DIA, w P "t
C.)
0
DIA, DIA. LL 0)
fJ
0 09
� u_
BOLI ARD SECTION SC-] A L 1---: 3 /'l 1` 0 ILL
ELEVATION
410d NAIL
HOG 41, OC 6X4 PT 1X
POST IO Pi 0 0-0c
4
SIMPSON
CONCRETE LUS210 HOC,
WALK WAY
X, x
CAR01
E A R' 1-4
_8X8 PT
POST
N T 9423 f 2
CONFICION
SIDEWALK TO BOARDWALK _ -��- - -- - - -__ _ r ° °X °�iF�'1 ;���sv
GUARDRAIL POST AT
CORNER OF NEW TO
EXISTING BOARDWALK SIMPSON L SIO -1- IQG S SEAL DATE: 1126/2012
A EACI- J015 TIE
T
NEW TO EXISTIN
BOAODWAL< G
2XI0 PT 12" OC zf
_SS/
%
C-3041
SIMPSON H2.5 1D t/ '-.PING
HOG JOIST TO
BAND ONE SIDE BOARDWALK BANDS
AT T;'E-IN LOCATION
T
LAS B SET OF PT
ANDS TO BE
INSTALLED PARALLEL THE DRAWINGS AND PLAN ENGINEERING
70 EXISTING POST SUPPORT TO ARE THE PROPERTY OF WOODARD S'EASE &
BOARDWALK BE LOCATED BASED ASSOCIATES, ISSUED EXCLUSIVELY ' FOR
ON TI-11E LOCATION THIS PROJECT AND SHALL NOT
!!E_IN BOARDWALK BE DUPLICATED OR USED FOR OTHER
PURPOSES, INVOICLE OR PART, WITHOUT
WRITTEN PERMISSION OF WOODARD SEAS'
CONNECTIO'N SCALE:3/1" 1­0" & ASSOCIATES.
NEW TO EXISTING BOARDWALK WOODARD SEASE & ASSOCIATES A139UME5
NO LIABILITY FOR DEVIATIONS FROM OR
CATIONS MA ETO THE PLANS BY
. ... ..... 0
OTHERS. WOODARD StASE &,ASs6c:IA,rEs
�3REENWAY DESIGN SUNSET POINT NO_IE'5 WILL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR
1.) DESIGNED IS BASED ON THE DRAWINCS BY �51-; EWART -PROCTOR ENc,"ERINC, AND CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO CONFORM
TO CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, FAILURE
SURVEYING LABELED SUNSET POIN t E 5',,i3DIV.5101J /"PB-S'UNSET', AND SE/,LED T
0 NOTIFY ENGINEER OF KNOWN
I1 -I9 °2005. DISCREPANCIES, OR CONSTRUCTION MEANS
2.) COMBINATION OF 10'-0" WIDE CONCRETE/SIDEWALK FOR GRADE AB'✓lE 100 AND METHODS.
YEAR FLOOD AND BOARDWALK CONSTRUCTION FOR GRADE BELOW IoG YEAR
FLOOD.
3,) THE GREED'S WAY IS NOTED TO STAPI 1,PPROXIMATELY AT I-­,D
P uj
TERMINATE AT' APPROXIMATELY 15�70 fER DRAWINGS PROVIDED By Cl',IL ENGINEER U)
'OR SUNSET P'OINTE. z
I.) CONTRACT!OR TO VERIFY ALL GRADE ELEVATIONS AND FINAL CON "RUCTION
15+10,18 16+00 f ELEVATIONS SO NOT TO EXCEED TH"' IREO'LlIRE'D MAXIMUMS SLOPES FC SIDEWALKS
OR BOARDWALKS WITH RESPECT TO N(--SBr--. z M.
5.) STAKED CENTERLINE OF THE GREEN WAY IS 10 BE APPROVED By '.DWNER PRIOR n
TO CONSTRUCTION, OWNER MAY MAKE MINOR ADJUSTMENTS TO THE GREEN WAY TO
PROTECT EXISTING TREES AND BE CLEAR OF 'IANHOLE COVERS, o
0 BOARDIJJALk', -1-0 REMAIN ON ONE SIDE OF SEWER LINE THE LENGTH _?-r TRAIL :;-
LL
< z
ul 3:
F-
c.qpyATo,­_- Of —­­ z cf) 0
f <
?j",egg pfans does f'of drveh per/0111970P
kjy'm I I -
mdOn irl, 11cor"Itmes V10 ILILI
'flarin 0 0 w
7`mr ao,,', QpPr'o"tgle, Ordinances. 0
ds andSpe-cij

vf
--------------
1. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY BATEMAN CIVIL SURVEY CO., UNDER 2W PRIVATE
THE suPERvam OF STEVEN P. CARSON, PLS. DRAINAGE EASEMENT
2. THIS IS NOTA BOUNDARY SURVEY. PROPERTY LINES SHOWN WERE r — — — — — — — —• — — - v
TAKEN FROM E=TING FIELD EVIDENCE, EXISTING DEEDS AND PLATS PRIVATE
OF PUBLIC RECORD, AND INFORMATION SUPPLIED 70 THE STIORMWATER EASEMENT
SURVEYOR BY THE CLIENT
3. THE LATITUDE, LONGITUDE AND STATE PLANE COORDINATES, IF
SHOWN, ARE GIVEN IN NORTH AMEMICAN DATUM OF IM (NAD83).
4. HELD EQUIPMENT USED: NIKON TOTAL ST ATION, EPOCH 35.
S. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES AND ALL
BEARINGS ARE NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE
SYSTEM UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN,.
6. THE PROPERTY LIES IN ZONE "r PER NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE R
d
PROGRAM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY
NUMBER 370403, PANEL 0750!, DATED 5/2/06-
7. ZONING IS R-10.
il. PROPERTY OWNER: MERITAGE HOMES OF NC, INC
5400 TRINITY ROAD, RALEIGH, NC 27607
SUITE 107
[phone]
9. NO GRID MONUMENTS FOUND WITHIIIN 2,000' OF THIS PROPERTY.
10. THE ONLY PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS ADD ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS
AS SHOWN HEREON
IL THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY.
CERnFirATE OF APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN
AND INSTALLATION OF STREEM, UTUJnES,
AND OTHER REQUIRED NPROVEENTl
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT' .
M
---ALL STREETS, UTIU71ES AND OTHER
REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS HAVE. SEE
INSTALLED IN AN ACCEPTABLE MANNER AND SOW95W APPROXIM\ATE
ACCORDING TO TOWN STANDARDS AND
SPECIFICATIONS OR GUARANTEIES OIFTHE 3%01�0 F
INSTALLATION Arvr%ki f%erLm= ninfu un=rv, JA. 2007
IMPROVEMENTS IN AN AMOUNr AND MANNER
sA'nSFACTORY 70 THE TOWN OF' HOLLY
SPRINGS HAS BEEN RECEIVED.
JLTHE TOWN OF HOLLY SPRINGS
APPROVES OF THE
EASEMENTSIRIGHT-OF-WAY DEEXCATION AS
SHOWN AND DELINEATED ON TITS PLAT.
fl'cc,
TO ENGINEER DATE
TOWN OF HOLLY SPRINGS, NORTH CAROLINA
�01.1 v i
Id 30 ILA -0
m
N
L12,10:1i,
t1upilum.
F !:�f I" cp
111111177 71
N/F
two"
fllhA �pps .1441
PIN.VW14509
*MMU 1,
Rm oases
to
74
F"NEOF OWN ERS1,11P
APDR *1 SHWW
`"9,*"WWWAY
rorN il"A".. A., --SF
"
I HERESY C M, CERTIFY THAT 1, AM THE Of
11HEFIERY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF
THE I" SHOWN MD DESCRIBED
THE: PROPIERTY SHOWN AND DESCRIBED
Uff s
HEREON. WHXH, PROPERTY IS L=ATED
.77-7777,
WITHIN "THE HIV S� REC,`iILATiCN+I
VOWTHIE SUDDIVINWREGULN"
APS
W OF HOIXY
JURISDI10TIC010F lit TOW
JUM$0tMMOF OF
THE TOWN P HOLLY
SPRINGS. AND THAT I FREELY ADOFT THIS
SPROM AND THAT t FREELY ADOPT'"
T �T7
,T
t1upilum.
F !:�f I" cp
N/F
two"
fllhA �pps .1441
PIN.VW14509
*MMU 1,
Rm oases
to
T �T7
,T
3=
Uff 00WOMM
, i , ,
AtWr.M
Wr
ROM"
PER B.M. 7 PG.
GRAPHIC SCALE
(w mv)
I inch = 40 ft
El
E-4
U,
rig
t1upilum.
F !:�f I" cp
WTON
two"
*MMU 1,
Rm oases
to
CERT*'CATS OF OWNERSHIP
F"NEOF OWN ERS1,11P
APDR *1 SHWW
`"9,*"WWWAY
rorN il"A".. A., --SF
"
I HERESY C M, CERTIFY THAT 1, AM THE Of
11HEFIERY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF
THE I" SHOWN MD DESCRIBED
THE: PROPIERTY SHOWN AND DESCRIBED
Uff s
HEREON. WHXH, PROPERTY IS L=ATED
WITHIN "THE HIV S� REC,`iILATiCN+I
VOWTHIE SUDDIVINWREGULN"
APS
W OF HOIXY
JURISDI10TIC010F lit TOW
JUM$0tMMOF OF
THE TOWN P HOLLY
SPRINGS. AND THAT I FREELY ADOFT THIS
SPROM AND THAT t FREELY ADOPT'"
3=
Uff 00WOMM
, i , ,
AtWr.M
Wr
ROM"
PER B.M. 7 PG.
GRAPHIC SCALE
(w mv)
I inch = 40 ft
El
E-4
U,
rig