Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20130798 Ver 1_401 Application_20130713w 20130798 Robert J. Goldstein and Associates, Inc. RJG &A ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 1221 Corporation Parkway, Suite 100 Since 1985 Tel: (919) 872 -1174 Raleigh, North Carolina 27610 Fax: (919) 872 -9214 e -mail: reoldsteinaRJGAcarohna.coni website• www.RJGAcarolina.com 17 July 2013 oil y Mr. David Shaeffer US Army Corps of Enginedirs 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587 Re: PCN for Lower Longview Lake Dam Repairs, Raleigh, Wake County ( Neuse River basin). Dear David, Attached is the PCN (NWP -3) for the City of Raleigh's proposed repairs to Lower Longview Lake Dam on an unnamed tributary of Crabtree Creek, two miles east of downtown Raleigh. I discussed the project with Jamie Shern in 2011, and based on that conversation he agreed the work could be permitted under Section 404 Nationwide Permit 3 for repair and maintenance. Let me know if you'd like to arrange a site visit to confirm this. DWQ staff visited the site with me in 2011, when we determined that the abandoned channel (original stream) below the dam is not subject to Neuse riparian buffers. The road across the dam crest (Albemarle Avenue) has been closed since 2008 due to the poor condition of the dam and its spillway culvert which serves as a bridge. The project will include the following much - needed structural and safety improvements to the dam and street: 1) widen the dam footprint to reduce the slopes of both the upstream and downstream faces; 2) replace the inadequate culvert spillway with a new dropbox riser, twin culverts through the base of the dam, and stilling pool below the dam; 3) raise the dam crest about three feet to prevent overtopping during major storms; and 4) widen the street to meet City standards and provide a sidewalk. The project as described herein, designed by Schnabel Engineering of Greensboro, will include the following unavoidable impacts to wetlands, streams, open waters (lake), and riparian buffers: Impacts Perm Temp Total Wetland 0.025 0.028 0.043 acre Stream 58. 10. 68. Lin.ft. Lake 0.410 0.917 1.327 acre Buffer zone 1 950. 20250. 21200. sq.ft Buffer zone 2 490. 4810. 5300. sq.ft The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) sent a scoping response letter stating that the dam is within Longview Gardens Historic District, which was listed in the National Register of Historic Places in 2011. SHPO requested site photos and plans for the reconstructed dam and road, and confirmation that the house to be demolished is not within the Historic District. NEPA & SEPA Environmental Documents EA, EIS, CE 1 Jurisdictional Wetland & Stream Buffer Delineations 1 404 - 401 Permits 1 G1S /GPS Mapping 1 Water Quality Studies I Stream & Wetland Mitigation and Restoration I Endangered Species Surveys I Biological Assessments & Conservation Plans I Water Intakes & Reservoirs I Water Lines & Treatment Plants I Sewerlines & Wastewater Treatment 1 Instream Flow Analyses 1 Interbasin Transfer Certificates 1 Watershed Assessment & Management 1 Archaeological Surveys and Testing 1 Phase 1 Site Assessments I Parks & Greenways Planning 1 CWMTF Grant Applications Robert J. Goldstein and Associates, Inc. RJG &A ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS RJG&A has submitted the requested photos, plans and information to SHPO, and attached copies to this PCN. SHPO also replied that it is unlikely that any archaeological resources would be affected, and that no archaeological survey is needed. C Feel free to email or call me or Jerry Robblbe at I Engineering if you have any questions about this project and its impacts�tn jlriSWiQi1al'wcters or other resources. ti Gerald Pottern, senior biologist Qpottern(aD-RJGAcarolina.com 919- 872 -1174 Copies To: NC Division of Water Quality (5 copies) Schnabel Engineering Raleigh Stormwater Utility Division ATTACHMENTS Pre Construction Notification (PCN) Form Agent Authorization Letter from City of Raleigh Project Vicinity, Topo and Soil Maps Selected Pages from Engineering Plans Stream, Wetland, Lake and Buffer Impact Maps Stream Quality Assessment Form Wetland & Upland Delineation Data Forms SHPO Comment Letter and Applicant's Response 401 Certification Fee Check for $240. (DWQ only) Page 2 y 1 1 `O�ot W A TF9 OG o < Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ED Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP-3 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ® Yes: (D.Shaeffer) ❑ No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization le. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deeds: Creek Floodplain (PIN 1724014398) NE of Albemarle Ave: City of Raleigh ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation ❑Yes No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu PIN 1724001981: DB= 1506, page 0543. PIN 1724014398: DB= 14858, page 2270. fee program. PIN 1724016151: DB= 1758, page 0548. PIN 1724013301: DB= 14858, page 2273. 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes ® No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes ® No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Lower Longview Lake Dam Repair 2b. County: Wake 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Raleigh, 2 rmles east of downtown on Albemarle Ave 2d. Subdivision name: Longview Gardens 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state NA project no: 3. Owner Information Lake (PIN 1724001981) SW of Albemarle Ave: Homeowners of Longview Gardens 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deeds: Creek Floodplain (PIN 1724014398) NE of Albemarle Ave: City of Raleigh Right Embankment (PIN 172401615 1) NE of Albemarle Ave: George & Carolyn Hall Left Embankment (PIN 1724013301) NE of Albemarle Ave: City of Raleigh 3b. Deed Book and Page No. PIN 1724001981: DB= 1506, page 0543. PIN 1724014398: DB= 14858, page 2270. PIN 1724016151: DB= 1758, page 0548. PIN 1724013301: DB= 14858, page 2273. Page 1 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3, Dec 2008 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC ): 4a. Applicant is: 3d. Street address: See Mailing Addresses Below 3e. Mailing Address: Longview Gardens HOA: 2536 Albemarle Ave, Raleigh NC 27610 -1810 City of Raleigh: 219 Fayetteville St, suite 1000, Raleigh NC 27601 -1309 George & Carolyn Hall: 2551 Albemarle Ave, Raleigh NC 27610 -1809 3f. Telephone no.: Contact: Chris Stanley, City of Raleigh Stormwater 919 - 996 -4003 3g. Fax no.: City of Raleigh Stormwater 919 - 996 -7633 3h. Email address: Contact: Chris.Stanley@raleighnc.gov 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: E] Agent ® Other, specify: City of Raleigh Stormwater Utility Division 4b. Name: Carl Dawson Jr., P.E. 4c. Business name: City of Raleigh Stormwater Utility Division 4d. Street address: 222 West Hargett Street, Room 400, 4e. City, state, zip: P.O. Box 590, Raleigh, NC 27602 4f. Telephone no.: 919 - 996 -3030 4g. Fax no.: 919- 996 -7633 4h. Email address: Carl.Dawson @raleighnc.gov, Chns.Stanley @raleighnc.gov, 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Gerald Pottern (Environmental Consultant) 5b. Business name: Robert J Goldstein & Associates, Inc. 5c. Street address: 1221 Corporation Pkwy, suite 100 5d. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27610 5e. Telephone no.: 919 - 872 -1174 5f. Fax no.: 919 - 872 -9214 5g. Email address: gpottem @RJGAcarolina.com 6a. Name: Gerald Robblee, P.E. (Engineering Consultant) 6b. Business name: Schnabel Engineering 6c. Street address: 11 -A Oak Branch Drive 6d. City, state, zip: Greensboro, NC 27407 6e. Telephone no.: 336- 274 -9456 6f. Fax no.: 336- 274 -9486 6g. Email address: grobblee @schnabel - eng.com Page 2 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3, Dec 2008 6- Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Properly identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): Upstream (Lake) Parcel PIN # 1724001981, Downstream (Outlet) Parcel: # 1724014398 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.7860 Longitude: - 78.5940 1c. Property size: Lake Parcel: 11.83 acres, Outlet/Floodplain Parcel: 0.99 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.): Lower Longview Lake on UT to Crabtree Creek 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Class C -NSW 2c. River basin: Neuse River: DWQ: 03- 04 -02, USGS: 03020201 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project at time of this application: Lower Longview Dam was built in the 1950s in the Longview Gardens neighborhood, on an unnamed tributary about 1900 feet upstream of its confluence with Crabtree Creek. The dam has a drainage area of 1.1 square miles, and impounds about 8 acres at normal pool level. Albemarle Ave runs along the crest of the dam, but has been closed to traffic since 2009 due to the poor structural condition of the culvert containing the spillway. Twenty residential properties border the lake, and several others border the creek below the lake. Milburnie Rd crosses this creek about 450 feet northeast (downstream) of Lower Longview Dam. Upper Longview Dam, which impounds a smaller lake upstream, is about 1400 feet west of Lower Longview Dam. Lower Longview Dam is approximately 20 to 25 feet tall and 550 feet long, with a crest elevation (road surface) ranging from 206 feet (lowest point near middle of dam ) to 210 feet (SE end of dam directly above spillway). The spillway crest elevation in the culvert beneath the road is approximately 201 feet, which is the normal pool elevation. The streambed elevation below the toe of the dam is approximately 183 feet. Elevations provided above are referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88). The downstream embankment slope is steep (1.5H:1 V and steeper in some areas) and the upstream slope has a shallow failure mass near the center of the dam. Both the upstream and downstream slopes of the dam are vegetated with brush and trees (many trees larger than 6 inches diameter). The existing principal spillway is a concrete box culvert, 15.8 feet wide by 7.5 feet tall, with concrete sidewalls and a steel and timber- framed roof which serves as a bridge for Albemarle Ave. A 3 -inch diameter natural gas pipeline and an 8 -inch diameter water pipeline are located within the roadway and are suspended below the culvert roof . The culvert inlet sill and much of the culvert floor is bedrock, and additional bedrock downstream of the culvert forms a 150 -foot long step -pool cascade that drops 18 feet to the sand/gravel creek bed below the dam. The receiving stream below the bedrock cascade is perennial, generally 10 to 15 feet wide, with sand, gravel and bedrock comprising the bed materials. Crayfish, mayfly and caddisfly larvae, sunfish, creek chubs and other small fish were observed by RJG &A during field surveys in February 2011. A muddy channel 140 feet long and 10 to 16 feet wide is located west of the stream and joins the stream 220 feet north of the spillway culvert. This sparsely- vegetated channel is the remains of the original (abandoned) stream prior to dam construction, and is now characterized as a linear wetland. It receives minor leakage from the lake's clogged drainpipe, seepage from under the dam, and runoff or seepage from adjacent uplands. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: The only wetland in the project area is the abandoned stream channel on the floodplain northeast of the dam and west of the active stream channel. It is approximately 140 feet long and 10 to 16 feet wide, with an area of 2000 sq.ft (0.046 acre). It is sparsely vegetated with a few wetland herbs, vines and small shrubs in the muddy channel bed, and larger shrubs and trees rooted on the non - wetland banks. The prevalence of soft silty mud and decomposing leaf litter indicates that it rarely conveys significant flow above the channel bed. The lake shoreline near the dam supports a narrow fringe (1 to 4 ft wide) of typical marsh herbs and shrubs, but these areas are within the normal lake pool and counted as open waters rather than wetlands. There may be additional wetlands along the upper lake shoreline beyond the project construction area; these areas were not examined. Page 3 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3, Dec 2008 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: The stream channel from the spillway culvert outlet at Albemarle Ave to the culvert inlet at Milbumie Rd is approximately 500 feet long. The upper 150 feet beginning at the culvert outlet is a bedrock cascade flowing over former uplands (not the natural channel) and below that it joins the low - gradient natural channel. Most of this stream is on parcel #1724014398, except the lowermost 50 ft near Milbumie Rd, which is on a residential lot beyond the project construction area. This stream is mapped on both the USGS Topographic Quadrangle (Raleigh East) and the USDA Soil Survey of Wake County (Sheet 59). 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: Dam safety inspection has revealed that Lower Longview Dam and spillway are in serious need of repair. Albermarle Ave along the dam crest has been closed to traffic since 2009 due to the poor condition of the road and spillway culvert roof which serves as a bridge for this road. The dam and spillway will be repaired and upgraded to meet current NC Dam Safety Act standards for a high - hazard dam. Trees will be removed from both dam slopes, and fill added to create a wider footprint and flatter slope of 3H:1 V. The new dam crest will be 36 feet wide to meet Raleigh street standards (with curb, gutter and sidewalk). The finished grade low point elevation will be approximately 209 feet, or three feet higher than the existing road surface low point. The old spillway culvert will be demolished and filled in, and a 1 -foot diameter pipe installed to maintain normal baseflow in the existing perennial stream. A new concrete drop box spillway inlet will be built near the middle of the dam to convey storm flows greater than the 1 -ft pipe's capacity, with twin culverts installed through the dam, and a stilling basin discharging to the old stream channel below the dam. The drop box and culverts are sized to pass the design storm without overtopping the dam, and the stilling basin will provide non - erosive flow velocity in the receiving stream. The lake's normal pool elevation will remain approximately the same at about 201 feet, but the lake surface area will be slightly reduced due to extension of the upstream slope. The project will maintain consistency with the City of Raleigh's Lake Preservation Policy. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Construction work will be performed in three stages, described below. Other tasks involving demolition and construction of utility lines, signs, driveways, and other structures that do not affect waters or riparian buffers are not described here. Stage 1: Install a temporary siphon pipe through the culvert spillway to drain the lake. Base flow and storm flow will be conveyed through the old culvert spillway (elevation 201 ft) during Stage 1 construction. Install the erosion and sedimentation control measures. Excavate sediment and woody debris along the upstream slope of the dam and adjacent lake bed, and construct the Stage 1 coffer dam (earth fill and geogrid) to dewater the proposed construction areas for the drop box spillway and upstream slope grading. Construct a second, smaller coffer dam across the former stream channel (wetland) downstream of the proposed stilling basin. Excavate the lake bed and a trench through the central portion of the dam down to residual soil foundation, remove the old clogged drain pipe, and construct the new drop box riser, twin culverts through the dam with filter drainage and diaphragm, and stilling basin below the dam. The drop box riser will have a 25 x 40 ft footprint, a bottom drain outlet at 188 ft elevation, a 20 -ft long front spillway at 201.6 ft, and two 35 -ft long side spillways at 206.3 ft. Backfill the trench over the new culverts and riser, then complete the Stage 1 grading on the center and left portions of the upstream dam embankment up to 208 ft elevation. Place riprap on the upstream slope between 196 and 206 ft elevation. Remove the Stage 1 cofferdams and siphon. Stage 2: Construct the Stage 2 coffer dam in the lake around the existing culvert spillway area, and a rock check dam across the creek below the bedrock cascade (180 ft downstream of the old culvert). Pass storm flows through the bottom drain outlet on the new drop box riser. Demolish and remove the existing spillway bridge and culvert, and clear, grub and excavate the downstream dam slope as required to install the drainage structures. Clean the bedrock downstream of the culvert, apply concrete to achieve proper grade for the new base flow spillway pipe, and install the concrete pipe (1 ft diameter, approximately 130 ft long) with inlet and outlet headwalls. The pipe inlet elevation in the lake will be the same as the old culvert spillway (201 ft) and the outlet will be at 194 ft elevation, located about 55 ft downstream of the old culvert outlet (to accommodate the fill required to widen the downstream dam slope). The exposed sewerline along the right bank below the culvert will also be encased in concrete. Build a reinforced concrete toe wall (68 ft long) just above and parallel to the left bank of the stream, downstream of the baseflow spillway pipe outlet, at the proposed toe of the expanded dam. Backfill the old spillway over the new baseflow pipe, and grade the remaining upstream and downstream portions of the dam embankment. Place riprap on the upstream slope between 196 and 206 ft elevation to match the central and left upstream portions. Seed all exposed soil areas on both slope with groundcover appropriate for dam embankments. Page 4 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3, Dec 2008 3e. continued: Stage 3: Remove the Stage 2 cofferdam and reconfigure the stream diversion to convey base flow through the new pipe spillway. The lake can now begin to refill, and storm flow will pass through both the concrete pipe spillway and the new riser. Install stormwater collection and drainage features for the road and downstream slope of the dam, with riprap extending 3 feet beyond the toe of slope below the downstream storm drain outlets. Install new utility lines (water, gas, electric) on the dam crest, build up the embankment to the design sub -base elevations for the road, then complete fine grading and paving of Albemarle Ave (209 to 211 ft elevation) and the new sidewalk. Remove the erosion and sediment control devices after permanent vegetation is established. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the ❑Yes ® No ❑ Unknown Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes ® No 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type ❑ preliminary ❑ Final of determination was made? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency /Consultant Company: Name (if known): Gerald Pottern Other: Robert J.Goldstein & Assoc (RJG &A) 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. DWQ staff Amy Chapman, Ian McMillan, and Lauren Witherspoon visited the site on 30 Aug 2011 with Gerald Pottern of RJG &A, Jerry Robblee of Schnabel, and John Brubaker of Raleigh Stormwater. DWQ confirmed during this field meeting that Neuse riparian buffers apply to the active perennial stream and not to the former channel or the spillway. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑Yes ® No ❑ Unknown 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. NA. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No 6b. If yes, explain. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ® Buffers Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. > NONE 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact # Type of jurisdiction Permanent (P) or Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Temporary T if known DWQ — non -404, other acres W 1 ®P ❑ T Stilling Basin Linear depression El Yes ® Corps 0.025 & Ri ra Rip rap (old stream channel) ®No DWQ W2 [—]POT Clearing & Temp Linear depression El Yes ® Corps Cofferdam (old stream channel) ® No C] DWQ 0.018 W3 ❑ P ❑ T NA NA ❑ Yes ❑ Corps NA ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts O.p 3 ac Page 5 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3, Dec 2008 2h. Comments: The wetland to be filled is the old stream channel, dewatered when the dam was built. The wetland will become an intermittent stream, receiving all lake outflow greater than the baseflow that the 12" spillway pipe will carry. 3. Stream Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. 4b. If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody Stream Impacts (feet) 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number - P1 NA- Existing Pond (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Permanent (P) or 02 ❑ P ®T Lower Longview Lake intermittent DWQ — non -404, width (linear Temporary (T) Stage 2 cofferdam fill Lake (INT)? other) (feet) feet) S1 ®P ❑ T Piped &Filled UT Crabtree Cr, bedrock on dam R E] INT ❑ ED Corps DWQ 12 ft 58 ft S2 ❑ P ®T Temp rock UT Crabtree Cr, ® PER ® Corps 15 ft loft fill elev below 201' (no pool loss) checkdam below bedrock ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 4E Total open water impacts Perm = 0.410 acre - -- Temp = 0.917 acre 4g. Comments: The permanent impacts (dropbox riser and upstream embankment fill) are within the temporary impact area (sediment I 688 fi 3i. Comments: The piped and filled segment on the bedrock cascade immediately downstream of the existing box culvert is necessary to accommodate extension of the downstream dam embankment, for dam safety reasons. temporarily drained during dam repair, and the sediment thus dewatered prior to removal. 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Temporary T Excavated Flooded P1 NA- Existing Pond 01 ❑ P ®T Lower Longview Lake Stage 1 lake sediment removal Lake 1.327 acre 02 ❑ P ®T Lower Longview Lake Stage 1 cofferdam fill Lake 0.296 acre 03 ❑ P ® T Lower Longview Lake Stage 2 cofferdam fill Lake 0.094 acre 04 ® P ❑ T Lower Longview Lake Dropbox riser & embankment Lake 0.225 acre fill elev above 201' (pool loss) 05 ® P ❑ T Lower Longview Lake Dropbox riser & embankment Lake 0.185 acre fill elev below 201' (no pool loss) 4E Total open water impacts Perm = 0.410 acre - -- Temp = 0.917 acre 4g. Comments: The permanent impacts (dropbox riser and upstream embankment fill) are within the temporary impact area (sediment removal and cofferdam areas. The temporary impact acreage is therefore 1.327 acre minus the permanent impacts (0.410 acre) = 0.917 acre. Fill in the lake is required to widen the dam embankment slope to 3:1 for dam safety purposes. The permanent lake fill (0.410 acre) includes 0.225 acre of pool area reduction (fill extending above 201') and 0.185 acre of lake bed made shallower. The lake will be temporarily drained during dam repair, and the sediment thus dewatered prior to removal. 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose of (acres) number pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 NA- Existing Pond 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 6 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3, Dec 2008 P2 NA below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5E Total 6b. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5g. Comments: Rehabilitation of existing dam and spillway. Pool elevation will not change, but pool area will decrease by 0.226 acre due to added fill for reducing the embanlanent slopes. 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ®Yes E] No If yes, permit ID no: Lower Longview Lake Dam is classified by NC NC Dam Safety NID ID# NCO 1627, State ID# WAKE -212 Dam Safety Program as a high - hazard dam. Buffer mitigation 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): Approx•8 acres at normal pool (existing) 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): Approx 750 acres 5k. Method of construction: Earthen embankment 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ® Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact # Permanent (P) or Reason for impact Buffer mitigation Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Temporary T Stream name required? (square feet (square feet 61 ❑ P ®T Clear & grade for upstream dam Longview Lake ❑ Yes 3460 0 embankment & road repair, RBK ® No B2 ❑ P ®T Clear Clear & grade for upstream dam Longview Lake El 9480 1470 embankment & road repair, LBK ® No B3 ❑ P ® T Clear for construction access UT Crabtree Cr ® Yes s 1105 0 ❑ P ®T Construction access for stream UT Crabtree Cr El Yes 985 0 piping and sewer casing ® No B4 ® P ❑ T Concrete casing on sewerline UT Crabtree Cr ® Yes s 420 0 B5 ® P ❑ T Concrete toe wall along left UT Crabtree Cr ®Neo 450 0 stream bank B5 ® P ❑ T New outlet stilling basin & riprap UT Crabtree Cr ® Nos 80 490 B5 ❑ P ® T Downstream wetland cofferdam UT Crabtree Cr ® Nos 0 280 B5 ❑ P ®T downstream embankment emban UT Crabtree Cr ® Nos 5240 3060 6h. Total buffer impacts 21,220 sq.ft `,300 sq ft 6i. Comments: D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization Page 7 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3, Dec 2008 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The downstream dam face must be extended to meet current safety requirements, so it is not possible to avoid the small wetland at the toe of the dam or the 58 -ft segment of stream below the old culvert. The stilling basin outlet will match the grade of the natural receiving stream below. The toe wall along the left stream bank will avoid the need to relocate or pipe the perennial stream. Open water impacts within the lake will be mostly temporary (dewatering, cofferdam, excavation and backfill) except that the lake surface area will decrease by 0.22 acre. The new drop box riser and fill required to broaden the upstream dam slope are unavoidable, but will have minor adverse impact on aquatic life or neighborhood use of the lake. The riprap along this slope will provide habitat structure for juvenile fish and other aquatic life. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Temporary cofferdams and bypass piping will keep the work area dewatered to minimize erosion, turbidity, and potential concrete toxicity. Erosion and sediment controls and flow bypassing will ensure minimal damage and adequate flow to the stream below the dam during construction. Trees must be permanently excluded from the dam embankment by periodic mowing, but all areas of the dam embankment that do not require concrete or riprap for stability will be kept vegetated to enhance stormwater infiltration. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ❑ Yes ® No 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? Mitigation bank Payment to in -lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank a. Name of Mitigation Bank: NA b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) �ype (NA) �uantity (NA) c. Comments: NA 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes b. Stream mitigation requested: (NA) linear feet c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): NA square feet e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: NA acres f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested: NA acres g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: NA acres h. Comments: Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. NA Page 8 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3, Dec 2008 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ tF, a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ® No buffer mitigation? within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. Zon c Reason for impact d. Total impact Multiplier 6e. Required mitigation e (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 NA NA 3 (2 for Catawba) NA one 2 NA NA 1.5 NA Stormwater drainage details are shown in Schnabel Engineering's plan sheets 14 to 18 and 30 to 39. 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: NA g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund). NA �h. Comments: NA E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ® Yes ® No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Comments: No new development; just in -land repair and replacement of existing dam and street. Runoff from the road surface and downstream dam slope will be collected and piped ❑ Yes ® No to the stilling basin. Stormwater drainage details are shown in Schnabel Engineering's plan sheets 14 to 18 and 30 to 39. 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? (Error! Not a valid bookmark self - reference.) /o 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes ® No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: No new development; just in -kind repair and replacement of existing dam and street. Runoff from the road surface and downstream dam slope will be collected and piped to the stilling basin. Stormwater drainage details are shown in Schnabel Engineering's plan sheets 14 to 18 and 30 to 39. 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: Stormwater drainage details are shown in Schnabel Engineering's plan sheets 14 to 18 and 30 to 39. ® Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program ❑ DWQ 401 Unit Page 9 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3, Dec 2008 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? City of Raleigh 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an ® Phase II ® NSW 3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs ❑ USMP apply (check all that apply): ❑ Water Supply Watershed State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval ❑ Other: letter.) 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review 2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Coastal counties 4a. Which of the following state- implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW ❑ ORW ❑ Session Law 2006 -246 (check all that apply): ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the ® Yes ❑ No use of public (federal /state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes ® No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1c. If you answered 'yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval ❑ Yes ❑ No letter.) 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ® No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application? ❑ Yes ® No 2c. If you answered 'yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): NA 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) Page 10 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3, Dec 2008 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes ®No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts? 3b. If you answered 'yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. This project will not increase the lake elevation, volume, impounded area, or developable shoreline. The neighborhood has been built -out for many years. This project is solely for dam safety and traffic safety purposes, not for growth. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. This project will not generate any new sanitary wastewater, but the adjacent homes upstream and downstream of the dam are served by the City of Raleigh sewer system. 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat? ❑ Yes ® No 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts? ® Yes ❑ No 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ® Raleigh ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? US -FWS and NC -NHP online lists of federal endangered species reported from Wake County include Dwarf Wedgemussel, Red - cockaded Woodpecker, and Michaux's Sumac. No suitable habitat for these species exists in or adjacent to the project area, based on field surveys by RJG &A in February 2011 and June 2013. Habitats in the project area have been fragmented and isolated by urban development for 50+ years, and it is unlikely that any of these species could persist in or colonize this site. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes ® No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NC -DMF and NC -WRC have not designated any Essential Fish Habitat in the Crabtree Creek watershed. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust ® Yes ❑ No designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? Lower Longview Lake Dam is located within the Longview Gardens Historic District, which was listed in the National Register of Historic Places in 2011. SHPO requested site photos and plans for the reconstructed dam-and road, and confirmation that the house to be demolished is not within the Historic District. Photos, plans and requested information are being sent to SHPO. SHPO also replied that it is unlikely that any archaeological resources would be affected, and no archaeological survey is needed. Page 11 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3, Dec 2008 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain? ® Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: The new spillway was sized to match the flow characteristics of the existing structure, with the upper spillway on the dropbox riser at 206.3 feet elevation. Schnabel Engineering has prepared a No -Rise Certification Letter based on HEC -RAS modeling which shows a "no -rise" condition. The project will not affect the FEMA 100 -yr flood elevation upstream or downstream. 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Wake County FIRM Panel #1724 (May 2006, viewed on www.ncfloodmaps.com) indicates a 100 -yr flood elevation of 201 feet (zone AE) extending from Crabtree Creek upstream to Lower Longview Dam. The FIRM Panel does not indicate a flood elevation upstream of the dam. Gerald Pottem 12 July 2013 Applicant/ Agent's Printed Name Date Applicant or Agent's Signature (Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from applicant is provided.) Page 12 of 12 PCN Form — Version 1.3, Dec 2008 rr North Carolina June 12, 2013 RE: Lower Longview Lake Dam Rehabilitation City of Raleigh Stormwater Uitlity Project SM 2012-0014 Permitting Agent Authorization (NCDWQ & USACOE 401 /404 Permitting) TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: www.raleighnc.gov This letter authorizes Robert J. Goldstein & Associates to act on behalf of the City of Raleigh for the purposes of obtaining Section 404 -401 authorization and permitting for the Lower Longview Lake Dam Rehabilitation Project at Albemarle Avenue. Should you have any further questions or comments, please contact Chris Stanley, Project Manager at (919) 996 -4003 or via email at chris.stanle, raleig nc.gov. Thanks much for your continued cooperation and support. Sincerely, Carl R. Dawson, Jr. Public Works D' cc: Danny Bowden, City of Raleigh Stormwater Utility Manager Scott Bryant, City of Raleigh Stormwater Senior Engineer Chris Stanley, City of Raleigh Stormwater Project Engineer Gerald Pottern, Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc. Gerald Robblee, Schnabel Engineering South, PC Samuel Kees, Schnabel Engineering South, PC File ONE EXCHANGE PLAZA CITY OF RALEIGH 1 EXCHANGE PLAZA POST OFFICE BOX 590 RALEIGH NC 27601 RALEIGH, NC 27602 -0590 (MAILING ADDRESS) Printed on Re(ii led Paper MUNICIPAL BUILDING 222 WEST HARGETT STREET RALEIGH NC 27601 USGS Topographic Quadrangle: Raleigh East. Lower Longview Lake Dam Project Vicinity Map. USDA Soil Survey of Wake County NC (1970). Lower Longview Lake Dam Project Vicinity Map. Wake County Naps GIS Affected Tax Parcels in the vicinity of Lower Longview Lake Dam. ]5'41' ZONE 742 500 FE ZONE 39E3 xr ZONE 35',7 740 OCO Fi 7 1 79' 3s' 30' 2 122 500 FUT FEMA Flood Hazard Map, Wake County FIRM Panel 1724, from NC Flood Mapping Program. Arrow indicates Lower Longview Lake Dam. 1 �7 tollpr�r� awnww 7DY:IYMOYYI .J� 0�l f0 Y IrJWND I` f T f —4-- � iO�YM� Ma.o.oa r � � r � 1 ®�® � Asatllnsrrnra� •MYRAtfpONlgY R i • �� '; � to t � i i osT.a aeoc ooreKt 9 / "War" PAID *000 Y / ro�obQ�ao ooaoa �wOawo�wufa on I nO Z n ✓l' I / TOYbO•fY YlllWla � f /YlTOKKYO�li0M1V4 TOlRAbiT /% / dYpiM1MO1Y10K pylMarlMllt " " O 9 O O �� OOIIDATIOAIMI/(MITtTM11AY _ , O /i _ Q v♦ ?AL r T t , M~T=GMftG MV4 TO Y OWa1fHO A•MYO/O Al 0 �14•ArRDU/OO COMPLAUM a eowT�lenal t � b - t KroreoAlowYaACO /Yf wOgT \ \ INS (IOfa1M MOIPIAC►tOY 11/1DMY1Ytn01ta 7 I y I I 1 �'l +y - AM INOMMT iONYROOMm ` 1KKT0YADLRT♦p `ryle�l'm _ MOMRACi0.pf _ �1 NL10NN •'OIftMIDA1tAfAy00K4f/OIA� f �� 1 fti rrYtwTa � Y1O100M1101 -- •�AtDK V H f � wowi4wri1 uollnoa11ao1wTttlar 1�ewraufro � ; ` ��1 4# 1 r '�� �t , r �/I � } r 1 Lower Loa�yiew Lade Nom a/ Pool :a Existing Water of the US: ' Lake, Stream and Wetland► n DE i puw 0 1W Figure A. Existing Waters of the US: Lake, Stream and Wetland, Lower Longview Lake Dam Repair, Wake County NC r T t , M~T=GMftG MV4 TO Y OWa1fHO A•MYO/O Al 0 �14•ArRDU/OO COMPLAUM a eowT�lenal t � b - t KroreoAlowYaACO /Yf wOgT \ \ INS (IOfa1M MOIPIAC►tOY 11/1DMY1Ytn01ta 7 I y OfIfM ffff4f.fpT f/ Y.) Wetland Impact W2: Stage 1 clearing 8 cofferdam ■ 0A18 acre Temp I _ 1 '• / Ni E r 'Wetland Impact W7: Stilling basin, I J, r �f-So/ fill & riprap ■ CAN acre Perm - __...a- Tempoi a�y s phan plpi fiat.. 40M Albemarle Ave _ "" T « ennanent pipe spillway ' —�— ALSBAMU E AVE. La Impact tags 1 Drop Box Riser + Embankment FIII / • jj d�� ' • 0225.8 cre Perm (pool reduction 9 Lab Impact 05: Stage 1 Drop - f ` Box Riser + Embankment FIII r ' --1-- 0.185 acre Perm (no pool IA* — • e...+fti..NJ r ,f, �1 _a, ( fff0�fs fAflf.IICMR r • • � � �oi. � � 1 Lake Impact 01: sediment z�� • • ( \ excavation ■ total 1.327 acre • 1 . • (includes T+P Impact areas 02-06) i • imp i : I I s I Cofferdam ■ 0288 acre Temp -_ AMtMflwffO.f«fff CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE NOTES ■+its s.sz' s _ _ i = _ _ _ _ _ _ �yLS ai�'� �`� ffO.RlfLw..p Tf«..ff fffM CVNf1 +no )•.uc •fffYY0..f1).Yp.ef0.Y !talet� Mf.Ce ■fMlef.11.afM ffWwOl olM.Maw wDO.w a.Ol ptlw�Mar.ww.siF. brow Y ffgff.0 f (:prtrfflfl YfiAfy4Cff P.Rwfw.r...F�•rOYf.f Figure B. Stage 1 Construction Impacts in Jurisdictional Waters. Lower Longview Lake Dam Repair, Wake County NC. Schnabel Sheet 11. X ` L 1 !• _ � �� 1 �� 1� i • � ` 1 � 't � .��.�.r'a EKrvdeosrrKIM bi PL*AZ '1 t 806KCOMCKWN \LC.AST \ Stream Impact S2: Tompor�ry 1 i rocs check dam 10 it i LNMS OF OKRIYAMM ceco++caeie'�,t'r' 1 / t � � j r17LVTtRr ccr:5ra�creo I + `y 1 , I r r 1 w� ` �, \ „r :,f�� \ � �* � 1 \ S r; •may 1 / ,, TM WALL Stream Impact 81: Pipe —= and flIl bedrock stream/ r� _ - \\ ` �.,_ '.' }� �- spIIKM 68 R Perm ; - - - - -- - - - - --------------- - _ - -- - -- - - - - -- -- - -- --- - - - - -- - - _ - -- ----------- f - - - - -- - -- rA BEMARLE AM - -.:r y,�,�X- ....rte- .-- �•--- -- -_ , --- --- i --- x ----- x -cL - , a�ar.. dgTTIM fTT1AE7Q9N9lTMM1 TO - _ T'pPdWIY COwTIVicrow 01"W" rB OE•luL , ow ev6:r6�M _ _ �JI 1 -- it 7pleaf«4!M -- na _ - _ urllrrONMGa _- -- - --� i'' _ r — —z —^ J!.a_ -rte - ra �_s-�— s •7_i � • At - - - - -- i% f------------------ _.. -_ tOiMIMY WIfi/IAMr = -- �`� -- i _ s - 4J Ji • i "— sin 1 W7l OF047NM/M'CS 1 i � / i r rJ • ' rrl i •'/ a / 1 i Ja 1 A r r 7111 7 1— —� h&F F IECTIOR ` 1 I r 1 ! 1 I I r Sur 2ON SHMT E•TOL 1 1 ! I r J 1 , I SLY FEMCEwnS* I 1 / iTMM) 51MiE 2 COFFERDAM r CL CMST LL 207.5 i dp Lake Impact 03: Stage 2 1 ; s '.) . �� r h� temp cofferdam = CAN acre � ,r Figure C. Stage 2 to 3 Construction Impacts in Jurisdictional Waters. Lower Longview Lake Dam Repair, Wake County NC. Schnabel Sheet 35. 1 .. .... ...... .... ` D 9M i1i 19 0Ptio9 ON i O■ PIN / 1724 01 1492 : 1• JELEMNZDER_`ON 41 • OB 6154 P JM 814 1960 -110 PN It 1724 01 3301 wetland / Intermittent stream �' • t1O0 -If■ below new stilling basin tce new .Tr-. 190--= ` P710PO000 „r,,,,at, a stream fill � 11 ewo MPM \\ � N I \ ! KATE L CW1c 4i MV. OOT - loc." {'. DO 1084 P 49 9'J -��011 NN 1722- t •� ¢A \ �? 4 r sl� ntSITIC %TFI q SANIARY g ■ER t K ErPASQI wn+ IWaCN 'JirNl j`. idrop' Proposed odgo of ANT'" 6 = -1 - * * box i ormal "am" pool, 201'. IrriseJ - - . rwa.m . - -_ -. _ - . • (SEC OHM A-1' lr 00r I�4w.m • r1tl.414 • . • i—i 11�"STi • • • +_ • • • +:) too of now upstream All ,SEX v PQi (Sa spw A -108) •tOMEOMNEM OF M 3VI[M O11111110cm Oo0P0 DF 1 361 P 127 _ 1110(1$) PIN } 1724 GO 1901 y UTKt Of rNiN11 ALL for STATE.iND P IM11Ni~! 1 1 LL S S - TROSPOKUTON SWAM r14O1JC LKRnn Figure D. Final Site Plan, Lower Longview Lake Dam Repair, Wake County NC. Schnabel Sheet 32. lop,. 0!41 5�� t rD.cE (*m? i (IS ■/ ,y.p COyNyIpR�K;IOgR� �t0�IOIMf+IO�[E Al Wj1 ISF OR P 1DDF u E1 REOOYYEND A. 9b WORMAI7Y 'ZVEP - - C.EVRIC METER 1XW. OW 1957 33 Buffer Impact B3 nAOS ICONAM AN I , Zone 1 a 1105 sf Temp 'wl 1 I caltr»Qo ftws \, Zone none Buffer Impact B5 \I Zone 1 ° 5240 st Temp 1 Buffer Impact B4 } i 530 st Perm Z e 1 = 985 st Temp J/ -•`•� i Zone 2 = 3340 st Temp f Q 420 st Perm 490 st Perm ` none 1 uns Or s»aawenAUN t perennial stream ti �, I ovcleaca.iiw..rr 1 _ ue>.r1oAnNaawn wa Alw :lt,tw iwlTM1M"pWI ' wbW011f «AllYl101 1 aL L. � 1 I Sflw/Y 1 l[ I 1 lYM ss.w ALBEMARLE AVE. — ALBEMARLE AVE _ Sim IYiLNlSOC y I _ i s k Existing Lake 1 - w Normal Pool 201' '. � awwlawursnluGnsw � . �� •'! �- �^�" Buffer Impact B2 Zone 1 a 9480 st Temp Zone 2 = 1470 st Temp 0 30 50 ft was s r ownwVNtMMCOMnMC:/oROrfrl® \ I pal wMrrrwanllwaolsa"rwwulwr _ ~� I �... I ( � • NOTES �, u.w l wotrgrlwllt IIbv0110100onwprl I ' tw V AEO MS. I, 4wlIH14t01 Buffer Im act E31 ' S CGA1NICi P.w lfd�010»SMMMHa "K9M/N101101 011.AM"m"1 Salta lO RNUWa *%* I p - — •••- rawlaassxANl+n 01AVWoOCMVM1 °s' °F^'°' — `y— — — Zon! 1 a 13460 tf Temp 8 E.GV.rl IM04011w�IwD "1"wwOWl�ga 2 sM•�YOR M4i pAl "A 91MA ALOPM SN10NMTOMM tSIMORAFMPSTOwI _. Zone 2 a none' , = Figure E. Riparian Buffer Impacts -- Lower Longview Lake Dam Repair, Wake County NC. Schnabel Sheet 9. LISACE AID // UWQ it Site ll_ _ (indicate oil attached map) I M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: ,,_/ A 1. Applicant's name: CIk o1 /Ce e" _ 2. Evaluator's name:_ 6eWel Pb /Anf 3. Dale of evaluation: �r t�0 %% 4. Time of evaluation: /0 :00 5. Name of stream: U ( Crab ftc Co-, 40"1146W L • 6. River basin: NeWtoflj IC MOW Cr 7. Approximate drainage area: ,Mj 2 8. Stream order: / /02 9. Length of reach evaluated: ��� fftt 10. County: Wake `, 11. Site coordinates (il'known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): t"o/low (5a►wPNS Laliludc (ex. 34 972312): 35. 7960 Longitude (ex. —77.556611 Y• ^ 731 • l y� Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet )rtho (Aerial) Phntu /CiIS Other GIS Other__ 13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and and mars and attach map identifying ,treanl(s) location): I . _ ... . . — ... N .... 14. Proposed channel work (if any): 1 A N y /Very, 15. Recent weather conditions: hotYml 16. Site conditions at time of visit: hormd wiofer Anse flow 17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters `Essential Fisheries !Habitat _Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _Y, Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed _(I-] V) 18. is there a pond or lake located upstream ofthe evaluation point'? YI:S NO If yes, estimate the water surface area: I acres 19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map'? GS NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? 0 NO 21. Estimated watershed land use: 6_° /, Residential 20 ON ConlmerciaV5ch001J__% Industrial _' %, Agricultural 2D % Forested _' %a Cleared/ Logged _% Other ( _ 22. Bankfull width: 11S_ feet 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 21%,) Gentle (2 to 4 %) _Moderate (4 to 10 %,) Steep (> 10111) 25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the c haracteri sties identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. 11,0 characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the highest quality. Evaluator's Signature ,t�� 9�O.tw__ Date 0 dune 2013 This channel evaluation onrm is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919 - 876 -8441 x 26. NC -D�l)Q Sik V1sif Auy ,3c� 20/1 —P' c�oyl�i�it�eo� pere�uc,fol� ntfi' US -ACE STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -- North Carolina Stream Evaluated: UT Crabtree Cr below Lower Loneview Lake Dam. Wake Countv. 24 Feb 2011 # CHARACTERISTICS ECOREGION POINT RANGE SCORE Coastal Piedmont Mountain 1 Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream 0­5 0 -- 4 0­5 4 (no flow or saturation = 0; strong; flow = max points) 2 Evidence of past human alteration 0­6 0 -- 5 0_5 2 (extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points) 3 Riparian zone 0­6 0 -- 4 0_5 2 (no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points) 4 Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0­5 0 -- 4 0­4 3 extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points) 5 Groundwater discharge 0­ 3 0 -- 4 0 -- 4 2 a (no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points) u 6 Presence of adjacent floodplain 0­4 0 -- 4 0­2 3 (no flood lain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points) IL 2 Entrenchment / floodplain access 0_5 0 -- 4 0­2 2 (deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points) 8 Presence of adjacent wetlands 0­6 0 -- 4 0­2 1 (no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points) 9 Channel sinuosity 0_5 0 -- 4 0­3 2 (extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points) 10 Sediment input 0­5 0 -- 4 0­4 2 (extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = max points) 11 Size & diversity of channel bed substrate NA 0­4 0 -- 5 2 (fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points) 12 Evidence of channel incision or widening (deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points) 0­5 0 -- 4 0­5 2 13 Presence of major bank failures 0 - -5 0 - -5 0 - -5 3 (severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points) m 14 Root depth and density on banks 0--3 0--4 0--5 3 < (no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points) 15 Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production (substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points) 0__S 0 -- 4 0­5 4 16 Presence of riffle- pool /ripple -pool complexes (no riffles /ripples or pools = 0; well - developed = max points) 0­3 0 -- 5 0­6 2 17 Habitat complexity 0 - -6 0 - -6 0 - -6 2 a (little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points) H Canopy coverage over streambed 0 -- 5 0 -- 5 0 -- 5 3 Q113 (no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points) ISubstrate 19 embeddedness (deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max) NA 0­4 0 -- 4 2 20 Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) 0­4 0 -- 5 0­5 3 (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) >_ 21 Presence of amphibians 0 -- 4 0 -- 4 0 -- 4 2 C (no evidence = 0, common, numerous types = max points) 0 � 22 Presence of fish 0 - -4 0 - -4 0 - -4 1 m (no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points) 23 Evidence of wildlife use (no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points) 0 - -6 0 - -5 0 - -5 2 Total Points Possible 100 100 100 54 W WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: LOUIer LONOVI(Pu City /County. RAC -14111. k11269 CO. Sampling Date 2y �� �'1 Applicant/Owner. O� QQ iP State: r- Sampling Point- 1 Investigator(s): _API�21d pothr� RTCrIII Section, Township, Range. Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): 000 Local relief (concave, convex, none): %I s�1'�°a►M bed Slope ( %). 0_ r % Subregion (LRR or MLRA): - I Un , Let: 35. 78i 0 Long: - 71r. slyo Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Irn"go E� e�D 1 NWI classification. PF01A Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _Y_ No (If no, explain in Remarks) Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology disturbed? i Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? INO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophyhc Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes _ No within a Wetland? Yea -A- No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_ No ndmarns fbir ►er srrfts" W ab4Ndened wheh clgwr wars 6ailf in 19sai • /yhv/vy Is seepose -6widon A atjawt uplands. Liftle or no .storf»ee flaw. 6S� 4m -Fl w of ueYW fv __ _ "W cgs ca 10o" east of wetkod . HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired) Primary Indicators (minimum of one Is reouired: check all that aoolyl _ Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ Surface Water (Al) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) �( Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) „ Moss Trim Lines (B16) Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Other (Explain In Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Iron Deposits (BS) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Water - Stained Leaves (B9) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Field observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No �_ Depth (inches). Water Table Present? Yes _ No Depth (inches), 1-10 Saturation Present? Yeses No Depth (inches): (� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ,&- No r eludes capillary fr e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks. US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size ) % Cover Species? $talus 1 r_eft la, _ - mil_ LAM) 2 Ater Mh 6 5 Y FAG 3 FAC species 4 FACU species 5 UPL species 6. Column Totals 7 = Total Corer 50% of total cover .r 20% of total cover Z. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size 1 �d z as erf*"!k r �_ �c _ Fin u1 3 _ �G0 4 5 6 7 B 9 50% of total cover 7-0 = Total Cover /0 20% of total cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. le UtcUA, SAG _Y- 3. 9& y _(Q_ 4. 101hor 10__ 5 t s Whehse 1* 1* a 9. 10 11. =Total Cover 1' 50% of total cover 20 20% of tote cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot sae ) 1. LONi a japm 5 y_ MC 2 Ydit ra,%fil _ y_ f %C-1 3 S#k;&Y ry-&- m — _k rAC, 4 5. p, _. = Total Cover 50% of total cover 20% of total toyer. Remarks, pnclude photo numbers here or on a separate sheet ) Sampling Point: 0 57-11 Wet Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC _ (A) Taal Number of Dominant Species Across All gate Percent of Dominant Species s� • That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC IS 0 (A/B) rrevalence Index worNsheet: _Total % Cover of. Multiply by. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% _ 3- Prevalence Index is s3.0' _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting date in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Tree - Woody plants, excludng vines, 3 in (7,6 cm) or more to diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height, SeplingiShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DSH and greater than or equal to 3 28 It (1 m) tell. Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall. Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in Hydrophytic Vagetatlon Present? Yes -X— No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: GA S-8 Wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) es) Color (moist) Color [moist) %_ Type' Loc' Texture Remarks 0- --70— Ifi.X&3 2_ 1'1_ .54- 10. to YX.Th' IS LYA 20 Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (Al) _ Dark Surface (S ?) _ _ Hisnc Epipedon (A2) _ _ _ Black Histic (A3) _ — jM6"4474�Id9) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matra (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) _ Stratified layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136,147) _ 2 cm Muck (A 10) (LRR M _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _ Depleted Below Dark Surf ace (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR K _ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) _ Sandy Gleyed Matra (S4) _ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplan Sods (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic Type Depth (inches) g6"40ked sf ft = 1 i"W wetland �_\ • 6A Hq War lower Lorlrw Lake \ 4P Hydric Soil Present? Yee x_ No To QvWee Creek r LOW- jqMjIeYIt 41; -' Sand.5MXR1 stream gedrXk Cascade "neW" chmmel from SP(Ilway culvert sp ;11W43 US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region . f= Project/Site: "Wer LOHaliM kM pA/l' City /County: & Qj�{ m �)ake CA - Sampling Date: 2q r¢6 2011 Applicant/Owner: C iaL.L State: Sampling Point: a Section, Township, Range: q landlorm (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): 0 ,J"- " p Slope G6A O - r Subregion (LRR or MLRA). -13( Let: 35. 78'60 Long. - %IF, Elmo Datum Soil Map Unit Name: 6mi3a ��D�l NWI classification- PFO A Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes --)C_ No (If no, explain In Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology disturbed? I Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes __X_ No Are Vegetation Sod or Hydrology naturally problematic? NO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes_ No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Sod Present? Yes Nom_ within a Wetland? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No_ X_ Rem arks: bdwteh ache sfi wm fo fAe easy- aad U11"dond CAQW el fv -%& W st HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired check all that apply) _ Surface Sod Cracks (136) _ Surface Water (Al) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) _ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) _ Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0) _ Moss Trim Lines (816) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry- Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8) _ Drift Deposits (63) _ Thin Muck Surface (0) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) _ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) _ Shallow Aquitard (03) _ Water - Stained Leaves (89) _ Microtopographic Relief (D4) _ Aquatic Fauna (B13) _ FAC- Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Y Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No, Depth (inches) > Is r� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No—X-_ includes capillw fringe) Describe Recorded Date (stream gauge, monitoring wen, aerial photos. previous inspections), d available Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species 9 Status _irk _y FAG 1.5 01C 110 �"C 7 _ = Total Cover 50% of total cover 20% of total cover Saolna/Shrub Stratum (Plot size ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 to V f r _Y 1 zly_ �_ = Total Cover 50% of total cover 20 20% of toted cover _1 Herb Stratum (Plot size / ) U 1 _�Et!(m A0 k 30 w P L 2 1wra fhie jn 3 zbg& P'a tei -F-d'� � 4 Rosa A611 fl 5 "RIC to f�G 7 8 9 10 11 = Total Cover 1� 50% of total cover W' 20% of total cover Woody VMS Stratum (Plot size ) 2 _5' Y -EW, 3 — ,�MYam =*wd FAG 4 5 7.5 = Total Cover 50% of total cover 1y__ 20% of total cover numbers here or on a separate sheet.) Sampling Point. &A F— UPL Number of Dominant Species Q That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strate (13) Percent of Dominant Species 6a /_ That Are OBL. FACW, or FAC' 6 0 (AB) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total Cover % of. OBL species Multiply by. x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% _ 3- Prevalence Index is s3.0' _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil end wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7 6 cm) or more to diameter at breast height (D6H), regardless of height Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less then 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3 28 It (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardess of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3 28 It in Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: 6A g— UPL Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features finncchassi Color (moist) _ % Color (moist) % Tvoe' —Loci Texture Remarks _ YR 3 -AL Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solle3: _ Histosol (Al) _ Dark Surface (S7) _ _ Hisbc Epipedon (A2) _ _ _ Black Hrsbc (A3) _ IN RA447,440) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matra (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) _ Stratified Layers (A5) _ Depleted Matra (F3) (MLRA 136,147) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR 1`4 _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Depressions (F8) _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR K _ Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) _, Sandy Gleyed Metric (S4) _ Umbnc Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicetois of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Stripped Metric (S6) _ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches) 44114911ted sued" = linter wetland • 6A F lq W>�r e` d!)c . • - - - 4'q Lower % Lon9v1eW Lake , Hydrtc Soil Present? Yes No _x_ To CmWee Creek :: Low- yr�rdiart r•. e P4 Cascade new It chmmel �rorr SQ(Ilway spillway US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation Office Ramona M. Banos, Administrator Governor Pat McCrory Secretary Susan Muttz July 16, 2013 Gerald Pottem Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc. 1221 Corporation Parkway, Suite 100 Raleigh, NC 27610 Re: Lower Longview Dam Rehabilitation, Raleigh, Wake County, ER 13 -1130 Dear Mr. Pottern: Office of Archives and History Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry Thank you for your letter of June 11, 2013, concerning the above project, which proposes: demolition of the existing Albemarle Avenue bridge,' demolition of the sidewalls and headwalls on the east side of the dam, demolition of one single - family house downstream of the dam, widening the existing dam footprint, and constructing a new outlet structure. There are no known archaeological sites within the proposed project area. Based on our knowledge of the area, it is unlikely that any archaeological resources that may be eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places will be affected by the project. We, therefore, recommend that no archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this project. The lake, dam, and bridge are located within the Longview Gardens Historic District, which was listed in the National Register of Historic Places in 2011. Before we can comment on the proposed undertaking, please forward photographs showing the existing dam, headwalls, sidewalls, bridge, outlet structures, and the house to be demolished. Also include a site plan showing the existing and proposed conditions. Will a new bridge be constructed, or will Albemarle Avenue be disconnected permanently? Please verify that the house to be demolished is 2541 Albemarle Avenue; this house is located outside of the historic district. The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800. Location 109 Fast Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -4617 Telephone /Fax (919) 807 - 6570/807 -6599 Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment, contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919- 807 -6579 or renee.gledhill- earle y a,ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number. Sincerely, PL4xuj- Fcdu`- Du' �/Ramona M. Bartos cc: Martha Lauer, Raleigh Historic Development Commission, martha.lauernn.rhdc.org Robert J. Goldstein and Associates, Inc. RJG &A ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 1221 Corporation Parkway, Suite 100 Since 1985 Tel: (919) 872 -1174 Raleigh, North Carolina 27610 Fax: (919) 872 -9214 e -mail: rgoldsteinfa.RJGAcarolina.com website: www.RJGAcarolina.com 17 July 2013 Ms. Renee Gledhill -Early State Historic Preservation Office 4617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -4617 Re: Lower Longview Lake Dam Repairs, Raleigh, Wake County (ER 13- 1130). Dear Renee, Thank you for your comment letter (July 16) on the Lower Longview Lake Dam repair project, - located two miles east of downtown Raleigh on an unnamed tributary of Crabtree Creek. We offer the following responses to your questions: " The lake, dam, and bridge are located within the Longview Gardens Historic District, which was listed in the National Register of Historic Places in 2011. Before we can comment on the proposed undertaking, please forward photographs showing the existing dam, headwalls, sidewalls, bridge, outlet structures, and the house to be demolished. Also include a site plan showing the existing and proposed conditions." Response: Project plans and photographs of the dam and house are attached, as requested in your comment letter. The dam is overgrown with trees and vines and there is not much .structure" to be seen in the photographs, except for the culvert. The house to be demolished at 2541 Albemarle Avenue is a single - family split -foyer style residence, built in 1968 according to Wake County tax records (iMaps website). As stated in your letter, this house is located outside of the historic district. " Will a new bridge be constructed, or will Albemarle Avenue be disconnected permanently? " Yes, Albemarle Ave will be rebuilt along the crest of the repaired dam, on its current alignment and 2 to 3 feet higher than the existing road. The new road will be a few feet wider and will include a sidewalk, which the current road does not. Feel free to email or call, me if you have any further questions or comments about this project and its impacts to the Longview Gardens Historic District. Sincerely, A41;6RAZ7 Gerald Pottern, senior biologist gpottern(&RJGAcarolina.com 919- 872 -1174 NEPA & SEPA Environmental Documents EA, EIS, CE 1 Jurisdictional Wetland & Stream Buffer Delineations 1 404 - 401 Permits 1 GISIGPS Mapping I Water Quality Studies 1 Stream & Wetland Mitigation and Restoration I Endangered Species Surveys I Biological Assessments & Conservation Plans I Water Intakes & Reservoirs I Water Lines & Treatment Plants 1 Sewerlines & Wastewater Treatment I Instream Flow Analyses I Interbasm Transfer Certificates I Watershed Assessment & Management I Archaeological Surveys and Testing I Phase I Site Assessments 1 Parks & Greenways Planning I CWMTF Grant Applications Schnabel Engineering Plan Sheet 2. List of Drawings. 2 O mmmTTT:pF7,:i, pJ eJe eJ .ppJ of J pr pJ pp! OJO NNJ JNJ NNJ J :p J :p NJ :p J :p J :p J :p ! :p J J J :p J :p J J ppJ J 7? ppJ :p J :p ppJ pJ :p of pJo J 4? J tnP4' J QJ �► q m m m 0 g g .4 0 g g !4 g 0 r ac X a Z X Z Oo g A A W N N N N 4? Q Q x "' a ao •� v g 8 M C a o o$ c A c $i $ z im Z rm ,Di � %c � � 1p � � � 544 41 W W w N! r Fn p 4 O Z r OQnoC�6�O.q L'1lblpO fbww 1 v St `s 44 LOWER LONGVIEW LAKE DAN REHAB CITY OFRALEIGH RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA Schnabel t CA q0 �'Q� ••'eisf'••.! ♦ 2 ®mom ar EN C I N G G Q I N G . . SEAL GERALD C. ROBBLEE, P.E. Md COVER SHEET ucam MAN" ous� 021395 1uam1ei6 0"jMM=ft* %91UA7 Tf3769sO1E8 %>t M4.0mfWp�gq.lOp °�+.,,,,,,,,wM`" wartNeulmuuoaaeaamuuelm�leeaansae Schnabel Engineering Plan Sheet 2. List of Drawings. ONE N►, _ / � LtM19a/aONSfr✓gIC71Wy IN to /� cJ) � r�Fm•uF % i P0UWff1TNAWfDiIVJCQ02UCW f � , F91rItRORA9MGFE"mum I! _ _ :�; �,.r. ' %�• M► - ' -� �y'��'.��� we ZrAcl 1= _- pu,►xw�n iEli+aWWfaapiri0. POBif 1 i�� r�— —•— F —f — — —•— 6 UNEKAUMPP F41n= DPASOM J J or � 1 } 1tjl.. 1 i, 0. ..=", no uFFmso►oornrFtueTta" s 7 NOTES OMITS OF CONSTRUCTION AND H1 FLAN TF:FFVO�.r cacrnoL Pawn To ®e Bar aFFO su�vE,®Fn FBa er arr�tsan aAti�F. of e sa cnrar.FFC.waoRTOOaFSCrnxrron LEGEND PERWIaE1R ® TBaePagAFrr s Fib owwewaw, Far: PWFFCQ sFTO r&r. FASE6apf EJF�tBJf 1 � E Q 1 r �p.o RJ�4+RD r� •� 1 ! d� 4 I F i w r O 1�x � X � � � ,�'��� . .� � rNr•FO 118• a,FFaaFOarF f/ CE) EAGENEMIT K i � -- Funim eseaunr FUnABDWMOEEiIEnOW — - t=A�EJ/EJIr ..r . .<> -a -,W TFh1XR WCCW" aLPCW2 BE ESUf3L19FEDPFCORTOFit� � 1 . - � TEaIPaRJIRY ' WNBTR{ICTIOrI I 1 tas�rrr j e ED �� t 1 �pe•sF�arxcsea�ac� / , ' jI "n i r / OONTROL POINT ID aOfib!f81CT10H "` a're+FSaa��*d� ELEVATION 1 i 2 rtOM r 8 tw a G r„s tp .r6,oN ago o° Y A -act g u C: xo s 0 ?� L 2-f% O T W ? �r _ Go at! J�, LL. A0 gV o U 90 2 d J Q ve m r• lm TEMPORARY CONTROL POINTS OONTROL POINT ID NORTHING EASTING ELEVATION 1 2 PRCUEcr CATe Im 2m SKEET ono 8 OF 39 LEGEND PARCEL INFO KEY J— 6TREU AOSRESS • • O A 1 S :' V• L 1 I ° •. . Y • O O s r . I, / Y' I v• r r„ OEFDIMfOFMAnal1 GENERAL NOTES: 1 BAMMPTOPOORAP M671AWVMWCMMBYTIECMOFRME KMC V M MORMM"AL CCMTWX OF MW SMM MW VER"AL COWMM CP RGWZ%OATSO MRL 20W vERncaiQa+ tRaasconroL�9w�aacusTEOerBaoNeELET +coo FRDY NGJpJB TO RAVO lt6• BY 1CY632M0 T1� l3.EVATLON BY 0110 PI, Tle ALEPoIOB aREREnaE a9PROV67ED 1M TiRTE�17 AMD RAYE!)a• tMO. a. ALL.RSe�e11�ES TLa LEST AJm won a83{I61H Wai Is BTP2�®1MO off tHE PROPOfiEO BASEUM AM LOOMW OORNBTRI: M 2 NE UWLWMOELa1EATEDBI'R7BEATJ OOLJ19MM&AblOOAW&VC CATO HOODAWV.2011. A PARCELEIatIMDARMMM DATA MPPMBYTMCITYOFRALCOM ~� ! MrLevRNrE AVE. Iparr♦ • f �'O � r „ • ' v i ttt��� N= EQPM COWFMM M%W EQSTRA LoMTom ysm . • . ... Ela9TMp ECOE � V6UEA 1 CREEK P.gUMOR WATEDMMAM RM AlGM IM EASTM Mm CF ROAD - RJ09Ta63 F" or CUR6I IU= LAZE lA.rOM 91101 M OM — MOSTM RXW OF VOY — — — — — — — — — — Egmm mw OF oFm& AV owir ii PROPERTY Lm 6 mom 1:M EMSTM MOM (MRO 10 LJOStMAJIASOfI Alv Ga iS EIOS!MOSATdTAFY3Ei11EP ® ® �JasrnaJlMLl000uLacLfAnour EASTltDLANTERMA01 �— • Cl IJOSTMLGVWATERVALMNMl aFlREHVORAW a O EJOStM1GGA8MsAa1 —01 —02— O3WM CVMCAO E3EC Rr.AL LIMED • • -1 EJa8TM1p LOW POLE. POrMt POLE• A GUY tMRB Q E1awm TREES 6 8NR m EXMTM RANTERS • _ = t ElOST6lrorEncs: PJ08Tm om BOX 6 $MR PARCEL INFO KEY J— 6TREU AOSRESS • • O A 1 S :' V• L 1 I ° •. . Y • O O s r . I, / Y' I v• r r„ OEFDIMfOFMAnal1 GENERAL NOTES: 1 BAMMPTOPOORAP M671AWVMWCMMBYTIECMOFRME KMC V M MORMM"AL CCMTWX OF MW SMM MW VER"AL COWMM CP RGWZ%OATSO MRL 20W vERncaiQa+ tRaasconroL�9w�aacusTEOerBaoNeELET +coo FRDY NGJpJB TO RAVO lt6• BY 1CY632M0 T1� l3.EVATLON BY 0110 PI, Tle ALEPoIOB aREREnaE a9PROV67ED 1M TiRTE�17 AMD RAYE!)a• tMO. a. ALL.RSe�e11�ES TLa LEST AJm won a83{I61H Wai Is BTP2�®1MO off tHE PROPOfiEO BASEUM AM LOOMW OORNBTRI: M 2 NE UWLWMOELa1EATEDBI'R7BEATJ OOLJ19MM&AblOOAW&VC CATO HOODAWV.2011. A PARCELEIatIMDARMMM DATA MPPMBYTMCITYOFRALCOM ~� ! MrLevRNrE AVE. Iparr♦ • f �'O � r „ • ' v i ttt��� � \rte_ J � v • \/ � V :�IL�CO • I �4. 1 � a v ` \� \ • J . _ \ '° ®OP OF STRUM r •a r ' _ ♦ % r 9 OF RIM -ff IYLY — ° s � �P'•'Y °fit 4 ♦ 1 JI ,; �J,o •r � ��y EXISTING OVERALL SITE CONDITIONS W 44 n, a O tzj $ V soft 0 lox W 47 Cz OV �z yQ' W � Q 0 S 00 Z � $ F W W w .. PROJECT: W21W1 RATE.1ar:o+ BRAIAETO NO aun B� 6 OF 39 N= . °y° >LI•IA c � \rte_ J � v • \/ � V :�IL�CO • I �4. 1 � a v ` \� \ • J . _ \ '° ®OP OF STRUM r •a r ' _ ♦ % r 9 OF RIM -ff IYLY — ° s � �P'•'Y °fit 4 ♦ 1 JI ,; �J,o •r � ��y EXISTING OVERALL SITE CONDITIONS W 44 n, a O tzj $ V soft 0 lox W 47 Cz OV �z yQ' W � Q 0 S 00 Z � $ F W W w .. PROJECT: W21W1 RATE.1ar:o+ BRAIAETO NO aun B� 6 OF 39 1 i STAGE 1 DOYMSTF49 M COFFER DAY CL CREST EL W 6 I - -- % I I ATE 03AVRT, 3X GNEETA1,0FaRaF�aLS � I I � o I 10-0 10 1 l WCP! TE b I �X I I I 1 r r I r I — Ti+D u•w Ir PROPOSED E3�+A1amENT — STRPPM LIMITS ISTAGE h _ ! 0 I CROP am MET amueTtam � SM SKUJ6110 FOR MIAW 2D 16 I / �/S pgC Tr EWAVATWN SLOM AVOCE709TT.Vt7 EWAVATIONFOI CROP BOXMIETSTRUCTURE CULVETi►. &4DSILLMO09M SYS 160 BASK SM O I F]R71YATmT1fOR:ILTBt/10T$IQIMI. f�t`?� 6>1EE714IIO FOR OETAO9 I CULVERT OUTLET PROTE7CTtON I Ott I� I , , EX31OIG GRIOM TO SE I , RUWWO d DTACE 3 To•F0 ALBEMARLE AVE. I LOCKINDOATE i I SIRMPWO LONTS (STAGE 11 SiPROfJP6'S,AWGIZLRFEAC ORDIYl7tmi[RS�OS //)JJ11J`lrr �^tate+wx+arosL;!EPIC�x�oRaNmr (Y A�A011Icw E)=VATEDOIAL a TO GULP AWA ARM STA0E 1 ooMFRET9 CONTRACTOR SK UL m� r/ I CONST UCCI 6LO K TO PI �co/mrrtan SIAM I GEOSYNT ETIC F13WCRCM COFFERDAM CLMWEL20U � 1� I 6Eif OETAA 60M p1EET A•t09 — I 1 a �f STAGE 1 STREAM DIVERSION CONCEPT PLAN VIEW FLM V 9 � mft Q1= mum W c a �i W 0 Z U CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE I 1 ORAW UWE WTIM CONtRACrW DEM4iD SIFNON. � W 2 Plop RASE 9101M fl1m"4 OTamwo Cm -LVIAV 3 NUtALLERCSMAMSECrAMCOKnWLkIVZUMS I NOTES e REMOVE S�A®IY FROM VWT IH FOOTFR FTOF OOFFERDNM 6 OONSTRUCf STAGE 1 CC (PI►RS 9TORV FIDMYTNROLION 1 EI WATION SHALL EXTEND FOR£ mmi. SOIL FOR TOILER VaTm SRIIWAYI CuLVMV ANN SN6AOY aOwAaTER Fn mMYlON 8 UT- WATE t IFTERPb9Mn=MSMNGASYCM-REOPEN "M FOUM47TION FOR RZ6Z CULVERT AND STRYN3 WWW SFHqN TO DRAW RESFRMRAF M STORY T REYOVE GEMVABff AND OROMNL SPORE FROM VVININ THE x CVLF&0 AVATC- UNZRAS.E SOILS AMaAIIXITLLAS uwm GPM UPSTR'JIN SLm CF TIE PROPOSED MI O1MfW WV0FlED YAT7N" 4 OORFEROAU S1 M lame Umomm LEVEL OP d COt57gICTMM CROP BOX I IAMSTWlCTURB.GwVERT. PRO. TIONRBOUREO.ODITTRACTORMAYPFNWW DRAYWGE owf*fu RL AND GTILLW O Own ADOTON& PROTECTION F DEMED 0 COMPLETE STAGE 1ORADWSBYBAdDiWNGOROP BOX BILET 6 CLEARM AND OR186WG AND STTL'Pp=OF STRUCTURE. CILVM AND STILLW BASW EWAVATIGNS AND 00086FRE1M1 BLCPE O1MW OF THE MWAVAl1O1 FOR CONSTRWT THE UPSTREAM SLOFE THE NEW SPR MY70 BE PERFORMED OL0TDX3 STAGE x 2D 16 I / �/S pgC Tr EWAVATWN SLOM AVOCE709TT.Vt7 EWAVATIONFOI CROP BOXMIETSTRUCTURE CULVETi►. &4DSILLMO09M SYS 160 BASK SM O I F]R71YATmT1fOR:ILTBt/10T$IQIMI. f�t`?� 6>1EE714IIO FOR OETAO9 I CULVERT OUTLET PROTE7CTtON I Ott I� I , , EX31OIG GRIOM TO SE I , RUWWO d DTACE 3 To•F0 ALBEMARLE AVE. I LOCKINDOATE i I SIRMPWO LONTS (STAGE 11 SiPROfJP6'S,AWGIZLRFEAC ORDIYl7tmi[RS�OS //)JJ11J`lrr �^tate+wx+arosL;!EPIC�x�oRaNmr (Y A�A011Icw E)=VATEDOIAL a TO GULP AWA ARM STA0E 1 ooMFRET9 CONTRACTOR SK UL m� r/ I CONST UCCI 6LO K TO PI �co/mrrtan SIAM I GEOSYNT ETIC F13WCRCM COFFERDAM CLMWEL20U � 1� I 6Eif OETAA 60M p1EET A•t09 — I 1 a �f STAGE 1 STREAM DIVERSION CONCEPT PLAN VIEW FLM V 9 � mft Q1= mum W c a �i W 0 3 3 CT QW10=01 E MAY2013 U n%0 %0 A -= SNEET 9 O 39 Z U m{ WS � W w d 3 3 CT QW10=01 E MAY2013 U n%0 %0 A -= SNEET 9 O 39 f% 1440 10o-For- — 2MD RXI&ORAOE ELm+uoaDXreHEu oROPBOA mm 8RJCmm csrM EL,ArameT wea PTAOE 1) i y/- I im ' CLAY OGRE FILL — oTRUCTURALFLL AFPROAMATEfi=AVATlO GMW 2+00 STAT10M FROM MOTH 1 CKWEYAly A WTCRNKNvTsMvft 2. TROMRACR NOT SHOM !� OROP BOX INLET CULVERT FLOW a+w 3650 90O 220 DeMOUS,ED RDAD 220 210 f— EASM QFU= EMEAN UM eM3LL 2 (WAGE a 210 F$ � o011CAaTECULVERt :00 BMMMO BM EA z* t w ` aw 100 110 EMBAPWJWW Leo ,eo o� F11 120 /SO sow 5.0 FINAL QFtFw F0 B*Xh MA PWvvMTED RF6 EAI8TWG GRADE PEIOO ATED PW8 osuuj � L 10r 4MFLTMTn E=MATWHSLOPE 2W - - EKCAVATCUFORFLLTER FILM SOW - a .o 4W +0 40 0 m b ® m SECTION THROUGH CULVERT AT FILTER 220 210 2W m ten im IN ,SO I� 11 LM CL m w M, '� yM ms 0 O a 0 60 a 1u _ � J o J J xa CL O B F \ a 'r d� lu 1 ` / r slraic6, oowls7REAw ( / I W-HI M UM CL OAST EL WAS f - -� - - - - - - -I oN I j K—Tj jo- e I 1 0 ` - -- L svGE, FnA► crude _ _ avarta.�as STA3E t FNAL GRADE I i t'�'E 1.6 IB•oo { ` STAGE ,C W0OFP8WA J 1 1 11 � cL caESTEi203.5 zaas t CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE NOTES 1. GACKFU E)QMVAMOH FOR DROP BOX INIEFBTRUCTNRE.OAVERT, I IF REGERVOR FILLS CURIMO A STMOk RFCPEN AIM STILLE SU RCONSIRUCTINiFIL.TERORAINAGED1A14RAGMS SDNOFTO DRAIN RESERVOIR AFTER STOW ANDONADOAO 1>' SWD. L CONSTRUCT UPSTREAM BLCK OF NEW 00ANKME tT TO EL 2008. * PLACE MW ON THE LET =6 OF THE UPSTREAM SLOPE BE711" ELEVATtON8180 AND 201L 4 II® THE REMAO NOPOR I OF THE UPSTREAM 3LCM I RB=V:IG ft$7REAM 0TWERSIMTO C=M BASE FLOWAND STORY FLOWS TIROUGHT*W LOWIFIEL OTTL6TON 7W PEN DROP BON NNET STRUCTUIRL WE STAGE2 STREAM TNVHR50N. A f G I� 1 �p��``. �oarbTUr<3srrt�iw I � CDNTOURS BMOYW ASS�F 7NATTHF Fi1ER OUPIRAM HAS BEEN UM LLEDA DBACIORILED MOOSTM6 GRADE WMN THE 8 UMY OI6AVATION u j , � � I 11, II R- -II DROP am WL6T ¢TRUCRNS �� WE SHIFT A.110 POR OETAXB I _ I I .I 1 \ P - ' - - — — — — — STAGE I FVM GRADE GTAOZ 1 FNIAI oaAOE _ aFOr rs zloa -SPOT EL 2058 i all Cuomo H1 BRIDGE To Be R89WEO0, STAGE 2 7 - ALB RI E AVE. 1011 Pf=— CONTRACTOR TO SIJ<R'LY NEATER ITROL PLAN AND ME PIPE ACCCORDWMY Q � Tai o 8 d Lu a m In K f ?Q •oe a •b ira�. ok a Ron O L Cz 5 0 W 0 o 996 ui �1 a Z W t STAGE I FINAL GRADING PLAN VIEW PR01 T- =GL FIOW E DATE MAY 2DT a ORAmm NO. AM10T BNB ° 11 OF 39 1 +50 12+00 13+00 14-00 250 240 230 EXISTING GRADE CL ALBEM/R3E AVE 220 210 -------- - -- - -- / — _____i_--- _- - - - - -_ _ —_ - -__ gee - -- - -- - -- 180 170 180 I 13-00 EXCAVATION LIMITS BASED ON Zt SIDE SLOPES TO DEPTH 8-1790 /$+OD 84W 174W 18+00 250 240 230 220 z - 210 H Q 2 / - -- - - -- - -- 200 J 170 ld 180 CULVERT SUSGRADE PROPOSED EXCAVTON 170 RE310U1L BOIL FOUNDATION 160 14-00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 STATION �i EXCAVATION PROFILE DOWN CL OF ALBERMARLE AVE 1 70 250 240 STAGE 1 COFFERDAM 270 CL CREST EL 2034 PROPOSED STAGE i FINAL GRADE 220 s> DETAIL 4 210 a Im w +25 2W cwcTlaa on.oc 200 0 50 100 - -- 160 _ _ REMOVE SEDIMENT AND 170 REMOVE SEaMEM STRIP SLOPE- I S MIN - - - • - • - --- ;- -- -. - . 160 . FRMU RM f N - ' COFFERDAM --- - - - - - - 150 -160 -150 -141 -130 -120 -110 -lao -90 -eo -70 �0 30 jo JO ,20 -10 0 10 20 30 4o So 8o 70 Bo 20 10, 110 120 130 140 150 161 250 240 230 Z20 210 200 190 180 170 180 150 STAGE 1 EMBANKMENT REPAIRS CROSS SECTION AT STA 14+00 FLOW ` WALL- I'M 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 PROPOSED STAGE I FINAL GRADE (RPTAP PLACED AT END OF STAGE 2) STAGE I COFFERDAM CL CREST EL 2034 EXISTING GRADE - REMOVE SEDIMENT AND - - _ STRIP SLOP5.1 S MIN. BD-150-140 - 30 - 120 -110 - 100 -W -S3 -70 -60 -50 40 JO .20 .10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 83 90 100 110 120 13C 140 150 160 170 180 191 STAGE 1 STREAM DIVERSION CROSS SECTION AT STA 16 +00 FLOW WALE 11W 0 w a0 no 240 230 220 210 200 190 ISO 170 160 250 210 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 150 150 PROPOSED STAGE 1 FINAL GRADE - SEE DETAIL 4 SHEET A -125 QTAnF I fYIFFFRfMW CLOWST EL 2034 REMOVE SEDIMENT NO . STRIP SLOPE. 1 6 MIN 50 -150 - 140.130.120 .110.103 -00 40 -70 40 V. <x1 7 FE� S E d NOTES 1 EXCAVATION SMALL EXTEND TO RESIDUAL SOIL FOUNDATION FOR DROP BOXFIAET STRUCTURE. CULVERT Alm STILLING BASIM. AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER COSTING GRADE DWVNBIREAM COFFERDAM CL CREST E 1875 . STAKE 1 EXCAVATION EL 179.0 -=•� 40 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 64 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 3 STAGE 1 PROPOSED EXCAVATION CROSS SECTION AT STA 15+00 FLOW 42 r tow +1 1 ( - 0OC PACEGEosrNTMEnC FMWFORCEMEIR 2FEET VERTICALLY ON CENTER GEOSWTH ;TIC SHALL WRAP EMBANIOFENT FACE ANDEXTEND 3 FEET BELOW THE NEYT LAYER. 250 240 230 220 210 2W 190 180 170 IOU 150 MIRAFI HP270 WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE GEOSYNTIIETIC OR EQUIVALENT AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER i— EX37040 GRADE •2.@ J STAGE 1 COFFERDAM TYPICAL SECTION FLOW J m I a W W m m U 0 6 .51- a q� O i B 9 i H d ;¢ o rn Cry A;� soft 01= R r__ V t9 V>t 0 8 ad w J LL O o = ° Q. Co) I� go 0 8 Lu °2C gw 20 5 17 U1 co) J W LLI O C9 J Q ° PROJECT 09210105 01 Ef DATE MAY 2013 S DRAIAANG NO. A -108 BMElT ° 12 OF 39 Al PROFOOM EMBAMMO STRIPPING LIMITS ff 00, Locom GATE t r to zm ' f , cp :ONiTRUCTION SEQUENCE / Q � I ---- ------ I L L 0 e4 o I CONSTRUCT STAGE 2 COFFERDAM. I PASS BASE APO STORM FLOW THROUGH LOW LEVEL OUTLET 02 THE NEW OROP BOX INLET STRUCTURE & DEMOLISH AM REMOVE THE EXISTINGFIR11M AND SPILLWAY STRUCTURE 4 CLEAR AND GRUB TREES ON GOVOISTREAM PORTION OF DAM IF NOT P6t14ORMED OWING STAGE I & STRIP AND E=AVATE THE DOVOCSTRE40A PORTION OF THE E== EMOVS(MENT AS SHOM AND AS REOUMED TO INSTALL DRAINAGE FEATURES. 6 PLACE LEVt1r4G CONCRETE IN LOW AREAS OF THE ROCK SPILLMY CHJTE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER 7 PLACE BLANKET AND CHI%lNEY DRAINS S, CONSTRUCTFEINFOROEDCONCRETE FOE WALL R CONSTRUCT NEWPIPE SPUVVAY IN FWrPRNrOFGBKXMW EMSTINGSPRLANAV SEE SHEET XII& 10. PLACE FILL FOR DOVWISTREAM EMBANCAENT SLOPE (SEE STAGE 2GRAWOPLAN) NOTES 1. U: RESERVOIR FLLBULgUWAUUMftE-OPL*4 SIPHON TO GRAIN RESERVOIR AFTER STORM, 2- OVER40MVATE UNSUITABLE S= AND BACKFILL AS NEEDED VWTH SPECIFIED MATEO" CASTIN PLACE CWCRETE -2 cmvmrcoownmcTm IN STAGE I CONCRETE TOE WALL PROPOSED EKBAN(MENT STRIPPING Lawars EJNCASE EJOSifNO 81WTARY SEWER ?EMAIL O3NA0'aFM TCMA12 F ROCK SURFACE TO BE GLEANED AND .1 oENrAL jEE t!ETAIL 2 COMB SHMEET A-1 aO ALBEMARLE AVE. 11 11 11 F + A L 1 -0 VALVE OPEN DURING STAGE TO OWASS BASE FLOW STAGE I GEOSYNTHETIC RED• 3RCED COFFERDAM CL CREST EL 2D?.5 SEE SHEETA-112 DETAIL S r.-'\ STAGE 2 STREAM DIVERSION CONCEPT PLAN VIEW FLOW 6 EXISTING EW40GE (L U4 LU 0 0- none oz Lu EXCAVATION TO TIE M c STAGE 2 EMBANKMENT EXCAVPTK*k Lr- 1 CONTFACTOR TO TAKE MEASURE13 TO LLJ r- LIMIT DISTURBANCE TO OUSTIM UTILITIES IN THE AREA OF THE RROM __ ,B6 2 r 0 zoo Ila, Lu 'o z C3 Of 0 t; Q 04 W c!) 1111C 1:10M 113F-Xlq PROJECT (8210006 M%W- WAY 2m 3 Bp DRAY%w No A-109 SHEET 13 Or 39 QALIGNMENT-CL OF ALBEMARLE AVE ALIGNMENT -M OF NBEAARLE AVE WALL "QQ CTn� ~4a,00AC 81A1RA{s,D ALW INVERT OFFSET -82A& SEE SHEET A -122 NORTH0�74124188 EL188A EASTNG42t2043N84 I NOS7INGz 120452.81 DIVERT FORDETAIIS ��"���'� EL 1 W 1 DOAII/STT�nANN EDGE OF BLANIOi' DRAIN ati.DO a1.90 t.m \ 60188 — — a OF PRINCIPAL PIPE SPUMY 01WE RT AT DRAIN DIVERT AT DRAM \ OUTLET COLLECTOR PPE THROUGH �� 8lANIET GRAN DIiCHAROEE.186A DISCHARGE E. 185A r ` PROICIP/LLSPILLWAY OJTLET HEADWALL 81+18 WERT EL 194.3 II II ALIGNMENT OF TOE ORNN COLLECTION UNITS OF BLANKET ORAN INVERT 11193.3 ALKODAZI T-CL 3F ALBEMARLE Ave ALX3WIEM OF TOE DRMNI twuECTNNI II II II P'PE ��" TL1P STILLRNO eA9N OVERT STATTOW13 -MO PIPE NORTH OF THE BUILT N7 BASIN ll CNNITmr DRAIN ELIS42 A SEMA41 E DIERT diSOWM EL� 11- 11 PIPE AUGNA87IfOFRIGHT OUTIO ODO922F AVE NORTHORIa7412i8A7 87a710Na1 381. EASTNO=21202E1.70 EL 1808 21-50, ABUTMENT COLLECTOR PIPE SET-W-381. NCRTHOIGn74108088 DIVERT ATORAN 1 T1TMo -„ Jla DISCHARGE EL 1883 CHMOIEY DRAIN -Ti INVERT INVERT Q 201 7 EL 191 A 2340 ONNERT EL 200.1 19*00 18100 IO.OD'TYP. 15+�D 1840 17.00 DRAWL ALKINUMT OR CLOFNSFYARLBAVE. ALBEMARLE AVE. DRAM COUEC7FD PIPE PROPOSED C100LEY DM101 J EXCAVATION AND DRAINAGE PLAN VIEW FLOW 2D100 280 250 210 230 220 210 200 199 INO fro NOTES 1. IF RESERVOIR FILLS OLWM A a. RB4OPEN 2. OVER49WAVATE UNSUITABLE SOI SAND BACKFILL AS NEEDED WTR1 SP6pFW MATERIALS * REVLSE UMTS OF BLANKET DRAIN AE NEEDED TO PRDWDE3PTOFSO. COVER OWRDRAK 4. C1EM VALVES 8HOLADOE OWALL®AT ALL DRAW OUT.ETB. SEE DETAIL 8 ON SHW A-123. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1 CON®TRULT STAGE 2 COFFERDAM. 2. PASS BASE AND STORM FLAW THROUGH LOW LEVEL OUTLET ON THE NEW OROP80X INLET STRUCTURE. 3 DEMOLISH AND REMOVE THE EJ0.4TTNG BRIDGE AND SPILLWAY STRUCTURE 4. STRIP ANDE7CAVATE THE DONNISTTEAM PORTION OF THE EXITTNG EXIBA IUMIT AS BHOVW MW AS FIERUNWO TO MSTALL ORAQA SE FEATURES. 8. PLACE LEVELING CONCRETE N LOW AREAS OF THE ROCK SPIV MAY CHUTE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER S. PLACE BIAGUET AND CHIMNEY DRAMS. T. CONSTRUCT REDWORCED CONCRETE TOE WALL. a CONBTRIKT NEW POE SPRLNAY N cOCTPRIIR OF DELOUSED E)OSTNG SPILLWAY. SM SHEET 001 D 9 PLACE FILL FOR DOINNSTREAY EMBANKMENT ELOPE (SEE STAGE 2 GRADING R.AQ• 21+00 II r FINAL GRACE � 1 F a _ $7% DRAIN FILL FATER SAW 94WI I ON fIIQOINTm on1 rwc 1489 12.0% -- 1.0% " TXRAN FILL 21-00 22-09 23-00 STATION PROFILE ALONG CHIMNEY DRAIN COLLECTOR PIPE a ao-0o sum 260 26D 240 240 aa9 no 220 210 ;RW1.0;tA11E 64110" PERPORAATTE1170 P 210 200 4)64% 190 IN 1W DRANFILL fro 3180 �r e.TU A 31.00 STATION PROFILE ALONG TOE DRAIN NI CLOF ALBEMAFILE AVE. 23188 CL 205 — — 280 cNmaEr DRAM TO BE sD FEET TT0C1U 25D 7ow � WITHIN THE SPILLWAY EWAVATRMN 240 GRADE AFTER STRPPNO EXCM40 GROUM3 230 22D I T 210 TOE CRAM CHIMNEY CRAIN 200 nL COLLECTOR PIPE '� 3A0' I— 2nD &W PIPE BOTTOM AOFTOE ISO 0.78 DRAM TRENCH ISO 0 TS TYP 0 7B TYP I80 170 2AW / ' 2349 GRADE AS NECESSAP.Y TO PRDNOE A 296 SL08 DOMNSTREW J CHIMNEY AND BLANKET DRAIN — TYPICAL SECTION 1� I 60-M W-9 40000 40*W 210 210 2W 250 RIAM CRAOO 210 240 FATER SA1m 0=0 Sam CLA 23D 11 2sa n � z 200 < 200 z RNAL GRADE F � ju OJ/'A 210 210 DRAM FO1 200 200 d 190 W ISO 180 64MM OA SOLD WALL PVC PERF OUTIET THROUGH PRINCIPAL ISO GRAN FI L ,SO DRAIN PIPE PATER SAID sPI11LLYD1r OUTLET NIEADI101LL 170 tro 4o ISO 14047 W.s STATION STATION i g� a � 8 W W J C13 O 0: c 6 ova ul� , a,g Zo:ON +.,�N........ .... • o m= K� .O; � i % � 68 93 z 0 LLJ a ')i c N W .+ PROFILE ALONG TOE DRAIN SOUTH OF STILLING BASIN (PROFILE ALONG RIGHT ABUTMENT COLLECTOR PIPE 6 a a0 R14 i1Nm 26D 240 no 220 O 64110" PERPORAATTE1170 P 210 NIAW pPQ 200 IN 180 3180 �r e.TU A Mli MAr41L1 CLOF ALBEMAFILE AVE. 23188 CL 205 — — 280 cNmaEr DRAM TO BE sD FEET TT0C1U 25D 7ow � WITHIN THE SPILLWAY EWAVATRMN 240 GRADE AFTER STRPPNO EXCM40 GROUM3 230 22D I T 210 TOE CRAM CHIMNEY CRAIN 200 nL COLLECTOR PIPE '� 3A0' I— 2nD &W PIPE BOTTOM AOFTOE ISO 0.78 DRAM TRENCH ISO 0 TS TYP 0 7B TYP I80 170 2AW / ' 2349 GRADE AS NECESSAP.Y TO PRDNOE A 296 SL08 DOMNSTREW J CHIMNEY AND BLANKET DRAIN — TYPICAL SECTION 1� I 60-M W-9 40000 40*W 210 210 2W 250 RIAM CRAOO 210 240 FATER SA1m 0=0 Sam CLA 23D 11 2sa n � z 200 < 200 z RNAL GRADE F � ju OJ/'A 210 210 DRAM FO1 200 200 d 190 W ISO 180 64MM OA SOLD WALL PVC PERF OUTIET THROUGH PRINCIPAL ISO GRAN FI L ,SO DRAIN PIPE PATER SAID sPI11LLYD1r OUTLET NIEADI101LL 170 tro 4o ISO 14047 W.s STATION STATION i g� a � 8 W W J C13 O 0: c 6 ova ul� , a,g Zo:ON +.,�N........ .... • o m= K� .O; � i % � 68 93 z 0 LLJ a ')i c N W .+ PROFILE ALONG TOE DRAIN SOUTH OF STILLING BASIN (PROFILE ALONG RIGHT ABUTMENT COLLECTOR PIPE 6 a a0 R14 i 0 1 - - - - - -_ / I I I I1a-- n / / 117b py� STAGE 2 FINAL GRADE Z,_/ I r SPOT EL 2085 r ►� 1 , 1 , 1 1 if 1 1 1 1 1 1 l l r I � I � a. U w 1 I `ate m 1 1 ' m m1 1 1 CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1 OONSTRI=TIE DOVAWFRFAM SLOPE OF TIE 01111INIDAFAT AHD TIE PORTION OFIM UPSTREAM SLOPE OW TIM RKWT SIDE OF TIE MANI(MENTTO TIE NA VON THE UPSTREAM PORTIONCONSTRUCIED N STAGE 1. 2. REMOVE TIE STAGE 2 COFFERDAM Nm REIDONFIGIURE TIDE STREAN DIVERSION TO CONVEY BASE FLOW TLILOUGH Tim NEW PIPE GPILLVCIY U ADDITION TO TIE LAW LEIEL OUMETON THE OROP BOX IO.ET STRUGTLTRE 3 PLACE MPRAP ON TIE REMAINING PORTION OF THE UPSTREAM 61 SEWAMNNELEVATONS198 AND 208 I � I I STAGE 2 FINAL GRADE , SPOT EL 218.5 1340 14+00 ALBEMARLE AVE. I I . i 1 I I r I / I 1 I NOTES 1. OVER0LCAVATE UNSUITABLE SOILS AND BACI ILL AS MEMED MTN SPECIFIED MATERIALS II 0 II STAGE 2 FINAL GRADE 11"' 1� "71 SPOT EL 205.6 11 U I1 11 II I — Q0 � o JL I v � i' l I II u II � ILIJ! I I 1I � I r mv" SOX INLET II STRUCTURE iSTAGE 2 COFFER DAN GEOSYNTHE7I1 CL CREST EL 207 5 I I I i I F I 1 I I, I� I m WM1 I! ' I I 1 I $ W o a ui o U n81 V wg was 0 41 z W G : °��i; 1 u _• W 0 I — I v � i' l I O U J � N Aftfwk I 1 I I, I� I m WM1 I! ' I I 1 I $ W o a ui o U n81 V wg was 0 41 z W G : °��i; 1 u _• W 0 STAGE 2 FINAL GRADING PLAN VIEW ` FLAN Q_1 vcAIr ffi @ PRO W.CT• Om1oa DATE MAI201 $ DRAIIUfDA3NO A-111 SHEET ° 15CWn ill 9�� I — I v � N N I O U J � N STAGE 2 FINAL GRADING PLAN VIEW ` FLAN Q_1 vcAIr ffi @ PRO W.CT• Om1oa DATE MAI201 $ DRAIIUfDA3NO A-111 SHEET ° 15CWn ill 9�� zao ?7D 370 r0 200 nQ too 170 t60 Iw 230 210 200 I 100 170 to ISo 11.00 Woo 10100 ,NaNn 176M A. u.Np mo 210 � no z QI z e i 3 Ian .p oc W Si BTAGB: C W Ole = ss4 ago ��-PPaii W 6MONVAT1Ol MITS BA91D 01121 010E BIAPEB 0 ao TO OEPTH EL 100.0 250 uo 240 no �aos16r17GRADBaaLBEUAR1aArT: PROPOSED CONCRETE BOX CULVERT — 230 2zD -------------------------- ------------------ ----------- - - - - -- ------------------- - - - - -- -- _+— - mma t708TIN0 %AMWH4 SAID 8ANUAT Y 200 CISNCOIAL PIPE SMUMV. OEO 04M M 17 SEY" powe TO w 01Y�tM 1l10 AND PROTECTED OMM NFMAMT 100 100 PROPOSED EXCAVATION PCR EXCAVAYGNAND EARTH MM tomla liYOVAI OONTigam too 120 TO UVIT THE Dt=RBMCE OF DOSTIIIOMUTI :S DITM AREA ISO no 100 1 i I ISO 1:100 13,00 4.00 15•C0 5000 t7.DD 70-00 STATION EXCAVATION PROFILE DOWN CL OF ALBEMARLE AVE 1 >o m 200 2!0 UP 210 zm HO too 170 100 100 -100 100 MO 430,120 110 •100 M 8p 40 40 6n .40 .30 .20 40 0 10 M D 00 50 61 70 00 00 100 110 10 130 U0 150 IM ` > STAGE 2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE AT STA 14+00 PtOW «.t 1 no 210 ISO no 210 no 100 too 170 ISO 100 -200 -100 100 -170 - 100 .100 -1w -137 -to -1 t0 -100 .00 -00 -M w -0 ♦0 A0 •20 •10 0 10 M 30 40 50 60 70 80 00 100 110 120 130 "0 150 100 170 t8o 100 200 4 STAGE 2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE AT STA 16+00 FLOW s 0 NOT739 1. STA= I BXCMMT10N LOOTS NOT DOOIMI. 250 no 270 no 210 2DD too tan 170 tan 150 E)DSt1IGCIRAOE MADE 1 ORAOTO F PROPOLEDOTAOE2fONLOR = STAGE201ELL - -- '� PROPOSED STAGE 2 6M2MSgklW STFUPPM. REMIDUE IN 200 •120 . 160.150 -140 -130 -to -1t0 -COD .00 .00 .70 60 30 -0 30 20 -10 0 10 20 20 00 60 Go 10 00 00 100 110 120 130 1 0 150 160 170 J STAGE 2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE AT STA 15+00 Rap 0 0 1.00 '1 I­ LOY UM FI NPM WOY®I POLV aE02rN11OTC PIAtE 3EQ8Y111ltETIC FAIT G P-dl01 AW ASI APPWAD BY 11@ ENGINEER 2 Tfev vFSrnoaur d1 CENTER r.EasvNTleTtt 9NAU01RAPEIdW=9fTPACEMDEXTEND 31$11 B6LMTMkMT LAVER. i — E709TIN00RADF EiJ STAGE 2 COFFERDAM TYPICAL SECTION now o e p U GGG!!! o $ c v 230 A. 9 210 ,p.« z QI z e i 3 Ian .p oc W Si 170 No C W Ole = ss4 150 ��-PPaii W Rppl� 3 87 0 at .I 8 o e p U GGG!!! o $ c v 00 I@ O OC o a zQ � � N W I R � K � vttaea: aD31000501 GTE 1111r 2013 ORAIAOO ND A-112 ONSET 16 OF 39 230 A. 9 210 ,p.« z QI z e i no 100 Ian .p oc W Si 170 No C W Ole = ss4 150 ��-PPaii W Rppl� 3 87 0 at .I 00 I@ O OC o a zQ � � N W I R � K � vttaea: aD31000501 GTE 1111r 2013 ORAIAOO ND A-112 ONSET 16 OF 39 4VI/ m .v i I °.�� \�, �, rsaaucrx><c�rn►Pweaotoox �,- STA2tCD-% ' 's tr jaw ,rowPn+avr.+s>A , e 9 i A1WWEi1T- [IQFALBEWUab AYE GWVM�TVWX 4" ML MORTMrJW49 mm i 9 _ 14 �� EAS'Ir�tzueao�e wry �� � I q . (V•l. 1 '- 1 , 1 1 1 PLOTY STAGE 2 AUXILIARY PIPE SPILLWAY PLAN VIEW ,-M MC OCT MANDARD PRrCAgrHrACKAU VRM TROM RACK pLLCYTJO M. �Mf ►Y Y. /1T,N tam 7ETML3 STA14an 1? AEf9LAKGL 1d1iT trupowo ir. -ustt Pr.�� f.troy , roll NvOvraDJA= gtJIR1 iLL 1 LMPERIEABUTVCOM — vxf -tao 4/ 1Z= W SEE MAIL S frrroaves mo P Exurmepalmynkmm 6TAm t A YFRBIIED OLiACH i N PlpT' ®200% 7a d MAME UM PIPE 0 zw% OCICRETE CRADLE St?R OF'TM A STATION STAGE 2 AUXILIARY PIPE SPILLWAY PROFILE VIEW _ _ - r NOTES L. 1+1.0.CHLLfT MOLEB 01t.S00i WTK txta STAPMPM Un MC 2 PM TO SEORMMDXTOHEAevw«ATXGWESv CONTRAffm T. ALL EL EMNM PRECAST TO 94M ASTM C917 l CKAMiERAM" CORI¢AY r OR HAVE A RACRA OF 1` — FTLTER Cow r pLLCYTJO M. �Mf ►Y Y. /1T,N U42-Kole 17 BECKMWAL JONT trupowo ir. -ustt .s eJC DOT LtAKOJNO gtJIR1 iLL I PRBC ABT EwApL,L — 4/ w1/ fM SEE MAIL S •• w,w 6TA 2t87.62 i ovnETrEADVJAUSrt�crlLl� ow aw r-�f w 1KVn ewer erl MM Flu t!0 � YRd MXTTlE IROK tii Q Kt 9 d DUMB RO11 PPB ®oAOR STATION STAGE 2 AUXILIARY PIPE SPILLWAY PROFILE VIEW _ _ - r NOTES L. 1+1.0.CHLLfT MOLEB 01t.S00i WTK txta STAPMPM Un MC 2 PM TO SEORMMDXTOHEAevw«ATXGWESv CONTRAffm T. ALL EL EMNM PRECAST TO 94M ASTM C917 l CKAMiERAM" CORI¢AY r OR HAVE A RACRA OF 1` -- - - - YTIBCK OALY'AKSZEO TO MEAD WALL WTX ICNi AICADR• TOP AND MOMAMEr CAA WY JiT7F 1w B ".C. "" FM BAP am ELEVATION SIDE �3 NC DOT STANDARD PRECAST CONCRETE HEADWALUENDWALL NOTE ORAdOMOOlAMMPIPE OUTZETOfeTNLOYM km 2M zm ita ¢ T2awdtde 1� 2M 7 or .l. T = 110 T"Q I 1 r 1 2fa3 4 PIPE CRADLE TYPICAL SECTION fJti 0 1 1 1 11111111191a us X14 n 1 f� r oz ILO cl Y I- Ci a J co jaia a g � -40C IV 1A r• wto�cT.111stooa ii DATE YAV Mf; CRAi1 W WO b A -113 { ti QT 17 OF 39 rose" 1 aaafwY /1'SfMa pLLCYTJO M. �Mf ►Y Y. /1T,N w. .s a 4/ w1/ fM ../.�n1*f waf 11 ;M^fw �wyt "maw •• w,w .as�/'. a.v •+a n... aw r-�f w • . }� -- - - - YTIBCK OALY'AKSZEO TO MEAD WALL WTX ICNi AICADR• TOP AND MOMAMEr CAA WY JiT7F 1w B ".C. "" FM BAP am ELEVATION SIDE �3 NC DOT STANDARD PRECAST CONCRETE HEADWALUENDWALL NOTE ORAdOMOOlAMMPIPE OUTZETOfeTNLOYM km 2M zm ita ¢ T2awdtde 1� 2M 7 or .l. T = 110 T"Q I 1 r 1 2fa3 4 PIPE CRADLE TYPICAL SECTION fJti 0 1 1 1 11111111191a us X14 n 1 f� r oz ILO cl Y I- Ci a J co jaia a g � -40C IV 1A r• wto�cT.111stooa ii DATE YAV Mf; CRAi1 W WO b A -113 { ti QT 17 OF 39 o m R N_Z 0 l o a C /a�4 m +cRSa+s+c ab I fill u Q r LOVIER LONOVIEW LAKE DAM REHAB CITY OF RALWH RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA STAGE 3 STREAM DIVERSION CONCEPT AND INSTRUMENTATION PLAN o� Y LL eIL■i11n11iNUmn I - -- -VIII N 1111 op Y c ` a SCh Aaboi �N CAgO rQQ���ESC�a� GMG,N000Ie1G i 031309 j uueeeeussacase *e a *� Q'' Iqa O�eL 0l�iivAb4�iIIN/ tsarAa�nmeafaao�..wr.�Y,. '�C w S p0 s1� m 8 r _ g D 2 = = = z 0 m c° Fn- S ti i ?m � qp� o a C /a�4 m +cRSa+s+c ab I fill u Q r LOVIER LONOVIEW LAKE DAM REHAB CITY OF RALWH RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA STAGE 3 STREAM DIVERSION CONCEPT AND INSTRUMENTATION PLAN o� Y LL eIL■i11n11iNUmn I - -- -VIII N 1111 op Y c ` a SCh Aaboi �N CAgO rQQ���ESC�a� GMG,N000Ie1G SEAL 031309 j uueeeeussacase *e a *� Q'' Iqa O�eL 0l�iivAb4�iIIN/ tsarAa�nmeafaao�..wr.�Y,. '�C w V, a iieQ win FOU5 " ra.sn arann Damn GERALD C. ROBBLEE. P.E. �dA1Q 0 OKM �eCIRHe'YI1 ALL YAK, pUt EQd a, a DROP BOX PLAN e lie PROVIDE UM 1'-T PJ' DROP BOX ELEVATION EL 210A W aeva RNAL GRADE 3 DROP BOX ELEVATION , ANAL VV4X Y IE M2111 Mm, P d w I a 4! IL j K b o co 0 O C7 AI rr J � 6p±�� i .o i �( Ods h _ m°: pI A a- 5 C � y m 8F CK N 1_0 LL �o v M Z l °o t gao J O a J Q 1�': it t � PROMMOMODW e DATE MAY 2013 ORRADa NO 6 A-115 e SMEET 19 OF 39 r z z m z F m 0 z �F o $ Ct � ' LOWER LONGVIEW LA REHAB m v c of RALEIGH RALEIGH, NCRTH CAROLINA a STILLING BASIN DETAILS " (1 OF 2) 1 4 F z ci v 0 m 4 II I � I I II II I I I � I II �I § Schnabel �„r�•'w GA O •QFt88f ° -z Qo ersman xmn oQ�n E b O I N E E O I N 0 ?Q ,7 GERALD C. ROBBLEE, P.E. T IICEMYE�OeHEN C45i Y. 0�7i M OokeroxAo"I(m 2710 ls77AOm H �.2p0 ®/ tl®E W m.mn ko C. i. CO2 r.. r 'i z ,l N I � 1 z I I s ¢ I I I y I $ Ct � ' LOWER LONGVIEW LA REHAB m v c of RALEIGH RALEIGH, NCRTH CAROLINA a STILLING BASIN DETAILS " (1 OF 2) 1 4 F z ci v 0 m 4 II I � I I II II I I I � I II �I § I I I I I I I I I I I J LOCAL. STATE Y 1p" R/HII� OEICRpn*N GATE Schnabel �„r�•'w GA O •QFt88f ° -z Qo ersman xmn oQ�n E b O I N E E O I N 0 ?Q ,7 GERALD C. ROBBLEE, P.E. SEAL 021395 ; A IICEMYE�OeHEN C45i r �•F�tN6YP,•�Yi 0�7i M OokeroxAo"I(m 2710 ls77AOm H �.2p0 ®/ tl®E W m.mn ko C. MO MCAROURAMFEAMONALEe3eBEMMMM I I I I I I I I I I I J LOCAL. STATE Y 1p" R/HII� OEICRpn*N GATE 1 / / ALIGNI lENT -TOE WALL PROFI E STATI0f#%+XX OFFSEf�.00-M ' N01"1940 -742" PJ1DT?p- Qt�1,,?H AJGIWE iT-ME WALL PROFILE 6TAT%XV: W1a00 l(ORTNWtr 741:1773 �m.� Fp3TItKa'^212�OO.BO / I&W C'd'r i 60.00 210 200 190 170 BD�00 PROVIDE DRAW CLEMOUT SEE DETALL I ON SHAT A.123 jam•- -16ER7 ALIMIEINT =TOE WALL PpOFLLE STATIOI =51?N O OFFSET C TOE WALL PLAN VIEW .Ch ea PROVIDE MAIPI CLEANOUT GEE DETALL I ON SHEET Ib12a DRADNGESYSTEM SEE DETAa a� - RNAL GRADE y j\ STRIPPED ROCK SURFACE CX5r W GRAM LEVELING COCCRERE NOT SHOWN STATION 2 TOE WALL ELEVATION VIEW t AL90NUM- TOEWLLLPROFILE f i STATON -GDOMM / OFFSET-0 A/ PROJECT: 0921000 MOR741170 DATE: MAY 201 REINFORCEMENT AT STA 50+80 DROMANG 11 GHE1 =T 20 of 39 NORTHING- 74117921 BSTING41120620.94 / 21 W. 60.65 zro 269 9A0 +{ 18 Q 181 170 67#W NOTES t. E)OAVAT[ON FOR THE TOE VdLLL TO EXTEEID TO ROCPAND SECLE ANED OFALL LCM U&TERIAL. 9 03"1 F m om eYm-w --TFTA W 1 w14I1 flW DEitESE00NS AND CREV=AS DIRECTED BY THE BIMNE$L 1 ADO RE INFMCEMIENT 01 TOE VITAL FCOTXGS DIQtEIO]tffALLrAS FOOTIN4 VWDTH INC7MASES. 4. NEGHT OF VERTICAL REOIFMCE61W VARIS AS WA.L HEGHT VARIES. a MCK VALVES TO BE MISTAAED AT ALL DRAIN OUTLETS, GEE OETALL O ON SHEET XID DRAIN OIERF GEE OETALL W ON SHEET A•12: 2 D I= —_ I= 3L 2w I 100 4 SECTION AT STA 50+15 • 3 TYPICAL TOE WALL DRAINAGE DETAILS 4 6 �we 1.41• t8 °� WQC bC fS ®8'EF app 5 REINFORCEMENT AT STA 50 +15 150 6 SECTION AT STA 50+35 8 SECTION AT STA 50+59 semm r-2 lj I 1.00 I 260 130 w�--•— 411 -� 10 SECTION AT STA 50+80 6 r fa a REINFORCEMENT AT STA 50+35 9 REINFORCEMENT AT STA 50+59 ILL @0 / —Ns@r MIA � I_I Q $ W EE 8H88a a.- � S in w l Ma tltltl Gl L ��10-;0N as -100 10z a .a; Y � a i h#A N J 0° Z W Q J J J 111 r t•a~ f i rn 456 EB 8• EF PROJECT: 0921000 DATE: MAY 201 REINFORCEMENT AT STA 50+80 DROMANG 11 GHE1 =T 20 of 39 8 i It o . o n A a m S 0 0 _ n S 0 weer ONOPOWPA =I A wo an." St a' "do LOWER LONGVIEW LAVE DAM REHAB wrrHmB RAVRNCL r7rJQ mml we aaam 9n p1` uuC Ilr ^•r� umau 1 ruum 11w1mon JO JCI JCS CITY OF RALEIGH � 1 � rorr.. 4 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA Schnab@f `.•`�rpP FM UCD1C9 W= C-= x � •• �j1 6NGIN66RIN6 5 �,�'E $ PROPOSED 31 2 JOHN C. IHNATOLYA, P.E. ALBEMARLE AVENUE nN 11Ii= NIR R 0-7699 -. �.`� _ PLAN AND PROFILE fill" a„ o 'ss�7 `°R "sl'e' "1`1�"' moo" IN 0* 9mich am / oomb l R /!7107 rltrig nna ^ IIORIN CaSOON f9lOFESSIOIAL DINIM 71M V ••• '�• I/ s1Fnm / • ror 1s 01oN DAYS: 4�a � No IY, Y o :,g _ .. I 10700.00 cu v 117al a / / m 8 n110 CRISIS r� 610 tlf 111,m a11t + 71 .70 / r PVC t +11.67 aalr ~ 111611 rr ' 711►+ t0u0 / 7 065101 Blalt ' x . 706x7 tr. 2Ar19 1.39 - ------ ---- -- -•• -1t ------- Stn17a09.66 110►tl 11 C9M � sm17+11A0 � m1n I U Low P7 u. - fA0 13cr PM 17+11 _ >aM pro "g BFI �P" 7 OLV - 20L I p011N, M CBI1 1aa m16u SVC17+4L35 SPAS ma Till � 1m1e 0 1116.0 m7a �17 m 644 w e0a 107Js f07.N Or .711.19 707m PN IN26a7 N PT 14426.62 7r r 711.44 El ab EV . 711.2 st+a 70110 PVl 14 man affif 11.19 !wa IDIJ1 3110,73 am= Imo I r ma0• FF M 1mn 717.11 � $� q tow i� PVC 16f .76 107a r o 7Aa LOW R 1 707.71 CB71 ffi16490.66 1116X1 CB72 101a �a $ QQ�' Slow sOL" OL75 .•QQ 1 NS 6: 1111.19 � �IROPyOqSE�7O 17' 011rt r 199a Iowan n a by nu• AppRoxwx Low. SNw0Y7R 6W96p dltAt p nut q ns1• 11W dI,. i '•`•�� 1116" 1116D a •r � ma G M o11M1 - ♦ � ` file 17 1801276 77X1 6 .7Yt67 tc 1f \ \. it .� Q �. It o . o n A a m S 0 0 _ n S 0 weer ONOPOWPA =I A wo an." St a' "do LOWER LONGVIEW LAVE DAM REHAB wrrHmB RAVRNCL r7rJQ mml we aaam 9n p1` uuC Ilr ^•r� umau 1 ruum 11w1mon JO JCI JCS CITY OF RALEIGH � 1 � rorr.. 4 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA Schnab@f `.•`�rpP FM UCD1C9 W= C-= x � •• �j1 6NGIN66RIN6 5 �,�'E $ PROPOSED 31 2 JOHN C. IHNATOLYA, P.E. ALBEMARLE AVENUE nN 11Ii= NIR R 0-7699 -. �.`� _ PLAN AND PROFILE fill" a„ o 'ss�7 `°R "sl'e' "1`1�"' moo" IN 0* 9mich am / oomb l R /!7107 rltrig nna ^ IIORIN CaSOON f9lOFESSIOIAL DINIM 71M V ••• '�• I/ s1Fnm / • ror 1s 01oN DAYS: 4�a � No IY, Y o :,g _ .. a It o . o n A a m S 0 0 _ n S 0 weer ONOPOWPA =I A wo an." St a' "do LOWER LONGVIEW LAVE DAM REHAB wrrHmB RAVRNCL r7rJQ mml we aaam 9n p1` uuC Ilr ^•r� umau 1 ruum 11w1mon JO JCI JCS CITY OF RALEIGH � 1 � rorr.. 4 RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA Schnab@f `.•`�rpP FM UCD1C9 W= C-= x � •• �j1 6NGIN66RIN6 5 �,�'E $ PROPOSED 31 2 JOHN C. IHNATOLYA, P.E. ALBEMARLE AVENUE nN 11Ii= NIR R 0-7699 -. �.`� _ PLAN AND PROFILE fill" a„ o 'ss�7 `°R "sl'e' "1`1�"' moo" IN 0* 9mich am / oomb l R /!7107 rltrig nna ^ IIORIN CaSOON f9lOFESSIOIAL DINIM 71M V ••• '�• I/ s1Fnm / • ror 1s 01oN DAYS: 4�a � No IY, Y o :,g _ .. • STAGE T DOP1tSTREAld „ COFMDAMCLCRESI WI SX0lMEReA4Sa \ • � CLEAR oocFSS To 1 , CONSTRUCTS b o flYFiALL$ fdR�� V / � d` u, � 1 WCNMGATli - n b 1/ 3fP'ORARTO01111TRUCRaIEMTHAIICE SEE GETAIL I ON SHEET &TAN _ r \ \ 1 sROit�OEmwaGDDer DROP BOX MET S MXfUNE, FTRFPCIO LI ITS \` sow A.l TI AOR aerA7L9 IS i I ` -01 tia N ��t \ i 1 exsavATTDTNFOROaOP ODXneT BTRUCTlI10L CLLVERr.APD SYLLNGSWU y EXCAW1T4% FOR gLTE7tNOT ONGMIL snuiNG SIUK tam GTEr A-1P0 FOR OEYA69 CULVERT OUILET PROTECTION � �, Ex=TTm08Ri0GET08E REMOVED CM OTAW 7 '– TIrAOeI LIMITS OPOtST001INCE ALBEMARLE AVE. 3 mg! W=K4ATED CNA MEL TT)mJIPAREA f CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE ` / AFTT3: snore cOl�eTOOa ORA.T LAK£TT!TIICOTTfRAOTOp p6S i1r� y/DM \ _ - Olive Tome \\ � -- � oaNerRVCrTaMCm�rloa 7 PtIMPBASEAW2WORMRiOWT HROUGVEXISMSRU.V^T• T, SWALL ER' 4 1 N1 AND a0MIETT COMTFOL MEASURES. GTAOE 1 GEOWNWETIC RIUMFORCEO COFFERCAM .. aaoa® aOrsRMMrTNwsoOrwNastoescnna OL CREST EL2W5 01WEROA I MOPES ARD rtNUrFORe�DwrnGeDaTwneTTCs 6. CON81RUC1 CoMTNACTDiT OED BTAOE I OOFFE3m1M (FTl'tT S1TlEI F10p9ROLIryI PJDSTCID 9PILLLTO►f► L EX CAVATETNi 4ZWHE )MMINCIEWEAAIMMTOREGIDUALGot FO AM110R FOR RISER CULVERT AND SMINO BASF/ f. REL40VM MIMM 40 ORGANIC SPWA FROM WHN THE MOOTS OF THE lPSTREAY ELOPE OF THE PROPOSW EMBANKMENT /. Comm1arCTNEwwwom"ffSTRI,CTUAS CULVEW, CRODOMOAPHRAOM;ANDShLL TOSAmm. 0. cDMPIETEoTAOENOFmmGTeACNF LUkOORCP BOX OUT S7RUCTIM 111VT31T, AW ff"LLM 03IMEXCMATICM9 AND CONSTRUCT TOM LOWRSM SLOPE. LAM CIP COMSTFRWT I r J " n STAGE 1 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN ctauor ^! aG� a s m 1111 W J � Q, a �g ` –&— _l LOCfi18GAYE • -0. �_ s DUAiTB Op_ -� Cz u sr:TNOMPD+e CONnfweTORTOSPVarTrouel CONTROL wbaAND GRERFEA INGZr MA'NTAIIN 61 W' ��' 0 1� 3 aFFaroor7ervuuQ NiAfNEAi�J\ \ �• (•i Ln a., ru :n n Q W 'Q r4 LLJ go go 3 2 a N O J� \ w0 LEGEND ulmTa DF TasrLT�TnTCS I M OF OONSTRUCrON — — 91T FE1C! — �s EMSANQENT OTRPPmG WITS .I wo ORIW=NO Na E -101 34 OF 29 1° ,; sLaLUTETe�oasalLK9rALLrn �• RNA" 111 PLACE TCE `� '•1 ROC1t dlBClc ONA y LeIRSOF 091 URBAHICB } t ' r CAST M PLACE LATE IN UTA CLLVETTTCCKSTR CTEO � I DLwTBIBs o eOEuR 4999 1 I _ � �1 t1 I!y A II aH>posmeTleANlarleeTr sT �qxc / o / .0-1 �fioAT$ i � E ' f ! 1 1 f r y f ! t r Z16 � 1 ` 13.0 Q II II f ----- . --�- -- - ---It - IL -_a._ . -�' - FT T N �- ALBEMARLE AVE. Hg4e J II 0 II 0091IND SPBAI m ex AvXRON TO , TEYPORM+r CONBTRSlCTgNElITRAHiCE — ,,`` j� JJ,, ne TO CrAm s 003"NOENT Sib OOTATL , ON 0IlEeT 6aer' R� �" "'71 61aCJtVAT10N. CCNTFt CTCSH TO TAKE MEARIlREDTOLOOTDIBTi mm TO _ EIDST13m UIOJTS sul""A/O=AOF TH03 efODGB a, 0 ` VALVE DP01 OURDID STAGS 2 10 TOBYPA3 L-MFWW I + L2WTO CF 010TURBAKOE TO a"," a t r LVSWM BRIDGE � i % TOm RENAMED 1T.Op r 1 CIE- H. COIST111=9 112COFFBIDIEL 2. PAW BADEAAOWORMFI .OWTFADIMLOWWALOUTLETON THE N WOROPSOKVIE: STIncli F4. 7 CeMOLMH Alm RBUDVB THE K70STIVO BRWOB AND CPU W STRUCTLViE BIRO• ANC EWAN ATE! TW OOW 11TNFAEE PORTIM OF TOM ®31110 BIBIII&WX? A9 910111 AND as R@OUS+fD TO n-sTALL WU04 9E FLATVRILL 5. PLACE LETit3DIOCOICRETE M LOM AREAS CF THE ROOK GPILLVAY CHLITE A3 W&CTED sync CHOO93ER e. PLACU WNW AND CMS WY ORFOUL 7 CdBTRU lMWCRCED CONCRE'E TW V1l% L 0. MISTRUOTMNWEOPLLMVINFOOTPRORO FeEieLr2oDEMVf iOCitLLWAY.GEEOEET A-H12, 0 PLAN FILL FOR DW AWFM W EUBWMM SLOPE (s® STAGE 2 ORACOIO PIMA STAGE 2 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN ulq ROW • m IV LEGEND LRRiSCP OISTURBWC8 LOIrtSOP CON9TWICTIORI — — SaT PENCE —_ — OOPtMKIREW filisPRNO UNITS W M @ ,Tt Yi aoi i� 6� q LU �9 = o U 0 -8 m W g a B Ito 0 a ILZU- �= W oY Z a u,e N 1K °Q W V r DUE* WAY WKYUND LR E -102 AHU�Y 35 OF 30 a RIFT PROTECT on sae O[TAtL 2 m BHM 6HOL _1 8lT Ft NCE OUIIET GTArA 3 C%WFM= el ' CLCFMW EL 201A LBIlTSOF DoHUTTaxr1ON n � I �N SEQUENCE H. COIST111=9 112COFFBIDIEL 2. PAW BADEAAOWORMFI .OWTFADIMLOWWALOUTLETON THE N WOROPSOKVIE: STIncli F4. 7 CeMOLMH Alm RBUDVB THE K70STIVO BRWOB AND CPU W STRUCTLViE BIRO• ANC EWAN ATE! TW OOW 11TNFAEE PORTIM OF TOM ®31110 BIBIII&WX? A9 910111 AND as R@OUS+fD TO n-sTALL WU04 9E FLATVRILL 5. PLACE LETit3DIOCOICRETE M LOM AREAS CF THE ROOK GPILLVAY CHLITE A3 W&CTED sync CHOO93ER e. PLACU WNW AND CMS WY ORFOUL 7 CdBTRU lMWCRCED CONCRE'E TW V1l% L 0. MISTRUOTMNWEOPLLMVINFOOTPRORO FeEieLr2oDEMVf iOCitLLWAY.GEEOEET A-H12, 0 PLAN FILL FOR DW AWFM W EUBWMM SLOPE (s® STAGE 2 ORACOIO PIMA STAGE 2 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN ulq ROW • m IV LEGEND LRRiSCP OISTURBWC8 LOIrtSOP CON9TWICTIORI — — SaT PENCE —_ — OOPtMKIREW filisPRNO UNITS W M @ ,Tt Yi aoi i� 6� q LU �9 = o U 0 -8 m W g a B Ito 0 a ILZU- �= W oY Z a u,e N 1K °Q W V r DUE* WAY WKYUND LR E -102 AHU�Y 35 OF 30 a 11 I. NSTALL ERCUM OONIRR 1EASLIRGi N THE FOLDSIO SEOIOM IA ORUIEI I,IRIFICE 18 SLT FEI 0016'IRUCIIOM E M AREA TH R W SHWAN a4 THE 00"MW AN t TIC MEAR �rO &NAEAE ES OrFA N574LATHES OLNCES AND S® 2. COM CERTMAN OF CM94AMM THIMUN, ON-SEE NWW= BY EROSoo COMROL OITcm F APIRom cmmwmR YAY 000.1 COOTAIWon tNYmt 0111MIRD w Oft 4�prrW{.IYI uwTS FOR STAGE 3, 3 SWALL WQ[RUK MID APPURrOvam 4. 06TALL NEW STORY 0AYNiE AND AFNLGATE NO PR01ECTM S. OOMPLL79 FRAIL otu D.lo G. 1� T05 MW EROSION CO URO MI.ES AS SITE S 7. W= PAW0 CONSTRUCTION N ORAOEO AREA(S). 6 OrwOSrSC 0C .o OraRlimm wn - .Ae OII SHE-E r -F -SEM �rEOFT1RIOIL PAtNIC, ETC. SEE StIFET IB FOR SEEIIND B. t1ND1 0NQR11000M s tD161EO NQ; ALL B ng AREAS AtE . CYl FAR AN DI ,wn BY EJWS1O11 10. INERT YEGCDIIpI NAS BEOOIE �g�p�, CALL fOR A FNAL , B,SPEDi101I Br TO,N EROSION CpBR0. OFFICE3t m OOfAN CER1i1C11TE OF DDYPLET0IL Su n3sc SiR S RENOIE ,EYPgpp. DNE7i9DM4. . ETC.. AND Rm DR PMIE BARE ATEL4. R080MSYER SUSAN DO t� p 649 t t PFIN ms ow m lo os3e Pi ® k uwFS THORK GENE to & THORPE Pot 71960 -110 1n4 01 0139 0 ® F y/ IIA f6.PH as Isle �Ppg5005 PDI%I1i24 01 Q337 i P FA k ON i EROSION CONIROL NARRAIM (SINX 3k A orc N® DUMAS Ttl,A9B11F AL O PINT &a Pam gig 08 604 P 388 RN x1729440011 33301 O¢ 9EE1 E_ e r � �Et010�rR ATEA (ItP) ,9 a LOCHATIE L TAIM I 08 6708 P 992 P0,#172401 0139 MiFi1 IBMK)RARY SwALE LOT 2600 d r, SAM MOM AMERICAN �fiA0l1 96 OR MMMIOYFD 9"vowkw w AIM DOLVE LI f l uc 9 / oe 724 01 �Q! %,O Dt 1 Fw w" -190 -- Poopo® ClkT ra GENERAL NOTES: PROPOSED SO FOU _- ____________ -_ Fq�D wFRO Tft SLT FOQ 2. FEYA FLOOOPLMN SW W ON THIS SITE PER RN MWS SMAI724M At SM1714001 OAtED wr 2. 2000, 100-rR iTD00AA01 Mo fiD00R10� 4: 300 -M FIDOORAN mill 01MUMI 1 ON IKE F)� ® F y/ IIA f6.PH as Isle �Ppg5005 PDI%I1i24 01 Q337 i P FA k ON i EROSION CONIROL NARRAIM (SINX 3k A orc N® DUMAS Ttl,A9B11F AL O PINT &a Pam gig 08 604 P 388 RN x1729440011 33301 O¢ 9EE1 E_ e r � �Et010�rR ATEA (ItP) ,9 a LOCHATIE L TAIM I 08 6708 P 992 P0,#172401 0139 MiFi1 IBMK)RARY SwALE LOT 2600 d r, SAM MOM AMERICAN �fiA0l1 96 OR MMMIOYFD 9"vowkw w AIM DOLVE LI f l uc 9 / oe 724 01 �Q! %,O Dt 1 Fw w" -190 -- Poopo® ClkT ra GENERAL NOTES: BE 0 ACCORDANCE ,. SPEC3ICILt01s DE 's CLOMIT CITY OF RUM 9. BrEt �S GAS LINE SHALL BE REYOIfD HUOR ro BMMM DAY CMTRUCR011 2. FEYA FLOOOPLMN SW W ON THIS SITE PER RN MWS SMAI724M At SM1714001 OAtED wr 2. 2000, 100-rR iTD00AA01 Mo fiD00R10� 4: 300 -M FIDOORAN 10. E M STREET SRNS SIL1LL BE REmovo MID wucap As OWECJED or TIE air OF AAIF)OIE SNOYN 1MY[ BEEN PLWDED er N3t00a11PS.00Y AS THE fERT Io0W19E am m" AAY 2. L006 tl• D � � m 3 NO HER O61AC15 TO aosTDro EEDAIDS AM MNG REUSE am CBI THE US AIBIY CgiPS oONiIEEM no m Cba N 1NE ss1m w a TIE BAOt Oi /pTpHE�R0p10gp�1r �sI�WA7W�DpEi uP'011 OBEY Q 0p1g}RIt•IpH, ME R am CRY s,Ni�LL ff AF1D61)FD i0 T!N D71�0�T�6II7E� ~ misllml 1' iiovlmllaFT i m�aAl N S=.Qrtt m r RAUDCH NAn w �pr�9W91W1A ti r cmnyrpy br OlOictwr,.�OYm AND S NET LAW LOCAMS YD OEUM ATCY PRDI f ROBERT J. GMDSIEN 4t ASSOOIOq DIG AID SURTErED BE YRIERS AND RAVEN EL INC. 13 OAY 0o1STf8ICig11 9W1 BE P101SED N A YAIDER 1IA: AOCESS TD 2800. 2401 2SS1. a 4: 2337 -mmm glE wL1pLw S NOT DPEffiD NN00 OOISIRUCIDII tET6h8RY d OdORALROR To VER" LOOM" W ALL COSH UATIES ABOVE AND B00W 4' O1lsIR11CI1N1 R�FA10,1®'BEA COISIRUC s Cd�BE. tbMltdlfxOR CJIAOE PIB011 ro AMY CoMSTfCX1pI. SIYLL COOFDNATE 111TH THE " CARRIER FOR BEST LDOIIIDN. 7. ff RLP, 9ULL BE REILOUED PER THE Lm !!< RNE]A:i 'S STMIDYD AVM IS MAN THE to �F� TO S. 6 0117E INW64 SNAL BE N5IALIED d EACH Aww SIT, ON THE NMIS pow ro RFADIRL or TIE YJOEIbDE AWOSS lIE OAY TE]DbRARI SNML 111D1 yON 13. E70AF10 SA10rARf SE1EA YAN40LE5, dFA1DID4. EATEA00161RIlCllbl IDOR 91YL DE FNIE IIINGNIS AID BETTER UMES LOCATED NIDW pBE p� APgLR�® AFTER EADI YyALVE. gLpPgO7II�OOYPLEEdI 0/ iLE IMgI MAID PIOW ro PLACEIImQ �. LLi LEe TA C YAMS OIP� SIiBE E PROIEy1m ro MIOD TIIIWGE AND F AND TI011G4 SHALL EEr THE CITY Oi Ib11m114 sIMIDND 9EdFrJ01N0 AND OIENS $ C O3 2Si6 HOYEOrFQASpOgF LOpMV01f CAR006 08 1363T oat (PREYWJS) 1857-33 PIN 1724 00 1981 mttaa #M Iv 0, °1L1'" Q` Ipa. ® 1 ACS. m..a v.err mr e®�.r — — r_ s • V .1 A � o•A O o•� �'A e O I _ 4 ' STANDARD CATCH BASIN ( YARD INLET PROTECTION 10 m. 119�62=L q COMM ®t�SOWJ •mOmmm01 I x TJas �L'1ty RN 1724 01 6293 , r - a,lw• � Sub LurrlAa000r - G,UTTERBUDDYOCurb ITtfet Drain Fdors a IN Aff AN SCNar.2F �i OEDIM R HALL k CARCLYN Y. HALL JR 013 1758 P 346 1060 -110 PIN 1724 Of 7121 O RAFFICIIANC SUM DO SM PP 787 1960 -110 Pt" tn4 00 %se o O 1 i -I- g f L /Yr I ol,ama i 1 CITY Or RALEIGH OONSIRICIM MUST BE N AOO D SVSL MD FEDBYL SAM A W LOCK. SPORDMIN SERRCEs X UTUTE4 8 B d LL ! it� -j aA z I'll 6 �boM y n u�r a' �rnrumnN�• mom 0 40 z u z z 8 s W M W c = LLI W� N0l.— _ Lr-N H Oz �0 I �Ug OU p in D< 0 a La iJ 1 O ,1111's PROJECT: 09210005.01 OATS MAY 2013 ORArr1NG No. E -103 36 of 39 I. GEAR THE ENTRANCE AND EXIT AREAOP ALL VEGETATION. ROOTS, AND OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERULLAD GRADE PROPERLY 2- PLACE FILTER FABRIC CVM CLEARED AREA A PLAGl VNAW woo To Tm apeam GRACIE AND OWB190M Of KWA ON THE PLAN* WO OMOOTM IT 4. PROVIDE URAINAGE TO CARRY WATER TO A SIATABLE OUTLET. MAINTENANCE NOTES' 1. MAINTAIN THE STONE PAD IN A CONDTION TO PREVENT MW OR SEDIMENT FROM LEAVONG THE CONSTRUCTION WM INS MAY REOURE PERIODIC TOPORESIM WITH UN CH STONE. 2. AFTER SAC• RAWALL. DICPECT AW STRIPMW USED TO TRAP SEMAENT AND CIFAR R OUT AS &MESSARY !. UNYEDIATELV REMOVE ALL OBJECTIONABLE MATERIALSSPILLJD. WASHED .ORTRACKEDONTOPUMAROADWAYS. NOTES 1. COARSE ANTE 2-3 INCH VVIUM STONE 2. MDQMAI T9pOffB& O INCHES *. MINI MUM LIMTK SO YET 4. MINIMUM IRDflt 23 FEET S. GEOTEKTIM F=LARED TO SEPARATE COARSE AGGREGATE FROM SLR S. MAINTAIN 10 PREVENT TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT ONTO PLBTLC ROADS, PLACE ADDITIONAL COARSE AGGREGATE AS OONDITICNB DEMAND. i TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NorTOSUUE GENERAL NOTE: 1. THESE SPE3C61CATTONS WEE REFEREACED FROM THE NC AND DESIGN MMi AM. AM 1.2005. AJTCAO TO 4� (Cllr FI zw CHECK DAM NOTES CO STRD,CDaH I. PLACE STOLE TO THE LIES AND DOENSIN/B SHIOWII IN THE PLAN ON A FILTER FABRIC FOUNDATION. 2. KEEP THE CDBER STONE BE== AT LEAST O INCHES BELOW NRLR AL GROUND LEVEL VI ERE THE DAY ABUTS TH3 CHANNEL BAFM 3. KEY THE STONE INTO THE DITCH BANOBAND EXTEND STONE AT LEAST IS FEET BEYOND TEE 01, BARK TO KEEP WATER FROM CUTTING NROUID THE BIDS OF THE CHECK DAY. 4. SETSPACOMBEIIMEENDAMSTOASSURETHATTHEELEVATIONATTHETOPOFTHELOWEIDIMISTHESAMEASTHE TOE ELEVATION OF THE UPPER DAM. S VERIFY THAT THE CMANNELREACHI ABOVE THE MOSTUPSTREW DAY B STABLE O. ENSLIRE THAT 3THER AREAS OF THE CHANNEL. SUCH AS CLILVER- ENTRANCE$ BEL06V THE CHACK DAMS. ARE NOT SUBJECT TO DAMAGE OR BLOCKAGE FROM DISPLACED STONES. LADNrevwCE 1. INSPECT CHECK GAYS AND CHANNELS WEEIG.Y AND AFTER EACH SKNBFICANTLtAl BC H GRRGREATBp RAIHFI EV@R AND FAIR IMMEDIATELY 2. CLEAN OUT SEDI ENT. STRAW. L8®8 OR OTHER DEBFOS THAT COJW CLOG THE CHAN EL14S REULMIED. a ANTICIPATE SUBMERGENCE AND DEPOSITION ABOVE THE CHECK OAM AND EROSION FROMHIGH FLOWSAROI EDGES OF TIEDAY. CORRECT ALL OAMAGES IMOMEDIATELY 4. REMOVE SEDINENT AOCUM LILATED BONED THE DAMS AS NEEDECTO PREVENT DAMAGE TO CHANNEL VEGET ALLOW THE CHNWNED TO DRAIN TIQtOIOH THE STONE CHEM DAM, AND PREVENT LARGE FLOWS FROM CARE SEDIMENT OVER THE DAML ADD STONES TO THE DAM AS NEEDEDTO MAINTAIN DESIGN HENHfl AND CROSS S PIPE INVERT NATURAL GROUND NC r• OR •• AGGREGATE F-4 VOLUME MAX EcIEDIMENT DEPTH CMEAN OUT POINT) AT 112 OF •' ELEVATION 11 _ 630 P k:7WMALL 3 2 CULVERT INLET SEDIMENT TRAP mmTO so" PERSPECTIVE VIEW Fjr 7 RDaa®LDAN 1� 0: W , a C m i \�P...... 4:03 �. gym. 01z A Lo �Z R Z LL W t/7 U a 9 -00 9t? �o OU 0 CI N C) w W V DATE MAY 2013 DRAWING NO. E -104 LRIL•Y 1 37 OF 39 A PERMANENT SEEDING: MM AW VESWw rom "00f anaQ a" am scar cm a tmmmato STAB!"11011 f&M FRAME EXCEPTI= f FORTLOP. BAS® ON BO L -EST CR I= LUT8/UCRE CF 610.10 FORTUR01 SEED Tfpm SEEM DATT3 sBEeavD RA 8: TALI FESCUE SEP, -APR IS A 20o RCO TOP s 6Emm u lLET OFAY IS -Asir 15 10 IM(CRADII man -AOW1s o TEMPORARY SEEDING: LOUT• 1 TGRACRE Fanymum, T40L8'. acsteOP tP10/OPERT60mocl m I= LWAUM OF 10 -10.10 FUMUZER VM BEED711PE1t semx p own, $Omm- RATEUI. CL' 1AMawAT WW1 -AUOtS IM (GRAM AUG Ta- MAY 1 120 MULCH rVPB AMD RATE OF APPIIW,tE : CLEM STRL.IWAT 2 TONSFZRB METHM OP ANCHOROMk ANIIIORED TUTRI TACIM ABWAPRWM E1 OMINER. GENERAL SEEDING NOTES: I 900.6TAHMA" MSHAU0R HEVHDONAWAVAOFTHRSMMMEREL*Z A=VM 0HAVE TOXIC PAR INORPOWAYU 3kn'tC EASED A000F01N) TOTHECRQUA® GTAtmttAT1OF1 TfAIQtQ1FCGU�/7GtflfiL 0 7I0a RlCT. L MORWC THE MPAREDMM STOBE MOMTOAM31WUMGEPDIOFMA(QLNC/ED ROW& ALL STONES L MtURTW W rWM O) VCaS Os AW SM SRCKIE, P.00TB„ AMD OTHR EARAMlWW WITER9"AT 17E UWACE OURM T1LE SD fifFP1M7lOFL S. RECOTJ WM THE AREA tOM A CLM.WACKEA ROLL13t THE FTL1131tsID GRADE B11ALL BE A 840077. EVEN SOL SURFACE W1Ti A LOOSE. WCOALY FIETpRIafiE ALL Rs M AND D P ES00NS 9-WA WFtDWOWMAHDFIUJI 'TOPROYMI"EAPRtOWMDLWAtEORA34AM GEEOD(OOFCRAOED ARF0ISTORE DOW PAIE AATELYAFTERFSN W-MGRIMARECLiTA9"MOSEEM9 FYMPARATIOR 13 COMPLETED GROUND STABILIZATION TIMELINE REQUIREMENTS MM AW VESWw rom 7111@ �TION STAB!"11011 f&M FRAME EXCEPTI= IY.Bmww 0a0:s. SwXm dTDms ?DAYS AND stem H101 QuKuTY1/L j" g , IW) ZOMM T OAYG NpNg MAPEi SFEE-ER THM 31 ?DAYS PMWESAiE10}7ORLMINLE DTWAMMMMO7STEEPER 7W W 2:1_N DAYTL M AtLCO® S1^wa31CT-FLATTEL 14 DAYS 74 AVO FaR SLOPES OIEATCA IM WFEW IN LENGTH ALLOT ERAFEUVOTM6LOPES "mm 1( a14�H7�fT 'OILPCRWCTOaAtOCOLYmNCW fiAT1ERT11ANL'1 =_ - - _ - -- 1 TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEEDING Dana so" GENERAL NOTE: 1. TMET88PEgPN`JITIOPDYIEtB R PTiOM T1Q «c 6IDOON ao at�FrovtTRDL tY.AFlOIItI AND OU CN TAAFAM AM 1. X01$. BAFFLES CONSTRUCTION NOTES: ORAO871EBAS 'JISOTItATTIf3LTOTTOY 81J E11ElFR0 lRTOBACKAI'IDSt0ET+09�8• 2 018TALL F1f76TT20R GAW OgRG� ALROS6 TFE IITmTM OF 11E BIaSO(ER BAEIOW LPIaAt:TICE 6.651. PORCUD BAFFLES) S STEEL POM S HOLLDBEOMYEdTOA DEPTH OF2 SDID1 ES. 8PAZE DAUAMLOOF 4FEETAPARf ,00 INSTALLED trP1118 SUMS CP THE EASM AD WELL. THE TOP OF THE FAERC MMU BE6 11110E3 MWER THAN THE ONERTOP TH2 GRUMV TOPBCF BAFFLES BMOM.O Be 290*0 LOWER TWO THE TOP OF THE BERNO A G9TALL ATLEM THREE ROM OF BAFRJ3 BETWEEN THE MUAMOMETCOCHARGE PONT. EMNSLEMIKM20FEPT01 LENMW UUUEE 2 BKFLFL S AKIN USOM PC'W8. WO GUPPIORT VAM OR RUE A THETDD OF TIE —A0DE TC PR9%vU tTUtOCD/0 6. TKiWPORDYSMATERUL, LNE AMVAOWBY COCRMATERUL ,CWERA61804=62OR THE TCPWL1 WMJ=MRARBARCNTOTIE 6AV&at3ELEOBFO1WANC1lWR 0TIEAAMWOKOULDHAVEFIVETOTENPERC NT OFEffl*G8MTHE1MFAVE.ATTA FMtOTOA MW AC A E&PORT UnMeTURHWL'TW MP TIED, 01ItR- CR STAPLED T. THE GOTTOMP" SUM OF THE FAWWSM" Bra ANCHORED BIAT REXCHORP00 =lA'NW[MCHEsRO51011IC0IMMUArnMQ UINUQ a Do NOT SPICE THE FmmR mn USE A OGNiQ(YDU9 PE86E ACROSS Tw BAm MAINTENANCE NOTES: 1 tN PMT RAFFM At LEAST CUCRAVEEK AND APM MMRA016>11 MOM ANYUEDURURVAWISfIII MATELV Y BB CLlRE TO M UL40AOC EM TO THE GAFFMO, GM=W TIE FM= OF A BAFVW COLLAPLE. TEAR. OCCOMPOM OR awc8 aFUxFI:tNY, RFaIAf!F IT PgMYU v L RETOOMSED[MENTDP09TSW CENLT REACHES MALPfULTOPR== tOE0AMUKSTCROMVOUMS FOR THE =ff PAN AMDTO REOLM RESSM ON THE GAFR E3 TOM CAM TO AYOD DALAfAKt THE CAFRAG ULU= CLEAMOU7. GECOWU DEPTH GHOWO 6EYEREKC9ED HALF THE CE3101 VtO7ACEOEFM •. A"M M COCRMl1UlMGOMOHAQaAMMAS BEER P VGTABCUSAM9IMMALL MONAM1TEN "ANDWDTABLE GMUEYF OEFCGFM Etl'!R9 TTE AREA TO GRADC. ATM GTA[iL=R. ATTACH COIR MESH SECLAMY TO THE CO01MESH tMFREM FACE OP TIEINfE FENCO 111 tLAUOR VA WESH Ff MCM W1TM A 1IA71 GPVADTG OF E11ARW i E0rOMLY TO YERnm P03m TOP OF OAFRB O' B @LOW TUP OF OEAl1 C a FT TIENLM 8;MXF"LEC AND COMPACTED FEMER ANO CC11M a E a� ROCK EAST SIQMMER BASIN BAFFLE DETAILS Nario%Mf 0% OF BIRFACEAiiEA 6EGronGHaNB m 25%OF MffACEARFA ovnxrzm Ida Q H 11 Q. O g m w Q: V «„a ff ` r �p3 am 3 s Ao; (S u rA C: ha u 0 1�— M Z LL gN Oy W ,J Na 00 W8 PROA= C210006 OATS MAY 2013 ORAVVMG NO. E -105 SHM ' 38 OF 39 SEDIMENT FENCE MA T crvWS: I USE A OVUM= FCLUM F'ASR C OF AT LEAST M B► YYEcW 6 PCL.TCLERND OR poLM1ER. V"CH M CERT61ED BY TUC MAHAIFACTURER CA SUPPLIES AD CONFORMING TO TiE REOUIRPUSM I/ AWN 0601. TFNIOI 4 Na1bIMN tN PART BELOW SYNTHETIC FLTER FABRIC SHOULD CCMnUN {ULTRA tCW RAY GOY/IT= AID CTAB LOM TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 0 NOMIHQCf BxFOCTFD INTAgE OOIISTiR)CitON UR A7 A TEWWATURE FWM Of 070 1207 TEMPORARY SILT FENCE MATERIAL PROPERTY REQUIREMENTS frsr NAT1:Lia WTI RWPDR7EL4 LWSdPKRTED1 TYPE DF SILT FENCE SILT PENCE VALUE GRABSTRAmm ASM D 1612 N tun RACHIEDImCR011 Opp SID WAIV X) __ xatADILILS oLRECTtDM Io0 450 mw cm PERIYTT" P sm-1 0.00 _ 005 mw GWER TO'PE71AD ASTYD176/ W OW J 000 WAX ARV, 6'IZg. cusw�q L3W uLTRAYROLET a 70%AFTEFt II► IRABILRTY ASrM D 400 RETADW sm HOURS OF 000 HOLM CP rYPN'JU. OTRodem F—O-CJRH I aLT FENCE SUPP W DIAL CONSIST OF 11OI UGE GMU MM MM A WENH OPAOOLD OF f50W00INDIE4 OR PREFAIRICATED POLTMER MESH OP EOVAUG ENr BTREXCTK 7 TKM CZFAULT W"M ARE BABOON B01R)CAL EVIODW WIN A VAWfYOP aE" M►. FOR ETMROt AWrALLV CENMmE ARM.A REVIEW OF PREVIOUSEXFERWWE ANOIOR Oft OP.RISMOMWT SF=WIC CEOTDQLE TESTS 61ACCCRIW CEYWTH AMU RD 5111 SHOLNlO 08 PERFOATED TO C@6i0I OWTA13UTY OF THEM REQU .07714:JSi0. AS OTF111.{RED, A060R01NLE YL'TMA91M D 1637. 2 PC= FOR l WMW-Mr FIENIX3 WILL BE 133 Lli'lWAR PT STEEL YIRM A MIN:YUM LENGrM OF 0 Fr. POSM SMALL WOVE 3 WIOZZMIONS TO FACILITATE FASTENING TN6 PAM= IiuT+ & FOR IiEP010RC! AM OF STANDARD ITREWM FILYEF FANIC, USE YORE FENCE LYSM A W13=0 14 OAWE AND A N4)=W a MESrtI+AIaRD aF a Yea CONSTRUCTION NOTES: e r 1. EMMM THAT THE I WHT OF THE SED.NDIT FRIM DOES NOTBxCEM 20 MISS AWW THE CROUMD QWACE m 2 CCMS'§U= THE FILTER FABA C FROM A CONTLNUC= RCLL CUT TD THE LErTM OF THE WmmR TO AVOA A>o1TS. YYEM L CG JOWM ARM lCSZ'SDARY, BEWFIELY FASTEN THE FILTER FAW=CMLY AT A SUPPORT POST MTN a Fen MINNI UT OVERLAP TO TIE M=AT IROW 3 SUPPORT STAPOMW SIFWJMTH FILTER FABRIC BY YORE MEM FASTENED SECURELY TO THE LPSLOFF SCE OF THIS POS, Sa0![L, 1S1Ar1:'TTR 0 USING ILL *3= EXTEND THE WM MESH SUPPORT '0 THE SOrMW OF THE TRD CK FASTEN( TIE PYRE REDIFORCEDIENT . THEN CABRIC ON THE L1PMOPE CUE OF THE FCKa POST. Mn OR RAM ZIP TICS SHALL HAVE ADWS M 111 WPOUNC TEN82E arkmm 1 tIUS:E POu1O A YA10AA/ OF rO" FOR UNSIPPORIED OMMU&1T FOM AND 6 FT FOR SUMICWW GE MBff FBICE 67PPORT TOP CF SN.T MMM PLOTS GHOULD BE OFM* 1 DECUPnVIWM THBGROLOOTO A MDRERAL OF 24 6="M MUST BE Al LEAST r 5 SMAWE A TR13= A TaT O INCHES ON AND 6IIAEB D� ALORM THE PROPO�D LSE OF PCSTS AM UPSLOPB Toe µpp � FROM THE RMOO R 6 FACET Q DUNES OF THE FASRW AWM THE BOTr=ANO ® OF tmE TRBICM 7 BACI6'BL TIM TRE-NI hWW SOL PLACED OVERTHF FILTER FAMC AND COMPACT 6 00 NOT ATTACH FILTER FAOLC TO EICYTING TREES. MAINTENANCE NOTES: STEELF:HCE V.RE FH FILTER BURY ODRE iF.HCE AND W13WARE CLOIH FW)Wr 10FW CAIN S FILTER FABRIC foNCRAUND Li 'OURYa' CF /PPER Erm of FLIER FABRIC iN TRBCH -I GLTFMCE -- 4-- — — w", STEEL FEND pppPpppOyyy������ 1. ItEVOWSOW31MWMCM IOU OF Cron ONILETISAOM&D EE711AXTMRIf f� 1. INSPECT SEMMIM FHB AT LEAST CTICE A WEEK AD AFTER EACH WMFIJIWT RAINFALL MM Cm 0101 OR OfI.+ATER} 2 fEPU®STONE as NFFT80T0cIxuLRS iLCOLwrranrl Y.q LF1:lroarn WM ANV W.ZILIBLED REFINAB L LIMTELY. 1 r OROIgp(1YP ) 2 SHOULD THE FASRW OF A s FE CE COLLAPSE, TZAR. CECOMPOSE OR BECOME DLE;FECTNNE. REPLACE R oROMPTLr SILT F�CE Q'Y TLET >L RR310LE lgDtLiEIR OEP06R78 AB 3�E88ARY TO PROVOS ADT30W1S ITIORAOE VQILRTB FOR THE IIEXI RPM NO TO REDLAFi PREbS7lRE 011 TIE FENCE TART: GFE TO A1101D l0ait10N01fi TNS FEIiCB DURYRO CLF1VWYi. CDT W DIM • 1tEMME ALL FEW" MATBOALB AM WMABLL3 REDIMW OEPOSITEI AM MM THE AREA TO Oft= AM BTASW= IT APTER THE CCNHiUTING DRWIAOS AREA MB BEEN PROPMT 6TABW» VAN NEW AMDL VWK Br m P08T --� ■ ,— var-ME34 few FABMFABIENEDTO LWMM SOE OP POETS FABRIC HIMHT'll COYPACiEDSCIL I SACIOLLINTREM M 214* UK 9'OF FA6iK DE.TALLED 90EID 4Fml 1 SILT FENCE ROM SOME GENERAL NOTE: 5 1 1 11ES! SPECDICATIONS wm REiI< mmom FIRCM TIE NC EROli m AND owimarr CON1= P AN mlO AfO 005Id1 MANUAL. PUPS 1.2D00. DMINT 1D 2D a� �o Y Q 8 S s a S SKIMMER BASIN FILTER DIAPHRAGM � IOt W '1RJIlE :as�0>e;u�. nx' !HlR�TL"hll�w.7UM. 3 IiuT+ a d e r m WIN L CG � ' a Sa0![L, 1S1Ar1:'TTR 0 O :as�0>e;u�. nx' !HlR�TL"hll�w.7UM. yyi�ne IiuT+ e r WIN .,. ' e lremF I Ri �I L F1L1E2 DIAPFRACM aW"BU GP BARREL - CSM DETAIL, 3) I t—rro - LIZ 20P — 1 -wl 1— 20D S SEDIMENT BASIN WITH SKIMMER DEWATERING DEVICE WT W SME SKIMMER DETAILS INtTT � spas ATTACH SKINNER WWATERING DEVICE r- U:� x, 3 is,� Ins w:4i -Oft a � tl c� IS W Q 0 2 WO a v co co �o 00 9 O� IX O W U We 7 PROJECT. Obcom, e LUTE: YqY 2013 5 CRAWAW Wa S[ SHEET 39 OF 39