820444_Routine Inspection_20210830

41-km
9
/i 7 t!
Facility Number
`H
Division of Water Resources
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 'O Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
Arrival Time:
Bc>�Kin LKe irrn
Departure Time:
Owner Name: 1tnJ1 (ie 1nvectroent mNQt
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
t 31)0
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: :1mPON Region: fro
ij mWn
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: Kenneth avNJ
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: rn
Certification Number: U'o 0E3(�j
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
LIOO _ J l�
coo 6pe o
f -)O . 4' 'i)
Other
Other
Cattle
Design Curren
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Wet Poultry
)esign Current
Capacity Pop..
Layer
Non -Layer
esign Current
aci Po
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ErNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
O Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
O Yes ❑ No 0 NA ❑ NE
O Yes ,e'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: cj9 - j j Ji
Date of Inspection: . 3Q f
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
2
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
i
-70 37
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
07es ❑ No
❑ Yes jar\lo
❑ Yeslf-No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift
12. Crop Type(s): �1 t 1 41 0
13. Soil Type(s): g d Q n to fl , cu '.1 run
❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes K No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 4-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield El 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
`E"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El -No ❑NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes TO -No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Other:
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Sludge Survey
❑ Yes ► No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes It°No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: ) -
Date of Inspection: - %O•
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check IX] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
J Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 19 ` t 1 I
00N GO 71
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes I'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
0 Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes A, No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes 112 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(]onments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as
endations o
as- J/4
7- /tad re
c.ap
Ito-7 cy)1 A
i)-) PO g I/717 .",/'(
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
ate e
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: (
Page 3 of 3
iD i fly oN
PA1(
Phone: I jCr P) 0 . 97!
G
Date:
'94
2/4/2015

FACILITY#: C.� ql-1 FARM NAME: {'I KIN La
<e,
FREEBOARD ACTUAL LAGOON LEVEL
PERMIT (#19)
- DUE EVERY 5 YEARS /�
- EXPERIATION DATE 9 (SCV LI NUMBER OF ANIMALS L100r WO) 2LI O
- ACTUAL NUMBER OF ANIMAL
- OIC CARD YES OR NO
WASTE UTILIZATION PLAN (WUP) (#20)
SOIL TYPES p,I(-l�j1f0N) wcorazor
CROP TYPES 2.1-1> c;(30
THE UTLIZATION PLAN SHOULD HAVE A (-) NEGATIVE NUMBER
ODOR CONTROL Maps
LIST YES OR NO
Irrigation Plan p
WASTE REPORT (#21)
-GOOD FOR 60 DAYS BEFORE OR AFTER
DATE Le I� XN I NITROGEN LEVEL I- C
SOIL REPORT (#21)
EVERY 3 YEARS: DATE 11
P-I (NO MORE THEN 400)
PH (Note if 4 or Tess)
Cu/ZN (NO MORE THEN 3000) CU ZN
(IF PEANUTS NO MORE THEN 300)
MENTAL CHECK OF CROP AND FIELD NUMBERS
IRR2 (#21)
ZONE ACRES PAN I C�) CROP TYPE
FLOW RATES ad NITROGEN (N) a` 9(1 I
120 Min inspection initialed Weather Codes
Commercial Fertilizer NO Chicken Litter NO
CALBRIATION (#24)

- EACH REEL SHOULD BE CALIBRATED
- DATE DUE EVERY TWO YEARS
- FLOW RATES
RAIN FALL (#21)
-INITIAL AFTER 1" RAIN EVENT
-LOOK FOR ANY LEVEL THAT IS LESS THEN THE DESIGNED FREEBORED
-LOOK FOR BIG NUMBER DIFFERENCES SEE THAT THEY MATCH THE IRR2
FORM
SLUDGE (#21 & 25)
-DUE EVERY YEAR: DATE 10, '^J ' �,
0: L-1•I P: C l %RATIO OF SLUDGE I
r
1:-_-)(P�O
OTHER FORMS (#22 AND #21)
✓ MORTALITY
RAIN BREAKER FORM CROP YElLDS
VISUAL CHECK
FOUNDATION OR PIT LEAKS PIPE LEAKS LAGOON
SEEPAGE LAGOON BARE AREAS TREES OR GRASS NEED TO
BE REMOVED EROSION DITCHES
WINTER CROP(OVERSEEDED) ALIVE CROP HARVESTED
FIELDS GOOD HEALTHY CORPS CORRECT
CROPS NO PONDING REELS FEED
BINS LAGOON GARBAGE