20130782 Ver 1_Application Attachments_20130722

AO�LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP mc.
Environmental Consultants
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jennifer Burdette, NC DWQ
FROM: Corey Novak, LMG
DATE: July 17, 2013
RE: Sampson County Economic Development Site
Jennifer:
Enclosed are copies of maps, data sheets, and pertinent site information for the Sampson County
Economic Development site, located adjacent to Faison Highway, Sampson County, NC. This data
package is for your use in preparation for a site review scheduled on July 24, 2013. We respectfully
request confirmation that there are no isolated wetlands present on the tract.
Please contact me if there is any additional information you need regarding site conditions.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Corey Novak
Land Management Group, Inc.
www.ln �group.net • Phone: [phone] Flex: 910.452.0060
3805 Wrightsville Ave., Suite 15, Wil nitlgi,rn, NC 28403

2p130782
Army Corps of Engineers
Wetland Data Package
Sampson County Economic Development
Sampson County
Property Owner: Sampson County
313 Rowan Rd.
Clinton, NC 28328
Applicant: Corey Glenn
Enviva Holdback, LLC
7200 Wisconsin Ave., Suite 1000
Bethesda, MD 20814
Site address: Faison Hwy
Sampson County, NC
Subdivision name: N/A
Parcel number: portion of PIN 13034368003 & 13034368002
Directions: From Raleigh take 140 East. Take exit 355 for Hwy 117 / Hwy
403 North. Take the 1 S` left onto the dirt road.
Nearest water body: Panther Branch
Name of watershed: Cape Fear River Basin
Coordinates of site: Latitude: 35.122163 °N
Longitude: - 78.184469 °W
USGS Quad: Dobbersville & Faison, NC
Total size: — 108 acres
Total size of Wetlands: no wetlands

C T GIS
GEO PIN
Sampson2
Printed ,2000N
�VEB HOSTING
OWNER
SAMPSON COUNTY
See Below for Disclaimer
OWNER STATE
OWNER ZIP
NC
Parcels (YelloNr)
TWP CODE
APB
13
Centerlines
r`
CONSIDERATION
Sampson County
_ t
40
a
NC Counties
t f
z
Primary Roads
z
c
Ml
— us
z
c
— NC
w
Municipal. Limits
L
V f
10821
GIS APN
2449000055
OWNER CITY
CLINTON
ACREAGE
155.50999999999999
;< 1 : 1139 Feet
PIN
GEO PIN
13034368003
2449493306
OWNER
SAMPSON COUNTY
OWNER ADDRESS
313 ROWAN ROAD
OWNER STATE
OWNER ZIP
NC
28328
TWP CODE
APB
13
2449 -49 -3306
BK PG
CONSIDERATION

F24
12:00:00 AM
$162,373$9321$1,3901$10,000
EXEMPT
Ne are cons
1720/806
SITE ADDRESS
FAISON HWY
LAND TAX DEFERRED
0
ASSESSED VALUE
174695
D=
17200806
editing our maps to improve accuracy of position and information T
or market value of property Always refer to the recorded deed for all
1750000
SEG TYPE
WOODLANDIWASTELNDILOTILOT
USE DES[
TOTAL TAX VALUE
174695
ld not be relied upon by anyone as a determination of thi
of this web site indicates Your acceptance of these terms.

#CONNE4iGIS 5
Printed July 17, 17, 2013 2013
WEB HOSTING See Below for Disclaimer
Parcels (Yellow)
Centerlines
Sampson County
?.
NC Counties
I
L_�
13034368002
Primary Roads
GIS APN
25400027
OWNER
SAMPSON COUNTY
OWNER ADDRESS
313 ROWAN ROAD
— Us
OWNER STATE
—
CLINTON
NC
z
ACREAGE
O
Municipal Limits
z
I _
ot
TAX CODE
1 1258 Feet
OBJECTID 1
PIN
GEO PIN
44421
13034368002
2540413593
GIS APN
25400027
OWNER
SAMPSON COUNTY
OWNER ADDRESS
313 ROWAN ROAD
OWNER CITY
OWNER STATE
OWNER ZIP
CLINTON
NC
28328
ACREAGE
TWP CODE
AM
115.5
13
2540 -41 -3593
TAX CODE
RK PG
CONSIDERATION

F171F24
DATE RECORDED
9/26/2008 12:00:00 AM
APPR SEG VALUE
$121,9921$385
EXEMPT
Ne are conl
1720/806
SITE ADDRESS
ELDON THORNTON RD (OFF)
LAND TAX DEFERRED
0
ASSESSED VALUE
122377
D=
17200806
editing our maps to improve accuracy of position and information T
or market value of property. Always refer to the recorded deed for all
1750000
SEG TYPE
WOODLANDIWASTELND
USE DESC
TOTAL TAX VALUE
122377
should not be relied upon by anyone as a determination of th
Use of this web site indicates your acceptance of these terms

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Sile: Sampson Co. Economic Development citylcounty. Sampson County Sampling Date: 7/12/13
AppilcenVOwner: Enviva Holdback, LLC / Sampson County State. NC Sampling Point: DP 1
Inveatlgator(s): Corey Novak - LMG section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): pine flat Local railer (concave, convex, none): none Slope (fir 0
LRR T 35.124075 78.186314 Datum: NAD 83
Subregion (LRR du MLRA): Lai.: Long: "
Soil Map unit Name: Lri - Lynchburg sandy loam NWl classification: upland
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes n„ No 0 of no, expton in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation F-1 Soil F-1 , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are -Normal Ctrcurnstenew' present? Yes M No=
Are Vegetation n, Soil 12. or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yea No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondoa Indleatora (minimum of Iwo ! red)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one ig mutred check all that sooty)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
[] Surface Water (At) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (813)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturatlon (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B18)
❑ Water Marks (81) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
0 Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Tldn Mudd Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (85) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquiterd (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
® FAC- Neutral Test (05)
❑ Water - Stained Leaven (BO)
❑ Sphagnum moss (138) (-RR T, U)
Feld Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes „F1 No RL Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes „a No Jrn.Y..t_ Depth (inches): >36
n
Saturation Present? Yes -E]- No J.Y__4- Depth (inches): >36
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No r . r
ndudes capillary tin e
Describe Recorded Data (steam gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
^-
Remarks: — ~
precipitation above normal
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' rad. y yj Cmr species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. Pinus taeda Rn Y_ FA • That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
2. Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
4. . Percent of
5. That Ar OBL FACW,por FAC: 100 (A/g)
6.
7.
8.-
Rn = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30 200A of total coyer. 12_ _
SaotingaMb Stratum (Plot size: 30' rad. )
t Nyssa svivatica ,�_ N
2. Cvrilla mcemiflora 3_ Y FACW
3. yacdnium corymbosum 8 N FACW
4.Ouamus niara 10 N FAC
5. Acer rubrum 30 Y FAC
6 1-Inuidambar stymciflua 5 N FAC
7.
8.
F_ = Total Cover
5o% of total cover: 4_ 2o% of total cover: 17.6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' rad. )
1. Osmunda cinnamomea A �_ FArW
2. Arundinaria tecta 2Q_ Y_ FACW
3. WoodWardia aereolate 2_ N_ nRl
4.
5.
Total % Cover of:
Multloly by
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
X3=
FACU species
x4=
UPL species
x5=
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Waln)
'Indicators ot hyddc sod and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 In. (7.6 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
6.
SaplinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.26 ft (1 m) tell.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall,
10.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in
11.
height.
12.
30__ = Total Cover
50% of total cover 18_ 20% of total cover. A
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' rad. )
1, Smilax rotundiNla so Y "
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
_ =Total Cover Vegetation n
50% of total cover: 2 20% of total cover 1Q_ Present? Yes r • r No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2 0

SOIL
or
Sampling Point: DP1
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (rndst) % Color (molst) �_ Twe Loci Texture Remarks
0 -8 10YR 4/1 100 FSL
8 >36 10YR 6/1 60 10YR 6/8 40 C M CL
'Type: C=Concentratlon. D= Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix. MS--Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL =Pore Lining. M­-Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
[]
Histosol (A1)
Q
Pdyvalue Below Surface (88) (LRR S, T. U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
(]
Histic EpIpedon (A2)
C1
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A70) (LRR 3)
❑
Black Histtc (A3)
a
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR D) ❑ Reduced VeRic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
a
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Solis (F19) (LRR P, S. 11
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Solis (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T. U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1536)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 Muck T)
Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
U) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
cm (A9) (LRR P,
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Q
Meri (F10) (LRR
Depleted Ochric (F11) (M LRA 151)
n
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Cr
Iran - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0. P. T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
D
Coast Pralde Redox (A16) (M LRA 150A)
Q
Umbdc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T. U) wetland hydrology must be present,
E3
Sandy Mucky Mineral (31) (LRR O, 3)
Q
Delta Ochle (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
a Sandy Gleyed Matrix (64) Q Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
U3 Sandy Redox (SS) Q Piedmont Floodplaln Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
D Stripped Matrix (S6) Q Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C,1530)
D Dark Surface (87) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:
Depth (Inches):
Hydric Soll Present? Yes M FT
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic end Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Projecusite: Sampson Co. Economic Development City/County: Sampson County sampling Dale: 7/12/13
Appiicantbwner Enviva Holdback, LLC / Sampson County state: NC sampling paint: DP2
Investigator(s): Corey Novak - LMG Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hifislops, terrace, eta): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave slope (%y 2
Subregion (LRR or MI.RA): LRR T Let: 35.122973 Long: - 78.182960 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map unit Name: Ra - Rains sandy loam NO classification: upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes .L..L No r r r (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are vegetation , Soil �, or Hydrology _Q significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes M No
Are Vegetation n Soil , or Hydrology -CL naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes No within a wetland? Yes _M No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yea No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
3emndmindicators (minimum of Iwo rekruiredl
PdM indicators (minimum
of one is matilied., chaSk ail that aoMvl
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (88)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (813)
❑ Sparsely vegetated Concave Surface (86)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (610)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Unes (1318)
❑ Water Marks (81)
❑ Oxidized Rhiiospheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (62)
❑ Presence of Reduced iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
❑ Drift Deposits (83)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (CS)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
❑ Algal Met or Crust (134)
0 Thin Murk Surface (C7)
® Geomorphxs Position (02)
❑ iron Deposits (BS)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aduitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (ST)
® FAC- Neutral Test (135)
❑ WaterStained Leaves (SO)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Precerd?
Yes ❑_ No gj Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Presenl7
Yes ,� No ,� Depth (inches): 30
Saturation Present?
Yes Q No Depth (inches): 30'
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes „� No ,�✓�
includes cu ills Erin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well. aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available:
-
Remarks-
—
Deep water table after above normal precipitation indicates secondary indicators are false- positives.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP2
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
30' rad. ) % Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
5
1. }spar rubrum
�_ �_ FAC:
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
5
3,
Species Across Ali Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Spades
100
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index wrorksheet:
7.
Total %Cover of: Multiply by:
8.
Total Cover
OBL spades x 1 =
50% of total cover: .5 20% of total cover. l-
FA CW spades x 2 =
Seolino/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' rad. )
FAC species x 3 =
FACU spades x4=
1. ever rubrum
Y _ FAC
uPL species X5=
Column Totals: (A) ta)
,5
2. Cvrilla racemiflora 10 �_ EAQW
3,
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
5.
6.
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
® 2 - Dominance Test Is -50%
8.
❑ 3 - Prevalence index is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation' (Explain)
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7"5 • 20% of total cover. 3_
Herb StMtuM (Plot size:
30' rad. )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. Setarla manna
An Y_ Awl
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. Funatorium canillifolium
2_ N F C 1
DeNnitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Arundinaria testa
5 N- FAG
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 In. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
4. Q munda connamomea 5 N FAC W
5.
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
9
10.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in
11.
height.
12.
102 = Total Cover
50% of idol cover. Al _ 20% of total cover 7n d
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' rad. )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
5 �_ FAr,._
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
,5 =Total Cover
Vegetation
P Yes �✓ No
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover., _
sent?
t „r
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
to the death needed to document the Indicator or
Sampling Point: DP2
Depth Matrix Redox Features
WOWS) Color (moist) �6 Color (mdst) % Twer Loa- Texture Remarks
0 -3 10YR 4/1 100 Loam
_3-8 10YR 3/1 100 FSL
8- >36 10YR 5/1 100 CL
'Type, Cxoncentration D=De etion RM= Reduced Matrix MS--Masked Sand Grains. 2Locaoon: PL--Pore Limn . M--Matrix.
Hydric
Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑
Histosd (Al) Q
Pdyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
❑
Hisdc EpIpedon (A2) Q
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3) Q
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Verde (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑,
Loamy Gloved Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplaln Sdis (F19) (LRR P, 8, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (AS) m
Depleted Metric (F3) ❑ Anomalous Bdght Loamy Solis (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A8) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 1538)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ® Red Parent Material (TF2)
1t�I
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
0 Other (Explain in Remelts)
®®
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) Q
Mad (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochdc (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Q
Won- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) %dicalors of hydrophyticvegetation and
n
Coast Pralde, Redox (A18) (MLRA 150A) Q
Umbdc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, 3) Q
Delta Ochdc (1`17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
E3
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Q
Reduced Verde (F18) (MLRA 150A,1SOB)
Sandy Redox (55) Q
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matdx (S8) Q
Anomalous "ht Loamy Sops (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 1530)
Dark surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:
Depth (Inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yesla No,D
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjecuSile: Sampson Co. Economic Development Ciy/County: Sampson County Sampling Date: 7/12/13
Appilca� owner Enviva Holdback, LLC /Sampson County State; NC Sempfing Pant: DP3
Inyestigator(s): Corey Novak - LMG Section, Township. Range.
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.,, pine flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope my 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Let: 35.121810 Long: - 78.183168 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map unit Name: Ra - Rains sandy loam Nwl Classification: upland
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes L:L No —M (If no, explain In Remarks.) ((----�(
Are Vegetation ; M , Son _ , or Hydrology M significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No
Are Vegetation J.�1, Soil or Hydrology Li naturally problematic? of needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydre Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators Imintmum of two ranuitedt
Per nary Indicators Iminimum of ong is recuired• check all that sooty)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (BS)
❑ Surface Water (A1) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (813)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (85)
[] High Water Table (A2) ❑ Mar Deposits MIS) XRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑ Moss Trim Unes (1318)
❑ Water Marks (81) ❑ Oxidized Rhi2ospheres along Uving Roots (0)
❑ Dry -Sewn Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (82) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (CO
❑ Crayfish Burrows (Ce)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (CB)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (54) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (02)
❑ Iron Deposits (85) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
® FAC- Neutral Test (135)
❑ WaterStatned leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (08) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes f j No 2L Depth (Inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes ,D,- No 2L Depth (inches): >36
Saturation Present? Yes. .., No I& Depth (inches): >36
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes, No
(Includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, rionlloring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available.
---
Remarks.
precipitation above normal
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP3,
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' rad. } Cover odes? Status
1. Mnus taeda go_ y FA_
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across AD Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dorrdnent rF
That Are OBL FC A , or FAC: 100 (p/B)
2. Liauidambar styraciflua 5 FAC
.N-
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Prevalence Index woritsheet:
Mulibly b
Total % Cover of: v:
08L species x 1=
FACW species x 2=
FAC species x 3,2
FACU spades x4=
UPL species x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
8
=Total Carer
6-5 50% ortotal cover: 32.5 2096 of total cover: 1_
Seolina/Shrub Sire um (Plat size: 30' rad. )
1. Acer rubrum 30 i_ FAC -
2. Cvrilla racemiflora 12 �_ FACW
3. V8CCiniUm corymbosum 5 N FACW
4. J-iauidambar
5•
styraciflua 35 Y FAC
HydrophyNc Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
® 2. Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
❑ Problematic Hydrophylle Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
7•
8.
A2 = Total Cover
500A of total cover: 4_ 20% of total cover. 16.4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' rad. )
1. Osmunda cinnamomea �_ �_ FACW
2. Arundinaria
tecta so �_ FA rw
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (1381-1), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 it (1 m) tell.
Herb - All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less Ihan 3.281t tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 328 it in
height.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7
6•
g,
10.
11.
12.
j- = Total Cover
50% ortotal cover: „3?�_ 20% of total cover. 13
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' rad. }
1. Smilax rotundifolia 40 y_ FAC
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ✓ No
2.
3.
4.
5•
40 = Total Cover
5o% of total cover: 2_ 20% of total cover: A
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Guff Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0

SOIL
or
Sampling Point: DP3
Depth Matrix Redox Featur
(inches) Color (moist) % Color ( mcist) % es Type' L_ a Texture Remarks
Qom_ 10YR 4/1 100 FSL
8- >36 10YR 6/1 60 10YR 6/8 40 C M CL
' Type: C=Concentretlon, D;tDepletlon, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS= Masked Sand Grains. tocatiod: PL =Pore lining, M=Mah
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydric
Histosd (A1)
Q
Pdyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR 8, T, U)
❑ 1 orn Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic E?Pipedon (A2)
a
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR 8, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muds (A10) (LRR 8)
Blade Hlstic (A3)
❑,
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen 80de (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, 8, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Meft (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Sops (F20)
Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (FS)
(MLRA 1538)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
I
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
®
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
13
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Q
Depleted Ochre (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Q
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P. T)
Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6) (MLRA 150A) Q
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T. U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (81) (LRR 0, S)
Q
Dole Oehdc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Q Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A,1508)
Sandy Redox (65) Q Piedmont Floodplaln Solis 09) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6) Q Anomalous Bright Loamy Sods (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (87) (LRR P, 8, T, U)
tractive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (Inches):
HydrlcSoilPreserd? Yes2i No—D
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and duff Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Sampson Co. Economic Development City /County: Sampson County Sampling Date: 7/12/13
Applicant/Owner Enviva Holdback, LLC / Sampson County State: NC sampling pot,* DP4
Investigator(s): Corey Novak / Craig Turner - LMG section, Township, Range:
Landform (hilislope, terrace, eta): pine flat Local repel (concave. convex, none): none Slope (96): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T W:35.122155 Long: - 78.181274 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Ra - Rains sandy loam _ NWI classification: upland
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the she typical for this time of year? Yes J- No ,4 (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation n, Soil =, of Hydrology - signifraently di udxd? Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes M No f
Are vegetation Jam, Soil -F—L, or Hydrology F-1 naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No M the Sampled Area ^
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes _L_1_ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
aemarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
is iminlmum of Iwo raordred)
Primary Indicators iminimum of one is reguimd• check all that apolv)_-
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
Q Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (813)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
Q High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (610)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B18)
❑ Water Marks (81) ❑ Oxidized Rhizoapheres along Living Roots (0)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (CO
❑ Crayrish Burrows (CB)
❑ Drift Deposits (63) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction In Titled Soils (CS)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) 0 Thin Muds Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic PosNon (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Agtntard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
0 FAC- Neutral Test (05)
❑ Waler-Sialned Leaves (Bg)
❑ Sphagnum moss (CS) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑_ No 2L Depth (inches): NSA
Water Table Present? Yes No I& Depth (Inches): >36
n
✓�
Saturation Present? Yes No Zn- Depth (inches)' >36
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No ,
includes caoillafy fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge. monitoring well. aerial photos, previous inspections), If available:
�'-
Remarks:
precipitation above normal
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP4
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' rad. ) % Cover edes2 Status
1. Pinus teeds Y FAC
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of
That Are BBL Dominant CW, or FAC: 100 (A B)
_ZQ
2. Acer rubrum 10 FAC
-N
3.
4.
5.
8.
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total %Cover of: MultioN by.
OBL spades x1=
FACW species x2=
FAC species x3=
FACU species x4=
UPL spedes x5=
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
8. -
80 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 4_ 2096 of total cover. ] 6
Saolin rlib Strelum (Plot size: 30' rad. )
1. Womb viminiana 10 N FAM
2. Cvriila racemiflora 30 i_ FACW
3. Acer rubrum 40 Y FAC
4.
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dorrdnance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophyllc Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and welland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6•
7.
8.
AI) = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 40 of total cover: 16 _
Herb stratum (Plot size: 30' rad, )
1. Osmunda cinnamomea in FACW
2. Arundlnaria
tecta 50 y_ FAr
Definitions of Four Vegetation strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
heighL
Sapling/Shmb - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DSH and greater than 3.28 R (1 m) tell.
Herb -All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
height.
3. Andronoaen virainicus N FAC
.5
4. Panic um s0. 30 Y NIA
5.
6.
7
8.
g,
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: AZ 20% of total cover. 1 Q_
We i& Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' rad. )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 15 y FAC
HydrophyUc
Vegetation
Present? Yes ,R, No -O
_
2.
3.
4.
5•
1_ = Total Cover
50% of total carer: 7.5 20% of total cover. .1_
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP4
Profile Description: (Descrlbe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
Histosol (Al)
(Inches) Color fmoist)
%_ Color (moist) _ Type Lee
Texture Remarks
04 10YR 30
100
SL
10YR 4/2
100
SL
9-16 10YR 6/3
45 10YR 6/8 10 C M
SCL mixed matrix
10YR 5/2
45
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
16 - >36 10YR 5/3
45 10YR 6/8 10 C M
SC_ L mixed matrix
10YR 4/2
45
Q
'Type, C=Cohcentretlon, D=Depletlon, RM= Reduced Makix, MS= Masked Sand (rains. _?Location _PL =Pore Lining, M=Matrlx.
Hydrlc Sell Indicators: (Applicable to all LRR9, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hyddc Soils':
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑,
Pdyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR % T, U)
❑ 1 o m Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Wpedon (A2)
❑,
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
a
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,6)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
a
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
❑ Piedmont Floodplaln Solis (F19) (LRR P, 3, T)
❑
Stratified Layers (A5)
Q
Depleted Matrix (F3) .
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Solis (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T. U)
Redcoc Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153S)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
I
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redark Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 ern Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface
Mad (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric 151)
_
Other (Explain In Remarks)
(A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Q
(F11) (MLRA
ken-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Coast Prairie Redox (A1 S) (MLRA 150A) Q
Umbdc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
D
Sandy Mucky Mineral (81) (LRR O, 3)
Q
Delta Ochdc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
U Sandy Gleyed Matrix (84) Q Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A,1508)
U Sandy Redox (SS) Cr Piedmont Fioodpiain Sells (F19) (1111 LRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6) Q Anomalous Bright Loamy Solis (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C,15313)
D Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:
Depth (Inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes „L No —M
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
f�o)ewsae: Sampson Co. Economic Development Cltylcount1. Sampson County sampling Date: 7/12/13
Applicart►Owner Enviva Holdback, LLC / Sampson County state: NC sampling point: DP5
Investigator(s): Corey Novak / Craig Turner - LMG Section, Township, Range:
Landfonn (hillslope, lerrece, etc ): Pine flat local relief (concave, convex, nonsy none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR T Let: 35.121461 Lam: - 78.185958 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map unit Nam Ra - Rains sandy loam NWI classlecation: upland
Are climatic f hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes -F—L No _0 (K no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation =, Soil Fl, or Hydrology = significantly disturbed? Are - Normal Circumstances' present? Yes = No
Are Vegetation El , Soil [:1 , or Hydrology ja naturally problematic? pf needed, explain arty answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations. transectsr Important features, etc.
Hydrophytc Vegetation Present? Yes No le the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Weiland? Yes,n. No�_
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators minhnum of two reaulred)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required- check all that g2olyl
❑ Surface Sol Cracks (80)
❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (S 13)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Mad Deposits (615) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (810)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1318)
❑ Water Marks (81) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roofs (0)
❑ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (82) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
❑ Drift Deposits (63) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Soils (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (54) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
[] Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
® FAC- Neutral Test (05)
❑ Water - Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? you = No 2L Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes Ll No 2L Depth (inches)- >36
�
a
Saturation Present? Yes _a No � Depth (inches): >36
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No J :._F_
ncludes ca fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well. aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
- -- --
precipitation above normal
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP5
Tree Stratum (plot size:
1. Pinus taeda
30' rad. ) % Cover Soedes7 Status
70 Y _ FAG
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dorninant
That Are BL OBL, or FAC: 100 (A/13)
2. Acer nibrum 5 .N-- FAC
3. Liouidarbar styraciflua Sri _ 1N FAC -
4.
5.
S.
7.
-
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x2=
FAC species X3=
FACU spades x4=
UPIL
Cdu spades XS=
aum n Totals: W (B)
prevalence Index = B/A =
B.
Total Cover
50% of total cover: 40 2091, of total cover. ,16
Saoiino/Shdb Stratum (plot size: 30' rad. j
1. Cyrilla racemiflora Y, FACW
.40
2. Persea borbonia 20 ,N FACW
3. Symolotms tinctoda, 330 �_ FAC
4. Quercus niam 5 N FAC
5. Liouidambar styraciflua
20 N FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
m 2 - Dondnance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
[] Prodematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric sal and wetland hydrology Must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
6.
7.
8.
115 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 57.5 2o% of total cover. 23___
Herb stratum (Plot size: 30' rad. )
1, Arundinaria testa AS Y
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 an) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
then 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 It (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 It In
height.
3•
4.
5
6.
7
B.
g,
10.
11,
12.
Total Cover
50% of total cover: d9 20% of total cover: 17
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' rad. )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 10 Y _
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ✓ No
2.
3.
4.
5.
i0_ =Total Cover
50% of total cover: ,5 20% of total cover. Z_
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and GultCoastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP5
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Fee=$
{Inches) Color (molstl % Color (mdst) % -Tybe'�l ocr Texture Remarks
,G-5 10YR 22 100 SL
5A I 10YR 3/3 100 SL
11 -21 10YR 5/3 100 SL
21 - >36 10YR 3/3 100 SL
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sills':
C3 Histosd (Al) a PdMfue Below Surface (38) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
J] Hisdc QpIpedon (A2) a Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Black Histic (A3) 0. Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) ❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) 0. Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) ❑ Piedmont Floodptaln Sans (F19) (LRR P, S. T)
[] Stratified Layers (A5) Q Depleted Matrix (F3) . ❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Sills (F20)
❑ Organic Bodies (Ali) (LRR P, T, U) Q. Redox Dark Surface (F8) (MLRA 1538)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (72) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) o Mad (F10) (LRR U) T Other (Explain In Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Q Depleted Oehrie (F11) (MLRA 150
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Q Iran- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
n Coast Prairie Redox (A10) (MLRA 150A) Q Umbdc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) Q Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
D Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Q Reduced Verdc (F16) (MLRA 150A,150B)
O Sandy Redox (S5) Q Piedmont Floodplaln Sills (F19) (MLRA 149A)
D Stripped Matrix (SS) Q Anomalous Bright loamy Solis (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C,153D)
D Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes a No MV/
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Sampson County Economic Development
State:NC County/parish/borough: Sampson City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.122163° 1, Long. - 78.184469° �.
Universal Transverse Mercator: I7S 756592.90 mE 3890206.36 mN
Name of nearest waterbody: Panther Branch
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: NE Cape Fear River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC):
'Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is /are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There _ "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Are no "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply):
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
❑ Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
❑ Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Q Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: linear feet: width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: al
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non - regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable) :3
Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain: Previously delineated isolated wetlands do not meet the three parameters. None of the previous wetlands meet
hydrology criteria. Two of the previous wetlands do not meet hydric soils criteria.
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
Z For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
' Supporting documentation is presented in Section HIT.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.I.; otherwise, see Section IILB below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size:
Drainage area:
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through I&I't tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are river miles from TNW.
Project waters are river miles from RPW.
Project waters are aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW-:
Tributary stream order, if known:
° Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to Flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man- altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: 1101Wlit.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands ❑ Concrete
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel ❑ Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/0% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/ op of complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry:
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Wftllst
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: Pick LW
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: ]Tic. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: ftj�. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
❑ shelving
❑
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑
❑ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑
❑ sediment deposition
❑
❑ water staining
❑
❑ other (list):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM.7 Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings /characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
ine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ physical markings;
❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OFIWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OFIWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'[bid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: _. Explain:
Surface flow is: -
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: _. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm /barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are river miles from TNW.
Project waters are aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
o
Flow is from:
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the _ floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type /percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally - sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if an )
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Itk LIN
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in thc cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (YM) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and /or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section III.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TN Ws: acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year- round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
'Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1 -6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA- STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
StiCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): 10
which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
'See Footnote # 3.
, To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands: acres.
NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
'Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
'udgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
'Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 7.5 minute Faison & Dobbersville quads.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Sampson County Soil Survey.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State /Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): NAPP 1998 infrared / 2010 & 2012 true - color.
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: SAW- 2008 - 01523, 11/24/2010.
Applicable /supporting case law:
Applicable /supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

�d
h
Q
ry,
Nn Ellis Rd v
tt
a =
ry �
E
(^
4113
lk�>40N
Writers itd
a
QP
Br Rw ak
TC
c
e
a
;e
NC403 _ 403
p��t� Bnghs
0
J
x
E. Main St
Solomon St
�.a
y
CL
Y°
Sources: Esri, DeL me, NAVTEQ, USGS, Intermap, iPC, NRCAN, Esri
Japan, METI, Esri CTnna (Hong Kong). Esri (Thailand), TomTom, 2012
L.: \PERMITS \2013 PERMIT FILES \03 -13 -125 - -- Sampson Co Economic Dev, Corey Glenn
*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: ArcGIS World Street Map SCALE 1" = 1 Mile
Sampson County
LMG
Economic Development Tract
LARD MANAGEMENT GROUP s.
Enruonmtnrol Consultants Figure 1
Sampson County, NC — www.LMGroup.net Vicinity
Phone. [phone] - 1.866.LMG.1078 y a p
June 2013 Fax [phone]
03 -13 -125 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403 1
�a
c
m
-
m
s
70
p+
Y°
Sources: Esri, DeL me, NAVTEQ, USGS, Intermap, iPC, NRCAN, Esri
Japan, METI, Esri CTnna (Hong Kong). Esri (Thailand), TomTom, 2012
L.: \PERMITS \2013 PERMIT FILES \03 -13 -125 - -- Sampson Co Economic Dev, Corey Glenn
*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: ArcGIS World Street Map SCALE 1" = 1 Mile
Sampson County
LMG
Economic Development Tract
LARD MANAGEMENT GROUP s.
Enruonmtnrol Consultants Figure 1
Sampson County, NC — www.LMGroup.net Vicinity
Phone. [phone] - 1.866.LMG.1078 y a p
June 2013 Fax [phone]
03 -13 -125 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403 1

a4N .'
t+
f
a
/4P
'f
i
f
+t
rr'
j_,
� T
L: \PERMITS \2013 PERMIT FILES \03 -13 -125 - -- Sampson Co Economic Dev, Corey Glenn
*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute. I -
Map Source: NRCS Sampson County Mosaic SCALE 1" — 800'
Sampson County LMG
Economic Development Tract LANDMANAGEMENT GROUP
n Figure 2 t � Sampson County, NC vw.LMmoup. set USGS Topographic Map
uwvw. LMGrou p. net
Phone: [phone] •1.866.LMG.1078
June 2013 Fax [phone]
03 -13 -125 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403

L.: \PERMITS \2013 PERMIT FILES \03 -13 -125 - -- Sampson Co Economic Dev, Corey Glenn
*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: NCDOT LiDAR data
SCALE 1" = 600'
Sampson County
LMG
Economic Development Tract LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
nrs sc Figure 3
E��;ranmentol C-- 11n
Sampson County, NC ' www.LMGroup.net LIDAR map
June 2013 Ph one: 910.452.0001.1.866.L MG. 1078
Fax [phone]
03 -13 -125 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403

L:\PERMITS \2013 PERMIT FILES \03 -13 -125 - -- Sampson Co Economic Dev, Corey Glenn
Legend
GoA: Goldsboro loamy sand
*Boundaries are approximate and are Ln: Lynchburg sandy loam NoA: Norfolk loamy sand
not meant to be absolute. Ra: Rains sandy loam
Map Source: NRCS Soil Survey
SCALE 1 rr = 600'
Sampson County
Economic Development Tract LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
t n:.nmnrr (nmnrr
Figure 4
Sampson County, NC wwwMGroup.net
Soils Map
Phone: [phone] •1.866.LMG.1078
June 2013 Fax [phone]
03 -13- 125 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403

L: \PERMITS \2013 PERMIT FILES \03 -13 -125 - -- Sampson Co Economic Dev, Corey Glenn
*Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 1998 NAPP Aerial Photography
SCALE 1" = 600'
Sampson County
LMG
Economic Development Tract LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
m Figure 5
Sampson County, NC ' www.LMGroup.net Aerial Photograph
June 2013 Phone: [phone].LMG.1078
Fax [phone]
03 -13- 125 3805 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403

dpl
dp5
. 2i£1T1
iN r y
•r
dp2
dp4
dp3
�r

Chart One
Rainfall Documentation
Combined Method taken from Accessing and Using
Meteorological Data to evaluate Wetland Hydrology, US
Army Corps of Engineers, ERDC /EL TR-
WRAP -001,
Date: 7 -16 -13
April, 2000.
Weather Station: CLIN Landowner: N/A
Tract name: N/A
County: Sampson State: NC
Soil name: N/A Growing season: 3/18 - 11/11
Date of hydrologic Observation: 7 -12 -13
Lon -term rainfall records
Condition
Product of
3 yrs. In
3 yrs. In
Rainfall
dry, wet,
Condition
Month
2
Month
10 less than
Normal
10 more than
inches
normal
value
Wei ht
columns
1 st month
prior"
7/12-6/13
3.49
5.10
5.87
9.20
wet
3.00
3.00
9.00
2nd month
prior'
6/13-5/15
2.87
4.04
4.70
8.09
wet
3.00
2.00
6.00
3rd month
prior'
5/15-4/16
1 2.27
1 3.42
1 4.28
1 2.40
normal
2.00
1.00
2.00
Sum=
17.00
Note: If sum is
'Condition value:
6 - 9 then prior period has been drier than normal
Dry =1
10-14 then prior period has been normal
Normal =2
15- 18 then prior period has been wetter than normal
Wet =3
CONCLUSION: antecedant precipitation was above normal
Chart One

Land Management Group, Inc.
2013 Cumulative Precipitation Assessment www.lmgroup.net
34
32
30
28
26
24
y
22
20
C
C 18
O
ca 16
'o- 14
i 12
CL 10
8
6
4
2
0
b �'b 'b �3 �'b �3 �3 �3 N3 N(b �3 �b �3 �3 r
PQ� PQ� � 4 0 0).1
JOCLIN Raingauge — Cumulative Total — Cumulative Average 30% — Cumulative Average 70%
Precipitation data obtained from:
Horticultural Crops Research Station, Sampson County NC - station CLIN (www.nc- climate.ncsu.edu]
30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from:
WETS Station: CLINTON 2 NE, NCI 881 1971 -2000 (wcc.nres.usda.gov)

2013 Cumulative Precipitation Assessment Land wwW lgement
mgroup netp' Inc.
34
32
30
28
26
24
N
.G 22
C 20
c 18
O
16
�a 14
12
CL 10
8
6
4
2
0
INCLIN Raingauge — Cumulative Total -- Cumulative Average 30% — Cumulative Average 70% — Average
Precipitation data obtained from:
Horticultural Crops Research Station, Sampson County NC - station CLIN (www.nc- climate.ncsu.edu:
30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from:
WETS Station : CLINTON 2 NE, NC1881 1971 -2000 (wcc.nres.usda.gov)

Z
L
a
Land Management Group, Inc.
2013 Cumulative Precipitation Assessment www.lmgroup.net
34
32 -- - --
30 - -- - - - - -- -
28 - - --
26 - -
.� 24
22 -
20 --- - - -- -
18 ------------------------ -
16
14 - --
12 - - - - - -- -
10 - - - - - -- - - - --
8 - - -- ---- - - - - -- ---------------------
6 -- - - -- - - - - -- ----------------------
4 - - -- - - - - -- ----
2 - -- - --
0
N
N
t
V
_
0
_.
�aA �aA �a� ��A �� , S��
it•CLIN Raingauge — Cumulative Total — Average
Precipitation data obtained from:
Horticultural Crops Research Station, Sampson County NC - station CLIN (www.nc- climate.ncsu.edu',
30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from:
WETS Station : CLINTON 2 NE, NC1881 1971 -2000 (wcc.nres.usda.gov)

a�
t
0
ca
.Q
a�
i
a
t Land 2013 _ 30 day Precipitation Assessmen ww . group, etp''nc.
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
n
IT
Sb- F910 Fz"O �a� ��� �`�� PQ� PQ� PQ� ��� ��� �aA A
rCLIN Raingauge —30 day total —30% —70%
Precipitation data obtained from:
Horticultural Crops Research Station, Sampson County NC - station CLIN (www.nc- climate.ncsu.edu)
30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from:
WETS Station : CLINTON 2 NE, NC1881 1971 -2000 (wcc.nres.usda.gov)

N
m
s
c
c
c
0
ca
*•
.Q
.v
d
L
a
t Land 2013 _ 90 day Precipitation Assessmen www. mgroup. etp''nc.
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
n
��� ��� �a� 4Q� QQ� QQ� ��a �a� �a� �a� �JC ��� ��� 'Sy NZ
M CLIN Raingauge —90 day total —30% —70%
Precipitation data obtained from:
Horticultural Crops Research Station, Sampson County NC - station CLIN (www.nc- climate.ncsu.edL
30% & 70% precipitation data obtained from:
WETS Station : CLINTON 2 NE, NC1881 1971 -2000 (wcc.nres.usda.gov)

North Carolina: Current Year to Date Departure from Normal Precipitation Valid at 7/17/... Page 1 of 1
North Carolina: Current Year to Date Departure from Normal Precipitation
Valid at 7/17/2013 1200 UTC- Created 7117113 15:52 UTC
http: // water. weather. gov /precip/ save. php? yday = 1374019200 &yday_analysis =0 &layer %5... 7/17/2013

North Carolina: Current Year to Date Observed Precipitation Valid at 7/17/2013 1200 UT... Page 1 of 1
North Carolina: Current Year to Date Observed Precipitation
Valid at 711712013 1200 UTC- Created 7117113 15 :49 UTC
http: // water. weather .gov /precip/ save. php? yday = 13 74019200 &yday_ analysis =0 &layer %5 ... 7/17/2013

North Carolina: Current Year to Date Normal Precipitation Valid at 7/17/2013 1200 UTC ... Page 1 of 1
North Carolina: Current Year to Date Normal Precipitation
Valid at 711712013 1200 UTC- Created 7117113 15:50 UTC
http:/ /water. weather .gov /precip /save.php ?yday = 1374019200 &yday_analysis =0 &layer %5... 7/17/2013