20130783 Ver 1_401 Application_20130713

July 23, 2013
20130783
Providing Sound Environmental Solutions
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC DENR Division of Water Quality
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
RE: Hodges Creek Stream Enhancement - Linzey Enterprises, LLC.
NWP 27/GC3689
Watauga County, NC
Ms. Higgins,
5902 Highway 421 South
Mountain City, TN 37683
ph /fax: [phone]
adam ®bfec.org
�JUL��o1
TM
3ranrh
Enclosed find 5 copies of the referenced project permit /PCN application. Also enclosed
please find a $570.00 check specific to the major water quality certification permit
application fee.
If you have any questions give me a call at 423.727.4476.
SincD*Boyy�d
Car

H
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 27 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Hodges Creek Stream Enhancement - Linzey Enterprises, LLC.
2b. County:
Watauga
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Boone, NC
2d. Subdivision name:
N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
LINZEY ENTERPRISES LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
1383/518
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
David Linzey
3d. Street address:
1710 HWY 105
3e. City, state, zip:
Boone, NC 28607
3f. Telephone no.:
828 -308 -6578
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
® Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
N/A
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Adam Williams, PWS
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Brushy Fork Environmental Consulting, Inc.
5c. Street address:
5902 Highway 421 South
5d. City, state, zip:
Mountain City, TN 37683
5e. Telephone no.:
423- 727 -4476
5f. Fax no.:
423 - 727 -4476
5g. Email address:
adam ®bfec.org
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
2900 -83- 6214 -000
Latitude: 36.2032189 N Longitude: -
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
81.6813467 W
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
1.46 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Hodges Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C;Tr:+
2c. River basin:
New
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
t i
The streambanks of Hodges Creek are actively eroding throughout the Linzey Enterprises, LLC. property. Currently the
property is used for a veterinary clinic (Animal Emergency & Pet Care Clinic of the High Country). Hodges Creek flows
through the property from West to East. The river left section is beginning to undermine a dog walking path that the vet
has installed.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Approximately 240 linear feet of Hodges Creek
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is to enhance Hodges Creek to decrease streambank erosion and reduce sediment export
from the site. Project elements include: streambank stabilization techniques including rock vanes (single, cross),
vegetated boulder toe, bank sloping, and riparian planting. Riparian planting, bank sloping, and boulder toe protection will
help stabilize erosive banks. Rock vanes (single, cross) will be used to redirect the thalweg from the banks and provide
grade control through the reach. A large gravel bar (river right), which has developed due to upstream erosion (river left)
will be reworked to support proposed structures.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed streambank stabilization will occur along approximately 240 linear feet of Hodges Creek (see Site Plan).
Rock vanes and vegetated boulder toes are proposed to be installed along the creek in the eroded areas. Following
construction, the disturbed areas will be seeded, matted (coconut fiber), and planted with native trees, shrubs, and
herbaceous species in all direct riparian areas (see re- vegetation detail). Proposed excavation equipment includes:
hydraulic thumb trac- hoe(s), and tandem axle road dump truck(s). All heavy equipment will be kept out of the stream
channel during project construction except where absolutely necessary to install boulder structures.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained fo? this property /
® Yes [I No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past.
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
Preliminary ❑Final
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: BFEC, Inc.
Name (if known):
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Jurisdictional field determination performed by Ben McGuire and
Connor Boyle, PE of Brushy Fork Environmental
Consulting, Inc.
S.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file° instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number -
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ - non -404, other)
(acres)
Tem ora
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0 impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ - non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ® P ❑ T
Stream
Stabilization
Hodges Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
-10
-240
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
® PER
® Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
-240
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
linear feet
Of
impacts
3i. Comments: Impacts will enhance Hodges Creek
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑ P ❑T
03 ❑P [IT
04 ❑P ❑T
41% Total open water impacts
0 impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
0 impacts
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse C] Tar-Pamlico ❑Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
LReaso:n
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
required?
B1 ❑ PEI T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P [IT
❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
0 impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form —Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed work and associated impacts are intended to stabilize Hodges Creek and the streambanks along the property
reach while minimizing impacts to aquatic resources. Design measures which minimize impacts include vegetated boulder toe
protection intended to decrease site sedimentation. All streambanks will then be planted with appropriate native species (see
re -veg detail).
All disturbed buffer areas will be immediately seeded upon completion (temporary - annual ryegrass), matted (coconut/coir
matting), and stabilized at the close of each construction day. Following construction, the banks of the restored channel will be
seeded with a native floodplain mix (permanent seed). Live stakes and matting staples will be used to secure the coconut
matting in these high- stress areas.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
All heavy equipment will be kept out of the stream channel during project construction except where absolutely necessary to
install vegetated boulder toe protection. Any entering of the channel or immediate riparian area will be done with new
equipment, no hydraulic leaks tolerated. Disturbance of channel bottom and banks and equipment access areas shall be held
to the minimum necessary to allow for bank stablization sufficient to restore the hydraulic capacity of the stream channel.
Streamflow will be diverted around the work area when channel base flow is less than 5 cfs. Flow diversion will not be
performed for work that is done from the top of bank, or minor placement of structures.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a perrnittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
WA
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWO
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
0 impacts
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWO)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The proposed project is not adjacent to a protected riparian buffer as
❑ Yes ® No
identified within the NC Riparian Buffer Protections Rules. The proposed project
exists within the New River Basin, which is not listed in the NCDENR Riparian
Buffer Rules. Therefore, a diffuse flow plan is not included in this application.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: This project does not require a
Stormwater Management Plan because the imperviousness is not increased by this project.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Boone
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWO Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state- implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federaVstate/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered `yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWO Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered `yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Due to the nature of the proposed project i.e. streambank stabilization in an already developed area, additional
development impacting nearby water quality is highly unlikely.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
® Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
BFEC, Inc. has contacted Bryan Tompkins with the US Fish and Wildlife Service. We will be notified if any endangered
species or critical habit exists in the project area.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA -- Office of Habitat Protection Division
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC Historic Preservation Office - Renee Gledhill Earley has received the site information. We will be notified if any historic
or archeological resources are present on -site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Construction will be performed in such a way so there will be no
net increase in water surface elevation pre- erosion. We are coordinating with the Town of Boone Planning Department to
address the Ordinances specific to working in a Special Flood Hazard Area.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Watauga County GIS Data,NC Floodplain Mapping
DFIRM Maps
Adam Williams, PWS
r
Brushy Fork Environmental
_
Consulting, Inc.
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

s"
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. N/A PLAN NO. N/A PARCEL ID: 2900 -83 -6214 -000
STREET ADDRESS: 1710 HWY 105 Boone, NC 28607
Property Owner:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Adam Williams . of Brushy Fork Environmental Consulting. Inc.
(Contractor /Agent) (Consulting Firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance
of this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Telephone:
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to
the best of our knowledg
Signature:
Date:— .1 9 — 6

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): 06/19/2013
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State: North Carolina County/parish/borough: Watauga City: Boone
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 36.2032189° N, Long. 81.6813467" W.
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17N
Name of nearest waterbody: Hodges Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) Into which the aquatic resource flows: New River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 05050001020010
Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s): 06 /192013
SECTION 11: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There re n "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
❑ Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
❑ Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain: Neither.
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There ® "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): t
❑ TNWs, including territorial seas
❑ Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
® Relatively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
(� Non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
® Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
❑ Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non - wetland waters: -240 linear feet: -15 (bkf) width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 0 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Established by OHWM -!
Elevation of established OHWM (if known): - 3150- 3250feet.
2. Non - regulated waters/wedands (check if applicable):3
❑ Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
2 For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year -round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
' Supporting documentation is presented in Section HIT.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW: No TNW found onsite.
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent ":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapawos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year -round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year -round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.DA.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section IILB.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and oftsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non -TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: 1.1 sq mdtraree' es' es
Drainage area: 1.1 square miles
Average annual rainfall: approx 55 inches
Average annual snowfall: aprrox 30+ inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
® Tributary flows through i tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are I river miles from TNW.
Project waters are I (or less) river miles from RPW.
Project waters are 51G-51G (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are or less aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain: No.
Identify flow route to TNWS: The project waters Hodges Creek, which flows east to Boone Creek, then Winklers Creek,
then South Fork New River (TNW).
Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
5 Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

Tributary stream order, if known: 2.
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ® Natural
❑ Artificial (man- made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man - altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: -15 feet
Average depth: -1.75 feet
Average side slopes: Local 1.-1- ocless,.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
® Silts ® Sands ❑ Concrete
® Cobbles ® Gravel ® Muck
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain: Eroding streambanks.
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain: Complex has been altered to some extent by active erosion.
Tributary geometry: elativel strai�h!
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): -0.013 %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for: Seasonal flow3
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year: 20 or greate)
Describe flow regime: perennial.
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Confined. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: iJnkn . Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑
® shelving
❑
vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
leaf litter disturbed or was
®
❑
❑
❑
hed away
sediment deposition
water staining
other (li
st):
❑ Discontinuous OHWM .7
Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
❑ High Tide Line indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings/characteristics
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (li
st):
(iii) Chemical Characteri
stics:
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sort
ts, if known:
6A natural or man -made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or thro
ing
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
me lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ survey to available datum;
® physical markings;
® vegetation lines /chan
ges in vegetation types.
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain: Water was cloudy at site visit due to recent storm activity. Stormwater pipes from Hwy 105 drain to stream.
Identify specific pollutan
ugh a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
® Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width): herbaceous and forested - 20 -3Oft.
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics: Wetlands drain to tributary.
® Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally- sensitive species. Explain findings:
® Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings: Trout Stream (Tr +).
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non -TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size:NAacres
Wetland type. Explain:NA.
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain: N /A.
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non -TNW:
Flow is: Fick Liss. Explain:
Surface flow is: PickPick Lis
Characteristics: ~y
Subsurface flow: Pick istL Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non -TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are Pickk L� river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick Lisp aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: Pick Lisf— _
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the Picl isE floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation typelpercent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally- sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic /wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any) __
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis: Pick List
Approximately ( NA +/- Total Subject Area) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
1. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section III.D:
2. Significant nexus findings for non -RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non -RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section rII.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
8 TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: NA acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year -round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial:
❑ Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.B. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: —240 linear feet —15- width (ft).
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non -RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
❑ Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
❑ Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
0 Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year- round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
[] Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section IMB and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW&
❑ Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non -RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
❑ Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area- acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters 9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
[� Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA - STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) :"
❑ which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
'See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act JuAvdiedon FoUowing Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non - wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
F. NON - JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
❑ Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
❑ Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
❑ Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a fording is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non - wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes /ponds: acres.
Other non - wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply - checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets /delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets /delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: BOONE, 1:24000.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: 3177(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Applicabletsupporting case law:
Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

54
41614 1�-
Little vegetation to hold
'bank in place
,lot 4—
Photosheet 2
AX

Airing
f.Eroding Streambai
Photosheet 3

36.1900000° N 36.2000000° N 36.2100000° N 36.220
CD
/
.�
CD
wo
w
UD
CD
CD
.411
M1
CD
oo
CA
bi
m
f�.,.....� ti... •t.�'• /'F '� t Y j
t i t /l/ • {/ 1
CD
0
00
w
- flJ
0
o
j
d
t J
• • ' ��
• _
. •� • • -
°o
°o
OD
• • '
/
22
C 7
O
`t t l "' i a
e
i m • • •• •
..
EL
••• • • b
• "�
w
.� \ r
t
3 '
.
• •.
CD
O
CD
__
0
m
36.1900000' N 36.2000000° N 36.2100000° N 36.220

�M >OOD
ao *D -nM,,, (7 ( C)
M Z Z 5> CAD vii Ali N
n p D m
cm�z-0
Z 3
zK - z2 ° = -0
<
D w Z � O
W Zz
O Q O U
o
p m o
Z � � �
2 N C W O O
Z
>N< n
r p C Z y
�m00Zn j co
�DmNf1C cn
< D W Z D Z O
Z rmG) CD
3 Z
onN��
G)
<V, D h 0
M m 0 y CL
C) m
Z 7o X_
M LA N m 0 Z
n�DZN� cn A W N —+
OrDmrn
Z m r T
cn0G) < m
W D N D (D
� T
= p O
c
C 2 D O cn
< m z M
< �✓ `�'P
M
r
m SR 1
Sp, N CD
CD CD
q0
ay
yN
055 m
ay y S
R t t R �3g2
N
r, as q�
ov
H De s CD
Z ^\
P-4
5� ZDL`a
9n
O F--I
r
M
s� SRI 7 Z
N
� titi 21
(D v
sq
co
IN&
A
SR r3 �8
S
_a SR p
g' ay f 7830 �
N (/
1 ►
s SR 152a
V.
■
N
O
s•.�
oarE:
Cover 7124120734`°'` Engineering Sound Environmental Solutions
y HODGES CREEK STREAMBANK STABILIZATION PROJECT DaawNev:
\ CD 5802 Highway 421 South
LINZEY ENTERPRISES, LLC ORB Mountain City, TN 37683
^ CHECKED BY: ph /fax: [phone]
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA Ayy +r .,tw
LICENSE # P. 1089 www.bfec.org

0
rn
t7
D
Z
Z
Irn^^
V/
0
rn
II
O
W
r
IF r
Orn
v am*c -3
o as -, n 3 x
� N 3�% n of O 3�w a
m 3 a' =r �
D �
m
VI
A
D rOD
� a 'c
D o0 o<a, � D C °•° o
0<q• W < cn n " A S
Oq r
N In �D M Oo ~ N i O
do Q•
U'1 � 00 W N �, W H
cn
V V 1--� N N " ' r
W Ln P N 9
A
OD D p) Nj
`- m
CD� V "a— , W v�� �� V�co oa
cQ cD Q N O Q ET
< v �3 .N_n
{� a) -. 0� O N (D 7 Q 0 'v .y. Z 7
ty
CD Q N O N� Q O Q (D CD CJ1
N_ CD 0 3 (D (D 7 i _Q Q O (D 3 v n
O
n —an N a �(p � (n cr O3 �= CD
CD N <'r cj ::r 7 a c Q O 0 O
c< y c CD O 7
(� N N ' ' N N Q- a N Q cn N p (D
0 (D 0
Q N = N (D - (D . (D (D
O cn fD n CD A N O N OL C X. 3
c N< p v a O n (n a N D
s m m J o � m a: " (D (°
m°a�oa o3Q
(n
00 y �Cv rn <m 0O c(ni
m o'Ma o' v Cno v o '�
c N O a' N ti (n < o
m Q�,.Q o� +o:o �(n3
U3 to 3 > j o
y Q O CD 4 y y 4 CQ 4 n
n (D (D Q (D N Q O Q (D 0 C
CD N' 3 3' + 3' m o 3
n n (SD � v= (� _ v j N
O O Q a) (n (D c n CL
a cn y 0 p� O CD (D
+o c a m
y y o o
CD
O
Stream Assessment Data
HODGES CREEK STREAMBANK STABILIZATION PROJECT
LINZEY ENTERPRISES, LLC
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE:
7/23/2013
uol4enal3
"''` Engineering Sound Environmental Solutions
5902 Highway 421 South
Mountain City, TN 37683
r� (��'J
•M LICENSE N P•1089 phil� Qwww blec. org
'
')th,m,1M1``�``
OruwNer:
cRB
w
CHECKED AY:
q yy
(,,
n
L
M
o
i
Ln
(„
00+
oi
o
;
M
I
M
rn
M
Ln
D �
i
N 0
r rn
O
3
OS +O
yw�
W
rt
OO +T
r_t
O
7
OS +T
OO +Z
;0;v
MA mi
LE
OZ +Z
0
rn
t7
D
Z
Z
Irn^^
V/
0
rn
II
O
W
r
IF r
Orn
v am*c -3
o as -, n 3 x
� N 3�% n of O 3�w a
m 3 a' =r �
D �
m
VI
A
D rOD
� a 'c
D o0 o<a, � D C °•° o
0<q• W < cn n " A S
Oq r
N In �D M Oo ~ N i O
do Q•
U'1 � 00 W N �, W H
cn
V V 1--� N N " ' r
W Ln P N 9
A
OD D p) Nj
`- m
CD� V "a— , W v�� �� V�co oa
cQ cD Q N O Q ET
< v �3 .N_n
{� a) -. 0� O N (D 7 Q 0 'v .y. Z 7
ty
CD Q N O N� Q O Q (D CD CJ1
N_ CD 0 3 (D (D 7 i _Q Q O (D 3 v n
O
n —an N a �(p � (n cr O3 �= CD
CD N <'r cj ::r 7 a c Q O 0 O
c< y c CD O 7
(� N N ' ' N N Q- a N Q cn N p (D
0 (D 0
Q N = N (D - (D . (D (D
O cn fD n CD A N O N OL C X. 3
c N< p v a O n (n a N D
s m m J o � m a: " (D (°
m°a�oa o3Q
(n
00 y �Cv rn <m 0O c(ni
m o'Ma o' v Cno v o '�
c N O a' N ti (n < o
m Q�,.Q o� +o:o �(n3
U3 to 3 > j o
y Q O CD 4 y y 4 CQ 4 n
n (D (D Q (D N Q O Q (D 0 C
CD N' 3 3' + 3' m o 3
n n (SD � v= (� _ v j N
O O Q a) (n (D c n CL
a cn y 0 p� O CD (D
+o c a m
y y o o
CD
O
Stream Assessment Data
HODGES CREEK STREAMBANK STABILIZATION PROJECT
LINZEY ENTERPRISES, LLC
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE:
7/23/2013
"''` Engineering Sound Environmental Solutions
5902 Highway 421 South
Mountain City, TN 37683
r� (��'J
•M LICENSE N P•1089 phil� Qwww blec. org
'
')th,m,1M1``�``
OruwNer:
cRB
CHECKED AY:
q yy
n
M
i
i
oi
o
;
M
I
M
rn
M
Ln
D �
i
N 0
r rn
3
A
OD D p) Nj
`- m
CD� V "a— , W v�� �� V�co oa
cQ cD Q N O Q ET
< v �3 .N_n
{� a) -. 0� O N (D 7 Q 0 'v .y. Z 7
ty
CD Q N O N� Q O Q (D CD CJ1
N_ CD 0 3 (D (D 7 i _Q Q O (D 3 v n
O
n —an N a �(p � (n cr O3 �= CD
CD N <'r cj ::r 7 a c Q O 0 O
c< y c CD O 7
(� N N ' ' N N Q- a N Q cn N p (D
0 (D 0
Q N = N (D - (D . (D (D
O cn fD n CD A N O N OL C X. 3
c N< p v a O n (n a N D
s m m J o � m a: " (D (°
m°a�oa o3Q
(n
00 y �Cv rn <m 0O c(ni
m o'Ma o' v Cno v o '�
c N O a' N ti (n < o
m Q�,.Q o� +o:o �(n3
U3 to 3 > j o
y Q O CD 4 y y 4 CQ 4 n
n (D (D Q (D N Q O Q (D 0 C
CD N' 3 3' + 3' m o 3
n n (SD � v= (� _ v j N
O O Q a) (n (D c n CL
a cn y 0 p� O CD (D
+o c a m
y y o o
CD
O
In
d
00 +0
OZ +O
0� +0
09 +0
08 +0
tiI1ID
OZ +T
Ob +T
09 +T
SL +T
NNNNNN■ �N
ME
NNNNNN-_ -.-
Miiiil�iiiii
---- - - - - --
�-=== NNNNNN
uopenal3
W w w w w
1
00 O ''^e N
.Q N
r�i
u01j
ena13
w w w w w
U1 O U1 O C!1
OZ +O
09 +0
Ti K
os +o
D V)
� rt
n 0
F
�
OO +T
OZ +T
Otl+T
09 +T
SL +T
Stream Assessment Data
HODGES CREEK STREAMBANK STABILIZATION PROJECT
LINZEY ENTERPRISES, LLC
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE:
7/23/2013
"''` Engineering Sound Environmental Solutions
5902 Highway 421 South
Mountain City, TN 37683
r� (��'J
•M LICENSE N P•1089 phil� Qwww blec. org
'
')th,m,1M1``�``
In
d
00 +0
OZ +O
0� +0
09 +0
08 +0
tiI1ID
OZ +T
Ob +T
09 +T
SL +T
NNNNNN■ �N
ME
NNNNNN-_ -.-
Miiiil�iiiii
---- - - - - --
�-=== NNNNNN
uopenal3
W w w w w
1
00 O ''^e N
.Q N
r�i
u01j
ena13
w w w w w
U1 O U1 O C!1
OZ +O
09 +0
Ti K
os +o
D V)
� rt
n 0
F
�
OO +T
OZ +T
Otl+T
09 +T
SL +T
Stream Assessment Data
HODGES CREEK STREAMBANK STABILIZATION PROJECT
LINZEY ENTERPRISES, LLC
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE:
7/23/2013
"''` Engineering Sound Environmental Solutions
5902 Highway 421 South
Mountain City, TN 37683
r� (��'J
•M LICENSE N P•1089 phil� Qwww blec. org
rn
OruwNer:
cRB
CHECKED AY:
q yy
n
M
i
i
oi
o
;
M
I
M
rn
M
Ln
D �
i
N 0
r rn
3
ena13
w w w w w
U1 O U1 O C!1
OZ +O
09 +0
Ti K
os +o
D V)
� rt
n 0
F
�
OO +T
OZ +T
Otl+T
09 +T
SL +T
1
uolj
enal3
w w w w w
O� V V 00 00
U'7 O U'1 O C!1
00 +0
OZ +O
Q17
+Q
09 +0
TI
os +o
D U)
n o
1
� OO +T
OZ +T
Ob +T
09 +T
08 +T
M
Stream Assessment Data
HODGES CREEK STREAMBANK STABILIZATION PROJECT
LINZEY ENTERPRISES, LLC
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE:
7/23/2013
"''` Engineering Sound Environmental Solutions
5902 Highway 421 South
Mountain City, TN 37683
r� (��'J
•M LICENSE N P•1089 phil� Qwww blec. org
rn
OruwNer:
cRB
CHECKED AY:
q yy
n
M
i
i
oi
o
;
M
I
M
rn
M
Ln
1
uolj
enal3
w w w w w
O� V V 00 00
U'7 O U'1 O C!1
00 +0
OZ +O
Q17
+Q
09 +0
TI
os +o
D U)
n o
1
� OO +T
OZ +T
Ob +T
09 +T
08 +T
M
Stream Assessment Data
HODGES CREEK STREAMBANK STABILIZATION PROJECT
LINZEY ENTERPRISES, LLC
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE:
7/23/2013
"''` Engineering Sound Environmental Solutions
5902 Highway 421 South
Mountain City, TN 37683
r� (��'J
•M LICENSE N P•1089 phil� Qwww blec. org
rn
OruwNer:
cRB
CHECKED AY:
q yy
n
M
i
oi
o
;
M
I
M
rn
M
Ln
D �
i
N 0
r rn
3
n
n
v
n
D
P,
rJ
?
O
L (D
Stream Assessment Data
HODGES CREEK STREAMBANK STABILIZATION PROJECT
LINZEY ENTERPRISES, LLC
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE:
7/23/2013
"''` Engineering Sound Environmental Solutions
5902 Highway 421 South
Mountain City, TN 37683
r� (��'J
•M LICENSE N P•1089 phil� Qwww blec. org
OruwNer:
cRB
CHECKED AY:
q yy

I
RUN I POOL
ctj�F
��F�kc Q / RvFFte 9,FF�E
FCOw\ POOL G� � PLAN VIEW RUN PO OL
y
BANKFULL
WATER SURFACE _ MAX DEPTH POOL
STREAM BED
PROFILE VIEW
Typical Bedform Grading Detail
PLAN VIEW
1/3
FLOW \ 1/3 � Pool
113 20 -30de
SILL
CROSS- SECTION
�r F WING
<— CROSS WjN
ay
BKFI ///
PROPOSED BED
ELEVATION
FOOTER ROCK
PROFILE VIEW
BKF
z -IO i
PROPOSED BED ELEVATION
= III =III
III =III =
—in T1�1
Ili
GEOTEXiTLE FABRIC FOOTER ROCK(.)
INSTALLATION:
A trench shall be dug in a manner that the footer rocks, cross header rocks and a MIN of
113 of the wing header rocks are buried beneath the bed surface elevation. Rocks are
precisely placed with a hydraulic thumb. Footer rocks shall be placed first with header
rocks placed on top prior to backfilling the trench. In the center (cross) portion the header
rocks shall be placed so that the top of the header rock is an elevation equal to the
proposed bed elevation. Geotextile fabric shall be placed in the trench with approx. 2 ft.
of overlap. Rock fill material shall be back filled around the fabric. The header rocks on the
wing portion shall be placed so that they slope up from the bed elevation at the cross
portion, to a bankfull elevation and meet the bank at a 20 -30 deg. angle. Header and
footer rocks at both ends shall be tied in securely to the bank to eliminate the possibility of
water diversion.
NOTES:
1. Rocks and logs can be used interchangeably
2. Sills should be buried at a depth of approx. 0.5'- 1' below ground elevation and
wrapped with continuous geotextile cloth tying into vane wing.
3. Sill should extend into the bank a minimum of 6 feet (or the length of the constructed
bench).
4. Minimum median boulder diameter approx. 4 -5 feet.
Typical Cross -vane Detail
GeoteMile Fabric
Flow
Footer Rocks
A
Degr3ees
SCOUR POOL
Plan View
Rock Sill
2:1 or FLATTER
Cross - section View
Live branch cuttings (1/2" - 1" diameter)
Low Bank Elevation
Degraded Vertical Bank
Low -flow Water Surface
Fabric
Al Water Surface
Profile View
Construction Notes:
*Construction will begin at the lowest point
Al of the slope
*Excavation of the minimum amount of
existing to provide a suitable recess
*Rocks shall be placed at least a three -point
bearing on the foundation material
*Rocks specified for this structure shall have
a median diameter of 3'
*Flat, rectangular rock will be used
*As the toe protection is built, layers will be
placed in an overlapping pattern to minimize
gaps
*Vegetated rock toe will be placed in a
Lower tier of boulder toe to be manor intended to stabilize the vertical
placed below existing thalweg elevation bank, not to constrict channel geometry
l­__1 1 1 =1 1 1 =1 11 =1 11 =1 I I—'i 1 1-11 rttl 111
Remove any unstable woody debris and preserve well - rooted vegetation
* Sloped fill to be seeded with temporary
grass within 1 day of ground disturbing
activity and covered with erosion control
fabric.
Typical Vegetated Boulder Toe Detail
W bkf
Geotextile Fabric
Footer Rocks
Cross - Section
uonsrrucoon Ivoces:
1. The lower rock (head rock) footer will first be placed followed by the head rock to set the initial structure elevation. The
subsequent rock (moving upstream) and associated footers will then be set sighting the proposed 20 -30 degree bank
deflection line.
2. Rock placement follows moving upstream at a 2 -10% slope until a bankfull elevation is reached at the end of the
structure wing.
3. A rock sill will then be constructed perpendicular to the structure angle to prevent the formation of a cutoff channel.
4. A trench shall be dug upstream on the bankside of the wing where non -woven geotextile fabric will be placed with approx.
2' of overlap; the trench will then be backfilled with native materials and re- vegetated.
5. Rock sills shall be buried at a depth approx. 0.5' - 1' below ground elevation and wrapped with continuous geotextile
fabric tied to the vane material.
6. Sill should extend into the bank a min. of 6 feet.
7. Minimum median boulder shall be Small, as defined in the Material Specifications.
Typical Rock Vane Detail
STRAW WATTLE 7 WOOD STAKE
1N
�J 00%
3(0�' f
SLOPE
SURFACE
TRENCH
Z_
N
t
Straw Wattle Detail
S
0
X7)111 3
co
c t Cn '0
o ;��
is o
O y v N �
COa ~^
of
fop U v
o, c
E o o Q
IZ
h
.j
LL,1
a
c
O
co
0
N
d
a
z
U
Ic Q
U
O
cc
Q_
Z
O_
Q
J J ZJ
W 0:
CU Z
N Q O
W Z
ui
W w Z
Z m
cn J
W
W
cc
U
W
O
Z
Sheet
4/5

J m w N N Z
m
m '<
n Fr = tD O O ID < (D
n= r•r'a c1 \
Om / / c= O N 0.0 cr ID
Ql R i ' 0 �' '* fD O< d n < '<
m 1 Goy 01 'v M N 0_ = N \ ICDI
1 Naves'(Dd 3d
ID
3 an
(D S rD � O N
L E
rb C Q r0 c� (D C 1D
$ 1 z C m� o=��N�.
G> \ O o �oo���-
1 ' m _
(b 0 Q i ry 01 O d fD to fl 3 CL
am 0 rD �E
(DD m rD 0 O c n
41 I 1 I z al 3 c`�i O ID 't3 M ID
11 p
1 S ° -1 ° M r•T C O
/ R p O v O
' O S 0 Q n v, c r, R d
0 < n1 O S a
$ < 3
fD 'O 7 3 '<
m < D) rD
0) Q v Q
T
rt G tD O rD
= to O
rD rD
H
m
Qi U9 A d A ~ O
N -R N .+ .N. r -.,
D z W3 m° c,O� ^.
z m D Ort d tT d N O D N 00 Cl -I d s o m 0 0 o; r p d d <' o �» ,n. o f 12p 3 0� a O rD
to 0 f�D E- Z 0 N fND N rD y C Q fD 3 3 �� 3 c < x.nW� N3 nay ^ d•a_m "•?.Q0 a_ CML i'0 of
tD N C -i < 3 1D fD n 3 3 <�� o a_».ao n p sco �»�•?.� T.CL a-"-° D o O O.
3- m -. r•r Q fD 0 !Z fD y M c Cr rD rr d O . o c^ n == 3 n r
Q fD O= cmil O D Z = D= rY to 3 Q CL c�j c= 'O = O r�o c c f o f c s y r°i = m ro rD X• s 3 d N o cal 3 (DD
�- 7r fD -� Z H• m 0'q O U•I O O O to < d4 =! Z S rD o_ ?. o n rD = c a S c a �' - rD c o CL
N CC = 1n U I Z C!1 to O 0 1�i1 3 3 +v M 3 •o s �. o a v �p » Q a (D U M
G) G d m rW N O• V r �' to N tp 3 rno 'Di � d N' < n °° `m' rrDO °: o CO 3 ' d 0 o a a o a M
C < d r�r T G cn m 3__ C) D r* fD 3 N m 7' a o c° o r0+
G O O �_ m c1 N 3 rr �*' c c1 m -n a MW 3 0 E o f. cD c a Dom. ^ 3 0� f• A
S o< Q r- m rD p 04 K < o » a =^ d rD s. S
t)p 00 (D O O 0 lD =. _ K O 3 3 .o^, o n y d N c_ a 3 0 O
rD d O C 3 d — — O = N = r0 o n rD � y x °; �D s o cr 0 v d 3
co 3 p G Z D to N cr o r+ o 3 m e 3 f 3 0° a rD 3 a tv = =. z-
N Z m X rD rD m O y C X c d s d = r? m a cr N p i• O an d O
O a tai m m = fD 1 _� C cn a cn N_ m y r zT N ro n g 7 0 rD av
a 00 N 30 0 N C O is d= N O A (D n' Z rD ^ ° d > > d O
pi tD m tD rD O N= n N O x m a? » ro ?; CD a (DD
j �• 3 n X p a p S y o c °o a ° �• o vi
0o m T=+,� mm N N-p O rD y rD
c < o0 0 in -+ m m
° = z �* 0 �+
=° QV Sao z ° ?.m 3.g 01 W -
rD = a x rt v r) o y r7 = m .�
ca. 0.) mO oo m CL �,� 3 chi
rn m 0n cu N M co r (D o a `^ a= ° z p O
<<y1 =N O o a °° rna o o
tD ° _._ =0oa tiCO
M °- o , < Z °r*' to fl' o ° a ° � a
mo =D�• 0'afD°5 *c-
0 z
LA L01 FD'
cn o r) a
= d o D
CO aQ 10
7t' • • , y /.iy ;� n • •;
•�., t.' .t,�•
Elevation J, o
SEMEN
n�
Oh
� r.� ~' I Z
� Q
�' to o i D O O a
3�r,� o���Oacb�y�Jan�Q��I�c�J
A a
ID Z5, ;-k y��s��o�
fD ���tv O�h1�����a��� Q��.O\
F o n o y 3 3.0 o h o�U
o
an niD OiJOtQOh�°tD�L1
�D ± to rt 0 a � Q J �• 0
C1. 0 •Oti � tL C � � �
wh < �J 0�� ,
o y aaa ��J o ��
-i lb ET 3
Qj m 0b yptp J J 0 %���OJ' k
�O p lb
^� a � o 0 3 J o �� r
0
MEMEL
DATE:
Details 7/23/2013
HODGES CREEK STREAMBANK STABILIZATION PROJECT DHA N e Engineering Sound Environmental Solutions
5902 Highway 421 South
U1cD LINZEY ENTERPRISES, LLC Mountain City, TN 37683
v I CHECKED BY: ph /fax: [phone]
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA AW UCENSExP -1089 www.bfec.org
3
0
O � Z
T -{ � ref
p �Dy �•��O
�aN
o � a�oo
a
� 0'0 � C a
�mmc�,
O
�
a S
w °o d
�
fl o c �° a
o a f a
.•�
p S O
°oe
oaufD,
X• O Ol v+
r+
H C fD n"i
rn
j o
$ � �
O'
N
rao
O- ..
O
f � S
S
G �
d
o to
�
a
n?
�
o �
o3i v
�
vOi
m �
p
� IJ n
H O
7
.r
Q �
O �
J m w N N Z
m
m '<
n Fr = tD O O ID < (D
n= r•r'a c1 \
Om / / c= O N 0.0 cr ID
Ql R i ' 0 �' '* fD O< d n < '<
m 1 Goy 01 'v M N 0_ = N \ ICDI
1 Naves'(Dd 3d
ID
3 an
(D S rD � O N
L E
rb C Q r0 c� (D C 1D
$ 1 z C m� o=��N�.
G> \ O o �oo���-
1 ' m _
(b 0 Q i ry 01 O d fD to fl 3 CL
am 0 rD �E
(DD m rD 0 O c n
41 I 1 I z al 3 c`�i O ID 't3 M ID
11 p
1 S ° -1 ° M r•T C O
/ R p O v O
' O S 0 Q n v, c r, R d
0 < n1 O S a
$ < 3
fD 'O 7 3 '<
m < D) rD
0) Q v Q
T
rt G tD O rD
= to O
rD rD
H
m
Qi U9 A d A ~ O
N -R N .+ .N. r -.,
D z W3 m° c,O� ^.
z m D Ort d tT d N O D N 00 Cl -I d s o m 0 0 o; r p d d <' o �» ,n. o f 12p 3 0� a O rD
to 0 f�D E- Z 0 N fND N rD y C Q fD 3 3 �� 3 c < x.nW� N3 nay ^ d•a_m "•?.Q0 a_ CML i'0 of
tD N C -i < 3 1D fD n 3 3 <�� o a_».ao n p sco �»�•?.� T.CL a-"-° D o O O.
3- m -. r•r Q fD 0 !Z fD y M c Cr rD rr d O . o c^ n == 3 n r
Q fD O= cmil O D Z = D= rY to 3 Q CL c�j c= 'O = O r�o c c f o f c s y r°i = m ro rD X• s 3 d N o cal 3 (DD
�- 7r fD -� Z H• m 0'q O U•I O O O to < d4 =! Z S rD o_ ?. o n rD = c a S c a �' - rD c o CL
N CC = 1n U I Z C!1 to O 0 1�i1 3 3 +v M 3 •o s �. o a v �p » Q a (D U M
G) G d m rW N O• V r �' to N tp 3 rno 'Di � d N' < n °° `m' rrDO °: o CO 3 ' d 0 o a a o a M
C < d r�r T G cn m 3__ C) D r* fD 3 N m 7' a o c° o r0+
G O O �_ m c1 N 3 rr �*' c c1 m -n a MW 3 0 E o f. cD c a Dom. ^ 3 0� f• A
S o< Q r- m rD p 04 K < o » a =^ d rD s. S
t)p 00 (D O O 0 lD =. _ K O 3 3 .o^, o n y d N c_ a 3 0 O
rD d O C 3 d — — O = N = r0 o n rD � y x °; �D s o cr 0 v d 3
co 3 p G Z D to N cr o r+ o 3 m e 3 f 3 0° a rD 3 a tv = =. z-
N Z m X rD rD m O y C X c d s d = r? m a cr N p i• O an d O
O a tai m m = fD 1 _� C cn a cn N_ m y r zT N ro n g 7 0 rD av
a 00 N 30 0 N C O is d= N O A (D n' Z rD ^ ° d > > d O
pi tD m tD rD O N= n N O x m a? » ro ?; CD a (DD
j �• 3 n X p a p S y o c °o a ° �• o vi
0o m T=+,� mm N N-p O rD y rD
c < o0 0 in -+ m m
° = z �* 0 �+
=° QV Sao z ° ?.m 3.g 01 W -
rD = a x rt v r) o y r7 = m .�
ca. 0.) mO oo m CL �,� 3 chi
rn m 0n cu N M co r (D o a `^ a= ° z p O
<<y1 =N O o a °° rna o o
tD ° _._ =0oa tiCO
M °- o , < Z °r*' to fl' o ° a ° � a
mo =D�• 0'afD°5 *c-
0 z
LA L01 FD'
cn o r) a
= d o D
CO aQ 10
7t' • • , y /.iy ;� n • •;
•�., t.' .t,�•
Elevation J, o
SEMEN
n�
Oh
� r.� ~' I Z
� Q
�' to o i D O O a
3�r,� o���Oacb�y�Jan�Q��I�c�J
A a
ID Z5, ;-k y��s��o�
fD ���tv O�h1�����a��� Q��.O\
F o n o y 3 3.0 o h o�U
o
an niD OiJOtQOh�°tD�L1
�D ± to rt 0 a � Q J �• 0
C1. 0 •Oti � tL C � � �
wh < �J 0�� ,
o y aaa ��J o ��
-i lb ET 3
Qj m 0b yptp J J 0 %���OJ' k
�O p lb
^� a � o 0 3 J o �� r
0
MEMEL
DATE:
Details 7/23/2013
HODGES CREEK STREAMBANK STABILIZATION PROJECT DHA N e Engineering Sound Environmental Solutions
5902 Highway 421 South
U1cD LINZEY ENTERPRISES, LLC Mountain City, TN 37683
v I CHECKED BY: ph /fax: [phone]
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA AW UCENSExP -1089 www.bfec.org
3
g
m Z
T -{ � ref
p �Dy �•��O
�aN
o � a�oo
C � � to � tL
���� °oa
� 0'0 � C a
�mmc�,
O
�
N•O C�.a�
7 aO.�
a
�
fl o c �° a
o a f a
.•�
p S O
X• O Ol v+
� �' d, O.
H C fD n"i
O � d �
m?o m
r�o �mn
3
o �•� �
0
� °-
rao
O- ..
O
f � S
S
G �
S � n.
� D
�
O
�
o �
o3i v
�
vOi
rD
rte+ m
�
�
Ott �
a
H O
7
Q �
J m w N N Z
m
m '<
n Fr = tD O O ID < (D
n= r•r'a c1 \
Om / / c= O N 0.0 cr ID
Ql R i ' 0 �' '* fD O< d n < '<
m 1 Goy 01 'v M N 0_ = N \ ICDI
1 Naves'(Dd 3d
ID
3 an
(D S rD � O N
L E
rb C Q r0 c� (D C 1D
$ 1 z C m� o=��N�.
G> \ O o �oo���-
1 ' m _
(b 0 Q i ry 01 O d fD to fl 3 CL
am 0 rD �E
(DD m rD 0 O c n
41 I 1 I z al 3 c`�i O ID 't3 M ID
11 p
1 S ° -1 ° M r•T C O
/ R p O v O
' O S 0 Q n v, c r, R d
0 < n1 O S a
$ < 3
fD 'O 7 3 '<
m < D) rD
0) Q v Q
T
rt G tD O rD
= to O
rD rD
H
m
Qi U9 A d A ~ O
N -R N .+ .N. r -.,
D z W3 m° c,O� ^.
z m D Ort d tT d N O D N 00 Cl -I d s o m 0 0 o; r p d d <' o �» ,n. o f 12p 3 0� a O rD
to 0 f�D E- Z 0 N fND N rD y C Q fD 3 3 �� 3 c < x.nW� N3 nay ^ d•a_m "•?.Q0 a_ CML i'0 of
tD N C -i < 3 1D fD n 3 3 <�� o a_».ao n p sco �»�•?.� T.CL a-"-° D o O O.
3- m -. r•r Q fD 0 !Z fD y M c Cr rD rr d O . o c^ n == 3 n r
Q fD O= cmil O D Z = D= rY to 3 Q CL c�j c= 'O = O r�o c c f o f c s y r°i = m ro rD X• s 3 d N o cal 3 (DD
�- 7r fD -� Z H• m 0'q O U•I O O O to < d4 =! Z S rD o_ ?. o n rD = c a S c a �' - rD c o CL
N CC = 1n U I Z C!1 to O 0 1�i1 3 3 +v M 3 •o s �. o a v �p » Q a (D U M
G) G d m rW N O• V r �' to N tp 3 rno 'Di � d N' < n °° `m' rrDO °: o CO 3 ' d 0 o a a o a M
C < d r�r T G cn m 3__ C) D r* fD 3 N m 7' a o c° o r0+
G O O �_ m c1 N 3 rr �*' c c1 m -n a MW 3 0 E o f. cD c a Dom. ^ 3 0� f• A
S o< Q r- m rD p 04 K < o » a =^ d rD s. S
t)p 00 (D O O 0 lD =. _ K O 3 3 .o^, o n y d N c_ a 3 0 O
rD d O C 3 d — — O = N = r0 o n rD � y x °; �D s o cr 0 v d 3
co 3 p G Z D to N cr o r+ o 3 m e 3 f 3 0° a rD 3 a tv = =. z-
N Z m X rD rD m O y C X c d s d = r? m a cr N p i• O an d O
O a tai m m = fD 1 _� C cn a cn N_ m y r zT N ro n g 7 0 rD av
a 00 N 30 0 N C O is d= N O A (D n' Z rD ^ ° d > > d O
pi tD m tD rD O N= n N O x m a? » ro ?; CD a (DD
j �• 3 n X p a p S y o c °o a ° �• o vi
0o m T=+,� mm N N-p O rD y rD
c < o0 0 in -+ m m
° = z �* 0 �+
=° QV Sao z ° ?.m 3.g 01 W -
rD = a x rt v r) o y r7 = m .�
ca. 0.) mO oo m CL �,� 3 chi
rn m 0n cu N M co r (D o a `^ a= ° z p O
<<y1 =N O o a °° rna o o
tD ° _._ =0oa tiCO
M °- o , < Z °r*' to fl' o ° a ° � a
mo =D�• 0'afD°5 *c-
0 z
LA L01 FD'
cn o r) a
= d o D
CO aQ 10
7t' • • , y /.iy ;� n • •;
•�., t.' .t,�•
Elevation J, o
SEMEN
n�
Oh
� r.� ~' I Z
� Q
�' to o i D O O a
3�r,� o���Oacb�y�Jan�Q��I�c�J
A a
ID Z5, ;-k y��s��o�
fD ���tv O�h1�����a��� Q��.O\
F o n o y 3 3.0 o h o�U
o
an niD OiJOtQOh�°tD�L1
�D ± to rt 0 a � Q J �• 0
C1. 0 •Oti � tL C � � �
wh < �J 0�� ,
o y aaa ��J o ��
-i lb ET 3
Qj m 0b yptp J J 0 %���OJ' k
�O p lb
^� a � o 0 3 J o �� r
0
MEMEL
DATE:
Details 7/23/2013
HODGES CREEK STREAMBANK STABILIZATION PROJECT DHA N e Engineering Sound Environmental Solutions
5902 Highway 421 South
U1cD LINZEY ENTERPRISES, LLC Mountain City, TN 37683
v I CHECKED BY: ph /fax: [phone]
BOONE, NORTH CAROLINA AW UCENSExP -1089 www.bfec.org