Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20051071 Ver 2_Staff Comments_20070706OS-1071 vs 2 Subject: OS-1071 vs 2 From: Kyle Barnes <Kyle.Barnes@ncmail.net> Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 07:36:54 -0400 To: Ian McMillan <ian.mcmillan@ncmail.net> Sorry about this one. This is an IP that we received info back and it did not get logged into BIMS until yesterday and it is due on Monday. 05-1071 vs 2 BSH Home Appliances, this one can be Issued with a condition that the State Stormwater permit be modified to show the new impact area. I looked up the old SW permit because I remembered the first version of this permit had some SW issues. The first SW permit was issued with the idea that the project would expand and the SW facilities should handle the new impervious area. As of today they have not modified the SW permit to reflect the new impervious area so that mod needs to be done. Also the first IP for this project had 0.45 acres of wetland impacts that they paid EEP under the COE conditions. This IP they have 1.02 acres of wetland impacts and they have an acceptance letter from EEP. Because this is the first time DWQ has charge the project mitigation should they be mitigating for 1.47 acres? Give me a call. 1 of 1 7/6/2007 8:57 AM