NC0044725_Pretreatment Inspection_20120530

APA.
,AF
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly. Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P. E. Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
May 30, 2012
James Croke
Pretreatment Coordinator
Laurinburg-Maxton Airport Commission (LMAC)
16701 Airport Road
Maxton, NC 28364
SUBJECT: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report
Laurinburg-Maxton Airport Commission (LMAC)
NPDES Permit No. NC0044725
Scotland County
Dear Mr. Croke,
Enclosed you will find a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report
for the inspection that was conducted on May 14, 2012 in the LMAC office at which time
I met with you and JoAnn Gentry, Executive Director & former LMAC Pretreatment
Coordinator. On the day of this pretreatment inspection, the requirements as outlined in
15A NCAC 2H .0900 for Local Pretreatment Programs were found to be met. This office
commends you for your efforts and accomplishments. If you have any questions, please
contact me at [phone].
Dale Lopez
Environmental Sp cialist
Enclosures: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report
EPA Water Compliance Inspection Report
cc: Monti Hassan, NC Division of Water Quality - PERCS Unit
SCAki Y -ales® e_
225 Green Street -Suite 714 —Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterqualitv.orq
An Equal Opportunity', Affirmative Action Employer
One
NorthCarolina
Naturally

United States Environmental Protection Agency
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
Water Compliance Insper:tlnn Repnrt
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31 98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection
1 I N I 2 151 31 NC0044725 111 121 12/05/14 117
Type Inspector Fac Type
181 P 1 191 S I 20I 1I
1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 J 66
Remarks •
211 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA ----Reserved------
671 2.0 1 69 701 31 711 1 72 I N I 731 1 174 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Laurinburg Industrial WWTP
16701 Airport Rd
Maxton NC 28364
Entry Time/Date
10:30 AM 12/05/14
Permit Effective Date
10/03/01
Exit Time/Date
02:00 PM 12/05/14
Permit Expiration Date
14/07/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)lTitles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
///
James Thomas Croke/ORC/910-844-5081/
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number .
Contacted
Jo Ann Gentry,16701 Airport Rd Maxton NC 28364//910-844-5081/9108449681 No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Pretreatment • Other
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary).
Name(s) nature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers
a
Dale Lopez ' 6 FRO WQ//910-433-3300 Ext.712/
:Date .
6 5P ®/41s-
Signature of Management Q A'Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
1i� h.li• 6/3iha,
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type
31 NC0044725 111 12/
2 12/05/14 1 17 181 P
(cont.) 1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Enclosed you will find a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection that was
conducted on May 14, 2012 in the LMAC office, at which time I met with you and JoAnn Gentry, Executive
Director & former LMAC Pretreatment Coordinator. On the day of this pretreatment inspection, the
requirements, as outlined in 15A NCAC 2H .0900 for Local Pretreatment Programs, were found to be met.
This office commends you for your efforts and accomplishments. If you have any questions, please contact
me at [phone].
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. All SIU's have their own 24-hour sample compositer.
2. (Please see question 23, above). Miniumum Detection Level (MDL) for LTMP were met.
3. (Please see question 23, above). Mercury's Minimum Detection Level (that is required by the NPDES
permit for Plant Outfall 001) is 0.5 ng/L (Method 1631). Please report the units as ng/L on the eDMR/DMR.
Please note that NO INDUSTRY INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED DURING THIS PCI.
Comments: Please keep up the good work.
Requirements:
1. Please notice the SUO information on the Pretreatment website
(http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/swp/ps/pret) indicating that the 2011 NC SUO and checklist were posted on
August 12, 2011. The Model SUO includes many revisions to address the revisions to NCAC 15A 02H
.0900 - Local Pretreatment Programs. All POTWs must include the SUO Checklist updated August 2011
when submitting their SUO for review. Unless otherwise spedified, updated SUOs are due to the Division
by December 31, 2012.
2. Mercury's Minimum Detection Level (that is required by the NPDES permit for Plant Outfall 001) is 0.5
ng/L (Method 1631). Please report the units as ng/L on the eDMR/DMR. For all other LTMP sample points
for Mercury, Method 245.1 may be used.
Page # 2

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION 'Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)1
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: LMAC
2. Control Authority Representative(s): James Croke
3. Title(s): PT Coordinator/ORC
4. Last Inspection Date: 07/26/2011 Inspection Type (Check One): ❑ PCI 0 Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? ❑ YES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO
PCS CODING
Trans.Code
N
Main Program Permit Number
MM/DD/YY
1 N 1 C 1 0 1 0 1 414171 2151 05
(DTIA)
Inspec.Type
P
(TYPI)
Inspector Fac. Type
l s l L I l
(INSP) (FACC)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
3
SIUS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
1
CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
NO C M
13. Number of SIUS in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
1
PSNC
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC) Scotland Mfg was SNC for TSS limits
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
15. Number of S1Us In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
1
SNPS
16. Number of SIUS In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
SNC for
SNC for
Not Put
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
❑YES PL4NO
❑ YES i NO
Limits:
Reporting:
dished:
1 Scot. Mfg TSS
0
0
0
❑ YES /1 NO
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES
23.
Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
Please see File Review Comments #2 and.#3
❑ NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® Y ES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ❑ YES ® NO
25. All LIMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? ® YES ❑ NO
26. If NO to 23 - 26, list violations
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES /1 NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7125/07 Page 1

28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW— Please review POT\t' files, verify- POTW has copy of Program
Element in their files; complete with supporring documents and copv of PERCS Approval Letter. and dates consistent with Proarant=nfo:. -
Program Element
Last Submittal
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
03/30/2011
EI Yes ❑ No
09/15/2011
E1 Yes ❑ No
04/01/2016
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
06/19/2008
0 Yes ❑ No
01/20/2009
/i1 Yes ❑ No
10/01/2013
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
02/29/2008
E/ Yes ❑ No
04/04/2008
Yes ❑ No
12/31/2012
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
01/17/2008
Yes ❑ No
04/04/2008
/i1 Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
08/08/2011
/4 Yes ❑ No
10/03/2011
E1 Yes ❑ No
09/01/2014
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION
29. User Name
1. Embrex
2. Railroad Friction
3. Scotland Manufacturing
30. IUP Number
007
002
005
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
1�1 Yes ❑ No
Issued 09/01/2011
►i1 Yes ❑ No
Issued 09/01/2011
EI Yes ❑ No
Issued 09/01/2011
32. Permit Expiration Date
04/16/2016
04/16/2016
04/16/2016
33. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
439.27
N/A
433
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
EI Yes ❑ No
02/01/2011
/1 Yes ❑ No
01/20/2011
EI Yes ❑ No
01/28/2011
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
►1 Yes ❑ No
11 / 16/2011
►i1 Yes ❑ No
11/22/2011
/'1 Yes ❑ No
12/06/2011
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a.@Yes •No
08/26/2011
a. ►Z@Yes ■No
06/16/2006
a. ►Z@Yes ■No
03/2009
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
❑Yes❑NoON/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
a. ►PYes •No
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
a. _Yes ■No
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
a.@Yes ■No
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
b. All Issues Resolved?
PERCS Review Letter dated 09/14/2011
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
►1 Yes ❑ No
E1 Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
►ZI Yes ❑ No
►ii Yes
❑ No
EI Yes ❑ No
41. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP. including flow?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
41 b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period. Did SIU submit all reports
on time?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
42a. For categorical lUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
file include process/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑NoON/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
1:Yes❑No181N/A
42b. For categorical lUs with Production based limits, does file include
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑NoISIN/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
Al
N/A
E1
N/A
EI
Yes
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identity
All Reporting_ Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑NolEN/A
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
c. If applicable, Did POTW resample within 30 days of becoming aware
of SIU limit violations in the sampling of the SIU?
POTW's
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑NotaN/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.®Yes❑No❑N/A
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
c.®Yes❑No❑N/A
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑
Yes
/i1
No
❑
Yes ►'I
No
11
Yes
❑
No
47. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
❑Yes❑NoION/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
48. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
49. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑NOON/A
50. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
51. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
❑ Yes /1 No
❑ Yes i1 No
❑ Yes /i1 No
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form
Upda ed 7/25/07 Page 2

•
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. All SIU's have their own 24-hour sample compositer.
2. (Please see question 23 above). Miniumum Detection Level (MDL) for LTMP:
Medals
MDL by commercial lab
MDL required by LTMP
Copper
0.002 mg/L
0.002 mg/L
Zinc
0.005
0.010
Nickel
0.005
0.010
Arsenic
0.005
0.010
Selenium
0.005
0.010
Molybdenum
0.005
0.100
Silver
0.002
0.005
Cadmium
0.002
0.002
Lead
0.003
0.010
Cyanide
0.005
0.010
Mercury
0.0002 mg/L
0.0002 mg/L (Method 245.1
for all sample points except
Outfall 001)
3. (Please see question 23, above). Mercury's Minimum Detection Level (that is required by the NPDES permit for Plant Outfall
001) is 0.5 ng/L (Method 1631). Please report the units as ng/L on the eDMR/DMR.
NO INDUSTRY INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED DURING THIS PCI
INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING:
Trans.Code
I I
1. Industry Inspected:
2. Industry Address:
Main Program Permit Number
MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type
I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 S 1 1 2 I
(DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC)
3. Type of Industry/Product:
4. Industry Contact:
Phone:
Title:
Fax:
5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? ❑ YES ❑ NO
6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
Comments:
A. Initial Interview ❑ YES ❑ NO
B. Plant Tour ❑ YES ❑ NO
C. Pretreatment Tour ❑ YES ❑ NO
D. Sampling Review ❑ YES ❑ NO
E. Exit Interview ❑ YES ❑ NO
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 3

Industrial Inspection Comments:
o:
OVERALL SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments: Please keep up the good work.
Requirements:
1. Please notice the SUO information on the Pretreatment website ( http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/swp/ps/pret )
indicating that the 2011 NC SUO and checklist were posted on August 12, 2011. The Model SUO includes many
revisions to address the revisions to NCAC 15A 02H .0900 - Local Pretreatment Programs. All POTWs must
include the SUO Checklist updated August 2011 when submitting their SUO for review. Unless otherwise spedified,
updated SUOs are due to the Division by December 31, 2012.
2. Mercury's Minimum Detection Level (that is required by the NPDES permit for Plant Outfall 001) is 0.5 ng/L (Method
1631). Please report the units as ng/L on the eDMR/DMR. For all other LTMP sample points for Mercury, Method
245.1 may be used.
Recommendations: None
NOD: ❑ YES NO
NOV: ❑ YES ® NO
QNCR: ❑YES NO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory ✓ Marginal Un atisfactory
PCI COMPLETED BY: Dale Lopez 1 , ATE: 05/30/2012
Reviewed by:
DATE:
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 4