NC0039586_Application_20210903

(' DUKE
ENERGY
PROGRESS
FEB 2 4. 2021
Serial RA-21--0058
Certified Mail Number: 7014 2120 0003 3196 7309
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Danny Smith, Director
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant
NPDES Permit No. NC0039586
Wake County
Kim E. Maza
Vice President
Harris Nuclear Plant
5413 Shearon Harris Road
New Hill NC 27562-9300
Dear Mr. Smith:
Duke Energy Progress, LLC, Harris Nuclear Plant (HNP) submits the following NPDES permit
renewal application for NPDES Permit Number NC0039586, which expires August 31, 2021.
The attached permit application package consists of the following documentation:
Enclosure 1 - US EPA Form 1 — General Information
Enclosure 2 - US EPA Form 2C — Existing Manufacturing, Commercial, Mining and
Silvacultural Operations, including Tables A-E for Outfall 006 (Combined
Discharge), Ouffall 007 (Harris Energy & Environmental Center), and the
Water Supply Intake
Attachment 1 - Form 1 — Section 6 — Existing Environmental Permits
Attachment 2 - Form 1 — Section 7 — Maps
Attachment 3 - Form 1 — Section 9 — CWA Section 316(b) Cooling Water Intake Structure
Reports
Attachment 4 - Form 2C — Section 2.1 — Line Drawing / Water Balance / Flow Table
Attachment 5 - Form 2C — Section 3.1 — Flows, Sources of Pollution, and Treatment
Technologies
Attachment 6 - Form 2C — Section 8 — Used or Manufactured Toxics
Attachment 7 - Form 2C — Section 9.2 — Toxicity Test Results
Attachment 8 - Form 2C — Section 10.2 — Contract Laboratories

NPDES Permit Application Package
RA-21-0058
Page 12
316 (b) Cooling Water Intake Structure Rule
In accordance with Part I, Condition A(17) of the existing NPDES permit, Harris Nuclear Plant is
in submitting the appropriate reports as required by Cooling Water Intake Structure Rule 40
CFR Part 125.95. These reports are enclosed are Attachment 3 - Form 1 — Section 9 — Intake
Structures.
Copper & Zinc Limitations
Duke Energy and NC DEQ DWR have been working together throughout the term of the current
permit regarding proposed effluent limitations for copper & zinc contained in the previous
NPDES permit issued August 29, 2016. Duke Energy has complied with the terms contained in
the Schedule of Compliance within the current permit and has recently submitted the Year 4
Report which demonstrates a site specific mixing zone alleviates the need for copper and zinc
limits. Duke Energy respectfully requests the removal of copper & zinc limits associated with
Part I (A)(6) Effluent Limitations and Monitoring Requirements (Outfall 006) and the compliance
language and date of September 30, 2021 as addressed in Part I (A)(9) Schedule of
Compliance (Outfall 006).
Industrial Stormwater NPDES Obligations and Responsibilities
Please note that no stormwater related information is included in this NPDES permit renewal
application package since the NC DEQ Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
(DEMLR) has requested the industrial stormwater permit application package be submitted
directly to their office. Our understanding is NC DEQ DEMLR will be issuing a separate
individual industrial stormwater NPDES permit to satisfy such NPDES obligations and
responsibilities.
This permit renewal package is being submitted at least 180 days prior to the permit expiration
date as required by NC GS 143-215.1 (C). and Part II, Section B, Condition No. 10 of NPDES
Permit No. NC0039586.
Should you have questions concerning this permit application please contact Mr. Bob Wilson,
HNP Site Environmental Field Support, by phone at 984-229-2444, or via e-mail at
Bob.Wilsonduke-energv.com.

NPDES Permit Application Package
RA-21-0058
Page 13
l certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared
under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on
my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly
responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. l am aware that there are significant
penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment
for knowing violations.
Sincerely,
-7 _-- f. --fr.,..-� .....—
Kim E. Maza
Vice President
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant
Enclosures
cc: Mr. David Hill, Industrial NPDES Permitting Branch
Certified Mail Number: 7014 2120 0003 3196 7316
Return Receipt Requested
Mr. Scott Vinson, Water Quality Regional Operations, Raleigh Regional Office
Certified Mail Number: 7014 2120 0003 3196 7323
Return Receipt Requested

NPDES Permit Application Package
RA-21-0058
Page 14
Enclosures

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination system Permit Number NC0039586
Enclosure 1
Form 1 — General Information

EPA Identification Number
NCD991278284
NPDES Permit Number
NC0039586
Facility Name
Harris Nuclear Plant
Form Approved 03/05119
OMB No.2040-0004
Form
1
NPDES
.SEPA
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Application for NPDES Permit to Discharge Wastewater
GENERAL INFORMATION
SECTION 1. ACTIVITIES REQUIRING AN NPDES PERMIT (40 CFR 122.21(f) and (1)(1))
Activities Requiring an NPDES Permit
1.1 Applicants Not Required to Submit Form 1
1.1.1
Is the facility a new or existing publicly owned
treatment works?
If yes, STOP. Do NOT complete CI No
Form 1. Complete Form 2A.
1.1.2
Is the facility a new or existing treatment works
treating domestic sewage?
If yes, STOP. Do NOT
complete Form 1. Complete
Form 2S.
✓❑
No
1.2
1.2.1
Applicants Required to Submit Form 1
Is the facility a concentrated animal feeding
operation or a concentrated aquatic animal
production facility?
❑ Yes 4 Complete Form 1 ❑✓ No
and Form 2B.
1.2.2
Is the facility an existing manufacturing,
commercial, mining, or silvicultural facility that is
currently discharging process wastewater?
O Yes 4 Complete Form ❑ No
1 and Form 2C.
1.2.3
Is the facility a new manufacturing, commercial,
mining, or silvicultural facility that has not yet
commenced to discharge?
❑ Yes -4 Complete Form 1 0 No
and Form 2D.
1.2.4 Is the facility a new or existing manufacturing,
commercial, mining, or silvicultural facility that
discharges only nonprocess wastewater?
❑ Yes 4 Complete Form 0 No
1 and Form 2E.
1.2.5
Is the facility a new or existing facility whose
discharge is composed entirely of stormwater
associated with industrial activity or whose
discharge is composed of both stormwater and
non-stormwater?
0 Yes 4 Complete Form 1 0 No
and Form 2F
unless exempted by
40 CFR
122.26(b)(14)(x) or
b 15
SECTION 2. NAME, MAILING ADDRESS, AND LOCATION (40 CFR 122.21(f)(2))
j
is
2E
ea
z
2.1
Facility Name
Harris Nuclear Plant and Harris Energy and Environmental Center
2.2
EPA Identification Number
NCD991278284
2.3
Facility Contact
Name (first and last)
John Dills
Title
Plant Manager
Phone number
[phone]
Email address
[e-mail]
2.4
Facility Malting Address
Street or P.O. box
5413 Shearon Harris Road
City or town
New Hill
EPA Form 3510-1(revised 3-19)
I State
North Carolina
ZIP code
27562
Page 1

EPA Identification Number
NCD991278284
11
r U
a
2.5 Facility Location
NPDES Permit Number
NC0039586
Street, route number, or other specific identifier
5413 Shearon Harris Road
County name
Wake
Facility Name
Harris Nuclear Plant
County code (if known)
Form Approved 03105/19
OMB No. 2040.0004
City or town
New Hill
State
North Carolina
SECTION 3. SIC AND NAICS CODES (40 CFR 122.21(f)(3))
SIC and NAICS Codes
3.1 SIC Code(s)
4911
3.2 NAICS Code(s)
22113
Description (optional)
Electric Power Service
Description (optional)
Electric Power Generation, Nuclear
ZIP code
27562
SECTION 4. OP_ RATOR INFORMATION (40 CFR 122.21(f)(4))
4.1 Name of Operator
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
4.2 Is the name you listed in Item 4.1 also the owner?
El Yes ❑ No
4.3 Operator Status
❑ Public —federal ❑ Public —state ❑ Other public (specify)
❑ Private ✓❑ Other (specify) Public utility
4.4 Phone Number of Operator
[phone]
4.5 Operator Address
Street or P.O. Box
5413 Shearon Harris Road
City or town j State
New Hill North Carolina
Email address of operator
[e-mail]
SECTION 5. INDIIAN LAND (40 CFR 122.21(f)(5))
c
5.1 Is the facility located on Indian Land?
❑ Yes No
ZIP code
27562
EPA Form 3510-1 (revised 3.19) Page 2

EPA Identification Number NPDES Permit Number
NC09912713284 NC0039586
Facility Name
Harris Nuclear Plant
SECTION 6. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS (40 CFR 122.21(f)(6))
le a
w
Form Approved 03105/19
OMB No. 2040-0004
6.1 Existing Environmental Permits (check all that apply and print or type the corresponding permit number for each)
❑ NPDES (discharges to surface 0 RCRA (hazardous wastes) ❑ UIC (underground injection of
water) fluids)
See Attachment 1
❑ PSD (air emissions)
❑ Nonattainment program (CAA)
❑ Ocean dumping (MPRSA) ❑ Dredge or fill (CWA Section 404)
SECTION 7. MAD (40 CFR 122.21(f)(7))
7.1
O.
❑ NESHAPs (CAA)
❑ Other (specify)
Have you attached a topographic map containing all required information to this application? (See instructions for
specific requirements.)
❑� Yes ❑ No ❑ CAFO—Not Applicable (See requirements in Form 2B.)
SECTION 8. NA7URE OF BUSINESS (40 CFR 122.21(1)(8))
as
1
co
0
E
8.1 Describe the nature of your business.
The Harris Nuclear Plant (HNP) consists of a 1,016 megawatt generating unit and associated facilities. The Harris
Energy and Environmental Center (HEEC) Includes facilities that provide support services (laboratories and
training) for the HNP and other Duke Energy Progress, LLC facilities.
SECTION 9. COOLING WATER INTAKE STRUCTURES (40 CFR 122.21(f)(9))
9.1
Does your facility use cooling water?
❑� Yes ❑ No 4 SKIP to Item 10.1.
9.2
Identify the source of cooling water. (Note that facilities that use a cooling water intake structure as described at
40 CFR 125, Subparts 1 and J may have additional application requirements at 40 CFR 122.21(r), Consult with your
NPDES permitting authority to determine what specific information needs to be submitted and when.)
Harris Reservoir
SECTION 10. VARIANCE REQUESTS (40 CFR 122.21(f)(10))
10.1
CG
c
c
Do you intend to request or renew one or more of the variances authorized at 40 CFR 122.21(m)? (Check all that
apply. Consult with your NPDES permitting authority to determine what information needs to be submitted and
when.)
O Fundamentally different factors (CWA 0 Water quality related effluent limitations (CWA Section
Section 301(n)) 302(b)(2))
O Thermal discharges (CWA Section 316(a))
❑ Non -conventional pollutants (CWA
Section 301(c) and (g))
® Not applicable
EPA Form 3510.1 (revised 3.19)
Page 3

EPA Identification Number
NCD991278284
NPDES Permit Number
NO3039586
Fadlity Name
Form Approved 03415/19
OMB No 2040.0004
SECTION
11. CHECKLIST
AND
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (4
Harris Nuclear Plant
CFR 122.22(a) and (d))
11.1
In Column 1 below, mark the sections of Fomi 1 that you have completed and are submitting with your application.
For each section, specify in Column 2 any attachments that you are enclosing to alert the permitting authority. Note
that not all applicants are required to provide attachments.
Column 9
Column 2
151
Section 1: Activities Requiring an NPDES Permit
•
wl attachments
19
Section 2: Name, Mailing Address, and Location
❑ wl attachments
❑✓
Section 3: SIC Codes
•
w/ attachments
0
Section 4: Operator Information
■
wl attachments
0
Section 5: Indian Land
•
wl attachments
.
✓❑
Section 6: Existing Environmental Permits
0
wl attachments
Section 7: Map
0
matopographic wl additional attachments
o
1
El
Section 8: Nature of Business
■
wl attachments
1
19
Section 9: Cooling Water Intake Structures
0
w/ attachments
b
e
151
Section 10: Variance Requests
•
wl attachments
CO
1
m
GI
Section 11: Checklist and Certification Statement
0 w/ attachments
i
ca
11.2
Certification Statement
1 certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision
in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. l am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Name (print or type first and last name)
Kim E. Maze
Official title
Vice President
Signature
-fel,..'" fr. 7.-31L 7 co--.
Date signed
'2 / -2 V /2-i
EPA Form 3510.1 (revised 3-19)

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0039586
Enclosure 2
Form 2C — Existing Manufacturing, Commercial, Mining and Silvicultural
Operations

EPA Identification Number
NC0991278284
NPDES Permit Number
NC0039586
Facility Name
Harris Nuclear Plant
Form Approved 03/05/19
OMB No. 2040-0004
Form
2C
NPDES
6EPA
U.S Environmental Protection Agency
Application for NPDES Permit to Discharge Wastewater
EXISTING MANUFACTURING, COMMERCIAL, MINING, AND SILVICULTURE OPERATIONS
SECTION 1. OUTFALL LOCATION (40 CFR 122.21(g)(1))
1.1
Provide information on each of the facility's outfalls in the table below.
Qutfafl
Number
Receiving Water Name
Latitude Longitude
006 Harris Reservoir 35' 34' 47" N 78' 58' 07"
007 Harris Reservoir
35° 38' 34.6" N 78° 55' 45.5" W
SECTION 2. LINE DRAWING (40 CFR 122.21(g)(2))
2.1
Have you attached a line drawing to this application that shows the water flow through your facility with a water
balance? (See instructions for drawing requirements. See Exhibit 2C-1 at end of instructions for example.)
0 Yes ❑ No
SECTION 3. AVERAGE FLOWS AND TREATMENT (40 CFR 122.21(g)(3))
3.1
13
aY
For each outfafl identified under Item 1.1, provide average flow and treatment information. Add additional sheets if
necessary.
"Outfatf Number" 006
Operations Con ributing to Flow
Operation
See Attachment 4
Average Flow
mgd
mgd
mgd
mgd
Treatment Units
Description
(include size, flow rate through each treatment unit,
retention time, etc.)
Code from
Table 2C-1
Final Disposal of Solid or
Liquid Wastes Other Than
b Discha 1e
EPA Form 3510-2C (Revised 3-19)
P1

EPA Identification Number
NCD991278284
3.1
cont.
Average Flows and 3
NPDES Permit Number
NC0039586
Operation
See Attachment 4
Facility Name
Harris Nuclear Plant
**Outfall Number** 087
Operations Contributing to Flow
Average Flow
Form Approved 03105119
OMB No 2040-0004
mgd
mgd
mgd
mgd
Treatment Units
Description
(include size, flow rate through each treatment unit,
retention time, etc.)
Code from
Table 2C•1
nal Disposal of 5oiia or
Liquid Wastes Other Than
by Discharge
**Outfall Number'"
1
Operations Contributing to Flow
Operation
Average Row
mgd
mgd
mgd
Description
(include size, lbw rate through each treatment unit,
retention time, etc.)
Code from
Table 2C•1
mgd
Final Disposal of Solid or
Liquid Wastes Other Than
by Discharge
E
3.2
Are you applying for an NPDES permit to operate a privately owned treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No 4 SKIP to Section 4.
3.3
Have you attached a list that identifies each user of the treatment works?
❑ Yes ❑ No
EPA Form 3510.2C (Revised 3-19)
Par 2

EPA Idenb cation Number
NCD991278284
NPDES Permit Number
NC0039586
Facility Name
Harris Nuclear Plant
Form Approved 03)05/19
OMB No.2040 0004
SECTION
4. INTERMITTENT
FLOWS (40 CFR 122.21(g)(4))
IOutfall
idayslweek
4.1
Except for storm runoff, leaks, or spills, are any discharges described in Sections 1 and 3 intermittent or seasonal?
0 Yes 0 No 4 SKIP to Section 5.
4.2
Provide information on intermittent or seasonal flows for each applicable outfall. Attach additional pages, if necessary.
Outfall
Operation
Frec
uency
Flow
Rate
Number
(list)
Average
DayslWeek
Average
MonthslYear
Long -Term
Average
Maximum
Daily
Duration
Radwaste System
1 to 2 dayslweek
12 monthslyear
0.020 mgd
.022 mgd
0.5 days
dayslweek
months/year
mgd
mgd
days
005
dayslweek
meet's/year
mgd
mgd
days
monthslyear
mgd
mgd
days
dayslweek
months/year
mgd
mgd
days
days/veek
months/year
mgd
mgd
days
dayslweek
monthslyear
mgd
mgd
days
dayslweek
monthslyear
mgd
mgd
days
days/week
months/year
mgd
mgd
days
SECTION
5. PRODUCTION
(40
CFR 122.21(g)(5))
d
2
.2
a
a
5.1
Do any effluent
0 Yes
limitation guidelines (ELGs) promulgated by EPA under Section
0 No 4
304 of the CWA apply to your
SKIP to Section 6.
facility?
5.2
Provide the following information on applicable ELGs.
ELG Category
ELG Subcategory
Regulatory Citation
Steam Electric
Steam Electric Power Generating
40 CFR Part 423
Production•Based Limitations
5.3
Are any of the applicable ELGs expressed in terms of production
0 Yes
GI
(or other measure of operation)?
No 4 SKIP to Section 6.
5.4
Provide an actual measure of daily production expressed in terms and units of applicable ELGs.
OutfNumbell r
Operation, Product, or Material
Quantity per Day
nit of
Measure
EPA Form 3510.2C (Revised 3-19)
•.31

EPA
NCD991278284
SECTION
II
E
c
co
i
R
a
Identification
6. IMPROVEMENTS
6.1
Number NPDES Permit Number
NC0039586
(40 CFR 122.21(g)(6))
Are you presently required by any federal, state, or
upgrading, or operating wastewater treatment equipment
affect the discharges described in this application?
❑ Yes
local authority
or
Facility Name
Harris Nuclear Plant
to meet an implementation
practices or any other environmental
Form Approved 03/05/19
OMB No. 2040-0004
schedule for constructing,
programs that could
6.3.
IA No 4 SKIP to Item
6.2
Briefly identify each applicable project in the table below.
Brief Identification and Description of
Protect
Affected
Outfalls
(list outfall
number)
Source(s) of
Discharge
Final Compliance Dates
Required
Projected
6.3
Have you attached sheets describing any additional
that may affect your discharges) that you now
water pollution
have underway
No
control programs
or planned? (option! item)
(or other environmental projects
Not applicable
• Yes •
0
SECTION
7. EFFLUENT
AND INTAKE CHARACTERISTICS (40 CFR 122.21(g)(7))
instructions to determine the pollutants and parameters you are required to monitor and, in turn, the tables you must
Not all applicants need to complete each table.
0
1
OS
F
Y
i
e
as
1
is,
See the
complete.
Table A. Conventional and Non -Conventional Pollutants
7.1
Are you requesting a waiver from your NPOES
your outfalls?
permitting authority for one or more of the Table A pollutants for any of
❑ No 4 SKIP to Item 7.3.
■ Yes
7.2
If yes, indicate the applicable outfalls below. Attach waiver request
Outfall Number Outfall Number
and other required
information to the application
Outfall Number
7.3
Have you completed monitoring for all Table
requested and attached the results to this application
A pollutants at
package?
each of your outfalls for which
No; has been
a waiver has not been
requested from my NPDES
for all pollutants at all outfalls.
IN Yes
a waiver
•
permitting authority
Table B.
Toxic Metals, Cyanide, Total Phenols, and Organic Toxic Pollutants
7.4
Do any of the facility's processes that contribute
listed in Exhibit 2C-3? (See end of instructions
wastewater
for exhibit.)
fall into one or more of the
primary industry categories
7.8.
0 Yes
• No 4, SKIP to Item
7.5
Have you checked "Testing Required" for all
toxic metals,
cyanide, and total phenols in
Section 1 of Table B?
GI Yes
• No
7.6
List the applicable primary industry categories and check the boxes indicating the required GCIMS fraction(s) identified
in Exhibit 2C-3.
Primary Industry Category
Required GCIMS Fraction(s)
(Check applicable boxes.)
Steam Electric Power Plants
El Volatile O Acid 0 BaselNeutral 0 Pesticide
❑ Volatile 0 Acid 0 Base/Neutral 0 Pesticide
❑ Volatile 0 Acid 0 Base/Neutral 0 Pesticide
EPA Form 3510-2C (Revised 3-19)
Page 4

EPA Idenbficabon Number
NCD991278224
NPDES Permit Number
NC0039586
Facility Name
Harris Nuclear Plant
Form Approved 03105/19
OMB No. 2040-0004
Ised or Manufactured
Toxica Effluent and Intake Characteristics Continued
7.7
Have
GC/MS
GI
you checked "Testing Required" for all required pollutants
fractions checked in Item 7.6?
Yes
in
■
Sections 2 through 5 of Table B for each of the
No
7.8
Have
where
GI
you checked "Believed Present" or "Believed Absent" for all pollutants listed in Sections 1 through 5 of Table B
testing is not required?
Yes ❑ No
7.9
Have
required
indicated
0
you provided (1) quantitative data for those Section 1, Table B, pollutants for which you have indicated testing is
or (2) quantitative data or other required information for those Section 1, Table B, pollutants that you have
are "Believed Present" in your discharge?
Yes ❑ No
7.10
Does the applicant qualify for a small business exemption under
❑ Yes 4 Note that you qualify at the top of Table B,
then SKIP to Item 7.12.
p
the criteria specified in the instructions?
No
7.11
Have you provided (1) quantitative data for those Sections 2
determined testing is required or (2) quantitative data or an explanation
pollutants you have indicated are "Believed Present" in your
0 Yes
through
discharge?
❑
5, Table B, pollutants for which you have
for those Sections 2 through 5, Table B,
No
Table C. Certain Conventional and Non -Conventional Pollutants
7.12
Have
for
FA
you indicated whether pollutants are "Believed Present"
all outfalls?
Yes
or
•
"Believed Absent" for all pollutants listed on Table C
No
7.13
Have you completed Table C by providing (1) quantitative data
indirectly in an ELG and/or (2) quantitative data or an explanation
"Believed Present"?
El Yes
•
for those pollutants that are limited either directly or
for those pollutants for which you have indicated
No
Table D.
Certain Hazardous Substances and Asbestos
7.14
Have
all
12I
you indicated whether pollutants are "Believed Present"
outfalls?
Yes
or
•
"Believed Absent" for all pollutants listed in Table D for
No
7.15
Have
and
0
you completed Table D by (1) describing the reasons the
(2) by providing quantitative data, if available?
Yes
❑
applicable pollutants are expected to be discharged
No
Table E.
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-Dioxin
(2,3,T,B-TCDD)
7.16
Does
know
0
the facility use or manufacture one or more of the 2,3,7,8-TCDD
or have reason to believe that TCDD is or may be present
Yes 4 Complete Table E.
0
congeners listed in the instructions, or do you
in the effluent?
No 4 SKIP to Section 8.
7.17
Have
El
you completed Table E by reporting qualitative data for
Yes
TCDD?
•
No
8. USED
OR
MANUFACTURED TOXICS (40 CFR 122.21(g)(9))
8.1
Is any
an
A
pollutant listed in Table B a substance or a component
intermediate or final product or byproduct?
Yes
of
■
a substance used or manufactured at your facility as
No 4 SKIP to Section 9.
8 2
List the pollutants below.
1. See Attachment 6 4. 7.
2. 5. 8.
3. 6. 9.
EPA Form 3510-2C (Revised 3-19)
Page 5

EPA Identification Number
NCD991278284
SECTION 9. BIOLOGICAL TOXICITY
NPDES Permit Number Facility Name
NC0039586 Harris Nuclear Plant
TESTS (40 CFR 122.21(g)(11))
Form Approved 03/05119
OMB No, 2040-0004
9.1
Do you have any knowledge or reason to believe that any biological
within the last three years on (1) any of your discharges or (2)
❑ Yes
on
•
test for acute or chronic toxicity has been made
a receiving water in relation to your discharge?
No 4 SKIP to Section 10.
1—
9.2
Identify the tests and their
ourposes below.
x
Tests)
Purpose of Test(s)
Submitted to NPDES
Permitting Authority?
Date Submitted
O
H
1
■
Yes ❑ No
13
n
■
Yes
■
No
■
Yes
■
No
SECTION
10. CONTRACT
ANALYSES (40 CFR
122.21(g)(12))
10.1
Were
r
any of the analyses reported in Section 7 performed by a contract laboratory or consulting firm?
Yes 0 No -4 SKIP to Section 11.
10.2
Provide information for each contract laboratory or consulting firm below.
Laboratory Number 1
Laboratory Number 2
Laboratory Number 3
Name of laboratory/firm
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
Duke Energy Analytical
Laboratory
1
Laboratory address
9800 Kincey Ave, Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
13339 Hagers Ferry Road
Huntersville, NC 28078-7929
Phone number
[phone]
[phone]
Pollutant(s) analyzed
BOD, COD, NH3, NO3-NO2,
TKN, TP, Fecal Coliform,
VOCs, PCBs, Radiological,
Bromide, Cyanide, Phenols,
Sulfite, & Sulfide
Oil & Grease, TOC, Metals,
Fluoride & Sulfate
SECTION
11. ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
(40 CFR 122.21(g)(13))
i
11.1
Has
■
the NPDES permitting authority requested additional
Yes
information?
A
No 4 SKIP to Section 12.
1
_
A
11.2
list the information requested and attach it to this application.
1. 4.
c
0
-
2. 5.
a
3. 6.
EPA Form 3510-2C (Revised 3.19)
PageE.

EPA
N
Identification
CD99127
Number
8284
NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Harris Nuclear Plant
Form Approved 03105/19
OMB No. 2040-0004
SECTION 12. CHECKLIST AND CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (40 CFR 122.22(a) and (d))
Checklist and Certification Statement
12.1
In Column 1 below, mark the sections of Form 2C that you have completed and are submitting with your application.
For each section, specify in Column 2 any attachments that you are enclosing to alert the permitting authority. Note
that not all applicants are required to com?lete all sections or provide attachments.
Column 1
Column 2
O Section 1: Outfall Location
O wl attachments
O Section 2: Line Drawing
ID wl line drawing
✓❑ wl additional attachments
❑ Section 3: Average Flows and
Treatment
El wl attachments
wi list of each user of
0 privately owned treatment
works
❑� Section 4: Intermittent Flows
O wl attachments
✓❑ Section 5: Production
O wl attachments
✓❑ Section 6: Improvements
O w/ attachments
0
✓❑ Section 7: Effluent and Intake
Characteristics
w/ request for a waiver and
supporting information
wl small business exemption
request
p w/TableA
✓❑ wl Table C
O wl Table E
0
O
wl optional additional
sheets describing any
additional pollution control
plans
Elw! explanation for identical
outfalls
❑ wl other attachments
❑ wl Table 8
❑ wl Table D
❑ wl analytical results as an
attachment
❑ Section 8: Used or Manufactured
Toxics
D wi attachments
0
Section 9: Biological Toxicity
Tests
✓❑ wl attachments
✓❑ Section 10: Contract Analyses
O w/ attachments
O Section 11: Additional Information
O wl attachments
✓❑ Section 12: Checklist and
Certification Statement
O wl attachments
12.2
Certification Statement
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information
submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly
responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. ! am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Name (print or type first and last name)
Kim E. Maza
Official title
Vice President
Signature
--14c
Date signed
-2/a•YIal 1
EPA Form 3510-2C (Revised 3-19) Page 7

OUTFALL 006 & INTAKE DATA - TABLE A

Oac
� a
?.
E
:
z
a G)
• O Ja—
i;
c • _• w ns
co
0
a)
O
c
a
w
a
as
c
O
c!
N
3
a
0.
a)
L
O
0
r
co
r
co
N
0
C�1
v
(No
Cq
Co
ri
N
0
v
C7
co
N
co
co
co
co
Cr)
N
0
C9
N
r
ao
1-
0
0)
r-
0
M
N
CA
co
1-
r
t+�
J
an
E
a
E
m
0
O
J
a)
E
N
c*i
Cn
v
E
N
CO
0
C7
z
E
N
0
C7
OS
N
Coi
Co
ui
6
w
Concentration
Concentration
CA
as
Concentration
w
y
l5
Concentration
co
to
l0
Concentration
U
Standard Units
Standard Units
CI
❑
CI
CI
0
0
El
0
CI
r
Chemical oxygen demand (COD)
CV
Total organic carbon (TOC)
Total suspended solids (TSS)
Ammonia (as N)
O
u.
C!]
Temperature (winter)
Temperature (summer)
pH (minimum)
co
pH (maximum)

OUTFALL 006 & INTAKE DATA - TABLE B

ti
N
Et
LL
0
1n
z
1-
-J
J
0
a
0
x
0
1-
0
z
cc
0
z
J
0
z
w
z
n.
J
0
CD
w
z
0
J
w
w
2
0
X
0
F-
m
w
-J
m
F-
E
a
x
.i
a
c�
a
m
v
O
V
co
O
0
0
N
N
O
y0
N
v
0
v
10
O
V
117
ID
V
N
0
0
0
47
m
0
v
lh
co
a
0
V
N
0
q
O
v
10
0
c
V
J
c
ti
J
Co
.0
J
co
z
a
J
7
ti
n
LJ
E
J
03
3
a
0
m
a
a
9
Concentration
Concentration
a
N
m
0
8
G
0
N
N
Concentration
a
N
1E
Concentration
O
b
b
Concentration
0
N
m
Concentration
N
16
2
Concentration
El
N
m
!Concentration
Concentration
N
A
i
El
(Concentration
0
0
0
O
a
0
0
0
a
a
a
a
a
a
0
a
0
a
Antimony, total (7440-36-0)
Arsenic, total (7440-38-2)
Beryllium, total (7440-41-7)
Cadmium, total (7440-43-9)
Chromium, total (7440-47-3)
Copper, total (7440-50-8)
Lead. total (7439-92-1)
Mercury, total (7439-97-6)
Nickel, total (7440-02-0)
Selenium, total (7782-49-2)
Silver, total (7440-22-4)
tD
0

€ E 3
0
O0
O
0
0
O
V
0
0
0
V
n
N
U_
0
0
Z
F-
J
J
0
0-
0
0
1-
0
Z
0
0
0
Z
Iri
J
0
Z
w
z
r
0
1-
ui
0
Z
0
U_
X
O
1-
m
W
0
H
E W
7 =
Z
co
t.))
0
O
0
E1 • 22
• oft
E
✓ • gscr
g Q v
N
0
V
1,1
O
0
V
O1
0
0
Ci
O
CG
O
0
0
V
O
O
0
M
Y
0
I0
V
0
V
0
V
0
V
0
N
V
0
V
0
N
V
m
0
O
V
0
V
O
V
1f)
Ia
O
V
0
N
V
01
O
v
V
W
N
{'7
O
V
0
N
V
N
M
0
V
O
N
V
0)
N
t7
0
0
V
al
M
0
V
E
E
OI
E
Concentration
0
0
0
CL
0
0
0
0
0
Thallium, total (7440-28-0)
Zinc, total (7440-66-6)
Cyanide, total (57-12-5)
O
0
d
u7
01
01
3
Ca
0
O
12
m0
O
U
Concentration
Concentration
N
A
Concentration
N
A
2
Concentration
0
2
0
C
Concentration
i
0
0
•12
0
0
0
U
a
LL
a
a.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Acrolein (107-02-8)
Acrylonitrile (107-13-1)
Benzene (71-43-2)
Bromotorm (75-25-2)
Carbon tetrachloride (56-23-5)
Chlorobenzene (108-90-7)
Chloroethane (75-00-3)
CV
N
N
Q
hl
N
ID
N
n
N
m
CV

�—
z a`
FE E 3
se j
v
o
v
0
v
0
v
0
,
0
v
2
E 0
za
v
Y
E
EE t 2 2
p 1
C1
E I rp
a 0
i Q
u0i
V
7
NO
O
v
V
01
NO
O
v
V
Q�
1N1
O
v
n0i
V
<0.329
<2.0
01
CM
0
v
N
V
0
M
0
v
N
V
01
N
0
v
N
V
<0.329
<1.0
10
(0
0
v
N
V
<0 329
<2.0
Q1
N
0
v
N
V
py
el
O
v
N
V
01
in
O
v
IC POLLUTANTS (40 CFR 12
Units
(spectry)
Concentration
7
3
7
3
7
7
3
Mass
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
Mass 1
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
(0
2
yE
�]
gft.)C
0.0
O
pig�
Mass
Concentration
N
N
3
yyE
p
C0
Mass
Concentration Ii
in
N
ye
in
N
O
e
C
Mass
Concentration
$
0
m
a 0
m
3
t
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
117
o�
O1
IMF
0
4
co
r-
O
0
O
N
0
0
0
1 1-dichloroethane ;15-34-3
0
0
1 2-di hloroethane i 107-06-2
F)
0
0
1,1-d chloroethylene 4'5-35-4)
0
3
1,2-dichloropropane (78-87-5)
u,
0
(0
CV
0
0
Ethylbenzene (100-41-4)
N
C7
Methyl bromide (74-83-9)
M
0
J
Methyl chloride (74-87-3)
0
Methylene chloride (75-09-2)
0
N
CV

is C O
y
Number
of
Analyses
e
r
r
r
r
e-
r
r
r
r
r
r
pl
iiW p�
C€ a
3 h aC;
O
v
O
v
o
v
OcoOin
V
o
Y
O
v
O
V
0
v
0o
V
V
Y
co
Y
p
1.a
Y
~'
'ElQ
[V
t a
1 I
E O
s C
2<
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
€ aaE.1
� i g
a a
Maximum
Monthly
Discharge
(if available)
E
'=
t
a
N
N
O
O
y
No
fO
Ci
Ol]ONc!
N
N
G
V
as
O
V
N
(7OO
O
V
N
O
V
<0.329
0
0m0
V
N
C
0
V
<0.824
O
O
V
V
to
O
O
y
co
v
O
6
V
l<8.236
ce
U
Q
cn
V-
Z
C
. v
p
Q
U
01
7
CaO1
7
7
3
ugIL
Of
7
7
Ot
3
t
7
C7
7
m
7
Concentration
coTC
Concentration
i6
p
C
p
N
Concentration
IE
Concentration
t0
Concentration 1
00
'Concentration
Mass
'Concentration 1
co
'Concentration '
l6
'Concentration '
Mass
C
2
O
(Mass
'Concentration
a)
OLS, AND ORGANIC T•
Presence or Absence
(check one)
21
a`
o
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
]d
CI
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
W
T
a
a
a
1
Z
0
U)
Q
1-a
wr
0
X
4
C �1
a
a
0
a
a
0
a
a
0
a
a
0
Poi€utantUParameter
(and CAS Number, if
available)
c
a
a
a
I-
g C`
F 5.14.
Toluene (108-86-3)
a}2 c
d
a
L.
N
p
c-
c 6
OLc)
1 1 1-tnchloroethane
(71-55-6)
1 1 2-tnchloroethane
(79-00-5)
Trichloroethylene (79-01-6)
Vinyl chlonde (75-01-4)
12-chlorophenol (95-57-8)
2,4-dichlorophenol
(120-83-2)
c—
v
a.
0 •
'O
N
)
tN
coN
Q
2,4-dinitrophenol (51-28-5)
m
J
CO
4
F
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
[V
N
N
N co
N
r
C7
N
ri
{'7
ri
Q
N
to
N

r-
0
Z
a
J
0
a
0
0
F
U_
C
4
0
0
a
4
cri
J
0
Z
a
J
a
0
F
1u
0
Z
}
0
to
ra-
w
U
i<
a
m
W
J
fb
V
J
3
Concentration
v
co
vV
N
2
0
0
tp
O
O
v
Concentration
CO
V
t/1
uv
5
0
1ri
O
V1
V
01
7
Concentration
m
0
V
R
2
O
0
v
0
C
0
,
5
0
0
0
Cr?
0
ui
v
0
O
ci
v
Concentration
0
v
ro
i
0
0
0
N
73 eh
CO
0 OS
t v
a
O
ri
v
O
v
0
Concentration
CO
V
In
N
5
0
v
cri
0
1[i
v
0
v
v
1ri
v
0
I0
v
O
V
c0
O
O
1f!
V
N
W
Y
V7
V
Ns.
N
tD
O
v
O
0
en
v
a
N
0
V
O
V
J
01
0
7
c
0
a en
c
t
,�
Concentration
Concentration
N
O
2
0
V
0
O
0
to
0
2
L
c
0
N
16
5
Concentration
en
R
i
0
12
CI
0
0
J
Benzidine (92-87-5)

E't.
3 63
z11:
,
r
.
•
r
r
r
r
r
F
1-
¶-
r
S
J - 1 ;
a
cl
1fi
V
O
tri
v
O
ui
v
o
V
0
ui
v
o
tri
v
O
Li
v
G
to
v
o
in
v
O
ui
v
O
v;
V
<5.0
o
vi
v
n
L
[V
ct
Number of
Analyses
Long -Term
Average
Daily
Discharge
(if available)
Maximum
Monthly
Discharge
(if available)
I gl
m
V
v
C
V
V
am
G
v
LS
V
mv
O
v
o
V
m
r
v
V
v
m�
O
v
,
V
v
O
v
,
V
W�mN
O
v
,
V
v
C
V
,
V
v
am
o
V
V
v
O
V
i
V
' <0.824
o
ui
V
<0.824
ui
V
v
m
C
V
U
o
co
Q
-
al
U
r•
C
Jp1
3
_1p
7
_
7
J
p1
7
-1
7
J
_1
7
_1
7
7
-1
7
_o J1
7
_1
7
7
Concentration
Mass
,Concentration
IR
m
i
Concentration
in
m
TC
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
tn
a
.2
IConcenlralion
Mass
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
en
en
ea
2
'Concentration'
Mass
'Concentration
Mass
'Concentration
Mass
Concentration
Mass
'Concentration
in
m
22
H
Q
o
a
N
o
0
o
r�
a
o
3
CI
0
o
a
I i
a
1
1
.1;3
rl
L]
J
L]
L.1
L.1
d
0
CI
o
w
_
a
J
rl
.
n
0
0
i
7
7
'7
i7
CI
0
0
0
n
OXIC METALS, CYANIDE, TOT
PollulantlParameter
(and CAS Number, if available)
3,4-benzofluoranthene
(205-99-2)
Benzo (ghi) perylene (191-24-2)
Benzo (k) fluoranthene (207-08-
9)
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
(111-91-1)
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether (111-44-
4)
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
(102-80-1)
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (117-
81-7)
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether (101
55-3)
Butyl benzyl phthalate (85-68-7)
2-chloronaphthalene (91-58-7)
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
(7005-72-3)
Chrysene (218-01-9)
Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene (53-70-
3)
m
w
_I
m
Q
F
r-
V;
v
CQ
a
en
v
o
v
r
v
eu
v
cn
v
r
v
o
r
v
o
r
a
ti
f
v
m
r
4
O7

_
E•1
z
,-
r
T
,-
r
61 i I 3
IO
V
o
v
0
v
0
v
o
v
a
v
p
V
o
v
o
v
0
v
N
N
0
0
EO 'Way
6
a4
z
"
T
r
r
r
T
0a 13
°L.-
fo W
EA.
1 U
avv
a
O
V
N
C
a
V
c.,::,
O
V
CO
Ov
aco
V
m
O
V
<0.824
<5.0
N
O
co
•ix
V
N
C
p
V
<0.824
<5.0
N
O
vv
a
V
N
O
v
T
p
V
<0.824
<5.0
N
G
v
a
V
N
co
O
v
V
F
Z
m A
-J =
a
c..)
ti
3
7
J
7
ti
3
7
J
-
ti
7
LJ
7
J
=,
J
a=
J
3
1
7
W.
p
0
O
a)
v
N
2
c
yCtl�
s]
U
Mass
Concentration
ccS
i
O
C
U
Mass
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
on
co 2
0
C
0
N
as
s
e
C
U
Mass
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
mcu
as
0
G
0
Mass
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
11
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a
0
E
c+ 6
N US
0
c
N
N
0
0
IA
ti
N
❑
0
co
0
as
as
a
as
N
0
O
C7
0
0
L
0
v
0
0
7 a
N
7

2 §
Ia
� t t
,_
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
.
.-
-
.
A 2 lI
J>
R
v
,
o
v
o
2
g
9
g
2
.
e
-
o
v
.
0,
v
o
f
o
9
o
-
I <5.0
2
v
\
.
§
e
kr
z
@
S
a.
/
]
]
_
\$$
/
§
/
a
c
\
u
/
§
u
/
CLi
-I
2
i
§
z3
_
-
.
r
-
-
_
-
.
r
-
-
_
E
i't2A§
�� 2C.
E -_
m . as
■�E0.
-
§ 2' o2
§ a —§
o x g
■ o *
a
§
<0.824
o
v;
©
A
R
v
•§
§
-
g
9
0
e
©
7
v
2
v
§
§
<0.824
°
V
-
CO
2
V
-
g
9
0
o#
V
©
V?
in§§
-
sr
CO
9
§
$
0
$
$
_l
9
I
ƒ
-I
0
-
?
_I
ƒ
u
f
$
a
0
.J
9
Concentration
(Mass
(Concentration
2
Concentration
2
'Concentratioj
2
(Concentration I
2
'Concentration
Mass
1Concentratio j
Mass
.
$
0
z
'Concentration
Mass
Concentration
k
'Concentration
k
'Concentration'
Mass
'Concentration'
Mass
§
$
2 -
2 I
8
v
a
8
e
v
e
o
_
El
CI
S
8
3�
f
0
O
a
O
0
0
O
la
0
0
0
Elz
■ 2
2 g
re£
Q
a
O
O
o
O
O
v
o
o
v
v
n
PollutantlParameter
(and CAS Number, if
available)
Hexachlorobenzene
(118-74-1)
Hexachlorobutadiene
(87-68-3) 11
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
(77-47-4)
Hexachloroethane
(67-72-1)
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene
(193-39-5)
Isophorone
(78-59-1)
Naphthalene
(91-20-3)
Nitrobenzene
(98-95-3)
N-nitrosodimelhylamine
(62-75-9)
IN-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
(621-64-7)
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
(86-30-6)
Phenanthrene
(85-01-8)
@
a
a�
CI
¥
g
ke
q
-
R
¥
§
#
Cl.
R
¥
9
-
-
V.
sr
V.
-
V.
-
k
sr

(Mass I I <0.824 I I I I I
utral Compounds)
Concentration uglL <0.050 1 <0.050 1
Mass <0.008
Concentration uglL <0.050 1 <0.050 1
Mass <0.008
Concentration ug!L <0.050 1 <0.050 1
Mass <0.008
0
o
o
0
o
c
S
¢
<0.050
0
0
o
0
0
o
0
0
a
<0.050 I
G
o
9
o
o
9$
S
o
0
0
f
0
©
9
<0.082
<0.050
$§
9
o
v
<0.008
<0.050
0 0
$¢
B
0
<0.008
<0.050
0
�
.
c
.
%
.
.
=
•
.
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
In
III 2
2
)
k
Mass
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
.
d
e
@
0
0
@
0
B
e
o
O
O
o
CI
O
0
0
O
O
0
o
0
O
0
0
\ @ 0.
§ EES
�z 2
G.z2 2 £
u �� £-§
o `v■ .co
j J\ $§ ¥
\ �� __ 2<0
2
$o
k2
&e
6
��
�E
E
si cli
�e
/
§2
�a
§#
I�
§�
¥a
§�
�k
laE
alb 9
7�$�
aE
§$
2
k�
'0¢
��
§-
2 al
a.
m ■
« (0
-
w
6
n
k
,r
6
in
I
co
6
N-
6
co
a
c
e
ui
§

2�
a
EE 1
2 4
.-
r
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
,
,-
-
-
.
& &§
-I 2 §
«
°
\
S
§
S
§
S
§
,
<0.050
°
\
S
¢
S
6
S
<0.50
S
f
S
?
S
?
\
1-7
•-
\
u
I
R
Number of
Analyses
Long -Term
Average
Daily
Discharge
(if available)
E 2, § 2
22 a
s o&
,
,
&
®aij
2 8 I a
■ 0 -
<0.050
<0.008
2
$
<0.008 I
<0.050
8
g
9
m
g
9
<0.008
S§
q
9
R
<0.050
§
q
9
S
d
0.1
R
G
<0.082
S
6
<0.082
G
d
-
<0.082
2
$
o
9
8
I <0.082
SCO
"
9
9
z
g
.a.
k
�u
}
a
u
ƒ
_
=
¥
g
.
J
$
.
. .
-I
$
ug1L
$
J
f
.
.
-I
a
.
-I
ƒ
$
J
Co
g
.
.
Concentration
2
,Concentration
(Mass
Concentration
2
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
2
Concentration
2
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
Mass
IConcentralion
Mass
Concentration
2
Concentration
Mass
§
j
Mass
Concentration
2
/
\
3
�\
to
§
2
1
2
8
El
El
El
-
El
El
El
El
El
8
El
-
f
Q
2
0
0
0
0
0
El
El
CI
.
0
0
^L.-■
E
;a
2
r IZ 1
O
0
0
CI
0
0
El
El
El
0
0
B. TOXIC METALS, C
Pollutant/Parameter
(and CAS Number, if
available)
}�
\
Endosutfan sulfate
(1031-07-8)
c\
�NI �
Endrtn aldehyde
(7421-93-4)
Heptachlor
(76-44-8)
Heptachlor epoxide
(1024-57-3)
PCB-1242
(53469-21-9)
PCB-1254
(11097-69-1)
PCB-1221
(11104-28-2)
JR
--
�\
PCB-1248
(12672-29-6)
PCB-1260
(11096-82-5)
PCB-1016
(12674-11-2)
@
/
a
d
a
w
,
�
u)
�
m
e
a
d
cv
n
w
§
N|
d

N
r
CC
LL
U
a
z
r
J
0
0-
0
0
U_
z
Q
0
z
05
.-J
O
z
W
z
J
0
W
0
z
}Q
U
J
w
U
0
th
w
r
m
z a
ijij
lizgf
..1271
0. 14
J G
:Tp
Uy
Elam
g
i
vo
to
0
v
O
0
O
0
ci
v

OUTFALL 006 & INTAKE DATA - TABLE C

n
Cr
N
c�+t
V
(n
z
J
J
0
d
J
z
0
z
w
z
0
z
0
z
z
z
0
F--
z
LU
z
0
0
z
w
to
U
w
-J
CO
E
Z <
E t a
• o• .= co
a
g
m L
C -3
2
7 m
�
4�_
K
m
• m
m
w
m
G a
I- a
F-
o • G
> j
8
8
m C
o
2
a
• L
m d
a m
8 8
0 c
v
c c
}° o
}
N
3 �
o
d L
o
c 2
m m
• ' co
N_ U
m
o
,. o
•C
� m
u 2 2
o o
U U
m 0
IV
o o
m
CO • CO
is To—
m
> s
.9 .2
.Ct
d
U V
❑ ❑
•
10
O
0
V
1
N
Y
O
0
O
U7
O
f'9
z
Z
Kl
O
n
O
CO.
017
N
N
N
m
h
10
N
1
0
J
en
E
A
aa
CFUI100 mi.
E
z
E
Z
OI
E
E
a
E
J
OI
E
E
0
15
c
0
0
N
M
l6
0
c
8
0
N
Concentration
Concentration
Concentration
Concentration
y
CO
Concentration
N
N
A
Concentration
co
14
2
Concentration
W
to
2
Concentration
Concentration
❑
❑
0
❑
0
0
13
❑
0
0
0
0
O
0
•
N
0
0
Nf
Fecal Coliform
Ip
11.
0
0
0
2Z
o
Z o
Oil and Grease
0
co
01
co
0) O T

_
z
E15
a I
z a
T
r
r-
r
r
r_
r,
r,
—
8-
Iptt�
a
o
g
o
0.103 1
Q
0.051
V
o
T
o
V
I 0.121
0
Q
1 <0.005
Number of
Analyses
r
T
r
r
T
T
r
T
r
0
Long -Term
Average
Daily
Discharge
(if available)
Maximum
Monthly
Discharge
(if available)
7
N
N
Maximum
Daily
Discharge
(required)
p8
Ol
ar0
•
0
Ca
.
in
—
tT
C1
N
g1p
N
0.268
co
N
I°
_
G
Lil
�D
1 <0.005
cv
co
,— ce
v
S
G
Ip
G
N
Q
N
r
O
l—
N
O
G
c°
O
r
C
0
Qy
y
O
U
Q
—
v
w
z
-
J
a1
J
E
J
E
..
J
E
..1
E
J
3
J
E
J
E
—
'
J
E
mg 7L
J
E
I
J
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
Mass
Concentralion
Mass
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
'Concentration 1
Mass
'Concentration 1
Mass
'Concentration
'Concentration
(Concentration
Mass
Concentration
Mass
'Concentration
J
a
=
uyo
J
Q
Zea
0
u�l
tig
cn
�l
u
H1
z
o
0
❑
❑
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
0
0
0
!ZI'
�
❑0
0
0
0
❑
0
0
1
PollutantlParameter
(and CAS Number, If
available)
Sulfite (as SO3)
(14265-45-3)
Surfactants
Aluminum, total
(7429-90-5)
Barium, total
(7440-39-3)
Iron, total
(7439-89-6)
Magnesium, total
(7439-95-4)
Molybdenum, total
(7439-95-4)
Manganese, total
(7439-96-5)
Tin, total
(7440-31-5)
Titanium, total
(7440-32-6)
Z
w
Z
0
U
Z
a
W
w N
2 co
U
0
c
2g
ca
Q4
J
m y
U v
m
rr
we I•-
r
II—
N
N
NQ
N
F.

0
z
z
z
z
z
z
cc
z
z
Q
z
z
a
z
0
m
ti
0
v
z
N
CD
ui
Z
0
M
v
z
co
v
z
J
U
0
(Concentration
Concentration
N
14
Concentration
N
Ip
Concentration
❑
0
0
a
0
s
v
m
Radium, total
Radium 226 total

OUTFALL 006 & INTAKE DATA - TABLE D

N
CC
IL
U
0
0
H
w
0
z
W
0
Z
fJ3
O
0
N
T
z
re
!lJ
U
J
m
1-
3 t
�$a
0
a W
0.
Insulation used on piping or other equipment (Trace amounts)
0
0
N
0
Z
0)
ea
0
a
0
0
0
8
Ta
7.
P)
0
0
Ti
.0
0
V
0
CI
0
io
0
N
W
0
!c
0
CI
h
0
0
Benzyl chloride
0
0
a)
ca
U
QI
0
0
E
R
m
0
0
0
N
0.
0
1
0
0
ID
0
[V
0
0
C
0
as
U
t7
0
CI
Carbon disulfide
0
0
C
00
0
Y7
0
0
N
0
L
o.
co
0
0
cp
0
0
0
0
0
CI
Crotonaldehyde
0
0
x
x
0
0
ai

t
a
0
a
0
re
c
O.
0
0
0
❑
0
❑
0
0
0
0
0
El
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
❑
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
GI
0
2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid)
0
E
8
O
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
U
'C
0
0
2
0.
0
0
0
11
0
2
0
z
0
G
E
0
T.
0 d
0
0
c
E
L
E
O_
Dintrobenzene
cr
0
0
w
0
C
0
0
'C
a
0
0
0
!L
0
Lu
Ethylene diamine
Ethylene dibromide
Formaldehyde
0
ti
N M Q tri fy co a; G fV �'�1 {O 11 d>
N N N N N N N N N re; el M M M el M M M

ti
N
N
N
lL
U
0
0
w
0
z
Lu
0
z
m
U)
❑
0
0
z
a
w
LLJ
W
J
CO
O
Q
O
t
C7
0
❑
m
0
0
❑
❑
Isopropanolamine
0
0
to
OJ
0
❑
c
0
a
0
O
co
to
0
Mercaptodimethur
a
0
0
0
t
x
0
0
0
Methyl mercaptan
v
0
0
Methyl methacrylate
0
0
Methyl parathion
of
0
0
0.
w
0
0
J
0
0
Monoethyl amine
I0
0
Monomethyl amine
1
0
0
N
l6
z
0
0
Naphthenic acid
0
Nitrotoluene
0
s
ro
a
n
uD

Available Quantitative Data
(specify units]
.---
-
1
-
,
-
None
a
{
I
. (40 CFR 122.21{g}(7)(v))1
Reason Pollutant Believed Present in Discharge
1 .
I'
1
1
Trace amounts occasionally present in oil used to fuel auxillary boilers
Trace amounts occasionally present in oil used to fuel auxiliary boilers
0
F...
c
LLI
al
a
n
Presence or Absence -
I(check one)
Believed
Absent
0
0
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
n
0
0
0
0❑❑
C
a
W
Z
z
m
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
n
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
0
0
E
m
cn
a
0
n
Cr-
a
N
z
z
a
i
�
w
0
�
ill
I J
I CO
a
c
IS
c
0.
Phenolsulfonate
Phosgene
Propargite
Propylene oxide
Pyrethrins
5
'5
0
Resorcinol
Strontium
c_
c
u
Z.
rn
Styrene
2,4,5-T (2,4,5-
trichlorophenoxyacetic acid)
FIDE (tetrachlorodiphenyl ethane)
2,4,5-TP [2-(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)
propanoic acid]
ITrichlorofon
ITriethanolamine
a
,c(1)
E
5,
s
d
H
ITrimethylamine
E
c
fil
3
Vanadium
CO
rn
0)
u�
C
10
�o
N
(0
M
m
QS'
m
fp
m
):
(0
00
cocci
0)
ea
O
n
is
N
ti
M
n
P.
In
N.
40
N.

Available Quantitative Data
(specify units)
0
c
0
Z
S {40 CFR 122.21(g)(7){v))1
Reason Pollutant Believed Present in Discharge
Trace amounts occasionally present in oil used 0 fuel auxiliary boilers
TANCES AND ASBESTO
Presence or Absence
(check one)
Believed
Absent
3
0
0
❑
Believed
Present
7
❑
❑❑
•
•
.�
.,
CO
a
1—
C
19
p
a
77. IVinyl acetate
78. Xylene
O
co
X
0;
180. 'Zirconium
N
0
a
O
C
N
0
a
N
y
T
cc
co
G)
LO
C7
LL
U
v
12)
C ..
� m
MI T
• N
7 •
O N
aT
O.
tU
• b
E
ai c
0
E
3
c
43,
E w
n u)
m•
0
L
7 O
z
.y L
C C1
N
lG
• .0
C
• 7
'el InE
• 1-
CD d
O n
C
.a II
• LL
U U
cco
`• m
C
a
Ca
O
U
714
.0
113
C
e
E E
cl) c`o
n

OUTFALL 006 & INTAKE DATA - TABLE E

ti
CI
N
N
L
0
0
0
m
ti
ri
r+i
Z
0
0
N
Z
W
El
CC
cr
0
J
0
Q'
H
W
co
ti
l'7
N
W
W
-J
co
0
0
0
b
a
2
5
c
0
N
d
E
a
c
m
0
O.
0
N
W
7
O
O.
N
T
0
{0
m
1.
CO
CC
U.
0
0
0
a
c
m
0
n
O.
0
0
0
N
E
m
0 M
N
O
m �
• U.
O 0
> 0
v
N a
C
N @
>. C
d .D
3 v
7
• c
O
01 0
‘ry
�o
▪ z
m m
V
7 (p
pC -13
U a
d N
L
W N
s a
N l0
C U
E U-
m 0
En 0

OUTFALL 007 - TABLE A

�a
c
0
a
0
to
B
c
Number of
Analyses
ICheck here if you have applied to your NPDES permitting authority for a waiver for all of the pollutants Listed on this table for the noted outfall.
Long Term
Average
Value
22.21(g)(7)(iii))'
Outfall 007
Number of
Analyses
co
I—
CD
r
CO
CO
N
ti
Go
CD
r
us
Long -Term
Average Daily
Discharge
(if available)
gri
O
r
g
cis
N
O
"
cm
O
N
0
1•
O
COO
Maximum
Monthly
Discharge
(if available)
Maximum
Daily
Discharge
(required)
co
fp
r
to
v
Ilb/Day + <52.1
M
co
O
co
CrD
co
G
mg-N/L 0.072
p
O
eki
O
G
�
—
O
m
co
N•
O
6
r
LL re
2
a
a.
J
�
00
E
T
❑
J
E
`
Ol
9v
a
J
co
7ti as
a
T
ef!
e
0
0
o
7
u)
3
oi
Concentration
40
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
Mass
0
-
ro
c
8
Mass
Concentration
W
Standard Units
Standard Units
a
o
Z
z
o
.a
��
a,0) ere
3 C'Q
a,_
�-
0
❑
0
0
El
❑
❑
❑
❑
U
z
0
z
0
z
Q
J
z
0
z
w
z
0
U
a
w
J
r+
G
.9
3
a
Biochemical oxygen demand
(BOD5)
Chemical oxygen demand (COD)
Total organic carbon (TOC)
Total suspended solids (TSS)
Ammonia (as N)
Flow
Temperature (winter)
Temperature (summer)
pH (minimum)
pH (maximum)
4
m
1
0
r I
N I
!rd
6
to
1�

OUTFALL 007 - TABLE B

E$�
E
Z
n
N
eNi
CC
U
0
F-
z
J
J
0
U
X
0
U
z
cc
0
z
vi
0
z
w
T
a
-J
0
F-
w
0
2
U
vi
J
w
w
0
O
ti
m
w
J
CO
1-
1
n
w
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
V
CV
0 G
0 N
v •
O V
c
0
CV
0 O
0 V
v
pN
O
O V
vo
O C
p
$ v
O
p V
v
pp
O C
O O
c v
O 4
C r
o
Q
I.
Q
r
V
O
0
0
v
V
Q
.•.
0
v
a,
7,
to
d
a a
7.
m =1
co
Q =
S.
m �l
CI 01
a =
7.
m GI
CI co
co
a =
7.
m
0,
a E
a.
m CI
0 m
a z
a,
m �1asf
a z
A
a =.o
7+
to
Q
!
co
0
7.
0
C
a
co
=
y.
Q
0
a
'Concentration
c
a
E
C
0 C
,o
U
c
0
!
C
0 C
2 U
c
0
!
E
0 C
2 U
c
0
E
C
N C
2 0
c
0
6
C
n 8.
0 C
2 U
c
0
C
8
M C
2 U
c
0
1
C
a 8
a C
2 U i
c
0
E
on 8
Le C
2 U
,n
W
i
c
0
C
8
C
U
a
CO
2
c
0
C
8
C
U
,n
to
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
a
O
0
0
0
Antimony, total (7440-36-0)
Arsenic, total (7440-38-2)
Beryllium, total (744041-7)
Cadmium, total (7440-43-9)
Chromium, total (7440-47-3)
Copper, total (7440-50-8)
Lead, total (7439-92-1)
Mercury, total (7439-97-6)
Nickel, total (7440-02-0)
Selenium, total (7782-49-2)
Silver, total (7440-22-4)
H
r
Cr
0
•

Intake
(Optional)
' (spunodmo3 eINeMASIV130) Ittlnitrigod alxoi *patio uopoesl
V
E•' c
z .
e € l l
J~a>
Y
Y
1 y
E 8
3 e
r
1,-.4
g
I 4 2m
co
0 .!2 a
a Q
g
e u l0
O
vy
v
O
O
vo
O
�j
v
o
O
o
Q
v
N
0
p
o
v
O
v
.
0
o
V
O
[V
v
<0.0004
<2.0
c
$
O
o
V
O
N
v
<0.0004
O
N
v
0
o
V
ti
Li
N
g
6 5
o g g
5 0 `-'
N
0
v
<0.00004
N
O
o
O
0
o
<0.0080
N
o
O
c
o
N
o
o
v
O
O
o
co
°.
CON
ea
o
?.
a
o
3
T
R
a
3+
A
.0
ug!L
T
16
.
c
a
T
^
.0
co
o
T
Q
o
IT
POLLUTANTS (40 CFR 12
Units
(specify)
Concentration 1 uglL
CI
E.0
04l
E
N
a
I mg!L
IC
.0
Concentration
N
i
cy
U
0
y
m
2
Concentration
N
A
2
e
0
pcy
fl
o
0
N
2
(Concentration
IA
2
(Concentration
y
CCP
5
(Concentration
y
m
2
(Concentration
Mass
m
(Concentration
rocoN
i
(Concentration 1
Mass
'Concentration
o
v
o
0
0
©
0
r
Presence or Absence
(check one) !I
II�
0
o
0
0
CI
0
0
0
0
❑
0
0
as
c
ffi' rt
1-
o
0
o
0
Acrolein (107-02-8)
Acrylonitrile (107-13-1)
Benzene (71-43-2)
Bromoform (75-25-2)
Carbon tetrachloride (56-23-5)
n
0
01
m
o
m
c
ill
G
01
d
O
v
Chlorodibromomethane
(124-48-1)
Chloroethane (75-00-3)
i-
•
.
1
_
Pollutant/Parameter
(and CAS Number, if available)
Thallium, total (7440-28-0)
Zinc, total (7440-66-6)
Cyanide, total (57-12-5)
�O
y
a
a..
N
N
N
P7
N
Y
N
in
N
to
N
Is-
N
m
N
m
w
_1
m
a
I-
N
T
M
Y ^
in
r

W
Y
eO
Number
of
Analyses
i'
7
.6E12
ti
r.
N
Number of
Analyses
r
T
r
r
,_
_
r
r
T
FrIa & 2
; ` a m
J Q v
E�
E _
4
§1o
Maximum
Daily
Discharge
(required)
0
u'J
V
-
0
0
0
V
ri
rl
0.0007
0$
N
V
C
0
O
V
0
N
V
C
80
0
O
v
N
V
<0.0004
0
N
V
<0.0004
0
N
V
v
8
0
C
v
a
N
V
n
?
0
V
0$
r
V
N
0
p
V
0
N
V
<0.0004
0
N
V
<0.0004
0
N
V
<0.0004
0
N
V
<0.0004
h
N
U
C.
Lo
CI
z D
a ..
M
J
J
O
a
U
Caemege�2.eEnQ�e0QcoQcaQm1.
.
r
a.0
r
3
a
=
Q
3
a
E
n
3_a
=
.a
a
Q
CO
a
Concentration
N
to
i
Concentration
N
co
i
Concentration
N
co
i
Concentration
N
os
2
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
y
to
i
Concentration
Mass
'Concentration
Mass J
Concentration
S, AND ORGANIC TOXI
Presence or Absence
(checJt one)
ai
a
❑
CI
0
0
a
a
0
0
a
0
a
0
2 g
Aa
GI
a
0
0
❑
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
z r1
w , a
a
a
a
a
0
a
a
0
0
0
a
0
Cl
a
Pollutant/Parameter
(and CAS Number, if available)
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
(110-75-8)
Chloroform (67-66-3)
Dichlorobromomethane
(75-2 -4)
1 1-dichloroethane (75-34-3)
N
eh
4
0
m
c
m
4
2
a
7
N
r
1 1-dichloroethylene (75-35-4)
1 2-dichloropropane (78-67-5)
1 3-dichloropropylene
(542 5-6
Ethylbenzene (100-4 -4
Methyl bromide (74-83-9)
Methyl chloride (74-87-3)
Methylene chloride (75-09-2)
1,1,2,2- tetrachloroethane
(79-34-5)
m
J
m
Q
i
N
0
N
r
N
N
*—
d
VI
*-
'1
Q
r
N
us
*.
f0
co01
N
N
0
N
N
r
N
N

Number
of
Analyses
'Section 3.Organic Toxic Pollutants (GC/MS Fraction - Acid Components) I
3ra�
Outfatl 007
1
C W
G
Z t
T
T
T
T
T
Long -Term
Average
Daily
Discharge
(if available)
Maximum
Monthly
Discharge
(if available)
Maximum
Daily
Discharge
(required}
O
N
V
O
C.
V
o
T
V
<0.0002
o
N
V
O
0
C
v
o
LV
V
<0.0004
a
N
V
0
G
V
o
N
V
<0.0004
o
N
V
p
o
G
V
o
0
V
<0.001
a
Y7
V
Q
O
o
V
o
O
V
<0.002
o
O
V
NO
a
O
V
o
D
V
O
o
O
V
n
'j'
f
i
LJ
a
n3
CO
a
uglL
COCO
a
>.
W
a=
T
al
a
[
3
T
0
a
}.
m
-
7
>.
ppN
3
7.0Ch
N
03
DI
19
Concentration
to
Concentration
10
Concentration
N
Concentration
I0
Concentration
Mass
E
G
C
N
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
N
Concentration
N
Concentration
N
Concentration
N
e
E.
8tyI��
N
OLS, AND ORGANIC T,
Presence or Absence
(check one}
o
o
a
a
a
i
a
o
0
o
0
a
o
v
o
a
o
v
o
o
a
o
a
w x ri
a. ffi
a g
F- re
0
a
a
o
0
0
o
a
o
0
0
0
0
I-
LI
o
Z
a,B
ui J Z
CC
U d ea
oN
1-
.92
L
'5 m
I. ...
(Toluene (108-88-3)
1,2-trans-dichloroethylene
(156-60-5)
co
0
u7
T" e�-
T ..`.. -
1,1,2-trichloroethane
(79-00-5)
Trichloroethylene (79-01-6)
Vinyl chloride (75-01-4)
I2-chlorophenol(95-57-8)
2,4-dichlorophenol
(120-83-2)
S
L
E'
a
(V .T..
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
(534-52-1)
2,4-dinitrophenol (51-28-5)
m
_1
J
0
Q
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
r
N
VI
M

z
ti
8
0
z
i
lalg
y
1 1
13
ig
c E
ZCn To
UW
0
v
0
V
to
O
0
v
J
Of
0
0
V
}
os
24.
❑
0
v
E
O
0
0
0
0
v
C
0
V
0
0
V
J_
0
0
0
V
❑
0
v
-J
co
0
0
.0
Concentration
0
0
N
of
Concentration
0
2
0
ti
Concentration
0
2
❑
0
0
Fr`1
O 1
o s
Km
to
M
Concentration
1b
ta
5
0
a
a
0
0
0
0
O
L Nl
ro !G
C W
am
Concentration
0
N
2
Q1
O
Concentration
H
co
5
a
C1
m
co
o
H
0
V
0
V
0
11
V
0
0
0
V
4
*0
V
0
0
0
0
v
0
0
V
ui
V
0
O
V
4
ui
V
8
V
2
rn
❑
.0
J_
0
R
3
7
0
R
0
0
C1
7
R
0
Concentration
N
R
2
Concentration
N
W
5
Concentration
Qf
R
2
Concentration
N
R
5
Concentration
in
R
2
0
45
0
0
0
Ui
N
W
5
a
0
0
0
❑
0
❑
0
❑
a
0
❑
❑
0
d
Q1
MN
CM
OA
am
N
7
Anthracene (120-12-7)
Benzidine (92-87-5)
W
C
m
a
CON
4101
OD in
f0

ii.i
1
.�wa>
1oo
h
6.
ry
N
ni
ce
Number of
Analyses
r
r
r
r
r
r
w
r
r
r
r
r
Long Tenn
Average
Daily
Discharge
(if available)
Maximum
Monthly
Discharge
(if available)
E g
4.
Ee<i
k p �i
le,QQ
g
�+
Q
v
r
O
O
O
V
O
ui
V
r
O
O
C
V
C
�i
V
<0.001
O
V
N
O
0
G
V
O
0
V
4
0
4
V
G
�j
V
Y
O
0
O
V
O
6
v
r
O
0
O
V
O
yj
V
S
0
G
V
O
lti
v
O
o
G
V
O
Lei
V
O
0
C
V
C
kci
V
r
O
0
C
V
O
6
v
r
O
0
O
V
O
6
V
C
0
O
V
U
a
Q
N
a
7
J v
J
0
EL
u
J
s,
T
R
o
a
J
s,
A
R
a
J
,
S.
R
a
a
J
o,
7.
R
a
a
o,
T
CO
o
a
J
8,
>.
R
a
ti
a
7+
R
o
J
s,
a
R
o
350
J
o,
3
7.
R
a
�J
8,
T
W
o
a
-I
8,
].
CO
a
a
T
R
a
J
s,
>
R
a
a
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
0C
2
o
m
U
N
2
LConcentration
N
i
'Concentration J
Mass
'Concentration]
Mass
c
m
U
Mass
'Concentration
fyY,
2
(Concentration
Mass
'Concentration
Mass
Concentration
03
2
(Concentration
Mass
Concentration
N
2
5, AND ORGANIC TOXI
Presence or Absence
(check one)
1
a
El
o
o
a
o
❑
o
a
o
0
0
1
❑
a❑
o
o
a
a
a
a
a
❑
a
❑
rl
❑
a
❑
a
a
a
a
❑
a
0
a
aLt
PollutantlParameter
(and CAS Number, if available)
3,4-benzofluoranthene
(205-99-2)
Benzo (ghi) perylene (191-24-2)
Benzo (k) fluoranthene (207-08-
9)
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
(111-91-1)
Bis (2-chlaroethyl) ether (111-44-I
4) II
Bis (2-chloroisopropyi) ether
(102-80-1)
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (117-
81-7)
4bromophenyl phenyl ether (101
55-3)
(Butyl benzyl phthalate (85-68-7)
I2-chloronaphthalene (91-58-7)
4chlorophenyl phenyl ether
(7005-72-3)
IChrysene (218-01-9)
Dibenzo (a,h) anlhracene (53-70-
3)
m
w
ciJ
a
n
CO
Q
a,
Q
c
Q
w
r
Q
1 N
r
Q
in
Q
4
Q
r
Q
to
r
Q
Q
Q
to
Q

ti
N
LL'
1L
0
N
1—
z
F
...1
-J
0
0-
0
1-
0
0
z
ui
0
z
w
J
0
w
z
}
1n
J
[1J
2
U
X
O
F—
m
W
J
CO
F-
E`o4
Z
t
gi
ea 61
o
a C
O
1f1
v
J
01
Concentration
S
v
a,
co
a
en
10
2
0
0
O
V
J
0
Concentration
Q
O
O
17
v
10
0
w
c
N
0
0
r
g
O
1n
v
01
!Concentration
LI
ri
Q
O
v
a,
0
.0
C
O
v
J
Concentration
Q
O
O
O
10
0
w
0
0
v
v
01
Concentration
0
ri
N
8
v
a.
co
.0
N
m
4
1f1
v
J_
Concentration
0
Ln
N
C
O
co
0
.0
Vl
as
O
v
ti
0
Concentration
El
O
O
v
14
0
a
O
'0
v
0)
Concentration
0
0
16
0
a
0
0
O
v
Concentration
0
Q
m
N
.r
8
O
v
co
0
.0
N
m
O
1n
v
O
O
0
v
a.
as
0
a
1Concentration
0
4,
co
A
0.
7.4st
N
m
O
CO
J
Concentration
O
Q
8
v
m
0
r
O
v
01
3
Concentration
0
0
a1
8
v
a.
0
.0
O
c
S0
0
3
N
m
LL v
0
v
J
Concentration
0
Q
0
8
O
co
0
a
en
1ti
c n
4
7 W LT.

Number
of
Analyses
O § I;
at
SS
7
N
r
a
U
0
Number of
Analyses
r
Long Term
Average
Daily
Discharge
(If available)
r.
E 6 2 W
_
Maximum
Daily
Discharge
(required)
i
$
v
o
$
dV
a
o
o
u0
g
civ
V
,o
v
T
g
o
V
a"
v
$
c
V
,caa
v
a
V
ui
v
g
o
V
o$
v
o
V
ul
v
Ir.
g
o
V
o
o
v
N
g
o
V
,oa
v
_
o
V
<5.0
<0.001
Q
F,
D
J
n_
U
7C
M is
C IP
7
!c
'L
J
7
16
J
l0
-I
7
m
Jo
ti
7
M
-IR
7
33
--I
=.
of
--I
7
CO
7
-I
�7
CO
a
-I
m
Q
-I
0.11i
m
7
CO
-I
CP
0z
33
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
co
NCO
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
Mass
'Concentration I
N
N14
'Concentration'
N
NCO
'Concentration
Ul
N
Concentration
N
NOf
'Concentration
N
Nco
(Concentration
N
Nco
'Concentration
[Mass
Concentration
N
Nco
Concentration
N
N
co
-
U
Z
oa
0
Z
a
Q
z_
w
a
�
o
r-
w
a
}
U
oi
_
w
V
C
Q
�.
CI
v
CI
El
a
o
o
v
CI
El
CIa
SO C p I.
In-
❑
0
0
0
0
0
0
❑
a
0
n
0
0
el
11
wrc
El
❑
0
0
0
0
CI
CI
0
0
0
Pollutant/Parameter
(and CAS Number, if
available)
Hexachlorobenzene
(118-74-1)
c
Cl
A
7
c2I
s
ili ��
.
�
-
m
m
Q.
E.'
y
=
Hexachtoroethane
(67-72-1)
d
gl
11n
�e
C'SIL
�07
0
C
a
E.
cr,
Naphthalene
(91-20-3)
Nitrobenzene
(98-95-3)
N-nitrosodimethylamine
(62-75-9)
N-nilrosodi-n-propylamine
(621-64-7)
c
co
0
L
q
c
--M
=j
Z
Phenanlhrene
(85-01-8)
O
clf d
c9
eN
T•
m
w
Q
i
A
I)
M
1n
CM
1v
CM
co
CM
01
CM
1 0
Q
•-
Y
c'e
V.
r)
Y
v
V.
ul

E It
z c
a
1
E
za
i
n
N
LI
0
z
F
J
J
0
a
0
a
1-
U_
z
0
0
z
Q
Ih
J
a
z
w
a
J
0
w
0
z
In
J
LL!
2
U_
0
a
w
J
0
h
0 0Lci 0
V 0
V
IA
2
El
T
1',
0
0
V
0
0
V
0
010
0
0
V
0
0
0
0
0
It)
0
0
0
0
0
V
u,
0
ci
V
0
0
0
0
0
V
0
u'i
0
0
0
0
S
0
0
V
0
8
0
V
1(I
0
v
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
V
u,
0
0
V
0
0
0
O
V
0
a
0
0
8
8
0
0
0
V
0
0
V
110
e
41
SO
01.
01
a
Ip
e
0
3
2
01
S0
01
7
2
CI
0
!Concentration
En
R
Concentration
N
l0
Concentration
vs
N
Concentration
H
RO
Concentration
N
2
Concentration
Concentration
H
60
Concentration
Concentration
Concentration
m
2
Concentration
N
La
O
1
CI
•
El
a
CI
0
0
❑
11,
CI
❑
CI
0
CI
❑
CI
❑
0
0
m
a
N
tri
Iri
U I m
a5
Iri
Q
r4
'Li in
-
ui
0
N
vC
W
IC)
❑ m
16
-D60
N �I
.0a
0
Lei
c
0

mc
g
2
g
- a)
i
N
N
N
p
V
Number of
Analyses
r
9-
r
r
r
9-
r
r
,_
9-
r
r
r
1`
A tzi
4.t
C iY
Sa o
man
Maximum
Daily
Discharge
(required)
pp
OOO
O
p
V
4
<0.00001
<0.050
O
V
op
O
$
C
V
2
<0.00001
<0.050
_
G
a
c.ce
O
V
0
d
<0.0001
Il <0.50
Q
V
I€
OGV
<0.0001
I)
O
v
S
OO
V
f
O
p
OO
V
A
VC
p
OO
V
p
0
O
V
ice-'
z
a
J
O
U
X
o
r
U
0
N
o
Z
z
a
0
E
a
—
1:
in
^
O1
7.
CO
❑
+n
J_
T
CO
❑
-I
-3
7
-
T
10
❑
J
4n
a
T
Of
Q
n
J
al
7
T
eO•
❑
L
-
Ol
a
T
n
❑
a
J
Or
7
7.
al
❑
p
J
cn
7
T
10
❑
1
al
T
10
❑
B
'..
J
O7
7
T
lO
❑
-
Of
7
T
m
Q
�I
7
g
T
t0
0
J
Q�
7
T
W
❑
L
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
Mass
(Concentration
Mass
Concentration
Mass
(Concentration 1
Mass
Concentration
Mass
(Concentration
dr
og
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
Mass
m
.
0
0
o
a
a
0
0
a
0
0
0
a
0
0.
..
1!
❑
0
❑
0
❑
❑
0
0
O
ci
❑
0
❑
Ea
~ OG
o
a
❑
a
a
❑
❑
❑
a
a
0
0
0
U
c6
1
a
1-
w
E
X
0
m
w
PollutantlParameter
(and CAS Number, If
available)
p-endosulfan
(115-29-7)
Endosulfan sulfate
(1031-07-8)
Endrin
(72-20-8)
Endrin aldehyde
(7421-93-4)
Heptachlor
(76-44-8)
Heptachlor epoxide
1(1024-57-3)
PCB-1242
(53469-21-9)
PCB-1254
(11097-69-1)
n
O
a
PCB-1232
(11141-16-5)
PCB-1248
(12672-29-6)
PCB-1260
(11096-82-5)
PCB-1016
(12674-11-2)
m
11]
ILI
If;
r
1L'J
,-
V �Cl
.N. --
LL7
m
Laiiii
.-
N
IdY)
N
N
�f1
N
t!)
N
in

N
N
N
CC
ca
ca
ca
Fz
J
J
0
Q
O
O
U
z
cc
a
0
z
ui
1
0
z
w
x
a
J
1-
O
Lu
0
z
r
J
r
w
2
U_
X
0
F-
w
1
F-
D
z a
za`
E
A 1
Le)
0
0
GI
CI
0

OUTFALL 007 - TABLE C

N
cc
2
Z
0
0
a
0
O
U
z
a
ce
w
U
U
w
m
E
z
w
0
Ta
a
3gts
° g
2 6 —
zi
a
N
0
V
0
O
Ci
V
N
V
Z
0
V
N
V
O
V
•
Yl
O
O
O
V
O
V
0)
O
crs
N
t7
co
O
O
V
O1
E
a
m
01
m
.61
7
LL
U
O
E
ca
.0
Z
O1
E
as
Q
a
E
m
a
111
E
a
m
0.
E
.0
07
E
m
.0
C1
E
Concentration
N
m
Concentration
H
N
m
'Concentration
N
H
m
Concentration
N
co
Concentration
51
co
Concentration
Concentration
N
m
Concentration
Hal
Concentration
Concentration
Concentration
0
0
0
0
❑
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•
ra
c co
O
U e
`0
0
U
Fecal CohIorm
m
0 0
ILO
Nitrate -nitrite
[G
ti
Oil and Grease
Oi
C
•

o.
m e
z
Z
3
E IL
V
-
r
..
-
0
h
ci
ni
N
Y
U
Number of
Analyses
r
r
I
.-
.-
.
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
1 I 2. ti
to g1
_Io ft
Maximum
Monthly
Discharge
(If available)
7 T V.
jG
G
2 G
-
y
CO
CO
O
O
cOO
O
O
O
O
4
3
O
<0.005
G
O
rO
7:7,
G
r
p
O
v
NI-
rn
O
0.031
O
rO
CD
108
N
O
G
JO
JO
O
G
I..N
G
O
V
C
v
O
O
v
O
O
vu_
Iii
z
z
a
1-
D
O
J
4
z
oif
z
us
z
Z
O
psk
z
in
a
J
z
?
—
a,
a
lb/Day
or
E
7.
CI
a
mgll.
7.
O
33
E
7.
m
3
rn
E
7.
co
rn
=
lb/Day
rn
E
T
0
a
as
E
7•
a
3
3,
lb/Day
on
E
lb/Day
a
E
IblDay
ao
E
A
0
rs
Concentration
Mass
Concentration
.
N
2
Concentration
7
N
2
'Concentration 1
fA
2
Concentration
Mass
'Concentration
Mass
'Concentration I
[Mass
(Concentration '
2
IConcentration
Mass
'Concentration
!Mass
O
2
C
C
U
H
2
Concentration
Mass
3E
to ap
g
0
0
0
0
0
0
CI0
0
0
0
El
5
°'
I i
0
0
0
❑
0
❑
0
-
E
0
0
0
0
z
Li
z
0
0
Z_
w
U
U
-J
m
Q
1-Y
Pollutant/Parameter
(and CAS Number, if
available)
M
0 --
`
u—.
c
i4
v1
Aluminum, total
(7429-90-5)
Barium, total
(7440-39-3) II
O N
o 4
mN.
_
a�
o ;
UN
1Iron, total
(7439-89-6)
Magnesium, total
(7439-95-4)
Molybdenum, total
(7439-95-4)
Manganese, total
(7439-96-5)
Tin, total
(7440-31-5)
Titanium, total
(7440-32-6)
r
c4
I a:.-
-
.-
(LiI�
Y
I CC 1C1
r r
G
CVN
r
I N
N
I ri
N

es
s
T
T
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
a
z
a
z
v
Ln
Q
z
v
v
a
z
Cr)
0
Z
0
a
v
z
J
U
a
J
S
U
a
-J
0
a
J
U
a
Concentration
Concentration
Concentration
0
N
Concentration
0
0
CI
❑
To
s
L
4
a
0
0
m
Radium, total
Radium 226, total

OUTFALL 007 - TABLE D
1

r-
c)
N
LL
0
v
u)
0
0
W
z
c
m
0
z
m
❑
0
0
CC
N
z
z
UJ
0
w
J
H
m
z
Insulation used on piping or other equipment {trace amounts}
❑
0
O
to
N
y
0
❑
0))
CO
U
tV
0
r
O
U
to
M
0
0
'C
O
U
d
0
❑
a)
10
E
0
a)
a;
0
Benzonitrile
n
0
Benzyl chloride
0
CI
0
0
a)
E
co
CO
d
0
a3
O.
to
U
1-
t
0
co
U
.N-
0
0
0
0
0
c+i
0
CI
Carbon disulfide
0
0
0
0
y
O
Z
to
C4
E
0
U
cc;
0
0
O
U
ri
a
CI
Crotonaldehyde
0
a)
C
co
a)
O
0
ao of

p
a
e '
as I -
a
asY
R
a
r CFR 122.21(g)(7)(v))1
Reason Pollutant Believed Present in Discharge
Q
0
0
w
mal
4
a
vI
IU
z
Q
1--
d,
m
m
d)
u)
❑
0
❑Er
4
Iz
a
1—
w
U
W
ca
Q
�
Presence or Absence I
(check one)
3_
c
m
a$a
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
�,
a
2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid)
Diazinon
Dicamba
1 Dichlobenil
Dichlone
2,2-dichloropropionic acid
Dichlorvos
Diethyl amine
Dimethyl amine
I Dintrobenzene
Diquat
Disulfoton
FDiuron
Epichlorohydrin
Ethion
Ethylene diamine
Ethylene dibromide
Formaldehyde
Furfural
O
N
N
N
N
f9
N
7
N,
47
N
(0
N
P
N
CO
N
0)
N
O
M
l7
(Ni
r)
ri
n)
(6
VI
ID
VI
1-4 I a I
VI VI

N
e--
LL
0
U)
0
H
ul
u!
Q
0
a
cn
cn
0
Z
a
1-
❑
cn
cn
0
LII
z
W
U
a
CO
a
3
m
C
1
0
0
0
L
0
0
0
a)
a
0
N
0
0
Isopropanolamine
0
CI
a)
co
m
N
Cl
El
0
0
a.
Y
0
0
c
0
:c
10
0
CI
Mercaptodimethur
0
0
0
❑
'Methyl mercaptan
0
0
Methyl methacrylate
ai
0
Methyl parathion
0
CI
0
0
0
❑
Mexacarbaie
lt1
0
El
Monoethyl amine
N
47
0
Monomethyl amine
0
0
a
m
Z
0
0
Naphthenic acid
0
0
Nilrotoluene
0
0
0
m
0-
Lri I --
to in ")

Available Quantitative Data
(specify units)
-
-
%
ti
Reason Pollutant Believed Present in Discharge
i
w
w
a
❑
z
a
tn
w
z
a
1-
Presence or Absence
(check one)
m
Zia'
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Believed
Present
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
D
❑
❑
❑
❑
cn
cn
❑
o
ce
�a
2
Z
a
a
w
0c
-J
m
a
Pollutant
Phenolsulfonate
Phosgene
Propargite
Propylene oxide
Pyrethrins
to
a
Resorcinol
Strontium
Strychnine
d
rn
2,4,5-T (2,4,5-
trichlorophenoxyacetic acid)
d
co
to
.c
a
o
u
``o
TO
W
2,4,5-TP [2-(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)
propanoic acid]
Trichlorofon
ITrielhanolamine
Triethylamine
Trimethyiamine
'Uranium
Vanadium
cri in
o
o
w�
O
10
CO
ID�
a
�
1-
N.
N

O
❑
io
8
5
0
C
d
X
m
0
0
O
T
x
0
8
N
co
•

OUTFALL 007 - TABLE E

0'
0
0

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0039586
Attachment 1
Form 1 — Section 6 — Existing Environmental Permits

Attachment 1
Form 1 - Section 6 - Existing Environmental Permits
Issuing Agency
Division of Health Services
Type of Permit
Main Reservoir
ID Number
633
Division of Health Services
Auxiliary Reservoir
633
Division of Air Quality
Synthetic Minor
08455
Division of Environmental
Management (DEM) *
DEM*
DEM*
DEM*
DEM*
DEM*
Division of Solid Waste
Management
Division of Waste Management
DWR
DWR
DWR
DEM*
DEM*
DEM*
DEM*
DWQ
Wake County Planning
Well Construction
Well Construction
Well Construction
Well Construction
410 Certification
401 Certification
Industrial Landfill
Underground Storage Tank
Laboratory Certification
Oil Terminal Facility
NPDES (HNP/HEEC)
NPDES (HNP Landfill)
Nondischarge
Nondischarge
Nondischarge
Nondischarge
Land Use
2497
1290
1145
922
WQC-I 198
WQC-214
92-10
0-006715
398
924020063
NC0039586
COC NGG 120032
WQ0009475
WQ0000584**
WQ0000506**
WQ0000838**
3830
Wake County Planning
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Division of Radiation Protection
USEPA
* Since issuance of permit agency name has c
** Permits held by contract disposal firrn
Land Use
Facility Operating License
Radioactive Materials License
Hazardous Waste
hanged to Division of Water Resources.
13383
NPF63
092-0218-4
NCD991278284

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0039586
Attachment 2
Form 1 — Section 7 — Maps

Harris Plant •
North Carolina
Attachment 2 - Form 1 — Section 7 - Map
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Hams Nuclear Plant
Wake County
Page 1 of 3

North Carolina I
Attachment 2 - Form 1 —Section 7 - Map
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant
Wake County
Page 2 of 3

Harris Plant •
North Carolina
Attachment 2 - Form 1 — Section 7 - Map
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant
Wake County
Page 3 of 3

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0039586
Attachment 3
Form 1 — Section 9 — CWA Section 316(b) Cooling Water intake Structure Reports

Clean Water Act § 316(b)
Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
New Hill, North Carolina
NPDES Permit NC0039586
Duke Energy Environmental Services I Environmental Programs
526 South Church Street
Charlotte NC 28202
February 2021
DUKE
ENERGY:

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Contents
Executive Summary 1
1 Introduction 3
2 Source Water Physical Data [§122.21[r)(2)1 6
2.1 Description of Source Waterbody [§122.21(r)(2)(i)] 7
2.2 Characterization of Source Waterbody [§122.21(r}(2)(ii)] 10
2.3 Locational Maps [§122.21(r)(2)(iii)] 13
3 Cooling Water Intake Structure Data [§ 122.21(r)(3)] 14
3.1 Description of CWIS Configuration [5122.21(r)(3)(i)] 14
3.2 Latitude and Longitude of CWIS [§122.21(r){3}(ii)] 15
3.3 Description of CWIS Operation [5122.21(r)(3)(iii)] 16
3.4 Description of Intake Flows and Water Balance [§122.21(r)(3)(iv)] 17
3.5 Avoided Withdrawals Due to Cooling Tower Utilization 18
3.6 Engineering Drawings of CWIS [§122.21(r)(3)(v)] 19
4 Source Water Baseline Biological Characterization Data [§122.21(r)(4)] 20
4.1 List of Unavailable Biological Data [§122.21(r)(4)(i)] 21
4.2 List of Species and Relative Abundance in the vicinity of CWIS [§122.21(r)(4)(ii)] 21
4.3 Identification of Species and Life Stages Susceptible to Impingement and Entrainment
[§122.21(r)(4)(iii)] 30
4.4 Identification and Evaluation of Primary Growth Period [§122.21(r)(4)(iv)] 35
4.5 Data Representative of Seasonal and Daily Activities of Organisms in the Vicinity of CWIS
[§122.21{r)(4)(v)] 37
4.6 Identification of Threatened, Endangered, and Other Protected Species Susceptible to
Impingement and Entrainment at CWIS [§122.21(r){4)(vi}i 42
4.7 Documentation of Consultation with Services [§122.21(r)(4)(vii)] 43
4.8 Methods and QA Procedures for Field Efforts [§122.21(r)(4)(viii)] 43
4.9 Definition of Source Water Baseline Biological Characterization Data [§122.21(r)(4)(1x)] 43
4.10 Identification of Protective Measures and Stabilization Activities [§122.21(r)(4)(x)] 43
4.11 List of Fragile Species [§122.21(r)(4)(xi)] 43
4.12 Information Submitted to Obtain Incidental Take Exemption or Authorization from Services
[§122.21(r)(4)(xii)] 44
5 Cooling Water System Data [§122.21(r)(5)] 45
5.1 Description of Cooling Water System Operation [§122.21(r)(5)(i)] 45
5.2 Design and Engineering Calculations [§122.21(r)(5)(ii)] 47
5.3 Description of Existing Impingement and Entrainment Reduction Measures [§122.21(r)(5)(iii)] 47
6 Chosen Method(s) of Compliance with Impingement Mortality Standard [§122.21(r)(6)] 49
7 Entrainment Performance Studies [40 CFR § 122.21(0(7)] 51
7.1 Site -Specific Studies [40 CFR §122.21(r)(7)(i)] 51
7.2 Studies Conducted at Other Locations [40 CFR §122.21(r)(7)(ii)] 51
i

316{b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
8 Operational Status [§ 122.21[r)[8)] 52
8.1 Description of Operating Status [§ 122.21(r)(8)(i)J 52
8.2 Descriptions of Consultation with Nuclear Regulatory Commission [§122.21(r)(8)(ii)] 53
8.3 Other Cooling Water Uses for Process Units f§122.21(r)(8)(11i}] 53
8.4 Description of Current and Future Production Schedules [§122.21(r)(8)(iv)] 53
8.5 Description of Plans or Schedules for New Units Planned within 5 years [§122.21(r)(8)(v)] 54
9 References 55
ii

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Tables
Table 1-1. Facility and Flow Attributes and Permit Application Requirements 4
Table 1-2. Summary of §316(b) Rule for Existing Facilities Submittal Requirements for §122.21(r)(2)-(8) and
(14). 5
Table 2-3. Monthly Average River Flows (cfs) from USGS Gage Stations near Harris Nuclear Plant during
October 1980--April 2017 11
Table 3-1. Number of Hours of CWIS Operation at Harris Nuclear Plant in 2016-2018. 16
Table 3-2. Monthly Average Withdrawals (MGD) from Harris Reservoir during 2016-2018 to Support Harris
Nuclear Plant Operations. 17
Table 4-1. 2014-2015 Biological Monitoring Transects on Harris Reservoir 21
Table 4-2. Fish Species and Community Composition (%) for each Transect (E, H, P, S, and V), collected by Boat
Electrofishing on Harris Reservoir, 2008-2016. 23
Table 4-3. Fish Species Collected and Relative Abundance (Fish/Hour) for all transects combined by Year from
Boat Electrofishing on Harris Reservoir, 2008-2016. 24
Table 4-4. Fish Species Collected, Composition, and Relative Abundance (Fish/Hour) for all transects combined
by Year from Boat Electrofishing on Harris Reservoir, 2014-2016. 26
Table 4-5. Fish Species, Number Collected, Community Composition % (COMP), and Relative Abundance (# of
Fish/Hour) for Transect P by Year from Boat Electrofishing on Harris Reservoir, 2008-2012 27
Table 4-6. Entrainment Potential for Fish Species Identified in Shearon Harris Reservoir. 30
Table 4-7. Period of Peak Abundance for Relevant Taxa in Table 4-4. Known Spawning and Recruitment
Period of Native Species with Documented Occurrence in Shearon Harris Reservoir, North Carolina (Jenkins
and Burkhead 1993; Rohde et al. 2009). 35
Table 4-8. Seasonal and Daily Activities of Species Present in Shearon Harris Reservoir (Jenkins and Burkhead
1194; Rohde et al. 2009). 37
Table 4-9. Summary of Rare, Threatened, or Endangered (RTE) Aquatic Species Listed for Shearon Harris
Reservoir, North Carolina, and Record of Occurrence or Potential to Occur in Harris Reservoir. 42
Table 4-10. List of Fragile Species as Defined by the EPA and their Occurrence in Shearon Harris Reservoir'44
Table 5-1. Percent of Design Flow Used in the Cooling Water System. 46
Table 5-2. Estimated Through -screen Velocities at Harris Nuclear Plant. 47
Table 5-3. Design and Actual (2016-2018) Flow Data 48
Table 8-1. Annual Capacity Factors at Harris Nuclear Plant, 2014-2019. 53
Iii

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARMS NUCLEAR PLANT
Figures
Figure 2-1. Aerial Photo of Harris Nuclear Plant and its Environs. 8
Figure 2-2. Location of Harris Nuclear Plant within the Cape Fear River Basin (Source: regions.noaa.gov) 9
Figure 2-3. Vicinity Map with Intake Structure. 13
Figure 3-1. Topographical Map with Intake Structure. 15
Figure 3-1. Harris Nuclear Plant Water Balance Diagram. 18
Figure 4-1. Map of 2008-2016 Biological Monitoring Transects on Harris Reservoir. 22
Figure 4-2. Transect V sampling stations V1 and V3 adjacent and near -field to CW1S. 22
iv

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Appendices
Appendix A. Harris Nuclear Plant § 122.21(0(2)-(8) Submittal Requirement Checklist.
Appendix B. Engineering Drawings of Cooling Water Intake Structure.
Appendix C. Engineering Calculations for Through -Screen Velocity.
v

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Abbreviations
'C degrees Celsius
7 degrees Fahrenheit
AIF actual Intake flow
A01 area of influence
BTA Best Technology Available
CCC closed cycle cooling
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
cfs cubic feet per second
cm centimeter
COC cycles of concentration
CPUE catch per unit effort
CTMU cooling tower makeup
CWA Clean Water Act
CWIS Cooling Water Intake Structure
DIF design Intake flow
Director NPDES Director
DO dissolved oxygen
Duke Energy Duke Energy Progress, LLC
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
ESA Endangered Species Act
EPRI Electronic Power Research Institute
fps feet per second
ft foot/feet
ft msl feet above mean sea level
gpm gallons per minute
HUC Hydrologic Unit Code
IPAC Information for Planning Conservation
m meter
µm micron
µS/cm microSiemens per centimeter
m3 cubic meters
MGD million gallons per day
mm millimeters
MW megawatts
MWIS makeup water Intake structure
NCDENR-DWQ North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources — Department of Water Quality
NCDNCR North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
NDCT natural draft cooling tower
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
OTC once -through cooling
POA percent open area
PVC polyvinyl chloride
Rule Clean Water Act §316Lb) rule
TL total length
TSV through -screen velocity
USEPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
USGS U.S. Geological Survey
VI

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Executive Summary
On August 15, 2014, regulations implementing §316(b) of the final Clean Water Act (CWA) rule for existing
facilities (the Rule) were published in the Federal Register with an effective date of October 14, 2014.
Facilities subject to the Rule are required to develop and submit technical material, in accordance with
§122.21(r), that will be used by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit
Director (Director) to make a Best Technology Available (BTA) determination for the facility.
Harris Nuclear Plant (HNP) began commercial operations in May 1987 and was permitted in pursuant to
the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement
between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (NC0039586).
Based on the §122.21(r) submittal material provided herein, HNP's selected method of compliance with
the Impingement Mortality Standard is the continued operation of a closed -cycle recirculating system.
Further, HNP requests that the Department designates the existing closed -cycle system as Best
Technology Available (BTA) for entrainment reduction. Give that HNP currently employs closed -cycle
cooling as described below, no further impingement or entrainment controls are necessary to comply
with the standards.
Impingement BTA
The final Rule, at §125.94(c), requires existing facilities to employ one of seven impingement BTA
alternatives'. HNP already employs two of these alternatives:
• Primary impingement BTA — Closed -cycle cooling with a natural draft cooling tower is utilized to
provide makeup water which is consistent with a closed -cycle recirculating system (CCRS) defined
at §125.92(c) and meets the BTA Standards for Impingement Mortality at §125.94(c)(1).
Accordingly, this is HNP's preferred option for complying with the impingement standard.
Entrainment BTA
The Rule does not prescribe BTA for entrainment but does require BTA to be determined by the
permitting authority on a site -specific basis. Based on the information presented in this report, HNP
requests that the Department designate closed -cycle cooling at HNP as BTA for entrainment based on
the following:
• When compared against the factors in 40 CFR § 122.25(f), an existing closed -cycle cooling system
provides benefits to entrainment relative to once -through cooling (OTC) without additional costs.
The HNP uses closed -cycle cooling, which minimizes entrainment through flow reduction. The
flow reduction achieved is calculated at 91% flow reduction based on design flow and 365 days
'Or under specific circumstances one of nine alternatives, which includes §125.94(c)(11) and (12) in addition to
§125.94(c)(1)-(7).
1

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
per year operation. Generally, only one CTMU pump is operated which results in a more realistic
flow reduction of approximately 95%. Using actual CTMU flows during the 2016-2018 period, the
withdrawal reduction is 97.2%.
• Statements made by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the preamble
to the Rule support a conclusion that an existing closed -cycle cooling system is appropriate for
designation as BTA for entrainment:
"Although this rule leaves the BTA entrainment determination to the Director,
with the possible BTA decisions ranging from no additional controls to closed -cycle
recirculating systems plus additional controls as warranted, EPA expects that the
Director, in the site -specific permitting proceeding, will determine that facilities
with properly operated closed -cycle recirculating systems do not require
additional entrainment reduction control measures. "2 (emphasis added)
This conclusion is further reiterated in the Response to Public Comments document, where EPA
states:
"EPA has made it clear that a facility that uses a closed -cycle recirculating
system, as defined in the rule, would meet the rule requirements for
impingement mortality at § 125.94(c)(1). This rule language specifically identifies
closed -cycle as a compliance alternative for the (impingement mortality]
performance standards. EPA expects the Director would conclude that such a
facility would not be subject to additional entrainment controls to meet BTA."3
(emphasis added)
Overall, entrainment at the facility is low and is not expected to involve federally protected species or
their designated critical habitat. Potential impacts to fish and shellfish populations at HNP due to
entrainment is also extremely unlikely due to the operation and configuration of the intake. Based on
these findings, the existing closed -cycle cooling system is the best technology available for reduction of
entrainment.
2 79 Fed. Reg. 48344 (15 August 2014)
3 Response to Comments, Essay 14, p. 62.
2

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
1 Introduction
Section 316(b) was enacted under the 1972 Clean Water Act (CWA), which also introduced the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program. Certain facilities with NPDES permits
are subject to §316(b) requirements, which require the location, design, construction, and capacity of
the facility's cooling water intake structure (CWIS)4 to reflect Best Technology Available (BTA) for
minimizing potential adverse environmental impacts.
On August 15, 2014, regulations implementing §316(b) of the final CWA rule (Rule) for existing facilities
were published in the Federal Register with an effective date of October 14, 2014. The Rule applies to
existing facilities that withdraw more than 2 million gallons per day (MGD) from waters of the United
States, use at least 25 percent of that water exclusively for cooling purposes, and have or require an
NPDES permit.
Facilities subject to the Rule are required to develop and submit technical material that will be used by
the NPDES Director (Director) to evaluate an applicant's preferred technology for compliance with the
impingement standard and to make a site -specific Best Technology Available (BTA) determination
regarding entrainment for the facility. The actual intake flow (AIF)5 and design intake flow (DIF)6 at a
facility determines which submittals will be required. As shown in Table 1-1, facilities with an AIF of 125
MGD or less have fewer application submittal requirements and will generally be required to select from
the impingement compliance options contained in the final Rule. Facilities with an AIF in excess of 125
MGD are required to address both impingement and entrainment, and provide specific entrainment
studies, which may involve extensive field studies and the analysis of alternative methods to reduce
entrainment (§122.21(r)(9)-(13)).
The §316(b) compliance schedule under the Rule is dependent on the facility's NPDES permit renewal
date. Facilities were required to submit their §316(b) application material to their Director with their
next permit renewal application unless that permit renewal application was due prior to July 14, 2018, in
which case an alternate schedule could have been requested.
° CWIS is defined as the total physical structure and any associated constructed waterways used to withdraw
cooling water from Waters of the United States. The CWIS extends from the point at which water is first
withdrawn from waters of the United States up to, and including, the intake pumps.
S AIF is defined as the average volume of water withdrawn on an annual basis by the cooling intake structure over
the past 3 years initially and past 5 years after Oct. 14, 2019. The calculation of AIF includes days of zero flow. AIF
does not include flows associated with emergency and fire suppression capacity,
6 DIF is defined as the value assigned during the CWIS design to the maximum instantaneous rate of flow of water
the CWIS is capable of withdrawing from a source waterbody. The facility's DIF may be adjusted to reflect
permanent changes to the maximum capabilities of the cooling water intake system to withdraw cooling water,
including pumps permanently removed from service, flow limit devices, and physical limitations of the piping. DIF
does not include values associated with emergency and fire suppression capacity or redundant pumps (i.e., back-
up pumps).
3

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Table 1-1. Facility and Flow Attributes and Permit Application Requirements.
Facility and Flow Attributes
Existing facility with DIF greater than 2 MGD and
AIF greater than 125 MGD.
Existing facility with DIF greater than 2 MGD and
AIF less than 125 MGD.
Existing facility with DIF of 2 MGD or less, or less
than 25 percent of AIF used for cooling
purposes.
New units at existing facility.
Permit Application Requirements
§122.21(r)(2)-(13)
§122.21(r)(2)-(8)
Director Best Professional Judgment
§122.21(r)(2), (3), (5), (8), and (14) and applicable paragraphs (r)(4),
(6), and (7) of §122.21(r)
Duke Energy Progress, LLCs (Duke Energy) Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant (HNP) is subject to the existing
facility rule and, based on its current configuration and operation (i.e., the facility has an AIF of Tess than
125 MGD), Duke Energy is required to develop and submit each of the §122.21(r)(2)-(8) submittal
requirements (Table 1-2) with its next permit renewal application in accordance with the Rule's
technical and schedule requirements. Appendix A provides a checklist summary of the specific
requirements under each of the §122.21(r)(2)-(8) submittal requirements and how each is addressed in
this report or why it is not applicable to HNP.
4

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Table 1-2. Summary of §316(b) Rule for Existing Facilities Submittal Requirements for §122.21(r)(2)-(8) and (14).
Submittal Requirements at §122.21(r)
(2) Source Water Physical Data
(3)
(4}
(5)
}71
Cooling Water intake Structure Data
Source Water Baseline Biological
Characterization Data
Cooling Water System Data
Chosen Method of Compliance with
Impingement Mortality Standard
Entrainment Performance Studies
Operational Status
Submittal Description
Characterization of the source waterbody including intake area
of influence.
Characterization of the cooling water intake system; includes
drawings and narrative; description of operation; water balance.
Characterization of the biological community in the vicinity of
the intake; life history summaries; susceptibility to impingement
and entrainment; existing data; Identification of missing data;
threatened and endangered species and designated critical
habitat summary for action area; Identification of fragile fish
and shellflsh species list (<30 percent impingement survival).
Narrative description of cooling water system and intake
structure; proportion of design flow used; waterreuse
summary; proportion of source waterbody withdrawn
(monthly); seasonal operation summary; existing impingement
mortality and entrainment reduction measures; flow/MW
efficiency.
Provides facility's proposed approach to meet the impingement
mortality requirement (chosen from seven available options);
provides detailed study plan for monitoring compliance, if
required by selected compliance option; addresses entrapment
where required.
Provides summary of relevant entrainment studies (latent
mortality, technology efficacy); can be from the facility or
elsewhere with justification; studies should not be more than 10
years old without justification; new studies are not required.
Provides operational status for each unit; age and capacity
utilization for the past 5 years; upgrades within last 15 years;
uprates and Nuclear Regulatory Committee relicensing status
for nuclear facilities; decommissioning and replacement plans;
current and future operation as it relates to actual and design
intake flow.
5

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
2 Source Water Physical Data [§122.21(r)(2)]
The information required to be submitted per 40 CFR §122.21(r)(2), Source Water Physical Data, is as
follows:
(i) A narrative description and scaled drawings showing the physical configuration of all source
water bodies used by the facility, including areal dimensions, depths, salinity and temperature regimes,
and other documentation that supports the applicant's determination of the waterbody type where
each cooling water intake structure is located;
(ii) Identification and characterization of the source waterbody's hydrological and
geomorphological features, as well as the methods used to conduct any physical studies to determine
the intake's area of influence within the waterbody and the results of such studies;
(iii) Locational maps; and,
(iv) For new offshore oil and gas facilities that are not fixed facilities, a narrative description and/or
locational maps providing information on predicted locations within the waterbody during the permit
term in sufficient detail for the Director to determine the appropriateness of additional impingement
requirements under §125.134(b)(4).
Each of these requirements is described in the following subsections.
6

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
2.1 Description of Source Waterbody [§122.21(r)(2)(i)]
HNP is a nuclear -powered electrical generation facility located in the southwest corner of Wake County,
North Carolina. Portions of HNP site also lie in southeastern Chatham County. HNP consists of one
pressurized light water reactor nuclear steam supply system and turbine generator rated at 992
megawatts with a cooling tower -based heat dissipation system. HNP began commercial operation in
May 1987. A 4,150-acre main reservoir was constructed to serve as the source of cooling tower
makeup. A smaller, 321-acre auxiliary reservoir was also constructed to serve as the primary source for
the Emergency Cooling Water System, which is designed to remove heat from the reactor and critical
components following a loss -of -coolant accident or a loss of off -site power.
HNP has two cooling water intake structures; one (Emergency Service Water and Cooling Tower Makeup
Intake Structure) on the main reservoir (aka Harris Reservoir), from which cooling tower makeup water
is obtained, and one (Emergency Service Water Intake Screening Structure) on the auxiliary reservoir
(aka West Reservoir), from which water is obtained for the plant's Emergency Service Water (ESW)
System. Harris Reservoir is a freshwater reservoir located in Chatham and Wake Counties, North
Carolina. The reservoir was created by impounding Buckhorn Creek, a tributary of the Cape Fear River.
The main body of Harris Reservoir has a surface area of approximately 4,150 acres, a maximum depth of
18 meters, a mean depth of 5.3 meters, a volume of approximately 8.9 x 107 cubic meters, a full -pool
elevation of 67.1 meters National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) [220 ft), and an average residence
time of 28 months. The reservoir began filling in December 1980 and full pool elevation was reached in
February 1983. The 40-mile shoreline is mostly wooded, and the 71-square mile drainage area is mostly
rolling hills with land used primarily for forestry and agriculture. A smaller 317-acre auxiliary reservoir
was also built to serve as the primary source for the Emergency Coiling Water System, which is designed
to remove heat from the reactor and critical components following a loss -of -coolant accident (LOCH) or
a loss of off -site power (LOOP).
From its headwaters east of HNP near Fuquay-Varina, Buckhorn Creek flows in a southwesterly direction
for most of its length, then moves south to its confluence with the Cape Fear. Buckhorn Creek has five
tributaries above the Harris Reservoir dam; Tom Jack Creek, Thomas Creek, Little White Oak Creek,
White Oak Creek and Cary Branch (HNP FSAR). Buckhorn Creek and its tributaries drain an area of 76.3
square miles (USGS 2004). Flows in Buckhorn Creek showed dramatic daily and seasonal fluctuations
prior to the development of Harris Reservoir, but are now regulated by the Harris Reservoir dam. From
1981 to 2016, annual mean streamflow (measured at USGS station 02102192 located approximately one
mile downstream of the darn) ranged from 1.33 to 137 cubic feet per second.
7

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
4."•
1-r!.
ffr
.
Figure 2-1. Aerial Photo of Harris Nuclear Plant and its Environs.
8

Legend
• Rao:
— Rrr, ers
Covrd.ss
upper Basin
Wadi Balm
Loan anti
I. Mai
Q Ybtenned Boundary
,►
erenVerda.r Lott
ran Nara, Remem r
EhLuber lit
316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Vtimin ton
Figure 2-2. Location of Harris Nuclear Plant within the Cape Fear River Basin (Source: regions.noaa.gov).
2.1.1 Water Quality
Surface water dissolved oxygen in Harris Lake ranged from 5.2 to 8,5 mg/L and surface water pH ranged
from 6.9 to 7.6 s.0 (Appendix A). Secchi depths were at or greater than a meter at all three lake
sampling sites (range = 1.0 to 1.6 meters), indicating that the water clarity was good. Total phosphorus
ranged from 0.02 to 0.05 mg/L and total Kjeldahl nitrogen ranged from 0.62 to 0.77 mg/L. Nitrite plus
nitrate concentrations were less than the laboratory detection level of 0.02 mg/L and ammonia ranged
from <0.02 to 0.05 mg/L. Chlorophyll a values ranged from 9.3 to 41.0 ug/L, the latter of which was the
single value that was greater than the state water quality standard of 40.0 ug/L for chlorophyll a.
Based on the calculated North Carolina Trophic State Index scores for the growing season of 2013,
Harris Lake was determined to exhibit elevated biological productivity or eutrophic conditions. This
9

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
reservoir was also determined to be eutrophic in 2003 and 2008 when it was last monitored by the
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR) (DWR Intensive Survey Unit 8/4/2014).
Duke Energy Progress conducted an environmental monitoring program in 2012 at Harris Lake to assess
the reservoir's overall water quality, identify potential introduction and expansion of invasive plant and
animal species to the reservoir and to demonstrate the existence of a recreational fishery in the lake. In
this study, Harris Lake was found to have high biological productivity with chlorophyll a values ranging
from 3 to 37 ug/L. Biological surveys identified the presence of Asiatic clams (Corbfcula fluminea) as well
as the invasive plants hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata) and Creeping Water Primrose (Ludwigia
uruguayensis).
2.2 Characterization of Source Waterbody [§122.21(r)(2)(ii)]
To identify and characterize the primary source water body (i.e., Harris Reservoir) the following
resources were reviewed and summarized:
* Environmental Monitoring Reports 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016
These data were compiled and analyzed for this report and are summarized below. This report was
developed utilizing the existing, available data for Shearon Harris Reservoir.
The Harris Reservoir shoreline is mostly wooded; the drainage area is mostly rolling hills with land used
primarily for silviculture and agriculture. Although the immediate watershed is forested, the expanding
towns of Apex and Holly Springs are to its north and east, respectively. The HNP facility NPDES permit
(NCNC0039586) regulates discharges to the reservoir. The reservoir also receives treated discharge
from a wastewater treatment plant in Holly Springs via Utley Creek (a tributary of White Oak Creek),
which flows into Harris Reservoir's northeastern -most arm.
An analysis of land use coverage in 2004 showed more than 70 percent of the sub -basin (which includes
several watersheds, including the Buckhorn Creek -Harris Reservoir watershed) is forested (NCDENR
2004a). However due to accelerated urban growth especially around the towns of Holly Springs and
Fuquay-Varina, the amount of land in pasture, cultivated crops, and forest will probably continue to
decrease while the amount of land committed to residential and commercial uses will increase.
Harris Reservoir was classified by North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality as eutrophic in
the agency's most recent Basinwide Assessment Report (NCDENR 2004a, pages 89, 93, and 94). The
reservoir was sampled by the agency in 2003. At that time, despite heavy rainfall in the watershed,
Secchi depths were greater than one meter at all sampling sites. Fecal coliform bacteria concentrations
were low. Total phosphorus concentrations were similar to those previously measured. Ammonia
concentrations were consistently below detection level at all sites and these concentrations were the
lowest ever observed. Aquatic macrophytes, including Hydrilla sp., were observed throughout the
reservoir. NCDENR classified Harris Reservoir as eutrophic based on calculated North Carolina Trophic
State Index scores (which are in turn based on water clarity, algal densities, and phosphorus
concentrations); it had received this classification in previous monitoring cycles as well.
Duke Energy Progress, formally Progress Energy , has monitored water quality and biological
communities in Harris Reservoir since the reservoir filled, in the early 1980s, in an effort to evaluate the
waterbody's health, track changes in water quality, document the appearance of nonnative plants and
10

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
animals, and assess the recreational fishery. Water quality (including temperature, dissolved oxygen,
pH, and turbidity), water chemistry (including major nutrients and various trace metals), fish have been
sampled quarterly and aquatic vegetation once annually (Progress Energy 2003a, pp. 4-6, Duke Energy
Progress 2016).
Like several other impoundments in piedmont of North Carolina, Harris Reservoir is a biologically
productive reservoir. Harris Reservoir has many of the characteristics of eutrophic southeastern
reservoirs including elevated nutrient concentrations, extensive growth of aquatic vegetation in
shallows, oxygen -deficient hypolimnetic water in summer (Duke Energy Progress 2016
The nearest USGS gage station is located at Buckhorn Creek near Corinth, North Carolina (USGS
02102192). The drainage area of this gaging station is 76.3 square miles. Downstream from Harris
Nuclear Plant on the Cape Fear River near Lillington, North Carolina is a USGS gaging station (02102500).
USGS 02098206 Haw River near Monclure, North Carolina, is located upstream from the mouth of the
Cape Fear River and has a drainage area of 1,691 square miles (Figure 2-3).
The estimated drainage area of the Cape Fear River Basin is approximately 9,164 square miles.
Table 2-3. Monthly Average River Flows (cfs) from USGS Gage Stations near Harris Nuclear Plant during October
1980—April 2017.
Month
Buckhorn Creek
near Corinth, NC
(cfs) [A]
Cape Fear River near
Lillington, NC (cfs) [B]
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
66
109
80
38
33
22
25
22
21
24
39
•
4610
5190 ----
6230 ---
4520 _
2390
2100
1670
1540 — -- -
1800
1870
2120
2950
[A] — USGS Gauging Station 02102192
[B] — USGS Gauging Station 02102500
11

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
The HNP is located in the Piedmont physiographic province near the fall line separating the Coastal Plain
from the Piedmont (FSAR p. 2.4.13-1). The site is located within the southeastern portion of the
Durham Basin and is underlain by rocks of the Triassic Newark Group. The plant area is covered by
residual soils derived from the underlying rock which consists of claystone, shale, siltstone, sandstone,
conglomerate, and fanglomerate (FSAR p. 2.4.13-1). The surficial clay soils and saprolite prevent ready
recharge to the rocks below (FSAR p. 2.4.13-2).
Vegetation at most of the HNP site is typical of the eastern Piedmont province of North Carolina (CP&L
1982). Forests at HNP are in various stages of ecological succession and consist of pine forest,
hardwood forest, or pine -hardwood mixtures. Loblolly pine (Pines taeda) dominates the pine forests,
but shortleaf (P. echinata), Virginia (P. virginiana), and longleaf (P. palustris) are also found at the site.
Hardwood forests at HNP are found primarily in lowland areas along streams. Dominant lowland forest
species are sweet gum (Liquidambarstyraciflua), red maple (Acer rubrum), American sycamore
(Platanus occidental's), American elm (Ulnus americana), and river birch (Becula nigra). Most of the
upland forests at HNP are a mixture of pines (Pinus spp.), oaks (Quercus spp.) and hickories (Carya spp.)
(NRC 1983).
Harris Reservoir provides some limited marsh habitat in shallow backwaters. These marshes and
adjacent shallows are used by waterfowl such as the mallard (Anas platyrhynchos), wood duck (Aix
sponsa), and Canada goose (Branca canadensis), and wading birds such as herons and egrets. A great
blue heron (Ardea heradias) rookery, known to be active during recent breeding seasons, is located at
the mouth of Jim Branch in the southeastern portion of Harris Reservoir.
12

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
2.3 Locational Maps [§122.21(r)(2)(iii)]
A vicinity map has been provided in Figure 2-3.
Tim Jail; Mims
tea
03.
Ada�y
R usurer
a
N
•
•
•
+ MC42
'tOer Map
+ _ y
•
NCl2 ''
•
•
•
•
Yob Dim
4uarMm
C reel,
Leis W i.
Ow Cr.A
•
0
WYifs 8i
Cie*
`r •
.•
.n"
Dud Milt
Croak
2
0
IOW
Figure 2-3. Vicinity Map with Intake Structure.
13

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
3 Cooling Water Intake Structure Data [§
122.21(r)(3)]
The information required to be submitted per 40 CFR §122.21(r)(3), Cooling Water Intake Structure
Data, is outlined as follows:
(i) A narrative description of the configuration of each of the cooling water intake
structures and where it is located in the waterbody and in the water column;
(ii) Latitude and longitude in degrees, minutes, and seconds for each of the cooling water
intake structures;
(iii) A narrative description of the operation of each of the cooling water intake structures,
including design intake flows, daily hours of operation, number of days of the year in operation
and seasonal changes, if applicable;
(iv) A flow distribution and water balance diagram that includes all sources of water to the
facility, recirculating flows, and discharges; and
(v) Engineering drawings of the cooling water intake structure.
Each of these requirements is described in the following subsections.
3.1 Description of CWIS Configuration [§122.21(r)[3)(i)]
HNP has two cooling water intake structures but only one is equipped with cooling water makeup
(intake) pumps.
The first structure is the Cooling Tower Makeup and Emergency Service Water Intake Structure
(CTMUESW). It is located at the end of a can& that stems from an arm of the Harris Reservoir. This
structure is equipped with two Cooling Tower Makeup (CTMU) pumps, each rated at 26,000 gallons per
minute (gpm), and two Emergency Service Water (ESW) pumps, each rated at 21,000 gpm. The
structure was constructed with 14 bays but only two bays are used for the CTMU pumps and two bays
are used for the ESW pumps. The remaining 10 bays are unused and do not have any pumps. Each of
the ESW pump bays have a concrete dividing wall with an eight by ten foot butterfly valve. The dividing
wall butterfly valve arrangement along with pipe valving permits operation of the EWS pumps by
accessing water from either the main or auxiliary reservoir. The CTMU pump bays are each equipped
with traveling screens with 3/8-inch openings. The ESW pump bays are fitted with traveling screens
with 3/8-inch openings. Normal water elevation is 220 feet. The invert to the suction for the pumps in
located at approximately 191.5 feet.
The second intake structure is the Emergency Service Water Intake Screening Structure which is located
at the end of a canal coming from the auxiliary reservoir. This structure has no cooling water intake
pumps and functions only as an alternate screened intake opening for water withdrawal by the two ESW
pumps located at the CTMUESW. This structure has traveling screens with 3/8-inch opening. The
normal water elevation in the auxiliary reservoir is 250 feet and the invert to the conveyance pipes is
approximately 233.3 feet in elevation. The structure does have two screen wash pumps (@500 gpm)
14

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
which are operated about one hour per year each; two fire protection system pumps (@3000 gpm)
which are operated about 12 hours per year each; and one fire jockey pump with negligible flow rate
and run time.
3.2 Latitude and Longitude of CWIS [§122.21(r)(3)(ii)]
The latitude and longitude (in degrees, minutes, and seconds) of HNP's CTMUESW structure are:
Latitude: 35° 37' 49" N;
Longitude: 78° 57' 13" W
The latitude and longitude of HNP's Emergency Service Water Intake Screening Structure are:
Latitude: 35° 37' 48" N;
Longitude: 78° 57' 20" W
New Hi Cw6nnple f 003 d 0.2 0.4 0.6 eA s .i
Figure 3-1. Topographical Map with Intake Structure.
15

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
3.3 Description of CWIS Operation [§122.21(r)(3)(iii)j
Under normal design operating conditions, the cooling water flow of HNP is 538,000 gallons per minute
(gpm). This total includes circulating water (487,000 gpm) and Normal Service Water (50,000 gpm)
flows, apportioned as follows: three circulating water pumps @ 162,300 gpm each (Progress Energy
2003d) and two NSW pumps @ 25,000 gpm each (Progress Energy 2003c). After passing through the
main condenser, cooling water (combined flow of circulating water and service water) is routed to a 100
percent capacity, 523-foot-tall, hyperbolic natural -draft cooling tower where the bulk of the waste
heated is removed (Progress Energy 2003b). The tower is designed to remove 6.663 X 109 BTU/hr at the
design flow rate of 538,000 gpm and reduce water temperature 25 degrees F.
Cooling Tower Makeup Pumps (two located in the ESW and CTMU Intake Structure) supply makeup
water from the main reservoir. Each Cooling Tower Makeup (CTMU) Pump has a 26,000 gpm capacity.
Normally, one CTMU pump operates continuously, supplying makeup water to the cooling tower, while
the other is kept in reserve. One pump supplies all the necessary makeup water to replace losses to
drift, evaporation, and blowdown.
Under certain extraordinary circumstances, CTMU pumps are also used to transfer water from the main
reservoir to the auxiliary reservoir. When drought limits the amount of water entering the auxiliary
reservoir and water levels drop beyond those considered optimal for safe operations, water is pumped
from the main reservoir to the 321-acre auxiliary reservoir. This typically requires 2 to 3 days of pumping
in drought years.
Finally, HNP has a non -recirculating Emergency Service Water system that allows the pumping of water
from the auxiliary reservoir or the main reservoir to various essential components following a Toss -of -
coolant accident or loss of off -site power. This system, which is tested periodically to ensure reliability, is
equipped with two 20,000 gpm pumps. Under typical circumstances, one of these pumps is operated
while the other is kept in reserve.
The number of CWIS operating hours from 2016 to 2018 is provided in Table 3-1. During these 3 years,
CWIS operated 8,760 hours per year (i.e., 100 percent of the time). Note this should not be confused
with the capacity factor of the HNP facility. Plant outages typically occur in the spring and/or fall each
year.
Table 3-1. Number of Hours of CWIS Operation at Harris Nuclear Plant in 2016-2018.
January
Number of Hours per Month of CWIS Operation
2016
2017
744
744
2018
744
2016-2018 Average
744
February
672
672
672
672
March
744 744 744
744
April 720 720 720
720
May
744 744 744 744
16

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Number of Hours per Month of CWIS Operation
2016
720
744
744
2017
720
744
744
2018
720
744
744
720 720 720
744
744
744
2016-2018 Average
720
744
744
720
744
720 720 720 720
744
744
744
744
Total Number of Hours 8760 8760 8760 8760
3.4 Description of Intake Flows and Water Balance
[§122.21(r)(3)(iv)]
Monthly average water withdrawals from 2016 through 2018 are provided in Table 3-2. The average
withdrawal for this period was 23.5 MGD compared to a DIF of 74.9 MGD. Note that the actual intake
flow (AIF) for the cooling tower makeup pumps represents a 68.6 percent decrease from the DIF.
Table 3-2. Monthly Average Withdrawals (MGD) from Harris Reservoir during 2016-2018 to Support Harris
Nuclear Plant Operations.
Month
January
February
March
April
May
June
Withdrawals (MGD)
2016
14.3
13.7
13.8
13.8
2017
26.2
28.2
2018
24.6
28.1
28.2 28,4
28.6
15-7
2016-2018
Average
21.7
23.3
23.5
19.4
14 2 28.7 22-7 21-9
14.9
33,3
29.8
25.9
July 14.9 34.5 29.6 26.3
August
15.3.111
333.2'
r 29.6
26.0
September 13 7 30 6 30 5 24 9
October
14.2
26.7
28-8
23.2
17

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Withdrawals (MGD)
2017
2016-2018
Average
November
14.9
27.5
27.8
23.4
December
13.3
28.7
27.2
22.6
Annual Average
14.2
29.4 26.9
23.5
Notes:
t. See eeeeeedpips 34 ee
near of new Men
Demk»ralizers
Secondary Waste
Holding Tanks
22 nonmenectee
.fwpnct
Sala .
meter
73 weowln.
Potable Water
111
qse AHEM
USW
Reactor Coolest
System
C Sena. l ena
volume Control
Sondery Wes>owster
Immanent
eo
K
Radwaste
Processing System
e�. r*F.+ en a�
�..,1 a i
Figure 3-1. Harris Nuclear Plant Water Balance Diagram.
3.5 Avoided Withdrawals Due to Cooling Tower Utilization
The utilized natural draft cooling tower provides effective reductions in withdrawals. Assuming that the
cooling water withdrawal without cooling towers would be the combined flow from the circulating
water pumps (774.15 MGD) and the normal service water pumps (72.00 MGD), the total comparable
once -through cooling withdrawal would be 846.15 MGD. As the actual withdrawal of water used for
makeup to the cooling tower is only 23.5 MGD, the reduction is expressed by:
[1 - (23.5 MGD / 846.15 MGD)] * 100 = 97.2%
18

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
3.6 Engineering Drawings of CWIS [§122.21(r)(3)(v)]
The following engineering drawings of cooling water intake structures are provided in Appendix B:
• Emergency Service Water System Main Reservoir Intake Structure MAS-SH 1
• Emergency Service Water System Main Reservoir Intake Structure MAS-SH 2
• Emergency Service Water Intake Structure MAS-SH 3
• Emergency Service Water Intake Structure MAS-SH 4
• Emergency Service Water System Auxiliary Reservoir Screen Structure MAS-SH 1
• Emergency Service Water System Auxiliary Reservoir Screen Structure MAS-SH 2
• Emergency Service Water System Auxiliary Reservoir Scree Structure MAS-SH-3
19

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
4 Source Water Baseline Biological Characterization
Data [§122.21(r)(4)]
The information required to be submitted per 40 CFR §122.21(r)(4), Source Water Baseline Biological
Characterization, is outlined as follows:
(i) A list of the data supplied in paragraphs (r)(4)(ii) through (vi) of this section that are not
available and efforts made to identify sources of the data;
(ii) A list of species (or relevant taxa) for all life stages and their relative abundance in the
vicinity of CWIS;
(iii) Identification of the species and life stages that would be most susceptible to
impingement and entrainment;
(iv) Identification and evaluation of the primary period of reproduction, larval recruitment,
and period of peak abundance for relevant taxa;
(v) Data representative of the seasonal and daily activities of biological organisms in the
vicinity of CWIS;
(vi) Identification of all threatened, endangered, and other protected species that might be
susceptible to impingement and entrainment at a cooling water intake structure(s);
(vii) Documentation of any public participation of consultation with Federal or State agencies
undertaken in development of the plan;
(viii) Methods and CIA procedures for any field efforts;
(ix) In the case of the owner or operator of an existing facility or new unit at an existing
facility, the Source Water Baseline Biological Characterization Data is the information included in (I)
through (xii);
(x) identification of protective measures and stabilization activities that have been
implemented, and a description of how these measures and activities affected the baseline water
condition in the vicinity of CWIS;
(xi) List of fragile species as defined at 40 CFR 125.92(m) at the facility; and
(xii) Information submitted to obtain incidental take exemption or authorization for its
cooling water intake structure(s) from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries
Service.
Each of these requirements is described in the following subsections.
20

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
4.1 List of Unavailable Biological Data [§122.21(r)(4)(i)]
The biological data needed to prepare the information required under 40 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) §122.21(r)(4) are available. A list of historical data reviewed to develop the baseline biological
characterization of the source waterbody, Shearon Harris Reservoir, includes the following:
• 2008-2016 Environmental monitoring and electrofishing studies, unpublished data (DEP 2019)
• Environmental Monitoring Reports 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016
These data were compiled and analyzed for this report and are summarized below. This report was
developed utilizing the existing, available data for Shearon Harris Reservoir. No impingement or
entrainment studies were performed in support of the development of this compliance documentation.
4.2 List of Species and Relative Abundance in the vicinity of CWIS
[§122.21(r)(4)(ii)]
Duke Energy has monitored the fish community in Harris Reservoir and near the CWIS since 1975 using
electrofishing and other gear types. The following sections describes the results of boat electrofishing
surveys on Harris Reservoir from 2008-2016, the fish assemblage summary based on a composite of
survey locations from 2008-2016, and summaries of the fish community composition and their relative
abundance from 2008-2016 for Transect P and V.
2008-2016 Sample Transects
Fish were sampled with boat electrofishing at Transects E, H, P, S, and V (Table 4-1, Fig 4-1). Transect V
is adjacent to the CWIS and is in the hydraulic zone of influence and near•field to the CWIS (Fig 4-2).
Transect P is approximately 2.3 km downlake of V and is far field in relation to the CWIS. The other
monitoring Transects, E, H, and S are approximately 7.1 km, 10.5 km, and 6.4 km from V, respectively.
Each monitoring transect consisted of two, fixed position stations situated on opposite shorelines from
each other, for a total of 10 stations (El, E3, H1, H3, P2, P3, V1, V3.) that were sampled quarterly in even
years (2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016). The stations and quarterly samples at each transect were
combined annually to produce the fish community summaries and relative abundance.
Table 4-1.2014-2015 Biological Monitoring Transects on Harris Reservoir.
Transect
Designation
E
H
P
Description
Approximately 500 meters uplake of Dam,
7.8 km downlake of CWIS
Latitude
(North)
Longitude
(West)
35.570944-78.967673
Buckhom Creek/Cary Branch Cove,
approximately 4 km uplake of dam, 10 km 35.591625 -78.940209
from CWIS
Far -field to the CWIS, Midlake,
approximately 5 km uplake of dam, near
NCWRC Holleman Rd boat access area,
2 6 km downlake of CWIS
21
35 609928-78.948025

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Transect
Designation
r
Description
White Oak Creek and Utley Creek Cove,
Uplake of New Hill Holleman Rd,
approximately 10 km uplake of dam, 6.3
km away from CWIS
CWIS Hydraulic zone of influence and
near -field, Thomas Creek cove adjacent
to intake canal, approximately 7 3 km
uplake of dam, 0 7 km away from CWIS
Latitude
(North)
Longitude
(West)
35.627708 -78 907922
35 630598-78.946179
Figure 4-1. Map of 2008-2016 Biological Monitoring Transects on Harris Reservoir.
Figure 4-2. Transect V sampling stations Vi and V3 adjacent and near -field to CWIS.
Boat electrofishing was conducting following standard methods (Murphy and Willis 1996) and Duke
Energy internal procedures. Electrofishing was conducted for 900 seconds (15 minutes) of effort at each
station (10 hours annual total effort across all stations and transects). Fish were identified to the
species level when possible using regional taxonomic references (Menhinick 1993, Jenkins and Burkhead
1994), measured for total length (TL) to the nearest millimeter, and weighed to the nearest gram. Fish
that could not be accurately identified in the field were preserved with 10 percent buffered formalin
solution and transported to the laboratory for identification and body measurements. Each specimen
was examined for hybridization, anomalies, disease, parasites, and general condition. Photographs were
also taken of fish with any deformity or anomaly. Some specimens were retained in 70 percent ethanol
for identification in the laboratory and for voucher purposes.
In total there were 27 species of fish (excluding hybrids) collected on Harris Reservoir from 2008 to
2016. There were 25 species of fish encountered at Transect E, followed by V with 22, S with 20, H with
19, and P with 18 species. Differences in species assemblages between transects were attributed to
22

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
species that were low in abundance and characterized as being Tess than 0.5% of the total fish
assemblage. The transects also had some differences in habitat such as presence of aquatic
macrophytes, water depth and structure. Species common to all transects were generally greater than
1% of the community assemblage. The fish community is representative of a typical southeastern
reservoir sportfish and forage fish assemblage comprised of (% fish community composition) Bluegill
(40%), Threadfin Shad (19%), Redear Sunfish (15%), Largemouth Bass (12%), Gizzard Shad (4%), White
Perch (2%), Golden Shiner (2%), and Black Crappie (1%) (Table 4-2). The fish community composition for
each of the years that were sampled (2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016) had similar composition
percentages between years.
The most numerous species collected in the reservoir from 2008 to 2016 (Table 4-3) were Bluegill (54.5-
178-1 Fish/Hour), followed by Threadfin Shad (7.5-92.9 Fish/Hour), Redear Sunfish (23.8-54.8
Fish/Hour), Largemouth Bass (18.4-52.5 Fish/Hour), Gizzard Shad (4.3-15.7), and Black Crappie (0.4-10.4
Fish/Hour).
Table 4-2. Fish Species and Community Composition (%) for each Transect (E, H, P, 5, and V), collected by Boat
Electrofishing on Harris Reservoir, 2008-2016.
Scientific Name
Ameiurus brunneus
Ameiurus catus
Ameiurus notalis
Ameiurus nebulosus
Ameiurus platycephalus
Amia Galva
Cyprineila nivea
Cyprinus carpio
Common
Name
Dorosoma cepedionum
Dorosoma petenense
Enneaconthus gloriosus
Esox niger
Etheostomo fusiforme
Etheostoma olmstedi
Snail Bullhead
White Catfish
0.75
0.40
Yellow Bullhead 0.05
0.74
0.92
0.42
Total Fish
Collected
15
0.63 80
0.09 0.06 0.04
Brown Bullhead 0.35 0.19 0.32
Flat Bullhead 0.19
0.25 0.09 0-46
Bowfin
Whltefin Shiner
0.25
0.10
Common Carp 0.10 0.19 0.74 0.78
Gizzard Shad 7.73 1.58 4.44 5.22 2.47 522
Threadfin Shad 2.59 26.65 22.37 13.61 23.99 2390 18.56
0.08 42
0.04
12
6
Tota I
Composition
0.12
0.62
0.05
0.33
0.09
0.48
0.02
1.42 82 0.64
4.05
Bluespotted 0.05 0.09 0.71 0.21
Sunfish
30
0.23
Chain Pickerel 0.35 0.22 0.78 55 0.43
Swamp Darter 0.03
Tessellated 0.05
Darter
1 0.01
1 0.01
23

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Scientific Name
Fundulus sp.
Ictalurus punctatus Channel Catfish
Lepomis auritus
Common
Name
A Killifish
Redbreast
Sunfish
M.
Loomis cyanellus Green Sunfish
Lepomisg!bbasus Pumpkinseed
110
'Lepomisgulasus Warmouth
Lepomis macrochirus Blueglll 44,62
immumm
Lepomismlcrolop� Redear Sunfish f 25.07
Lepomissp_ X (Hybrid) Sunfish (Hybrid)
FNMA „MIIM=1011-
Mlcropterussalmoldes Largemouth Bass
Marone americana White Perch
If 11
0.70 0.22
0.50 0.84
0.25
0.05 0.06
0.08
Total Fish
Collected
23
0.03 0.25 49
0.00
0.03
0.04 6
4
1
0.55 0.40 0.18 1.91 0.92 109
38.78 36.41 41.37 39.78 5163
16.53 12.20 11.21 11.85 1930
0,09 0,03 0.08 5
9.62 4„ 7.43 15.48 18,33 10.97 1596
3.59 4.43 0.83 0.16 0.04 239
Notemigonus� Golde5 4, 0.62 1.34 2.85 3,22 239
crysoleucas
Nob -opts spp.
Pomoxis
nigromaculatus
Shiners and
Minnows
0.35 0.25 0.60 0.29 0.42 47
0.62 3.10 0.62 2.09 165
rPh
Total
Composition
0.18
0.38
0.05
0.03
0.01
0.85
40,10
14,99
0.04
12.40
1.86
1.86
037
1.28
Table 4-3. Fish Species Collected and Relative Abundance (Fish/Hour) for all transacts combined by Year from
Boat Electrofishing on Harris Reservoir, 2008-2016.
mellE
Amelurus brunneus
Ameiurus catus
Amelurus natalis
Common
Name
Snail Bullhead
White Catfish
Yellow
Bullhead
2008
0.1
2010
2012
2014
0.1
2016
0.1
2.4 0.7 0.2 2.3 2.4
24

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Scientific Name
Ameiurus nebulosus
Ameiurus platycephalus
Amia calva
Cyprinella nivea
Cyprinus carpio
Dorosoma cepedianum
Dorosoma petenense
Enneacanthus glariosus
Esox niger
Etheostoma fusiforme
Etheostoma olmstedi
Fundulus sp.
Ictalurus punctatus
Lepomis auritus
Common
Name
Lepomis cyanellus
Lepomis gibbosus
Lepomis gulosus
Lepomis macrochirus
Lepomis mlcrolophus
Lepomis sp. X (Hybrid)
Micropterus salmoides
Brown
Bullhead
2008
0,6
2010
1-2
2012
0.7
2014
L3
Flat Bullhead 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.2
Bowfin
Whltefin
Shiner
Common Carp
2016
0.2
1,3 1.0 1.7 L7 1.0
0.2
1-1 0.9 0.9 1.9 3.4
Gizzard Shad 7-7 4.3 12.0 15.7 12.5
Threadfin Shad
Bluespotted
Sunfish
Chain Pickerel
Swamp Darter
Tessellated
Darter
A Killifish
Channel
Catfish
Redbreast
Sunfish
Green Sunfish
Pumpkinseed
Warmouth
Bluegill
Redear Sunfish
Sunfish
(Hybrid)
Largemouth
Bass
92.9 55-3 14.9 7.5 68.4
0.7 0.9 0.6 0,5 0.3
1.a 1-1 1.3 0,9 0-4
0.1
0.1
0.3 1.3 0.0 0.1 0.6
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.2 0,1
1.8
1,6
0.3
0.1 0,1 0.2
0.0 0.1
4.1 3.8 1-1 1.1 0.8
129.6 178.1 51.5 54.5 101.5
37.8 49.6 54-8 26.2 23.8
03
28.1
52.5 20.4
18,4
0.2
39.7
25

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Scientific Name
Morone americana
Notemigonus crysoleucas
Notropis spp.
Pomaxis nigromaculatus
Common
Name
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
White Perch 0.1 5.5 2.7 7.2 8.4
Golden Shiner
Shiners and
Minnows
Slack Crappie
3.3
6.8
5.3
2.5
5.3
0.9
3.1 10,4 1.1 0.4 1.5
Table 4-4. Fish Species Collected, Composition, and Relative Abundance (Fish/Hour) for all transects combined
by Year from Boat Electrofishing on Harris Reservoir, 2014-2016.
Scientific Name
Ameiurus catus
Ameiurus natalis
Common
Name
White Catfish
Yellow
Bullhead
Amelurus nebulosus Brown
Bullhead
Ameiurus platycephalus
Flat Bullhead
2014
Quantity
3
1
Amia calva Bowfin 4
Cyprinus carpi() Common Carp 4
Dorosoma cepedianum Gizzard Shad 16
Dorosoma petenense
Threadfln Shad
Enneacanthus gloriosus Bluespotted
Sunfish
Esox niger
Chain Pickerel
Fundulus sp, A Killifish
Ictalurus punctatus
Lepomis auritus
Channel
Catfish
Redbreast
Sunfish
1
4
Composition
0,02
Fish/Hr
1.5
0.01 0.5
2016
Quantity
Composition
Fish/Hr
0.02 2 3 0.47 1.5
2 14 2.17 7
0.09 a 12 1.86 6
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.5
1
411 63.82 205.5
2
5
0.78
1
2.5
25

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Scientific Name
Lepomis cyanellus
Common
Name
Green Sunfish
2014
Quantity
Composition
Fish/Hr
Lepomis gulosus Warmouth 1 0.01 0.5
Lepomis macrochirus
Bluegill
59
0,33
2016
Quantity
29.5 95
Composition
14.75
Fish/Hr
47.5
Lepomis mlcrolophus Redear Sunfish 61 0.34 30.5 36 5.59 18
Lepomis sp. X (Hybrid)
Sunfish
(Hybrid)
Micropterus salmoides Largemouth
Bass
Morone americana White Perch '
Notemigonus
crysoleucas
111-111-
Nurcopls spP
Nntropis spp.
Pomoxis
nigromaculatus
Golden Shiner
Shiners
Black Crappie
24 0.13 12
2 O al
1
ST
3
5
0.16
7.92
0.16
0.47
0.5
25,5
1.5
0.78 2.5
Table 4-5. Fish Species, Number Collected, Community Composition % (COMP), and Relative Abundance (# of
Fish/Hour) for Transect P by Year from Boat Electrofishing on Harris Reservoir, 2008-2012.
Scientific Name
Common
Name
Amelurus catus White
Catfish
Amelurus nataiis
Yellow
Bullhead
Amelurus Brown
nebulosus Bullhead
Amia cahra
Bowfin
Cyprinus carpio Common
Carp
Dorosoma
cepedianum
Gizzard Shad
2008
Quantity
8
Comp
2.68
Fish/Fir
4
3 1.00 1.5
2010
Quantity
Comp
FishlHr
1 0.13 0.5
2012
Quantity
1
Comp
0.30
FishlHr
0.5
1 0.30 0.5
2 0.67 1 1 0.13 4-5 1 0.30 0.5
13
1 0.13 0.5
4.35 6-5 9 1-17
4.5
19
5.65
95
27

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Scientific Name
Dorosoma
petenense
Common
Name
Threadfin
Shad
Enneacanthus Bluespotted
gioriosus Sunfish
Esox niger
Chain
Pickerel
Ictalurus punctatus Channel
Catfish
2008
Quantity
Comp
Fish/Hr
2010
Quantity
Comp
FishlHr
2012
Quantity
Comp
FishlHr
15 5.35 S 345 44.75 172.5 4 L19 2
1 0.33 0.5
Lepomis gulosus Warmouth 1 0.33 0.5
Lepomis
macrochirus
Bluegill
Lepomis Redear
microlophus Sunfish
Lepomis sp. X Sunfish
(Hybrid) (Hybrid)
Micropterus Largemouth
salmoldes Bass
Morone americana White Perch
Notemigonus Golden
crysoleucas Shiner
1
0,13 0.5
128 42.81 64 189 24.51 94.5 154 45.83 77
4.2 13.33 20 49 6.36 24.5 113 33.63 56.5
0.67 1
62 24.74 31 104 13.49 52 38 11.31 19
2 0.26 1 3 0.89 1,5
LO 3.34 5 10 1,30 5 2 0.60
2
Notropis spp. Shiners 4 1.34 2 8 1.04 4
Pomoxis Black
nigromacuiatus Crappie
9
3.01
4,5
51
6.61 25.5
1
Table 4-5. Continued.
Scientific Name
Ameiurus catus
Ameiurus natalis
Amelurus nebulosus
Common
Name
White Catfish
Yellow
Bullhead
Brown
Bullhead
2014
Quantity
9
Composition
2,84
1 0.32
3 0.55
FishlHr
4,5
0.5
1.5
2016
Quantity
1
1
Composition
0.23
0.23
Fish/Hr
0.5
0.5
28

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Scientific Name
Amia calva
Cyprinus carpio
Dorosoma cepedlanum
Dorosoma petenense
Common
Name
Bowfin
Common Carp 3
Gizzard Shad 29
2014
Quantity
Threadfin
Shad
Enneacanthus gioriosus Bluespotted
Sunfish
Esox ntger
Ictalurus punctatus
Lepomis gulosus
Chain Pickerel
Channel
Catfish
Warmouth
4
17
1
Composition
Fish!Hr
•
1.26 2
0.95
2016
Quantity
2
1.5 12
Composition
0.45
1
2.72 6
9.15 14.5 26 5.90 13
5.36
8.5
0.32 0.5
102
1
23.13
0.23
51
0.5
2 0.63 1 3 0.68 1.5
2
0.63
1
1
0.23
0.5
Lepomis macrochirus Blueglll 154 48,58 77 163 36.96 81.5
Lepomis microlophus Redear 35 11.04 17.5 27 6.12
Sunfish
13.5
Lepomis sp. X (Hybrid) Sunfish
(Hybrid)
MIcropterus saimoides Largemouth 47 14.83 23.5 84 19.05 42
Bass
Moron americana White Perch 3 0.95 1.5 10 2.27 5
Notemigonus crysoleucas
Notropis spp.
Pomoxis nigromaculatus
Golden Shiner
5
1.58 2.5 2
0,45
1
Shiners .MIN
�0.23 11 [ 0
Black Crappie
2
0 a3
1
5
1.13
2.5
4.2.1 Invasive Species
Common Carp, which were stocked everywhere for decades by the U.S. Fish Commission beginning the
late 1870's (Cole 1905), are considered exotic and potentially invasive and have been collected in
Shearon Harris Reservoir. White Perch, which were first observed in the reservoir during 1996 from an
undocumented stocking, are not exotic, but are non-native to the interior waters of North Carolina and
could be considered invasive. These fishes do not appear to be having an impact on the extant reservoir
fish community. The presence and operation of the CWIS has not contributed to the presence of the
29

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
exotic or invasive species nor has the structure contributed to the decline of the established fishes in the
reservoir.
4.3 Identification of Species and Life Stages Susceptible to
Impingement and Entrainment [§122.21(r)(4)(iii)]
The CWIS design, with a TSV of less than 0.5 fps, is compliant with impingement BTA requirements of
the Rule. As such, no species or life stages are anticipated to be susceptible to impingement at the
Shearon Harris CWIS. To the extent any species may have the potential to be entrained, based on the
operational parameters of the CWIS on Shearon Harris Reservoir (low DIF and TSV), interactions with
aquatic organisms are expected to be limited with no potential for adverse environmental impacts.
4.3.1 Impingement
The degree of vulnerability to impingement exhibited by adult and juvenile fish species depends upon
biological and behavioral factors including but not limited to: Seasonal fish community structure,
spawning effects on distribution, habitat surrounding intake structures, water quality stressors, high
flow events, and the location and attraction to the flow associated with the intake. In addition,
swimming speed, intake velocity, screen mesh size, trash rack spacing, and other intake configurations
will also affect the susceptibility to impingement. For example, clupeids have high susceptibility to
impingement based on multiple factors such as schooling behavior, distribution in the water column,
negative rheotactic response to intake flows, and poor swimming performance in winter months due to
lower water temperatures (Loar et al 1978).
No ongoing or historical impingement studies have been performed at the CWIS on Shearon Harris
Reservoir. The CWIS withdraws water from Harris Reservoir through traveling screens with a design TSV
of less than 0.5 fps. In the Rule, intake screens designed to achieve a T5V at or below 0.5 fps are
compliant with the impingement reduction standard.
4.3.2 Entrainment
Table 4-6. Entrainment Potential for Fish Species Identified in Shearon Harris Reservoir.
Species
(Common Name)
Habitat UselPreference
Potential for Entrainment"
mida
Bowfin
Centrarchidae
Black Crappie
Constructs nests in vegetation in
shallow water, over submersed
tree roots, eggs are demersal and
stick to surrounding vegetation
Construct nests around
vegetation close to other nests
Unlikely due to water depth in the vicinity of the
CWIS, eggs are demersal and adhesive
Unlikely due to water depth in the vicinity of the
CWIS, demersal and adhesive eggs, parental care of
nest until larvae swim -up
30

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Species
(Common Name)
Bluegill
Bluespotted
Sunfish
Green Sunfish
Largemouth Bass
Pumpkinseed
Redbreast
Sunfish
Redear Sunfish
Warmouth
lupeu . ae -
Gizzard Shad
Threadfin Shad
Cyprinidae
Common Carp
Golden Shiner
VVhitefin Shiner
Esocidae
Chain Pickerel
Ictaluridae
Habitat Use/Preference
Nest generally constructed in
shallow waters
Occupies and spawns in
vegetated areas
Construct nests around
vegetation
Nest constructed In shallow areas
of one to six feet
Spawns in vegetation, associated
with vegetated areas
Construct nests over sift -free or
lightly silted sand and gravel in
cover
Nest generally constructed in
shallow waters
Construct nests in cover
Broadcast spawners
Broadcast spawners
Lays adhesive eggs in shallow
vegetation in the vicinity of the CWIS
Potential for Entrainment"
Unlikely due to water depth in the vicinity of the
CWIS, demersal and adhesive eggs, parental care of
nest until larvae swim -up
Unlikely due to habitat and spawning preference
Unlikely; limited quantity of vegetation available in the
vicinity of the CWIS
Unlikely due to water depth in the vicinity of the
CWIS
Unlikely due to habitat and spawning preferences
and low abundance of adults (only 1 collected from
2008-16 at Transect S)
Unlikely; specific substrate type not present
Unlikely due to water depth in the vicinity of the
CWIS, demersal and adhesive eggs, parental care of
nest until larvae swim -up
Unlikely; no cover near intake
Likely, broadcast spawner increases susceptibility
Likely, broadcast spawner increases susceptibility
Adhesive eggs are cast over
rooted aquatic vegetation,
filamentous algae, gravel, and
sometime on nests of black
basses and sunfishes, schools in
open water and along edges of
weedy habitat
Unlikely due to absence of shallow, vegetated habitat
Unlikely due to habitat and spawning preference,
adhesive and demersal eggs, relatively low
abundance
Assumed to spawn in crevices, Unlikely due to habitat and spawning preference and
very low abundance
travels in schools
Prefers vegetated areas for
spawning and daily activities,
eggs demersal and adhesive
Unlikely due to habitat and spawning preference,
adhesive and demersal eggs
31

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Species
(Common Name)
Brown Bullhead
Channel Catfish
Flat Bullhead
White Catfish
Snail Bullhead
Yellow Bullhead
White Perch
Swamp Darter
Tesselated Darter
'TSV below 0 5 fps
avoidance of the in
abitat UselPreference
Females lay eggs in dark shallow
areas under rocks and inside logs
Cavity nesters, found in large
open areas with woody debris,
bank cavities; moderate currents
Cavity nesters
Cavity nesters
Cavity nesters
Cavity nesters
Potential for Entrainment"
Unlikely due to habitat preference
Unlikely due to habitat preference
Unlikely due to habitat preference
Unlikely due to habitat preference
Unlikely due to habitat preference
Unlikely due to habitat preference
Broadcast spawners on primary Unlikely due to habitat preference in the vicinity of the
points with hard substrates, eggs CIS and having adhesive and demersal eggs
are adhesive and demersal
Eggs attached to underside of
leaves, found near streams in
reservoirs
Eggs attached to underside of
rocks, found near streams in
reservoirs
Unlikely due to habitat and spawning preference,
rarity of adults
Unlikely due to habitat and spawning preference.
rarity of adults
at the CW1S will minimize potential for entrainment for all species based on their ability for
take. Species with floating eggs would continue to have some susceptibility to entrainment.
4.3.3 Selected Species
A subset of species present in Shearon Harris Reservoir with the likelihood to be entrained was selected
for detailed life history descriptions including reproduction, recruitment, and peak abundance.
Threadfin Shad and Gizzard Shad were selected as target species because of reproduction (i.e.,
broadcast spawner or floating eggs). Bluegill was also selected as a target species because it was the
most abundant species in historic electrofishing collections, is a substantial contributor to the
recreational fishery, and is an important forage species for game fish. Other selected species that
contribute to the recreational fishery of Shearon Harris Reservoir and were among the most dominant
species collected in historic electrofishing sampling include Redear Sunfish, Largemouth Bass, White
Perch, Golden Shiner, and Black Crappie.
32

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Of the selected species, two (i.e., Threadfin Shad and Gizzard Shad) are recognized as having the highest
potential for entrainment at the CW1S. The species account descriptions below are ordered from most
abundant to least.
Threadfin Shad
Spawning occurs in shallow waters such as near shorelines or riverbanks. Threadfin Shad spawn from
April to July in water temperatures above 16°C between dawn and sunrise (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993;
Rohde et al 2009) (Citation). Spawning occurs near the shoreline and over aquatic plants and other
submerged objects with eggs that are demersal and adhesive. Threadfin Shad are sensitive to sudden
changes in water temperature and oxygen content resulting in frequent die -offs in late summer and
winter (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993; Rohde et al 2009). (Citation). This species is not considered fragile
but are similar to the fragile classified Gizzard Shad in their biology, physiology, and morphology. The
Threadfin Shad similar enough to Gizzard Shad to warrant treatment as a fragile species in this report.
Gizzard Shad
Gizzard Shad are classified by the EPA as a fragile species (Table 4-10). Gizzard Shad spawning can occur
from mid -March to late August, with peak population spawning in May and June at water temperatures
ranging from 15.6-22.8°C (Wailus et al. 1990). They spawn in large schools and their adhesive eggs are
deposited on roots, fibers, and debris along the shore (Miller 1960). Gizzard Shad are extremely prolific
spawners and can deposit as many as 400,000 eggs at one time (Tomelleri and Eberle 1990).
Bluegill
Bluegill occur in most rivers and lakes in the southeastern U.S. and are frequently found in backwater
habitats containing vegetation and woody debris. Bluegill spawn at water temperatures between 19.4
and 26.7°C (Cornish and Welke 2004; Spotte 2007). The spawning season begins in spring or early
summer when the water temperature reaches approximately 21.1°C with the peak of spawning in the
mid -Atlantic region occurring in May or June. Individual fish may spawn several times within the same
season (Rohde et al. 1994).
Bluegill are colonial breeders and build nests to spawn in that are usually in close proximity to each
other. Males construct nests that are approximately 1 foot in diameter in shallow water (i.e., depths of 1
to 3 feet). The eggs from several females can be fertilized and deposited in the nest, which is then
defended by the male until the eggs have hatched. Because the nests are located in shallow depths,
water level fluctuations can severely impact successful reproduction as nests can be stranded by low
water level or disrupted by strong wave action. The adhesive eggs hatch after 72 hours at 22.2°C and 34
hours at 26.7°C (Cornish and Welke 2004). The yolk sac is absorbed when larvae are 6 millimeters long,
at which time they leave the nest and move into littoral vegetation. Fry are free swimming after
approximately 10 days (Carlander 1977). Fecundity ranges from 2,000 to 8,000 eggs at age 3 and up to
60,000 eggs at ages 4 to 8,
Redear Sunfish
Redear Sunfish inhabit a variety of habitat including vegetated ponds, lake, reservoirs, pool and
backwater of streams and small rivers over mud or sandy bottoms (Jenkins and Burkhead 1993).
Spawning starts, usually in synchrony, in May when water temperatures reach 20 to 21° C and can
33

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
continue into mid -summer. Redear Sunfish are colonial breeders and build nests in close proximity to
each other in water shallower than two meters. Females can produce from 12,000 to 30,000 demersal
sticky eggs. Males guard the eggs and fry in the nests. Redear Sunfish consumes a wide variety of
insects, but due to large molariform teeth, the fish also crushes and eats snail, small mussels and clams.
Largemouth Bass
Largemouth Bass spawn when water temperatures reach 15.6-23.9 °C (Heidinger 1975). The male builds
a nest in substrate typically comprised of rocky sand or gravel and cleared of organic debris and silt
(Emig 1966; Rohde et al. 1994; Pflieger 1997). The nests are 2 two 3 feet in diameter and usually widely
spaced (i.e., 30 feet apart) unless the available nesting area is limited. Nests are built in areas of no
current or wave action (Pflieger 1997) at depths of 1 to 15 feet.
Males remain at the nest to fan the eggs to keep them silt -free and to protect the young for up to two
weeks (Pflieger 1997). Eggs hatch in 2 to 5 days (Emig 1966) and the fry form tight schools over the nest
and begin to feed in five to eight days. The schools break up approximately 1 month after hatching when
the young bass are approximately one inch long. Growth rates are variable and depend on the lake
productivity and food availability. Largemouth Bass typically mature at about ages 1 to 2 in the region
(Carlander 1977; Rohde et al. 1994), or when they reach approximately 10 inches long (Pitlo et al. 2004).
White Perch
White Perch are native to Atlantic slope rivers and are a semianadromous species typically found in
lower and mid -estuary areas that make spawning runs into upstream reaches of rivers. White Perch
have been introduced into may freshwater reservoirs inside and outside of their native range. They
were first observed in Shearon Harris Reservoir in 1996. White Perch are broadcast spawners and can
produce from 20,000 to 150,000 adhesive and demersal eggs (Jenkins and Burkhead 1994). Spawning
occurs in aggregations and takes place when temperatures are between 10 and 16° C during a one to
two -week period. Peak spawns may occur in Shearon Harris in February, March, or April. Spawning
takes place on primary points (rather than secondary points in embayment areas), on cover -free shallow
sloping points that have hard/sand clay features (Wong 2002). White perch are opportunistic feeders
and eat insects, zooplankton and fishes. Older fishes concentrate on young of the year shad when
available (Wong 2002). White Perch school in open water and are found in shallow to moderate depths
for most of the year but move to deeper water during the winter. In reservoirs, White Perch can occupy
similar areas as Black Crappie.
Golden Shiner
The Golden Shiner is widely distributed throughout eastern North America and found in a variety of
habitats including streams, river, ponds, lake, and reservoirs. The shiner typically associates with
vegetation and often swims in schools in alongside vegetation shorelines (Jenkins and Burkhead 1994).
The Shiner feeds on plankton from midwater to surface depths and will often follow the plankton daily
migration. Midge larvae, microcrustaceans, and insects are also a component of the diet. Spawning
may occur from April through August from 15 to 26° C. Adhesive eggs are cast over rooted aquatic
vegetation, filamentous algae, gravel, and sometimes on the nests of black basses and sunfishes (Etnier
and Starnes 1993). Females can produce up to 200,000 eggs. Sexual maturity is reached at two years of
growth usually at lengths of 65-80 mm.
34

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SIHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
4.4 Identification and Evaluation of Primary Growth Period
[§122.21(r)(4)(iv)]
Fish are cold blooded, thus primary growth occurs when water temperatures are 10°C or above. The
conventional view on seasonal variation in fish growth in North America is that growth is fastest in the
spring and early summer, slows in the late summer and fall, and virtually stops in the winter (Gebhart
and Summerfelt 1978). The majority of fishes will have their highest densities shortly after the hatch
occurs when larvae are concentrated, and natural mortality has not yet reduced numbers. Feeding
competition is especially important during late spring through early summer when the bulk of fish are in
their early life stages. During this time, they are more susceptible to starvation (May 1974). This is a
critical stage in development, where larval fish have a short time period to initiate exogenous feeding
before starving (Ehrlich 1974; Miller et al. 1988).
Table 4-7. Period of Peak Abundance for Relevant Taxa in Table 4-4. Known Spawning and Recruitment Period
of Native Species with Documented Occurrence in Shearon Harris Reservoir, North Carolina (Jenkins and
Burkhead 1993; Rohde et al. 2009).
Common
Name`
Feb
Mar Apr
May
Jki:} Jul
Aug
Sop
Oct
Nov
Dec
Chain Pickerel
Bowfin
Black Crappie
Golden Shiner
Bluegill
Bluespotted
Sunfish
Green Sunfish
Hybrid Sunfish
Largemouth
Bass
Pumpkinseed
Redbreast
Sunfish
Redear Sunfish
Warmouth
Gard Shad
Threadfin Shad
in
LIME
ME_ _
[1111111 it
•
i
rT+
If
t ,
1
rumil7 rip7
Ern
35

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Common
Name*
Feb Mar Apr
May
Common Carp
Brown Bullhead
Channel Catfish
FIE -Bullhead
Wh Catfish.
SnaifBu Ihead
Yellow Bu Ahead
Swamp Darter
Tesselated
Darter
White Perth
KiliI sh
Whitefin Shiner
Jun Jut
Aug
Sop
Oct
Nov
Doc
MEM
■lila
:MEL
teimi
3irimoum
1--_--
E1T
Gray -shaded months indicate the
known spawning and recruitment
period
36
■
Darker -shaded months
indicates period of potential
peak abundance

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
4.5 Data Representative of Seasonal and Daily Activities of
Organisms in the Vicinity of CWIS [§122.21(r)(4)(v)]
Table 4-8. Seasonal and Daily Activities of Species Present in Shearon Harris Reservoir (Jenkins and Burkhead
1194; Rohde et al. 2009).
Species
(Common
Name)
Seasonal Activities (Spawning)
Daily Activities (Feeding and Habitat)
Bowfin
spawns from March to early June
at temperatures between 16-196 C,
constructs bowl shaped nests in
depression in shallow waters on
bottom, in dense vegetation,
among weeds, tree roots or under
Togs, nest may occur singly or in
groups, eggs are demersal,
adhesive, covered with filaments,
and stick to surroundings, young
remain In nest guarded by male
and are also guarded when they
leave the nest
inhabits slow water, usually found concealed in or near
vegetation, near or in cover such as logs, branches, cut
banks, young eat insects and crustaceans, adults prey
on fish and anything catchable
CaL7trarchidae
Black Crappie
spawning occurs from late
February to early June. Nests are
constructed in shallow water to
moderately deep water (to 6
meters), sometimes In close
proximity to each other and usually
associated with vegetation or
structure, larvae are pelagic and
move inshore as larger juveniles
usually found in vegetated areas of backwaters in
streams and nvers in ponds and reservoirs, aggregates
around structure and associates with aquatic vegetation
fallen trees, stumps young Black Crappie feed an
aquatic Insects and small fishes and adults feed
primarily on fishes
Bluegill
spawns from May through
September, generally most of the
growing season, peaking in June,
constructs nests in aggregations in
shallow water on sand or gravel
bottoms, eggs are guarded by
male
young are planktivores, adults eat aquatic and terrestrial
insects; found in pools, lakes, streams, and rivers, with
vegetation, overhead cover, structure
Bluespotted
Sunfish
spawning occurs from May to habitats include heavily vegetated, slow waters of
September, spawns several limes, swamps, ponds, streams, ditches, tree roots; eats small
likely in aquatic vegetation crustaceans, insects from water column and vegetation
37

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Species
(Common
Name)
Green
Sunfish
Largemouth
Bass
Pumpkinseed
Redbreast
Sunfish
Redear
Sunfish
Seasonal Activities (Spaw
spawns April through August,
constructs nests In colonies as
shallow depressions in sand and
gravel in pools in sand and gravel
near shelter such as logs and
vegetation, males guard eggs In
nests
spawning occurs late April to June
when temperatures are between
16 to 18 ° C, with peak spawning
occurring in April and May; nests
are generally located in sand or
gravel at the base of logs, stumps,
and emergent vegetation along
shorelines usually at depths of 0.6
meters, both male and female
guard eggs in nest
spawns in April and May between
16 and 21° C, but may extend to
August, constructs solitary nests in
open shallow water on sand and
gravel, males guard eggs in nest
spawns from June thru August
between 16-28° C, nests are
constructed generally at one -meter
depth on bottom over sand and
gravel, often with overhead cover,
eggs are adhesive and can form
large clumps in the nest, males
guards eggs in nest
generally spawns from April
through August, spawning onsets
with temperatures of 20-21 ° C,
nests found in aggregate and are
constructed in waters shallower
than 2 meters, often near
vegetation and in colonies, males
gurads eggs in nest
Daily Activities (Feeding and Habitat)
prefers slow pools and backwaters of low- and moderate
gradient streams and rivers, but also occur in ponds,
lakes, and reservoirs, highly tolerant of conditions such
as turbidity and drought and can rapidly colonize new
habitats, Food preferences are aquatic Insects and small
fishes, frequently associated with vegetation and large
rocky areas or rip -rap shorelines
occupies a wide variety of habitats, prefer warm, calm,
and clear water and thrive in slow streams, farm ponds,
lakes, and reservoirs, young feed primarily on plankton,
insects, small fishes, adults feed on fishes, frogs, and
almost any other animal of appropriate size
feeds on microcrustaceans, aquatic insects, snails, small
clams, some small fishes, found in ponds, lakes,
reservoirs, creeks. and streams
a generalist predator that eats insects, crayfish,
arthropods, mollusksand fishes; inhabits pool habitat,
lakes, and rivers, associates with woody debris, stumps.
and undercut banks, abundant in upstream reaches of
reservoirs, rip -rap shoreline, and rocky points
generally, eats small prey, snails, and small mussels and
clams, small insects and fishes; habitat is primarily
lacustrine, generally found in vegetated lakes, ponds,
reservoirs, streams, rivers, or backwater areas.
38

Species
(Common
Name)
VVamiouth
Seasonal Activities (spawning)
spawns from mid -spring into
summer, occasionally early fall,
starts spawning at 21° C, male
constructs solitary nests often
hidden in vegetation and guards
eggs
Gizzard Shad
Threadfin
Shad
spawns in aggregations at near
surface depths from March to
August, from 10 to 29° C. peaking
above 18° C, eggs are demersal
and adhere to algae, rocks, or
other objects
spawns in aggregations at near
surface depths often over
structure, eggs are demersal and
adhere to vegetation and brush
316(b} Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Daily Activities (Feeding and Habitat)
young eat plankton and small insects while adults eat
insects, snails, crayfishes, and fishes; inhabits pools and
backwaters, swamps, lakes, and frequently associates
with aquatic vegetation, and large rocky areas,
commonly associates with rip -rap shorelines in
reservoirs
filter feeders that strain the plankton from the water
column; open water, pelagic schooling fish
filter feeders that strain the plankton from the mid -water
column, open water, pelagic schooling fish
Cyprinidae
Common
Carp
spawning occurs in the spring in
the shallow water and along
shorelines in reservoirs, over
vegetation, tree roots, or open
bottom, peak spawning occurs
between 15 and 20° C and usually
when aquatic vegetation is flooded
during April and May, spawning
activities create Tots of turbidity,
eggs attach to vegetation or sink
into the mud
Golden
Shiner
spawning may occur from April
thru August, from 15 to 26° C,
adhesive eggs are cast over
rooted aquatic vegetation,
filamentous algae, gravel, and
sometime on nests of black basses
and sunfishes
Whitefin
Shiner
spawns from June thru August,
assumed to be spawn in crevices
tolerant of a wide range of environmental conditions.
Typically found in the calm and mud -bottomed waters of
sluggish pools, backwaters, and reservoirs where
vegetation is present ,omnivores That ingest mouthfuls
of the soft bottom sediments (detritus), expels them into
the water, and then feeds on the disclosed insects,
crustaceans, annelid worms, mollusks, weed and tree
seeds, aquatic plants, and algae
feeds primarily from midwater to surface depths on
plankton, microcrustaceans, and insects, sometimes
algae; sometimes schools in open water and along
edges of weedy habitat, moves from shallow inshore
areas to open waters following plankton migrations
diet consists mainly of insects and some plant material;
found in small schools over sand and gravel in larger
creeks and rivers, sometimes along reservoir shorelines
Esociadae
39

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Species
{Common
Name)
Chain
Pickerel
Seasonal Activities (spawning)
coldwater spawners, between 2
and 22°, during winter and early
spring, scatters sticky eggs over in
and around vegetation or tree
roots
young feed on small crustaceans and insects, adults
feed on fish, frogs, snake, and mice opportunistically.
active predators in winter, solitary fish found in slow
waters and lakes that are well vegetated, found in
depths Tess than 3 meters, juveniles prefer shallower
water
Killifish
spawns from April to Septembers,
in open spaces in vegetation or
sandy areas, eggs have filaments
that adhere vegetation and other
surroundings
eats small organisms from the bottom, water column,
and surface, mainly on midge larvae and
microcrustaceans_ invertebrates, insects, inhabits ponds,
lakes, streams, rivers, often found schooling in or near
vegetated. shoreline habitats, or open sandy areas
Ictaluridae
k
Brown
Bullhead
Channel
Catfish
Flat Bullhead
White Catfish
spawning temperatures ranged
between 14 to 29' C from March
through June, nesting occurs on
firm or shallow sandy areas in or in
open, under cover such as logs.
burrows, or in trash litter (cans,
buckets, etc. ), both male and
female guard eggs
spawning is from May through
July, between 21 and 30° C, nests
are constructed in sheltered areas
spawning occurs in May and June
at peaking at temperatures
between 21-24° C in May,
assumed to construct nests and
guard eggs similar to other
Bullhead catfishes
spawns from May through July
starting at temperatures of 21 ° C in
May, large nests are constructed
on bottom in sand or gravel, near
or in fallen tree and logs, eggs are
then guarded by male
feeds on aquatic invertebrates and fish; omnivorous
feeding on aquatic invertebrates and fishes, occupies
warm, medium and large rivers, reservoirs in near -shore
habitats, associates with cover such as large rock, rip -
rap shorelines, Togs_ fallen trees
young feed primarily on plankton and insect larvae and
larger fish eat almost any available food items including
other fish; found in lakes, rivers, streams occupying a
variety of habitats and substrates
feeds on aquatic invertebrates and fishes; occupies
warm, medium and large rivers, reservoirs in near -shore
habitats, associates with cover such as large rock, logs,
fallen trees
young feed on aquatic insects, adults are omnivorous,
consuming invertebrates, Asian Clams, fishes, and
plants, found in reservoirs, rivers, ponds
40

Species
(Common
Name)
Snail
Bullhead
Yellow
Bullhead
Seasonal Activities (Spawning)
similar to flat bullhead, spawns
from May thru July starting at
temperatures of 21 ° C in May,
large nests are constructed on
bottom in sand or gravel, near or in
fallen tree and logseggs are then
guarded by male
spawns from late April thru June.
excavates shallow nests near
cover or in the open, eggs are
guarded by male
316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Daily Activities (Feeding and Habitat)
similar to flat bullhead_ feeds on aquatic invertebrates
and fish, omnivorous feeding on aquatic invertebrates
and fishes, occupies warm, medium and large rivers,
reservoirs in near -shore habitats. associates with cover
such as large rock, logs_ fallen trees
young feed primarily on microcrustaceans and insect
larvae, adults are omnivorous and mainly eat aquatic
macroinvertebrates and fishes; found in reservoirs,
streams, associates with cover, dense aquatic
vegetation, large rock outcrops
Moronidae
White Perch
Imo
�Peritida
Swamp
Darter
Tesselated
Darter
spawns from March to June, most
spawning takes places in 1 to 2
weeks when water temperatures
are between 10 to 16 ° C, peak
spawning period variable but likely
to be in February, March. or April.
aggregates during spawning
period on primary points and
scatters/broadcasts eggs aver
hard clay sandyrocky areas.
eggs are adhesive and demersal
spawning occurs from late winter
to September, eggs are unguarded
and are attached to leaves. debris,
vegetation, stone
spawning occurs from late March
thru June between 16 to 18 ° C
creates a nest depression under
rock and attaches eggs to rock.
and guards eggs
feeds on microcrustaceans, crayfishes. insect larvae,
and fishes; found in rivers, reservoirs, schools in open
water, found during most of year in shallow and
moderate depths, but much deeper during the winter,
occupies similar areas as Black Crappie
feeds on microcrustaceans, aquatic insect larvae. and
midges; found mainly In swamps, streams, and rivers,
occasionally found in reservoirs near streams
feeds on immature insects, small invertebrates, midge
larvae, found in creeks, streams, rivers, swampy flows,
occasional found in reservoirs near streams
41

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
4.6 Identification of Threatened, Endangered, and Other Protected
Species Susceptible to impingement and Entrainment at CWIS
[§122.21(r)(4)(vi)]
The Rule requires the permittee to document the presence of federally listed species and designated
critical habitat in the action area (see 40 CFR 125.98[f]). For the purpose of defining listed species, the
action area is defined as Shearon Harris Reservoir.
A desktop review of available resources was performed to develop a list of species with protected,
endangered, or threatened status that might be susceptible to impingement and entrainment at the
CWIS on Shearon Harris Reservoir. The USFWS's map -based search tool (Information for Planning and
Consultation [IPaC]) was used to identify state or federally listed rare, threatened, or endangered (RTE)
aquatic species or critical habitat designations within Shearon Harris Reservoir. Listed species spatial
occurrence data from the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program was cross-referenced spatially with
Shearon Harris Reservoir. Because the Shearon Harris CWIS is in a freshwater environment, marine and
anadromous federally listed species and designated critical habitat under National Marine Fisheries
Service jurisdiction were not considered.
State or federally listed rare, threatened, or endangered (RTE) aquatic species or critical habitat
designations occurring with Shearon Harris Reservoir, are provided in Table 4-7. Federal species of
concern and candidate species were omitted from the list (unless they were also state threatened or
endangered), as there are no requirements to address those species under the Rule or Section 7 of the
ESA. The following materials were reviewed to develop the species list in Table 4-7:
• IPaC (https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/) (USFWS 2019) for the search area shown on Figure 4-1, and
• North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources (NCDNCR) Natural Heritage
Program Data explorer listed species element occurrence data (NCDNCR 2018).
Historical electrofishing results for Harris Reservoir are discussed in Section 4.2 of this report. No
federally or state -listed species were collected during electrofishing surveys on Harris Reservoir from
2008 to 2016. The UFWS IPAC search indicated that the Cape Fear Shiner (Notropis mekistocholos)
might be affected by activities in the search location (Shearon Harris Reservoir). The reservoir is outside
of any critical habitat designation and is not included in any of the known or managed populations
(USFWS 1987, 1988, 2017). The NCNHP element of occurrence spatial search did not have any records
for federal or state listed species in the reservoir. The Cape Fear Shiner is not likely to occur in the
reservoir.
Table 4-9. Summary of Rare, Threatened, or Endangered (RTE) Aquatic Species Listed for Shearon Harris
Reservoir, North Carolina, and Record of Occurrence or Potential to Occur in Harris Reservoir.
Source
Scientific
Name
Commo
n Name
Federal
Status"
State Status
Record of occurrence or potential to
occur in Harris Reservoir
USFWS
Notropis Cape
mekistocholas Fear
Shiner
Endangered Endangered
Not likely to occur, No historical records
in reservoir, Hams Reservoir outside of
critical habitat
42

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Source
Scientific
Name
Commo
n Name
Federal
Status*
State Status
Record of occurrence or potential to
occur in Harris Reservoir
NCNHP nla Na of
nFa
No occurrences of state listed species
in Shearon Harris Reservoir
4.7 Documentation of Consultation with Services
[§122.21(r)(4)(vii)]
In preparing this response package for compliance with the Rule, there has been neither public
participation, nor coordination undertaken with the Services. DEP has not submitted information to
obtain incidental take exemption or authorization from the Services.
4.8 Methods and QA Procedures for Field Efforts
[§122.21(r)(4)(viii)]
DEP has not submitted information to obtain incidental take exemption or authorization from the
Services.
4.9 Definition of Source Water Baseline Biological Characterization
Data [§122.21(r)(4)(ix)]
Data presented in this report were compiled from DEP's historic and ongoing Environmental Monitoring
Program on Shearon Harris Reservoir. Relevant reports have been provided as attachments to this
document (Appendix E).
4.10 Identification of Protective Measures and Stabilization
Activities [§122.21(r)(4)(x)]
DEP has performed habitat improvements in Shearon Harris to increase angling success by recreational
users at the DEP employee use area. The design of the cooling water intake structure (i.e., T5V less than
0.5 fps) are anticipated to minimize impingement and greatly reduce entrainment.
4.11 List of Fragile Species [§122.21(r)(4)(xi)]
In the Rule, the EPA identifies 14 species of fish as fragile or having post -impingement survival rates of
less than 30 percent. Occurrence of fragile species in Harris Reservoir was evaluated using historical
sampling data (Table 4-2 Fish Species and Community Composition). The environmental monitoring
program for Harris Reservoir has documented Gizzard and Threadfin Shad in electrofishing surveys.
Gizzard Shad are listed by the EPA as a fragile species (Table 4-10). Threadfin Shad, which is not on the
EPA's list of fragile species, is closely related to several fragile species (family Clupeidae) and is expected
to have very low post -impingement survival. Both the Gizzard and Threadfin Shad are discussed in
43

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Section 4.3.3 Selected Species Reviewed, and their seasonal and daily activities are summarized in Table
4-8. Because the CWIS has coarse -mesh screens with a TSV less than 0.5 fps, the facility is compliant
with impingement mortality compliance option §125.94(c)(2). Impingement is anticipated to be
negligible at this facility based on the low TSV; therefore, a discussion or assessment of potential fragile
species is not warranted.
Table 4-10. List of Fragile Species as Defined by the EPA and their Occurrence in Shearon Harris Reservoir'.
Scientific Name
Common Name
Alosa pseudoharengus Alewife
Alosa saptdlssima
Clupeo harengus
Anchor' mltchil l
American Shad
Atlantic Herring
Bay Anchovy
Alosa crest -Nails Blueback Herring
Pomatomus saltatrix
Bluefish
Occurrence in vicinity of Shearon
Harris CWIS"
No
No
No
No
No
No
Poronotus triocanthus Butterfish No
Dorosoma cepedlanum Gizzard Shad
LutJanus griseus Grey Snapper No
Yes
Alosa mediocrls
Hickory Shad
No
Brevoortla tyrannus Atlantic Menhaden No
Osmerus mordax Rainbow Smelt
Etrumeus sadina Round Herring No
Engraulis eurystale
No
Silver Anchovy
No
2 Threadfin Shad are not included on the EPA Fragile Species list; however, it is in the
same family as Gizzard Shad and is documented as having a low post -impingement
survival rate.
4.12 Information Submitted to Obtain Incidental Take Exemption or
Authorization from Services [§122.21(r)(4)(xii)]
Duke Energy has not submitted information to obtain incidental take exemption or authorization from
the Services. There is no potential for impacts to any endangered species from operation of the Harris
Nuclear Plant makeup water intake structure.
44

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
5 Cooling Water System Data [§122.21(r)(5)]
The information required to be submitted per40 CFR §122.21(r)(5), Cooling water system data, is
outlined as follows:
(i) A narrative description of the operation of the cooling water system and its relationship to
cooling water intake structures; the proportion of the design intake flow that is used in the system; the
number of days of the year the cooling water system is in operation and seasonal changes in the
operation of the system, if applicable; the proportion of design intake flow for contact cooling, non -
contact cooling, and process uses; a distribution of water reuse to include cooling water reused as
process water, process water reused for cooling, and the use of gray water for cooling; a description of
reductions in total water withdrawals including cooling water intake flow reductions already achieved
through minimized process water withdrawals; a description of any cooling water that is used in a
manufacturing process either before or after it is used for cooling, including other recycled process
water flows; the proportion of the source waterbody withdrawn (on a monthly basis);
(ii) Design and engineering calculations prepared by a qualified professional and supporting data to
support the description required by paragraph (r)(5)(i) of this section; and,
(iii) Description of existing impingement and entrainment technologies or operational measures and
a summary of their performance, including but not limited to reductions in impingement mortality and
entrainment due to intake location and reductions in total water withdrawals and usage.
Each of these requirements is described in the following subsections.
5.1 Description of Cooling Water System Operation
[§122.21(r)(5)(0]
HNP's circulating water system is a closed -bop system; that is, the water is recycled and reused in the
steam turbine condensers. The purpose of the circulating water system is to supply cooling water to
various plant components and systems. The heat transferred to the circulating water in the condenser is
rejected to the atmosphere by the evaporation process in the cooling tower. Approximately 99 percent
of the intake water is used for non -contact cooling and no water is used for contact cooling.
The closed cycle cooling system consists of a natural draft, hyperbolic cooling tower that provides a heat
sink for the recirculating condenser cooling water and the normal service water systems. The normal
service water is withdrawn from the closed -cycle cooling water system (cooling tower basin) and
provides cooling water to various plant components and systems. During normal operation, one CTMU
pump supplies all the necessary makeup water (37.44 MGD, design) for the closed -cycle cooling system
in order to restore losses due to drift, evaporation, blowdown and internal consumption. Infrequently,
in drought years, the CTMU pumps are also used to transfer water from the main reservoir to the
auxiliary reservoir. Additionally, during periods of extreme cold weather, heated cooling water may be
discharged to the auxiliary reservoir in order to ensure that ice does not build up at the emergency
cooling water intake screening structure. The closed -cycle recirculating cooling system is generally in
operation when the plant is in operation. Assuming a capacity factor of 90%, the plant would operate
approximately an average of about 329 days per year. However, the circulating water pumps operated
45

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
continuously during the 2016-2018 period. The closed -cycle recirculating system has a blowdown that
averages approximately four MGD per month.
The two ESW pumps are intended for emergency use only but are tested periodically to ensure reliable
operation. Typically, one or the other EWS pump draws water from the auxiliary reservoir about four
days per quarter and draws water from the main reservoir about 10 days per year. This amount totals
approximately 786 million gallons per year. This water is conveyed through critical plant components
and discharged back to the auxiliary reservoir by the ESW discharge canal.
Under normal operating conditions, the recirculating (internal) cooling water flow is 774.15 MGD. This
total includes recirculating cooling water (702.15 MGD) and Normal service water (NSW, 72.0 MGD)
flows apportioned as follows:
• 3 circulating water pumps @ 234.05 MGD each
• 1 NSW pump @ 72 MGD
The total flow to the cooling tower is 846.15 MGD. The cooling tower makeup pump design flow is 74.9
MGD and this is considered to be the cooling water DIF.
5.1.1 Proportion of Design Flow Used in the Cooling Water System
Historical water withdrawals from Harris Reservoir to support HNP operations from 2016 to 2018 are
provided in Table 3-2 (Section 3.4). Based on the water balance diagram (Figure 3-1), approximately 99
percent of the intake flow is used for non -contact cooling purposes (i.e., cooling tower makeup water).
The remainder is used as service water for various plant uses such as fire protection water, boiler wash
water, and demineralizer water. Table 5-1 provides the proportion of the 74.88 MGD DIF withdrawn
from the Harris Reservoir from 2016 through 2018. Although the historical averages are not necessarily
indicative of future withdrawals, only 31.4 percent of the DIF was withdrawn from the Harris Reservoir
from 2016 to 2018.
Table 5-1. Percent of Design Flow Used in the Cooling Water System.
Month
Percent (%) of Design Flow (i.e., 74.88 MGD)
Used in the Cooling Water System
2616
2017
2018
Average
of 2016-
2018
January
19.1%
35.0%
32.9% 29.0%
February
18.3% 37.7% 37.5% 31.2%
March
18.4% 37.7% 37.9% 31.3%
April
18.4% 38.2% 21.0% 25.9%
May 19,0% 38.3% 30.3% 29.2%
June 19.9% 44.5% 39.5% 34.6%
July 19.9% 46.1% 39.5% 35.2%
August 20.4% 44.3% 39.5% 34.8%
September 18.3% 40.9% 40.7% 33.3%
46

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
October
November
December
Percent (%) of Design Flow (i.e., 74.88 MGD)
Used in the Cooling Water System
2016
19.0%
19.9%
17.8%
Annual Average 19.0%
2017
35.7%
36.7%
35.7%
39.2%
2018
38.5%
37.1%
36.3%
35.9%
Average
of 2016-
2018
31.0%
31.3%
29.9%
31.4%
5.2 Design and Engineering Calculations [§122.21(r)(5)(ii)]
Table 5-1 provides the estimated TSV under low and full pond water depths. The maximum withdrawal
rate from the period of record (January 2016 - December 2018) is 34.5 MGD (23,958 gpm) and occurred
one time in July 2017. The engineering calculations of TSV prepared by a qualified professional are
provided in Appendix C.
Lake elevations are typically at or above 215 ft-msl. Based on the data reviewed to prepare this report,
lake elevations below 213 ft-msl feet would be a rare if not exceptional event. At a lake elevation of
approximately 212.8 ft-msl, the resultant through -screen velocity would be 0.50 fps.
Table 5-2. Estimated Through -screen Velocities at Harris Nuclear Plant.
Operating Scenario and Reservoir Level Condition
Design Through Screen Velocity (fps)
Estimated Approach Velocities with
Altemate Operational Scenarios (fps)
Normal Pond (220 ft-msl)
Low Pool (215 ft-nisi)
Low Technical Specification
(205 ft-msl)
Maximum flow at normal pond
(220 ft msl)
Maximum Flow at Technical
Specification (205 ft-msl)
TSV (fps)
0.38
0.46
0.74
0.2
0.5
5.3 Description of Existing Impingement and Entrainment
Reduction Measures [§122.21(r)(5)(iii)]
HNP achieves substantial reductions in entrainment and impingement by means of flow reduction. The
underlying assumption for entrainment is that entrainable organisms have limited or no motility and
passively move with the water entering the power plant; therefore, reduction in flow results in a
47

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
commensurate reduction in entrainment' . This flow reduction is achieved through the use of closed -
cycle recirculating cooling system.
The design flow of the recirculating cooling system is 846.15 MGD. Assuming a 365 day per year
operation this results in an annual flow of approximately 308,844.75 Million gallons per year or if the
plant operated a once -through cooling system they would withdraw approximately this amount per
year. The plant is designed to withdraw the following amount per year assuming no emergency
withdrawal is needed:
Table 5-3. Design and Actual (2016-2018) Flow Data.
AU
Design Total
Operation Total
Actual Total (2016-2018)
Daily Volume
74.9 MGD design
Annual Volume
27,338.5 MG
37.44 MGD expected operation 13,665.6 MG
23-5 MGD actual (2016-2018)
8577.5 MG
786 MG
28,124.5 MG
14,451,6 MG
9,363.5 MG
Proportioning the recirculating water (hypothetical once -through) to the amount withdrawn by the
closed -cycle system, a flow reduction of approximately 91% is realized. Since generally only one CTMU
pump is in operation a more realistic flow reduction is approximately 95%. Actual operational data from
January 2016— December 2018 shows a flow reduction of 97%. With either scenario, the flow reduction
is certainly commensurate with those flows generally achieved by closed -cycle recirculating systems on
a freshwater system.
' This is the underlying assumption in EPA's calculation of entrainment reduction associated with closed -cycle
cooling — see USEPA 2014.
48

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
6 Chosen Method(s) of Compliance with
Impingement Mortality Standard [§122.21(r)(6)]
The information required to be submitted per 40 CFR § 122.21(r)(6) is as follows:
The owner or operator of the facility must identify the chosen compliance method for the
entire facility; alternatively, the applicant must identify the chosen compliance method
for each cooling water intake structure at its facility. The applicant must identify any
intake structure for which a BTA determination for Impingement Mortality under 40 CFR
125.94 (c)(11) or (12) is requested.
The Rule at 40 CFR 125.94(c) gives existing facilities seven BTA options for achieving impingement
mortality compliance. These are listed below. A facility needs to implement only one of these options.
1. Operate a closed -cycle recirculating system as defined at 40 CFR 125.92(c)(1) (this includes wet,
dry or hybrid cooling towers, a system of impoundments that are not WOTUS, or any
combination thereof);
2. Operate a cooling water intake structure that has a maximum design through -screen velocity of
0.5 fps or less;
3. Operate a cooling water intake structure that has a maximum actual through -screen velocity of
0.5 fps or less;
4. Operate an existing offshore velocity cap that is a minimum of 800 feet offshore and has bar
screens or otherwise excludes marine mammals, sea turtles, and other large aquatic organisms;
5. Operate a modified traveling screen system such as modified Ristroph screens with a fish
handling and return system, dual flow screens with smooth mesh, or rotary screens with fish
returns. Demonstrate that the technology is or will be optimized to minimize impingement
mortality of all non -fragile species;
6. Operate any combination of technologies, management practices, and operational measures
that the Director determines is BTA for reducing impingement. As appropriate to the system of
protective measures implemented, demonstrate the system of technologies has been optimized
to minimize impingement mortality of all non -fragile species; and
7. Achieve a 12-month performance standard of no more than 24 percent mortality including
latent mortality for all non -fragile species.
Compliance options 1, 2, and 4 are essentially pre -approved technologies that require minimal
additional monitoring after their installation and proper operation. Options 3, 5, and 6 require that
more detailed information be submitted to the Director before they can be specified as the BTA to
reduce impingement mortality. Options 5, 6, and 7 require demonstrations with field studies that the
technologies have been optimized to minimize impingement mortality of non -fragile species.
In addition, the Rule provides two other impingement compliance BTA options for which the Director
may consider little or no additional controls for impingement mortality (USEPA 2014a). These options
apply under very specific circumstances.
49

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
• De minimis rate of impingement — if the rates of impingement at a facility are so low that
additional impingement controls may not be justified (Section 125.94(c)(11)); and
• Low Capacity utilization of generating units — if the annual average capacity utilization rate of a
24-month contiguous period is Tess than 8 percent (Section 125.94(c)(12)).
Harris Nuclear Plant meets the requirements of 40 CFR §125.94(c)(1) (BTA Option #il) based on data
provided in Table 5-2. In addition, the cooling tower makeup pumps have a design and actual through -
screen velocity of <0.5 fps and therefore compliant with the requirements of 40 CFR §125.94(c)(2) and
(3) (BTA Options 2 and 3).
By meeting the CCRS criterion (BTA #1) the existing technologies in use at Harris Nuclear Plant are BTA
for impingement mortality compliance. Furthermore, the cooling water makeup pumps have a design
through -screen velocity that is lower than the 0.5fps standard for impingement mortality compliance.
5U

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
7 Entrainment Performance Studies [40 CFR §
122.21(r)(7)]
The information required to be submitted per 40 CFR § 122.21(r)(7), Entrainment performance studies,
is as follows:
The owner or operator of an existing facility must submit any previously conducted
studies or studies obtained from other facilities addressing technology efficacy, through -
facility entrainment survival, and other entrainment studies. Any such submittals must
include a description of each study, together with underlying data, and a summary of
any conclusions or results. Any studies conducted at other locations must include an
explanation as to why the data from other locations are relevant and representative of
conditions at your facility. in the case of studies more than 10 years old, the applicant
must explain why the data are still relevant and representative of conditions at the
facility and explain how the data should be interpreted using the definition of
entrainment at 40 CFR 125.92(h).
7.1 Site -Specific Studies [40 CFR §122.21(r)(7)(i)]
Harris utilizes a CCRS, therefore entrainment survival is not anticipated. Hence, no site -specific
entrainment performance studies (i.e., studies evaluating biological efficacy of specific entrainment
reducing technologies or through -facility entrainment survival) have been conducted at Harris.
7.2 Studies Conducted at Other Locations [40 CFR §122.21(r)(7)(ii)]
As of the date of this report, no entrainment performance studies conducted at other facilities have
been determined relevant for documentation in this section.
51

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
8 Operational Status [§ 122.21(0(8)]
The information required to be submitted per 40 CFR §122.21(r)(8), Operational status, is outlined as
follows:
(i) For power production or steam generation, descriptions of individual unit operating
status including age of each unit, capacity utilization rate (or equivalent) for the previous 5
years, including any extended or unusual outages that significantly affect current data for flow,
impingement, entrainment, or other factors, including identification of any operating unit with a
capacity utilization rate of less than 8 percent averaged over a 24-month block contiguous
period, and any major upgrades completed within the last 15 years, including but not limited to
boiler replacement, condenser replacement, turbine replacement, or changes to fuel type;
(ii) Descriptions of completed, approved, or scheduled uprates and Nuclear Regulatory
Commission reiicensing status of each unit at nuclear facilities;
(iii) For process units at your facility that use cooling water other than for power production
or steam generation, if you intend to use reductions in flow or changes in operations to meet
the requirements of 40 CFR 125.94(c), descriptions of individual production processes and
product lines, operating status including age of each line, seasonal operation, including any
extended or unusual outages that significantly affect current data for flow, impingement,
entrainment, or other factors, any major upgrades completed within the last 15 years, and plans
or schedules for decommissioning or replacement of process units or production processes and
product lines;
(iv) For all manufacturing facilities, descriptions of current and future production schedules;
and,
(v) Descriptions of plans or schedules for any new units planned within the next 5 years.
Each of these requirements is described in the following subsections.
8.1 Description of Operating Status [§ 122.21(r)(8)(i)]
HNP is normally used for base Toad generation. Plant outages typically occur during the spring (February
to May) and/or in the fall/winter (October to December) months.
HNP began commercial operations in May of 1987. The HNP Unit 1 original operating license was
renewed and will expire on October 24, 2046.
During 2018 the low pressure turbine was upgraded with a resultant electrical generation capability of
992 MWe.
Utilization for Previous 5 Years
Monthly and annual average capacity factor information for 2014-2019 is provided in Table 8-1. Annual
capacity factors during this period ranged from 90 to 101 percent.
52

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Table 8-1. Annual Capacity Factors at Harris Nuclear Plant, 2014-2019.
Month
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Annual Average
Capacity Factor (%i
2014
2015
2016
88 104
104 104 104 103
104 103 103 104
102 2 103 103
78 48 102 103
100 101 101 102
101 101 101 101
101 101 101 102
102 101 101 101
103 102 20 81
103 104 62 104
104 102 105 104
99 90 92 101
2017
104
104
2018
99
100
19
64
101
101
101
101
102
104
103
90
2019
104
103
103
101
101
100
99
99
99
31
39
104
90
8.2 Descriptions of Consultation with Nuclear Regulatory
Commission [§122.21(r)(8)(ii)]
No consultations with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) were conducted for this report.
However, during the "Initial License Renewal Application" process, the NRC published a Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement (NRC, 2008) that with respect to cooling water concerns, NRC staff
concluded that there would be no impacts with continued operation.
8.3 Other Cooling Water Uses for Process Units [§122.21(r)(8)(iii)]
HNP does not use cooling water for process units; therefore, this subsection is not applicable.
8.4 Description of Current and Future Production Schedules
[§122.21(r)(8)(iv)]
HNP is not a manufacturing facility; therefore, this subsection is not applicable.
53

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
8.5 Description of Plans or Schedules for New Units Planned within
5 years [§122.21(r)(8)(v)]
There are no plans for decommissioning, replacing, or adding new units at this station during the next
five years.
54

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
9 References
Cole, L. J. 1905. The German carp in the United States. Pages 523-641 in Report of the Bureau of
Fisheries for 1904. U.S. Department of Commerce and Labor, Government Printing Office,
Washington, D. C.
Ehrlich, K. F. 1974. Chemical changes during growth and starvation of herring larvae. Pages 301-323 in J.
H. S. Blaxter, editor. The early life history of fish. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Etnier, D. A., & Starnes, W. C. 1993. The fishes of Tennessee. The University of Tennessee Press,
Knoxville, Tennessee.
Gebhart, G. E., and R.C. Summerfelt. 1978. Seasonal Growth of Fishes in Relation to Conditions of Lake
Stratification. "Oklahoma Cooperative Fishery Research Unit 58 (1978): 6-10. Oklahoma State
University, Stillwater, Oklahoma.
Jenkins, R.E., and N.M. Burkhead. 1993. Freshwater Fishes of Virginia. American Fisheries Society,
Bethesda, Maryland.
Loar, J.M., J.S. Griffith, and K.Q. Kumar. 1978. An analysis of factors influencing the impingement of
threadfin shad at power plants in the southeastern United States. Pages 245-255 in L.D. Jensen,
editor. Fourth national workshop on entrainment and impingement. EA Communications,
Melville, New York.
May, R. C. 1974. Larval mortality in marine fishes and the critical period concept. Pages 3-19 in J. H.S.
Blaxter, editor. The early life history of fish. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Miller, T.J., Crowder, L.B., Rice, J.A., Marshall, E.A. 1988. Larval size and recruitment mechanisms in
fishes: toward a conceptual framework. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
45:1657-1670 p.
Menhinick, E.F. 1991. The Freshwater Fishes of North Carolina. North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission, Raleigh, NC.
Murphy, B.R., and D. W. Willis, editors. 1996. Fisheries techniques, 2nd edition. American Fisheries
Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
NCDNCR (North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources. 2018. North Carolina Natural
Heritage Data Explorer element occurrence data. NCDNCR, Raleigh, NC.
Rohde, F.C., R.G. Ardt, J.W. Foltz and J.M. Quattro. 2009. Freshwater Fishes of South Carolina. The
University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, 544 pp.
USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 1987. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants:
determination of endangered species status and designation of critical habitat for the Cape Fear
shiner. Federal Register 52:186(25 September 1987):36034-36039.
USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 1988. Cape Fear Shiner recovery plan. USFWS, Atlanta.
USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2017. Cape Fear Shiner (Notropis mekistocholas) 5-Year Review:
Summary and Evaluation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southeast Region, Raleigh Ecological
Services Field Office. Raleigh, NC.
55

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2019. Information for Planning and Consulting (IPaC).
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/ accessed February 5, 2019.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). 2008. Generic Impact Statement for License
Renewal of Nuclear Plants (NUREG-1437), Supplement 33 Regarding Shearon Harris Nuclear
Power Plant, Unit 1, Final Report. Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. Washington, DC.
Wong, R.K. 2002. White Perch Expansion and Life History Within a Southern Reservoir. Master's Thesis.
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). 2004. Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Techniques to
Define the Hydraulic Zone of Influence of Cooling Water Intake Structures. 1005528. EPRI, Palo
Alto, CA.
EPRI. 2007. Cooling Water intake Structure Area -of -Influence Evaluations for Ohio River Ecological
Research Program Facilities. 1015322. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA.
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. 2007. Duke Energy 316(b) Impingement and Entrainment
Study Summary Report: Submitted in Support of the Duke Energy's 316(b) Impingement and
Entrainment Characterization Studies (Pursuant to 40 CFR 125.95(b)(3)). Charlotte, North
Carolina. November 27, 2007.
National Geographic Holdings, Inc. 2001. North Carolina seamless USGS topographic maps on CD-ROM.
National Geographic Maps. San Francisco, CA.
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources (NCDNCR). 2016. Natural Heritage
Program. NCDNCR, Division of Land and Water Stewardship. June 15, 2016.
http://www.ncnhp.org/data/species-community-search.
Seaber, P. R., F. P. Kapinos, and G. L. Knapp. 1987. Hydrologic Unit Maps. U. 5. Geological Survey Water -
Supply Paper 2294. 23pp.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2014. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System - Final Regulations to Establish Requirements for Cooling Water Intake Structures at
Existing Facilities and Amend Requirement at Phase I Facilities; Final Rule. 40 CFR Parts 122 and
125. Federal Register Vol. 79 No. 158. August 15, 2014.
Wiegel, Robert L. 1964. Oceanographic Engineering, Prentice -Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, NJ,
56

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Appendices

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Appendix A. Harris Nuclear Plant §122.21(r)(2) — (8)
Submittal Requirement Checklist.
Title
(4) Source Water Baseline Biological Characterization Data
Citation
40 CFR
12x.21(r)
Requirement
(2}(I) Narrative description and scaled drawings of source waterbody.
(2)(11)
Identification and characterization of the source waterbody's
hydrological and geomorphological features, as well as the
methods used to conduct any physical studies to determine
intake's area of influence within the waterbody and the results of
such studies.
(2)(111) Locational maps.
Narrative description of the configuration of each CWIS and where
it is located in the waterbody and in the water column.
Provided in Report?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
(3}(il) Latitude and Longitude of CWIS. Yes
(3}(ill) Narrative description of the operation of each CWIS.
(3)(lv) Flow distribution and water balance diagram. Yes
(3)(v)
Yes
(4)(il)
Engineering drawing of CWIS.
A list of the data supplied in paragraphs (r)(4)(ii) through (vi) of
this section that are not available and efforts made to identify
sources of the data.
A list of species (or relevant taxa) for all life stages and their
relative abundance in the vicinity of CWIS.
{4}(iil} Identification of the species and life stages that would be most
susceptible to impingement and entrainment.
(4)(iv)
Identification and evaluation of the primary period of
reproduction, larval recruitment, and period of peak abundance
for relevant taxa.
(4){v} Data representative of the seasonal and daily activities of
biological organisms in the vicinity of CWIS.
(4)(vi)
Identification of all threatened, endangered, and other protected
species that might be susceptible to impingement and
entrainment at cooling water intake structures.
Yes
Yes, but not
applicable because all
data are available.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
A-1

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Title
Citation
40 CFR
122.21(r)
(4)(vii)
(4)(vlii)
(5) Coaling Water System Data
(4)(lx)
(4)(x)
Documentation of any public participation or consultation with
Federal or State agencies undertaken in development of the plan.
Methods and CIA procedures for any field efforts.
In the case of the owner or operator of an existing facility or new
unit at an existing facility, the Source Water Baseline Biological
Characterization Data is the information included in (i) through
(xli).
Identification of protective measures and stabilization activities
that have been implemented, and a description of how these
measures and activities affected the baseline water condition in
the vicinity of CWIS.
(4)(xi) List of fragile species as defined at 40 CFR 125.92(m) at the facility.
(4)(xii)
(5)(i)
Provided in Report?
Information submitted to obtain Incidental take exemption or
authorization for its cooling water intake structure(s) from the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries
Service.
Narrative description of the operation of the cooling water system
and its relationship to CW1S.
Number of days of the year the cooling water system is in
operation and seasonal changes in the operation of the system.
(5)(i) Proportion of the design intake flow that is used in the system.
Proportion of design intake flow for contact cooling, non -contact
cooling, and process uses.
Distribution of water reuse to include cooling water reused as
(5){1) process water, process water reused for cooling, and the use of
gray water for cooling.
Yes, but not
applicable.
Yes, but not
applicable as no new
data have been
collected.
Yes, noted in report
that (I) through (xil)
provide this
Information.
Yes
Yes
Yes, but not
applicable.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
not applicable
A-2

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Tirlc
Citation
40 CFR
122.21(r)
Requirement
Description of reductions in total water withdrawals including
cooling water intake flow reductions already achieved through
minimized process water withdrawals.
Description of any cooling water that is used in a manufacturing
(5)(I) process either before or after it is used for cooling, Including other
recycled process water flows.
OHOProportion of the source waterbody withdrawn (on a monthly
{5)(ii}
basis).
Design and engineering calculations prepared by a qualified
professional and supporting data to support the description
required by paragraph (r)(5)(i) of this section.
Description of existing impingement and entrainment
technologies or operational measures and a summary of their
performance.
Identification of the chosen compliance method for the entire CWIS or each
CWIS at its facility.
(CO
(6)(ii)
Impingement Technology Performance Optimization Study for
Modified Travelling Screen.
Two years of biological data collection.
Demonstration of Operation that has been optimized to minimize
impingement mortality
Complete description of the modified traveling screens and
associated equipment.
Impingement Technology Performance Optimization Study for
Systems of Technologies as STA for Impingement Mortality.
Minimum of two years of biological data measuring the reduction
in impingement mortality achieved by the system.
Provided in Report?
Yes
not applicable
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No, not selected
compliance path and
thus not applicable.
A-3

Title
Citation
40 CFR
122.21(r)
316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Requirement
Site -specific studies addressing technology efficacy, through plant
entrainment survival, and other impingement and entrainment
mortality studies,
(7}(iij Studies conducted at other locations including an explanation of
how they relevant and representative.
(7)(iil)
Studies older than 10 years must include an explanation of why
the data are still relevant and representative-
(8)(i}
Description of individual unit age, utilization for previous 5 year,
major upgrades in last 15 years.
Descriptions of completed, approved, or scheduled uprates and
(8){ill Nuclear Regulatory Commission relicensing status of each unit at
nuclear facilities.
(8)(iv}
18)(v)
Other cooling water uses and plans or schedules for
decommissioning or replacing units.
For all manufacturing facilities, descriptions of current and future
production schedules.
Descriptions of plans or schedules for any new units planned
within the next 5 years_
A-4
Provided in Report?
Yes; note that no
site -specific studies
were conducted at
this facility.
Yes; note that studies
at other locations
were not determined
to be relevant.
not applicable
Yes, need updated
numbers
Yes, but not
applicable.
Yes, but not
applicable.
Yes, but not
applicable.
Yes

Appendix B. Engineering Drawings of Cooling Water
Intake Structure
B-1

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
•
to
It I
417
_,AA
r
-fir`
,'
T • Y
ZE
ooti .
ii
:II
1,
{
}
!'�`'-1
d i
;h' i r
SE.E�
1;i;' ;'
0111
u- >dnrsE■-iiI MCLI a It RiMILIIIIIIMMUMI
er
i
14.
um
di
IV4
•
- ---
��;j{ 0 1�li!61 141
E?, IsuE
111
ril...1..i
LIL{ ili {-�1 1 1
! St i1'=i'il
#lije! ilL�li i }iE:ii! ! I } 7 { �i'il 1 i{
1lilif {i ill 1 +i I i i i 'i � is i;'Ii 1 E,
EIS fE1 d {.l�E{i, Ij ll� itp i _ �ii��fii �IIE� r �l �luie `#{f, 'i,���l,
�{� ,1}• jii'j1tji!tlf �1ui• l#��0 hoot. }i IEI;.r �j i iig it 111 i1i bilil 11ji 11 �iihji E # � iii {:
si : ; itr.k i i 1 5� I3 � ! j � � ! [+� jenl;u u�llel�; { { 5{�1
Sg In
B-2

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
8-3

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
64

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
B-5

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
B-6

11
1 „MU
0 , II ig . II 114
d •••••••
2t IF
,eki a i /
1 ' ',-,-- I ), 41. 1 \k•••71 la f
I, ik"! f•f:i 1 li tiefiN 1pf i i 'TO
2 Ili- Z;:q
0 = 1>11.1:k: 3 11 -,.. •ScN.:-.1111
iffri f -• .-"itt ,F r . N
f " lis
cr1.77_,...7f,7_,,
\ -il 51-
i
i i?
1 ki
!
1.411
r-c
1
a Jr ,,
11 1
.il
T 7
ti
ti
;I :4
ho
0
$ 8-7
,
sus r j
Ilit. 4;
Pi V
a c
;I:
0 Iii pia
....:.,c-it-....7. J.- I...r'l ''-::'..„„
... 04_. '4g•i•: Prt T
16IHj
i
i= 1 ,
.1.,..,„..., r AI, 1 a
- .' _...- 7...-..;. 1 1.T1
•
_ 11 - -,- '
"1 •••
, C-1...
: ,12 'ii` l' 13111...11;
i
811.1.1' k.,••
.• •
ih. • •-• ....... .
1,
!Li 1' .;..! t
till
A
Pi 11;i-I41 I
... j 7 ,i1.7..7.,„.A-"
qs 11
i i _ • , ....-...._ra 1 liiOifqiipialli'iP1iieiilii1Omil.lIhrPaiiiitil`ilt' iiIiil4llihll lifIiianngiipplt ig; I 11.
I-=-•-_--r-_-_7‘;-
1, tg.
P,.tt,.
Pi.liMlll
lrf. ji-71iTr.!. Iti lii 1 i lilt3111-', ; III.: i .i t ei: L
2,, .ei I au., r• ' ; 4!]6'. I Ilp:.- I
7,____,-...—il tisti-
k I. THI*Ni iiiqi 1si :-.- 9 L'""!""
iljling 1 6 a__ i
.
. . ... -
316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
•••
a ,
TFl 141 IP!
41 •
=I :r
I 4:1 I r
1.! -p-
c.z
5-1
,c
3-10

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
w t
hli
if 4
P
{ 3t its {°
IF 0. :,�
Fq
y ,� it14 rit
i1
B-8
I NIP
1111
e,
7r ~R r
w I y
i1:
a
a C
T
9
t
tE

316(b) Compliance Submittal Requirements
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
Appendix C: Engineering Calculations for Through -
Screen Velocity
c-1

a
A
}
a
TJ
0
h
c
b R
C
m
H
LC pj
S
Y
9
P. N N Yi Ill
.. m 03 10
R 10 N N .-1
3
t
Z
Z
a.
0
W
CC
0
•
m
rn
0
0
m
0
0
V'
at
CC
S
CC
P.
m
u
c
8
M
m c is
90 N
E
u ,
a' y g
a c E
V' ;
cc m
m
w o V,
w r
p 13
m
V 1--
W
L
Op
U
0
U
Z
H
El
b
11
N
i0
(.$
v
a
a
u
z
to
>1
5
•
s
g ro
I�r � 5
8x1
O
1'S '
u
us
Velocity. fps*
_.w
*!brute MIL 250.00 ft.
S
O
N
47.
O
O ^ �
kr;4
V
a •p a
V AO
2 W m )
Si _4 0
W a
0 V
4 4 * N
1
w
g - Lifting speed of baskets, rpm (app
a
a
A
d
I1
M
4
N
41
0
•
w
L
a
w
a
$
0]
P'1
Stainless Steel
Stainless Steel
1.1
m
00 040p�
MIS
•'1 gi
O
44 Y 4 v
U z 2
1 1 1 1
4 A 41 '1:3

411
wi
12
$
+
111
—
iii
•
,
+
"4
TA
e at
at
q c
o «
2
. 7 r.
o.
§
- .
_c nil ro
o
MI
to
— k c
ii k V
0
/ 0ƒ
§ 2
_ 77
E \ o m >.
CO R ;
] �<
0 OS C .\X
Xi I/0}§ at <2A
c I fa k'0 k\ a£
di
k dCVIum
/}Qk��� im
�13cc� 2241
��e-E§o
$$k[§G
e..11m
\>a$AkX
INSERT REQUESTED INFORMATION INTO GREEN CELLS AND SHEET CALCULATES TSV
0
cc.L
. a
to
«
B
2
k
1/1
013
11.1
S
0
a1=
E e
E E E
ro fa
---_--D
.2
/
e 0.2
E e §
�.
■ ■ ■ k k k
_ _ 0.
VI

INSERT REQUESTED INFORMATION INTO GREEN CELLS AND SHEET CALCULATES TSV
ai
CP
+
No
Vi
VI
ao
/
7.
\ k el
3
- 2
. .
a \ ■.
k E �' a.
r o
§ § Li
di a to k$
i G
Li 7
VI
] 77 El
I \ Al
01 §,-0
- fa. . e
LI
o -%\ -
k a-°•- o—\ \
)3)g§$ mG 0
2§> § = ©ractrIo
§ § § § — - - ) § 7 0 0
e°210
/ 0 a o® 2 z t 2 E E E E%
§ 6 =_ uj: 2=_ 0 2
/ @ 15 0. § o 8
-`3�7k 0
■a• 1m 1.
/>020 11
= °
§ ( o. ƒ§
(§ $ 0. 5E
.$ ■s §
@ 22�f})�}$
c _ & § ® o
\2 ��0W34,.�
] ) k m = _ _ _ac ; 6.
2 • }Lo4 E E E E ]) §
kU. 0 E Cu Cu Cu § § k #
fa
) ct
13
c>
OD

\
§
■
+
4
•
41
P4
$
+
Pi
gr.
k
d 2
4.1
§ E _ § -
%ni §
- — . .
I § g
k k g
" § r $
go u d
fa c 431 k �7
i in e a
v.
-a 2 E §
2 k \ .0
K k�� al
k a .k< \
o . m § - gu _
" � §}£}§ f/� 7
f § `0 e 5 2 a.
�7\�§�k B§� § k
\ \ /) 9,1 0 j on CC in § / . _ _ A
» rro 2Oae)®■ &&2E ■»§%
-. B _ a 2§{ __ IL a m VI_: a
,44 5 222SEe&o
o T. §-of��cn o
�/ /\\2k§ z b
iv a'
2 • § E �§
514 ) /2 § /2
e t _ % _ m °
2 5 I �$'�Ia�02
c- ■ _.=�®�
k 2 �00 2 ƒ20tog'2/f
in �_ 2 E E = / .c = 2 § 6- @
■ k / , ; ; ; . - . ®® j
9 o �, 2% E■ E E 2 2 a_
@< CL_ 01 0) 0) c c 2 m§
/ \ « 5 0 E _ ; .. ■ § ■ E §
/ \ « • CL 2 § § § U k 2 ■ £
0� ° Zt
EP o 2/
\�o c>
■ .§
§ Eo j
% 101 a I 11 /
= 3 » 2 r
V

a
N
N
3
a
N
N
C
GI
E
r
a
3
+
a
N
N
VI
a
E
CI
N
N
t
a
E
m
4.4
E
II
N
INSERT REQUESTED INFORMATION INTO GREEN CELLS AND SHEET CALCULATES TSV
Lc
4.4
3
0
1*
0
47
n
CU
co
0I
3
0
=
0
Rai
m
II
01
I.
{e'
8
N
n II
N *'
awl A
C
C
E 0'
a _
QS.
r'n U3
73 E
3 y Y
1.1 WI ? C'
inC
.37
o a as
u R ti
VI
h0
V a
y Z Q 3. c
to cu
N H E
m
m 0
y
a rI
a o
V1 u a a aJin
aJ 7
a E E E a E Ta
= LL1 N N N =N '0
0
Q
n
`0
0. C
E Si
u
E.
HNP Reissua
E
0
04
a
E
C
00
2 v
o Ilyi
= a C
L a
E E a
7
av
m
0
Cu
C.
0
L
a
E
N
N
m 0
a =
W
O m
a m c
L N u
E..
0 61 0.

I
}
+
4
•
Tsi
k
+
E
rs
-
re 8 °
. .
~ k
kra
C. a
t I
31
\E
\� fIJ
°t)1' CU
27§u
Z. z
ak5 / c
B)G § k
cc )§/ a o
_.LnCD9
=- E E E E —
= UJ = 2 = I : k
L.
* �§
E E ■
% 5 -
5= a=Mt=
Efff•..
a§-aCU9=J
4403.! §-
Con-
. v .. _ © u '-
)\kkkk}cmsn
.CI Ca
E (
- 04 4) 51
E £ ■ ■ § §
0. 2 § §
percent clogging

k•
01
2
k
V.
to
CU
ea
oo to
\
7 ■.e0
1•0 —
22\-ab)
§ § % § § ' 2
\ § QW0.0dj
f7aE.
ƒ 2 C)/)[§
•
0 c L cl oI-
j§ J &
©'
Ef
t 2 Nk
�
5° @
§�
la
2 co
w c•
§ 2
ak K ko
T0 \k
•
0r k/
CL ! � 0
!"
o_ c>
/ 21
u \ § 311
k
§ ©> 2
cc i 2 § §
CLI
0
a
01
k
/
\
m
I §
m
1.11
O.
to§© CU
}u,
§ E E E
m fa fa ■ ■ §
/
0
§ E
E§
1
) 0 §
O.
00 £c—Ce22G
2k0 23,°'/
=.0.e� 01 -�8
} 0 k k k k] o\
E §§ 2§ 0 k k
E;�VIm m 2 E 2
1,1
percent clogging

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0039566
Attachment 4
Form 2C — Section 2.1 — Line Drawing / Water Balance / Flow Table

Attachment 4 — Form 2C
E
m 1
cu
V
c_ ar
� a) e 2 u, =
o '0 3 -� =
• ..» U
O E C C b E =
0
O v
✓ O
i
mW1111111
iL_]is.
wa;sus 2UtssaaOJJ a;sUMpIg
0
l—w-To combined outralI (CTB) line

C9
0
7
De -chlorination
1
U
0
0

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant and Harris Energy & Environmental Center
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0039586
Attachment 4
Form 2C - Section 2.1 - Flows, Sources of Pollution, and Treatment Technologies
Stream
Flow @ Maximum Power*
Flow @ Temperature
Shutdown*
Notes
1
21,000 gpm
2I,000 gpm
Emergency/Testingl Intermittent use
2
510 MGM
0 — 5 MGM
Varies with dissolved solids
3
864 MGM
9 MGM
Cooling tower make-up
4
648 MGM
4 MGM
Average meteorological condition
5
0 — 14,000 gpm
0 — 14,000 gpm
Cooling tower bypass line
6
500,000 gpm
0 — 284,000 gpm
7
500,000 gpm
0 -- 284,000 gpm
8
300 gpm
0 — 176 gpm
9
20,800
0 .. 10,000
Intermittent operation
10
300 gpm
0 . 176 gpm
11
1.2 MGM
210,000
Condensate polisher regenerations and
rinse (Intermittent operation)
12
24,000 gpm
0 — 16,500 gpm
—
13
24,000 gpm
0 — 16,500 gpm
—
14
315,900 gpm
0 — 185,000 gpm
15
315,900 gpm
0 — 185,000 gpm
16
6 MGM
5 MGM
17
208,300
208,300
18
0
0
Very infrequent operation
19
666,600
666,600
20
500
500
Auxiliary boiler drains
2I
50,000 gpm
50,000 gpm
Service water system
22
1,220,800
220,000
Secondary waste (Nonradiological),
alternate route
23
0
0
Secondary waste (Radiological), not
normally used
24
0 —1 MGM
Make-up as needed
25
7,645,000
7,645,000
26
4,000,000
4,000,000
27
300 Ibs/month
300 Ibs/month
Settling basin sludge
28
3,033
3,033
Treated water tank drains
29
11,000
11,000
Fire pump test
30
8,786,200
8,786,2000
Storm drains includes rainwater and
firewater
3

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant and Harris Energy & Environmental Center
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0039586
31
1.2 MGM
1.2 MGM
Potable water
32
2,445,000
2,445,000
_
33
39,000
39,000
Reactor coolant system
34
1.200.000
1,200,000
Demineralized water
35
500
500
Demineralized water to auxiliary
boilers
36
11,000
11,000
Fire pump test
37
1,167
1,167
Hydrant and drain tests
38
693,000
693,000
Plant and HE&EC water usage
39
0.2 MGM
0.2 MGM
Sanitary waste
40
_
Sludge removal as necessary
41
8,340,000
8,340,000
Yard and roof drains
42
10,000
10,000
_
43
33,300
33,300
_
44
_
Makeup as required
45
1,220,800
220,000
Makeup 9 and 11
46
0.065 MGD
0.065 MGD
Sanitary waste (average flow at -
0.025 MGD with peak flows to 0.065
MGD)
47
413,000
413,000
Radwaste
48
10,000 gpm
10,000 gpm
Boron recycle
49
67,000
67,000
Boron Recycle/CVS letdown
50
30
30
Used oil
51
75,000
75,000
Equipment drains
52
316,000
316,000
Floor drains
53
7,000
7,000
Decontaminated waste
54
6,000
6,000
Laboratory waste (chemistry)
55
4,100
4,100
Varies with number of filter
backwashes
56
5 - 10 gpm
5 - 10 gpm
Water treatment steam heater drains
57
120,000
I20,000
Condenser water box (approximately
two drains/year)
58
6,950,700
6,950,700
Low -volume waste
Units: Gallons per month unless otherwise noted
4

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0039586
Attachment 5
Form 2C — Section 3.1 - Flows, Sources of Pollution, and Treatment Technologies

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant and Harris Energy & Environmental Center
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0039586
Attachment 5
Form 2C — Section 3.1 Flows, Sources of Pollution, and Treatment Technologies
HARRIS NUCLEAR PLANT
The Harris Nuclear Plant (HNP) consists of a 1,016 MW generating unit and associated facilities.
The HNP systems include a Westinghouse pressurized water reactor, three re -circulating steam
generators, a turbine generator, a one -pass condenser, an open re -circulating (cooling tower)
cooling water system, and a lake to makeup water lost by evaporation. In a pressurized water
reactor design, steam is produced in the secondary system steam generators using hot water from
the reactor core. The primary system does not normally come into contact with any other part of
the generating system, such as the steam cycle which includes the turbine and the condenser.
Outfall 006 — Combined Outfall to Harris Lake
The HNP operates on an open re -circulating cooling system using a natural draft cooling tower
and 4100 acre makeup water storage reservoir. All five major wastewater discharges at the HNP
are combined in a 36-inch diameter common pipe which discharges to the Harris Lake 500 feet
offshore at 40 feet below the surface (Discharge Serial No. 006 in this application.) The
individual waste streams contributing to the common outfall pipe are: cooling tower blowdown,
sanitary waste treatment plant effluent, metal cleaning wastes, low -volume wastes, and radwaste
system. (These waste streams are enumerated in the present permit as Discharge Serial Numbers
001, 002, 003, 004, and 005, respectively.) Toxicity testing has been conducted on the combined
outfall line since February 1990. Each of the waste streams, as well as miscellaneous discharge
points, are described in this narrative. Also included is a list of chemicals which are expected to
be in waste streams from the HNP (Attachment 6).
Outfall 001- HNP Cooling Tower Blowdown discharge to Outfall 006
The cooling tower provides the condenser with a supply of water for removing the heat rejected
by the condensation of steam. (The circulating water temperature rise across the condenser is
25'F.) This heat is dissipated primarily by evaporation as the water falls through the tower.
This evaporation is essentially pure water vapor, with the dissolved and suspended solids
remaining to concentrate.
To prevent the solids from causing scale and corrosion problems, some of the concentrated
cooling water is discharged from the cooling tower basin, i.e., blowdown. During plant
operation, the cooling tower basin continuously discharges for optimum performance.
Blowdown currently averages approximately 6 MGD. Makeup water for cooling tower
evaporative losses and cooling tower blowdown is provided from the main reservoir. The
cooling tower also serves as a partial source of service water, which is used for non -contact
cooling of auxiliary equipment throughout the plant. The cooling tower is infrequently drained

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant and Harris Energy & Environmental Center
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0039586
for maintenance. The normal operating procedure includes draining the residual water to the
Iake via Discharge Serial No. 006.
Occasionally, the condensers are drained for maintenance and repairs. When the condensers are
drained, it is necessary to route the residual water (approximately 60,000 gallons per condenser
per event) to area storm drains which discharge to the Iake. This water is monitored prior to
discharge for appropriate parameters required for cooling tower blowdown in accordance with
the NPDES permit. Presently, condenser draining events are reported with relevant monitoring
data to DWQ on attachments to monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports.
Outfall 002 - HNP Sewage Treatment Facility discharge to Outfall 006
The HNP is served by a 0.065 MGD firm capacity sewage treatment facility comprised of:
a) a 0.015 MGD extended aeration sewage treatment facility (consisting of an equalization
basin, aeration basin, sludge holding tanks, raw sewage holding tank, clarifiers, and
chlorine contact tanks); This unit is current not being operated. and
b) a 0.050 MGD recirculating packed bed filter system consisting of four T-Max settling
units, six AX-Max treatment units, two AdvanTex polishing units, ultraviolet
disinfection, and an effluent pump station serving the combined sanitary treatment units
to discharge to Outfall 006.
Currently, treatment system residuals are land applied off site by a contract disposal firm
(Granville Farms, Inc., Permit No. WQ0000838). In addition to sanitary waste, HVAC
condensate is discharged to the sewage treatment facility. Because the HNP sewage treatment
facility receives industrial type waste as well as domestic type waste, the land application of the
mixed sludge meets the exemption conditions stipulated at 40 CFR Part 503.6.
Outfall 003 - HNP Metal Cleaning Wastes discharge to Outfall 006
Infrequently, cleaning of heat exchanger equipment by chemical solutions may be necessary.
CIeaning solutions would be routed to the waste neutralization basin for pH adjustment (or other
chemical neutralization) prior to discharge to the settling basin where further treatment by
sedimentation occurs. To date, the only metal cleaning which has been conducted was a
preoperational flush. If a new system is added in the future or if an existing system is changed
out, flushing could be necessary again. Also, metal cleaning may be needed in the future for
plant systems (e.g., steam generators, auxiliary boilers, piping, etc.). Chemical solutions used
may include phosphates, organic cleaners, citric acid, or oxalic acid.

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant and Harris Energy & Environmental Center
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0039586
Outfall 004 - HNP Low -Volume Wastes discharge to Outfall 006
In the operation of the HNP, there are many processes which result in intermittent low volumes
of various waste streams. Low -volume waste is treated by neutralization (for pH adjustment),
sedimentation, and separation. These wastes may be treated in the oily waste separator and/or
neutralization basin as needed prior to routing to the sedimentation basin, which ultimately
discharges to the common outfall line. Periodically as a maintenance practice this basin may be
physically cleaned using chlorine, a bisulfate is added after cleaning to remove the chlorine
before discharge. Chemicals present in these systems may include corrosion products (such as
copper and iron) corrosion inhibitors (such as nitrites, molybdates, ammonia, hydrazine,
carbohydrazide, and ethanolamine), acids and bases from water treatment processes, and
wastewater from ion exchange processes and ammonium bisulfate from dechlorination. Low -
volume waste flow from the settling basin averages approximately 0.2 MGD. The various low -
volume waste sources are described below:
a) Water treatment system wastes from processing of demineralized water and potable
water.
(The water treatment system includes coagulation, filtration, disinfection, and ion
exchange. Wastes from treatment include filter backwash and demineralizer regeneration
wastes.)
b) Non -radioactive oily waste, floor drains, and chemical tank containment drains.
(Turbine building wastes which could contain oil are routed to the oily waste separator
for treatment prior to routing to the neutralization basin. Used oil is collected by a
contractor for reclamation.)
c) Steam generator and auxiliary boiler draining following wet Iayup
d) Non -radioactive secondary waste from condensate polishers
e) Miscellaneous drains/leaks from condenser, steam generator, and secondary components
f) Auxiliary boiler system blowdown
g) Miscellaneous waste streams not otherwise identified elsewhere in this application.
Outfall 005 - HNP Radwaste Treatment System discharge to Outfall 006
The radwaste system is designed to collect, store, process, and release any radioactive or
potentially radioactive liquids associated with operation of the nuclear power plant. The waste
streams are collected in tanks and sampled for conventional pollutants and radioactivity. The
3

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant and Harris Energy & Environmental Center
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0039586
specific batch treatment is selected based on these analytical results. This allows for selection of
the proper treatment processes for each individual batch. Most radwaste streams are treated by
the Modular FIuidized Transfer Demineralization System (MFTDS) that uses filtration and ion
exchange in a manner that minimizes the production of solid wastes. Boric acid is recycled. The
secondary waste system (SWS) is for treating radioactively -contaminated water from the
secondary steam cycle system; however, since that system is not normally contaminated, those
flows are routed to the normal low -volume waste treatment system after radiological monitoring.
After treatment, the radwaste flows are stored in one of four tanks: the secondary waste sample
tank, the treated laundry and hot shower tank, the waste monitor tank, or the waste evaporator
condensate tank. After monitoring to verify adequate treatment, the tanks are discharged to the
common outfall line.
The cooling tower bypass line provides a flow of lake water for radwaste releases, as regulated
by the NRC.
Other HNP Discharges
1. Storm Drains
Runoff from parking lots, outside storage areas, roof drains, and other areas on the plant
site are collected in storm drains and ultimately routed to release points which discharge
to Harris Lake. Flow contributed from those areas is estimated at 8.8 million gallons per
month, based on average rainfall of 43 inches per year and a runoff assumption factor of
0.7.
In addition to stormwater, a few miscellaneous sources of water are also intermittently
routed to the storm drains. These sources that have a minor contribution to overall storm
drain flows are as follows:
a. Upflow Filter Clearwell System
The upflow filter clearwell system has been abandoned in place and no longer has
any drains which might discharge to Harris Lake.
b. Heat exchanger on the demineralizer feedwater
It is necessary to heat the source water to the demineralized water treatment
system to achieve optimum degassification. To accomplish this, steam is used to
heat the feedwater. The condensed steam is discharged to the storm drains that
flow to Harris Lake at approximately 5 -. 10 gallons per minute. This steam could
contain trace amounts of hydrazine and ammonia used for chemistry control in the
auxiliary boiler steam system. Due to the low flow rate and the long retention
a

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant and Harris Energy & Environmental Center
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0039586
time, the temperature of the condensed steam should be at ambient temperature
upon reaching the lake.
c. Condenser water box drains
Prior to condenser maintenance or repairs it is sometimes (approximately
twice/year) necessary to drain circulating water to the storm drains
(approximately 60,000 gallons per condenser per event) that discharge to Harris
Lake. This water is monitored for selected cooling tower blowdown parameters.
d. Filtered water storage and Demin water Storage Tanks
Water is treated using a micro -filtration unit for turbidity control and then stored
in a tank prior to subsequent filtration (nano -filtration unit) and disinfection.
Occasionally, some water from these tanks may be drained to the storm drains
that discharge to Harris Lake. This water may contain trace amounts of chlorine.
e. Fire protection system
Approximately 5000 gallons of lake water used for annual testing of the fire
protection system is routed to most of the storm drains that discharge to Harris
Lake. In the event of a fire, additional water could be discharged to storm drains.
f. Condenser home!!
g•
During outages (approximately once per 18 months) it is necessary to drain the
condenser hotwell for condenser maintenance and inspection. Approximately
70,000 gallons of this water resulting from condensed steam is drained to storm
drains that discharge to Harris Lake. It may contain trace amounts of
ethanolamine, 100 ppb or less of boron, and 100 ppb or less ammonia.
Condensate storage tank
Infrequently it is necessary to drain the condensate storage tank for maintenance.
Approximately 400,000 gallons per event is drained to storm drains that discharge
to Harris Lake. It may contain 200 ppb or less boron, 1000 ppb or less ammonia,
and trace hydrazine.
h. Air conditioning system condensate
The condensate from various building air conditioning systems flows to various
storm drains to Harris Lake. The volume is generally low and is greatest in the
humid summer months.
5

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant and Harris Energy & Environmental Center
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0039586
i. Service water system strainers
J.
Infrequently, when service water strainers located at the makeup pumps from the
cooling tower basin are backwashed to remove biofouling organisms or debris, a
small volume of service water overflows the basin and runs to the adjacent storm
drain that discharge to Harris Lake.
Maintenance Activities
During maintenance activities at the facility it may become necessary to drain all
or some portion thereof of the following plant systems; normal service water,
emergency service water, circulating water, potable water, and demineralized
water. Maintenance activities at the facility may also require the hydrostatic
flushing of system piping with discharge to the storm drain system. In addition,
the facility may find it necessary to wash equipment with deed water and
discharge to the storm drains
2. Emergency Service Water System
This system primarily provides non -contact cooling water for nuclear safety -related
equipment systems and during emergency conditions. The emergency service water
system discharges to the auxiliary reservoir which is used as the plant's heat sink during
emergency conditions, a feature required by Nuclear Regulatory Commission regulations
to provide a reliable supply of cooling water. Under normal operating conditions, the
auxiliary and the main reservoirs are isolated from each other; however, the reservoirs
may be connected as necessary. In addition to emergency situations, this system is used
periodically for to raise auxiliary reservoir basin level, system testing purposes or for
containment cooling as needed. This water may contain traces of chemicals identified for
the cooling tower blowdown.
6

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant and Harris Energy & Environmental Center
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0039586
HARRIS ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER
The Harris Energy & Environmental Center (HE&EC) includes facilities that provide support
services (laboratories and training classrooms) for the HNP and other CP&L operations. The
sources of wastewater at the HE&EC are domestic waste. conventional laboratory waste, cooling
tower blowdown, and potentially radioactive liquid waste from the radiochemistry and
metallurgy laboratories. Additionally, floor drains from several shops and storage buildings are
routed to the wastewater treatment facility. All waste streams, with the exception of the
radiological wastewater, receive treatment in the 0.020 MGD wastewater facility.
Components of the treatment facility include a bar screen, submersible pump station as an
influent pump station, three treatment ponds, sand filtration, chlorination and dechlorination, as
well as the various lift stations for the HE&EC's various buildings. The pond portion of the
treatment facility consists of an aerated pond with a minimum retention time of 10 days followed
by a stabilization pond, also with a minimum retention time of 10 days. The third pond is a
polishing pond with a minimum 2-day retention time. Effluent from the treatment facility is
discharged via the effluent discharge pipe into Harris Lake.
If necessary, sludge from the treatment facility will be removed and land applied by a contractor
(a contractor for sludge disposal will be chosen when needed). Because the treatment facility
receives industrial type waste as well as domestic type waste, the land application of the mixed
sludge meets the exemption conditions stipulated as 40 CPR 503.6
Domestic Waste
The maximum domestic waste flow from the HE&EC sanitary facilities is approximately 0.014
MGD. In addition to the approximately 200 permanent employees on the site, the HE&EC,
serving as a company training facility and as a visitors' center for the nearby Harris Nuclear
Plant, accommodates a fluctuating population (ranging from 0 to 450 additional people per day).
Wastewater from the HNP may also be conveyed on private plant roads, to the HE&EC for
treatment during times where sanitary flows generated onsite exceed the capacity of the HNP
sewage treatment plant.
Laboratory Waste
Laboratory waste flow, consisting primarily of rinse water from the chemical, metallurgical, and
biological laboratories, is approximately 0.001 MGD. HE&EC personnel are educated in the
proper disposal of laboratory wastes and are encouraged to minimize the use of laboratory drains
for chemical disposal. Most laboratory chemical wastes and oily wastes are drummed for off -
site disposal.
7

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant and Harris Energy & Environmental Center
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC9039586
Stormwater
Stormwater runoff from the HE&EC is composed of laydown yards, training areas, parking Iota,
roof, and lawn drainage. This non -industrial stormwater is not subject to the Phase I stormwater
regulations of 40 CFR Part 122.
8

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0039586
Attachment 6
Form 2C — Section 8 — Used or Manufactured Toxics

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant and Harris Energy & Environmental Center
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0039586
Attachment 6
Form 2C - Section 8 — Used or Manufactured Toxics
Although not added or produced, the following elements could potentially be present in the discharge
due to normal pipe erosion/corrosion:
Copper
Zinc
Iron
Silver
The following elements could be present in oil which is used to fuel auxiliary boilers:
Antimony
Chromium
Nickel
Zinc
The following chemicals
Chemical
Ammonia
Ammonium Bisulfite
BETZ FOAMTROL
1440
BETZ Flogard MS6208
BETZ DepositroI
PY5200 or BL 5325
BETZ Inhibitor AZ
8104
BETZ Spectrus BD
1500
BETZ Flogard MS
6222
BETZ Polymer 1192
Boron
Detergent and Waxes
Arsenic
Copper
Selenium
Beryllium
Lead
Silver
Nickel
Cadmium
Mercury
Thallium
are used at the plant site and may be present within the waste treatment system:
Quantity
(used per year, estimate)
2000 gallons
12,000 gallons
100 gallons
1,800 gallons
7,000 gallons
7,000 gallons
Amount varies depending
on biological activity and
temperature of makeup
water
9,000 gallons
600 gallons
13, 000 lbs
300 — 400 gallons
Frequency
As needed
Daily
As needed
As needed
As needed
As needed
As needed
As needed
As needed
As needed
Weekly
Purpose
pH control
CI, removal
Foam control agent
Corrosion control
Corrosion control
Corrosion control
Corrosion control
Corrosion control
Corrosion control
Reactivity control
Housekeeping
1

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant and Harris Energy & Environmental Center
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0039586
Ethanolamine
Hydrazine
Polyelectrolytes
Sodium Carbonate or
Bicarbonate
Sodium hypochlorite
(15% solution)
Sodium hydroxide
(50%)
Sodium or Potassium
Molybdate
Sodium EDTA
Sodium or Potassium
Nitrite
Sulfuric Acid
Potassium
Permanganate
50% Citric Acid
Carbohydrazide
GEBetz AD-20
GEBetz AK-110
GEBetz Kleen MCT-
511
GEBetz Kleen MCT-
103
GEBetz DCL-32
GEBetz Hypersperse
MDC-700
GEBetz Flogard POT
80L Zinc Phosphate
GEBetz Spectrus 1300
GEBetz DT 1401
Potassium Persulfate
0.6 M
Phosphoric Acid
0.6 M
Nalco 71D5 Plus
7,000 gallons
1,000 gallons
200 — 300 gallons
200 — 300 lbs
Amount varies depending
on biological activity and
temperature of makeup
water
1,106,800 lbs
100 — 200 gallons
100 — 200 gallons
500 lbs
815,000 lbs
200-400 gallons
200-400 gallons
200-400 gallons
200 -400 gallons
200- 400 gallons
200-400 gallons
200-400 gallons
200-400 gallons
200-400 gallons
1,440 gallons
2,700 gallons
100 gallons
100 gallons
100 gal/yr
Daily
Daily
As needed
As needed
4times/Day
As needed
As needed
As needed
As needed
As needed
Daily
As needed
As needed
As needed
As needed
As needed
As needed
Daily
Daily
Daily
Daily
Daily
Daily
Daily
As Needed
Corrosion control
Corrosion control
Water treatment
pH adjustment
Biocide
pH control and resin
regeneration
Corrosion control
Corrosion control
Corrosion control
pH control and resin
regeneration
Iron Control
System Cleaning
Corrosion Control
System Cleaning
System Cleaning
System Cleaning
System Cleaning
Chlorine Removal
Membrane Deposit
Control
Corrosion Control
Non -oxidizing Biocide
Buffering Agent
Analyzer Reagent
Analyzer Reagent
Foam Control Agent
2

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant and Harris Energy & Environmental Center
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0039586
Nalco 7384
Nalco 3DT 120
Nalco 3DT 179
Nalco 3DT 190
Nalco 3DT 197
Nalco 3DT-198
Nalco 3DT-199
Nalco 3DT-398
Nalco 3DT-098
Nalco 7357
Nalco 73550 or 73551
Nalco 3DT185
Nalco 8103 PLUS
Nalco TRAC 104
Nalco TRAC 102
Nalco PC-33
Nalco PC-87
Nalco 7408
Nalco PC- 1 9 1 or PC-
191T
Nalco 7390
Nalco H-130
Nalco H-550
Nalco CB70
Nalco 19H
Nalco Pretect 7080
1,800 gal/yr
7,000 gal/yr
8,000 gal/yr
6,000 gal/yr
100 gal/yr
8,000 gal/yr
6,000 gal/yr
6,000 gal/yr
100 gal/yr
Varies
9,000 gal/yr
600 gal/yr
100-200 gal/yr
50-100 gal/yr
200-400 gal/yr
200-400 gal/yr
400-800 gaUyr
200-400 gal
200-400 gal
1440 gal
5 gal
16,000 gal
15 gal
10 gal
As Needed
As needed
As Needed
As Needed
As Needed
As Needed
As Needed
As Needed
As Needed
As Needed
As Needed
As Needed
As Needed
As Needed
As Needed
As Needed
As Needed
As Needed
Daily
Daily
As Needed
As Needed
Daily
Daily
Daily
Corrosion Control
Dispersant
Corrosion Control
Deposit Control
Corrosion Control
Corrosion Control
Corrosion Control
Corrosion Control
Corrosion Control
Corrosion Control
Biodispersant
Corrosion Control
Settling Agent
Corrosion Control
Corrosion Control
System Cleaning
System Cleaning
Chlorine Removal
Membrane Deposit
Control
Corrosion Control
Non -oxidizing Biocide
Biocide
Chlorination
Enhancement
Corrosion
control/Oxygen
Scavenger
Corrosion control
3

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0039586
Attachment 7
Form 2C — Section 9.2 — Toxicity Test Results

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant and Harris Energy & EnvironmentaI Center
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0039586
A. 4utfall Number
006
006
006
006
Attachment 7
Form 2C — Section 9.2 — Toxicity Test Results
Date
02/03/2020
05/04/2020
08/03/2020
11/02/2020
Type of Test
24 Hr Pass/Fail Acute
(TGE6C)
24 Hr Pass/Fail Acute
(TGE6C)
24 Hr Pass/Fail Acute
(TGE6C)
24 Hr Pass/Fail Acute
(TGE6C)
Results
PASS
PASS
PASS
PASS
1

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant
National Pollutant Discharae Elimination System Permit Number NC0039586
Attachment 8
Form 2C — Section 10.2 — Contract Laboratories

Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant and Harris Energy & Environmental Center
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Number NC0039586
Attachment 8
Form 2C — Section 10.2 — Contract Laboratories
Laboratories involved with analyses conducted for
Form 2C, Section 7, Table A — Conventional and Non -Conventional Pollutants (including DMRs);
Form 2C, Section 7, Table B — Toxic Metals, Cyanide, Total Phenols, and Organic Toxic Pollutants;
Form 2C, Section 7, Table C — Certain Conventional and Non -Conventional Pollutants; and
Form 2C, Section 7, Table E -- 2,3,7,8 Tetrachlorodibenzop Dioxin (2,3,7,8 TCDD):
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
Duke Energy Central Laboratory
13339 Hagers Ferry Road, Mail Code MG03A2
Huntersville, NC 28078
NC DEQ DWR Laboratory Certificate No. 248
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Harris Nuclear Plant Laboratory
5413 Shearon Harris Road
New Hill, NC 27562
NC DEQ DWR Laboratory Certificate Nos. 398 & 5145
Pace Analytical Services, LLC
9800 Kincey Avenue, Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
NC DEQ DWR Laboratory Certificate Nos. 12, 40 & 67
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
351 Depot Street
Asheville, NC 28801
NC DEQ DWR Laboratory Certificate Nos. 037 & 600
GEL Laboratories, LLC
2040 Savage Road
Charleston, SC 29407
NC DEQ DWR Laboratory Certificate No. 233
I