20181275 Ver 1_UTtoMagness_CatEx_Submittal_FINAL_20210830

We Make a Difference
INTERNATIONAL
May 13, 2019
Paul Wiesner, Project Manager
NCDEQ - Division of Mitigation Services
5 Ravenscroft Drive, Ste. 102
Asheville, NC 28801
Subject: Task 1: Environmental Screening Documentation Submittal for the UT to Magness Creek
Mitigation Project; Broad River Basin — CU# 03050105 — Cleveland County, NC
NCDMS Project ID No. 100081; NCDEQ Contract No. 007604
Dear Mr. Wiesner:
Please find enclosed one digital copy of the Categorical Exclusion (CE) for the UT to Magness Creek
Mitigation Project in Cleveland County, NC. The Project is located in the Broad River Basin
(Cataloging Unit 03050105) and the NC Division of Mitigation Services Targeted Local Watershed
(TLW) 03050105-080060. The project drains directly to Magness Creek and the First Broad River, which
is a drinking water source for the City of Shelby and other downstream municipalities. Existing reaches
within the project site flow to the south-southwest where the downstream extent of the project is bordered
by Selkirk Drive.
The proposed project is a full -delivery, stream mitigation effort for the NC Department of Environmental
Quality (DEQ) Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) in response to RFP#: 16-007400. The project will
involve the restoration and enhancement of approximately 3,210 linear feet (LF) of existing stream, and the
re-establishment and rehabilitation of 1.72 acres of riparian wetlands. A Best Management Practice (BMP)
in the form of a constructed sediment detention pond will be installed in an unstable ephemeral drainage
that receives run-off from an area that is frequently used by livestock. A conservation easement will be
implemented along all project reaches in an excess of 30 feet from the top of bank and will incorporate
some of the existing functional wetlands. The conservation easement will protect the entire project area in
perpetuity. Livestock will be excluded from the conservation easement with permanent fencing.
In addition to the submittal of the CE document for the completion of Task 1, Baker submitted the
Landowner Authorization Forms prior to the on -site project review meeting with the Interagency Review
Team (IRT) and DMS on September 27, 2018, as required. Based on the preliminary mitigation plans and
the on -site meeting, and the subsequent contract amendment for riparian wetland credits, the project will
generate 3,123 stream mitigation units (SMUs) and 1.707 wetland mitigation units (WMUs) in the Broad
River Basin. The proposed activities are outlined below in Tables 1 & 2.
Table 1. UT to Magness Stream Details
Reach ID
Length (ft)
Mitigation Approach
Credit Ratio
SMUs
MS
2,950
Restoration
1:1
2,950
UT2
260
Enhancement I
1:5:1
173
Total Credits
3,123
MBAKER INTL.COM Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
797 Haywood Road, Suite 201
Asheville, NC 28806 1 Office:828.350.1408

We Moke o Difference
Table 2. UT to Magness Wetland Details
Mitigation Approach
Acres
Credit Ratio
WMUs
Proposed Re-establishment
1.684
1:1
1.684
Proposed Rehabilitation
0.034
1:5:1
0.023
Total Credits
1.707
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at [phone] or via my email
address at mclemmons&mbakerint.com.
Sincerely,
Micky Clemmons
Project Manager
Cc: File

Appendix A
Categorical Exclusion Form for Ecosystem Enhancement
Program Projects
Version 1.4
Note: Only Appendix A should to be submitted (along with any supporting documentation) as the
environmental document.
Part 1: General Project Information
Project Name: UT to Magness Creek
County Name : Cleveland
EEP Number: Project # 100081; Contract # 7604
Project Sponsor: FHWA
Project Contact Name: Micky Clemmons / Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
Project Contact Address: 797 Haywood Road, Suite 201, Asheville, NC
Project Contact E-mail: Mclemmons mbakerintl.com
EEP Project Manager: Paul Wiesner ( aul.wiesner ncdenr. ov)
Project Description
The UT to Magness Creek mitigation project is located in Cleveland County, NC, east of the Town of Lawndale,
within the Broad River Basin (03050105) and the NC DMS Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) 03050105080060.
Located within a water supply watershed (WS-IV), the project drains directly to Magness Creek and the First
Broad River, which is a drinking water source for the City of Shelby and other downstream municipalities.
Existing reaches within the project site flow to the south-southwest where the downstream extent of the
project is bordered by Selkirk Drive.
The existing stream reaches have been significantly impacted by unrestricted livestock access and the removal
or impairment of riparian buffers. Most of the project reaches are incised, unstable, and exhibit areas of
active bank erosion from both high flows and livestock access. Riparian buffer vegetation varies from areas
with no woody buffer vegetation to areas with large trees but at low density and without any significant
understory.
The project will involve the restoration and enhancement of approximately 3,210 linear feet (LF) of existing
stream, and the re-establishment and rehabilitation of 1.72 acres of riparian wetlands. A Best
Management Practice (BMP) in the form of a constructed sediment detention pond will be installed
in an unstable ephemeral drainage that receives run-off from an area that is frequently used by livestock.
Native riparian buffers will be established along all proposed reaches. A conservation easement will be
implemented along all project reaches in an excess of 30 feet from the top of bank and will
incorporate some of the existing functional wetlands.
For Off icial Use Only
Reviewed By:
Date EEP Project Manager
Conditional Approved By:
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA
❑ Check this box if there are outstanding issues
Final Approval By:
Date For Division Administrator
FHWA
6 Version 1.4, 8/16/05

2: Al I Projects
Regulation/QuestionPart
..
Coastal Zone ManaciementAct CZMA
1. Is the project located in a CAMA county?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Does the project inwl\,e ground -disturbing activities within a CAMA Area of
❑ Yes
Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ No
® N/A
3. Has a CAMA permit been secured?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
4. Has NCDCM agreed that the project is consistent with the NC Coastal Management
❑ Yes
Program?
❑ No
® N/A
Com rehensive Environmental Response, Com ensation and Liabili Act CERCLA
1. Is this a "full -delivery" project?
® Yes
❑ No
2. Has the zoning/land use of the subject property and adjacent properties ever been
❑ Yes
designated as commercial or industrial?
® No
❑ N/A
3. As a result of a limited Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential
❑ Yes
hazardous waste sites within or adjacent to the project area?
® No
❑ N/A
4. As a result of a Phase I Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous
❑ Yes
waste sites within or adjacent to the project area?
❑ No
® N/A
5. As a result of a Phase 11 Site Assessment, are there known or potential hazardous
❑ Yes
waste sites within the project area?
❑ No
® N/A
6. Is there an approved hazardous mitigation plan?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
National Historic Preservation Act Section 106
1. Are there properties listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of
❑ Yes
Historic Places in the ro'ect area?
® No
2. Does the project affect such properties and does the SHPO/THPO concur?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
3. If the effects are adverse, have they been resolved?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real PropgrW Ac uisition Policies Act Uniform Act
1. Is this a "full -delivery" project?
® Yes
❑ No
2. Does the project require the acquisition of real estate?
® Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
3. Was the property acquisition completed prior to the intent to use federal funds?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ N/A
4. Has the owner of the property been informed:
® Yes
* prior to making an offer that the agency does not have condemnation authority; and
ElNo
* what the fair market value is believed to be?
❑ N/A
Version 1.4, 8/16/05

3: Ground -Disturbing Activities
ResponsePart
American Indian Religious Freedom Act (AIRFAI
1.
Is the project located in a county claimed as "territory" by the Eastern Band of
® Yes
Cherokee
Indians?
❑ No
2.
Is the site of religious importance to American Indians?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ N/A
3.
Is the project listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic
❑ Yes
Places?
❑ No
® N/A
4.
Have the effects of the project on this site been considered?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
Antiquities Act AA
1.
Is the project located on Federal lands?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Will there be loss or destruction of historic or prehistoric ruins, monuments or objects
❑ Yes
of antiquity?
❑ No
® N/A
3.
Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
4.
Has a permit been obtained?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
Archaeolo ical Resources Protection Act ARPA
1.
Is the project located on federal or Indian lands (reservation)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Will there be a loss or destruction of archaeological resources?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
3.
Will a permit from the appropriate Federal agency be required?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
4.
Has a permit been obtained?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
Endanciered Species Act ESA
1.
Are federal Threatened and Endangered species and/or Designated Critical Habitat
® Yes
listed for the county?
❑ No
2.
Is Designated Critical Habitat or suitable habitat present for listed species?
® Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
3.
Are T&E species present or is the project being conducted in Designated Critical
❑ Yes
Habitat?
® No
❑ N/A
4.
Is the project "likely to adversely affect" the specie and/or "likely to adversely modify"
❑ Yes
Designated
Critical Habitat?
❑ No
® N/A
5.
Does the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries concur in the effects determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
6.
Has the USFWS/NOAA-Fisheries rendered a "jeopardy" determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
Version 1.4, 8/16/05

Executive Order 13007 Indian Sacred Sites
1.
Is the project located on Federal lands that are within a county claimed as "territory"
❑ Yes
by
the EBCI?
® No
2.
Has the EBCI indicated that Indian sacred sites may be impacted by the proposed
❑ Yes
project?
❑ No
® N/A
3.
Have accommodations been made for access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred
❑ Yes
sites?
❑ No
® N/A
Farmland Protection Polic Act FPPA
1.
Will real estate be acquired?
® Yes
❑ No
2.
Has NRCS determined that the project contains prime, unique, statewide or locally
® Yes
important farmland?
❑ No
❑ N/A
3.
Has the completed Form AD-1006 been submitted to NRCS?
® Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act(FWCAJ
1.
Will the project impound, divert, channel deepen, or otherwise control/modify any
® Yes
water
body?
❑ No
2.
Have the USFWS and the NCWRC been consulted?
® Yes
❑ No
❑ N/A
Land and Water Conservation Fund Act (Section 6 f(l
1.
Will the project require the conversion of such property to a use other than public,
❑ Yes
outdoor recreation?
® No
2.
Has the NPS approved of the conversion?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
Magnuson -Stevens Fi she ry Conservation and ManagementAct(Essential Fish
Habitat)!
1.
Is the project located in an estuarine system?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Is suitable habitat present for EFH-protected species?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
3.
Is sufficient design information available to make a determination ofthe effect ofthe
❑ Yes
project on EFH?
❑ No
® N/A
4.
Will the project adversely affect EFH?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
5.
Has consultation with NOAA-Fisheries occurred?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
Miciratory Bird Treat Act MBTA
1.
Does the USFWS have any recommendations with the project relative to the MBTA?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Have the USFWS recommendations been incorporated?
❑ Yes
❑ No
® N/A
Wilderness Act
1.
Is the project in a Wilderness area?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Has a special use permit and/or easement been obtained from the maintaining
❑ Yes
federal
agency?
❑ No
® N/A
Version 1.4, 8/16/05

UT to Magness Creek Mitigation Project / Categorical Exclusion —Summary
Broad River Basin — CU# 03050105— Cleveland County, NC
NCDMS Project ID No. 100081; NCDEQ Contract No. 007604
Project Background
The UT to Magness Creek mitigation project is proposing to restore and enhance approximately 3,385
linear feet (LF)ofstreamwithintheBroad River Basin forthepurposeofobtaining stream mitigation credit
for the NC Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). Project reaches have been significantly impacted by
historic channelization, unrestricted livestock access, and a lack of quality riparian buffers. Stream banks
consist of heavily grazed pasture grass with some areas of widely scattered trees, mixed with pockets of
invasive species. Project reaches are unstable, incised and exhibit active bank erosion from both high flows
and livestock access. A constructed sediment detention pond will be installed in an unstable ephemeral
drainage to treat pasture run-off from an area that is frequently used by livestock. Livestock will be
permanently excluded from all project areas. Buffers in excess of 30 feet will be established along all
proposed reaches. In addition, most of the existing functional wetlands will be incorporated inside the
conservation easement to protect them in perpetuity.
The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) requires agencies to use an interdisciplinary
approach in planning and decision -making for actions that will have an impact on the environment. The
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and NC Department of Transportation (NCDOT) have
determined that DMS projects will not involve significant impacts and therefore a Categorical Exclusion
(CE) is the appropriate type of environmental document for this project. FHWA has also determined that
stream restoration projects are considered land disturbing activities; therefore, Parts 2 and 3 of the DMS
CE checklist and a summary of the findings applicable to the environmental regulations associated for this
project are included. Supporting documentation is included in the Appendix.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)
A preliminary review of the project and adjacent parcels zoning/land use status was conducted on August
1, 2018 using the Cleveland County,NC GIS Tax Mapping application (https://www.webgis.net/nc/
Cleveland/). Results from this review did not indicate any commercial or industrial designations within
the project parcels nor those abutting or adjacent the project properties. A search of environmental
records for the project area was conducted on August 6, 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc
(EDR). Results from the EDR's Radius Map Report did not find any current nor historic hazardous
waste records for any properties within or adjacent to the project review area. See the Appendix for full
EDR report. Based on these results, no additional documentation is required to meet regulatory
compliance for CERCLA.
National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106)
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. (Baker) requested a review and comment from the State Historic
Preservation Office (SHPO) on any possible issues that might emerge with respect to architectural,
archaeological, and/or cultural resources from the restoration project on August 3, 2018. On December 17,
2018, NC DMS sent a review request to the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians' Tribal Historic Preservation
Office (EBCI THPO), the United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma's (UKB) THPO, and
the Cherokee Nation's THPO. On September 4, 2018, Baker received a response letter from SHPO fording
that no historic resources would be affected by the project. On January 8, 2019, NC DMS received a
response letter from the Cherokee Nation stating that "no instances where this project intersects or adjoin"
records of cultural and historic resources; therefore, no impacts to Cherokee resources are "foreseen... at
this time". On April 10, 2019, Baker received a correspondence email stating that the United Keetowah
Band of Cherokee (UKB) concurs with the recommendation not to conduct a cultural resource survey for
UT to Magness CreekMitigationProject; DMS Project No.100081
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
CE Summary

the UT to Magness Creek mitigation project. No response was received from the Eastern Band of the
Cherokee Indians (EBCI). All correspondence on this issue is included in the Appendix.
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Act
Prior to signing the Option Agreement for the Conservation Easement, each property owner of the land
involved in the restoration project was notified that Baker does not have condemnation authority and as to
the fair market value of the land involved. Copies of each Option Agreement is included in the Appendix.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. (Baker) conducted an on-line review of the project area with the use of
the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) IPAC website (https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac�, on
August 6, 2018. This review generated an Official Species List (OSL), which identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that
may occur within the boundary of the proposed project and/or may be affected by proposed project.
Results from review found the following two federally listed species. No USFWS designated critical
habitats were located within the project boundaries.
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal
Habitat
Biological Conclusion
Status
Present
Myotis septentrionalis
Northern Long-eared Bat
T
No
No Effect
Hexastylis naniflora
Dwarf -flowered
T
Yes
No Effect
Heartleaf
Baker conducted a two-mile radius search using the Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data Explorer
(https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/) on August 6, 2018. Results fromthis search found no known occurrences
of any of the above referenced species within two miles of the project site.
Based on our review, field surveys, USFWS and FHWA consultation, Baker has developed the following
determinations for the above referenced species.
Myotis septentrionalis (Northern Long -Eared Bat) — Threatened
USFWS optimal survey window: June 1- August 15
In North Carolina, the NLEB occurs in the mountains, with scattered records in the Piedmont and coastal
plain. In western North Carolina, NLEB spend winter hibernating in caves and mines. Since this species is
not known to be a long-distance migrant, and caves and subterranean mines are extremely rare in eastern
North Carolina, it is uncertain whether orwhereNLEB hibernate in eastern NC. During the summer, NLEB
roost singly or in colonies underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees (typically
>3 inches dbh). This bat also been found, rarely, roosting in structures like barns and sheds, under eaves
of buildings, behind window shutters, in bridges, and in bat houses. Pregnant females give birth from late
May to late July. Foraging occurs on forested hillsides and ridges, and occasionally over forest clearings,
over water, and along tree -lined corridors. Mature forests may be an important habitat type for foraging.
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
The IPAC Official Species List generated on August 6, 2018, stated that the presence of the species may
be affected by the proposed project; therefore, Baker conducted a two-mile radius search using the Natural
Heritage Program' s Data Explorer (https://ncnhde.natureserve.org� on August 6, 2018 and found no known
occurrences of the NLEB within two miles of the Project site, nor are there any caves within the project
area that would provide hibernation habitat. Because the project will include the removal/clearing of trees,
Baker conducted a field review on May 23, 2018 to determine the presence or absence of roosting habitat
for the species within the project area. Results of the field review found that there were no shagbark hickory
UT to Magness Creek Mitigation Project; DM Project No. 100081
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
CE Summary

or similar type trees within the project area that would provide roosting habitat for the NLEB; therefore, no
suitable habitat will be removed nor cleared as result of the project. Based on these findings, the biological
opinion criteria outlined in the Range -wide Programmatic Consultation for Indiana Bat and Northern
Long-eared Bat (Version 5.0, February 2018) deems that the project will meet Section 7(a)(2) requirements
of the ESA with the use of the 2018 programmatic biological opinion of "No Effect" for the NLEB. A c opy
of the Consistency letter (TAILS 04EN1000-2018-R-0615) associated with the project determination is
included in the Appendix.
Hexastylis naniflora (Dwarf -flowered heartleaf) —Threatened
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: mid -March — early July
The dwarf -flowered heartleaf is a low -growing evergreen perennial that has heart -shape leaves that are four
to six centimeters long. The leaves are dark green and leathery and are supported by long thin leaf stems
connecting it to an underground stem. The blooms are small, inconspicuous jug -shaped flowers that are
usually beige to dark brown or purple. The flowers are found near the base of the leaf stems and are often
buried beneath the leaf litter. The plant grows in acidic soils along bluffs and adjacent slopes, in boggy
areas next to streams, and along slopes of nearby hillsides and ravines.
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
A review of NCNHP records conducted on August 6, 2018 did not indicate any known occurrences of the
Dwarf -flowered heartleaf within 2.0 miles of the study area. However, acidic soils and a few small pockets
of open wooded area occur along the top of the stream bank within the project site.
Since these conditions may provide marginal habitat for the species, a project site review was conducted
on May 23, 2018. No populations or individuals of the species were identified during the site review. The
project will have "No Effect" on the species.
Farmland Protection Policy Act (FPPA)
On August 7, 2018, Baker submitted the AD-1006 form for the UT to Magness Creek Mitigation Project
to the North Carolina State Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Office. The NRCS responded
on August 27, 2018 with the determination that implementation of this restoration project would result in
the conversion of 10.3 acres of prime and unique farmland soils and of 0.70 acres of statewide important
or local important farmland soils. Baker submitted the completed AD-1006 form to the NRCS Assistant
State Soil Scientist September 19, 2018. The completed AD-1006 form and all correspondence on this
issue is included in the Appendix.
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA)
A letter was sent by Baker to the NC Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) and the USFWS on
August 7, 2018 requesting their comment and review on the UT to Magness Creek Mitigation Project. On
August 17, 2018, Baker received a response letter from the NCWRC stating they do not anticipate impacts
to federally listed endangered or threatened species as a result of the proposed project. However, the
presence of the Broad River spiny crayfish (Cambarus spicatus), a federal and state species of concern, has
been documented on Magness Creek proper. Therefore, NCWRC requests to be alerted if the crayfish is
observed during construction, so that they can be safely relocated. As of September 19, 2018, Baker has
not received any comments from the USFWS. Copies of all correspondence are included in the Appendix.
Nfigratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)
A letter was sent by Baker to the USFWS on August 7, 2018 requesting their comment and review on the
UT to Magness Creek Mitigation Project in relation to migratory birds. As of September 19, 2018, Baker
has not received any comments from the USFWS on this issue. All correspondence with the USFWS is
included in the Appendix.
UT to Magness Creek Mitigation Project; DMS Project No. 100081
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
CE Summary

APPENDIX
UT to Magness Creek Mitigation Project; DM S Project No. 100081
MichaelBaker Engineering, Inc.
CE Summary

UT To Magness Creek
Selkirk Drive
Lawndale, NC 28090
Inquiry Number: 5383530.2s
August 06, 2018
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
(rEDW Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
FORM-LBF-CCA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
Executive Summary-------------------------------------------------------
ES1
Overview Map
2
Detail Map
3
Map Findings Summary----------------------------------------------------
4
Map Findings
8
Orphan Summary---------------------------------------------------------
9
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking
GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
GeoCheck - Not Requested
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC5383530.2s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
SELKIRK DRIVE
LAWNDALE, NC 28090
COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
35.4065000 - 35' 24' 23.40"
81.5293000 - 81 ° 31' 45.48"
Zone 17
451939.2
3918053.8
893 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 5947038 LAWNDALE, NC
Version Date: 2013
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from: 20140618
Source: USDA
TC5383530.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

F- MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
SELKIRK DRIVE
LAWNDALE, NC 28090
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP
ID SITE NAME ADDRESS
NO MAPPED SITES FOUND
DATABASE ACRONYMS
RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ELEVATION DIRECTION
5383530.2s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL___________________________ National Priority List
Proposed NPL________________ Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS -------------------- Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL__________________ National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY__________ Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS_________________________ Superfund Enterprise Management System
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE-------------- Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS------------------ Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF------------------ RCRA- Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG------------------- RCRA- Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG------------------- RCRA- Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-CESQG---------------- RCRA- Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS_________________________ Land Use Control Information System
US ENG CONTROLS_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Engineering Controls Sites List
TC5383530.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US INST CONTROL_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Sites with Institutional Controls
Federal ERNS list
ERNS_________________________ Emergency Response Notification System
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS_____________________ Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCL/S
SHWS------------------------- Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF_______________________ List of Solid Waste Facilities
OLI____________________________ Old Landfill Inventory
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST__________________________ Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
LUST -------------------------- Regional UST Database
INDIAN LUST_________________ Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST_________________ State Trust Fund Database
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST____________________ Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST___________________________ Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST___________________________ AST Database
INDIAN UST__________________ Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP__________________ Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
VCP___________________________ Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS______________ Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS----------- A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY_______________________ Recycling Center Listing
TC5383530.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
HIST LF_______________________ Solid Waste Facility Listing
INDIAN ODI___________________ Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
DEBRIS REGION 9----------- Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
ODI___________________________ Open Dump Inventory
IHS OPEN DUMPS___________ Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL_________________ Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL_______________________ National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Land Records
LIENS 2_______________________ CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS________________________
Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS________________________
Spills Incident Listing
IMD___________________________
Incident Management Database
SPILLS 90____________________
SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80____________________
SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS_________________________
Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD__________________________
Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS_______
State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR_______________
Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST____________
EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA_________________________
Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS__________________________
Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS--------------------------
Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD__________________________
Records Of Decision
RMP__________________________
Risk Management Plans
RAATS________________________
RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP___________________________
Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS_________________________
PCB Activity Database System
ICIS___________________________
Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS__________________________
FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS_________________________
Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA______________
Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER_______
PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO ---------------------
Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS____________________
FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS_____________________
Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT____________________
Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV_____________
Indian Reservations
FUSRAP______________________
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA_______________________
Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS____________
Lead Smelter Sites
TC5383530.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US AIRS______________________
Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES____________________
Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES ---------
Abandoned Mines
FINDS -------------------------
Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
ECHO -------------------------
Enforcement & Compliance History Information
DOCKET HWC----------------
Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
UXO ---------------------------
Unexploded Ordnance Sites
FUELS PROGRAM___________
EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRS__________________________
Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS___________________
ASBESTOS
COAL ASH____________________
Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS______________
Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance -----------
Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES------------------------
NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC----------------------------
Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP---------------------------
Animal Operation Permits Listing
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP_____________________ EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto ----------------- EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner_____________ EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS____________________ Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF_______________________ Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST____________________ Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were not identified.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
TC5383530.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
TC5383530.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

OVERVIEW MAP - 5383530.2S
IV
Target Property
A
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
1
Manufactured Gas Plants
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
0 1/4
1/2 1 Mlles
Indian Reservations BIA
Upgradient Area
Power transmission lines
Hazardous Substance
100-year flood zone
Disposal Sites
500-year flood zone
■
National Wetland Inventory
0
State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: UT To Magness Creek CLIENT: Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
ADDRESS: Selkirk Drive CONTACT: Kristi Suggs
Lawndale INC 28090 INQUIRY #: 5383530.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.4065 / 81.5293 DATE: August 06, 2018 4:52 pm
Copyright �o 2018 EDR, Inc.(,) 2015 Tom Tom Rel. 2015.

DETAIL MAP - 5383530.2S
IV
Target Property
A
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
1
Manufactured Gas Plants
i
Sensitive Receptors
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
0 1 /9 1 /4 1 /2 Mlles
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
Power transmission lines Disposal Sites
100-year flood zone
500-year flood zone
■ National Wetland Inventory
0 State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: UT To Magness Creek CLIENT: Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
ADDRESS: Selkirk Drive CONTACT: Kristi Suggs
Lawndale INC 28090 INQUIRY #: 5383530.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.4065 / 81.5293 DATE: August 06, 2018 4:54 pm
Copyright �o 2018 EDR, Inc.(,) 2015 Tom Tom Rel. 2015.

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database (Miles) Property
< 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Proposed NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
NPL LIENS TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
SEMS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
RCRA-SQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
RCRA-CESQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
LUCIS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US INST CONTROL 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal ERNS list
ERNS TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
OLI 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
TC5383530.2s Page 4

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database (Miles) Property
< 1 /8
1/8- 1 /4
1/4- 1 /2
1/2- 1
> 1
Plotted
LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LUST TRUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
AST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
INDIAN UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
VCP 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
M QQIN9us] ill Ie10=Iill 191:i67ill lkvil=11ill III ril00**Q0IR
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
HIST LF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN ODI 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
DEBRIS REGION 9 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
ODI 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
IHS OPEN DUMPS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US CDL TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SPILLS TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
IMD 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
SPILLS 90 TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SPILLS 80 TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
TC5383530.2s Page 5

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database
(Miles) Property
< 1 /8
1/8- 1 /4
1/4- 1 /2
1/2- 1
> 1
Plotted
FUDS
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
DOD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US FIN ASSUR
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
EPA WATCH LIST
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
2020 COR ACTION
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
TSCA
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
TRIS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SSTS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ROD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
RMP
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
RAATS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
PRP
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
PADS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ICIS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
FTTS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
MLTS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH DOE
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH EPA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
PCB TRANSFORMER
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
RADINFO
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
HIST FTTS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
DOT OPS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
CONSENT
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
INDIAN RESERV
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
FUSRAP
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
UMTRA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LEAD SMELTERS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US AIRS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US MINES
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
ABANDONED MINES
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
FINDS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ECHO
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
DOCKET HWC
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
UXO
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
FUELS PROGRAM
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
AIRS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ASBESTOS
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
DRYCLEANERS
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
Financial Assurance
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NPDES
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
UIC
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
AOP
TP
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0
EDR Hist Auto 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
TC5383530.2s Page 6

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target Total
Database (Miles) Property < 1/8 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RGA LF TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
RGA LUST TP NR NR NR NR NR 0
- Totals -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC5383530.2s Page 7

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation Site
•10-A19:.y7.11P1.]
MAP FINDINGS
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
TC5383530.2s Page 8

m
a

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 05/13/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 23
NPL Site Boundaries
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Sources:
EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 1
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 3
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 4
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 5
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 10
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 6
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 7
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 8
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Date of Government Version: 05/13/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 23
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC5383530.2s Page GR-1

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 05/13/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 23
Federal CERCLIS list
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAG) sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version: 11/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017
Number of Days to Update: 92
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites,
and remedial activities performed in support of EPA's Superfund Program across the United States. The list was
formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous
waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons,
pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the
sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 05/18/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 23
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
TC5383530.2s Page GR-2

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under
the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP,
renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while
it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed
and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge,
assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the
site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or
other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean
that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the
location is not judged to be potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 05/18/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 23
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 86
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the
waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 86
Federal RCRA generators list
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate
over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC5383530.2s Page GR-3

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators
(CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal institutional controls /engineering controls registries
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version: 05/14/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: Department of the Navy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building
foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 02/13/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 02/13/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC5383530.2s Page GR-4

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 03/19/2018 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file includes sites on the National Priority
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version: 08/09/2011 Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2011 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2011 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2018
Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties. Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 05/01/2018 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2018 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2018
Number of Days to Update: 41 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version: 04/18/2018 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/27/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2018 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2018
Number of Days to Update: 28 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OLI: Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information. (Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
sites).
Date of Government Version: 08/15/2017 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2017 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2017 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2018
Number of Days to Update: 64 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC5383530.2s Page GR-5

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites, as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database. Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTs.
Date of Government Version: 05/04/2018 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2018 Last EDR Contact: 05/08/2018
Number of Days to Update: 34 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
Date of Government Version: 05/04/2018 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2018 Last EDR Contact: 05/08/2018
Number of Days to Update: 34 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona. California. New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version: 04/10/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.
Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version: 04/25/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.
TC5383530.2s Page GR-6

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 05/08/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version: 04/13/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA, Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska
Date of Government Version: 04/24/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs.
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2018 Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2018
Number of Days to Update: 61 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 05/15/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017
Number of Days to Update: 136
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available
information varies by state program.
TC5383530.2s Page GR-7

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 05/04/2018 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2018 Last EDR Contact: 05/08/2018
Number of Days to Update: 34 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Date of Government Version: 05/30/2018 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2018 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2018
Number of Days to Update: 36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/13/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version: 05/08/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).
TC5383530.2s Page GR-8

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/24/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/25/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/10/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property
due to varying levels of cleanup possible, practical, or necessary at the site.
Date of Government Version: 05/01/2018 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2018 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2018
Number of Days to Update: 41 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA, Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC5383530.2s Page GR-9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 142
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations.
Date of Government Version: 05/01/2018 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2018 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2018
Number of Days to Update: 41 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled, or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment. All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2018 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/05/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2018 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2018
Number of Days to Update: 20 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
Date of Government Version: 03/19/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing
A listing of solid waste facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2007 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2009
Number of Days to Update: 17 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC5383530.2s Page GR-10

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing
A listing of recycling center locations.
Date of Government Version: 05/03/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/03/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2018
Number of Days to Update: 7
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/30/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004
Number of Days to Update: 39
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County, California.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009
Number of Days to Update: 137
Source: EPA, Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land
A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivices, Indian Health Service
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2018
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory
Register.
Date of Government Version: 02/22/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018
Number of Days to Update: 71
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC5383530.2s Page GR-11

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version: 02/22/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018
Number of Days to Update: 71
Local Land Records
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA ('Superfund') lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version: 05/13/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2018
Number of Days to Update: 30
Records of Emergency Release Reports
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 03/26/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SPILLS: Spills Incident Listing
A listing spills, hazardous material releases, sanitary sewer overflows, wastewater treatment plant bypasses and
upsets, citizen complaints, and any other environmental emergency calls reported to the agency.
Date of Government Version: 06/12/2018 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2018 Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2018
Number of Days to Update: 40 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents
Date of Government Version: 07/21/2006 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2006 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/23/2006 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011
Number of Days to Update: 22 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
TC5383530.2s Page GR-12

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 09/27/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch
Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that
are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80.
Date of Government Version: 06/14/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Other Ascertainable Records
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 01/31/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/08/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2015
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps
of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,
Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007
Number of Days to Update: 339
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018
Data Release Frequency: N/A
TC5383530.2s Page GR-13

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,
Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/15/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post -closure care of their facilities.
Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a "Watch List' to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and
local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/08/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2018
Number of Days to Update: 198
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
TC5383530.2s Page GR-14

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/10/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018
Number of Days to Update: 2
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all
registered pesticide -producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 05/13/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2018
Number of Days to Update: 30
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RMP: Risk Management Plans
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program
Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing
industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst -case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee
training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.
Date of Government Version: 11/02/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2017
Number of Days to Update: 21
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC5383530.2s Page GR-15

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017
Number of Days to Update: 126
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016
Number of Days to Update: 43
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/23/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC5383530.2s Page GR-16

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
COAL ASH DOE: Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version: 05/24/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2017
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
Date of Government Version: 04/03/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2018
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FI FRA
(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA
regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some
EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
TC5383530.2s Page GR-17

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2018
Number of Days to Update: 42 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version: 03/31/2018 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2018 Telephone: Varies
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2018 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2018
Number of Days to Update: 74 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2017
Number of Days to Update: 218
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 546
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where
radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations.
Date of Government Version: 12/23/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/27/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/17/2017
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/19/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills
shut down, large piles of the sand -like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
TC5383530.2s Page GR-18

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 06/23/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 23
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Date of Government Version: 05/13/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2018
Number of Days to Update: 30
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: American Journal of Public Health
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS)
The database is a sub -system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants,
steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action,
air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 05/03/2018 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/31/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2018 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2018
Number of Days to Update: 29 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing
This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron
ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such
as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States.
TC5383530.2s Page GR-19

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 12/05/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/29/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2008
Number of Days to Update: 49
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing
Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team
of the USGS.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines
An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide
information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory
contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated
with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE
program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing
problems are reclaimed.
Date of Government Version: 03/08/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/13/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018
Number of Days to Update: 87
Source: Department of Interior
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 02/21/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/23/2018
Number of Days to Update: 28
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.
Date of Government Version: 02/25/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018
Number of Days to Update: 83
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Source: Department of Defense
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC5383530.2s Page GR-20

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 01/04/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels
Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.
Date of Government Version: 02/20/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/21/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/23/2018
Number of Days to Update: 30
AIRS: Air Quality Permit Listing
A listing of facilities with air quality permits.
Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2018
Number of Days to Update: 41
ASBESTOS: ASBESTOS
Asbestos notification sites
Date of Government Version: 10/15/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2018
Number of Days to Update: 48
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/23/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites
A listing of coal combustion products distribution permits issued by the Division for the treatment, storage,
transportation, use and disposal of coal combustion products.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2015 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2016 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/18/2016 Last EDR Contact: 07/30/2018
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites, active and abandoned, that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
knowledge of and entered into this database.
Date of Government Version: 04/23/2018 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2018 Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended
to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures
if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
TC5383530.2s Page GR-21

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 05/04/2018 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2018 Last EDR Contact: 05/08/2018
Number of Days to Update: 34 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available
to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated
facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012 Source: Department of Environmental & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2012 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2012 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2018
Number of Days to Update: 23 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information
Hazardous waste financial assurance information.
Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/12/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2018 Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2018
Number of Days to Update: 43 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing
General information regarding NPDES(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permits.
Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2018 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2018
Number of Days to Update: 38 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing
A listing of uncerground injection wells locations.
Date of Government Version: 06/01/2018 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/25/2018 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2018
Number of Days to Update: 50 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AOP: Animal Operation Permits Listing
This listing includes animal operations that are required to be permitted by the state.
Date of Government Version: 01/26/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/07/2018 Last EDR Contact: 06/15/2018
Number of Days to Update: 90 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture
of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
TC5383530.2s Page GR-22

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited
to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station,
filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources
that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were
not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived
from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled
from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 196 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC5383530.2s Page GR-23

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North
Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 172 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version: 01/03/2018 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/14/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2018 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018
Number of Days to Update: 36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/13/2018 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/01/2018 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2018
Number of Days to Update: 19 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version: 04/30/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/03/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/07/2018 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2018
Number of Days to Update: 35 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/25/2017 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/25/2017 Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2018
Number of Days to Update: 62 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC5383530.2s Page GR-24

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Source: Department of Environmental Management
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2018 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/09/2018 Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2018
Number of Days to Update: 45 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2018
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2018
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: PennWell Corporation
Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty
Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases
(Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information
is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant
its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: PennWell Corporation
This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best
effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any
particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell.
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: [phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals.
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: [phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: [phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States.
TC5383530.2s Page GR-25

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC5383530.2s Page GR-26

9
o
0
a
a
0070
IQo
0
a P N
Belwood
040 I
0o fl
0
� 1
0
Fallston
I
Site Location
0
Selkirk Drive
0 18
0 o a
rt
/: Site is located within Targeted Local
Watershed 03050105080060
4 03050105080090
t, Site Figure 1
Location Project Vicinity Map
10 27 UT to Magness Creek
Stream Mitigation Project
150Michael
I N T E R N A T I O N A L
i
---__18 10 0.5 1 2
Cleveland County Cleveland County MIIeS

Proposed Conservation Easement
4z
Burns
• - I 1.
ich
9t6 • !� -
r
e
i �-
.�
C/I
ism
�eoo �r laQ i l •( �,U- -
Lawndale Quadrangle Copyright:© 2013tibnal Geo ra hic Society,i'cubd
0 1,600 3,200 Figure 2
Michael BakerFeet USGS Topographic Map
UT to Magness Creek
INTERNATIONAL 1 inch = 1,600 feet Stream Mitigation Project

o/
A
/F
Q Proposed Conservation Easement
Project Parcel Boundaries
Figure 3
Michael Baker0 550 1,100 Project Area Map
Feet UT to Magness Creek
N T E R N A T 1 0 N A L 1" = 550' Mitigation Project

OPTION TO PURCHASE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
THIS OPTION TO PURCHASE CONSERVATION EASEMENT (the "Option") is made and
entered into this 23rd day of February, 2018 _(the "Effective Date"), by and among
Robert and Kay Yarboro; residing at 2803 Selkirk Drive, Lawndale, NC 28090 (the "Grantor"), and
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING, INC., a corporation organized in the State of New York with
offices at 797 Haywood Rd., Suite 201, Asheville, North Carolina 28806 ("Baker").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of that certain real property located in Cleveland County, North
Carolina, containing 168.71 acres (PINs 2641419802, 26141528927, 2641538722, 2641540498,
2641600979), more or less, as more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated
herein by reference, together with the improvements thereon and all appurtenances thereto belonging and
appertaining, and all creeks, streams, rights -of -way, roads, streets and ways bounding said real property
(collectively the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, Grantor has agreed to convey to Baker, an exclusive right and option to acquire a
conservation easement, as more particularly described on the attached Exhibit B (the "Easement"), over the
Property in accordance with the terms of this Option; and
WHEREAS, Baker is interested in acquiring the Easement in order to develop and construct a full
delivery wetland, stream, and/or buffer restoration project over the lands covered by the Easement (the
"Work") in conjunction with requests for proposals issued under the Division of Mitigation Services
(formerly the Ecosystem Enhancement Program and Wetlands Restoration Program) within the North
Carolina Department of Environmental Quality ("DEQ") and Baker has agreed to undertake such Work
with respect to the Easement in accordance with the scope of work set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto;
and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition
Policies Act of 1970, Baker hereby notifies Grantor that: (i) Baker believes the fair market value of the
Easement is the Purchase Price, pursuant to Paragraph 4(a), together with the value of the environmental
improvements to be made to the Easement by Baker in performing the Work on the Easement; and (ii)
Baker does not possess the power of eminent domain;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of (the "Signing Date
Option Deposit") and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Grant of Option. Grantor hereby grants unto Baker, its successors and assigns, which shall
be limited to a third -party designated by Baker qualified to be the grantee of a conservation easement under
N.C.G.S. §121-35(2), the exclusive right and option to purchase the Easement in accordance with and
subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Option.
2. Term. The term of this Option shall commence on the Effective Date and shall expire
Thirty -Six (36) months after the Effective Date (the "Term"), unless extended by the parties, in writing. A
Memorandum of Option to Purchase Easement in the form attached as Exhibit D shall be executed by both
parties simultaneously with this Option and recorded at Baker's sole discretion and expense in the county
where the Property is located to provide record notice of this Option. In no event shall this Option be
recorded or filed in the public records.

3. Exclusivity of Option. Grantor covenants and agrees that it will take no action to sell or
transfer the Easement during the Term, and that Grantor will not encumber the Property in a manner that
would impair the intended use of the Easement hereunder, it being intended and agreed that the Option is
exclusive to Baker and Baker's successors and assigns.
4. Exercise of Option. At any time prior to the expiration of the Term, Baker may exercise
this Option by giving Grantor no less than thirty (30) days prior written notice of the date Baker desires to
consummate the purchase of the Easement under this Option (the "Closing"). Closing shall take place at a
time and place reasonably acceptable to both parties. The terms of the purchase and sale of the Easement
at Closing shall be as follows:
a Purchase Price. The total nurchase nrice for the lasement shall be
per acre (the "Purchase Price")
included in the Easement as determined by the Survey prepared pursuant to Paragraph 4(b),
below. The Option Deposit shall be credited towards the Purchase Price at Closing.
b. Survey. Prior to Closing, Baker shall obtain, at Baker's expense, a survey prepared
by a registered land surveyor duly licensed in the State of North Carolina showing the
boundary of the Easement as well as all casements, rights -of -way, encroachments and
improvements located thereon, and the exact acreage of the Easement (the "Survey"), and
that Baker shall have consulted with Grantor and taken in to account Grantor's concerns as
to the exact delineation of boundaries of the Easement. Following consultation with
Grantor and the completion of the Survey, a new legal description of the Easement shall
be prepared from the Survey. The new legal description shall be substituted for the
description currently attached hereto as Exhibit B, and all references contained herein to
the "Easement" shall be deemed to refer to the new description prepared from the Survey.
C. Prorations, Costs and Expenses of Closing. At Closing, ad valorem taxes for the
current year for the Easement area shall be prorated, and Grantor shall remain responsible
for all other ad valorem taxes applicable to the remainder of the Property subsequent to
Closing. At Closing, Grantor shall pay any outstanding ad valorem taxes for prior years
on Grantor's real or personal property, any late list penalties, revenue stamps or transfer
taxes applicable to the Easement, and any mortgages or liens with respect to the Property.
At Closing, Baker shall pay any costs related to the Survey, any title examination expenses,
title insurance premiums, recording costs for the deed conveying the Easement, costs of
recordation of any recorded plats showing the Easement, as well as any engineering or site
plan costs. Each party shall bear its own accounting and attorney fees.
d. Closing Documents and Title. At Closing, Grantor shall deliver (i) a deed
substantially in the form of the attached Exhibit E (the "Deed") conveying the Easement
to Baker or to a legally qualified non-profit organization or government agency as
contained in N.C.G.S. § 121-35(2) designated by Baker, provided, that the final form of the
Deed shall be in form mutually acceptable to Baker and Grantor so long as such form is
consistent with the provisions of Article 4, The Conservation and Historic Preservation
Agreements Act as contained in N.C.G.S. §121-34 through 42. The Deed shall convey
good, marketable and insurable title to the Easement, free and clear from all mortgages,
liens, easements, covenants, restrictions and other encumbrances, except those previously
accepted by Baker in writing; (ii) lien affidavits warranting and holding harmless any title
insurance company insuring title to the Easement, from and against unpaid mechanics and
2

materialmen's liens; and (iv) any other documents and papers necessary or appropriate in
connection with the consummation of the transaction contemplated by this Option.
At Closing, Baker shall deliver (i) a Settlement Statement setting forth each party's costs,
expenses, prorations and other financial analysis of the purchase and sale of the Easement
as contemplated hereby; (ii) the Note as defined in item 4(e), below; and (iii) any other
documents necessary to consummate the transaction contemplated by the Option.
C. Payment. It is understood that funding for the purchase of the Easement shall be
provided by the State of North Carolina pursuant to the Division of Mitigation Services of
DEQ and that such funding is made subsequent to recording of the Easement and
subsequent to Closing. Therefore, at Closing, Baker shall deliver to Grantor a promissory
note in the amount of the Purchase Price, less the Option Deposit and closing costs,
mortgage pay-offs, expenses, and prorations applicable to Grantor, which promissory note
shall bear interest at Zero Percent (0%) per annum on the unpaid balance until paid or until
default and which promissory note shall be due and payable in full on the date ninety (90)
days after the Closing (the "Note"). At the time of Closing, Baker shall record the Deed
and any plat referenced in the Deed and deliver copies of the recorded documents to the
State Property Office for review and funding. The Note shall contain an express provision
that if the DEQ fails to fund the purchase of the Easement in the amount of the Purchase
Price thereby causing Baker to fail to pay the Note in full on or before the maturity date,
then Baker, as Grantor's sole remedy, shall be liable to Grantor for all reasonable costs and
expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, required to have the Easement removed and
the title to the Property returned to the condition it was prior to the imposition of the
Easement, at which point the Note, this Option, and all duties, responsibilities and liabilities
with respect thereto shall be null and void. Otherwise, Baker shall pay the Note in full
upon receipt of funding by the State of North Carolina.
£ Condition of Property; Intended Use. Prior to Closing, Grantor shall remove all
rubbish and trash, including any hazardous waste or harmful chemical substances, from the
Easement but shall otherwise keep the Property in the same condition as of the Effective
Date, reasonable wear and tear excepted. Grantor shall prevent and refrain from any use
of the Property for any purpose or in any manner that would diminish the value of the
Easement or adversely affect Baker's intended use of the land for the Easement, which use
is to provide the Division of Mitigation Services within DEQ with wetland, stream, and/or
buffer mitigation credits. Grantor acknowledges that Baker will enter into an agreement
with DEQ to provide these credits, and Grantor agrees not to undertake or permit any
activities on the Property that would diminish Baker's ability to obtain such credits. If any
adverse change occurs in the condition of the Easement prior to Closing, whether such
change is caused by Grantor or by forces beyond Grantor's reasonable control, Baker may
elect to (i) refuse to accept the Easement at Closing; (ii) accept the Property at Closing, or
a portion thereof with a corresponding adjustment of the Purchase Price; or (iii) terminate
this Option and the transaction itself and declare this Option null and void.
g. Warranty of Title. Grantor covenants, represents and warrants that, as of the
Effective Date and Closing: (i) Grantor is the sole owner(s) of the Property and is seized
of the Property in fee simple absolute; (ii) Grantor has the right and authority to convey
this Option and the Easement and Grantor will hold the grantee of the Easement harmless
from any failure in Grantor's right and authority to convey the Easement, including issues
of title; (iii) there is legal access to the Property and to the Easement; (iv) the Easement is
free from any and all encumbrances, except those accepted by Baker in writing; (v) Grantor
3

will defend title to the Easement against all lawful claims of other parties; (vi) that the
Property is free of any hazardous wastes.
5. Right of Entry and Inspections. Baker, and its agents and employees or other authorized
representatives, may enter upon the Property during the Term for the purpose of making surveys,
conducting soil, engineering, geological and other subsoil or environmental tests to determine the suitability
of the Property for the Easement. Baker shall repair or pay for any damage done to the Property caused
while such tests are being made. Baker shall advise Grantor at least twenty-four hours in advance of any
entry upon the Property for the purposes of surveying, testing or inspecting as set forth herein. Baker shall
be permitted during the Term to obtain land use permits or other approvals relating to any part of the
Easement, and Grantor agrees to execute such documents, petitions, and authorizations as may be
appropriate or required in order to obtain such land use permits and approvals. Grantor shall join with
Baker in applications and any non judicial or non -administrative proceedings to obtain such approvals if
necessary. After Closing, Baker reserves the right to perform periodic inspections of the Easement to ensure
compliance with easement restrictions contained in the Deed. If Baker does not duly exercise this Option
and purchase the Easement, Baker shall return the Property to the condition in which it existed prior to any
investigations undertaken by Baker, its agents, employees or contractors pursuant to this Option.
6. Permanent Access and Construction Easements. In connection with this Option and
delivery of the Easement, Grantor shall also;
(a) convey and grant to Baker, its successors, assigns, contractors and agents, a non-
exclusive temporary construction easement, the location of which shall be determined in
the sole discretion of Grantor, for ingress, egress and regress on, over and upon Grantor's
Property, sufficient to allow Baker, its agents and contractors to construct and restore the
Easement area to stream and/or wetland conditions required by DEQ, said temporary
construction easement to include sufficient access to allow heavy equipment to access the
Property and the Easement, as necessary; and
(b) convey and grant to Baker, its successors and assigns, a non-exclusive permanent
easement for ingress and egress to the Easement, the location of which shall be determined
in the sole discretion of Grantor, in order that Baker, its successors and assigns, may have
a permanent means of adequately accessing the area covered by the Easement. The
permanent access easement referred to herein shall be set forth in an accurate survey, the
legal description of which shall be included in a recorded permanent access easement
which shall run with the land.
7. Indemnification. Baker agrees to indemnify and save harmless Grantor from and against
any loss, claim, damage, cost or expense (including reasonable attomey's fees) suffered or incurred by
Grantor by reason of any injury to person or damage to property on or about the Property to the extent
caused by Baker, its officers, employees, agents, invitees, contractors, or subcontractors entering or
conducting work upon the Property, except for any loss, claim, damage, cost or expense suffered or incurred
as a result of the negligence or intentional misconduct of Grantor or Grantor's employees, agents or
invitees.
8. Notices. Unless otherwise set forth, any notice or other communication required or
permitted hereunder shall be in writing and (a) delivered by overnight courier; (b) sent by facsimile
transmission, or (c) mailed by Registered or Certified Mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows (or to
such other address for a party as shalI be specified by like notice; provided that notice of change of address
shall be effective only upon receipt thereof);
4

If to Baker: Jake Byers
Michael Baker Engineering
797 Haywood Rd. Suite 201
Asheville, NC 28806
If to the Grantor: Robert and Kay Yarboro
2803 Selkirk Drive
Lawndale, NC 28090
9. Miscellaneous.
a. This Option, together with the exhibits attached hereto which are incorporated
herein by reference, contains the entire understanding of the parties hereto with respect to
the subject matter contained herein. No amendment, modification, or discharge of this
Option, and no waiver hereunder, shall be valid or binding unless set forth in writing and
duly executed by the parties hereto.
b. Any provision of this Option that shall be found to be contrary to applicable law
or otherwise unenforceable shall not affect the remaining terms of this Option, which shall
be construed as if the unenforceable provision or clause were absent from this Option.
C. This Option shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their
respective heirs, personal representatives, successors, and assigns.
d. This Option shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of North Carolina without application of its conflicts of laws provisions.
e. No act or failure to act by either party shall be deemed a waiver of its rights
hereunder, and no waiver in any one circumstance or of any one provision shall be deemed
a waiver in other circumstances or of other provisions.
f. Grantor agrees to not mow or otherwise damage vegetation within Easement area
after Baker plants or replants the same. If Grantor or Grantor's agents or invitees damage
vegetation within the Easement, Grantor will replace the lost or damaged vegetation at their
expense.
g. Baker shall ensure that access to portions of the Grantor's property shall not be
impeded by the proposed.
j. This Option shall not be assignable by Baker, except to another entity acquiring at
least fifty-one percent (51 %) interest in Baker or Baker's business or to an entity qualified
to be the grantee of a conservation easement under N.C.G.S § 121-35
h. Baker shall exclude livestock from the area included within the conservation
easement by constructing a woven wire fence along the surveyed easement line. This fence
will be constructed according to NRCS specifications and will include gates as needed for
managing crossings and to provide human access.
5

i. Baker shall install a well, waterlines and up to 5 insulated, pressurized water tanks
to provide a water source for livestock, when they are excluded from the restored stream
channel and buffer. This water system will be installed according to MRCS standards.
j. Baker shall install two ford type stream crossings in accordance with MRCS
standards, to provide livestock access to pasture areas that are separated from other pastures
by the conservation easement fencing.
on

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Option as of the date first above written.
G TOR:
By:
Print Name: 'R0 be 1' a e b v ev
Title:_ —w VAo'
MICHAEL BAKER ENGI ERING, INC.:
By:
Print Name: Dwain, Hathaway
Title: Vice President
7

en -ar -
Note: This map may not be a certified survey and has not been
reviewed by a local government agency for compliance with any
applicable land development regulations and has not been
.-•� reviewed for compliance with recording requirments for plats7.
I
• .� r
* �1 YARBORO ROBERT E',i`
YARBORO KAY D� f . ► :,). t _
2641540498 _
' ro `.� fe
YARBORO ROBERT E s • ' r-*'
�i YARBORO KAY D`'•
YARBORO ROBERT E 2641538722 ► L
YARBORO KAY b •, �'. t ��
2641538722 +i► , r'
YARBORO ROBERT E
YARBORO KAY D
2641528927
OL
tom•
•.l
ra
YARBORO ROBERT E
YARBORO KAY D
�
2641419802
— YARBORO ROBEZE
YARBORO KAY
2641528927
F
ARBORO ROBERT E
YARBORO KAY D
2641419802
� •: � '� YARBORO ROBERT E
1
YARBORO KAY D
26 1fi00979
1 r
Project Streams
Parcel Boundaries „•: .r►`�:',,.,+ , Broad 03Q50'!Q5
r
Michael Baker, 0 250 500 1,000 Exhibit A
Feet Landowner(s):
INTERNATIONAL Yarboro, Robert E. and Kay D.

o
451600
35o 24'39"N
g
r
1
93
1
93
1
93
N
93
0
ro
93
1
93
0
r
93
35o 24' 8" N
451600 451700 451800 451900 45200(
rl
Map Scale: 1:4,660 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet.
o Meters N
0 50 100 200 ?00
Feet
0 200 400 800 1200
Map projection: Web Mercator Conermordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
Soil Map —Cleveland County, North Carolina
(UT to Magness Creek Mitigation Project)
451700 451800 451900 452000
452100
452100
452200
35o 24' 39" N
g
r
1
93
N
93
1
93
N
93
0
ro
93
1
93
0
r
93
35o 24'8" N
452200
m
8/7/2018
Pagel of 3

Z
O
G
O
LL
Z
Ca
G
0
Z
/W
V
W
J
a
O O �
7
U O 0-0
U O O
O) E
Q m —_
Q O m
U O C C
y E m y
y O O O
O E U)
m m O O
= U) E in
> O O a)
C >
-0C O
a) -0
0 O Q 6
> Q m U
m cn E
a
E (-o a) m
m
O C m N y
U (i) m E rn
C
E
c (1)
E 2
y a) m m
W E U W
O O
y
m
O
>
O
a)
U
Uy y
m
m
(n
a)
0
0 L
6
y 7
D O
m
.N E
'O tll -O
�,
m
QUA
O
N
E
=
U)
w
Q
a)
O
O N
a) m N cr
O O
U)
O
O
N
Q
y-0 N
m
L
.�.-� O
N a)
U
Q
a)
.�.. N
U)
a) CJ
O
Z
O
tl)
U y '6
m CL
0 d
N C U) m
Q
Z
O
a)
`) a)
E
U W
m m W" O a)
(fl
N
L
y m a)
s
U)
c Q N N
D
Q
a)
O Q >+
w y
U
m
a)
a) O
N _
o m C 0
m U= O
a)
)
(n
O
m
m
O)
O
Q ._ m
m E
c
0
a)
>+ a) ._ U
C
O
N
U O
N
U
O
L
Q
E T m u)
Q
��'� 9 m
7 u) U O tl)
o�
'O
C c
m O
Q
N
N
N m E
O m
y
a)
U a) .o Q
'0
a)
a)
m-0
C
.�-� J
m
a)Q
U) U) .�
Q c
n
>
U
Q
y
t O
N
a)
Z E
8
m ai m o
a)
aaci a)
m
m
a)
rn
o o
a)
rn m
-O
m
m rn
O _0 T
m 7
,tl)
C
N Q
y (6
O '6 m CL
O a)
>'
g U
U)
m
U .o
Q m
0
m
s cn E
E
-
m
E m 3 U
D O a) a) a)
7 to
O m
Q
7
O_ O
N
m
C m
76 O
U) U)U
0
U
U) U
>
Q a)
(n a)
m O
E O
y O N
N
0 a N �
m m
a) a)
o
o a) O
Q .a? a) 0
m O n
U)
!E0
7
O LPm
a) E m
FL E
U U
2 QU=o Q m
H o
U U
U T
0 aN°
H 0. U)
y
�
y
Q
4
Li
O
U
R
L
a
L
Q
a
Q
>.
O
a)
R
2
y
O
a
-yo
O
L
a)
Q
CL
Z U)
°
J
m
E
a)
m
y
0
O
°
O
R
a
m
o O
U) U)
N
>
L_
O
u)
y 0
cn
�
o
a)
U
J
a Q
*
R
a
R
�
C
�
R 4
R5
F
R
m
y
C
O
y
0
.�
O
Q
U)
a°
a°
N
c
N
a
CL
O
U
a
0y
>C >C
Q
>C
a)
a)
C)
Q
3
Q
o
o
w
Q
O O
FL
O
°
O
�
o`
�Q
W
,
oY
Q
o
a) O-
R
—oo
3
O
w>>
aRaoU
Co
o an
Q
0
n n
0
n
p
m
O
'
a)
a
O
m
m
U)
R
U)
o
U)
o
in U) U)
w
a
R
yp�pyp��
`¢
`
11F
U)
Q
y
0
U
� a)
U '
— m
0 a)
U Q
O
U
m
0
m
Z

Soil Map —Cleveland County, North Carolina
UT to Magness Creek Mitigation
Project
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
ChA
Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, frequently flooded
10.3
93.8%
PaC2
Pacolet sandy clay loam, 8 to
15 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
0.7
6.2%
Totals for Area of Interest
11.0
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/7/2018
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

U.S. Department of Agriculture
FARMLAND CONVERSION IMPACT RATING
PART I (To be completed by Federal Agency)
Date Of Land Evaluation Request 8/7/2018
Name of Project UT to Magness Creek Mitigation Project
Federal Agency Involved FHWA
Proposed Land Use Stream Mitigation
County and State Cleveland, NC
PART II (To be completed by NRCS)
Date Request Received By
NRCS 08/07/2018
Pe , on Co pleting F r
Mil 6ortes � NRCS
Does the site contain Prime, Unique, Statewide or Local Important Farmland?
(If no, the FPPA does not apply - do not complete additional parts of this form)
YES NO
Z
Acres Irrigated
none
Average Farm Size
113 acres
Major Crop(s)
CORN
Farmable Land In Govt. Jurisdiction
Acres: 79% % 236,827 acres
Amount of Farmland As Defined in FPPA
Acres: 61.4%% 93,263 acres
Name of Land Evaluation System Used
Cleveland Co,. NC LESA
Name of State or Local Site Assessment System
N/A
Date Land Evaluation Returned by NRCS
August 27. 2018 by eMail
PART III (To be completed by Federal Agency)
Alternative Site Rating
Site A
Site B
Site C
I Site D
A. Total Acres To Be Converted Directly
11.0
B. Total Acres To Be Converted Indirectly
0
C. Total Acres In Site
11.0
PART IV (To be completed by NRCS) Land Evaluation Information
A. Total Acres Prime And Unique Farmland
10.30
B. Total Acres Statewide Important or Local Important Farmland
0.70
C. Percentage Of Farmland in County Or Local Govt. Unit To Be Converted
0.0118
D. Percentage Of Farmland in Govt. Jurisdiction With Same Or Higher Relative Value
4.4%
PART V (To be completed by NRCS) Land Evaluation Criterion
Relative Value of Farmland To Be Converted Scale of 0 to 100 Points
97
PART VI (To be completed by Federal Agency) Site Assessment Criteria
Criteria are explained in 7 CFR 658.5 b. For Corridor ro ect use form NRCS-CPA-106
Maximum
Points
Site A
Site B
Site C
Site D
1. Area In Non -urban Use
(15)
15
2. Perimeter In Non -urban Use
(10)
10
3. Percent Of Site Being Farmed
(20)
20
4. Protection Provided By State and Local Government
(20)
20
5. Distance From Urban Built-up Area
(15)
5
6. Distance To Urban Support Services
(15)
5
7. Size Of Present Farm Unit Compared To Average
(10)
10
8. Creation Of Non-farmable Farmland
(10)
0
9. Availability Of Farm Support Services
(5)
5
10. On -Farm Investments
(20)
10
11. Effects Of Conversion On Farm Support Services
(10)
0
12. Compatibility With Existing Agricultural Use
(10)
0
TOTAL SITE ASSESSMENT POINTS
160
100
0
0
0
PART VII (To be completed by Federal Agency)
Relative Value Of Farmland (From Part V)
100
97
0
0
0
Total Site Assessment (From Part VI above or local site assessment)
160
100
0
0
0
TOTAL POINTS (Total of above 2 lines)
260
197
0
0
0
Site Selected: A
Date Of Selection 9/19/2018
Was A Local Site Assessment Used?
YES NO ❑
Reason For Selection:
Name of Federal agency representative completing this form: FHWA Date: 9/19/2018
(See Instructions on reverse side) Form AD-1006 (03-02)

ROY COOPER NORTH CAROLINA
Governor Environmental Quality
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
Elizabeth Toombs
Cherokee Nation
Tribal Historic Preservation Office
P.O. Box 948
Tahlequah, OK 74465
[e-mail]
Dear Ms. Toombs,
The North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) - Division of Mitigation
Services (DMS) requests review and comment on any possible issues that might emerge with
respect to archaeological or cultural resources associated with the proposed UT to Magness
Creek mitigation site. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is the lead federal
agency for this proposed mitigation project. A USGS Topographic Map and a proposed
project conceptual map showing the project area are enclosed. The topographic figure was
prepared from the Lawndale, 7.5-Minute USGS Topographic Quadrangle. The project
location (Latitude and Longitude) is as follows: (35.4065 N,-81.5293 W).
The UT to Magness Creek mitigation project is located in Cleveland County, NC, east of the
Town of Lawndale, within the Broad River Basin (03050105) and the NC DMS Targeted Local
Watershed (TLW) 03050105080060. Located within a water supply watershed (WS-IV), the
project drains directly to Magness Creek and the First Broad River, which is a drinking water
source for the City of Shelby and other downstream municipalities. This TLW consists of a
mix of rural and commercial land use, with approximately 49% of land dedicated to some
form of agricultural production. Like the project area, many streams within this TLW are
highly unstable with eroding banks and limited aquatic habitat.
Land use within the project area consists predominantly of livestock production but has also
included row crops. Project stream reaches have been significantly impacted by historic
channelization, unrestricted livestock access, and the removal or impairment of riparian
buffers. Most of the reaches are incised, unstable, and exhibit areas of active bank erosion
from high flows, hoof shear, and raw banks. Riparian buffer vegetation varies from areas
with no woody buffer vegetation to areas with large trees but at low density and without any
significant understory.
The project will involve the restoration and enhancement of approximately 3,385 LF of
existing stream. Degraded riparian wetlands will be restored and/or enhanced with the
NORT�CARQLINA
D�
Depart-M of 8Mm"Mel4ualiry f
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W. Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

implementation of Priority Level 1 restoration, livestock exclusion, and native riparian
buffer plantings; however, no wetland credit is being sought. A Best Management Practice
(BMP) in the form of a constructed wet pond will be installed in an unstable ephemeral
drainage that receives run-off from an area that is frequently used by livestock. Native
riparian buffers will be established along all proposed reaches. A conservation easement
will be implemented along all project reaches in an excess of 50 feet from the top of bank and
will incorporate the BMP as well as some of the existing functional wetlands. Livestock will
be excluded from the conservation easement with permanent fencing.
We ask that you review this site based on the attached information to determine the
presence of any known historic properties. Please feel free to contact us with any questions
that you may have concerning this project.
Respectfully,
Paul Wiesner
Western Regional Supervisor
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
828-273-1673 Mobile
paul.wiesnerOncdenr.gov
Western DMS Field Office
5 Ravenscroft Drive
Suite 102
Asheville, N.C. 28801
Attachments:
Figure 1: USGS Topographic Map
Figure 2: Proposed Project Conceptual Map
cc: Donnie Brew, FHWA
NORT9CARQLINA
D
DeDartmeM of 8Mm"Mel4ualiry f
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 W. Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
919.707.8976

We Make a Difference
INTERNATIONAL
August 7, 2018
Milton Cortes, Assistant State Soil Scientist
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
4407 Bland Rd., Suite 117
Raleigh, NC 27609
Email Milton.Cortes&nc.usda.gov
RE: Prime and Important Farmland Soils
NCDMS, UT to Magness Creek Mitigation Project
Cleveland County, NC
Dear Mr. Cortes:
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. (Baker) is contracted by the North Carolina Division of Mitigation
Services (NCDMS) to conduct stream restoration/enhancement activities for the above -referenced project.
The project area is located in Cleveland County, North Carolina approximately 1.0 mile southeast of the
Town of Lawndale on the United States Geological Survey's (USGS) Lawndale Topographic Quadrangle.
The center of the project area is located at 35.4065 N and-81.5293 W. Located within a water supply
watershed (WS-IV), the project drains directly to Magness Creek and the First Broad River, which is a
drinking water source for the City of Shelby and other downstream municipalities. Existing reaches within
the project site flow to the south-southwest where the downstream extent of the project is bordered by
Selkirk Drive. Please see the enclosed USGS Topographic Maps for a depiction of the project site location.
The UT to Magness Creek site was identified to provide compensatory mitigation for unavoidable stream
impacts. The existing stream reaches have been significantly impacted by unrestricted livestock access and
the removal or impairment of riparian buffers. Most of the project reaches are incised, unstable, and exhibit
areas of active bank erosion from both high flows and livestock access. Riparian buffer vegetation varies
from areas with no woody buffer vegetation to areas with large trees but at low density and without any
significant understory.
The project will involve the restoration and enhancement of approximately 3,385 LF of existing stream.
Degraded riparian wetlands will be restored and/or enhanced with the implementation of Priority Level 1
restoration, livestock exclusion, and native riparian buffer plantings; however, no wetland credit is being
sought. A Best Management Practice (BMP) in the form of a constructed wet pond will be installed in an
unstable ephemeral drainage that receives run-off from an area that is frequently used by livestock. Native
riparian buffers will be established along all proposed reaches. A conservation easement will be
implemented along all project reaches in an excess of 50 feet from the top of bank and will incorporate
some of the existing functional wetlands. Livestock will be excluded from the conservation easement with
permanent fencing.
Baker conducted a review of the project area using the US Department of Agriculture Natural Resources
Conservation Service's (USDA NRCS) Web Soil Survey. A Soils Classification Report and Map was
generated for the soils that are present within the proposed conservation easement. Based on the data
determined from this review, there are a total of 10.3 acres of Chewacla loam (ChA) and 0.7 acres of Pacolet
sand clay loam (PaC2) within the project area.
MBAKERINTL.COM
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
Ballantyne One, 15720 Brixham Hill Avenue
Suite 300, Room 336
Charlotte, NC 28277 1 Office: 704.665.2200

We Make a Difference
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this project or need any additional
information. I can be reached at [phone] or via my email address at ksuggskmbakerintl.com.
Sincerely,
19&1a�gr
Kristi Suggs
Enclosures: USGS Topographic Map
NRCS Soils Classification Report & Map
FFPA Form AD-1006
Cc: File

We Make a Difference
INTERNATIONAL
August 7, 2018
NC Wildlife Resource Commission
Atlas: Olivia Munzer, Western Piedmont Coordinator
2430 Turner Road
Mebane, NC 27302
Email: olivia.munzer&ncwildlife.org
RE: Categorical Exclusion Project Review Request
UT to Magness Creek Mitigation Project, Cleveland County, NC
NCDEQ DMS Full -Delivery Project ID 9100081
Broad River Basin (03050105)
Dear Ms. Munzer:
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. (Baker) respectfully requests review and comment from the NC Wildlife
Resource Commission (WRC) on any possible concerns they may have with regards to the
implementation of the UT to Magness Creek Mitigation Project. Please note that this request is in support
of the development of the Categorical Exclusion (CE) for the referenced project.
The project area is located in Cleveland County, North Carolina approximately 1.0 mile southeast of the
Town of Lawndale on the United States Geological Survey's (USGS) Lawndale Topographic Quadrangle.
The center of the project area is located at 35.4065 N and-81.5293 W. Located within a water supply
watershed (WS-IV), the project drains directly to Magness Creek and the First Broad River, which is a
drinking water source for the City of Shelby and other downstream municipalities. Existing reaches within
the project site flow to the south-southwest where the downstream extent of the project is bordered by
Selkirk Drive. Please see the enclosed Vicinity and USGS Topographic Maps for a depiction of the project
site location.
The UT to Magness Creek site was identified to provide compensatory mitigation for unavoidable stream
impacts. The existing stream reaches have been significantly impacted by unrestricted livestock access and
the removal or impairment of riparian buffers. Most of the project reaches are incised, unstable, and exhibit
areas of active bank erosion from both high flows and livestock access. Riparian buffer vegetation varies
from areas with no woody buffer vegetation to areas with large trees but at low density and without any
significant understory.
The project will involve the restoration and enhancement of approximately 3,385 LF of existing stream.
Degraded riparian wetlands will be restored and/or enhanced with the implementation of Priority Level 1
restoration, livestock exclusion, and native riparian buffer plantings; however, no wetland credit is being
sought. A Best Management Practice (BMP) in the form of a constructed wet pond will be installed in an
unstable ephemeral drainage that receives run-off from an area that is frequently used by livestock. Native
riparian buffers will be established along all proposed reaches. A conservation easement will be
implemented along all project reaches in an excess of 50 feet from the top of bank and will incorporate
MBAKERINTL.COM
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
Ballantyne One, 15720 Brixham Hill Ave., Ste. 300 Office 336
Charlotte, NC 28277 1 Office: 704.665.2200

We Make a Difference
some of the existing functional wetlands. Livestock will be excluded from the conservation easement with
permanent fencing.
Data Review and Analysis
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. (Baker) conducted an on-line review of the project area with the use of
the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) IPAC website (hit2s:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac_/), on
August 6, 2018. This review generated an Official Species List (OSL), which identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that
may occur within the boundary of the proposed project and/or may be affected by proposed project.
Results from review, found the following two federally listed species. No USFWS designated critical
habitats were located within the project boundaries.
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal Status
M otis se tentrionalis
Northern long-eared bat
Threatened
Hexastylis nani ora
Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf
Threatened
On August 6, 2018, Baker conducted a two-mile radius search using the Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP) Data Explorer(https://ncnhde.natureserve.org_/). Results from this search and found no known
occurrences of any of the above referenced species within two miles of the project site.
Myotis septentrionalis (Northern long-eared bat) — Threatened
USFWS optimal survey window: June 1- August 15
In North Carolina, the northern long-eared bat (NLEB) occurs in the mountains, with scattered records in
the Piedmont and coastal plain. In western North Carolina, NLEB spend winter hibernating in caves and
mines. Since this species is not known to be a long-distance migrant, and caves and subterranean mines are
extremely rare in eastern North Carolina, it is uncertain whether or where NLEB hibernate in eastern NC.
During the summer, NLEB roost singly or in colonies underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both
live and dead trees (typically >3 inches dbh). This bat also been found, rarely, roosting in structures like
barns and sheds, under eaves of buildings, behind window shutters, in bridges, and in bat houses. Pregnant
females give birth from late May to late July. Foraging occurs on forested hillsides and ridges, and
occasionally over forest clearings, over water, and along tree -lined corridors. Mature forests may be an
important habitat type for foraging.
No critical habitat has been designated for this species and the project site is located outside of a county
and/or watershed where NLEB maternity trees or hibernation sites are known to occur. Additionally, a
two-mile radius search using the Natural Heritage Program's Data Explorer
(https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/) on August 6, 2018 found no known occurrences of the NLEB within two
miles of the Project site.
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Hexastylis naniflora (Dwarf -flowered heartleaf) — Threatened
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: mid -March — early July
The dwarf -flowered heartleaf is a low -growing evergreen perennial that has heart -shape leaves that are four
to six centimeters long. The leaves are dark green and leathery and are supported by long thin leaf stems
connecting it to an underground stem. The blooms are small, inconspicuous jug -shaped flowers that are
usually beige to dark brown or purple. The flowers are found near the base of the leaf stems and are often
buried beneath the leaf litter. The plant grows in acidic soils along bluffs and adjacent slopes, in boggy
areas next to streams, and along slopes of nearby hillsides and ravines.

We Make a Difference
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Please provide comments on any possible issues that may arise with respect to the endangered species,
migratory birds or other natural resources from the construction of the proposed project. The following
additional supporting documentation has been included for reference: Vicinity Map, USGS Topographic
Map, and Project Site Map. If Baker has not received response from you within 30 days, we will assume
that the NCWRC does not have any comment or information relevant to the implementation of this project
at the current time.
We thank you in advance for your timely response, input, and cooperation. Please contact me if you have
any further questions or comments. I can be reached at [phone] or via my email address at
ksuaas(a,mbakerintl.com.
Sincerely,
11�axr
Kristi Suggs
Cc: File
Enclosures

We Make a Difference
INTERNATIONAL
August 3, 2018
Renee Gledhill -Earley, Environmental Review Coordinator
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Email: Environmental.Reviewkncdcr. og_v
RE: Project Review Request
UT to Magness Creek Mitigation Project
Cleveland County, North Carolina
Broad River Basin (Catalog Unit - 03050105)
Dear Ms. Gledhill -Earley:
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. (Baker) is contracted by the North Carolina Division of Mitigation
Services (NCDMS) to conduct stream and/or wetland restoration/enhancement activities for the above -
referenced project. We are requesting an office review of the attached documentation and comment on any
possible issues that may emerge with respect to archaeological or cultural resources associated with the
proposed stream and/or wetland restoration/enhancement project.
The project area is located in Cleveland County, North Carolina approximately 1.0 mile southeast of the
Town of Lawndale. The project is located on the United States Geological Survey's (USGS) Lawndale
Topographic Quadrangle. The center of the project area is located at 35.4065 N and-81.5293 W. The
project site flows south-southwest and is bordered at the downstream extent by Selkirk Drive. Please see
the enclosed Vicinity and USGS Topographic Maps for a depiction of the project site location.
The UT to Magness Creek site was identified to provide compensatory mitigation for unavoidable stream
impacts. The existing stream reaches have been significantly impacted by unrestricted livestock access and
the removal or impairment of riparian buffers. Most of the project reaches are incised, unstable, and exhibit
areas of active bank erosion from both high flows and livestock access. Riparian buffer vegetation varies
from areas with no woody buffer vegetation to areas with large trees but at low density and without any
significant understory.
The project will involve the restoration and enhancement of approximately 3,385 LF of existing stream.
Degraded riparian wetlands will be restored and/or enhanced with the implementation of Priority Level 1
restoration, livestock exclusion, and native riparian buffer plantings; however, no wetland credit is being
sought. A Best Management Practice (BMP) in the form of a constructed wet pond will be installed in an
unstable ephemeral drainage that receives run-off from an area that is frequently used by livestock. Native
riparian buffers will be established along all proposed reaches. A conservation easement will be
implemented along all project reaches in an excess of 50 feet from the top of bank and will incorporate
some of the existing functional wetlands. Livestock will be excluded from the conservation easement with
permanent fencing.
MBAKERINTL.COM
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
Ballantyne One,15720 Brixham Ave., Suite 300, Office 336
Charlotte, NC 282771 Office:704.665.2200

We Make a Difference
An on-line search was conducted on August 3, 2018 using the HPOWEB GIS Map Service to identify any
historic properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places that lie within a one -mile radius of the
project site. Results from the search identified only one surveyed area of historic reference: Arthur Lee
and Lesta Spangler House (Site ID CL0395). Please refer to the enclosed SHPO Map for a depiction of the
project area's location relative to the historic property.
On -site investigations and discussions with landowners have not revealed any potential cultural resources
within the proposed easement areas. No archeological artifacts have been observed or noted during
preliminary surveys of the site for restoration purposes, and no existing structures are located within the
areas proposed for restoration or enhancement. The majority of the site has historically been disturbed due
to past and current management for pasture grazing and livestock production.
Baker appreciates your timely attention to this matter. If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will
assume that there are no comments with regard to the project area and archaeological and cultural resources.
Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions regarding this project or the extent of proposed
disturbance. I can be reached at [phone] or via my email address at ksugg`kmbakerintl.com.
Sincerely,
A
a�gp
Kristi Suggs
Enclosures: Vicinity Map
USGS Topographic Map
SHPO Map
Cc: Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians (EBCI)
File

We Make a Difference
INTERNATIONAL
August 3, 2018
Holly Austin
Section 106 Assistant
Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians
P.O. Box 455
Cherokee, NC 28719
Email: hollymaustin&gmail.com
RE: Project Review Request
UT to Magness Creek Mitigation Project
Cleveland County, North Carolina
Broad River Basin (Catalog Unit - 03050105)
Dear Ms. Austin:
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. (Baker) is contracted by the North Carolina Division of Mitigation
Services (NCDMS) to conduct stream and/or wetland restoration/enhancement activities for the above -
referenced project. We are requesting an office review of the attached documentation and comment on any
possible issues that may emerge with respect to archaeological or cultural resources associated with the
proposed stream and/or wetland restoration/enhancement project.
The project area is located in Cleveland County, North Carolina approximately 1.0 mile southeast of the
Town of Lawndale. The project is located on the United States Geological Survey's (USGS) Lawndale
Topographic Quadrangle. The center of the project area is located at 35.4065 N and-81.5293 W. The
project site flows south-southwest and is bordered at the downstream extent by Selkirk Drive. Please see
the enclosed Vicinity and USGS Topographic Maps for a depiction of the project site location.
The UT to Magness Creek site was identified to provide compensatory mitigation for unavoidable stream
impacts. The existing stream reaches have been significantly impacted by unrestricted livestock access and
the removal or impairment of riparian buffers. Most of the project reaches are incised, unstable, and exhibit
areas of active bank erosion from both high flows and livestock access. Riparian buffer vegetation varies
from areas with no woody buffer vegetation to areas with large trees but at low density and without any
significant understory.
The project will involve the restoration and enhancement of approximately 3,385 LF of existing stream.
Degraded riparian wetlands will be restored and/or enhanced with the implementation of Priority Level 1
restoration, livestock exclusion, and native riparian buffer plantings; however, no wetland credit is being
sought. A Best Management Practice (BMP) in the form of a constructed wet pond will be installed in an
unstable ephemeral drainage that receives run-off from an area that is frequently used by livestock. Native
riparian buffers will be established along all proposed reaches. A conservation easement will be
implemented along all project reaches in an excess of 50 feet from the top of bank and will incorporate
some of the existing functional wetlands. Livestock will be excluded from the conservation easement with
permanent fencing.
MBAKERINTL.COM
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
Ballantyne One,15720 Brixham Ave., Suite 300, Office 336
Charlotte, NC 282771 Office:704.665.2200

We Make a Difference
On -site investigations and discussions with landowners have not revealed any potential cultural resources
within the proposed easement areas. No archeological artifacts have been observed or noted during
preliminary surveys of the site for restoration purposes, and no existing structures are located within the
areas proposed for restoration or enhancement. The majority of the site has historically been disturbed due
to past and current management for pasture grazing and livestock production.
Baker appreciates your timely attention to this matter. If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will
assume that there are no comments with regard to the project area or archaeological or cultural resources.
Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions regarding this project or the extent of proposed
disturbance. I can be reached at [phone] or via my email address at ksugg`kmbakerintl.com.
Sincerely,
A a7e;,
Kristi Suggs
Enclosures: Vicinity Map
USGS Topographic Map
Project Area Map
Cc: NC State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
File

We Make a Difference
INTERNATIONAL
August 7, 2018
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
Atlas: Marella Buncick, Endangered Species Biologist
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801
RE: Categorical Exclusion for UT to Magness Creek Mitigation Project, Cleveland County, NC
NCDEQ DMS Full -Delivery Project ID 9100081, Broad River Basin (03050105)
IPAC Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2018-SLI-0615
Dear Ms. Buncick:
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. (Baker) respectfully requests review and comment from the US Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) on any possible concerns they may have with regards to the implementation
of the UT to Magness Creek Mitigation Project. Please note that this request is in support of the development
of the Categorical Exclusion (CE) for the referenced project.
The project area is located in Cleveland County, North Carolina approximately 1.0 mile southeast of the
Town of Lawndale on the United States Geological Survey's (USGS) Lawndale Topographic Quadrangle.
The center of the project area is located at 35.4065 N and-81.5293 W. Located within a water supply
watershed (WS-IV), the project drains directly to Magness Creek and the First Broad River, which is a
drinking water source for the City of Shelby and other downstream municipalities. Existing reaches within
the project site flow to the south-southwest where the downstream extent of the project is bordered by
Selkirk Drive. Please see the enclosed Vicinity and USGS Topographic Maps for a depiction of the project
site location.
The UT to Magness Creek site was identified to provide compensatory mitigation for unavoidable stream
impacts. The existing stream reaches have been significantly impacted by unrestricted livestock access and
the removal or impairment of riparian buffers. Most of the project reaches are incised, unstable, and exhibit
areas of active bank erosion from both high flows and livestock access. Riparian buffer vegetation varies
from areas with no woody buffer vegetation to areas with large trees but at low density and without any
significant understory.
The project will involve the restoration and enhancement of approximately 3,385 LF of existing stream.
Degraded riparian wetlands will be restored and/or enhanced with the implementation of Priority Level 1
restoration, livestock exclusion, and native riparian buffer plantings; however, no wetland credit is being
sought. A Best Management Practice (BMP) in the form of a constructed wet pond will be installed in an
unstable ephemeral drainage that receives run-off from an area that is frequently used by livestock. Native
riparian buffers will be established along all proposed reaches. A conservation easement will be
implemented along all project reaches in an excess of 50 feet from the top of bank and will incorporate
MBAKERINTL.COM
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
Ballantyne One, 15720 Brixham Hill Ave., Ste. 300 Office 336
Charlotte, NC 28277 1 Office: 704.665.2200

We Make a Difference
some of the existing functional wetlands. Livestock will be excluded from the conservation easement with
permanent fencing.
Data Review and Analysis
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. (Baker) conducted an on-line review of the project area with the use of
the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) IPAC website (hit2s:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac_/), on
August 6, 2018. This review generated an Official Species List (OSL), which identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that
may occur within the boundary of the proposed project and/or may be affected by proposed project.
Results from review, found the following two federally listed species. No USFWS designated critical
habitats were located within the project boundaries.
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal Status
M otis se tentrionalis
Northern long-eared bat
Threatened
Hexastylis nani ora
Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf
Threatened
On August 6, 2018, Baker conducted a two-mile radius search using the Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP) Data Explorer(https://ncnhde.natureserve.org_/). Results from this search and found no known
occurrences of any of the above referenced species within two miles of the project site.
Myotis septentrionalis (Northern long-eared bat) — Threatened
USFWS optimal survey window: June 1- August 15
In North Carolina, the northern long-eared bat (NLEB) occurs in the mountains, with scattered records in
the Piedmont and coastal plain. In western North Carolina, NLEB spend winter hibernating in caves and
mines. Since this species is not known to be a long-distance migrant, and caves and subterranean mines are
extremely rare in eastern North Carolina, it is uncertain whether or where NLEB hibernate in eastern NC.
During the summer, NLEB roost singly or in colonies underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both
live and dead trees (typically >3 inches dbh). This bat also been found, rarely, roosting in structures like
barns and sheds, under eaves of buildings, behind window shutters, in bridges, and in bat houses. Pregnant
females give birth from late May to late July. Foraging occurs on forested hillsides and ridges, and
occasionally over forest clearings, over water, and along tree -lined corridors. Mature forests may be an
important habitat type for foraging.
No critical habitat has been designated for this species and the project site is located outside of a county
and/or watershed where NLEB maternity trees or hibernation sites are known to occur. Additionally, a
two-mile radius search using the Natural Heritage Program's Data Explorer
(https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/) on August 6, 2018 found no known occurrences of the NLEB within two
miles of the Project site.
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Hexastylis naniflora (Dwarf -flowered heartleaf) — Threatened
USFWS Recommended Survey Window: mid -March — early July
The dwarf -flowered heartleaf is a low -growing evergreen perennial that has heart -shape leaves that are four
to six centimeters long. The leaves are dark green and leathery and are supported by long thin leaf stems
connecting it to an underground stem. The blooms are small, inconspicuous jug -shaped flowers that are
usually beige to dark brown or purple. The flowers are found near the base of the leaf stems and are often
buried beneath the leaf litter. The plant grows in acidic soils along bluffs and adjacent slopes, in boggy
areas next to streams, and along slopes of nearby hillsides and ravines.

We Make a Difference
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Please provide comments on any possible issues that may arise with respect to the endangered species,
migratory birds or other natural resources from the construction of the proposed project. The following
additional supporting documentation has been included for reference: Vicinity Map, USGS Topographic
Map, and Project Site Map. If Baker has not received response from you within 30 days, we will assume
that the USFWS does not have any comment or information relevant to the implementation of this project
at the current time.
We thank you in advance for your timely response, input, and cooperation. Please contact me if you have
any further questions or comments. I can be reached at [phone] or via my email address at
ksuaas(a,mbakerintl.com.
Sincerely,
11�axr
Kristi Suggs
Cc: File
Enclosures

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
http://www.fws.2ov/nc-es/es/cog fr
IPaC Record Locator: 361-13503224
71.
risdi s WNNJJUrV.
14L'][ ,N,pf
t
August 07, 2018
Subject: Consistency letter for the 'UT to Magness Creek Mitigation Project' project (TAILS
04EN1000-2018-R-0615) under the revised February 5, 2018, FHWA, FRA, FTA
Programmatic Biological Opinion for Transportation Projects within the Range of the
Indiana Bat and Northern Long-eared Bat.
To whom it may concern:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has received your request dated to verify that the
UT to Magness Creek Mitigation Project (Proposed Action) may rely on the revised February
5, 2018, FHWA, FRA, FTA Programmatic Biological Opinion for Transportation Projects within
the Range of the Indiana Bat and Northern Long-eared Bat (PBO) to satisfy requirements under
Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) (87 Stat.884, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 1531 etseq.).
Based on the information you provided (Project Description shown below), you have determined
that the Proposed Action will have no effect on the endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) or
the threatened Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis). If the Proposed Action is not
modified, no consultation is required for these two species.
For Proposed Actions that include bridge/structure removal, replacement, and/or
maintenance activities: If your initial bridge/structure assessments failed to detect Indiana bats,
but you later detect bats during construction, please submit the Post Assessment Discovery of
Bats at Bridge/Structure Form (User Guide Appendix E) to this Service Office. In these
instances, potential incidental take of Indiana bats may be exempted provided that the take is
reported to the Service.
If the Proposed Action may affect any other federally -listed or proposed species and/or
designated critical habitat, additional consultation between the lead Federal action agency and
this Service Office is required. If the proposed action has the potential to take bald or golden
eagles, additional coordination with the Service under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
may also be required. In either of these circumstances, please advise the lead Federal action
agency for the Proposed Action accordingly.

08/07/2018 IPaC Record Locator: 361-13503224
The following species may occur in your project area and are not covered by this determination:
• Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf, Hexastylis naniflora (Threatened)

08/07/2018 IPaC Record Locator: 361-13503224 3
Project Description
The following project name and description was collected in IPaC as part of the endangered
species review process.
Name
UT to Magness Creek Mitigation Project
Description
The UT to Magness Creek mitigation project is located in Cleveland County, NC, east of the
Town of Lawndale, within the Broad River Basin (03050105) and the NC DMS Targeted
Local Watershed (TLW) 03050105080060. Located within a water supply watershed (WS-
IV), the project drains directly to Magness Creek and the First Broad River, which is a
drinking water source for the City of Shelby and other downstream municipalities. Existing
reaches within the project site flow to the south-southwest where the downstream extent of
the project is bordered by Selkirk Drive.
The existing stream reaches have been significantly impacted by unrestricted livestock access
and the removal or impairment of riparian buffers. Most of the project reaches are incised,
unstable, and exhibit areas of active bank erosion from both high flows and livestock access.
Riparian buffer vegetation varies from areas with no woody buffer vegetation to areas with
large trees but at low density and without any significant understory.
The project will involve the restoration and enhancement of approximately 3,385 LF of
existing stream. Degraded riparian wetlands will be restored and/or enhanced with the
implementation of Priority Level 1 restoration, livestock exclusion, and native riparian buffer
plantings; however, no wetland credit is being sought. A Best Management Practice (BMP) in
the form of a constructed wet pond will be installed in an unstable ephemeral drainage that
receives run-off from an area that is frequently used by livestock. Native riparian buffers will
be established along all proposed reaches. A conservation easement will be implemented
along all project reaches in an excess of 50 feet from the top of bank and will incorporate
some of the existing functional wetlands. Livestock will be excluded from the conservation
easement with permanent fencing.

08/07/2018 IPaC Record Locator: 361-13503224
Determination Key Result
Based on the information you provided, you have determined that the Proposed Action will have
no effect on the endangered Indiana bat and/or the threatened Northern long-eared bat. Therefore,
no consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service pursuant to Section 7(a)(2) of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) (87 Stat. 884, as amended 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is
required for these two species.
Qualification Interview
1. Is the project within the range of the Indiana bat[']?
[1] See Indiana bat species profile
Automatically answered
No
2. Is the project within the range of the Northern long-eared bat[']?
[1] See Northern long-eared bat species profile
Automatically answered
Yes
3. Which Federal Agency is the lead for the action?
A) Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
4. Are all project activities limited to non -construction['] activities only? (examples of non -
construction activities include: bridge/abandoned structure assessments, surveys, planning
and technical studies, property inspections, and property sales)
[1] Construction refers to activities involving ground disturbance, percussive noise, and/or lighting.
No
5. Does the project include any activities that are greater than 300 feet from existing road/
rail surfaces[']?
[1] Road surface is defined as the actively used [e.g. motorized vehicles] driving surface and shoulders [may be
pavement, gravel, etc.] and rail surface is defined as the edge of the actively used rail ballast.
Yes

08/07/2018 IPaC Record Locator: 361-13503224 5
6. Are all project activities greater than 300 feet from existing road/rail surfaces[']?
[ 1 ] Road surface is defined as the actively used [e.g. motorized vehicles] driving surface and shoulders [may be
pavement, gravel, etc.] and rail surface is defined as the edge of the actively used rail ballast.
No
7. Does the project include any activities within 0.5 miles of an Indiana bat and/or NLEB
hibernaculum[' ]?
[1] For the purpose of this consultation, a hibernaculum is a site, most often a cave or mine, where bats hibernate
during the winter (see suitable habitat), but could also include bridges and structures if bats are found to be
hibernating there during the winter.
No
8. Is the project located within a karst area?
No
9. Is there any suitable['] summer habitat for Indiana Bat or NLEB within the project action
area[2]? (includes any trees suitable for maternity, roosting, foraging, or travelling habitat)
[1] See the Service's summer survey guidance for our current definitions of suitable habitat.
[2] The action area is defined as all areas to be affected directly or indirectly by the Federal action and not merely
the immediate area involved in the action (50 CFR Section 402.02). Further clarification is provided by the
national consultation FAQs.
No
10. Does the project include maintenance of the surrounding landscape at existing facilities
(e.g., rest areas, stormwater detention basins)?
No
11. Does the project include wetland or stream protection activities associated with
compensatory wetland mitigation?
Yes
12. Does the project include slash pile burning?
No
13. Does the project include any bridge removal, replacement, and/or maintenance activities
(e.g., any bridge repair, retrofit, maintenance, and/or rehabilitation work)?
No

08/07/2018 IPaC Record Locator: 361-13503224 6
14. Does the project include the removal, replacement, and/or maintenance of any structure
other than a bridge? (e.g., rest areas, offices, sheds, outbuildings, barns, parking garages,
etc.)
No
15. Will the project involve the use of temporary lighting during the active season?
No
16. Will the project install new or replace existing permanent lighting?
No
17. Will the project raise the road profile above the tree canopy?
No
18. Is the location of this project consistent with a No Effect determination in this key?
Automatically answered
Yes, because the project action area is outside of suitable Indiana bat and/or NLEB
summer habitat

08/07/2018 IPaC Record Locator: 361-13503224
Determination Key Description: FHWA, FRA, FTA
Programmatic Consultation For Transportation Projects
Affecting NLEB Or Indiana Bat
This key was last updated in IPaC on March 16, 2018. Keys are subject to periodic revision.
This decision key is intended for projects/activities funded or authorized by the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), and/or Federal Transit
Administration (FTA), which require consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(Service) under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for the endangered Indiana bat
(Myotis sodalis) and the threatened Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis).
This decision key should only be used to verify project applicability with the Service's February
5, 2018, FHWA, FRA, FTA Programmatic Biologicalpinion for Transportation Projects. The
programmatic biological opinion covers limited transportation activities that may affect either bat
species, and addresses situations that are both likely and not likely to adversely affect either bat
species. This decision key will assist in identifying the effect of a specific project/activity and
applicability of the programmatic consultation. The programmatic biological opinion is not
intended to cover all types of transportation actions. Activities outside the scope of the
programmatic biological opinion, or that may affect ESA -listed species other than the Indiana bat
or NLEB, or any designated critical habitat, may require additional ESA Section 7 consultation.

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
Natural Heritage Program
Governor Roy Cooper Secretary; Susi H. Hamilton
I0[y0lart]29:YYto]
August 6, 2018
Kristi Suggs
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
Ballantyne One - 15720 Brixham Hill Ave.
Charlotte, NC 28277
RE: UT to Magness Creek Mitigation Project; 167680/01
Dear Kristi Suggs:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. These
results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been
documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that
these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists. Tables of
natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile radius of the project area, if any, are also
included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile radius of the
project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for guidance.
Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https:Hwww.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project
review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions.
Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the
NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP
data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund easement, or an
occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please
contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler&ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
MAILING ADDRESS: Tele--hone: 019) 7DT-8107 LC)CA.TICN
1651 Mail Service Center rt,rrsv.ncnhv.org 121 West hones S7reat
Ralaigh, NC 27699-1651 Ralaigh, NG 27603

k
\ U
\
�a
06
n
06
of e
B
\
a [ m
Cl)
a 2
z
m \
)
7
%
§
±
\
\
ƒ \
<
k
§ �
�
� �
S
2 7
k E
cu
§ § ±
§
E
§
]
n o _
u
_tm�
fz
w
®■w�§
t
aw
CN
9
zk
�k�/_
�\/
�\
$ kJ k
m �
§®
�m�
0
z\
\\
W�
S2
_
0
§ 3
ƒ
\\
0
(
o E =
n
E
§§ 2�
§
3
m m
<
« u co O
\
7
\2
2
7
\
f
\n 'E
z
D4 \
\
/U
22 2
=
�
f
&2 2
°
°
o
n
m_ e
0
/
CDW
(D
§
\/
J
u
\D
2cu
E $
k
]
§
)
2 /
z
]/
\§0 )
2
2
k{
w F- 0 O
It
§
/
E

J
«
�
�
2
0
\
J
2
k
0
�
k0
k �
o
(D CO
�0_
��w-
w§
fe§§=
/k' }
0
k0
z=
k
\ / / /
\
ƒ
� a
06
/ / /
B
\
»%
am m
+2 /G =G
E�
U)
3m
.\._
z
m m
§
Wj
LLm
\ \ \
<
\ \ \
k A A A
\
Scu
\ E
§ § ± ± 2
]
§
cu
0
2§
/z
§ \ \ \
I m t G t
O�ao 0 0
/7
0 \ \ \
§
§
m
0
•
0
-
.m \ 2
. §
_0
,z
o
m
\u
'E n 2)
\
\
! § 2 m m /
—
-
;o IOIO3
. E
\
E
-
-
/
0
i
. E k \ /
f
. e \�
2
.z \ m 2
k
=
2 2
a
\ \
2 2 \
k
§
�/
•: E E }
m
E
o
,g \ 2 /
e
cu
£
n
_
�S \ / \
§
\ /
-
f
\ \
i. _ _
°
2
7cu
, E $ $
i 2 / / \
]
§
.00
C _
\ /
` ° ) ) /
k{
±
2
2
It
§
/

fld P8
tp
Li
of y
Seiwk D,
Re
ol
C',
L
C; 2
N dam`
LO
c
LLi 0 0
C3 E
E
W
w
awe
oz
It

9 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 9
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
17 August 2018
Ms. Kristi Suggs
Michael Baker International
Ballantyne One, 15720 Brixham Hill Ave.
Suite 300, Office 336
Charlotte, North Carolina 28277
Subject: Request for Project Review and Comments
UT to Magness Creek Mitigation Site
Cleveland County, North Carolina
NCDEQ DMS Full -Delivery Project ID4100081
Dear Ms. Suggs,
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission (NCWRC) received your letter on 07
August 2018 requesting review and comment on any possible concerns regarding the UT to Magness
Creek Mitigation Site. Biologists with NCWRC have reviewed the provided documents. Comments are
provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as
amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667e) and North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 113-131 et seq.).
The UT to Magness Creek Mitigation Site is located along Selkirk Drive and south of Schneck Farm
Road near Lawndale, Cleveland County, North Carolina. The mitigation site is in agricultural and
riparian forested lands. The project will provide compensatory mitigation for unavoidable impacts to
streams within the Broad River Basin (HUC 03050105). The project will restore and enhance
approximately 3,385 linear feet of an unnamed tributary to Magness Creek and riparian wetlands;
however, no wetland credits are being requested.
We have records for the federal species of concern and state special concern Broad River spiny crayfish
(Cambarus spicatus) along Magness Creek. We have no records of federal or state -listed species at or
adjacent to the site. However, the lack of records from the site does not imply or confirm the absence of
federal or state rare, threatened, or endangered species. An on -site survey is the only definitive means to
determine if the proposed project would impact rare, threatened, or endangered species.
Based upon the information provided to NCWRC, it is unlikely that stream and wetland mitigation will
adversely affect any federal or state -listed species. However, we recommend leaving snags and mature
trees or if necessary, remove tees outside the maternity roosting season for bats (May 15 — August 15).
We recommend that riparian buffers are as wide as possible, given site constraints and landowner needs.
NCWRC generally recommends a woody buffer of 100 feet on perennial streams to maximize the
Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

Page 2
17 August 2018
UT to Magness Creek Mitigation
Cleveland County
benefits of buffers, including bank stability, stream shading, treatment of overland runoff, and wildlife
habitat.
Stream and wetland restoration projects often improve water quality and aquatic habitat. Establishing
native, forested buffers in riparian areas will help protect water quality, improve aquatic and terrestrial
habitats, and provide a travel corridor for wildlife species. Provided stringent measures are taken to
minimize erosion and sedimentation from construction/restoration activities, we do not anticipate the
project to result in significant adverse impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. If I can be of additional assistance, please call (919)
707-0364 or email olivia.munzer&ncwildlife.oM.
Sincerely,
0—kt�
Olivia Munzer
Western Piedmont Habitat Conservation Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
Ec: William T. Russ, NCWRC

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administcator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary Susi H. I Iamilton
September 4, 2018
Kristi Suggs
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
Ballantyne One
15720 Brixham Avenue, Suite 300, Office 318
Charlotte, NC 28277
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: UT to Magness Creek Mitigation Project, Lawndale, Cleveland County, ER 18-1817
Dear Ms. Suggs:
Thank you for your letter of August 3, 2018, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.review&ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
67,Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

Office of the Chid
Bill John Baker
GW SSB D3P
Principal Chief
CHEROKEE NATION@
JSS&��
E0G,f3
& G
P.O. Bax 948 • Tahlequah, OK 74465.0948 • 91845]-5000 • ebkee g
S. Joe Crittenden
Deputy Principal Chief
WPA DWA O-EOGA
January 8, 2019
Paul Wiesner
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Western DMS Field Office
5 Ravenscroft Drive, Suite 102
Asheville, NC 28801
Re: Magness Creek Mitigation Project
Mr. Paul Wiesner:
The Cherokee Nation (Nation) is in receipt of your correspondence about Magness Creek
Mitigation Project, and appreciates the opportunity to provide comment upon this project. Please
allow this letter to serve as the Nation's interest in acting as a consulting party to this proposed
undertaking.
The Nation maintains databases and records of cultural, historic, and pre -historic resources in this
area. Our Historic Preservation Office reviewed this project, cross referenced the project's legal
description against our information, and found no instances where this project intersects or adjoins
such resources. Thus, the Nation does not foresee this project imparting impacts to Cherokee
cultural resources at this time.
However, the Nation requests that the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
(NCDEQ) halt all project activities immediately and re -contact our Offices for further consultation
if items of cultural significance are discovered during the course of this project.
Additionally, the Nation requests that NCDEQ conduct appropriate inquiries with other pertinent
Tribal and Historic Preservation Offices regarding historic and prehistoric resources not included
in the Nation's databases or records.
If you require additional information or have any questions, please contact me at your convenience.
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.
Wado,
Y_
Elizabeth Toombs, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer
Cherokee Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Office
[e-mail]
918.453.5389

From: Erin Thompson [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 10:06 AM
To: Brew, Donnie (FHWA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Follow-up RE: Request regarding UT to Magness Creek Stream Mitigation Project, Cleveland County, North
Carolina
The UKB concurs with the recommendation not to conduct a cultural resource survey for the UT to Magness Creek
Mitigation Project, Cleveland County, North Carolina.
Thank you,
Erin Thompson
Interim THPO
United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee
18627 W. Keetoowah Circle
Tahlequah, OK 74464
918-871-2838 (0)
480-275-9009(C)