WQ0003090_CEI_20210903

ROY COOPER.
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
Scott Kidd, Town Manager
Town of Liberty
P.O. Box 1006
Liberty, North Carolina 27298
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
September 3, 2021
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Town of Liberty — Wastewater Surface Irrigation
Permit No. WQ0003090
Randolph County
Dear Mr. Kidd:
On August 30, 2021, Division of Water Resources staff person Caitlin Caudle conducted
a scheduled compliance inspection. Tremaine Fike, ORC, was present during the entire
inspection. A review of records, treatment facilities, irrigation fields, and monitoring wells
was completed. This review reflected compliance with the subject permit. The following
items of concern were noted:
1. Per Permit Condition 111.14 "a gauge to monitor waste levels in the 15-acre
stabilization storage lagoon shall be provided. This gauge shall have readily visible
permanent markings, at inch or tenth of a foot increments, indicating the following
elevations: maximum liquid level at the top of the temporary liquid storage volume;
minimum liquid level at the bottom of the temporary liquid storage volume, and the
lowest point on top of the dam." Mr. Fike has relayed that the freeboard marker
may not accurately represent the freeboard of the lagoon. Considering this
information and the previous overflow issues, this office requests that the
freeboard marker be resurveyed and reinstalled if necessary before the end
of the calendar year.
2. Per Permit Condition 11.3 "groundwater monitoring wells shall be constructed in
accordance with 15A NCAC 02C .0108..." As described in 15A NCAC 02C .0108,
repair the lid on Monitoring Well 6 so that it closes completely, and clear the
area around Monitoring Well 2 so that it is easily accessible.
Please refer to the enclosed inspection report for additional comments and observations.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Caitlin Caudle or me at the
letterhead address or phone number, or by email at [e-mail].
NORTH
D E
D.psrtmem of ln.imnmomni au.i`
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
336.776.9800

Sincerely,
DocuSigned by:
�OD2D3CE3F1 B7456...
Jennifer F. Graznak, Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQWSRO
enc: Compliance Inspection Report
cc: Randolph County Environmental Health([e-mail])
Tremaine Fike, ORC ([e-mail])
WSRO Electronic Files
DWR Laserfiche File WQ0003090
LD_E
NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental quaky
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality j Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
336.776.9800

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQ0003090 Effective: 05/01/19 Expiration: 08/31/24
SOC: S19011 Effective: 01/01/21 Expiration: 12/31/23
County: Randolph
Region: Winston-Salem
Contact Person: Sandra Dixon Title:
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications: SI,
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 08/30/2021
Primary Inspector: Caitlin Caudle
Secondary Inspector(s):
Entry Time 10:06AM
Certification:
Owner : Town of Liberty
Facility: Town of Liberty WWTF
7187 E Highfill Ave
Liberty NC 272981006
Exit Time: 12:26PM
Phone: [phone]
Phone:
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Wastewater Irrigation
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
▪ Treatment Flow Measurement -Effluent
II Treatment Flow Measurement -Water
Use Records
▪ Record Keeping
▪ Treatment Influent Pump Station
▪ Storage
(See attachment summary)
▪ Treatment Flow Measurement -Influent
▪ Treatment
▪ Treatment Lagoons
▪ Treatment Disinfection
▪ Standby Power
•
•
Miscellaneous Questions
Treatment Barscreen
▪ End Use -Irrigation
▪ Treatment Flow Measurement
▪ Wells
Page 1 of 6

Permit: WQ0003090 Owner - Facility:Town of Liberty
Inspection Date: 08/30/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
On August 30, 2021 Division of Water Resources staff person Caitlin Caudle conducted a scheduled compliance inspection.
Tremaine Fike, ORC, was present during the entire inspection. A review of records, treatment facilities, irrigation fields, and
monitoring wells was completed. This review reflected compliance with the subject permit. The following items of concern
were noted:
1. Per Permit Condition 111.14 "a gauge to monitor waste levels in the 15 acre stabilization storage lagoon shall be provided.
This gauge shall have readily visible permanent markings, at inch or tenth of a foot increments, indicating the following
elevations: maximum liquid level at the top of the temporary liquid storage volume; minimum liquid level at the bottom of the
temporary liquid storage volume, and the lowest point on top of the dam." Mr. Fike has relayed that the freeboard marker
may not accurately represent the freeboard of the lagoon. Considering this information and the previous overflow issues, this
office requests that the freeboard marker be resurveyed and reinstalled if needed by the end of the calendar year.
2. Per Permit Condition 11.3 "groundwater monitoring wells shall be constructed in accordance with 15A NCAC 02C
.0108..." As described in 15A NCAC 02C .0108, repair the lid on Monitoring Well 6 so that it closes completely, and clear
the area around Monitoring Well 2 so that it is easily accessible.
Other observations:
• Ms. Caudle recommended that Zones 6 and 7 be mowed next as the Johnson grass is taller than the spray heads.
• All monitoring wells were reviewed.
• Most of the spray zones have been mowed multiple times this summer.
• Some solids were visible on top of the lagoon. Mr. Fike stated that the lagoon is turning over, as it does every year.
• All vegetation had been removed from the lagoon liner.
• The trees overhanging in Zone 8B are still present. Mr. Fike stated that the equipment is broken and he has not been
able to get to that area yet. He plans to remove the limbs as soon as his equipment is repaired.
• A large amount of Johnson grass is present in Zone 6 and 7. Broad leaf weeds are present in other zones. The individual
that has the contract to mow the zones has discussed treating the zones for weeds and strategies for managing the
Johnson grass.
• The contact information in the Operation and Maintenance Plan has been updated.
• The wet area discovered during the follow up inspection in Zone 1 was dry. Mr. Fike stated that Zone 1 had not been
sprayed since late July. The soil in this area could require a lower application rate or seasonal limitations. This may need to
be reviewed during the next permit renewal.
• The leaking valve in Zone 3 and Zone 4 was temporarily fixed. The parts needed for a full repair are 10 weeks out. This
valve was fixed on August 27, 2021. Mr. Fike plans to reseed the area that was disturbed.
• The chlorine contact chamber was cleaned as requested during the follow up inspection in April. The chamber was
skimmed, and all solids removed. The solids were disposed of in the trashcan where solids from the bar screen are disposed
of.
• Freeboard is measured from the top of the concrete intake chamber using a tape measure.
• The lift station after the bar screen is inspected every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. The generator is checked every
Wednesday.
• Mr. Fike attached the floats in the lift station to a cable with a weight in order to secure the floats in the wet well.
Previously the floats were getting tangled and not working properly during high flow events. Since this cable has been
installed Mr. Fike has not had any issues with the lift station. As the cable is installed, the floats are still able to work
correctly. The floats are just anchored in one location and are no longer able get tangled with each other.
• The sensor for the flowmeter is installed above the weir after the bar screen.
• At the time of inspection, approximately 147 gpm was entering the system.
• Duckweed and frogs were present in the chlorine contact chamber.
• The flowmeter was last calibrated on October 9, 2020.
• Freeboard was 3 inches at the time of inspection.
• Zones 3A, 2, and 1 were not being used as they were being mowed. Round bales were still present in the field. Mr. Fike
stated that he repairs any damage after all equipment has left those zones.
• Additional areas in Zones 6 and 7 are permanently capped other than those marked on the current site map. This may
need to be reviewed during the next permit renewal.
• Trees had fallen into Zones 1 and 2. Mr. Fike is waiting to remove the trees after all hay equipment is moved.
• Mr. Fike and other personnel mow around the spray heads after the zones are mowed for hay.
Page 2 of 6

Permit: WQ0003090 Owner - Facility:Town of Liberty
Inspection Date: 08/30/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Type
Reuse (Quality)
Infiltration System
Single Family Spray, LR
Activated Sludge Spray, LR
Activated Sludge Spray, HR
Recycle/Reuse
Activated Sludge Drip, LR
Single Family Drip
Lagoon Spray, LR
Treatment
Are Treatment facilities consistent with those outlined in the current permit?
Do all treatment units appear to be operational? (if no, note below.)
Comment:
Treatment Influent Pump Station
Is the pump station free of bypass lines or structures?
Is the general housekeeping acceptable?
Are all pumps present?
Are all pumps operable?
Are floats/controls operable?
Are audio and visual alarms available?
Are audio and visual alarms operational?
# Are SCADA/Telemetry alarms required?
Are SCADA/Telemetry available?
Are SCADA/Telemetry operational?
Comment:
Treatment Flow Measurement -Influent
Is flowmeter calibrated annually?
Is flowmeter operating properly?
Does flowmeter monitor continuously?
Does flowmeter record flow?
Does flowmeter appear to monitor accurately?
Comment:
Treatment Flow Measurement -Water Use Records
Yes No NA NE
•
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ ❑•❑
❑ ❑•❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
Page 3 of 6

Permit: WQ0003090 Owner - Facility:Town of Liberty
Inspection Date: 08/30/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Is water use metered?
Are the daily average values properly calculated?
Comment:
Treatment Flow Measurement -Effluent
Is flowmeter calibrated annually?
Is flowmeter operating properly?
Does flowmeter monitor continuously?
Does flowmeter record flow?
Does flowmeter appear to monitor accurately?
Comment:
Standby Power
Is automatically activated standby power available?
Is generator tested weekly by interrupting primary power source?
Is generator operable?
Does generator have adequate fuel?
Comment: The lift station has a generator that is tested
power.
Treatment Barscreen
Is it free of excessive debris?
Is disposal of screenings in compliance?
Are the bars spaced properly?
Is the unit in good condition?
Comment:
Treatment Disinfection
Is the system working?
Do the fecal coliform results indicate proper disinfection?
Is there adequate detention time (>=30 minutes)?
Is the system properly maintained?
If gas, does the cylinder storage appear safe?
Is the fan in the chlorine feed room and storage area operable?
Is the chlorinator accessible?
If tablets, are tablets present?
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
Is contact chamber free of sludge, solids, and growth?
If UV, are extra UV bulbs available?
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
weekly. The irrigation pumps have no back up
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
Page 4 of 6

Permit: WQ0003090 Owner - Facility:Town of Liberty
Inspection Date: 08/30/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
If UV, is the UV intensity adequate?
# Is it a dual feed system?
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)?
If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site?
If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1000- - )
If yes, then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment: Duckweed is present in the chlorine contact chamber.
Record Keeping
Is a copy of current permit available?
Are monitoring reports present: NDMR?
NDAR?
Are flow rates less than of permitted flow?
Are flow rates less than of permitted flow?
Are application rates adhered to?
Is GW monitoring being conducted, if required (GW-59s submitted)?
Are all samples analyzed for all required parameters?
Are there any 2L GW quality violations?
Is GW-59A certification form completed for facility?
Is effluent sampled for same parameters as GW?
Do effluent concentrations exceed GW standards?
Are annual soil reports available?
# Are PAN records required?
# Did last soil report indicate a need for lime?
If so, has it been applied?
Are operational logs present?
Are lab sheets available for review?
Do lab sheets support data reported on NDMR?
Do lab sheets support data reported on GW-59s?
Are Operational and Maintenance records present?
Were Operational and Maintenance records complete?
Has permittee been free of public complaints in last 12 months?
Is a copy of the SOC readily available?
No treatment units bypassed since last inspection?
Comment: There have been multiple bypasses since the last inpsection.
End Use -Irrigation
Are buffers adequate?
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑•❑
❑ ❑•❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑•
❑ • ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Page 5 of 6

Permit: WQ0003090 Owner - Facility:Town of Liberty
Inspection Date: 08/30/2021 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Is the cover crop type specified in permit?
Is the crop cover acceptable?
Is the site condition adequate?
Is the site free of runoff / ponding?
Is the acreage specified in the permit being utilized?
Is the application equipment present?
Is the application equipment operational?
Is the disposal field free of limiting slopes?
Is access restricted and/or signs posted during active site use?
Are any supply wells within the CB?
Are any supply wells within 250' of the CB?
How close is the closest water supply well?
Is municipal water available in the area?
# Info only: Does the permit call for monitoring wells?
Are GW monitoring wells located properly w/ respect to RB and CB?
Are GW monitoring wells properly constructed, including screened interval?
Are monitoring wells damaged?
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ •
❑ ❑ ❑ •
❑ ❑ ❑ •
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Two zones have an excessive amount of johnson grass. One monitoring well needs the lid on
the well cap repaired.
Page 6 of 6

V VI
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Section
• NON -DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORT
WASTEWATER IRRIGATION
General Information
Facility Name: Liberty WWI
Permit No.: W00003090
Owner: 61 '
ORC Name: Tremaine Fike
Backup ORC: tl rQ
Other Contact: Scott Ki
County: Randolph
Issuance Date: 05/01/2019
Expiration Date: 08/31/2024
Telephone No.: 336-215-8795
Telephone No.:
Telephone No.:
Location (address, gps or directions): 7187 E Highf ll Avenue, Liberty NC 27298
R *son for Inspection
ROUTINE. 4/FOLLOW-UP ❑ COMPLAINT ❑ PERMITTING ❑ Other:
Comments (attach additional pages as necessary)
Submit permit renewal by March 4, 2024
-Ca ibrate irrigation equipment by August 31, 2024
rimmed trees from irrigation zones? on gradient runoff from irrigation?
No\ tot fire, c?4 1ri7rnlin-f ia-nkur\ w11k {vine cls sODA asr epeavets_
Yee ,otation removed from lagoon liner? yts3
deg tation in the spray fields? Johnson grass? (As of oywilS6� io_ss\n (SR-, brbadlecrd t CE.Ab
- fl �oVVes ;hA4 t�i is �c't43kb66 sem(se diinl vita mall cJ`vren}-
',td dated contact info in & plan'ries
urveying staff g,uage? ��r�, rD Yla Q,um - bns `�
k ! (SUatiC� ea 14 Dre�llew ?tam* 2kfifrYllre " 1 r
of in fieldl1? jai l( rim ynnew fd.V'e c�ttW, etwAvv12 a6 (),5 \f\S\ttc%[GS-4S?fayed
�i�li�ftcd�`f�,�c� -9 (Vekxi&f tnc`.
aloe for fie ree and our? �-G'yy1l 0 r Xe t pa( �-5 arc to t/.if t,1Q % [�L,i } c0`! �iA t(
62 nz, ara \c Mat ci; r>v unci_
CUpadkct\vimd
C Y �L ry �e id;wv ny'tecyS'c> htkr cn�e.LAR c imemk�ra &v, reed esr
��(Ca I �Y�2 c�
� se�� 'zsiz( (t� t•ecnevec4i�1 w�ye
(bon de. (,7 -- ovQ\\1\4 be61cnSvc rays
Vi e\ !Mt 4 W ,�clw
a/�\ 3— VV�bw,( t beg'
`36NA2 �U\ A% (36 ytr 16 OnA itAsooN 1xvYlii\Q 6Nter
Is a follow-up inspection necessary ❑ Yes ❑ No
Primary Inspector: Caitlin Caudle
Date of Inspection: $ ISO/ ib Z
Secondary Inspector:"-
le (y Entry Time (0 a. Exit Time: g-lfrop

Non -Discharge Compliance Inspection Report
li1Q U5u3e-- P1 yv' kb �ci% con , -e4 ,+ , LIc4gr&i t ad.
Record Keeping and Re rting In orma ton Y
Is current permit available upon request?
Has the facility been free of public complaints for the last 12 months? N
Are maintenance and inspection logs present (date & time of inspections, visual observations,
any maintenance (adjustments, cleanings, equip chtinges) or repairs taken)?
Are weekly freeboard records present? DaiIv Ik5kk1 e. \Jv: \v' B� tvct.CX iAnli‘t�-�'Ute_
Are irrigation tracking records present (date, weather, volume, length time, field #,'J
Hydraulic loading, nutrient loading, other)?
as irrigation equipment been calibrated (once/permit cycle) & records present?
pAre records present for residuals removal (date, volume, Resid Hauler Name,
AStA tM41)Clame/permit of the receiving parry or letter from Municipality). al '`L15\l g' C4r)tn i
W6:1yvts is an Operation & Maintenance Plan, and Spill Plan present? [ mP°'
W (Ndun Are appropriate grade ORC & Backup ORC designated? Up to date on CE?
E fluent Monitoring:
Were effluent monitoring reports present? ® NDMR ril NDAR ❑ NDMLR
Are flow rates less than permitted flow? Permitted Flow: 550,000 GPD
Are application rates adhered to? Permitted Rate: 0.21 in/hr, 52 in/yr
Are lab sheets available for review and support monitoring reports?
Are samples analyzed for the required parameters (See permit)?
Effluent concentrations do NOT exceed permit limits or 2L GW standards? Fecal recently
If required, are PAN records present and complete?
Groundwater Monitoring:
[s groundwater monitoring required?
Were GW-59's and lab results present?
Were samples analyzed for the required parameters (See permit)?
Observed records indicate no 2L GW quality violations?
515k fecal PAW 5 ,WY 3n15
Soil Analysis:
Were annual soil analyses results present for each irrigation field?
If lime was called for on the Agronomist report, was lime applied?
Copper and Zinc indices: j<2,000 ❑ 2,000 — 3,000 ❑ >3,000
Was Sodium less than 0.5 meq/100 cm' ?
Lich Exchangeable Sodium Percentage (ESP) less than 15% ?
1pl" t W 1—_1Ai aei11(�i���bf•`�3 1,085 GPM um s with 1,000 linear ft force main
nmp Sta�ton D scrpN n: pumps
All pumps present, operational R
Floats/Controls operable
4t? WPt43
U�' OG}-(b(cl 46lW4
BUIE werking]
Audio & Visual Alarms Operational lQfj Stf1pcolt -40,-1' �d
Free of bypass lines or structures A e fl t o/'c.
General housekeeping good (' ate! 9Jgi-C r+ nflpS
Back-up power available, routinely tested & fueled? wanryn wea g '36 A
Treatment Bar Screen Description: present
Are bars spaced properly & free of excess debris? Ova riktAtAr j.1 001 Q A
Are screenings disposed of properly?
Is unit in good condition (excess corrosion)?
OsA with d e tx b611r'Y Ji'
❑X
N
�ZI
❑❑❑❑❑ ❑ ❑m ❑❑
N ❑ ❑ ❑ NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ E
❑ ❑
N ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑
N NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
N NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
• r
Y F M t P'E
Is aeration present?
Are pumps present and operational?
Is unit in good general condition?
Page 2of4
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑

Non -Discharge Compliance Inspection Report
Aeration mechanism operable & accessible?
Aeration basin thoroughly mixed?
Settleometer & dissolved oxygen results acceptable?
Is sludge an acceptable color?
Residual Storage/Treatment
® Lagoon ❑ Basin
❑ Septic Tank
Y
Capacity (gallons): 88 days, to acre
If Septic Tank, is a sanitary T or filter present?
How often are residuals pumped?
Treatment Filter(s) Description: •
Is unit accessible fo`t view4Le,�inspection port or not subsurface)?
Is the filter media present, correct size &type? ....,
Is mud well free of excess solids and fil
Is media free of pondi excess vegetation?
Is clear well free-arexcess solids and filter media?
D c washing/air scour frequency appear adequate?
T._al.-- ..l CI_ :cc 8 D...,Irk
,.x
Weirs level, free of excessive solids & algae?
Scum removal system operational and accessible? Sludge level:
Sludge blanket at acceptable level? (generally 25% or less of the sidewall)
Clarifier effluent free of excessive solids?
Treatment Disinfection Description: chlorination, flow proportional liquid feed
Type: ❑ Tablets ❑ Gas ® Liquid ❑ UV
Is the system properly maintained and working?
Fecal coliform results indicate proper disinfection?
Adequate detention time (> 30 minutes)?
If tablets, proper size & type?
Present in Cylinder(s)?
If UV bulbs, are replacement bulbs on hand?
Is conta t chamber free of slud e, solids and growth?
i66MC. c\OCA Anse �I t %S *
refbei
Flow Measurement a
Flowmeter location: NInfluef� ❑ Effluent
Is flowmeter calibrated3nnually (design flow >10,000 gpd)? ) O) �) 26)
Is flowmeter operating properly? Calibration records present (w/in 10%)?
Does flowmeter record flow?
If no flowmeter (<10,000 gpd), are water -use records available (water meter)?
Are the daily average values properly calculated?
Treatment
Are treatment facilities consistent with those outlined in permit?
Do all treatment units appear to be operational? If no, note below.
List any items/units):
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
N NA NE
❑ Fe❑o
Y �E
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Y
111
E
N NA NE
DDE
DDE000
❑ ❑ ❑
N NA NE
DDE
❑ E ❑ ❑❑
❑ r
❑ ' n
IZ❑ ❑
N NA NE
EDO
❑ ❑ ❑
EEO
❑ ❑
DOD
N NA NE
EDE
❑ ❑ ❑
Page 3 of 4

Non -Discharge Compliance Inspection Report
Effluent Storage
1Lagoon(s) ❑ Above ground tank(s) ❑ Underground tank(s) ❑Other:
Amount of Storage (days, months, gallons, etc.): 88 days
Effluent Storage Lagoon(s) E Primary ❑ Secondary
Influent structure(s) free of obstructions?
No signs of seepage, overtopping, down cutting or erosion on embankments?
Proper vegetation type w/ no excessive vegetation present on embankments?
Liner (if visible, is it intact)?
Baffles/curtains in good condition?
AF eeboard is 4 feet from overtopping? Measurement at time of inspection:
aff gauge is clearly marked?
No evidence of overflow (vegetation discolored or laying down/broken)?
No unusual color (very black, textile colors)?
No Foam present? Are antifoam agents used? ❑ Yes 0 No
No floating mats (sludge, plants, inorganics)? I f&QoDY\ k" i)1 A, 642 ('>
No signs of excessive solids buildup (from botto )? J
Aerators/mixers operational (if present)?
Effluent structure is free of obstructions and easily accessible?
Effluent Pump station - Description: 1,830 vertical diffusion vane irrigation pump
All pumps present, operational
Floats/Controls operable cut off float switch only, manual an switch
Audio & Visual Alarms Operational
Free of bypass lines or structures
If required, is a rain sensor present and operational
General housekeeping good
Back-up power
u
An
End Use -Irrigation Number of Fields: 8
Are buffers adequate?
Are cover crops the type specified in permit and/or in good condition? , thir 5dQttia-CS
No signs of runoff, ponding, or drift? -VT? 5
Is the acreage specified in the permit being utilized?
Is the application equipment present, operational, and in go c dition? .
No limiting slopes present in irrigation fields?
zit t�R,� 0.i`t e19`Ah4tCrlD�c�
Is site access restricted and/or signs posted in accordance w� ii permit/ ( V
No water supply wells within the CB?w,ia,u,c-na,o,
No water supply wells within 250' of the CB?
Is permit being followed?
Groundwater Monitoring Wells
Does the permit require monitoring wells? If so, answer the following.
Are the monitoring wells properly installed according to the permit?
Are the monitoring wells located properly w/ respect to RB & CB?
Are the wells properly identified & free of damage?
Page 4 of 4
Y
N
El
El
El
El
N
❑
go
E
NA
E
❑.
NA
❑,
NA
❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑
04 ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑�
N NA NE
El
❑ ❑ ❑
O ❑ ❑

d
cOP
00 56
a
o
o'
CD
CD
112
2
/t/ •
unnun
D D.�
o �a =
x83o
N
7 X N 7
v�.�
o: a

ti m
k a a- m
CD CD.
mr
o • �.m
= D) v
• n _ • s
• 0 O
9cr
c„ N N
O C to O • a W a O
O CDC y
ti w
• T O
t] O CCD
0 3 c -
() 3 co O
• CD 0 Cr
C O _.
co°—' 3
.n 3
c V c
co co 0
• a
0
CD
iii
co
3
co
-,
o
co
r co
O C,
• O
a 2
c a
=
J
co 5.
m• O
az
O • N
O ri
3 0
oco to
m m
2 co m
m
co . 3
-•,m
0•
0 D
ct 3 3 y
• m c<
C pO N 3
N co
z 3

c
O S ti
3 A
N
c
a m
(0 W � G
co
y 0
co
o D m
co o 0
::t
3w
N Z
0
N 3.
q-
(O80,
N
3
o
a)
m
m
rn
ZIV-uLN HV-ulN
N
J
N
D
cn n
N CO
a
co
to
z
0
w
Z
!mem :sselo Hog
r
3
0
2
0
OE8Ed :a1 alawes
N (� A
m O
co a
n
co
0
0
0
N
H
3
0
.
0 0 -or 0
N
0 Z
N
0
O
o 0
co
co
O 0
0
O
N
0
0 W
:suogepuawwoo
O 1 w
N 3 m
N
O N
C
0 0
IV 0
co N "an
0
o D m
m 0 0
0
0
0-
-a
m =
3
a
O 9 0
0
0
3w
N •
Z
O
w
0) 7
0 ° )c
3w
W a ..
A CO
J _
0
o_
O
A
co
A
D
D
N
N
D
rn 0
O Z
N 0)
N N
z
0
Z
imam :sselo I!oS
r
3
0
2
N
0
Ld :al aldwes
" n A_
m 0
0a
n
0
0
0
)
3
0
r
O O N
0 0 o 0
N
O Z
N
0
O
0 9 Q
N
0 0
of
0
O
O
N
0
0 CO
:suogepuewwoo
Z
c
N
3
co
0
N
O
N
c
0 3 co
N
m a AD
GGG c
O j N
CO
N
m
03 co
A
3w
0
o D m
v. n 0
d
a
rn acn
5
3
0
a
N _ O
0
0
2
N.)
0
0 3
e (0
3w
A CO
O
w
J
0,
Zltl-u1N bltl-UW
N
0
W
rn 0
co c
O
CO
z
C)
z
0
w
Z
IeJau!w :sselo I!OS
:iJoas!H aw!1
9d :01 alawes
N " n A
T
co a
n
m
cn
co
0
3
0
r
N •
0 0 0 0
N
O Z
N
0
O
oh)
0
N
O
O
O o)
O
O
N
0
0 0
:suo!yepuawwoo
Z
c
(D
3
y
Cr
N
O
CCD
c
O 1 co
J m
0
0
Po
N
c) m
n
07
N N
0
o rn
V O 0
C)
o
o.
rn aco
3
.0
_
J 9
0
0
3w
No x
O
0
N e
ua
o
A O)
W
a)
D
N
w
V _
N
CO
y
m 0
N c
N co
co
co
z
0
w
Z
IeJau!A :sselo I!oS
r
3
0
2
N
O
9d :oi alawes
0 W
T
co a
n
m
0
0
)
cn
0
r
O O
0 0 0 0
0
N
O Z
O
O
0 N
O O
0 0
oco
0 0)
O
O
N
3
0
0
o W
:suo!;epuawwo
Z
0 0
3 3
d 0
N 0 N
0
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division
999Z-SEL (616) `auogd
0
0
0
0
O
O
ua
co
O
0
3
0
O
a
z
0
LZL I. 01S- LZAd
A
A

Test Results [units - WN in g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dni3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.22 1.05 9.0 90 0.9 6.2 29 23 69 20 43 169 116 225 225 139 0.2 2
r N
Test Results [units - WN in g/cnt3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]: Soil Class: Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH P-I K-I Ca% Mg% S-I Mn-I Mn-AI1 Mn-Al2 Zn-I Zn-AI Cu-I Na ESP SS -I NO3-N
0.27 0.98 10.7 92 0.9 6.3 13 23 70 21 44 160 109 76 76 104 0.3 3
Sample ID: F8A
Lime History:
Page 3 of 4
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/ Report No. FY21-SL011727
3
� a
x m
'
O G
Q
T
co
co
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1 -Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 0.0 120-200 70 90 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 - 0.0 -
Recommendations: Lime Nutrients (lb/acre)
Crop (tons/acre) N P2O5 K2O Mg S Mn Zn Cu B
1-Fescue/OGrass/Tim, M 0.0 120-200 110 90 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 - 0.0
More
Information
Note: 12
More
Information
Note: 12

Recommendations
Lime
If testing finds that soil pH is too low for the crop(s) indicated, a lime recommendation will be given in units of either
ton/acre or Ib/1000 sq ft. For best results, mix the lime into the top 6 to 8 inches of soil several months before planting.
For no -till or established plantings where this is not possible, apply no more than 1 to 1.5 ton/acre (50 Ib/1000 sq ft) at one
time, even if the report recommends more. You can apply the rest in similar increments every six months until the full rate
is applied. If MG is recommended and lime is needed, use dolomitric lime.
Fertilizer
Recommendations for field crops or other large areas are listed separately for each nutrient to be added (in units of
lb/acre unless otherwise specified). Recommendations for N (and sometimes for B) are based on research/field studies
for the crop being grown, not on soil test results. K-I and P-I values are based on test results and should be > 50. If they
are not, follow the fertilizer recommendations given. If Mg is needed and no lime is recommended, 0-0-22 (11.5% Mg) is
an excellent source; 175 to 250 lb per acre alone or in a fertilizer blend will usually satisfy crop needs, SS -I levels appear
only on reports for greenhouse soil or problem samples.
Farmers and other commercial producers should pay special attention to micronutrient levels. If $, pH$, $pH, C or Z
notations appear on the soil report, refer to $Note: Secondary Nutrients and micronutrients In general, homeowners do not
need to be concerned about micronutrients. Various crop notes also address lime fertilizer needs; visit
ncagr.gov/agronomi/pubs.htm.
Recommendations for small areas, such as home lawns/gardens, are listed in units of Ib/1000 sq ft . If you cannot find
the exact fertilizer grade recommended on the report, visit www.ncagr.qov/agronomi/obpart4.htmtlfsfind information that
may help you choose a comparable alternate. For more information, read A Homeowner's Guide to Fertilizer.
Test Results
The first seven values [soil class, HM%, W/V, CEC, BS%, Ac and pH] describe the soil and its degree of acidity. The
remaining 16 [P-I, K-I, Ca%, Mg%, Mn-I, Mn-AI1, Mn-Al2, Zn-I, Zn-AI, Cu-I, S-I, SS -I, Na, ESP, SS -I, NO3-N (not routinely
available)] indicate levels of plant nutrients or other fertility measurement. Visit wwv ncagr.gov/agronomUuvrst.htm
Understanding the Soil Report: explanation of measurements, abbreviations and units
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Phone: [phone] Website: www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/ Report No. FY21-SL011727
..■(N��Io0IN•0003-02-;m7mcn0
- — m- m; o:[(�,>o ¥ _ ,�
' ` ~
,
«
;
N.
%
},0:@#+:R=;:a, «,Tao«$::Germ!
/
___ _«! „ =0=oz«a0=oo�;
!
_ -- {[i)\)§(]\m»(if;/mm®!
- _= 0 ;Eg=toe ;
,
_ _
ocxD
e\% _-_ _-- - 53C c c #
ITIoll
\y( } -- \ _,} i��
X _ } -' 0 CT _
0 ; J<(
\ _. CD ;,
NJ -a-
03
co
\
5 }