NC0039594_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018

Water Resources
Environmental Quality
November 8, 2017
Mr. Tim Hedrick
Pretreatment Coordinator
Town of Maiden
19 North Main Avenue
Maiden, North Carolina 28650
Subject: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection
Town of Maiden
NPDES Permit No. NC0039594
Catawba County
Dear Mr, Hedrick:
t7PfR
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Interim Director
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection of the
Town of Maiden's Industrial Pretreatment Program on October 31, 2017, by Mr. Wes Bell of this Office,
Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bell
at [phone], or via email at wes.bell@ncdenr.g©v.
.p_. W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
Enclosure:
Inspection Report
cc: Deborah Gore, PERCS Unit
MSC-1617 Central -Basement
State of North Carolina j Environmental Qua ityl Water Resources k Water Quality Regional operations
Mooresville Regional Office 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 310 8 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704-663-1699

NORTFI CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION IComnlete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)1
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: Town of Maiden
2. ControI Authority Representative(s): Tim Hedrick, Shuford Wise
3. Title(s): WWTP Superintendent/Pretreatment Coordinator, WWTP Backup ORC
4. Last Inspection Date: 2/23/17 Inspection Type: ® PCI ❑ Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? ® YES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO ® NA
PCS CODING
Trans.Code
N
Main Program Permit Number
NC0039594
MM/DD/YY
10/31/17
(DTIA)
Inspec.Type
P
Inspector
S
�INSPI
Fac. Type
1
(FACC)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIM)?
1
SILTS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (ClUs)?
1
CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
1 I. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NO1N
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
0
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
15. Number of SILTS In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
SNPS
16. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
SNC foi
SNC foi
Not Pu
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SILTS on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
N YES ❑ NO; Daily effluent pH
minimum violations in January and
June 2017 (1 per month).
■ YES / 1 NO
Limits: NA
Reporting: NA
Wished: NA
None
❑YES ®NO
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is LIMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES ❑ NO
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMPISTMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? Z YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ® YES ❑ NO
25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? ® YES ❑ NO
26. If NO to 23 - 26, list violations:
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES Z NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: - Added:
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 1

28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW — Please revie
s, complete with supporting documents and copy of PERCS Approve
Program
adworlts Anal sis WA
hdustrial Waste Survey (IWS
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
rcement Res
eP
ong Term. Monitoring Plan (LT
DLISTRIALn USER P
29. User Name
0. IUP Number
1. Dotes File Con
in Current Pe
Permit Ettrtiration Date
Catetorical Standard. A r died LE.4
ubmittal Received
4
6/26/14
9
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIE
CFR. Etc. Or N/A
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed. Within One Year Prior
o Permit Issue Date?
Does File Co
on Completed Withi
6. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? See Lnsltection Form from POTW)
7. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Manaernent Plan (TO
a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
39, During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms
41a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual. Period, Did the SIU Complet
Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
41b. During
on time?
42a. For categoric
file includa
42b. For categorica
ucti
st Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports
with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
es (dilution flows as Required by IUP?
s with Production based limits, does file include
ss and/or flows as Res wired b IUP?
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identi
All l,intits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
4b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identi
All Reporting Non -Compliance from SIl! Sampling
a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
c. Did POTW resample within 30 days of knowledge of SIU limit
violations from the POTW satn.le event?
45. During
46, Dunn
S.e
e Most Recent SAnnual Period, Was the SIU in SNC
e Lost Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
ed in the POTW's E'RP CNOVs, Penalties, timin , etc.'?
47. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
48. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection
49. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order
50. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining
Requested. Information For You?
y of This
POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Element in
etter, and dates consistent with Pro . Info:
Last Approval Date Next Due,
Date In file Ii A e pli+eabl
3/1.8/14
6/27/14
S OR 1 FILE REV
Yes No
Yes No
a. Yes DNo a. DYes DNo
b. DYes DNo b. DYes DNo
YesDNoDN/A DYesDNo©NIA.
NoSN'/A
DYesDNoNA
DYesDNo oN/A
a.DYes©NoN/A
b. ©YesDNo®N/A
c. D Ycs DNo' N/A
DYesDNoDN/.
YesDNoDN/A
SPEC ON
Yes No
No
a DYes ©No
b D Yesp'NoDN/A
DYes
DY
NoDN/A
N©DN/A
DNoC
DYcsDNoDN/A DYesDNoDN/A
a.❑YesEINoF N/A 'a.❑YesDNoDN/'A
b.DYesDNo❑NIA
c.DYesDNo❑N/A
Yes 1 No
DYesDNoIIN/A DYesDNoDN/A
D YesDNoA
DYesDNoEIN/A
a.DYes❑NoCINGA
b.❑YesDNo INIA
DYes ONoDN/A.
YesDNoDN/A
a.DYesDNoDNfA
b.DYDNo❑NIA
b,❑YesDINoDN/A
c DYesDNoDN/A
1 Yes IR No
YesDNoDN/A
DYesDNoDN/A
Yes0NoONfA
a.❑ Yes❑NOON/A
b.DYetisDNoDN/A
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspcctiori {PCI) Form
Updatcd 7/25'07 Page 2

prE REVIEW COMMENTS:
23. The POTW is in the process of revising (and submitting) the STMP to reduce the silver detection level (from 0.005 mg/L to 0.001 mg/L).
28. The SUO was adopted on 9/15/14.
35. POTW performed the SIU inspection on 11/29/16.
36. The POTW must ensure the Slug/Spill Control Plan and TOMP (if applicable) are kept current and include all pertinent information.
37. The SIU performed the TTO sampling on 12/28/16 and has previously submitted a TOMP (7/1/14 revision date). The POTW will require
the SIU to perform TTO monitoring prior to the end of 2017.
39. POTW contracted Water Tech Labs and R&A Labs for analyses.
40. SIU contracted Pace Analytical Services for analyses.
41 b. The SIU submitted the flow records past the required deadline (by the 15th of each month) on two occasions during first hal f of 2017. The
POTW had verbal communications with the SIU regarding late submittal of reports. The SIU had changed personnel responsible for IUP
compliance.
SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments: The POTW must ensure of the following: all SIU chain of custody forms are properly maintained; ERP is properly
followed for late submittal of reports; Slug/Spill Plans and TOMP are kept current; and all composite samples (SIU and POTW
sampling events) are properly preserved throughout the 24-br. period as required in 40 CFR 136.3, Table II.
Overall, the POTW is properly implementing the Pretreatment Program.
NOD: ❑ YES ®NO
NOV: ❑ YES ® NO
QNCR: ❑ YES ®NO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory ® Marginal ❑ Unsatisfactory_ ❑
PCI COMPLETED BY:
Wes Bell, Mooresville Regional Office
DATE: November 8, 2017
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 3

ater Resources
Environmental Quality
April 26, 2017
Mr, Todd Herres
Town Manager
Town ofMaiden
19 N. Main Avenue
Maiden, North Carolina 28650
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
,Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Subject: PAR Review
Town of Maiden WWTP
NPDES Permit No, NC0039594
Catawba County
Dear Mr. Herres:
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for the
reporting period of January through .December 2016. Based on the review, the POTW completed the
PAR in accordance with 1 SA NCAC 2H .0908(b) requirements and guidelines set forth in Comprehensive
Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment Pro ams. The next PAR will be due March 1, 2018.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact me at (704)
235-2192 and/or Deborah Gore at [phone] or at wes.bell rt,ncdenr.gpv and
deborah.goreAa,ncdenr. gov,
cc: Deborah Gore, PERCS Unit
MSC-1617 Central -Basement
WB
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
3ta of North Carulina Environmental Quality) Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office 1 610 East Center Avenue, 'Suite 310 I Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704-66,3- ➢ 699

Water Resources
Environmental Quality
February 27, 2017
Mr. Shuford Wise
Pretreatment Coordinator
Town of Maiden
19 North Main Avenue
Maiden, North Carolina 28650
Subject: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection
Town of Maiden
NPDES Permit No. NC0039594
Catawba County
Dear Mr. Wise:
111
—1 -ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection of the
Town of Maiden's Industrial Pretreatment Program on February 23, 2017, by Mr. Wes Bell of this Office.
Should you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. BeII
at [phone], or via email at [e-mail].
Enclosure:
Inspection Report
cc: Sarah Bass, PERCS Unit
MSC-1617 Central -Basement
WB
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
State of North Carolina ] Environmental Quality] Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Office j 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 310 I Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704-663-1699

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
• PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION f Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)1
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: Town of Maiden
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Shuford Wise, Tim Hedrick
3. Title(s): WWTP ORC/Pretreatment Coordinator, Pretreatment Technician/WWTP Backup ORC
4. Last Inspection Date: 11/12/15 Inspection Type: ❑ PCI ® Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? ® YES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? El YES ❑ NO ® NA
PCS CODING
Trans.Code
Main Program,Permit Number
NC0039594
MM/DD/YY
02/23/17
-(DTIA)
Inspec.Type
P
(TYPI)
Inspector
S
1NSP)
Fac. Type
1
(FACC)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
1
SIUS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs ?
1
CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year? -
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN
12. Number of SIGs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
NOCM
13. Number of STUs in SNC for Either Reporting. or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
0
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last-2 Semi -Annual Periods .
0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
SNPS
16. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
0 '
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
SNC for
SNC for
Not Pu
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
❑'YES ®NO
❑ YES ... •
Limits: NA
Reporting: NA
blished: NA
None
❑ YES I NO
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
22. • Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES El NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ® YES ❑ NO
25. A1I LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? ® YES ❑ NO
26. If NO to 23 - 26, list violations: -
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be EIiminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES ® NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
❑ NO
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 1

28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELE
their files, complete with supporting doctl
Program Element
eadworks Analysis (HWA
dustriul Waite Survey (IWSe
Sewer Use Ordinance ISUO
orcement Response PI
ong Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP
ENTS REVIEW — Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Elem
and copy of PERCS Approval Letter, and dates consistent with Program Info:
Submittal Received
Date In tile?
61/1S 2 Yes ] N
4
6
9/24/08
5/7/10
Next Due,
Applicable
Date
9/0
Approval
Yes I 1 No
Yes 1 1 No
STRIAE USER PER
29. User Name
30. IUP Number
IT
'FILE RE
GKN Driveline
Does File Contain Current P
2. Permit Expiration. D
E
Catet,orical Standard A died E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or NB/A
IP F
E REVIE
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
36. a, Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
b. If No, is Otte Needed? (See Inspection Form from. POT
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TO'I
38, a, Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All ls.sues Resolved?
S OR I FILE
® Yes El No
4
i� Yes No
a. Yes DNo
b. DYes DNo
a.. Yes DNo
b.DYesONoNIA
VIE
A
iD
a. DYes DNo
b. DYes ©No
a. Yes
No
b oYes DNcaON`,
During the Most Recent Serni-Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
ng as Required b IUP, including flow?
40. D
Contain POi W Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
41a. During, the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sg as Required by IUP, including flow?
41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports
on time?
42a, For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
title include rocessi'diIution flows as Required b IUP?
42b. For categorical Ws wa Pt
production rates and/or
43a, During the Most Recent
All Limits Non•Com liar
43b. During t
All R
uction based limits, does file include
rws a Required by
i Annual Period, Did the POTW ldentif
om Both POTW and SIU Sam
e Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Iden
Not Co r liance from SIU Sarn lint
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self -
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
c. Did POTW resample within 30 days of knowledge of SIU limit
violations from the POTW sample event?
45, During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
4t, During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken.
as S seeified in the PUTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, titttin�, etc.)?
47. Does the File Co
Assessment Notices?
48. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
El Yes No
DYeslNoDN/A
Yes 1No
Ye
SPEC'TIOI
Yes
Yes 1 1 No
a. DYes ©No
b. DYes C,No
a. DYes ONo
b.tlYesl INoDNJA
Yes
Yes1 1No
©YesDNoON/A
49. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforce ent Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order`:'
50. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
YesDNoD!
YesDNoDN
oC'IN/A
DYesDNo N/A.
pYes©NoNIA
©YesDNo
YesDNoDN/A
a,oYes oNo ; 'A
b.OYesONoNiA
c.0Yes ON N'A
Yes
a.oYesDNo ' A
b.DYesDN >I N/A
Yes 2 No
0YesDNo0N/A
'L YesDNoDN/
©Yes(NoI NIA
3.©YesDNoCINIA
b. o Yes©NooN/A
c. o YesONoON/A
es
0YesDNo0Nr'A
a. o Ye,ONoON/A
b o Yes ©NoC NL
DYesDNoDlaN A
s
pYes©No©N!'A
a.oYes DNoDN/A
bc0lYes0No©NIA
c.0 Yes ONoDN/A
Yes[ IN
0YesDNol iN/A
ova es©NoDN/A
a. ©YesDNoDN/A
b.DYes0No0N/A
0 Yes D No
Yes El No
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PC
orm t pduteA.1 "12 S 07 Page 2

E REVIEW COMMENTS:
28. The SUO was adopted on 9/15/14.
35. POTW performed the SIU inspection on 11/29/16.
37; The SIU performedrthe-TTO sampling on 12/28/16 and has previously submitted a TOMP (7/1/1*revision date).
39. POTW contracted Water Tech Labs and R&A Labs for analyses.
40. SIU contracted Pace Analytical Services for analyses.
46. The POTW issued a NOV for the SIU's failures to monitor mercury (both quarterly sampling events) during the July 2016 — December
2016 monitoring period.
SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments:
The records reviewed during the inspection were organized and well maintained. Pretreatment staff must ensure that all future permit
renewals are effective upon expiration of the previous permit.
Overall, the POTW is properly implementing the Industrial Pretreatment Program.
Recommendations:
The POTW staff must ensure all applicable documentation mailed by the SIU is date stamped to verify compliance with all required
deadlines.
NOD: ❑ YES ® NO
NOV: ❑ YES ® NO
QNCR: ❑ YES NO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory ® Marginal ❑ Unstisfactory_ ❑
PCI COMPLETED BY:
Wes Bell, Mooresville Regional Office
DATE: February 27, 2017
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 3

Water Re
LNVVIYONMEN1A
April 26, 2016
Mr. Todd Helms, Town. Manager
Town of Maiden
19 N. Main Avenue
Maiden, North Carolina 28650
PAT MCCRORY
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Subject: PAR Review
Town of Maiden WWTP
NPDFS Permit No, NC0039594
Catawba County
Dear Mr. Fuel
reont
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for the
reporting period ofJanuaty through December 2015. Based on the review, the POTW completed the
PAR in accordance with 15A. NCAC 2H .0908(b) requirements and guidelines set forth in omprehensivre
Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment Programs. The next PAR will be due March 1., 2017,
lf you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact Mr, Wes Bell at
[phone] and/or Ms, Sarah Bass at [phone] or at wes.be,[e-mail] and.
sarah.bass@ncdenr,gov.
cc: Sarah Bass, MRCS Unit
MSC-1617 Central -Basement
WB
y,
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
State of North Caroline Erwirorunentai Quality i Water Resources Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Of5ce ¢ 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704 663 1699

Pliilir Pat McCrory
Governor
North Carolina Department of Environmental Qua
Donald van der Vaart
Secretary
November 18, 2015
Mr, Randy Smith
Wastewater Superintendent/Pretreatment Coordinator
Town of Maiden
113 West Main Street
Maiden, North Carolina 28650
Subject: Pretreatment, Audit Inspection
Town of Maiden
'NPDES Permit No. NC0039594
Catawba County
Dear Mr. Smith:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Audit Inspection Report for the inspection of the Town of Maiden
approved Industrial Pretreatment Program on 'November 1.2, 2015 by Mr, Wes Bell of this Office.
The report should be self-explanatory; :however, should you have any questions concerning this report, please
do not hesitate to contact Mr. Bell at [phone], or at wes.belqncdenr.gov.
Enclosure:
Inspection Report
cc: Sarah Bass, PERCS Unit
MSC 1617-Central Files/Basement
WB
Michael L. Parker, Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, DEQ
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave,: Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] \ Faic )704) 663.6040 Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: woncrtcwaterquality,org
Aro Euuat Otmortunitv AffirmAct[oci EITIUkrief 30% Fteofdleci/10% Post Corvsumer Dane

Background Information:NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
PRETREATMENT AUDIT REPORT
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: Town of Maiden
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Randy Smith
3. Title(s): Wastewater Superintendent/Pretreatment Coordinator
4. Address of POTW:
Mailing 113 West Main Street
City Maiden Zip Code 28650
Phone Number [phone] Fax Number [phone] E-Mail rsmith(ai1maidennc.gov
5. Audit Date 11/12/2015
6. Last Inspection Date: 11/15/2013 Inspection Type: ® PCI ❑ Audit
7. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s) ? ® Yes ❑ No
If No, Explain.
8. In the last year has the POTW experienced any NPDES or Sludge Permit compliance problems? ❑ Yes ® No
If Yes, Explain.
9. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Order Type and Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ Yes El No ® NA
Parameters Covered Under Order
PCS (WENDB)Coding:
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MMIDD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type
INI . INICIO 10 13 19 15 I9 14 1 111 112115 1 IGI Is 1 Li]
(DTIA) (TYPI) (1NSP) (FACC)
10. Current Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUS)?
11. Current Number of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUS)?
1
1
SIDS
CIUS
12. Number of SIUs Not Inspected by POTW in Last Calendar Year?
13. Number of SIUs Not Sated by POTW in Last Calendar Year?
14. Enter Higher Number of 12 or 13
-15. Number. of SIUs with No IUP, or with an Expired IUP
16Number of S1Us in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of Last 2
Sena -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
17Number of SILTS in SNC for Rem g During Either of Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
18Number of SIUs in SNC for Limits Violations During Either of Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
19. Number of SIUs in SNC for Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods
20. Number of SIUs in SNC for Self -Monitoring Requirements that were Not Inspected or Sampled
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NOIN
NOCM
PSNC
MSNC
SNPS
SNIN

21. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW
Program Element Last Submittal
Headworlcs Analysis (HWA) 6/3/1.5
Industrial Waste Survey (I"W ;) 1/13/14
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO) 6/226/14
Enforcement Response Plan ( ) 9/24/08
Short Ter rn Monitorin Plan STMP
g ( ) 5/7/10
Legal Authority (Sewer Use Ordinance-S110
Last Approval
Date file" Date In file
No 8/3/15 Yes Q No
No 3118/14
Yes
Yes No 6127/14 Yes Nib
Yes 0 No 11/19/08 Yes ❑ No
Yes ._ No ro 8/3/1 0Yes 0 No
Date Next. Du
1f Applicable
4/1/20
22. Do you have any to and/or areas from which you receive wastewater which are not in your annexed jurisdiction?
0 Yes No I.f yes, Please list these towns andior areas,
23. If yes to #22, Do you have current Interjurisdictional Agreements (I As) or other Contracts? El Yes El No NA
A copy, if not already submitted, should be sent to .Division.
24. If yes to 422, Have you had any trouble working with these towns or districts? 0 Yes a' No NA
If yes, :Explain.
25. Date of Last SUO Adoption by Local Counci.1 9/1.5/2014
2.6, Have you had any problems interpreting or enforcing any part of the SUO?
If yes, Explain.
Enforcement (Enforcement Response Plan-ERP)
Yes No
27. Did you send a copy of the ERP to your industries? (] Yes [ No
If no, POTW must send copy within 30 days.
28. Have you had any,problens interpreting or enforcing arty part of the ERP (i.e, any adjudication„, improper enforcement, etc?
Yes • No If yes, Explain.
29. List Indus
NA
Resour
under a Schedule or Order and' Type of Schedule or Order
30. Please Rate the Following: S=Satisfact
rsonnel Available for Maintaining
POTW's Pretreatment Proram
Access to POTW Vehicles for
Sampling, Inspections, and
Ernerencies
Access to Operable Sampling
Equipment
ability of Funds if Needed for
Additional Sampling andl`or Analysis
Reference Materials
Staff Training (i.e. Annual and
Regional Workshops, Etc.)
Computer Equipment (Hardware and
Software)
U
U-Unsatisfactory
;planation, if Unsatisfacto

r32.
oes the POTW have an adequate data management system to run the preetreatment program? ® Yes ❑ No
plain Yes or No. Excell spreadsheet.
ow does the POTW recover the cost of the Pretreatment Program from their industries? Explain.
The Town will charge fees for any additional sampling.
Public Perception/ Participation:
33. Are there any local issues affecting the pretreatment program (e.g.. odor, plant closing, new or proposed plants)?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, Explain.
34. Has any one from the public ever requested to review pretreatment program files? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Explain procedure. If no, How would the request be addressed? The request would be made in writing to the Town's
Attorney and would be handled by the Town Manager and Pretreatment Coordinator. •
35. Has any industry ever requested that certain information remain confidential from the public? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, Explain
procedure for determining whether information qualified for confidential status, as well as procedure for keeping files confidential
from public. If no. how would the request be addressed?: The request would be made in writing to the Town's Attorney and
the Pretreatment Coordinator would be included in the review process. Confidential files would be kept in a locked file
cabinet at Town Hall.
36. In addition to annual inspection, does the POTW periodically meet with industries to discuss pretreatment? ® Yes ❑ No
37. Is the public notified about changes, in the SUO or Local Limits? ® Yes ❑ No
38. Were all industries in SNC published in the last notice? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
Permitting (Industrial Waste Survey-IWS):
39a...How does the POTW become aware of new or changed Users? Town Planner gives all new businesses a short IWS
Form.
39b. Once the POTW becomes aware of new or changed Users, how does the POTW determine which industries have the
reasonable potential to adversely impact the WWTP and therefore require a new permit or a permit revision? (Who is an
SIU?) Pretreatment Coordinator will evaluate Short Form and issue Long Form if applicable. The Pretreatment
Coordinator will evaluate the loading, potential impacts to WWTP, industrial processes, and any categorical
processes.
40. Does the POTW receive waste from any groundwater remediation projects (petroleum, CERCLA) or landfill leachate?
❑Yes No If Yes, How many are there?
Please list each site and how it is permitted, if applicable.
41. Does the POTW accept waste by (mark if applicable) ❑ Truck ❑Dedicated Pipe ® NA
42. If the POTW accepts trucked waste, what controls are placed on this waste? (example. designated point, samples drawn,
manifests required) The Town does not accept trucked waste and/or septage haulers.
43. How does the POTW allocate its loading to industries? Mark all that apply
❑ Uniform Limits ❑ Historical Industry Need ❑ By Surcharge ® Categorical Limits ❑ Other
Explain Other:
44. Review POTW's copies of current allocation tables for each WWTP. Are there any over allocations? ❑ Yes Z No
If yes, What parameters are over allocated?
45. If yes to #43, What is being done to address the over allocations? (short-term IUPs, HWA to be revised, pollutant study, etc.)
NA
46. Does the POTW keep pollutant loading in reserve for future growth / safety? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
If yes, what percentage of each parameter 5-10%.
47. Has the POTW experienced any difficulty in allocation? (for example: adjudication by an industry) ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Explain.

Internal and eommerci
48. How does the POTW decide on which pollutants. to ffisttit i.n the permits? zMonitor for? (f©r e ample. were only those pollutant
listed on the application limited; categorical parameters; NPDES Pollutants of Concern)
Categorical parameters and NPDES POCs.
49..How does the POTW deckle what the monitoring frequency should be for the various pollutant art industry pernuts ? Explain.
Potential impacts to WWTP; monitoring typically starts a
levels.
Permit Co nr lia
per month and reduced to quarterly based on pollutant
50. Does the POTW currently have or during the past year had any permits under adjudication? `ties No
If yes, which industries? What was (will be) the outcome of the adjudication?
51. Demonstrate how the POTW judges compliance,' This should include compliance judgment on. all violations of Itmits, reporting
requirements, and permit conditions, as well as for SNC. NOVs for limit violations; Division's Compliance Judgement
Worksheet for SNC determinations (chronic and TRC); NOV for monitoring violations and reporting violations more than
30 days late; ERP followed for continued violations (monitoring and limit).
52, Does the .POTW use the Division's model inspection fonn or equivalent?
If no, does the PC)',FW forrn include all DW'R data? ] Yes [ No
N o
Were all SlUs evaluated for the need of a slug,<'`spill control plan during their most recent inspections? J Yes ( No
If no, Explain,
54, What criteria are used to determine if a slug spill control plan is needed?
The only SLII has a slug/spill control program; New SIIJ's would be evaluated for chem.cial storage practices, presence and
location of floor drains, potential. impacts to WWII'.
What criteria does the POTW use to determine if a submitted slug/spill control plan is adequate?
Contacts are up to date, presence of emergency response equipment, appropriate containment structures, spill prevention.
equipment, and adequate reporting, plan.
56, .Flow does the POTW decide where the sample point for an SIU should be located?
Sampling point would be at the end of all treatment processes and separate from domestic waste stream.
57, Has the P01 W established a procedure to ensure that representative samples will be taken by the POTW or SIU each time?
(example: correct location„ proper programming of sampler; clean equipment; swirling the sample bucket uniformly)
I,'O'I"W. Ye- No SIU: Yes L] No If yes, Explain. SDI contracts commercial lab to perform
sampling..
58. Who performs sample anal°sas
Metals
Conventional Parameters
Organics
PO"l W for
R&A Labs
Water Tech Labs
R&A Labs
-xplain the Chain of Cos Procedure used for both in house and commercial lab samples,
chain of custody (COC) forms used by POTW. SW uses commercial lab COC form.
g/Short Term Monitoring Plan (L.JSTMP) and Headworks Analysis (EIWAL
64a, Is 1 TMP'STMP Monitoring :Being Conducted at Appropriate 1 ocations and Freguencies`> El YES [] NO
Are Correct Detection. Levels being used for all L'TMP,°'S'l1MP Monitoring'? YES LI NO
i`MP/STMP Data Maintained in Table or Equivalent'' YES © NO Is Table Adequate? YES L] NO
t30b.
60c.
60d,.
60e.
601.
All LIMPS -IMP effluent data on Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR)?
If N0 to any above, list violations
Should any Pollutants of Cokern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP,!!S`1MP?
If yes, which ones? Eliminated;
61. Do you complete your own headworks analysis (HWA'
If, no, Who completes your HWA? Phone (,
Added:
No
YES LI NO DWQ Inspector, verify yourselfl
'ES `Q NO
Do you have plans to revise your HWA in the near future? J Yes No
If yes, What is. the reason for the revision? (mark all. that app. ya) Olncreased average flow
ES li
rharrge
More LIMP data available L]Resolve over allocation
ear expiration (Other Explain.

pr
3. In general, what is the most limiting criteria of your HWA? ❑Inhibition ❑ Pass Through ® Sludge Quality
64. Do you see any way to increase your loading in the future (Example: obtaining more land for sludge disposal)? ® Yes ❑ No
Explain. Reserve capacity in WWTP.
65. Do you plan any significant changes to the pretreatment program or changes to the WWTP that may affect pretreatment?
No.
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW:
66. User Name
1. GKN Driveline 2.
3.
67. IUP Number
001
68. Does File Contain Current Permit?
1il Yes • No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
69. Permit Expiration Date
12/31/16
70. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
433
71. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year
Prior to Permit Issue Date?
'1 Yes ❑ No
• Yes ❑ No
• Yes • No
72. Does File Contain Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar
Year?
i1 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ■ No
❑ Yes . ❑ No
73. a. Does File Contain Slug/Spill Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. ®Yes ■No
b. DYes ❑No
a. • Yes ■No
b. ■ Yes ■ No
a. ■Yes II No
b. DYes pNo
74. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a
Toxic Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
®Yes No NIA
Yes ©No ❑N/A
❑Yes No ❑/A
75._ a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. 0 Yes pNo
b. ❑Yes❑No®N/A
a. ■ Yes • No
b .❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a. • Yes ■ No
b •❑Yes❑No❑N/A
76. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did POTW Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP, including Flow?
/ 1 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ■ No
• Yes ❑ No
77. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
/ZI Yes ❑ No
• Yes • No
IN Yes • No
78. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP, including Flow?
®Yes pNo ❑N/A
Yes ❑No DN/A
DYes pNo ❑N/A
79. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all
reports on time?
®Yes pNo DN/A
DYes pNo ON/A
❑Yes ❑No ❑N/A
80a. For categorical lUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF),
does file include process/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes ❑No ®N/A
❑Yes ❑No ❑N/A
DYes ❑No ❑NIA
80b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes pNo oN/A
DYes ❑No ❑N/A
❑Yes ❑No ❑N/A
81. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did POTW Identify All
Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
®Yes ONo ON/A
DYes ■No ■NA
DYes ■No ■ Ni
82. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did POTW Identify All
Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
❑Yes pNo ®NIA
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
83. a. Was POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW within 30
Days?
c. If applicable, did POTW resample and obtain results within 30
days of becoming aware of SIU limit violations in the POTW's
sampling of SIU?
a.®Yes❑NoDN/A
b.❑Yes❑No®NIA
c.®Yes ❑No ❑NIA
a.Vies ❑NooN/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
c.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
aOYes❑No❑NIA
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
c.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
84. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was SIU in SNC?
_ ■ Yes /1 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
LI Yes ■ No
85. During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in POTW s ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
®Yes❑ cONIA
❑YesDNoON/A
❑YesONo❑N/A
86. Does File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
DYes[No❑N/A
87. Does File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No!N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
88. a. Does File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.❑Yes ❑No N/A
b.❑Yes ❑No ERN/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
b.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
89. Did POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any
Requested Information For You?
■ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
D Yes ❑ No

FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
29. The POTW ended the consent order with the SIU on 10/ 1.7/14.
72. The POTW performed last year's SIU inspection on 12/22/14.
74. The SIU has submitted semi-annual TTO Certifications and will also perform TTO sampling by the end of 2015.
81185. The SIU violated the pH limit on 2/20/15. The SfUr was resampl.ed by the POTW in early April 2015 and complied with the pH limit.
The POTW issued a NOV for the pH limit violation on 4,/20/15.
INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING:
Trans,Code
Main Program Permit Number
0
9
5
9
ection type
ru_
(TYPI)
Inspector Facility Type
2
(1NSP) (FACC)
1. Industry Inspected. GKN Driveiine
2, Industry Address: 1848 GKN Way, Newton, NC 28658
39 Type of Industry/Product: Automotive Drive trains
4, Industry Contact: Fred Wilson & Lee Kearson Title: Plant Engineer & hIS Coordinator Phone: [phone] & (828)
428-6458 Fax: [phone] & [phone]
5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? Yes LI No
6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
Continents:
A. Initial Interview Yes Q No
B. Plant Tour Yes No
C. Pretreatment Tour f Yes ❑ No
D. Sampling Review Yes No
E. Exit Interview ® Yes * No
Industrial Inspection Comments:
The pretreatment system includes multiple equalization canes, mnitiple
adjustment/chemical precipitation, ozonation, RO system, and Rowe measure
ltration rtnits (ultrafiltration and paper), pH
nt. The sludge from the pretreatment system is
disposed off -site by Ilaz-Mat. The Plant Engineer and wastewater staff are certified for the operation of biological and
physical/chemical treatment systems. The pretreatment system appeared to be properly operated and well maintained.
The Lapping wastewater (parts coating process) is separately collected and disposed off -site by Haz-Mat,
Metal shavings are stored under cover and recycled.
SUMMARY AND CIMMENTS:
Audit Comments: The POTW musteusut°e that composite samples are properly preserved throughout the 24-hr. sampling period
as required by 40 CFR 136.3.
The Town's pretreatment records were organized and well maintained. The POTW's Pretreatment Program is being properly
implemented.
NOD: © Yes No
NOV: 0 Yes ®No
QNCR: 0 Yes
POTW Rating:
Satisfaetory Margial © Unsatisfactory
Audit COMPLETED i3Y:
DATE: November 18, 2015
Wes RelI, WQROS, Mooresville Regional Office

Ncam,
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
April 16, '2015
Mr..Randy Smith
WWTP Superintendent/Pretreatment Coordinato
Town of Maiden
19 N. Main .Avenue
Maiden, North Carolina 28,650
Subject: PAR Review
Town of Maiden VilWIP
NPDES Permit No. NC0039594
Catawba County
Dear Mr. Smith:
witting
isvi )1,4,
Donald van der \Inn
Secretary
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for the reporting
period of:January through December 2014. Based on the review, the POTW completed the PAR in accordance
with 15A NCAC 2H .0908(b) requirements and guidelines set forth in Comprehensive Guidance for North Carolina
Pretreatment Programs. The next PAR will be due March 1, 2016.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR.,please do not hesitate .to contact me at 7 4) Z 5-2192 andlor
Sarah Bass at [phone] or at yre,,,ibe111-0-1c en r.gpv and ,sarah.bass@ncdenrgov,
Sincerely,
Wes Bell
Environmental Specialist
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
cc; Sarah Bass, PERCS Unit
Mooresville Regicriei Office,
Location: 610 East Cent& Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville„ NO 28'115
Plniitite.: 7 663-1699 Fa v (704 663-6040 Customer Service: 1-877-623-6148
nternet: 'eiri.im,novaterquaiity,n
pot tun(ty Afforittitve Acton Employer -Recycledit ()% Post Consumer patter

NcDERTI
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor
Mr. Randy Smith
WWTP Superintendent/Pre • ea
Town of Maiden
113 W. Main Street
Maiden, North Carolina 28650
Dear Mr. Smith:,
Division of Water Quality
Charles Wakild, P.E.
Drector
April 19, 2013
t Coordinator
Subject: PAR Review
Maiden WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0039594
Catawba County
John E. Skyana, 111
Secretary
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for the reporting
period of January through December 2012: Based on the review, the POTW completed the PAR in accordance
with 15A NCAC 214 .0908(b) requirements and guidelines set forth in Comprehensive Guidance for North Car
Pretreatment Programs, The next PAR will be due March 1, 2014:
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact Donna Hood and myself at
[phone] and/or Sarah Morrison at [phone] or at donnahoodrilincdent,goy, wes.belancdenrlov, and
sarah.rnorrisorancilenrgoy
Sincerely,
Wes Bell
Environmental Specialist
Surface Water Protection Section
cc: Sarah Morrison, PERCS Unit
Nkicresviiie Regionai Office
Location: 6.10 East Center Ave.: Su te 3.01 MOOreSae, NC 28115
Phone: [phone]. ) Fax [phone] ) Customer Service: 1-677-623-6748
Internet www:riewaterquality:org
On
No Carolina
,/ alarm*
An, Equal Opportunily %Affirmative Acton Employer - 30% Rmycled110% Past Consumer paper

North Carotin
Mr.Randy Smith
Pretreatment Program Coordinato
Town of Maiden
113 West Main Street
Maiden, North Carolina 28650
Dear Mr, Smith:
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Charles- Wakilcl, l''. E Dee Fr at gran
Director Secreiary
Subject.
May 18, 2012
Pretreatment Compliance Inspection
Town of Maiden
NPDES Permit No. NC0039594
Catawba County, NC
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment C".ornpli,ance Inspection Report for the inspection of the Town of
Maiden approved I.ndustrial Pretreatment Program on May 8, 2012 by John Lesley, Wes Bell, and Donna Hood
of this office.
The report should be self explanatory, however, should you have any questions concerning this report,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone]..
Sincerely,
Robert 13. Krebs
egional Supervisor
face Water Protection Section
Enclosure
cc; Central Files
Sarah Morrison, PERCS Unit
Mooresville E nitanal 01W
t.oe_ation:: 61tl 1 a14 t:
Nlaune: (7(14) 663-1699 t.1=ax: ("lt➢1
Internet httpJIGonal.nc ienr.arq web/wq
NorthCarolin i
.1n Equal Opp orn.iunl¢y suarmur par

lliarn T. Herons.
ager
Town. of Maiden
Post Office Box 1.25
Maiden, North Carolina 28650
NCDENR
a l3rpar°tr et of Environment and Natural Resources
t)ivision el Water Quality
Charles WItkl,f'
Director
May 8, 201.2
Subject: Pretreatment Compliant e lalspection
Town of Maiden
NPDES Permit No, NC0039594
Catawba County, NC:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection. Report for the inspection of the Town of
Maiden approved Industrial Pretreatment Program on May 8, 2012 by John Lesley, Wes Bell, and Donna Hood
of this office..
The report should he self exp'1anato'ry; however, should you have any questions concerning this report,.
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at (704) 663-1.699.
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Sarah Morrison, PERCS Unit
filWle Regional Offioe
I nr rrreC htp / rta[ nri'Jenri©rq et wq
uune, ur,: z l f5
Sincerely,
"belt B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Secti
NorrthCaro.lin:
Naturally
rllrlr�Y,.trCvi^.,.I

rirANORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OFWATER QUALITY
NR PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
_..a,..
UND INFORMATION lComplete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)1
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: Town of Maiden
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Randy Smith
3. Title(s): WWTP Supervisor/Pretreatment Program Coordinator
4. Last Inspection Date: 11/4/10 Inspection Type: ❑ PCI ® Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? ® YES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO ® NA
PCS CODING
Trans.Code
N
Main Program Permit Number
NC0039594
MM/DD/YY
05/07/12
(DTIA)
Inspec.Type
P
Inspector
S
(INSP)
Fac. Type
1
(1 ACC)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
1
SIUS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
[ 1
CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
_ 0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
0
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
SNPS
16. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual. Periods
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
SIudge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
® YES ❑ NO
4/2/11 Weekly Avg. fecal coliform
❑YES ®NO
SNC for Limits: None
SNC for Reporting: None
Not Published: None
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW:
GKN Driveline (formerly Getrag)
Copy of SOC in PAR
❑ YES ® NO
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES ❑ NO
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? EYES ❑ NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ® YES ❑ NO
25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? ® YES ❑ NO
26. If NO to 23 - 26, list violations:
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES ® NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 1

TREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW— PIease review POTW files, verify POTW has copy ofProgram Element in
files, complete with sunnortine documents and cony of PERCS Annroval Letter, and dates consistent with Program info:
Program Element
Last Submittal Received
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
2/28/11
Al Yes ❑ No
5/24/11
® Yes ❑ No
4/1/15
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
11/17/08
/Z1 Yes ■ No
6/8/09
►A/ Yes ■ No
11/1/13
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
1/8/09
►�1 Yes ■ No
1/16/09
® Yes ❑ No
12/31/12
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
9/24/08
►�1 Yes ❑ No
11/19/08
El Yes ❑ No
Short Term Monitoring Plan (STMP)
5/7/10
® Yes ❑ No
8/3/10
® Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (lUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTIO
29. User Name
1. GKN Driveline
2.
3.
30. 1UP Number
001
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
® Yes El No
❑ Yes El No
❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Permit Expiration Date,
12/31/16
33. Categorical Standard Applied (LE. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
433
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
►II Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
® Yes • No
•
Yes / No
❑
Yes ❑ No
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. ®Yes ■No
b. ❑Yes ■ No
a. •Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
a. ❑Yes ■No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
37. For 40 CFR 4I3 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. ►5 Yes ❑No
b.El Yes 0No❑N/A
a. • Yes ❑No
b.❑Yes ❑No❑N/A
a. • Yes i]No
b.❑Yes ❑No❑N/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
r Yes ❑ .No
• Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
0 Yes 0 No
41a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
❑Yes®No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports
on time?
❑Yes®No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
42a. For categorical Ilk with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
file include process/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑No®NIA
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
42b. For categorical Ns with Production based limits, does file include
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑No®NIA
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
❑Yes■No®NA
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
®Yes❑No❑N/A r
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
c. Did POTW resample within 30 days of knowledge of SIU limit
violations from the POTW sample event?
a.❑Yes ❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
c.pYes ❑No12:IN/A
a.❑Yes ❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes ❑No❑NIA
c.❑Yes❑NaL7N/A
a.❑Yes ❑No❑NIA
b,❑Yes ❑No❑NIA
c.❑Yes ❑No❑NIA
45. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑ Yes
/1
No
• Yes ❑ No
■ Yes ❑ No
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
47. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
ElYes❑No❑NIA
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
48. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
®Yes❑No❑NIA
❑Yes❑NcDN/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
49. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.tEiYes ❑No❑NIA
b.®Yes ❑No❑NIA
a.❑Yes ❑Nc❑N/A
bin Yes ❑NcDN/A
a.❑Yes ❑NoO1N/A
b. Cries ❑No❑N/A
50. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
• Yes No
■ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Farm Updated 7/25/07 Page 2

VIEW COMMENTS:
e IUP Application was completed on 10/31/11.
GKN Driveline (formerly Gegtrag Gears) was inspected on 11/16/11.
The GKN Driveline IUP was approved on 1/31/12.
GKN Driveline was noncompliant for failing to monitor in July 2011 (monitoring was done on June 30, 2011 by mistake), failing to
monitor weekly October 2-8; 9-16, and 17-24, 2011 as required in the permit. The SIU was assessed a $600 civil penalty and proof of
penalty payment was maintained on file (a paid receipt). GKN Driveline (Getrag Gears in 2011) was under the constraints of a SOC.
The SOC expired on 12/31/2011 and a new permit was issued 1/1/2012. The SIU has been compliant with the new permit.
SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments:
The Town of Maiden Industrial Pretreatment Progrram is well managed and all program elements were complete and up to date.
Donna Hood and Wes Bell, Mooresville Regional Office, also participated in this inspection.
Requirements:
See the Program Elements Review Section of this Report.
Recommendations:
None
NOD: ❑ YES ® NO
NOV: El YES ® NO
QNCR: ❑ YES ®NO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory ® Marginal ❑ Unsatisfactory_ El
PCI COMPLETED BY:
DATE: May 8, 2012
John Lesley, Mooresville Regional Office
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 3

North. Caro
Be e:r1 ° .Eaves Pcrd.ue
Governor
Nir. William T. I-erm.s
Town Manager
Town of Maiden
Post Office Box 125
illaiden„ North Carolin.
closed is a copy oft
NCDENR
a 'Department of En'Tironrneertt and Natural Resources
Division of wares Quality
Cole n If Sullins
Director
2010
Pretreatrrerrt Audit Report
Town of Ntaid
NPIw)l:FS Per it No.N(. 0039S94
Catawba County. NC
Audit Report for the. insp
Industrial Pretreatment Program. on November 4. 201. 0 by John
and Wes Be.
f. 1aiden approved
-this Office.
The report: should be self-explanat .rry,110 e °er, should you. have any questions concernin this report,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. I esley or me at: (704) 66-1699.,
Sincerely,
B. Krebs
al. Supervisor
er Protection Section
sure
cc: Central }Files
Dana Rolle PERCS 1
Mociresville Regional Otfi�c
610 Last Centel AVe,„ tiuiie, 301 . ere
70,4 63-169 t Fax' (704) n(33-640410 t C`�a
et; htip.lipertal.naienr.orghveaawg
r a",'23-67 t5
An E'ArAl Oppolin Employe - 5E s Ret•wc. 1 10''r Poo C

NCDE
Background I
Control is,
Control Aud
Titlets): Sup
►
Address of PU'I V
CAROLiNA DIVISION OF WA' rF:R QUALITY
RETREAT iE'I! AUDIT REPORT
(P01 N rt te: ;Maiden
RepresertttrtixlSl; Randy Sn►ith
endent/Prctr-ot rarn Coordinator
Street Post Office .Box PO Bo
City' tad:e Zip Code. Maiden, N
Phone Number 82f3-428-5032 Fax Number 828 4"28-5
Audit I. ate I 1 442010
Last inspection Date: 02 02"2010 Inspection
rxpfa.
6
Audit
widen
Completed Ail Requirements front the Precious Inspection and Pr a{ rarra lnib Sheet(s) `'
8. In the last year has the. POT experienced any NPf)1IS or Sludge Penn it c.c?tripliaucc l t'croblc
IExplain.
1s PO"I"W under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Con
Order Type and Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met?
Paranic.ters Covered Under OR.
i'CS (NV ErNDB)C°rrdin ;:
t Nttm
1 I. Cu
12.,...N Mimi,.
13, Number of S11ts Not Sampled by POT'\A ui L
14, Enter Iliac r tiumber of 1.2 or 13
15. Number of tiNo f.l P, or with ati 1wx irecl 111P
16. Number of SILIs in SNC for Either R.eporli
Senii-<Arinual Periods (`1"otal. Number of S
_Number17. of 11 s to SNC for R.eportutg
I Number of SIt .> tit SNC for Limits Violation I tn`iti Either
Main Prour:
C 0
hid US
60''''
Not Inspected b
PO'T`W it
0° Number of S1Us in SNC for Both Ri porti
Semi -,Annual Periods
rher of S1I15 i
1C Ibr Self -
Violations Dur
No
bripectot
tI SP)
of Last 2
1'ac.. t +lie
01N
yuircrtienl that were Not 1ti�f cctcd rr Satrtpled..._ i tl _i SNIN
,..,v, (let

21. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW
Program Element
Last Submittal
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
9/29.10
® Yes ■ No
6/18.08
® Yes ❑ No
In Review
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
11/17/08
® Yes ❑ No
6/8/09
Yes ■ No
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
1/8/09
® Yes ❑ No
1/16/09
® Yes ❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
9/24/08
►�I Yes ❑ No
11/1908
® Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
5/7/10
►3 Yes ❑ No
8/3/10
Yes ❑ No
Legal Authority (Sewer Use Ordinance-SUO)
22. Do you have any towns and/or areas from which you receive wastewater which are not in your annexed jurisdiction?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, Please list these towns and/or areas. Lincoln County no longer discharges to Maiden.
23. If yes to #22, Do you have current Interjurisdictional Agreements (IJAs) or other Contracts? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
A copy, if not already submitted, should be sent to Division.
24. If yes to #22, Have you had any trouble working with these towns or districts? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
If yes, Explain.
25. Date of Last SUO Adoption by Local Council 11/17/08
26. Have you had arty problems interpreting or enforcing any part of the SUO? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Explain.
Enforcement (Enforcement Response Plan-ERP)
27. Did you send a copy of the ERP to your industries?
If no, POTW must send copy within 30 days.
28. Have you had any problems interpreting or enforcing any part of the ERP (i.e. any adjudication, improper enforcement, etc?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, Explain.
29. List Industries under a Schedule or Order and Type of Schedule or Order
Getrag Corporation
Resources
® Yes ❑ No
30. Please Rate the Following: S=Satisfactory M=Marginal U=Unsatisfacto
Rating
Explanation, if Unsatisfactory
Personnel Available for Maintaining
POTW's Pretreatment Program
Pretreatment Coordinator (other duties, WWTP ORC), one
part time technician, and one other staff person if needed.
/ZIS ■M ❑U
Access to POTW Vehicles for
Sampling, Inspections, and
Emergencies
2 Vehicles, 4 portable samplers
►IS ❑M ■U
Access to Operable Sampling
Equipment
►'� S ■ 11-1 ■ U
Availability of Funds if Needed for
Additional Sampling and/or Analysis
/IIS ❑M ❑U
Reference Materials
►,IS ■M ❑U
Staff Training (i.e. Annual and
Regional Workshops, Etc.)
®S ❑M ❑U
HWA Workshop, EPA Region 4 - Charlotte Class
Computer Equipment (Hardware and
Software)
►1 S ❑M ❑U

1. Does tlac. Pry Vi have an adequate data traan<ar.emenr ,`=stctaa to run the pretreatment pro
Explain ` .5r ;No, \tierosot't Excel
does the PO'FW recover the: cost ot`the Pretreat -lie it industries? Explain.
a satmplint costs are directly' billed to St Li and the SI. () reytrir s < snrchartae program he itrat
pliant' Particlaattran:
r, plant dos
Explain,
d.
proptt+sod.. plants)?
tat thn latifalta: ev'c r requested to review pretreatment program tiles':' Ei Yes o
prao etltarµ, llmrato, it a e xvould the request be „idJres eri? (."all for appointment taa s
industry ev r requested rh
confidential
36, In addition tea
37. is the public n
38, Were all industries i1S S\(:" published in the Iasi notice?
(Induv
tr
dtl,,
secret, Pr(.
secure office
etiun, dotes the Pr)"1°'st' pen
S C) or local Limits? E Yes El No
No hiss
t`.' E Yes Ej No
businesses a short
OT4k" becomes a'vaire or new or chat. ie l 1_ rs, laa.> v does the Pr)'i-1h" determine which indts trie have the
adversely impact the WWII' 1 P and iheretatire r'egtaire a ras ev permit: or a permit rev rsiaa,a (' `lao is an
1J-h10 definition of a Significant Industrial tssa a, Prattrea'atment Comprehensive ;nide,
mpact WWII', collection ,system, or cause pass through to the r
41, Does the P()1 \ ` accept was
<J;_'.. lithe POT v`v£ accepts trtrcl a
in inifc is reguired1 N.►
4
l I�;e.aitir
being done to addr
NA
Does the POTW keep polls.
II`yes, what Clpcentage. of each parameter
fig
xplaa%n.
placed ataa.
How does the :PO'. decide on vviaich pollutants to limit in tl
listed on the applit:atiota 6irraiteal, oatu ctrit aal Is iraraaet .t°s; NPI)f PoI lutants o
NP©I S POCs, categorical parameters, sludge Jim
71=R.( 1.a1) or land till le tehan.
adjudication by an itulu tr,) Li Yet
s drai•4'Vt.
pa llat tants
$ afl.rP:a
teat.; °orsr9

r49. How does the POTW decide what the monitoring frequency should be for the various pollutants in industry permits ? Explain.
Potential to impact based on flow and/or MAHL. Site inspection for illicit discharges, spill/slug potential. Compliance
history.
Permit Compliance:
50. Does the POTW currently have or during the past year had any permits under adjudication? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, which industries? What was (will be) the outcome of the adjudication?
51. Demonstrate how the POTW judges compliance. This should include compliance judgment on all violations of limits, reporting
requirements, and permit conditions, as well as for SNC. Compliance Judgment Worksheet - 66% violations = chronic SNC,
33% TRC violations = TRC SNC. NOV for reporting 30 days late, civil penalties if non reporting continues beyond the first
incident. ERP followed for continued violations 0-$25,000 per violation or severe violations (causes NPDES limit violations
or endangerment to environment or worker health/safety) $1000 min. up to $25,000 per violation.
52. Does the POTW use the Division's model inspection form or equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, does the POTW form include all DWQ data? ❑ Yes ❑ No
53. Were all SIUs evaluated for the need of a slug/spill control plan during their most recent inspections? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, Explain.
54. What criteria are used to determine if a slug/spill control plan is needed?
All SIUs have a slug and spill control program.
55. What criteria does the POTW use to determine if a submitted slug/spill control plan is adequate?
Provides details of storage area, containment structures, spill prevention and clean up procedures, procedures to prevent
stormwater contamination, and industrial contact list, and notification list (fire dept, WWTP, Haz Mat etc.)
56. How does the POTW decide where the sample point for an SIU should be located?
Contains representative flow of all process wastewaters, segregated from domestic discharges.
57. Has the POTW established a procedure to ensure that representative samples will be taken by the POTW or SIU each time?
(example: correct location; proper programming of sampler; clean equipment; swirling the sample bucket uniformly)
POTW: ® Yes ❑ No SIU: .® Yes ❑ No If yes, Explain. POTW has went over the use of sampling
equipment and proper grab sample collecton.
58. Who performs sample analysis for the POTW for
Metals R&A Labs
Conventional Parameters Water Tech.
Organics Water Tech.
59. Explain the Chain of Custody Procedure used for both in house and commercial lab samples.
An in-house chain of custody form is used for all field parameters (temperature, pH) and flow readings. Commercial chain
of custody form is used for all sample analyses.
Long/Short Term Monitoring Plan (L/STMP) and Headworks Analysis (HWA):
60a. Is LTMPISTMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES ❑ NO
60b. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
60c. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ® YES ❑ NO
60d. All LTMP/STMP effluent data on Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR)? ® YES ❑ NO DWQ Inspector, verify yourself?
60e. If NO to any above, list violations
60f. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES ® NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
61. Do you complete your own headworks analysis (HWA) ? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, Who completes your HWA? Phone ( }
62. Do you have plans to revise your HWA in the near future? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, What is the reason for the revision? (mark all that apply) ❑Increased average flow ❑NPDES limits change
❑More LTMP data available ❑Resolve over allocation 05 year expiration ❑Other
Explain.

hat is the most limiting criteria of your H11'A? lnhibitiun j Pass Through Sludge Quality
64. Do you see any way to
ease your loading in the (inure (Example: obtainia
Explain. Reserve capacity in W V TP.
ore land for sludge disposal)?
Yes E. No
6 . Do you plan any significant changes to the pretreatment program or changes to the W W 1 P that may affect pretreatment?
No.
NDL'STRIAI, USER PERMIT
User
arne
67. IUP Numbe
Doe
70
ntain Current Pe
Pet�nit Eniratit)rl Date
Ca
ndard Applied
PI F
E REVI
Corporation
40 CFR,
s File Contain. Permit Application Conrple
o Permit Issue Date?
72. Does File
73. a. Does File C:
b.ifNo, isOn
in Inspection. Coi
ain SlugtlSpil
leeded":' (See
p
ltn La;
Control Plan?
nsoection Form
NA
n One Year Prior
Caleirda
PCIT
74. For 40 CI :R 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a "Toxic
Organic Management Plan ('TOMP)?
. a. Does. File Contain ( i
b. Al] Issues Resolved?
mitR.eview Letter from Divisi
76. During Most Recent Semi -Anil Period Did P01 W Co
Sampling as Required by ILJP, including 11ow?
77. Does File. Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Fon-rls`?
78. During Most Recent. Semi -Annual Period, Did S1U Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP. including Flow`
ptete
79. Durin<,, Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit al'l ret?carts on
For categorical ILJs vvit¢t Combined Vvastestrealn Formula (CWF), does
file include processldiltrtion flows as Required by IUP?
80b.. For categorical IUs with. Production based limits, does file include
production rates and!'or fltrvvs as Required by IUP?
81. During 1'
Limits N
8 During
Reportirr
st Recent Sc.rni-Annual Period, Did P01 W Identify A
-Compliance from Both. POT'W and SIU Sampling`?
st Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did POTW Identify Al!
Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling'
83. a. Was PC)TW Notified by SRI (Within 24 Hours) of All. Self-
Monitoring Violations`:'
b..Did Industry Resample and submit results to PO'I'W within 30 Days?
c. If applicable, did PQTW resample and obtain results within 30 days of
becoming risers of SIU limit violations in the POT'W's sampling of S1V0
During ost R
Per
85, During Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Vs'
Specified in POTVw's :ERP (NOVs, Penalties,
86. Does File Contain Penalty Assessment Notic
Does File Contain Proof
Penal
lection?
n
cement''aken as
t `17
a,. Does File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b..Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
89. Did. PQTW Representative have Difficulty in Obtaining Any Reel
Information For 'You?
1.2/31 /11
E Yes O No
❑Yes❑.No❑NIA
Yes
Nr
°ON/ A
ON/.A
No❑NtA
'es❑No❑ NIA
YesDNo❑NIA
❑Yes❑No©N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/.A
a.oYesoNjoNIA
b.❑YesoNo❑NIA
a. ®Yes ON o
b,❑' C oNcioN A
❑Yes❑No❑N, A
a.❑Yes
❑N,'A
t'YesDNoDDNIA
c.❑Yes❑NODN/A
❑1''es❑No❑N`A
❑Yes❑
❑Yes©NoDNlr'A
oti❑No❑N(
es0N0❑N'A.
n fY C ^a 00'7

FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
71: 1UP Application 10/31/06
73: Inspection completed as part of this Audit, 11/4/10.
81-88: Getrag Corporation was in SNC for the January -June period for zinc (TRC violations ). $400 was assessed against the SIU. The
Pretreatment Coordinator stamps the Notice of civil penalty "PAID" afer verification from City Hall. The SOC was amended on May 1,
2010 to include interim permit limits for chromium, copper, lead, nickel, silver, and zinc due to the construction and start up of new
treatment facilities at the SIU. The SOC expires on January 1, 2012.
INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING:
Trans.Code
N
Main Program Permit Number
N
0
0
3
9
5
9
4
1. Industry Inspected: Getrag Corporation
2. Industry Address: 1848 Getrag Parkway, Newton, NC 28658
3. Type of Industry/Product: Automotive drive trains
4. Industry Contact: Mr. Fred Wilson Title: Plant Engineer
MM/DD/YY
04
(DTIA)
11
10
Inspection type
U
(TYPI)
Inspector Facility Type
S
(INSP) (FACC)
2
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]I25
5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No
6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
Comments:
A. Initial Interview Yes ❑ No
B. Plant Tour ® Yes ❑ No All areas of wastewater production were observed.
C. Pretreatment Tour ® Yes ❑ No The facility is in process of doing feasibility study of treatment technology.
D. Sampling Review ® Yes ❑ No POTW collected chain of custody forms for file.
E. Exit Interview ® Yes ❑ No
Industrial Inspection Comments:
1. The Plant Engineer and wastewater staff are certified for the operation of biological and physical/chemical treatment
systems.
2. The biotower has been removed from service. Clarifiers are still in use.
3. Chemical addition is used to remove metals via pressure media filters (belt filter press). The filtrate is pumped to an
equalization tank (caustic is added in the EQ tank) where metal precipitation occurs. The wastewater is conveyed to 4 process
tanks (2500 gallons each). Solids arc removed and dewatered and the water is sent to ultra -filtration prior to discharge.
Lapping wastewater (water used in the process of coating the parts with a protective "paint") is taken off site for disposal by
Haz-Mat Transport out of Charlotte.
4. Metal shavings are sold to a metal recycle company. Prior to recycle, metal waste is kept under cover in dumpsters.
5. All dewatered sludge is taken off site for disposal in an industrial non -hazardous landfill.

St.! MAR .A 1D CO TMENT.ti„
it Comments:
Thy: PC)TW appeared to be well r;rr2anized and cer ' kn
n ttt�dated FRP ryas Bent t the
Thecomposite sampler is sers` small anti does not ke.r a iee thrott•lottt tl e sans �l rt e%tints. he ' T ' is st1Prplw•i
Re-co'rruienns:
NoD: Q 1°es
NOV: [ es
QNCR: 11 Yes
Rating:
E No
.Audit C()MFFTED B
esley, v' ooresville Reg.iorta
[DATE:
P P. 7

. ATI
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
Mr. Randy Smith
Town of Maiden
Post Office Box 125
Maiden, North Carolina 28650
March 30, 2010
Subject: PAR Review
Town of Maiden
NPDES Permit No. NC0039594
Catawba County, NC
Dear Mr. Smith:
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR) for the
reporting period of January through December 2009. Based on the review, it appears that the POTW completed
the PAR in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0908(b) requirements and guidelines set forth in Comprehensive
Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment Programs. The next PAR will be due March 1, 2011.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone]
or by email at [e-mail].
Cc: Dana Polley, PERCS Unit
Sin
Y,
L Lesley
Mooresville Regional Of ice Contact
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] \ Fax: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/l0% Post Consumer paper
NorthCarolina
Naturally

ACM
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
March 5, 2010
Mr. William T. Herms
Town Manager
Town of Maiden
Post Office Box 125
Maiden, North Carolina 28650
Subject: Toxicity Test Results
Town of Maiden WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0039594
Catawba County, NC
Dear Mr. Herms:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Enclosed is a copy of the toxicity test results relative to the inspection conducted at the subject facility
on February 2 and 5, 2010 by John Lesley of this Office. Whole effluent samples were collected for use in a
chronic pass/fail toxicity test. The test utilizing these samples resulted in a pass.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone].
Enclosure
Since
Y,
/LRobert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
cc: Central Files
Susan Meadows, Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Catawba County Health Department
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 23115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-674S
Intemet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer paper
NorthCarolina
Naturally

i�vlQRif NI)l N
To: Rob Krebs
Surface Water Protection, R.0
indy A. Mot re
Supervisor, Aquat
Carol Hollenkamp
Quality Assurance Cffic
4W'`hole. effluent
Maiden WWTP
NPDES Permit NC00395941001
Catawba County
201.0
cology Unit
tits
aquatic toxicityt test tt to flow proporatiotaal composite samples of e-ftluent disc. d from Maiden
—FP has been completed. Maiden WWTP has an effluent discharge permitted that is 1.00 million
per day (MGD) e-nterirtg the Clark Creek (7Q 10 of 12.0 CFS). Whole effluent samples were
collected on February 2 and February 5 by John Lesley and a facility representative for use in a. chronic
bia pass -fail toxicity test. The test using these samples resnited in a pass. Tox
vs.
`Test Type
Test Concentrations
Test Result
Control Survival
Control Mean Reproduction
Test Treatment Survival
Treatrnertt tviean Reproduction
First Sample pi!
First Sample Conductivity
First Sample Total Residual Chlorine
Second Sample Lail
Second Sample Conductivity
Second Sample Total Residual Chlorine
Test results for the above samples indicate th
impacts on receiving water. We may be reac
Basin: CTB35
cc: Central Files
John Lesley, MR0
3-Brood Cett'�
l.0%
Pass
92%
25.3 neonates
92°
25.5
6.15
309.0 t icromhos/cm
<0,1 m /L.
592 SU
cr dubia chronic grass fail
tlae effluent would not be predicted to have water quality
d at [phone].
Aqua c Toxicology Unit
Enviror lnent a Sci rues Section

ATA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
February 3, 20.10
Mr. William T. Herms
Town Manager
Town of Maiden
Post Office Box 125
Maiden, North Carolina 28650
Subject: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection
Town of Maiden
NPDES Permit No. NC0039594
Catawba County, NC
Dear Mr. Herms:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection of the Town of
Maiden approved Industrial Pretreatment Program on February 2, 2010 by Mr. John Lesley of this Office.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
' Robert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Dana Folley, PERCS Unit
JL
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 30 [ Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: http:llportaI. cdenr.orolweblwq
NonrthCarolina
Naturally
An Enual Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer-- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
NCDENR PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program 'Info Database Sheet(s)I
1, Control Authority, (POTW) Name: Town of Maiden
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Randy Smith
3. Title(s): ORC - Pretreatment Program Coordinator
Last Inspection Date: 2/26/2009 Inspection Type: ® PCi ❑ Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)2 ® YES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters:
PCS CODING
"T rans,Code
Are Milestone Dates Being filet'? ❑ YES ❑ NO ZNA
Main Program Permit Number
N NC0039594
Current Number Of Sionificarit Industrial
secs
MMIDDiYY
02/02/2010
(DTIA)
Inspec.Type
P
(TYPI)
Inspector
S
INSP)
Fac, Type
1
(FACC)
SIDS
Current Number Of Catel Industrial Us
'IUs
Number of SILTS Not Inspected By POTW' in the Last Calendar Year?
0. Number of SIUs Not Sampled. By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
Enter the Higher Number of 9 or I0
2. Number of Sills With No
0
xpired [UP
3. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either ,Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last:2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in S.
14. Number of SIUs to SNC For Reporting During Either oa t 2 Seroi Annual Periods
1 s. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
16, Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
POTW INTERVIEW
l7. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes. What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, 'Etc.)?
if Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been 'Published for
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SILTS on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21, Are Any Permits Or Cavil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? It'Yes, /hich
Ones?
0
0
0
0
SNC for Limits: NA
SNC for Reporting: NA
Getrag Corporation
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIE'V+'.
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ❑ "
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMPISTMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
24, Ts LTMP"STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? Z YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? YES ❑ NO
25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? Z YES ❑ NO
26, If NO to 23 - 26, list violations:
Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ® YES ❑ NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
CIUS
NOIN
PSNC
SNC
SLAPS
S El NO
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance. Inspection (PCI) Form Iipjatoil 7 25/(17 Page 1.

8. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW— Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Element in
ete with supporting documents and copy of PERCS Approval Letter, and dates consistent with Program Info:
Program Element
Last Submittal Received
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
6/8/09
® Yes ❑ No
6/18/08
® Yes ❑ No
9/1/10
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
11/17/08
A. Yes ❑ No
6/8/09
Al Yes ❑ No
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
1/8/09
A. Yes ❑ No
1/16/09
0 Yes ❑ No
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
9/24/08
►1 Yes ❑ No
11/19/08
/1 Yes ❑ No
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
1/15/10
► . Yes • No
5117/07
// Yes E No
T (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 1U INSPECTION)
29. User Name
1. Getrag Corporation
2.
3.
30. IUP Number
00001
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
Yes • No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑
No
32. Permit Expiration Date
12/31/11
33. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
433
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
►/ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
2 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
• Yes El
No
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. 2Yes •No
b. ❑Yes No
a. ■Yes No
b. ■ Yes ■No
a. ■Yes ■No
b. ['Yes No
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. ®Yes ■No
b.®Yes❑No❑NlA
a. Yes ■No
b.❑Yes❑No❑NtA
a. •Yes ■No
b.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
1�4 Yes • No
❑ Yes • No
❑ Yes ❑ No
•
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
41 a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow? •
®Yes❑No❑NIA
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports
on time?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
42a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
file include process/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑NoON/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
42b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑No®NIA
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling? •
®Yes❑No❑NA
•
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
❑Yes❑NolEN/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of A11 Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
c. Did POTW resample within 30 days of knowledge of SIU limit
violations from the POTW sample event?
a.❑Yes❑No NIA
b.❑Yes❑No®N1A
c. Yes❑No❑NIA
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
c.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.171Yes❑No❑N1A
c.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
45. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑ Yes
0
No
❑ Yes
•
No
❑ Yes ❑
No
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
® Yes ❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
47. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑NoON/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
48. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑NoON/A
❑Yes❑NoDN/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
49. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.®Yes❑No❑NIA
b.EmYes❑No❑N/A
a.❑Yes ❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
a.❑Yes ❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
50. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes • No
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 2

FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
32. The expiration date of the 11,[1' has been extended to 12 3➢/11 (the permit was originally issued for 3 gears) in order to complete a
new HWA and STMP. The POTW lost industrial discharges from the Lincoln County Industrial Park which necessitated the new
HWA and STMP.
34. Getrag Corporation I[,.'P AppIlcation was dated Iile'3l.+flan
35. Getrag Corporation was inspected by the POTW un 9117/09.
38, The Division approved the IUP on 1/1.1/07.
44. All. Getrag Corporation sample analyses are copied directly to th.W by the SIU's contract lab.
46_ Notices of violation were issued to Getrag Corporation for nickel and zinc limit violations,
Getrag Corporation is currently under a SOC for nickel. The St`1C: will be amended to include ittrirrr zine Iirnits and a revised
construction schedule for a new pretreatment system.
St.}MMAR7x" AND:COMM:ENTS:
Comments:
i.a The 618/0'+9 HWA submittal was not approved because of the loss oi'in
new 1-tWA must be submitted by 9= 1110,
2. 1 he POTW has developed a S"I"MI' and submitted it for approvzd on 1 1
3. The SUO ww'as adopted on 1 1 "17 08,
users
ccrltt Coun , industrial Park. The
P is currently under review,
Requirements:
See the Pretreatment Prog? am Elements section of this report.
Recommendations:
The Pretreatment Progra is well organized and .managed. 'the computer lacked up several ttnre tlurirrg the intipectiott, It is
recnmrnended. that new hardware be purchased to ensure program data is not accidentally lost by a computer failure, It also recommended
that an electronic backup system (
NOD: El YES E1 NO
NOV: LI YES NO
QNCR: r] YES E NO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactor
PCI COMPLETED
'Iarglnal
drive) be used to ':tore 1
1 nsa
DATE: February 3, ?flt0
John esley. Ioaresville Regiondl Office
.atment Compliance [nspecti°n (PCI) FAtrrnl

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
March 3, 2009
Mr. Randy Smith
WWTP Superintendent
Town of Maiden
Post Office Box 125
Maiden, North Carolina 28650
Subject: Pretreatment Compliance
Inspection
Town of Maiden
NPDES Permit No. NC0039594
Catawba County, NC
Dear Mr. Smith:
rt; -
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection of the Town of
Maiden approved Industrial Pretreatment Program on February 26, 2009 by Mr. John Lesley of this Office.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report,
please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
�dbert B. Krebs
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Dana Folley, PERCS Unit
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
North Carolina
• Naturally
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer paper

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION O %V TR Q[1ALIT\
NCDENR PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACK(Rt I."l I),INF R1 1n T1oN [Complete Pi-1w To PCI; Review Proi yarn Infer Database Sttte't
1. Control Authority Mar Name: Town of Maiden
Control Authority Representative(s): Randy Smith
?. 1 itle(s), Pretreatment Program Coordinator, ORC
d. Last Inspection Date: 5./7/08 Inspection "Trltre:.
5, Has Program Completed All Requirements from the. Previous
6.
Z PCI
Is POTW under an i)t° lee That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? El
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are. Milestone Dat
PCS CODING
I'r.rns,Code
N
Main Program Perm,
IN CQO39594
nd Program Lido Sheens)`' ( l''ES
S NO
YES 0 NO N,
02/26/2OO$
WTI A
lnspec.rype
(TY.
7. C urge er' Of Si4 rri ticarrt Industrial Users (Sli Js)2
Current Number Of C.tatct orical lndustrial I.ise.rs (i IUs)?
9 Nutrtl er of SIUs Neat Int ccted Be POT AAr" isr the [.asI Calendar YeMar`'
1t1. Number of SIT's Not Sarn led By PCB"IY'A' in the Last Calendar Veari
Liter the Idi her Ntrtrthnr of 9 or 10
12. Number of SIUs Witlt No IUP, or 4A'ith an I..x fired IT IP
1. Number of SIUs in SNC for I.ither Reporting crr l.itrtits Vicalation.s Iwttrrirtg I:'itlrer of the Last 2
Sen:ti- Annual Pcricads (' 1"ottrl Number of SNC
..... .............. .
C I. Number of Sit,1 C' crr Re cartinrs I)trrirr< f ither of the Last 7 Scrrai ,<Annual Pentads
l 5. Number of SIUs Itt SNC" Leer Limits Viol atiun During I ither of` the. Last Sc nti 1i..
nt Numb
16, Number of SIUs In SNC I{t
Semi-annual Periods
*see comments
t Rcportir
ttnual Periods.
d I inrits Violations During 'Either of the Last 2
POTW INTERVIEW
17, Since the Last I'C-1, latas the .POT ' had any NPD[S Litrrits iolata
If Yes, What ate the Parameters and How are these Problems Bein
ed?
Since the Last PC:I, hers the POT had any Problems .Related to an Industrial
Discharge (lntert:erence, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, F.tc.;p:>
If Yes, How are these Problems Bc,.rry ,Addeo
Which Industries have been in SNC for .Linuts or Reporting during
either of the I ast 2 Semi -Annual Periods"? Not 'seen Published for
Public Notice"?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
S
'S:P
NO
I
PSNC
MSN(
Inspector
Cl
® YES ❑ NO
D YES NO
R.AV. Garcia vas a source of
13OI) and "T'SS causing viola
S1'C for p.,cnits: A'.T, LeeBoy (see comni
SNC for Reporting: NA
Not Published: NA
20, Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all Slts man an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
1. Are Any 'Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently" Under A.dpudication? if Yes, Which
Ones.?
G<,T
77)
24,
?.
26, If NO to 2 -- 26, list violations:
P/ST1VIP
None
Is LTMP/S"IM.P Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate i.,ocations and Frequencies? ICJ YES
Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMPIS`''NIP Monitoring? ® YES 0 :NO
is LTM /STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? YES El NO Is Table Adequate?
All LTMP `S"IMP eff'fluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report`' YES NO
NO
YES [] N(:)
ispe
7. Should any Pollutants of Concern he li,lintinated knit or Added to LIMP SIIA' P"7 (_j %Eva J NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Ad(
NC DAVIT Prerrcatrue.nt Compliance Inspc nr Updated 7/1'.

. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW- Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy ofProgram Element in
:_ V.l , , T IIIIPYP cv;rh cnnnnrtina rinrnmanFc �nri ennv of PF,RCS Annroyal Letter. and dates consistent with Program Info:
Program Element
Last Submittal
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
12/15/08
' Yes ❑ No
8/11/08
e Yes ❑ No
3/15/09
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
11/1/08
® Yes ❑ No
11/19/03
Yes ❑ No
3/15/09
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
1/8/09
Yes ❑ No
1/16/09
eil Yes ❑ No
InforcementResponsePlan-(ERP)•
9/24/08-
IR-Yes'❑-No—
11/19/08
Z-Yes-❑-No---
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
5/4/07
Yes ❑ No
5/17/07
® Yes ❑ No
see comments
L USER PERMIT IUP} FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION)
29. User Name
1. Getrag'Gears
2.
00001
3.
-
30. IUP Number
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
A Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Permit Expiration Date
12/31/09
33. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
433
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
® Yes ❑ No
• Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
0 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
• Yes ❑ No
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes ■No
a. ❑Yes ■No
b. EYes ■No
a. • Yes ❑No
b. ■Yes ■No
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
_
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. ►ti Yes ❑No
b.elYes❑No❑NIA
a. ■Yes •No
b.❑Ycs❑No❑N/A
a. • Yes ❑No
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
/1 Yes ❑ No
• Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
1/ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes III No
41a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
®YespNo❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports
on time?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
42a. For categorical Ns with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
file include process/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑YespNo❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
42b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
❑Yes❑No0NA
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
❑Yes❑No®NIA
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
c. Did POTW resample within 30 days of knowledge of SIU limit
violations from the POTW sample event?
a.❑Yes❑No®NIA
b.❑Yesallo®N/A
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
c.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
b.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
c.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
45. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
❑ Yes ON
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑YespNo❑N/A
47. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A 1
48. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑YespNo❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
49. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.❑Yes❑NOON/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a.❑YespNo❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
50. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
❑ Yes I1 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes • No
NC DWQ Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated 7/25/07 Page 2

REVIEW CO"4'1MENT
Getrag Gears permitaappiication was dated 10131,4)d.
An inspection for Getrag Gears was conducted on 8/1-1/08.
SLf wT NARY AN TD COMMENTS:
Comments:
1, Cataler North American, i�. v `. Crracia
Industrial Park flow was transferred to L
2, The Sewer Use Ordinance was adopted by City Council on 11117,
3. The IWS was submitted on 1 11l4108. More ixaft rtnation wwras regar
, and V T.. 1..,eeBoy were all dropped in the July -December period of 2008. The. Lincoln County
due
<1. A new SBR. treatment system has been constructed. The LTMP was developed for the pure oxy ett WWTP that is no Iartt er fat servi
The current LTMP should be revised to fat the existing SBR facility, Please consult the Coniprehensive Guidance for North Carolina
Pretreatment Programs in developing the LIMP.
. 13OD limit violations occurred in January, February, March, April. May, and June 2008. RW Garcia, a darn chip manufacturer, was
found tta the cause of the violations. TSS Jinni violations occurred in January, March, Ma and June 2008. A Pretreatment Perim tt was
issued by the Town and was adjudicated by R.W Garcia, RW Garcia flow was shifty d to that. City of Lincoolnton in July 2008..
LeeBoy was in SNC for the January to June 2008 period for zinc limit violations.
Requirements:
Submit the revised HWA and the corrected lt&'`S by no later than 3115/09.
Recommendations:
NOD: El YES NO
NOV: [1] YES ' NO
QNCR: L1 YES Ej NO
POT Ratin:
Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory_ El
PC1 CO l4 P ETED I3Y'.
Regional Mice
DATE: tilarch , 2009
NC D\VQ Pretreatnrertt t' rnpti:rac traspz asoti y&°t r r'c1 rr1

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 19, 2007
Mr. Kevin Sanders, Interim Town Manager
Town of Maiden
Post Office Box 125
Maiden, North Carolina 28650
Subject: PAR Review
Town of Maiden
NPDES Permit No. NC0039594
Catawba County, NC
Dear Mr. Sanders:
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR)
for the reporting period of January through December 2006. Based on the review, it appears that
the POTW completed the PAR in accordance with 15ANCAC 2H .0908(b) requirements and
guidelines set forth in Comprehensive Guidance for North Carolina Pretreatment Programs. The
next PAR will be due March 1, 2008.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone] or by email at [e-mail].
Sine rely,
John Lesley
Mooresville Regional•° fice Contact
Cc: Dana Folley, PERCS Unit
Central Files
NOACarolina
dvaturally
ter
NCDEN
N. C. Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 610 E. Center Ave. Suite 301, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
April 18, 2006
Mr. Mike Lingerfelt
Wastewater Treatment Superintendent
Town of Maiden
Post Office Box 125
Maiden, North Carolina 28650-0125
Subject: PAR Review
Town of Maiden
NPDES Permit No.NC0039594
Catawba County, NC
Dear Mr. Lingerfelt:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR)
for the reporting period of January through December 2005. Based on the review, it appears that
the POTW completed the PAR in accordance with guidelines set forth by the Division for
modified pretreatment programs.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact John
Lesley of this Office at [phone].
Cc: PERCS Unit — Dana Folley
Central Files
JL
Sincerely,
g,�
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
ATA
NCDENR
b
or
nc
thCarolina
r7l?aturaij
Phone [phone] Customer Service
Fax [phone]
Mooresville Regional Office Division of Water Quality
Internet: www.ncwaterqualitv,ora 610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycledlt 0% Post Consumer Paper

aF WarFR
QG
Michael F. Easley, Govery r
William G. Ross Jr., Scaret�{y
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
� IJ1ir1r��
Division of Water Quality
April 7, 2005
Mr. Mike Lingerfelt
Wastewater Treatment Superintendent
Town of Maiden
Post Office Box 125
Maiden, North Carolina 28650-0125
Subject: PAR Review
Town of Maiden
NPDES Permit No.NC0039594
Catawba County, NC
Dear Mr. Lingerfelt:
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR)
for the reporting period of January through December 2004. Based on the review, it appears that
the POTW completed the PAR in accordance with guidelines set forth by the Division for
modified pretreatment programs.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact John
Lesley of this Office at [phone].
Cc: PERCS Unit — Jon Risgaard
Central Files
No"rthCttrolina
Naturally
Sincerely,
()--F
ral
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
/ Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
14CDENR
N. C. Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 610 E. Center Ave. Suite 301, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

�D WA 7- 9Q Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
`Q G North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
rAlan W. Klimek, P. E. Director
? -1 Division of Water Quality
o -c
December 7, 2004
Mr. Kevin Sanders, Town Manager
Town of Maiden
Post Office Box 125
Maiden, North Carolina 28650-0125
Subject: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection
Town of Maiden-
NPDES Permit No. NC0039594
Catawba Co., NC
Dear Mr. Sanders:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection
conducted at the subject facility on February 27, 2007 by John Lesley of this Office. The Town's
Pretreatment Program is commendable.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone]..
Sine ly,
John Lesley
Acting Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Dana Folley, PERCS Unit
Catawba County Health Department
1No e Carolina
�turally i
NC DEN
N. C. Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 610 E. Center Ave. Suite 301, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

NCDENR
AC.221,
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)j
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: Town of Maiden
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Mike Lingerfelt Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
3. Title(s): Pretreatment Coordinator E-mail:
4. Last Inspection Date: 01 /12 /2006 Inspection Type: ® PCI ❑ Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection or Program Info Sheet(s)? ® Yes ❑ No
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Order Type and Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
PCS CODING
Trans. Code
INI
Main Program Permit Number
INICI0I0I3191519141
MM/DD/YY
I(12I27120I
(DTIA)
lnspec.Type
I I
(TYPI)
Inspector
IsI
(INSP)
Fac. Type
L]_.J
(FACC)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
3
SIUS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CITA)?
2
CIUS
9. Number of S1Us Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN •
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
3
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
3
SNPS
16. Number of S1Us In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any POTW Permit Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
(See Comments Section)
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC during either of the Last 2 Semi -
Annual Periods? Have any Industries in SNC (During Either of the Last
2 Semi -Annual Periods) Not Been Published for Public Notice?
(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
® Yes E No
5/06 - BOD, TSS
2/06 - BOD
® Yes ❑ No
See Comments Section
SNC for Limits: See Comments Section
SNC for Reporting: NA
Not Published: NA •
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
NA
❑ Yes ® No
Filename: Maiden 0607 pci
Revised: 6/30/98
Page I

TREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW— Please review POTW files and complete the following:
111111 Program Element
Date of Last Approval
Date Next Due, if Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
10/7/03
11/1/07
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
11/19/03
9/1/08
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
5/30/03
6/1/07
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
3/24/04
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
3/24/04
LTMP FILE REVIEW:
22.
23.
Is the LTMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® Yes ❑ No
Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to the LTMP? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Barium, N-Hexene Added:
24. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP Monitoring? ® Yes ❑ No
25. Is the LTMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No Is the Table Adequate? ® Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW(3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION
26. User Name
1. Getrag Gears 2. Cataler North America
3. V.T. Leeboy
27. IUP Number
0001
0002
0004
28. Does File Contain Current Permit?
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes • No
29. Permit Expiration Date
12/31/09
12/31/09
12/31/09
30. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
433
NA
433
31. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
® Yes • No
Yes ❑ No
►;1 Yes • No
32. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
® Yes ❑ No
iI Yes ❑ No
Al Yes ❑ No
33. a. Does the File Contain a Slug Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. ®Yes ❑No
b. ■Yes ❑No
a.e Yes ❑No
b. ❑Yes Elio
a. ®Yes No
b. ❑Yes •No
34. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certifiers, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
®Yes❑No❑NIA
35. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. ►y Yes ❑No
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
a. P. Yes ■ No
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
a. ®Yes ■ No
b.®Yes❑No❑NIA
36. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP?
® Yes ❑ No
Al Yes ■ No
® Yes ❑ No
37. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
I1 Yes ❑ No
1 Yes ❑ No
0 Yes ❑ No
38. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP?
®Yes❑No❑NIA
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑NIA
39. Does Sampling Indicate Flow or Production?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑NoDN/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
40. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
1Z1 Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
/ / Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
ill Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
41. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample Within 30 Days?
a.oYesDNo❑NIA
a.®Yes❑No❑NIA
a.®Yes❑No❑NIA
b. o Yes ■ No
b. _+ Yes ■ No
b. ®Yes ■ No
42. Was the SIU Promptly Notified of Any Violations (Per ERP)?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑NIA
®YesONo❑N/A
43. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
■ Yes ® No
>;1 Yes ■ No
/ / Yes ■ No
44. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTWs ERP?
❑Yes❑No®NIA
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
45. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑NotAN/A
❑Yes❑No®NIA
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
46. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑NoNN/A
❑Yes❑No®NIA
47. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.❑Yes❑NoCEIN/A
b.❑Yes❑No®NIA
a.❑Yes❑NoE3N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®NIA
a.❑Yes❑No®NIA
b.❑Yes❑No®NIA
48, Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes / / No
❑ Yes / 1 No
Filename: Maiden 0607 pci
Revised: 6/30/98
Page 2

FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
Question 33: The POTW is requiring that the slug and spill control programs be updated by 4/1/2007.
Question 41: The contract laboratory copies the POTW on all monitoring for the Sills.
Question 19 and 43: Getrag Gears was in SNC during January - June 2006, the SNC has been resolved. Cataler was in SNC for
July - December 2006, SNC has been resolved. V.T. Leeboy was in SNC druing July - December 2006 for cyanide and zinc. The
cyanide SNC was resolved, the zinc SNC is resolved pending process changes being incorporated by the SIU.
PCI SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
PCI Comments:
1. (Question # 17 and 18) Lucky Country, a licorice manufacturer, discharged high BOD waste to the WWTP that resulted in
NPDES Permit limit violaitons. The industry has since ceased discharge of the process wastewater (taking it off site for treatment).
2. The Pretreatment Coordinator/WWTP ORC will not be employeed by the Town after March 2007. Be advised that the town
must designate a person responsible for the Pretreatment Program to be the contact person with the Division even if a consultant is
hired to take over the program. Furthermore, the backup ORC may serve as the surogate for the ORC for 120 days. Before 120
days have elapsed, an ORC with the same Grade Certification - Grade III Biological Certification - as the WWTP classification
(Class 3 facility) must be designated by the Town.
Requirements: See the Program Elements Review Section for due dates.
Recommendations: The Town's Industrial Pretreatment Program has grown more complex over time. Mike Lingerfelt has done an
outstanding job as both the Pretreatment Program Coordinator and WWTP Operator In Responsible Charge. It is recommended
that the Town consider these two responsibilities as separate positions in the future due to the increasing complexity of the Town's
Industrial Pretreatment Program and the upcoming construction of new wastewater treatment facilities.
NOD: ❑ Yes ® No
NOV: ❑ Yes ® No
QNCR: ❑ Yes ® No
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory
Marginal El Unsatisfactory ❑
PCI COMPLETED BY: '-'2-7
C
Jo ey, Mooresville Regional Office
DATE: March 1, 2007
Filename: Maiden 0607 poi Page 3
Revised: 6/30/98

Michael F. Easley. G rnor
William G. Ross Jr., S terry
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek. P. E. Director
Division of Water Quality
December 7, 2004
Mr. Todd Clark, Town Manager
Town of Maiden
Post Office Box 125
Maiden, North Carolina 28650-0125
Subject:
Dear Mr. Mr. Clark:
Pretreatment Audit Inspection
Town of Maiden
NPDES Permit No. NC0039594
Catawba Co., NC
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Audit Report for the inspection conducted at the subject
facility on December 2, 2004 by John Lesley of this Office. The Town's Pretreatment Program is
commendable.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning
this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone].
Enclosure
cc:
JL
NorthCarolina
Naturally
c(?
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Central Files
Jon Risgaard/Dana Folley, Pretreatment Group
Catawba County Health Department
ii .
NCDEN
N. C. Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 610 E. Center Ave. Suite 301, Mooresville NC 28115 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PRETREATMENT AUDIT REPORT
Background Information (Complete prior to audit; review Program Info Database Sheet(s)1
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: Town of Maiden
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Mike Linnerfelt
3. Title(s): Pretreatment Program Coordinator
4. Address of POTW:
Mailing Post Office Box 125
City Maiden, North Carolina Zip Code 28650-0125
Phone Number 828-428-5032 Fax Number 828-428-5606 E-Mail
5. Audit Date 12/02/2004
6. Last Inspection Date: 10/02/2003 Inspection Type: ® PCI ['Audit
7. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection or Program Info Sheet(s) ? ® Yes ❑ No
If No, Explain.
8. In the last year has the POTW experienced any NPDES or Sludge Permit compliance problems? ® Yes ❑ No
If Yes, Explain. Cyanide 3/04 daily maximum reported value 43 ug/l permit limit: 22ug/1
9. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Order Type and Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
Parameters Covered Under Order
PCS (WENDB)Coding
Trans.Code
I N I
Main Program Permit Number
LI L C I O 10 13 1 9 1 5 1 9 14 _I
MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type
112 1 02 104 1 1 G I LaJ LLI
(DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC)
10. Current Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUS)?
2
SIUS
11. Current Number of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUS)?
1
C1US
12. Number of SIUs Not Inspected by POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
13. Number of SIUs Not Sampled by POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
14. Enter the Higher Number of 12 or 13 - - - - -
- 0
NON `
15. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC) —
1
PSNC
16. Number of SIUs with No IUP, or with an Expired IUP
0
17. Number of SJUs in SNC for Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
18. Number of SIUs in SNC for Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
19. Number of SIUs in SNC for Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods
I
0
20. Number of SIUs in SNC for Self -Monitoring Requirements that were Not Inspected or Sampled
0
SNIN _
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form

ATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW- Please review PO I.W tiles and complete the lollowing:
Program Element
Date of Last Approval
Date Next Due, If Applicable
eadworks Analysis (HWA)
10/20/03
11/1/07
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
11/19/03
9/1/08
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
5/30/03
Enforcement Response Nan (ERP)
3/24/04
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
3/24/04
Legal Authority (Sewer Use Ordinance-SUO)
21. Do you have any towns and/or areas from which you receive wastewater which are not in your annexed jurisdiction?
® Yes ❑ No If yes; Please list these towns and/or areas. Lincoln County
22. If yes to #21, Do you have current Interjurisdictional Agreements (IJ'As) or other Contracts? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
A copy, if not already submitted, should be sent to Division.
23. If yes to #21, Have you had any trouble working with these towns or districts? ['Yes ® No ❑ NA
If yes, Explain.
24. Date of Last SUO Adoption by Local Council 5/30/03
25. Have you had any problems interpreting or enforcing any part of the SUO? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Explain.
Enforcement (Enforcement Response Plan-ERP)
26. Did you send a copy of the ERP to your industries? ❑ Yes ® No
If no, POTW must send copy within 30 days.
27. Have you had any problems interpreting or enforcing any part of the ERP (i.e. any adjudication, improper enforcement, etc?
Yes ® No If yes, Explain.
28. List Industries under a Schedule or Order and Type of Schedule or Order
None
Resources
29. Please Rate the Foliowine: S=Satisfactory M=MarginaI U Unsatisfacto
Rating
Explanation, if Unsatisfactory
Personnel Available for Maintaining
POTW's Pretreatment Program
S ■ M ❑U
Access to POTW Vehicles for
Sampling, Inspections, and
Emergencies
®S ■ M ■ U
Access to Operable Sampling
Equipment
®S ❑M ❑U
Availability of Funds if Needed for
Additional Sampling and/or Analysis
OS ❑M ❑U
Reference Materials
CIS ❑M ■U
Staff Training (i.e. Annual and
Regional Workshops, Etc.)
®S ■M ❑U
Computer Equipment (Hardware and
Software)
E t S ❑M ❑U
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form

30. Does the POTW have an adequate data management system to run the pretreatment program? ® Yes ❑ No
Explain Yes or No. Uses Division approved spreadsheets
31. How does the POTW recover the cost of the Pretreatment Program from their industries? Explain.
All sampling costs are recovered, surcharge program for BOD and TSS.
Public Perception/ Participation
32. Are there any local issues affecting the pretreatment program (e.g.. odor, plant closing, new or proposed plants)?
❑ Yes ® No If yes, Explain.
33. Has any one from the public ever requested to review pretreatment program files? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Explain procedure. If no, How would the request be addressed? Documents cannot be removed from review area and
Town staff would make all copies.
34. Does the POTW have a procedure in place that addresses requests by an industry for certain information to remain confidential?
Z Yes ❑ No If yes, Explain. Sealed files with restricted access.
35. In addition to annual inspection, does the POTW periodically meet with industries to discuss pretreatment? ® Yes ❑ No
36. Is the public notified about changes in the SUO or Local Limits? ® Yes ❑ No
37. Were all industries in SNC published in the last notice? ® Yes ❑ No
Permitting (Industrial Waste Survey -MS)
38. How does the POTW determine which industries have the reasonable potential to adversely impact the WWTP and
therefore require a permit? (Who is an SIU?) IWS Short Forms are required for all new industries and a complete
IWS is performed every 5 years. Information from survey is compared to requirements for SILT status in
Comprehensive Guidance Book.
39. Does the POTW receive waste from any groundwater remediation projects (petroleum, CERCLA) or landfill leachate?
0Yes No If Yes, How many are there?
Please list each site and how it is permitted, if applicable. •
40. Does the POTW accept waste by (mark if applicable) El Truck ❑Dedicated Pipe ® NA
41. If the POTW accepts trucked waste, what controls are placed on this waste? (example. designated point, samples drawn,
manifests required) NA
42. How does the POTW allocate its loading to industries? Mark all that apply
❑ Uniform Limits ® Historical Industry Need ❑ By Surcharge ® Categorical Limits ❑ Other
Explain Other:
.Review copies of current allocation -tables for each WWTP . Are there any over allocations? ❑ Yes ® No _:.'
If yes, Whatparameters are over allocated?
44. If yes to #43, What is being done to address the over allocations? (short-term lUPs, HWA to be revised, pollutant study, etc.)
NA
45. Does the POTW keep pollutant loading in reserve for future growth / safety? ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, what percentage of each parameter 20%
46. Has the POTW experienced any difficulty in allocation? (for example: adjudication by an industry) ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Explain.
47. How does the POTW decide on which pollutants to limit in the permits? Monitor for? (for example: were only those pollutants
listed on the application limited; categorical parameters; NPDES Pollutants of Concern)
Categorical parameters and NPDES pollutants of concern.
48. How does the POTW decide what the monitoring frequency should be for the various pollutants in industry permits ? Explain.
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form

Vrtliare required to monitor quarterly, noncategorical user was required to monitor monthly, reduced to once per 4
e
reasonable potential to impact the WWTP.
mpliance
49. Does the POTW currently have or during the past year had any permits under adjudication? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, which industries? What was (will be) the outcome of the adjudication?
50. Demonstrate how the POTW judges compliance. This should include compliance judgment on all violations of limits, reporting
requirements, and permit conditions, as well as for SNC. Uses the Division approved Compliance Judgement Worksheet,
Comprehensive Guidance Document.
51. Does the POTW use the Division's model inspection form or equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, does the POTW form include all DWQ data? ❑ Yes ❑ No
52. Were all SIUs evaluated for the need of a slug and spill control plan during their most recent inspections? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, Explain.
53. What criteria are used to determine if a slug control plan is needed?
Potential to impact WWTP based on materials on site and the probability of these materials getting into the collection
system.
54. What criteria does the POTW use to review a submitted slug control plan?
Current contact information, mitigation plans, requirement to immediately notify the Town for slug/spill events.
55. How does the POTW decide where the sample point for an SIU should be located?
Most representative sampling piont of process wastewater prior to mixing with other sidcstreams.
56. Has the POTW established a procedure to ensure that representative samples will be taken by the POTW or SIU each time?
(example: swirling the sample bucket uniformly) ® Yes ❑ No
If yes, Explain. Sampling criteria explained in TUP. Pace Labs collects all STU samples.
57. Who performs sample analysis for the POTW for
Metals Pace Labs
Conventional Parameters Pace Labs
Organics Pace Labs
58. Explain the Chain of Custody Procedure used for both in house and commercial lab samples.
Every sample taken must be accompanied by a completed chain of custody form.
Long Term Monitoring PIan (LTMP) and Headworks Analysis (HWA)
59. Is LTMP maintained in a table? ® Yes ❑ No
Review Data and Explain. All data is complete and up-to-date. MDLs are being met.
60. Do you complete your own headworks analysis (HWA) ? ® Yes ❑ No
If no, Who completes your HWA? Phone ( ) —
61. Do you have plans to revise your HWA in the near future? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, What is the reason for the revision? (mark all that apply)
['Increased average flow ONPDES limits change ❑Other
❑More LTMP data available ['Resolve over allocation ❑5 year expiration
Explain.
62. In general, what is the most limiting criteria of your HWA?
®Inhibition El Pass Through ❑Sludge Quality
63. Do you see any way to increase your loading in the future (Example: obtaining more land for sludge disposal)? ® Yes ❑ No
Explain. Reserve capacity in WWTP is sufficient to allow for increased loading if it is needed.
Summary
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form
D.... A

au plan any significant changes to the pretreatment program or changes to the WWTP that may affect pretreatment?
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS)
65. User Name
1. Getrag Grears 2. Cataler North America
3.
66. IUP Number
0001
0002
67. Does File Contain Current Permit?
E4 Yes ❑ No
'CI Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
68. Permit Expiration Date
12/31/06
12/31/06
69. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
433
NA
70. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Pernut Issue Date?
Z Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
71. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
0/ Yes • No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
72. a. Does the File Contain a Slug Control Plan?
b.IfNo, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. eYes ■Na
b. ❑Yes ❑No
a. El Yes ■No
b. •Yes ■No
a. ■Yes ■No
b. ■Yes II No
73. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
®Yes❑No❑NIA
❑Yes❑No®NIA
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
74. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. ®Yes DNo
baYes❑No❑N/A
a, 0 Yes DNo
b.®Yes❑No❑NIA
a. ■Yes DNo
b.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
75. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP?
11 Yes ❑ No
Xi Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
76. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
E Yes ❑ No
/ 0 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes • No
77. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP?
®Yes❑No❑NIA
®Yes❑No❑NIA
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
78. Does Sampling Indicate Flow or Production?
ElYesDNo❑NIA
®Yes❑No❑NIA
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
79. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
! , Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
80. a. Was the POTW Notified by SILT (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resainple Within 30 Days?
a.®Yes❑No❑N/A
a.❑Yes❑No®NIA
b. ❑Yes ❑No
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b. 1Yes ■No
b. ■Yes !No
81. Was the SIU Promptly Notified of Any Violations (Per ERP)?
®Yes❑No❑NIA
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
82. During the Most Recent Sena -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
® Yes ❑ No
• Yes ' No I
❑ Yes ❑ No
83. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTW's ERP?
ElYes❑No❑NIA
❑Yes❑No®NIA
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
84. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®NIA
❑Yes❑NoIN/A
85. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑Na❑NIA
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
86. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.❑Yes❑NoisiN/A
b.❑Yes❑No®NIA
a.❑Ycs❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑NooN/A
a.❑Yes❑No0N1A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
87. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
• Yes No
❑ Yes al No
• Yes • No
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
Getrag Gears (Question 82) was in SNC for technical review criteria violations for zinc in the January - June 2004 period.
Pace Laboratories routinely sends the POTW a copy of the SIU monitoring test results.
Audit SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Audit Comments:
I. The program is very well organized and managed.
2. The interjursidicational agreement between the Town of Maiden and Lincoln County is currently under review by the local
Governments involved (see Question 22).
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form

i ements:
1. See the Program Elements Review Section of this report.
2. A copy of the revised Interjursidicational Agreement with Lincoln County must be sent to the Division's Central Office when
it is completed (Question 22)
3. A copy of the POTW's ERP must be sent to the SIUs (Question 26) by no later than January 10, 2005.
Recommendations: The POTW is doirrE a commendable job, keep up the good work.
NOD: ❑ Yes ®No
NOV: ❑ Yes ® No
QNCR: ❑ Yes ® No
POTW Rating;
Satisfactory
Marginal El
Unsatisfactory ❑
Audit COMPLETED EY. •�. �z DATE: December 6, 2004
Jo esley, Mooresville Re lona! Office
INDUSTRY INSPECTION PCS CODING:
Trans.Code Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY Inspec.Type Inspector Fac. Type
INI INICI0 10 I3_19 15 19 14 1 112I2 1 04 I IS I Li]
(DTIA) (TYPI) (INSP) (FACC)
I. Industry Inspected: Cataler North America
2. Industry Address: 2002 Cataler Drive, Lincolnton, North Carolina 28092
3. Type of Industry/Product: Coats substrates for catalytic converters in the automobile industry.
4. Industry Contact: Chad Reynolds Title: Utility Maintenance Phone: Fax:
5. Does the POTW Use the. Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No
6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
Comments:
A. Initial Interview ® Yes ❑ No
B. Plant Tour ® Yes ❑ No
C. Pretreatment Tour ® Yes ❑ No
D. SampIing Review ® Yes ❑ No
E. Exit Interview ® Yes ❑ No
Industrial Inspection Continents:
•
Cataler North America uses an advanced physcial/chemical treatment system with dual stage tertiary filtration followed by
final pH adjustment. All sludge is recycled for metals reclaimation.
North Carolina Pretreatment Audit Form

Michael F. Easley. G
William G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek. P. E. Director
Division ofWater Quality
Colon H. Sullins. Deputy Director
Division orWater Quality
Mr. Mike Lingerfelt
Wastewater Treatment Superintendent
Town of Maiden
Post Office Box 125
Maiden, North Carolina 28650-0125
Subject:
Dear Mr. Lingefelt:
March 29, 2004
PAR Review
Town of Maiden
NPDES Permit No.NC0039594
Catawba County, NC
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR)
for the reporting period of January through December 2003. Based on the review, it appears that
the POTW completed the PAR in accordance with guidelines set forth by the Division for
modified pretreatment programs.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact John
Lesley of this Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
(A."(
(Y D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Cc: Pretreatment Unit - Central Office
Central Files
JL
NorthCaralina
2Vatzzlah'i
AVA
NCDENIR
N. C. Division of Water Quality, Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville NC 28I15 [phone] Customer Sea -vice
I-877-623-6748

Ofr1 Michael F. Elsie
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
7 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
mor
r
ove
Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
October 3, 2003
Mr. Herman Caudler, Town Manager
Town of Maiden
Post Office Box 125
Maiden, North Carolina 28650-0125
Subject: Pretreatment Compliance
Inspection
Town of Maiden WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0039594
Catawba County, NC
Dear Mr. Caudler:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection
of the Town of Maiden's approved Industrial Pretreatment Program on October 2, 2003 by Mr.
John Lesley of this Office. The Town's Industrial Pretreatment Program is commendable.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
et
1j D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Jon Risgaard, Pretreatment Group
Catawba County Health Department
JL
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, North Carolina 28! 15
441477,6
NCDENR
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

VAri
CDENR
. SA �WY T
r
I.
� Nwna.K Ruaau.¢t,
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
CKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI: Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)[
Control Authority (POTW) Name: Town of Maiden
Control Authority Representative(s): Mike Lingerfelt Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
3. Titte(s): Pretreatment Program Coordinator E-mail: [e-mail]
4. Last Inspection Date: 2 /20 /2003 Inspection Type: ® PCI ['Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection or Program Info Sheet(s)? ® Yes ❑ No
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Order Type and Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
PCS CODING
Trans.Code
I.N1
Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY
INPCI0 10 13 I9 IC I9 14 I 1inIO2I031
Inspcc.Type
LPG
Inspector
Fac. Type
LLJ
(u t IA) (1 Y PI)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
(INSP) (FACE
2
SIUS
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
I
CMS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUS Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN
l2. Number of SIUS With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUS in SNC)
0
PSNC
14. Number of SIUS in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUS In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
SNPS
16. Number of SIUS In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any POTW Permit Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
(See Comments Section)
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC during either of the Last 2 Semi -
Annual Periods? Have any Industries in SNC (During Either of the Last
2 Semi -Annual Periods) Not Been Published for Public Notice?
(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
® Yes ❑ No
Cyanide - 7/2003
TSS - 2/03 and 3/03
® Yes ❑ No
Cyanide - possible pass through
SNC for Limits: NA
SNC for Reporting: NA
Not Published: NA
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
None
❑ Yes ® No
Filename: Maiden pci 0304
Revised: 6/30/98
Page

TREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW- Please review POTW files and complete the following:
rProgram Element
Date of Last Approval
Date Next Due, If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
9/4/02
submitted
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
Submitted 8/27/03
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
5/30/03
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
9/21/94
12/31/03
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
7/9/03
LTMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is the LTMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® Yes ❑ No
23. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to the LTMP? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
24. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP Monitoring? ® Yes ❑ No (see Comments Section)
25. Is the LTMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No Is the Table Adequate? ® Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW(3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR I FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION)
26. User Name
1. Getrag Gears
2. Catler North American
3.
27. IUP Number
0001
0002
28. Does File Contain Current Permit?
A Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes • No
29. Permit Expiration Date
12/31/03
12/31/03
30. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
433
NA
31. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
0 Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
I Yes ❑ No
I Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No _
33. a. Does the File Contain a Slug Control PIan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. EYes ■ No
b. ❑Yes No
a. ►a Yes No
b. ❑Yes ❑No
a. •Yes ■ No
b. ❑Yes ■No
34. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 ITO Certifiers, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
®Yes❑No❑NIA
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
35. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. ►3 Yes ■No
b.®Yes❑No❑NIA
a. 0 Yes No
b.®Yes❑No❑N/A
a. •Yes ■No
b.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
36. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP?
Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes • No
37. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
Yes ❑ No
111 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes • No
38. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP?
ElYes❑No❑NIA
E1Yes❑No❑NIA
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
39. Does Sampling Indicate Flow or Production?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
40. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
// Yes ❑ No
• NA
0 Yes El No
❑ NA
• Yes • No
❑ NA
41. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample Within 30 Days?
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.®Yes❑No❑NIA
a.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
b. •Yes ■No
b. ►Yes ■No
b. •Yes •No
42. Was the SIU Promptly Notified of Any Violations (Per ERP)?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
43. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑ Yes /„/ No
❑ Yes ®No
NYes ❑ No
44. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTWs ERP?
❑Yes❑No®NIA
®Yes❑No❑NIA
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
45. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
EYesDNoDN/A
46. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
47. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®NIA
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑NoEN/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.171Yes❑No❑N1A
48. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
❑ Yes I No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Filename: Maiden pci 0304
Revised: 6/30/93
Page 2

REVIEW COMMENTS:
atler North American was in violation of CN during the May 2003 reporting period.
PCI SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
PCI Comments:
The Town's Pretreatment Program is very commendable.
Requirements:
Update the Enforcement Response Plan to be consistent with current maximum civil penalty amount ($25,000) allowed by NCGS
143-215.6A. Please submit the update to the Division's Central Office by no later than 12/31/2003.
Recommendations:
The POTW is using mercury method 1631 for effluent mercury analysis. Please indicate this in the LTMP on the Detection Limits
page and submit the page to the Division's Central Office for inclusion in the Town's file.
NOD: ❑ Yes ® No
NOV: ❑ Yes ® No
QNCR: ❑ Yes ® No
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory El
PCI COMPLETED BY:
Marginal ❑ Unsatisfactory ❑
Joisley, Mooresville Re 1 Office
DATE: October 3, 2003
Filename: Maiden pci 0304 Page 3
Revised: 6/30/98

CF.EaY
Govemor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
(M
NCDENR
February 21, 2003
Mr. Herman Caudler, Town Manager
Town of Maiden
Post Office Box 125
Maiden, North Carolina 28650-0125
Subject: Pretreatment Compliance
Inspection
Town of Maiden WWTP
NPDES Permit No. NC0039594
Catawba County, NC
Dear Mr. CaudIer:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection
of the Town of Maiden's approved Industrial Pretreatment Program on February 20, 2003 by Mr.
John Lesley of this Office. The Town's Industrial Pretreatment Program is commendable.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone].
r1
Enclosure
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Central Files
Dana Polley, Pretreatment Group
Catawba County Health Department
JL
Customer Service Mooresville Regional Office, 919 North Main Street, Mooresville, NC 28115 PHONE [phone]
1 800 623-7748 FAX [phone]

NCDENR
,CAn• GfW*. LbyfMprt OF
fleaw c,,
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION rComplete Prior To PC1; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)1
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: Town of Maiden
2. Control Authority Representative(s): Mike Lingerfelt Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
3. Title(s): Pretreatment Program Coordinator
4. Last Inspection Date: 03 /27 /2002 Inspection Type: ® PCI ❑ Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection or Program Info Sheet(s)? ® Yes ❑ No
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Order Type and Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
PCS CODING
Trans.Code
! rl I
Main Program Permit Number
INICl0 10 13 19 IH 19 14 1
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
MM/DDIYY
02I211 I03I
(DTIA)
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
1 1 . Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
Inspec.Type
IPi
(TYPE)
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
16. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any POTW Permit Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
(See Comments Section)
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC during either Of the Last 2 Semi -
Annual Periods? Have any Industries in SNC (During Either of the Last
2 Semi -Annual Periods) Not Been Published for Public Notice?
(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
21.
Inspector Fac. Type
Lam. 11 I
(INSP) (FACC)
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SIUS
CIUS
NOW
NOCM
PSNC
MSNC
SNPS
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
SNC for Limits: NONE
SNC for Reporting: NONE
Not Published: NONE
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
NONE
❑ Yes ® No
Filename: maiden pci 0203
Revised: 6/30198
Page 1

RETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW -- Please review POTW files and complete the following:
r Program. Element
Date of Last Approval
Date Next Due, If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
Submitted 10/10/02
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
8/10/98
8/1/03
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
12/6/94
submit revised SUO to Central Office
by 4/30/03 see comments.
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
9/21/94
Long Term Monitoring Plan (LTMP)
Submitted 10/10/02
LTMP FILE REVIEW:
22.
23.
Is the LTMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® Yes ❑ No
Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to the LTMP? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
24. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP Monitoring? ® Yes ❑ No
25. Is the LTMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No Is the Table Adequate? ® Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW(3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1
26. User Name f
{
1. Getrag Gears
2. Catler North America
3.
27. IUP Number
0001
0002
28. Does File Contain Current Permit?
®
Yes ❑ No
® Yes • No
❑ Yes ❑ No
29. Permit Expiration Date
12/31/03
12/31/03
30. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
433
NA
31. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
1 Yes ❑ No
'A Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
O Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
33. a. Does the File Contain a SIug Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. ►2 Yes ■ No
b. :Wes ❑No
a. » Yes ❑No
b. •Yes •No
a. ■ Yes ❑No
b. ['Yes ■No
34. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certifiers, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
®Yes❑No❑NIA
❑Yes❑No®NIA
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
35. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved? (see comment #1)
a. ❑Yes No
b.❑YesDNo®NIA
a. •Yes No
b.UYes❑No®NIA
a. DYes No
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
36. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP?
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
37. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
» Yes ❑ No
' Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
38. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP?
®Yes❑No❑NIA
®Yes❑No❑NIA
_
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
39. Does Sampling Indicate FIow or Production?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑NIA
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
40. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
// Yes E No
❑ NA
/ Yes ❑ No
E NA
• Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
41. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample Within 30 Days?
a.®Yes❑No❑NIA
b. EYes ■ No
a.®Yes❑No❑NIA
b. ►:a Yes ■ No
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b. •Yes • No
42. Was the SIU Promptly Notified of Any Violations (Per ERP)?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
43. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑ Yes 12 No
11
Yes
El
No
❑ Yes ❑ No
44. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTWs ERP?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
®Yes❑No❑NIA
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
45. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No®N/A
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
_
46. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑No®NIA
[ ❑Yes❑No®NIA
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
47. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.❑Yes❑NoEIN/A
b.❑Yes ❑No®NIA
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
48. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
• Yes ® No
❑ Yes 11 No
_
❑ Yes 11 No
Revised: 6/30/98
Page 2

FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
1. Correspondence dated September 4, 2002 requested more information be sent regarding the IUP approvals for Getrag Gears
and Cataler North America. The additional information was sent on September 20, 2002.
PCI SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
PCI Comments: The Town's Pretreatment Program is very well managed and organized. All records were complete and up-to-date.
Requirements: A revised copy of the Town's Sewer Use Ordinance that contains language relative to fats, oil, and grease must be submitted
to the Central Office by no later than April 30, 2003.
Recommendations: The Town's Pretreatment Program is commendable, keep up the good work.
NOD: ❑ Yes ® No
NOV: ❑ Yes ® No
QNCR: ❑ Yes ® No
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory
PCI COMPLETED BY:
Marginal ❑ Unsatisfactory ❑
DATE:February 21, 2003
esiey, Mooresvillet$ptonal Office
Filename: maiden pci 0203 Page 3
Revised: 6/30/98

WAT�C6)
pG
r-
4 rrwmitir� -i
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
April 9, 2002
Mr. Mike Lingerfelt •
Wastewater Treatment Superintendent
Town of Maiden
Post Office Box 125
Maiden, North Carolina 28650-0125
Subject: PAR Review
Town of Maiden
NPDES Permit No.NC0039594
Catawba County, NC
Dear Mx. Lingefelt:
Mooresville Regional Office staff has reviewed your Pretreatment Annual Report (PAR)
for the reporting period of January through December 2001. Based on the review, it appears that
the POTW completed the PAR in accordance with guidelines set forth by the Division for
modified pretreatment programs.
If you have any questions concerning your PAR, please do not hesitate to contact John
Lesley of this Office at [phone].
Sincerely,
(.( D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Cc: Dana Folley, Pretreatment Unit - Central Office
Central Files
JL
4471
NC,DtNR
Customer Service
1 80D 623-7748
Division of Water Quality 919 North Main Street Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]

1
of ArF9
--4
-c
March 28, 2002
Mr. Herman Caudler, Town Manner
Town of Maiden
Post Office Box 125
Maiden, North Carolina 28650-0125
Michael F. Easley
Govemor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
Subject: Pretreatment Compliance
Inspection
Town of Maiden
NPDES Permit No. NC0039594
Catawba County, NC
Dear Mr. Caudler:
Enclosed is a copy of the Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report for the inspection
of the Town's approved Industrial Pretreatment Program on March 27, 2002 by Mr. John Lesley
of this Office. The Town's Industrial Pretreatment Program is commendable.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Lesley or me at [phone].
Sincerely,
D. Rex Gleason, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Enclosure
cc: Central Files
Dana Folley, Pretreatment Group
Catawba County Health Department
JL
Customer Service Division of Water Quality 919 North Main Street Mooresville, NC 28115 Phone [phone]
1 800 623-7748 Fax [phone]

NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
BACKGROUND INFORMATION [Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(5)1
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: Town of Maiden
2. ControI Authority Representative(s): Mike Lingerfelt Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
3. Title(s): Wastewater Treatment Superintendent
4. Last Inspection Date: 01 /23 /01 Inspection Type: ® PCI ❑ Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection or Program Info Sheet(s)? ® Yes ❑ No
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
Order Type and Number: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® NA
PCS CODING
Trans.Code
INI
Main Program Permit Number
INICI01013191514191
MM/DD/YY
1 03 1 27 1 Sl2 I
Inspec.Type
IP
Inspector
IS 1
Fac. Type
bi
(ll11A) ("IYPI)
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
(INSP)
(FAC(
SIUS
1
8. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
1
CIUS
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Enter the Higher Number of 9 or 10
0
NOIN
12. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP
0 -
NOCM
13. Number of SIUs in SNC for Either Reporting or Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi -Annual Periods (Total Number of SIUs in SNC)
0
PSNC
14. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
MSNC
15. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During, Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods
0
SNPS
16. Number of SIUs In SNC For Both Reporting and Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2
Semi-annual Periods
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17.
Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any POTW Permit Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
(See Comments Section)
18. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC during either of the Last 2 Semi -
Annual Periods? Have any Industries in SNC (During Either of the Last
2 Serni-Annual Periods) Not Been Published for Public Notice?
(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
® Yes ❑ No
2/01 - CN daily max. limit
violation traced to improper
sampling.
❑ Yes ® No
SNC for Limits: NA
SNC for Reporting: NA
Not Published: NA
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits Or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
None
❑ Yes ® No
Filename: Maiden pci 0I-02.doc
Revised: 6/30/98
Page 1

TREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW- Please review POTW files and complete the following:
Program Element
Date of Last Approval
Date Next Due, If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
517/98
9/1/02
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
8/10/98
8/01/03
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
12/6/94
,
Enforcement Response PIan (ERP)
9/21/94
Long Term Monitoring PIan (LTMP)
3/17/94
LIMP FILE REVIEW:
22. Is the LTMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® Yes ❑ No
23. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to the LTMP? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
24. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP Monitoring? ® Yes ❑ No
25. Is the LTMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® Yes ❑ No Is the Table Adequate? ® Yes ❑ No
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW(3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION
26. User Name
1. Getrag Gears
2.
3.
27. IUP Number
0001
28. Does File Contain Current Permit?
1'1 Yes • No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes • No
29. Permit Expiration Date
12/31/02
30. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
433 _
31. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
E1 Yes ❑ No
• Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
E/ Yes ❑ No
• Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes • No
33. a. Does the File Contain a Slug Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. CI Yes ■No
b. ■Yes ■No
a. ❑Yes •No
b. •Yes •No
a. •Yes ❑No
b. •Yes ❑No
34. For 40 CFR 4I3 and 433 TTO Certifiers, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
❑Ycs❑No❑NIA
35. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. kIiYes ■No
b.E3Yes❑No❑NIA
a. ❑Yes •No
b.❑Yes❑No❑NIA .
a. •Yes •No
b.❑Yes❑No0N/A
36. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP?
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes • No
❑ Yes • No
37. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
® Yes • No
❑ Yes • No
❑ Yes ❑ No
38. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP?
SYesE1No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
39. Does Sampling Indicate Flow or Production?
®YespNo❑NIA
❑YespNo❑NIA
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
40. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ Yes • No
❑ NA
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
41. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample Within 30 Days?
a.®Yes❑No❑NIA
b. ®Yes ❑No
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a.❑YesL]NooN/A
b. ❑Yes ❑No
b. DYes ■No
42. Was the SIU Promptly Notified of Any Violations (Per ERP)?
®YesDNo❑N/A
❑YespNo❑NIA
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
43. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑ Yes ►1 No
• Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes •No
44. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTWs ERP?
®Ycs❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑NoDN/A
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
45. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑Yes❑No®NIA
❑Yes❑No❑NIA
❑YespNo❑N/A
46. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑YespNo®NIA
❑YespNo❑NIA
❑YespNo❑N/A
47. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.DYes❑No®NIA
b.❑YespNo®N/A
a.❑YespNo❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
a.❑Yes❑No❑NIA
b.❑YespNo❑N/A
48. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
• Yes I/ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Filename: Maiden pci 01-02.doc
Revised: 6/30/98
Page 2

FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
The contract laboratory for Getrag Gears used a higher detection limit than specified by the IUP; however, the detection limit was
still lower than the IUP limit. The POTW sent Getrag Gears a NOV for the lab error.
PCI SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
PCI Comments:
I. The Town's approved Pretreatment Program is well managed and organized.
2. A new SIU. Cataler of North America, will be discharging to the Town. The SIU has been determined to be non -categorical. IUP
is underway.
Requirements:
1. A Headworks Analysis must be submitted to the Division's Central Office for approval by no later than September I, 2002.
2. An Industrial Waste Survey must be submitted to the Division's Central Office for approval by no later than August I, 2003.
Recommendations:
NOD: ❑ Yes ® No
NOV: ❑ Yes ® No
QNCR: ❑ Yes ® No
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory
Marginal
o.
/
PCI COMPLETED BY:r C''.
John Lesley, Mooresville RegionaliOffice
Unsatisfactory ❑
DATE: March 28, 2002
Filename: Maiden pci 01-02.doc Page 3
Revised: 6/30/98