310282_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20210826

Facility Number = - I d7�7_
U Division of Water Resources
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit: &Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review p Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0,0outine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: j Region: UJ I D
Farm Name: 'I 1 k� W w{. { 1 Owner Email:
Owner Name: fX-P (-F% �d" I Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to I
Wean to I
Feederto
Farrow to
Farrow to
Farrow to
Other
Title:
.'ync.'1'h ws Vlli��
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
100I INon-Layer
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: _
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes b ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Vo❑ NA ❑ NE
Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

[Facility Number: '3k jDate of Inspection: U� d
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes P-leo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structtu/re 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: �/✓7la_ �/7�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): jSr�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? [—]Yes ❑.IdS ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes rfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑Ao ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
— /
'PQO NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
v
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate
Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved
Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
Vo ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
C3`lNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
[o ❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[:>o ❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
rOrKo ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other.
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [t],Ai6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking []Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes E2,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes (_'_flTo� ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: 11 -
Date of inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes EQ-Mr Ej NA
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑'So ❑ NA
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No n-<A ❑ NE
❑ Yes Eg,?go ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Z2 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
01<0 ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
EtrNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
��No ❑ NA
❑ NE
YesNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional Daees as necessarvl.
Y/clhg - i�I .� t�,Q .e7 OQ
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone: Lj1(�JiIw ( /66f 7/f
Date: u 4 Ate(/
Page 3 of 3 511212020