The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20070913 Ver 1_Closeout Report_20130621pec�� 601 North Mitigation Project EEP ID (IMS #92546) DENR -EEP Contract No. D 06054 -A USACE Action ID SAW - 20071926 -390 DWQ 401# 07 -0913 Closeout Report Prnieet CeNinv and C7amifle2tions County Union General Location Monroe NC Basin Yadkin Physiographic Region Piedmont Ecore "on Southern Piedmont USGS Hydro Unit 03040105- 081010 NCDWQ Sub -basin 03 -07 -14 Wetland Classification N/A Thermal Regime Warm Trout Water No Prni —t Performers Source Agency NC EEP Provider Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC Designer Kiml -Hom and Associates Construction Contactor L -J. Inc Planting Contractor New Forest Services Monitoring Firm NCSU BAE (W-11 Prnieet ArtMfiec and Timeline Month Activity July 5 2006 Project Instituted Date June 2007 Permitted Date 404/401 obtained February 2008 Construction Completed March 2008 Planting Completed March 2008 Post Construction Monitoring Gauges Installed May 2008 As built Survey Complete June 2008 As -Built Report Submitted March 2009 1 st Annual Monitoring Report February 2009 Supplemental Planting trees seeding, live stakes December 2009 2nd Annual Monitoring Report February 2010 Supplemental Seeding December 2010 3rd Annual Monitoring Report March 2011 Supplemental Planting to correct encroachment on field edges and other limited areas November 2011 4th Annual Monitoring Report December 2012 5th Annual Monitoring Report January 2013 Beaver control off project limits May 2013 Invasive Control June 2013 Closeout Report Submitted 09 0413 CC�@�dL p s J�� pNFc _ WATER ALITY Project Setting and Background Summary This stream mitigation project was developed to provide stream mitigation units for the NC EEP full delivery process Previous stream conditions demonstrated significant channel degradation as a result of crop planting practices that left no riparian buffer Increased runoff intensity caused incision, bank erosion and loss of bed form Water quality was diminished due to increased turbidity from bank erosion and elevated water temperatures caused by a lack of vegetative shading Habitat was reduced by the diminished water quality and continued loss of physical habitat such as bed features, woody debris, and a well- developed vegetation community Migrating head cuts further incised the channels Restoration of the stream included establishment of stable cross - sectional geometry, restoration of channel sinuosity, and increased streambed diversity Annual monitoring has demonstrated a successful and stable restoration design and construction of 3036 feet of E/C type channel throughout the reach The restored channel and riparian buffer has provided improved aquatic habitat through increased bed form and channel pattern diversity, reducing water temperature through shading and reduction in sediment by eliminating bank erosion The riparian habitat has been transformed from open field to a thriving buffer with over 450 trees per acre average across the site All repairs were relatively minor consisting of supplemental planting in 2009 (herbaceous, bare roots, live stakes), 2010 (seeding) and 2011 (3 gallon containerized trees) of certain sections to correct easement encroachment and ensure adequate stem height as well as to fully establish herbaceous species Control of invasive plants over a20 foot section occurred in May 2013 to remove aquatic primrose The channel pattern, profile and cross sections have all remained stable and monitoring shows that the planted vegetation has met all of the vegetation success criteria The site has had no beaver impact but is being watched due to beaver impact downstream of the project on adjacent property The goals and objectives of the project being met, this project should be approved for full mitigation credit Goals and Objectives • Produce a minimum of 3,000 stream mitigation units (SMU) to NCEEP (contracted amount) Goals related to hydrology include: • Re- establishing floodplam connect by raising bed elevations • Increase flood storage by re- establishing floodplam Goals related to water quality include. • Reducing turbidity by reducing sediment inputs • Reducing water temperatures by providing shading • Increasing / stabilizing oxygen levels by reducing BOD /COD and increasing reoxygenatmg turbulence Goals related to habitat include • Improved bed habitat by increasing riffle— pool diversity, reducing sediment deposition, and improving low flow water depths • Improve bank habitat by increasing stability and woody biomass • Improve floodplam habitat by establishing microtopography and hydrology, removing invasive vegetation, and increasing habitat diversity • Improve food web dynamics by adding biomass (such as detritus, wood debris and leaf matter) and re- establishing floodplam connection The restoration achieves these goals through the following objectives• • Stabilizing channel bed and banks through modifying dimension, pattern, and profile using natural channel design • Installing in- stream structures such as rock vanes • Installing in -bank structures such as root wads • Raising stream bed elevations • Restoring soils in riparian buffer • Removing invasive vegetation • Planting native vegetation in riparian buffer Success Criteria Vegetation Survival of at least 320 planted stems per acre after the year three As -Built Linear Footage Streams monitoring period Survival of at least 260 planted stems per acre after the year five Stream Mitigation Units SMU Wetland Mitigation Units monitoring period WMU A photo log will be maintained over the monitoring period and must demonstrate maturation of planted vegetation Stream Bankfull events a nummum of two bankfull events must be documented - 11 within the five-year monitoring period - Cross - Sections There should be little change in as -built cross sections Cross sections shall be classified using the Rosgen stream classification method and all monitored cross - sections should fall within the quantitative parameters defined for "E" or "C" typq channels 13,036 - The longitudinal profiles should show that the bedform features are remaining stable Bedforms observed should be consistent with those observed in "E" and "C" type channels Photographs will be used to evaluate stream characteristics Restoration Reach Mitigation Approach As -Built Linear Footage Streams As -Built Acreage (Wetlands) Mitigation Ratio Stream Mitigation Units SMU Wetland Mitigation Units STREAM WMU _ UT Restoration 13,036 - 11 3,036 - Total 1 13,036 - 1:1 13,036 - Unit Type Mitigation Unit Total -Mitigation Stream Mitigation Units 3,036 S Wetland Mitigation Units WMU _ UM�oo�� X000 ME i I- �I �1 Stream Observation Areas SOA Number Feature Station Description Identified Out of bank channel developing SOAI MY5 -PAI Floodplam 111 +28 Continue to monitor 2012 111 +43 no action required Invasive Aquatic Plant SOA2 MY5 -PA2 In stream 110 +72 aquatic primrose (Ludwigia 2012 hexapetala) Removed Veg growing in channel SOA3 MY5 -PA3 In stream 119 +10 Continue to monitor 2012 no action required Out of bank channel developing SOA4 MY5 -PA4 Floodplam 119 +44 Continue to monitor 2012 119 +95 no action required Out of bank channel developing SOA5 MY5 -PA5 Floodplam 120 +06 Continue to monitor 2012 120+28 no action required Out of bank channel developing SOA6 MY2 -PA9 Floodplam 121 +53 Continue to monitor 2012 122 +06 no action required SOA7 MY3- Floodplam 122 +74 Out of bank channel developing PA10 123 +12 Continue to monitor 2012 no action required 601 North Mitigation Site USGS Map SOURCE: USGS VA Won ufcounw w nsaw, Pic quahn*, 20m umfod =W 601 North Mitigation Site �irirb SOURCE: NRCS Web Solt Survey Soils Map Unlon County, NC 300 feet 4raa.� r iil�'� L ion County, NC - 601N Reach 1 Monitoring Profiles Sheet 1 of 2 x 609 A xk` "�Ohx x x A 607 605 ox x° � % Fx < o %ox C p +;, 603 - - -- TW -As Built TW -MYl -- • ux ,�e•.� R W TW -MY2 TW -MY4 o' W 8• °� 601 x LTOB - MY4 • RTOB - MY4 • ° TW -MY3 WS -MY1 0 �3• x TOB -As Built LTOB -MY1 m 'P 599 ° ° ° x RTOB - MYl - LTOB - MV2 � o RTOB - MY2 ° JOB - MY3 - Oo ` .6 0 o o,Fo lir 4ir x�x�f• _ RTOB - MY3 TW - MY5 • °y 597 • RTOB - MYS JOB - MYS L' 595 10000 10200 10400 10600 10800 11000 11200 11400 Station (ft) t 0 597 x �c 0 °e 595 ° 601N Reach 1 Monitoring Profiles Sheet 2 of 2 B ° x .x 40 ' + e K x^ e x _ x °e1� 7f Y Imo' 11900 12100 12300 12500 12700 12900 Station (ft) it 593 c 0 m TW - As Built 0/ 591 TW - MY1 W TW - MY2 TW - MY3 WS -MY1 TOB - As Built 589 LTOB - MY1 = RTOB - MYt LTOB - MY2 RTOB - MY2 587 LTOB - MY3 RTOB - MY3 TW - MY4 • LTOB - MY4 = RTOB - MY4 585 -TW-MY5 ■ RTOB - MY5 LTOB - MY5 583 11700 11500 601N Reach 1 Monitoring Profiles Sheet 2 of 2 B ° x .x 40 ' + e K x^ e x _ x °e1� 7f Y Imo' 11900 12100 12300 12500 12700 12900 Station (ft) it 601N R1 RXS-1 6080 594,50 601N R7 RXS3 6075 584.00 607.0 Q 806.5 u- 593.50 BAN- �MY18060 � -MY2 583.00 6055 MY3 592.50 �_ MY4 605.0 MVS SAS -8ui11 223 228 233 238 243 248 253 258 263 STATION (FT) 802.50 602.00 601.50 601.00 —� 0 800.50 a W 696.06 ~ ~I J ��I W 599.50 t I 599.00 —� 147 152 601N R1 RXS-2 157 162 167 172 177 182 187 STATION (FT) 609 R1 PXS1 808.5 808.0 607.5 -Built Z 807.0 O i 806.5 MV2 (2000) 808.0 W 605.5 605.0 50 60 70 80 90 100 STATION (FT) 593 601N R1 PXS-3 �—AS$ui8 ' 592 ti.�BANKFULL � —MY7 (2008) .� 597 —e—MY2 (2009) ��MY3 (201 0) 590 � MY4 (2011 589 ) --. MVS (2012) / w 569 W 587 586 14 24 34 SAS �BANKFULL t MV1 (2009) -w- MV3 (2010) � MY4 (2011) •�•�-MYS (2012) 44 54 84 74 84 STATION (FT) 594,50 601N R7 RXS3 584.00 593.50 583.00 592.50 SAS -8ui11 O Q W 582.00 591.50 �BANKFULL rt- MY1 (2008) MY2 (2009) - W 591.00 � —MYS (2010) � MY4 (2011) 590.50 —,-_ MY 5 (2012) 590.00 176 186 196 206 216 226 STATION (FT) 609 R1 PXS1 808.5 808.0 607.5 -Built Z 807.0 O i 806.5 MV2 (2000) 808.0 W 605.5 605.0 50 60 70 80 90 100 STATION (FT) 593 601N R1 PXS-3 �—AS$ui8 ' 592 ti.�BANKFULL � —MY7 (2008) .� 597 —e—MY2 (2009) ��MY3 (201 0) 590 � MY4 (2011 589 ) --. MVS (2012) / w 569 W 587 586 14 24 34 SAS �BANKFULL t MV1 (2009) -w- MV3 (2010) � MY4 (2011) •�•�-MYS (2012) 44 54 84 74 84 STATION (FT) R1 PXS1 808.5 808.0 607.5 -Built Z 807.0 O i 806.5 MV2 (2000) 808.0 W 605.5 605.0 50 60 70 80 90 100 STATION (FT) 593 601N R1 PXS-3 �—AS$ui8 ' 592 ti.�BANKFULL � —MY7 (2008) .� 597 —e—MY2 (2009) ��MY3 (201 0) 590 � MY4 (2011 589 ) --. MVS (2012) / w 569 W 587 586 14 24 34 SAS �BANKFULL t MV1 (2009) -w- MV3 (2010) � MY4 (2011) •�•�-MYS (2012) 44 54 84 74 84 STATION (FT) SAS �BANKFULL t MV1 (2009) -w- MV3 (2010) � MY4 (2011) •�•�-MYS (2012) 44 54 84 74 84 STATION (FT) 44 54 84 74 84 STATION (FT) Summary of Crest Gauge Monitoring Results 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 CG1 CG1 CG1 CG1 CG1 Date of Bankfull Event August March February none observed March Date of Bankfull Event observed May November observed August Maximum Height Above Bankfull 01 0 3 17 n/a 06 feet Summary of Morphologic Parameters Monitoring Results 601 North Parameter Cross Section RXS 1 Riffle Cross Section PXS 1 Pool 2009 2010 2011 Dimension Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MY I MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 BF Width (ft) 123 110 117 104 119 94 237 242 260 225 24 1 234 BF Cross Sectional Area (ft) 116 96 92 90 86 74 257 246 244 206 228 190 BF Mean Depth (ft) 09 09 08 09 07 08 l l 10 09 09 09 08 BF Max Depth (ft) 1 5 1 5 16 16 1 5 14 28 28 28 23 29 28 Width/Depth Ratio 130 125 15 0 120 165 165 217 242 28 8 25 0 26 7 29 2 Parameter Cross Section RXS2 Riffle Cross Section PXS2 Pool 2009 2010 2011 Dimension Base MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 BF Width (ft) 142 156 133 257 139 119 203 181 195 130 181 135 BF Cross Sectional Area (112) 113 118 114 133 126 98 134 134 132 116 123 131 BF Mean Depth (ft) 08 07 08 05 09 08 07 07 07 09 07 10 BF Max Depth (ft) 15 16 16 15 14 1 5 19 20 19 19 1 8 16 Width/Depth Ratio 17 9 20 7 15 5 15 1 15 4 I4 3 30 6 25 8r— 13 6 14-51 25 8 13 5 Parameter Cross Section RXS3 Riffle Cross Section PXS3 Pool 2009 2010 2011 Dimension Base MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 BF Width (ft) 105 110 131 87 108 78 269 249 225 175 170 215 BF Cross Sectional Area (ft) 64 66 60 5 1 59 47 282 243 235 203 209 199 BF Mean Depth (ft) 06 06 05 06 05 06 10 10 10 1 1 12 0 9 BF Max Depth (ft) 10 12 1 1 10 10 07 28 25 262 22 24 23 Width/Depth Ratio 172 1 183 1 283 1 147 1 200 131 1 25 7 24 9 22 5 1 15 9 1 142 12391 Additional Reach Parameters As -built 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Dimension Base MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Channel slope (tuft) 00082 0 0079 0 0079 0 0076 0 0073 0 0075 Channel sinuosity 1 24 124 124 124 124 124 Bankfull discharge' (cfs) 1 20 1 20 1 15 1 16 1 16 1 15 *Bankfull discharge is estimated using the downstream most nffle cross sectional area, the continuity equation and Manning s formula for estimating velocity Results of 2012 Vegetation Monitoring 601 North Planted Species (Site wide, Initial planting) Common Name Scientific Name Abbreviations Paw Paw Asimina trilobo AT River Birch Betula mgra BN Shag Bark Hickory Carya ovate CO Green Ash Froxinus pennsylvamca FP Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxtt QM Water Oak Quercus mgra QN Willow Oak Quercus phellos QP Planted Species (supplemental planting) Common Name Scientific Name Abbreviations River Birch Betula mgra BN Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvamca FP Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxit QM Water Oak Quercus mgra QN Willow Oak Quercus phellos QP Red Bud Cerc/s canadensis CC Planted Species by Plot 601 North September 2012 (MY5) ' SURVIVING PLANTED SPECIES LIVE Plot Pawpaw River Birch Shagbark Hickory Green Ash Swamp Chestnut Water Oak Willow Oak Oak PLANTED STEMS N1 Criteria 2 2005 9 2010 1 2012 12 N2 Stems 3 Stems Stems 2 1 1 1 MY2 8 N3 MYS 4 14 3 5 12 2 12 14 Totals 0 9 0 14 6 2 3 0 34 Percent 0 265 0 412 176 591 88 0 100 Rummnry of Result- of Veuetnitan Monitnrm¢ MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS Final Stems per Acre P Plot Planted 2008 - 2009 2010 2012 Criteria As- 2005 2009 2010 2011 2012 Stems Stems Stems Stems Stems Stems (stems/ac) Built MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS N1 14 12 12 12 12 12 260 566 485 485 485 485 485 N2 14 10 8 8 8 8 260 566 404 323 323 323 323 N3 17 14 14 14 14 14 260 688 566 566 566 566 566 EEP Recommendations and Conclusions • The restored stream channel has remained stable and is providing the intended habitat and hydrologic functions All monitoring cross sections and longitudinal profile showed little adjustment in stream dimension over the entire monitoring period The site experienced seven bank full events over the 5 year monitoring period • Vegetation monitoring has documented the average number of stems per acre on the site to be 458, with a planted stem density ranging from 323 to 566 planted stems per acre All vegetation plots have achieved the success criterion of 260 planted trees per acre at monitoring year 5 The project has achieved success based on stated success criteria and is recommended for regulatory closure Contingencies • Remedial actions are underway starting in May 2013 to remove the invasive aquatic plant water primrose Vegetation was manually removed Visual inspection will occur one month after removal and the process will be repeated until no evidence of the invasive species is found upon inspection • Beaver activity has not been noted on site but has been present dust downstream of the project limits and trapping and dam removal occurred in winter /spring 2013 Inspections for beaver activity will occur during spring/summer of 2013 until closeout If found, beavers will be trapped and their dams removed Pre Construction Photos: 601 North looking upstream pre construction 601 North looking upstream pre construction 601 North looking upstream pre construction 601 North looking upstream pre construction Post Construction Photos: 601 North during 2009 monitoring phase 601 North during 2009 monitoring phase 601 North during 2011 monitoring phase. 601 North during 2012 monitoring phase. 601 North during 2012 monitoring phase. 601 North during 2012 monitoring phase. APPENDIX A — Watershed Planning Summary 92546- 601 North Property The 601 North Property project is located in Catalog Unit (CU) 03040105 and Hydrologic Unit (HUC) 03040105081010 (Upper Lanes Creek watershed) and is listed as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) in the 2009 Lower Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin Restoration Priority Plan (RBRP) (2009 Lower Yadkin Pee -Dee RBRP). The project is approximately 7 miles south of the City of Monroe, Union County and is located on a Tributary to Wicker Branch. As stated in the RBRP, goals for CU 03040105 include improved management of stormwater runoff to these waters, protection of valuable threatened and endangered wildlife resources and continued mitigation of impacts resulting from rapid urbanization of the area. In addition, contributing to the restoration of water quality in DWQ- identified impaired streams is a priority. According to the RBRP this HUC has over 30 animal operations and approximately 50% of its land is in agriculture use. Lanes Creek is rated as impaired for failing to meet its designated use of supporting aquatic life due to fair biological community ratings and high turbidity according to the 2012 303d list. Some agricultural practices and development impacts are possible contributors to the degraded biological integrity within this watershed. In addition, this watershed includes a Wildlife Resource Commission priority area and also the NC NHP Significant Natural Heritage Area (SNHA) Lanes Creek Aquatic Habitat. There is one other EEP restoration project in this watershed. Historically the project area has been primarily agricultural fields. Stream restoration improvements implemented by this project include the establishment of a riparian buffer to increase pollution filtration, reduction of nutrient and sediment inputs to the stream, and improvements to in -stream and riparian habitat. In addition, the reconnection of the stream to its floodplain facilitates increased flood storage. These project benefits will contribute to water quality improvements in downstream, 303d listed, waters and also a State identified SNHA by reducing sedimentation, increasing pollutant removal capabilities and improving the quality of in- stream habitat available for the biological communities. EEP 2013 Project Closeout 601 North Property (Yadkin 03040105) APPENDIX B — Land Ownership and Protection SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT The land required for the construction, management, and stewardship of this mitigation project includes a portion of the following parcel http / /www nceep net/GIS DATA/PROPERTY /92546 601NorthPropertypdf Site Protection Deed Book & Page Acreage Grantor County Instrument Number protected Franklin W Howie Jr Union Conservation Easement 4386/726 84581 http / /www nceep net/GIS DATA/PROPERTY /92546 601NorthPropertypdf Appendix C — 404/401 Permits U8 ARMY CORM OV dNCINURS W11MD+6fOND1a1A Amm 0)MWJM)+M:M Caar'W. —Q.H.- CQRAAL ROADf ryEC1OflAL ANDNATION Wl0q VEBIilCATO1. IigmrO.v /A.gyvmdAdf. AAber 1.ICM.MN. dr�0tlm IIM etm TskpNS Ne Sa mJlvwmdp.pvryln..r..4P m1Men'mmh+bva.by Ml Nxa�am Dvm.w. d ra•+� aw and.mnn- N.al«. JAu AN•�bY` ®! ®+Olm.�m W+1 ��mAat+)+NC�1 Arw..m �o®tl1m..N.am r...xMbm p Cap S.wLay Olyd _Qp1TNmL Om �ffi F.a°..M LM. dvagmuea 8nalO! >d W,FV,ea,D..wv.vM�m.amN...mv w.lre..4.daawv�oa.o�nm T.e.aw vm.. dvr.a.ow.M.ivmd v.«A.� ®sw..y v va. uwni'!:S'�^k mwva.wMN.oy Mlme Cqr lvnbbd Nbdplinrd AmrWb ?wY a..JY.L.Ja M.]mM, B.Ny1.NC Hll..i.f. rowmr.o.r� +usai si e 5 An.n ibbr ww.mara UrM r Nwmmr/rmn FmYmnwd�LEmAmg. 900C;tlflyb &b N00 9.m1Y1 Nc 2>BT 6Wpa EDt Nvm 6Fmn BWOr4en yaa EFP Amlwu gw+VAb�yCr+lmtlim w9 Ambwtl Wmb. DBrY W.I tw Yw Now Mpw'tl. m n:[adriMaM M tlMIW ooMtb. rbtlmMm+N C.La mbmxl 9mo bor bq m d wm.me Wan mw,ewr u..w H tNUm aomwbm M..Eptl pol.a m u,ma Cow.Y m 0..mD.e F ya «epg4atbn /.aN.e by M DVA.md W.b QbmrlDFM11m Wr n m0) Albr v+br oWV . o. Nw «rnwre Iml w. nM.a mm.w.a a wtl. amlhavtl c.rn rm xmwvasm war oae. w..e enwwb.m.r m. (1wr.l Crtl+wau qwn ry m gym. Ntlort�tla Pem� Mnmb n mm0 h bme mryqnr u s Amy c«p aE.gru. M.wmbum ra.tlbwatlrnanr mr.lamwbetl..'wb b.bs poMa+rm.b.ywa aWoot bm�C em.. Maus.a q Ra b mammy s.aa.a rm Emtlm comma . /bwtlr suly/ wtlrm.emartlav T.tloM mb1 Ca.e«mn M wp. w�v.rmoar.ew. P'.a nm.m.M. [B.snl.s rmmM bM WNrtlf:n+ONOV. TM wp«tl b a'SY MIe bM pupm.tlaMbnFtl yae..ve.d l� w>p«b. b.� Yom ��rhu Fwrna r.a Yw. m.Y4nrl�..bwM C«Nmdm W ggwtl 4WF M b Mrwy MM«mW b mm.Ui'm MAtl mrmevu m.mmm IeM iwearNa. m M unmwma you mmi ma wmgr aw M bmahD wnmmN 1 TI.e 1lmr.mia.gmgdfu Mq NrieNl.eFwgbq orvmp.ml.+tlM Sm'^na H�..m a.m tiwnn�rW I d ft Ntlmmw.bW«n.rN�Mr prime upm e.ngam qM paemroe.bnelroMwowtl dMr.Wa l NoDimY«oi tlNaw nvxwm wm Bb praw.Ftl mwl pi6b.omm smM nmvrmq. y«m.0 FMm.m.aM.«Wnd Om NO/b Cwo.n. B.emmlMEi./tn Cana W.r M.Atlm mmaaJ w er ro mmm mn a ma. ww auen mab.e., erm, w mr ooa. 1 U..emm. - Mpel.µM.F.YVX.A..amptls.m wnMw.lo..e Crl0oma Caro— rmnro M w+nv«mm UM aM ND DH.IVi dwv«amr �� abmisurM r TMV NW3r Nm aC tr Uvm NrwaP.mBq Pm4eemad Ba.. oN 6.chmyq AU4.Nwvn Webtlw Dr.al»� Amen mor .msnxm.w saMapw U�Coff lam aft rm vrmbb+pa by Bro pmd+ w Mfl u m9Wm!byM uwma am u..m.a &rmm me n.ma u m M tabvme.�m. USAm C".(Fnymv. Ammla CMAW�A 151 A—A M Ad-Ift N«b Cnalma 11[01 M M�m..mtl r.wvmmga rumr m mqm m..mqu.«e bmmMn M m us A'mr C�.aFallm.mpeambM. vy.. AUbom�lywam. p.m. you wambr¢Ym pmtl. rw.mww..ma�rrba «mw�.a Ib —Ymbfr atl Oe.mkua.onaa by M.fo.e mfmmrMpnd+Mbam canplma m amwdm.v r�lb oamml -. ••ib«ofM wb pvom utl mquved ovup.wem �tl m .tta.Amw A� Ne Vwml I «.bluona S.pvm...f PVm«M D.o 6 � Carybaa ln.Nq.rra(6riwmrW Bpbl E.dape)rW mrtlgtl.rnte.b• . a,. msaammdo:au+ra�N�w«�auwmaw�m.n� m..ba be�w ovND ar��btl..A tl.mrmw b�.. m+e..o wr( mavMrw.a.mmb. a.vwma «rrJ.MaMN w mr m. «Neer b. w b.HO Neb1w. w br n.mpmmnv.. /M«.Mryb ®smip.w, WA mry /..Fa1m1. wm nl.epbtl..ralDtlonro Fatl. m�wu rpopbrb m. wommno. rF aM rrbre. pbnqubenre. F.rweriMwl.ISANCIL a+manm. em..maMlo MYrmmmn vnDtlW monM.Fpm.nU0b MU9 Nmycwv.a Fi�fm pmtl. pa4.wb F.mwerpwm IM NCAC 91110] .ftl po.ma Oery/Y.mrb ptic Av.gnrmN4/re am1111 NCAC I11 f6D1 My MWwla.0tl mndberY Ntl MpCbl.emM ..{�IIb ntOm .iW b pRm.e b IN UaW 61tl.. Amry4wp d Enphn«.rP Nbnl«F wn A�P .d b8 9vi wldM Gm WHV Ma wtl tlultlaamiwmMWbdMw1 usa, mmlmq. odm. mmuvuaw«Nmm,rwmwrm.ny.mul«sneim rw, rmtl rltgT ®mNg0r erbmtlloa M«M 0..40r T.Mb.IwAq.wM.rbnrmm.r owdm. bfApw 1100 d MNwm Caotb Onrrtl BiMMb MplMgAmtlNMteM Ib.hpa 6lb sess.ovv ntltly�NC armsaru rwm+sbxb.rmro.wrlw.... mtl.m mvra u+m ym.akb.«aap m.rmnmr.nbleM M.bNauN Dlww olwrw Damn mmw s.mon w1 d M cbmw.NrN1 1 W l.m.br ogmbm, p4e. blm..�b A6 N.1 Johmon H M ra..Mb Bpbntl a1u r i016m +ew«IK cr+e N.my ns. rwmramMF Atl.4b staTasarn bwrwH b.eav Ab.unrs cosh. a cwncblon x AmnrbpgE.p.Nw. M/a.0e b. /bYR V/tlrW Utl .OtO.I DWI Btly z Fmk ®A LslY Fina iCpr Keiar Hem fab+OL Jan FO Bw 1m140meb0 KIR]61069 Mitigation Project Name 601 North Property EEP IMS ID 92546 River Basin YADKIN Cataloging Unit 03040105 Applied Credit Ratios: 1:1 1.5:1 2.5 1 5:1 1:1 31 21 51 1'1 3 1 2 1 5'1 1'1 14.1 2.1 5 1 1 1 3 1 n Fi 1 1 1 1 1 IMS Amount 3,036.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 IMS - Ledger 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Positive = increase / Negative = decrease) Information as of 3/17/2013 3,036.00 O zCC O a d � e . L ?C C z d d o z w =?qR z r r o C o W t a zdrill 5 Z i • t 6 Z C 0 p Beginning Balance (feet and acres) NCDOT re TM its (feet and acres): JNotApplicable EEP Debits feet and acres): DWQ Permits USACE Action IDs Impact Project Name 2002 -0672 2009 -00876 NCDOT TIPS R -2559/ R -3329 - Monroe Bypass & Connector 3,036.00 Remaining Balance (feet and acres) 0.00 IMS Amount 3,036.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 IMS - Ledger 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Positive = increase / Negative = decrease) Information as of 3/17/2013