The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20070911 Ver 1_Closeout Report_20130621601 West Mitigation Project EEP ID (IMS# 92545) DENR -EEP Contract No. D 06054 -E USACE Action ID SAW- 2007 -1927 -390 DWQ 401# 07 -0911 Closeout Report Project Type - Stream Prniert Cettino snd Classifieatinns County Union General Location Monroe NC Basin Yadkin Physiographic Region Piedmont Ecore ion Southern Piedmont USGS Hydro Unit 03040105- 081010 NCDW Sub -basin 03 -07 -14 Wetland Classification N/A Thermal Regime Warm Trout Water No Prniert Performers Source Agency NC EEP Provider Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC Designer Kimle -Horn and Associates Construction Contractor North State Environmental Planting Contractor New Forest Services Monitoring Finn NCSU BAE Overall Project Activities and Timeline 0q -04 :0�3 t )SNR - Wf TI~. � 4UAL" wJ.;idltd>i 3 St9 rivvalee. Branch Month Activity July 2011 Pro ect instituted date June 2007 Permits received February 2008 Construction Completed March 2008 Planting Completed March 2008 Post Construction Monitoring Gauges Installed May 2008 As -Built Survey completed June 2008 As -Built Report Submitted March 2009 1st Annual Monitoring Report February 2009 Supplemental Planting trees seeding, live stakes February 2009 - July 2013 Beaver Control December 2009 2nd Annual Monitoring Report December 2010 3rd Annual Monitoring Report March 2011 Supplemental Planting (trees) to correct encroachment on field edges and other limited areas November 2011 4th Annual Monitoring Report March 2012 Repair to structure at STA 145 +60 December 2012 5th Annual Monitoring Report March and May 2013 Supplemental Planting for encroachment areas as well as in and around W2 and W4 June 2013 Closeout Report submitted Protect Setting and Background Summary This stream mitigation project was developed to provide stream mitigation units for the NC EEP full delivery process Previously the stream was straightened and channelized as part of agricultural practices that also left no riparian buffer Increased runoff intensity caused incision, bank erosion and loss of bed form Water quality was diminished due to increased turbidity from bank erosion and elevated water temperatures caused by a lack of vegetative shading Habitat was reduced by the diminished water quality and continued loss of physical habitat such as bed features, woody debris, and a well - developed vegetation community Migrating head cuts further incised the channels Restoration of the stream included establishment of stable cross - sectional geometry, restoration of channel sinuosity, and increased streambed diversity Annual monitoring has demonstrated a successful design and construction of 4532 feet of stable restored E/C type channel throughout the reach The restored channel and riparian buffer has provided improved aquatic habitat through increased bed form and channel pattern diversity, reducing water temperature through shading and reduction in sediment by eliminating bank erosion The riparian habitat has been transformed from open field to a successful riparian buffer with over 450 trees per acre average across the site All repairs were relatively minor and consisted of the repair of one stone structure (station 145 +60) in 2010 and supplemental planting in 2009, 2011, 2012, and 2013 to correct easement encroachment, and low stem counts in W2 and W4 Control of beavers has been on going and the Site has been in continuous management throughout the monitoring period in the lower portion of the site including in Lanes Creek outside of the project area Nine bankfull events were documented exceeding the required 2 to meet the success criteria The channel pattern, profile and cross sections have all remained stable and monitoring shows that the planted vegetation has met all of the vegetation success criteria The goals and objectives of the project being met, this project should be approved for full mitigation credit Goals and Objectives • Produce a minimum of 4,500 stream mitigation units (SMU) to NCEEP (contracted amount) Goals related to hydrology include: • Re- establishing floodplain connect by raising bed elevations • Increase flood storage by re- establishing floodplain Goals related to water quality include. • Reducing turbidity by reducing sediment inputs • Reducing water temperatures by providing shading • Increasing / stabilizing oxygen levels by reducing BOD /COD and increasing reoxygenatmg turbulence Goals related to habitat include: • Improved bed habitat by increasing riffle — pool diversity, reducing sediment deposition, and improving low flow water depths • Improve bank habitat by increasing stability and woody biomass • Improve floodplam habitat by establishing microtopography and hydrology, removing invasive vegetation, and increasing habitat diversity • Improve food web dynamics by adding biomass (such as detritus, wood debris and leaf matter) and re- establishing floodplam connection The restoration achieves these goals through the following objectives: • Stabilizing channel bed and banks through modifying dimension, pattern, and profile using natural channel design • Installing in- stream structures such as rock vanes • Installing in -bank structures such as root wads • Raising stream bed elevations • Restoring soils in riparian buffer • Removing invasive vegetation • Planting native vegetation in riparian buffer Success Criteria Vegetation Survival of at least 320 planted stems per acre after the year three As -Built Linear Footage Streams monitoring period Mitigation Ratio Survival of at least 260 planted stems per acre after the year five Wetland Mitigation Units monitoring period A photo log will be maintained over the monitoring period and must demonstrate maturation of planted vegetation Stream Bankfull events a minimum of two bankfull events must be documented within the five-year monitoring period Cross - Sections There should be little change in as -built cross sections Total Cross sections shall be classified using the Rosgen stream classification 1.1 4532 - method and all monitored cross - sections should fall within the quantitative parameters defined for "E" or "C" type channels The longitudinal profiles should show that the bedform features are remaining stable Bedforms observed should be consistent with those observed in "E" and "C" type channels Photographs will be used to evaluate stream characteristics Restoration Reach Mitigation Approach As -Built Linear Footage Streams As -Built Acreage (Wetlands) Mitigation Ratio Stream Mitigation Units S Wetland Mitigation Units STREAM UT Restoration 4532 - 1 1 4532 Total 4532 - 1.1 4532 - Mitigation Unit Type Mitigation Unit Total Stream Mitigation Units 4532 S Wetland Mitigation Units 49+4ag .7is 1-4w,,Ay� qwnc - . / mma" 000ccococ rim- Y . � SOAIO µY4 OAU ' STA-- MAS ..... ' 0 Easement Boundary Stream Rt _ \\\ Q �_ 1 1 \ Collins `� \`take Dam C°Ilir's`Lake I) Watershed Size 0.4 so miles / r Al . �\\\ it ` O: O�` `��, ( � / f- f I.�• 600 y;` f o r j kyo I P1.5 x 601 West Mitigation Site - '\ USGS Map SOURCE: USGS �. WimC4VWA NC Pageland Quadrangle 2010 i Legend BaB Badin channery sift loam _ 2_ - 8 % slope BaB2 Badin channery silty clay loam 2 - 8 % slope RI SdC2 Badin channery a silty clay loam 8 -15 %slope ChA Chewada slit loam 0 - 2 % slope CmB Cid channery sift loam 1- 5 % slope 4. GoE Goldston very channery slit loam 4 -15 % slope GoC Goldston very channery slit loam 15 - 45 % slope �. GsB Golitton -Badin complex 2 - 8 %slope MhA Misenheimer- R2 Cid camplez 0 -3 %slo ;;, • . TaB Tarrus gravelly silt loam 2 - 8 % slope - TbB2 Tarrus gravelly silty clay loam 2 - 8 %slope Easement Boundary 601 West Mitigation Site , Soils Map 1'.6w Union CMMY, NC SOURCE: NRCS Web Soils Map �,m� Stream Observation Areas Year SOA PA ID Feature Station Description Noted Stream obstruction SOA1 MY4 -PA9 In stream 102 +32 Continue to monitor, no action MY 4 2011 required Diversion Channel SOA2 MY2 -PA3 Floodplam 103+73— Continue to monitor, no action MY2 -2009 103 +83 required Diversion Channel SOA3 MY5 -PA1 Floodplam 104 +92 - Continue to monitor, no action MY5 -2012 105 +21 required Diversion Channel SOA4 MY5 -PA2 Floodplam 105 +91 - Continue to monitor, no action MY5 -2012 106 +15 required Stream obstruction SOA5 MY4 -PA10 Floodplam 106 +70 Continue to monitor, no action MY4 -2011 required SOA6 MY4 -PA6 Log Sill 107 +52 Washed out Sill Log MY4 -2011 Streambed stable continue to monitor Diversion Channel SOA7 MY4 -PA8 Floodplam 108+83— Continue to monitor, no action MY4 -2011 110 +28 required Stream obstruction SOA8 MY4 -PA11 In stream 135 +12 Continue to monitor, no action MY4 -2011 required Stream obstruction SOA9 MY4 -PA12 In stream 135 +15 Continue to monitor, no action MY4 -2011 required Stream obstruction SOA10 MY4 -PA13 In stream 136 +45 Continue to monitor, no action MY4 -2011 required Beaver Dam SOA 11 MY3 -PA4 In Stream 140 +28 Beaver trapped and dam removed MY3 -2010 Management ongoing until closeout Beaver Dam SOAl2 MY3 -PA5 In stream 14234 Beaver trapped and dam removed MY3 -2010 Management ongoing until closeout 601W Reach 1 Monitoring Profiles Sheet 1 535 533 tAA 4,1: •�i. .y• A'[ Debris Jam with backwater (typical) A* •' 531 A - • r529 - - A• ' •. •A 527 A. 'j - TW -As Built TW -MY1 -� -: A •• .� -. 4 TW -MY2 TW -MY4 - TW - MY3 TW - MY5 .J -- WS - MYl WS -MY5 r 525 — TOB -As Built I TOB - MY1 - TOB - MY2 - TOB - MY3 TOB - MY4 TOB - MY5 523 10000 10100 10200 10300 10400 10500 10600 10700 10800 109W Station (ft) 601W Reach 1 Monitoring Profiles Sheet 2 529 TW - As Built TW - MV1 TW - MY2 TW -MY4 527 �A'• TW - MY3 TW - MYS � WS - MYl WS - MV5 •'�� A_ �'Y TOB -As Built TOB -MY1 525 _ �• TOB - MY2 TOB - MY3 TOB -MY4 TOB -MY5 G •��!`t- 523 ` � A. a W (��i•' i 521 -• off- 4 1 519 517 10900 11000 11100 11200 11300 11400 11500 11600 11700 11800 Station (ft) 601W Reach 2 Monitoring Profiles Single Sheet ,a i* *x x 504 lkx lk x x iE>I' x xx .x% Ak• x Y z x x x x z Debrisjams caused by willow growth in channel 502 x ) xz x xx ' 1f x • X• xxx x x I x x x x ..—x Ax —x x x ♦� ♦1 'jY/ x xxkz 500 ! y' 6 x i0k XI * x �' .. •I�Ix . . Y x z x �.• ♦� j x x x x x x %xx x x x xx x x x I ♦� •♦ ;•xxx %xx x x x z xx x x x.xx #It x x x x x�Yfk 'x . Yi x C G 498 - xx x x •zx Y x x x y — - -TW - As Built .11 ��••x lu TW - MYI xx 496 - -- TW -MY2 l TW -MY3 xx TW -MY4 TW - MYS 494 WS - MYl WS -MY5 • TOB -As Built • TOB - MYl n TOB - MY2 492 TOB - MY3 • TOB - MY4 • TOB - MY5 490 13000 13200 13400 13600 13800 14000 14200 14400 14600 Station (ft) 601W R2 RXS -1 -SAS Buitt ��BANKFULL t MY1 (2008) -+� -MY2 (2009) t MY3 (201 0) rt -MV4 (2011) --d-- MY5 (2012) 504.00 503.50 503.00 F - � As -Bunt ��BANKFULL 00 502.50 t MYt (2008) Q -1� MY2 (2D09) j502.00 MY3 (2 010) W MY4 (2011) 501.50 -� MY5 (2012) 501.00 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 STATION (FT) 601W R2 RXS-2 601W R1 RXS -1 501.00 - 532.00 500.50 - 500.00 Z� 499.50 0 499.00 j W 498.50 531.50 BAs -Built - +- �BANKFULL t tMY1 (2008) - w _MY2 (2009) 498.00 _ MY 3 (2010) 497.50 531.00 t MVS (2012) 497.00 - - - -- - 530.50 f u 530.00 O � 529.50 11 W 529.00 528.50 528.00 208 213 218 223 228 233 238 243 248 253 STATION (FT) 601W R2 RXS -1 -SAS Buitt ��BANKFULL t MY1 (2008) -+� -MY2 (2009) t MY3 (201 0) rt -MV4 (2011) --d-- MY5 (2012) 504.00 503.50 503.00 F - � As -Bunt ��BANKFULL 00 502.50 t MYt (2008) Q -1� MY2 (2D09) j502.00 MY3 (2 010) W MY4 (2011) 501.50 -� MY5 (2012) 501.00 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 STATION (FT) 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 STATION (FT) 526.00 525.50 525.00 524.50 � 524.00 p 523.50 F � 523.00 w w 522.50 522.00 521.50 - 601W R1 PXS -1 -AB$uitt �•BANKFULL - MY7 (2008) - MY2 (2009) - MY3 (2010) - MY4 (2012) - MY5 (2012) so ss so 65 70 75 eD es ao STATION (FT) 504.00 503.50 503.00 502.50 502.00 = 501.50 F 501.00 500.50 w 500.00 498.50 49900 601 W R2 PXS -1 �AsAuilt -BANKFULL -r MY1 (2008) -� MY2 (2009) -� MY3 (2010) � MV4 (201 1) t MY5 601W R2 RXS-2 501.00 - 500.50 - 500.00 Z� 499.50 0 499.00 j W 498.50 BAs -Built - +- �BANKFULL t tMY1 (2008) - w _MY2 (2009) 498.00 _ MY 3 (2010) 497.50 - MY3(2011) t MVS (2012) 497.00 - - - -- - 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 STATION (FT) 526.00 525.50 525.00 524.50 � 524.00 p 523.50 F � 523.00 w w 522.50 522.00 521.50 - 601W R1 PXS -1 -AB$uitt �•BANKFULL - MY7 (2008) - MY2 (2009) - MY3 (2010) - MY4 (2012) - MY5 (2012) so ss so 65 70 75 eD es ao STATION (FT) 504.00 503.50 503.00 502.50 502.00 = 501.50 F 501.00 500.50 w 500.00 498.50 49900 601 W R2 PXS -1 �AsAuilt -BANKFULL -r MY1 (2008) -� MY2 (2009) -� MY3 (2010) � MV4 (201 1) t MY5 88 93 99 103 108 113 118 123 128 STATION (FT) 499.50 489.00 498.50 498 00 Z497.50 O Q 497.00 496.50 w 496.00 495.50 10 20 (2012) 88 93 99 103 108 113 118 123 128 STATION (FT) 499.50 489.00 498.50 498 00 Z497.50 O Q 497.00 496.50 w 496.00 495.50 10 20 Summary of Crest Gauge Monitoring Results 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 CG1 CG1 CG1 CG1 CG1 Date of Event November August November None March Recorded Date of Event None October February None August Recorded Recorded Date of Event None None May None August Recorded Recorded Recorded Maximum Height Above Bankfull 01 01 0 4 n/a 0 3 feet Summary of Morphologic Parameters Monitoring Results 601 West Parameter R1 Cross Section RXSI Riffle R Cross Section PXS1 Pool 2009 2010 2011 2012 Dimension Base MYI I MY2 I MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MYI I MY2 I MY3 MY4 MY5 BF Width (ft) 140 144 80 104 97 86 334 347 262 241 278 296 BF Cross Sectional Area (ft") 78 80 70 90 68 63 317 294 264 273 263 272 BF Mean Depth (ft) 06 06 08 09 07 07 10 08 10 11 10 09 BF Max Depth (ft) 16 16 13 16 14 13 28 3 1 24 24 24 25 Width/Depth Ratio 1250 260 11 2 120 1 138 119 1 35 2 1410 260 213 294 320 Parameter R2 Cross Section RXS1 Riffle R2 Cross Section PXS1 Pool 2009 2010 2011 2012 Dimension Base MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 BF Width (ft) 181 206 213 186 216 175 253 242 263 200 208 170 BF Cross Sectional Area ( f e ) 96 126 109 99 1 1 0 114 237 252 222 23 1 242 217 BF Mean Depth (ft) 05 06 05 05 05 7 09 10 09 12 12 13 BF Max Depth (ft) 1 7 1 9 1 9 1 8 1 8 1 LO 3 2 3 4 2 9 2 9 2 8 2 7 Width/Depth Ratio 33 9 33 9 41 5 35 1 42 5 0 26 9 23 2 31 1 173 179 130 Parameter R2 Cross Section RXS2 Riffle R2 Cross Section PXS2 Pool 2009 2010 2011 2012 Dimension Base MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 BF Width (ft) 166 00047 12 7 11 4 12 1 18 9 32 1 33 6 36 9 24 9 34 7 20 5 BF Cross Sectional Area (fe) 10 5 [122 9 9 9 0 10 6 11 9 24 1 24 1 25 0 22 8 25 1 21 9 BF MeanDepth(ft) 06 08 08 09 06 07 09 07 11 BF MaxDepth(ft) 19 14 13 18 22 L4679 26 25 26 23 Width/Depth Ratio 262 154 163 145 1381 30 0 54 6 27 1 480 190 Additional Reach Parameters As- Built 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Dimension Base MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 BF slope (11:/11) 00046 00047 00047 00055 00047 07047 Channel Sinuosity 121 121 121 121 121 121 Bankftdl discharge* (cfs) 25 1 33 1 29 1 29 1 34 1 28 *Bankfull discharge is estimated using the downstream most nffle cross sectional area, the continuity equation and Manning's formula for estimating velocity Vegetation Monitoring Results 601 West — 601 West Planted Species (Site wide, initial planting) Common Name Scientific Name Abbreviations Paw Paw Asimina triloba AT River Birch Betula mgra BN Shag Bark Hickory Carya ovate CO Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvamca FP Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michouxii QM Water Oak Quercus mgra QN Willow Oak Quercus phellos QP 601 West Planted Species (supplemental planting) Common Name Scientific Name Abbreviations River Birch Betula mgra BN Green Ash Frownus pennsylvamca FP Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxu QM Water Oak Quercus mgra QN Willow Oak Quercus phellos QP Red Bud Cercis canadensls CC 601 West Planted Species by Plot 601 West September, 2012(MYS)_ Stem "s SURVIVING PLANTED SPECIES f LIVE Plot Pawpaw River Birch Shagbark Hickory Grcen, Ash, Sw`amp� Che's'tnut'' Oak +Water Oak WJlow Oak Oak, _ .PLANTED STEMS, W1 2012 5 1 1 7 W2 St'—' 2 Built gi SMY1R hMY21 FMY3A �MY41 '2MYS` 1 13 1 6 4 W3 7 1 1 5 242 1 2 283 10 W4 8 8 8 4 4 2 607 323 6 W5 283 4 1 1 3 11 2 11 11 TOTALS 0 12 3 11 4 3 5 0 38 Percent aa 000 029 010 027 012 010 012 000 1 00 Summary of Recnita of Waetatinn Mnmtnrmo *volunteer elderberry and supplemental planting have the plots currently meeting the MY5 success criteria Plots are Isolated areas of low stems as surrounding acreage has high survival rates based on observation Stem "s y }MY2- MY3 M]4 - MY5' nel ,_ Ste ms periAc�e�' i Oki,' - _! - iMant_ed ate - 2009 -` 'Stems` " 20101- "2011ti 2012 r`Succg9i. > ntenaz - - _ As=i, .tZ011g 2009 201 2011 }�j2012� St'—' (stems/ac), Built gi SMY1R hMY21 FMY3A �MY41 '2MYS` W1 13 9 6 7 7 7 260 526 364 242 283 283 283 W2 15 8 8 8 7 4 260 607 323 323 323 283 260* W3 16 11 11 11 11 10 260 647 445 445 445 445 404 W4 17 10 7 6 6-1 6 1 260 1688 404 283 242 242 260* W5 17 14 1 12 1 11 1 13 1 11 1 260 1688 566 485 1 445 1 526 1 445 *volunteer elderberry and supplemental planting have the plots currently meeting the MY5 success criteria Plots are Isolated areas of low stems as surrounding acreage has high survival rates based on observation EEP Recommendations and Conclusions • The restored stream channel has remained stable and is providing the intended habitat and hydrologic functions All monitoring cross sections and the longitudinal profile showed little adjustment in stream dimension over the entire monitoring period, demonstrating a stable stream environment Nine bank full events were documented over the 5 year monitoring period • Vegetation monitoring has documented the average number of stems per acre on the site to be 308 at closeout, with a planted stem density range of 260 to 445 stems per acre Supplemental Planting (bare roots, live stakes and seeding) occurred in February 2009 to ensure proper herbaceous and woody stem growth Plots W2, W4 and their surrounding areas were replanted with additional 3 gallon containerized trees dunng the 2012 -2013 growing period to bring the stem count in and around these plots above 260 stems per acre Volunteer species are thriving in Plot W2 and both of the plots are isolated areas of low stem count based on observation of the surrounding buffer Based on these results the entire site has met the success criterion of at least 260 stems per acre at monitoring year 5 Areas of encroachment were also replanted with 3 gallon containerized trees in 2012 -2013 • Desirable volunteer stems such as elderberry, cottonwood and redbud are thriving on the site • The project has achieved success based on stated success criteria and is recommended for regulatory closure Contingencies: • Beaver management is ongoing and monitoring for beaver activity and trapping as required will occur until the final closeout of the Site Pre Construction Photos: 601 West pre construction 601 West pre construction 601 West pre construction Construction Phase ne ! l 11 601 West under construction 601 West under construction 601 West under construction 601 West under construction 601 West prior to planting 601 West prior to planting Monitoring Phase 601 West during 2012 monitoring phase 601 West during 2012 monitoring phase 601 West during 2012 monitoring phase. 601 West during 2012 monitoring phase. 601 West during 2012 monitoring phase. 601 West during 2012 monitoring phase. APPENDIX A — Watershed Planning Summary 92545- 601 West Property The 601 North Property project is located in Catalog Unit (CU) 03040105 and Hydrologic Unit (HUC) 03040105081010 (Upper Lanes Creek watershed) and is listed as a Targeted Local Watershed (TL W) in the 2009 Lower Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin Restoration Priority Plan (RBRP) (2009 Lower Yadkin Pee -Dee RBRP). The project is approximately 10 miles south of the City of Monroe, Union County and is located on a Tributary to Lanes Creek. As stated in the RBRP, goals for CU 03040105 include improved management of stormwater runoff to these waters, protection of valuable threatened and endangered wildlife resources and continued mitigation of impacts resulting from rapid urbanization of the area. In addition, contributing to the restoration of water quality in DWQ- identified impaired streams is a priority. According to the RBRP this HUC has over 30 animal operations and approximately 50% of its land is in agriculture use. Lanes Creek is rated as impaired for failing to meet its designated use of supporting aquatic life due to fair biological community ratings and high turbidity according to the 2012 303d list. Some agricultural practices and development impacts are possible contributors to the degraded biological integrity within this watershed. In addition, this watershed includes a Wildlife Resource Commission priority area and also the NC NHP Significant Natural Heritage Area (SNHA) Lanes Creek Aquatic Habitat. There is one other EEP restoration project in this watershed. Historically the project area has been primarily agricultural fields. Stream restoration improvements implemented by this project include the establishment of a riparian buffer to increase pollution filtration, reduction of nutrient and sediment inputs to the stream, and improvements to in- stream and riparian habitat. In addition, the reconnection of the stream to its floodplain facilitates increased flood storage. These project benefits will contribute to water quality improvements in adjacent downstream, 303d listed, waters and also a State identified SNHA by reducing sedimentation, increasing pollutant removal capabilities and improving the quality of in -stream habitat available for the biological communities. Cmei CmekM i w— « { 3 ANSON .. i UNION propwiv �- -..rte` - _ — - W West R opera 7 EEPP1g6da- 2113Gosaout EEPPrgeda(iW 8 State of South Carolina • 319Prolads • GWNTE Bala EEP Lod Watalaead Pkns N ,,EEPTary•ea LOr'al WalershCC� 0 1 2 d p��. W e EEP 2013 Project Closeout,. 601 West Pro (Yadkin 03040105 —Miles Q eoua) 8anealas S ` 1 Rev 23APd1913 APPENDIX B — Land Ownership and Protection SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT The land required for the construction, management, and stewardship of this mitigation project includes a portion of the following parcel http / /www nceep net/GIS DATA/PROPERTY /92545 601 WestPropegypdf Site Protection Deed Book & Page Acreage Grantor County Instrument Number protected Franklin W Howie Jr Union Conservation Easement 4386/726 128167 http / /www nceep net/GIS DATA/PROPERTY /92545 601 WestPropegypdf Appendix C — 404/401 Permits US. ARMY CORPS OP 6NCINC6RS WnAUNOTON DIM UM Anm W MW-)pl u92 Ctl" Ilan trees Q— ftmw CVWr PTRAUT(MUMAL ANY)IATIUNWIUP) YCRIPI VOY mp..ty O.va I nmbv and A.m. TaebpmaaY na, ntl un. w Aepu BYtl�Erd9tr�Ii� TaAp' -N. Sm ea boom arpapap (r.a pdV r..Omidmakv mn ed } YI w.Y omgem d Pal:p A d daq n..Ma ] Al u a v ,....n.a don Alp— ®Aesa R.�m vA n..v. Aa UtaCl m1 Amtaa.. w5..lpw.lrw.wpbe NWanW r..m Y.ee. n Iwl.m.. �m, a.�..a..ne.w..�mr..6.ee.+mearaw t'e•°uar�u.m. m... svamdemdm .rv.Y.tmn..d.ir.we.n®e�.IN are�v ®�avq. Q �sdm >WYV.velslv.aDyObanmly eynl snwb 6.dvmu abu�a Ylma.deeadmi� 1�V..��tl IwAF�nrn>•ItYlslwevvaW�Y) a bsJrmusvrnY.W b �^nl�mmb eMv a�..WmaOV d. �sal,ao �Aa IGYAR pa a e.pry..A P m evm b N C Prm dlLml.trR -.- Depnmm a Y. Any wnnwr av r nbm b Hama d br �.gv@dry Y dab q ak+ uWmn.dryrgwW..ean.. pb tpmo..b nlpY)nl p.pa)u �.TaYana.rpbmi s tw na n,lgr Fapwmdadumitam. maw,mb,pa anpabmammamer+ma e.byrbwdmwntmd.R� T.rWra r awes. Y ro n a� •rvY. w .mara sw.aroa seryn n .a. cn rwrrc 1ar.r en. a Ards. trre Id+b.R r.R a, m..A ttrq.c nAp mu CdAnY o�� o...t`wnaao�u.lva..mrs A.maJ )W) UYN. c-" W.m W Nwbn W.p.br firab BM pob.lBono B Ecdamv C.pGmyp 9ue.31Op RAbOn MC 2IBtl5 Ma}FC nM Wes Sawn R..bYbi bra EEP AaPRa/ALtlml WmY QmNy G.11rrb�mq)Wbdy edmuM. oRm w wwYw — b- b- --b.ac —Wb MWla9W mt8 .�pY.. bntl paw bneat n 3J.v.da.bM rJ 5000 i.n.r bppl tlunan.e Y�wi. blow Uw4 baron bmgi.b M .a1.d pa(.aN nnpn Cwb a apde.em )w.m6upm.ae.Me b b. [Amtd WAb Uv�r (OwC)pn Yw z2 iW) Albraw.bmw.wppamn wn..a eY.mWYaba bb pgrpbawaMpy WYw Oa®YOwtl CenAnptlp Nd.dW JBtB. rlsl+anb nwveon N r.p W Y Tln(irWrtlW Jd�✓fp..pybto NlbnWM hmY Wtb 1.)aeAY �InmNtYAa.paa.M1p.mtpw Wp�.pR brae'96av rwYrtl WRamG lnW.d Cpl Rtlm� +.m Empbn cam4 Rmria.typ .tewYn SwpJ webYw mpFYa. rlr d,a. nm.a c.nzlapan r wW.aw M.vodaa.o, rn.W em... aa. ap.rWa YpmmpbMCWlrr cwpt pap))v.pporYStm7p.5pbMaWpap Wm Apm um wrpa..vepn rod Aad�vlar nwAetvm. wawapt ym p.atlrpYru babp WWrpn mn p.rw..e m.aa Lep4Armlmaq.Y.e..1YtlW WWU1b. OtM papnryb am.Mnw+waw mW pabr.a)p1aM nmrdf/ pvaaaba bpdrppybm a AM aMbom In endpm m by mp6.rabb tlM mrlbatba Idl.r.el Ypmnp'y.1ni Mldbdnp mW V. t TIY pbOm.vM Rpbb Mtn Ymtl MroW WrramvwmuWdbnYM.pgawemgn.am np ad'r.n.ncee z nw.a YW anvYmaam. rtv yer o.npn bran wndYldra MPd.abeYnmre Mamp dbe pgap „wswmm.aWW mmwnwmr bb pqw YnnmrR Wrebr.awwl. M..rpWrwrm...p.afee MmoY fowl ar.M d M Mwb C.rdn.9a0bvnatlEwM Cwdd 1dsYq nb YM d NrHCpI n rrY ro WflYbs d YAW rYa p.alr alvOnN iYhM d ndp am. A UpancmvlebpndM mq.µM.iTAV ..Hal vngbsm r.NnMa.YpNO CWtec.wd Ca1Wb. bmbM YIINYWWm. UNd MAC ObIYOnd W.b CVYI put apaorA._aa Kan. tir�lyrps. wy.ow�r..v.u... a.r.wn.f —M � t•W wrwuv a, bbe ]OMIMM PbmtTSPC NWRI Nm.acWmlr uwm N dlbm Pevbmmd6lUpa and SwhY Aub NWmn Wd C.bprbva. J—" M M1OlaY MO.ye 9mreQgln Ua edap4liaaa. by by b, pmapE nYIhV"Mama)Mbr 94 dr bb .f-0 tmmit m mF Wb %tlAm. US AMCapdPagepa. AnadbY CMAW86A 151P A. Rem105 AYm$Nde Cne�1)WI M rb.eeb da y.ap®nd adary v mbl.nm • oomp0w. hnpaxim yp us Amy cw.otr tlmd..q.�he, Vfmo mtmcdah �6 mbwdl n.w.t�tm vamu pgmmR mpdi0u1o0. a dwump 1 ba,bTdapOtw braab �abMb..bew dfvmad Pemo 1..Apaapmpmt m ®lamm .im a tem ee ®ep®arm m p ®R m .apmvl aaaea w. wpvJda a ®.am.am M admu atmt� J � Cp^ippY. llp.ppkmn(FaabanlYMN Bam6ECAWpIYmravteGdl .mWWm• aaa.wm rry atm b.br ptiAy Yimad (Mrip .p Ipai.m W b br amgf Y..a an pmm mxpl d M awl wYa Aa) aW mry abw .Hato yum naA.dve. a mr .m aawd mn IIO.W MmIVM IAW MrA afa.:nef w by w ml p.b6 mW (.d.L9 Mitiv. bumin e..bYml d.eiap vY)w rr Yoe a bead w b p.bnlW.IY.0. abY p.Or<vl®ola ti nw>A.ry b.wv ampnvm OWOIVYIe.glot.�nwOl /08 wNbYmbl'Cm.mnaYM _(d)mew.w.O,o wrA anWN. mYIFOWMmbmaOmbsoMt5AHCAC M OpM(� Man taeM1bV MavmkJ. W, pVA ].Ibn lmlrM pPpd.n rmtla U9 Armrfpp.tl Impbgln.¢wmna.Ib tJAiSA NCAC ✓J �6F AT'nw�n ..bel�mMbntl�iV b.mePi.� P—k baby.n.IMwvAOY robe IAiM Stipp AmryCaped6piw. b..pa�.na m.ay pYmbbYSO pnurt b BYLM A(Y tlM CI.T WpY AC WYNEAbe p.mm mme0laaM Iel qum.bM W.P. tlym ao M.aYd.p dM ra ®am dH. mMbUn pa mry s b �aCpOrabr Mnbq Yaa n,W .tl abn roeW. ap.mb Mp pe.eaM bbbnn TOeW b.taa.p pna...bv paaw.btl osenm. baumltl t50B a om NtlbGmp. o.nnaamea. m MabpaAmra Wde w.w.. nu Y.1 Swbe Crw RYrI�, N C T)lSDd)t. Uiwt6owi Wtlb a.dpaa wlb.lamb b6pvtlo ydts4b.nwbp Tlv bm rary1.> M r..waM a.m. tlwm t)ufry vie. BOmmAM awaw.wmrAa p ym lua a'r1 OAdndW p.p. bbdva ptr Alm JoYammM Yoawi. Rppdtd Onu W )IY6B} teopsw L}N Aadyb MC.dN ampmRtleynpwJJaT1t S.rmary o /4e— b CdpnHSib AnWWYIbC S—d Cmr ta' Awry CaP d Fipwn Adagb 1.n 1MRIat WWdrd. LYW YRO lrro OrWry SraYFµ F➢A C.NJ FYp n. Cap IflyderMm.. Toep St bM Po BoA ]]Op8 RmsWA NC })S'm.JppJ Mitigation Project Name 601 West Property EEP IMS ID 92545 River Basin YADKIN Cataloging Unit 03040105 Applied Credit Ratios: 1:1 1.5:1 2.5:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1 1 3 1 2 1 51 1:1 3:1 0.51 1 1 1 1 IMS Amount 4,532.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 IMS - Ledger 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Positive = increase / Negative = decrease) Information as of 3/17/2013 11 4,532.00 c c t w m iz c a0 c o U z c C. u c C o z LCU c c a c w z c m o a V ia° m m U C m m C ow U LL^ o m o U m a 0 =r = 0 z o a Z Beginning Balance (feet and acres) NCDOT Pre -EEP Debits (feet and acres): Not Applicable EEP Debits (feet and acres): DWQ Permits USACE Action IDs Impact Project Name 2002 -0672 2009 -00876 NCDOT TIPs R -2559/ R -3329 - Monroe Bypass & Connector 3,472.36 2010 -0782 2010 -00726 NCDOT TIP R -2533C - NC 49 Widening 1,059.64 Remaining Balance (feet and acres) 0.00 IMS Amount 4,532.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 IMS - Ledger 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Positive = increase / Negative = decrease) Information as of 3/17/2013 11