The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20070896 Ver 1_Closeout Report_20130621Wolf Pond Stream Restoration Project EEP ID (IMS# 92551) DENR -EEP CONTRACT NUMBER D 06054 -B 00 USACE ACTION ID # SAW- 2007 - 1925 -390 15 DW Q 404 #07 -0896 rJ - AT" we&an , CLOSEOUT REPORT Yvettandss Serra PROJECT TYPE: Stream �AC Project Setting and Classifications County Union General Location Monroe, NC Basin Yadkin Pee -Dee Physiographic Region Piedmont Ecoregion Southern Piedmont USGS Hydro Unit 03040105 -070010 NCDWQ Sub -basin 03 -07 -14 Wetland Classification N/A Thermal Regime Warm Trout Water No Project Performers Source Agency NC EEP Provider Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC Designer Mmley -Hom and Associates Construction Contractor North State Environmental Planting Contractor New Forest Services Monitoring Finn NCSU BAE Property Interest Holder NC EEP Overall Project Activities and Timeline Month Activity July 5, 2006 Project hrslituted Date June 2007 Permitted Date (404/401 obtained) February 2008 Construction Completed March 2008 Planting Completed March 2008 Post Construction Monitoring Gauges Installed June 2008 As -Built Report Submitted March 2009 1st Annual Monitoring Report February 2009 Supplemental Planting (trees, seeding, live stakes) December 2009 2nd Annual Monitoring Report December 2010 3rd Annual Monitoring Report April 2011 Limited re- grading, seeding, tree planting, mulching UT2 PH section December 2011 4th Annual Monitoring Report March 2012 Supplemental Planting to correct encroachment December 2012 5th Annual Monitoring Report March 2013 Supplemental Planting due to Beaver Activity June 2013 Closeout Report Submitted July 2012 — July 2013 Beaver Management Project Setting and Background Summary The Wolf Pond site is located approximately 8 miles south of Monroe in Union County (see Figure 1) The property is located west of Wolf Pond Road, SR 207, and south of Joe Collins Road The site is accessed by a farm path that runs adjacent to the main power transmission lines that bisect the property The project is a restoration of approximately 4,500 linear feet of unnamed tributaries to Adams Branch in the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin The project is made up of an upper and lower section of UT2, referred to as Reach 3 and Reach 1, respectively for monitoring and UT1, referred to as Reach 2 for monitoring The Wolf Pond site has a drainage area of 0 83 square miles The dominant historic land use was originally timber production followed by intensive agricultural production of crops including corn, soybeans, and winter wheat The channel was straightened and channel►zed for agricultural purposes This led to an incised condition with little to no floodplam access Previously the stream was straightened and channelized as part of agricultural practices that also left no riparian buffer Increased runoff intensity caused incision, bank erosion and loss of bed form Water quality was diminished due to increased turbidity from bank erosion and elevated water temperatures caused by a lack of vegetative shading Habitat was reduced by the diminished water quality and continued loss of physical habitat such as bed features, woody debris, and a well- developed vegetation community Migrating head cuts further incised the channels Restoration of the stream included establishment of stable cross - sectional geometry, restoration of channel sinuosity, and increased streambed diversity Supplemental Planting consisting of two year old bare roots, live stakes and seeding occurred in 2009 to ensure adequate stem height and establishment of herbaceous vegetation Portions of the Priority II section of Reach 2 were regarded, seeded, replanted with 3 gallon containerized trees and mulched in April 2011 to correct erosional areas 3 gallon containerized trees were planted in to correct areas of encroachment along the field edges in March 2012 and then in March 2013 in the areas near the beaver dams to mitigate for beaver cuttings The restoration has been successful in meeting the design goals All hydrologic and water quality goals have been achieved as the channel and cross sections have remained stable and the site has experienced eleven bank full events Riparian habitat has been greatly improved Stream structures, cross sections and pattern have maintained stability, although several areas have been watched for several years to see if they develop into issues and appear to not be doing so Goals and Objectives • Produce a minimum of 4,500 stream mitigation units (SMU) to NCEEP (contracted amount) Goals related to hydrology include• • Re- establishing floodplam connect by raising bed elevations • Increase flood storage by re- establishing floodplai Goals related to water quality include: • Reducing turbidity by reducing sediment inputs • Reducing water temperatures by providing shading • Increasing / stabilizing oxygen levels by reducing BOD /COD and increasing reoxygenatmg turbulence Goals related to habitat include. • Improved bed habitat by increasing riffle — pool diversity, reducing sediment deposition, and improving low flow water depths • Improve bank habitat by increasing stability and woody biomass • Improve floodplain habitat by establishing microtopography and hydrology, removing invasive vegetation, and increasing habitat diversity • Improve food web dynamics by adding biomass (such as detritus, wood debris and leaf matter) and re- establishing floodplam connection Page 2 of 24 The restoration achieves these goals through the following objectives: • Stabilizing channel bed and banks through modifying dimension, pattern, and profile using natural channel design • Installing in- stream structures such as rock vanes • Installing in -bank structures such as root wads • Raising stream bed elevations • Restoring soils in riparian buffer • Removing invasive vegetation • Planting native vegetation in riparian buffer Success Criteria Vegetation Survival of at least 320 planted stems per acre after the year three monitoring period Survival of at least 260 planted stems per acre after the year five monitoring period As -Built A photo log will be maintained over the monitoring period and must demonstrate maturation of Stream planted vegetation Stream Two bankfull flow events must be documented within the five-year monitoring period There should be little change in as -built cross sections Cross sections shall be classified using the Ratio Mitigation Rosgen stream classification method and all monitored cross - sections should fall within the quantitative parameters defined for C type channels The longitudinal profiles should show that the bedform features are remaining stable, e g they are Units not aggrad rig or degrading Bedfonms observed should be consistent with those observed in C type channels Photographs will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradanon or degradation, bank S erosion success of n anan vegetation and effectiveness of erosion control measures Proiect Assets Stream Mitigation Watershed As -Built Mitigation Stream Restoration Approach Acreage Linear Ratio Mitigation Reach Footage Units Streams S UT2/Reach Restoration 083 2,972 1 1 2,972 1/Reach 3 UTI/Reach 2 Restoration 012 1,541 1 1 1,541 Total 083 4,513 1:1 4,51 Page 3 of 24 Protect Site Maps Page 4 of 24 'N 191111l 900011111 ��811111 �00000aoo I' � §E Y � M SOA16 - STA: 214+14 L �ru Project Site Maps SOUKE: USGS Monroe, NC Quadrangle 2013 Wolf Pond Mitigation Site USGS Map Scale:i °.1100, Page 7 of 24 Legena BOB BOdin dmwmwry silt loom 2 - B % slope BOB Bodln dharrrety At loom S -15 % slop ChA Chewada sik loam 0 - 2 % slope OnB Gel dmttrery sik loom 1- 5 % slope ScA SwW -t]d a nnpieu 0 - 3 %slope TO Torras grOrelly At loam 2 - s % slope TbB2 Tarrus Qavelly My day loom 2 - R %slope WyB WynDU Fwdly loam 2 - b % slope D Wolf Pond Mitigation Site 1.. 6w SOURCE: NRCS Web Sob Map Soils Map Say: Page 8 of 24 i+! .10 i Stream Observation Areas SOA Feature Reach Description Sta o& Noted MY5 -PA3 Beaver Dam SOAI In stream I 220+30 Remedial Action Underway — Ongoing management until closeout 2012 SOA2 In stream 1 MY5 PA4 Beaver Dam 2012 222 +34 Remedial Action Underway — Ongoing management until closeout SOA3 Left Bank 1 MY4 PA6 LB scour 2011 222 +85 Continue to monitor — no action required SOA4 Floodplam I MY4 PA8 LB cutoff channel 2011 224 +81 Continue to monitor — no action required SOA5 In stream 1 MY5 PA5 Beaver Dam 2012 224 +96 Remedial Action Underway — Ongoing management until closeout SOA6 Floodplain 1 MY4 PA7 LB cutoff channel 2011 227 +31 Continue to monitor — no action required SOA7 In stream 1 MY5 PA6 Beaver Dam 2012 227 +32 Remedial Action Underway — Ongoing management until closeout SOAS Floodplam 1 MY3 PA4 RB cutoffchannel (Healed) 2010 229 +75 Continue to monitor — no action required SOA9 In stream 1 MY5 PA7 Beaver Dam 2012 230+26 Remedial Action Underway — Ongoing management until closeout SOA10 Left Bank 2 MY4 PA2 LB gully entering 2011 103 +29 Continue to monitor— no action required SOAI 1 Bank 2 MY4 PA4 r Bank Scour above vane 2011 109 +25 Continue to monitor — no action required Headcut SOAl2 In stream 2 MY4 P A3 107 +79 +1 A3 Continue to monitor — no action required 2011 Not visible anymore SOA13 Left Bank 2 MY4 PA5 LB scour 2011 107 +92 - 107 +98 Continue to monitor — no action required SOA14 Floodplwn 2 MY4 PAI Cutoffchannel both banks 2011 100 +43 - 107 +46 Continue to monitor — no action required MY5 PA2 Backwater from dam SOA15 In stream 3 Continue to monitor— no action required 2012 210+76 Remedied with dam removal SOA16 In stream 3 MY5 PA2 Debris Dam 2012 214 +13 Continue to monitor — no action required Page 9 of 24 Cross Sections F o W Wan Pond R1 RXS-1 _ WoN Pond R1 PXS-1 60100 60350 60150 612 60350 ur�(mq m3m 602m 60200 ®150 601m 60050 6OUm —' -Bun — 84NI6VLL MY1 <2ET5) MY2 WCU) — MY3 polo) W4(2011) —Nr7S 8012) —mmm rrlm�n �rw �a XT t 120 r JK 603m - 60250 - 60200 - 60150 - oz 601 m - < 60050 ' w 60000 - u 599 59900 69850 00 45 50 55 50 65 ]0 ]5 do f5 90 0 :0 20 30 b 50 W M t!0 STATION (F1) STATION (Ff) 616 Wan Pond R2 PXS- I Wolf Pond R2 RXS-2 615 611 F613 —AS -Bun Q — E34NIffULL 612 —MY1 PW —� 9009) r, fitt — MY3c2olo) 610 MY /(2011) —MYS 90 2) 609 0 16 28 611m — 1 61050 610m s � fi0950 60900 60950 60Bm IB5 190 z 39 4B 58 66 78 68 STATION (F1) WOK Pond R3 RXSI 613 612 671 BAD ur�(mq 61500 —' -Bun 6m WB —mmm rrlm�n �rw �a XT t 120 r 00 45 50 55 50 65 ]0 ]5 do f5 90 0 :0 20 30 b 50 W M t!0 STATION (F1) STATION (Ff) 616 Wan Pond R2 PXS- I Wolf Pond R2 RXS-2 615 611 F613 —AS -Bun Q — E34NIffULL 612 —MY1 PW —� 9009) r, fitt — MY3c2olo) 610 MY /(2011) —MYS 90 2) 609 0 16 28 611m — 1 61050 610m s � fi0950 60900 60950 60Bm IB5 190 z 39 4B 58 66 78 68 STATION (F1) WOK Pond R3 RXSI 613 612 671 BAD ur�(mq 61500 —' -Bun 6m WB —mmm rrlm�n �rw �a XT 6WITULL 120 125 130 135 110 145 156 155 160 IE STATION (FT) Wolf Pond R3 PXS- 1 AsBui11 B4NIffULL — MY1 POpg) — MY2 (2009) MY3 (210) — MYI (2011) — MYS(2012) 26 31 36 4'. sE 51 5E n' cc 71 STATION (FT) Page 10 of 24 F F F r 0 WoN Pond R2 FD(S.1 61650 61600 61550 61550 615!10 61500 —' -Bun ....611511 t` 611m — AS-Bwn 61150 6WITULL 61100 �BONIffULL —MY1 R00BI JK � 61350 61350 —MY2 9009) — MY3 (2010) —MY2 Q009) — MY3 (2010) —MYI (2OII) 67300 61310 W 61250 612m 611m 61250 61200 �MYS (2012) —MY5(012) 235 611m 195 230 205 210 215 220 725 STATION (FT) STATION (FT) Wolf Pond R3 PXS- 1 AsBui11 B4NIffULL — MY1 POpg) — MY2 (2009) MY3 (210) — MYI (2011) — MYS(2012) 26 31 36 4'. sE 51 5E n' cc 71 STATION (FT) Page 10 of 24 F F F r 0 WoN Pond R2 FD(S.1 61650 6160D 61550 61500 —' -Bun 60650 61150 6WITULL 61100 — MY19") JK 61350 —MY2 9009) — MY3 (2010) 67300 MY /(2011) 61250 61200 �MYS (2012) 235 210 205 250 255 257 266 270 275 231 2B STATION Fn WoN Pond R2 PXS-2 61850 6®m EU750 64700 60650 �1 ®6m —SkNW84NIffULL —MY1 11009) 60550 —MY2 RUES) — MY3(2010) -- MY4 PD! 1) —MYS (2012) 605m 60400 60 C,5 ?i 75 Em 85 90 95 100 105 STA71ON " "17 r. O M N A tlevriion h) 3 1.; ■ x Nb x' M X %IP " 1 � N x �x III � D X . % x I oN 0 3 %� � Y Di x v x y �tj %* S pix Od�x 7% S xl��► y q k >P MQ ex% .� x ■ 9 pd ■ o � , Y ml G Y • t S DG r 0 e L o' y b O A u. N 4. 0 N Q. _A Y % N J _ N x X: rr '' r : x >> i Cx% N _ F F F F F F 3 3 == F- F f F I p I a X ■ ' M % X X� M C Xx . "m r% m N N m X r � R X z� aQ L - - a p L Y L M 0 C K - � X 4yLI* M, X % 1 10f r z z N � - z z M r Y Y M z I' h M uor's N 4. 0 N Q. _A Welf Pond Rya Ch 3 ea 0, 12P 1 MY'l TW AAY2 Bit. If3 xs TW MY15 TOM. MY, TOO -MY3 ICI. MV4 TnD - MY5 Page 13 of 24 Summary of Crest Gauze Monitorme Results Page 14 of 24 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Date of Event August March November May July Date of Event June December August Observed Observed Date of Event None None February None None Observed Observed Observed Observed Maximum Height Above Bankfull 12 18 13 07 02 feet Note 5 bankfull events occurred in 2010 but only the three largest are listed Page 14 of 24 Summary of Moraholoaic Parameters Parameter R1 Cross Section RXS 1 Riffle RI Cross Section PXS 1 Pool Dimension Base Dimension Base MYI MY2 MY3 MY41 MY5 Base MYI MY2 MY3 I MY4 MY5 BF Width (ft) 237 220 264 21 2 198 209 330 351 33 1 314 305 273 BF Cross Sectional Area (ft) 204 242 247 227 229 237 400 428 44 5 40 7 424 472 BF Mean Depth (ft) 09 1 1 09 1 1 12 14 12 12 1 3 1 3 14 BF Max Depth (ft) 22 28 28 29 23 24 31 32 33 33 34 j Width/Depth Ratio 27 5 20 0 28 1 19 8 17 0 18 3 27 1 28 8 24 6 24 2 21 4 Parameter R2 Cross Section RXS 1 Riffle R2 Cross Section PXS 1 Pool Dimension Base Dimension Base MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MYl MY2 I MY3 MY41 MY5 BF Width (ft) 24 1 228 295 258 243 286 252 285 279 217 204 22 4 BF Cross Sectional Area (ft) 221 225 223 210 217 202 219 277 324 296 307 1292 Mean Depth (ft) 0 9 1 0 0 8 0 8 0 9 0 7 0 9 1 0 1 2 1 4 06 MaxDepth(ft) L 22 21 23 21 22 21 24 28 28 27 10 A82 th/Depth Ratio 263 23 1 39 1 317 27 1 39 3 28 9 29 4 24 1 119 115 Parameter R2 Cross Section RXS2 Riffle R2 Cross Section PXS2 Pool Dimension Base Dimension Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 I MY5 Base MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 BF Width (ft) 306 304 308 266 289 293 21 6 21 3 173 185 113 144 BF Cross Sectional Area (ft) 425 414 417 408 394 380 114 122 8 8 13 67 76 BF Mean Depth (ft) 14 14 14 1 5 14 13 05 0 6 0 7 0 4 06 BF Max Depth (ft) 29 3 1 28 28 28 23 1 5 16 15 10 10 J176 Width/Depth Ratio 22 1 1224 227 173 213 22 6 409 37 2 25 4 41 5 115 Parameter R3 Cross Section RXS 1 Riffle R3 Cross Section PXS 1 Pool Dimension Base Dimension Base MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 BF Width (ft) 20 1 212 234 204 122 128 35 8 32 1 351 309 332 352 BF Cross Sectional Area (ft) 104 103 103 105 104 113 316 344 314 279 310 305 BF Mean Depth (ft) 05 05 04 05 08 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 BF Max Depth (ft) 16 19 19 1 8 2 1 21 26 26 23 23 25 22 Width/Depth Ratio 139 1 43T 53 39 8 14 4 14 5 40 5 36 8 39 I 34 2 35 6 40 7 Additional Reach Parameters Wolf Pond Dimension Base MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS Channel slope (ft/ft) 0 0068 0 0059 0 0059 0 0056 0 0061 0 0061 Channel sinuosity 126 126 126 126 126 126 Bankfull discharge* (cfs) 68 89 81 80 89-91 "Bankfull discharge is estimated using the downstream most rifle cross sectional area, the continuity equation and Maiming's formula for estimating velocity Page 15 of 24 Planted Species by Plot and Summary of Results Wolf Pond Planted Species (Site wide, initial planting) Common Name Sclentific Name Abbreviations Paw Paw Asimina triloba AT River Birch Betula nigra BN Shag Bark Hickory Carya ovate CO Green Ash Froxinus pennsylvanica FP Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii QM Water Oak Quercus nigra QN Willow Oak Quercus phellos QP Planted Species (supplemental planting) Common Name Scientific Name Abbreviations River Birch Betula nigra BN Green Ash Froxinus pennsylvonica FP Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michouxii QM Water Oak Quercus nigra QN Willow Oak Quercus phellos QP Wolf Pond November 2012 (MY5) Stems Planted SURVIVING PLANTED SPECIES LIVE Plot Pawpaw River Birch Shagbark Hickory Green Ash Swamp Chestnut Oak Water Oak Willow Oak Oak PLANTED STEMS WP1 MYI 3 MY3 5 MY5 WP1 2 13 10 WP2 11 10 2 2 3 1 1 445 9 WP3 1 15 3 1 2 2 2 3 607 13 WP4 364 5 364 2 3 15 2 15 12 WP5 1 260 3 607 2 607 566 1 WP4 8 TOTALS 2 14 3 13 8 3 9 0 52 Percent 004 027 006 015 015 006 017 000 1 00 Summary of Results of Vegetation Monitoring Plot Stems Planted MY1 2008 Stems MY2 2009 Stems MY3 2010 Stems MY4 2011 Stems MYS 2012 Stems Final Success Criteria (stems/ac) Stems per Acre Ay 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Budt MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 WP1 13 13 13 11 11 10 260 526 526 526 445 445 404 WP2 1 15 10 1 10 1 9 1 9 1 9 260 607 404 404 364 364 364 WP3 16 15 15 15 14 13 1 260 647 607 607 607 566 526 WP4 17 12 12 12 12 12 260 688 485 485 485 485 485 WP5 17 9 9 1 10 10 8 1 260 688 364 364 404 404 323 Page 16 of 24 EEP Recommendation and Conclusion • The restored stream channel has remained stable as evident by the fact that all monitored cross sections and longitudinal profiles show no significant adjustment in stream dimension over the entire monitoring period The stream channel is also providing the intended habitat, water quality, hydrologic and riparian functions and has met all success criteria including eleven bankfull events While cattails are present in portions of the site the canopy will close soon shading the cattails out The overall mitigation benefits of flood storage, temperature reduction and removing sediment will continue • Beaver have been active on the site since July 2012 and a beaver management program has been initiated Beaver are regularly trapped from the site and the dams removed up to the top of bank • Vegetation monitoring has documented the average number of surviving planted stems per acre on the site to be 420, with a stem density range of 323 to 526 stems per acre All areas have achieved the success criteria of 260 trees per acre at monitoring year 5 • The project has achieved success based on stated success criteria and is recommended for regulatory closure All items shown as stream areas of observation with the exception of Beaver Management do not warrant any action and have healed on their own or were not of significant concern and less than 1% coverage of the site The portions of the site that were impacted by beaver were replanted with 3 gallon containerized material in March of 2013 in an effort to jump start the return of the riparian vegetation which will reestablish with the seed bank and stump sprout on its own EEP recommends project closure at 4513 SMUs Contineencies • Beaver management including inspection and trapping as required will be ongoing until closeout of the Site Page 17 of 24 Pre- Construction Photos 2005 -2006 0-trait& ! Im&- .a Page 18 of 24 Post - Construction Photos After Planting (2008) Page 19 of 24 (2012) Monitoring Year 5 Page 20 of 24 APPENDIX A - Watershed Planning Summary The Wolf Creek project, located in Yadkin 03040105, is not located in a current EEP watershed planning area (i a Targeted Local Watershed or Local Watershed Planning area) Page 21 of 24 APPENDIX B — Land Ownership and Protection SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT The land required for the construction, management, and stewardship of this mitigation project Includes a portion of the following parcel http //www nceep net/GIS DATA/PROPERTY /92551 WolfPond pdf LONG -TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN Upon approval for close -out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the site will be transferred to the NC Department of Transportation, which will be responsible for periodic inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation easement are upheld Page 22 of 24 Site Protection Deed Book & Acreage Grantor County Instrument Page Number protected Franklin W Howie Jr Conservation Union 4386/726 131561 Easement http //www nceep net/GIS DATA/PROPERTY /92551 WolfPond pdf LONG -TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN Upon approval for close -out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the site will be transferred to the NC Department of Transportation, which will be responsible for periodic inspection of the site to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation easement are upheld Page 22 of 24 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WILMINGTON DISTRICT Action ID SAW - 2007 - 1925 -390 County Union USGS Quad- Monroe GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION Property Owner / Authorized Agent. Environmental Banc and Exchange, Att'n• Norton Webster Address 909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100 Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 Telephone No.: Size and location of property (water body, road name /number, town, etc ) Wolf Pond Stream Restoration Project located on a 13.37 acre tract off of JD Helms Road*, south of Monroe Description of projects area and activity, Restore 4,750 LF of unnamed tributaries to Adams Branch Restoration activities will include: channel relocation excavation of floodplain benches adjustment of pattern, profile, and dimension, and installation of rock cross vanes a vanes lost sills, low vanes, root wads and riparian buffer establishment Applicable Law ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) ❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403) Authorization- Regional General Permit Number Nationwide Permit Number 27 Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached Nationwide conditions and your submitted plans Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified, suspended, or revoked If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i a are under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity is completed within 12 months of the date of the nationwide's expiration, modification, or revocation, unless discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend, or revoke the authorization Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification You should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone 919 - 733 -1786) to determine Section 401 requirements For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA), prior to beginning work you must contact the N C Division of Coastal Management This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State or local approvals /pemuts If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory program, please contact Mr Steve Chapin at (828) 271 - 7980 x224 Corps Regulatory Official Steve Chapin Date June 29, 2007 Expiration Date of Verification. June 29, 2009 The Wilmington District is comnutted to providing the highest level of support to the public To help us ensure we continue to do so, please complete the attached Satisfaction Survey or visit http• / /www saw usace army mil /WETLANDS /index htinl to complete the survey online Copy Furnished: Kimley -Horn and Associates (Todd St. John), P.O. Box 33068, Raleigh, NC 27636 -3068 Permit Number: Permit Type: Name of County. Name of Permittee Date of Issuance: Project Manager 2007 -1925 -390 NW27 Union Environmental Banc and Exchange, Att'n Norton Webster June 29, 2007 Steve Chapin Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit, sign this certification and return it to the following address- U.S Army Corps of Engineers Attention: CESAW -RG -A 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, North Carolina 28801 -5006 Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by an U.S. Army Corps of Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to permit suspension, modification, or revocation. I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in accordance with the permit conditions. Signature of Permittee Date Mitigation Project Name Wolf Pond EEP IMS ID 92551 River Basin YADKIN Cataloging Unit 03040105 An 1i.H (:rcrtit R.tin 1*1 1 6.1 9 5.1 S'1 1 1 3'1 9'1 S'1 1'1 3'1 9'1 S'1 1 1 3 2 1 5'1 1'1 3'1 0.5:1 1:1 1:1 • 4,513.00 A O A q a z 10' R C A a aW z U C A W R E au K z w C m a aZ z a O L q C U L C m O m L A � b a C m p 1.- C a z � O b O z Beginning Balance (feet and acres) NCDOT Pre-EEP Debits (feet and acres): INot Applicable EEP Debits feet and acres): DWQ Permit No USACE Action IDs Impact Project Name Statewide ILF Credit Purchase 1,157.00 Remaining Balance (feet and acres) 3,356.00 IMS Amount 4,513.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 IMS - Ledger 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (Positive = increase / Negative = decrease) C: Information as of 3/17/2013