20211267 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20210820

DWR
Dlrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
June 1, 2021 Ver4.1
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20211267
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
'Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Long Creek Greenway & Water Quality Improvement Project (Treyburn to 1-485)
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Ian Eckardt
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
8/20/2021
Nearest Body of Water
Long Creek
Basin
Catawba
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.342016-80.887008
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Mecklenburg
Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
Version#*
1
What amout is owed?*
r $240.00
IT $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Alan Johnson:eads\adjohnson1
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
Is this a courtesy copy notification?*
r Yes r No

ID#
Version
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date
7/2/2021
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:
pick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docunent
Long Creek Greenway and Water Quality Improvement Project (Treyburn Dr. to 1-465) - DWR Pre -Filing Meeting
Request Form. pdf
File type nest be FCF
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
W Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
r- Yes
r No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r- Yes IT No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 27 - Restoration
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 42 - Recreation Facility
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 13 - Bank Stabilization
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
55.06KB
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular r 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit r Riparian Buffer Authorization
r Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: r Yes r No
For the record onlyfor Corps Permit: r Yes r No
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
r Owner W Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r- No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Multiple parcels - see attached Parcel Information Sheet
2b. Deed book and page no.:

Multiple parcels - see attached Parcel Information Sheet
2c. Contact Person:
Mecklenburg County Asset and Facility Management (POC: David Booth)
2d.Address
Street Address
3205 Freedom Drive, Suite 6000
Address tine 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28208
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
David. [e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
David Booth, Project Manager
3b. Business Name:
Mecklenburg County Asset and Facility Management
3c.Address
Street Address
3205 Freedom Drive, Suite 6000
Address tine 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28208
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
David. [e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Ian Eckardt
4b. Business Name:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
4c.Address
Street Address
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28203
4d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
ieckardt@v,ildlandseng.com
State / Rovince / Rion
NC
Country
us
2f. Fax Number:
Slate / province / Region
NC
Country
us
3e. Fax Number:
State / Rmince / Rion
NC
Country
us
4e. Fax Number:
C. Project Information and Prior Project History C^)
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(i appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Charlotte

2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
See attached Parcel Information Sheet
2c. Project Address
Street Address
8508 Beatties Ford Rd.
Address tine 2
city
Charlotte
Postal / Zip Code
28216
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Long Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Catawba
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030501011403
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
Approximately 80 acres. This is a linear
project located on multiple parcels; therefore,
the size is based on the overall project area.
State / Province / Region
NC
(buntry
US
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The project is located in a developing watershed in northwest Mecklenburg County. Land use in the project area includes wooded floodplain corridors along Long Creek and maintained
utility right-of-ways. Surrounding land use include open spaces, shopping centers, residential communities, and some forest.
A review of aerial photography indicates the project area and surroundings were largely rural and agricultural through the 1970's with development increasing significantly during the
period from the late 1970s through the 1990s. Long Creek appears to have been historically straightened which also affected the adjacent tributaries. In the project area, Long Creek is
generally incised and disconnected from its historic floodplain with the exception of one section which is bedrock controlled. Bank erosion is common throughout the project area.
Bedform diversity is lowand consists primarily of long sandy runs with pools developed around debris jams. Contributing tributaries are also incised in order to meet the lowering bed
elevation of Long Creek. During the 2000's, the project area saw increased pressure from suburban sprawl with the establishment of the 11485 Outer Loop and associated increases in
housing and development. Additional impervious surfaces within the watershed have increased the magnitude and frequency of peak flows which has resulted in further damage to
previously manipulated and incised channels.
A portion of the project area on parcel PINs (03319199, 03313221, and 03327109) was utilized as a %etland mitigation site for North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
(TIP R-2248) constructed in the mid to late 1990's and closed out in 2009. The parcels were transferred from NCDOT to Mecklenburg County with an agreement for a future greenway
allowance. The USACE has reviewed the situation and stated that impacts to the NCDOT wetland credit area can be allowed if Mecklenburg County can provide a "land swap" to
preserve the overall size of the mitigation site. Apprommately 33 acres of Mecklenburg County land will be placed in a conservation easement. Correspondence with Mecklenburg
County, NCDOT, and USACE can be provided if necessary.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes r- No r Unknown
If yes, please give the DWR Certification number or the Corps Action ID (exp. SAW-0000-00000).
Long Creek Greenway Phase 1 (SAW-2019-00868)
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
9.77 AC (Wetlands & Open waters)
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
14,662 LF
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The project is a joint greenway and water quality improvement project. The greenway will provide a linear trail for recreation, fitness, and community connection. Water quality
improvements include stream restoration, enhancement,and preservation along Long Creek that Will reduce erosion and increase aquatic habitat.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*

The project includes approArnately two miles of greenway trail along Long Creek and 9,000 linear feet of stream improvements involving restoration and enhancement between
Treyburn Drive and the western 1-485 crossing. The greenway section begins in the vicinity of the Colonial gas pipeline crossing of Long Creek and continues southwestward to the
second, western crossing of 1-485. Connector trails or partially built/stub out portions of future connector trails are proposed at Ambleside Drive, Belstead Brook Court, Sheltonham
Way, and Trotter Road to provide direct access to surrounding neighborhoods. The greenway will be a 12-foot wide asphalt path with sections of raised boardwalk and prefabricated
pedestrian bridges to cross and/or over look streams and wetlands. Board walk sections will be supported by timber piers. A trailhead with parking is proposed immediately east of the
Beatties Ford Road trail crossing.
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services (CMSWS) identified the Long Creek corridor from Treyburn Drive to 1-485 as a stream improvement opportunity, concurrent with
Mecklenburg County's Asset and Facilities Management's (AFM) development of the adjacent greenway corridor. NC Land & Water Fund (NCLWF) is a funding partner with CMSWS for
the stream improvement work along Long Creek which is not proposed for mitigation credit. Long Creek is generally incised and disconnected from its historic floodplain throughout the
project area. Eroding banks are common and ebsting stream bedform is limited to long sandy runs and pools that have developed at debris jams. An ebsting sewer line runs parallel
with Long Creek and is generally near the left top of bank.
The project seeks to improve water quality through restoration and enhancement activities. Water quality objectives include decreased nutrient and pollutant levels in storm flows
achieved by filtering in -stream flood flows through restored floodplain areas; decreased stream water temperatures achieved by planting vegetation along the stream for shade; and
increased dissolved oxygen concentrations through creating in -stream aeration points (structures) and developing deep pool zones. Ecological objectives include creating in -stream
habitat through structure placement, establishing woody vegetation along the stream banks, and diversifying the bedform; improving terrestrial habitat through invasive species removal
and re-establishing a native buffer along the riparian corridor; decreasing channel velocities by increasing channel roughness with bank vegetation and reconnecting the stream to a
floodplain through benching.
Stream restoration and enhancement approaches are based on ebsting conditions, constraints, habitat and water quality improvement potential, channel evolution stage, and the
riparian condition. Restoration and enhancement will be achieved using natural channel design and successful local stream design projects as reference reaches to inform design.
Stream restoration will involve a Rosgen Priority 2 approach and include the excavation of a new stream channel and associated floodplain benches to provide flood storage.
Restoration will also include the installation of in -stream structures such as constructed riffles, rock/log sills, rock/log j-hooks, log vanes, and brush toes. Enhancement is proposed
where constraints limit improvement opportunity and generally involve a combination of laying back stream banks, constructing a bankbull bench, and/or installing rock bank protection
with keyed in riprap. Preservation is proposed to relatively stable portion of Long Creek that is bedrock controlled between the first 1-485 and Beatties Ford Road crossings. Five
unnamed tributaries will also be impacted for relocation and stabilization purposes as they are re -connected to newly constructed sections of Long Creek. For project purposes the
tributaries have been identified as Trib A Lower, Trib B, Trib E, Trib N, and Trib U. Impact figures are provided in the Miscellaneous Section of this application.
Excavators will be used for channel and floodplain excavation as wall as for bank grading and in -stream structure installation, while articulated and track trucks will be used for hauling
soil. Small equipment such as mini excavators and skid steers may also be used during grading activities. A native riparian buffer Will be planted along project streams.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes
r No
Comments:
Streams and wetlands were delineated by Wildlands Engineering 2020 and 2021. A modified
preliminary jurisdictional determination is included was this submittal.
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2020-01819
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Ian Eckardt
Agency/Consultant Company: Wildlands Engineering
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes C No
C Unknown
6b. If yes, explain.
The Long Creek Greenway is part of the overall Mecklenburg County greenway system with ebsting and proposed phases. A separate stream and wetland mitigation project (Long
Creek Corridor Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site) is being designed immediately adjacent to portions of the greenway/water quality improvement project between Treyburn Drive and
Beatties Ford Road. The mitigation project is proposed for construction concurrently with the greenway/stream improvement project. Separate Nationwide permits will be sought for the
mitigation project.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
P Wetlands 17 Streams -tributaries i— Buffers
f— Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts

2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type * (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name *
2e. Forested *
[2f. Typeofurisdicition
W1
Construction access
T
ff-mland Hardwood Forest
Wetland M
Yes
Both
0.027
(acres)
W2
Floodplain grading ��T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland A
Yes
Both
0.003
(acres)
W3
Filling as part of stream
P
mland Hardwood Forest
ff
Wetland B
Yes
Both
0.001
restoration
(acres)
W4
Construction access to
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland C
Yes
Both
0.122
build boardwalk
(acres)
crossing.
WS
Construction access to
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland C
Yes
Both
0.186
build boardwalk
(acres)
crossings.
W6
Construction access
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland D
Yes
Both
0.001
(acres)
W7
Construction access to
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland O
Yes
Both
0.092
build bridge and
(acres)
boardwalk crossings.
W8
Construction access to
T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland E
Yes
Both
0.132
build boardwalk
(acres)
crossing.
W9
Construction access ��T
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Wetland 00
—�]
Yes
Both
0.024
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.587
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.588
21. Comments:
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.001
Wetland impacts were avoided as much as possible. Impacts are primarily temporary for construction access necessary to build the greenway and
associated boardwalk sections. Wetland impact (W3) is the only permanent impact necessary related to the restoration of Trib B which will be filled
and relocated.
3. Stream Impacts
3a. Reason for impact (?)
3b.lmpact type *
3c. Type of impact*
3d. S. name*
3e. Stream Type*
Type of
3gSwidth *
3h. Impact
❑
�[3f.
urisdiction*
length*
S1
Construction access
Tem orar
P Y
Other
Lon Creek
g
Perennial
Both
35
64
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
82
Bank grading for stabilization
Temporary
Bank Stabilization J
Long Creek
Perennial
Both
35
249
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
S3
Stream restoration
Permanent
Relocation
Long Creek
Perennial
Both
35
3,096
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)
S4
Construction access
Tem orar
P Y
Other
Lon Creek
9
Perennial
Both
35
94
Average (feet)
(lirearfeet)
S5
Bank stabilization
Permanent
Bank Stabilization
Long Creek
Perennial
Both
35
24
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S6
Bank grading for stabilization
Temporary
Bank Stabilization
Long Creek
Perennial
Both
35
305
Average (feet)
(linearfee[)
g7
Bank grading for stabilization
Temporary
Bank Stabilization
Long Creek
Perennial
Both
35
833
Average (feet)
(lin�rfeel)
S8
Stream restoration
Permanent
Relocation
Lon Creek
g
Perennial
Both
35
2,724
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
S9
Construction access
Tem orar
P Y
Other
Trib A Lower
Intermittent
Both
6
24
Average (feet)
(linearfeet)
�01
Stream restoration
Permanent
Relocation
Trib A Lower
Intermittent
Both
6
94
Average (feet)
(lin�rfeel)
�11
Stream restoration
Permanent
Relocation
Trib B
Perennial
Both
10
339
Average (feet)
(lin�rfeet)
�2]�StreamAverage
restoration
Permanent
Relocation
Trib U
Intermittent
Both
8
320
(feet)
(liriearfeet)
S13
Construction access
Tem orar
P Y
Other
Trib D
Intermittent
Both
12
67
Average (feet)
(lir�rfeet)

��4�Constructionp
S15
access
Stream restoration
Tem orar y
Permanent
Other
Relocation
Trib E
Trib E
Perennial
Perennial
��-]
Both
10
Average (feet)
10
Average (feet)
92
(liriearfeet)
59
(linearfeet)
S16
Stream restoration
Permanent
Relocation
Trib N
Intermittent
Both
10
Average (feet)
137
(lir:earfeet)
3i. Total jurisdictional ditch impact in square feet:
3i. Total permanent stream impacts:
6,793
3i. Total stream and ditch impacts:
2706
3i. Total temporary stream impacts:
1.728
3j. Comments:
Total stream impacts is miscalculated in Section 3i. The correct total stream impact length is 8,521 linear feet.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The greenway design incorporated the location of existing streams and wetlands in order to avoid these features as much as possible. Proposed
greenway crossings of streams and wetlands consist of either bridge or raised boardwalk to avoid permanent impacts. Bridge crossings will span top
of bank to top of bank. Boardwalk sections will be constructed using driven timber pilings to avoid impacts. Stream restoration and enhancement are
proposed on degraded sections of stream while relatively stable sections of stream are proposed for preservation and being avoided. Restored
stream alignments were designed to avoid wetland impacts.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Boardwalks crossings will be supported by timber piers that will be driven in to avoid discharge. Construction will be limited to the immediate project
area with silt and/or safety fence demarcating disturbance limits to avoid unnecessary impacts. Restored sections of Long Creek will be construction
will be done in the dry as much as possible through offline construction and pump around practices will be utilized where feasible when working in
existing online channels. Newly constructed channel banks will be stabilized using biodegradable coir fiber matting, seeding, and planted with native
riparian species. Haul roads, staging areas, and access routes will be located on uplands as much as possible to avoid impacts and temporary
crossings will be minimized. Mud mats will be utilized for crossing existing wetlands. Construction practices will follow guidelines from the NC Erosion
and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes
r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Compensatory mitigation should not be required because the project intends to increase aquatic resource function and services through stream restoration and enhancement activities.
The greenway design has avoided impacts to stream and wetlands to the maximum extent practicable using bridge and boardwalk crossings.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes
r No
If no, explain why:
The project is located in the Catawba River basin where only the main stem of the Catawba River has associated NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules. The project area is on a smaller
tributary (Long Creek) to the Catawba with no NC Riparian Protection Rules.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information u
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*

r Yes r No
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPAISEPA)?*
r Yes r No
Comments:
This is a Mecklenburg County greenway and water quality improvement project which is not subject to NEPA or SEPA requirements.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes f• No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The greenway project is proposed in an urban watershed where a majority of surrounding land has already been developed for commercial and
residential purposes. A majority of land within and immediately adjacent to the project area is wooded floodplain that is publicly owned by Mecklenburg
County. This will serve as buffers immediately adjacent to much of the trail and associated stream enhancement. A NC Land & Water Fund (NCLWF)
will be recorded on this water quality improvement project which will restrict future development. A conservation easement is also proposed on a
separate stream and wetland mitigation project (Long Creek Corridor Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site) is being developed by Charlotte -
Mecklenburg Storm Water Services immediately adjacent to portions of the greenway project in between Treyburn Drive and Beatties Ford Road will
further restrict future development immediately adjacent to the greenway/stream improvement project.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
r Yes r No
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
r Yes r No
r^ Unknown
Si. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
r Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
An official species list (Consultation Code: 04EN10000-2021-SLI-0010) was obtained from the USFWS IPAC on 10/2/2020. A pedestrian survey was
conducted by Wildlands Engineering in August 2020. Results of the survey found summer roosting areas for the Northern Long Eared Bat and
suitable habitat for the Schminitts sunflower, the smooth coneflower, and Michaux's sumac. No individuals or populations of the listed plant species
were observed. No suitable habitat was found to epst for the Carolina heelsplitter. A letter requesting review and comment was submitted to the
USFWS on 10/8/2020. USFWS responded on 10/23/20 with no concerns for project related impacts to federally protected species. Correspondence
with USFWS is enclosed in the miscellaneous section of this application.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website
(https://wm.fisheries. n oaa. gov/resource/map/essential-fish-habitat-mapper)
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) was contacted on 10/7/2020 for review and comment on any possible issues that might
emerge with respect to archeological or cultural reviews. SHPO responded on 11/10/20 stating, "We have conducted a reviewof the project and are
aware of no historic resources Mich would be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed." Correspondence
with SHPO is included in the Miscellaneous section of this application.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The project is being designed to result in no rise in the FEMA regulated base flood elevation. Wildlands is working with the local floodplain
administrator (Mecklenburg County) to obtain the appropriate floodplain development permit prior to construction.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
Mecklenburg County NC Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panels 4538 and 4548, with effective dates of September 2, 2015.
i Miscellaneous
6
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one
file when possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
nick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docunent
Long Creek Greenway and Water Quality Improvement Project (Treyburn Dr. to 1-485) - PCN Cover Letter and
63.95MB
Uploads.pdf
File rrust be FUF or KVIZ
Comments
A cover letter, table of contents, and supporting documentation are provided below.
Signature
W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the INC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Lloyd David Booth
Signature
Date
8/20/2021

% &V
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
MEMORANDUM
TO: 401/404 Permit Reviewer
FROM: Ian Eckardt, Wildlands Engineering
DATE: August 17, 2021
RE: Pre -Construction Notification - Supporting Documentation
LONG CREEK GREENWAY AND WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
(TREYBURN DR. TO 1-485)
Charlotte, NC
On behalf of Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services (CWSWS) and Mecklenburg County's Asset
and Facilities Management (AFM), Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) is submitting a Pre -
Construction Notification (PCN) for the Long Creek Greenway and Water Quality Improvement Project
(Treyburn Dr. to 1-485) in north central Mecklenburg County approximately eight miles north northwest
of uptown Charlotte, NC in the Catawba River Basin (HUC 03050101). The project seeks Nationwide
Permits (NWP) 13 (Bank Stabilization), NWP 27 (Aquatic Habitat Restoration), NWP 42 (Recreational
Facilities) and corresponding Water Quality Certifications 4134 and 4139 for a joint greenway trail and
water quality improvement project between Treyburn Drive and 1-485. The project proposes two miles
of greenway trail along Long Creek and 9,000 linear feet of stream restoration and enhancement.
Supporting Documentation Table of Contents
1 Figures....................................................................................................................................... 2
2 Photolog..................................................................................................................................22
3 Landower Authorization Form and Additional Parcel Information.........................................30
4 Agency Correspondence (NCSHPO & USFWS)........................................................................ 39
5 Preliminary Jurisdiction Determination Documentation........................................................60
6 Construction Plan Sheets...................................................................................................... 217
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 704-332-7754 or at [e-mail] should you
have any questions.
Sincerely,
Ian Eckardt
Environmental Scientist

Site 1:
Long Creek Greenway & Water Quality Improvement Project
(Treyburn Drive to 1-485)
Figures (Vicinity, USGS, Delineation, Soils, NWI, Impacts)

v
_
- :' ` o•'Y �
ter=
_
°' N o
Jr �
Maa�� y'heillr�
r
M
l Glevk
o
�Ugtl
14, 0
7lale'.:•
C
� r�0
19
+��M�S•77�
r l .
1V �nnma d l:
Ce ➢Z+su Wet
r/ .i-
ju
•r's
t' o
ps f
� Mo 4y
_
_
i
I
wT3
\ ¢4
- i"
i
\�
d f
<-+�
R'N3 U'
m
E m
♦
�
-� \
/ • -
•, uo-, a v rm ��
-
uo-,
� 4 r
V �
o
cr
v
3
a
9W
ors
�I
U� 0
Qz
z�
w
¢Z
�o
n Z
Fal W
t�

a
v
3
a
ii
N
0
I�

v
3
a
t�

O
� r04
�i
cn�j
r)

O
r)

a
LL
0
0
M
t�

O
t�

T
A
3
c
v
v
C7
� r04
�i
cn�j
r)

' - O
O
�f d
14
a'
c
o ,
c -
w � z
f
'Q
a w
c w
c
� a �
c
Ar 4n i
•sy f� w• . �" a '. r .
S rr c
°f4nyp�]�f
flrrdqe -Q"� .: ✓. - - -
Via; .• �. � --
w c❑ r
c o U ♦ .
t
w ,
c / '�, 1 1 1 1 •
w + _
❑ m
c "
w
1
a
,ri
e. , a
�. >tE E15i-
a � � a- :1,r ❑

3
a
0
� r04
�i
cn�j
r)

ppp 3
c
�
m
wu
o
zo
t
m
a
a
7
a
•
s�'
- -
-
o
o
v
IM
c
3
3
3
c
+
]ram
�
R
.
.
.It.
`y
Y
OF
3"
0
Im
O
O
�
N
{
�
3
O
N
v
f
N
c
a
N
c
a
Q
u
c
a
r
3
3
m
T
a
�
v
%i
-'- r
f ec
U
8 0�
�
i
p
y
-
v
3
a
LL
O
O
O
O
t�

E
O
� r04
�i
cn�j
4

O
t�

Figure 6.2: Aquatic Resource Impact Map
Long Creek Greenway and Water Quality Irmprovement Project
1-485)
�FTVW I L D L A N D S STORM 0 150 Feet Pre -Construction
o to Notification
E N G I N E E R I N G WATER Pre -Construction Notification
1- s.M-� ;� I I 'N Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services
Mecklenburg County, NC

o c
0 0
• i � o
7 � -
U
1
c �
o, G
U
■
VI
� _ V
d
1
N
LL
O
O
V
O
O
N
O
t�

O
� r04
y
cn�j
11)

Figure 6.5: Aquatic Resource Impact Map
t„M q Long Creek Greenway and Water Quality Irmprovement Project
1►�,r 1-485)
W I L D L A N D S STORM 0 250 Feet Pre -Construction
o to Notification
E N G I N E E R I N G WATER Pre -Construction Notification
f- s.M-. ;� I I Charlotte -Mecklenburg Storm Water Services
Mecklenburg County, NC

Section 2:
Long Creek Greenway & Water Quality Improvement Project
(Treyburn Drive to 1-485)
Photolog

�
J
f
'p
g Via" ,itij
40
7, q-;
Xxi- `t .
N
4

"Fire,
��r btu, •
f
�t
a:
+-�`
•••i-�~'_
-•;,�? is
..x
• �, s.- .ri•i1�•gy k-aft..

�IoiufB h 4 �^-h�
XX Tit
e,
Z' +
77
• .y � ��.yy �-+ems
op
z;r.I Y

f� ,
1
2"
ll i
r '
Al't : "1 r �l t r
g • i r
-4
dry. s
t,
a
h,`ta y',ysa ��5t?• +t--: 'P°�yrF•j4L
a 'fib '4

ft �
n k �
`f 53
._ h _ ,�a' a� ob• 'i � �k
�,�- Sri t.,s� t.•
,�r �M}, �'yV. ��� tsr �'% :rah r���. •` _ -
r �•
^4Rr; �iA
�,,�J.-.. v �yr� _ ter• �'.+'�-.
in—
g� y�
-.1•:'�l `; +!K.' .+E. -.
_ •� ,.. tire. �:.��°;,;;,,.:� -.�:, ..

rTeo
r -:
t '�' • ter. � �y�. - �
1.4
• ter,' ,. ��
./ �� :�i� •y+� 1`7 fir] •�� � t.`.`�'4''4 �,;
lJl
`fie: _.��,`:: _ •'��-.4`�'_� r:..;'4
�,a;: �� . ..�,. •.. • yam' - • � •,rt. y'• ,.: � ' 'f
AM
r . . , x _ �y►;.7 ` it .

Section 3:
Long Creek Greenway & Water Quality Improvement Project
(Treyburn Drive to 1-485)
Landowner Authorization Form & Additional Parcel Information

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
The undersigned landowner(s) identified below hereby authorize Wildlands Engineering, Inc. to act as
the agent in obtaining a preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (pJD) and/or necessary
permits/certifications (401/404) for Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Drive to
Oakdale Road) on the identified property in Mecklenburg County, NC. As part of the authorization the
landowner authorizes access to Wildlands Engineering, Inc., the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality, and the US Army Corps of Engineers personnel for the evaluation of the property
as it relates to the project including stream and wetland determinations and delineations.
Parcel ID: 02514123, 02514876, 02514899, 02516106, 02516108, 02516299,
02519398, 02519399, 02522110, 02522111, 02522294, 02524199,
02531270, 02531271, 02531297, 02531299, 02533283, 02533460,
03311112, 03313221, 03317499, 03318299, 03319199, 03325101,
03325115, 03325116, 03325117, 03327109, 03327334, 03314608,
03325105,03325114,03326105
Street Address: N/A
Listed Owner: Mecklenburg County Mecklenburg County
600 E. 4t" Street- 11t" Floor & 700 E. 4t" Street- 4t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202 Charlotte, NC 28202
Parcel ID: 02524196
Street Address: N/A
Listed Owner: Mecklenburg County Parks and Recreation Department
5841 Brookshire Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28216
Responsible Party: David Booth, Project Manager, Mecklenburg County AFM
Name & Title
aRn_RRR_a7aa
Phone Number:
Signature:
Date: 09/03/2020

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
The undersigned landowner(s) identified below hereby authorize Wildlands Engineering, Inc. to act as
the agent in obtaining a preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (pJD) and/or necessary
permits/certifications (401/404) for Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement: Treyburn to
Oakdale on the identified property in Mecklenburg County, NC. As part of the authorization the
landowner authorizes access to Wildlands Engineering, Inc., the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality, and the US Army Corps of Engineers personnel for the evaluation of the property
as it relates to the project including stream and wetland determinations and delineations.
Parcel ID: 03327107, 03327199
Street Address: N A
Listed Owner: Mary Morgan Parker
2742 Miranda Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28216
Responsible Party: ) VIA YC]o�h PA Q Wh ,
Name & Title
Phone Number: 704 1399 13Z7L I is
Signature:
Date: �' a

m v
W Z N J Z N .. .. .. i j
ZFo' YDN_ UDN f
W U O N WUo -
IDNi
UON
woo
ZYo Zz
W ~� _ U0IN s; .
Z woo
wOUo UDN
`. C7 zFN WUo .. a.
m ry . .
Z �.. Ww z
..,
Z m - - - -
UON �zo 5.'lY. woo
woo
W Z�
C7 YD m k
m W U o
w ~ w z MN
Z
Y0N (9 cYioN
w m
• OU o ZYo U o zz0 ' W Z v
Y N K O W F o O 0 s JYR
' UUN ��z g
WUo >Fo jWw°
Wzo mK FN
` 19 Co �' �z aN
-� - WUo .. YQ Wo NO
C7 mY ow "
w~r" w�
Z mo �
F o
wooW UoOON _.
0� Z
n 0 oo - -
Y < a o
z
w o 2 W
lr g 2E �Zr g.
K _y'
00
woo
m % M
J Z l � y'
woo m r.
m
wl-N
No
Z
ZYm; w°o.. �....
z '
O o wp 1 r
m ° n}:"•
� z m
Y0 U O m 'R
woo f .
_.
- � � 1
- ZFoom
. _ WUo'•
zvr wz �,•
m Y A M Z Nm
ZYo UOar YAM
•. wzI woo UOM Y M W U o
K
r7'
- w OU oo m ,
7 � z n `
` o o m
W O o
W O O
{ i
m
om
w~� w F � m Q w OUo a
2 YDN YD •� wzvr
a U O M U O M V'•'� . Y D mN l O
" WUo W U o
2 o O
o a
w a
- � o
1 �
0
N

Long Creek Greenway & Water Quality Improvement Project
(Treyburn to 1-485) — Parcel Information
#1.) Parcel ID: 02514123
#2.) Parcel ID: 02514876
Deed / Book: 22899 / 842
Deed / Book: 22791 / 549
Site Street Address:
Site Street Address:
9534 Bayview Py.
N/A
Charlotte, NC 28216
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Finance Dept.
Finance Dept.
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
Charlotte, NC 28202
U.) Parcel ID: 02514899
#4.) Parcel ID: 02516106
Deed / Book: 22791 / 549
Deed / Book: 08939 / 452
Site Street Address:
Site Street Address:
N/A
N/A
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Finance Dept.
Finance Dept.
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
Charlotte, NC 28202
#14.) Parcel ID: 02516108
#6.) Parcel ID: 02516299
Deed / Book: 07165 / 291
Deed / Book: 08016 / 272
Site Street Address:
Site Street Address:
N/A
N/A
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Finance Dept.
Finance Dept.
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
Charlotte, NC 28202
#7.) Parcel ID: 02519398
#8.) Parcel ID: 02519399
Deed / Book: 07658 / 256
Deed / Book: 06949 / 589
Site Street Address:
Site Street Address:
N/A
N/A
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Finance Dept.
Finance Dept.
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
Charlotte, NC 28202

Long Creek Greenway & Water Quality Improvement Project
(Treyburn to 1-485) — Parcel Information
#9.) Parcel ID: 02522110
#10.) Parcel ID: 02522111
Deed / Book: 28204 / 114
Deed / Book: 28204 / 114
Site Street Address:
Site Street Address:
N/A
N/A
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Finance Dept.
Finance Dept.
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
Charlotte, NC 28202
#11.) Parcel ID: 02522294
#12.) Parcel ID: 02524199
Deed / Book: 08864 / 746
Deed / Book: 07658 / 256
Site Street Address:
Site Street Address:
N/A
N/A
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Finance Dept.
Finance Dept.
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
Charlotte, NC 28202
#13.) Parcel ID: 02531270
#14.) Parcel ID: 02531271
Deed / Book: 13094 / 881
Deed / Book: 13094 / 881
Site Street Address:
Site Street Address:
N/A
N/A
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Finance Dept.
Finance Dept.
600 E. 4th St. 11th Floor
600 E. 4th St. 11th Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
Charlotte, NC 28202
#15.) Parcel ID: 02531297
#16.) Parcel ID: 02531299
Deed / Book: 19218 / 821
Deed / Book: 30122 / 270
Site Street Address:
Site Street Address:
N/A
N/A
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Finance Dept.
Finance Dept.
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
Charlotte, NC 28202

Long Creek Greenway & Water Quality Improvement Project
(Treyburn to 1-485) — Parcel Information
#17.) Parcel ID: 02533283
#18.) Parcel ID: 02533460
Deed / Book: 13094 / 881
Deed / Book: 13094 / 881
Site Street Address:
Site Street Address:
N/A
9020 Treyburn Dr.
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Charlotte, NC 28216
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Finance Dept.
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
Finance Dept.
Charlotte, NC 28202
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
#19.) Parcel ID: 03311112
#20.) Parcel ID: 03313221
Deed / Book: 32672 / 90
Deed / Book: 10455 / 296
Site Street Address:
Site Street Address:
N/A
N/A
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Finance Dept.
Finance Dept.
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
Charlotte, NC 28202
#21.) Parcel ID: 03317499
#22.) Parcel ID: 03318299
Deed / Book: 07609/ 691
Deed / Book: 07609/ 691
Site Street Address:
Site Street Address:
N/A
N/A
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Finance Dept.
Finance Dept.
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
Charlotte, NC 28202
#23.) Parcel ID: 03319199
#24.) Parcel ID: 03325101
Deed / Book: 05799 / 291
Deed / Book: 32672 / 90
Site Street Address:
Site Street Address:
N/A
4104 Oakdale Rd.
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Charlotte, NC 28216
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Finance Dept.
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
Finance Dept.
Charlotte, NC 28202
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202

Long Creek Greenway & Water Quality Improvement Project
(Treyburn to 1-485) — Parcel Information
#25) Parcel ID: 03325115
#26.) Parcel ID: 03325116
Deed / Book: 32672 / 90
Deed / Book: 32672 / 90
Site Street Address:
Site Street Address:
N/A
N/A
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Finance Dept.
Finance Dept.
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
Charlotte, NC 28202
#27.) Parcel ID: 03325117
#28.) Parcel ID: 03327109
Deed / Book: 32672 / 90
Deed / Book: 05799 / 291
Site Street Address:
Site Street Address:
4120 Oakdale Rd.
N/A
Charlotte, NC 28216
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Finance Dept.
Finance Dept.
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
Charlotte, NC 28202
#29.) Parcel ID: 03327334
#30.) Parcel ID: 03314608
Deed / Book: 33099/ 259
Deed / Book: 32672/ 90
Site Street Address:
Site Street Address:
N/A
N/A
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Finance Dept.
Finance Dept.
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
600 E. 4t" St. 11t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
Charlotte, NC 28202
#31.) Parcel ID: 03325105
#32.) Parcel ID: 03325114
Deed / Book: 32672 / 90
Deed / Book: 32672 / 90
Site Street Address:
Site Street Address:
N/A
N/A
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Finance Dept.
Finance Dept.
700 E. 4t" St. 4t" Floor
700 E. 4t" St. 4t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202
Charlotte, NC 28202

Long Creek Greenway & Water Quality Improvement Project
(Treyburn to 1-485) — Parcel Information
#33) Parcel ID: 03326105
#34.) Parcel ID: 02524196
Deed / Book: 32672 / 90
Deed / Book: 30855 / 238
Site Street Address:
Site Street Address:
N/A
N/A
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Mecklenburg County Real Estate
Mecklenburg County Parks & Recreation Dept.
Finance Dept.
5841 Brookshire Blvd.
700 E. 4" St. 4" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28216
Charlotte, NC 28202
#35.) Parcel ID: 03327107
#36.) Parcel ID: 03327199
Deed / Book: 06947 / 215
Deed / Book: 05799 / 291
Site Street Address:
Site Street Address:
N/A
N/A
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Property Owner & Mailing Address:
Mary Morgan Parker
Mary Morgan Parker
2742 Miranda Rd.
2742 Miranda Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28216
Charlotte, NC 28216

Section 4:
Long Creek Greenway & Water Quality Improvement Project
(Treyburn Drive to 1-485)
Agency Correspondence (NCSHPO & USFWS)

WILDLANDS
E N G I N E E R I N G
October 7, 2020
Renee Gledhill -Earley
State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Subject: Request for Review and Comment
Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Drive to Oakdale Road)
Charlotte, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Gledhill -Earley:
On behalf of Mecklenburg County Storm Water Service (CMSWS), alongside Mecklenburg County Asset and Facility
Management (AFM), Wildlands Engineering, Inc. requests review and comment on any possible issues that might
emerge with respect to archaeological or cultural resources associated with the Long Creek— Treyburn Drive to
Oakdale Road stream enhancement and greenway project in Mecklenburg County, NC. A USGS Topographic Map
and an Overview Site Map showing the approximate project area are enclosed. The topographic figure was
prepared from the Charlotte, NC 7.5-Minute USGS Topographic Quadrangle, and the site is located at latitude
35.34, longitude-80.886.
The Long Creek Greenway has been identified as a corridor for the Carolina Thread Trail, providing connections to
several neighborhoods, significant commercial and retail, and a future park site on Oakdale Road. The Long Creek
stream portion of the project will involve stream restoration, enhancement, and preservation along 9,000 LF of
Long Creek. The stream project will improve bedform diversity, bank stability, floodplain connectivity, and provide
native vegetation within the floodplain corridor. Construction of this project will affect Jurisdictional Waters of the
U.S. and require Section 404/401 permitting.
Structures within or immediately adjacent to the project area include sewer lines and manholes, gas line,
powerlines, road culverts, commercial buildings, storm drainage infrastructure, and residential homes. The
surrounding land use includes forests, developed open spaces, shopping centers, and residential communities.
Three NC Natural Heritage Program Managed Lands are located within the project area: Mecklenburg County
Open Space — Long Creek Greenway, Mecklenburg County Open Space — Oak Hills Park, and a NC Department of
Transportation Mitigation Site. One architectural structure was located within the project area: Long Creek Mill
Ruin. Neither the mill ruin nor the millrace will be disturbed during construction. Stream stabilization will be
implemented along Long Creek to protect and aid in preserving the Long Creek Mill Ruin. No additional
architectural structures or archaeological artifacts were observed or noted within the project limits during
preliminary surveys of the site. We ask that you review the site based on the attached information to determine
the presence of any historic properties.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact us with any
questions that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this project.
Sincerely,
V
Kirsten Gimbert, Senior Environmental Scientist
[e-mail]
704.941.9093
Attachments: Figure 1 Overview Site Map, Figure 2 USGS Topographic Site Map
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (P) 704.332.7754 • 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104 • Charlotte, NC 28203

Acc
zLu
w
�Z
a�
Az
W
a
y

0
Qoe
zuj
z
a(D
Qz
ui
l�

6 � STAT£
r� Qunr-n •nog%'•
North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper
Secretary Susi H. Hamilton
November 10, 2020
Kirsten Gimbert
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC 28203
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
kgimbertgwildlandseng.com
Re: Construct Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Drive to Oakdale Road),
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, ER 20-2193
Dear Ms. Gimbert:
Thank you for your letter of October 7, 2020, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental. review(cr,,ncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6598

WILDLANDS
E N G I N E E R I N G
October 8, 2020
Byron Hamstead
US Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Subject: Request for Review and Comment
IPAC Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00016
Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Drive to Oakdale Road)
Charlotte, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Hamstead:
On behalf of Mecklenburg County Storm Water Service (CMSWS), alongside Mecklenburg County Asset and Facility
Management (AFM), Wildlands Engineering, Inc. requests review and comment on any possible issues that might
emerge with respect to endangered species, migratory birds, or other trust resources associated with the Long
Creek— Treyburn Drive to Oakdale Road stream enhancement and greenway project in Mecklenburg County, NC. A
USGS Topographic Map and an Overview Site Map showing the approximate project area are enclosed. The
topographic figure was prepared from the Charlotte, NC 7.5-Minute USGS Topographic Quadrangle, and the site is
located at latitude 35.34, longitude-80.886.
The Long Creek Greenway has been identified as a corridor for the Carolina Thread Trail, providing connections to
several neighborhoods, significant commercial and retail, and a future park site on Oakdale Road. The Long Creek
stream portion of the project will involve stream restoration, enhancement, and preservation along 9,000 LF of
Long Creek. The stream project will improve bedform diversity, bank stability, floodplain connectivity, and provide
native vegetation within the floodplain corridor. Construction of this project will affect Jurisdictional Waters of the
U.S. and require Section 404/401 permitting.
Structures within or immediately adjacent to the project area include sewer lines and manholes, gas line,
powerlines, road culverts, commercial buildings, storm drainage infrastructure, and residential homes. The
surrounding land use includes forests, developed open spaces, shopping centers, and residential communities.
Based on a resource list generated from the US FWS IPAC website there are five (5) Federally Threatened or
Endangered Species that may be present in or near the proposed project boundaries. They are the Northern long
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis), the Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), the Michaux's sumac (Rhus
michauxii), the Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), and the smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata).
No critical habitat has been designated for the Northern long-eared Bat (NLEB), the Michaux's sumac, the
Schweinitz's sunflower, nor the smooth coneflower. Critical habitat has been designated for the Carolina
heelsplitter; however, the project resides outside of the critical habitat.
Pedestrian Survey
A pedestrian survey was conducted between August 10-13 and 17-19, 2020. Results of the survey found areas of
potential summer roosting for the NLEB and areas of suitable habitat for the Schweinitz's sunflower, the smooth
coneflower, and the Michaux's sumac. No suitable habitat was found to exist for the Carolina heelsplitter. Per the
NCNHP, there are documented occurrences of the Schweinitz's sunflower and the Michaux's sumac within 1 and 2
miles of the project area, respectively. No individuals or populations of any of the above referenced species were
documented on -site.
Wild lands Engineering, Inc. (P) 704.332.7754 • 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104 • Charlotte, NC 28203

WILDLANDS
E N G I N E E R I N G
IPAC Regulatory Review
On October 2, 2020, a regulatory project review was conducted for the project site using the USFWS online
Information for Planning and Consultation (IPAC) determination key. A result determination was obtained for the
NLEB; however, a manual determination is required for the remaining above referenced species.
Biological Determinations
Northern Long -Eared Bat:
Based on results from this review process (IPaC Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00016) "any take of the northern
long-eared bat that may occur as a result of the Action is not prohibited under the ESA Section 4(d) rule adopted
for this species at 50 CFR §17.40(o)". Official consistency documentation letter generated from the website is
included.
Please provide review and comment concerning the above referenced species, as well as any possible issues that
might emerge with respect to endangered species, migratory birds, or other trust resources from the proposed
project. If we have not heard from you in 45 days, we will assume that you do not have any comments regarding
associated laws or information relevant to this project at the current time.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact us with any questions
that you may have concerning this project.
Sincerely,
Kirsten Gimbert, Senior Environmental Scientist
[e-mail]
704.941.9093
Attachments:
USFWS Consistency Documentation Letter
Figure 1 Overview Site Map
Figure 2 USGS Topographic Site Map
Wild lands Engineering, Inc. (P) 704.332.7754 • 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104 • Charlotte, NC 28203

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Ecological Services Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801-1082
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
http://www.fws.gov/nc-es/es/couMfr.html
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN1000-2021-TA-0010
Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00016
Project Name: Long Creek Greenway
e x
hSai k 4YYFJiYJft
October 02, 2020
Subject: Verification letter for the 'Long Creek Greenway' project under the January 5, 2016,
Programmatic Biological Opinion on Final 4(d) Rule for the Northern Long-eared Bat
and Activities Excepted from Take Prohibitions.
Dear Kirsten Gimbert:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) received on October 02, 2020 your effects
determination for the 'Long Creek Greenway' (the Action) using the northern long-eared bat
(Myotis septentrionalis) key within the Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC)
system. This IPaC key assists users in determining whether a Federal action is consistent with the
activities analyzed in the Service's January 5, 2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion (PBO).
The PBO addresses activities excepted from "take"fil prohibitions applicable to the northern
long-eared bat under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) (87 Stat.884, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Based upon your IPaC submission, the Action is consistent with activities analyzed in the PBO.
The Action may affect the northern long-eared bat; however, any take that may occur as a result
of the Action is not prohibited under the ESA Section 4(d) rule adopted for this species at 50
CFR §17.40(o). Unless the Service advises you within 30 days of the date of this letter that your
IPaC-assisted determination was incorrect, this letter verifies that the PBO satisfies and
concludes your responsibilities for this Action under ESA Section 7(a)(2) with respect to the
northern long-eared bat.
Please report to our office any changes to the information about the Action that you submitted in
IPaC, the results of any bat surveys conducted in the Action area, and any dead, injured, or sick
northern long-eared bats that are found during Action implementation. If the Action is not
completed within one year of the date of this letter, you must update and resubmit the
information required in the IPaC key.

10/02/2020 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00016
This IPaC-assisted determination allows you to rely on the PBO for compliance with ESA
Section 7(a)(2) only for the northern long-eared bat. It does not apply to the following ESA -
protected species that also may occur in the Action area:
• Carolina Heelsplitter, Lasmigona decorata (Endangered)
• Michaux's Sumac, Rhus michauxii (Endangered)
• Schweinitz's Sunflower, Helianthus schweinitzii (Endangered)
• Smooth Coneflower, Echinacea laevigata (Endangered)
If the Action may affect other federally listed species besides the northern long-eared bat, a
proposed species, and/or designated critical habitat, additional consultation between you and this
Service office is required. If the Action may disturb bald or golden eagles, additional
coordination with the Service under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act is recommended.
[1]Take means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to
attempt to engage in any such conduct [ESA Section 3(19)].

10/02/2020 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00016 3
Action Description
You provided to IPaC the following name and description for the subject Action.
1. Name
Long Creek Greenway
2. Description
The following description was provided for the project'Long Creek Greenway':
Greenway and stream enhancement project
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://www.google.com/
maps/place/35.337056387022905N80.90497661114603W
Determination Key Result
This Federal Action may affect the northern long-eared bat in a manner consistent with the
description of activities addressed by the Service's PBO dated January 5, 2016. Any taking that
may occur incidental to this Action is not prohibited under the final 4(d) rule at 50 CFR
§17.40(o). Therefore, the PBO satisfies your responsibilities for this Action under ESA Section
7(a)(2) relative to the northern long-eared bat.
Determination Key Description: Northern Long-eared Bat 4(d) Rule
This key was last updated in IPaC on May 15, 2017. Keys are subject to periodic revision.
This key is intended for actions that may affect the threatened northern long-eared bat.

10/02/2020 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00016
4
The purpose of the key for Federal actions is to assist determinations as to whether proposed
actions are consistent with those analyzed in the Service's PBO dated January 5, 2016.
Federal actions that may cause prohibited take of northern long-eared bats, affect ESA -listed
species other than the northern long-eared bat, or affect any designated critical habitat, require
ESA Section 7(a)(2) consultation in addition to the use of this key. Federal actions that may
affect species proposed for listing or critical habitat proposed for designation may require a
conference under ESA Section 7(a)(4).

10/02/2020 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00016 5
Determination Key Result
This project may affect the threatened Northern long-eared bat; therefore, consultation with the
Service pursuant to Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (87 Stat.884, as
amended; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is required. However, based on the information you provided,
this project may rely on the Service's January 5, 2016, Programmatic Biological Opinion on
Final 4(d) Rule for the Northern Long -Eared Bat and Activities Excepted from Take Prohibitions
to fulfill its Section 7(a)(2) consultation obligation.
Qualification Interview
1. Is the action authorized, funded, or being carried out by a Federal agency?
Yes
2. Have you determined that the proposed action will have "no effect" on the northern long-
eared bat? (If you are unsure select "No")
No
3. Will your activity purposefully Take northern long-eared bats?
No
4. [Semantic] Is the project action area located wholly outside the White -nose Syndrome
Zone?
Automatically answered
No
5. Have you contacted the appropriate agency to determine if your project is near a known
hibernaculum or maternity roost tree?
Location information for northern long-eared bat hibernacula is generally kept in state
Natural Heritage Inventory databases — the availability of this data varies state -by -state.
Many states provide online access to their data, either directly by providing maps or by
providing the opportunity to make a data request. In some cases, to protect those resources,
access to the information may be limited. A web page with links to state Natural Heritage
Inventory databases and other sources of information on the locations of northern long-
eared bat roost trees and hibernacula is available at www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/
mammals/nleb/nhisites.html.
Yes

10/02/2020 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00016
M.
6. Will the action affect a cave or mine where northern long-eared bats are known to
hibernate (i.e., hibernaculum) or could it alter the entrance or the environment (physical or
other alteration) of a hibernaculum?
No
7. Will the action involve Tree Removal?
Yes
8. Will the action only remove hazardous trees for the protection of human life or property?
No
9. Will the action remove trees within 0.25 miles of a known northern long-eared bat
hibernaculum at any time of year?
No
10. Will the action remove a known occupied northern long-eared bat maternity roost tree or
any trees within 150 feet of a known occupied maternity roost tree from June 1 through
July 31?
No

10/02/2020 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00016
Project Questionnaire
If the project includes forest conversion, report the appropriate acreages below.
Otherwise, type Win questions 1-3.
1. Estimated total acres of forest conversion:
2. If known, estimated acres of forest conversion from April 1 to October 31
0
3. If known, estimated acres of forest conversion from June 1 to July 31
0
If the project includes timber harvest, report the appropriate acreages below.
Otherwise, type Win questions 4-6.
4. Estimated total acres of timber harvest
U
5. If known, estimated acres of timber harvest from April 1 to October 31
0
6. If known, estimated acres of timber harvest from June 1 to July 31
0
If the project includes prescribed fire, report the appropriate acreages below.
Otherwise, type Win questions 7-9.
7. Estimated total acres of prescribed fire
0
8. If known, estimated acres of prescribed fire from April 1 to October 31
0
9. If known, estimated acres of prescribed fire from June 1 to July 31
0
If the project includes new wind turbines, report the megawatts of wind capacity
below. Otherwise, type Win question 10.

10/02/2020 Event Code: 04EN1000-2021-E-00016
10. What is the estimated wind capacity (in megawatts) of the new turbine(s)?

� o
O V
0- K r v
m Q Y
tl.0 m u
0
C .> v
� T �
(U (U
N U
y
N
i1
U
O
0
l�

ua
United States Department of the InteriorSERVIUE
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
October 23, 2020
Kristen Gimbert
Senior Environmental Scientist
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
1430 S. Mint St, Suite 104
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
Dear Kristen Gimbert:
Subject: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation; Mecklenburg County, North
Carolina Log No. 4-2-21-014
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the information provided in your
correspondence dated October 8, 2020 wherein you solicit our comments regarding project -
mediated impacts to federally protected species. We submit the following comments in
accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 661-667e); the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. §4321 et seq.); and
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
Project Description
According to the information provided, Mecklenburg County Stormwater Services proposes to
stabilize streambanks and modify instream habitat along 9,000 linear feet of Long Creek in
Charlotte, North Carolina. The site consists of riparian mixed forest, maintained transmission
line easements, and roadways. Surrounding land use is dominated by residential development
and forested areas. This, along with IPaC data, were the only details provided of proposed
project actions.
Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species
According to Service records, suitable summer roosting habitat may be present in the project
area for the federally threatened northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis). However, the
final 4(d) rule (effective as of February 16, 2016), exempts incidental take of northern long-eared
bat associated with activities that occur greater than 0.25 miles from a known hibernation site,
and greater than 150 feet from a known, occupied maternity roost during the pup season (June 1
— July 31). Based on the information provided, the project (which may or may not require tree
clearing) would occur at a location where any incidental take that may result from associated
activities is exempt under the 4(d) rule. Although not required, we encourage you to avoid
any associated tree clearing activities during the maternity roosting season from May 15 —
August 15.
The information provided suggests that potential suitable habitat for the federally endangered
Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), smooth coneflower (Echinacea laevigata), and

Michaux's sumac (Rhus michauxii) occurs onsite (e.g. transitional areas along forest edges,
fencerows, roadsides, utility rights -of -way, etc.). However, targeted surveys conducted during
the optimal survey window did not detect any evidence for these species. Based on the presence
of suitable habitat, but negative survey results collected during the optimal survey windows, we
would concur with a "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determination for these species
from the applicable action agency. Moreover, we believe that suitable habitat is not present
onsite for the federally endangered Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorates), and we require
no further information at this time.
Please be aware that obligations under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is
listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action.
We offer the following general recommendations in the interest of protected natural resources:
Erosion and Sediment Control
Measures to control sediment and erosion should be installed before any ground -disturbing
activities occur. Grading and backfilling should be minimized, and existing native vegetation
should be retained (if possible) to maintain riparian cover for fish and wildlife. Disturbed areas
should be revegetated with native grass and tree species as soon as the project is completed.
Ground disturbance should be limited to what will be stabilized quickly, preferably by the end of
the workday. Natural fiber matting (coir) should be used for erosion control as synthetic
netting can trap animals and persist in the environment beyond its intended purpose.
Stream Channel and Bank Restoration
A natural, stable stream system is one that is able to transport a wide range of flows and
associated sediment bed load while maintaining channel features and neither degrading nor
aggrading. Alterations to the dimension, pattern, or profile of the stream channel as well as
changes to streambank vegetation, floodplains, hydrology, or sediment input can significantly
alter this equilibrium.
We offer the following recommendations for the Applicant's consideration:
Streambanks with deep-rooted woody vegetation are the most stable, and stream
restoration efforts should incorporate the use of native vegetation adapted to the site
conditions. Live dormant stakes may be used to reestablish root structure in riparian
areas. In areas where banks are severely undercut, high, and steep, whole -tree
revetment or rock may be used as a stabilization treatment (small rock, gravel, sand,
and dirt are not recommended due to their erosive nature), and it should not extend
above the bank -full elevation (the elevation of the channel where the natural
floodplain begins). Deep -rooting woody vegetation should be established along banks
where any channel work is accomplished. Tree and shrub plantings should be spaced
at intervals no greater than 10 feet along banks. Vegetated riparian zone widths
2

should be as wide as practical but should extend at least 30 feet from the stream
channel.
2. Only the absolute minimum amount of work should be done within stream channels to
accomplish necessary reconstruction. Restoration plans should account for the
constraints of the site and the opportunities to improve stream pattern, dimension, and
profile with minimal disturbance.
Reconstruction work should follow natural channel design methodologies that are
based on the bank -full, or channel -forming stage of the stream. Bank -full stage
maintains the natural channel dimensions and transports the bulk of sediment over
time. Natural channel conditions should be identified using a reference reach (nearby
stream reaches that exemplify restoration goals). Restoration design should match the
pattern, dimension, and profile of the reference reach to ensure the project's success.
4. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area to the
extent possible. Sandbags, cofferdams, bladder dams, or other diversion structures
should be used to prevent excavation in flowing water. These diversion structures
should be removed as soon as the work area is stable.
Equipment should not be operated in the stream unless absolutely necessary.
Machinery should be operated from the banks in a fashion that minimizes disturbance
to woody vegetation. Equipment should be: (a) washed to remove any contaminant
residue prior to project construction, (b) in good working order, and (c) checked to
ensure there are no leaks of potential contaminants (such as oil or other lubricants)
prior to and during construction.
6. Adequate measures to control sediment and erosion must be implemented prior to any
ground -disturbing activities in order to minimize effects on downstream aquatic
resources. In North Carolina, non -cohesive and erosion -prone soils are most common
in the felsic-crystalline terrains of the mountain and upper piedmont regions.
Therefore, reconstruction work should be staged such that disturbed areas would be
stabilized with seeding, mulch, and/or biodegradable (coir) erosion -control matting
prior to the end of each workday. Matting should be secured in place with staples;
stakes; or, wherever possible, live stakes of native trees. If rain is expected prior to
temporary seed establishment, additional measures should be implemented to protect
water quality along slopes and overburden stockpiles (for example, stockpiles may be
covered with plastic or other geotextile material and surrounded with silt fencing).
Pollinator Habitat
Pollinators, such as most bees, some birds and bats, or other insects, including moths and
butterflies, play a crucial role in the reproduction of flowering plants and in the production of
most fruits and vegetables. Declines in wild pollinators are a result of loss, degradation, and
fragmentation of habitat and disease; while declines in honey bees has also been linked to
disease. The rusty -patched bumble bee (Bombus affznis) historically occurred in North Carolina's
Mountain and Piedmont provinces. Although not required, we encourage the Applicant to
3

consider our recommendations below to benefit the rusty -patched bumble bee and other
pollinators. Moreover, the creation and maintenance of pollinator habitats at this site may
increase the value of the project for the adjacent community it serves, and help reduce the spread
of invasive exotic plants. Please consider the following:
1. Sow native seed mixes in disturbed areas or in designated pollinator areas with plants
that bloom throughout the entire growing season.
2. Taller growing pollinator plant species should be planted around the periphery of the
site and anywhere on the site where mowing can be restricted during the summer
months. Taller plants, left un-mowed during the summer, would provide benefits to
pollinators, habitat to ground nesting/feeding birds, and cover for small mammals.
3. Low growing/groundcover native species should be planted in areas that need to be
maintained. This would provide benefits to pollinators while also minimizing the
amount of maintenance such as mowing and herbicide treatment. Milk weed species
are an important host plant for monarch butterflies.
4. Avoid mowing of flowering plants. Designated pollinator areas show be mow only
50% of the plant height, but no lower than 8 inches.
5. Avoid mowing outside the active season for rusty -patched bumble bee and other
pollinators (April 15 — October 15).
6. Leave slash piles, mulch piles, or loose dirt piles along woodland edges. These areas
provide nesting habitats and/or nest materials for some pollinators.
7. Avoid the use of pesticides and specifically neonicotinoids.
8. Additional information regarding plant species, seed mixes, and pollinator habitat
requirements can be provided upon request.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments. Please contact Mr. Byron
Hamstead of our staff at [e-mail], if you have any questions. In any future
correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-21-014
Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor
4

Section 5:
Long Creek Greenway & Water Quality Improvement Project
(Treyburn Drive to 1-485)
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Documentation

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID 4: SAW- 2020-01819 Begin Date (Date Received):
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Long Creek Greenway and Water Quality Improvement Project (Treyburn Dr. to 1-485)
2. Work Type: ❑Private ❑Institutional ❑✓ Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
The project proposes a combined greenway and stream rehabilitation along Long Creek and several tributaries between Treyburn Drive
and I-485 in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The greenway will provide a linear trail for recreation, fitness, and community
connection. Stream rehabilitation on sections of Long Creek and several tributaries will include restoration and enhancement to address
erosion and/or instability. Preservation is proposed to relatively stable stream sections.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Mecklenburg County Asset and Facility Management - POC: David Booth
3205 Freedom Drive, Suite 6000, Charlotte, NC 28208
phone: [phone] email: [e-mail]
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (POC: Ian Eckardt)
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: N/A
7. Project Location —Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
Coordinates: Lat: 35.342016 Long:-80.887008
Site Address: 8508 Beatties Ford Rd, Charlotte, NC 28216
8. Project Location —Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: Multiple -see attached parcel information
9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg County
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Long Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Catawba River - 03050101
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit 4
Regional General Permit 9
L✓J Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
✓ Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
Compliance
No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
August 18, 2021
Mr. Bryan Roden -Reynolds
US Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Field Office
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
Subject: Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation and Request for Verification
Long Creek Greenway and Water Quality Improvement Project (Treyburn Drive to 1-485)
SAW-2020-01819
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Roden -Reynolds:
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. (Wildlands) is resubmitting a request for written verification from the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) regarding the extent of potential waters of the United States within the revised
assessment area of the subject project. An initial request was submitted on October 14, 2020, followed by a field
visit with the USACE on November 5, 2020. Since then, the assessment area has been slightly enlarged to
account for revisions in the greenway corridor. The current phase of greenway and stream rehabilitation has
been shortened from Treyburn Drive to 1-485 however the assessment area extends to Oakdale Road which was
the original project footprint.
The following attachments are included with the revised preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) packet:
• Figures (Vicinity, USGS Topographic, Delineation, Soil, NWI, Parcel)
• Jurisdictional Request Form
• Agent Authorization Forms
• Mecklenburg County Property Cards
• Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form
• Representative Site Photolog
• USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms & NCDWR Stream Identification Forms
• USACE Antecedent Precipitation Data
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 704-332-7754 ext. 108 or [e-mail] should you have
any questions regarding this request.
Sincerely,
�� 0'�" ��
Ian Eckardt, PWS
Senior Environmental Scientist
Long Creek Greenway and Water Quality Improvement Project (Treyburn Drive to 1-485)
Preliminary Jurisdictional Delineation and Request for Verification Page 1

Long Creek Greenway and Water Quality Improvement Project
(Treyburn Drive to 1-485)
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request for Verification
Figures

� - •M f- (r (�V � N � � '0p
f h v 'vns lo i
,.iyr.. ,,,y
Maa,�y'�OiWvrµ
M
l f Cree*
O
a
LO
0
It
dr:
-
JD� C ate, s'en?'vim—/j
aue�iaep.
o $�
o
r+Q
��
19
Siah:'1.
y,1Va7�n.9i d)iu'• _ �.nwi i3
Ci
rl
J
,
o
��
r
Amy
•� 9z ��r2�
� J
\
a ?
�` Mo
1 u
'a %) x
IL
Lu
J
E�
�� � �J t�
=Z •/�
� C i.
...
Y
-
'. lfl a G,F ecrl
LO
v
I
`
M
��.
_•-
LO
LO
`,
Nrn
O
O
t
cr
Gl
3
a
V
C
0
l�

�'r eso
❑•j. r. • .� . y :. _ _ ' ... � :. Ceti .ell r 1-4
• - J' �, Yy . .:ifs/=J=.`
ram:• � - ••� .r• ^7
� :� � cal. � t-. ��'• \ J �,.., � ' ' � aI• .�,� o"r
?�! '� • ' x.� � • - _-�. r' �+� � '�' <' L:': ;'Flap-•.�`f3,
- 1. r ��`'}. ' � •. _ 'I ,.'•�_ '`,4:' '�S
�I � � � �'JI � F•�y �, f � . ` ��� 1 _ I �I;�t \` -�S ' :.9;/d�.. �'n � t
W
�• � � 'ram. a
con
� N W
'dam
M
'Jti' o vi m
T
a �
m c
N c0 u U ti
zo
u
t — C M
0Eo3
F a m E a Q
� t to
u
ri v•ca
a
LL C A
y C
O �
ca o
�• V
cr
v
3
a
V
C
O
N
O
Qz
zw
�Z
�0
Qw
i
40)

e
As
C 0 C w
o � c
E
E Y
L
m
� a
c
0o y
o v
� N y
d
N N Q A VOq
a a a
��y v
m m
10 a a a v v
3 m
« a
a « a c c c « m m m c a « a m
O O Gl Gl Gl p_ O O C 0
a` z
LL
0
N
0
0
e�

O
e�

O
;- w
Q�.
l
0

Job
.8 M-6,
Y „
Y E7
aQ
c ry
3s
m
a
d U'
3a �u
d� 2 ao �o
O _
cr
v
3
a
0
0
O
e�

� )k
§$
.
�
{ _
/ )}
|
$
{
I
\
��

;- w
Q�.
l
J

T
A
3
c
v
v
C7
Y
Gl
;- w
Q�.
l
e�

0
;- w
Q�.
l
0

��F3 �,, �. m m •o+ O Z o u 1.
3� y _ a v v•�a
r7 a = v c o c
��.• � � E E o m c m a � x
a 0 m LL c m
c v
as o
L
' m O'
o
6� v
A L L L `y Y C
oo z
o
� N
' N
a
a a = a
_ - m
m m m
ou
v
•x•:, r �a. a a a 3
® Eo
gillo
_
4�1 qi❑C -
FDw
cl
mztudzo
�..
aa7.-u:M
43
� 3
'o-- w
Q ER
Q

olk a�
�.t� o`1aNa1st
owwTv ve
a ".y SLID
r �
Q w
v
3
a
V
c
O
N
LL
O
O
0
e�

E
O
;- w
C
l
0

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington DHStrict
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegLilator3 PermitProgram/Contact/CouniyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 8508 Beatties Ford Road
City, State: Charlotte, NC
County: Mecklenburg
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): Multiple (see attached information)
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Ian Eckardt - Wildlands Engineering
Mailing Address: 1430 S. Mint Street, Suite 104
Charlotte, NC, 28203
Telephone Number: 704-332-7754
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
✓❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION'
Name: Multiple Owners (see attached information)
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
z Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Ian Eckardt
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agent'
4/23/2021
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
PigI intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
ned to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
✓❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
0 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area 183 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.342016
Longitude:-80.887008
zA legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).'
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature") . Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary .lurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/iurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
0 Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary _Jurisdictional Determination For and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved .Jurisdictional Determination Forma
0 Vicinity Map
0 Aerial Photograph
0 USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
0 Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. tional Wetland Inventory M , Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, oodplain maps)
❑✓ Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCWAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑✓ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
1_J Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatorregdocs/`ID/RGL 08-02 App A Prelim .iD Form fillable.pdf
8 Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program4lurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD) , which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
The undersigned landowner(s) identified below hereby authorize Wildlands Engineering, Inc. to act as
the agent in obtaining a preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (pJD) and/or necessary
permits/certifications (401/404) for Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Drive to
Oakdale Road) on the identified property in Mecklenburg County, NC. As part of the authorization the
landowner authorizes access to Wildlands Engineering, Inc., the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality, and the US Army Corps of Engineers personnel for the evaluation of the property
as it relates to the project including stream and wetland determinations and delineations.
Parcel ID: 02514123, 02514876, 02514899, 02516106, 02516108, 02516299,
02519398, 02519399, 02522110, 02522111, 02522294, 02524199,
02531270, 02531271, 02531297, 02531299, 02533283, 02533460,
03311112, 03313221, 03317499, 03318299, 03319199, 03325101,
03325115, 03325116, 03325117, 03327109, 03327334, 03314608,
03325105,03325114,03326105
Street Address: N/A
Listed Owner: Mecklenburg County Mecklenburg County
600 E. 4t" Street- 11t" Floor & 700 E. 4t" Street- 4t" Floor
Charlotte, NC 28202 Charlotte, NC 28202
Parcel ID: 02524196
Street Address: N/A
Listed Owner: Mecklenburg County Parks and Recreation Department
5841 Brookshire Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28216
Responsible Party: David Booth, Project Manager, Mecklenburg County AFM
Name & Title
aRn_RRR_a7aa
Phone Number:
Signature:
Date: 09/03/2020

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
The undersigned landowner(s) identified below hereby authorize Wildlands Engineering, Inc. to act as
the agent in obtaining a preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (pJD) and/or necessary
permits/certifications (401/404) for Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement: Tre burn to
Oakdale on the identified property in Mecklenburg County, NC. As part of the authorization the
landowner authorizes access to Wildlands Engineering, Inc., the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality, and the US Army Corps of Engineers personnel for the evaluation of the property
as it relates to the project including stream and wetland determinations and delineations.
Parcel ID: 03307405
Street Address:
N/A
Listed Owner:
Oakdale Harris Holdings LLC
9000 Statesville Rd.
Charlotte NC 28269
Responsible Party:
r /JZ V6,
Name & Title
Phone !Number:
Signature:
Date:
�C�

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
The undersigned landowner(s) identified below hereby authorize Wildlands Engineering, Inc. to act as
the agent in obtaining a preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (pJD) and/or necessary
permits/certifications (401/404) for Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement: Treyburn to
Oakdale on the identified property in Mecklenburg County, NC. As part of the authorization the
landowner authorizes access to Wildlands Engineering, Inc., the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality, and the US Army Corps of Engineers personnel for the evaluation of the property
as it relates to the project including stream and wetland determinations and delineations.
Parcel ID: 03327107, 03327199
Street Address: N A
Listed Owner: Mary Morgan Parker
2742 Miranda Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28216
Responsible Party: ) VIA YC]o�h PA Q Wh ,
Name & Title
Phone Number: 704 1399 13Z7L I is
Signature:
Date: �' a

(� 0 ZN
.yc w
D N.
� ' Y O ry - 77h -S
Z F U
Z ry-'y.. r.
w�N .Y. _
000
wIN ZZa - Uo o , ,' '•'i'
Uoo W-W
w mFM'. o.o _ 1
w
z(000
JDoVOUoO� "' W -
W
W Z n 4
�YD Y'ON .
mIN ^ =)N UUo
W O N WZM
,ON ZM .P
W U o ? U O o z m F rn
g m F m w - 10 w N
- W Z 2 - Z F Y O N
1
Y p N p w
Z W U o
UUo D Y U w g
Zzrn
�. �- N �N
YO ry ZZ ao _
_ UU O w< W •IL=-r
C7 ZZm Yy
rn W�
m>o WAN
F yp0
w�z N w U o
YON
000
wz
D t
7�o r y
Zo -
r
Y Sao Z
w �
UUo • _ _ ., �.
s
LL
R IMi; r
M1^
- � •'ice'_ ... ,
• Mn] .. - Z 1 - ••
o
q-ZN
m>m ZZWmm
. Y Op ode •=
ZZN
wIn
Z,Zrn •ec .r,
W
wOp Mo .' . _ - :yam._' •d=.
mYo j>
..mYo zZN
Z W z F .
- W M Y O M W D N _
.. Y6M UUo Yo OM ''-
1 UUo W U o
w 7
• Y _ Y O M `
m j o U U o
FF.. W
K
W Z
o
Om
U U o m Y�2 m Y �2zI-
_
w D M w I M m z . a
_' .. V OUo V OUo W DM
oo
w 70
¢ z p'a_
1 0
Y o o W
pOo m
O

Long Creek Greenway and Water Quality Improvement Project
(Treyburn Drive to 1-485)
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request for Verification
Property Record Cards

IVIECKLENBUIRU LUUN I it — PROPEM R€CURB CARD PR PERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02514123 MECKLENBURG COUNTY Total Appraised Value
REAMES RD CHARLOTTE NC 600 E FOURTH ST $73,000
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 9612
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN - AC
Land
23.1815 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date -
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District
NA
Legal Description
NA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020
Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$73,000
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$73,000
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
-
Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
-
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
-
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
-
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt) -
LAND
Use Units
Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
9612 23.1815
ACRE
C501
$73,000
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$73,000
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$209,200
11/15/2003
2003
CORRECTION OF LAND AREA:AC/SQ FT/DIM
$473,600

IVIECKLENBUIRU LUUN I it — PROPEM R€CURB CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02514876 MECKLENBURG COUNTY Total Appraised Value
AINSWORTH ST CHARLOTTE NC 600 EAST FOURTH ST $110,000
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
8600
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc
OTHER COUNTY PROPERTY
Land
8.73 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
-
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District
NA
Legal Description39-968
_
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
_
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$110,000
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$110,000
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
-
Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
-
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
-
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
i -
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
8600 8.73
ACRE
C501
$110,000
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/16/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$110,000
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$100,100
07/24/2004
2004
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
$128,100

IVIECKLENB IRU LUUN I it — PROPEM R€CURB CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02514899 MECKLENBURG COUNTY Total Appraised Value
NCALKSTONE RD CHARLOTTE 600 EAST FOURTH ST $115,900
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 8600
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc OTHER COUNTY PROPERTY
Land
9.2016 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date -
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
_ Special District
NA
Legal DescriptionREENWAY M43-971
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$115,900
Building Value i
$0
Features
$0
Total
$115,900
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area - Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story - Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation - External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s) - Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt) -
LANE)
Use Units Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
8600 9.2016 ACRE
C501
$115,900
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/16/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$115,900
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$49,400
04/11/2006
2006
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
$31,600

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I it — FRUPEM RECORD CARD FRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02516106 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
8508 BEATTIES FORD RD /FINANCE DEPT $317,800
CHARLOTTE NC 600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 8600
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc OTHER COUNTY PROPERTY
Land
12.613 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date -
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price -
Special District
NA
Legal Description M3-345
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$317,800
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$317,800
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
8600 12.613
ACRE
C501
$317,800
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$317,800
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$241,200

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I it — FRUPEM RECORD CARD FRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02516108 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE
8604 BEATTIES FORD RD /FINANCE DEPT
CHARLOTTE NC 600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
R120
Neighborhood
Land Use Desc
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ACREAGE
Land
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
Last Sale Date
-
Fire District
Last Sale Price
-
Special District
Legal Description
NA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Total Appraised Value
$107,700
C501
6.84 ACRE
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
Land Value $107,700
Building Value $0
Features $0
Total $107,700
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built -
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat -
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall -
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s) -
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use
Units Type Neighborhood
Assessment
R120
6.84 ACRE C501
$107,700
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$107,700
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$90,300

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I it — FRUPEM RECORD CARD FRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02516299 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
NCEATTIES FORD RD CHARLOTTE /FINANCE DEPT. $131,000
600 E 4TH ST 11 TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 8600
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc OTHER COUNTY PROPERTY
Land
9.24 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date -
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price -
Special District
NA
Legal Description M26-276
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$131,000
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$131,000
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
8600 9.24 ACRE
C501
$131,000
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$131,000
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$184,800

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I it — FRUPEM RECORD CARD FRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02519398 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
WOODFORD BRIDGE DR /FINANCE DEPT $8,300
CHARLOTTE NC 600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
9612
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN - AC
Land
2.65 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District
NA
Legal Description
GREENWAY M24-41
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$8,300
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$8,300
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
9612 2.65
ACRE
C501
$8,300
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$8,300
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$14,200

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I it — PRUPEM RECORD CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02519399 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
BELSTEAD BROOK CT /FINANCE DEPT $12,600
CHARLOTTE NC 600 E 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
9612
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN - AC
Land
3.99 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District
NA
Legal Description
GREENWAY M24-8&711 BELS
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$12,600
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$12,600
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood
Assessment
9612 3.99
ACRE C501
$12,600
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$12,600
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$9,500

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02522110 MECKLENBURG COUNTY
W W T HARRIS BV CHARLOTTE NC 600 E 4TH ST
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
Land Use Desc
Exemption/Deferment
Last Sale Date
Last Sale Price
Legal Description
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
9612
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN - AC
COUNTY
P5 M54-390
Neighborhood
Land
Municipality
Fire District
Special District
Total Appraised Value
$125,700
RE07
329749.2 SQUARE FEET
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$125,700
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$125,700
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built Built Use / Style
Story
Heat Fuel
Foundation
External Wall Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s) Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
9612 329749.2 SQUARE FEET RE07 $125,700
FEATU RES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce
a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is
also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions,
please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/16/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$125,700
02/06/2015
2013
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$164,900
06/06/2013
2013
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
$164,900

M€CKLEN13URG IUUNTTr — PROPEM R€CURB CARE) PRUPERTTr SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02522111 MECKLENBURG COUNTY Total Appraised Value
NC T HARRIS BV CHARLOTTE 600 E 4TH ST $101,700
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 9612
Neighborhood
RE07
Land Use Desc 100 YEAR
FLOOD PLAIN - AC
Land
279943.2 SQUARE FEET
Exemption/Deferment COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
-
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
-
Special District
NA
Legal Description
P5 M54-390
_
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real
Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$101,700
Building Value i
$0
Features
$0
Total
$101,700
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
-
Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
-
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
-
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
-
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt) -
LANE)
Use Units
Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
9612 279943.2
SQUARE FEET
RE07
$101,700
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/16/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$101,700
02/06/2015
2013
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$140,000
06/06/2013
2013
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
$140,000

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I it — PRUPEM RECORD CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02522294 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
REAMES RD CHARLOTTE NC /FINANCE DEPT. $24,800
600 E 4TH ST 1TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code 9612
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN - AC
Land
7.87 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price -
Special District
NA
_
Legal Description GREENWAY M25-914 M26-48 &586 &610
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$24,800
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$24,800
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
9612 7.87 ACRE
C501
$24,800
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$24,800
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$21,500

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I it — PRUPEM RECORD CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02524199 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
AMBLESIDE DR CHARLOTTE NC /FINANCE DEPT $27,700
600 E 4TH ST 11 TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
9612
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN - AC
Land
8.8 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District
NA
Legal Description
GREENWAY M25-646
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$27,700
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$27,700
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood
Assessment
9612 8.8
ACRE C501
$27,700
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$27,700
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$23,700

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I it — PRUPEM RECORE) CARE) PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02531270 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
KIMMEL LN CHARLOTTE NC /FINANCE DEPT $0
600 EAST 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code R311
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc CONDOMINIUM COMMON AREA
Land
1 LOT
Exemption/Deferment COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date -
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price -
Special District
NA
Legal Description GREENWAY M29-123
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$0
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$0
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s) Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units Type Neighborhood
Assessment
R311 1 LOT C501
$0
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$0
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$0

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I it — PRUPEM RECORD CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02531271 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
TREYBURN DR CHARLOTTE NC /FINANCE DEPT $21,000
600 EAST 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
9612
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN - AC
Land
6.68 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District
NA
Legal Description
GREENWAY M29-304
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$21,000
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$21,000
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood
Assessment
9612 6.68
ACRE C501
$21,000
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$21,000
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$100

IVIECKLENBUI U LUUN I it — €RUPE Tf RECORD CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02531297 MECKLENBURG COUNTY
TREYBURN DR CHARLOTTE NC 600 E FOURTH ST
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
KEY INFORMATION
Total Appraised Value
$3,000
Land Use Code
9612
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN - AC
Land
1 LOT
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
-
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District
NA
Legal Description
GREENWAY M34-312
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$3,000
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$3,000
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
- Year Built -
Built Use / Style -
Story
- Heat -
Fuel -
Foundation
- External Wall -
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
- Half Bath(s) -
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
-
LAND
Use
Units Type Neighborhood
Assessment
9612
1 LOT C501
$3,000
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$3,000
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$15,000
02/15/2003
2003
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$2,000

IVIECKL€NBUI U LUUN I it — PRUPE Tf RECORD CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02531299 MECKLENBURG COUNTY
TREYBURN DR CHARLOTTE NC 600 EAST FOURTH ST
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
KEY INFORMATION
Total Appraised Value
$300
Land Use Code 9600
Neighborhood
C501
_
Land Use Desc WASTELAND, SLIVERS, GULLIES, ROCK
Land
1 LOT
OUTCROP
Exemption/Deferment COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District
NA
Legal Description INA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$300
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$300
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
9600 1 LOT
C501
$300
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$300
07/12/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$200
02/04/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$200
05/19/2008
2008
CLERICAL CORRECTION IN VALUE
$200
07/24/2004
2004
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
$1,700
12/12/2003
2003
CORRECTION OF LAND AREA:AC/SQ FT/DIM
$1,700

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I it — PRBP€M RECORE) CARE) PROF€RTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02533283 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
SHENINGTON PL CHARLOTTE NC /FINANCE DEPT $14,100
600 EAST 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
9612
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN - AC
Land
4.48 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District
NA
Legal Description
GREENWAY M27-964
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$14,100
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$14,100
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood
Assessment
9612 4.48
ACRE C501
$14,100
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$14,100
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$66,800

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I it — PRUPEM RECORD CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02533460 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
CINNABAY DR CHARLOTTE NC /FINANCE DEPT $66,200
600 EAST 4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
9612
Neighborhood
C501
Land Use Desc
100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN - AC
Land
21.03 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price
Special District
NA
Legal Description
GREENWAY M27-853, 854 &855
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate
Assessed Value
Land Value
$66,200
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$66,200
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood
Assessment
9612 21.03
ACRE C501
$66,200
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$66,200
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$300

IVIECKILENB IRU LUUN I it — PROPEM R€CURB CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03311112 MECKLENBURG COUNTY Total Appraised Value
6322 MT HOLLY-HUNTERSVILLE 600 E FOURTH ST $53,000
RD UNINC NC CHARLOTTE NC28202
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code R120
Neighborhood
D301
Land Use Desc SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
- ACREAGE Land
3.5696 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment -
Municipality
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date -
Fire District
COOKS
Last Sale Price -
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description TRACT 3 M63-23
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$53,000
Building Value �
$0
Features
$0
Total
$53,000
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area -
Year Built -
Built Use / Style -
Story -
Heat -
Fuel -
Foundation -
External Wall -
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s) -
Half Bath(s) -
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt) -
LANE)
Use Units Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
R120 3.5696 ACRE
D301
$53,000
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$53,000
05/09/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$42,100
02/04/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$42,100
01/02/2003
2003
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$181,300

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I it — PRUPEM RECORD CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03313221 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
PRIMM RD UNINC NC /FINANCEDEPT $819,300
600 E 4TH ST 11 TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code R120
Neighborhood
D301
Land Use Desc SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
- ACREAGE
Land
37.93 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment COUNTY
Municipality
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date -
Fire District
LONG CREEK
Last Sale Price -
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description NA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate
Assessed Value
Land Value
$819,300
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$819,300
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
-
Built Use / Style
-
Story
Heat
-
Fuel
-
Foundation
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s)
-
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s)
-
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
R120 37.93 ACRE
D301
$819,300
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$819,300
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$1,048,700

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I it — PRUPEM RECORD CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03317499 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE
TROTTER RD CHARLOTTE NC /FINANCE DEPT
600 E 4TH ST 11 TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
R120
Neighborhood
Land Use Desc
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ACREAGE
Land
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
Last Sale Date
-
Fire District
Last Sale Price
-
Special District
Legal Description
P GREENWAY M24-626 & 25-119
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Total Appraised Value
$12,500
D301
9.2659 ACRE
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
Land Value $12,500
Building Value $0
Features $0
Total $12,500
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area Year Built - Built Use / Style -
Story Heat - Fuel -
Foundation External Wall - Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s) Half Bath(s) - Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
R120 9.2659 ACRE D301 $12,500
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$12,500
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$307,300

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I it — PRUPEM RECORD CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03318299 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE
TROTTER RD CHARLOTTE NC /FINANCE DEPT
600 E 4TH ST 11 TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
R120
Neighborhood
Land Use Desc
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ACREAGE
Land
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
Last Sale Date
-
Fire District
Last Sale Price
-
Special District
Legal Description
P GREENWAY B3 M25-366
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Total Appraised Value
$6,500
D301
2.41 ACRE
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
Land Value $6,500
Building Value $0
Features $0
Total $6,500
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built -
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat -
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall -
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s) -
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use
Units Type Neighborhood
Assessment
R120
2.41 ACRE D301
$6,500
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$6,500
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$9,400

IVIECKt€NBUIRU LUUN I it — PRCPEM R€CURB CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03319199 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
PRIMM RD UNINC NC /FINANCEDEPT $30,200
600 E 4TH ST 11 TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code R100
Neighborhood
D301
Land Use Desc SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Land
22.39 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment COUNTY
Municipality
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date -
Fire District
LONG CREEK
Last Sale Price -
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description NA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate
Assessed Value
Land Value
$30,200
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$30,200
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND _
Use Units Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
R100 22.39 ACRE
D301
$30,200
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$30,200
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$694,800

IVIECKLENBUI U LUUN I it — €RUPE Tf RECORD CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03325101 MECKLENBURG COUNTY Total Appraised Value
4104 OAKDALE RD UNINC NC 600 EAST 4TH ST 11TH FL $62,000
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
R120
Neighborhood
D301
Land Use Desc
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ACREAGE
_
Land
2.17 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date
-
Fire District
LONG CREEK
Last Sale Price
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description
TRACT 2 M63-23
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value $62,000
Building Value _ $0
Features $0
Total $62,000
No buildings to show.
LAND
Use Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
R120 2.17 ACRE D301 $62,000
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
01 /14/2019
05/09/2014
02/04/2011
07/24/2004
01/02/2003
Effective for Tax Year
2019
2011
2011
2004
2003
Reason for Change
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
0
New Value
$62,000
$172,100
$216,200
$185,000
$266,300
C:1

IVIECKLENBUIRU LUUN I it — PRUPEM R€CURB CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03325115 MECKLENBURG COUNTY Total Appraised Value
OAKDALE RD UNINC NC 600 E.4TH ST 11TH FLOOR $75,800
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code R120
Neighborhood
D301
_
Land Use Desc SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ACREAGE
Land
3.51 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment -
Municipality
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date
Fire District
COOKS
Last Sale Price
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description TRACT 4 M63-23
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
_
2020 Real Estate
Assessed Value
Land Value
$75,800
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$75,800
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area -
Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story -
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation -
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s) -
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt) -
LAND
Use Units Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
R120 3.51 ACRE
D301
$75,800
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$75,800
05/09/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$39,900
02/04/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$92,200

IVIECKL€NBUI U LUUN I it — PRUPEM RECORD CARD PRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03325116 MECKLENBURG COUNTY
OAKDALE RD UNINC NC 600 E.4TH ST 11TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Total Appraised Value
$400
Land Use Code 9600
Neighborhood
D301
_
Land Use Desc WASTELAND, SLIVERS, GULLIES, ROCK
Land
1 ACRE
OUTCROP
Exemption/Deferment
Municipality
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date
Fire District
COOKS
Last Sale Price
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description TRACT 1 M63-23
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$400
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$400
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
-
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat
-
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall
-
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
-
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
9600 1 ACRE
D301
$400
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$400
05/09/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$500
02/04/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$500

M€CKLEN13URG IUUNTTr — PROPEM R€CURB CARD PRUPERTTr SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03325117 MECKLENBURG COUNTY Total Appraised Value
OAKDALE RD UNINC NC 600 E.4TH ST 11TH FLOOR $731,000
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
R100
Neighborhood
D301
Land Use Desc
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Land
54.147 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date
-
Fire District
LONG CREEK
Last Sale Price
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description
TRACT 2 M63-23
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$731,000
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$731,000
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area -
Year Built -
Built Use / Style -
Story -
Heat -
Fuel -
Foundation -
External Wall -
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s) i -
Half Bath(s) -
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood
Assessment
R100 54.147
ACRE D301
$731,000
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/16/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$731,000
05/09/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$70,400
02/04/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$281,800
07/24/2004
2004
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
$201,300

IVIECKL€NBUIRU LUUN I it — FRUPEM RECORD CARD FRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03327109 MECKLENBURG COUNTY, C/O REAL ESTATE Total Appraised Value
NCEATTIES FORD RD CHARLOTTE /FINANCE DEPT $43,200
600 E 4TH ST 11 TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202-2816
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code R120
Neighborhood
D301
Land Use Desc SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
- ACREAGE Land
31.97 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment COUNTY
Municipality
CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Date -
Fire District
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
Last Sale Price -
Special District
NA
Legal Description NA
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$43,200
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$43,200
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built -
Built Use / Style -
Story
Heat -
Fuel -
Foundation
External Wall -
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s) -
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units Type
Neighborhood
Assessment
R120 31.97 ACRE
D301
$43,200
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$43,200
02/07/2015
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$251,100

IVIECKLENBUIRU LUUN I it — FROPEM R€CURB CARD FRUPERTf SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03327334 MECKLENBURG COUNTY
FOX THORNE DR CHARLOTTE NC 600 EAST FOURTH ST
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
R120
Neighborhood
Land Use Desc
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ACREAGE
_
Land
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY
Municipality
Last Sale Date
-
Fire District
Last Sale Price
Special District
Legal Description
GREENWAY M30-905
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
Total Appraised Value
$4,800
D301
3.52 ACRE
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$4,800
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$4,800
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area -
Year Built -
Built Use / Style -
Story I -
Heat -
Fuel -
Foundation -
External Wall -
Fireplace(s) -
Full Bath(s) i -
Half Bath(s) -
Bedroom(s) -
Total (SgFt) -
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood
Assessment
R120 3.52
ACRE D301
$4,800
FEATURES
No data to display.
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value, it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could
reduce a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for
that year. It is also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you
have any questions, please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$4,800
05/09/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$0
02/04/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$0
01/02/2003
2003
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$0

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03314608 MECKLENBURG COUNTY
MT HOLLY-HUNTERSVILLE RD 600 EAST FOURTH ST
UNINC NC CHARLOTTE NC28201
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
Land Use Desc
Exemption/Deferment
Last Sale Date
Last Sale Price
Legal Description
R120
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ACREAGE
COUNTY
TRACT 2 M63-23
Neighborhood
Land
Municipality
Fire District
Special District
Total Appraised Value
$310,400
D301
19.1594 ACRE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
LONG CREEK
FIRE SERVICE A
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value $310,400
Building Value $0
Features $0
Tota 1 $310,400
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
Built Use / Style
Story
Heat
Fuel
Foundation
External Wall
Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood
Assessment
R120 19.1594
ACRE D301
$310,400
FEATU RES
No data to display
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce
a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is
also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions,
please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$310,400
05/09/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$107,600
02/04/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$107,600
07/24/2004
2004
COMBINED REAL ESTATE
$496,200
01/02/2003
2003
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$200,700

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03325105 MECKLENBURG COUNTY
PRIMM RD UNINC NC 700 EAST4TH ST4TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Total Appraised Value
$71,000
Land Use Code
R120 Neighborhood
D301
Land Use Desc
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ACREAGE Land
2.63 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY Municipality
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date
Fire District
LONG CREEK
Last Sale Price
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description
M63-23
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$71,000
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$71,000
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area Year Built Built Use / Style
Story Heat Fuel
Foundation External Wall Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s) Half Bath(s) Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
R120 2.63 ACRE D301 $71,000
FEATU RES
No data to display
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce
a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is
also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions,
please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$71,000
11/09/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$28,500
03/17/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$28,500
02/15/2003
2003
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$21,000

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03325114 MECKLENBURG COUNTY
4600 OAKDALE RD UNINC NC 700 EAST4TH ST4TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Total Appraised Value
$131,600
Land Use Code
R120 Neighborhood
D301
Land Use Desc
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ACREAGE Land
10.8285 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment
Municipality
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date
Fire District
COOKS
Last Sale Price
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description
TRACT 5 M63-23
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$131,600
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$131,600
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
Built Use / Style
Story
Heat
Fuel
Foundation
External Wall
Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood
Assessment
R120 10.8285
ACRE D301
$131,600
FEATU RES
No data to display
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce
a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is
also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions,
please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$131,600
05/09/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$97,200
02/04/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$97,200
10/18/2003
2003
REVISED NOTICE
$153,700

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 03326105 MECKLENBURG COUNTY
PRIMM RD UNINC NC 700 EAST4TH ST4TH FLOOR
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Total Appraised Value
$1,493,100
Land Use Code
R120 Neighborhood
D301
Land Use Desc
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ACREAGE Land
55.2985 ACRE
Exemption/Deferment
COUNTY Municipality
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date
Fire District
LONG CREEK
Last Sale Price
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description
M63-23
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$1,493,100
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$1,493,100
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area Year Built Built Use / Style
Story Heat Fuel
Foundation External Wall Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s) Half Bath(s) Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
R120 55.2985 ACRE D301 $1,493,100
FEATU RES
No data to display
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce
a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is
also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions,
please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
01 /14/2019
11/09/2014
03/17/2011
04/08/2005
03/15/2003
Effective for Tax Year
2019
2011
2011
2005
2003
Reason for Change
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
New Value
$1,493,100
$354,000
$354,000
$386,400
$542,700

MECKLENBURG COUNTY — PROPERTY RECORD CARD PROPERTY SEARCH
PARCEL ID: 02524196 MECKLENBURG COUNTY PARKS AND
AMBLESIDE DR CHARLOTTE NC RECREATION DEPARTMENT
5841 BROOKSHIRE BLVD
CHARLOTTE NC 28216
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code
Land Use Desc
Exemption/Deferment
Last Sale Date
Last Sale Price
Legal Description
R111
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - COMMON
COUNTY
C/A M25-509
Neighborhood
Land
Municipality
Fire District
Special District
C510
1 LOT
CHARLOTTE
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
NA
Total Appraised Value
$0
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2020 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$0
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Tota 1
$0
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
Built Use / Style
Story
Heat
Fuel
Foundation
External Wall
Fireplace(s)
Full Bath(s)
Half Bath(s)
Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
LAND
Use Units
Type Neighborhood
Assessment
R111 1
LOT C510
$0
FEATU RES
No data to display
VALUE CHANGES
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce
a property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is
also possible that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions,
please call the County Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
Date of Value Change
Effective for Tax Year
Reason for Change
New Value
01/14/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$0
12/23/2013
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$0
02/04/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$0
01/02/2003
2003
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$0

Mecklenburg County - Property Record Card Property Search
Mecklenburg County — Property Record Card Property Search
PARCEL ID: 03307405 OAKDALE HARRIS HOLDINGS LLC
Total Appraised Value
OAKDALE RD UNINC NC 9000 STATESVILLE RD
$658,600
CHARLOTTE NC 28269
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code R120
Neighborhood
D301
Land Use Desc SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ACREAGE
Land
44.35 ACRE
Exemption / Deferment -
Municipality
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date 06/15/2004
Fire District
LONG CREEK
Last Sale Price $364,000 I
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description M43-195
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2021 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value $658,600
Building Value $0
Features $0
Total $658,600
LAND
USE UNITS TYPE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSMENT
R120 44.35 ACRE D301 $658,600
BUILDING
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
Built Use / Style
Story
Heat
Fuel
Foundation
External Wall
Fireplace(s)
D
Full Bath(s)
0
Half Bath(s)
0
Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
FEATURES
No data to display
111ILUM:/104101:1101
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce a
property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is also possible
that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions, please call the County
Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
DATE OF VALUE CHANGE
01/14/2019
05/09/2014
02/04/2011
04/11/2006
07/12/2003
01/02/2003
EFFECTIVE FOR TAX YEAR
2019
2011
2011
2006
2003
2003
REASON FOR CHANGE
NEW VALUE
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$898,100
REVALUATION REVIEW - PEARSON
$415,600
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$1,238,900
DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE/OR NEW PARCEL
$711,900
EQUALIZATION OF VALUE
$710,600
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$1,068,400
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are
provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation.

Mecklenburg County - Property Record Card Property Search
Mecklenburg County - Property Record Card Property Search
PARCEL ID: 03327107 PARKER MARY MORGAN
Total Appraised Value
BEATTIES FORD RD UNINC NC 2742 MIRANDA RD
$43,400
CHARLOTTE NC 28216
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code R120
Neighborhood
D301
Land Use Desc SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - ACREAGE
Land
1.02 ACRE
Exemption / Deferment -
Municipality
MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date 07/21/1992
Fire District
LONG CREEK
Last Sale Price $0
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description M35-007
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2021 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value $43,400
Building Value $0
Features $0
Total $43,400
LAND
USE UNITS TYPE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSMENT
R120 1.02 ACRE D301 $43,400
BUILDING
BUILDING (1)
Finished Area
Year Built
Built Use / Style
Story
Heat
Fuel
Foundation
External Wall
Fireplace(s)
D
Full Bath(s)
0
Half Bath(s)
0
Bedroom(s)
Total (SgFt)
FEATURES
No data to display
1�/1�U�:/1►Cel�
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce a
property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is also possible
that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions, please call the County
Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
DATE OF VALUE CHANGE
01/14/2019
05/09/2014
02/04/2011
01/02/2003
EFFECTIVE FOR TAX YEAR
2019
2011
2011
2003
REASON FOR CHANGE
NEW VALUE
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$43,400
REVALUATION REVIEW -PEARSON
$48,800
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$48,800
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$50,500
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are
provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation.

Mecklenburg County - Property Record Card Property Search
Mecklenburg County — Property Record Card Property Search
PARCEL ID: 03327199 PARKER MARY MORGAN Total Appraised Value
BEATTIES FORD RD UNINC NC 2742 MIRANDA RD $18,000
CHARLOTTE NC 28216
KEY INFORMATION
Land Use Code R100 Neighborhood D301
Land Use Desc SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Land 0.15 ACRE
Exemption / Deferment - Municipality MECKLENBURG COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Last Sale Date 07/21/1992 Fire District LONG CREEK
Last Sale Price $0 Special District FIRE SERVICE A
Legal Description LB M35-007
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
2021 Real Estate Assessed Value
Land Value
$18,000
Building Value
$0
Features
$0
Total
$18,000
LAND
USE UNITS TYPE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSMENT
R100 0.15 ACRE D301 $18,000
BUILDING
BUILDING (1)
FEATURES
No data to display
111ILUM:/104101:1101
The value change history shows only changes in appraised value; it does not show exemptions, exclusions or deferrals that could reduce a
property's taxable value. If any of these are in effect for a particular tax year, it will be shown on the property tax bill for that year. It is also possible
that some previous value changes might be missing from this list or listed in the wrong order. If you have any questions, please call the County
Assessor's Office at 704-336-7600.
DATE OF VALUE CHANGE
EFFECTIVE FOR TAX YEAR
REASON FOR CHANGE
NEW VALUE
01/15/2019
2019
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$18,000
05/09/2014
2011
REVALUATION REVIEW -PEARSON
$14,400
02/04/2011
2011
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$14,400
01/02/2003
2003
COUNTYWIDE REVALUATION
$12,000
Disclaimer
Mecklenburg County makes every effort to produce the most accurate information possible. No warranties, expressed or implied, are
provided for the data herein, its use or interpretation.

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: June 10, 2021
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Ian Eckardt; 1430 S. Mint St. Suite 104 Charlotte, NC 28203
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: wimington District, Long Creek Greenway and Water Quality Improvement Project
(Treyburn Dr. to 1-485)
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC county/parish/borough: Mecklenburg city: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.342016 Long.:-80.887008
Universal Transverse Mercator: UTM 17
Name of nearest waterbody: Long Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
See attached

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:GIS figures including Vicinity, USGS Topographic, Delineation, Soils and NWI
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
■❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 7.5 Minute Mountain Island Lake & Derita
■❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: NRCS Web Soils Survey Website
❑■ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: NWI Wetland Mapper Website (USFWS)
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
El
■❑
100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ❑■ Aerial (Name & Date): 2019 aerial on GIS figures with submittal
or ❑■ Other (Name & Date): Representative site photos with submittal
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: SAC-2019-00868
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
} Digitally signed by Ian Eckardt
Ian car L Date 2021.04.22 14 50 09-04'00'
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Y
3
aj
O i
« 3
0
O w
« v 3
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
a3 3 H
C
C
O
C
O
C
O
C
O
C
O
C
O
C
O
C
O
C
O
C
O
C
O
C
O
v S a)O
s a
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
CL m
f° E
Ln
cn
cn
cn
cn
cn
Ln
cn
cn
Ln
cn
cn
cn
ao «
o s Z
a) U
(7 t
U
�+
f6 LC
3 aJ
sa
a
3
o a,
•i
LL
3 a)
J
�
L.L
J
L.L
J
L.L
J
LL
J
00
J
L.L
J
L.L
J
L.L
J
L.L
J
L.L
J
J
00
L.L
J
E .�
o
.
m
�
—A-I
N
` 1
00
�
LLn
N
O
0)
a a,
—A
� i
« o
fC
E a)
N �
N
W
(A
L
Ln
L
0)
Ln
L
N
L
N
L
N
L
i
aJ
N
L
Ln
aJ
i
0)
i
0)
i
0)
N
cu
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
f6
i
s
C
C
O
C
C
C
C
O
C
O
O
O
O
O
O
z
O
O
O
O
z
O
z
z
z
z
au
a
'c
'c
+_
c
c
c
>
E
E
E
E
E
E
a)
O
O
00
lD
Ln
I
00
m
N
N
m
-a
m
M
Ln
N
00
O
r�
n
Ln
lD
m
m
lD
—1
00
Il
00
Ln
M
n
N
lD
•
N
00
00
Il
O
Ol
m
lD
00
n
lD
00
n
lD
00
m
lD
00
n
Il
00
n
n
00
lD
00
00
00
m
00
N
m
00
lD
00
00
n
00
C
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
J
OP
OP
OP
OP
OP
OP
OP
OP
OP
OP
OP
OP
OP
M
Il
n
n
-A
N
n
M
-A
Ln
Ln
a)
Il
lD
n
N
m
00
N
N
O
00
Il
lD
'a
Ln
O
00
M
lD
-A
lD
tD
m
O
3
Ln
O
M
Ln
lD
O
lD
Ln
.--I
Il
O
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
J
Ul
Ul
Ul
Ul
Ul
Ul
Ul
Ul
Ln
Ln
Ul
Ul
Ln
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
Y
i
Y
�
aJ
L
aJ
L
aJ
U
Q
co
m
U
LU
Z
of
L
L
zto
a
a
L
L
L
aj
N
u
Lli
.--.
ri
00
dl
ri
N
(M
M
N

v
O L
a+ �
T O
s y
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
m
f° s E
L
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Y
Lo
O L Z
y •u
C7 s
3
U
.Y
L
sa
a
0 3
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
N
dl
dl
Lfi
00
dl
Lr)
O
M
M
Lf)
lD
O
dl
-
O0
n
O
n
O
O
O
00
O
lD
M
Ln
a v
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
L
v �
a+ o
E
.Y
LU
LYJ
v
L
O
ci
C)
C)
C)
C)
C)
fu
C:
C:
C:ccc
c
cr
cc
cc
cc
cc
cc
cc
cc
cc
cc
cca
cc
cicc
C)
0)
0)
0)
0)
C)
C
C)
C)
0)
0)
0)
c
aj
CL
T
H
a1
m
lD
00
M
lD
M
00
N
N
N
I"
Ln
—A
lD
m
r"
tD
N
m
lD
lD
r�
O
lD
M
M
Ln
O
m
0)
M
Il
r"
N
M
N
O
m
lD
O
N
r�
Ln
r�
lD
00
M
m
Ln
m
lD
m
Il
m
Ln
O
lD
O
O
00
lD
N
I"
O
o0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
D1
D1
m
00
DD
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
J
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
OP
OP
OP
OP
OP
OP
m
n
to
M
m
m
lD
O
O
r�
O
lD
0)
0)
a)
M
N
lD
lD
O
A
Ln
m
N
N
Ln
A
O
m
—A
—A
M
lD
lD
N
I"
O
A
N
.- A
.- A
00
r�
r�
n
.- A
Ln
M
+'
�t
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
J
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
L
a
co
U
LL
U-
aJ
_0
_0
_
_0
_0
.0
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C:
a-
C
C
C
C
ate..
L
U�
lD
00
m
O
.--I
N
N
Ln
lD
N
N
N
N
N
N

v
O L
a+ �
T O
s 0)0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
s a
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
m
f° s E
L
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Y
O L Z
� •U
t7 t
3
U
.Y
aj
L
sa
a
0 3
r>
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
0
00
Ln
M
r�
M
N
Ln
O
m
n
m
00
Ln
E
lD
N
—A
N
—A
O
N
N
00
—A
00
—A
Ln
00
rl
M
M
—A
N
O
N
—A
rl
—A
—A
Ln
a v
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L
v �
Y O
E
Y
LU
W
v
L
O
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
vi
U
�
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
cr
ci
C)
OJ
a
a
a
CL
O
O
O
v
CL
T
H
a1
00
m
—A
N
Ln
N
rl
M
00
00
N
-a
O
N
rl
m
M
lD
M
N
N
lD
rl
n
—A
00
00
M
Ln
lD
Ln
lD
lD
O
C.0
00
n
—A
m
m
lD
lD
rl
n
Ln
O
O
O
O
m
O
m
O
O
O
O
00
00
00
00
00
m
m
m
m
00
m
m
m
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
J
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Ln
00
M
—A
N
M
00
lD
Il
N
Ln
m
lD
G1
00
rl
lD
lD
N
rl
O
N
rl
00
N
'6
m
n
Ln
N
00
M
M
rl
—A
00
lD
m
Ln
7
Ln
—A
O
lD
N
lD
00
N
00
Il
n
M
N
+'
M
M
M
N
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
J
Ul
Uf
Uf
Uf
Uf
Uf
Uf
Uf
Uf
Uf
Uf
Uf
Uf
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
O
w
Z
O
—A
N
M
L
w
cc
cc
cc
E
`°
`°
cc
c
f6
0
cc
0
0
0
Za
a
ci*'
cc
a
a
a0i
a
a0i
a
a0i
a
v
O
O
O
Vf
ONO
N
O
M
M
M
M
�
M
M
00
al
O
M
M
M

Long Creek Greenway and Water Quality Improvement Project
(Treyburn Drive to 1-485)
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request for Verification
Site Photographs

�
J
f
'p
g Via" ,itij
40
7, q-;
Xxi- `t .
N
4

"Fire,
��r btu, •
f
�t
a:
+-�`
•••i-�~'_
-•;,�? is
..x
• �, s.- .ri•i1�•gy k-aft..

�IoiufB h 4 �^-h�
XX Tit
e,
Z' +
77
• .y � ��.yy �-+ems
op
z;r.I Y

f� ,
1
2"
ll i
r '
Al't : "1 r �l t r
g • i r
-4
dry. s
t,
a
h,`ta y',ysa ��5t?• +t--: 'P°�yrF•j4L
a 'fib '4

ft �
n k �
`f 53
._ h _ ,�a' a� ob• 'i � �k
�,�- Sri t.,s� t.•
,�r �M}, �'yV. ��� tsr �'% :rah r���. •` _ -
r �•
^4Rr; �iA
�,,�J.-.. v �yr� _ ter• �'.+'�-.
in—
g� y�
-.1•:'�l `; +!K.' .+E. -.
_ •� ,.. tire. �:.��°;,;;,,.:� -.�:, ..

rTeo
r -:
t '�' • ter. � �y�. - �
1.4
• ter,' ,. ��
./ �� :�i� •y+� 1`7 fir] •�� � t.`.`�'4''4 �,;
lJl
`fie: _.��,`:: _ •'��-.4`�'_� r:..;'4
�,a;: �� . ..�,. •.. • yam' - • � •,rt. y'• ,.: � ' 'f
AM
r . . , x _ �y►;.7 ` it .

Long Creek Greenway and Water Quality Improvement Project
(Treyburn Drive to 1-485)
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request for Verification
Stream and Wetland Data Forms

SCP1
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: FAO Pp
ProjectlSite: ��r�
Latitude:3r3,2145773
Evaluator: Lei
County_
Longitude:_ 90. $Mo97
Total Points:
Stream Determination tcircle one]
Other 1{ 'q Cyr
Stream is at least intermittent
q3
Ephemeral lntermittenlcereranr
e.g. Quad Name-7
if? f 9 or perenmal if? 30" -5
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = a
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
2
5. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
�3]
S. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
es =
Q1 I1134 QI GIW Pt;:, PIG IIVI ICI , - 4',Vuz:­IVl it Ili it tal 1VQ1
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 1 0 l
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.
16, Organic debris lines or piles
0-1
0.5
1 1.5
17_ Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 4
es -
C. Biology (Subtotal = _ (�t ]
15. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland piants in streambed
0
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
M
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
M.
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1 1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetiand plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 her = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: i S d ' G
pi� C
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
SCP2
Rate: ���y�z� �Q
ProjectrSite:
Latitude:
Evaluator: T
County:
Longitude:_ W- 90 7 M
Total Points:
Stream Determination { '
Other Pc--T.+ Xc
Stream is at least intermittent 41
Ephemeral intermitter Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial it? 30'
as
A. Geomorphology {Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along fhalweg
0
1
Cy
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
3
B. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
B. Headcuts
1
2
3
9- Grade control
0
0.5
15
10- Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11- Second or greater order channel
No = 0
<Tes = 3
P�l���l.�a� of •���c:a u��. �r�i �u��.�a, .ar.r. v.v/..�....r......... ... ........
R 4-l��rErnlnnv !Ci Fhfntal a �!_`] 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
C3 -
13. iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
15
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
4 0.5
No = 0
11 1.5
es

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Project/Site:
Evaluator: County:
C�
Total Points; Stream Determi n
Stream is at least intermittent {circle one)
if? Igor perennial ifz30* a • Ephemeral ntermitten Perennial
SCP3
Latitude: 3 5-3c1� 077
Longitude: - 231!� 969956
Otheri��
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1Q
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
ripple -pool sequence
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodpiain
0
1
a
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
3
8. Neadcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1 5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =
Yes = 3
.1 - u - 1-0 ale IIVI IaLUU, aUtf UIJ UUZiZil UI IS Ill II la IUai
B. Wvdrolnrjv tSlihtntal = 1n. '� 1
12_ Presence of Baseflow
�D
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
M
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
<1�3>
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
k.. QIUIUUV 1 Z)U0101al = P1 I
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1 5
24. Amphibians
` 1
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0'
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 her = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
date: 0l
SCM
1Zu D ProjectlSite: Latitude: 1
Evaluator: County: Longitude:-
Longitude:-8�.87����
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent Stream Determination (circle one) Other 7Z 9 B
if z 19 or perennial if? 34` 35 Ephemeral lntermltten erenma e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geo-nor hold [Subtotal
1a- Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool se uence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
a artificial ditches are not ed rat d
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
0
1
2
0
1
1
3
0
1
2
0
2
3
0
1
(2)
3
0
1
2
0
1
2
1
2
3
®
0.5
1
1.5
0
1 T.
1
1.5
No
es=3
iseussions in manual
B. H drolo Subtotal
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
C2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
C. Biology Subtotal = }
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streamhed
2
1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
�j
1
2
21. Aquatic Mollusks
.I
2
22. Fish
❑.5
1
23. Crayfish
0 5
1
24. Amphibians
0 5
25, Algae
0.5
1
26. Wetland plants in streamhed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:
Yes =
3
3
0
1.5
1.5
0
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5

SCP5
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 9/ag /aa ProjectlSite: on1 &"AiC Latitude: 35.3`Ib(82
Evaluator: County: (►� jel L Longitude:
Total Points: Stream Determination (circle one) Other Tr, b C
35 Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral Intermitten erennial eg Quad Name:
if 19 or perennial in 30'
A. Geomormholog t_(Subtotal =_ I )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
(3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
n le -pool sequence
0
1
2
t�
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3 _
5. Active/relict fioodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
0
1
1
(2
2
3
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
(2)_
3
8. Headcuts
0
U
3
9. Grade control
0)
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
05
1
1.5 _
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0)
Yes = 3
R HVrirnlnrnr ISuhtntat = C1 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
Q
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
t
2
3
14. Leaf litter
(1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1 5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
UP
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
( 3)
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
(0)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1_
2
3
22, Fish
0
(0.5)
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5)
1
{ 1.5
25. AlgaeCO)
0.5
1 ,�„�
1.5
26, Wetland plants in streambed
M
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0 Wont
.perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: olasr,,jaj t Lrp Ts l ;;j
(..�knnoW nnl
sr.law. u,
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: S j Q /,;;o 2-.o ProjectlSite: C
Evaluator. �? County:
C C.
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent Stream Determination (circle one)
if 19 orperennial if z 30* a Ephemera ermitten Perennial
SCP6
Latitude: 3 7 3 4�(C ] `�
Longitude: _ 80 A 7_7 -SLf
Other j 0. , 6 D
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomor polo [Subtotal = `� .5 } Absent Weak Moderate
a.
1 Continu4 of channel bed and bank
p
1
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
2
ri pie -pool sequence
0
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
p
�
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
p
2
8. Peadcuts
d
2
9. Grade control
0
0
10. Natural valley
0 5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
-No = 0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology {Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
d
1
2
14. Leaf litter
1 5
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
p
0 5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
C. Biology Subtotal = }
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
®
2
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
22. Fish
0 5
1
23. Crayfish
S'
0.5
1
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
25. Algae
0.5
1
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; ❑BL = 1.5
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See
p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
Strong
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1.5
1.5
Yes =3
3
3
0
1.5
Yes
0
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 SCP7
Date:
.2- 0 ?2- Project/Site: L Latitude:
Evaluator: County:
Total Points: Longitude: r .
Stream is at least intermittent Stream Determination (circle one) Other /
if? 19 or perennial if? 30* Ephemeral lntermitten a ennra 0.9. Quad Name: W
A. Geomor hol❑ {Subtotal = )
Absent
1 a- Continuity of channel bed and -ban k
0
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri !e- oal se uence
0
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
8. Headcuts
0
9. Grade control
0
10. Natural valley
0
11. Second or greater order channel
Ni
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology [Subtotal
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
17 Soil -based evidence f h• h
❑ rg water table. No = 0
C. Biology Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
03
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
22. Fish
0
23. Crayfish
24. Amphibians
25. Algae
0 ;
26. Wetland plants in streambed
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: irt�.►:i �� ,-. ,L,- __L L . P. -_,
i .. • -A .7
Sketch:
Weak
1
Moderate
2
Strong
2
3
©
2
3
3
3•331.5153
"1,12
0.5
0.5
2
2
i
0.5
0.5
0.5
FACW = 0.75; 03L = 1.5 ther
2
I
2
3
0.5
0
1
1
1.5
(: o
1
0
2
3
2
M0
3
1
1
1.S
1,5
1.5
11
1.5

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:�� Project/Site:
Evaluator: County: r
uJ C3 C: IC.
Total Points..
Stream is at least intermittent Stream DeWrm1 n [Circle one]
if2 19 or perennial if a 30' �. Epherneral nterrnitten Perennlai
A. Geomorphology [Subtotal = j 5
1""' Continufty of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channef along thalweg
3. fin -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- oaf sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
S. Activelrefict floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
S. Headcuts
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley
11 _ Second or greater order channei
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drolo Subtotal
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
15_ Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or plies
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
C. Biology (Subtotal
18 F•b
Latitude:.3�
Longitude: _�$� D r]
Other l R;
e.g. Quad Name:
-Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
0
1
3
0
3
0
3
0
jj
2
3
0
2
3
0
3
0
2
3
0
1
2
3
0
0•
1 1 1
1.5
0
0.5
o=a
Yes=3
0
2
1
2
€.5
1
0,6
0
0.5
0
No=0
i roes roa#s in streambed
3
2
1
19_ Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
20. Macrobenthos {note diversity and abundange)
0
1'
2
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
22. Fish
0.5
1
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
24. Amphibians
0
0.
1
25. Algae
0
E 5
1
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 #
.perennial streams may also be ide tified using other methods. See
p. 35 of manual.
Notes: cc e
•`a
Yw a n.sG S.i.l,
Sketch;
Yes =
her =
3
3
0
1.5
1.5
0
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date; 0 � Pr*cMte:
rn OAuq R [r
Evaluator: 7 County_
Tota
Strew Points: stream Deter on (circle one)
Stream is a enni intermittent hemer Intermltten Perennial
if z 99 or perennial if z 30* P
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = /0
18. Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
-ripple-pool sequence
4- Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
B. Headcuts
9- Grade control
SCP9
Latitude: 3S.12�) 9g 4
Longitude: -9a.'a 5Z
Other / R ,,6 J J
e.g. quad Marne:
bsent
F
Weak
Moderate
Strang
0
1
2
0
2
3
0
2
3
1
2
3
0
2
3
0
2
3
0
2
3
o
2
3
0
1
1.5
0
No
=
Yes
= 3
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
a artificial ditches are not rated-, see discussions in manual
H B. drola Subtotal = 7
12. Presence of Baseftw
0
�
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0-5
17
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
05
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
C. Biology (Subtotal = )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
22. Fish
0.5
1
23- Crayfish
D
D 6
1
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
25. Algae
0
0.s
1
26_ Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75-1 OBL
= 1.5 <
*perennial streams may also he identified using other methods- See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:
Yes
Q
7
1-5
V
0
M
1.5
1.5
1.5

NC DW Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: * J a
SCP10
�( Latitude: 3 5-N3 0-25
Evaluator: -ZFCG-f a{� Cpunty: 91Y� e ! [ Longitude: _ 8
Total Points:`
Stream is at least intermittent Stream Deter mation {circle one) Other �-
if? 19orperennial if?30* Ephemeral In ermitten Perennial e"g. Quad Name:
A. Geomor hold Subtotal = i ' . �5 )
Absent
1 a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple- iool sequence I. -
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
5. Active/relict foodplain
0
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
7• Recent alluvial deposits
0
8. Headcuts
0
9. Grade control
V
10. Natural valley
0
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual_-'
B. Hydrology Subtotal ! ,
12. Presence of BaseFlow
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5 ,
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
C. Biology {Subtotal = h
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthas {note diversity and abundance}
21. Aquatic Mollusks
22. Fish
Z3. Crayfish
24. Amphibians 0
25. Algae 0
26. Wetland plants in streambed
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: -
c
^tea• r�" L1 e.[ ❑<< SDI
r
Weak
1
1
1
' 0.5
Moderate
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
Yes
2
2
0.5
1
1
Yes = 3
2 1
2 1
1 2
1 2
0.5 1
0.5 1
0.5 1
0.5 1
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
L . - Q eJ
Sketch: !
Strong
?-i0- t
4rnrr/ +1 I fan I I I. a.
3
3
3
3
3
3
1.5
1.5
3
3
0
1.5
1.5
0
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form 'Version 4.11
SCP11
Date: r � �zo
Project/Site: ( &
Latiturie:35 , N4 641
Evaluator:.
County: ell
Longitude:
r
Total Points:
Stream is at least intennittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral <termitten Perennial
Other f �a
e.g. quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial if? 30"
I
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
19- Continuity of channel bed and hank
0
1
2
Q
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
Q
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
J)
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
<0
3
7. Recent alluvia! deposits
0
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11 _ Second or greater order channel
a =
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal =� _}
12. Presence of Base€iow
0
2
3
13iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf fitter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
C010
1
1.5
16. organic debris lines or piles
r 0
P 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
INo = 0
es = 3. '
C. Biology (Subtotal = L--)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.6
24. Amphibians
0.5
1 1
1.5
25, Algae
0.5 1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; DBL = 1.5 thsr =
'perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

SCP12
NC DWO Sh•eam Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: I _ 15 _ of `
Project/Site: Lon y �te�tt
Latitude: 35. 3,4 S g2�{
Evaluator:
County: �tLl(
Stream Determination
Longitude: _ 8p� 86-�%izb
Otherirr: � A' UJ cr)
1 P
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 3 y
it 2 19 or .perennial it a 30•
Ephemeral Intermitten Perennia
e.g. Quad Name:
A, Geomorphology (Subtotal = �tJ•S )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1° Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool se uence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
('V
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
8. Headcuts
(92
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5% j
1 _
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
CV 1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
arunuiai uircnes are nor raved, see discussions in rnanuai
R Hvrtrnlnnv tSuhtntal = R 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
a
3
13, Iron oxidizing bacteria
2
3
14. Leaf litter
f.
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
(0.51
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5,
1 _
rYes
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
= 3
C Rinlnnv tSuhtntal � IU. 5 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
CS-)
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
�
95
1
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0>
0.
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75: OBL = 1.5 Other = 0�
.perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
\
Notes: 0Lsurvt A 1 crane _, sL�
0`t a ' �bn � s�•,1 g
n nd 5� rt..�:. .
r nr 54rtaan rs e'4100
P axr r cl
Sketch: Yrt7�c.,rn �r. GV`V{�S �!,�c.,�,,,
C�aAn11 emitsIV\
r,S
4t WL'�+inJ,
t* Q.K-Kii Wvt11
Lmi ,

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
SCP13
Date: 1q _
Project/Site". i`°^� �'r�Gl�
Latitude: 3$.3y0 6y1
Evaluator: T
County: �eC1C16n�0��
Longitude: - 80.869$'ib
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 31.f
Stream Determination (ci i -
Other Yf,',J Ga
Ephemeral Intermittent�Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
i(; 19 or perennial i(>_ 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = ,Z )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
Z
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
C1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
_ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
�3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
[ 0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
IruJ
1
2
3
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley �~ / �, �1_
�5-J
0
0
0.5
_ 0.5
��
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
dltlllUdl uRUIUb dIC Ilut IdtuU, 3CC wbuUb31V115 III IIIdiludl
P Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 1I.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3 r
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
__!]
1
2
1)
14. Leaf litter
1.t
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
(: Rinlnnv (:;iihtntal = Z;- 1 -'
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
i. 3_)
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3_)
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0-)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
_
1
2
3
22. Fish
0)
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians I �r
0
0�
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
/
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p• 35 of manual. --��
Notes: 7,122�,y a r �5 �t ` '3 w�., E rw,+ `�'r►�. ^.,, fsA
i4aft
.4 _T . A ,.J s
Sketch:
�
`.U� �� arch o'�
Q n � .s,i +�.,r�' K r 10.l�
A
k►}� �� �r �` 4
�ea�.r r. primp `��r-t�r■ `•-`�- �J �� � .
na a�+U r p�]Lr.tir f v, ,L,•'� � � '1 �'�t .

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Dr. to Oakdale Rd.) City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 9/30/2020
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP1
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering Inc.) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.341336 Long:-80.872516 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan Loam (MO) NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No x (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data Point 1 is located in Wetland C and is representative of Wetland C, which is a large forested wetland in the back of the Long Creek floodplain.
The USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicates the site has experienced wetter than normal conditions in the three month period leading up to
the sampling date.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
x Crayfish Burrows (C8)
x Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
x Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 1
Water Table Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 0
Saturation Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 14
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP1
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Platanus occidentalis
15
Yes
FACW
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
30
Yes
FAC
3. Acer rubrum
20
Yes
FAC
4.
5.
6.
7.
65
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
33
20% of total cover:
13
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
1. Ulmus americana
20
Yes
FACW
2. Quercus phellos
5
No
FAC
3. Nyssa sylvatica
5
No
FAC
4. Quercus rubra
5
No
FACU
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
35
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
18
20% of total cover:
7
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1. Saururus cernuus
75
Yes
OBL
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
75
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
38
20% of total cover:
15
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 75 x 1 = 75
FACW species 35 x 2 = 70
FAC species 60 x 3 = 180
FACU species 5 x 4 = 20
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 175 (A) 345 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.97
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
_4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Types
Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-4
10YR 5/2
85
5YR 5/6 15 C
PL
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
4-9
10YR 5/4
65
5YR 5/8 35 C
PL
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
9-14
10YR 4/1
60
7.5YR 5/8 40 C
PL
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Dr. to Oakdale Rd.) City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 9/30/2020
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP2
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering Inc.) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.341565 Long:-80.871968 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan Loam (MO) NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No x (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data Point 2 is located adjacent to Wetland C and is representative of uplands adjacent to Wetland C, which is a large forested wetland in the back of
the Long Creek floodplain. The area is mapped as wetland by the NWI database but area lacks hydric soil indicators. The USACE Antecedent
Precipitation Tool indicates the site has experienced wetter than normal conditions in the three month period leading up to the sampling date.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
x Crayfish Burrows (C8)
x Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
x Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP2
Absolute
Uominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
20
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Quercus rubra
50
Yes
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 42.9% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
70
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
35
20% of total cover:
14
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species 35 x 2 = 70
1.
Ulmus americana
35
Yes
FACW
FAC species 70 x 3 = 210
2.
Lindera benzoin
15
No
FAC
FACU species 87 x 4 = 348
3.
Asimina triloba
45
Yes
FAC
UPL species 15 x 5 = 75
4.
Ligustrum amurense
5
No
UPL
Column Totals: 207 (A) 703 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.40
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
100
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
50
20% of total cover:
20
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Geum urbanum
10
Yes
UPL
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
2
No
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Persicaria virginiana 10 Yes FAC
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
22
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
11
20% of total cover:
5
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Lonicera japonica
15
Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
15
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
8
20% of total cover:
3
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-11 10YR 3/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
11-14 10YR 3/2 75 7.5YR 3/4 25 C PL Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Dr. to Oakdale Rd.) City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 9/15/2020
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP3
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering Inc.) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.343145 Long:-80.872039 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan Loam (MO) NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No x (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data Point 3 is located in Wetland N and is representative of Wetlands D, M, and N which are wetlands located at or towards the back of the Long
Creek floodplain. The USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicates the site has experienced wetter than normal conditions in the three month
period leading up to the sampling date.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
x Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
x Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP3
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Ulmus americana
30
Yes
FACW
2. Platanus occidentalis
15
Yes
FACW
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
15
Yes
FAC
4. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
15
Yes
FACW
5.
6.
7.
75
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
38
20% of total cover:
15
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
1.
Acer rubrum
35
Yes
FAC
2.
Ulmus americana
10
No
FACW
3.
Ligustrum sinense
7
No
FACU
4.
Asimina triloba
5
No
FAC
5.
Ulmus alata
3
No
FACU
6.
7.
8.
9.
60
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
30
20% of total cover:
12
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1.
Saururus cernuus
5
Yes
OBL
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
5
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
3
20% of total cover:
1
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 5 x 1 = 5
FACW species 70 x 2 = 140
FAC species 55 x 3 = 165
FACU species 10 x 4 = 40
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 140 (A) 350 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.50
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
_4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-11 10YR 5/2 90 5YR 4/6 10 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
11-16 7.5YR 4/2 75 5YR 4/6 25 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Dr. to Oakdale Rd.) City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 9/15/2020
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP4
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering Inc.) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.342873 Long:-80.872076 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan Loam (MO) NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No x (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data Point 4 is located adjacent to Wetland N and is representative of uplands adjacent to Wetlands D, M, and N which are wetlands located at or
towards the back of the Long Creek floodplain. The USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicates the site has experienced wetter than normal
conditions in the three month period leading up to the sampling date.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
x Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP4
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
25
Yes
FACU
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
3. Juglans nigra
25
Yes
FACU
4.
5.
6.
7.
70
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
35
20% of total cover:
14
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
1.
Lindera benzoin
20
Yes
FAC
2.
Asimina triloba
15
Yes
FAC
3.
Morus alba
5
No
UPL
4.
Carpinus caroliniana
10
Yes
FAC
5.
Elaeagnus umbellata
5
No
UPL
6.
Carya tomentosa
5
No
UPL
7.
Ligustrum sinense
5
No
FACU
8.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
10
Yes
FACW
9.
75
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
38
20% of total cover:
15
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1.
Toxicodendron radicans
2
No
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
2
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
1
20% of total cover:
1
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
1.
Lonicera japonica
2
No
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
2
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
1
20% of total cover:
1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71.4% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 10 x 2 = 20
FAC species 67 x 3 = 201
FACU species 57 x 4 = 228
UPL species 15 x 5 = 75
Column Totals: 149 (A) 524 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.52
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
_4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP4
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3
7.5YR 3/4
100
Loamy/Clayey
3-11
5YR 4/6
100
Loamy/Clayey
11-16
10YR 4/4
85
5YR 4/6 15 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Dr. to Oakdale Rd.) City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 9/15/2020
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP5
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering Inc.) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.342736 Long:-80.874245 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Pacolet Sandy Loam (PaE) NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No x (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data Point 5 is an additional upland data point representative of areas of Long Creek floodplain that exhibit wetland hydrology indicators and
hydrophytic vegetation but lack hydric soil indicators. The USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicates the site has experienced wetter than normal
conditions in the three month period leading up to the sampling date.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
x Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
x Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
x Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
x Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP5
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Populus deltoides
35 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Ulmus americana
45 Yes
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
80 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
OBL species 70 x 1 = 70
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species 62 x 2 = 124
1.
Acer rubrum
25 Yes
FAC
FAC species 75 x 3 = 225
2.
Acer negundo
15 Yes
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2 No
FACW
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Ulmus americana
10 No
FACW
Column Totals: 207 (A) 419 (B)
5.
Betula nigra
5 No
FACW
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.02
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
57 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
29 20% of total cover:
12
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Saururus cernuus
70 Yes
OBL
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
70 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
35 20% of total cover:
14
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP5
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-14 10YR 4/4 75 5YR 3/4 25 C PL Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
14-16 7.5YR 4/1 85 7.5YR 4/6 15 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Dr. to Oakdale Rd.) City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 9/15/2020
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP6
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering Inc.) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.345993 Long:-80.879381 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan Loam (MO) NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No x (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data Point 6 is located in Wetland 0 and is representative of Wetlands 0, A, and B which are linear wetlands located within the Long Creek
floodplain. The USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicates the site has experienced wetter than normal conditions in the three month period
leading up to the sampling date.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
x Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
x Crayfish Burrows (C8)
x Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
x Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
x Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP6
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Platanus occidentalis
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: 25
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
1. Carpinus caroliniana
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: 25
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
is
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Absolute Dominant Indicato
% Cover Species? Status
50 Yes FACW
50 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 10
50 Yes FAC
50 =Total Cover
20% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
iff
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species 0
x 1
= 0
FACW species 50
x 2
= 100
FAC species 50
x 3
= 150
FACU species 0
x 4
= 0
UPL species 0
x 5
= 0
Column Totals: 100 (A)
250 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A
= 2.50
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
_4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP6
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 2.5YR 4/2 85 5YR 4/6 15 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
3-14 2.5YR 4/4 80 5YR 4/6 20 C PL Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Dr. to Oakdale Rd.) City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 9/15/2020
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP7
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering Inc.) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.345996 Long:-80.879182 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan Loam (MO) NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No x (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data Point 7 is located adjacent to Wetland 0 and is representative of uplands adjacent to Wetlands 0, A, and B which are linear wetlands located
within the Long Creek floodplain. The USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicates the site has experienced wetter than normal conditions in the
three month period leading up to the sampling date.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
x Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
x Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
x Crayfish Burrows (C8)
x Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP7
mDsoiuie
uominam
inaicaior
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Platanus occidentalis
50
Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liriodendron tulipifera
20
Yes
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
10
No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
80
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species 52 x 2 = 104
1.
Elaeagnus umbellata
40
Yes
UPL
FAC species 22 x 3 = 66
2.
Asimina triloba
10
No
FAC
FACU species 24 x 4 = 96
3.
Carya tomentosa
2
No
UPL
UPL species 42 x 5 = 210
4.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2
No
FACW
Column Totals: 140 (A) 476 (B)
5.
Ligustrum sinense
2
No
FACU
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.40
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
56
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
28 20% of total cover:
12
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Toxicodendron radicans
2
No
FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
2
No
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
4
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
2 20% of total cover:
1
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP7
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 7.5YR 3/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
3-15 7.5YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Dr. to Oakdale Rd.) City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 9/15/2020
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP8
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering Inc.) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.341938 Long:-80.885953 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan Loam (MO) NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No x (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data Point 8 is located in Wetland E and is representative of Wetlands E & F which are larger wetlands located within the middle of the Long Creek
floodplain. The USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicates the site has experienced wetter than normal conditions in the three month period
leading up to the sampling date.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
x Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
x Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 2
Saturation Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Salamander present
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP8
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Salix nigra
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
% Cover Species? Status
65 Yes OBL
65 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 33 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' )
1. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 10 Yes
2. Salix nigra 2 No
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
12 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 6 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'
1. Murdannia keisak
2. Impatiens capensis
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
is
50% of total cover: 50
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
13
FACW
OBL
3
99 Yes OBL
1 No FACW
100 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 20
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 166 x 1 = 166
FACW species 11 x 2 = 22
FAC species 0 x 3 = 0
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 177 (A) 188 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.06
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
X 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
_4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP8
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-4
10YR 4/2
90
7.5YR 4/6 10 C PL
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
4-11
10YR 3/1
95
7.5YR 4/6 5 C PL
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
11-14
N 3/
100
Loamy/Clayey
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
X Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Dr. to Oakdale Rd.) City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 9/15/2020
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP9
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering Inc.) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.342149 Long:-80.885885 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan Loam (MO) NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No x (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data Point 9 is located adjacent to Wetland E and is representative of uplands adjacent to Wetlands E & F which are larger wetlands located within
the middle Long Creek floodplain. The USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicates the site has experienced wetter than normal conditions in the
three month period leading up to the sampling date.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No hydrology indicators present
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP9
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Quercus rubra
15
No
FACU
2. Acer negundo
25
Yes
FAC
3. Quercus phellos
35
Yes
FAC
4. Quercus nigra
10
No
FAC
5.
6.
7.
85
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
43
20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
1.
Acer negundo
40
Yes
2.
Ligustrum sinense
2
No
3.
Celtis laevigata
2
No
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
44
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
22
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1.
Carex sp.
25
Yes
2.
Persicaria virginiana
7
No
3.
Rubus argutus
2
No
4.
Microstegium vimineum
2
No
5.
Geum urbanum
5
No
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
41
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
21
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
1.
Lonicera japonica
2
No
2.
3.
4.
5.
2
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
1
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
17
FAC
FACU
FACW
FAC
FACU
FAC
UPL
m
FACU
0
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 2 x 2 = 4
FAC species 119 x 3 = 357
FACU species 21 x 4 = 84
UPL species 5 x 5 = 25
Column Totals: 147 (A) 470 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.20
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
_4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP9
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-5 10YR 3/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
5-14 10YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Dr. to Oakdale Rd.) City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 9/15/2020
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP10
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering Inc.) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.341602 Long:-80.887313 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan Loam (MO) NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No x (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data Point 10 is an additional upland data point which is representative of areas in the left floodplain of Long Creek that have indicators of out of bank
hydrology (drift deposits) and hydrophytic vegetation but lack hydric soil indicators. The USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicates the site has
experienced wetter than normal conditions in the three month period leading up to the sampling date.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
x Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP10
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
20
Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Populus deltoides
20
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
3.
Quercus michauxii
10
Yes
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
25
20% of total cover:
10
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species 100 x 2 = 200
1.
Quercus michauxii
60
Yes
FACW
FAC species 35 x 3 = 105
2.
Acer negundo
10
No
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
Ulmus americana
5
No
FACW
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 135 (A) 305 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.26
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
75
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
38
20% of total cover:
15
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Leersia virginica
5
Yes
FACW
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
5
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
3
20% of total cover:
1
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Campsis radicans
5
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3
20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP10
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-11 10YR 3/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
11-17 10YR 3/2 85 5YR 4/4 15 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Dr. to Oakdale Rd.) City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 9/15/2020
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP11
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering Inc.) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.341795 Long:-80.891636 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan Loam (MO) NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No x (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data Point 11 is located in Wetland Q which is a depressional low that collects stormwater discharge in the right floodplain of Long Creek. The
USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicates the site has experienced wetter than normal conditions in the three month period leading up to the
sampling date.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
x Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
x Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
x Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
x Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
x Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP11
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
15 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
20 Yes
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Salix nigra
5 No
OBL
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
40 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20 20% of total cover:
8
OBL species 105 x 1 = 105
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species 30 x 2 = 60
1.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
10 Yes
FACW
FAC species 20 x 3 = 60
2.
Acer negundo
5 Yes
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 155 (A) 225 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1.45
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
15 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Murdannia keisak
95 Yes
OBL
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Persicaria hydropiper
5 No
OBL
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
100 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
20
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP11
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 4/2 80 7.5YR 5/8 20 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
4-16 5YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Dr. to Oakdale Rd.) City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 9/15/2020
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP12
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering Inc.) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.341603 Long:-80.891506 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan Loam (MO) NWI classification: PEM1A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No x (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data Point 12 is located adjacent to Wetland Q and is representative of uplands adjacent to Wetland Q which is a depressional low that collects
stormwater discharge in the right floodplain of Long Creek. The USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicates the site has experienced wetter than
normal conditions in the three month period leading up to the sampling date.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No hydrology indicators present
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP12
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
10
No
2. Acer negundo
25
Yes
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
30
Yes
4. Juglans nigra
10
No
5.
6.
7.
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
4 (A)
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
FACU
Species Across All Strata:
4 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
100.0% (A/B)
75
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
38
20% of total cover:
15
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
1.
Celtis laevigata
20
Yes
FACW
2.
Elaeagnus umbellata
5
No
UPL
3.
Prunus serotina
2
No
FACU
4.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1
No
FACW
5.
Ligustrum sinense
1
No
FACU
6.
7.
8.
9.
29
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
15
20% of total cover:
6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1.
Microstegium vimineum
95
Yes
FAC
2.
Verbesina alternifolia
2
No
FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
97
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
49
20% of total cover:
20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 51 x 2 = 102
FAC species 132 x 3 = 396
FACU species 13 x 4 = 52
UPL species 5 x 5 = 25
Column Totals: 201 (A) 575 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.86
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
_4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP12
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-14 5YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Dr. to Oakdale Rd.) City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 9/15/2020
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP13
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering Inc.) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.338963 Long:-80.894095 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan Loam (MO) NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No x (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data Point 13 is an additional upland point just downstream of 1-485. The area is a large shallow depression that appears to pond water for short
durations, has hydrophytic vegetation, but lacks hyric soil indicators. The USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicates the site has experienced
wetter than normal conditions in the three month period leading up to the sampling date.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
x Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
x Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
x Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
x Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP13
mDsoiuie uominam
inaicaior
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
50 Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Populus deltoides
10 No
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Quercus pagoda
15 Yes
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
75 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
38 20% of total cover:
15
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species 100 x 2 = 200
1.
Ulmus americana
25 Yes
FACW
FAC species 40 x 3 = 120
2.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
10 No
FACW
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
Liquidambar styraciflua
15 Yes
FAC
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Quercus phellos
15 Yes
FAC
Column Totals: 140 (A) 320 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.29
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
65 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
33 20% of total cover:
13
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP13
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-11 7.5YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
11-15 10YR 5/4 70 5YR 4/6 30 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Dr. to Oakdale Rd.) City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 9/15/2020
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP14
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering Inc.) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.337133 Long:-80.895925 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan Loam (MO) NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No x (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data Point 14 is located in Wetland G and is representative of Wetlands G & H which are linear depressions located in the middle of the Long Creek
floodplain. The USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicates the site has experienced wetter than normal conditions in the three month period
leading up to the sampling date.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
x Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
x Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
x Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
x Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
x Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP14
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Platanus occidentalis
50 Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
2. Populus deltoides
15 No
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3. Acerrubrum
15 No
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
80 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species 50 x 2 = 100
1. Acer rubrum
10 Yes
FAC
FAC species 45 x 3 = 135
2. Asimina triloba
5 Yes
FAC
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 95 (A) 235 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.47
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
15 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP14
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Types
Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-9
10YR 5/2
70
5YR 4/6 30 C
PL
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
9-13
10YR 4/2
75
5YR 4/4 25 C
PL
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
13-16
10YR 5/1
80
5YR 4/6 20 C
PL
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Dr. to Oakdale Rd.) City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 9/15/2020
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP15
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering Inc.) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.337125 Long:-80.896241 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan Loam (MO) NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No x (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data Point 15 is located adjacent to Wetlands G & H and is representative of uplands adjacent to Wetlands G & H which are linear depressions
located in the middle of the Long Creek floodplain. The USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicates the site has experienced wetter than normal
conditions in the three month period leading up to the sampling date.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
x Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
x Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP15
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Platanus occidentalis
20
Yes
FACW
2. Liriodendron tulipifera
30
Yes
FACU
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
30
Yes
FAC
4.
5.
6.
7.
80
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
40
20% of total cover:
16
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
1.
Liriodendron tulipifera
35
Yes
FACU
2.
Acer rubrum
15
Yes
FAC
3.
Asimina triloba
5
No
FAC
4.
Liquidambar styraciflua
5
No
FAC
5.
Ulmus americana
2
No
FACW
6.
Cercis canadensis
2
No
FACU
7.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2
No
FACW
8.
9.
66
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
33
20% of total cover:
14
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
1.
Toxicodendron radicans
10
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
10
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
5
20% of total cover:
2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
1.
Lonicera japonica
2
No
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
2
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
1
20% of total cover:
1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 24 x 2 = 48
FAC species 65 x 3 = 195
FACU species 69 x 4 = 276
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 158 (A) 519 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.28
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
_4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP15
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-10 10YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
10-16 2.5YR 5/4 85 5YR 4/6 15 C PL Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Dr. to Oakdale Rd.) City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 9/15/2020
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP16
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering Inc.) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Toe of Hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.337627 Long:-80.897834 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan Loam (MO) NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No x (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data Point 16 is located in Wetland I and is representative of Wetland I which is a depressional wetland located at the outer edge of Long Creek
floodplain at the toe of a hillside slope. The USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicates the site has experienced wetter than normal conditions in
the three month period leading up to the sampling date.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
x Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
x Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
x Crayfish Burrows (C8)
x Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
x Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
x Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes x No
Depth (inches): 8
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP16
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Platanus occidentalis
25 Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liriodendron tulipifera
30 Yes
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
20 Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 6 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83.3% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
75 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
38 20% of total cover:
15
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species 40 x 2 = 80
1.
Ulmus americana
10 Yes
FACW
FAC species 55 x 3 = 165
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
5 No
FAC
FACU species 30 x 4 = 120
3.
Acer rubrum
25 Yes
FAC
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5 No
FACW
Column Totals: 125 (A) 365 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.92
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
45 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
23 20% of total cover:
9
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Campsis radicans
5 Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP16
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-8 2.5YR 5/1 75 5YR 4/6 25 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
8-14 5YR 3/1 90 5YR 4/6 10 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
X Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Dr. to Oakdale Rd.) City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 9/15/2020
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP17
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering Inc.) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.337593 Long:-80.897429 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan Loam (MO) NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No x (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data Point 17 is located adjacent to Wetland I and is representative of uplands adjancent to Wetland I which is a depressional wetland located at the
outer edge of Long Creek floodplain at the toe of a hillside slope. The USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicates the site has experienced wetter
than normal conditions in the three month period leading up to the sampling date.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
x Crayfish Burrows (C8)
x Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
x Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP17
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Platanus occidentalis
30
Yes
FACW
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
50
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71.4% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
80
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
40
20% of total cover:
16
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Saplinci/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species 60 x 2 = 120
1.
Cornus florida
10
No
FACU
FAC species 75 x 3 = 225
2.
Ulmus americana
25
Yes
FACW
FACU species 19 x 4 = 76
3.
Acer rubrum
15
Yes
FAC
UPL species 2 x 5 = 10
4.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5
No
FACW
Column Totals: 156 (A) 431 (B)
5.
Ligustrum sinense
2
No
FACU
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.76
6.
Acernegundo
5
No
FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
Ilex opaca
2
No
FACU
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
64
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
32
20% of total cover:
13
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
Toxicodendron radicans
5
Yes
FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Geum urbanum
2
No
UPL
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Carex sp. 15 Yes
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
22
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
11
20% of total cover:
5
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Lonicera japonica
5
Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3
20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP17
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-10 10YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
10-14 10YR 5/4 75 5YR 4/6 25 C PL Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Dr. to Oakdale Rd.) City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 9/15/2020
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP18
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering Inc.) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.334603 Long:-80.906255 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monocan loam (MO) NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No x (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data Point 18 is an additional upland data point located within a fallow golf course fairway on the former Oak Hills Golf Course. Area is representative
of a majority of the left floodplain of Long Creek upstream of Oakdale Road. The USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicates the site has
experienced wetter than normal conditions in the three month period leading up to the sampling date.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
x Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No hydrology indicators present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP18
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
1.
FAC species 40 x 3 = 120
2.
FACU species 55 x 4 = 220
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 95 (A) 340 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.58
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Eupatorium capillifolium
25 Yes
FACU
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Verbesina alternifolia
30 Yes
FAC
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Verbena bonariensis 10 No FAC
4. Ambrosia artemisiifolia
10 No
FACU
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5. Fragaria virginiana
10 No
FACU
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6. Erigeron canadensis
10 No
FACU
height.
7
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
95 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
48 20% of total cover:
19
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP18
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-15 10YR 3/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Dr. to Oakdale Rd.) City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 1/18/2021
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP23
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering Inc.) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.346183 Long:-80.876833 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan loam (MO) NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil X or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data Point 23 is located in Wetland HH and is representative of Wetland HH, which is a forested wetland in the right floodplain of Long Creek
floodplain that was historically ditched. The USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicates the site has experienced normal conditions in the three
month period leading up to the sampling date.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
X Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 2
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 2
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP23
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) % Cover Species? Status
1. Acer rubrum 30 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
30 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
1. Celtis laevigata
10 Yes
FACW
2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5 Yes
FACW
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
15 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
8 20% of total cover:
3
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 15 x 2 = 30
FAC species 30 x 3 = 90
FACU species 0 x 4 = 0
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals: 45 (A) 120 (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.67
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
X 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
_4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP23
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-14 10YR 4/1 75 5YR 5/8 25 C PL/M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
X Piedmont Flood plain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Long Creek Greenway and Stream Rehabilitation (Treyburn Dr. to Oakdale Rd.) City/County: Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 1/18/2021
Applicant/Owner: Mecklenburg County State: NC Sampling Point: DP24
Investigator(s): Ian Eckardt (Wildlands Engineering Inc.) Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): Floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.346120 Long:-80.876958 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan loam (MO) NWI classification: PF01A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data Point 24 is representative of uplands adjacent to Wetland HH. The USACE Antecedent Precipitation Tool indicates the site has experienced
normal conditions in the three month period leading up to the sampling date.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (B1) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132) —Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP24
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
45 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2. Acer rubrum
25 Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5 No
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 4 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
75 =Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
38 20% of total cover:
15
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species 5 x 2 = 10
1. Asimina triloba
10 Yes
FAC
FAC species 82 x 3 = 246
2. Lindera benzoin
2 No
FAC
FACU species 5 x 4 = 20
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 92 (A) 276 (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.00
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
12 =Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
6 20% of total cover:
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Lonicera japonica
5 Yes
FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5 =Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP24
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 10YR 4/4 100 Loamy/Clayey
6-14 10YR 4/6 100 Loamy/Clayey
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Long Creek Greenway and Water Quality Improvement Project
(Treyburn Drive to 1-485)
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request for Verification
USACE Antecedent Precipitation Report

O
N
O
N
T O
R N
z CD
O
CD
° N
Q NN
L O
6 N
N
UJ
C
Q
10
t]
(p
OD
N
Ifl
Ill
M
rl
f\
O
O
�
z
10
in
ai
rn
m
ll�
u�
L
N
rl
ri
N
N
m
M
�
Q
N
N
0)
0)
M-
M
N
O
I!1
H
D]
N
M
N
o7
o7
°
M
h
t°
h
CJ
CJ
t°
O
r
y�
07
O
M
m�t
O
M
N
N
W
t0
H
li I
h
0)
O]
M
Itl
I�
m
....
l0
C7
r-I
rl
N
Ih
C]
In
O
y
U
C
ul
N
ul
u1
0
00
T
N
Q
y^
w
O]
O
m
I�
01
l0
M
O
N
M
u1
�
m
I11
M
I!I
m
`
m
T
m
o
0
0
07
0
rl
0
O
T
ID
N
l0
I11
O
N
aj
N
W
rID
r
r
r
r
r
r
i
�
w m
N
I�
lD
a
T
a
O
w
m
m
�o Ill
01
09
-
In
°
rnC�
m
CRC�
a
m
°
°
T
ri
M
O
M
h
O7
M
wH
rl
t0
M
M
o7
O
r-I
rl
�
N
N
Ill
M
I!1
M
Ill
M
Ill
M
I!1
M
Ill
M
M
Ill
M
v
w
w
w
w
w
a
m
Ln
W
O
W
z�
N
Z
}cq
}
:
N
lfl
01
o
g
Y
W
M
.-
Q
J
J
0
J
Q
J
J
W
F W
Ln
F
iE
z
m
�^
0
0
W
L
In
Ir
0
F
w
F
w
Ir
01
~
Q
Q
O
ro
N
F
Z
Z
2
2
_
=
V
V
Q
_
U
CO h t0 Ill 7 M N rl O
(sayDul) IlpJuip\d

a -
N
W ON
V O
N N
O oN
ICD
N
n ON
0 °
N
Q ON
O
N
O
L O
° N
Q ON
�p
6 N
�CD
N
v
C
Q
10
t]
(p
�
O7
N
Ifl
Ill
M
rl
Itl
O
O
�
z
10
in
ai
rn
m
to
L
N
rl
ri
N
N
m
M
�
Q
�
N
N
T
�
m
M
1�
O N
Ill
r-I
N
N
M
N
O7
o7
°
M
h
t°
h
CJ
CJ
t°
O
r
y�
m
O
M
m�t
O
M
N
N
W
l0
H
li I
h
0)
O]
M
Itl
....
lfl
c7
r-I
rl
N
h
c]
In
O
y
U
C
ul
N
ul
u1
0
00
T
Ln
Q
y^
w
O]
O
m
I,
01
l0
M
O
N
u1
m
M
m
l
`
Ol
a,
m0
c+
0
O7
c!
c
O
T
ID
N
l0
I11
O
N
aj
N
W
rID
r
r
r
r
r
r
i
�
m
N
I�
lD
a
T
a
O
w
m
m
II1
to
01
0o
-
In
°1
c7
Q1
07
c7
11
-°
0
0
0
0
0
00
O
°
m
°
V
ai
M
ri
rl
m
I�
O
M
M
h
h
m
m�
m
oo
rl
to
M
M
o7
O
r-I
rl
�
N
N
Ill
M
I!1
M
Ill
M
Ill
M
I!1
M
Ill
M
M
Ill
M
v
m
w
z
w
w
w
w
a
�
Ln
w
o
w
z
�
,Ln
n
O
J
N
Y
W
M
.—
Q
J
J
0
J
Q
J
J
W
F W
Ln
f—
a
0
Inz=wt
Lu
0~
Q
Q
Q
tp
N
F
Z
z
2
m
_
=
V
V
Q
_
V
O] h t0 u1 � M N rl O
(sayDul) IlpJuip\d

N
�N
° N
Q CD
O
u N
O°
N
d O
N N
11 CD
0
N
O
O
C N
7 O
N
N
UJ
u
Q
>
10
t]
(p
�
O7
N
Ifl
Ill
M
rl
Itl
O
O
z
10
in
ai
rn
m
to
L
O
N
rl
ri
N
N
m
M
�
Q
C
N
N
O1
�
M
m
M
1�
O N
Ill
r-I
N
N
M
N
O7
o7
°
M
h
t°
h
CJ
CJ
t°
00
Ih
y�
m
O
M
m�t
O
M
N
N
W
t°
H
li I
h
M
O]
M
Itl
....
lfl
c7
r-I
rl
N
h
c]
In
O
U
u
C
ul
N
ul
u1
D
00
°
Ln
Q
y^
w
O]
O
Ol
I�
01
lD
M
O
N
M
u1
�
O]
I11
M
I!I
O]
`
m
T
D7
0
0
0
D7
0
rl
0
C
Ol
N't
m
O
m
m
I
m
O
T
I�
N
w
II1
O
N
�
>
N
W
lfl
r�
r
r
r
r
r
r
a)oo
�
w
N
�
lD
a
01
a
m
w
m
m
II1
to
0o
cq
ul
In
C
°1
c7
c1
W
O
c7
n
CI
°1
°
c?
op
D
N
c?
op
D?
c?
°
V
ai
M
ri
rl
,
m
I�
O
M
M
h
o6
m�
m
oo
rl
to
M
M
o7
O
r-I
rl
�
N
N
Ill
M
I!1
M
Ill
M
Ill
M
I!1
M
Ill
M
M
Ill
M
v
m
w
z
w
w
w
w
a
m
Ln
w
w
o
w w
z
�
,Ln
n
cq
O
J
N
Y
W
M
.—
Q
J
J
0
J
Q
J
J
W
F W
Ln
f—
aInz=w
00w
L
C
0
H
H
w
Ir
01
Lu
0~
Q
Q
Q
tp
N
F
Z
z
2
m
_
=
V
V
Q
_
V
O] h t0 u1 � M N rl O
(sayDul) IlpJuip\d

Section 6:
Long Creek Greenway & Water Quality Improvement Project
(Treyburn Drive to 1-485)
Construction Plan Sheets

a 1
�
�FF
9ig
Q
V
^W
i
0
w
a
z
w
5.
LU
a.
C og m v4
'mow
z�=-°ozo� dz�°`n c7w z'wS _az,'a nocnxS��m.z
N
Et -a z°ti Wp =gym A
5.
Mori ciuf�i>cia Srvc�i�aec'�ca u,mci u°$ w�c�ua c>��cia €.^_2c4a
a
J c fr wFw Eo_ ¢ Z
w
�Z QQ ow gw o N
Q = Ow s1z z jZ Zz �i
Wo z Sa,� oW ��' rW '�" z
z Ow
O J
a
LL ��
W8
sR�
LO
p6co
00 �l o
z
�
w
Q �
W z -� r
J
U
LU
2
W .o
�Wy
€ a
I_ Z w CO
0 IL
z U) )
0 W C7
Q o Z
J U QQ
� S

G Q
.
ii uinr...........
a a y
Q
s
�X��
�88�SS�a�a��g8888
SS mmmmmm m sm�3
II S S J J J J c�1 J S J S J d J J i1
a1s =TV.
i3333a33�3as====Q==;=33ey
sss�a�ss3ss��a��s�g��ss��ss�ssissassssssss�s���s"sss�ss��sss3s�'ss��s�3sss��"s��s3a�as
w »ao $ $$w$$o
oosooisa»�«y 6a amra =� JJ]a���� $mo'o10$
s a�
aa4g�oW
s����oo�>
e �eoa ee�e asses$"" �.'3kk Jses'so�� Wdct
ffiffi�
as 'aos s' 3'aa�'o'e�'o'aa��o�oR Ra3l$���33�� 3�3333333��333 333335333333 33a333 33333i

Q
Lu
0 LU 0: 0 0
LLJ W
....... . CL CL

r
� r
,
�U
gEpTnvs
�SR 207 1
O p
p
Nil
E
,
CN
V------ `-
1
: p
0,
a y

2 u a202 8Lu 6 Q
w VAll
-aa"-d
o�s� � Jam.- a rcN puao�
u� 3
o.oF '
�Z
3
wa
33a
`
°Q ran,
os qu
umoa
wog
ay
wow
um n
-z-w N .
o4a a�
7
ZON
U�—
O�
�` ITI
—=-' uLIr
iey
ao�
I RN
s W,
gg� k
Ir

rn
QZ.
g
} H e S 'LL
°d O p p:
z it
LLJ
�A I� �
0�0� 4 1 1
I rl a y gay
.!et5\ .8
� 3{
S8J Ea. t I pAp6g �gF$N,�-l1 �• I g ...{7
MR zz
Bg IN
;••�, '� I $'yy I�# r.. �I,I IfE 1 4W �3$s Yogi.9a� —
AMH� Rw
His
\
i
,'3; 3, w `gW=9�ogo °asa =gy g- B�
�>-ag�l
L4�9 s das �v
m
ji
,�Irl I / Igo �•� ��h,l I If %�� f I '` �' \ �\`� d �
�tl I �\ � u..L ffi
W � � ! �a � � "�, �� $ � �� `s c� � \ '•.:,��:�.�.: �a, `1vvv�� � ��5� �I W a--
NN
s is
M zgw�
$
e��- a �I , 1 I I 1 �� rr; � " \ � 's ! /� �/ / .. .• .•. ��' l ���
8:. �5'. 1 I I ' I I 1 � J i� E rIl � \ r � ;',i••: ;•..'-••;I '...•'.'.:'.,'••.y ,..: �:
\cgs � � - ^� y � r �\ 'il 1 li 83 ':\ / / •.•,.�g �z�� '.� : ,
ti .:r.
\9: � gq"yy$� fill
•••• •••••'•' "I'•••'.'•••'•'••••'••,:'.I•. ;'.: ;:::•'.' 'S� \\)g
3 'cy
T g e3it gv
h
M1 "HI
W a � a BEyy
T I�4'£
I �'��!\ ��l� a� g�8 5
�-y tl_
Ai 5� W — `
+4i aye 13Q �.� -
1Y f a 11 I I r � m a' c pl t
\

rn
Q
=
h zNO
H
33Ig
H
•.•i.'.•.•.'.•.•.•.•.•.,•.•.'.•. ,' is � ..�, d' o"a; a a 4
J oo. ale
ggyYgg 1
PAR-
11 lie
'k 1j/ u 9•
tl
-
1 1 _
y i 1 • 1 � 4`\ \ jIj
j l lY 1 11 I ILQp' I / 3 gg 5 �5
1 U {ii 1 11 8 /R as
19
M.
a og'�
11
as
a g a fF_�
PER
1 \ r
� s 1'�am� ° ��• k
Ah
IRE
still
Ape
:•� i:':'..6�a €a. _ a :' €1 ' 8�' xr fly sy ��'ae fi
�� �$ ��ir•5 P ...� � .., ,'.'. '.'. ��$� ��� €a� �� �� \�', '�� � +� g� Hi l4 i6�' fx Ed � e
eM
pm Ai
4Sg�6 �� es3 • ••'•:.:,:.: IR�. s�� � 3
1

m
A
cn
� g
�
k
Ih
/ ri
r
r
'x d
coo
d v o
o 0
gat
77-7
i r r�. i _ I • i��yr
r 1
emg
pp jJI
in tit
E
I
�

"4
W
12
LL
a _ - •ro O
z W W
I a I
� ! I
_ r 11 ;Irkg
I' a�

I z
a 1 e `i-
W d Q W V E°
00
w o-
�S
• 77
CB
FS2
3y 49 A �qa
r 411
gi2£gll�
!
44
p((II
. �fl •` ( I I ��
li
d
"�z8��g��F�o
. '�'. • s II s.9� l l iirJ-I15ffi§ �� 1 1 j gk3fok�F o §wd
§�3
IIINLev 2
r
ail
1 `
_
C11 R Jm
.•�` � Eg � I I � 3
II • • ��Q\'• 'l. •. •, : yak 4 �„ ' � � ,1
I • ; � n �� I Iw
"
�• :::
••.•, A
r/
i
rr
' I

11.1I!
J
A\u .h
h
W Q
LO
XQ-
�s o� ro
Z W
8�
W
cm
s
W
LL��g 8a
W �
f
y $
fq¢,�e gin. w FA
ea 9
NIL
�SSqAMed
Ri ti'a31-H %3a �g �Y�'QG 3C�u N gR dw s6
'bq,� e � li •`3� , � � I
c
K—
I i
3 '
ell ---
���
AF
I 1
' \. gi38�� I ` -\.�1 1/ 1�-� \f �^//y/. Y �`�/� /h � l ■y.� l /�1/ %� `V \. E

w a
3
a s�i c s
w
03
Q
gocLq `
^d�0
0 z
r
9$§
s
3
CL
00
Y�FP
W
F
LL of �a
w rQ
a �
�a
a
3�
r
i
� r
s � r
------ "
r'
C
hF
H
K

c G
iii+inr
�@
01
/ a
pppgpg ` f �e r1 I I
a
Hn
P HP,
II I p?9°v\
M
_
IV
$AN � I o!
'f illll i�lll�
IffIII
I III !'
f 111 i f l l f I�
Il��ill.',iiyll I�
I
z� gs���tE��:Es'
i
\
v \i
tl
m 3b In

lulls
W!
n
-j W
cr 3 5 W W �
aa
oo�
c�WLLJ
�o 0y
o
nunu,
.n
p
Q a CL
u.
N.
t- 4P
Mina
ILJ�
I ;; _� \� � � €�� `.r r , .�"`� ��h �\
o gynx
a Hn
DPh 9€mow s -q W�`>§ s 6 \ $ /I• e �' ¢:,
liar m ,NT, : rral • f m
�*j* -_l _ -- - _ ��`� �' '� •'0�3 _ t�''' ors, x� rl 1I
— Kir
i €
J�
111
�, � � ®� • ti a wb r�� / 3: �� � \gym s �
--
�
'lam ✓
-r � P
�sy "( f �k�,� "'t /4e

m
Q
nuir4 i
} F n
Y} J Z er C
e
R rc
z
lw
p
Z K O Y
y'
w€
6
g
o& n
Dw Qaa
6 rrQ
omi
0
�
1
wR
e s
g a 3
PUSH
g
•
W's
3
y�y Ij
3
11a �ya
5 Y
Hd
�I �e
ygIJJH
��'���
4''RY
W ilW
N
�S s � 1
ap�7��g4
1 _ 51 N
�� ��
��
R>b� SSS
Pit
I �,J:,
l
� �4�
lnH
r
ffff
I
I
Fg r
,l
g �
f 6 J
r lI A`

Q
�� wa aWrY E8
o :.,....:,._ o o z or
v� 4: °' °�. 3 W w u
¢ ` = n V W °a p p
z LL' w z
a a w� 9[ el a R.s
�.wo
T
ej
1
S
'f
�I
�I
s �
oQF
o-
a
i
o�R
4W p e &
i� till
i,rl
g5 p 99 ppg§ p�p
333 g639g���
I;il3.1
, 1 k'
i N
p�go�gzgm�°��
geia� ;a.� el
a WWWLL»Eam
i

ui
Y�
} H
F Z m
4
e
��
w
o
oa..,.....,q,,
h
uJ
a
J W r
�WwE
F
O
Olk.!° LU
�
a.
Qaa
°j
+
HIM
5 ,r Aa:.:' �.;.. o , i i.. � a�� „THIN
j f
j I
J
�HIN�
m
+ i 2
• '� 1
� 1. p���� 1
,�_
oo�� j
�/
I
$ �I E�
Ili �qq i'3`
e
d

...,.,,,„�,'
Y
} r
~ Z 1O z
¢
'rc
o
�wLLJ
oo�
�LLJ Q CL
a
L
p& n
I
Z Ol
a
CL
rj
1 I bbb iiip
,
,
i gg

'K
So`?a�`innu�k
o
W d d W U
�
ES
CV
uj
CL

} e ¢ rc
Q uluru ' Y JLLJ
2 q C F z C) Lu
LU 1 k o
CL
F
rQ
o$
y;l�fr pp�
_ M O
RIF
7-1
lit
IMIN
MI
�°�
HIM
II ��� G
I
I RlPi8lfFp kA
A 1
5 �2
z r$gy

zi niu�4 h W Lu Q 'ONJ W H Oz
Al
U�oaO>�
k3 QZ V1 .�. boAn� �`� �i ro Z W o L Y up6�m g
I WCL
a
✓�
r
r
�I
--
----
c
r � � 9l I
yHg o
�P`3 g� yM�5
w
a�a� 112
ga OF
3OF '4�
33.7
O i3
8iu1
p Un
r
AAA i i
P��8X��arr
g6m� I
r
r
E
I
e d g F P�
E e ## ,t F�"✓
A
F
r G
I m m
t r a m C
—
�,
i
f I
�jc Cv
/� ii��
-

N F ( 3
3 r q ¢ a M
®pp 4u I w w° o N
te
w
71
Q
M
Aso p�a9 �+ PH ;i� o 1``��;
oil�� ;� � �° g"9 �s&»fl aNg�& �o gdg;p.o.y
a
NH
H3wg4F�s��$��W
'€=
as a$ t'iP cwiw 7= :a5 ffi�'�'=Ec`a�ss
�uF gg" _oW �zW° .< pw��g�o�a.8=
g s� Lek S H'S� 3 3oa ; �'°
� 3< €_-- ws X. @' ��"
�I5 w1m�- s €'wz�tl �Ta,W,"� w w i
g�as€sumae�a��„3=; o.goa a€Psas
2�s�3�;€ e - 5i€a 'g
F�1
5E 3€Ewp����
w�a
r€,�,��°a-LL goo
y3w aW te a$ £ ° RO ag
z 'p �=' =Y ya"8 o� €�� -p°8Q W,
Fon—wRIN
o N.HNf € fig.
zpH rv'��o'"�a< g
om � €�ry�rynm"
sE eea9a�s; �Alw� .—
�
.t
�#
E wE _ swam a- €
'�w�8w1=o5°�
$ g g i �e sp sh m boy yam gg3 V „� s
2p p B p b 3 (7R 4H m 8�", a K'
i 8 [8 a fi LLo
N E3 B CY o muz€omgam,.«��.
W r p 5 55gg pp !` k[ e o gg
w sma�
ig
.50
fl-
Z.=6��s mQo .ae�aqun R aW g 3
�w�
.�ewe�am
woe

m
w a M W r Y€& w
� : m z W w LLJ z a' x ° x 3 3 8 U
a a
w a M W r Y€& w
� : m z W w LLJ z a' x ° x 3 3 8 U
a a

iF
I
a h.....I
o
W
zo
rr"nnnn�o-
LUzaa
o
n
vp
— Z
III O
u
N
i3ulu w%E�''"3
S �yW Gtl n4 �8¢�a
shoo HUHP
IJ
i=z°�
sMevsm
00
0
cl
W
U
Ix
m
Q
w
z
J
w
a
a
J
Q
Za
0�
e
O=
n

a w
w¢�a
$ffi$to
o
1€
o
s
g9geEE yEyy
Ig 888L a
oil
oil
inn I. I
HUM!
ti6 il6i 11a !s l$!$ eg i aW�
� �4 i$i�A {�s pEl�?{b
g �ti8�Ei3glEEe!{{4lAef$�41C� �ii�g,�a�
561
lot,"
?
gt gtia :e se 8$!
ig� Fri
aa'b q Hul-�j
541 5 e E 41 Y akB G
?F st frig& r/1
$ E�
E•y
lip
lull
sHU Hill
g4
a
s
e
i
Hull
yyy
rn
gg 9r
7
Ulu
3���ps E4�4 �• iab gY ��H !E
�
SS$
ltUl
��
�
p�a�����991��3k'� 111"
`�g6`3�i$��4ti�6$
�:N S
e g� S�� �
as"�a��i gs�
€'S�•�H
Y4�ip �P
Q�$ � #e$dg&
?g
¢Q"_�
{.HOW
�??f
yygs
`e�i{s$el�� $?
�ErY§'���E�
e€��
�3
!
��g?�Yr Y
�g4:$
�{a
S��E

\
�
• §)
�
� |t
\
£§
,
»�
0z auj
\
§
*
\
oLu >0§O E
!CLa-
§§!
e
§
f
§ §
•
2
§(
6
���k�
\
|
i
§
�
I
>
)
§
i
(
»
\
\
;
�O
)«
^
»
/ \
©
�
`
®
§ § a
!
-
\
�'
\ \§§
:
Fir
E
}
�
`
Ez
;\
-
«
w\
§R
:

Q � uiu •1 } ~ Z m u � - o
u J
GO
a
k
i
y
Z
e U q
a{y
�k
gad 11
I1 €t ! 11-.111z5 Mi 111111,411 11 141
e -iqe$"�� s 5
! is�� pp a as4 a! Z#a
Ov i
wigtill TIMRAT
€
p M 1
B a_
�8g�gg�gi yygg pg�gjJ9 �9gg S55iggn gx a
i3 aE�� a5i4! v�Ea}� 5@9$51 ii <s
a �-r a � a a •
n

FI
cy
:sue: w Y s
c� moo
�8 a ''ya�l z� wzam
& Y M ,mnu .an.�` p F a
K
t—
i
t "A
mom /e� rah I m
k
y\I \
`1I t
1
1`1
I
O B
;
1 I I 1
1
,
t, qq
f
��-��1'
\ I
<-------"-_-- —
0
\
f
P
i f
I
I
` \

`amE,,,' n wawrp�j p
=3 o m y�
7
11
O
a
i
J
g \ \
* `
4
i 1 I w M
N
1
1
d
o _
i jyr 1
i
d
i �
EI
4a
a
s E]]yyyS
+ p
1
+
I
0,
1
E
II
I �\
M
A , -
E
\
1
p
w
,I�
•IIl
+
1
o
J
l
1 �
Li

Q
Y
i�lirrr Y� J Z Y� u�
o Lu
Woo w ;s c+)
�50
D3� caw room o ��
Gaa?'€�
r
�
0
r
r
a
r
r
+
O
+
r r
r
1
I
z
r
rl
+
0
rf
+
t
r
o
o
O
+
O
0
+
�
1
I
i
i4
o
M
aT
r i /ice
t,
r
-�712
I

i
6
o LLJ
LU
LU aJ3 >•
-cy
Ile I
st 01"D
VA
LC:'
JEE0
r 'ov,
2o7A)
cli
cy
14

Y! Z m
8
A °�
,,, o
N
w r
w d a o
_``o�''_ 3i
Lu
m`
'h'�uini+x+• ," m„„ o
Z L L U M.
O � Q � a � �
� rc
�
�
z
�
14.
-- .EE.�l s
p.
I
_
w
aoac
� a
_
as tot
eawe
visim
_ 17 e
W 6M
e
K
0 N I
elIMP
E yi
i 4i
0
,Y f
a
I� I
g i 9

N Lu
vW°nayop�
%v oTena✓ � :, ��T, ro Z W KCL
� a
CS E
w vcsmeruzm rw co,mr -naa :a.mm IB WL
I
I
'I
I
I
I
as a�
4F8
s
oa
I
i
A8
_
eI
I
I.J
I
`
r
I
I
I Q
I
m
se to
�7
\
F
`
I
B
A
SV
w7

A
.1 w
w o
-�....,,�;;= n U w O CV
k
sry 4y
9YPN m
a
11
_
e5'pg9
ovQg9 $
a
--
III
xcA�IE
R4
a -a L8F i
a,
:a '
sx a�$
a
F
eroee
saxes
eases a
B
� Y A
1
@a3
:�
i$ 8
1� a •�
9
as
;gg
Irea
brow
loow g-
I
oraai E
$
z�
- - - -- - -
---------
----
'I`- ---4- --
---, --
r
� k
m
Ae
I
jai-
l�Bsi �a �8g6 %Gg��

A
9
o
N
Am
W d d V
w
�'ai
Az
rr^�
v1
__ n
%��_
V w °tl 0 m
8,3
o
g�
%
tg§
s
N
�
I�w��i5 Al !,la
4;14 i lip Ifi;
MIR
tm ry
-_--
_
_
seig3
aa�o�e
Ig88
3
OGLOB
3� s
. �
ao eea IY
tram
ttt
sse '
I
I
-
£
c=am
x
eeaeo
s jjj
erxeo
ss�� a
pz
w
12.W i f
0
1
'►
%
�
I
1
st
r
�p
ga
..�
♦46r'�fe�'
r i
f \
1

^Ir,i3i NLo
otl
Lu
yo
s
€
11§
s
N
w
Z�
of O
w W a �.
m
g
c'
r
a
U
S15BB
d=�
a� e
mLOB
I
m
18
6 Pa
a
H, �a
�
m
-
sas8
!
i
m
—`
-
nit
^s.
p�pew$A
mm
o
s
z
�
mB
is
_ MBBB
ss,a
xa
rc rwarrw
LL[BB
4
?
?
3
owi I NMI � I
qd
m
l : � "A -A,

Uauj
w°CK
>'O `a
m
FF§
B
C%j
'h��uinw`o�"•
-:"'.�Imo,. 0
Lu
0 �I
Q � a :
�
�
'w
4�
i
a
3x�a
ee`
CYiaa
__
-

w
uzdaW
LU
m
CN
LP tBB R
I
s �
�
-
i
Brace
t,'
e
Ir
gz
tl
Brcu
"'s
V
Br°m e
i
r
oaa
i
-
t
I
�

�aR.,....
o
W d
a w F p
d
CV
R R A R 2 9 2 2
��
9CPB0
es Leo
-
B
M'n
�ud3 //
a tl/
8
3
CYCW
d�
ems°ems
orem
area
----'
e�
ardw
H-0
arce>
oee.e
3 _ 3 e
TFMi.
80.
_
M8
erza
t
�d
a3
,.c • �3
I E
Y
ui za
le'p6
I
4 a'Eg
I
-
lL'19B
55
91,
RE
spa
zr,a
Y H U d a
gga M�e3s
II
/,
I
}
g w
1 odd
P

15 E
i
i
aPSpI.gM I�
N
w
o
ZfY
raa �•
I
o
�
x
g
e
oil
I
g��k6
I
v
I
w
w Y
I
,
54B1B n
aow0
araoo �
CPOW
I
I,
oca.
I
I
1
,
e
6 u
W
r�
y����•s
gg C.�W
uqe
es�
I
�
OP

rt S
314g I 1
0
,y l\
I
m
H1�
weu
iC
-
I
I
I
e
N[U
i
I
II
eg'uo
I
1
f
� W
@ogl—i
ww
3 °
1
z
=
1
g?
n
_
IM
__
a
1
I
y
�$
si
$s
it
lm
1
�

w
w
Q' w
I O
a
%%duo.►, ,
..ry�huini�x�•`"•
.°�, ,-= ro
':,n�,,,, o
0 C�w
�
w w pnw
II
I
,e9
r
r EiRR�
m37 HraY ! ��� a�loo
.ss<w,s ��g88
l wnw
wnu
6 8
e�� m
�cnin
�= xnin
is
� w
i
� 1
Ir
I �
i
I
I
• 8
1�
I�
I
w

w
Ucq
W vaK>O
w
m
—
€
iF
B
CV
%%duo.►, ,
.`',-= ro
C7 Kw
Z
I
ai,xx
n�
tl
£€
-
ucG
I
mrG
mrG
mYG
tlYlL
v ma
tlBlB
I
77
��
w
IBYG
tlYG
tlsu
BLYLB
�z
Ir
I
r s
me
mYLB
a
��
i
R
I
i
mxe
w
I
I
Yea
`R.
,1
a�a§o @ I
4
'"` Iw,euwe .sa sreE+ca„wacmnmw
®Yee
Yee
II
.: as.eom n5la
rt S
QI
4 111 Moil
� of I l liki
ll
'Y
li
tl

UW oNayO0ma
0 N
%v oTena✓� .,�.°'°c� m Z W W p-' C' } a 6 4
..rrr�uini�x�•`"""��� in�,�,a o 3 a- P R c Ci
O$u�i1 g
HIP I '
o �
Il all
a�
I
�a
ffE
Ll
�
I
-�l

fl-to$
HIM
^yl,rr,r,
h
5G
wLLJ
F Z m
W
3
aig
rr iilyu`°
nm°'
O U'
#
QCL
H
Ell10
■
arAza
-
a,rAu
LZ
Ae
•e7
fs
S�.F
I
� �.
,■1
ecru
00'O�la
e
s
— S
5
za
HIM

a I:
ma.
VW+0aS. 0°LU �
o K U
ma.
VW+0aS. 0°LU �
o K U
o
99
%�
•. lea
�i e e e
>�+
1 '95
b
T
III'
G
I
Y
O
e
IV
$d
i
105
e��
3
�a
�ee
E II
�A
t0'Wl
Y�BF
a
\\
BY[Ol
Bi
1
11
\1
1
1
1
V
V
�
y tl�i
6 �
�k� d�4�6 g•—�, I
e
qua

H O �
Ll
N �
W'aa'�O `a m 'szW, N
��„ 7��1,1,,,,,�" O a a R U
eg vgii, gig R.gn
SHIM H 1,
Ryl
gg9 �
gggy6i �tl3�gpE$�E yy
o
ES W
1
eo3
�J
46YEe
4rsw
e�sg
�
I
e 9:7
e�
e �:
£ M
� x:: el.'s
_i
'
ffgW
C88
{
'
90YBG
I
(
I €
Ho I
ones
� M4 r3rf
� I
I
�% '
!
!
S1900
o• EB
Y&
51508
nn 5
jjIjI''
iek
mwm
— -i
0
Y C
S1
.9
$

w
°° I'D�nsdll
o�ag s
I fi
p�i9�aII
� a
T
11 s
i II
$$$ s
I
1,
,
' II
I ,\I
I
'I
�I
I
I !
I
!f
ja p
1
I
tt
m.l._
t-
�
f
3�
A g
i---
__-----
SEG---
3 w
I
€
�'w xf
��'P '\•�66�F
��V g$•e
H IN
�. l
!!!
I ;
9
iirt I ■ ...
■

EN C zi 7 W w m o��' CI) W cc�O
oa,M, • o p s a c r U
Sal
_
\11
1
B„as
— -
--__- ------
--- - -
QE
.fag•
1
� \\\
6
`111 -
a
s�
P
x
i
,•�••, �
ga. `..
♦
3
` 1
�
1 do

w RC
K yp O
LLJQ
a a
�
a3
U
J
Ell
y eo teE 1?ei •gjF

= W W pC T N o k;
23
a
k
jpy?j?
U
m
--
IL
4_T
III
w
❑ w
tC
N W
==F
o
O
M
F
a
•e � of
w
�
�
Z
m
m
<n e
J S
� w
Q
cJ
N N
F
ui
w
W
O
r
m
U
w
m
iF N

E
r/�
UW eDOS0
:
KOO
o
3
LU

a
3i
k
aim w+ w m e a 4 w
°4f Wm�o w '" o Nmz sai °m
o�Q�
Qa agoa�a m o !I9� wzw o
S LL� �- soda$ °iz
a z � a
�
-
oa�
lit $
I
aim RUN,
-o , a 'oME
! mH°w8INi w -° o u oohilz <a$1 `mNm° WI
�°s
�
aw�For � a ISO
�mx o i rc w o-
`mz aJi-z" om�oa MN wz °w ewe = 1H � y
�n� °' 'u 1
3 iN �w `� �� �m i o
�www zawYi�`m G i�LL �o ��$ m�i �LLi
° °i 'awok
o-�� ay ° i °a'mza °$ w8 oy 8a LLFLL 3 N - o
¢ Swo $m
wgoak' z
J�¢LLas `3x i Y ws'U'�5 a� U z QQa
rc c�iax�o Min wo �N � �y $ 9
d � Nmaozwm F lit m uza1w mull
� ley rcy �� v� � $ a: w1
'¢ x n ¢m o�n �y �u ¢m� . ¢m Z�a � � �o N
Wo
HT
P2 o
lij�W
a �S w��yw 8 S ed�d
�10
a
pig Y

Uk v1 v'n o Z� FaCL
'
lira
il°
lil°
11°�

o ff' a 3 W w g o co
$- n 0uj
Wrooy�: m c§ cV
CD
a
k
s
A y1 U' GIi rrll� �m Fe�
wg �� �J� a
Now=� nay--'
rc o J o
0 N
o w z w. x w w a
j a W F i
4 a�;caw a o o
W xu�imi'm 3 w OR
z a N LL g
"p wow i
m= _ _ME
�a
0
gw
w N _I o
�mw a ow oy a o 3s
- «y��=H SN ooV iwm o" J
K 4pQS �N KO pNQ m g Q ({
W� ~ qpd C
^ \ W
.ff.4 '�"O.IR�S1SIOf Z4%E i � Q 3��
"O4n Q O 9 �
OOC \ OO O �qQ
m
�a g
L goyso�7
g ps g
_€ ;�gF 1 g
a _ e
ZO
w a
oo
ip
Z, w go 4 e
71
g�
sgiig§�Y

^iiin„ o Wa dWv o o& 00
VWeDOS kF: ' N
C7w BOO a o k 3

�ww
o
Cl)
U W eD
CD
ss
linos°
m„�.
O0
2rc
�'

uj
Lu
CDW
KOO
o
i
CS
2
e3

4 ,° O a
�� rc 9 i U
a
k
{}p
SNIVA HONI-49 HonOUH1 HONI-9 °
q1N3W3SVON331 UONOO
a I
Till
� c a E gig; xp
a
o �
b7`
w
w
U
Z
- w
Ld
axxaa4Se O
-eaves xa �
Ld
axes csx -€ @ IT Z
mxx.4=,exe.xexx a Ou
0�

NO
B
YY
FI
_
_
supw`nnr q`
�n
I
-
I
I ei elf `—
� mania Nd �niu �nia —nra � id —n r Figt`--nro tiva n.rd -
4
� d Los 1,
,

111«illll/r�
rrllirrr�
F in
a
k
S
4
1►-
""'•Lu
ry
W Q
J W r
u
O
O'
;
=
6
_'YIP °
Z
W
a
b
Ir l�upP9`
J
1
s
¢
$
i
I
g
MIR.
MEESE,
MMM::
EMERK
MEN
0 IMINE
0
R
i� 3
mmmm
1III
moil
R
MORE
MENE
@®@ e@
ME
® ®T
®R
In
MEE
1
I
r
I
I
I
f
I
i
a�
w�
s
I
B
a
I
r
�g
Fa
64
I
g
�I
I
I I
9
B
�
I
I
I
_
��kfl
I
gg s�
Ir
i 6
�
I
AV
i5[
I

y
'
�
F- � r
Y �z
g
Q
d=
rr^I
y. Ur
w
OU.c7'��uj
4 4,rp
�T` d' h
Z a
���wQ
$
0 :)wLLJ
5 •� ro
ZW a'n w�
N q
° ��m
3
>
`�^
��
zUya
q.
°��a�
°
U
3?
f�
p 5

rn >
A 0 = 0 YrZ a= z �
zz H d z -F o W 4
I da I Oc�LL�w a¢v ���w ° z
al aW r^ LL 0 :,, ice_ n U d> $ C�
pwj�� Syu \ U` wU�a
ro Z a, e ee J
z 2NN �'sQ� aaa
yw.y
. a w
o
��
HP
�gSass�,W E
E5z S6 nz :m So Q�o�?zis=i°gd��o:W°,� ``=a3 3
o Owp i� s 8 aw`"? i��i3M 8o38n8 Nx E $ q2
so
05
z
oQso= _ Go < 5
g o�E `"s z Sf Wa3��Fy "3€,�,8 � ES-'oG
ssgG�;?��i
�rmr.� �6 z'N
g�xfi
G IN
aE
a8xa3 o�D'i a9�
-� �E s s € ° u $ ° remLi
it
89
bi
26,
s
FF o� G
'2r
am a W�
5o fa i EgQ
a kdz -
5�
on
4 �o Wo` 3a� oo�'s�
y se g _`o
mg
f��'•�x e"�W
5 ¢cS=ezMa=�=s�� ERaE3
u
Ha-a=>�'�e8EWFf`W4�
asoo=S:a9rB3��Ra:E z�a8?Woo�Ptma E°Foa�a z
c o
an a� a" asp a�
b
3
E
U
ili ili
' x
i
�

/
���
\[
. |
§���! * \
[/G\
\\e
) \
=°oE-
G§§w! `
oG>&�
o!o&, Q
_ \
..
mo
o
`\
z§��
§/ice{ d
E�
§�
e
)§
U
-
[
.[�

to Z
�gg A YrZ w z ff O Y M
�R���A2ai=?u rIL�^1 OOLL-' Oc~iOLL Z~Fw 3d•r�l h W�J�W�rWao, arc 3� -'' Ww
LUwh wUJ wUU
�ip3n C1
��Z CD

\w
/
E-O
z! *
=°0E_ ~
t \
§�(G/
oIf
o
\ /
E
0 wLLJ ;
`°
o!o&, Q
_ \
.
°o
)§
@
z10
§/ice{
. [
§
.[�
)
|
\�«
/ ( ��
|
|
§/
� �
}
)
- |
\}
-
_
� \
}
(
\\\
(

\�
LO
/
E���! *
= ~
t \
§�(G/ Q
o
\ /
E
G§§w! ;
`°
If
o!o&,
=
R,
°o
)§
@
z§��
§/ice{ d
2
§�
e
10
. [
.[�

VI
IZi
Z O O ZF h
W J W r a, 0 3
Z
O Y
W
CD
u
��.;i
=
W70F� 3�'1 n
UCljW
'^
m Au
T�
ti/1
p�UJ 5 a��&&
°
U' wO�n w�
o
�
x€ri
a Z
aF .lz
ZZN W
a ` �z
Zi
ee
�`
20
J
/1
U
ja
F

' ( /
00 z
°Lu ~
(\
\
Q
e
z§w!
` \
If
o!o & , Q
Q
-
�
§/$�{
k§
§\
�
O
)
!„
m m
!<
2 §
p

=
/
�0
m(
§§
p
\
z!
2 — /_
§\
mt
§�! ?
coo&: Q
\co
-
�
` \
§
_
�§
[
)
|
8;
/(
a
� t
�
&
,
|
€
-
|
[ §
�
�
��
\\
_§!

y
Q
Cu 2 i
'
=y.
0 O Z
z
0�Lu >wW
Z
WOda z�
°¢
Z y a
U) N
Z
TT
w >
n
4
U) U
e
4 O
F�
o��
g
{
j
j
i
i 3
a
3
O
F M Y
i
M W
O N
m
o O
W
po
M
I
j
F FO 00 co m
I
N ppm
OG
1
�m
I
mM
F•F^4� fFM
i
a
O]pppp
Gm
NI-'i j"
i
I
I
F
I
I
I
1
-
I
i
i
j
j
g
omo

to O_�c7 w�Z a = u Z � !�
LL
O�co
�KK §bin � 0 Z of w`x" LU 1
� ¢ n zz RL o pray
n2
g �\,� 3 � I � O � I•
E a
F�o
wi Oast
oa���
1 0 _
qp
y11b
\o
z q
\ 0
1

A =z Y~z a s z J N
LL
EL 0
Fri irca n U C1 7 W `Y# d'
9 ��Az Vi 0 7 liJ b 1d 0 W p a wK d :R LU
zZywa� o pQaa �£°� �¢ U
S
I
a

y '
SJ C-J
aw r
LL:D Aga
p�j�� `srd�"' aim If w� a LU
p a �� $ rz
zuw z
)In . o r a s z
= 3 Uya w � E p� ��5� �$ �j4 U
III`: I ii
L9�L[T�tl15- -
1 i
l
eo9e9 =n913
fl i
i'
j.
9-. -A313
9i.911 -tl15 j
1 I
_ 5i-T69 =n3�3
69+53[69 -vLs
9b5T1=tl16
i
i
tv.vtl=v153
i
i
A
1
II
1
�1�

y
q pzC7 WjZ a s� gJ
It
;_ O Z 3 J o W Q V— o o ILL O r
U O a' n tr Q
w aW w a
=3t� P1.4
c�d> € as CO
p�j� W Vi U` wD WiXL n' z� ° ee.
�
� F
BS+EZl=tl15 j
j
ocse9 =n313 �
f i�,nl 15
�4
-- -- — UB+SZLy15-3NIlH71HW__/• --
F
I ��---- ..-_—------_
J
I
5
.. EO'Se9 =n 53
n r /
oi
i .....
lI
i f '
I
f -
I-
5m-A313
+
+ 1 }
1 1 I
i-ED
49+LZf =tl15
i
S•1 �
I
£
T1 \
Os069 =n313 I
FV+ozl =tl15
i
i
_ ..-b5'599r-A913
p
4
O6•fiSi-tl15
1 2 � Y 1
uuti z
1 r�`
D2'069 -A313
64+8IS =V15
ss =A313
y_ i
DE18T
i
�� i •
1 •1
0�
� i 1 •3 \
$n m e
e

1 Q _ Y F Z z u g .� Z J �J
Z•i r �p0Z_ ,o ' W Q W �a oo CL
g IL
rl 0W 'a Udww� s �iy
Of
Sy'3' $ (7 WOan w 9 Y 6 :R LL1 1
1 I "
- — —' O8+GZT V1S - 3Nf1 HJ1VW
IOT
<o 3t
=�1 a�zF�
T5
Iik�,u��
m
u
0
3�:

y
HIMI
"w.LLJ ,•^.'+ OjZ�c QE1 zci uZC
LL 0- LLJOZg 3€`•�%aZ LJdLWy' 4Kg? .O
zZ F
4) Lu Of Za ~ZU a
UrVL1
GO
/
i
1
4

y
Y FaZgVW'a
g
�
Zaw
Jziy
AA1
o
0l-I
.
W o
Udw
1L
m
z w
Kw
0N
O
W�7
ws rc
°rc
:a
Q
CO
1
r
��an
tl`S
U
ti
.rO?
1 b� '1
1
S- p
T
mL
I i 11 001��$�
I
�
� �
`
a b tr i I 1 _ vo1 '•
•i
3 3
a
_
3 F Wv
I i55
35�
,z ¢ywaN
E_i2
-
j
r
o
1 i
3
o'
So

y
OU0Fz3 Qwrn a7�Vo o a& atL
LLJ
aW n jwp�w°\° Qa W
zyZC55
Oo4
�
I,
g � 3
I � 3
i
� f
1
� Y 1
� 3
f
r I g
7T i
9 Y a
N
I a
ice_- 1N g
I -_ � (f ✓� M^ \\ ~, ` ` -. `� CLOD _ i j i
� 9-V
a 7 �
O G l i 3
°q—tea y a
g I j nao,
f j I ! \ �3 i tiaPoi g
� il_' T 3NR�?lbGli
1 ! ..4.i 3
/
I
I
p
_
I
TH
m
w
n

y
% Z W
LLZOpOFc.�0LLNZ arwqEm -- Fwz�iy
�O�� °zn zWaW
10
z u) ui W OLJWO
o
Vrr,J
U
—
I LLM—Lon—LOG SrIl S'iN5lH71dW Il J E�
WD-09*
e`
-
T—t
111
M
n
--Loo--EOo---lvo--too— 1 a 1
1
I 3
I yh
I
I
§§
1
1
I
55�
�� �� 1 Y 3
.�• \� I h 55E ��
�
54�
a I 3
� � T
g o H \
I
-HIS
o
—
OS+�t'T
T b.�s 3NI1 H71bVU l � I
s
I
0

g N
IJ
=
}
Z
Ja
ONCO
„
LG
z°
�a
LLJ0
2�U))L
ZW �
Of
CL
GOQ
U
Qgr65� VL5 - 3NIl ADIVD—
3s.
S \ _C✓ s N=o
` w
/ G
� I
E• I a r11
w
f
� III
(P
% lot -ate s
VIS_
rr.419—
------------
I
I
Ir/
I

y
Z J
Zi 0•'o00z
�a
00
2 N N LL, K M. 'uj
of
we'd° p r [1 EL U
_
ITFF
------ os+s9tivls_3r�n ��rw
�— i. _ ---- — — — _
—!
I
i
I
IM
Z
11 M i I
m
u
f
;I
ttt
I
1
g3
I
ij
I
1
liA1f S
i d I
d
y
�
� r
N
�

y
A
as
� a w
z& �Z J
Oao
ILI * W
o Kdir
°
LU
a 2NNZOf
EL
C�
/110
G{
_ 08+TLT VIS- 3N�Il HDI Y�
it
f
IF
k
I I
4
f

y
Gi =O IY C7 Y F Z a z g Z J M
Zi r w Z F O Z_
p�7�LLi 5y ��' U` .� LU aQ
k
+LL L V15 = a HJ1bL1/
�bb'S99 -M131 r j
IOMLLS -b153 � •^ 1 � - -
'i �
t)E OG9 =rt313- �-.- - - - - I �o =Um 1 •\ U .•`
1 ^
9 SLI=tl15 IIl "o �y
TE*SLT =tl15 � � 1b x��y � I II
i o N Q
1 �1 r1 w i x
809Li =tl19
JE
Z O
i
65 599 � tl 53 `• �/ w l�
f a, iPs� i i aw�31
89599 3l3 i 1
ii+PLl-tl13 I II�, ••� � � •� ��
9.EL 1 � �I � j .•�
Z I:
LD*fLl =l15 �
0 8'r
09'049 =h313 � s � a
NO a 3 Q
AI � �,\ � to •\ ^ I}I 1 - z � � .i
96+ZLt =b153 �2 N\ g I F z� �o
I 1 —
i
99539 =M13,3 g ,
1 1+ao

y }
a�oz3 w o w4g�a 3 �� o aw N
@. Oc> wJ n a�ww o �a O
0�7�W 5a a \ OWOoa w� 6 :R LU i
ziyaa o pQaa€� �¢ U
O6'699 =h313 11 -
69tf8i=qAS - i1
i
OC 9 =A313
[L+cc
R
Q�
f �� �C ilLtE8I bt5 � Nf7 HJtbVv_
Z � s
. o
1 �
1 sl}�I
5

o�ci W Z dW ze u 9 4J J i1J
oc~i��3 Q( o N
e LU > �[ ` 5� 0of0 d 2�N� W Ada RL W O a a ?a o d 6�em :a Of I
W r1,
U—%rn
Oi'999 -A313
��—
�xY
- � I I 1 — � �/�'i•4 `mil' � ` �k� i � a � a � �
00'699 =M1313 9 i 3 a
r 88.88i=V15 ! I ` / j / 1� • # 38 # i #
za inBW
c W � � i• � 3, # i # + 3
�a .a .T
- - N
�3ss— I - � I N ' `' y� y �• i j
RC'699 =nn3 I - I I /� %• 0 LlT / 3 SSE
2E+E91 =tl15 I I / S f� s5E �55Er55E'r 5�55
4 55 � 355
� p ` N '// {i• �t _ �� 55`' 355-�355 �-355 111
�3
!M Nr EIO.AS 15 '- 5 f
aF�o
_ �\ SE•L8i =Y15 _ � I- •i YdO�a im-n
96.981 =tl15 i I� In ����
4 G
T
09'699 -n313
N I W
N N
W ef\
e m
W
o
s9 v99-nai3 - - - - IC :� 3� i• / !
wp
I ?4
Ef OBf tl15 � •— - -- - .•�
I
b1s _
3 •
e �

y
Gi
Zi
'
owo
XFOZ_ n
W4wf-_ as
LL
�/•�
��Qu
r
W
oft• �"k''
Oc�~ w_ P 1' n
LL70F 1
�z'
aa�Wo
Ud
N
aR
v�
tl�a
0 w 5a'�
ra° °
Z U) LU "n
OWda'n' w�
r g �. c�
°
E
:a
wo
F- Z
/I
UNa u:
d a �
J�
rc
5€�
"
N 4
�J
I 1 _ +
I�$$ _ _ f I� _ 08+S6Td1S-3NI1H:)i W _ 4
8
1
8 i w
cz
-
9 '999 -A313 8
I I j•
/
6i+V[t = tl15 O° I � IT 1 �,• f r Q
1 l
98!E6t = b1G 1 II
. � AI I -• a
z ,
1
1
a 1
z 3 0
d
- 9F1E99-A313 1 R !I I 1
cz•zcs=tlls ! � ,' ! �' � �o L, og
17 o l
9E,F99 =A313
[s.E[69 =A31�
T 1 d
_ 1 r L o3
aE,96t.tl1s
„Qilf '� t 3II
� - — �� j �• 68I b1S 3� 1 HJ� yyU

y r
C
Q Zar Y �Z W rze u g Z � I~
�OOZ .f'r h W Q W f a p3 IL
!ef n IL 0 N
&� LL70�W p ,� UC3 ul �p 3YV <tr CD
5� Qy� oH7K §d5� W IL w °a E. 6 :R w
ix uj
z� 1
z RL a
`2a�a. °' o praa

y rr p� TT
Fi 3- Od'C7
Z; z�Oz �aaa��� o waWr o a� N
LL7r7u.IK. n Up>w E _� 4
9L
p��wK g�"i m zw¢�a xp ° s s �� TH
u0 1
zZyw " o Arad` ° °� �' rz U
-ate---
o
_ n 00'S64=n3Z3
' - 6•LOS=tl15— --- '—
Y'
=6313
�['(619
• 5=tl15 i
hE'L69=Ana
fig+90S =tl1S�L
W$69 - n j
t£*905=tl15
—SSE
_ ns n
I M i
I NI No
j J i sl.
r /
'Re
I
44
O 4 3
s � �
VF
r
00+905 V15 - 31UI1 H�lyW�—'a'—lgJ1f
L �lyl
1
44
4 I it
—SSF` '

s - OMC7 Yrz �° u a .� Z J LO
oc~i0z Q0" n W o p aLL M
3 i U- m Lu ?I rc n u 0 ` �� n p Y# E�
~p�>� W 5 i� of t -Z g 5 W zu)NaK p 0Q- IL �s �E [�� �e �¢ U
UN w• �� H f rc g$ �N
8 91 &
r
_ E8'F69 =A313 r
86+fiZi=tl15 �_ �
TV Ed =A913 - -
LmgzLa vu
ib'Z89 = R319
LL+bZi=V19
CS'9F9 = A313 r
gg+bZZ=tl19
V `a
Z9'S69 "3l3� I
OE+6ZL 9
8Z 969 113N
1141, 1
15''
9Z 69 M17j3 '
-EC bR Y1S- i
6+bZZ= —.e.� - - 0�2 J I
—SSCYSSE—:�
r
09'Z69 =All3 SSE T SSE - - -
65+9ZZ=V1S i q
X33��ON07
�Z[[
�Z
1 I ,
N �
1
3N11N�1dW �\
pSkaZZdLS r
�1 3j
\ mn
33-

§( \ ��§§» » §)(B\\§ <y
. w 2
|� / $ (/� ) .1°5.
CO
§-� ? o!o&N!E r.
- ` � �� ` § / i !|� ,! 2 n •
[ �§��

} n
A � =
ZZyWK bu` ra°cl Q� U
-
rO� 3 \
\ u
1
r1:6 a4
lob
3
\ = 4 p O

FJ� r TT
A r Y F Z w rz a u g - vJ
LL7O�� ilwu-rca �, UC1jW c�� �; :$P �
E ��Qu Y1 dwj� W 5y'b � \ U` If n
a a: ZZNaa nu ti p oaaa
= 3 - p g
k
Z A
Q
Z
a
Z
� z
O
V x
a
A wS.
a
d
z
Z
d
z
¢ _z
x z
j,j + +
e + + 1
+ + i
+ +I a a a 6
+ + °oaaa° �
�JJ�m + + �aoo �aa°¢ a
' o i+ +
aaa°aa g
a°a
aoa oaaa a° a�
z
F
z
a %
fr
a °z
� d
r�
+ +
{\ \ V II}+ + 11
I \ + +1
+ +
+ +
h� 1 + +
o L lI II+ + 1
NOW
3N
3N
3
�as`e
s
�
5b555
s
do��
o����o
�
a
xx
pgE
$
F
fop
e
%
�
Z�
O�S
I�i
MIN-1
w&�
!
r88
x
x
K
x
3
3
3
�
'E
8
° k
�
zz
xx pp
xx
5a
pn
���s`ee�
�
�5�n
S,1
3
�
bbbbb
S �
e�q�
EE•
�
E
F
O o
0 0
0
0
o
0 0�
o
0
mama.am
4 a
�
.R
x
x
4
3
i
3�
i�
i2°�
t
t z
-
yy 99
b
b c
a§§§§
b
°��
b
o b
�
�
i
-
yg
b
3
�
•
E Y�
°
E a
pp
y
u4
i
a
s
6y
3s
g

qy B
Y F F z % Z
d=� u O U O F�F 3Lu
LLJ
3 aLO
LU
3 c010
i

¢ z
Q
t
\S�
a
9 1
,
1 �
01`
1
1 0l
/r!
r/
\ +++7 \ 1 +++++'•
y+ /+ + + +
i ! 4 + + + / \
% /+++++

y 3 z r i
Q �
E O LO
z ^+ W a
aaC �U a r h 7 o caU C7
5 aW R," ate❑ a �y,p_n z CD
�� Q a v 1 S p j W 5 m Z W n w d s Z
U¢ �x zZyW� o praa �£ ez Q ()
I
+ +/ + + +
+
+ + + + os
+ + +/+ + + + + 5�'
,,22��+ + + + 4''y++
+ + + +
— J am'+ + + �/� }}/yg+" •\ + + + 4 +
+ + + + + + t / \' \ /+ + f + + +
+ + + + + +
+ + ? + + 4 f F 4 +�4 4
+� + +p + + + �F + + +
+ + + +�4 + + + /\ \ \ \ \ \ \ �. fr + + +
++++ + +
+++ey\+++++`, �\�f
�s +++ �-___,_���tt-�++++
+
+
+� \\y+
++++++� t! a + +
+ + ^� +
+
+ `�' h ✓ + SSE 4,_tlOI �QOlr 01
1
1
1
1
1
1
JI
1
21
�1
ZI
� 1
1 11 1

y '
¢_sV 0z3
OU
wa LL70F> i4,
u;
��Q� 0P7ww �.� ro Z W 60
a ��
3 v—a d iU
„e
1
1 �
1 ,
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
P
g
� �jG,65A
`\ f

y
� _
e Zi 0�-OZF : "' W4WHa o3 jz IL
KA
O~��F>� •'_Sua["tz
Vn
ZZ \L1
10
I
CL
GAS -GAS
� ! �M `ram

i aomo z
A z Y z ff 5 LO
Zz a : 0 Z F� --ram ry W 4 w~ a a 3 d L%
E—I _ ooLLF 3 Q n ���0 0
LL7Lug, n Udjw oa �Q �Ytl z
O 7 �'1J �4�o m z W I ir Z / 1
_ LU
U
X
o� 1
MASCNCINE"SH�C_6S_
4 ,.+
1
+
++ 1
+ fI
— +
+
+
+
------ - - - - --
g}
�E
CE'rF
IM1 I
i
MATCHLINE - SHEET C-6.56

w A e
O�C7 YrZ a
iZ i d' - O Z =F�' ,, o w a W~— a 3 a LO
oc�
w70F� j Z
H w W &&&
AVe o��ww `s�dnii Owo�a a" s $
.1? ZzvNia� OQaa �z >���= Q •U
U
a e
++�a�' R
+ +
+ r$ `Oa /
+ate-
+ \ \ °
i,
}
+
+
0
++
+ + a v 1i
/ } + 1 CI
I + s `g
t
.++++++++ +
i, 'l$
+ + + + ;, '�\ S \ \ \ \ + \r�y r + + +" +
& + + } ser o l8[ + + qa
+ +. \+\+
++++ \ \ .\' \ \ \�, ` ++ d a'ja Leo,
++ \ 1 a'' S. \ \ \ ++
1 + +�\ ,! ,1 \ \ \\
+ }\'\•
++
+ + I + + + + +
Ip� + + + + +
L + ++
o
\_-- +++
c

to
'
~ Z z
u
g
ryC
KJ
2 i
� 0 o Z p ry
LL 6i LL~ 3 'f3 J� h
W J W r? a 3
7 U
W
J d'
W 7 Q F >W QT"wz1� rc
j W Sr�,� ' i�3 \
U C1 W W c�
W O a
N
o
4
y
Q U
W Z
CD
ZZyW�
Z
O�aa` �z
��€�
�
�
U
r,
U
= 3
_a
Q E
p
g
a
o
0
a
c
m
°
6gE10
a
f�"- m
N
� � CD
o� G
Ui
N�
ppw
f
N_
- 08�
3�
o
3�
w�l�
v'c
x
m Ala .2
m

y
gyp
a�
g���'�''��" +t�'qy�
O Z 3 JQ! ar M1
d' 7� U O
WaE ��Qu
T�
LL�oGW s�¢��n
~O ��'& �,�
Udjw
vL
V1
j Srz,�
0Z
a
�
=LLo
Jo
HI willp
� b
�
PEE
0
7
as
y€
s'_ m
faa o
W
op
e�^'
is EJ
F
on!
LLO
afm
¢�eC
LL6 ._
rF
m Y O`
N
i�i
c
Es
3
Y
9
�
C.
mh
1 bat
_ a
_
Rill
o Wy
m�
ae
(i
a ri
8a
�iZ
a yw
�
oa i
f
m �
�JNrvmm a a dam

�Qu
OULL~w3s''�
70F>> ��a
UCH
4
Q V
♦/�
zi„
vl
0 -:)
zrq towK "� °
D a, a wir
Zra a
o
�
6
W Z
vL
.?z
g
zNa ,
Q
0Tu�
O
J
U
U —
rc
g�
uW
Ufa
�
cos<�
G¢�
w
ooa¢?a
�o
C m LL
ail
REIN
4
a a m
F$ W
"
<m
_
o!
t
N
05
�F
�m
3
W IaW ze�ne aoaai
Gio
•v
a �
Q
Ia W idols as Soh
lauladrn a aoi
m
;T,41
gm
ZC
-
I
; E
o
�
3
—
�
8� x -
O
Fgc
GyiZ
g
-
r =:
W
EW,ra
z�zazo_
LL
Wwoa
m3oo�G8
zl^3¢M

Z� �F0z
fla? �///�� LL laa n Ci iy rt g =' a gY H V VL/
B� aEEE `ems 0�j W 5 °0z D i L �, �, a° \ U` a'D ` zx _ o y W 1
F r1W ZU)HlW ~ o Z ra a s �VS
3zw a Z
�WzmpW
zee °,Vx
� 2ry
o °q✓,,.
u
oz
dz
r
ogz iS
a
.��
qRt
D
gam
�
o
G
yy
lig iJsp6
m4n�`aY -
Nu
€jpxor
�P
R1Z
:
_ o
"G PINY.
a�W
ffii_
G
o�G�aLLio St
4
O
as
1
pa
�i
� 3 z
t
I
o�
t�iyo
3
G i
Vz
�zwo
���Saa
i�p3
O l
�o

y
N
Egy"
DOO Zwco
�Au
uj KI
d�
0
�
�Y
U
IA
ro
Z W o a
m
t
6
O Z
'
� y
� �
p �
�I�,
Q�
ti
U
_
k
a`
A
e
0
3
f�
-
i1 uOL71�Q
E ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑!
❑Oo ❑ ❑
C7 f7oo❑ `
aUi - ❑ D o 0 0\ g
mo c ❑Do El El , v
,
z ❑0000�
Lld000!� biz
Yx sI _ ❑0000
ox ❑Coon
❑0000
❑000Ell
!�
g p0000!;
spa wad wm� ;</
F
zD
Fg _
ff
�E
SE
Fo
s z
� m a
H y F
y 3 N V A
a
y 3�
8 9 s E
e9 8§ 5 EIE
i oS N Eas` a 3 E E
z €
E d
3
H
¢
d
d
¢
�
s
-
9
€
g
s
q
a
u
�
e
o�
s
5
9
i
94
g
v
g5

y
E Q
'
O 0
w 7 Z a s
s
w
Zi
r
0� Ozh
LL70F> 3�'
WH_ 0�
fiJW
wad. .li
?Irc: n
0P7KW��\
Ud�
UWUd'n w�
€
U
WZ
CD
1
Z(I)
U

g y '
C H q o0z w
z�w�- o'er Nw (0
LL 7 0 p��jww
Z(4)/1 W 3`u ?I°rc3: no z0UOrCw,17d�a
oOVZ UVLi
/ 3 U g

y
Zi
'
0z ti
Oc�LL~w Q n
} F 41
WJwHa a3
���w$
wa .�7W
L
LL70F .�'pxn
UC3] rc�
p�j��i ard� �i \
C7w0�a'
zZyao: °
-
OQaa xi
U
f
J W tY
cq
W
e z 1
o U
rc 6

��/
» -
)§ �L�
,
x
o
/§
)
°� ©��E
/\
R:
�)k )
:\
61i\��
k},
§k j
_
� \
2
<
.
"iK e
\
\
�
§
/
2
<
�
§
- ;6
q
+
_,
/
low
( =w,I
V z
200
_9\
w\
/§
�f
/ m
/ "~
}
I
0 E
q \
_
o :
Hz
%/
\ \_
\»
m
i
�/�
Ld
~
LI
2
,
/
§
®
:
r
§�
/\�// \/
`
\
61
i
§\ /
u�)
/
/ |
}\
�~1
Gi
0

`
b
Lu aG� )
§!_§�E
7�
/
CD
)(
oLu ,
`
|!§
`;
(
w
lz§
M !
;
r.
W
6
° k k
I
|
•,
|
\\\
/u��
\
�
/
§�
E
\
�
--/---=
-
�-�----
[
----/(-=--
\/�-----
�
.� . � � e
2/ :
_
��
2� /� § 2 �
\l�-----�-
�
(
�.
I
�
»a
�
�
--]---�-�----
,
---H
_ -
E
� ! �
i

h| \ { o _o�= ! |«| R!` a \
§) §)k `§• ©� OR
.o
» !a,
" 4� �° « 3 � ) ■§| ) !� •
/ g� ! ( � - , • `!` �r�
�
g
, j
j
/
Ed
�
\
"VNIVU
,
j �
�
\ \ \. \\
?
).
I *
®
!
2
/
>i 7
S
)/
m
®
._,
q
§§ I
Of
/
m
,
3
2
.
i m
®
-
S
/LLJ\
L� 0
'
\
0
q /
S -
lz
/
><
I <Z.
4
88 2vp11
\
.
�\ �}
i m
2
w!
® °
2�� -
I
ƒ
�lw
i �
o
!
/ \/
{
I
.
G\
. w
.W.
WE
I #
. LLJ
I �
;
.NZ
!
-
\)�
\
\
%
�
|
�
»�2
k
|
'
:
-
�w
.
1�� |
r
r
r ! m
§

ao t
Y>-LU
u
3
rc
7 W
W ad O E
R N[
S
mQE
W
z w
O R f a
q
5
J s
a
a HLLJ
a 0
m H
LLI
w J cL
LLI
K
mm
TFI O
U
W.
00
Ad g
(30tld H3V )'SI3'XVM.0-,t 0 19b.-01 .F
dAll H
w� b Q Q
H z
LLI O
Or
a uj
N
W mLL
N Ny a o
Wzmrcaaommm
•aro.£
q
z
Hz
Z ; H
a� -- - H
w s JX >
W O d o LLi
p
H N J
N LLi
W J o
(J Q • O
O 3 :
H p m
m Q
m
Wm
dV0 ONIl00d
.0-,bl .b-.6
mmu
� 3
5
�
mWo
Nm
mo
H UJCO�
CC
�H
pZ
J
Z in ohm
Wo�H^
�
0_
Q O
r
W
W W
� F
w N
H H>
r
W -
a
_
N
H
CO a
r ..
Z
4
HW
H
wZHm
O
Z
H
w
�
O a
p _ w X
tr � a0u:
a Uzi
o"wa
Z
x
<
_
-
i
i
o!
i
I
i
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
i
i
i
•„£-,Z
„ /ib-,£ . /fib-,B
m�� i
a
a3
oa�
(30tld'tl3
'dAl1
'S10'XtlW „0-,I
tl [Bbz-OI

!
r
*
/N
2
§
2■
k§a �z,o,c
§ -
!
§
§
§k §� §
|
f
\.Q
Q ` ;
'§ �
|
.
| ■ /
)
.
,
,!.
, i|
(
(
I
\(\ /
;
_ e
/
2= /
/
.
/
- e
/{
; \ f
i §
ww
�
I , O
�
C
i
+
i m
®
# ) ¢
�,
Z-
uE.
« ®` °
j )
><\w®
j_K
I q }
r
\
G
>
w/
_ / !2
lw
00
4
w
>
-
\�
-i
'.
d
cf
-,
\ 00
% L ^
~
/
-
2
/
Iz
IW
1.
#
j
//j
®
®
W.
i
JT
// |
w, |
/}/Im.
MW \ /� \ \ /
E E
,

\
m _� -
j�
l=-
�
I
i
I
---�-----------
I
I
---�
\�
■
� i
�\
j(
] I
\
-
� I
�
.
`
b
�
\
�� FLU )
%\
}
§!_§�_ ,
|!.
§
\
)(
0. �2{ !
,§|
\
f
w
w
:
0 °
k k
|
•
��,
�
|
�
--—
=----�
--
--�-----
-----------
�

■0ni0a�i.ii.in
>
4
Y} C ao t
-�
3
LU
Lu
z
IZ
W 7 "
O� E
w N
g N
E
9
u
O
W a'S
w K
° Y =
��
o
00 fa`
€o
SmB
m�
0U
q
5
H °
m Q
wY w
O
w
H
Q
w J
w; I CL
m w
mo m� O
R.
U
w�
e� em (
HQ�orYN
iW wzo�m-som
ama�;F_ia
a�oworym
m
P.
�ON
fdA11 w 'I
1J0.0
!
'UlJw,
f£
-
a~ms
° om�O
w Uw
Q N
am
w .All
W.
zz
w1 �QuQaz~FH� zoHLdQZo wwaQ
l L-
dlJ
z.
5
� 3
mmm
,0-,ZI IVMNJV6 •.6-,6 .9-,1
Q
m
IIIl

c
/) \
��\
��
\
k!_G�� `
-
©
\
,
§
:
o! -§- >
§;|
®!
m
12
.
|U
�
P.
\ ,
5
z
_
,
^
�
/
j n
ewl-
\�
i
\
\}
\
/§(\
, J
\
/
e
.
3 . 2z,
z
Of
z o
| o,
z
.\ \/
\
-
W.
/
(D
; /Z
-
®�
/
E§
;
b
\ /
Of
F-�
.
E
' O
Ww W.266
, _1.
e
°
_ �
$
( z
2lw
q
.
Z.
,
!
\
\
/\
//
m.
.�
�\
-
\
.\
// \
_ ,
�LLI~
meHo
Vgi
, i
�
\
J\\
J4w_
,\|
'
\i�
*,
j MIP \ /� \ \
» !
§
§ E E §
/
!

s
-
r
Y C ado t
3
>-
LU
s'g�g
LU
C1 Z a
N
E
83
rr��
ixoE
x� E
W Ir O
R
o
S
v.
¢wj
~
o� � IL do
q
5
H
Q
wY
O
�w�

Qsy
¢'x
N w } a
° w3
g 'aJ
O
jv o
u'w�o I�
W w ixLLI m
..
ak
q
V f� w
Nr W`Hw II _
¢ W'" 21.
s r aN� 3 W W I I I I I w��11
o J� <so„o'w a m
Wiz.- `2 �o
oc iiHz
II I \
�xG� �3�I I
Wr • I I s Ld
m�?zlzo
_ wm I I I W
4�V1.rc II I H
iw�Jw I� >
i LL;� II I Z
C3 II I m O
f �
II I Nm;
f o I I CNIWI
I II I
Iz
lw
1.
ww
f II I
� f
J ff I I I
1 II I
11 II
f LL-- _ IH
Rol
f 3 ry
19
Q
W f
�a 1 wm
f �
f
f
—1Y- ------ ----- -- — -----
I I nf I I I
dbddZy �Nodd
1I dX3 1 I I I
I sz I I ha I
i 1 W
1 O 1
11
1 I m O I H j Z w jl
___ __ 1 1 ,e I 1• I I I Q z II
—--f—+---- ---- --� N -- —+- ;--T---- J I I
'08 480d S3111b3e / I C <
I I! I I I I—
1
I I Q l I r l II it
IF Nl W LLJ
J OJ 3
¢ W w
w W w
/—'I ------ — --- --- -i---------�--- ------ II o J a
__ F____ I _;J� J
L11 / I� Q
II
I —NJ
—Ni
z, L_u
// wm
iLL�m
Id
r
m
1

jF
[ ^
\
>
.
LU
§
�■ ,.
uz_�,= !
k
®
oLu §
|\|
a ,
,
§ k k9L
)
.
/ .
�! >
!
| ■
|
,
..,
;!
:
;
!
°
© ,
$
2
_
c
c
e
§
a
z
0
/
z
0
w
e
2
z

Contact Name*
Contact Email Address*
Project Owner*
Project Name*
Project County*
Owner Address:*
Is this a transportation project?*
Ian Eckardt
[e-mail]
Mecklenburg County Asset and Facility Management
Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement Phase 2 (Treyburn Dr. to
1-485)
Mecklenburg
Street Address
3205 Freedom Drive, Suite 6000
Address Line 2
aty
Charlotte
Postal/ Zip axle
28208
r Yes r No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - F 401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular Express
F- Individual Permit F- Modification
F Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
C Yes (-- No
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
us
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Alan Johnson
Please give a brief project description below and include location information.*

The Long Creek Greenway and Stream Enhancement Phase 2
(Treyburn Drive to 1-485) is in north central Mecklenburg County
approximately eight miles north northwest of uptown Charlotte, NC in
the Catawba River Basin (HUC 03050101). Charlotte -Mecklenburg
Storm Water Services (CMSWS) identified the Long Creek corridor
from Treyburn Drive to 1-485 as a stream enhancement opportunity,
concurrent with Mecklenburg County's Asset and Facilities
Management's (AFM) development of the adjacent greenway
corridor. CMSWS contracted with Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
(Wildlands) to assess the existing conditions of the stream corridor
and develop stream enhancement construction documents. NC Land
& Water Fund (NCLWF) is a funding partner with CMSWS for the
stream enhancement work.
Long Creek's watershed is urban, and the stream is generally incised
and disconnected from its historic floodplain except for one reach
which is bedrock controlled. Bedform diversity is low and consists
primarily of long sandy runs with pools developed around debris
jams. The design for Long Creek proposes a mix of preservation,
enhancement, and Priority 2 restoration to stabilize stream banks and
diversify available instream habitats for maximum functional uplift.
The project proposes to construct approximately two miles of multi-
use trail in conjunction with stream restoration, enhancement, and
preservation along approximately 9,000 linear feet (LF) of Long
Creek and associated project tributaries.
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
1 understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
I also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature
lay €ck&'&F
Submittal Date 7/2/2021