NC0060283_Fact Sheet_20210824

DocuSign Envelope ID: AEA1ADC2-6DE6-4768-982A-D5CD1E309E1D
Fact Sheet
NPDES Permit No. NC0060283
Permit Writer/Email Contact Emily Phillips
Date: February 24, 2021
Division/Branch: NC Division of Water Resources/NPDES Complex Permitting
Fact Sheet Template: Version 09Jan2017
Permitting Action:
❑X Renewal
❑ Renewal with Expansion
❑ New Discharge
❑ Modification (Fact Sheet should be tailored to mod request)
Note: A complete application should include the following:
• For New Dischargers, EPA Form 2A or 2D requirements, Engineering Alternatives Analysis, Fee
• For Existing Dischargers (POTW), EPA Form 2A, 3 effluent pollutant scans, 4 2' species WET
tests.
• For Existing Dischargers (Non-POTW), EPA Form 2C with correct analytical requirements based
on industry category.
Complete applicable sections below. If not applicable, enter NA.
1. Basic Facility Information
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name:
Mr. George Morosani/Ridgeview Community WWTP
Applicant Address:
932 Hendersonville Road, Suite 201/Asheville
Facility Address:
Dryman Mountain Road & Impala Trail/Asheville
Permitted Flow:
0.0078 MGD [-54 people]
Facility Type/Waste:
Minor Municipal; 100% domestic
Facility Class:
Class I
Treatment Units:
• 15 separate septic tanks and subsurface sandfilter systems (one
tank/filter for every two mobile home spaces)
• Sewer -collection line
• Tablet chlorination with chlorine contact chamber
• Tablet dechlorination
• Cascade reaeration
Pretreatment Program (Y/N)
N
County:
Buncombe
Region
Asheville
Page 1 of 9

DocuSign Envelope ID: AEA1ADC2-6DE6-4768-982A-D5CD1E309E1D
Briefly describe the proposed permitting action and facility background: Ridgeview Community WWTP
has applied for an NPDES permit renewal at 0.0078 MGD. This facility serves a population of 54 people.
The facility has a single Outfall 001.
2. Receiving Waterbodv Information:
Outfalls/Receiving Stream(s):
Outfall 001 — UT of Smith
Mill Creek
Stream Segment:
6-79
Stream Classification:
C
303(d) listed/parameter:
N/A
Basin/Sub-basin:
French Broad/04-03-02
3. Effluent Data Summary
Table. Effluent Data Summary Outfall 001
EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
[Parameter Codes]
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Average
Daily
Maximum
Measurement
Frequency
Sample
Type
Sample
Location 2
Flow
[50050]
0.0078 MGD
Weekly
Instantaneous
Influent or
Effluent
Temperature (°C)
[00010]
2/Week
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine [TRC] 3
[50060]
17 µg/L
2/Week
Grab
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen
[00300]
Not < 5.0 mg/L
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
BOD, 5-day (20°C)
[C0310]
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids
[C0530]
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
NH3 as N
[C0610]
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Page 2 of 9

DocuSign Envelope ID: AEA1ADC2-6DE6-4768-982A-D5CD1E309E1D
pH
[00400]
Not < 6.0 nor > 9.0
standard units
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform
(geometric mean) [31616]
200 / 100 ml
400 / 100 ml
2/Month
Grab
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity 4
[TGP3B]
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Temperature (°C)
[00100]
Weekly
Grab
Upstream &
Downstream
Dissolved Oxygen
[00300]
Weekly
Grab
Upstream &
Downstream
4. Instream Data Summary
Instream monitoring may be required in certain situations, for example: 1) to verify model predictions
when model results for instream DO are within 1 mg/1 of instream standard at full permitted flow; 2) to
verify model predictions for outfall diffuser; 3) to provide data for future TMDL; 4) based on other
instream concerns. Instream monitoring may be conducted by the Permittee, and there are also
Monitoring Coalitions established in several basins that conduct instream sampling for the Permittee (in
which case instream monitoring is waived in the permit as long as coalition membership is maintained).
If applicable, summarize any instream data and what instream monitoring will be proposed for this
permit action: Instream monitoring for Temperature and DO.
Is this facility a member of a Monitoring Coalition with waived instream monitoring (Y/N): NO
Name of Monitoring Coalition: N/A
5. Compliance Summary
Summarize the compliance record with permit effluent limits (past 5 years): Monthly average limit
violations in 2015, as well as Insufficient ORC qualifications for O&M. Numerous frequency violations
in 2017, which proceeded to NOVs.
Summarize the compliance record with aquatic toxicity test limits and any second species test results
(past 5 years): N/A
Summarize the results from the most recent compliance inspection: Last inspection occurred November
2018, with no apparent problems per BIMS.
6. Water Quality -Based Effluent Limitations (WQBELs)
Page 3 of 9

DocuSign Envelope ID: AEA1ADC2-6DE6-4768-982A-D5CD1E309E1D
Dilution and Mixing Zones
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0206, the following stream flows are used for dilution considerations
for development of WQBELs: 1 Q 10 streamflow (acute Aquatic Life); 7Q10 streamflow (chronic Aquatic
Life; non -carcinogen HH); 30Q2 streamflow (aesthetics); annual average flow (carcinogen, HH).
If applicable, describe any other dilution factors considered (e.g., based on CORMIX model results): NA
If applicable, describe any mixing zones established in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B. 0204(b): NA
Oxygen -Consuming Waste Limitations
Limitations for oxygen -consuming waste (e.g., BOD) are generally based on water quality modeling to
ensure protection of the instream dissolved oxygen (DO) water quality standard. Secondary TBEL limits
(e.g., BOD= 30 mg/1 for Municipals) may be appropriate if deemed more stringent based on dilution and
model results.
If permit limits are more stringent than TBELs, describe how limits were developed: NA
Ammonia and Total Residual Chlorine Limitations
Limitations for ammonia are based on protection of aquatic life utilizing an ammonia chronic criterion of
1.0 mg/1 (summer) and 1.8 mg/1 (winter). Acute ammonia limits are derived from chronic criteria,
utilizing a multiplication factor of 3 for Municipals and a multiplication factor of 5 for Non -Municipals.
Limitations for Total Residual Chlorine (TRC) are based on the NC water quality standard for protection
of aquatic life (17 ug/1) and capped at 28 ug/1 (acute impacts). Due to analytical issues, all TRC values
reported below 50 ug/1 are considered compliant with their permit limit.
Describe any proposed changes to ammonia and/or TRC limits for this permit renewal: There are no
proposed changes.
Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA) for Toxicants NA
If applicable, conduct RPA analysis and complete information below.
The need for toxicant limits is based upon a demonstration of reasonable potential to exceed water quality
standards, a statistical evaluation that is conducted during every permit renewal utilizing the most recent
effluent data for each outfall. The RPA is conducted in accordance with 40 CFR 122.44 (d) (i). The NC
RPA procedure utilizes the following: 1) 95% Confidence Level/95% Probability; 2) assumption of zero
background; 3) use of'V2 detection limit for "less than" values; and 4) stream flows used for dilution
consideration based on 15A NCAC 2B.0206. Effective April 6, 2016, NC began implementation of
dissolved metals criteria in the RPA process in accordance with guidance titled NPDES Implementation of
Instream Dissolved Metals Standards, dated June 10, 2016.
A reasonable potential analysis was conducted on effluent toxicant data collected between NA. Pollutants
of concern included toxicants with positive detections and associated water quality standards/criteria.
Based on this analysis, the following permitting actions are proposed for this permit:
Page 4 of 9

DocuSign Envelope ID: AEA1ADC2-6DE6-4768-982A-D5CD1E309E1D
• Effluent Limit with Monitoring. The following parameters will receive a water quality -based
effluent limit (WQBEL) since they demonstrated a reasonable potential to exceed applicable
water quality standards/criteria: NA
• Monitoring Only. The following parameters will receive a monitor -only requirement since they
did not demonstrate reasonable potential to exceed applicable water quality standards/criteria,
but the maximum predicted concentration was >50% of the allowable concentration: NA
• No Limit or Monitoring: The following parameters will not receive a limit or monitoring, since
they did not demonstrate reasonable potential to exceed applicable water quality
standards/criteria and the maximum predicted concentration was <50% of the allowable
concentration: NA
• POTW Effluent Pollutant Scan Review: Three effluent pollutant scans were evaluated for
additional pollutants of concern.
o The following parameter(s) will receive a water quality -based effluent limit (WQBEL)
with monitoring, since as part of a limited data set, two samples exceeded the allowable
discharge concentration: NA
o The following parameter(s) will receive a monitor -only requirement, since as part of a
limited data set, one sample exceeded the allowable discharge concentration: NA
If applicable, attach a spreadsheet of the RPA results as well as a copy of the Dissolved Metals
Implementation Fact Sheet for freshwater/saltwater to this Fact Sheet. Include a printout of the RPA
Dissolved to Total Metal Calculator sheet if this is a Municipality with a Pretreatment Program.
Toxicity Testing Limitations
Permit limits and monitoring requirements for Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) have been established in
accordance with Division guidance (per WET Memo, 8/2/1999). Per WET guidance, all NPDES permits
issued to Major facilities or any facility discharging "complex" wastewater (contains anything other than
domestic waste) will contain appropriate WET limits and monitoring requirements, with several
exceptions. The State has received prior EPA approval to use an Alternative WET Test Procedure in
NPDES permits, using single concentration screening tests, with multiple dilution follow-up upon a test
failure.
Describe proposed toxicity test requirement: NA
Mercury Statewide TMDL Evaluation
There is a statewide TMDL for mercury approved by EPA in 2012. The TMDL target was to comply
with EPA's mercury fish tissue criteria (0.3 mg/kg) for human health protection. The TMDL established a
wasteload allocation for point sources of 37 kg/year (81 lb/year), and is applicable to municipals and
industrial facilities with known mercury discharges. Given the small contribution of mercury from point
sources (-2% of total load), the TMDL emphasizes mercury minimization plans (MMPs) for point source
control. Municipal facilities > 2 MGD and discharging quantifiable levels of mercury (>1 ng/1) will
receive an MMP requirement. Industrials are evaluated on a case -by -case basis, depending if mercury is a
pollutant of concern. Effluent limits may also be added if annual average effluent concentrations exceed
the WQBEL value (based on the NC WQS of 12 ng/1) and/or if any individual value exceeds a TBEL
value of 47 ng/1
Page 5 of 9

DocuSign Envelope ID: AEA1ADC2-6DE6-4768-982A-D5CD1E309E1D
NA Table. Mercury Effluent Data Summary
# of Samples
Annual Average Conc. ng/L
Maximum Conc., ng/L
TBEL, ng/L
WQBEL, ng/L
Describe proposed permit actions based on mercury evaluation: NA
Other TMDL/Nutrient Management Strategy Considerations
If applicable, describe any other TMDLs/Nutrient Management Strategies and their implementation
within this permit: NA
Other WQBEL Considerations
If applicable, describe any other parameters of concern evaluated for WQBELs: NA
If applicable, describe any special actions (HQW or ORW) this receiving stream and classification shall
comply with in order to protect the designated waterbody: NA
If applicable, describe any compliance schedules proposed for this permit renewal in accordance with
15A NCAC 2H.0107(c) (2) (B), 40CFR 122.47, and EPA May 2007 Memo: NA
If applicable, describe any water quality standards variances proposed in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.3(e) and 15A NCAC 2B. 0226 for this permit renewal: NA
7. Technology -Based Effluent Limitations (TBELs)
Municipals (if not applicable, delete and skip to Industrials)
Are concentration limits in the permit at least as stringent as secondary treatment requirements (30 mg/l
BOD5/TSS for Monthly Average, and 45 mg/l for BOD5/TSS for Weekly Average). NA
If NO, provide a justification for alternative limitations (e.g., waste stabilization pond). NA
Are 85% removal requirements for BOD5/TSS included in the permit? NA
If NO, provide a justification (e.g., waste stabilization pond). NA
Industrials (if not applicable, delete and skip to next Section) NA
Describe what this facility produces:
List the federal effluent limitations guideline (ELG) for this facility:
If the ELG is based on production or flow, document how the average production/flow value was
calculated:
Page 6 of 9

DocuSign Envelope ID: AEA1ADC2-6DE6-4768-982A-D5CD1E309E1D
For ELG limits, document the calculations used to develop TBEL limits:
Table. TBEL Development per NA
Pollutant
Daily Maximum
BPT/BAT
(lb/1000 lb)
Daily Maximum
Limit
(lb /d)
Monthly Average
BPT/BAT
(lb/1000 lb)
Monthly Average
Limit
(lb/d)
If any limits are based on best professional judgement (BPJ), describe development: NA
Document any TBELs that are more stringent than WQBELs: NA
Document any TBELs that are less stringent than previous permit: NA
8. Antidegradation Review (New/Expanding Discharge):
The objective of an anti -degradation review is to ensure that a new or increased pollutant loading will not
degrade water quality. Permitting actions for new or expanding discharges require an anti -degradation
review in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0201. Each applicant for a new/expanding NPDES permit
must document an effort to consider non -discharge alternatives per 15A NCAC 2H.0105 (c)(2). In all
cases, existing instream water uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing use is
maintained and protected.
If applicable, describe the results of the antidegradation review, including the Engineering Alternatives
Analysis (EAA) and any water quality modeling results: NA
9. Antibacksliding Review:
Sections 402(o)(2) and 303(d)(4) of the CWA and federal regulations at 40 CFR 122.44(1) prohibit
backsliding of effluent limitations in NPDES permits. These provisions require effluent limitations in a
reissued permit to be as stringent as those in the previous permit, with some exceptions where limitations
may be relaxed (e.g., based on new information, increases in production may warrant less stringent TBEL
limits, or WQBELs may be less stringent based on updated RPA or dilution).
Are any effluent limitations less stringent than previous permit (YES/NO): NO
If YES, confirm that antibacksliding provisions are not violated: NA
10. Monitoring Requirements
Monitoring frequencies for NPDES permitting are established in accordance with the following
regulations and guidance: 1) State Regulation for Surface Water Monitoring, 15A NCAC 2B.0500; 2)
NPDES Guidance, Monitoring Frequency for Toxic Substances (7/15/2010 Memo); 3) NPDES Guidance,
Reduced Monitoring Frequencies for Facilities with Superior Compliance (10/22/2012 Memo); 4) Best
Page 7 of 9

DocuSign Envelope ID: AEA1ADC2-6DE6-4768-982A-D5CD1E309E1D
Professional Judgement (BPJ). Per US EPA (Interim Guidance, 1996), monitoring requirements are not
considered effluent limitations under Section 402(o) of the Clean Water Act, and therefore anti -
backsliding prohibitions would not be triggered by reductions in monitoring frequencies.
For instream monitoring, refer to Section 4.
11. Electronic Reporting Requirements
The US EPA NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule was finalized on December 21, 2015. Effective
December 21, 2016, NPDES regulated facilities are required to submit Discharge Monitoring Reports
(DMRs) electronically. Effective December 21, 2020, NPDES regulated facilities will be required to
submit additional NPDES reports electronically. This permit contains the requirements for electronic
reporting, consistent with Federal requirements.
12.Summary of Proposed Permitting Actions:
A. Table. Current Permit Conditions and Proposed Changes NA
Parameter
Current Permit
Proposed Change
Basis for Condition/Change
NA
MGD — Million gallons per day, MA - Monthly Average, WA — Weekly Average, DM — Daily Max
B. Table. it Conditions and Proposed Changes NA
Parameter
Current Permit
Proposed Change
Basis for Condition/Change
Page 8 of 9

DocuSign Envelope ID: AEA1ADC2-6DE6-4768-982A-D5CD1E309E1D
N A
MGD — Million gallons per day, MA - Monthly Average, WA — Weekly Average, DM — Daily Max
13. Public Notice Schedule:
Permit to Public Notice: 4/6/21
Per 15A NCAC 2H .0109 & .0111, The Division will receive comments for a period of 30 days following
the publication date of the public notice. Any request for a public hearing shall be submitted to the
Director within the 30 days comment period indicating the interest of the party filing such request and the
reasons why a hearing is warranted.
14. Fact Sheet Addendum (if applicable):
Were there any changes made since the Draft Permit was public noticed (Yes/No): NO
If Yes, list changes and their basis below: NA
Page 9 of 9

DocuSign Envelope ID: AEA1ADC2-6DE6-4768-982A-D5CD1E309E1D
TREVCO
ENVIRONMENTAL * MAINTENANCE * CONSTRUCTION
2020 Howard Gap Road
Hendersonville, N.C. 28792
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
5/12/20
Permit Renewal Request 2020
Wren Thedford,
Please find enclosed a permit renewal package for Ridgeview Acres MI-IP (NPDES
permit # NC0060283). There have been no changes or modifications to this facility since
the issuance of the last permit. We respectfully request this permit to be renewed. We
also hope that you find this package in order.
If we may be of further assistance please do not hesitate to call or correspond.
Sincerely,
Trevor C. McMinn

DocuSign Envelope ID: AEA1ADC2-6DE6-4768-982A-D5CD1E309E1D
5/12/2020
Point Source Branch
Surface Water Protection Section
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: Delegation of Signature Authority
RidgeView Community
NPDES No. NC0060283
To Whom It May Concern:
By notice of this letter, I hereby delegate signatory authority to each of the following
individuals for all pennit applications, discharge monitoring reports, and other
information relating to the operations at Ridgeview Community as required by all
applicable federal, state, and local environmental agencies specifically with the
requirements for signatory authority as specified in 15A NCAC 2B.0506.
Name
Trevor McMinn
Title
0-RC
if you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at 828-274-
4111.
Sincerely,
3eorge Lvorosam
Ridgeview Community
Managing "Wernher
cc: Asheville Regional Office, Surface Water Protection Section
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit

DocuSign Envelope ID: AEA1ADC2-6DE6-4768-982A-D5CD1E309E1D
NPDES APPLICATION - FORM 1)
For privately -owned treatment systems treating 100% domestic wastewaters <1.0 MGD
Mail the complete application to:
N. C. DENR / Division of Water Resources / NPDES Program
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
NPDES Permit PC0060283
If you are completing this form in computer use the TAB key or the up - down arrows to move from one
field to the next. To check the boxes, click your mouse on top of the box. Qtner wise, please print or type.
1. Contact Information:
Owner Name
Facility Name
Mailing Address
City
State / Zip Code
Telephone Nirmber
Fax Number
e-mail Address
George Morosani
Ridgeview Community WWTP
932 Hendersonville Road., Suite 201
Asheville
NC / 28803
[phone]
gw.stjrn a 7ao1. com
2. Location of facility producing discharge:
Check here if same address as above ❑
Street Address or State Road Dryman. Mountain Road and Impala Trail
City
State / Zip Code
County
Asheville near Emma
NC / 28806
Buncombe
3. Operator Information:
Name of the firm, public organization or other entity that operatps the facility. (Note that this is not
referring to the Operator in Responsible Charge or ORC)
Name
Mailing Address
City
State / Zip Code
Telephone Number
Fax Number
e-mail Address
George Morosani
932 Hendersonville Road, Suite 201
Asheville
NC / 28803
[phone]
(SW 99-Ljift
g [e-mail]
1 of 3 Form-D 912013

DocuSign Envelope ID: AEA1ADC2-6DE6-4768-982A-D5CD1E309E1D
NPDES APPLICATION - FORM D
Por privately -owned treatment systems treating 100% domestic wastewaters <1.0 MGD
4. Description of wastewater:
Facility Generating Wastewater/check all that apply):
Industrial ❑ Number of Employees
Commercial ❑ Number of Employees
Residential X Number of Mobile Homes -5-4--
School ❑ Number of Students/Staff
Other ❑ Explain:
Describe the source(s) of wastewater (example: subdivision, mobile home park, shopping centers,
restaurants, etc.):
Mobile Home Park
Number of persons served: 54
5. Type of collection system
X Separate (sanitary sewer only) ❑ Combined (storm sewer and sanitary sewer)
6. Outfall Information:
Number of separate discharge points _ one only
Outfall Identification number(s) 001
Is the outfall equipped with a diffuser? ❑ Yes X No
7. Name of receiving stream(s) (NEW applicants: Provide a map showing the exact location of each
outfall):
Unnamed tributary of Smith Mill Creek
S. Frequency of Discharge: X Continuous
If intermittent:
Days per week discharge occurs:
❑ Intermittent
Duration:
9. Describe the treatment system
List all installed components, including capacities, provide design removal for BOD, TSS, nitrogen and
phosphorus. If the spnep provided is not sufficient, attach the description of the treatment system in a
separate sheet of paper.
15 Separate septic tanks and subsurface sand filter systems one tank/filter for every two
naobatle homes spaces). A common collection line. A tablet chlorinator and de -chlorinator
with cascade reaeration at the outfall.
2 of 3 form-D 9013

DocuSign Envelope ID: AEA1ADC2-6DE6-4768-982A-D5CD1E309E1D
NPDES APPLICATION - FORM D
For privately -owned treatment systems treating 100% domestic wastewaters <1.0 IVIGD
10. Flow Information:
Treatment Plant Design flow 0.0078 MGD
Annual Average daily flow 0.002 ___MGD (for the previous 3 years)
Maximum daily flow 0.007 MGD (for the previous 3 years)
11. Is this facility located on Indian country?
❑Yes XNo
12. Effluent Data
NEW APPLICANTS: Provide data for the parameters listed. Fecal Coliform, Temperature and pH shall be grab
samples, for all other parameters 24-hour composite sampling shall be used If more than one analysis is reported,
report daily maximum and monthly average. If only one analysis is reported, report as day maximum.
RENEWAL APPLICANTS: Provide the highest single reading (Daaly Maximum) and Monthly Average over
the r, ast 36 martths for parameters currently ire your _permit. Mark other. parameters `N/A'
Monthly
Average
Parameter Daily
Maximum
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) 17
Fecal Coliform >600
42
Total Suspended Solids
10.6
Units of
Measurement
Mg/1
55 Colonies/ l00ml
Temperature (Suanmer)
Temperature (Winter)
pH
24.5
24
7.1
6.2 Mg/1
19.7 Degrees C
13.5 Degrees C
6.4
13. List all permits, construction approvals and/or applications:
Type Permit Number Type
Hazardous Waste (RCRA) NESHAPS (CAA)
UIC {SDWA) Ocean Dumping (MPRSA)
NPDES Dredge or fill (Section 404 or CWA)
PSD (CAA) Other
Non -attainment program (CAA)
14. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION
Permit Number
I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application and that to the
best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate.
Georzie Morosani Owner
Printed name of Person Signing
Title
51131(20
Date
North Carolina General Statute 143-2156 (b)(2) states: Any person who knowingly makes any false statement representation, or certification in any
application, record, report, plan, or other document files or required lo be maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management
Commission implementing that Article, or who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any recording or monitoring device or method
required to be operated or maintained under Article 21 or regulations of the Environmental Management Commission implementing that Article, shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed $25,000, or by imprisonment not to exceed six months, or by both. (la U.S.C. Section 1001
provides a punishment by a fine of not more than $25,000 or imprisonment not more than 5 years, or both, for a similar offense.)
3 of 3
Form-D 912013

DocuSign Envelope ID: AEA1ADC2-6DE6-4768-982A-D5CD1E309E1D
TREVOO
2020 Howard Gap Road
Hendersonville, N.C. 28792
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Sludge Management Plan
General information:
Facility System Name: Ridgeview Acres Mobile Home Park
Responsible Entity: George Morosani
Person in Charge: George Morosani
Applicable Permit: NPDES # NC0060283
Description of treatment process:
The 0.0078 MGD wastewater treatment facility consists of 15 separate septic tanks and subsurface
sand filter systems (one tank / filter system for every two mobile home spaces). A collection line, a chlorine
contact chamber, chlorine and dechlor tablet feeders, and cascade aeration.
This facility is located at Ridgeview Acres MHP on Dryman Mountain Road near Emma in Buncombe
County.
Sludge management
Sludge removal is handled onsite by the Park Manager on an as needed basis by a local pump truck
contractor. All associated costs of this hauling will be paid by George Morosani. Removal and management
of this sludge will be done in a timely manner and in the best interests of facility operation and the
environment. This facility dries up in dry weather and flows in the wettest months.
George Morosani L
X Date: 5J 13j),

DocuSign Envelope ID: AEA1ADC2-6DE6-4768-982A-D5CD 1 E309E 1D
CITIZ
Public Notice
North Carolina Environmental Manage-
ment Commission/NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 1617
Notice of Intent to Issue a NPDES Waste-
water Permit NC0069957 Laurelwood Mo-
bile Home Park, NC0060283 Ridgeview
Acres MHP The North Carolina Environ-
mental Management Commission propos-
es to issue a NPDES wastewater discharge
permit to the person(s) listed below.
Written comments regarding the pro-
posed permit will be accepted until 30
days after the publish date of this notice.
The Director of the NC Division of Water
Resources (DWR) may hold a public hear-
ing should there be a significant degree
of public interest. Please mail comments
and/or information requests to DWR at
the above address. Interested persons may
visit the DWR at 512 N. Salisbury Street,
Raleigh, NC 27604 to review information
on fife. Additional information on NPDES
permits and this notice may be found on
our website: httpJ/deq.nc.govlabout/divisi
on s/wa ter-resou roes/water-resources-
permits/wastewater-branch/npdes-
wastewater/ppublic-notices,or by calling
[phone]. Lonnie Hensley (47 May-
fair Dr, Candler, NC 28715) requested re-
newal of NPDES permit NC0069957 for the
Laurelwood MHP WWTP in Haywood
County. This facility discharges to Beaver -
dam Creek in the French Broad River Ba-
sin. Currently, no parameters are water -
quality limited. This discharge mayaffect
future wasteload allocations to this por-
tion of the receiving stream. Parks Banks
requests to renew permit NC0060283 for
Ridgeview Acres MHP Buncombe County,
discharging treated domestic wastewater
to a UT of Smith Mill Creek, French Broad
River Basin. The parameters Fecal
Coliform, Dissolved Oxygen and Total Re-
sidual Chlorine (TRC) are water -quality
limited. This discharge may affect future
wasteload allocations to the receiving
stream.
April 8, 2021
04678689
04678689
]\-TIMES
PARTOFTHE USA TODAY NETWORK
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
BUNCOMBE COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
Before the undersigned,a Notary Public, duly commissioned, qualified and
authorized by law to administer oaths, personally appeared said legal clerk,
who, being first duly sworn, deposes and says: that he/she is the Legal
Clerk of The Asheville Citizen -Times, engaged in publication of a
newspaper known as The Asheville Citizen -Times, published, issued, and
entered as first class mail in the City of Asheville, in Buncombe County and
State of North Carolina; that he/she is authorized to make this affidavit and
sworn statement; that the notice or other legal advertisement, a true copy of
which is attached here to, was published in The Asheville Citizen -Times on
the following date(s) 04/08/21. And that the said newspaper in which
said notice, paper, document or legal advertisement was published was, at
the time of each and every publication, a newspaper meeting all of the
requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597 of the General Statues of
North Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the meaning of
Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North Carolina.
Signed this 8th of April, 2021 ,
gigt/-
Legal Clerk
Sworn to and subscribed before the 8th of April, 2021
Notary Public of State of Wisconsin, County of Brown
My Commission expires.
[phone] I [phone] FAX
14 O. HENRY AVE. I P.O. BOX 2090 I ASHEVILLE, NC 28802 I [phone]
KATHLEEN ALLEN
Notary Public
State of Wisconsin