20201819 Ver 2_17BP.9.R.79 supporting documents_20210820

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER J. ERIC BOYETTE
GOVERNOR SECRETARY

Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 9
375 SILAS CREEK PARKWAY
WINSTON SALEM, NC 27127
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968

Website: ncdot.gov
Location:
375 SILAS CREEK PARKWAY
WINSTON-SALEM, NC 27127

20 August 2021

Andrew Williams
Regulatory Project Manager
Regulatory Division Office
US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587

SUBJECT: Pre-Construction Notification Pursuant to General Permit No. 50
Replacement of Bridge No. 230 on SR 2250 (Becks Church Road) over Pounder Fork
Creek (Class WSV; B) in Davidson County.
WBS Number: 17BP.9.R.79

Dear Mr. Williams:
We are requesting a Section 404 General Permit N. 50 from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for
the replacement of Bridge No. 230 with a new bridge. The existing bridge is a single span 41’6” bridge and
is being replaced with a 70’ single -span (24” cored-slab) structure. The bridge will be replaced on its
existing alignment, and traffic will be detoured offsite during the construction period.
The project will temporarily impact 0.020 acres of wetlands and 8 liner feet of stream. It will permanently
impact 0.40 acres of wetland and 384 linear feet of streams. The streams to be impacted include Pounder
Fork Creek and a UT to Pounder Fork Creek. The wetlands to be impacted to wetlands named WC, WE
and WF in the attached jurisdictional determination.
Protected Species
The USFWS lists Schweinitz’s sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii) as endangered for Davidson County.
Suitable habitat (e.g., dry, clayey, early successional roadsides and utility rights-of-way) for Schweinitz’s
sunflower is present within the project area. The project was originally surveyed for Schweinitz’s
sunflower (Heilanthus schweinitzii) on October 10, 2017, and none were found. The project was
resurveyed by Amy Euliss, Division 9 PDEA Engineer on August 19, 2021, and none were found.
Additionally, a review of the August 2021 NCNHP database indicates no known Schweinitz’s sunflower
occurrences within 1.0 mile of the study area. Since habitat was present but no sunflowers were found
and there are no known populations within one mile of the project area, we determined that the
project would have ‘no effect’ on Schweinitz’s sunflower.

The USFWS also lists the northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) (NLEB) as threatened for Stokes
County. The NCDOT determined the project “May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect” the NLEB.
Habitat for the NLEB is present within the study area, this habitat consists of forested areas throughout the
study area. However, NCDOT will not be cutting any tress during this project.
The USACE has developed a Standard Local Operating Procedure for Endangered Species (SLOPES) to
address NLEB when they are the lead agency, which NCDOT will follow for this project. NCDOT has
determined that the proposed action does not require separate consultation on the grounds that the proposed
action is consistent with the final Section 4(d) rule, codified at 50 C.F.R. § 17.40(o) and effective February
16, 2016. Section 7 responsibilities are therefore considered fulfilled.
Bald eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Habitat for the bald eagle
primarily consists of mature forest in proximity to large bodies of open water for foraging. Large dominant
trees are utilized for nesting sites, typically within 1.0 mile of open water. A desktop-GIS assessment of the
project study area, as well as the area within a 1.0-mile radius of the project limits, was performed. No
water bodies large enough or sufficiently open to be considered potential feeding sources were identified.
Since there was no foraging habitat within the review area, a survey of the project study area and the area
within 660 feet of the project limits was not conducted. Additionally, a review of the August 2021 NCNHP
database revealed no known occurrences of this species within 1.0 mile of the project study area. Due to the
lack of individuals, nests, or known occurrences within 1.0 mile, it has been determined that this project
will not impact this species.
Cultural/Historic Resources
The project was submitted to NCDOT Cultural Resource in compliance with the 2020 Section 106
Programmatic Agreement. ‘No Survey Required’ forms were obtained for both Archeology and Historic
Architecture. Therefore we concluded that the project would have no effect on theses resources.
Additionally, we submitted the project for input to the Catawba Indian Nation. They had no concerns in the
project area.
In addition to the PCN form, the following documentation, supporting the natural and cultural resources
related to the site, are included with the submittal:
• Permit Drawings and Stormwater Management Plan
• Schweinitz’s sunflower survey memo
• DMS Acceptance letter
• Cultural/Historic Resources:
∗ Historic Architecture and Archeology “No survey required forms”
∗ Tribal coordination with the Catawba Indian Nation

If you have any questions, comments or need additional information after reviewing this material please
contact me at [phone]. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,

Amy Euliss
NCDOT Division 9 PDEA Engineer

Permit Drawings and Stormwater Management Plan
(Version 2.08; Released April 2018)SF-280230TIP No.:17.BP.9.R.79County(ies):Davidson Page 1 of 1TIP Number:Date:Phone:Phone:Email:Email:County(ies):CAMA County?Design/Future:Year:2041Existing:Year:Aquatic T&E Species?Comments:YesNoNoN/ADeck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the General Project Narrative)(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)ac.(Approach) 18' paved width (2-9' lanes) with 6' unpaved sloped shoulders(Bridge) 2-9' lanes (25.167 Ft curb-to-curb) with 3.5 ft [e-mail] Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer?NRTR Stream ID:Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):Existing SiteProject Length (lin. miles or feet): ac.Surface Water Body (1): Water Supply V (WS-V) NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water BodyBuffer Rules in Effect:None3480(Approach) 2-12' lanes with 8' shoulders(Bridge) 2-12' lanes with 7'11" shouldersWaterbody Information2021NCDWR Stream Index No.:SF-280230Impairments:Other Stream Classification: Primary Classification: Project Built-Upon Area (ac.)Class BThe existing single-span 41'6" bridge is being replaced with a proposed 70' single-span (24" cored-slab) structure. The bridge will be super-elevated at 3%, with 12' travel lanes and 7'11" shoulders, 39'10" clear width and 42' oTO width. Existing drainage patterns are being maintained. Runoff is being discharged as far from the stream as practicable. No deck drains are used and a single bridge approach drop inlet is provided at the northwest corner of the proposed bridge which discharges into a riprap lined roadside ditch.2801 Yorkmont RoadNorth Carolina Department of TransportationHighway Stormwater Program STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR NCDOT PROJECTSProject Type:NCDOT Highway Division 9Address:General Project Information17.BP.9.R.79WBS Element:Bridge ReplacementWBS Element:Wood Environment & InfrastructureNCDOT Contact:336-747-7800Suite 100Charlotte, NC 28208Contractor / Designer:[e-mail]-Salem, NC 27127Address:2/11/2020DavidsonLexingtonDaniel Dagenhart375 Silas Creek ParkwayRiver Basin(s): City/Town:0.4Typical Cross Section Description: Surrounding Land Use: General Project Narrative:(Description of Minimization of Water Quality Impacts)NoForest & rural farmlandPounder Fork Creek12-1201.2800 ft.Project DescriptionProposed ProjectYadkin-Pee DeeNoneSupplemental Classification: NoneWetlands within Project Limits?
Creek
.20
VICINITY MAP
OFF SITE DETOUR ROUTE N.T.S.
LOCATION
PROJECT SITE
-L- Sta. 10+00.00
BEGIN PROJECT 17BP.9.R.79
DANIEL R. DAGENHART
CHRISTOPHER H. LEE, PE

25 50 10050
25 50 10050
2.5 5 10 5
D
T
V

%
%
MPH

% *
DUAL

* TTST =

DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
K
0
0
0
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)

PROJECT LENGTH
RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
LETTING DATE:
STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
STATE PROJ. NO.F. A. PROJ. NO.DESCRIPTION
NO.
TOTAL
SHEETS
N.C.
SHEET
1
DESIGN DATA
SIGNATURE:
SIGNATURE:
P.E.
P.E.
2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
PROJECT ENGINEER
GRAPHIC SCALES PLANS
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
ENGINEER
ROADWAY DESIGN
LOCATION:
TYPE OF WORK:09/08/99DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
0
00
$$$$$$SYSTIME$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$DGN$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$USERNAME$$$$CONTRACT:17BP.9.R.79 ARTMEN
N ASO
H
DEPT
O
F TRA SPORTTIONTATEOFNRTCAR
O
LI
NASee Sheet 1A For Index of Sheets
NC ENG F-1253
DURHAM, NC 27703
4021 STIRRUP CREEK DRIVE
PLANS PREPARED BY:PLANS PREPARED FOR:
DIVISION 9
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WINSTON SALEM, NC 27127
375 SILAS CREEK PARKWAY
DIV 9 BRIDGE PROGRAM MANAGER
NCDOT CONTACT
17BP.9.R.79
DAVIDSON COUNTY
GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVING & STRUCTURE
17BP.9.R.79 P.E.
4
ADT 2021
ADT 2041
= 50
FUNC CLASS = COLLECTOR
TOTAL LENGTH OF PROJECT 17BP.9.R.79 = 0.152 mi
LENGTH STRUCTURE PROJECT 17BP.9.R.79 = 0.014 mi
LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT 17BP.9.R.79 = 0.138 mi
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE NO. 230 ON SR 2250
(BECKS CHURCH RD) OVER POUNDER FORK CREEK
= 7
= 96
= 84
REGIONAL TIERNC 47NC 8I-
8
5
BECKS CHURCH ROAD
65% RIGHT OF WAY PLANSAUGUST 17, 2021
17BP.9.R.79 R/W
NOVEMBER 19, 2019PROJECT:= 3,480
= 6,380
TO HWY 47
-L- POT Sta. 13+79.88
BEGIN BRIDGE
POUNDER FORK CREEK-L- POT Sta. 14+52.13
END BRIDGE
TO OLD HYW 64
-L- Sta. 18+00.00
END PROJECT 17BP.9.R.79
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
17BP.9.R.79 CONST.
(BECK
'S CHURCH RD.)
-L- SR 2250
-L- Sta. 19+07.00
END CONSTRUCTIONNAD 83/NA 2011
TO OLD HWY 64
TO HWY 47
TYPE-III
TYPE-III
TYPE-III
GREU TL-3
TYPE-III
GREU TL-3
GREU TL-3
GREU TL-3
-L- STA. 14+63.01 TO 14+68.01 LT.
SHOULDER BERM GUTTER
NOTE: PAVED SHOULDER TAPERS ARE 8:1.
-L- POT STA. 10+00.00
BEGIN PROJECT
-L- POT STA. 18+00.00
END PROJECT
-L- POT STA. 19+07.00
END CONSTRUCTION
GV
GV
18" DIP
BECK'S CHURCH ROAD (SR 2250)
N 20°09'31" E
162.82'S 61°15'31" W
175.00'
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
S
S
72" CHL
48"WW 1SBW
MTLS
7
2°
3
6'
3
1" W2
1
3.
0
0'
TO OLD HWY 64
280230-2
280230-1
S 61°05'29" E335.46'N
7
7°13'2
9" W12
0.5
4'
N
7
7°0
8'2
9" W3
4
0.8
6'50.00'
DB 1760 PG 1474
WOODS WOODS
RR SPIKE IN 18" BIRCH
ELEV.=625.99'
BL STA 10+67 49RT
N 733891 E 1636760
BM2
STEPHEN DOYLE
DB 1008 PG 99
WOODS
PUMP STATION
DB 1829, PG 801-808
DAVIDSON COUNTY
EASEMENT
PUMP STATION
2
1
WOODS
SSMH
INV=608.17'
INV=608.21'
RIM=630.27'
REBECCA SCARFF
DB 445 PG 399
3
WOODS
WOODS
RR SPIKE IN 24" OAK
ELEV.=636.11'
BL STA 12+62 69LT
N 733680 E 1636686
BM1
WOODS
POUNDER FORK CREEKCHURCH
BECK'S REFORMED
DB 1760 PG 1474
1
CHURCH
BECK'S REFORMED
DB 1794, PG 769
SEWER EASEMENT
30' DAVIDSON COUNTY
EIP APPROXIMATE LOCATION( Not to Scale)
2:1
D
d
DETAIL 1
Ground
Natural
Geotextile
Type of Liner= Class 'I' Rip-Rap
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
Max. d=1 Ft.
Min. D=1 Ft.
( Not to Scale)
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
2:1D
B
d
DETAIL 2
Ground
Natural
Slope
Fill
GEOTEXTILE
2:1 or Flatter
B=2.0 Ft.
Max. d=1.0 Ft.
Min. D=1.0 Ft.
Type of Liner= Class 'I' Rip-Rap
( Not to Scale)
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
2:1D
B
DETAIL 3
Ground
Natural
Slope
Fill
GEOTEXTILE
2:1 or Flatter
2:
1 OR FLATTER2' BASE DITCH (SEE DETAIL 3)
V DITCH (SEE DETAIL 1)
2' BASE DITCH (SEE DETAIL 2)
24" PIPE
0401
0402
d
B=2.0 Ft.
Min. D=1.0 Ft.
Max. d=1.0 Ft.
134 SY GEOTEXTILE
-L- STA. 15+50 LT TO STA. 17+50 LT
80 SY GEOTEXTILE
82 TN CLASS "I" RIP RAP
-L- STA. 14+30 LT TO STA. 15+50 LT
5 SY GEOTEXTILE
3 TN CLASS I RIPRAP AND
TIE TO EXISTING SWALE
WITHIN BRIDGE LIMITS
FILL IN EXISTING DITCH
148 SY GEOTEXTILE
150 TN CLASS "I" RIP RAP
-L- STA. 10+00 RT TO STA. 12+65 RT
( Not to Scale)
RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT
DETAIL 5
Grade
Ditch
2'
GEOTEXTILE
10'min.
1.0'min.
(Variable)
Channel Bed
REMOVE 18" DIP
AND GEOTEXTILE
CLASS II RIPRAP
AND GEOTEXTILE
CLASS II RIPRAP
STABLE CONDITION
SWALE, EARTHEN BOTTOM,
EXISTING GRASS-LINED
STA. 13+83 TO 13+99, STA. 14+29 TO 14+50
ROADSIDE DITCH
TIE TO EXISTING
Geotextile= 44 sy
Type of Liner= 40 TONS,CL II Rip-Rap
7 SY GEO
3 TONS CL "I" RIP RAP
15"
TB 2GI
SITE 1 SITE 2
SITE 6
SITE 4
SITE 3
SITE 5
4 17BP.9.R.79

NC ENG F-1253
DURHAM, NC 27703
4021 STIRRUP CREEK DRIVE
NAD 83/NA 2011
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.

DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
SHEET 2 OF 4
PERMIT DRAWING
TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
E E IN WETLAND
DENOTES EXCAVATION
HC HC
CLEARING
DENOTES HAND
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
ROADWAY / BRIDGE
RELATIONSHIP SKETCH
BERM GUTTER
SHOULDER
STA. 14+52.13
END BRIDGE
STA. 14+63.01
END APPROACH SLAB
STA. 13+69.01
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
STA. 13+79.88
BEGIN BRIDGE
0 3020100TYPE-III TYPE-III
TYPE-IIITYPE-III GREU TL-3
GREU TL-3
12'12'CLR RDWY39'-10"42'7'-11"
7'-11"
1'-1"
1'-1"0 30 3-L- PT Sta. 13+49.08
-L-
( Not to Scale)
Geotextile
Elevation
Natural Bed
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
DETAIL 4
1'
Length= 2 Ft.
PIPE OUTLET DITCH STABILIZATION
STA. 14+67 LT.

3 SY GEOTEXTILE
Type of Liner= 2 TONS CL I Rip-Rap - Keyed-In
FFF
F
F
FF
F
C
FF
FFF
F
F
C
C
C
C
F F
F
C
C C C C
C
F
TO OLD HWY 64
TO HWY 47
TYPE-III
TYPE-III
TYPE-III
GREU TL-3
TYPE-III
GREU TL-3
GREU TL-3
GREU TL-3
-L- STA. 14+63.01 TO 14+68.01 LT.
SHOULDER BERM GUTTER
NOTE: PAVED SHOULDER TAPERS ARE 8:1.
-L- POT STA. 10+00.00
BEGIN PROJECT
-L- POT STA. 18+00.00
END PROJECT
-L- POT STA. 19+07.00
END CONSTRUCTION
GV
GV
18" DIP
BECK'S CHURCH ROAD (SR 2250)
N 20°09'31" E
162.82'S 61°15'31" W
175.00'
EXISTING R/W
EXISTING R/W
S
S
72" CHL
48"WW 1SBW
MTLS
7
2°
3
6'
3
1" W2
1
3.
0
0'
TO OLD HWY 64
280230-2
280230-1
S 61°05'29" E335.46'N
7
7°13'2
9" W12
0.5
4'
N
7
7°0
8'2
9" W3
4
0.8
6'50.00'
DB 1760 PG 1474
WOODS WOODS
RR SPIKE IN 18" BIRCH
ELEV.=625.99'
BL STA 10+67 49RT
N 733891 E 1636760
BM2
STEPHEN DOYLE
DB 1008 PG 99
WOODS
PUMP STATION
DB 1829, PG 801-808
DAVIDSON COUNTY
EASEMENT
PUMP STATION
2
1
WOODS
SSMH
INV=608.17'
INV=608.21'
RIM=630.27'
REBECCA SCARFF
DB 445 PG 399
3
WOODS
WOODS
RR SPIKE IN 24" OAK
ELEV.=636.11'
BL STA 12+62 69LT
N 733680 E 1636686
BM1
WOODS
POUNDER FORK CREEKCHURCH
BECK'S REFORMED
DB 1760 PG 1474
1
CHURCH
BECK'S REFORMED
DB 1794, PG 769
SEWER EASEMENT
30' DAVIDSON COUNTY
EIP APPROXIMATE LOCATION( Not to Scale)
2:1
D
d
DETAIL 1
Ground
Natural
Geotextile
Type of Liner= Class 'I' Rip-Rap
STANDARD 'V' DITCH
Max. d=1 Ft.
Min. D=1 Ft.
( Not to Scale)
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
2:1D
B
d
DETAIL 2
Ground
Natural
Slope
Fill
GEOTEXTILE
2:1 or Flatter
B=2.0 Ft.
Max. d=1.0 Ft.
Min. D=1.0 Ft.
Type of Liner= Class 'I' Rip-Rap
( Not to Scale)
SPECIAL LATERAL BASE DITCH
2:1D
B
DETAIL 3
Ground
Natural
Slope
Fill
GEOTEXTILE
2:1 or Flatter
2:
1 OR FLATTER2' BASE DITCH (SEE DETAIL 3)
V DITCH (SEE DETAIL 1)
2' BASE DITCH (SEE DETAIL 2)
24" PIPE
0401
0402
d
B=2.0 Ft.
Min. D=1.0 Ft.
Max. d=1.0 Ft.
134 SY GEOTEXTILE
-L- STA. 15+50 LT TO STA. 17+50 LT
80 SY GEOTEXTILE
82 TN CLASS "I" RIP RAP
-L- STA. 14+30 LT TO STA. 15+50 LT
5 SY GEOTEXTILE
3 TN CLASS I RIPRAP AND
TIE TO EXISTING SWALE
WITHIN BRIDGE LIMITS
FILL IN EXISTING DITCH
148 SY GEOTEXTILE
150 TN CLASS "I" RIP RAP
-L- STA. 10+00 RT TO STA. 12+65 RT
( Not to Scale)
RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT
DETAIL 5
Grade
Ditch
2'
GEOTEXTILE
10'min.
1.0'min.
(Variable)
Channel Bed
REMOVE 18" DIP
AND GEOTEXTILE
CLASS II RIPRAP
AND GEOTEXTILE
CLASS II RIPRAP
STABLE CONDITION
SWALE, EARTHEN BOTTOM,
EXISTING GRASS-LINED
STA. 13+83 TO 13+99, STA. 14+29 TO 14+50
ROADSIDE DITCH
TIE TO EXISTING
Geotextile= 44 sy
Type of Liner= 40 TONS,CL II Rip-Rap
7 SY GEO
3 TONS CL "I" RIP RAP
15"
TB 2GI
619619
620620620620620621621621621
621
621622 622622622623623623623623624624624624624625625625625625625625625625
625625626626626626
626626626626627627627 627627627627627
627627628628628 628
628628
628629629 629
629629
629630630630630
630
630
630630630630630630
630
630 630630630631631
6
3
1 631631631631
6
3
1631632632
632632632632
632632632633633633
633633634
6346346
34635635
635635635
635
635636
636636
636
637
637637
638
638638
639
639639640
640
6406
4
0
640640
641
6
4
1
641641
642
6
4
2
642642643
6436
4
3
643644
64464
4
644645645
645
645645646
646646
647
6
4
7
648
649 650650650651652653
SITE 1 SITE 2
SITE 6
SITE 4
SITE 3
SITE 5
4 17BP.9.R.79

NC ENG F-1253
DURHAM, NC 27703
4021 STIRRUP CREEK DRIVE
NAD 83/NA 2011
DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
R/W SHEET NO.
SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.

DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
SHEET 3 OF 4
PERMIT DRAWING
TS TS
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
DENOTES TEMPORARY
E E IN WETLAND
DENOTES EXCAVATION
HC HC
CLEARING
DENOTES HAND
S S SURFACE WATER
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
ROADWAY / BRIDGE
RELATIONSHIP SKETCH
BERM GUTTER
SHOULDER
STA. 14+52.13
END BRIDGE
STA. 14+63.01
END APPROACH SLAB
STA. 13+69.01
BEGIN APPROACH SLAB
STA. 13+79.88
BEGIN BRIDGE
0 3020100TYPE-III TYPE-III
TYPE-IIITYPE-III GREU TL-3
GREU TL-3
12'12'CLR RDWY39'-10"42'7'-11"
7'-11"
1'-1"
1'-1"0 30 3-L- PT Sta. 13+49.08
-L-
( Not to Scale)
Geotextile
Elevation
Natural Bed
Ground
Natural
Ground
Natural
DETAIL 4
1'
Length= 2 Ft.
PIPE OUTLET DITCH STABILIZATION
STA. 14+67 LT.

3 SY GEOTEXTILE
Type of Liner= 2 TONS CL I Rip-Rap - Keyed-In
FFF
F
F
FF
F
C
FF
FFF
F
F
C
C
C
C
F F
F
C
C C C C
C
F
17BP.9.R.79
NC ENG F-1253
DURHAM, NC 27703
4021 STIRRUP CREEK DRIVE
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT SHEET 4 OF 4
PERMIT DRAWING5/14/99SHEET NO.PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
HYDRAULICSROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER ENGINEER
$$$$$$SYSTIME$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$DGN$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$USERNAME$$$$DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL
UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED
600
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00
610
620
630
640
650
660
670
680
600
610
620
630
640
PI = 12+75.00
EL = 631.21'(-)5.4218%
VC = 450'
K = 79 PI = 16+75.00
EL = 632.35'
(+)0.2849%
(+)0.7324%
VC = 150'
K = 335 ELEV. 632.90'STA. 17+50.00END GRADE-L-
RR SPIKE IN 12" OAK
ELEV. = 636.11'
BL STA. 12+62 69 LT
N 733680 E 1636686
BMI
STA. 14+52.13END BRIDGESTA. 13+79.88BEGIN BRIDGE(-) 4
.4
9
0
6%PI =15+50.000El = 626.00(+) 3.5000%
(+) 1.5528%PI =17+11.000El = 628.50PI =17+31.000El = 629.50(+) 5.0000%
(+) 4.2105%
DIRECTED BY ENGINEER
INCIDENTAL MILLING ASBY ENGINEER
DIRECTED
MILLING AS
INCIDENTAL
NWS = 622.8'
El = 641.00
PI =10+00.00
BEGIN DITCH
EL = 629.10
PI = 12+65.00
END DITCH
EL = 621.80
PI = 14+30.00
BEGIN DITCH
El = 630.30
PI =17+50.00
END DITCH
LEFT DITCH
RIGHT DITCH ELEV. = 631.82SAG -L- Sta. 14+77.53(+)0.2849%1.5:11.5:1ELEV. 643.41'STA. 10+50.00BEGIN GRADERR SPIKE IN 18" BIRCH
ELEV. = 625.99'
BL STA. 10+67 49 RT
N 733891 E 1636760
BM2
632.9
500
4,900
631.5
100
3,650
629.3
25
2,600
5/7/2019
622.8
DESIGN DISCHARGE
DESIGN FREQUENCY
BASE DISCHARGE
CFS
YRS
YRS
BASE FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING ELEVATION
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE CFS
CFS
YRS
FT
FT
FT
DESIGN HW ELEVATION
BASE HW ELEVATION
BRIDGE HYDRAULIC DATA
DATE OF SURVEY
W.S. ELEVATION
AT DATE OF SURVEY FT
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fill In Fill In in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No.(From/To)Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp.Design
(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ac)(ft)(ft)(ft)
1 12+80 - 13+15 6" WL 0.00 0.00 <0.01 <0.01 0.00
2 13+93 - 14+33 6" WL 0.00 <0.01 0.00 8.00 0.00
3 14+74 - 15+27 Overhead Power Lines 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.010
4 14+36 - 17+50 Drainage Ditch 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 0
5 14+13 Bank Stabilization 0.00 0.00 84 0.00 0.00
6 11+88 - 12+43 Fill Slope 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010
TOTALS*:0.00 0.00 <0.01 <0.01 0.02 0.00 <0.01 384.00 8.00 0.00
*Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
Revised 2018 Feb SHEET 6 OF 6
WETLAND AND SURACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARY
SURFACE WATER IMPACTSWETLAND IMPACTS
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
SF-280230
03/05/2021
DAVIDSON
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
17.BP.9.R.79

DMS Letter of Approval
April 28, 2021
Ms. Amy Euliss
NCDOT Division 9 Environmental Officer
North Carolina Department of Transportation
375 Silas Creek Parkway
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27127
Dear Ms. Euliss:
Subject: Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
Division 9, Replace Bridge 230 on SR 2250 (Becks Church Road), Davidson County,
WBS No 17BP.9.R.79
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) will provide
the stream mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information supplied by you on April 28, 2021, the
impacts are located in CU 03040103 of the Yadkin River basin in the Central Piedmont (CP) Eco-Region, and
are as follows:
Stream &
Wetlands
River
Basin
CU
Location
Eco-
Region
Stream Wetlands
Cold Cool Warm Riparian Non-
Riparian
Coastal
Marsh
Impacts Yadkin 03040103 CP 0 0 300.0 0 0 0 *Some of the impacts may be proposed to be mitigated at a 1:1 mitigation ratio. See permit application for details.
DMS commits to implementing sufficient compensatory stream mitigation credits to offset the
impacts associated with this project as determined by the regulatory agencies in accordance with the In-Lieu
Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation
acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from DMS.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth Harmon at 919-
707-8420.
Sincerely,
James B. Stanfill
DMS Asset Management Supervisor
Cc: Mr. Andy Williams, USACE – Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Mr. Monte Matthews, USACE – Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Ms. Amy Chapman, NC Division of Water Resources – Raleigh
File: R-5737 – Division 9

Cultural Resource Review Documentation
NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not
valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: na County: Davidson
WBS No: 17BP.9.R.79 Document: MCC
F.A. No: na Funding: State Federal
Federal Permit Required? Yes No Permit Type: NWP
Project Description: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Division 9 intends to
replace Bridge No. 230 on SR 2250, Becks Church Road, over Pounder Fork southeast of Lexington. No
preliminary designs were available at the time of the archaeological review. Based on the project
description, an area of potential effects (APE) measuring 528 feet (nearly 161 meters) long and 120 feet
(almost 37 meters) wide was established for the purposes of the archaeological review. Thus, the
proposed APE is estimated to encompass approximately 1.5 acres (slightly over .6 hectare).
SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW
Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions:
The initial review of the site maps and files archived at the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology
was conducted on June 12, 2017. No previously recorded archaeological resources are located within the
proposed APE. While no archaeological resources have been previously identified in the proposed APE,
two known archaeological sites are recorded within .5-mile of the project. Site 31DV680**, the Beck;’s
UCC Cemetery, is recorded roughly 860 feet southwest existing Bridge No 230. Site 31DV4, a lithic
scatter recorded by amateur archaeologists, was identified roughly 1800 feet west of the proposed project
on the broad Pounder Fork floodplain. An examination of the data presented on the North Carolina State
Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/) reveals the following
recorded historic property locations within .5-mile of the proposed project: the National Register-listed
Beck’s Reformed Church Cemetery (DV0502); and the possible former location of the Henry Hedrick
Conrad House (DV0018).
An examination of soils in Davidson County presented on the National Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey (http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx) indicates that the
following soil types fall within the delineated APE: Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently
flooded (ChA); and Pacolet sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes (PaD).
No further archaeological investigations are required for the project within the area established as the
current APE. Should the project change to include a larger footprint than covered by the current APE,
further consultation will be necessary. In the unlikely event that archaeological remains are encountered
during the bridge replacement, work should cease in that area and the NCDOT Archaeology Group
should be notified immediately.
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
1 of 3
Project Tracking No.:
17-05-0049
Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting
that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE:
As evidenced by the presence of 31DV4 along the Pounder Fork floodplain, the landforms surrounding
the proposed project likely retain the potential for archaeological deposits. But, the scale of the project is
relatively small and aerial photographs of the vicinity appear to show both some utilities placement
adjacent SR 2250 and some evidence of unusual drainage features on the Pounder Fork floodplain.
Interestingly, aerial photographs of the project area (as well as Google Street view imagery) show
relatively recent utilities facilities and perhaps a sewer-line (utilities pipeline?) immediately northeast of
the APE. The possibility that significant archaeological deposits could be located within this small APE
is considered to be reasonably low.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: Map(s) Previous Survey Info Photos Correspondence
Other: soil map
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST
NO ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED
June 15, 2017
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST Date
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
2 of 3
Project Tracking No.:
17-05-0049
Aerial photograph with 2-foot contours illustrating the location of the proposed APE (in orange) for the
replacement of Bridge No. 230 on SR 2250.
“No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY REQUIRED” form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2015 Programmatic Agreement.
3 of 3
Project Tracking No.:
17-05-0049
Soil Map—Davidson County, North Carolina
(Bridge No. 230 on SR 2250)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
6/14/2017
Page 1 of 339575503957570395759039576103957630395765039576703957690395771039575703957590395761039576303957650395767039576903957710570010570030570050570070570090570110570130570150570170570190570210570230570250
570010 570030 570050 570070 570090 570110 570130 570150 570170 570190 570210 570230 570250
35° 45' 39'' N 80° 13' 32'' W35° 45' 39'' N80° 13' 21'' W35° 45' 34'' N
80° 13' 32'' W35° 45' 34'' N
80° 13' 21'' WN
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 15 30 60 90
Meters
Map Scale: 1:1,160 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Davidson County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 17, Sep 19, 2016
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Feb 11, 2011—Mar 2,
2011
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Soil Map—Davidson County, North Carolina
(Bridge No. 230 on SR 2250)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
6/14/2017
Page 2 of 3
Map Unit Legend
Davidson County, North Carolina (NC057)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
ChA Chewacla loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, frequently flooded
1.0 66.8%
PaD Pacolet sandy loam, 8 to 15
percent slopes
0.5 33.2%
Totals for Area of Interest 1.5 100.0%
Soil Map—Davidson County, North Carolina Bridge No. 230 on SR 2250
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
6/14/2017
Page 3 of 3

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER J. ERIC BOYETTE
GOVERNOR SECRETARY

Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 9
375 SILAS CREEK PARKWAY
WINSTON SALEM, NC 27127
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968

Website: ncdot.gov
Location:
375 SILAS CREEK PARKWAY
WINSTON-SALEM, NC 27127

March 26, 2020

Dr. Wenonah Haire
Catawba Indian Nation
Tribal Historic Preservation Office
1536 Tom Steven Road
Rock Hill, SC 29730

Dear Dr. Haire,

The North Carolina Department of Transportation is starting the project development, environmental, and
engineering studies for the replacement of Bridge Nos. 230 on SR 2250 (Becks Church Road) Pounder
Fork Creek in Davidson County as project 17BP.9.R.79. The US Army Corps of Engineers is the lead
federal agency for compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and a Permit is anticipated under the Section 404 Process with
the USACE. The project vicinity map is attached. The coordinates of this project are approximately
35.760180, -80.224175.

We would appreciate any information you might have that would be helpful in evaluating potential
environmental impacts of the project including recommendation of alternates to be studied. Your comments
may be used in the preparation of a NEPA/ State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Environmental
Document.

In accordance with Section 106 of the NHPA, we also request that you inform us of any historic properties
of traditional religious or cultural importance that you are aware of that may be affected by the proposed
project. Be assured that, in accordance with confidentiality and disclosure stipulations in Section 304 of the
NHPA, we will maintain strict confidentiality about certain types of information regarding historic
properties.

Please respond by May 15, 2020 so that your comments can be used in the scoping of this project. If you
have any questions concerning this project, or would like any additional information, please contact me at
[e-mail] or [phone].

Thank you,

Amy Euliss
NCDOT Division 9 Environmental Officer

cc: Matt Wilkerson, NCDOT Archaeology Team Leader
Nicholle Braspennickx, USACE Project Manager
Daniel Dagenhart, NCDOT Division 9 Bridge Program Manager
Christopher Lee, P.E., Wood.

April 21, 2020

Attention: Amy Euliss
NC Department of Transportation
375 Silas Creek Parkway
Winston-Salem, NC 27127

Re. THPO # Project # Project Description
2020-193-168 17BP.9.R.79 Replacement of Bridge Nos. 230 on SR 2250 Pounder Fork Creek

Dear Ms. Euliss,

The Catawba have no immediate concerns with regard to traditional cultural properties,
sacred sites or Native American archaeological sites within the boundaries of the
proposed project areas. However, the Catawba are to be notified if Native American
artifacts and / or human remains are located during the ground disturbance phase
of this project.

If you have questions please contact Caitlin Rogers at 803-328-2427 ext. 226, or e-mail
[e-mail].

Sincerely,
Wenonah G. Haire
Tribal Historic Preservation Officer

Catawba Indian Nation
Tribal Historic Preservation Office
1536 Tom Steven Road
Rock Hill, South Carolina 29730

Office 803-328-2427
Fax [phone]

Schweintiz’s Sunflower Review

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROY COOPER J. ERIC BOYETTE
GOVERNOR SECRETARY

Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION 9
375 SILAS CREEK PARKWAY
WINSTON-SALEM, NC 27127
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Customer Service: 1-877-368-4968

Website: www.ncdot.gov
Location:
375 SILAS CREEK PARKWAY
WINSTON-SALEM, NC 27127

August 19, 2021

MEMORANDUM TO: Replacement of Bridge No. 230 on SR 2250 (Becks Church
Road) Project File

FROM: Amy Euliss, NCDOT Division 9 PDEA Engineer

SUBJECT: Schweinitz’s Sunflower Memo for Replacement of Bridge No. 230
on SR 2250 (Becks Church Road) in Davidson County.
17.BP.9.R.79.

The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace bridge no.
230 on SR 2250 (Becks Church Road) in Davidson County. The project was originally
surveyed for Schweinitz’s sunflower (Heilanthus schweinitzii) on October 10, 2017, and
none were found. The project was resurveyed by Amy Euliss, Division 9 PDEA Engineer
on August 19, 2021, and none were found. Additionally, there are no known populations
within 1 mile of the project area. Since habitat was present but no sunflowers were found
and there are no known populations within one mile of the project area, we determined that
the project would have ‘no effect’ on Schweinitz’s sunflower.