20060331 Ver 1_Other Documents_20120402

ECS CAROLINAS, LLP "Setting the Standard for Service"
EOLLP
c^ft(0LLqum^s cvouteutif tical • Construction Materials • Environmental - FacilitieS NC RegiMerod En9ir1!X1rhg Film F-1078
A pl," ra 07A.4 n
A 12 , ev 14
Ms. Bonnie Renfro
Randolph County EDC
P.O. Box 2001
Asheboro, North Carolina 27204
Reference: Stream/Welland Verification Services Summary Letter
Approximate 126.67 Acre Tract
U.S. Highway 311
Sophia, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 09:15749A
Dear Ms. Renfro:
ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) la, pleased to provide you with this summary letter for the
Wrgafnfiwegarid vedlIcial"tion sep-14cas at the sfte kated on U.S. 14119l, y 311 in SWhla, North
Carolina. ECS delineated the wetlands on the site in March 2008 (ECS Project No. 09:15749A,
report dated March 26, 2008). ECS mturned to the site for vedftftn meetings wAh Mr, John
Thomas with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE} on May 13, 2008 and Ms. Sue
Homewood with the NCDENR Division of WSW Quality (DWQ) on May 20, 2005, The agew0a
concurred with our delineation and the results are included on the attached figure that was
generated immediately following the meetings (Figure 4A).
Mr. Thomas did not Issue a jurisdictional dellelirminatfon letter. Ms. Homewood lowed Pli
verification letter on June 9, 2008 (included as an attachmerit). Please note, the NCDENR
DWO regulations changed on August 1, 2009 requiring the DWO to require mitigation for
impacts to intermittent streams. Therefore, the reference to non-milligiable on the attached
figure Is no longer accurate. Howtiver, the USAGE deemed the intermittent streams as
rnmo*wa a+ a i•i "tin ThArpmro tha rAnulOnn chance will not Impact the results from the
previous verifications.
The verifications are limited to a period of five years from the verification date. It will be
necessary to have the site reverified after May 13, 2013.
4811 Koger Boulevard • Greensboro, NG 27407 • 7 336-856-7150 • F: 336-856-7160 www.e,,,Iimitod.com
ECS Carolinas. LLP • 7-CS Florida. LLC • ECS Mid-Atiantic, LLC • ECS Southeast. LLC F(,S Tuxa,-', LLP

Approximate 126.67Acre Tract — US. Highway 311
Sophim North Carolina
ECS Project 09-15749A
April Z 2012
ECS appreciates the opportunity to provide wetland services for your project. Please contact us
at [phone] if you have any questions concerning this report.
Sincerely,
EC$ CAROLINA LLF
Michael T. Brame, PWS
Environmental Principal
Attachments: Figure 4A — Stream/Wetland Verification Map
DWO Verification Letter

ECS CAROLINAS, LLP
Geotechnical a Construction Materials •Environmental
ELMLP
zJ
C^ROI-414^0
March 26, 2008
Ms. Bonnie Renfro
Randolph County EDC
P.O. Box 2001
Asheboro, North Carolina 27204
Reference: Report of Wetland Delineation
Approximate 126.67 Acre Tract
U.S. Highway 311
Sophia, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 09:15749A
Dear Ms. Renfro:
ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) is pleased to submit this report of the. jurisdictional waters/wetland delineation
for the site located on U.S. Highway 311 in Sophia, North Carolina. This report summarizes our findings
for the site.
Background
ECS was contracted to delineate jurisdictional waters including streams and wetlands on the above
referenced site. The site contains undeveloped, wooded land and fields. A storage yard for erosion
control fencing, styrofbam, metal and abandoned equipment is located on the northern portion of the site.
Wetlands are defined by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the United States Enviro =-ental
Protection Agency as "those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a
frequency and duration sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances, do support a prevalence of
vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions." In order for an area to be classified as
wetland, bydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology indicators must be present.
Literature Review
We have reviewed the 'USES Topographic Map, the Soil Survey of Randolph County and the Geologic
Map of North Carolina to obtain information regarding the site,
• The USGS Topographic Map (Figure 1) shows unnamed tributaries to Caraway Creek crossing the
central and southeastern comer of the site. The map shows additional drainage swales on the site that
could contain surface waters or wetlands.
The USDA Soil Survey of Randolph County (Figure 2) shows the same unnamed tributaries to
Caraway Creek crossing the site. Soils on the site are mapped as Georgeville silty clay loam
Georgeville silt loam and Wynott-Enon complex. The Georgeville series consists of well drained,
moderately permeable soils that occur on broad ridges and hill slopes. The Wynott series consists of
4811 Koger Boulevard - Greensboro, NC 27407 - [phone] - Fax [phone]

Approximate 126.67 Acre 'Tract— US. Highway 311
Sophia, North Carolina
ECS Project 09- 15749A
March 26, 2408
well drained, moderately slowly to slowly permeable soils that occur on ridges and hill slopes. The
soils on the site are not identified on the Hydric Soils List for Randolph County.
The Geologic Map of North Carolina indicates that the site is located in the Carolina date Belt of the
Piedmont Physiogra hic Province. The soils encountered in this area are the residual product of in
place chemical weathering of rock presently underlying the site. In general, shallow unconfined
groundwater movement within the overlying soils is controlled largely by topographic gradients.
Recharge occurs primarily by infiltration along higher elevations and typically discharges into
streams or other surface water bodies. The elevation of the shallow water table is transient and can
vary greatly with seasonal fluctuations in precipitation. Movement in this water table is generally
from higher to lower elevations. As such, shallow groundwater would be expected to flow beneath the
site toward the unnamed tributaries to Caraway Greek.
Site Reconnaissance
ECS personnel conducted the site reconnaissance on March 24, 2008, The site contains undeveloped,
wooded land and fields. A storage yard for erosion control fencing, styrofoam, metal and abandoned
equipment is located on the northern portion of the site. During our reconnaissance, we observed the site
for evidence of ponds, streams and wetlands. No ponds are bated on the site. Several streams cross the
site. Some of the streams have meanders, defined beds and banks and contained flowing water at the time
of our reconnaissance, Fish, crayfish and salamanders were observed in these streams. Based on our
observations, these streams are perennial. Other streams contained small amounts of flowing water in
areas, stagnant water in the deeper pools in areas and in some areas of the streams were dry. The streams
have ordinary high water marks. Based on our observations, it is our opinion that these streams are
intermittent. ECS marked centerlines of the streams using blue and white striped flagging.
Wetland vegetation, wetland hydrology indicators (including inundation and saturated soils) and hyd?c
soils (low chroma color) were observed in pockets adjacent to the streams. The wetland packets are
separated from surrounding uplands by distinct topographic breaks, soil breaks and vegetation breaks.
Soils outside the wetland areas are bright and appear to be well drained. The wetland boundaries were
marked in the field using red and white striped flagging. Routine wetland determination data forms
supporting our opinion are included as attachments.
Figure 3 shows the approximate location of the streams and wetlands, including our designations. Our
designations are subject to change during subsequent U.S. Army Corps of Engineer and North Carolina
Division of Water Quality verifications. Figure 3 is based on our field notes and should only be used for
preliminary planning purposes. A survey of the flags will show the exact locations and extent of the
streams and wetlands.
General Discussion
Section 404 of the Glean Water Act regulates the discharge of dredge and fill materials into waters of the
United States (lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, etc.), including wetlands. Waters of the United States include
the territorial seas, navigable coastal and inland lakes, rivers and streams, intermittent streams, and
wetlands. Activities that could be regulated under Section 404 include the placement of fill for
construction of roadways; residential, commercial or industrial structures; and the construction of water
retention ponds along tributaries. The EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers jointly administer the
2

Approximate 126.67 Acre Tract— U.S. Highway 311
Sophia, North Carolina
ECS Project 04- 15749A
March 26, 2008
Section 404 program. Section 401 of the Clean Water Act grants each state the authority to approve,
condition, or deny any Federal permits that could result in a discharge to State waters.
The streams and wetlands located on the site are regulated by the U,S. Army Corps of Engineers and the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality. ECS recommends that our flags be verified by these two
agencies. Following the verifications, a metes and bounds survey of the jurisdictional boundaries should
be conducted to determine their exact locations and extent. A sitelgrading plan can then be developed to
determine the extent of the proposed impacts to jurisdictional waters and wetlands, if any. An attempt
should be made to minimize or avoid world ,gin these areas, if possible,
Permits will be required prior to impacting any open waters, including perennial or intermittent streams.
Mitigation and stormwater management plans may be a condition of any perm its issued for the site. In
addition, buffers may be required adjacent to the stream.
For impacts to one -half acre or more of wetlands or to more than 300 linear fleet of stream channel, an
individual permit (IP) may be required. An IP requires a tat analysis, alternative site analysis, project
justification, plans to avoid and minimize impacts: h a proposed mitigation plan. Depending on the
habitat analysis and the extent of impacts, and Environrssental impact Statement may be required by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. An tP allows for a public comment period and may require 4 to 18
months to obtain depending on conditions arising during the U.S. Army Cases of Engineers review and
public comment period.
Watershed Classification
Unnamed tributaries to Caraway Creep cross the site. According to the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, Caraway Creep is located in the Yadkin
River Basin and has been classified Glass C waters.
ECS appreciates the opportunity to provide wetland services for your project. Please contact us at (336)
856 -7150 if you have any questions concerning this report.
Sincerely,
ECS CAROLIiAs, LLP
Michael T. Brame Denise M. Poulos, LSS C"'*`
Senior Environmental Scientist Principal Scientist
Attachments. figure 1 — Site Ucation Map
Figure 2 — Soil Map
Figure 3 — Stream/Wetland Location Map
Routine Wetland Determination Data Forms
3

DATA FORM
F- ROUTINE WETLAND DETERNUNATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
Project/Site: Approximate 136.67 Acre Tract — U.S. highway 311 Project No: Date. March 24, 2008
Applicant/Owner: Randolph County EDC County: Randolph
Investigators: ECS Carolinas, LLP 09- 15749A State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP -1
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: Wooded
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation:)? Yes No Trausect ID:
Is the area a potential .Problem Area? Yes No Field Location: View Figure 3
(if needed, ex lain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species (LatinlCommon) Stratum Indicator Plant S ecles (Latin/Common) Stratum Indicator
Salix uigra
Black willow Tree /Sap OBL
Platanus oecidentalis
American sycamore TreelSap FACW-
Li estrum sinense
Chinese trivet TreelSap FAC
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: 100% FAC Neutral: 100%
(excluding FAC -) Numeric index:
Remarks:
The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic.
HYDROLOGY
LJ
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Wetland hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Primary Indicators
Aerial Photographs
Inundated
Other
Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
No Recorded Data
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators
Depth of Surface Water: 0"
Oxidized Root Channels In Upper 12 Inches
Water- stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water In Pit: >13"
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC - Neutral 'rest
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12"
rl
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland hxdrolm indicators are present
(Wetform) page 1 of 2

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manua
Project/Site: Approximate 126.67 Acre Tract -- U.S. Highway 311
Project No:
Date: March 24, 2008
Applicant/Owner: Randolph County EDC
County: Randolph
Investigators: ECS Carolinas, LLP
09- 15749A
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP -1
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Wynott -Eason complex
Map Symbol: Wthl Mapped Hydric incluslon? ❑Iles � No
Drainage Class: Well drained Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type: Yes E] No
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Ultic and Typic bapludalfs
Profile Descri tion
Depth
Matrix Color
Mottle Color
Mottle
inches)
Horizon
Munsell Molst)
UunmIlMolst .
Abundance/Contrast
Textur Concretions, Structure etc.
0 -12"
1OYR 414
0%
Loam
Hydric
Soil
Indicators:
®
istosol
❑ Concretions
❑
Histic Epipedon
❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
❑
Sulfidic Odor
®Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
❑
Aquic Moisture Regime
❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
❑
Reducing Conditions
❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils List
❑
Gleyed or Love Chroma Colors
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are not present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytie Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? Yes No
Wetland hydrology Present? Yes No
Hydric Soils Present? ❑yes LnJ No
Remarks:
Hydric soil indicators are not present. The sampling point is not located within a wetland.
(Wetform) Page 2 oi-2

ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
Project/Site: Approximate 126.67 Acre Tract— U.S. highway 311 Project No: Date: March 24, 2008
Applicant/Owner: Randolph County EDC County: Randolph
Investigators: ECS Carolinas, LLP 09- 15749A State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP -2
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No Community ID: Wooded
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation:)? Yes No Transect ED:
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No Field Location: View Figure 3
(If needed, explain on the reverse side)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species (Latin/Common)
Stratum
Indicator
Plant Species (Latin/Common)
Stratum
Indicator
Liquidambar smr- acinua
'free /Su
FAC+
Sweet gum
Juncus sp.
herb
FACW
Rush sp.
Percent of Donftant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC: 100%
(excluding FAC -)
FAG Neutral:100%
Numeric Index:
Remarks:
The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
Z No Recorded Data
Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water: 2"
Depth to Free Water In Pit: Surface
Depth to Saturated Soil: Surface
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators
vsj Inundated
in Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water - Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC- Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
Wetland h ydrology indicators are present.
(Wetform)
Page l of 2

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
J1987 COE Wetlands
Delineation Manua
Project/Site: Approximate 126.67 Acre Tract -- U.S. Highway 311
Project N
Date: March 24, 2008
Applicant/Owner: Randolph County EDC
County; Randolph
Investigators. ECS Carolinas, LLP
09-15749A
State: North Carolina
Plot ID: DP-2
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase). Wynott-Enos complex
Map Symbol: WtB
Mapped Hydric Inclusion? ❑Yes Enj No
Drainage Class: Well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Ultic and Typic hapludalfs
Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type: Myes [:] No
Profile Descri ption
Depth
Matrix Color Mottle Color
Matrix
Mottle
(inches)
Horizon,
11 Moist) (Mansell Moist)
ell
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions, Structure
0-2"
E7.55Y,4/2 10YR 4/4
10%
Loam
3-12"
2.5Y 613 SYR 3/4
20%
Loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
[1, nistosol
❑ Histic Epipedon
F-1 Concretions
❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
❑ Sulf1dic Odor
❑ Aquic Moisture Regime
❑ Reducing Conditions
❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
❑ Listed an National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors
L] Other Zillain. In Remarks)
Remarks.
Hydric soil Indicators are present. They appear to be the result of a perched water table since the underlying soils are bright.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? MYes LJ No is the Sampling Point within the Wetland? JNYes LJ No
Wetland Hydrology Present? ZYcs No
Hydric Soils Present? Yes M No
Remarks:
The three wetland criteria are present. The sampling point is located within is wetland.
(Wetform) Page 2 of 2

THESTREAM/WETLAND LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THIS MAP AREAPPROXIMATF. THEY HAVE: BEEN DELINEATED BY FCS, THEY
WERE VERIFIFF) BY MR, JOHN THOMAS WITI ITI-11i US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (USACE.) ON MAY 13, 2008. THEY WERE
VERIFIED 13Y MS, SUE IIOMEWOOD WITH 144ENCDENR DIVISION OF WATUR QUALITY ON MAY 20, 2008. 'I'HI:YIIAVE. NOT' BEEN
SURVEYED.
The visit with Ms. Sue Homewood
(NCIDENR) was conducted during normal
conditions. Ms. Homewood concurred with
our flags. Ms. Homewood informed us that
the WDENR will not rquirr mitigation for
impm to the intitrmillptil 0mom The
;Wf,*nl?NR will reI iiirg 1.1 mili ation for.
I
linpam to the patuniol §lr#om§: tY
Legend/Mitigation Ratios
Approximate Location of Perennial Stream (2:1 Mitigation Ratio = USACE111:1 Mitigation Ratio NCDENR)
,0 . � Approximate Location of Intermittent Stream (1:1 Mitigation Ratio — USACE/Non-Mitigable = NCDENR)
Approximate Location of Welland
RESULTS FROM VERIFICATION
'0
The visit with MrJohnThomas (USACE) was
conducted following a rainfall event on the
previous day. 'The streams contained more
water than normal. Mr. Thomas concurred
with our flags. Mr. Thomas informed us that
the USACE will require IA mitigation for
impacts to the intermittent streams and 2:1
mitigation for impacts to the perennial
streams. Mr. Thomas indicated that he will
revisit the site during normal conditions to re-
evaluate the streams if there is potential that
the streams will be impacted by future
projects.
The visit with Ms. Sue Homewood
(NCIDENR) was conducted during normal
conditions. Ms. Homewood concurred with
our flags. Ms. Homewood informed us that
the WDENR will not rquirr mitigation for
impm to the intitrmillptil 0mom The
;Wf,*nl?NR will reI iiirg 1.1 mili ation for.
I
linpam to the patuniol §lr#om§: tY
Legend/Mitigation Ratios
Approximate Location of Perennial Stream (2:1 Mitigation Ratio = USACE111:1 Mitigation Ratio NCDENR)
,0 . � Approximate Location of Intermittent Stream (1:1 Mitigation Ratio — USACE/Non-Mitigable = NCDENR)
Approximate Location of Welland

'��I - ` -�~ /•� r" r" i' / • i i f lip '�
/ • + f 1 f
r ` r
ate,,,.,. , - -. :.` \ \ • '�` ;�
qp
Ph
_ n0l, iV
Piz
low
R�
t o
:E-
i`
I ! J
II
1
I
I
I
w
k.
}
Y
A'::0,LtiE
10
18Agg
_9 511'.'1
�6�
Ca404LC
s�ara a
I
.� �'� � �� `� r 1. /•" / ,
Ny 41"
3 /All
a ! /
AIR
N\1
II + u1' f N d' fH{J�'
t /tj�
!�r''1 �♦ �! r 1 1 4
- morasancwwuaca�wfsuuu +Eaaaswnz�a3� , vwcu,�:,u�m..�.,� SummeJ�neincenn�Assoca #rs. PLLC
ACE AVANT US 311 SITE
�w Aga, nra•- .
4
NEW MARKET 7WiP.- RANDOM COUNTY- NORTH UROi1NA
r
p
o �o
,
F
A'::0,LtiE
10
18Agg
_9 511'.'1
�6�
Ca404LC
s�ara a
I
.� �'� � �� `� r 1. /•" / ,
Ny 41"
3 /All
a ! /
AIR
N\1
II + u1' f N d' fH{J�'
t /tj�
!�r''1 �♦ �! r 1 1 4
- morasancwwuaca�wfsuuu +Eaaaswnz�a3� , vwcu,�:,u�m..�.,� SummeJ�neincenn�Assoca #rs. PLLC
ACE AVANT US 311 SITE
�w Aga, nra•- .
4
NEW MARKET 7WiP.- RANDOM COUNTY- NORTH UROi1NA

-
R�b+Fq',e9��d
L A340. � a59 A V I lEle II
MF
F
Z° J a 1Z
� $ Z
A � c
n b
I
o a�a
n �
o � 4
A
s�
M,c
%
;j;
� 8a
s
�
I m
I 4
D
i I o
ff1 i� � �� �
�'��"4
it fi ;h4
A � s g � e9 34q
z 34 0:
➢
�
?�g:gU�
:x. !;: � £�
4��
4 =
a �8 e, �7ag e97
ad
�D
'�to
k ;S
1 }"�
ti�L-gli
t:
y } - W
UM
�t� p M
ra
Z
x
-
R�b+Fq',e9��d
L A340. � a59 A V I lEle II
MF
F
Z° J a 1Z
� $ Z
A � c
n b
I
o a�a
n �
o � 4
A
s�
M,c
%
;j;
� 8a
s
�
I m
I 4
D
i I o
ff1 i� � �� �
�'��"4
a
A � s g � e9 34q
z 34 0:
➢
�
?�g:gU�
:x. !;: � £�
4 =
a �8 e, �7ag e97
ad
�D
'�to
k ;S
1 }"�
t:
s'
a
m{
ow
�m
yo
r
MN
r� nv
O m
Z n,
1
Z P,�
F
%
I K
� 8a
s
�
I m
I 4
D
i I o
ff1 i� � �� �
�
z
Ii, 3� �[ F
� E •
•
�yyyl9� ■ �'�
��Sp �
.i
�
y �
3
s
1
Z P,�
F
4 / �
i
1
7
0
n
o.
A
A
I
n
A •
�i
TI
Tl
t
� Il
I,
tat �
f it S
d �
� g
� .3 ii dS 3k Ran GG Q
M
�I
B
� 8a
s
a I
I 4
i$
ayl
ff1 i� � �� �
� E� 4�. 9
g {tit
Ii, 3� �[ F
� E •
•
�yyyl9� ■ �'�
��Sp �
.i
�
y �
3
4 / �
i
1
7
0
n
o.
A
A
I
n
A •
�i
TI
Tl
t
� Il
I,
tat �
f it S
d �
� g
� .3 ii dS 3k Ran GG Q
M
7.'
I !
! 1
_ I
I 1'.
s I a �
�I
B
g
s
a I
I 4
i$
ayl
$
g {tit
g
7.'
I !
! 1
_ I
I 1'.
s I a �
;t
B
g
s
a I
I 4
i$
ayl
$
g {tit
g

I. " "°•4'P °'T'•'t°7
IRL._3 -wvi
HUNON -uNPO.) - AW i3)(AW MIN _
1 �"'
w
3VS I I E Sn iNVAV 3 ?V
--
1wg1
'sn7rnassld�LuanuBu�ii�ruurn[�`
a "�" n.,r.m>q.�,
G�s�tuYm'uar+rvve'�aasodoaa -, „�
"s:� `� J77d
ri:
xm
a �a
. - S g C
/.. 5 q..$x -_s /� rrr R•x sr ,a - �' ; EB 8 0 ;,S E
°52p$ €c9 g6 fiy{stlby`,Zx a / / °�•t>y s Eg ��s of a
/' '� sE$T.D € a 6 yD';•8:gg °4 /'= - -- - - -- - s g `VE as S8i a
Ss $ +u,$`o� /� fi� =a
m : a `es:PoDfii r: Ses 65 "a 4 i II'/, 7..- r? 3sa 'f$
N �e �i8
ca n��a c c•�4pxaeg�. f _ Etl 8 axe "�" 3 s �..s fi
sg e
�sa�D's- gs'fta k !} �,\ P �: B§ kl ° QED' :=
i� ap6aPa �s•b a1d� °�'�g�sg= ��z���2a�o•. � !Iii r." _ \ }` aS �3� fl� g e s`�n �� E
ro
r
�ld
Ij
<r `('-
PM
` j l r��/ y".i•, il�i \�\ \\ _ t1 // /i
I "fr ;' � —rte .// � /'1, �a '` \ - - '�1.l�rrn �\ ♦ � \\ � /� /
Iff�frl(i(i /i/�rliJ'r ,jai /.r___ r�1 \ \� .\•� \�\\1� ����\ \ \E ` _ %' %/ - � \' rll lyl!{
\ ♦�,`, �+lE`t Yi r r ltE� \ \ \.\ \♦ r \a,� Y\ - �/�/��_1 \ \� r,, ( \mac
� rl �� ��� , \U\ ♦. , \t'. �\ ✓!j� �� } l \\ �t \\ �- 1�����\♦�\,�\ ��- _-i- / �r ♦ ti'�4 \ \l `1 I
�`- , ♦. W" •Vey `� \ �� .�\\..\�\ •/
/
li 44\��1i
ll Y I \ \
i 1 5- � - 1 r � i ! IIr +1 _ _ '�i� %'•' 1 I I ff{
I Y ra' 41 f / Y , �IlJr�.lr l 1p•L: \ � - j_ "� / / //� Y -� Itl l

_ `� \+ � \� `. \ �( �`\` \`�', V:♦ � �n 11 Fit � � N
� �, \ \ • -,, [ �� `. \.`I \`�\ fig+`. ��� :�i� �
eel
Li
/ < 1Z CC
`•�xV i I'r`fl!
1 ! I I
s9 \
tT
Hi
-
3 T.
+yi�'t
r:kvzP ifY.li".•.H•Y r� ..
VNnOWKLWN,AWW HdWNVY -'AW 13A! AGN
�
. - -. ni •uilJ -
ms I ! F Sn INVAV 3)V
Vr a� wv raPLe7 �x ��
'Oai�. +5
�."]"],j sa�eiaoss�! uuaaulav� hwiuwns'
°'^'�"
'�*
bux5wifi5lN11dYil9UWri7 R35oeoYd
_ `� \+ � \� `. \ �( �`\` \`�', V:♦ � �n 11 Fit � � N
� �, \ \ • -,, [ �� `. \.`I \`�\ fig+`. ��� :�i� �
eel
Li
/ < 1Z CC
`•�xV i I'r`fl!
1 ! I I
s9 \
tT
Hi
ft
�F /
IS�i"I.1I /
I r.
I'fAF
1
6N
m
es
\
b jig ;
(n
i
R�
i
!
friNi i'vo
girl
r
v
Z
LO
a
m
z
w
Q
S V)
i
ft
�F /
IS�i"I.1I /
i