20060331 Ver 1_Other Documents_20120530

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Land Quality Section: 585 Waughtown Street, Winston- Salem, NC 27107 (336) 771 -5000
County: Randolph Project: ACE /AVANT 11 River basin: Cape Fear
Person financially responsible:, AceAvant Real Pro e Company, LLC Project # RANDO- 2012 -017
Address: Attn: Tracy Matson 109 Seminole Drive Archdale NC 27263
1. Project location: Old Way Road Sophia
Pictures: Yes: ❑ No: X .Prints: ❑ Slides: ❑ Video: ❑ Digital: ❑
2. Weather and soil conditions: PC /60's/Wet Soil Initial inspection: Yes: ❑ No: X
3. Is site currently under notice of violation? Yes: ❑ No: X
4. Is the site in compliance with S.P.C.A. and rules? Yes: ❑ No: X If no, check violations below:
5. Violations:
❑ a. No approved plan, G.S. 113A -57 (4) and 15A N.C.A.C413.0107(c)
X b. Failure to follow approved plan, G.S. 113A -57 (5)
X c. Failure to submit revised plan, G.S. 113A- 54.1(b) and 15A
N.C.A.C. 48.011 S(a)
❑ d. Failure to provide adequate groundcover, G,S. 113A -57(3) and
15A N.C.A.C. 48.0007(b) or 15A N.C.A.C. 4B.0124(e)
X e. Insufficient measures to retain sediment on site, G.S. 113A -57(3)
X f Failure to take all reasonable measures, 15A N.C.A.C.4B0105
X g. inadequate buffer zone, G.S. 113A -57(1)
❑ h. Graded slopes and fills too steep, G, S. 113A -57(2) or 15A
N.C.A.C. 413.0124(d)
❑ i. Unprotected exposed slopes, G.S. 113A -57(2)
❑ j. Failure to maintain erosion control measures,
15A N.C.A.C. 413.6113
❑ k. Failure to self - inspect G.S. 113A- 54.1(e) and 15A N.C.A.C.
48.0131
❑ 1. Other (describe)
6. Has sedimentation damage occurred since last inspection? Yes: X If yes, where? (check all that apply) No: ❑
Lake /natural watercourse on the tract: X Lake /natural watercourse off the tract. ❑ Other property: ❑
Description: Sediment into drainage cess road c 1 e intQ stream channel t culvert cross'
Degree of damage: slight: X moderate: ❑ severe: ❑
7. Contact made with (name): Steve Zieglar /Brian, Coble Title: DeyclQpgr5
Inspection report given: ❑ or sent: X to person financially responsible. Date given/ b 5
8. Potential NPDES Permit Violation? Yes: X No: ❑ Describe: Failure to follow the approved erosion control plan_
9. Corrective actions needed:
❑ Submit an adequate sedimentation and erosion control plan for approval, covering all areas disturbed or to be disturbed.
X Install all sedimentation and erosion control measures as shown on the approved plan, including the following locations:
Install Temp. Riser Basin Sed. Trap # I and measures north of basin per the approved plan. See comment note # 8.
X Submit a revised sedimentation and erosion control plan for approval for the following areas: revised plan must mgull_
areas disturbed outside the approved plan limits of disturbance ie east of trap 2 0 access road onto 311 and drainage north.
❑ Provide adequate permanent ground cover on all areas where development has been completed for 15 working or 90
calendar days, whichever is shorter (I5 working or 60 calendar days, whichever is shorter, in High Quality Waters).
X Install erosion and sediment control devices sufficient to retain sediment on the tract.
X Install temporary sediment traps, basins and rock dams and associated diversions as shown on the approved plan, including
the following locations: divert as much area as possible into Sed. Trap # 3 as discussed in the field.
❑ Install adequate drop inlet protection as shown on the approved plan, including the following locations:
X Provide an adequate stream buffer zone of sufficient width to confine visible sedimentation within the 25 % of the buffer
nearer the land disturbance using natural or artificial means (minimum 25 -foot width in Trout Waters) including the following
areas: areas in stream buffer zones will need to be addressed on the revised plan.
❑ Reduce the angle of graded slopes to an angle on which vegetative ground cover may be established at the following
locations:
X Provide adequate temporary or permanent ground cover on all graded slopes where rough or fine grading has been
completed for 21 calendar days, including the following areas: all ditch lines w/ matting and exterior slopes per a roved plan.
❑ Maintain all sedimentation and erosion control measures as specified in the approved platy and as required to prevent
sedimentation damage including the following locations:
Pagel of 2

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Land Quality Section: 585 Waughtown Street, Winston - Salem, NC 2 710 7 (33 6) 771 -5000
County: _Randolph Project: ACE /AVANT II River basin: Cape Fear
Person financially responsible: _AceAyant Real Property Company, LLC Project # RANDO -2012 -017
Address: Attn: Tracy Matson 109 Seminole Drive_ Archdale, NC 27263
1. Project location: Old Way Road, Sophia
Pictures: Yes: X No: ❑ Prints: ❑ Slides: ❑ Video: ❑ Digital: X
2. Weather and soil conditions:_ Cloudy1601s/Wet Soil Initial inspection: Yes: X No: ❑
3. Is site currently under notice of violation? Yes: ❑ No: X
4. Is the site in compliance with S.P.C.A. and rules? Yes: ❑ No: X If no, check violations below:
5. Violations:
❑ a. No approved plan, G.S. 113A -57 (4) and 15A N.C.A.C413.0107(c)
X b. Failure to follow approved plan, G.S. 113A -57 (5)
❑ a Failure to submit revised plan, G.S. 113A- 54.1(b) and 15A
N.C.A.C. 4B.01 18(a)
❑ d, Failure to provide adequate groundcover, G.S. 113A -57(3) and
15A N.C.A.C. 4B.0007(b) or 15A N.C.A.C. 4B.0124(e)
❑ e. Insufficient measures to retain sediment on site, G.S. 113A -57(3)
X £ Failure to take all reasonable measures, 15A N.C.A.C.4B0105
❑ g. Inadequate -buffer zone, G.S. 113A -57(1)
❑ h. Graded slopes and fills too steep, G.S. 113A -57(2) or 15A
N.C.A.C.4B.0124(d)
❑ i. Unprotected exposed slopes, G.S. 113A -57(2)
❑ j. Failure to maintain erosion control measures,
15A N.C.A.C. 4B.0113
❑ k. Failure to self - inspect G.S. 113A- 54.1(e) and ISA N.C.A.C.
45.0131
❑ 1. Other (describe)
6. Has sedimentation damage occurred since last inspection? Yes: ❑ If yes, where? (check all that apply) No: X
Lake /natural watercourse on the tract: ❑ Lake /natural watercourse off the tract: ❑ Other property: ❑
Description:
Degree of damage: slight: ❑ moderate : ❑ severe: ❑
7. Contact made with (name): Title:
Inspection report given: 0 or sent: X to person financially responsible. Date give .� jiK� s
8. Potential NPDES Permit Violation? Yes: X No: ❑ Describe: Failure to follow the approved erosion control plan
9. Corrective actions needed:
❑ Submit an adequate sedimentation and erosion control plan for approval, covering all areas disturbed or to be disturbed.
X Install all sedimentation and erosion control measures as shown on the approved plan, including the following locations:
Install Temp. Riser Basin Sediment Trap # 1 and measures north of basin per the approved plan at this time.
X Submit a revised sedimentation and erosion control plan for approval for the following areas: revised plan must cover all
areas disturbed outside the approved plan limits of disturbance (ie east of trap 2 &3, access road onto 311, and drainage north.
❑ Provide adequate permanent ground cover on all areas where development has been completed for 15 working or 90
calendar days, whichever is shorter (15 working or 60 calendar days, whichever is shorter, in High Quality Waters).
X Install erosion and sediment control devices sufficient to retain sediment on the tract.
❑ Install temporary sediment traps, basins and rock dams and associated diversions as shown on the approved plan, including
the following locations:
❑ Install adequate drop inlet protection as shown on the approved plan, including the following Iocations:
❑ Provide an adequate stream buffer zone of sufficient width to confine visible sedimentation within the 25 % of the buffer
nearer the land disturbance using natural or artificial means (minimum 25 -foot width in Trout Waters) including the following
areas:
❑ Reduce the angle of graded slopes to an angle on which vegetative ground cover may be established at the following
locations:
X Provide adequate temporary or permanent ground cover on all graded slopes where rough or fine grading has been
completed for 21 calendar days, including the following areas: all ditch lines w/ matting and basin slopes per approved plan.
❑ Maintain all sedimentation and erosion control measures as specified in the approved plan and as required to prevent
sedimentation damage including the following locations:
Page I of 2

Project Name:
ACEAVANT Site
State ID:
RAN
DO-
201
1 -021
RAN
DO-
2012
-017
05/23/2012 Inspection
Photos

| �
\ --
\ ' ----
Uioant PER
of L9 3"
�y.
iF IWMA ACE AVANT US 311 SITE
/
. �
\ --
\ ' ----
Uioant PER
of L9 3"
�y.
iF IWMA ACE AVANT US 311 SITE

•Check dam at end of access road disturbed area
*Entrance onto HWY 311 outside of Approved Plan limits

•View of area not disturbed yet to Basin # 1,
*Area below above picture mostly drains to Basin # 2 & 3,

•Area along east side not adequately diverted and outside
approved plan limits of disturbance.

Kirchner, Chuck
From:
Euliss, Amy
Sent:
Thursday, May 24, 2012 9:00 AM
To:
Homewood, Sue; Graznak, Jenny
Cc:
Kirchner, Chuck
Subject:
FW: Ace Avent 5 -22 -12
Attachments:
Below basin around corner.JPG; downstream 2nd pipe.JPG; First pipe - inlet.JPG; First pipe
outlet.JPG; sediment beside outlet 2nd pipe.JPG; turbid basin.JPG; upstream 2nd pipe.JPG,
DSCN0135.JPG; DSCN0136.JPG
Here are the pictures of the Ace Avent site from Mason Herndon.
From: Herndon, Mason
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 8:09 AM
To: Euliss, Amy
Subject: Ace Avent 5 -22 -12
Amy, attached are the pictures I took on Tuesday @ Ace Avent. The untitled pictures are of sediment in the stream
between the proposed industrial park and R- 2606B. Call me if you have any questions.
Thanks!
MH
Mason Herndon
Environmental Senior Specialist
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection
[e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
E -mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

R •,(
al

Kirchner, Chuck
From:
Graznak, Jenny
Sent:
Tuesday, May 22, 2012 12:25 PM
To:
Kirchner, Chuck
Cc:
Basinger, Corey
Subject:
FW: Turbidity problem in Randolph County
Hey Chuck,
Not sure if you have been made aware of this situation yet, but you can read the email trail below to catch up. Mason
Herndon with DWQ visited the site today along with Barry Harrington and discovered a subdivision nearby that has no
measures and is depositing sediment into several streams and through DOT's project described below. Mason said the
subdivision is located on Old Way Road in Sophia and saw a sign for Ace Avant (a concrete company out of Archdale). Do
you know anything about this project? Thanks.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Jenny Graznak
NC DENR Winston -Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
585 Waughtown Street
Winston - Salem, NC 27107
Voice: (336) 771 -4960
FAX: [phone]
E -mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
Carolina Public Records Cow and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Basinger, Corey
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 11:06 AM
To: Herndon, Mason; Euliss, Amy
Cc: Gantt, Matt; Graznak, Jenny
Subject: RE: Turbidity problem in Randolph County
Based on my conversation with Craig Frazier this morning, the pond owner's name is Wyatt Farlow. Appears that this is
the same issue you reference in your email below.
if WSRO can be of assistance in your investigation, please advise.
Thanks.
Corey
W. Corey Basinger
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Winston -Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
Email: carey.basinger @ncdenr.gov
Rhone: (336) 771 -5000
Fax [phone]
E -mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records taw and may be disclosed to
third parties.

From: Herndon, Mason
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 8:53 AM
To: Euliss, Amy; Basinger, Corey
Cc: Gantt, Matt; Graznak, Jenny
Subject: RE: Turbidity problem in Randolph County
Good Morning Everyone,
Can anyone provide me with any additional information on the location of pond and /or the property owners name?
The only complaint or report I have received concerning sediment in a pond on the US 311 Bypass Project was reported
by Mr. Wyatt Farlow whose pond is located on 3083 Thompson Heath Rd in Sophia. The pond is approximately 9000 ft
downstream of the project. There have been incidents where sediment loss have occurred on project and discharged
into tributaries that feed the pond, however the sediment was promptly removed by NCDOT's contractor. The losses
were not due to a lack of maintenance or inadequate measures, they were in conjunction with heavy rain events that
overwhelmed the devices. NCIDOT had core samples taken from the pond in June 2010 and found little to no
accumulation of sediment in the pond, however turbidity has been an continuing issue due to a residual film of sediment
in the stream system that could not be retrieved. Mr. Farlow has acquired an attorney and all records and reports have
been provided to him earlier this year.
As I stated earlier this is the only report I have received concerning sediment in a pond. I will contact the NCDQT
resident engineer's office to see if they have received any other complaints.
If this is the site and you have any questions or need any additional information, please don't hesitate to contact me.
Thanks!
Mason
Mason Herndon
Environmentaf Senior Specialist
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality.
Surface Water Protection
mason. hern don (a ncdenr.gov
Phone: [phone]
E -mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Euliss, Amy
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 9:07 AM
To: Basinger, Corey; Herndon, Masan
Cc: Gantt, Matt; Graznak, Jenny
Subject: RE: Turbidity problem in Randolph County
Corey,
Mason Herndon handles DOT projects in Randolph County, because its in DOT Division 8. He is in the
process of issuing a NOV to DOT on this project. I have included him on the email, so he can
respond. I'm assuming this is associated with US31 1, as I -77 doesn't run through Randolph County.
Mason,

Can you respond to Corey on This? See the email chain below From addressed to Chuck Wakild? If
its not associated with DOS, please let me know.
Amy
From: Basinger, Corey
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 8:02 AM
To: Euliss, Amy; Graznak, Jenny
Cc: Gantt, Matt
Subject: FW: Turbidity problem in Randolph County
Amy & Jenny,
Please check into this issue and let me know your findings.
Thanks.
CB
Matt,
What is the status of this project from your perspective"?
Thanks.
CB
W. Carey Basinger
Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection Section
Winston -Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Fax [phone]
E -mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
third parties.
From: Matthews, Matt
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 9:47 AM
To: Basinger, Corey
Cc: Bush, Ted
Subject: RE: Turbidity problem in Randolph County
Corey,
I'll try to go downstairs today and talk with Mr. Frazier. If you could check into it from your end, that would help as well.
Thanks,
Matt
Matt Matthews
NC DENR /Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection Section
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1617
v -(919) 807 -6384
f- (919) 807 -6495
Matt. Matthews ncdenr. ov
http: / /portal.ncdenr.orci/web /wq /swp
3

E -mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
From: Wakild, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 9:02 AM
To: Matthews, Matt; Basinger, Corey
Cc: Bush, Ted
Subject: FW: Turbidity problem in Randolph County
Matt - Talk with DLR and DOT and, if possible, Craig Frazier to get their take. A field visit also seems warranted.
From: THOMAS ELLIS [mailto:tellis3 bellsouth.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 10:07 PM
To: Wakild, Chuck
Subject: Turbidity problem in Randolph County
Chuck
I just returned from the work session of the Soil and water Conservation
Commission. Craig Frazier, a Soil and Water Conservation Commissioner and
former EMC member, showed some photos of a problem that local efforts in
Randolph County have been unable to get addressed.
In brief and as relayed to me, this is an erosion and sedimentation
problem caused by the construction of a new part of I -77 in Randolph
County. The soil has left the site and deposited sediment in a private
pond down stream in excess of 9 inches deep. Neither NCDOT, nor Land
Quality have shown interest or concern and have made no attempts to
protect: either water quality in the receiving stream nor the property of
the downstream farmer.
From photos taken yesterday and presented by Mr. Frazier, the stream
appears to be quite turbid.
Please have someone go to the Soil and Water Commission meeting tomorrow
morning (Wednesday)in the Ground Floor Hearing Room of the Archdale
Building and get this information directly from Mr. Frazier.
I would appreciate hearing what the DWQ field staff has to say about this
situation. DOT is a major actor in changing of land use in our state. We
have given them significant consideration in regards to their activities
in building and maintaining highways and other road infrastructure which
has the potential to impact water quality. However problems do occur and
measures should be taken to protect the streams and downstream property
owners.
Thanks for following up on this for me.
Tom
4