NC0090018_Application_20210806 (2)

Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, North Carolina 27502
919-859-0669
www.agriwaste.com
Ms. Sydney Carpenter
NPDES Permitting Program
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
RE: Application for Individual NPDES Discharge System — Broch Property
Lower Beaverdam Loop Road, Candler, NC 28715 (PIN: 9605-25-0161)
Dear Ms. Carpenter,
July 28, 2021
Enclosed please find information supporting an application for a new individual NPDES
discharge system for a proposed tiny home village located in Buncombe County, North Carolina.
The tiny home village will consist of ten (10) tiny homes and a communal bath house. The site
has been deemed unsuitable for ground absorption sewage treatment systems by the Buncombe
County Environmental Health due to unsuitable soil wetness conditions, unsuitable soil depth,
and insufficient space.
The proposed system is to be sized for 2,400 gallons per day and has been designed to convey all
wastewater from the proposed facilities, including greywater, to the new septic tank. This
application is being submitted with the intent to gain an Individual Discharge Permit.
The following information is included with this letter:
NPDES - Form 1. Attachment A.
Modified Application — Form 2A. Attachment B.
Documentation From Buncombe County Health Department. Attachment C.
Soils Evaluation report by Walker Ferguson, LSS of Land Resource Management,
PLLC. AttachmentD.
Correspondence from USGS. AttachmentE.
Correspondence from NCNHP. Attachment F.
Stream Classification. Attachment G.
Flow Path to "Blue Line" Water Feature. Attachment H.
Information on connection to Regional Sewer System. Attachment I.
Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA). Attachment J.
Local Government Review Forms. AttachmentK.
Topography Map (per 40 CFR 122.21(f)(7)). Attachment L.
Process Flow Diagram. Attachment M.

The proposed discharge point is Beaverdam Creek, located along Lower Beaverdam
Loop Road. The discharge system will utilize the following components:
New Septic Tanks with Effluent Filter and/or new STEP systems
AdvanTex AX-100
Re -circulation Tank
UV Disinfection
Flow Meter
Discharge Point with Rip -Rap
NPDES - Form 1
As part of Form 1, the feasibility of alternatives to discharging must be addressed. The
following alternatives are to be evaluated:
Connection to a regional or municipal sewer collection system.
Letter from the local or county health deparlment describing the suitability
or non -suitability of the site for all types of wastewater ground adsorption
and innovative non -discharge systems, as well as documenting the repair
potential of the failed system.
Investigate land application such as spray irrigation or drip irrigation.
Modified Application — Form 2A
As part of Form 2A, monitoring Table A was completed. The facility is proposed, so no
site -specific effluent could be tested. The provided data is the average pollutant levels
that was sampled from ten (10) comparable facilities.
Letter from the local or county health department describing the suitability or non -
suitability of the site for all types of wastewater ground adsorption and innovative
non -discharge systems. Document the repair potential of the failed system.
The Buncombe County Health Depailment indicated that the site is unsuitable for
installation of a ground absorption septic system in letter dated May 24, 2021
(Attachment C). The letter indicated that an improvement permit cannot be issued due to
unsuitable soils.
Investigate Land Application such as spray irrigation or drip irrigation.
Per the soil evaluation by Walker Ferguson, LSS of Land Resource Management, the site
does not have suitable soil to accommodate a non -discharge surface spray or drip
wastewater system (Attachment D). Based on the map provided, the majority of the
property is unsuitable for septic permitting. There an area (borings 4, 5, and 13) that has
potential for non -discharge permitting, but size and stream proximity,
7Q10 & 30Q2 Flow Estimates
The United States Geological Survey (USGS) was contacted to determine the 7Q10 and
30Q2 flow estimates for the proposed wastewater discharge point. The proposed
discharge point is Beaverdam Creek. The analysis from USGS indicates both the 7Q10
and 30Q2 discharge for the point in question are positive (Attachment E).

Endangered Species Information
The NC Heritage Program was contacted to gather endangered species information. No
species were found within a one -mile radius of the property that held federal or state
endangered status. One vascular plant, Virginia Spiraea, may be located within the
project area that holds federal and state endangered status.
Flow Path to "Blue Line" Water Feature
The discharge point is a portion of Beaverdam Creek that is on the applicant's property.
A map showing the path from the discharge point to the first "blue -line" stream, as shown
on the NC DEQ Stream Classification Map, can be seen in Attachment H.
Receiving Stream Beaverdam Creek
Stream Class C; Tr
Connection to a Regional or Municipal Sewer Collection System
Connection to a sewer collection system will likely not be available. Correspondence
from MSD Planning & Development indicates that the closest sewer system is in excess
of 4 miles from the applicant's property. At an estimated cost of $100/ft, the cost to
extend the sewer line would be $2,112,000 (plus engineering and tap fees).
Engineering Alternatives Analysis
An Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA) has been completed for this site and is
included as Attachment J. The completed EAA demonstrates that a wastewater treatment
system permitted as an Individual Discharge is the only feasible option for this site. We
have exhausted all other options for this site as follows:
a.) connection to a municipal or regional sewer collection system
- Not feasible due to costs (at the present time).
b.) subsurface disposal
- Inadequate soil for a subsurface absorption system.
c.) wastewater irrigation (drip and spray)
- Inadequate soil and not feasible due to fill soil costs for a
non -discharge ground absorption system.
d.) reclaimed -water systems
- Inadequate soil and not feasible due to fill soil costs for a
reclaimed water system. No reasonable ability to operate
as a bulk distributor of reclaimed water.
e.) Any viable combination of the above
- There are no viable combinations of the above due to soil
and cost limitations.

Local Government Review Forms
As part of the EAA, Local Government Review Forms were sent to Buncombe County
and the City of Asheville. A copy of the form submittals is included as Attachment K.
To date, only one completed form has been received.
Topography Map
A topographic map (per 40 CFR 122.21(f)(7)) is included as Attachment L.
Process Flow Diagram
A process flow diagram for the proposed system is included as Attachment M.
Suggested Permit Compliance Limits
Suggested permit limits are based on the limits of a neighboring facility, comparable
treatment systems, and The Upper French Broad River Subbasin Overview. BOD and
TSS values are taken from the 2021 draft permit for Laurelwood Mobile Home Park,
while Fecal values were determined from the general discharge permit, as well as data
from facilities with comparable treatment technology. When determining the proposed
compliance limits, the South Hominy Creek Subwatershed Overview was considered.
Because of the following statement, "At Beaverdam and Warren Creeks, the fish
communities were impacted by nearby land use practice. Nutrients did not seem to be an
issue at any of the sites.", it was determined that this was not a nutrient sensitive
subwatershed.
Effluent Characteristics Limits
Monthly Average Daily Max
Flow 2,400 gpd
BOD, 5-day
Total Suspended Soils
Fecal
30.0 mg/L 45.0 mg/L
30.0 mg/L 45.0 mg/L
200 MPN/100 mL 400 MPN/100 mL
I appreciate your time and efforts in reviewing this application. If you have any
questions or comments, please feel free to contact me at 919-859-0669.
Best Regards,
Kevin Davidson, P.E.
V.P. of Engineering

Attachment List
Attachment A NPDES — Form 1
Attachment B Modified Application — Form 2A
Attachment C Documentation From Buncombe County Health Department
Attachment D Land Resource Management Soils Evaluation Report
Attachment E Correspondence from USGS
Attachment F Correspondence from NCNHP
Attachment G Stream Classification
Attachment H Flow Path to "Blue Line" Water Feature
Attachment I Information on Connection to a Regional Sewer System
Attachment J Engineering Alternatives Analysis
Attachment K Local Government Review Forms
Attachment L Topography Map
Attachment M Process Flow Diagram

Attachment A
NPDES — Form 1

EPA Identification Number
NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Form Approved 03/05/19
OMB No. 2040-0004
Form
NPDES
coEPA
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Application for NPDES Permit to Discharge Wastewater
GENERAL INFORMATION
SECTION
1. ACTIVITIES REQUIRING AN NPDES PERMIT (40 CFR 122.21(f) and (f)(1))
N
o Activities Requiring an NPDES Permit
o
1.1
Applicants Not Required to Submit Form 1
1.1.1
Is the facility a new or existing publicly
treatment works?
If yes, STOP. Do NOT complete
Form 1. Complete Form 2A.
owned
1 1 2
Is the facility a new
treating domestic
If yes, STOP. Do NOT
complete Form 1.
Form 2S.
or existing treatment works
sewage?
(y No
m No
Complete
1.2
Applicants Required to Submit Form 1
1.2.1
Is the facility a concentrated animal
operation or a concentrated aquatic
production facility?
Yes 4 Complete Form 1
and Form 2B.
feeding
animal
1.2.2
Is the facility an existing
commercial, mining,
currently discharging
❑ Yes 4 Complete
1 and
manufacturing,
or silvicultural facility that is
process wastewater?
✓ No
Form i No
Form 2C.
1.2.3
Is the facility a new manufacturing, commercial,
mining, or silvicultural facility that has
commenced to discharge?
Yes 4 Complete Form 1
and Form 2D.
not yet
1.2.4
Is the facility a new
commercial, mining,
discharges only nonprocess
❑ Yes 4 Complete
1 and
or existing manufacturing,
or silvicultural facility that
wastewater?
✓ No
Form ✓ No
Form 2E.
1.2.5
Is the facility a new or existing facility
discharge is composed entirely of stormwater
associated with industrial activity
discharge is composed of both stormwater
non-stormwater?
Yes 4 Complete Form 1
and Form 2F
unless exempted by
40 CFR
122.26(b)(14)(x) or
b 15 .
whose
or whose
and
✓ No
2. NAME,
MAILING ADDRESS, AND LOCATION (40 CFR 122.21(f)(2))
Name, Mailing Address, and Location
2.1
Facility Name
Broch Property
2.2
EPA Identification Number
2.3
Facility Contact
Name (first and last)
Kimberly Broch
Title
Owner
Phone number
828 - 595 - 3193
Email address
[e-mail]
2.4
Facility Mailing Address
Street or P.O. box
45 Gaston Mountain Road
City or town
Asheville
State
North Carolina
ZIP code
28806
EPA Form 3510-1 (revised 3-19)
Page 1

EPA Identification Number
NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Form Approved 03/05/19
OMB No. 2040-0004
cn m Name, Mailing Address,
Operator Information o SIC and NAILS Codes 0
- —i and Location Continued
0 0
2.5
Facility Location
Street, route number, or other specific identifier
Beaverdam Loop Road PIN: 9605 - 25 - 0161
County name
Buncombe
County code (if known)
City or town
Candler
State
North Carolina
ZIP code
28715
N 3. SIC
AND NAICS CODES (40 CFR 122.21(f)(3))
3.1
SIC Code(s)
Description (optional)
7033
Tiny Home Campground
3.2
NAICS Code(s)
Description (optional)
N 4. OPERATOR
INFORMATION (40 CFR
122.21(f)(4))
4.1
Name of Operator
AQWA
4.2
Is the name
❑ Yes
you listed in Item 4.1 also the owner?
(=i No
4.3
Operator Status
❑ Public —federal ❑ Public —state ❑ Other public (specify)
M
Private ❑ Other (specify)
Phone Number of Operator
4.4
252 - 243 - 7693
Indian m Operator Information
Land -i Continued
0
4.5
Operator Address
Street or P.O. Box
1507 Drexel Street N
City or town
Wilson
State
North Carolina
ZIP code
27896
Email address of operator
[e-mail]
N 5. INDIAN
LAND (40 CFR 122.21(f)(5))
5.1
Is the facility
❑ Yes
located on Indian Land?
C1 No
EPA Form 3510-1 (revised 3-19)
Page 2

EPA Identification Number
NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
SECTION 6. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS (40 CFR 122.21(f)(6))
6.1
Form Approved 03/05/19
OMB No. 2040-0004
Existing Environmental Permits (check all that apply and print or type the corresponding permit number for each)
❑ NPDES (discharges to surface
water)
❑ PSD (air emissions)
❑ Ocean dumping (MPRSA)
SECTION 7. MAP (40 CFR 122.21(f)(7))
0-
CU
7.1
❑ RCRA (hazardous wastes)
❑ Nonattainment program (CAA)
❑ Dredge or fill (CWA Section 404)
❑ UIC (underground injection of
fluids)
❑ NESHAPs (CAA)
❑ Other (specify)
Have you attached a topographic map containing all required information to this application? (See instructions for
specific requirements.)
® Yes ❑ No ❑ CAFO—Not Applicable (See requirements in Form 2B.)
SECTION 8. NATURE OF BUSINESS (40 CFR 122.21(f)(8))
8.1
Describe the nature of your business.
Rental Style Tiny Home Housing. 10 Tiny Homes and one collective
bathhouse.
SECTION 9. COOLING WATER INTAKE STRUCTURES (40 CFR 122.21(f)(9))
9.1
9.2
Does your facility use cooling water?
❑ Yes ®No4SKIP toItem 10.1.
Identify the source of cooling water. (Note that facilities that use a cooling water intake structure as described at
40 CFR 125, Subparts I and J may have additional application requirements at 40 CFR 122.21(r). Consult with your
NPDES permitting authority to determine what specific information needs to be submitted and when.)
SECTION 10. VARIANCE REQUESTS (40 CFR 122.21(f)(10))
10.1
Do you intend to request or renew one or more of the variances authorized at 40 CFR 122.21(m)? (Check all that
apply. Consult with your NPDES permitting authority to determine what information needs to be submitted and
when.)
❑ Fundamentally different factors (CWA ❑ Water quality related effluent limitations (CWA Section
Section 301(n)) 302(b)(2))
❑ Non -conventional pollutants (CWA ❑ Thermal discharges (CWA Section 316(a))
Section 301(c) and (g))
® Not applicable
EPA Form 3510-1 (revised 3-19)
Page 3

EPA ldentrficabon Number
NPDES Pemut Number
FaGhty Name
SECTION 11. CHECKLIST AND CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (40 CFR 122.22(a) and (d))
Checklist and Certification Statement
x
x
x
x
x
F Arm A nnrnthari n i X i 1 /'f Q
In Column 1 below, mark the sections of Form 1 that you have completed and are submitting with your application.
1 For each section, specify in Column 2 any attachments that you are enclosing to alert the permitting authority. Note
that not all applicants are required to provide attachments.
Column 1
Section 1: Activities Requiring an NPDES Permit
CZ] Section 2: Name, Mailing Address, and Location
Section 3: SIC Codes
Section 4: Operator Information
II Section 5: Indian Land
Section 6: Existing Environmental Permits
In Section 7: Map
Section 8: Nature of Business
■
Section 9: Cooling Water Intake Structures
Section 10: Variance Requests
11.2
Column 2
EJ wi attachments
0 w! attachments
TI wl attachments
0 w/ attachments
II
wl attachments
OA
Section 11: Checklist and Certification Statement
■
w/attachments
[xi wl topographic 0
map w/ additional attachments
El w! attachments
■
wl attachments
[TI w! attachments
0 wl attachments
Certification Statement
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision
in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the
information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Name(printortypefirstandastname)
Kimberly Broch
Official title
Owner
Date signed
July 28, 2021
x
x
x
x
Kimberly Broch
x
Owner
July 28, 2021
EPA Form 3510-1 (revised 3-19)
Page 4

Attachment B
Modified Application — Form 2A

North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Modified Application Form 2A
Revised March 2021
Modified Application
Form 2A
Minor Sewage Facilities < 0.1 MGD
and No Pretreatment Program
NPDES Permitting Program
Note: Complete this form if your facility is a MINOR new or existing publicly owned treatment works.

NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Modified Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
Form
NPDES
NC Department of Environmental Quality - Application for NPDES Permit to Discharge Wastewater
MINOR SEWAGE FACILITIES (Before completing this form, please read the instructions. Failure to follow
the instructions may result in denial of the application.)
SECTION 1. BASIC
APPLICATION INFORMATION FOR ALL APPLICANTS (40 CFR 122.21(j)(1) and (9))
Facility Information
1.1
Facility name
Broch Property
Mailing address (street or P.O. box)
45 Gaston Mountain Road
City or town
Asheville
State
NC
ZIP code
28806
Contact name (first and last)
Kimberly Broch
Title
Owner
Phone number
828 - 595 - 3193
Email address
zach@securerestorai
Location address (street, route number, or other specific identifier) ❑ Same as mailing address
Beaverdam Loop Road PIN: 9605 - 25 - 0161
City or town
Candler
State
North Carolina
ZIP code
28715
1.2
Is this application
for a facility that has yet to commence discharge?
4 See instructions on data submission ❑ No
requirements for new dischargers.
(y Yes
Applicant Information
1.3
Is applicant different from entity listed under Item
❑ Yes
1.1 above?
1:/ No4SKIPtoItem1.4.
Applicant name
Applicant address (street or P.O. box)
City or town
State
ZIP code
Contact name (first and last)
Title
Phone number
Email address
1.4
Is the applicant
the facility's owner, operator, or both? (Check only one response.)
❑ Operator ❑ Both
0 Owner
1.5
To which entity should the NPDES permitting
❑ Facility
authority
send correspondence? (Check only one response.)
❑ Facility and applicant
(they are one and the same)
FA Applicant
Existing Environmental Permits
1.6
Indicate below any existing environmental permits. (Check all that apply and print or type the corresponding permit
number for each.)
Existing Environmental Permits
❑ NPDES (discharges to surface
water)
❑ RCRA (hazardous waste)
❑ UIC (underground injection
control)
❑ PSD (air emissions)
❑ Nonattainment program (CAA)
❑ NESHAPs (CAA)
❑ Ocean dumping (MPRSA)
❑ Dredge or fill (CWA Section
404)
❑ Other (specify)
ion.com
Page 1

NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Modifiec Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
Collection System and Population Served
1.7
Provide the collection system information requested below for the treatment works.
Municipality
Served
Population
Served
Collection System Type
(indicate percentage)
Ownership Status
100 % separate sanitary sewer
® Own ❑ Maintain
40
% combined storm and sanitary sewer
0 Own ❑ Maintain
❑ Unknown
0 Own ❑ Maintain
cYc separate sanitary sewer
0 Own ❑ Maintain
cYc combined storm and sanitary sewer
0 Own ❑ Maintain
❑ Unknown
0 Own ❑ Maintain
cYc separate sanitary sewer
0 Own ❑ Maintain
cYc combined storm and sanitary sewer
0 Own ❑ Maintain
❑ Unknown
0 Own ❑ Maintain
cYc separate sanitary sewer
0 Own ❑ Maintain
cYc combined storm and sanitary sewer
0 Own ❑ Maintain
❑ Unknown
0 Own ❑ Maintain
Total
Population
Served
40
Separate Sanitary Sewer System
Combined Storm and
Sanitary Sewer
Total percentage of each type of
sewer line (in miles)
100 0/°
0/°
Indian Country
1.8
Is the treatment works located in Indian
❑ Yes
Country?
1:1
No
1.9
Does the facility discharge to a receiving
❑ Yes
water that flows through
0
Indian Country?
No
Design and Actual
Flow Rates
1.10
Provide design and actual flow rates
in the designated spaces.
Design Flow Rate
.0024 mgd
Annual Average Flow Rates (Actual)
Two Years Ago
Last Year
This Year
--- mgd
--- mgd
--- mgd
Maximum Daily Flow Rates (Actual)
Two Years Ago
Last Year
This Year
--- mgd
--- mgd
--- mgd
Discharge Points
by Type
1.11
Provide the total number of effluent discharge points to waters of the State of North Carolina by type.
Total Number of Effluent Discharge Points by Type
Treated Effluent
Untreated Effluent
Combined Sewer
Overflows
Bypasses
Constructed
Emergency
Overflows
1
---
---
---
Page 2

NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Modifiec Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
Outfalls and Other Discharge or Disposal Methods
Outfalls Other Than to Waters of the State of North Carolina
1.12
Does the POTW discharge wastewater to basins, ponds,
for discharge to waters of the State of North Carolina?
❑ Yes
or other
surface impoundments that do not have outlets
4 SKIP to Item 1.14.
0 No
1.13
Provide the location of each surface impoundment and associated discharge information in the table below.
Surface Impoundment Location and Discharge Data
Location
Average Daily Volume
Discharged to Surface
Impoundment
Continuous or Intermittent
(check one)
gpd
0 Continuous
0 Intermittent
gpd
❑ Continuous
❑ Intermittent
gpd
❑ Continuous
0 Intermittent
1.14
Is wastewater applied to land?
❑ Yes
4 SKIP to Item 1.16.
17 No
1.15
Provide the land application site and discharge data requested below.
Land Application Site and Discharge Data
Location
Size
Average Daily Volume
Applied
Continuous or
Intermittent
(check one)
acres
gpd
❑ Continuous
❑ Intermittent
acres
gp d
❑ Continuous
❑ Intermittent
acres
gp d
❑ Continuous
❑ Intermittent
1.16
Is effluent transported to another facility for
❑ Yes
treatment prior to
discharge?
4 SKIP to Item 1.21.
0 No
1.17
Describe the means by which the effluent is transported (e.g., tank truck, pipe).
1.18
Is the effluent transported by a party other than the applicant?
❑ Yes ❑ No 4 SKIP to Item 1.20.
1.19
Provide information on the transporter below.
Transporter Data
Entity name
Mailing address (street or P.O. box)
City or town
State
ZIP code
Contact name (first and last)
Title
Phone number
Email address
Page 3

NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Modifiec Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
Outfalls and Other Discharge or Disposal Methods Continued
1.20
In the table below, indicate the name, address, contact information, NPDES number, and average daily flow rate of the
receiving facility.
Receiving Facility Data
Facility name
Mailing address (street or P.O. box)
City or town
State
ZIP code
Contact name (first and last)
Title
Phone number
Email address
NPDES number of receiving facility (if any) 0 None
Average daily flow rate mgd
1.21
Is the wastewater disposed of in a manner other than
not have outlets to waters of the State of North Carolina
❑ Yes
17
those already mentioned in Items 1.14 through 1.21 that do
(e.g., underground percolation, underground injection)?
No 4 SKIP to Item 1.23.
1.22
Provide information in the table below on these other disposal methods.
Information on Other Disposal Methods
Disposal
Method
Description
Location of
Disposal Site
Size of
Disposal Site
Annual Average
Daily Discharge
Volume
Continuous or Intermittent
(check one)
acres
gpd
❑ Continuous
❑ Intermittent
acres
gpd
❑ Continuous
❑ Intermittent
acres
gpd
❑ Continuous
❑ Intermittent
Variance
Requests
1.23
Do
Consult
❑
0
you intend to request or renew one or more of the variances authorized at 40 CFR 122.21(n)? (Check all that apply.
with your NPDES permitting authority to determine what information needs to be submitted and when.)
Discharges into marine waters (CWA ❑ Water quality related effluent limitation (CWA Section
Section 301(h)) 302(b)(2))
Not applicable
Contractor Information
1.24
Are
the
0
any operational or maintenance aspects (related to wastewater treatment and effluent quality) of the treatment works
responsibility of a contractor?
Yes ❑ No +SKIP to Section 2.
1.25
Provide location and contact information for each contractor in addition to a description of the contractor's operational
and maintenance responsibilities.
Contractor Information
Contractor 1
Contractor 2
Contractor 3
Contractor name
(company name)
AQWA
Mailing address
(street or P.O. box)
1507 Drexel Street N
City, state, and ZIP
code
Wilson, NC 27896
Contact name (first and
last)
Steve Barry
Phone number
252 - 243 - 7693
Email address
[e-mail]
Operational and
maintenance
responsibilities of
contractor
Sample and Maintain
the System
Page 4

SECTION
c
o
2. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Outfalls to Waters of
NPDES Permit Number
(40 CFR 122.21(j)(1) and
the State of North Carolina
Facility Name
(2))
Modifiec Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
2.1
Does the treatment works have a design
❑ Yes
flow greater
than or equal to 0.1 mgd?
No 4 SKIP to Section 3.
0
Inflow and Infiltration
2.2
Provide the treatment works' current average daily volume of inflow
and infiltration.
Average Daily Volume of Inflow and Infiltration
gpd
Indicate the steps the facility is taking to minimize inflow and infiltration.
Topographic
Map
2.3
Have you attached a topographic map to this application that contains all the required information? (See instructions for
specific requirements.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Flow
Diagram
2.4
Have you attached a process flow diagram or schematic to this application that contains all the required information?
(See instructions for specific requirements.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Scheduled Improvements and Schedules of Implementation
2.5
Are improvements to the facility scheduled?
❑ Yes ❑ No 4 SKIP to Section 3.
Briefly list and describe the scheduled improvements.
1.
2.
3.
4.
2.6
Provide scheduled or actual dates of completion for improvements.
Scheduled or Actual Dates of Completion for Improvements
Scheduled
Improvement
(from above)
Affected
Outfalls
(list outfall
number)
Begin
Construction
(MM/DD/YYYY)
End
Construction
(MM/DD/YYYY)
Begin
Discharge
(MM/DD/YYYY)
Attainment of
Operational
Level
(MM/DD/YYYY)
1.
2.
3.
4.
2.7
Have appropriate permits/clearances concerning other federal/state requirements been obtained? Brief
response.
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ None required or
y explain your
applicable
Explanation:
Page 5

NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Modifiec Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
SECTION 3. INFORMATION
ON EFFLUENT DISCHARGES (40 CFR 122.21(j)(3) to (5))
Description of Outfalls
3.1
Provide the following information for each outfall. (Attach additional sheets if you have more than three outfalls.)
Outfall Number 001
Outfall Number
Outfall Number
State
North Carolina
County
Buncombe
City or town
Candler
Distance from shore
ft.
ft.
ft.
Depth below surface
ft.
ft.
ft.
Average daily flow rate
.0024 mgd
mgd
mgd
Latitude
°
°
° "
Longitude
°
°
"
Seasonal or Periodic Discharge Data
3.2
Do any of the outfalls described
❑ Yes
under Item 3.1 have seasonal or
periodic
1:1
discharges?
No 4 SKIP to Item 3.4.
3.3
If so, provide the following information
for each applicable outfall.
Outfall Number
Outfall Number
Outfall Number
Number of times per year
discharge occurs
Average duration of each
discharge (specify units)
Average flow of each
discharge
mgd
mgd
mgd
Months in which discharge
occurs
Diffuser Type
3.4
Are
M
any of the outfalls listed under Item 3.1 equipped with a diffuser?
Yes ❑ No4SKIPtoItem3.6.
3.5
Briefly describe the diffuser type at each applicable outfall.
Outfall Number 001
Outfall Number
Outfall Number
Rip Rap
Waters of
the U.S.
3.6
Does
one
11
the treatment works discharge or plan to discharge wastewater to waters of the State of North Carolina from
or more discharge points?
Yes ❑ No 4SKIP to Section 6.
Page 6

NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Modifiec Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
Receiving Water Description
3.7
Provide the receiving water and related information (if known) for each outfall.
Outfall Number 001
Outfall Number _
Outfall Number
Receiving water name
Beaverdam Creek
Name of watershed, river,
or stream system
French Broad
U.S. Soil Conservation
Service 14-digit watershed
code
12-digit HUC
060101050501
Name of state
management/river basin
North Carolina
French Broad
U.S. Geological Survey
8-digit hydrologic
cataloging unit code
06010105
Critical low flow (acute)
30Q2 0.73 cfs
cfs
cfs
Critical low flow (chronic)
7Q10 0.49 cfs
cfs
cfs
Total hardness at critical
low flow
N/A mg/L of
CaCO3
mg/L of
CaCO3
mg/L of
CaCO3
Treatment Description
3.8
Provide the following information describing the treatment provided for discharges from each outfall.
Outfall Number 001
Outfall Number
Outfall Number
Highest Level of
Treatment (check all that
apply per outfall)
0 Primary
0 Equivalent to
secondary
® Secondary
❑ Advanced
❑ Other (specify)
0 Primary
0 Equivalent to
secondary
0 Secondary
0 Advanced
0 Other (specify)
❑ Primary
❑ Equivalent to
secondary
0 Secondary
0 Advanced
0 Other (specify)
Design Removal Rates by
Outfall
BOD5 or CBOD5
>95
TSS
>95 %
%
%
Phosphorus
® Not applicable
0 Not applicable
0 Not applicable
Nitrogen
Ammonia
❑ Not applicable
>95 NH3 %
0 Not applicable
0 Not applicable
Other (specify)
® Not applicable
%
0 Not applicable
%
0 Not applicable
%
Page 7

NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Modifiec Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
Treatment Description Continued
3.9
Describe the type of disinfection used for the effluent from each outfall in the table below. If disinfection varies by
season, describe below.
Outfall Number
001
Outfall Number
Outfall Number
Disinfection type
Dual UV
Seasons used
all
Dechlorination used?
❑ Not applicable
❑ Not applicable
❑ Not applicable
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ No
❑ No
Effluent Testing Data
3.10
Have you completed monitoring for all Table A parameters and attached the results to the application package?
0 Yes Comparable Facilities ❑ No
3.11
Have you conducted any WET tests during the 4.5 years prior to the date of the application on any of the facility's
discharges or on any receiving water near the discharge points?
❑ Yes
1:1 No4SKIPtoItem3.13.
3.12
Indicate the number of acute and chronic WET tests conducted since the last permit reissuance of the facility's
discharges by outfall number or of the receiving water near the discharge points.
Outfall Number
Outfall Number
Outfall Number
Acute
Chronic
Acute
Chronic
Acute
Chronic
Number of tests of discharge
water
Number of tests of receiving
water
3.14
Does the POTW use chlorine for disinfection, use chlorine elsewhere in the treatment process, or otherwise have
reasonable potential to discharge chlorine in its effluent?
❑ Yes 4 Complete Table B, including chlorine.
1 No 4 Complete Table B, omitting chlorine.
3.15
Have you completed monitoring for all applicable Table B pollutants and attached the results to this application
package?
❑ Yes
0 No
Have you completed monitoring for all applicable Table D pollutants required by your NPDES permitting authority and
3.18
attached the results to this application package?
❑ Yes
sampling required by NPDES
authority.
0No additional
permitting
Page 8

NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Modifiec Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
Effluent Testing Data Continued
3.19
Has the POTW conducted either (1) minimum of four
or (2) at least four annual WET tests in the past 4.5
❑ Yes
quarterly WET tests for one year
years?
4 Complete
preceding this permit application
tests and Table E and SKIP to
0No
Item 3.26.
3.20
Have you previously submitted the results of the above tests to your NPDES permitting authority?
❑ Yes ❑ No 4 Provide results in Table E and SKIP to
Item 3.26.
3.21
Indicate the dates the data were submitted to your NPDES permitting authority and provide a summary of the results.
Date(s) Submitted
(MM/DD/YYYY)
Summary of Results
3.22
Regardless of how you provided your WET testing data to the NPDES permitting authority, did any of the tests result in
toxicity?
❑ Yes ❑ No 4 SKIP to Item 3.26.
3.23
Describe the cause(s) of the toxicity:
3.24
Has the treatment works conducted a toxicity reduction evaluation?
❑ Yes ❑ No 4 SKIP to Item 3.26.
3.25
Provide details of any toxicity reduction evaluations conducted.
3.26
Have you completed Table E for all applicable outfalls and attached the results to the application package?
❑ Yes Not Applicable ❑ Not applicable because previously submitted
information to the NPDES •ermittin• authorit
Page 9

NPDES Permit Number
Faality Name
Modified Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
SECTION 6. CHECKLIST AND CERTIFICATION STATEMENT (40 CFR 122.22(a) and (d))
Checklist and Certification Statement
6.1 in Column 1 below, mark the sections of Form 2A that you have completed and are submitting with your application. For
each section, specify in Column 2 any attachments that you are enclosing to alert the permitting authority. Note that not
all applicants are required to provide attachments.
Column I Column 2
Section 1: Basic Application u
Information for Alt Applicants wl variance request(s)
� Section 2: Additional
Information
ag Section 3: Information on
Effluent Discharges
Section 4: Not Applicable
01
ii
wl topographic map
wl additional attachments
El w/ Table A
w/ Table B
0 w! Table C
1
O wl additional attachments
Ea w/process flow diagram
■
w/ Table D
O w/ additional attachments
Section 5: Not Applicable
O Section 6: Checklist and
Certification Statement
❑ wl attachments
6.2
Certification Statement
1 certify under penalty of law that this document and al! attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information
submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible
for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and
complete. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine
and imprisonment for knowing violations. _
Name (print or type first and last name)
Kimberly Broch
Official title
Owner
Signature
Date signed
July 28, 2021
Page 10

NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Outfall Number
Modified Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
TABLE
A. EFFLUENT PARAMETERS
FOR ALL POTWS
Pollutant
Maximum Daily Discharge
Average Daily Discharge
Analytical
Methods
ML or MDL
units)
(include
Value
Units
Value
Units
Number of
Samples
Biochemical oxygen demand
® BOD5 or ❑ CBOD5
(report one)
3.52
mg/L
10
o MDL
Fecal coliform
1.63
M PN/100 mL
10
o ML
❑ MDL
Design flow rate
436
gpd
10
pH (minimum)
pH (maximum)
Temperature (winter)
Temperature (summer)
Total suspended solids (TSS)
3.38
mg/L
10
0 ML
❑ MDL
1 Sampling shall be conducted according to sufficiently sensitive test procedures (i.e., methods) approved under 40 CFR 136 for the analysis of pollutants or pollutant parameters or
required under 40 CFR chapter I, subchapter N or 0. See instructions and 40 CFR 122.21(e)(3).
* NOTE : No site -specific effluent could be tested. The provided data is the average pollutant levels that were sampled from
ten (10) comparable facilities.
Page 11

EPA Identification Number
NPDES Permit Number
Facility Name
Outfall Number
Modified Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
TABLE B. EFFLUENT PARAMETERS
FOR ALL POTWS WITH A FLOW EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 0.1 MGD
Pollutant
Maximum Daily Discharge
Average Daily Discharge
Analytical
Methods
ML or MDL
(include
units)
Value
Units
Value
Units
Number of
Samples
Ammonia (as N)
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Chlorine
(total residual, TRC)2
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Dissolved oxygen
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Nitrate/nitrite
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Kjeldahl nitrogen
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Oil and grease
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Phosphorus
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Total dissolved solids
❑ ML
❑ MDL
1 Sampling shall be conducted according to sufficiently sensitive test procedures (i.e., methods) approved under 40 CFR 136 for the analysis of pollutants or pollutant parameters or
required under 40 CFR chapter I, subchapter N or 0. See instructions and 40 CFR 122.21(e)(3).
2 Facilities that do not use chlorine for disinfection, do not use chlorine elsewhere in the treatment process, and have no reasonable potential to discharge chlorine in their effluent are not
required to report data for chlorine.
EPA Form 3510-2A (Revised 3-19)
Page 12

EPA Identification Number
TABLE C. EFFLUENT PARAMETERS
NPDES Permit Number
FOR SELECTED POTWS
Maximum Daily Discharge
Facility Name
Average
Outfall Number
Daily Discharge
Modified
Analytical
Method1
Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
ML or MDL
(include units)
Pollutant
Value
Units
Value
Units
Number of
Samples
Metals, Cyanide, and Total Phenols
Hardness (as CaCO3)
❑ ML
0 MDL
Antimony, total recoverable
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Arsenic, total recoverable
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Beryllium, total recoverable
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Cadmium, total recoverable
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Chromium, total recoverable
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Copper, total recoverable
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Lead, total recoverable
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Mercury, total recoverable
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Nickel, total recoverable
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Selenium, total recoverable
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Silver, total recoverable
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Thallium, total recoverable
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Zinc, total recoverable
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Cyanide
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Total phenolic compounds
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Volatile Organic Compounds
Acrolein
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Acrylonitrile
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Benzene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Bromoform
❑ ML
❑ MDL
EPA Form 3510-2A (Revised 3-19)
Page 13

EPA Identification Number
TABLE C. EFFLUENT PARAMETERS
NPDES Permit Number
FOR SELECTED POTWS
Facility Name
Outfall Number
Modified
Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
Maximum Daily Discharge
Average Daily Discharge
Analytical
Method1
ML or MDL
(include units)
Pollutant
Value
Units
Value
Units
Number of
Samples
Carbon tetrachloride
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Chlorobenzene
0 ML
❑ MDL
Chlorodibromomethane
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Chloroethane
❑ ML
❑ MDL
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Chloroform
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Dichlorobromomethane
❑ ML
❑ MDL
1,1-dichloroethane
❑ ML
❑ MDL
1,2-dichloroethane
❑ ML
❑ MDL
trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
1,1-dichloroethylene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
1,2-dichloropropane
❑ ML
❑ MDL
1,3-dichloropropylene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Ethylbenzene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Methyl bromide
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Methyl chloride
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Methylene chloride
❑ ML
❑ MDL
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Tetrachloroethylene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Toluene
0 ML
❑ MDL
1,1,1-trichloroethane
❑ ML
❑ MDL
1,1,2-trichloroethane
0 ML
❑ MDL
EPA Form 3510-2A (Revised 3-19)
Page 14

EPA Identification Number
TABLE C. EFFLUENT PARAMETERS
NPDES Permit Number
FOR SELECTED POTWS
Facility Name
Outfall Number
Modified
Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
Maximum Daily Discharge
Average Daily Discharge
Analytical
Method1
ML or MDL
(include units)
Pollutant
Value
Units
Value
Units
Number of
Samples
Trichloroethylene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Vinyl chloride
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Acid -Extractable Compounds
p-chloro-m-cresol
❑ ML
❑ MDL
2-chlorophenol
❑ ML
❑ MDL
2,4-dichlorophenol
❑ ML
❑ MDL
2,4-dimethylphenol
❑ ML
❑ MDL
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
❑ ML
❑ MDL
2,4-dinitrophenol
❑ ML
❑ MDL
2-nitrophenol
❑ ML
❑ MDL
4-nitrophenol
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Pentachlorophenol
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Phenol
❑ ML
❑ MDL
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Base -Neutral Compounds
Acenaphthene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Acenaphthylene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Anthracene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Benzidine
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Benzo(a)anthracene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Benzo(a)pyrene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
3,4-benzofluoranthene
0 ML
❑ MDL
EPA Form 3510-2A (Revised 3-19)
Page 15

EPA Identification Number
TABLE C. EFFLUENT PARAMETERS
NPDES Permit Number
FOR SELECTED POTWS
Facility Name
Outfall Number
Modified
Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
Maximum Daily Discharge
Average Daily Discharge
Analytical
Method'
ML or MDL
(include units)
Pollutant
Value
Units
Value
Units
Number of
Samples
Benzo(ghi)perylene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
❑ ML
❑ MDL
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Butyl benzyl phthalate
❑ ML
❑ MDL
2-chloronaphthalene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Chrysene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
di-n-butyl phthalate
❑ ML
❑ MDL
di-n-octyl phthalate
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
1,2-dichlorobenzene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
1,3-dichlorobenzene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
1,4-dichlorobenzene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Diethyl phthalate
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Dimethyl phthalate
❑ ML
❑ MDL
2,4-dinitrotoluene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
2,6-dinitrotoluene
0 ML
❑ MDL
EPA Form 3510-2A (Revised 3-19)
Page 16

EPA Identification Number
TABLE C. EFFLUENT PARAMETERS
NPDES Permit Number
FOR SELECTED POTWS
Facility Name
Outfall Number
Modified
Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
Maximum Daily Discharge
Average Daily Discharge
Analytical
Method1
ML or MDL
(include units)
Pollutant
Value
Units
Value
Units
Number of
Samples
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Fluoranthene
0 ML
❑ MDL
Fluorene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Hexachlorobenzene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Hexachlorobutadiene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Hexachloroethane
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Isophorone
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Naphthalene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Nitrobenzene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
❑ ML
❑ MDL
N-nitrosodimethylamine
❑ ML
❑ MDL
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Phenanthrene
0 ML
❑ MDL
Pyrene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
❑ ML
❑ MDL
1 Sampling shall be conducted according to sufficiently sensitive test procedures (i.e., methods) approved under 40 CFR 136 for the analysis of pollutants or pollutant parameters or
required under 40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N or 0. See instructions and 40 CFR 122.21(e)(3).
EPA Form 3510-2A (Revised 3-19)
Page 17

TABLE D. ADDITIONAL POLLUTANTS
NPDES Permit Number
AS REQUIRED BY NPDES PERMITTING
Maximum Daily Discharge
Facility Name
AUTHORITY
Average
Outfall
Daily Dischar
Number
e
Modified
Analytical
Method1
Application Form 2A
Modified March 2021
ML or MDL
(include units)
Pollutant
(list)
Value
Units
Value
Units
Number of
Samples
•
No additional sampling is required by NPDES permitting authority.
❑ ML
❑ MDL
❑ ML
❑ MDL
❑ ML
❑ MDL
❑ ML
❑ MDL
❑ ML
❑ MDL
❑ ML
❑ MDL
❑ ML
❑ MDL
❑ ML
❑ MDL
❑ ML
❑ MDL
❑ ML
❑ MDL
❑ ML
❑ MDL
❑ ML
❑ MDL
❑ ML
❑ MDL
❑ ML
❑ MDL
❑ ML
❑ MDL
❑ ML
❑ MDL
❑ ML
❑ MDL
Sampling shall be conducted according to sufficiently sensitive test procedures (i.e., methods) approved under 40 CFR 136 for the analysis of pollutants or pollutant parameters or required
under 40 CFR chapter I, subchapter N or 0. See instructions and 40 CFR 122.21(e)(3).
Page 18

Attachment C
Documentation From Buncombe County Environmental Health Department

Re:
Buncombe County Health and Human Services
Public Assistance & Work Support Strategies —Public Health - Social Work Services — Veterans Services
Jim Holland, MBA
Health and Human Services Director
Application for Improvement Permit for
Parcel Identification No. 9605250161. Beaverdam Loop Rd. Candler, NC 28715.
Dear Ms. Kimberly Broch
The Buncombe County Health and Human Services, Environmental Health Division on _5/24/21
evaluated the above -referenced property at the site designated on the plat/site plan that accompanied your application.
According to your application the site is to serve numerous homes for a total of 20-bedrooms with a design wastewater
flow of 2400 gallons per day. The evaluation was done in accordancc with the laws and rules governing wastewater
systems in North Carolina General Statute 130A-333 and related statutes and Title 15A, Subchapter 18A, of the North
Carolina Administrative Code, Rule. 1900 and related rules.
Based on the criteria set out in Title 15A, Subchapter 18A, of the North Carolina Administrative Code, Rules .1940
through .1948, the evaluation indicated that the site is UNSUITABLE for a ground absorption sewage system.
Therefore, your request for an improvement permit is DENIED. The site is unsuitable based on the following:
Unsuitable soil topography and/or landscape position (Rule .1940)
Unsuitable soil characteristics (structure or clay mineralogy) (Rule .1941)
X Unsuitable soil wetness condition (Rule .1942)
_X_ Unsuitable soil depth (Rule .1943)
Presence of restrictive horizon (Rule .1944)
_X_ Insufficient space for septic system and repair area (Rule .1945)
Unsuitable for meeting required setbacks (Rule .1950)
Other (Rule .1946)
These severe soil or site limitations could cause premature system failure, leading to the discharge of untreated
sewage on the ground surface, into surface waters, directly to ground water or inside your structure.
The site evaluation included consideration of possible site modifications, as well as use of modified, innovative, or
alternative systems. However, the Division of Environmental Health has determined that none of the above options
will overcome the severe conditions on this site. A possible option might be a system designed to dispose of sewage
to another area of suitable soil or off -site to additional property.
For the reasons set out above, the property is currently classified UNSUITABLE, and no improvement permit shall
be issued for this site in accordance with Rule .1948(c).
Note that a site classified as UNSUITABLE may be classified as PROVISIONALLY SUITABLE if written
documentation is provided that meets the requirements of Rule .1948(d). A copy of this rule is enclosed. You may
P.O. Box 7408, Asheville, NC 28802
[phone] buncombecounty.org
In accordance with Federal law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) policy, this institution Is prohibited
from discriminating on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. Under the Food Stamp Act and USDA policy, discrimination is prohibited also on
the basis of religion or political beliefs.

hire a consultant to assist you if you wish to try to develop a plan under which your site could be reclassified as
PROVISIONALLY SUITABLE.
You have a right to an informal review of this decision. You may request an informal review by the soil scientist or
environmental health supervisor at the Buncombe County Health Center. You may also request an informal review by
the N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources regional soil specialist. A request for informal review by
the regional soil specialist must be made in writing to the Buncombe County Health Center.
You also have a right to a formal appeal of this decision. To pursue a formal appeal, you must file a petition for a
contested case hearing with the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. To get
a copy of a petition form, you may write the Office of Administrative Hearings or call the office at [phone] or
from the OAH web site at www.oah.state.nc.us/form.htm. The petition for a contested case hearing must be filed in
accordance with the provision of North Carolina General Statutes 130A-24 and 150B-23 and all other applicable
provisions of Chapter 150B. N.C. General Statute 130A-335 (g) provides that your hearing would be held in the county
where your property is located.
Please note: If you wish to pursue a formal appeal, you must file the petition form with the Office of Administrative
Hearings WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS LETTER The date of this letter is June 9, 2003. Meeting
the 30 day deadline is critical to your right to a formal appeal.
If you file a petition for a contested case hearing with the Office of Administrative Hearings, you are required by
law (NC General Statute 150B-23) to serve a copy of your petition on the Office of General Counsel, NC
Department of Health and Human Services, 2001 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699-2001.
Do NOT serve the petition to the Buncombe County Department of Health and Human Services. Sending a copy of
your petition to the Buncombe County Department of Health and Human Services will NOT satisfy the legal
requirement in NC General Statute 150B-23 that you send a copy to the Office of General Counsel, NC Department
of Health and Human Services.
You may call or write Buncombe County Department of Health and Human Services, Environmental Health Division, if
you need any additional information or assistance.
Sincerely,
1)5
312.1121
William B. Turner, REHS
Environmental Health Program Specialist
30 Valley Street
Asheville, NC 28801
828-250-5038
Enclosures: (Copy of Rule .1948)
P.O. Box 7408, Asheville, NC 28802
[phone] buncombecounty.org
In accordance with Federal law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) policy, this institution is prohibited
from discriminating on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. Under the Food Stamp Act and USDA policy, discrimination is prohibited also on
the basis of religion or political beliefs.

Attachment D
Land Resource Management Soil Evaluation Report

/1/ LAND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Land Evaluation by Land Experts
f 130x $25T, ASHEVILLE, NC 281T5 II B28.231.1663 , WW._ANURM.cOM
February 8, 2021
Zach Broch
3863 Sweeten Creek Road
Arden, NC 28704
zachA securerestoration. com
Attention: Zach Broch
Regarding: Report of Findings
Preliminary Soils Evaluation
Parcel ID # 9605-25-0161
TBD Beaverdam Loop Road, Buncombe County, NC
LRM Project# 78020
Dear Mr. Broch:
Land Resource Management, PLLC (LRM) has conducted a preliminary soils investigation
on 6.19 Acres off Beaverdam Loop Road in Buncombe County, North Carolina. Based on
this soils evaluation, LRM has determined the 6.19 acre parcel is suitable for a single 4
bedroom aerobic subsurface drip irrigation (SSDI) onsite wastewater system.
The preliminary soils evaluation and recommendation is based on, observations made and
data collected on topography, landscape position, parent material, underlying geology, and
soil characteristics. Soil characteristics include, but are not limited to, depth to a Seasonal
High Water Table (SHWT), depth to a restrictive horizon, total soil depth, soil horizonation,
soil structure, soil color, clay mineralogy, bulk density, consistence, plasticity, stone
content, and percent sand, silt, clay, and mica. They follow the guidelines set forth in the
North Carolina Administrative Code -Rules for Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems,
Title 15A-DENR, Subchapter 18A, Section .1934 through .1970, amended October 1st,
2011.
Thank you for this opportunity to provide you with soils data and interpretation. Please let
us know if any assistance is needed in obtaining a septic permit from Buncombe County
Health Depaitiuent.
Sincerely,
Walker Ferguson, LSS
President, Land Resource Management, PLLC
1

LAND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Land Evaluation by Land Experts
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT NAME: ZpeN 7vocN
DATE: Sill /L6Z°
DESCRIBED BY:'E
Saurolite
Death to
Boring
Number
Soil
Depth
(in.)
Controlling
Texture
Clay
%
Slope
%
LP
PM
Texture
•
Thickness
(in.)
WB
(in.)
HB
(in.)
SHWT
(in.)
LTAR
)3D''
CI_
%
3®/
('
A,
—
-
:.0"
r.e,"
id"
03
';
1
CL.
j°/d
3°%a
FP
A
--_
›)„
.39
g',
JS
3
721,t
3p, �
o.:�
°
�b
—
—
>2y
>21 °"
lc
d
a'
0 L-
'-6%
5%
ice!n
A
`"_
>3a'
>y'
/24 °
JS
'73'
Ct_
/
/
-A
---
......
>3'
>301!
/2't
vs
732''
CL
l/.f%
fe
""
>38„,,1
,>37"
r
?,j
7
a
t o'
—
—
}32
>32„
0
Z
730
CL
`P%
ti9.f
A
_
_
c.'‘
w
li„
0
>30''
jCL
794
y%
q
>
._
—
>7'
'
'`
0_ )
to
> "
/ 1✓
3 '
'' ° .-
FP
A
—
—
G
-i_s
(f
,Z`f ,
-t__
/✓ ,,,
rf
4
_
_
/,J•.
)-:
fIZ
>2H'L
° .
rr°
z
7Zg"
5--.
A
i)
21/ ff
t--
Z S /o
,''
Fi
{i
/e7--I'
%:
/
HB = Hard bedrock
LTAR = Long Term
Acceptance Rate
SBRF = Stopped by rock
fragments
SHWT Seasonal high
water table
Weathered bedrock
WB =
Denotes aerobic drip
in LTAR column
PM = PARENT MATERIAL:
A = Alluvium
C = Colluvium
R = Residuum
AIR = Alluvium over
Residuum
C/R = Colluvium over
Residuum
TEXTURES:
C = Clay
CL = Clay loam
L = Loam
LS = Loamy sand
. S = Sand
SC = Sandy clay
SCL = Sandy clay loam
SL= Sandy loam
SiL= Silt loam
SiCL = Silty clay loam
LP = LANDSCAPE POSITIONS:
CB =Colluvial bench LT =Low terrace
CF=Colluvial fan NS=Noseslope
FP=Floodplain
FR =Falling ridge
FS=Footslope
HS=Headslope
HT =High terrace
RT=Ridgetop
SH =Shoulder
SS =Sideslope
TS=Toeslope
UD =Upland draw

AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Land Evaluation by Land Experts
PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT NAME: as gee'
DATE: /'
DESCRIBED BY:
Saprolite
Death to
Boring
Number
Soil
Depth
(in.)
Controlling
Texture
Clay
%
Slope
%
LP
PM
Texture
Thickness
(in.)
WB
(in.)
HB
(in.)
SHWT
(in.)
LTAR
19
� Zt-r
5.{ L
z51
3a��
:LT
0
ZU
?'2`1'
e t_
7- Ye,
RYA
—
;,
, _,
7
(J�
HB = Hard bedrock
LTAR = Long Term
Acceptance Rate
SBRF = Stopped by rock
fragments
SHWT Seasonal high
water table
Weathered bedrock
WB=
Denotes aerobic drip
* = in LTAR column
PM = PARENT MATERIAL:
A = Alluvium
C = Colluvium
R = Residuum
A/R = Alluvium over
Residuum
C/R = Colluvium over
Residuum
TEXTURES:
C = Clay
CL = Clay loam
L= Loam
LS = Loamy sand
S = Sand
SC = Sandy clay
SCL = Sandy clay loam
SL = Sandy loam
SiL = Silt loam
SiCL = Silty clay loam
LP = LANDSCAPE POSITIONS:
CB =Colluvial bench LT =Low terrace
CF=Colluviai fan NS =Noseslope
FP =Floodplain
FR =Falling ridge
FS=Footslope
HS=Headslope
HT =High terrace
RT=Ridgetop
SH =Shoulder
SS =Sideslope
TS=Toeslope
UD =Upland draw

4S) LAND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Land Evaluation by Land Experts
Key:
' Preliminary Boring Unsuitable for Septic Permitting
Preliminary Boring Suitable for SSDI or LPP Mound
Soil Borings are spaced on an approximate 100' grid pattern and marked with orange/black ribbon.
1:2,257
0 0.0175 0.035 0.07 mi
i i I. 11 r. 1 1
0 0.03 0.06 0.12 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garrrin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan,
Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand),

Attachment E
Correspondence from USGS

8/27/2020
StreamStats
7Q1 0 and 30Q2 Request
Region ID: NC
Workspace ID: NC20200827145325998000
Clicked Point (Latitude, Longitude): 35.49441, -82.68926
Time: 2020-08-27 10:53:43 -0400
Basin Characteristics
Parameter Code
https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/
Parameter Description
Value Unit
1/3

8/27/2020 StreamStats
Parameter Code Parameter Description Value Unit
DRNAREA Area that drains to a point on a stream 4.69 square miles
PCTREG1 Percentage of drainage area located in Region 1 0 percent
PCTREG2 Percentage of drainage area located in Region 2 100 percent
PCTREG3 Percentage of drainage area located in Region 3 0 percent
PCTREG4 Percentage of drainage area located in Region 4 0 percent
PCTREG5 Percentage of drainage area located in Region 5 0 percent
Peak -Flow Statistics Parameters[Peak Southeast US over 1 sgmi20095158]
Parameter Code Parameter Name Value Units Min Limit Max Limit
DRNAREA Drainage Area 4.69 square miles 1 9000
PCTREG1 Percent Area in Region 1 0 percent 0 100
PCTREG2 Percent Area in Region 2 100 percent 0 100
PCTREG3 Percent Area in Region 3 0 percent 0 100
PCTREG4 Percent Area in Region 4 0 percent 0 100
PCTREG5 Percent Area in Region 5 0 percent 0 100
Peak -Flow Statistics Flow Report
—Peak Southeast USover 1 sgmi2oo95158]
PII: Prediction Interval -Lower, Plu: Prediction Interval -Upper, SEp: Standard Error of Prediction, SE: Standard Error (other -- see report)
Statistic Value Unit PII Plu SEp
2 Year Peak Flood 365 ft"3/s 208 639 34.5
5 Year Peak Flood 665 ft"3/s 382 1160 34
10 Year Peak Flood 899 ft"3/s 507 1590 35.1
https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/
2/3

8/27/2020 StreamStats
Statistic Value Unit PII Plu SEp
25 Year Peak Flood 1220 ft"3/s 663 2240 37.5
50 Year Peak Flood 1450 ft"3/s 763 2760 39.6
100 Year Peak Flood 1730 ft"3/s 879 3400 41.9
200 Year Peak Flood 1980 ft"3/s 970 4040 44.3
500 Year Peak Flood 2360 ft"3/s 1100 5060 47.7
Peak -Flow Statistics Citations
Weaver, J.C., Feaster, T.D., and Gotvald, A.J.,2009, Magnitude and frequency of rural floods in the Southeastern United
States, through 2006-Volume 2, North Carolina: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5158, 111 p.
(http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5158/)
USGS Data Disclaimer: Unless otherwise stated, all data, metadata and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for
which the data were collected. Although these data and associated metadata have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness and approved for release by the U.S.
Geological Survey (USGS), no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data for other purposes, nor on all computer systems, nor
shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty.
USGS Software Disclaimer: This software has been approved for release by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Although the software has been subjected to rigorous
review, the USGS reserves the right to update the software as needed pursuant to further analysis and review. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made by the USGS
or the U.S. Government as to the functionality of the software and related material nor shall the fact of release constitute any such warranty. Furthermore, the software
is released on condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S. Government shall be held liable for any damages resulting from its authorized or unauthorized use.
USGS Product Names Disclaimer: Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Application Version: 4.4.0
https://streamstats. usgs.gov/ss/ 3/3

Firefox https://outlook.office.com/maiUsentitems/id/AAQkAGE5ODAwZGVjL...
USGS response to DWR USGS Low Flows request # 2020-94 (dated 2020/09/03) for
Beaverdam Creek Buncombe County...RE: [EXTERNAL] 7Q1O/3OQ2 Request-
Streamstat Basin Del for Lucas Property Buncombe Co. NC
Weaver, John C <[e-mail]>
Tue 9/8/2020 5:17 PM
To: Julie Davidson <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
[e-mail]<[e-mail]>;[e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
[e-mail] <[e-mail]>; Weaver, John C <[e-mail]>
Ms. Davidson,
In response to your inquiry about the low -flow characteristics for a location on Beaverdam Creek at
Beaverdam in southwestern Buncombe County, the following information is provided:
A check of the low -flow files here at the USGS South Atlantic Water Science Center (Raleigh office) does not
indicates a previous low -flow determination for the point of interest, identified by the lat/long coordinates
(35.49441, -82.68926) provided via email dated 09/03/2020 from the DWR USGS Low Flow portal following
your request submission.
In the absence of site -specific discharge records sufficient for a low -flow analysis, estimates of low -flow
characteristics at ungaged locations are determined by assessing a range in the low -flow yields (expressed as
flow per square mile drainage area, or cfsm) at nearby sites where estimates have previously been
determined.
A basin delineation completed using the online USGS StreamStats application for North Carolina
(https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/) indicates the drainage area for the point of interest (StreamStats adjusted
coordinates 35.49441, -82.68926 NAD83) is 4.69 sqmi, which confirms the drainage area submitted as part of
the request information.
For streams in Buncombe County, low -flow characteristics published by the USGS are provided in the
following reports:
(1) The first is a statewide report completed in the early 1990's. It is USGS Water -Supply Paper 2403, "Low -
flow characteristics of streams in North Carolina" (Giese and Mason, 1993). An online version of the report is
available at https://pubs.usgs.gov/wsp/2403/report.pdf. The report provides the low -flow characteristics
(based on data through 1988) via regional relations and at -site values for sites with drainage basins between 1
and 400 sqmi and not considered or known to be affected by regulation and/or diversions.
(2) The second is a statewide report published in March 2015. It is USGS Scientific Investigations Report
2015-5001, "Low -flow characteristics and flow -duration statistics for selected USGS continuous -record
streamgaging stations in North Carolina through 2012" (Weaver, 2015). The report is available online at
https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2015/5001/. The report provides updated low -flow characteristics and flow -
duration statistics for 266 active (as of 2012 water year) and discontinued streamgages across the state where
a minimum of 10 climatic years discharge records were available for flow analyses.
Low -flow characteristics estimated for point of interest:
Inspection of the reports indicates the presence of ten (10) nearby selected USGS partial -record sites (5) and
continuous -record streamgages (5) in the general vicinity of the point of interest where low -flow
1 of 3 3/11/2021, 2:14 PM

Firefox https://outlook.office.com/maiUsentitems/id/AAQkAGE5ODAwZGVjL...
characteristics were published. Among these 10 index sites, the low -flow discharge yields for the indicated
flow statistics are as follows:
Annual 7Q10 low -flow yields ==> from 0.22 to 0.56 cfsm (average about 0.36 cfsm, median about 0.39 cfsm)
Annual 30Q2 low -flow yields ==> from 0.43 to 1 cfsm (average about 0.73 cfsm, median about 0.76 cfsm)
Winter 7Q10 low -flow yields ==> from 0.3 to 0.69 cfsm (average about 0.49 cfsm, median about 0.51 cfsm)
Annual 7Q2 low -flow yields ==> from 0.36 to 0.87 cfsm (both average and median about 0.62 cfsm)
Average annual discharge yields ==> from 1.1 to 3.2 cfsm (average about 2 cfsm, median about 2.4 cfsm)
Application of the above range in yields to the drainage area (4.69 sqmi) for the point of interest results in the
following estimated low -flow discharges:
Annual 7Q10 low -flow discharges ==> from 1 to 2.6 cfs (average about 1.7 cfs, median about 1.8 cfs)
Annual 30Q2 low -flow discharges ==> from 2 to 4.7 cfs (average about 3.4 cfs, median about 3.6 cfs)
Winter 7Q10 low -flow discharges ==> from 1.4 to 3.2 cfs (average about 2.3 cfs, median about 2.4 cfs)
Annual 7Q2 low -flow discharges ==> from 1.7 to 4.1 cfs (both average and median about 2.9 cfs)
Average annual discharge discharges ==> from 5.2 to 15 cfs (average about 9.4 cfs, median about 11.3 cfs)
Please note:
(1) The estimated flows are provided in units of cubic feet per second (cfs).
(2) The low -flow yields provided above are rounded to 2 significant figures. Estimated low -flow discharges less
than 1 cfs are rounded to 2 significant figures. If between 1 and 100 cfs, then rounded to 1 decimal place; if
greater than 100, then rounded to the nearest whole number (zero decimal places).
(3) The information provided in this message is based on a preliminary assessment and considered
provisional, subject to revision pending collection of future data and further analyses.
These provisional streamflow statistics are provided via the DWR USGS Low Flows cooperative agreement
between the USGS and the N.C. Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources.
Hope this information is helpful.
Thank you.
Curtis Weaver
J. Curtis Weaver, Hydrologist, PE Email: [e-mail]
USGS South Atlantic Water Science Center Online: https://www.usgs.gov/centers/sa-water
North Carolina - South Carolina - Georgia
3916 Sunset Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Phone: [phone] // Fax: [phone]
Original Message
From: Julie Davidson <[e-mail]>
2 of 3 3/11/2021, 2:14 PM

Firefox https://outlook. office. com/mail/sentitems/id/AAQkAGE5ODAwZGVj L...
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 11:54 AM
To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
[e-mail]; Weaver, John C <[e-mail]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] 7Q10/30Q2 Request-Streamstat Basin Del for Lucas Property Buncombe Co. NC
This email has been received from outside of DOI - Use caution before clicking on links, opening attachments,
or responding.
This attachment goes with the request I just submitted.
Thank You,
Julie Davidson
Julie Peele Davidson
GIS Specialist
[e-mail]
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc. (AWT)
501 N. Salem St. Suite 203
Apex NC 27502
Office: 919.859.0669
Direct: 919.367.6315
Cell/Text: 919.971.23 26
www.agriwaste.com
3 of 3 3/11/2021, 2:14 PM

Attachment F
Correspondence from NCNHP

■•■u■
•• • NC DEPARTMENT OF
•
Eamon NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■■■■■
April 12, 2021
Julie Davidson
Agriwaste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem St.
Apex, NC 27502
RE: Lucas Onsite Wastewater Design Lucas
Dear Julie Davidson:
Roy Cooper, Governor
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Walter Clark
Director, Division of Land and WaterSlewardship
NCNHDE-14446
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Di rectory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butlerncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
C1 121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH, NC 27603 • 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699
1 OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Lucas Onsite Wastewater Design
Project No. Lucas
April 12, 2021
NCNHDE-14446
Element Occurrences Documented Within Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status tatus Rank Rank
Date Rank
Vascular Plant 1803 Spiraea virginiana Virginia Spiraea 1919-07 X 3-Medium Threatened Threatened G2 S2
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
No Managed Areas Documented within the Project Area
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/help. Data query generated on April 12, 2021; source: NCNHP, Q4 January 2021. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 4

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Lucas Onsite Wastewater Design
Project No. Lucas
April 12, 2021
NCNHDE-14446
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
Group
EO ID Scientific Name
Common Name
Element Accuracy
Observation Occurrence
Date ` Rank
Federal State Global State
Status Status Rank Rank
Amphibian 11532
Crustacean 31040
Dragonfly or 33442
Damselfly
Mammal 36002
Mammal 34295
Vascular Plant 1803
Cryptobranchus
alleganiensis
alleganiensis
Cambarus reburrus
Calopteryx amata
Myotis lucifugus
Eastern Hellbender 2013-04-10
French Broad River
Crayfish
Superb Jewelwing
Little Brown Bat
Myotis septentrionalis Northern Long-eared
Bat
Spiraea virginiana Virginia Spiraea
2011-09-27
2004-Pre
2005-06-14
2005-06-14
1919-07
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name
Pisgah National Forest - Pisgah Ranger District US Forest Service
Conserving Carolina Easement Conserving Carolina
C 3-Medium
E 3-Medium
H?
E
E
X
Special
Concern
Significantly
Rare
5-Very Significantly
Low Rare
2-High Significantly
Rare
2-High Threatened Threatened
3-Medium Threatened Threatened
Owner Type
Federal
Private
G3T2 S3
G3 S2
G5 S1S2
G3 S2
G1G2 S2
G2 S2
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.ora/help. Data query generated on April 12, 2021; source: NCNHP, Q4 January 2021. Please
resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

April 12, 2021
▪ Project Boundary
▪ Buffered Project Boundary
Managed Area (MAREA)
NCNHDE-14446: Lucas Onsite Wastewater Design
1:22,218
0 0.175 0.35
1 ti
0 0.3 0.6
0.7 mi
1.2 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, Increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
Page 4 of 4

Attachment G
Stream Classification

Surface Water Classifications:
Stream index 6-76-5-8
Stream Name: Beaverdam Creek
Description: From source toSouth
Hominy Creek
Classification: C;Tr
Date of Class.: June 30 1973
W hat does this More info
Class. mean?
RiverBasi.n: French Broad
Zoom to

Attachment H
Flow Path to "Blue Line" Water Feature

PIN 9605250161 Beaverdam Loop Rd. Candler, NC 28715
July 26, 2021
0
0.02
1:2,257
0.04
0.08 mi
Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Ea rthstar Geographics, C N ES/Ai rbus DS,
USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, I GN, and the GIS User Community

Attachment I
Information on Connection to a Regional Sewer System

Kristy Green
From: Rhinehart, Heather <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 4:32 PM
To: Kristy Green
Cc: PlanDevDept
Subject: RE: Sewer Availability Request
Attachments: 99999 BEAVERDAM LOOP RD MAP.pdf
Good afternoon Kristy,
I have attached a map above and MSD sewer lines are not located near this property.
I have searched the map and not showing any MSD lines close to this area.
Hope this helps and if you need any more information let me know.
Thank you,
HEATHER A RHINEHART
System Coordinator II
MSD Planning& Development/Engineering Division
Metropolitan Sewerage District
2028 Riverside Drive
Asheville, North Carolina 28804
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
From: Kristy Green <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 4:14 PM
To: Rhinehart, Heather <[e-mail]>
Subject: Sewer Availability Request
Good Afternoon Heather,
I hope you are having a great week! I have a sewer availability request for a property located at Lower Beaverdam
Loop Road, Candler, NC 28715 (PIN 9605-25-0161) . Can you please let me know the approximate distance to the
nearest sewer location, as well as if there are any plans for the sewer line expansion towards the property in the
next 5 years? Thanks for your help!
Regards,
Kristy Green, E.I.
Assistant Project Engineer
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc. (AWT)
Office: [phone] / Direct: [phone]
501 N Salem Street, Suite 203 Apex, NC 27502
[e-mail]
1

99999 BEAVERDAM LOOP RD
Author: HEATHER RHINEHART
1:4,000
Date: 5/5/2021
The Metropolitan Sewerage District of Buncombe County, NC has prepared these maps based on best available information for use in assisting District maintenance work, service area analysis, and
planning. The District does not warrant the accuracy of any of the information shown. Field verification is advised for all information shown on the maps or included with manhole data. No guarantee is
given as to the accuracy or currency of any of the data. Therefore, in no event shall the District be liable for any special, indirect, or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from
loss of use, data, or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence, or other action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the information herein provided. Grid shown is North Carolina
State Plane Coordinate System NAD 1983 (North American Datum 1983).

Attachment J
Engineering Alternatives Analysis

Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, North Carolina 27502
919-859-0669
www.agriwaste.com
Engineering Alternatives Analysis
Broch Property
Lower Beaverdam Loop Road
Candler, NC 28715
PIN: 9605-25-0161
Buncombe County
Date: July 28, 2021
Design Engineer:
Kevin D. Davidson, P.E.
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, NC 27502
Office: 919-859-0669
Direct: 919-747-2306

Engineering Alternatives Analysis (EAA) Guidance Document
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
STEP 1. Determine if the proposed discharge will be allowed
Determination of whether the proposed wastewater discharge will be allowed. There are several potential
restrictions to a wastewater discharge to surface waters, including:
• Zero flow stream restrictions [15A NCAC 2B.0206(d)(2)] apply to oxygen -consuming waste in
zero -flow streams. In order to determine streamflow at the proposed discharge location, contact
the U.S. Geological Survey at 919-571-4000.
Response: The USGS was contacted for streamflow estimations for the portion of Beaverdam Creek from the
discharge point to South Hominy Creek. There is positive flow for the 7Q10 and 30Q2 stream
estimates.
• Receiving stream classification restrictions [e.g., ORW, WS, SA, NSW, and HQ class waters
have various discharge restrictions or require stricter treatment standards]. Stream
classifications are available on the the DWR Classification and Standards/Rule Review Branch
website: (http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/csu), while wastewater discharge restrictions
for various stream classifications are presented in state regulations [ 15A NCAC 2B.0200].
Response: The DWR Surface Water Classification for Beaverdam Creek is C; Tr.
• Basinwide Water Quality Plans. These basin -specific plans list NPDES permitting strategies
that may limit wastewater discharges to particular streams within the basin due to lack of stream
assimilative capacity, etc. Basin plans are available on the DWR website, or you may contact the
DWR Basinwide Planning Branch (http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/bpu).
Response: Beaverdam Creek is within the French Broad River Basin.
• Impaired waters and TMDLs. Certain waterbodies listed as impaired on the 303(d) list and/or
subject to impending TMDLs may have wastewater discharge restrictions. The list of 303(d)
impaired waters is located on the DWR website, or you may contact the DWR Modeling and
Assessment Branch (http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/mtu).
Response: Beaverdam Creek does not appear to be an impaired water according to DWR Modeling and
Assessment Branch.
• Presence of Endangered Species. If endangered species are present in the proposed discharge
location, there may be wastewater discharge restrictions. Endangered species information may
be included in the Basinwide Water Quality Plan, or you may contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (919-856-4520), N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission (919-733-3633), or the N.C. Natural
Heritage Program (919-733-7701).
Response: The NC Heritage Program was contacted to gather endangered species information. No species were
found within a one -mile radius of the property that held federal or state endangered status. One
vascular plant, Virginia Spiraea, is expected to be located within the project area that holds federal
and state endangered status.
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 1 of 8

Within the one -mile radius of the property, the NC Heritage Program indicates that other species
have Federal or State status of the following:
Eastern Hellbender (Amphibian) — State Status: Special Concern
French Broad River Crayfish (Crustacean) — State Status: Significantly Rare
Superb Jewelwing (Dragonfly or Damselfly) — State Status: Significantly Rare
Little Brown Bat (Mammal) — State Status: Significantly Rare
Northern Long-eared Bat (Mammal) — State & Federal Status: Threatened
Virginia Spiraea (Vascular Plant) — State and Federal Status: Threatened
Non -municipal applicants.
Due to staff constraints, the NPDES Unit cannot prepare speculative limits for non -municipal applicants.
Thus, it is your responsibility to make your own determination as to whether the proposed discharge might be
allowed by the Division, by evaluating the water quality factors listed above. It is highly recommended that
you discuss the proposed discharge with the applicable DWR Regional Office and/or NPDES Unit staff, who
may be able to provide input on the likelihood of a new/expanding discharge. As a first step, you must
obtain streamflow estimates for the proposed discharge location to ensure that the receiving stream is not
subject to zero flow restrictions. Low flow data (specifically, drainage area, the summer and winter 7Q10,
average flow and 30Q2 flow statistics) can be obtained for a nominal fee from the U.S. Geological Survey in
Raleigh at 919-571-4000. The low flow data must be submitted with the EAA, and will be used by the permit
writer to develop permit limits. You must also verify that the proposed action (i.e., construction of a
wastewater treatment plant and its appurtenances) is consistent with local zoning and/or subdivision
ordinances. You will need to request the local government(s) to complete a Local Government Review Form
(Attachment A), and include the signed and notarized form with your NPDES application package.
Response: The United States Geological Survey (USGS) was contacted to determine the 7Q10 and 30Q2 flow estimate for
the downstream tributary of the proposed wastewater discharge point. The proposed discharge point is in
Beaverdam Creek. The analysis from USGS indicates the 7Q10 and 30Q2 discharge for the point in question is
positive for both flow estimates (Attachment E of application package).
All applicants.
If you conclude that the proposed discharge will pass the "allowable discharge" criteria, then begin the EAA
preparation by summarizing the following general information about the proposed project:
• Provide a description of the proposed project. If the project will be constructed in phases, provide a
schedule for constructing each additional phase, and provide the projected flow per phase (see STEP 2).
Response: A wastewater discharge system is to be constructed for a tiny home village located in Buncombe County, North
Carolina. The proposed system will serve 10 tiny homes with a flow of 2,500 gallons per day. The proposed
discharge point is in Beaverdam Creek, located on the applicant's property. The proposed treatment system will
utilize the following components:
Septic Tank with Effluent Filter
AdvanTex AX-100
Recirculation Tank
Flow Meter
UV Disinfection
Discharge Point with Rip -Rap
Construction of the proposed system will occur in a single phase with an anticipated completion time of
approximately 2 weeks after the start of construction activity.
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 2 of 8

Applicant Information:
Name:
Mailing Address:
Phone Number:
Contact Person:
Facility Information:
Name:
Address:
PIN:
County:
Phone Number:
Contact Person:
FAA Preparer's Information:
Name:
Mailing Address:
Phone Number:
Contact Person:
Kimberly Broch
45 Gaston Mountain Road
Asheville, NC 28806
954-654-2709
Kimberly Broch
Kimberly Broch
Lower Beaverdam Loop Road
Candler, NC 28715
9605-25-0161
Buncombe
954-654-2709
Kimberly Broch
Kevin Davidson, P.E.
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street
Apex, NC 27502
919-859-0669
Kevin Davidson, P.E.
STEP 2. Provide reasonable projections for population and flow
Residential Population Projections.
Facilities requesting an NPDES discharge permit for new or expanding domestic wastewater discharges
must document the population to be served within the service area over a 20-year planning period. The NC
State Demographics unit provides population data for each county and municipality and can be accessed on
the Internet at http://www.demog.state.nc.us. If 20-year population projections for specific areas are not
available, a linear extrapolation of population trends from the past decade should be used. Any deviation
from a linear projection method must be clearly justified. If population projections include future
annexations, include a proposed annexation schedule as well as any annexation requirements that must be
met.
Response: The wastewater treatment system is designed for 10 tiny homes, the population to be served will be limited by the
number of homes. For the 20-year planning period, the system will be designed for a 10 tiny home village with a
flow of 240 gallons per day per home. The design flow is 2,400 gallons per day for the facility.
STEP 3. Evaluate technologically feasible alternatives
Alternative A. Connection to an Existing Wastewater Treatment System.
You must evaluate the feasibility of connecting to an existing wastewater treatment system served by a
municipality or other entity holding a valid NPDES or Non -Discharge Permit. All connection options
should include an evaluation of a gravity line and/or force main with pump station(s).
1. Existing Sewerage System:
(a) Identify whether there are existing sewer lines within a five -mile radius, or consider a greater
radius if cost effective for the project size.
Response: Connection to a sewer collection system is not feasible for this facility. Ms. Heather Rhinehart, System
Coordinator II Metropolitan Sewerage District — Engineering Division, indicated that sewer is not currently
available for the applicant's property and there are currently no plans to extend the sewer. The closest sewer
system is located approximately 4 miles from the applicant's property (Attachment I). For reference, if an
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 3 of 8

installation cost of $100/ft of installed sewer line was assumed, the cost to connect this property to the sewer line
would exceed $2,112,000. Additional costs including the cost of the pump station, potential "tap" or sewer capital
fees, road repair costs, frontage fees and fees for right of way permits would also be incurred by the owner.
(b) Provide a preliminary indication of flow acceptance from existing municipal or private
WWTPs under consideration for connection. If a municipal or private WWTP cannot accept
the wastewater, include a letter documenting such and consider this alternative
technologically infeasible.
Response: N/A No sewerage available
(c) If an existing sewerage system will accept the wastewater, evaluate the
piping/pumps/resources necessary to connect to the existing wastewater treatment plant.
Attach a topographic map or a site drawing showing the physical route of this alternative.
Conduct a Present Value Cost Analysis per STEP 4.
Response: N/A No sewerage available
2. Planned Sewerage System: Determine if a regional sewerage system within a five mile radius is
projected to be available within the next five years to receive waste from the project site. If
applicable, determine availability date and flow acceptance projection from appropriate
authority.
Response: As indicated above, a regional sewer system exists within a five mile radius of the applicant's property, but the
Metropolitan Sewerage District has no plans to extend their coverage area toward the applicant.
Alternative B. Land Application.
Land application disposal alternatives include individual/community onsite subsurface systems, drip
irrigation, and spray irrigation.
1. Provide an estimate of the best case hydraulic loading rate based on County Soil Surveys or from
a soil evaluation performed by a soil scientist. Include calculations showing the hydraulic
loading rate and the total area of land needed for the land disposal system, including buffers.
Response: The Buncombe County Department of Environmental Services indicated that the site is unsuitable for
installation of a ground absorption septic system in a letter dated May 24, 2021 (Attachment C of application
package). The letter indicated that a permit cannot be issued due to unsuitable soil wetness conditions,
unsuitable soil depth, and insufficient space.
Per the soil evaluation by Walker Ferguson, LSS of Land Resource Management, PLLC, the site does not have
suitable soil or space to accommodate a ground absorption or surface drip or surface spray wastewater system
(Attachment D of application package).
Regardless of the fact that a subsurface ground absorption cannot be designed or permitted for this site, the
potential size of a subsurface system has been estimated. According to the county soil survey, the site is
classified as a Iotla Loam soil (IoA) and Rosman Fine Sandly Loam (RsA). These sandy loam soils are
frequently flooded and very restrictive for wastewater systems. For a subsurface system in this soil, a drip
system with pretreatment would be required. These soils would have a long-term acceptance rate (LTAR)
ranging from 0.05-0.15 gpd/sq.ft., with a typical rate of 0.1 gpd/sq.ft. Subsurface systems also require the
drainline to be installed with the contour so that each drainline is at a constant elevation. This results in a
"fanning" of the drainline and requires additional space in order to install the required amount of drainline The
sizing calculation is summarized in the table below:
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 4 of 8

Subsurface Dripfield Design Alternative
# Tiny Homes
Daily Flow
10
2400 gpd
LTAR 0.1 gpolsgft
Minimum Area Required (Nominal) 24,000 sqft
Estimation for Topographical Variation 9,000 sqft
Estimated .Area Required (Actual) 32,000 sqft
Approximate Area .Available 166,111 sqft
=fhv/L74
The current property's land available for the system is 166,111 sqft, due to setbacks and existing site
conditions. A schematic of this area is shown in Appendix A of the EAA. The land needed for a subsurface
dripfield design is a minimum of 24,000 sq. ft., so there may be sufficient space for this type of system at the
residence. Although there may be sufficient space, due to limitations caused by the soil characteristics and
conditions, this property is not suitable for a subsurface system.
The potential size of a non -discharge surface application system has also been estimated. According to the
county soil survey, the site is classified as a Worsham series soil. For a surface system in this soil, the SFR
loading rate group is likely restricted to a maximum annual loading of 19.5 in/year. The sizing calculation for
a non -discharge surface system is summarized in the table below:
Non -Discharge Surface Design Alternative
# Bedrooms 20
Daily Flow 2400 gpd
Surface Loading Rate 19.5 inlyear
Minimum Area Required (Nominal)
Approximate Area Available
72,065 sqft
84,969 sqft
The current property's land available for a surface drip or spray system is 84,868 sqft, due to setbacks and
existing site conditions. The major limiting factors that prevent this type of system are the 100' stream setback,
the 50' property setback, and the location of future tiny homes as well as the 15' foundation setback associated
with them. A schematic of this area is shown in Appendix A. The land needed for a non -discharge application
system is estimated at 72,065 sq. ft., so while there is potentially enough space for this type of system, soil
characteristics and conditions limit usage.
2. Assess the availability of land. If insufficient land is available onsite, assume that the necessary
land can be purchased and estimate the land purchase cost based on local real estate prices.
Alternatively, provide documentation to demonstrate that insufficient land is available for sale in
the project area (include letters from adjacent property owners indicating no interest in selling
property).
Response: Because insufficient land is available onsite (due to inadequate soil) offsite land was reviewed. The table
below lists neighboring properties and the value of the land as listed by the Buncombe County GIS website.
The values listed in the table do not reflect the value of the single-family residences. The soil types listed for
these properties are Evard-Cowee Complex (EvE2) and Clifton Clay Loam (CkE2). These sites, like the
applicant's site, will be very restrictive for wastewater systems. Much of the listed southern and northern
parcels are restricted for septic application by topography and unnamed tributaries of Beaverdam Creek.
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 5 of 8

3. Provide a description of the wastewater treatment system and the non -discharge application
system. Include a site plan showing the proposed layout, the application area, any existing
structures, proposed structures, and other uses within the site.
Response: A typical subsurface drip system or a non -discharge surface spray or surface drip system with pretreatment
considers the following components:
- Septic Tank with Effluent Filter
- Recirculation Tank
- AdvanTex Treatment Pod (AX 100 unit)
- Pump Tank
- UV Disinfection
- Headworks Box
- Control Panel
- Disposal Field (drip or spray) with addition of fill soil
Note: The proposed discharge system does not consider the pump tank, headworks box or disposal field.
Site drawings of these alternative systems showing the available application area are included as Appendix A
of the EAA. Due to the cost requirements of a drip or spray system and the lack of sufficient soil, there is no
ability to consider any of these systems on this property.
4. Explain the proposed reuse plan if reclaimed water will be used by a third party.
Response: There is no reuse plan being considered either on -site or by a third party. It is not feasible to consider using
reclaimed water on the site or becoming a bulk distributor of reclaimed water. The table below summarizes
the amount of reclaimed water that could be beneficially used on site. As shown in Appendix A, there may
be sufficient area to utilize the daily flow of reclaimed water. Although there may be sufficient space, due to
limitations caused by the soil characteristics and conditions, this property is not suitable for on -site
utilization of reclaimed water. Regardless of the fact that the soil at this site is not suitable for this system,
installing this system would not be feasible due to costs.
On -site Utilization of Reclaimed Water
Daily flow through system
Available Area to Irrigate
Application Rate
Acceptable Volume to Irrigate.
2400 gpd
2110,3114 sgft 't r. cope -von pa rtv
0.5 in/week
Fesc morass
8753 fefweek
= 9365 gpd
5. Conduct a Present Value Cost Analysis per STEP 4. For the reclaimed water system include the
potential revenue generated by selling the water.
Response: A Present Value Cost Analysis is included as Appendix B of the EAA. An analysis was performed for a
sub -surface drip system, a non -discharge surface application system, and a reclaimed water system. A
summary of the analysis is included in STEP 4.
6. Provide all calculations, documentation and maps as necessary to support assumptions and
conclusions.
Response: Calculations performed to evaluate land application alternatives are shown above in Alternative B, Points 1
and 4.
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 6 of 8

7. Note: The design of land application systems must meet the treatment and design requirements
specified in 15A NCAC 2T .0500 or 15A NCAC 18A.1900.
Response: The treatment systems specified above in Step B would meet the treatment standards required by these rules
as they pertain to single family residences. However, due to the restrictions listed above, no land -based
systems can be considered.
8. Note: Proposed discharges from groundwater remediation systems must evaluate the potential
for an infiltration gallery treatment alternative.
Response: N/A
Alternative C. Wastewater Reuse.
You must evaluate reusing all or a portion of the wastewater generated. Some municipalities are currently
reusing wastewater within the confines of their WWTP property for irrigation, toilet flushing, backwashing,
etc., while other municipalities have established progressive reuse programs for residential irrigation. Reuse
applications might include golf course irrigation, crop irrigation (e.g., hardwood or pine plantation,
grasses), athletic field irrigation, landscape uses, and commercial/industrial uses. Some of these reuse
applications will be evaluated under Alternative B, Land Application. The design of reclaimed water
systems must meet the treatment and design requirements specified in 15A NCAC 2U.
Response: All reuse applications for this project scale were evaluated under Alternative B, Point 4. Wastewater reuse
was determined to be infeasible for this project.
Alternative D. Direct Discharge to Surface Waters.
1. No new or expanding (additional) discharge of oxygen -consuming waste will be allowed to
surface waters of North Carolina if both the summer 7Q10 and 30Q2 streamflows are estimated
to be zero, in accordance with 15A NCAC 2B.0206(d). Private applicants must contact the USGS
in Raleigh at 919-571-4000 and obtain (generally for a nominal fee), the receiving streamflow data
(s7Q10, 30Q2, annual average streamflow) at the proposed discharge location. This information
must be included in the EAA, and will be used to develop permit limits.
Response: Because this is an new treatment facility, estimated flow at the discharge point is required to be positive.
Based on the 7Q10 and 30Q2 reports provided by USGS, the flow is expected to be positive. The average
for the 7Q10 was about 1.7cfsm and the average for the 30Q2 was about 3.4 cfsm.
2. All direct discharge systems of oxygen -consuming wastes should be evaluated both with tertiary
filtration [BOD5= 5 mg/1, NH3-N= 1 mg/1] and without, and assuming a weekly sampling
regime.
Response: Tertiary filtration is not required. Based on actual sample results from similar treatment systems (other
facilities using the same technology) in many cases, a BOD5 of 5 mg/1 and NH3-N of 1 mg/1 can be met.
3. Provide a description of the proposed wastewater treatment facilities, including a schematic
diagram of the major components and a site plan of the treatment facility with outfall line(s).
Response: Schematic drawings can be found in Attachment M (of application package).
4. Provide documentation of the availability of required land and/or easement agreements.
Response: N/A
5. Conduct a Present Value Cost Analysis per STEP 4.
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 7 of 8

Response: A Present Value Cost Analysis for the discharge system is included in Appendix B. A summary of the
analysis is included in STEP 4.
6. Note: All direct discharge treatment systems must comply with Reliability Requirements
specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0124.
Response: The system serves a private facility that is served by an onsite well and does not have elevated water storage
tanks In the event of a power outage, water will not be available to the homes and bath house. There is
storage available in the system to hold some waste until power is restored to the system.
Alternative E. Combination of Alternatives.
You should evaluate the possibility of a combination of wastewater alternatives that would minimize or
eliminate a direct discharge alternative. For example, consider whether the facility can operate a land
application system during the dry season when streamflows are at their lowest and provide less dilution, and
operate an NPDES discharge system during the wet season when soils may not be as amenable to land
application and the receiving stream provides its greatest dilution.
Response: A non -discharge alternative is not feasible due to the space and soil constraints listed in Alternative B. The
presence or absence of a seasonal high water table will not relieve the other constraints.
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 8 of 8

STEP 4. Evaluate economic feasibility of alternatives
PVCA Summary Table.
The EAA must include a Summary Cost Table, which summarizes present worth costs developed for all
technologically feasible wastewater alternatives. The summary should include a breakdown of capital costs
and recurring costs. In some situations, the Division may require the applicant to refine cost estimates for
some alternatives, or possibly collect actual soil data to better characterize the land application alternative.
Ultimately, the final determination on cost effectiveness is made by the Division with consideration of
monetary costs as well as potential environmental impacts.
Response: The following table presents the cost analysis for several types of wastewater systems. Given the
information presented above, the only technologically feasible alternative is the Discharge System. The
"Install Cost" includes the estimated cost to design and install the specific type of system. The installation
cost does not include the cost of fill soil that would likely need be added, at the direction of a L.S.S., to
maintain suitable soil depths within a drainfield. The "Present Value of Costs" is based on a discount factor
of 1.2%.
Cost Analysis for 10 Tiny Homes
System Type
Sub -Surface System
Non -Discharge System
Reclaimed System
Discharge System
Install
Cost
$157,000
$197,000
$249,000
$103,000
20 yr
Annual Cost
$43,010
$257,680
$286,033
$211,338
Present
Total Cost Value
20 years of Costs
{$}
$200,010 $79,685
$454,680 $ 81,127
$535,033 $314,534
$314,338 $211,267
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 9 of 8

Appendix A. Site Maps
For
System Alternatives Analysis
- Subsurface System Option
- Non -Discharge System Option
- Reclaimed Water Option

AWF
50` SIRE PM SE
--
AVAILABLE
APPLICATION AREA
T T T T
+ + + +
+ + + +
+ + + +
AREA = 166,111 ft2
Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, North Carolina 27502
919-859-0669
www.agriwaste.com
Broch Property
Surface Discharge
WasteWater Treatment System
Otyner Information:
Kimberly Broch
45 Gaston Mountain Road
Asheville, NC 28806
Property Information:
Loyyer Beayerdam Loop Road
Candler, NC 28715
Buncombe, NC
PIN: 9605-25-0161
For
Review
o� y
REy, ISSUED DATE DESCRIPTION
SHEET TITLE
Alternative Design:
Subsurface Drip
DRAWN BY:
K. Green
CREATED ON:
5/20/21
REVISED BY:
REVISED ON:
RELEASED BY:
RELEASED ON:
DRAWING NUMBER
Subsurface System Option
SE-1

AWF
100' STREAM SETBACK.
80
160
Feet
AVAILABLE
APPLICATION AREA
T T T T
+ + + +
+ + + +
+ + + +
AREA = 84,868 ft2
100' STREAM SETBACK
STREAM SETS AC
Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, North Carolina 27502
919-859-0669
www.agriwaste.com
Broch Property
Surface Discharge
Waste*ater Treatment System
0tyner Information:
Kimberly Broch
45 Gaston Mountain Road
Asheville, NC 28806
Property Information:
Loyyer Beayerdam Loop Road
Candler, NC 28715
Buncombe, NC
PIN: 9605-25-0161
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SEAL
For
Review
o� y
REy. ISSUED DATE DESCRIPTION
SHEET TITLE
Alternative Design:
Non -Discharge Systems
DRAWN BY:
K. Green
CREATED ON:
5/20/21
REVISED BY:
REVISED ON:
RELEASED BY:
RELEASED ON:
DRAWING NUMBER
Non -Discharge System Option
SE-2

AWF
AVAILABLE
APPLICATION AREA
T T T T
+ + + +
+ + + +
+ + + +
AREA = 210,314 ft2
80
160
Feet
Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, North Carolina 27502
919-859-0669
www.agriwaste.com
Broch Property
Surface Discharge
Waste*ater Treatment System
Otyner Information:
Kimberly Broch
45 Gaston Mountain Road
Asheville, NC 28806
Property Information:
Loyyer Beayerdam Loop Road
Candler, NC 28715
Buncombe, NC
PIN: 9605-25-0161
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SEAL
For
Review
o� y
REy, ISSUED DATE DESCRIPTION
SHEET TITLE
Alternative Design:
Reclaimed Water
DRAWN BY:
K. Green
CREATED ON:
5/20/21
REVISED BY:
REVISED ON:
RELEASED BY:
RELEASED ON:
DRAWING NUMBER
Reclaimed Water Option
SE-3

Appendix B. Present Value Cost Analysis
For
System Alternatives Analysis
- Subsurface System Option
- Non -Discharge System Option
- Reclaimed Water Option
- Surface Discharge Option

Engineering Alternatives Analysis
PVCA Calculation
Sub -Surface System
Co
PV
$42,000
1.200%
PV = C
I$79,685
Estimated Cost to Design and Install System
Present Value of Costs
Cost Analysis for 10 Tiny Homes
Present
Install 20 yr Total Cost Value
Cost Annual Cost 20 years of Costs
System Type ($) ($) ($) ($)
Sub -Surface System $157,000 $43,010 $200,010 $79,685
Non -Discharge System $197,000 $257,680 $454,680 $281,127
Reclaimed System $249,000 $286,033 $535,033 $314,534
Discharge System $103,000 $211,338 $314,338 $211,267
Cost Summary Table
Year Annual Fee Operations Fee Sample Cost Pumping Cost UV Replacement Cost Ct Total Ct PV
Increase 5% every 3 Increase 3% yearly Increase $50 every 5 Increase 3% yearly Annual Incurred Annual Total Present Value
years years Costs ($) Discounted Cost Discounted of Costs ($)
($) Costs ($)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,050
1,050
1,050
1,103
1,103
1,103
1,158
1,158
1,158
1,216
1,216
1,216
1,276
1,276
1,276
1,340
1,340
516
531
547
564
581
598
616
635
654
673
693
714
736
758
780
804
828
853
878
905
0
0
0
0
300
0
0
0
0
350
0
0
0
0
400
0
0
0
0
450
125
129
133
137
141
145
149
154
158
163
168
173
178
184
189
195
201
207
213
219
1,701
1,720
1,740
1,810
2,131
1,853
1,928
1,951
1,974
2,404
2,079
2,105
2,189
2,217
2,645
2,335
2,365
2,396
2,491
2,974
43,010
1,681
1,680
1,679
1,726
2,008
1,725
1,773
1,773
1,774
2,134
1,823
1,824
1,875
1,876
2,212
1,929
1,931
1,933
1,986
2,343
1,681
3,361
5,039
6,765
8,774
10,499
12,272
14,045
15,819
17,953
19,776
21,600
23,475
25,351
27,563
29,492
31,423
33,356
35,342
37,685
43,681
45,361
47,039
48,765
50,774
52,499
54,272
56,045
57,819
59,953
61,776
63,600
65,475
67,351
69,563
71,492
73,423
75,356
77,342
79,685

Non -Discharge System
Co
PV
$54,800
1.200%
PV = C
Estimated Cost to Design and Install System
11
+ (1 + )r
I$281,127
Present Value of Costs
Cost Summary Table
Year Annual Fee Operations Fee Sample Cost Pumping Cost UV Replacement Cost Ct Total Ct PV
Increase 5% every 3 Increase 3% yearly Increase $50 every 5 Increase 3% yearly Annual Incurred Annual Total Present Value
years years Costs ($) Discounted Cost Discounted of Costs ($)
($) Costs ($)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
10,400
10,400
10,400
10,920
10,920
10,920
11,466
11,466
11,466
12,039
12,039
12,039
12,641
12,641
12,641
13,273
13,273
13,273
13,937
13,937
429
442
455
469
483
497
512
528
543
560
577
594
612
630
649
668
688
709
730
752
0
0
0
0
300
0
0
0
0
350
0
0
0
0
400
0
0
0
0
450
125
129
133
137
141
145
149
154
158
163
168
173
178
184
189
195
201
207
213
219
11,014
11,031
11,048
11,585
11,904
11,622
12,188
12,207
12,228
13,172
12,844
12,866
13,491
13,515
13,939
14,196
14,222
14,249
14,940
15,418
257,680
10,883
10,771
10,659
11,046
11,214
10,819
11,211
11,096
10,983
11,691
11,264
11,150
11,553
11,436
11,656
11,730
11,612
11,496
11,910
12,146
10,883
21,654
32,313
43,359
54,573
65,393
76,604
87,700
98,683
110,374
121,639
132,789
144,342
155,778
167,434
179,164
190,776
202,271
214,182
226,327
65,683
76,454
87,113
98,159
109,373
120,193
131,404
142,500
153,483
165,174
176,439
187,589
199,142
210,578
222,234
233,964
245,576
257,071
268,982
281,127

Reclaimed System
Co
PV
$63,700
1.200%
PV = C
I$314,534
Estimated Cost to Design and Install System
Present Value of Costs
Cost Summary Table
Year Annual Fee Operations Fee Sample Cost Pumping Cost UV Replacement Cost Ct Total Ct PV
Increase 5% every 3 Increase 3% yearly Increase $50 every 5 Increase 3 % yearly Annual Incurred Annual Total Present Value
years years Costs ($) Discounted Cost Discounted of Costs ($)
($) Costs ($)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
7,800
7,800
7,800
8,190
8,190
8,190
8,600
8,600
8,600
9,029
9,029
9,029
9,481
9,481
9,481
9,955
9,955
9,955
10,453
10,453
3,718
3,830
3,944
4,063
4,185
4,310
4,439
4,573
4,710
4,851
4,997
5,147
5,301
5,460
5,624
5,793
5,966
6,145
6,330
6,520
0
0
0
0
300
0
0
0
0
350
0
0
0
0
400
0
0
0
0
450
125
129
133
137
141
145
149
154
158
163
168
173
178
184
189
195
201
207
213
219
11,703
11,818
11,937
12,449
12,875
12,705
13,248
13,386
13,528
14,454
14,254
14,409
15,020
15,185
15,754
16,002
16,182
16,367
17,055
17,701
286,033
11,564
11,540
11,517
11,869
12,130
11,828
12,187
12,168
12,151
12,828
12,501
12,487
12,863
12,849
13,173
13,222
13,212
13,204
13,596
13,944
11,564
23,104
34,621
46,491
58,620
70,448
82,635
94,803
106,953
119,782
132,283
144,770
157,633
170,482
183,655
196,877
210,088
223,293
236,889
250,834
75,264
86,804
98,321
110,191
122,320
134,148
146,335
158,503
170,653
183,482
195,983
208,470
221,333
234,182
247,355
260,577
273,788
286,993
300,589
314,534

Discharge System
Co
PV
$26,000
1.200%
PV = C
I$211,267
Estimated Cost to Design and Install System
Present Value of Costs
Cost Summary Table
Year Annual Fee Operations Fee Sample Cost Pumping Cost UV Replacement Cost Ct Total Ct PV
Increase 5% every 3 Increase 3% yearly Increase $50 every 5 Increase 3% yearly Annual Incurred Annual Total Present Value
years years Costs ($) Discounted Cost Discounted of Costs ($)
($) Costs ($)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
5,200
5,200
5,200
5,460
5,460
5,460
5,733
5,733
5,733
6,020
6,020
6,020
6,321
6,321
6,321
6,637
6,637
6,637
6,968
6,968
3,172
3,267
3,365
3,466
3,570
3,677
3,788
3,901
4,018
4,139
4,263
4,391
4,523
4,658
4,798
4,942
5,090
5,243
5,400
5,562
0
0
0
0
300
0
0
0
0
350
0
0
0
0
400
0
0
0
0
450
125
129
133
137
141
145
149
154
158
163
168
173
178
184
189
195
201
207
213
219
8,557
8,656
8,758
9,123
9,531
9,342
9,730
9,848
9,970
10,731
10,511
10,643
11,081
11,222
11,768
11,833
11,987
12,146
12,641
13,260
211,338
8,456
8,452
8,450
8,698
8,979
8,697
8,950
8,952
8,955
9,525
9,218
9,224
9,490
9,496
9,840
9,777
9,787
9,799
10,078
10,445
8,456
16,907
25,357
34,055
43,034
51,731
60,681
69,633
78,587
88,112
97,330
106,554
116,044
125,540
135,380
145,157
154,944
164,743
174,821
185,267
34,456
42,907
51,357
60,055
69,034
77,731
86,681
95,633
104,587
114,112
123,330
132,554
142,044
151,540
161,380
171,157
180,944
190,743
200,821
211,267

Attachment K
Local Government Review Forms

SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION
• Complete items 1, 2, and 3.
- • Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or onthe front if space permits.-
1. Article Addressed -to:
200 Cetterit SkvIC k
SH•Ikt ,a
Ai .voit, NC, 'LNbl
u
111111 1111111111
1111
NIII
9590 9402 4017 8079 2084 15
COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY
A. Signature k ) I-
B. Received by (Printed Name)
.414 Agent
❑ Addressee
C. Date of Delivery
D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: p No
pe label)
7018 0680 0001 7701 2385
3. Service Type
❑ Adult Signature
0 Adult Signature Restricted Delivery
❑ Certified Mail®
C(Certified Mail Restricted Delivery
❑ Collect on Delivery
❑ Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery
sured Mail
sured Mail Restricted Delivery
ver $500)
PS Form 3811, July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053
SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION
• Complete items 1, 2, and 3.
• Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
• Attach this card to the back of the maiipiecE
or on the front if space permits.
1
Article Address to:
-.tbNra of ekt \xt(
1rcY'� tie Cl vto1
Cowtk 9
P•0 fox �- l II li � ?
(I IIIII II III IIIIII II
9590 9402 4017 8079 2084 08
I
❑ Priority Mail Express®
❑ Registered MaiiTM
0 Registered Mail Restricted
9�eelivery
,Metum Receipt for
dise
tI��ppeerchan
6'Signature Confirmation"
❑ Signature Confirmatr fl
Restricted Delivery
)antestiaReturn,Receipt
COMPLETE T!-!!S SECTION ON DELIVERY
A.
B. R-•-ivedyj(Printed
D.
N Agentr)%
Addressee
afilflegiverT
s e ivery address different . item 1? 0 Yes !
If YES, enter delivery address b = ;w: p No,
USP`?
9 Artinla Number (Transfer from service label)
7018 0680 0001 7701 2378
PS Form 3811 July 2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053
3. Service Type
0 Adult Signature
❑ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery
0 Certified Mail®
Sitertified MOii Restricted Delivery
❑ Collect on Delivery
❑ Collect on Delivery Restricted Delivery
insured Mail
,i
Insured Mail Restricted Delivery
(o
ver $500)
0 Priority Mal Express®
0 Registered Mail7"
Ot pehRegistered Mail Restricted :,
very
etum Receipt for
Merchandise
i '3ignature Confinnationl'
❑ Signature Confirmation.
Restricted Delivery
Domestic Return Receipt ;�

Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, North Carolina 27502
919-859-0669
www.agriwaste.com
Ms. Debra Campbell, City Manager
City of Asheville
70 Court Plaza
P.O. Box 7148
Ashville, NC 28802
May 6,2021
RE: Local Government Review Form
Application for Discharge System — Broch Property
Lower Beaverdam Loop Road, Candler, NC 28715 (PIN 9605-25-0161)
Dear Ms. Campbell,
Enclosed please find a Local Government Review Form required for a Certificate of
Coverage application supporting a proposed wastewater treatment system (system). The
proposed system will be an individual discharge permit that is permitted under the
NPDES Permitting Program. The proposed system will serve a proposed tiny home
village located in Buncombe County, North Carolina (nearby the City of Asheville).
It is my opinion that a wastewater treatment system covered by the Individual Discharge
Permit is the only technologically feasible option for this property. The site has been
deemed unsuitable for ground absorption by licensed soil scientist.
Please complete the enclosed form for inclusion in the application for the proposed
system. This residence is located in Buncombe County. Please note that this form is
only meant to determine zoning/jurisdiction information for the town and does not
indicate your approval of the proposed system.
I appreciate your time and efforts in completing this form. If you have any questions or
comments, please feel free to contact me at 919-367-6310.
Best Regards,
Kevin Davidson, P.E.
V.P. of Engineering

Broch Property
Lower Beaverdam Loop Road,
Candler,NC 28715 (PIN 9605-25-0161)
Attachment A. Local Government Review Form
General Statute Overview: North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (c)(6) allows input from local governments in the
issuance of NPDES Permits for non -municipal domestic wastewater treatment facilities. Specifically, the Environmental
Management Commission (EMC) may not act on an application for a new non -municipal domestic wastewater discharge facility
until it has received a written statement from each city and county government having jurisdiction over any part of the lands on
which the proposed facility and its appurtenances are to be located. The written statement shall document whether the city or
county has a zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect and (if such an ordinance is in effect) whether the proposed facility is
consistent with the ordinance The EMC shall not approve a permit application for any facility which a city or county has
determined to be inconsistent with zoning or subdivision ordinances unless the approval of such application is determined to
have statewide significance and is in the best interest of the State.
Instructions to the Applicant: Prior to submitting an application for a NPDES Permit for a proposed facility, the applicant
shall request that both the nearby city and county government complete this form. The applicant must:
• Submit a copy of the permit application (with a written request for this form to be completed) to the clerk of the city and
the county by certified mail, return receipt requested.
• If either (or both) local government(s) fail(s) to mail the completed form, as evidenced by the postmark on the certified
mail card(s), within 15 days after receiving and signing for the certified mail, the applicant may submit the application to
the NPDES Unit.
• As evidence to the Commission that the local government(s) failed to respond within 15 days, the applicant shall submit
a copy of the certified mail card along with a notarized letter stating that the local government(s) failed to respond within
the 15-day period.
Instructions to the Local Government: The nearby city and/or county government which may have or has jurisdiction over
any part of the land on which the proposed facility or its appurtenances are to be located is required to complete and return this
form to the applicant within 15 days of receipt. The form must be signed and notarized.
Name of local government City of Asheville
(City/County)
Does the city/county have jurisdiction over any part of the land on which the proposed facility and its appurtenances are to be
located? Yes [ ] No [ ] If no, please sign this form, have it notarized, and return it to the applicant.
Does the city/county have in effect a zoning or subdivision ordinance? Yes [ ] No [ ]
If there is a zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect, is the plan for the proposed facility consistent with the ordinance? Yes [ ]
No[ ]
Date Signature
(City Manager/County Manager)
State of , County of
On this day of , personally appeared before me, the said
name to me known and known to me to be the person described in
and who executed the foregoing document and he (or she) acknowledged that he (or she) executed the same and being duly sworn
by me, made oath that the statements in the foregoing document are true.
My Commission expires .(Signature of Notary Public)
Notary Public (Official Seal)
EAA Guidance Document Revision: April 2014
Page 9of8

Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, North Carolina 27502
919-859-0669
www.agriwaste.com
Ms. Avril Pinder
County Manager
Buncombe County
200 College Street, Suite 300
Asheville, NC 28801
May 6,2021
RE: Local Government Review Form
Application for Discharge System — Broch Property
Lower Beaverdam Loop Road, Candler, NC 28715 (PIN 9605-25-0161)
Dear Ms. Pinder,
Enclosed please find a Local Government Review Form required for a Certificate of
Coverage application supporting a proposed wastewater treatment system (system). The
proposed system will be an individual discharge permit that is permitted under the
NPDES Permitting Program. The proposed system will serve a proposed tiny home
village located in Buncombe County, North Carolina.
It is my opinion that a wastewater treatment system covered by the Individual Discharge
Permit is the only technologically feasible option for this property. The site has been
deemed unsuitable for ground absorption by licensed soil scientist.
Please complete the enclosed form for inclusion in the application for the proposed
system. This property is located in Buncombe County. Please note that this form is only
meant to determine zoning/jurisdiction information for the county and does not indicate
your approval of the proposed system.
I appreciate your time and efforts in completing this form. If you have any questions or
comments, please feel free to contact me at 919-367-6310.
Best Regards,
Kevin Davidson, P.E.
V.P. of Engineering

Broch Property
Lower Beaverdam Loop Road
Candler, NC 28715 (PIN 9605-25-0161)
Attachment A. Local Government Review Form
General Statute Overview: North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 (c)(6) allows input from local governments in the
issuance of NPDES Permits for non -municipal domestic wastewater treatment facilities. Specifically, the Environmental
Management Commission (EMC) may not act on an application for a new non -municipal domestic wastewater discharge facility
until it has received a written statement from each city and county government having jurisdiction over any part of the lands on
which the proposed facility and its appurtenances are to be located. The written statement shall document whether the city or
county has a zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect and (if such an ordinance is in effect) whether the proposed facility is
consistent with the ordinance. The EMC shall not approve a permit application for any facility which a city or county has
determined to be inconsistent with zoning or subdivision ordinances unless the approval of such application is determined to
have statewide significance and is in the best interest of the State.
Instructions to the Applicant: Prior to submitting an application for a NPDES Permit for a proposed facility, the applicant
shall request that both the nearby city and county government complete this form. The applicant must:
• Submit a copy of the permit application (with a written request for this form to be completed) to the clerk of the city and
the county by certified mail, return receipt requested.
• If either (or both) local government(s) fail(s) to mail 'the completed form, as evidenced by the postmark on the certified
trail card (sPuithiza..1.5,dau, a.£ter eiuing..aiad_-signing-far-then . ed mail, the aprlic-=ntT bmi« «t.e aLpl -,- •- : `e-
the NPDES Unit.
■ As evidence to the Commission that the local government(s) failed to respond within 15 days, the applicant shall submit
a copy of the certified mail card along with a notarized letter stating that the local government(s) failed to respond within
the 15-day period.
Instructions to the Local Government: The nearby city and/or county government which may have or has jurisdiction over
any part of the land on which the proposed facility or its appurtenances are to be located is required to complete and return this
form to the applicant within 15 days of receipt. The form must be signed and notarized.
Name of local government Buncombe County
(City/County)
Does the city/cou ty have jurisdiction over any part of the land on which the proposed facility and its appurtenances are to be
located? Yes [✓fo [ ] If no, please sign this form, have it notarized, and return it to the applicant.
Does the city/county have in effect a zoning or subdivision ordinance? Yes [o [ ]
If there is a�zoning or subdivision ordinance in effect, is the plan for the proposed facility consistent with the ordinance? Yes [ ]
No [ ] /1471-Vv/tes61e Cleve Iort•ete'Pirvis //a /IS &en /44
Date 5//1/702 7DY Cb rid t'''�C'u Lri' i f 'fr�; ✓. s'D/i
f� � Signature
S r.►.wr<,�v- �! eras%+vt c,,*a,
State of " A\ C.01.0, County of r,�Orv►t&P
On this a day of .i. �(` `, personally appeared before me, the said
name �,evviNkr5\-Qi•
to me known and known to me to be the person described in
and who executed the foregoing document and he (or she) acknowledged that he (or sh;p executed the same and being duly sworn
by me, made oath that the statements in theheforegoing document are true.
pC My Commission expires1 O pto lo 0`111I I11i/0i
.(Sign6 9‘05cgasy
NotoiV QUac
Cotol
nrilbe
Notary Pul1ficj(Official Seal)
EAA Guidance DoiPage b,
tt 4
131
•lion: April 2014

Attachment L
Topography Map

AWF
Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem St. Suite 203
Apex NC 27502
P: 919.859.0669
www.ag riwaste.com
Discharge Point Location
AQWA-Broch Property
Buncombe Co., NC
PIN: 9605250161
Assumes each inhabited
property contains a well.
Drawn By: Julie Davidson
Reviewed By: Kevin Davidson
Date: 7/28/2021
QParcel
_ ) 1 Mile Radius
DischargePt
2 ft. Contour
*Surface water and/or bad topo areas have not been officially evaluated for stream ID according to local regulatory requirements. This map is intended for preliminary purposes only and not to be used as a plat/survey or can it be assumed all streams are identified on this property.*

Attachment M
Process Flow Diagram

AWF
AAAAAAAAAA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
240 gpd
240 gpd
240 gpd
240 gpd
240 gpd
240 gpd
240 gpd
240 gpd
240 gpd
240 gpd
2400 gpo
Bath House
xxFlow for each house assumes oath house £low*x
Septic Tank
8,000 gal
AX100
Pod
Recirculation
Tank
8,000 gal
Flow
Meter
L(J
Discharge
Engineers and Soil Scientists
Agri -Waste Technology, Inc.
501 N. Salem Street, Suite 203
Apex, North Carolina 27502
919-859-0669
www.agriwaste.com
Broch Property
Surface Discharge
Wasteyyater Treatment System
Otyner Information:
Kimberly Broch
45 Gaston Mountain Road
Asheville, NC 28806
Property Information:
Loyyer Beayerdam Loop Road
Candler, NC 28715
Buncombe, NC
PIN: 9605-25-0161
For
Review
o� y
REy, ISSUED DATE DESCRIPTION
SHEET TITLE
Flow Schematic
DRAWN BY:
K. Green
CREATED ON:
7/22/21
REVISED BY:
REVISED ON:
RELEASED BY:
RELEASED ON:
DRAWING NUMBER
Flow Schematic
FS-1