20130687 Ver 1_401 Application_20130713

KqUINOX
RONMENTAL (6-
tOM0M • Ot
fO ►fAf1 NOM
2013068t
7.02.13
The following application is a co- application for New Belgium Brewery and the City of Asheville for the
development of New Belgium Brewing's: East Coast Brewery. The project includes improvements by the
City of Asheville which include road improvements to Craven Street, a greenway along the French Broad
River, Stream Restoration and Stormwater BMPs. This application is for those improvements to be
made by the City of Asheville. There are no anticipated impacts on waters of the US from the
development of the site by New Belgium. Included in this application are the following:
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Application for Department of The Army Permit
• Supporting Calculations
• Maps & Plans
• Wetland Delineation
• Stream Delineation
• Greenway Plans
• Stream Plan and Profile
• Grade Control Structure and Wetland Impacts
• Greenway Trail and Wetland Impacts
o Arch Culvert and Stream Channel Treatment
• New Belgium Agent Authorization Letter
• City of Asheville Agent Authorization Letter
New Belgium Brewing
500 Linden Street
Fort Collins, CO 80524
City of Asheville
Public Works Building
161 S. Charlotte Street
Asheville, NC 28801
�David Tuch- President
[1@110169=1
L5
JUi 5 2013
Equinox Environmentel Consultation and Design, Inc.
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100, Asheville NC 28801
828.253.6856
www.equinoxenvironmental.com

O- WA T_"
oa OG
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
ti
o <
DWQ protect no
1. Processing
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 27 & 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification.
® Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit.
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Craven Street Improvements - New Belgium Brewery
2b. County:
Buncombe
2c. Nearest municipality / town-
Asheville
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T I.P. or state
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed.
Kimberly Beth Jordan and Christine Nicole Perich
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
New Belgium Site — 5008/1972
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
New Belgium Brewing Company Inc. & City of Asheville
3d. Street address:
500 Linden Street
3e. City, state, zip:
Fort Collins, CO 80524
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no..
3h. Email address
KJordan @newbelgium.com
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
® Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
McCray Coates
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
City of Asheville
4d. Street address:
Public Works Building, 161 S. Charlotte Street
4e. City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28801
4f. Telephone no..
828 - 259 -5935
4g. Fax no..
4h. Email address:
mcoates @ashevillenc.gov
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
David Tuch
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
5c. Street address:
37 Haywood Street
5d. City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28801
5e. Telephone no.:
828 - 2536856
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
david @equinoxenvironmental.com
Page 2 of 12

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
9638 -87 -3707
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude: 35.587810 Longitude: - 82.572626
(DD.DDDDDD) ( -DD DDDDDD)
1c Property size.
18.99 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
French Broad River
proposed project.
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
B- Primary Recreation, Freshwater
2c. River basin: map is available at
French Broad River
hftp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The proposed site is located within Asheville City Limits adjacent to the French Broad River. Topographically, most of the
site consists of a large flat, impervious area recently cleared of warehouse structures. The eastern boundary of the
parcel slopes down to the French Broad River, where the riparian corridor is forested. One perennial stream bisects the
center and one perennial stream intersects the southeastern comer of the property. The National Land Cover Dataset
(2006) classifies the site as a mixture of low to high intensity development, deciduous forest, and developed open space.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.25 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
789 ft.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project.
See Supplemental Information
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See Supplemental Information
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments. A jurisdictional Stream Determination has been
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
performed as well as a wetland delineation by Equinox
Environmental Consultation & Design, Inc. which has been
reviewed by the local US Army Corps of Engineers - Tasha
McCormick
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
Preliminary ❑Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company: Equinox Environmental
Name (if known): Hunter Terrell
Consulation and Design, Inc.
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Met with Tasha McCormick of the Corps and Tim Fox of NCDENR for a site review of the wetland delineation (May 2013)
and a jurisdictional determination of the stream (Fall 2012).
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
[:]Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
,6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
This is a joint venture project between the City of Asheville and New Belgium Brewing. As a first phase the City of
Asheville will start constn�stwn on improvements to Craven Street, the greenway along the French Broad River, and the
stream restoration. The stream restoration will be constructed in two phases. The first phase will include the arch culvert
and the stream channel. The upland areas will be temporarily seeded until New Belgium is nearing completion with the
construction of the site including parking areas, buildings and stormwater BMPs. At this time the upland areas will be
planted with native bottomland hardwood forest species.
The New Belgium site development will include two pedestrian bridges that completely span the stream and will have
footings placed outside of the stream channel and top of bank.
Page 4 of 12

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ®P ❑ T
Fill
Bottomland
® Yes
® Corps
0.06
Hardwood Forest
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ® P ❑ T
Excavation
Non -Tidal
❑ Yes
® Corps
0.03
Freshwater Marsh
® No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.09
2h. Comments: Wetland impacts will occur in both wetlands on site (see Stream and Wetland Delineation map). Wetland
impacts include fill for a 10' wide greenway trail (Wetland 1) and excavation for a grade control structure (Wetland 2) as part of
the stream restoration.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
Unnamed
S1 ®P ❑ T
Replace Culvert
Tributary to
® PER
® Corps
9,4
67.5
with Arch Culvert
French Broad
❑ INT
® DWQ
River
Unnamed
S2 ®P ❑ T
Arch Culvert
Tributary to
French Broad
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
9.4
278
River
Unnamed
S3 ®P ❑ T
Restoration
Tributary to
French Broad
® PER
[]INT
® Corps
❑ DWQ
9.4
369
River
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
Page 5 of 12

S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
714.5
3i. Comments: Stream impacts will be limited to Stream 1 (see Stream and Wetland Delineation map). Impacts to this stream
include a section where the existing round culvert will be replaced with an arch culvert, a section where an arch culvert will be
constructed over the stream, and a section where the stream channel will be restored.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indiv" ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P
04 ❑P
0. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 12

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below.
If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then
you MUST fill out Section D
of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse
❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba
❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
im act
required?
61 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
E] Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer Impacts
6i. Comments.
Page 7 of 12

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See Supplemental
b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See Supplemental
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank.
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested.
acres
4h. Comments.
Page 8 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? If you will have to fill out this entire form — please
contact the State for more information.
El Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments.
Page 9 of 12

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑Yes No
❑
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project ?
_6%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: The site is reducing overall impervious
cover by 6 %.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
® Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Asheville
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply).
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B.0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
Yes
® ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
El Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
® Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Most recent N.C. Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Database; USFWS Critical Habitat Web Portal
(hftp://criticalhabitat.fws.gov/crithab/)
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
TO Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA- National Marine Fisheries Service Essential Fish Habitat Mapper V 3.0
htt : / /www.habitat.noaa. ov/ rotection/efh/habitatma gr.html
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
State Historic Preservation Office -HPO Web (http: / /gis.ncdcr.gov /hpoweb /);
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements. A No -Rise Certification Report has been prepared with
supporting hydraulic analysis, in accordance with NC Emergency Management National Flood Insurance
Program guidelines, and has been submitted to NCDPS officials for review.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NCDPS Floodplain Mapping Program data, and
FEMA Flood Map Panels were used in assembling floodplain data for design determination.
David Tuch
/
� � i-
i �
7.02.13
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.
Page 12 of 12

SUPPLEMENTAL
Section B
3d. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project).
The purpose of the project improvements for the New Belgium Brewing: East Coast Brewery is
based on a partnership with the City of Asheville and New Belgium Brewing. As part of this
partnership the City of Asheville has agreed to make improvements to the site as part of an
incentive package to help attract New Belgium Brewing to Asheville. In return New Belgium is
developing the site which includes a beer production facility and tasting room. This project is
estimated to create 154 local jobs to operate the facility. The construction of the facility is
estimated to support 1,252 jobs over a seven year period, pumping an estimated $41 million
into the community, as estimated by the Asheville Chamber of Commerce. The project is seen
as a major economic development catalyst for the River Arts District and will have significant
benefits to the overall community and the revitalization of the riverfront as part of the Wilma
Dykeman RiverWay.
Both the City of Asheville and New Belgium Brewing have a goal of developing the site in a
sustainable manner. As such, the improvements to the site that the City of Asheville is
providing include stormwater improvements and a greenway. The stormwater improvements
are part of a larger project and are being considered by the City of Asheville as a regional
stormwater project. There are three major aspects of this regional stormwater project:
1. Watershed Improvements- The City of Asheville is looking to improve water quality and
address sedimentation issues upstream of the New Belgium property prior to water
entering the New Belgium site & the French Broad River.
2. Craven Street Improvements- The City of Asheville is looking to address water quality along
Craven Street (porous pavers or porous concrete and bio- retention), the stream within the
New Belgium property, and a parking area which will include stormwater BMPs (Low Impact
Parking Lot)
3. New Belgium Site- New Belgium Brewing is looking to implement water quality within their
site including stormwater BMPs such as constructed wetlands, bio- retention areas, bio-
swales, and rainwater collection.
The purpose of the stream restoration is to improve the conditions of the unnamed tributary
that flows through the site before emptying into the French Broad River. The stream has been
manipulated overtime and is currently exhibiting low ecological value as an aquatic system. In
fact, water flow is subsurface and one of the goals is to re- establish base flow where it currently
does not occur. To improve the stream and not impact the existing wetland above Craven
Street, a grade control structure will be constructed to maintain the original elevation of

Wetland 2 (See Wetland and Stream Delineation Map) improving water quality downstream of
the structure. To accommodate the programming needs of the site for New Belgium Brewing,
an arch culvert to help meet the parking requirements for the site is also planned to be
constructed. As well, an arch culvert is proposed for Craven Street in which an existing culvert
is located. The City of Asheville will construct the arch culvert under Craven Street and New
Belgium Brewing will construct the arch culvert within the site.
As part of this project a greenway will also be constructed by the City of Asheville to provide a
key connection to the larger greenway system in Asheville for alternative transportation,
recreation, and health benefits to the community. This greenway section will provide a critical
link to the progress energy corridor to the south linking to the French Broad River Park and will
be part of a loop that will connect to the east side of the river and the Wilma Dykeman
RiverWay. It will also include a connection to the West Asheville community.
The approximate dates for construction are September 2013 - September 2014 for the
improvements identified above. The greenway will rely on coordination with the Metropolitan
Sewerage District (MSD) and the stream restoration is proposed to be built in phases. Phase
one of the stream restoration will include the arch culvert and the stream channel including all
of the in- stream structures. The areas beyond the stream channel will be temporarily seeded
and used for temporary diversion ditches. When the work within the site is nearing completion
the grading and final planting for the areas between the stream channel and the New Belgium
site will be graded and planted with native vegetation. The site work is scheduled to be
completed by December 2014.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used
The greenway is a 10' asphalt paved trail that will be located on an existing bench within the
existing MSD sewer easement. There will be a trailhead located at the terminus of the trail at
the north end of the site across from Craven Street. There are two unnamed tributaries which
the greenway will cross. Stream 2, closest to Haywood Road, will be spanned with an arch
culvert. Stream 1, that bisects the New Belgium site, will be crossed with a bridge and
abutments outside of the top of bank will be used to support the bridge. The span of the arch
culvert and the footings are more than 2 %Z times bank full width which on average is 9.4 feet
and above the ordinary high water mark. The greenway plans provided indicate grading and
structures to be constructed including crossings and retaining walls. The overall length of the
greenway is 2,316 linear feet.
The stream restoration includes 369 linear feet. In addition, an arch culvert will be used to span
the stream for 278 linear feet, approximately 67.5 linear feet of which will be replacement of
the existing culvert with a bottomless arch culvert. A grade control structure will be

constructed before the stream flows under Craven Street into the arch culvert. This grade
control structure will limit the impacts to the existing wetland while also allowing the necessary
gradient for the stream as it flows under Craven Street. At Craven Street the existing culvert
which is essentially silted in will be replaced with an arch culvert. The arch culvert will include
footers and the stream channel will include a linear to keep the base flow from going
subsurface. Appropriately sized rock, as well as concrete baffles to deter movement will also be
placed within the channel through the section of the arch culvert. Once the stream flows
through the arch culvert it will enter a restored section of stream. The stream will be designed
as a threshold channel with Type B morphology and an immobile bed constructed of natural
river cobble. The design includes in- stream structures to create a riffle pool system and grade
control structures using natural stone boulders. A low rock wall will be constructed at the back
of the floodplain bench. Above the bench the slope will be graded and when needed, retaining
walls will be used to step up the slope with terraces to meet the grade of the New Belgium site.
Native plants will be used to revegetate the banks and provide habitat and shade along the
stream.
For construction of the greenway a motor grader, mini track hoe, and bobcat will be the
primary equipment used to construct the trail. The limits of disturbance will be flagged to avoid
unnecessary impacts to the wetland. The stream will be constructed from the top down with
the arch culvert installed first and progressing downstream. A track hoe will be used for the
stream channel construction activities.
Section D
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in
designing the project.
The City of Asheville and New Belgium Brewing are focused on creating a model for sustainable
commercial development and have taken steps to minimize and avoid impacts to jurisdictional
waters. In fact, the stormwater BMPs that will be used by the City of Asheville and New
Belgium Brewing show their commitment to being sensitive to the environment since many of
the stormwater BMPS are not required as there not an increase in impervious cover as a result
of the project.
The project has been designed to avoid impacts to wetlands and streams whenever possible.
The wetlands on the property are located along the floodway near Haywood Road and
immediately above the site on the southwest side of Craven Street. The wetland along the
floodway is located where the greenway passes. Impacts could not be avoided as the trail
surface needs to be designed to accommodate a 60,000 lbs. pound Metropolitan Sewerage
District (MSD) vehicle to access the line and manholes. To attempt to avoid this wetland impact
and meet the design criteria for the trail would require excessive cost to build a trail that has
the structural integrity to accommodate such a weight. In addition, the agreement that MSD

and the City of Asheville have for allowing greenways within their MSD sewer easement states
that "no structures, including footings, are allowed in MSD easement areas ". A boardwalk
system to span a wetland is considered a structure by MSD.
Wetland 2, located near the southwest boundary of the parcel along Craven Street, has been
created due to sediment that has accumulated in the culvert passing under Craven Street. This
blockage in essence is serving as a dam that backs water up above the road and has created the
conditions for the wetland. Impacts to the wetland in this location are minimized by utilizing a
grade control structure. If a grade control structure was not used the wetland area would need
to be re- graded to connect to the stream that passes under Craven Street. If such grading were
to occur it would change the hydrology and drain the wetland. The grade control structure
prevents draining the wetland and allows the stream restoration on the New Belgium property
to create the longitudinal grade necessary for the stream restoration.
Avoidance and minimization of impacts to the unnamed tributary that flows under Craven
Street through and existing culvert is a significant part of this project. A portion of this stream
will be restored while another section will be spanned with a bottomless arch culvert. At the
onset of the design it was thought that the entire stream would be piped. However, the design
team representing both New Belgium Brewing and the City of Asheville was able to meet the
design needs and program elements of the site (providing the necessary parking requirements)
while also enhancing the degraded stream through restoration. As the unnamed tributary
enters the site the existing culvert will be replaced with a bottomless arch culvert. The arch
culvert will then be extended to span the stream and provide employee parking above the
stream. Beyond this section the stream will be restored.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through
construction techniques.
During the construction of the greenway the limits of disturbance will be flagged by the
surveyor and sediment fencing will be used to minimize impacts. The stream will include
temporary diversion of stormwater off the banks of the stream during construction. As well
sediment fencing will be used to minimize sediment from reaching the stream channel.

SAMPLE AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: p
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID: -103- 81- 3'702
STREET ADDRESS: Z-( D cl ! C i2A
Please print:
Property Owner. _ N CW FSG I-G l u M nsy�7 i �.3G1 COW'" IF
1 NG ,
Property Owner:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
-IM—A l D 1.1- � . of ti CQ 0(r.CV- la3V tQQ*4MGl1XkL
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm) GC1.3WLTAT1dJ &bE5W )IVG.
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, Issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certiflcation and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (If different than property above):
500 LINDG'ti1 �T. �h =�Z.t Cot.0 -aNS AGO 8d Z`-r
Telephone: CIO . Li Iq , 4l 3
We hereby certify the above Information submitted in this application Is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
A -( 2 I C PkA�! 0 San/
G- -6rvL'-,'eAt. MANA-66C, 4JAt6v't-CF
rized Signature Authorized Signature
Date: Lo , j U N- 2 a 13 Date:

SAMPLE AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID: �3 70 !7
STREET ADDRESS: 21 «VrA I ( G myevr stn G
A -s4 -e- l ls. NC- 2-29F3041'
Please print:
Property Owner:
Property Owner:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
, of 1 ��i 'Q � A f eal ll(-'
(Contractor / Agent) (Narr a of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
i &
Telephone: S Z b- Z� 9- 5 9 6 b
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorize516, nature
Date: Z 5 I
Authorized Signature
Date:

E UINOX Figure 1. Stream and Wetland
Q
E NYV PO \MENTAL Delineation Map
This map is not a survey and is not to be construed as such.
Q Property Boundary
® Jurisdictional Wetland
Perennial Streams
Buncombe County Parcels
N
2010 Color Aerial Photo

Conceptual Design
Estimated Channel Values from Regional Curves
Project: Craven Street
Project No.: 1057 -CRAV
Client: City of Asheville
Contract No.: -
County/State: Buncombe Co., NC
Hydro - Physio Province: NC Mountains
WA BKF
ABKF
dMMEAN
n
`�8KF
WBED
dMAx
WBKF
dm":
Regional Curve Equations
Coefficient
Exponent
17.36
0.3693
18:559-
0:6616
1.1771
0.2697
55:425
1 0.7874
12
0.45
1.5
0.27
Approximate Equations
Coefficient
Exponent
14.53496
0.39
1.64794
0.27
Design Status
FINAL
(Limited Data, Not Used in Calculations)
(Limited Data, Not Used in Calculations)
(Used in Calculations)
(Used in Calculations)
P X1057- CRAV�Design�2013- 04- 17CRAVChannel Design xlsm 611912013
Estimated Dimensions from Regional Curves
UNBORN
..
Spacing
�R
P X1057- CRAV�Design�2013- 04- 17CRAVChannel Design xlsm 611912013

Reach Locations
Project: Craven Street
Project No.: 1057 -CRAV
Client: City of Asheville
Contract No.: -
County /State: Buncombe Co., NC
Existing Thalweg Proposed Design
Reach Stationing Stationing Description
Begin End Begin End
Craven 10+00 13 +80 from pipe Inv to French Broad River
P 0057- CRAODesign12013- 04- 17CRAVChonnel Design xlsm 611 912 01 3

Discharge Calculations
Estimated Values from Regional Regression Equations
Project: Craven Street
Project No.: 1057 -CRAV
Client: City of Asheville
Contract No.: -
County /State: Buncombe Co., NC
Event
Bankfull
2 -yr
5 -yr
10 -yr
25 -yr
50 -yr
100 -yr
200 -yr
500 -yr
Regional Regression Equations
Coefficient
Exponent
55.425
0.7874
-13#
0.7-02
242
0.677
334
0.662
476
0.645
602
0.635
745
0.625
W 8
0.616
1160
0.605
Include
C
Design Status
FINAL
Estimated
Discharges
Drainage
Area
(Mi2)
Bankfull
(Cfs)-
MEMO
P U057-CRAVWesign�2013 -04 -17 CRAVChannel Design xlsm 611 912 01 3

a
Project: Craven Street
Project No.: 1057 -CRAV
Client: City of Asheville
Contract No.: -
County /State: Buncombe Co., NC
Design Section 1
Design Status
FINAL
100
'--
- - - - - -- - - - - -- - --
i
Detailed
Section
Coef
-----------
WBKi
WEED
15.50
0.45
120%
d, u
1.55
I
WBE[
Bank Slope
2.5
(H:1)
Thalweg Ratio
0.3
161%
WTHI
Toe Depth Ratio
0.8
2.3
1.4
Bench Width Ratio
0,5
2.3
d w
Bench Slope
10
(HA)
Drainage Area
0.20
(sq. mi.)
dTOI
1.0
94%
107%
112%
#DN /01
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.8
94%
107%
115%
6.4
5.0
5.9
8.6
135%
172%
145%
I
I
0.74
0.70
0.75
112%
102%
107%
#VALUEI
10.3
7.3
I
so
115%
162%
133%
#VALUEI
0.62
0.69
0.67
0.73
�
1 106%
109%
#VALUEI
14.3
9.3
12.2
�
15.4
107%
166%
127%
#VALUE!
I
I J
t
400 450 500
Regional Curve Reference/Watershed - -- Quick Section
S50 600
Detailed Section - Design Section
Point of Comparison ABKI
Thompson Creek Downstream of Site
dMEAP
Hydr. F
Wild Ratic
Section c.omoansons
Regional
Curve
Design Section
Quick
Section
Detailed
Section
Coef
Exp
WBKi
WEED
15.50
0.45
120%
d, u
1.55
0.27
WBE[
Bank Slope
2.5
(H:1)
Thalweg Ratio
0.3
161%
WTHI
Toe Depth Ratio
0.8
2.3
1.4
Bench Width Ratio
0,5
2.3
d w
Bench Slope
10
(HA)
Drainage Area
0.20
(sq. mi.)
dTOI
Point of Comparison ABKI
Thompson Creek Downstream of Site
dMEAP
Hydr. F
Wild Ratic
Section c.omoansons
Regional
Curve
Ref/
Wtrshed
Quick
Section
Detailed
Section
Design
Section
9.6
6.8
8.5
0.0
11.5
120%
169%
136%
#DIV /01
7.8
4.7
6.3
7.5
96%
161%
120%
2.3
1.4
1.5
2.3
96%
161%
150%
1.1
0.9
0.9
0.0
1.0
94%
107%
112%
#DN /01
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.8
94%
107%
115%
6.4
5.0
5.9
8.6
135%
172%
145%
#VALUE!
0.67
0.74
0.70
0.75
112%
102%
107%
#VALUEI
10.3
7.3
8.9
11.9
115%
162%
133%
#VALUEI
0.62
0.69
0.67
0.73
117%
1 106%
109%
#VALUEI
14.3
9.3
12.2
15.4
107%
166%
127%
#VALUE!
P 11057 -CRAVE Design �2013-04-1 7 CRAVChonnel Design xlsm 611912013

Typical Section Dimensions
Project. Craven Street
Project No.: 1057 -CRAV
Client: City of Asheville
Contract No.: -
County/State: Buncombe Co., NC
Design Status
FINAL
Pool Dimensions
P X1057- CRAV�Design12013- 04- 17CRAVChannel Design xlsm 611912013

Hydraulic Dimensions
Project- Craven Street
Project No.- 1057 -CRAV
Client: City of Asheville
Contract No.: -
County/State: Buncombe Co., NC
Stream Entrench
Reach Type ABKF PWET RHYD dMEAN W/D Ratio Ratio
Craven B 8.6 11.9 0.7 0.7 15.4 0.0
Morphologic Dimensions
Pool Spacing/WAvG Pool Spacing
2EM Status
INCOMPLETE
P X 1057- CRAV�Design�2013- 04- 17CRAVChonnel Design xlsm 611912013

Morphologic Dimensions
Project Craven Street
Project No.: 1057 -CRAV
Client: City of Asheville
Contract No.: -
County/State: Buncombe Co., NC
Design Status
INCOMPLETE
C Meander
SAVG 'VALLEY Sinuosity Width
Ratio
0.010
P 0057- CRAODesign�2013- 04- 17CRAVChonnel Design xlsm 611912013
MEN
Feature Length
�-fflpff.Tw-n
P 0057- CRAODesign�2013- 04- 17CRAVChonnel Design xlsm 611912013

Structure Dimensions
Project: Craven Street
Project No.. 1057 -CRAV
Client: City of Asheville
Contract No.: -
County/State: Buncombe Co., NC
Design Status
INCOMPLETE
Boulder Size
P X 1057- CRAV�Design�2n13 -04 -17 CRAVChonnel Design xlsm 611912013

Competence Calculations
Project: Craven Street
Project No.: 1057 -CRAV
Client: City of Asheville
Contract No.: -
County /State: Buncombe Co., NC
Design Status
INCOMPLETE
Reach
mom
Largest Particle
Calculations
Representative Particle Calculations
Wom®
Min
Max
Craven
Representative Particle
Low
80%
100%
0.0281 to 0.0351
Kim
MN
Reach
Calculation Method
Sediment
Load
Percent Calculated
Slope
Design Slope Range
(ft/ft)
Min
Max
Craven
Representative Particle
Low
80%
100%
0.0281 to 0.0351
P ( 1057 -CRAVE Design �2013-04-1 7 CRAVChannel Design xlsm 611912013

Transition Reach Design
Project: Craven Street
Project No.: 1057 -CRAV
Client: City of Asheville
Contract No.: -
County /State: Buncombe Co., NC
Design Status
INCOMPLETE
P X1057- CRAV� Design `2013- 04- 17CRAVChannel Design xlsm 611912013
Design
Depth
Critical
Shear
T*
Transition
Slop
(ft/ft) I
Shear
T 'Size
(in)
Armor
Size
P X1057- CRAV� Design `2013- 04- 17CRAVChannel Design xlsm 611912013

Supplemental Bed Material Design
Project: Craven Street
Project No.: 1057 -CRAV
Client: City of Asheville
Contract No.: -
County/State: Buncombe Co., NC
Design Status
INCOMPLETE
Material Gradation
Percentage of Total by Weight
Material
Size
Sand/Clay
ABC(M)
1/2" Stone
(No. 57)
3/4" Stone
(No 5)
2" Stone
(Surge)
6" Stone
NCDOT
(Class A)
12" Stone
NCDOT
(Class B)
1B" Stone
NCDOT
(Class 1)
Sand
#16
#10
100
#8
12
#4
9
2
3/8"
9
3
1/2"
16
12
2
3/4"
16
25
3
in
13
48
32
1.5"
12
7
58
2"
13
3
5
3"
19
4"
50
19
5"
50
19
6"
19
19
13
B"
19
19
13
9"
5
19
14
ion
19
14
12"
19
14
14"
5
13
16"
14
18"
5
24"
Toth %
100
100
100
100
100
-100
100
100
P X1057 - CRAV `Design�2013- 04- 17CRAVChonnel Design xlsm 611912013

Supplemental Bed Material Desian
Project: Craven Street
Project No.: 1057 -CRAV
Client: City of Asheville
Contract No.: -
County /State• Buncombe Co., NC
DeSIQn Status
INCOMPLETE
Composition Material
D•
(Class A)
Stone:
�•
�•
-
-
-
--
--
Design
P 11057- CRAV�Design�2013 -04 -17 CRAVChonnel Design xlsm 611912013
P 11057- CRAV�Design�2013 -04 -17 CRAVChonnel Design xlsm 611912013

HEC47AS Plan Ran 03 River Cammn Rmch 1
Rod
Rh4W Ble
P4d9a
O Tah11
►On Ch B
W.B. Bav
C78 W.9.
EO. Bev
E.O. 51cps
WI CM
RoW AM
Top
Fla ftN Ch1
Shear Chan
aa)
m
@)
@
MW
(wN
@)
Usiaan)
1
12
Blff
1600
197880
197958
197918
197964
0005225
1 91
839
1142
039
023
1
12
2 YR
14913
197860
1981 19
1980 61
198147
0 006577
463
4622
3150
_
053
093
1
12
10 YR
29256
197860
198203
198139
198248
0007489
606
7271
31501
0 80
145
1
12
80 YR
45622
197860
198282
198198
198343
0007913
722
9745
3150
i 064
190
1
Ili
BID*
1600
197786
197844
197844
197867
0039290
379
422
942
100
108
1
it
2 YR
14913
197786
1979 87
1979 87
1980 53
0020598
6 77
2839
2768
090
220
1
11
10 YR
29254
197786
198085
1980 65
198150
0018158
813
52 53
3150
090
280
1
11
60YR
458 22
197786
198124
1981 24
1992 38
0 019390
965
71101
3150
096
368
ISD
1
10
Bill
1600
187650
197700
197708
197733
0070895
461
3471
901
131
168
1
10
2 YR
14913
197650
197801
1978 51
197955
0071452
1008
1650
1964
159
544
1
10
10 YR
29264
1976 50
197868
197929
198064
0055495
11W
3333
3040
150
649
1
to
YR
45822
197650
197920
197989
198150
0051166
1331
4965
3150
1 50
760
1
9
BIff
18 00
1873 97
197481
197455
197489
0009739
2 36
6771
1068
052
038
1
19
2 YR
149,131
197397
197638
197598
197673,
0 009589
526
39 73
3150
063
124
1
9
/0 YR
292 54
1973 97
1977 18
1976 76
1977 73
0 009897
8 65
6577
31 50
068
178
1
9
5D YR
45622
1873 87
197793
197735
1978 66
0010160
793
89 34
3150
072
229
1
B
BIff
1600
197362
197451
197458
0007681
18 18
736
1095
047
031
1
6
2 YR
14913
197362
197605
197640
0 008812
511
41 13
3150
061
lie
1
e
10 YR
1 29254
197362
197684
1977 38
0 009818
8 63
6595
3150
068
177
1
8
6D YR
45622
197362
187755
197829
0010447
790
8848
31 50
0731
233
1
7
BIO:
18 00
1873 31
197389
197389
197412
0 039670
380
421
941
100
108
1
17
2 YR
14913
197331
197532
197532
1975 98
0020502
8 77
2838
2768
3901
220
i
7
10 YR
29254
197331
197610
197610
197695
0018199
813
5249
3150
)901
280
1
7
5D YR
45622
19733t
197870
197870
197783
0019311
964
7121
3150
098
387
1
8
Bill
1600
197200
197252
197258
197282
0063116
4 441
361
908
1 24F
154
1
8
2 YR
14913
197200
197353
1974 01
197501
0 066849
9 87
1887
2002
154
519
1
6
10 YR
29254
197200
197421
1974 79
197609
0052608
11 62
3414
30 83
146
8 24
t
8
60 YR
45822
1972 00
197473
187539
197688
0049147
13 14
50 43
31 50
147
7 38
1
Is
BRF
1600
1970 75
197133
197133
197156
_ 0 039631
3 80
421
941
100
109
1
8
2 YR
14913
1970 75
187244
1872 78
197355
0 043810
864
20 33
2254
1 27
3 82
1
5
10 YR
292 54
1970 75
197299
197354
197478
0 049019
11 35
3525
3140
1421
592
1 Is
6D YR
45622
197075
197347
197414
1975 71
0 049353
1315
5035
31 50
148
740
1
4
aw
1600
196954
197006
197012
197036
0062549
4431
362
909
124
153
1
4
2 YR
14913
196954
1971 18
197155
197240
0050585
9 041
1911
2166
136
4241
1
4
10 YR
29254
196954
197178
197233
197358
0 D49708
11411
3503
3128
143
598
1
4
6D YR
4%22
1969 54
197226
197293
1974 51
0049570
13 17
5027
31 50
148
742
1
8
ow
18 00
1988 97
1867 33
1887 55
196810
0 257681
7 02
228
8 321
23 7
4 36
1
2 YR
14913
1966 97
1968 25
196898
1970 69
0146478
12 59
1237
1593
219
910
1
3
10 YR
292 64
19W97
196883
196976
197204
0111001
14 82
24 43
25 29
2 OB
1084
1
3
60 YR
46622
196697
1968 32
197035
197303
009M71
1650
38 50
3150
2011
1231
1
2
Bill
1600
1968 33
1966 78
1966 91
1967 21
0105678
526
304
8 77
2
2 YR
148 13
196633
196763
1968 34
196994
0133717
12 25
12 61
18 38
1
2
10 YR
292 64
198833
196818
196912
197146
0115075 1
1499
2406
25 0425 04
92+06:71281
2
50 YR
45622
196633
196865
1989 71
1972 52
0102152
18 81
37 85
31 W
t
1
Blff
1600
196441
196524
1964 99
1965 33
0 010009
239
6 70
1065
0 53
038
1
1
2 YR
14913
196441
196573
1966421
196796
0126774
13 O8
16 82
208
821
1
1
10 YR
29254
196441
196623
1967201
196966
0122513
�12
23 38
24 62
215
11 65
1
50 VR
458 22
1984 41
196888
188780
— 1970 87
0113555
—
36 01
31501
216
13 BB

.e
1

8 F i a ral�
��" � LEGEND
�Je � CGS
A " - USACE
�� NCDWQ
. USACE 710NAL
4g� ti _ _° ,, - ._ _ m °.• LIMITS
- \ \ \!
/ - 1995 —°�
' ° NCDWQ ORDINAR�f �' - _ v
°
A6H -WATER (OHW)- v
o 6 AD TRU - / ZOp0' o o � �♦ o o /° - � � �� c 3 v �� o
' o 14, 6. s\
— i�85 o i _
\\
� / �/ / / �/
lool
\ ( ! f o,
.10 o i /
ol
°° °/ .1e
\ 12
loll / 0.
kV
�?0��
ol
7' 1
.g, w FIGURE 1
NEW BELGIUM ASHEVILLE
USACE & NCDWQ EXHIBIT
� ® , ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
4' ti COMM. NO. 3267 SCALE 1" = 40'
r w
Mattern & Craig
�©
o g
CONSULTING ENGHMS • SURWMRS
o . _ 12 BROAD STREET
ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28801
(828) 254 -2201
DATE: 9/11/12 FAX [phone]

1
1
Uo
o LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TO WETLAND
1 0.06 AC.
Typ. ► WETLAND BOUNDARY
1 (0.15 AC.)
1SE3 „ 1 Tw:197o •„_,,,_,••_„ „_•, _ _ _ - - - - _- -�- - - - -„_ •_,•,
.00
o �
s
i
- 20' MSD R.O.W.
\
I � `. 118t01LI- -
a I `
a �
J
O
O
J J I
a a J I 9
0
i
0
SANITARY SEWER a _ _ o n >
J ' S ]
100 -YR FLOODPLAIN
ROCK OUTCROP �-� mom
'm
�I
I
I
404/401 APPLICATOON GREENWAY WETLAND IMPACT EXHIBIT ,A_ o
6-21-13 (1 of 2) W 5 0 10 m 30
rm

memo its
wevoll
", 111 111
6*00 0000 20600 it 1
sun I sum, 000
o �
o
p / O
o O
WETLAND BOUNDARY O
(0.003 AC.) o o
d o
o � O
c o O
c o
o G
404/401 APPUi AT�ON
6-21-13
GREENWAY WETLAND IMPACT EXHIBIT
( 2 OF Imo �� \)
,CALL I I IC
1 5 o s n 15

O I
■I
m
r U,
II CD
O I�
C
ti
c�
v
I
E;
MATCHLINE C8D
I
•4
T
N K
D (D -0
O
CLw
V
N_p ,
I,
CJ
i
I
i
�N
u�
- ;
1 �
J�
0-11
CJ f 1
C)
I
U�
i
u -fi
0
I I
-4-
I I4
C)
I
O) +
U,
C)
C f
■ ION!,
��oxo
D D N
go,
I
(D 7
< < 3
O N
D D 7 1
3
C 7 O
+ _ (D
(D
0 CD O O
O) N
N Opp O
0)
� J
(D o
a-
0
O
a I
rn I
(D
J
(D
� I
I
I
I
I
I�
U)
N <
(D (D
O
W N
(D
ID
o�
Ln
0
a
J
i
■ ■ ■ ■ ■■I ■
MATCHLINE C8F
�Ua -Lj-Z =— I---- L------------------ - - - - --
'CHLINE C8D
•— 1 t� - - - -- -----------------------
1 • �+ I 1
t �
1 � \
t\ �
A m
t• \ 1
I 1
1, 1
!s ,
I �
1 + 1 1
1 ,
l
t 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
! I 1
1 1 I1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1 1
•I
11 1 I 1
11 I 1
11 1 W I I •1
11 1 I •1
1 I •I
1 ,I
1 1 •I
11 1
1 I �
r
!r
1,1 �
11 1 •jw
1
11 ;1
1 � j•■r
J
1
Il `
\ 1
\ � 1
v
t 1 O C
1
t 1
1 1 RD
I LD
1 v
.p
1 g 1r+
t w�
T j
III I � 1
I, it 1 I 1
III I II 1' _ 1
` \
�
■rlli
�� 1
o
(D (D O rt 7
�
7• I
5 0
3
D
F
m N 3
(D a
<
_T7�
rt J
N
D (D O
O 7 3
rt 0
N
C p N
(0 0 O
yQ
CO 10
0)
� T O
0Wa
O)WO
on
C40)�0
S_
Ln
<
M
s�
�
(D
a
Ln
0
a
J
i
■ ■ ■ ■ ■■I ■
MATCHLINE C8F
�Ua -Lj-Z =— I---- L------------------ - - - - --
'CHLINE C8D
•— 1 t� - - - -- -----------------------
1 • �+ I 1
t �
1 � \
t\ �
A m
t• \ 1
I 1
1, 1
!s ,
I �
1 + 1 1
1 ,
l
t 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
! I 1
1 1 I1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1 1
•I
11 1 I 1
11 I 1
11 1 W I I •1
11 1 I •1
1 I •I
1 ,I
1 1 •I
11 1
1 I �
r
!r
1,1 �
11 1 •jw
1
11 ;1
1 � j•■r
J
1
Il `
\ 1
\ � 1
v
t 1 O C
1
t 1
1 1 RD
I LD
1 v
.p
1 g 1r+
t w�
T j
III I � 1
I, it 1 I 1
III I II 1' _ 1
` \
�
■rlli
�� 1
�
Y
B
8
t 1 1
n
111 11 I
S L -�-
i
------------------------ Z
t — - - - --
MATCHLINE C8E ,
-,�- - -A— ----------- - - - - -- I�
M
•I x
i
1
a• 1
1
I v
1
1 O
1 Z
1 �
I �
I
I
e
e
.a
r fll
i• 11
a
r 1
/1
11
w
yl l
1
2 1 1 `<° CRMN S1RLE1 IMPROVEMtNTS ssuc Dnce Remsons Doto �
^ 3 0 05/22/2015 _�
Mattern &Craig
s N�
/[�Z � n 11AI (\ �/ /t c I_ ` C CG�SL.I�NG EAG NEfRS /.SL4VtY0RS Drown dy FC
T�/w•/ V 3 - \���� NV4 Y11 ��YiIV JL f� L .i E�UIN�X .—pea dy _ _4 – A ',t\ L 7
O cr,ECKED or or y I NN
CIY Ot ASNtVILLL, NORIri CAROLINA
It oo(e os /zz /iota I �

-
- - - - - - - - -
i
In
—
'
\
II 1
`°
I 1 �
p00j --- - - - - --
e
nt Pe frson
° ° \
Pg °
,ZI e
\
per
1
uJ
- - - - - - --
1 1
1
Be,,owin 3c iontrty Mensell
:, =`yt
1 ,'\
i
In
'
\
`°
I 1 �
e
nt Pe frson
° ° \
Pg °
/POTENTIAL BUS SHELTERS
\
(BY OTHERS)
`\
1 1
1
Be,,owin 3c iontrty Mensell
:, =`yt
1 ,'\
9638 -85 -8878
D B 4679 Pc, 6,5
p B 154, Pg 78
s ' "-
/
o °- 16 -------- -- -- - - -\ ----
-- -- - - -- -- ---- ------ -- °-- --- - - - - -- - - — -
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
°
°
e
°
1
0 � 1
� o
°
/ o
(/ ©
[POWERPOLE v
— _ B NON - ENCROACHMENT ZONE • , e
e
® - -- - - - - -- 1
� e
1
1
e
' ; 1
0 % �
R25 °
® °
,
e
1 I 1
� 1
� e
1
®® GREENWAY ALIGMNENT FROM STATION 19 +00 i
THROUGH CONNECTION TO HAYWOOD ROAD IS O e
TENDED AS CONCEPTUAL ONLY. ALIGNMENT o
ALt�RNATIVES ARE BEING EXPLORED
------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
30 — ' 7 -1 -50 i8 - -00 8 - -50 19 -1 00 '19 -; -50 20 -i 00
20 -' 5C 2,- -00 2 -50 22 - -00 22 -• 50
2020
2010
2000
1990
'198 ^v
19 70
1960
23 -, 02,3-:- 6
a "s
Y O
c Y
u\ 2 L W u
o 0 o v o°
0�i
Z.
b
un
_W
Z_
W
u C
N �
Z z V
O J 0
O
0: Z
CL
w Q w
in 7
w
w W o
r r
V Ci L
V,t—1 S—le
10
IHO--70;tCl Score
20
C—�s2,6 ,11•-00•
3267
Sleet ko
C8F

1
wo
--- -- -- --- - - --�-
STREAM - PLAN VIEW
scale 1"=10'
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
2004
I
I
I
rr
r i
z 'I
2000 • - - - - -
1998 STREAM OUTFALL
FROM PIPE - - - - - - - - -
PEDE!
1992 - EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL - - - - -- - -- -
EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL
1988 - -- -- - - - - - - -
PROPOSED STREAM CHANNEL - - - - - - - - - - - -- --
1984 - - - - --- - - -- - - - -- --- -- -_ - - - - - -- _ - __- --- --- -PROPOSED STREAM CHANNEL - --
1 +pp
1978 - — - - - - r - - --
2 *Q0
1972
_ O
1988 TYPICAL RIFFLE
TYPICAL POOL TYPICAL RIFFLE
1984
TYPICAL POOL
1960,---
O O
O
+
p
O
N N C �
r r r r r r
STREAM - LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
horizontal scale 1"=10' vertical scale 1"=5'
,•''tN RO "•
N
r a m \
— � N
TTO O V O
ix
O
z
Z
G
L J J
7 7 '-
< O
r
} z
J
G >
:J f
Vc•t ca Sce'e
o Sce e
of X10
320/
Srec• \o
C9B

_j
-
__ --, \ ) 28" BE 0
—0
L20
to
51116 N ; 530 at Oo t --- - <` 26" SYC
c' _ '
'32" SYC 12" BE g ��_r_� _ -�!! __74_�� -S
19L 16" BE j_ _0�" 55 �___- - ----- - '
12
.►• 6 `F BIR
— •�2Y_6c.' =� - - - - - -- -19 »4, �4'src ��- ��1�'--- - - - - -- � - -- � - 1995 --
026 SYC \SL.
.6 ",B'R —.. �'C_'CT- - - " SYG -- - -- - -- 12 9E 12" BE
_ �•• —__ - J BAR" 14" $� _ �1°" 4.,.J
7 1.. 46" SYC 30' BE 8" SYC 9" AS+ -- �C9 %0 -- { S -ia' ar` 70 =u ^\ - c 13 8E- t �L
s- -- �- 30" S -- _ \1 1_ ,6 8 '3" LOCj
1 L•t= $f- -.--�_ "' ---- -- S7EPPOOL3 -- �\ �� s=-'� - .2" H;C _ t3 - -
�� -- �� ar 'p(� - r2° sE_ -200
3 } �`�' -19 Y2� SYC - 14" OC _ - -- - '
Q' ``-✓ 2 "- 8E - --- - 012" BE - -5--! _ -_�5__ _s1. -_ _- -= -- __ -' 7r -LIlC - ---- - - - - -- _
— S ^ss t ss -- ��_ s�_— s5=— s -_ sis- —sF- ^ s - / c _�_�' `; �1 r %z44JJ�Fl - -- \ - - -- - -- ------- - - - - -- _ - 05-- --
L _ - - - ATM,,
,$. _ _ _ _ _
----------- ---• -- -- - - - ---- - -1 � � , c \ �! ,.�1 1 4.98 \i �,� "` __ -_ _ _-
y - - - -- -\ , N I� II �/ �4 •rLG \ \ '' �, IR� //_ --/6 !- - , GRAVEL
— 1 L r� (1 I iCFj
\ \I ! I 111 'li " IIt tl \I[ I i--L GRAVEL
4 I r _ ;. N ^ \\ \\\ • \; 50 ,11 1 'll_ 1, ,,q2= 1 \ F - I J> C �� r oE�bLOL
I
N � � \ 11 � / , \1 \ \� '11` I ' f 114 4` •\ C J> /�y0 O
� m ,
� I
\` SL•"109 ,, 11, 111 11 ,IR \" I V
-
I c-A,
.11,10L i M 1i7Alj9ry,.
E 'd 'L i I 1, 1 1 1 I (✓
-
i
PROPOSED STREAM
j ROCK VEINS-
-
---- --- - - - - - - - '� ,/ \11 1 _' —•-`I� I t; II 1� I '�E II /
/
SL -105'
00, /
LO
SL -104
O I I
�°o, EVENS
00 CD
TYPICAL Pool / crl
TYPICAL R LAW
i- _SL4o3_ I I ,p«75 i 14 i `
/ /
/
' I
\ i 1 SL -102 i AM ii11�Q /
LO
LJl Q%
/
1 I I I
GRAVE, _ 1 I I y I SL -101 i I I F � / oo \ �
i!k_ T ' 110°251 I ` / / \ \\
\ I i REINFORCED OUTFALL
T SETTLING POOL
/
/
:SL -991 /
_j 0 ,
e
1 pp I .-
I
1
o
I 1
-o
I
I I
I
n
s
O O U O
Fi
O
if
Z
C
1-
z Z
w
� c
y <
z 4-
� Q O
O i
z J
w LL
v',
Z O
cr
< Y
U U
Vc•t cc Scc'e
N/A
No eo ^tc' ScC'e
1 -20'
3267
5 —t N.
C9A

�-
j I
Ln
O ` 11 J N ` I � , i *1 : I
I I" I11N I W
� V1
co WIS
CP
13 00' - -
_,,,4, ICU
2i 11
1.0
IP
-
1 N I 1 1 I
I.
STREAM - PLAN VIEW
scale 1"=10'
2004-- - - - - - - - - --
2000 - -
1998 - -- - -- - — - - -
__ _ PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
1992
EXISTING STREAM CHANNEL -
1988 — - - - - -
1984 - PROPOSED STREAM CHANNEL __ —_ , _ - PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE - - - - - will - - - - -- _ - --
1978- - -
I
1972 - -
1988
TYPICAL RIFFLE
,984 � �. 4 +00
TYPICAL POOL srm�».are
1960 0. - ION 195
MSD (APPROX. ELEV.)
1958
LO
N M M
STREAM - LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
horizontal scale 1 " =10' vertical scale 1 " =5'
I
4 +45
CID
co
TABLE 1 SECTION DIMENSIONS
q
RIFF] F : MENSONS P00 0 yENStONS
�'YPICAL
REACH CCIM
,IO
STAT C`.
rimu \•Te.o
Wnw V1__
WERNOUS LINOR
SECTION 1
_—
p� Virt IVyr oyy\
TYPICAL PIFFLE
•:OT TO SVEE
4tq PI
OU
Ct) (n1 VO (fl)
r. YIgS„
Gy
Nyt
23 ' 1C
100
1 080 1 09 j 58 ' 151
w4AEG
4ow 1b,
IY, ^EFV 0�5 . •ff9
SECTION 1
TYP CAL POOL
NOT TO STALE
TABLE 1 SECTION DIMENSIONS
RIFF] F : MENSONS P00 0 yENStONS
�'YPICAL
REACH CCIM
,IO
STAT C`.
rimu \•Te.o
Wnw V1__
car
_—
p� Virt IVyr oyy\
C1) GO
4tq PI
OU
Ct) (n1 VO (fl)
Crpvc� 1
0400 70 St °_0
115 75
23 ' 1C
100
1 080 1 09 j 58 ' 151
II
I I
n
N
� m \
0
n 7 V O
0
T
s
Z
Q
z L
O
(n �
G
7 � V
S 77
O < V
L �
>
7
(v
a >
Hp, SCOIC
1' -10.
co-- '--c,
3267
5 -t \o
c9c]

ARCH CULVERT-
GRADE CONTROL STRUCTURE
® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® m
I
1
i Fif
0 /
GRADE CONTROL STRUCTURE;
I M PACT AREA (0.01 AC.)
� , I
I
EXCAVATED AREA (0.02 AC.)
404/401
6 -21 -13
DELINEATE
WETLAN
0
Cf)_ - -
_ _ --- - -
� o
� d
I'
1� 32.4'
� 1
I \ 1
1 \
\ 1
\ I
1 \
\
I
27.0' 1
� � I
o
I
1,
GRADE CONTROL STRUCTURE EXHIBIT
application xP-112
10 5 0 10 1D

GRADE CONTROL CONCRETE WALL TOP OF
WALL 1986.5 WITH LOW FLOW NOTCH AT
1986.0
TECH ARCH ALUMINUM STEEL
1 X 6' -3"

GRADE CONTROL CONCRETE WALL TOP
WALL 1986.5 WITH LOW FLOW NOTCH AT
1986.0
GRADE CONTROL CONCRETE WALL TOP
WALL 1986.5 WITH LOW FLOW NOTCH AT
1986.0
FILTER FABRIC
CONTECH ARCH ALUMINUM STEEL
CORRUGATED STRUCTURAL PLATE
ARCH CULVERT OR EQUIVALENT
0.125" THICK
22" RIB SPACING.
-12" STONE FOR STREAM BED 12" DEEP
8" X 18" CONCRETE BAFFLES REQUIRED EVERY
5 FEET TO PREVENT MOVEMENT OF RIP RAP
12" OF ABC BEDDING COARSE

GRADE CONTROL CONCRETE WALL TOP OF
WALL 1986.5 WITH LOW FLOW NOTCH AT
1986.0
CURRENT SILT LEVEL 1986.0
REMOVE APPROXIMATELY 0.01AC OF
ACCUMILATED SILT FROM BEHIND
PROPOSED GRADE CONTROL
STRUCTURE.
1016 SLOPE
I
1 % SLOPE
mod—i
1993.3 CRAVEN STREET
CONCRETE HEADWALL
CONTECH ARCH ALUMINUM STEEL
12'-0" X 6' -3"
TOP OF ARCH FOUNDATION AT INLET 1982.5
18"X 18" CONCRETE BAFFLE
6" -12" STON4 FOR STREAM BED 12" DEEP
EDPM LINER
UNDERCUT AND BACKFILL WITH WASHED
STONE, EXACT DEPTH AND LOCATION TO BE
DETERMINED BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
0