20190200 Ver 1_Year 0 Monitoring Report_2021_20210817

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20190200 Version* 1
.....................................
Select Reviewer:*
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 08/17/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal -8/17/2021
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* O Yes fJ No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
l� Stream rJ Wetlands E Buffer ❑ Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Lindsay Crocker [e-mail]
Project Information
ID#:* 20190200 Version:*1
Existing ll) Existing Version
Project Type: F DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Odell's House
County: Johnston
Document Information
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation As-Built Plans
File Upload: Odell'sHouse_100041_MY0_2021.pdf 21.78MB
Rease upload only one R7F of the corrplete file that needs to be subrritted...
Signature
Print Name:* Lindsay Crocker
Signature:*
may atereet

MYO FINAL MONITORING REPORT
Odell's House Mitigation Project
Johnston County
Neuse River Basin
CU 03020201
DMS Project # 100041
DMS Contract# 7420
Contracted RFP # 16-007279
USACE Action ID Number: SAW-2018-00431
DWR Project # 2018-0200
Calendar Year of Data Collection: 2021
d •
R
Yx
- 3
F
c
;, roe *..
Y 0,
y dt{y X•?,'' fi�.. r
f�,. ' x yorxv:
Prepared for:
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
a
Mitigation Services
ENVIRONMENTAL OVALITY

4 WATER & LAND SOLUTIONS
7721 SIX FORKS ROAD, SUITE 130, RALEIGH, NC 27615
[919)614.5111 I wolerinndsolutions,com
July 16,2021
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
Attn: Lindsay Crocker,Project Manager
217 W.Jones Street,Suite 3000
Raleigh,NC 27609
RE: WLS Responses to NCDEQ DMS Review Comments for Task 6 Submittal,Draft Baseline
Monitoring Report for the Odell's House Mitigation Project,DMS Full-Delivery Project ID
#100041,Contract#7420,Neuse River Basin,Cataloging Unit 03020201,Johnston County,NC
Dear Ms.Crocker:
Water&Land Solutions,LLC (WLS)is pleased to present the Final Baseline Monitoring Report(including
record drawings) for the Odell's House Mitigation Project to the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). Per the DMS review comments,
WLS has updated the Final As-Built Baseline Monitoring Report and associated deliverables accordingly.
We are providing the electronic deliverables via cloud link. The electronic deliverables are organized
under the following folder structure as required under the digital submission requirements:
1. Report PDF
2. Support Files
1_Tables
2_CCPV
3_Veg
4_Geomorph
5_Hydro
6_Photos
We are providing our written responses to DMS'review comments on the Draft As-Built Baseline Report
below. Each of the DMS review comments is copied below in bold text, followed by the appropriate
response from WLS in regular text:
General:
• Page 1,indicates linear feet of construction and wetland.Clarify that this is the design,not as-
built footage. Response: Language was added to indicate that these numbers are based on design.
• The stream geomorphology tables show that the bankfull discharge from pre to design to
post remained constant.Explain how this occurred or correct calculations. Response:The
discharge numbers in the table are correct for pre,design,and MY0 for all reaches. The bankfull
discharge estimate is held constant throughout and what varies is the cross-sectional area and
velocity. As cross-sectional area increases,the velocity decreases and vice versus.The bankfull
discharge is chosen and held at a constant and the designed cross-sectional area is based on that

number. For'C'stream types,the design channels acceptable velocity ranges are between 3-5 ft/s
and for'B'stream types it is between 4-6 ft/s.
• The stream geomorphology tables do not appear to be populated correctly.The'n'columns
are showing many more cross-sections than were taken.Please explain or revise,contact
DMS for verbal explanation.This may also apply to recently reviewed Buffalo Creek
Tributaries.Response:The definition of the'n'columns was misunderstood and has been corrected
accordingly.
• The Mitigation Plan indicates that macrobenthic invertebrate monitoring will occur to show
pre-and post-response.Please provide this data and show monitoring on location on the
CCPV in the baseline report.Response: Data from the invertebrate monitoring occurred pre-
construction and is included in App F.Data is not tied to a performance standard and repeat
sampling will occur in MY3.The location of sampling is shown on the CCPV.
• Describe if there was any temporary or permanent cover planted in the vegetation section of
the baseline report.Response:Temporary and permanent seeding occurred during construction
and followed the mitigation plan.The report has been updated to include the temporary/permanent
seeding.
• It was noted in the field that given the dense vegetative conditions,it was very difficult to
discern any flow paths for R1 and R5 (headwater valley through the ponds).It was also noted
that much of the accumulated/legacy sediment was left along pond bottoms,creating some
very mushy areas for ponded water.DMS thinks that the headwater stream areas through the
ponds may be at-risk for credit and advises WLS to consider that as the project moves
forward.Response: This concern was addressed in the mitigation plan Section 6.7.1 site
construction methods and in more detail within Section 6.7.3 and the USACE IRT mitigation plan
response.WLS followed the construction approach described in the mitigation plan,however during
construction the contractor did not remove excess legacy sediments greater than 12"across the
entire pond bottom areas.Extreme wetness and saturated soil conditions during the winter months
prevented the contractor from removing all legacy sediments throughout R1 and R5.The contractor
incorporated suitable fill material and woody debris to construct the headwater pilot channels
across the low point of valley(pond bottom) as shown on the mitigation plan design,as-built
drawings,and orthophotos.The mushy areas were graded as floodplain depressions and are
expected to fill in with vegetation during the monitoring period.WLS observed surface flow after
construction prior to vegetation establishment.We understand the recent herbaceous vegetation
growth makes it difficult to observe surface flow and will monitor surface flow per the mitigation
plan Section 8.2.3.Any subterranean flow will be documented to determine if a corrective action is
required during the monitoring period.
• The"fencing encroachment"area shown on the CCPV appeared to be a slight variation in the
fence install that was corrected and fence moved.If that is the case,it is ok to leave this off
the CCPV since it was quickly corrected following construction and did not result in any
vegetation damage.This comment also applies to the visual assessment table. Response: The
encroachment area has been removed from the CCPV,report,and table.
• Please label the wetland areas on the detailed pages of the CCPV(1a and 1b). Response: The
wetland areas have been labeled on Figures la and lb.
• Provide elevation of wetland gages in a table format or on drawings if possible/available.
Response:The elevation of wetland gauges was not surveyed during as-built.

• Include any pictures and/or drone videos to assist IRT in visualizing.Response:Drone videos
and photos are included in the Photos folder of E-Data.
Riparian Buffer MYO:
• Confirm that the headwater mitigation credit requires 7 years of monitoring per alternative
mitigation.Response: Headwater mitigation credit requires 7 years of monitoring.
• Replace Table 1 with the current DWR/DMS credit table (available at DWR or DMS website
for templates).Confirm that shapefiles are attributed (labeled)to match these tables and that
the physical area calculations reflect the table.Response:Table 1 has been updated to the
current format and the attribute tables match the data in Table 1.
• Confirm that the new as-built top of bank was used to calculate as-built buffer conditions and
that the table was updated to reflect surveyed as-built conditions.Response:The new top of
bank was used to calculate the as-built buffer conditions and the table has been updated
appropriately.
Electronic Comments:
• Please include the zero credit spatial features that connect creditable features if possible (e.g.
easement breaks). Response: The zero credit features are included in the e-data.
• The following stream segments,excluding the headwater restoration segments,have lengths
that do not match the asset table-presented below as feature length vs.asset table length.
Please review and address these differences.
o R4: 199 ft.vs. 192 ft.
o R6:422 ft.vs.438 ft.
o R7 (Upper): 673 ft.vs.659 ft.
Response: The stream lengths in the asset table now match the attribute table.The differences noted
by DMS were a result of transferring from CAD into GIS.
• Please include spatial features characterizing the Pre-Existing Channel.Response: The pre-
existing channel is included in the e-data.
Please contact me if you have any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
Water&Land Solutions,LLC
Catherine Manner
Water&Land Solutions,LLC
7721 Six Forks Road,Suite 130

Raleigh,NC 27615
Office Phone: [phone]
Mobile Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Table of Conte, 6,s
1 Project Summary 1
1.1 Project Location and Description 1
1.2 Project Quantities and Credits 1
1.3 Current Condition Plan View 3
2 Goals, Performance Criteria, and Functional Improvements 4
2.1 Project Goals and Objectives 4
2.2 Project Success Criteria 5
2.2.1 Streams 5
2.2.2 Wetlands 7
2.2.3 Vegetation 8
2.2.4 Visual Assessment 8
3 Project Attributes 8
3.1 Design Approach 8
3.1.1 Stream 8
3.1.2 Wetland 10
3.2 Project Attributes 11
4 Monitoring Year 0 Assessment and Results 13
4.1 As-built Survey 13
4.2 As-Built Plans/ Record Drawings 13
4.3 As-Built/ Baseline Assessment 13
4.4 Morphological Assessment 13
4.5 Stream Hydrology 14
4.5.1 Stream Flow 14
4.5.2 Headwater Stream Channel Formation 14
4.5.3 Wetlands 14
4.5.4 Vegetation 14

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A -Visual Assessment Data
Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Cross-Section Photos
Stream Photo Points (Culverts Crossings, Ell Reaches)
Appendix B -Vegetation Plot Data
Final Plant List
Redline Plant List
Vegetation Performance Standards and Summary Table
Vegetation Plot Counts and Densities Table
Vegetation Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot Maps
Appendix C- Stream Morphology Data
Cross-Sections with Annual Overlays
Baseline Longitudinal Profile
Baseline Stream Data Summary Tables
Cross-Section Morphology Data
Appendix D- Hydrologic Data
Flow Gauge and Crest Gauge Installation Diagrams
Surface Flow and Wetland Gauge Photos
Appendix E - Project Timeline and Contact Info
Appendix F—Other Data

1 Project Summary
1.1 Project Location and Description
The Odell's House Mitigation Project("Project") is a North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
(NCDEQ), Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) full-delivery stream and wetland mitigation project
contracted with Water & Land Solutions, LLC (WLS) in response to RFP 16-007279. The Project provides
stream and wetland mitigation credits in the Neuse River Basin (Cataloging Unit 03020201). The project
site is in Johnston County, North Carolina, between the Town of Wendell and the Community of Archer
Lodge.The Project is in the Lower Buffalo Creek Priority Sub-watershed 030202011504, study area for the
Neuse 01 Regional Watershed Plan Phase II, Final Report (RWP), and in the Targeted Local Watershed
03020201180050, of the Neuse River Basin.
The Project involved the restoration, enhancement, preservation and permanent protection of eight
stream reaches (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7 upper, and R7 lower), 6 wetland areas (W1, W2, W3, W4, W5,
and W6), and their riparian buffers, totaling approximately 4,313 linear feet of designed streams, and
453,057.200 square feet of riparian buffers. Stream restoration is within the conservation easement and
the existing powerline right-of-way. The Project also includes riparian wetland restoration (re-
establishment and rehabilitation), enhancement and the preservation of 3.890 acres (based on design).
The Project will provide significant ecological improvements and functional uplift through stream and
wetland restoration and will decrease nutrient and sediment loads within the watershed. The mitigation
plan provides a detailed project summary and Table 1 provides a summary of project assets. Figure la-c
illustrates the project mitigation components.
Prior to construction, landowners historically manipulated streams and ditched riparian wetland systems
to provide areas for crop production and cattle grazing. Cattle had complete access to streams and
wetlands except for R7 and W5/W6, resulting in eroded banks, habitat destruction, and poor water
quality.Two man-made ponds existed where reaches R1 and R5 are now located.
1.2 Project Quantities and Credits
The Project mitigation components include a combination of Stream Restoration, Enhancement, and
Preservation activities, as well as Riparian Wetland Restoration (Re-establishment & Rehabilitation)
Enhancement, and Preservation, as summarized in the Table 1 below.
4 MVO FINAL Odell's House
DMS Project# 100041
1

Table 1.Odell's House(ID-100041)Project Mitigation Quantities and Credits
Original
Mitigation Original Original Original
Plan As-Built Mitigation Restoration Mitigation
Project Segment Ft/Ac Ft/Ac Category Level Ratio(X:1) Credits Comments
Stream
437 533 Warm R 1.00000 437.000 Full Channel Restoration,Planted Buffer,Exclusion of Livestock,Permanent
R1 Conservation Easement
526 518 Warm EII 2.50000 210.400 Livestock Exclusion,Invasive Control,Supplemental Planting,Habitat Structures,
R2 Permanent Conservation Easement
1,091 1,103 Warm R 1.00000 1,091.000 Full Channel Restoration,Planted Buffer,Exclusion of Livestock,Permanent
R3 Conservation Easement
190 199 Warm Ell 3.00000 63.333 Livestock Exclusion,Invasive Control,Supplemental Planting,Habitat Structures,
R4 Permanent Conservation Easement
340 392 Warm R 1.00000 340.000 Full Channel Restoration,Planted Buffer,Exclusion of Livestock,Permanent
R5 Conservation Easement
432 422 Warm R 1.00000 432.000 Full Channel Restoration,Planted Buffer,Exclusion of Livestock,Permanent
R6 Conservation Easement
625 674 Warm EI 1.50000 416.667 Dimension,Pattern and Profile modified,Livestock Exclusion,Supplemental
R7(upper) Planting,Permanent Conservation Easement
R7(lower) 412 461 Warm P 10.00000 41.200 Permanent Conservation Easement
Total: 3,031.600
Wetland
W1 0.476 0.477 R REE 1.00000 0.476 Livestock Exclusion,Pond drainage,Limited soil manipulation,and Planting
W2 0.416 0.413 R REE 1.00000 0.416 Livestock Exclusion,Pond drainage,Limited soil manipulation,and Planting
W3 0.666 0.645 R RH 1.50000 0.444 Limited soil manipulation and Planting
W4 0.234 0.227 R REE 1.00000 0.234 Limited soil manipulation,Restored groundwater hydrologyand Planting
W5 1.654 1.636 R E 2.50000 0.662 Restored hydrologyand Planting
W6 0.444 0.440 R P 10.00000 0.044 Permanent Conservation Easement
Total: 2.276
Project Credits
Stream Riparian Non-Rip Coastal
Restoration Level Warm Cool Cold Wetland Wetland Marsh
Restoration 2,300.000
Re-establishment 1.126
Rehabilitation 0.444
Enhancement 0.662
Enhancement I 416.667
Enhancement II 273.733
Creation
Preservation 41.200 0.044
Totals 3,031.600 2.276
3,031.600
2.276
4 MY0 FINAL Odell's House
DMS Project# 100041
2

1.3 Current Condition Plan View
The following pages present the Current Condition Plan View (CCPV).
MYO FINAL Odell's House
DMS Project # 100041

Wendell[; ] _
L
• Figure IX) ' � _ .
•
ge
t. . ��
loir.
s a all - ,-‘r it• . .
;111L1
mill
R7 Upper,, ._
M' 4 i
- r
R7 Lower 'ilor
4
R 6
. a
\ \ ` .
Figure90 11.
+4
If.,a". / . .. IDEI
• ' , , . ' ' -- , - - - \ 4,..-3,- „._ f. y -,.! , .,
35.71854, -78.35143 zr;
- - ��� � ' meµ n^t�'`��' .:f•
4 -. .4 .
, z - - ' ' : ,,i,
. . . ..- _ n`4 6 F
+�
‘ f
, ,,,,
K.
r T:'�
•
,f
1
= Conservation Easement ie.' .F- ,;,,i,..
or-
Mapping Index �yxx j' _ +
Stream -
Stream (No Credit)
a
Wetland Feet
0 250 500
_AI
4
USACE Action ID Number: USACE FIGURE
1NAT E R & LANDM Odells House Mitigation Project SAW-2018-00431 Current Conditions Plan View
Johnston County, North Carolina June 2021 Monitoring Year 0 1 a
SOLUTIONS 1 rIgaz on service, MYO NAD 1983 2011 State Plane
CNY I R 0 RpC RTAC WAY.lTY
North Carolina FIPS 3200 FT US

•
. .1,
al
. '
> .
_ .
, -
x}
'\
` -
" '21', - ',,_°. ,. ,. ,
11
'z S10
r Mg - —,..
• O _ -
: • ,26+00 /
, •28+oo ,
r aGBE/0 r . • a+ ° No Stream Credit R6 -A r - , 10+35'
1yA : r l Easement Break(Powerline)
29+00 ' n
.-.
r
r3 y
"• # • � '
° - : -,, . wx"a t L 22+00 3.� r a v +00
P
• 31+48 • I 21+00 20+0 ;. 19+00 \
a• Y � 15+OO
• xi. � --® — t. . -.\ `� r _
=•00 — 16+00 O
f , 8 MS
y
� �
,
6 ,,
M ,
XS 8
r
1 E. W Conservation Easement x x Fenceline HV Centerline Macrobenthic Photo Station (4)
Invertebrate Sample
— — Top of Bank ED Geolift-Toewood Stream Mitigation 404/401 Fixed Veg Plot
Ili Pre-existing Channel ED W
Log Step Pool HV Wetland Mitigation
a 404 Fixed Veg Plot
C Crest Gauge ED Log Weir Restoration Re-Establishment
Random 50m x 2m ,
t • Flow Gauge ED Rock Weir Enhancement I Enhancement Vegetation Plot
Rain Gauge ED Stone Riffle Enhancement II Rehabilitation — — Cross Sectionslu
• Wetland Gauge • Stationing Preservation Preservation Culvert
•
• Stream (No Credit) Feet
0 125 250
hPIIP
4
TM USACE Action ID Number: USACE FIGURE
1NAT E R & LAND Odells House Mitigation Project SAW-2018-00431 Current Conditions Plan View
S C� L U T I CJ N S
Johnston County, North Carolina June 2021 Monitoring Year 0 1 b
M7rigattanservices MYO NAD 1983 2011 State Plane
CNN'I 0 HNC krAI.*UM try
North Carolina FIPS 3200 FT US

111111f I 0A' 1 -- ^ n .a z . . ,- • , rx. : \rf ! I i I I I 1111•.,� ?t S1, '4 .. . . 'a
Conservation Easement >< x Fenceline -•-• HWV Centerline Macrobenthic Invertebrate ❑ Photo Station 4 �' � '
® Sample
Wetland Mitigation
- — Top of Bank ® Geolift Toewood Stream Mitigation 404/401 Fixed Veg Plot
Pre-existing Channel G Log Step Pool HWV — 404 Fixed Veg Plot
'� -
O Crest Gauge • Log Weir Restoration ��` Re Establishment ,
Random 50m x 2m •
Flow Gauge ® Rock Weir Enhancement I �� Enhancement Vegetation Plot
9+45
\�� Rehabilitation - - Cross Sections 11+00 �'�- -10+0
Rain Gauge • Stone Riffle Enhancement II
�\ Preservation Water Quality Improvement R1 / 1
Wetland Gauge •• Stationing Preservation
Features .P ,, 12+00
Stream (No Credit) C •
Culvert
ill gaa 13+00
7G11 O 4
9 No Stream Credit
�. 14+00 Above Easement
fix
4 15+009
l'
+o
h
x-� u' 16+0„ / .
'17+00 .._.
vt t` �e'r 2
18+00, -
No Stream Credit' ., .
Beyond • 19+00; 44 '' Ma
-1
-x >< X X X >< _ 20+oaks
R4 '-f ' . f
-, 35+86 35+00 - 34+00
•,— IL ! PS-3 _
•. .-„, 23+00 v.
spy ,. �l. 22+00;.�
�.
'. .�.. , 24+00 SZ�y,
4. s.._. ,. ,,,.33+00 25+00 '�/�i�i a•
t. rx ry "• 26+00 /.." 4 ..
e,- ; - -; „ - , ,c.:1..,`, 4 ,:, ° ..„% , -
,tt' t a,,,., IT 31+00 5
. - .. f 4.
' - gEt9
• _ ,a _ _ _ Feet
tottsi
0 150 300
4TM USAGE Action ID Number: USAGE FIGURE
WAT ER & LAN © PC Odells House Mitigation Project SAW-2018-00431 Current Conditions Plan View
SOLUTIONS Johnston County, North Carolina June 2021 Monitoring Year 01 C
Mitigation services MYO NAD 1983 2011 State Plane
CNN'I R O HNC RTAC P.M.LTY
North Carolina FIPS 3200 FT US

2 Goals, Performance Criteria, and Functional Improvements
2.1 Project Goals and Objectives
The Project will meet the goals and objectives described in the Odell's House Final Approved Mitigation
Plan and address the general restoration goals and opportunities outlined in the DMS Neuse River Basin
Watershed Restoration Priorities (RBRP). More specifically, three out of the four functional goals and
objectives outlined in the Wake-Johnston Collaborative Local Watershed Plan (LWP) as well as the Neuse
01 RWP will be met by:
• Reducing sediment and nutrient inputs to the Buffalo Creek Watershed.
• Restoring, preserving and protecting wetlands, streams, riparian buffers and aquatic habitat.
• Implementing agricultural BMPs and stream restoration in rural catchments together as "project
clusters".
To accomplish these project-specific goals,the following objectives will be measured to document overall
project success:
• Restore stream and floodplain interaction and geomorphically stable conditions by reconnecting
historic flow paths and promoting more natural flood processes;
• Improve and protect water quality by reducing streambank erosion, nutrient and sediment inputs;
• Restore and protect riparian buffer functions and habitat connectivity in perpetuity by recording
a permanent conservation easement;
• Incorporate water quality improvement features to reduce nonpoint source inputs to receiving
waters
4 MVO FINAL Odell's House
DMS Project# 100041
4

Table 2:Summary:Goals,Performance and Results
Likely Functional Cumulative
Goal Objective/Treatment Performance Criteria Measurement Monitoring
Uplift
Results
Create a more natural and
higher functioning headwater Maintain seasonal flow on
Improve and/or remove existing
Improve Stream flow regime and provide intermittent stream for a
Base Flow stream crossings and restore a aquatic passage;re-establish minimum of 30 consecutive 2 Flow gauges(R1&R5) Data in MY1
Duration more natural flow regime and appropriate wetland days during normal annual
aquatic passage.
hydroperiods and provide rainfall
hydrologic storage
Reconnect
channels with Design BHRs to not exceed 1.2 Provide temporary water Minimum of four bankfull 2 Crest Gauges/pressure
floodplains and and increase ERs no less than 2.2 storage and reduce erosive events in separate years. transducers(R3&R7 Lower)
Data in MY1
riparian wetlands for Rosgen'C'and'E'stream types forces(shear stress)in channel Wetland hydrology for 8%of and 5 wetland groundwater
to allow a natural and 1.4 for'B'stream types. during larger flow events. growing season. gauges(W1,W2,W3,&W5)
flooding regime.
Construct stream channels that Reduction in sediment inputs Bank height ratios remain
below 1.2 over the monitoring
Improve stabilty of will maintain stable cross- from bank erosion,reduction of all cross sections
period. Visual assessments 10 Cross section surveys
stream channels sections,patterns,and profiles shear stress,and improved BHR<1.2
over time. overall hydraulic function. showing progression
towards stability.
Within planted portions of the
site,a minimum of 320 stems
Plant native species vegetation a Increase woody and per acre must be present at
minimum 50'wide from the top of herbaceous vegetation will year three;a minimum of 260
Tree data for 12 Veg Plots
Establish Riparian the streambanks with a provide channel stability and stems per acre must be present 12/12 veg plots
(species&height),visual
Buffer Vegetation composition/density comparable reduce streambank erosion, at year five and average height met -2021
assessment
to downstream reference runoff rates and exotic species of seven feet;and a minimum
condition. vegetation. of 210 stems per acre and
average ten foot tree heights
must be present at year seven.
2.2 Project Success Criteria
The success criteria for the Project will follow the approved performance standards and monitoring
protocols from the final approved mitigation plan; which was developed in compliance with the USACE
October 2016 Guidance, USACE Stream Mitigation Guidelines (April 2003 and October 2005), and 2008
Compensatory Mitigation Final Rule. Cross-section and vegetation plot data will be collected in Years 0, 1,
2, 3, 5, and 7. Stream hydrology data and visual monitoring will be reported annually. Specific success
criteria components and evaluation methods are described below.
2.2.1 Streams
Stream Hydrology: Four separate bankfull or over bank events must be documented within the seven-year
monitoring period and the stream hydrology monitoring will continue until four bankfull events have been
documented in separate years. Stream hydrology monitoring will be accomplished with pressure
transducers installed in pools and correlating sensor depth to top of bank elevation (see appendix D for
installation diagrams). Recorded water depth above the top of bank elevation will document a bankfull
event. The devices will record water depth hourly and will be inspected quarterly. In addition to the
pressure transducers, traditional cork gauges will be installed at bankfull elevation and will be used to
document bankfull events with photographs.
4 MVO FINAL Odell's House
DMS Project# 100041
5

Stream Profiles, Vertical Stability,and FloodplainAccess: Stream profiles,as a measure of vertical stability
and floodplain access will be evaluated by looking at Bank Height Ratios (BHR). In addition, observed
bedforms should be consistent with those observed for channels of the design stream type(s). The BHR
shall not exceed 1.2 along the restored Project stream reaches. This standard only applies to restored
reaches of the channel where BHRs were corrected through design and construction. Vertical stability will
be evaluated with visual assessment, cross-sections and, if directed by the IRT, longitudinal profile.
Stream Horizontal Stability:Cross-sections will be used to evaluate horizontal stream stability on restored
streams. There should be little change expected in as-built restoration cross-sections. If measurable
changes do occur, they should be evaluated to determine if the changes represent a movement toward a
more unstable condition (e.g., downcutting, erosion) or a movement towards increased stability (e.g.,
settling, vegetation establishment, deposition along the streambanks, decrease in width/depth ratio).
Cross-sections shall be classified using the Rosgen Stream Classification method and all monitored cross-
sections should fall within the quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type.
Stream cross-section monitoring will be conducted using a Topcon RL-H5 Laser Level. Three-dimensional
coordinates associated with cross-section data will be collected in the field (NAD83 State Plane feet FIPS
3200). Morphological data will be collected at ten cross-sections. Survey data will be imported into
Microsoft Excel® and the DMS Shiny App for data processing and analysis.
Reference photo transects will be taken at each permanent cross-section. Lateral photos should not
indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the stream banks. Photographs will be taken of both
streambanks at each cross-section. A survey tape stretched between the permanent cross-section
monuments/pins will be centered in each of the streambank photographs. The water elevation will be
shown in the lower edge of the frame, and as much of the streambank as possible will be included in each
photo. Photographers will attempt to consistently maintain the same area in each photo over time.
Jurisdictional Stream Flow:Monitoring of stream flow will be conducted to demonstrate that the restored
stream systems classified as intermittent exhibit surface flow for a minimum of 30 consecutive days
throughout some portion of the year during a year with normal rainfall conditions. Stream flow monitoring
will be accomplished with pressure transducers installed in pools and correlating sensor depth to the
downstream top of riffle elevation (see appendix D for installation diagrams). If the pool water depth is at
or above the top of riffle elevation,then the channel will be assumed to have surface flow.The devices will
record water elevation twice per day and will be inspected quarterly to document surface hydrology and
provide a basis for evaluating flow response to rainfall events.
The stage recorders include an automatic pressure transducer(HOBO Water Level (13 ft) Logger)set in PVC
piping in the channel. The elevation of the bed and top of bank at each stage recorder location will be
recorded to be able to document presence of water in the channel and out of bank events. Visual
observations (i.e.wrack or debris lines)and traditional cork crest gauges will also be used to document out
of bank events.
Channel Formation: During monitoring years 1 through 4, the preponderance of evidence must
demonstrate a concentration of flow indicative of headwater stream channel formation within the
4MVO FINAL Odell's House
DMS Project# 100041
6

topographic low-point of the valley or crenulation as documented by the following indicators for reaches
R1 and R5:
• Scour(indicating sediment transport by flowing water)
• Sediment deposition (accumulations of sediment and/or formation of ripples)
• Sediment sorting (sediment sorting indicated by grain-size distribution with the primary path of
flow)
• Multiple observed flow events (must be documented by gauge data and/or photographs)
• Destruction of terrestrial vegetation
• Presence of litter and debris
• Wracking(deposits of drift material indicating surface water flow)
• Vegetation matted down, bent,or absent(herbaceous or otherwise)
• Leaf litter disturbed or washed away
During monitoring years 5 through 7, the stream must successfully meet the requirements above and the
preponderance of evidence must demonstrate the development of stream bed and banks as documented
by the following indicators:
• Bed and banks (may include the formation of stream bed and banks, development of channel
pattern such as meander bends and/or braiding at natural topographic breaks, woody debris, or
plant root systems)
• Natural line impressed on the bank(visible high-water mark)
• Shelving(shelving of sediment depositions indicating transport)
• Water staining(staining of rooted vegetation)
• Change in plant community (transition to species adapted for flow or inundation for a long
duration, including hydrophytes)
• Changes in character of soil (texture and/or chroma changes when compared to the soils abutting
the primary path of flow)
2.2.2 Wetlands
Wetland Hydrology:The performance standard for wetland hydrology will be 12 percent based on the
suggested wetland saturation thresholds for soils taxonomic subgroups.The proposed success criteria for
wetland hydrology will be when the soils are saturated within 12 inches of the soil surface for 12 percent
(27 days) of the 227-day growing season (March 21st through November 3rd) based on WETS data table
for Johnston County, NC. The saturated conditions should occur during a period when antecedent
precipitation has been normal or drier than normal for a minimum frequency of 5 years in 10 (USACE,
2005 and 2010b). Precipitation data will be obtained from an on-site rain gauge and the Clayton (CLAY)
Research Weather Station, approximately 9 miles southeast of the Project site. If a normal year of
precipitation does not occur during the first seven years of monitoring, WLS will continue to monitor the
Project hydrology until the Project site has been saturated for the appropriate hydroperiod. If rainfall
amounts for any given year during the monitoring period are abnormally low, reference wetland
4 MVO FINAL Odell's House
DMS Project# 100041
7

hydrology data will be compared to determine if there is a correlation with the weather conditions and
site variability.
2.2.3 Vegetation
Vegetation monitoring will occur in the fall each required monitoring year, prior to leaf drop. Plots will be
monitored in years 1, 2,3,5,and 7.Vegetative success for the Project during the intermediate monitoring
years will be based the survival of at least 320, three-year-old planted trees per acre at the end of Year 3
of the monitoring period; and at least 260, five-year-old, planted trees per acre that must average seven
feet in height at the end of Year 5 of the monitoring period.The final vegetative restoration success criteria
will be achieving a density of no less than 210, seven-year-old planted stems per acre that must average
ten feet in height in Year 7 of monitoring.
Vegetation success will be monitored at a total of nine permanent vegetation plots (10m x 10m) and 3
random vegetation transects (50m x 2m and 20m x 5m). Vegetation plot monitoring follows the CVS-EEP
Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis of species
composition and density of planted species. Data will be processed using the DMS Shiny App. In the field,
the four corners of each plot will be permanently marked with PVC at the origin and rebar at the other
corners.Tree species and height will be recorded for each planted stem and photos of each plot are to be
taken from the origin each monitoring year.
2.2.4 Visual Assessment
WLS will conduct visual assessments in support of mitigation performance monitoring.Visual assessments
of all stream reaches will be conducted twice per monitoring year with at least five months in between
each site visit for each of the seven years of monitoring. Photographs will be used to visually document
system performance and any areas of concern related to streambank and bed stability, condition of in-
stream structures,channel migration, active headcuts, live stake mortality, invasive plant species or animal
browsing, easement boundary encroachments, cattle exclusion fence damage, and general streambed
conditions.
3 Project Attributes
3.1 Design Approach
3.1.1 Stream
The Project stream design approach included a combination of Stream Restoration, Enhancement, and
Preservation activities. Priority Level I restoration approaches were incorporated with the design of both
single-thread meandering channels and headwater stream valleys. All non-vegetated areas within the
conservation easement were planted with native species vegetation and any areas of invasive species
were removed and/or treated.
Restoration:R1, R3, R5, and R6
• R1—R1 begins near the top of what was previously a farm pond.The outlet pipe and earthen dam
was removed, and the pond was drained to reconnect the new stream channel with its
geomorphic floodplain. The reach was restored as a Rosgen 'DA' stream type. This approach
4 MVO FINAL Odell's House
DMS Project# 100041
8

allowed the restoration of a stable headwater channel with appropriate bedform diversity,as well
as improved ecological function through increased aquatic and terrestrial habitats. The valley
bottom within the old pond bed was graded to restore the natural microtopographic variability
that is common within headwater stream and wetland systems.A small pilot channel was graded
to allow the natural flow path to maintain a defined channel form as vegetation becomes
established. One agricultural BMP was installed above R1 to capture, attenuate, and treat
concentrated flow that would otherwise enter the riparian buffer as untreated water. The BMP
was constructed outside of the conservation easement and was fenced to restrict cattle access.
• R3— R3 begins at a culvert crossing downstream of R2. Work along R3 involved a Priority Level I
Restoration. A majority of the channel was restored in its natural valley location with minor
adjustments to channel planform. The reach was restored as a Rosgen 'B4' stream type. This
approach allowed the restoration of a stable channel form with appropriate bedform diversity, as
well as improved ecological function through increased aquatic and terrestrial habitats. A
dilapidated CMP pipe was replaced and a bankfull culvert was added to improve flood flows and
aquatic life passage. A fence was constructed outside of the conservation easement to restrict
cattle access.
• R5 —Similar to R1, R5 begins near the top of what was previously a farm pond. An existing pipe
was removed and replaced near station 10+00 to redirect flows within the natural valley. In
addition, the existing pond drainage pipe was removed at the permanent easement crossing and
the embankment was lowered. A new culvert and bankfull pipe was installed near station 14+50
to improve flood flows and aquatic life passage.The reach was restored as a Rosgen 'DA' stream
type. This approach allows restoration of a stable headwater channel with appropriate bedform
diversity, as well as improved ecological function through increased aquatic and terrestrial
habitats. The valley bottom within the old pond bed was graded to restore the natural
microtopographic variability that is common within headwater systems.Similar to R1,a small pilot
channel was graded to allow the natural flow path to maintain a defined channel form as
vegetation becomes established. A fence was constructed outside of the conservation easement
to restrict cattle access.
• R6— R6 begins at the culvert outlet below R5 and the previously existing pond dam. Work along
R6 involved a Priority Level I Restoration.The remnant channel was back filled, and a majority of
this reach was constructed offline in the low part of the valley.The reach was restored as a Rosgen
'B4c' stream type. This approach allows restoration of a stable channel form with appropriate
bedform diversity, as well as improved ecological function through increased aquatic and
terrestrial habitats. A fence was constructed outside of the conservation easement to restrict
cattle access.
Enhancement Level II:R2 and R4
• R2 — R2 begins at the terminus of R1. An Enhancement Level II approach was utilized along the
entire reach.Construction activities consisted of strategic mechanized removal of invasive species
4 MVO FINAL Odell's House
DMS Project# 100041
9

vegetation (i.e. golden bamboo), grading existing or disturbed stream banks back to a stable
dimension, installing erosion control matting, and supplemental riparian buffer planting and live
stakes. The reach is classified as a Rosgen 'C5' stream type. A fence was constructed outside of
the conservation easement to restrict cattle access.
• R4— R4 begins at the terminus of R3. An Enhancement Level II approach was utilized along this
reach. Construction activities consisted of strategic mechanized removal of invasive species, in-
stream structure installation to stabilize an existing headcut and bank erosion,grading the stream
banks back to the existing stable dimension, installing erosion control matting, and supplemental
riparian buffer planting and live stakes. The reach in this section is classified as a Rosgen 'E5'
stream type. A fence was constructed outside of the conservation easement to restrict cattle
access.
Enhancement Level I:R7 upper
• R7 upper-The upper section of R7 begins at the terminus of R6.The reach was constructed as a
Rosgen 'DA' stream type. The remnant straightened channel and small pond were backfilled and
a pilot channel was relocated within the natural valley. This work allows diffuse flows across the
R7 floodplain and extensive wetting of the adjacent wetlands. Small in-stream structures in the
form of log weirs were installed to increase bedform diversity. The low flows through R7 upper
now follow historic flow patterns and spread out through channel depressions, restoring a more
natural stream hydrology function.
Preservation:R7 lower
• R7 lower-The downstream section of R7 is currently classified as a Rosgen 'E5' stream type.The
Preservation approach extends the wildlife corridor from the Buffalo Creek floodplain boundary
throughout a majority of the riparian valley, while providing a natural hydrologic connection and
critical habitat linkage within the catchment area.
3.1.2 Wetland
Riparian Wetland Re-establishment: W1, W2, and W4
Areas of hydric soils were documented along portions of the project floodplains areas. These hydric soil
areas and pond impoundments were restored to higher functioning riparian wetlands as a direct result of
implementing Priority Level I stream restoration, pond removal, limited soil manipulation and removal of
soils (less than 1-foot depth) and planting native vegetation. The restored groundwater hydrology will
allow the wetland areas to regain their natural or historic functions.
Riparian Wetland Rehabilitation: W3
Areas of significantly degraded riparian wetlands (poorly functioning) were also documented along
portions of the project floodplains areas.These poorly functioning wetland areas were restored as a direct
result of implementing a Priority Level I stream restoration, removal of livestock, limited soil manipulation
4 MVO FINAL Odell's House
DMS Project# 100041
10

and removal (less than 1-foot depth) and planting native vegetation. The groundwater hydrology will be
restored and allow the wetland areas to regain their natural or historic functions.
Riparian Wetland Enhancement: W5
As described above, the restoration activities provide significant functional uplift across the project area.
The activities also improve and enhance the hyporheic zone interaction and hydrology to existing wetland
areas. Wetland enhancement areas were planted with native wet tolerant species.The restoration of the
stream channels will also improve areas of adjacent wetlands through higher water table conditions
(elevated stream profile) and a more frequent over-bank flooding regime.
Riparian Wetland Preservation: W6
Areas of highly functioning riparian wetlands were also documented along lower portions of R7 floodplain.
These wetland areas benefited from upstream functional uplift as a direct result of implementing a Priority
Level I restoration, removal of livestock and planting native vegetation. The groundwater hydrology will
be improved upstream which allow these wetland areas to maintain their natural or historic functions.
3.2 Project Attributes
See Table 3 below for Project Attributes.
4 MVO FINAL Odell's House
DMS Project# 100041
11

Table 3.Project Attribute Table 11
Project Name Odell's House Mitigation Project
County Johnston
Project Area(acres) 15.092
Project Coordinates(latitude and longitude decimal
35.71589,-78.35345
degrees)
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
River Basin Ne use
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 3020201
I.
DWR Sub-basin 03-04-06
Project Drainage Area(acres) 41.8(R7 lower)and 95.4(R4)
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area <1%
Land Use Classification 2.01.03,2.01.01,3.02(69%cultivated crops/hay,2%grass/he rbaceous,25%mixed forest,4%pond)
Reach Summary Information
Parameters R1 R2 R3 R4 RS R6 R7(upper) R7(lower)
Pre-project length(feet) N/A(pond) 632 1169 392 N/A(pond) 610 468 412
Post-project(feet) 533 518 1103 199 392 422 674 461
Valley confinement(Confined,moderately confined, moderately moderately
N/A unconfined N/A unconfined unconfined unconfined
unconfined) confined confined
Drainage area(acres) 42.9 64 83.2 95.4 19.4 30.7 39.7 41.8
Perennial,Intermittent,Ephemeral N/A Perennial Intermittent Intermittent N/A Intermittent Intermittent Intermittent
NCDWRWater Quality Classification C,NSW C,NSW C,NSW C,NSW C,NSW C,NSW C,NSW C,NSW
Dominant Stream Classification(existing) N/A(pond) C5 G5 E5 N/A(pond) E5 G5 E5/DA
Dominant Stream Classification(proposed) DA/E5 C5 B5 E5 DA/E5 B5c B5c E5
Dominant Evolutionary class(Simon)if applicable N/A IV/V III IV/V N/A III I
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters W1 W2 W3 W4 WS W6
Pm-project(acres) 0.476 0.416 0.666 0.234 1.654 0.444
Post-project(acres) 0.476 0.416 0.666 0.234 1.654 0.444
Riparian Riparian Riparian Riparian Riparian Riparian
Wetland Type(non-riparian,riparian)
Riverine Riverine Riverine Riverine Riverine Riverine
Leaf silt
Water, Leaf silt loam, Leaf silt loam, loam,
Bonneau Bonneau sand,
Mapped Soil Series Cowarts Water Cowarts loamy Cowarts
loamy sand sand loamy sand sand, Leaf silt loam
Wedowee
sandy loam
N/A,non Hydric,non Hydric,non Hydric,non non-hydric,
Soil Hydric Status N/A
hydric hydric hydric hydric Hydric
Regulatory Considerations
Parameters Applicable? Resolved? Supporting Docs?
Water of the United States-Section 404 Yes Yes PCN/404 permit
Water of the United States-Section 401 Yes Yes PCN/401 permit
Endangered Species Act Yes Yes Categorical Exclusion
Historic Preservation Act Yes Yes Categorical Exclusion
Coastal Zone Management Act(CZMA or CAMA) No N/A N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat No N/A N/A
4 MYO FINAL Odell's House
DMS Project# 100041
12

4 Monitoring Year 0 Assessment and Results
4.1 As-built Survey
An as-built survey conducted under the responsible charge of a North Carolina Professional Land Surveyor
(Marshall Wight, PLS with WithersRavenel),was utilized to document the as-built or baseline condition of
the Project post-construction. The Project construction and planting were completed in March and April
2021 and as-built survey was completed in May 2021. Cattle were removed from the site prior to
construction and permanent fencing was completed in April 2021. Baseline monitoring activities occurred
in March - May 2021.
4.2 As-Built Plans/Record Drawings
The results of the as-built survey establish and document post-construction or baseline conditions and
will be used for comparing annual post-construction monitoring data. The as-built plans or record
drawings were developed utilizing the final construction plans as the "background", and then overlaying
the as-built survey information on the plan and profile sheets. Any significant adjustments or deviations
made to the final construction plans during construction are shown as redline mark-ups or callouts on the
as-built survey plan sheets.The as-built plans/record drawings were submitted separately.
4.3 As-Built/Baseline Assessment
No significant deviations were documented between the final construction plans and the as-built
condition that may affect channel performance, channel lengths, or changes in vegetation species
planted. Along R1, the channel alignment was adjusted from approximate design station 11+62 to 12+37
due to poor/wet soil conditions in the remnant pond bottom. Upper R6 was also slightly adjusted from
approximate station 16+00 to 17+37 to protect existing vegetation and prevent root damage within the
dripline. Lastly, upper R7 was realigned from approximate station 12+17 to 14+59 to more closely follow
the existing flow paths and floodplain contours. The in-stream structure installation generally followed
the proposed design in these locations and additional woody material was installed along R1 and R5
respectively. Lastly, six log riffles were replaced with three log weirs and woody debris along upper R7 to
increase bedform diversity and minimize disturbance to existing wetland vegetation. No major issues or
mitigating factors were observed immediately after construction which require consideration or remedial
action.
4.4 Morphological Assessment
Morphological data for the as-built profile was collected in March 2021. Refer to Appendices A and C for
summary data tables, morphological plots, and stream photographs.
4.4.1.1 Stream Horizontal Pattern& Longitudinal Profile
The MYO stream channel pattern and longitudinal profiles closely match the design parameters.The MYO
plan form geometry or pattern fell within acceptable ranges of the design parameters for all restored
reaches. These minor channel adjustments in riffle slopes, pool depths and pattern do not present a
stability concern or indicate a need for remedial action and will be assessed visually during the annual
assessments.
4 MYO FINAL Odell's House
DMS Project# 100041
13

4.4.1.2 Stream Horizontal Dimension
The MYO channel dimensions generally match the design parameters and are within acceptable and stable
ranges of tolerance. It is expected that over time that some pools may accumulate fine sediment and
organic matter, however, this is not an indicator of channel instability. Maximum riffle depths are also
expected to fluctuate slightly throughout the monitoring period as the channels adjust to the new flow
regime and catchment conditions.
4.5 Stream Hydrology
4.5.1 Stream Flow
Two pressure transducers (flow gauges)were installed in March 2021 on reaches R1 and R5 to document
baseflow conditions. The flow gauge locations are within the upper one-third of the project reaches as
shown on the CCPV and data will be included in the Monitoring Year 1 Report.
4.5.1.1 Bankfull Events
Two crest gauges were installed in March 2021 to document bankfull events. WLS installed a conventional
cork crest gauge, along with a pressure transducer to validate flood status on R3 and R7 lower. Stream
hydrology data will be included in the Monitoring Year 1 Report in this section and in the appendices.
Recorder locations are shown on the CCPV.
4.5.2 Headwater Stream Channel Formation
During monitoring years 1 through 4, the preponderance of evidence must demonstrate a concentration
of flow indicative of channel formation within the topographic low-point of the valley or crenulation as
documented by the indicators listed in section 2.2.1. This evidence will be addressed in the Monitoring
Year 1 Report.
4.5.3 Wetlands
Five groundwater wells were installed in March 2021 to monitor wetland hydrology. Groundwater well
locations are shown on the CCPV and the data will be included in subsequent monitoring reports.
4.5.4 Vegetation
Monitoring of the nine permanent vegetation plots and three random plots/transects was completed
during the first week of May 2021. Vegetation data and photos can be found in Appendix B. The MYO
average planted density is 748 stems per acre, which exceeds the interim measure of vegetative success
of at least 320 planted stems per acre at the end of the third monitoring year. Each plot also met the
interim measure requirement with 607 — 1,214 stems per acre. Volunteer species were not noted at
baseline monitoring but are expected to establish in upcoming years.
Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation
is becoming well established throughout the project. Temporary and permanent seeding of the project
was completed during and following construction activities per the mitigation plan.
A large population of golden bamboo (Phyllostachys aurea)existed along the left floodplain of R2 prior to
construction. Construction activities included bamboo removal in this area by ripping the roots/rhizomes,
4MYO FINAL Odell's House
DMS Project# 100041
14

cut stump herbicide treatments, and foliar spray of small shoots. Herbicide treatments used 50 percent
glyphosate for cut/stump and three percent for foliar spray. This area will continue to be monitored
closely and any treatments will be documented in future monitoring reports.
4 MY0 FINAL Odell's House
DMS Project# 100041
15

Appendix A :•Visual Assessment Data
Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Photos: Cross-Section Photos
Photos: Stream Photo Points (Culvert Crossings and Ell Reaches)

Table 4:Visual Stream Stability Assessment
Reach R1,R2,R3,R4,R5,R6,R7(upper and lower)
Assessed Stream Length 4,302
Assessed Bank Length 5,384
Number Stable,
Major Channel Category Metric Performing as Total Number in As- Amount of %Stable,Performing as
built Unstable Footage Intended
Intended
Bank Surface Scour/Bare Bank Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth 0 100%
and/or surface scour
Bank toe eroding to the extent that bank failure appears likely.
Toe Erosion Does NOT include undercuts that are modest,appear sustainable 0 100%
and are providing habitat.
■ Bank Failure Fluvial and geotechnical-rotational,slumping,calving,or collapse 0 100%
Totals 0 100%
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across
Structure Grade Control 116 116 100%
the sill.
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not
Bank Protection exceed 15%.(See guidance for this table in DMS monitoring 34 34 100%
guidance document)

Visual Vegetation Assessment
Planted acreage 11.17
Mapping Combined %of Planted
Vegetation Category Definitions Threshold Acreage Acreage
Bare Areas Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material. 0.10 acres 0.00 0.0%
Low Stem Density Areas Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on current MY stem count criteria. 0.10acres 0.00 0.0%
Total 0.00 0.0%
Areas of Poor Growth Rates Planted areas where average height is not meeting current MY Performance Standard. 0.10 acres 0.00 0.0%
Cumulative Total 0.00 0.0%
Easement Acreage 15.1
Mapping Combined %of Easement
Vegetation Category Definitions Threshold Acreage Acreage
Invasives may occur outside of planted areas and within the easement and will therefore be calculated
against the total easement acreage:Include species with the potential to directly outcompete native,
Invasive Areas of Concern 0.10 acres 0.00 0.0%
young,woody stems in the short-term or community structure for existing communities. Species
included in summation above should be identified in report summary.
Encroachment may be point, line,or polygon. Encroachment to be mapped consists of any violation of
Easement Encroachment Areas restrictions specified in the conservation easement. Common encroachments are mowing,cattle access, none 0.00
vehicular access.Encroachment has no threshold value as will need to be addressed regardless of impact
area.

516121, 9:51 AM $: - ' ,, 516/21 5.;AM.
Johnston Johnston
.ram.-.,7.,.r1 -
•
1 ; p'
ti'
`�1
y.
s:
-r- .ram ''r`. r .. •_r
�fr
4? -- r
+may - R RIP�1
"" s� _ � •
R1, XS-1, Upstream (MY-00) R1, XS 1, Left Bank (MY-00)
5/6/21, 9:51 AM �: 516121, 9:50 AM
a ❑hnston ""kr - . Johnston
4.
•
r.
' i - i' .� ram' _ `}'.� t - - -_'
7 q
R1, XS-1, Downstream (MY-00) R1, XS 1, Right Bank(MY-00)

• _ 1 .-� gas° s a, l ,r+v If xt°ar_ r ..
{ 1 4 ,s 312121 10°30 AM '` 312121, 10.30AM
' 1 j 5 A t -� ,rI ' ,e4
,• ., �, Johnston; ,: Johnston
r i t QM 1 . a e �� it'
•)1 1 _ yq
� L ^f i • s' ..c r. 43 -- -1 ,.
-.. ,4apSflC Y` 'S,trr` -• "'". _
715TM }
` .'=,�, , w� mac'''. - _ rr y- 'i" - ' _ + ;� `
' `fir _ .
-
-�' ,� ^
''ii+ a
1 ... r• _.�+.. .x "..?in.Y+�F' .. t1i� ii, °.di.. t. #' `4._Y
R2, XS-2, Upstream (MY-00) R2, XS 2, Left Bank (MY-00)
En°' '4 , r# 'a f r : '3!2/21, 10.30 AM"--:
' 312121, 10:30 AM
a� ¢ ' I
+, Johnstone - Johnston
•
• s rJM
' a( -4.,F/H _ .awry _ ''r 0, �' +°,r' , ^ y ..
r, T
r
'l
M1 ,.
r^
•
s
•
_ / v - • ". -..
. .' r _ � - °. gip' . .:- . .+...
R2, XS-2, Downstream (MY-00) R2, XS 2, Right Bank(MY-00)

' f• { - • '�F i 11 -•
r 18f y •_f Yg - 4f1'G' .'•
ej
t { Y.' y ° .. , ;'312f21, 10:52 AMj a _ ., • 3f2121, 1052AM
,;_:
1 �A ,: ._•, j ■`,0°F ! Johnstong: ' .. *"` `> -" Johnston IIHIPt:
Yti+ if �� 3 �:�:r ': ., : .f
. Y
i
•
+ _ -'
R2, XS 3, Upstream (MY-00) R2, XS-3, Left Bank (MY-00)
s � L}_ / 17- • Y _
r' •
41. f•312f21, 10:52 AM ti �� 1 :: .: s' Fes,°.,:,312f21, 10:52 AM
•
;' Johnston tM � ,. =, Johnston
•
` • yam'. '!4'y si Y._ • - �, +� '= '- •.•,,,.. _ ...i„ '
�y �' "'-, „,._ '� mot( .Y Fes* r 4P x r d 1 � �
... "' '..yy`.:. ?w.�..- r ,.'S yY. r '`'-'r d_is. ;4�a_tyt ' :: :4+- 4,�� s d
a, .L rtr '� y f , r rA+ f II '
h r ri
a
- >.,.r- a._ - t '- �.. .1 ft%rrti JF . 'a�16,1� `": � .r$aKi% '- T,f„ yr..J. - - ."::,t' '-, :::' F
fir. ''
r r - _ ws-. ter ..r :.. ri' r •a` ,,, f" a ,,r` • .. �:`t- -
f"T:
• ,p � .. r.. as- ff r� i
ti r• x ".+� . .-,. ._ € S of r
R2, XS-3, Downstream (MY-00) R2, XS 3, Right Bank(MY-00)

• 3l2121, 9:17 AM. 312/21, 9:18 AM
'tJohnstonIJohnston -Joh onJo
..,,,.�� � 1 ��.. �, s^•, � "i' a�` 4 5.r s�• •. t �1>wr �R > , � �,�„ § •
j
n
t ( as ls.s� +3' y
x S
"
A.
•
fro A .. ., . -. . -N -' 1,. ..-:‘.-r. -..„
ill
R3, XS-4, Upstream (MY-00) R3, XS-4, Left Bank (MY-00)
•
Ili. � � 4 + L, i 312l21, 9:17 AM • - "'` 3/2/21, 9:17 AM" -
' "y' `t Johnston 1� _ Johnstone
.� 4 • si
'e.',< '�.ao s .1, .+a•. - _ _".._" - '� . - - '-- r 3�--= - y ems-'n !•4`?r
iptv.t." mr,„,7- a.. Ali ,-
Ti
� f4a -
Y
�4,7
R3, XS-4, Downstream (MY-00) R3, XS 4, Right Bank(MY 00)

I
' ._ ?:221. 3 43 f.'1 w '' - 312121, 9:41 AM.A°
Jr.hns. s .
ry _ . Johnstone
'ie.. • CF_
•. .�4'r ... ! -r -��.' if•-x .� ., __ -"41.+e. ..•._ y.Arr / •+,a``:: i.,3.cwrQ
...0,,,.. . ,..,„ .....
....7:_ _ ,... ,
rr f..
,' :
R3, XS-5, Upstream (MY-00) R3, XS-5, Left Bank (MY-00)
• 312f21, 9.42 AM . f ` - 3/2121, 9:42AM
Johnston _ �^ Johnston
'e + '* j a i.::'1_ 4, "
.. ,, -_-
.a411 :-` P -_ 4r .� �t{l*L { }nF s .-ram
iiii '''''44r -:,•i-_,:.::•,?-„,........ • _
. i ——.,,, .
F-
1 ;
R3, XS-5, Downstream (MY-00) R3, XS-5, Right Bank(MY-00)

� i _ 5/6/21, 10'29 AM + _ a ��: 7. o 516/21, 10.24 M`
Johnston x Johnston
.. � � . ...Ix-.
..-_ '' ; '�-ire rr .,X• v Y' 'r;. ,_,.-„r..., �,.,y"J a`
p..s+ .r .ads- ;fir r ., GF `:,l''. a �-
' • _ . -
xr �r
,, t ti w- , .. -;• ..yy k " ,- vas .� — -
P
•
+ � / : : . :IT: y --
v. c
"a
, f 4,. fr 1 1.
--.:::-_,-,..'s,. ,N- -..r.:',1-,
yr.� ,"C ; . r�l { :21:1"
. Aatiok,
` w
--' ,,. e, .--,-.:44. ,,,-; _..,-.7.7. .., i...?. ,;,..-- ..„.-,:- . .., - 4r: .,,,. . _. _ . „ .
v.
4.
R5, XS-6, Upstream (MY-00) R5, XS 6, Left Bank (MY-00)
Y - tee. tiiii s
/6/21, 1 D:27 AM .5/6/21, 10:29 AM
�-:,, ,, - - --, Johnston _.. '. Johnston
I
11,
=
A AfL1 a r _
- • �` 1 :.
C'. }as .., • , `F _-... ty-_ `..
Ac
' _ +JY_ .. I �
R5, XS-6, Downstream (MY-00) R5, XS 6, Right Bank(MY-00)

`'3/2121, 1:01 PM-� 312121, 1:00 PM:
Johnston—,-. 4 = Johnston .'
-
R
\t -...n.k .. Y."4 , � 'Se ��y$ .y...~ F•_ ... }h; d``Y'. 's9 S x:`_" nc
....._ _ - 'lA
- 1s y1�d - _ - t �,.',�",�,,F ��' - --
Aiiiise..:7 .--_-- ... .,._
rs ;F
R6, XS 7, Upstream (MY-00) R6, XS-7, Left Bank (MY-00)
312121, 1:01 P M " 4 ,il. 3/2/21, 1:01 P M
Johnston ; - Johnston::;
yy� •may •
-: r
•
•
�fA '''° 7 Imo+'•, a` • -�• '�1� ya�r r x
w E
-
.1, "
1
A.
r
r �`, .
`'K`R" ..
I
R6, XS-7, Downstream (MY-00) R6, XS 7, Right Bank(MY-00)

�� ...y f � 3/2/21, 1:02 PM-
, .
3r2r21, 02 PM ,
JohnstonJ
- t-
'�.e` . _ r1^�se[c r- tip- . _ .
- j fir '' l � . _
�.
s�
4 .
_ i _ - '4
IV
It-
' • — . 1 411:
•
%. -.
R6, XS-8, Upstream (MY-00) R6, XS 8, Left Bank (MY 00)
312r21, 1:02 PM:---.�`' 3/2/21, 1:02 PM �Johnston € 7 Johnston• !r
ry
cam-
°-�... - - '- - . `ems+-.. _ o'a"•r" .s.+ �° -- -°s`
, .i ro xs,w r� �. „� mow,
_"` -- - ;I" ,, ((s Al ` 2 1 _ii ae +�. 'r -4i►''I
Ar
'�T. - .. r .
.r-may n_ r _ j k �•v - - --
.
-w
R6, XS-8, Downstream (MY-00) R6, XS 8, Right Bank(MY 00)

c
-.414 y 1, f / 11 .. ,o5,' r s. f 1: • k a 1 fi , I. .�' 1 i , f. r
, ) + ithiki , Z �F: "'w 3!2l21, 2.00 PM �! ''ti � ? t 3!2l21, 2:01 PM
��_ 1 ayE ;i °;+r Johnston „ ,} '1 1 ,` t Johnston
{r 1 '4 ,1.. ft.i. �Y: p- f - , I d. ) - .t r- a s it :a,:. r.,
r L
.R �.... y. a 1, { 'ik .1, its r '_� �,-y.
a ref (. * w i-� _ ,{ y ,S,k�.� c^ �,- K;,i r F; t A. t y � '_ „r;
i a x t mac. - .x 4, x=� } r
l - sae, 5 .i,..,s,. ". i,% 7 _.3.,..--a -,n, A ( h ,71,-t� � a
vF
T
S _life
-
i�'` ..�, , ,.. i
_r r - ,"``-{am ,,.:,
_ ,
t
F r
r ram_ . °; r
_¢�°. i t-- hk't y aid C'r M a i^ -. r''; k.-..
` ' c 9
,
} ,_ •
,,.f , ``3 �
R7 upper, XS-9, Upstream (MY-00) R7 upper, XS 9, Left Bank(MY-00)
iji ' - . .. r #4,: F,; ` '
r` it d .. : )12/21, 2:0 1 PMv 32l21 2:01 P . `_
i`, Johnston �Johnston� _
e
*--•7
F � tS`' _+�.. F . _ I.
_ f _ - -.. +yam
4
V —F' ` P� f-_ __ dr.- - 4 ..
R7 upper, XS-9, Downstream (MY-00) R7 upper,XS 9, Right Bank(MY-00)

•
l I " ��4'. A- • fJ. •/'. =} .,1 t r' r t +f w �, r1R� 14 ,',2 -- i. `:' ,c,:,
> ' °AF. r, r ,; .f 3J2l21, 1.49 PM � • is - k '.l t *.,+_ ` 3l2121, 1,49 PM.;_
` ;; ` - f Johnston,' re,. � ' 0uc�� a ;s Johnston =
•t � t s r. s2^ty. .w�d4 V jam, {.1 ,'
�.-.cr ,G ry.� aF� r 1 k".. "`' f + ' Y"j -ryfI s "' - .+:
-,-. --.N.,„_ -. -.4k,__- ,._„
'm „ ate s. s � _:AO-47'p/ ç
' , r ,140:- � y '" � -iw �,' c cs x Y
�r ra.e i ' s' • 2- 3 x °t wx: s if ; r '- * #_ , -
i `. 4r .F %..� � � :i - • ?- tip' rl ice. c fix* •J -- ■�
_ '�. vc
y
w
{y 3 & "f'\ Y �' � �
itiiii,
l
k
�p
h
-4, .....,..--, . . - . , .
j�T�,'
R7 upper, XS 10, Upstream,,,,, --
(MY-00) R7 upper, XS 10, Left Bank(MY 00)
7 rh , t�,.. elf rR+ + �:':
_ x w :::.,,4 312121, 1.'49 PM '' 3!2/21, 1:50 PM
'" t f
.. , K .,.,, 'may Johnston
F a
v :• c. „y, _ .e rr"-a�.�k' '" ,- ;' ,1 y.,,s - -' t ,f 1'.
c.
liktit
t .y'�r . a . •"` -_t •_+4 3 k•- ;: _`n" 4`�-, . _7"-• s � 1 •i�f r —o- -i ,
#' .+ err a �` .>* _�+. r
" � � Y
.- .- cT{
a,F µ raFF `w '. �,Y' 'S �� f -
�,.+ 3,,,y-j � d d
...vt% litgpt.
ry E .,4r I S T -y "" yip •�- _ ,
-el
�[ r _ ��l'r if& J 1 f Y J
R7 upper,XS 10, Downstream(MY-00) R7 upper, XS 10, Right Bank (MY 00)

P •l 4l
- -.312121 10.16 AM 10� 1 . I-I a:" ' # ;mA o'r i 1 ,3f2l21, 10:17 AMf
c„4 , illJohnston ,( rf; ,i t 4.r ,ii Johnston
oi-
s s, o r
r r
LAM g_... �r • ' ..
•414
te
PS-1— R2, Ell, Upstream (MY-00) PS 1—R2, EII, Downstream (MY 00)
5/4/21, 1114AM '- 514121, 11.02AMr
' � ' *' Johnston : •Ne • Johnston
ti'. - {'r= w•T. ,y yc J ice.
'' _ 5. e�. r ••L — ale _
14: ..: ....A3 ,--:,- ,
. :41:2*:%'70'.., f..e>,
f^. -?q[ S4Y. 'c . J � 3 �' a per,' s�fi.i,+^ +4
L� 1 ry •
• }^.
., _ ,,v
�, 2FSh
t
j��++
rt _
y `
PS-2—R2 Culvert Crossing, Upstream (MY-00) PS-2— R2 Culvert Crossing, Downstream (MY-00)

, • '.1-
--0 .- • '',• .• " - . •••••.!.9 , •-.•-• .• --i •I'1 :=:.-',... .`4e.• ' ''''4. '..',. ,1,'• 1- '
' ..x..---•-- '^ ik.. •
Ailk
esilliki •
,-.,• '. 3/2/21, 10:03 AM. ij ,
a-741...e.thi( VA 1. 4.1101.,.-ft :.. . ' ' 1. '
r-tii'() 4114 ' d
/2/21,
.: - ,.-,,,• ---• . Johnston :. ',---P."-- . - ,-;-, L.t ',r- ' - • ' i .- ' 1 /1,'--_ Johnston:,
-1 , .•• 4
lit', '•A.;; i!' A i;k,t'e t 11 lc-- " ' 1 '; i . 1414
.,.',. _-1 - • ' j' „..-r . ‘,,-•' _ -- ' .
,•• -.-,'.', A ' ,,ti C - - --i ELI,'4 t. , 1.. ^. • •40 ., •,..., _!' -
I'I i ' '-'. __ __ ' A.'•:.:-....
-.--'
1, . - ' '
-'-. .Ntt . ..,. . -.....''..*',..,t
..4.. ' - Z
' •'. .''1'• --'. ' 1 ; •
. 4 • Irf
4 t - • I
.1 . •
:L.(....1.1.-,..,. •_,,._ -, ,
ilimi,..-,_ . ,...!:',. - . , " - .
'.4. .- .,.,.fii...*44, •• ,
. . , ._... . .. -..-lio.W, ___ , ' 1, t. ::. • •
•---'-'--,,r,:7.-.`.- .., -, --;.1165,41 . .,-.1-1,...:-.:0:- '...--:" tlt i lt,l','':,.• . , •,•,.:,(..,, . .,,,,„ .
..x....,z-z--- • . ',..---..-„g_L a,,,,,,..
,,,...,„„.....„,....,..,..„:„,..,z..
.,r..- z,i.#1,..1.7r,-" ,e*F,i4..i.,.: • . _ ,---Ii.', • ...; .- . •Z':4'....,'-' .. .
-.-,. .4, 4 , -,.- -. .,.,. .::,,,,-.,,..,..,-- _ ...._... .. ..
--..-.--7--,,;.-e, -. .... .,.:, • --. -1, 111,, ..,, , .. , ._., , - •
,_-,te.9.i' . ,y-='''• lii.i."--7---ev.,'" -
Aiiielft r. - 'AIL • ' % . ' ".- '' -, _
' - • r
''.• -'- -. 14._ -11... - '4. • 1 ' , •
,..,-,:-- -::-."-t--- ' --'' - • -• ...• 1.... - ' .., t-,-''.'-'-:•'---_ '' - Ls.-.0r
_ - —. ., - ',Ak-_.•rdiffevirk .30-. . ,, ... .-.• t.- ..
.. ,. -,_ .•-44, _--
- --_4,-- +., ,i- -.., . , • / 4 st• S. ..•- '.•-7.-:=-''....._.1 , .
T. ,'" •A .1, .' ,-.-'''.-...,,.-
- . '4 -.
.441. ....
-k..,A-r..., -,- ., ••... - • -
....„_. . _.,...
.. _ , ...
- ,,.. ..
_ • ,
_ _ •_ .,.. . ,..• Li.
...„. _ ,.... ... ,.. ,
. . . ..
.
- '
. :si. -•'.' - ..,,,, . -
. --, ,
.i.- .- . •
--- PS-3- R4, Ell, Upstream (MY-00) PS-3-R4, Ell, Downstream (MY-00)
. .
.,..•,•
•-,- •;,,,!,.. ' .. . .......,_ _
... ,,,
At A4404- --- • • F;-q•-
-;1,1 ; . • ,... . .: .. . - - , -, .
. .. ._ ,
IIMPIP . 5/4/21:11:53 AM . 5/4/21, 11:55 AM'
,
/g , .
- ' Johnston -,•
--,- ' . - .•--
„...
..-.•-• . ... Johnston .
,.. .ri.,.•-•- -,Kar • • ..-
..
•••.- • . • . _ ....„_, .. ._, . . ..
.. . .
.- ..„• • ••-..„.• . '. • ilf • • ..„ - ._. v.t.,..-
, ••,•-•-. . _ ..,.., , .
1 .. .....,9.' .," .
,
- r, liff,..',!:-'•,''•
.
.. . .
`----t•-:---••-„-Am..._,,if---..--1,,,';, : 1-..• .! •••'• — -.,r ,
•-•,.. • - -'"Illi.1 IMMIMMIKINIMI ewer, I- - -. ,
.
- . . . -
•
,i-AltArrVel'-'rr,"*". -...•-‘-'-'' - . ' , 0+0' ''.- _... . _ - . ._ . .
-, • • • -, 4•4'.--- -•-•=' -----. ''e -.7'.-
;:10fiki4,,t 7":.."F",'-i-.-.--,,,, -'-•''--,,-- r_A . , . ,r--- . -, -•,. , , '.?•v•-••-„,..,,,_. - ..-14.. -- ....
!.,_- .:, ....,:'..,.".'4.r-,-- .•4:.,•---,,...&N-4.-',..%-•.-"----4,- ,--7.-- _.:•...---9f.., -.1A.,H,-,.... -.•-• ... - , .:4*--.... ,,-: -y ,i_ -.-_,...'_.-„,•- s,.•,,:,.•,:s.,.,-,
- ---**'-:1-'76-,.-- •"-, ----2 t.,-- -•*-411.----.-..;4-,,,'• ..,.,:•::*-1' .--,--- ..[,...,..4 ,,r„..,-,-;-..
- •-•,:-R.-i,-,i---•••-s,,*,-,17'• •• ..,--i- .•.,,--."-0----..-,:---- ------W-4,....4,•,,,;_••• .___--, ... ..,--- - r.,-,•,‘„4:4.-N„,
, .•' .,.S; 4'.si-1', 4;aititot,'
..,.-4„,-.,,_ .4:- -,••• L t„--;•,_,,,,_ :, ,- . • .. _ , ... ,,,__,..,,.-:;:cf, , -k. .• -........_-_Lta..„2--.,. 4,-‘0,.'.',,„, ,47111,1a...!' '. ',..-..e`,;•--::. .'.. '-..,, ! ..",,,,:1.1'5'e
-
":",..,_ArN,,..',. ..,. , -..'Z,i_ . . --. :''. -."-.,.,..:A_..'..._ -_..,-,-__,-:!._.:,..c.,-..-7... ..--1%.lir ..."' "..44.:;--..-••,-.* 3!•;!".!"-.1'.':'..WA.
..--- . . -- • " - '..!''' ' - - '--'. • '- . '5.'N,-.... t-.'-' .- .'--''!'''•--1.?:4'..-7---.:Tho-'--'1i6;•-•;. 7 • -
µ• ' ,, _..,,
'- -,':),,..--'.e.4.J...a ,.. ... - •
• .4.:„.y......p.4,..1.1e•!. ., .
,
,.f''.7'.i!, •!.'''.:','P!"_.,;,, - • •.. .. , —. A '',... - ..-:.,-
. , •-•, . ..-. ..,
' •- ' • ,
.. - . „
...,. : . .. ..
. .. .
..• •• . ., . .. . . ,
. . .., _. , . . .
L , ..„,.. .___ . ,..,,,,t„:„ .,__,:.,_ •
....:„., ,. ..„.„ _ ... • . . _,,,,„:„,,,.-..„..,-",,..,,,,,,,.. .
.....: • :_...
.:., •„:. ...---....trw. - - ----_,..
,,... •..h„.,..e - • ... .
PS-4-R5 Culvert Crossing, Upstream (MY-00) PS-4- R5 Culvert Crossing, Downstream (MY-00)

Appendix B .
Vegetation Plot Data
Redline Plant List
Vegetation Performance Standards Summary Table
Vegetation Plot Counts and Densities Table
Photos: Vegetation Plot Photos
Veg Plot Maps

Odell's House Mitigation Project
Red-line Planting List
Species Common Name Stems % Planted Mitigation
a ii s Plan %
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash 228 3.00% 3%
Betula nigra River birch 608 8.00% 12%
Quercus michauxii Swamp chestnut oak 608 8.00% 10%
Quercus pagoda Cherrybark oak 532 7.00% 10%
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore 684 9.00% 12%
Quercus nigra Water Oak 532 7.00% 10%
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar 684 9.00% 12%
Quercus phellos Willow Oak 532 7.00% 10%
Diospyros virginiana Persimmon 456 6.00% 4%
Carpinus caroliniana Ironwood 456 6.00% 3%
Hamamelis virginiana Witch Hazel 456 6.00% 3%
Asimina triloba Pawpaw 456 6.00% 4%
Lindera benzoin Spicebush 456 6.00% 4%
Alnus serulatta Tag Alder 456 6.00% 0%
Corylus americana Hazelnut 456 6.00% 3%
Total 7,600 100%
* changes from mitigation plan in red
*Tag Alder was not planted within potential Nutrient Buffer Areas

Vegetation Performance Standards Summary Table(Data Collected:5/6
eg Plot 1 F Veg Plot 2 F
t.(ft) #Species %Invasives Sm /Ac.tes Av.Ht.(ft) #Species I
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0 688 2 9 0 64 I. 607 2 8 0
Vegg Veg Plot 5 F V-;
Stems/Ac. Av.Ht.(ft) - cies %Invasives Stems/Ac. Av.Ht.(ft) #Species %Invasives Stems/ cAv. -It.(ft) pecies %Invasive=
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0 769 2 9 0 607 2 8 0 1214 2 9 0
R
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0 850 2 8 0 769 2 6 0 688 2 8 0
Monitoring Year 7
Monitoring Year 5
Monitoring Year 3
Monitoring Year 2
Monitoring Year 1
Monitoring Year 0 648 2 7 0 688 2 11 0 810 2 11 0
*Each monitoring year represents a different plot for the random vegetation plot"groups".Random plots are denoted with an R,and fixed plots with an F.

Odell's House Stem Counts and Densities Table
Planted Acreage 11.17
Date of Initial Plant 2021-03-03
Date(s)of Supplemental Plant(s) #N/A
Date(s)Mowing #N/A
Date of Current Survey 2021-03-23
Plot size(ACRES) 0.0247
Tree/S Indicator Veg Plot 1 F Veg Plot 2�Veg Plot 3 F Veg Plot 4 F Veg Plot 5 F Veg Plot 6 F ff- Veg Plot 8 F Veg Plot 9 F Veg Plot 10 Veg Plot 11 Veg Plot 12
EirScientific Name Common Name R R R
111
hrub Status
Planted Total Planted Totted _Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total- Total Planted Total Planted ...TotalTotal Total Total
Asimina triloba pawpaw Tree FAC 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1
Betula nigra river birch Tree FACW 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 8 8 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2
Carpinus caroliniana American hornbeam Tree FAC 2 2 3 3 1 1 3 3 1 1 2
Corylus americana American hazelnut Shrub FACU 1 1 1 1 1 1 2
Diospyrosvirginiana common persimmon Tree FAC 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2
Species Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree FACW 1 1 4 4 6 6 2 2 2 1
Included in Hamamelis virginiana American witchhazel Tree FACU 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Approved
Lindera benzoin northern spicebush Tree FACW 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Mitigation Pla•
Liriodendron tulipifera tuliptree Tree FACU 4 4 2 2 4 4 4 4 7 7 5 5 2 2 6 4
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree FACW 4 4 2 2 4 4 3 3 2 2 5 5 6 6 7 7 1 1 1 2 5
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak Tree FACW 2 2 2 2 1 1 3 3 1 1 2
Quercus nigra water oak Tree FAC 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 2 2 2 2
Quercus pagoda cherrybark oak Tree FACW 3 3 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 3 3 2 3
Quercus phellos willow oak Tree FACW 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 3 3 4 4 5 5 2 1 1
S Performance Standard 17 17 16 16 15 15 19 19 15 15 30 30 21 21 19 19 17 17 16 17 20
Post Mitigation
Plan Species Alnus serrulata hazel alder Tree FACW 1 1
Sum Proposed Standard 17 17 16 16 15 15 19 19 15 15 30 30 21 21 19 19 17 17 16 18 21
Current Year Stem Count 17 16 15 19 15 30 21 19 17 16 17 20
Stems/Acre 688 648 607 769 607 1214 850 769 688 648 688 810
Mitigation Plan Species Count 9 9 8 9 8 9 8 6 8 7 10 10
Performance
Standard Dominant Species Composition(%) 24 19 27 21 47 27 29 37 29 38 17 24
Average Plot Height 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Invasives 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Current Year Stem Count 17 16 15 19 15 30 21 19 17 16 18 21
Post Mitigation Stems/Acre 688 648 607 769 607 1214 850 769 688 648 729 850
Plan Species Count 9 9 8 9 8 9 8 6 8 7 11 11
Performance Dominant Species Composition(%) 24 19 27 21 47 27 29 37 29 38 17 24
Standard Average Plot Height 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Invasives � 0 A 0 0 0 0 ` 0 0 0 0
1).Bolded species are proposed for the current monitoring year,italicized species are not approved,and a regular font indicates that the species has been approved.
2).The"Species Included in Approved Mitigation Plan"section contains only those species that were included in the original approved mitigation plan.The"Post Mitigation Plan Species"section includes species that are being proposed through a mitigation plan addendum for the current monitoring year(bolded),species that have been approved in prior monitoring years
through a mitigation plan addendum(regular font),and species that are not approved(italicized).
3).The"Mitigation Plan Performance Standard"section is derived only from stems included in the original mitigation plan,whereas the"Post Mitigation Plan Performance Standard"includes data from mitigation plan approved,post mitigation plan approved,and proposed stems.

*� ;' /23f21, 11:45AM 3/23/21, 2:18 PM
Johnston Johnston
%
16L
�. - ..• f�.� A`"',:tit - �-.,a. ".a j�Jb _.
Fixed Veg Plot 1 (MY-00) Fixed Veg Plot 3 (MY-00)
,,, ,of T.:ri"3.._,',0-'-.2'-'.. ' i„ ,itr,:,:,.1.,*".. -- ,..: . A;'..L,_,',.,.r..4"4.,..f5,,' ir
,' 4tAvt..f. 3f23f21 1.12 PM r 3/23/21, 2:41 PM
- Johnston Johnston
r ��R�, a+ w,r -,.....,,,,1gl1
...!.. 2„. 1 Vilitilik A 1 ,• !.',; ' 0,' '''• ••'. •-•'0'•
P
.. :y. 4 -....
dxi<
pp 1 • _• ,,✓- � Fr.-
7� _.S!! 4, v*1 .
•
- ' it _ r F r' -,xx ,* . 7:*
... _
Fixed Veg Plot 2 (MY-00) Fixed Veg Plot 4 (MY-00)

- ,
''.• '•' .„..7.m: '''''.'.'-..-,
,''-'-''-4. r.',-.T•,„.•,...' ..
' 'ix,.,'....`r'•-,1'•,i,fi .:::,,, ,.i.•.„,.*p,,,.,•,,,.,1 „, •_.,':\ . .„. .
n , , N3/23/21 305PM 't,
.,l• A-j..,..'''',..1.,i,..\'''1''.', ''''...:.'!„'::.•!'...','..';..'!3tit4,1`'1.:1,'''„
K-,' 3/23/21, 9:55 A-M.. r
JohnstonhnV Johnston
r
1-
.i,
, - 'VI* iii.' ,;(P •.;, .
'7 '''''' ",i''', AI '..;-,' t!,6:,' .IT* 401::- -.:'.'' Vl. '71%6: .:'-- .,,,...,:....; '.•.,- i,,..-ii,... ,
. - -r:,... i01(1,._,.:, :i: ,,t. ,..7... ..... =,-;•,. A Ir4...i...° .- ,•0'.114t. .-,
••••. ;LTA, • --- • ,
elli
77,- ,•,,,..,,,,- -A,i,',•''.••, ' •••• • - ,' • - 1 •41v•.•,,•/
;,., ... , .,•,,, ... . 0., ..,..t.,_ ,,, . , .--41-4V I'
4 ... k...;,i,• lik.....,..:.' . '''
. •••':' ___ ,, ..-. + -'-. • -. _ ..
. i.,
.7 /4*e'lk
.,. ..7..--_.--.
. ,_ •-- ,-,.-. .
_ • -.-. I
' '
,1, -.,.•--
: -5.i,r,.. -•-,..---,•. .
------ -r:27! "-- -7-
7,;::".•2" :;----.;.•-.,...-7-_,--:-. '''-'-•'-'•'-.. -.-.-'.--':''-
• :• -:...-. ... •••.: • ..,--7..:=1. _,-...,.,
.T.. -
••,,t ,,
•
• , .. ...:„ - _ '. _
. .
.iri,..*,'"ii.ikt:::-,-14-4*„.••• . :... :'. • ..:.... •. ',--.-
•• ' • • •• '• •. -- - ' • • c•-•••••.:•••5••••••:• '.',4• •••---'.-Ai,4-•--;,..--- -• . ...-',:t,2,-,'•.•-bL•;-,A,Fixed Veg Plot 5 (MY-00) Fixed Veg Plot 7 (MY-00)
i 7., J•:.:.,• -- •
......„,-;;;": ... •..'L,4°i .,'"i'.._:,..•::
.•
• , , „. . T,
;',.',.:10 • '•','.•:....,,,,,i,-,.:Ii..-..,,:•'..,',. ,.,...,. _. . . ,, „'t..1.;,.1, t,1 •i , . .i'..,SIon:C4), 'ff'--:-
•-, vb. - ,1 ,,.1., ,-...7---..• i .. i _ -,rio
.-•"-.,, .4- :)':,:,....,- '.1 , 1, ' f.. " , 4 X 4.i _ [.,'... -:
,...• .
' . '' ''.-* ''...,1.:-.•-• ,-- '].. W3/23/21, 10:19 AM
Johnston
. ...1.k.,,i ,•,• .1 .1 ,.i.fkl,...• •,..At, .
• ,4,101 H. 1 Ji , ! r.r.7."„46 .,.7 . , -.-
.i,..e.p,it .j. *1 1'- .:,..,
: .. , -- t ...,,-',. ,:.... ..-:
, — 0 m-A.0.• .,.
- . ,..
. .„ . ..6„....
i• -: i:,•';, '. .--- k
. .
.-.... •-.•,, ... „,,, •..`-:.... ...'..,;,,-.4.4 . 1 at
• ,.. __
,
= -----:_ -tot j ;,,., _H..; .. ••,„•... •
iril •-
: .-....„..,.. -.:. .
-----.. _ - ..,••._....„- i, 'if j "/.- . _ . , ._ . ...
......,,.. . ,
... • . • , .•
1 , . -::•••••.:. ,..7--=:-..,, - .----- -.7 . „ ' •
...-
. i .,.... . . . ..., ..- . : _
- '..---- , • -. :..- , - . . ..,....
. .
, .,....- •...,.. _ . . . • .. , ..,,
- — --• ' • --
.z-,... ..._..,...... ---. _ . '-"-'"1••SX'.",-, ' '- ''-L').•".
-... , ..----
,,
.... . .
, •. ...•
..,- -, . •,....•..-. • "-''''' ' • ' ' - ".• _•_ 1,-. ..•••••.'"' , ,
•
. 4-
- 2,-1-47-• - z.2-• -4,--
,,
..-„,. ...._ ....-..„.... ,,_ ...,„. ....,,
- •- -. ..,... . .,
-- - ,. ,
.•'. ..••••_ • ••-
Fixed Veg Plot 6 (MY-00) Fixed Veg Plot 8(MY-00)

' t . 5/6121, 9:14 AM '� i% 1•:
:• � 3r23121, 1:41 P M
3 Johnston 1► "4 Johnston
ifi'
w . i
., k 4 4 11 !,'. -- 41i1 1 ill I i ..
'r`.ah itm
- m ' _ -
S y
S
•
Af t
e !_ f r 1-
:�� '�"-
Y f
•
• •r - w
/1F �iF _ _
Fixed Veg Plot 9 (MY-00) Random Veg Plot 10 (MY 00)
,: ,, {i
� . . l �,� k 3�t, �f �, � i , , �' t g�� ;3123121, 9:14 AM ,! ff3/23/21, 9:13 AM
' .. .ya �.ie��. J1� d� ; Johnston . .. 1- a: F, -.,''C,' " Johnston'
7� }
-' - - - -a
_ " ^'
C r,`
x -
r �~ . - - _
fi
=,. _ �z
-r' ram. ..- w+.g.,..X x_„ i - �Y
x..
f
,yam e �r .s._- - +W'- `ALL - ..
1
Random Veg Plot 11 (View Northeast) (MY-00) Random Veg Plot 11 (View Southwest) (MY-00)

;.• 3 ifs 1.- - - - b ra r
"�gii - F' 3123121, 10:40 AM x., "��'�' '� 3/23/21, 10:46 AMf
Its." x , p
a : Johnston..... ,�}..,« y `1: ; ., igo..�y[,..- i' Johnston
\ • �hy� c._ rw: "T idlylei.
�' �'t''•'%-4- u es•..: '-7_ y r �• 'S.l [. ��J� '1. � .., r i i'} s •i --9•" _� 4
•
r' • L ` 'n -.' r. • t. .-: -.-.rr �Y.:..rK• �h. -+ rye-- •�,..r�rc�, -1+i• - r .,,.. .,,•M
I q ..�t:..,... __i. :}'�-l.^+7,`]�•Sri r' 3�- �. -1 i V 1
4 r M1 _^A-' - . a . • y.. ". ��y.,,' a,Y, .3 .eye�i. Cr
Z. 1' i'it, ��:-._R=z17 �1.x' i- �.X f -mot_ -• S ,f 1 @.:•`?`�--V �• - a,;.
Y • : �Sr.. �_ c'1F]�i• - J^ ^ __ `�V �."""."• ! . - s r .,ti y --3M[
J '< . � :+`? '{',• Yee � y't tCy�;;u-. .• •fN•.,. _' ;r.•,» q: ° � .�.. �' ; _r
�:1 I f4 �cm lam ,�' a . ._ u" ``'i: � yy,�'. t qC\ w y^
..1� ,y .F r +5 <' ,4R "Ir-'q'-. 'bT' k}_ . . `=sY . --+
r� .e1 l-`•- �.} 1 y' 1. � . ^ -�•, -. f ,k .. } ,-- jam,-••�' ..
:ems- • i•3 I a n •• • •• •• •• •4‘..,
• •g4RIIIRW • • �til:,Y._e r iA / ' y � ' Y -' 1• ��,. -' - � �•
• • 4ji
.�_y .` �♦ `.. 'mot • ,e �¢*
a �,.' f��� • •
„f F
ri.:'
� ai . . x'1, ` 7 ( t.. t,. { 1 i ,
.� :.'' r"8 . ; r• :* am f'y X' �, Ty } -, L
r.
,- - !_ a ,,o, h,f T Vey y •i ' f - '�j4 X !_ '!�• • 'rA ' 'f�1�I.'� `�• -`Z
,.. ie
t,�'�:;ss ;' Yd.Y' •' .6,.y� ` .„tl+' s Ch t, [ti �Y^. \ r, .�.5- \'
.t,,,!,,...,..,.. ...4,..,.,„
•
.... .
Random Veg Plot 12 (View Southwest) (MY-00) Random Veg Plot 12 (View Northeast) (MY-00)

Plot Scientific I Common Map
ID Name Name ID
Plot 1 Liriodendron
1 tuliptree a
tulipifera p
10.0- • Platanus American
1 b
occidentalis sycamore
• Liriodendron
1 tuliptree c
tulipifera p
0 n I Platanus American
1 d
occidentalis sycamore
7.5 h r 1 auercus nigra water oak e
P auercus
1 willow oak f
phellos
• Liriodendron
m k q 1 tuliptree g
tulipifera
- 5.0 r 1 Betula nigra river birch h
} 9 1 Carpinus American i
caroliniana hornbeam
1• Hamamelis American
f r virginiana witchhazel
Fraxinus
2.5- 1 green ash k
pennsylvanica
b 1 auercus swamp
d michauxii chestnut oak
r
a 1 auercus swamp m
michauxii chestnut oak
0.0 e r
Platanus American 1 n
occidentalis sycamore
0.0 2 5 5.0 7.5 10.0 r
X(m) 1 Platanus American o
occidentalis sycamore
• Liriodendron
1 tuliptree
tulipifera p p
✓ Carpinus American
1 q
caroliniana hornbeam
Plot Scientific Common Map
ID Name Name ID
Quercus cherrybark
Plot 2 2 a
pagoda oak
r
2 Quercus cherrybark b
5" 9 pagoda oak
• Hamamelis American
2 c
virginiana witchhazel
e r 2 Betula nigra river birch d
r
q" 2 auercus cherrybark e
pagoda oak
d r 2 Betula nigra river birch f
I 2 Asimina triloba pawpaw g
3- k p r 2 Corylus American h
E f h r americana hazelnut
Platanus American
} 2 occidentalis sycamore
r
2- 2 Liriodendron tuliptree
tulipifera p
b rLiriodendron
2 tuliptree k
I tulipifera
r
auercus swamp
1 n 2 I michauxii chestnut oak
• Hamamelis American
a m 2 m
virginiana witchhazel
r
2 auercus swamp0 n
0- o michauxii chestnut oak
2• Platanus American o
0 5 10 15 20 occidentalis sycamore
X(m)
2 Linden northern
benzoin spicebush p

Plot Scientific Common Map
Plot 3 ID Name Name ID
Platanus American
3 a
10.0 occidentalis sycamore
Hamamelis American
0 3 b
virginiana witchhazel
e • Quercus
9 3 willow oak c
phellos
3• Platanus American d
7.5 occidentalis sycamore
n r
f 3 Asimina triloba pawpaw e
d h r
3 Platanus American f
occidentalis sycamore
5.0 r Liriodendron
} m 3 tulipifera tuliptree g
3• auercus cherrybark h
c I pagoda oak
✓ Liriodendron
3 tuliptree i
2.5 tulipifera
I r
3 Liriodendron tuliptree
tulipifera P
b r auercus
1 3 hellos
✓ willow oak k
P
3 Platanus American I
0.0- a k occidentalis sycamore
• Liriodendron
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 3 tuliptree m
X(m) tulipifera
r 3 Betula nigra river birch n
✓ 3 auercus nigra water oak o
Plot Scientific Common Map
ID Name Name ID
Quercus
4 willow oak a
phellos
4• Liriodendron tuliptree b
tulipifera p
✓ Carpinus American
4 c
Plot 4 caroliniana hornbeam
4 Quercus cherrybark d
10.0 pagoda oak
n r 4 Quercus cherrybark e
q m pagoda oak
4 Platanus American f
p 0 occidentalis sycamore
4 Carpinus American
7.5- caroliniana hornbeam g
r
k 4 Liriodendron tuliptree h
i .1 I r tulipifera
4 Asiminatriloba pawpaw i
I
- 5.0 r 4 Asiminatriloba pawpaw j
}
r
Quercus
4 willow oak k
phellos
r 4 Platanus American
h 9 f e
I
occidentalis sycamore
2.5- r Liriodendron
4 tuliptree m
S tulipifera
r
4 Liriodendron tuliptree n
tulipifera p
a 0 d r 4 Betula nigra river birch o
b
0.0 4 Carpinus American
caroliniana hornbeam P
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 r 4 Quercus nigra water oak q
X(m) r Platanus American
4 r
occidentalis sycamore
4• Hamamelis American s
virginiana witchhaael

Plot 5 Plot Scientific Common Map
ID Name Name ID
10.0- Diospyros common 5
a
0 virginiana persimmon
r
5 Liriodendron tuliptree b
tulipifera p
r
quercus swamp
m k s
michauxii chestnut oak c
Platanus American d
n S
7.5- occidentalis sycamore
• Liriodendron
5 tuliptree e
tulipifera
✓ quercus
5 willow oak f
phellos
I r 5 Lindera northern
— 5.0 h benzoin spicebush g
1 r
} 5 Asimina triloba pawpaw h
• Liriodendron
S tuliptree
tulipifera p
f r 5 quercus nigra water oak j
g 5 Platanus American k
2.5- e occidentalis sycamore
• Liriodendron
5 tuliptree I
tulipifera
b r Liriodendron
5 tuliptree m
d r tulipifera
a C 5 Liriodendron tuliptree n
tulipifera
0.0-
Liriodendron
5 tuliptree o
tulipifera
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0
X(m)
Plot Scientific Common Map
ID Name Name ID
6 Diospyros common a
virginiana persimmon
✓ quercus
6 willow oak 6
phellos
r
quercus
6 willow oak c
phellos
✓ Fraxinus
6 green ash d
pennsylvanica
✓ 6 quercus cherryhark e
pagoda oak
Plot 6 r 6 Platanus American f
occidentalis sycamore
r
Fraxinus
6 green ash g
5- pennsylvanica
✓ 6 Corylus American h
americana hazelnut
C r quercus
6 phellos willow oak i
4- r 6 quercus nigra water oak j
0 A r 6 Cuercusnigra water oak k
d i t ' 6 Betula nigra river birch I
Platanus American
li 6 m
V r occidentalis sycamore
quercus cherryhark
3- 6 n
pagoda oak
k r 6 Platanus American o
E D occidentalis sycamore
} r fi Betula nigra river birch p
b e n r 6 Betula nigra river birch q
2- p 6 quercus swamp r
S W michauxii chestnut oak
Z r 6 Betula nigra river birch s
r
6 Platanus American t
occidentalis sycamore
✓ Platanus American
1- 6 u
occidentalis sycamore
✓ 6 quercus nigra water oak v
C r 6 Betula nigra river birch IN
q y r 6 Betula nigra river birch x
m
Fraxinus
a f r X 6 green ash y
0- gh pennsylvanica
✓ 6 Betula nigra river birch x
0 5 10 1�5 20 r 6 quercus swamp A
X(m) michauxii chestnut oak
✓ 6 Betula nigra river birch e
✓ Fraxinus
6 green ash C
pennsylvanica
r
6 quercus swamp D
michauxii chestnut oak

Plot Scientific Common Map
ID Name Name ID
7 Carpinus American a
caroliniana hornbeam
Plot 7 r 7 Platanus American b
occidentalis sycamore
r
Platanus American
10.0 7 c occidentalis sycamore
r t r 7 6etula nigra river birch d
S r Quercus
U 7 willow oak e
phellos
✓ 7 6etula nigra river birch f
✓ Corylus American
7.5- O 7 americana hazelnut g
r
q P 7 Platanus American h
n m occidentalis sycamore
7 Lindera northern i
benzoin spicebush
7• Liriodendron tuliptree j
5.0 tulipifera
I J k r
} Platanus American
7
j occidentalis sycamore k
Platanus American
7 occidentalis sycamore
✓ Quercus
2 5 h g 7 phellos willow oak m
f r
e 7 quercus willow oak n
phellos
r
Platanus American
7 0
occidentalis sycamore
b C r Liriodendron
a d 7 tulipifera tuliptree p
0.0-
7 auercus cherrybark
pagoda oak 4
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 r Quercus
X(M) 7 phellos willow oak r
✓ Liriodendron
7 tuliptree s
tulipifera
r
Liriodendron
7 tuliptree t
tulipifera
r
Liriodendron
7 tuliptree u
tulipifera
Plot Scientific Common Map
ID Name Name ID
Fraxinus
8 green ash a
Plot 8 pennsylvanica
8 Diospyros common b
virginiana persimmon
10.0- m r 8 Carpinus American c
r s caroliniana hornbeam
r
Fraxinus
8 green ash d
pennsylvanica
r
Fraxinus
8 green ash e
pennsylvanica
7.5 q n r 8 Platanus American f
j occidentalis sycamore
r
8 Platanus American
occidentalis sycamore g
r
C
0 Fraxinus
8 green ash h
pennsylvanica
k Platanus American
5.0 8 occidentalis sycamore
} r Platanus American
8
p d occidentalis sycamore
✓ 8 Carpinus American k
caroliniana hornbeam
e r 8 Betula nigra river birch I
✓ Carpinus American
2.5 8 p m
caroliniana hornbeam
r
b Fraxinus
8 green ash n
f pennsylvanica
r
8 Platanus American o
occidentalis sycamore
0.0 h g a r 8 Platanus American
occidentalis sycamore p
r
0.0 2..5 5.0 7.5 10.0 8 Platanus American
occidentalis sycamore
X(m) r
Fraxinus
8 green ash r
pennsylvanica
✓ Hamamelis American
8 s
virginiana witchhazel

Plot Scientific Common Map
ID Name Name ID
Plot 9 9 Liriodendron tuliptree a
tulipifera p
✓ Liriodendron
10.0 9 tuliptree b
tulipifera
p Q r 9 Quercus nigra water oak c
r 9 Quercus nigra water oak d
✓ 4uercus
9 willow oak e
q phellos
✓ 4uercus
7.5- n h 9 willow oak f
phellos
r
Quercus
9 willow oak
phellos g
r
Ill I 9 Fraxinus
pennsylvanica green ash h
r
Fraxinus
5.0 I 9 green ash i
} g r pennsylvanica
9 Carpinus American
k caroliniana hornbeam
9• Platanus American k
occidentalis sycamore
f r
9 Quercus cherrybark
2.5- pagoda oak
r
9 Quercus cherrybark m
e r pagoda oak
auercus
9 willow oak n
C phellos
• Quercus
0.0- d a b 9 phellos willow oak o
r
9 Quercus cherrybark
0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 pagoda oak p
X(m) r 9 Betula nigra river birch q

Appendix C .
Stream GeomorphologyData
Cross-Sections with Annual Overlays
Baseline Longitudinal Profile
Baseline Stream Data Summary Tables
Cross-Section Morphology Data

Cross-Section 1 (R1 - Headwater) MYO Distance Elevation Features
0 263.66 TLP
267- 3.21762102 263.377
8.1012209 263.268
13.0068711 263.123
266- 15.7230882 262.931
18.9721 .
265-
24.0131884 263.136
28.9898673 263.206
-775
34.9634537333 263.268263013
264 39.8961583 263.181 TLB,BKF
041.9740322 262.875
44.2414602 262.6 LEW
--- ---• y 44.9172464 262.483 THW
263-
45.7456592 262.555
46.6212066 262.603 REW
262 47.7577308 262.618
49.6458951 262.797
0 20 40 60 80 53.1173216 263.157 TRB
Distance(ft.) 56.7610276 263.804
60.8177063 263.782
+ MY 0 -- Bankfull Elevation-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 66.7124862 264.11
— Current Low Top of Bank 71.4457487 265.174
80 265.698 TRP
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 263.18
Bank Height Ratio-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 0.96
Thalweg Elevation 262.48
LTOB Elevation 263.16
LTOB Max Depth 0.674
LTOB Cross Sectional Area 4.77

Cross-Section 2 (R2- Pool) MYO Distance Elevation Features
0 255.772 TLP
2[S£-
4.16149649 255.637
7.96496585 255.428
11.007553 254.835
12.1749619 254.66 TLB
14.2163795 254.155
9-__
17.8122883 253.891
c
20.4328914 253.682
21.6817288 253.675
> 22.5765706 253.143 LEW
au
w 23.8282721 252.957
2,4-
24.5543602 252.906 THW
24.9935798 252.955 REW
26.1109158 254.61 TRB,BKF
27.3725572 255.414
,2 29.3058486 255.971
233.2406827 256.048
G 10 20 30 40 50 37.9718276 256.416
Distance(ft.) 42.1271405 256.945
45.8967429 257.296
+ MY 0 -- Bankfull Elevation-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 50 258 TRP
— Current Low Top of Bank
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 254.61
Bank Height Ratio-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 252.91
LTOB Elevation 254.61
LTOB Max Depth 1.704
LTOB Cross Sectional Area 11.76

Cross-Section 3 (R2- Riffle) MYO Distance Elevation Features
0 254.901 TLP
2S8- 4.03151312 254.86
8.05891389 254.479
12.0820873 254.633
17.0051659 254.212
17.0051659 254.212
a3
17.8380307 253.93 TLB
19.388986 253.558
0 21.0775378 253.272
22.3455016 253.118
m
22.6948921 252.943 LEW
254-
23.4904365 252.825
23.8309149 252.809 THW
24.7871188 252.885
25.2678376 252.977 REW
252 25.918131 253.288
26.71262 253.456
0 10 20 30 40 50 27.4435581 253.904 TRB,BKF
Distance(ft.) 28.7524682 254.444
29.8957815 255.632
+ MY 0 -- Bankfull Elevation-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 33.9938929 255.781
— Current Low Top of Bank 37.9593341 255.899
42.0014874 255.877
45.8818011 256.178
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 50 256.675 TRP
Bankfull Elevation-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 253.90
Bank Height Ratio-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 252.81
LTOB Elevation 253.90
LTOB Max Depth 1.095
LTOB Cross Sectional Area 6.03

Cross-Section 4 (R3- Riffle) MYO Distance Elevation Features
0 243.839 TLP
244 3.95452715 242.514
8.89212427 241.467
14.7295684 240.919
20.623485 240.639 TLB
21.486855 240.462
242 22.149498 240.115 LEW
23.1882395 239.892
g 24.3784161 239.85
j 25.1576374 239.849 THW
26.4426693 239.976
240
27.7896542 240.132
28.9273996 239.826
29.7624802 240.338 REW
30.819244 240.523
238 31.9363554 240.601 TRB,BKF
36.0512331 240.588
0 10 20 30 40 50 41.2482107 241.125
Distance(ft.) 46.281841 241.588
50 242.442 TRP
+ MY 0 -- Bankfull Elevation-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area
— Current Low Top of Bank
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 240.60
Bank Height Ratio-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 239.85
LTOB Elevation 240.60
LTOB Max Depth 0.752
LTOB Cross Sectional Area 4.90

Cross-Section 5 (R3- Pool) MYO Distance Elevation Features
0 243.251 TLP
3.90129889 241.924
9.12909289 240.639
14.8138033 240.335
18.1463366 240.085 TLB,BKF
19.233291 239.928
242 21.731327922.9514465 239.389 LEW
0
238.825
0 23.9180688 238.323
24.9357467 238.336 THW
a)
240 25.2514991 238.159
26.0717019 238.622
27.7204923 239.353 REW
29.1177418 239.79
31.5173604 240.097 TRB
238 36.9876084 240.438
41.9813675 240.642
0 10 20 30 40 50 45.9617756 241.11
Distance(ft.) 50 241.829 TRP
+ MY 0 -- Bankfull Elevation-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area
— Current Low Top of Bank
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 240.09
Bank Height Ratio-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 238.34
LTOB Elevation 240.09
LTOB Max Depth 1.749
LTOB Cross Sectional Area 10.02

Cross-Section 6 (R5- Headwater) MYO Distance Elevation Features
0 252.697 TLP
2'''i" 5.00446241 251.92
10.0878593 251.89
14.8985366 251.766
- 20.044288 251.729
26.9519767 251.052 TLB
34.4575034 250.776
34.4575034 250.776
37.717808 250.657
39.8296093 250.605
a)251-
w _ ) 40.3774576 250.569 THW
40.8095245 250.647 REW
41.7972294 250.928 TRB,BKF
256-
44.9950278 250.954
50.9320066 251.18
55.9426926 251.278
60.8786019 251.231
G 20 40 60 80 66.1009831 251.433
Distance(ft.) 71.0224593 251.475
76.0234489 251.704
+ MY 0 -- Bankfull Elevation-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 80 252.094 TRP
— Current Low Top of Bank
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 250.93
Bank Height Ratio-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 250.57
LTOB Elevation 250.93
LTOB Max Depth 0.359
LTOB Cross Sectional Area 2.55

Cross-Section 7 (R6- Pool) MY0 Distance Elevation Features
0 245.859 TLP
247- 4.06531881 245.15
6.34482159 244.411
10.1161799 244.246
246- 14.0444837 244.356
16.9767609 244.204
17.6503834 244.204
E.245
c 20.1993214 244.242 TLB,BKF
g 20.7724056 243.884
j ---✓ 22.5087482 243.98 LEW
a)244 \i/ 23.8193192 242.707
w
25.3651806 242.579 THW
26.2278646 242.812
243-
27.4620956 243.919 REW
28.1685243 244.425 TRB
242 30.1043234 244.462
33.9797334 244.294
0 10 20 30 40 50 38.0488834 244.6
Distance(ft.) 41.9404591 244.708
45.9495869 244.498
+ MY 0 -- Bankfull Elevation-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 50 245.099 TRP
— Current Low Top of Bank
MVO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 244.24
Bank Height Ratio-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 242.58
LTOB Elevation 244.24
LTOB Max Depth 1.663
LTOB Cross Sectional Area 6.78

Cross-Section 8 (R6- Riffle) MYO Distance Elevation Features
0 246.08 TLP
4.22098531 245.838
8.24019302 244.958
12.1560777 244.704
--,- 16.0390876 244.729
18.0612763 244.791
20.2145515 244.588 TLB
w 2a6 �•
21.1587208 244.479
g • ♦ 21.609788 244.347 LEW
23.1343721 243.956 THW
w 24.5295715 243.955
25.9175317 244.127
27.7622968 244.302 REW
2- -
29.661418 244.696
34.1093706 244.588 TRB,BKF
242 38.2920663 244.603
41.9982984 244.823
0 10 20 30 40 50 45.9587526 244.92
Distance(ft.) 50 245.044 TRP
+ MY 0 -- Bankfull Elevation-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area
— Current Low Top of Bank
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 244.59
Bank Height Ratio-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 243.96
LTOB Elevation 244.59
LTOB Max Depth 0.632
LTOB Cross Sectional Area 3.23

Cross-Section 9 (R7 upper- Riffle) MYO Distance Elevation Features
0 236.034 TLP
2381 3.1349504 235.54
5.07291258 235.528
10.8944722 235.69
237- 14.5207868 235.633
16.8093882 235.839
19.1489961 235.66
A 236- 21.6081564 235.649
o /s\ 23.1828047 235.677 TLB
23.69206 235.582 LEW
a)235• 24.3258246 235.35 THW
w
24.8979 235.403
234- 25.3532398 235.569
25.927702 235.745 REW
26.8508177 235.649 TRB,BKF
233• 30.1282337 235.319
32.2623764 235.582
0 10 20 30 40 50 34.996658 235.571
Distance(ft.) 38.9002414 235.556
43.6166778 235.742
+ MY 0 -- Bankfull Elevation-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 50 235.9 TRP
— Current Low Top of Bank
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 235.65
Bank Height Ratio-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 0.97
Thalweg Elevation 235.35
LTOB Elevation 235.65
LTOB Max Depth 0.299
LTOB Cross Sectional Area 0.39

Cross-Section 10 (R7 upper- Pool) MY0 Distance Elevation Features
0 233.858 TLP
2371 4.07528551 233.82
8.0649266 233.822
12.1713 233.883
236- 15.963298 233.93
20.058336 233.919
23.1165907 233.892 TLB,BKF
A 235- 24.028201 233.708 LEW
c
g 24.5076751 233.555
j y T 24.6497585 233.527
• 234— _ — - 24.8844045 233.474 THW
w
25.35148 233.524
233 26.0052017 233.637 REW
26.8511769 233.845 TRB
28.0551381 233.722
232 31.1541693 233.866
35.1212256 234.147
0 10 20 30 40 50 39.1651712 234.323
Distance(ft.) 43.4049889 234.226
47.3148504 234.337
+ MY 0 -- Bankfull Elevation-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 50 234.566 TRP
— Current Low Top of Bank
MVO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankfull Elevation-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 233.89
Bank Height Ratio-Based on As-Built Bankfull Area 0.68
Thalweg Elevation 233.47
LTOB Elevation 233.85
LTOB Max Depth 0.371
LTOB Cross Sectional Area 0.70

Odell's House Mitigation Project
Longitudinal Profile - R1, R2, R3, R4
As-Built (MVO 2021)(Data Collected May 2021)
275
270 A
265
-Thalweg
260 Elevation
-Water
255
_ n
Surface
Elevation
to 250 -Left Bank
_cu Y Elevation
W
245
Right Bank
Elevation
240 - J"l�
235 - F;
230 -
225
900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400 3500 3600 3700
Station (ft)

Odell's House Mitigation Project
Longitudinal Profile - R5, R6, R7
As-Built (MVO 2021)(Data Collected May 2021)
260
255 -
250
Thalweg
Elevation
245 - Water Surface
Elevation
240 - Left Bank
f° Elevation
W
235 - Right Bank
Elevation
230 -
225 —
220
1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300
Station(ft)

Baseline Stream Data Summary
Odell's House,R1 Odell's House,R2 Odell's House,R3
Parameter Pre-Existing,Condition,applicable) Demon Monitoring Baseline(MYO) Pre-Existing Condition,applicable) Demon Monitoring Baseline(MYO) Pre-Existing Condition,applkable( Demon Monitoring Baseline(MYO)
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width(ft' N/A 0 6.0 13.2 1.0 11.0 1.0 8.0 9.5 1.0 5.7 1.0 8.0 11.1 1.0
Flcadprane Width(ft) N/A 0 31.3 115.0 62.6 1.0 27.0 1.0 25.0 50.0 29.3 1.0 11.5 1.0 25.0 30.0 34.3 1.0
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft N/A 0 0.5 0.4 1.0 0.3 1.0 0.5 0.6 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.6 0.5 1.0
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) N/A 0 0.7 0.7 1.0 0.7 1.0 0.7 1.1 1.0 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.8 1.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft) N/A 0 3.2 5.1 1.0 3.7 1.0 4.2 6.0 1.0 5.6 1.0 4.8 5.4 1.0
Width/Depth Ratio N/A 0 11.4 34.3 1.0 33.0 1.0 15.2 15.0 1.0 5.8 1.0 13.3 23.2 1.0
Entrenchment Ratio N/A 0 5.2 19.2 4.7 1.0 2.5 1.0 3.1 6.3 3.1 1.0 2.0 1.0 3.1 3.8 3.1 1.0
Bank Height Ratio N/A 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Max part size(mm)mobilized at bankful N/A 19.0 17.0 25.0 37.0 42.0 46.0 35.0 32.0
Rosgen Classification Pond DA/E5 DA C5 C5 C5 G5 B5 B5c
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) 11.0 11.0 11.0 14.5 14.5 14.5 20.0 20.0 20.0
Sinuosity(ft) N/A 1.08 1.16 1.07 1.07 1.04 1.20 1.12 1.10
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft N/A 0.0089 0.0107 0.0168 0.0168 0.0195 0.0133 0.0142 0.0152
Omer
Baseline Stream Data Summary
Odell's House,R5 Odell's House,R6 * : Odell's House,R7 upper
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition(applicable) Design Monitoring Baseline(MYO( Pre-Existing Condition(applicable) Design Monitoring Baseline(MYO( Pm-Existing Condition(applicable) Design Monitoring Baseline(MYO(
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width(ft' N/A 0 5.5 13.4 1.0 4.1 1.0 6.0 8.9 1.0 1.0 6.0 2.2 1.0
Floodprane Width(ft) N/A 0 49.0 103.0 38.1 1.0 53.3 1.0 22.0 40.0 44.0 1.0 1.0 126.0 145.0 49.6 1.0
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft N/A 0 0.3 0.2 1.0 0.6 1.0 0.4 0.4 1.0 1.0 0.4 0.2 1.0
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) N/A 0 0.4 0.4 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.5 0.6 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.3 1.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ftz) N/A 0 1.8 2.6 1.0 2.5 1.0 2.4 3.3 1.0 1.0 2.4 0.4 1.0
Width/Depth Ratio N/A 0 16.8 68.9 1.0 6.8 1.0 15.2 24.0 1.0 4.2 1.0 15.2 14.0 1.0
Entrenchment Ratio N/A 0 8.9 18.7 2.8 1.0 12.9 1.0 3.7 6.7 4.9 1.0 1.5 1.0 21.0 24.2 22.2 1.0
Bank Height Ratio N/A 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Max part size(mm)mobilized at bankful N/A 10.0 7.0 32.0 22.0 20.0 20.0 11.0
Rosgen Classification Pond DA/E5 DA E5 B5c B5c G5/Channelized B5c B5c
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Sinuosity(ft) N/A 1.08 1.09 1.05 1.12 1.09 1.03 1.07 1.09
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft N/A 0.0077 0.0083 0.0145 0.0135 0.0129 0.0153 0.0123 0.0131
Other

Cross-Section Morphology Data
Odell's House Mitigation Project:DMS#100041(Data Collected 3/24/2021)
Cross-Section 1(Headwater-R1) Cross-Section 2(Pool-R2) Cross-Section 3(Riffle-R2) Cross Section-4(Riffle-R3)
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 263.18 254.61 253.90 240.60
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull'Area 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 262.48 252.91 252.81 239.85
LTOB Elevation 263.16 254.61 253.90 240.60
LTOB Max Depth(ft) 0.67 1.70 1.10 0.75
LTOB Cross Sectional Area(ft') 4.77 11.76 6.03 4.90
Cross-Section 5(Pool-R3) Cross-Section 6(Headwater-R5) Cross-Section 7(Pool-R6) Cross-Section 8(Riffle-R6)
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 240.09 250.93 244.24 244.59
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull'Area 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Thalweg Elevation 238.34 250.57 242.58 243.96
LTOB Elevation 240.09 250.93 244.24 244.59
LTOB Max Depth(ft) 1.75 0.36 1.66 0.63
LTOB Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 10.02 2.55 6.78 3.23
Cross-Section 9(Riffle-R7 upper) Cross-Section 10(Pool-R7 upper)
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+ MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY5 MY7 MY+
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull'Area 235.65 233.89
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfull'Area 0.97 0.68
Thalweg Elevation 235.35 233.47
LTOB Elevation 235.65 233.85
LTOB Max Depth(ft) 0.30 0.37
LTOB Cross Sectional Area(ftz) 0.39 0.70
The above morphology parameters reflect the 2018 guidance that arose from the mitigation technical workgroup consisting of DMS,the IRT and industry mitigation providers/practitioners.The outcome resulted in the focus on three primary morphological parameters of interest for the
purposes of tracking channel change moving forward.They are the bank height ratio using a constant As-built bankfull area and the cross-sectional area and max depth based on each years low top of bank.These are calculated as follows:
1-Bank Height Ratio(BHR)takes the As-built bankful area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation. For example if the As-built bankfull area was 10 ft2,then the MY1 bankfull elevation would be adjusted until the calculated bankfull area within the MY1 cross
section survey=10 ft2.The BHR would then be calculated with the difference between the low top of bank(LTOB)elevation for MY1 and the thalweg elevation for MY1 in the numerator with the difference between the MY1 bankfull elevation and the MY1 thalweg elevation in the
denominator.This same process is then carried out in each successive year.
2-LTOB Area and Max depth-These are based on the LTOB elevation for each years survey(The same elevation used for the LTOB in the BHR calculation).Area below the LTOB elevation will be used and tracked for each year as above.The difference between the LTOB elevation and the
thalweg elevation(same as in the BHR calculation)will be recroded and tracked above as LTOB max depth.
Note:The smaller the channel the closer the survey measurements are to their limit of reliable detection,therefore inter-annual variation in morphological measurement(as a percentage)is by default magnified as channel size decereases.Some of the variability above is the result of this factor and some is due to the large amount of depositional
sediments observed.

Appendix D .
Hydrologic Data
Flow Gauge and Crest Gauge Diagrams
Photos: Surface Flow and Wetland Gauges

TOP OF FLOW GAUGE
ELEV. =6.91
Lo
V
I
2
I-
d
w
a
— — _ _ _ FLOW O ELEVATION OF DOWN
co STREAM RIFFLE=9.91
i�//�/��/ z
AAA/ /A %/A%/AA/ / ——BASEFLOW
\% \\/ \/%\�\/�\\\\/\\///\ / _
i///v/// //v/ //v///v / //v/ /v// /////v.7-rL / /
\V�,//AAj�/AAj/AAA\ AAA�//AAj /AAj/AAAVAj/AAA/// / /v j/\//AA��VAj/AAA\/AAj \/AA/
\/\\ \ \/\//%///%///\/ %\%/� //\/%%//%//\/ /\/ \/
/\\ /
\A�V%AAA/% VA\/ \\/%V% VS/% \\/%\\/%/% ��A/A
/ v//V//�/�A��A/AA/�//�/��/%�/V�Xv
FLOW GAUGE #1 - R1
Flow Depth = (Sensor Depth + Top) - Elevation of Riffle
Flow Depth = (4.25 + 6.91) - 9.91
Flow Depth = 1.25 feet

TOP OF FLOW GAUGE
ELEV. =2.30
0
0
a.
w
a
FLOW 0 ELEVATION OF DOWN
co STREAM RIFFLE=6.06
i // / w
AAA/ /A % BASEFLOW
���/AjAjA�AjAAAjAjA� jAA / /v j \//�A� �Aj�AA�/�Aj \/�A/
/\\ \ \ %/////// ///\ L/\/ / %/%/ \\
// AAAA/% VA\/%\\/ % VS/% \\/%\\/%/% �A/A
FLOW GAUGE #2 - R5
Flow Depth = (Sensor Depth + Top) - Elevation of Riffle
Flow Depth = (4.00 + 2.30) - 6.06
Flow Depth = 0.24 feet

CROSS SECTIONAL VIEW OF STREAM
PRESSURE
TRANSDUCER
CORK GAUGE ..,.... ),,,,,
TOP OF CREST GAUGE
1 1 HEIGHT = 0.23
3.31 = 4/
0) BANKFULL 1
co
14 4 DEPTH t\)1iL, i ® a r
w
itI 0 I
® II
0
z
w
V u)
Crest Gauge CG-1 (R3)
Bankfull Event Depth (for transducer) = (Top of Gauge + Sensor Depth) - Bankfull Depth
Bankfull Event Depth = (0.23 + 4.89) - 3.31
Bankfull Event Depth = 1.81 feet

CROSS SECTIONAL VIEW OF STREAM
PRESSURE
TRANSDUCER
CORK GAUGE ..,.... ..i.,,,,
TOP OF CREST GAUGE
HEIGHT = 0.41
1
0 4.85 =
/1 0 Lri BANKFULL
ii DEPTH
IA
® o al
ORI Ct I
® O
u)
z
w
0)
V
Crest Gauge CG-2 (R7 lower)
Bankfull Event Depth (for transducer) = (Top of Gauge + Sensor Depth) - Bankfull Depth
Bankfull Event Depth = (0.41 + 5.00) - 4.85
Bankfull Event Depth = 0.56 feet

r - a. _
,'�� f II 4%. • '•
312l21, 11:14 AM ^-; 3/2/21, 11:23 AM -
' Johnston I Johnston.
4 1„1 i ,r.-7 - , ` id �
,. -- -,,-.1104b, • , ,• ,r,l'fp,,., _,. .6..
VI,C.,.• L,II, !till .1 i . pi' , f
'- 41 0 i ' i OV: -.'
• , a r. - . t'' 0
i �{ I(iI r
•
_ f
r
1.r..
f+gyp �� ;
iIFYI/F, 1'SR'� f f; Y `\� `� - '''*. A • `I _ rr-w' 'AL
a err �t t. �`' " +.. .."{ .rA
r, . �,
Y
lireZM`' TP t f fi ri+ S w, 1. kia i -
Flow Gauge (FG-1)—R1 Flow Gauge (FG 2)—R5
, �s ,�_ �k 311121, 2:42FM 311l21, 2:42FM
,.E ;, � � Johnston �+ Johnston
e` i' .} • -x ,[' s.� rw +< `"-- ,tom.",,;•2. '-- � .. =+-r
• " �, .' •ti - c .ii rw-�.g sue, ai'�.r`' u •:n�
•
-—, t-'1c. mow,, _ _ L6 � '� J' y - T -�•.^ _ _ -��'+ ,�.. -
3
--
x
1 K▪ ....9, lid{ '�! �.
5
,-.}^ g y .. _ ▪ �k - F• - a, -ems.
Crest Gauge (CG-1, Pressure Transducer)— R3 Crest Gauge (CG-1, Cork)— R3

II d. Iir. '.te ql Y..;.. �' ! •'1.4r 4*• 4 ,•- •-� ri. #� q c •+¢ + 3J2l21 2.43 PM1.1 '; '` I • .I • IN !� ti # 3J2l21, 2:4� PM Johnston. • '. J 3 CI' Johnston' ii!'y�,;�; ,11 ,l=:` +
+ 5
•
+P I J •I
f. ' . ` a#
,{„_` � ',: �' - - =-.- - y ' ` E. t � „ # •
•
s �� 'h<, 3' µre -'`,;>� - ''
•-. .'*�.. - �. - } fit,,,ya �.� 4 „r,_'"5r-•-A• _ __ .
_.y a. ' j f, .fit+!_ ... - - -- - -c - r....
.-yt T XJ .y.y i bCrw
1 �a�r P
Crest Gauge (CG-2, Pressure Transducer)— R7 lower Crest Gauge (CG 2, Cork)— R7 lower
- 3/3/21, 8:57 AM_, �d' + ;i ' r9 3/3/21, 8;36 AM.,
�r r- f II
- Johnston Johnston
- j t —�- - - - -
r.1jc _ _ ^c- .�a►+5"i•�5 .,mac -`- - . '�i i•:--qo-'.'.
` _ s4, 9 jF,? �7rvq } <a p .. yY," s T :IA.. 1pb � , tea-1 \ - _
•
,i. i '' • 1 T
-
-ry' .ice _
R
.. �i 1 .-At,
\ '.
Wetland Gauge (WG-1)—W1 Wetland Gauge (WG-2)—W2

�!l'�j r , y� ,. - s .i s•h I' 'II Y i i i . ' 1 1 fir, r ig•
+. �i ��, - k t ' Ir. i ��` "til' 313121, 9:39 AM�1
� �. 313/21, 9:19 AMN. A1;.. IFrse 3. Johnston ■S ,� `� i sr �• i „�i '� Johnston
,I , . .. ,. ; , .',..-4 , 7 I: "94 Ile <;!
rrA' lCax Jr..' 1(,- "' T ;•µ c ` �� ,, t �y (i,
'" A7f Ly. 4. . :•s(rk:1�R• 4r' i�' _u- '`'� �. . ` YrX ` t
,. 1-,I.•.`! y . „.., • , .V., ..),,zi: ,.., , Is • .
Wetland Gauge (WG-3 —W3 Wetland Gauge (WG-4)—W5
iJ . .H, r� t ' , t �1 k 1 , h . . ; 3/3/21, 9:55 AM�:•, R t . 1 "4 Johnston
All%
.fir•`-. .._ J k., �-.ic _ �_ 3r4�:�..: -n•:
..fir r- ! '�•'.r;- .,. lillip ri• i ` •" ' ..
pry . r T. ;•.:_x
.34
rev`-•
�.
7
`-
J
Wetland Gauge (WG-5)—W6

Appendix E :
Project Timeline and Contact
Info

• Project Timeline and Contacts Table
Data Collection Task Completion or
tivity or Deliverable IIIIComplete _ Deliverable Submission
Project Instituted N/A 1/2/2018
Mitigation Plan Approved N/A 8/26/2020
Construction (Grading) Completed N/A 3/25/2021
Planting Completed N/A 4/1/2021
As-built Survey Completed NA 6/11/2021
MY-0 Baseline Report 5/6/2021 6/15/2021
MY1+ Monitoring Reports
Remediation Items (e.g. beaver removal, supplements, repairs etc.)
Encroachment
Project Name/Number
Provider 7721 Six Forks Road Suite
130
Water& Land Solutions, LLC Raleigh, NC 27615
Mitigation Provider POC: Emily Dunnigan [phone]
Designer 7721 Six Forks Road Suite
130
Water& Land Solutions, LLC Raleigh, NC 27615
Primary project design POC: Chris Tomsic, WLS [phone]
Construction Contractor 2889 Lowery Street
North State Environmental, Inc. Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Primary contractor POC:Andrew Roten [phone]

Appendix F :•Other Data
Macrobenthic Survey Data

Macrobenthic Sampling Data
R3-OdearII's House Mitigation Site
Monitoring Ye MYO
Biotic Index Score NA*
Water Quality Level NA*
*No benthics were collected during sampling
f.4 .• , As. "., Y'`' ' + " ..'- ('
4.
mil;- 4�, ` S
e :' - - Y
•
ko
Sr/- Y l ; „ 'A �f
,, ,f ' i:::,04_ e,-,..,,,y. ,4, , ,...
.y
� ' � . :t
._ I 0,6 52020
View Upstream
.r c '. ' irk ?.. x
,, :- .
w
1` F 5 S , -,.- .' t y'.-
49
eT.. 17��, � 44 tltl
_ ,
M �" ' � r•
ddI ` .,..
). mil0.
f � '�{t } G -' : F�
.. , y- .r
f' ` i..
t,r >n it, 1
— r,
View Downstream

Macrobenthic Sampling Data
R7-Odell's House Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year MYO
Biotic Index Score NA*
Water Quality Level NA*
*No benthics were collected during sampling
F are -�
'.:
i t 1 ;-
' q'A
or
.�, � � A r
L r •0
,, y -F r f fli = f ,it' r '/ i a `-
3C die `, ,,' ,,,. �� T 4.,
"4fib � � 3� ' � ; 7 `_.. ��®d
' , akYd' j a
r ' t I. ' 10. ....., lir, `
t
View Upstream
. `r'
4 , , . itior..\ ,..,:iiii. , tie -It '' -/ ,L,
yt
x
1.
View Downstream

DocuSign Envelope ID:2433D266-3AF6-4253-B076-1 2905B233888
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY - DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICESr--- 1
WATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
ODELL'S HOUSE MITIGATION PROJECT 7721 Six Forks Rd.,Suite130
Raleigh,NC 27615
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 14-5111
waterlandsrlandsolutions.com
SURVEY CERTIFICATE NCDEQ - DMS PROJECT ID # 100041
"I,MARSHALL G.WIGHT,CERTIFY THAT THIS PROJECT WAS COMPLETED PROJECT ENGINEER
NCDEQ - DMS CONTRACT # 7420 UNDER RFP 16-007279 $/16/Zo21
UNDER MY DIRECT AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE FROM 01vi ilf,,j
AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION;THAT THIS GROUND •.n*. \ C ARC�•.,
SURVEY WAS PERFORMED AT THE 95 PERCENT CONFIDENCE LEVEL TO N E US E RIVER BASIN (C U 03020201 ) o�\o� •'•- '.'• ./ti'',
MEET FEDERAL GEOGRAPHIC DATA COMMITTEE STANDARDS;THAT THIS ♦ \ * -SSII0'•. 9 �j
SURVEY WAS PERFORMED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A USAC E ACTION ID # SAW-2018-00431 : ,•-.� '�'-�•'
TOPOGRAPHIC/PLANIMETRIC SURVEY TO THE ACCURACY OF CLASS A AND D W R I D # 2018-0200
VERTICAL ACCURACY WHEN APPLICABLE TO CLASS C STANDARD,AND SEAL •' -
THAT THE ORIGINAL DATA WAS OBTAINED ON MARCH 19TH 2021; Do uSigne : i rz
THAT THE RSURVEY OWNAS LINESED ON]
YNOTM ETTHES TYPE OF WORK : STREAM, BUFFER AND WETLAND MITIGATION ��L'L,ti,t,a. -
ma
CONTOURS SHOWN AS[BROKEN LINES]MAY NOT MEET THE STATED SHEET INDEX �� - 7.R, "" �STANDARD;AND ALL COORDINATES ARE BASED ON NAD 83(2011)AND �j' F Q._yamALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD 88" PROJECT SUMMARY �I�-� �4" �`�����Stream Riparian Wetland1 COVER SHEET '�..�pHE P �`�
Project Reach Creditable Units Mitigation Mitigation Project Wetland Proposed Wetland Mitigation Ratio Mitigation Credits III11j"®„'`��
Designation Type of Mitigation (LF) Ratio(X:1) Credits(SMCs) Area Type of Mitigation Area(AC) (X:1) (WMCs)
THIS DOCUMENT ORIGINALLY ISSUED AND SEALED BY MARSHALL G.WIGHT, ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
W1 Wetland Reestablishment 0476 1 0476
L-5034,ON R1 Stream Restoration(PVHW) 437 1 437.000 h ---- ---- 2 LEGEND WLS ENGINEERING,SPRINGS
W2 Wetland Re-establishment 0416 1 0416 5 DULASPRINCS RD.
R2 Stream Enhancement Level II 526 2.5 210.400 WEAVERVILLE,NC 28787
R3 Stream Restoration{E'I} 1,091 1 1,091.000 W3 '. Wetland Rehabilitation '. 0.666 1 5 0.444 FIRM LICENSE NO.P-1480
��IIIIIV1 R4 Stream Enhancenent Level 11 190 3 63.333 W4 Wetland Re-establishment 0234 1 0.234 REVISIONS
4� CA n��i 3-I PLAN AND PROFILE A DRAFT MIT PLAN 2-24-20
♦♦ ' W5 Wetland Enhancement 1 654 2.5 0662
♦ .(`\ R„ I R5 Stream Restoration(PVHVV) 340 1 340.000
\ - W6 Wetland Preservation 0444 10 0044
♦♦ .-•" •• ��j- � B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5-15-20
♦ G • • {� R6 Stream Restoration(F5) 432 1 432.OD0 Total 3.890 2.276
so
♦ FESSIp •. 7 �. 1 MONITORING PLAN C FINAL MIT PLAN 8-12-20
'�O 4, •: R7(upper) Stream Enhancement Level I 625 1.5 416.667 Note f No mitigation credits were calculated outside the conservation easement boundaries
t_ D FINAL MIT PLAN 9-8-20
' SEAL l•' R7(low er) Stream Preservation 412 10 4t200
E IFC PLANS 10-12-20
Total 4,053 3,031.500
L— 5 0 3 4 Note 1''No mitigation credits were calculated outside the conservation easement boundaries F AS-BUILT PLANS 6-14-21
ss '•l ''' • Note 2:Rl and RE credits are calculated based on headwater valley length. G AS-BUILT PLANS(REVISED) 8-13-21
i ';9�/ �O••' • PROJECT NAME
a SU0` ••••• ♦.`� VICINITY MAP
—DocuSig 'y•••..,,,..���,�♦♦ N.T.S. ODELL'S
Mk441 G 1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■ Y■■ ■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■41 )
,,,',`, • ■ ■ LAKKE L HOUSE
`-62C73F441B864C1... 8/16/2021 END CONSTRUCTION R2• BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R3 ■ ■
MITIGATION
../
• STATION 20+78 •
■ 1 2 i J� , OP
___ `P, ,„„.
PROJECT
• L.-\ 2s+oozs+ —1 ■ oY o,-o
• . �� 27+O)— o ■ ° -Le JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
END CONSTRUCTION R1 is a '0 00 1 END CONSTRUCTION R3 ° "EJECT J-
+0026+01 r p r ■ o
■ BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R2 O 0 24+�� / BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R4 2 G o
O +0 r - J LOCATION Y DRAWING INFORMATION
• STATION 14+91 m� 23 =s fir STATION 31+69 ■ 3 �� o
■ ,p1 �t'�j� 1 `'�.. ■ 5P t ���� PROJECT NO. 18-003
002 ♦ — `-T od •
t I Q6, FILENAME ASB 01 ODELLS HOUSE COVER.DWG
•
53 ■ l e
■ 0X ', 11�- ` ti• DESIGNED BY CAT
0
■ �- 00��®�._. ,-" �, Y 4`19, �• ■ o� DRAWN BY AL
■ DNA. ■ _�,; ■ DATE 8-13-21
• 0�,;0 j -^ A ■ -o `o , •■ HORIZ.SCALE 1"=400'
• -- „0 - r--`-Y / ■ ,�`�, END CONSTRUCTION R4 ■ VERT.SCALE NIA
• 1 ' ■ • / STATION 33+60 ■ -
A► i.i /ii oa . ` ■
9 \60 oo ■
END CONSTRUCTION R5 `oo^
■ o�� o°�`Oo •BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R6 ■ APPROXIMATE •PROJECT CENTER ■ NORTH
STATION 14+87 g ■ 35.715894°N,-78.353453°W •
0/ 1 ■ . 200 100 0 200 400
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R1 °° . —Mr-l• END CONSTRUCTION R6 ■
• _ — ♦ GRAPHIC SCALE
STATION 10+08 — r p'.."`".1 ._� BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R7 UPPER
•■ °° \t �"�+p0 ' �°- 0 "G�o STATION 21+11 ■ SHEET NAME
400 10, • ..� ;v„' 78 7• , •■
■ �� ' yw ]L ;± � rq ;Oa0+0py END CONSTRUCTION R7 LOWER
• / STATION 31+48
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R5 ®— cF I
Jt Qo ■
• ° STATION 10+65 `moo -_roo —-�� - ,tom o �`� ■1— °o' COVER•
• •
■ °'31+00 042 I CS, •
i SHEET
■
■ END CONSTRUCTION R7 UPPER ■ a�. '-:..-----;--1', / ■
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R7 LOWER ■ -n - � ■
• STATION 27+36 i ct "� z1
WM ■■■ ••••••••••••••••••••••• ■■ ••I -1U■■■■■■■I SHEET NUMBER
I AS—BUILT 1

DocuSign Envelope ID:2433D266-3AF6-4253-B076-12905B233888
r -,
4 WATER & LAND
SOLUTIONS
7721 Six Forks Rd.,Suite 130
Raleigh,NC 27615
[phone]
Lwaterlandsolutions.com
LEGEND 8/16/2021
PROJECT ENGINEER
•
ROOTWAD �� ��C\ OG/
®..��. <.�.. LOG VANE �7 .6.cFESSIp/1/.... 'mot
I
I-----=I LOG WEIR e SEAL
-\I\ Doc �igy�e • -
�yy mi
LOG STEP-POOL
',
4P6
000oa00 •O pHER P ♦♦
00 00000068 CONSTRUCTED STONE RIFFLE �,1 HE ''.v
00 00�0 0°�0 ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING,PLLC
6 DU LA SPRINGS RD.
W EAVERVILLE,NC 28787
` FIRM LICENSE NO.P-1480
CONSTRUCTED LOG RIFFLE REVISIONS
S3
A DRAFT MIT PLAN 2-24-20
B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5-15-20
C FINAL MIT PLAN 8-12-20
GEOLIFT W/TOEWOOD D FINAL MIT PLAN 9-8-20
E IFC PLANS 10-12-20
F AS-BUILT PLANS 6-14-21
000
O ODoO°oo RIP RAP G AS-BUILT PLANS(REVISED) 8-13-21
PROJECT NAME
• • • • • •• OUTLET CHANNEL ODELL'S
-CE CE CONSERVATION HOUSE
EASEMENT BOUNDARY
-- EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR MITIGATION
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR PROJECT
-LOD LOD- LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
-WLB WLB- EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY
DRAWING INFORMATION
EXISTING WOODLINE
PROJECT NO. 18-003
AS-BUILT TOP OF STREAM BANK FILENAME ASB_O2_ODELLS HOUSE_LEGEND.DWG
DESIGNED BY CAT
EXISTING PROPERTY BOUNDARY
DRAWN BY AL
O O 0 EXISTING FENCE DATE 8-13-21
15+00 HORIZ.SCALE N/A
- -- AS-BUILT CENTERLINE(THALWEG) VERT.SCALE N/A
EXISTING FARM PATH
0 EXISTING TREE
FLOODPLAIN DEPRESSION
WATER QUALITY TREATMENT FEATURE
____
SHEET NAME
—x— AS-BUILT FIELD FENCE
AS-BUILT WETLAND BOUNDARY
LEGEND
SHEET NUMBER
I AS-BUILT 2

DocuSign Envelope ID:2433D266-3AF6-4253-6076-129O5B233888
01
WATER QUALITY \ \ > > > ;(>r' .�1 7 1 —� /�TREATMENT FEATURE \\ �� y>� . , —\�_ WATER & LAND
Ne \1��� \1 It , / > >> > > >iy,? '�- /, 4 EXISTING WETLANDS \
LOG WEIRS INSTALLED TO PROVIDE �\ �, 'i /> >�'' ,> � j`� y — J _ . SOLUTIONS
ADDITIONAL HABITAT AND / Q� ,/ \ \ \ - > > >' {,%� > , >`r, - ainn/// �> a 5� �i a�rn> 9�M
-1' Q �2 3 GRADE CONTROL. 6 > , , '� , �_
O EXISTING PIPE AND �> B0 /,> r, sr,
> W ,
\fit ( , > it J' a 7721 Six Forks Rd.,Suite 130
/ EMBANKMENT R OVED 1� \ k, >l' i
I • I , > > �> \, Raleigh,NC 27615
� .. 73'^-� ,0 ///s/ L DEPREFSION(TYPN \\ ,�Q/ ��\ �, \> >lJ, ,�,> , /' .> �� ' >>�>ll, i�, > > > /� {�> ' , ,> [phone]
C SO- �/ I \ \,. ) REMO D INVASIVE'' {
984- r0� /// / / > // }.�\\\�6:• . I ` SPEC! S VEGETATION >{ �' , �> > �I' >' waterlandsolutlons.com
rn / �) \ / ' • ' �"�N J/` \ SLOPED BANK AT 2:1,SEEDED,777 7 i >
M TTE CLOG RI TES / �.F_\* ,� MULCHED,MATTED AND _— �" l PROJECT ENGINEER
/ f� / a! •.`* .`. 1 LIVE STAKED 40 _ $ 16 20`} /
• i{t +pb \I1111
.;�:o ��J / . . . ----F--'-'- 1 . �- — _ = 1%'�—_ �•AA CAR /I.
N 'I° _ .`. ... ... _ �30'. _`. . X�O-. r �VP1O a tit �,, ��` ,i
1 �� r �� ESSIp''. by
io-
.7 . � 1 i / .`.`. . - fi No•
.� +oo ���1t` � __ - �R2 x " '�Q� L�1�;pl VI( _
BEGIN CONSTRUCTIO�NI R1 f .� 5.���}', -:7.7.
r �l.' c- '6: \ '' ' _� SEAL -
12
STATION 10+08 k 4. ` ' 11 '�.`. ,xO'�" & -�... . T..
u1''"a _ ;.`. . 1. ,- 5 / _ W t �,y ,Gy�.O,L / FLow /I.` .`'�� . ' . i..,, ,J .: ` L� AS-BUILT ^^ �C/r-
N � v D�.7�`J' VFG- ®d'e• FLOW =/}. '. . � . . . 1 `�� TOP OF BANK
s+ - :j.`(. . . . .�'• •. . - J \ \ TYP 5' ,- °j� r I�,1F` 4
•
• II
``\,%ERVICEsevRING,PLLCLOGWIRSINALLEDDE CS RD./�, 0 LOG I�NEIR \ BUILTW > ,NC 28787THALWEG(TYP.) ADDITIONAL HABITAT ANDNo.P-1 480
TLANDS r I fig { �� REVISIONS
�6z (TYPE GRADE CONTROL. I I I 1
\ 1 \ / A DRAFT MIT PLAN 2-24-20
1 / AS-BUILT
�^.CC _ ` f B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5-15-20
CONSERVATION �s� b� 1 FIELD FENCE(TYP.) C FINAL MIT PLAN 8-12-20
EASEMENT (TYP.) \ J �> N/F
a„ � W.ODELL EDWARDS
D FINAL MIT PLAN 9-8-20
IRREVOCABLE TRUST AND E IFC PLANS 10-12-20
PROPOSED CHANNEL ALIGNMENT WAS ADJUSTED DURING MELANIE E.DURHAM Q\ F AS-BUILT PLANS 6-14-21
CONSTRUCTION FROM APPROXIMATE STATION 11+62 TO 12+37 D.B. 03343,PG.0381 0 DUE TO EXISTING SOIL CONDITIONS. LOD P.I.N.:179100-16-8552 G AS-BUILT PLANS(REVISED) 8-13-21 LOn I
_j OD \ PROJECT NAME
280 ODELL'S
1711111111/►/,. •
HOUSE
rDocu ignedby: •
*A ,\N. CARC3!4 MITIGATION
"i • ,,••• ,c °•c--„,io;,% .0
PROJECT
SEAL
`-62C73 441B864C1... ,�L— 5 0 3� r JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
.' /ZOZ1 I. .-3,A. 0; : DRAWING INFORMATION
I�-5 p•. S a'.•.•' $ PROJECT NO. 18-003
/)-'S FILENAME AA03100DELL'SHOUSEPLAN AND PROFILE DWG
''�,,,4I L••G.•� S% DESIGNED BY CAT
270 ///11111\ilk`, 270 DRAWN BY AL
DATE 8-13-21
AS-BUILT HORIZ.SCALE 1"=60'
BANKFIILL VERT.SCALE "=3'
--/\-1L----. -----....--- .k \-, -\
DESIGN
BANKFULL NORTH
AS-BUILT • ` 30 is o 30 so
THALWEG `?
260 \ 260 GRAPHIC SCALE
AS-BUILT WATER
SURFACF
\ SHEET NAME
DESIGN _ R 1 & R2
THALWEG
PLAN AND
PROFILE
250
SHEET NUMBER
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 250
I AS-BUILT 3

DocuSign Envelope ID:2433D266-3AF6-4253-B076-12905B233888
(
CONSERVATION / ` �, �--
�_ •
EASEMENT(TYP.) / l 1� 1
�ri�� j�) QO, O, RANDY L EDWARDS AND WATER & LAND
_ �J.iJ I_ �� QO� WIFE RHONDA B EDWARD
�'�S \ P.ID.N.:10791 0 36-0446 SOLUTIONS
// / X END CONSTRUCTION R2 _ _
/ , EXISTING WETLANDS I BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R3 v h Q�7 7721 Six Forks Rd.,Suite 130
�� y� / I STATION iQ+ - /� \
v ✓/— �5� \— I I — AS-BUILT • J J 1 Q Raleigh,NC 27615
RE1OVE UNVASIVE (7 ��PZn^ X c ^ > / 1 — THALWEG(TYPE �/ O7 (919)614-511 1
• SP DIES VEGETATION S X I N / ✓ ._r 1 / / r — — LWaterlandSOIUtIOnS.COm
r\ -�Z / J �' S2--_, r J TOP OFBANK(IYP.) u
\ J �`— �L� \ I X �- — PROJECT ENGINEER
�\ 51- J �— <u! 8/16/2021 ,, ►►
o.
_ \ // s CAR
a „\-c -a�nA a'mA, /\I.' I', --e �- An / ` �� �' — C�J�R3 a ,�0Q�� �./4/
p R2 T 0I ;� �� —/,� FLOW - ----`0"-- ♦ •
nrn
-� 9�5 S' .>�� d _ f \ FLOW 19+0 � 13+" T —'� - { 7- �.— _ ♦ `� S S�Q ••••�'� ,��
j a ate.-.. / •�� O \ i •: m j"` ,✓` N 714.,.*.m..
+11 = x -24� �_ z ••k SEAL l•• tt
• ol
t per' ' ` W / •0• .., - i �46� DocuSi9ned by
j�' ' Fjt=RMANENT get-VERT CRC'!'S�S/NG I l.._ CI 125 J
_ I LF OF 6"DIA.F11jPE ,� OMITTED CONSTh�trcTED� ✓�-� A.�: . - tk. C�•Y�^�ti-� y�
i +�1 �/ 1$ -f �~ '�� �\ If -250.00' — - O INSTALLED LOG WEIR._ — \ ,A ° ,+F • s• E!v'1( u7;1:ko \'
i� l/� \G RIFFLE AND t p
00
wiTIIT
i �� . INV OUT=4�&68' X I - \ \ \ \1--N;, � � 1 I 0'�.,•• ,��
.e6 ��- 1 30 LF OF 24"DIA.HDPE FLOODPLAIN CULVERT (�- \ �� _ y�\\ , HER••/ t. � ch J� INV IN=250.63 .I X \ \ �'a ��` _ ,��11 tt�,,
� 11`) 1 INV OUT=250.11 \ — �46 �,.y,..l 1111111
/' ,/ 1 \ \ ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
0 _ TOP OF ROAD =254.54' j Q X — — 'sg�� wLs ENGINEERING,PLLC
VP 10 - � �4,y� �� �� WEAVERVILLRINNCS 2B787
NL
�/ A_� D FIRM LICENSE NO.P-1480
�. s459-' / - \ \ L \ \ YS \ `_ \ — REVISIONS
—CONSTRUCTED STONE RIFFLE — \ — �� \ A DRAFT MIT PLAN 2-24-20
•
INSTALLED TO PROVIDE • — / fX/ \ AS-BUILT \ \ \ \ - B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5-15-20
�� ADDITIONAL HABITAT_AND -.--�s0.� l N/F GELD FENCE(TYP.) t0D \ -'��/ W.ODELL EDWARDS \ - C FINAL MIT PLAN 8-12-20
GRADE CONTROL. _ IRREVOCABLE TRUST AND \�.�$
�'" — 1 v f �0ti MELANIE E.DURHAM \ D FINAL MIT PLAN s-8-20
- �/ V �� J 4 C�6 \ ��. E IFC PLANS 10-12-20
-- _ fj / \ O D.B. 03343,PG.0381
- J — 0 P.I.N.:179100-16-8552 \ F AS-BUILT PLANS 6-14-21
— J �/
/ C01 G AS-BUILT PLANS(REVISED) 8-13-21
- J ^ \ \
PROJECT NAME
ODELL'S
260 260
Oil VI 11/4 Qoc4ned by. SO vl CAR 0, * HOUSE
M�W, o� • ....si • iti' MITIGATION
62C73 4418864C1_ : :��� CCA��1 • .1 PROJECT
JU1 r.
• 8 16 2021 i
-::: _.--- . , . —\ / / : - 5 0 3 4 : JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
� Cc: .71
•_ — ,• = \ /� ••gjlj 'I `y1 '� DRAWING INFORMATION
,��•S/••..% Slit` •���, PROJECT NO. 18-003
- AS-BUILT � 'PS6/ • •��V ��� FILENAME ASB_03_10_ODELLSHOUSE PLAN ANDPROFILEA'NG
BANKFULL :SIGN
,44,E%L G.
DESIGNED BY CAT
250 'FULL 250 DRAWN BY AL
^ AS-BUILT WATER
SURFACE I DATE 8-13-21
HORIZ.SCALE
, ` VERT.SCALE
PERMANENTrULVE'�. CROSSING ��- • -
30 LF OF 6"DIA.HDPE _
I IN=250.00' I, �� — 1- . �` `• /
INV*UT=249.08' _ • •
—
30 LF OF 24"DIA.HDPE FLOODPL^IN CULVERT _____,..
I V IN=250.63 AS-BUILT
IN OUT=250.11 THALWEG
TOP OF RIAD =254.54' DE GN NORTH
THAL G
30 15 0 30 60
11
240 240 GRAPHIC SCALE
SHEET NAME
R2 & R3
PLAN AND
PROFILE
SHEET NUMBER
230 230
17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00
4
I AS—BUILT

DocuSign Envelope ID:2433D266-3AF6-4253-B076-12905B233888 r--- 1
rN/F 4�7 \ - _i
�� RANDY L EDWARDS AND r \
WIFE RHONDA B EDWARD —_
_ 6WATER & LAND
D.B. 04838,PG.740 / J ^ _ �- — — �,_ SOLUTIONS
P.LN.:179100-36-0446 O 1 Q7 ��__
\2� CONSER ON \ ~ �� —
N EASEMENY(TYP) �^ /\ , — —
\ AS-BUILT1 — _ 7721 Six Forks Rd.,Suite 130
Mtn ,./ /� AS-BUILT ` \ „ jP OF BANK 4--,
�� _ J _ Raleigh,NC 27615
i // -T-HALLWEG(TYP.) 7 p _ l—_ _ /_� _
1 Cs'
® � / i // / �,` — r (919)614 51 1 1
/ / / / �j / s�trsv - — — ` — �� — waterlandsolutions.com
l O, Q0,( ______74. �'b , S / // O _ — �j ��, --\ -" — `-- __ f� --, — \ PROJECT ENGINEER
4 i/ /�/»I� i -+ / ' oo� \ - ti - 1\ 8/16/20,`�nIn11��
QO1 / /\' / �8� / / ;.�:; ." L \ INSTALLED G&ADE� '�. `h �, ? ��, C qR //.
fr
// / f J 0�8� / — - ^ \ N \ �ONTRO�-HOOK VANE. \� � ,♦♦Q��� O`��'��
u
/ � / /� � J f � fad //�s� — \ \\ t\ • -\ � �� t�� � � .♦ �. oFESSIpy�9
b •
i � l— // � / \ \ _ � \ x — ` — � �~ = '� SEAL l: _
L / \ �\ "'i \ \� - ; DocuSi ned b
/ ti / / /� T'p°` x °ram \ ` �� �� \ \ • -
-____ — __ ---, <4,4 — -) \\ \ \_ ,-4464,:Jr- Z„, •?••fr. \ \ \
1. r - / \ _\ —a3 L \ \ E11 A
/ o \ b \ 111®i►
/ r� � . ✓' �y / /' l AS-BUILT C \ \���� \ \ \ \ \ �� �\ \ y ) ENGINEERING
WLS ENGINEERING PLSCY
/ / Z .��� -, / / 4Z' FIELD FENCE_ —' \ ` \ \ \ \ 1 \ 1 \ 5 DULA SPRINGS RD.
/ - ' TYP, \ �� \ ` �, WEAVERVILLE,NC 28787
2;/ '_, 80 ` _ / / ( ) / Q-�y/%/ \ \ - \ FIRM LICENSE No P-1480
/ � � _.� 7\�_ �3� / —_-:_-_=-- 0 `•ate � l \— \� \ �4� \ <> ` \ \ \ REVISIONS
/ \ F[OA / \' \, �4� \ \ \ ` ` I A DRAFT MIT PLAN 2-24-20
_ \ ✓� �� B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5-15-20
- --` — -247- —_`_ / — — - 1 N/F \
— '248- — — ,�/(� W.ODELL EDWARDS \ C FINAL MIT PLAN 8-12-20
le-Sq.-0-Cl" IRREVOCABLE TRUST AND `"�J END NNSTRUCTION R3 o O D FINAL MIT PLAN 9-8-20
MELANIE E.DURHAM BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R4 I '� E IFC PLANS 10-12-20
f, 1 �� D.B. 03343,PG.0381 \ Si7ITION 31+70 I F AS-BUILT PLANS 6-14-21
(j� — - P.I.N.:179100-16-8552
1 G AS-BUILT PLANS(REVISED) 8-13-21
Op -.;.'' PROJECT NAME
L 1 \ �5:
ODELL'S
260260
DocuSign d by: �%%A�N'CARp�11i HOUSE
♦ MITIGATION
M Ul; x _c♦`�° oF�SSIo,.. PROJECT
-62C73F441B864C1... = SEAL
8/16/2021 L— 5 0 3 4
• JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
9 O�'
'i a•• ` PROJECT DRAWING INFORMATION oO
\A\ FILENAME ASB_03100DELL'SHOBSEPLAN AND PROFILE.D1'WG
'',.;4I L••G. \\ s% DESIGNED BY CAT
250 IliI11 i nt°�� 250 DRAWN BY AL
DATE 8-13-21
HORIZ.SCALE 1"=60'
VERT.SCALE
• DESIGN I
�
-
-„,_ 1 ASMUILI BANKFULL
_, 1 BANKFLLL
/� AS-BUILT NORTH
---__/-/ /- \� WATER —\
t SURFACE 30 15 0 30 60
240 I •`� . 240 GRAPHIC SCALE
1,- , �� . SHEET NAME
A -�/
R3 & R4_1 / --���
THALWEG �� I /� r ill
_
0000„. • _.., . PLAN AND
DESIGN PROFILE
THALWEG
SHEET NUMBER
230 230
24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00 29+00 30+00 31+00
5
AS-BUILT

DocuSign Envelope ID:2433D266-3AF6-4253-6076-129O5B233888
�y) �� N/F
' -7� / ..----------C END CONSTRUCTION R3 VA
RANDY L EDWARDS AND
/ i - BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R4 Q.
j��� f f/"� \ STATION 31+70 '--_—____\:‘
\ , WIFE RHONDA B EDWARD WATER & LAN D
// / '�`` D.B. 04838,PG.740
�/r /^/ �j//l OO _ \ P.I.N.:179100-36-0446 N/F
/ / �3 `�"L(i_ REPLACED CONSTRUCTED LOG SOLUTIONS
`" JAMES THURMAN AND
AS-BUILT RIFFLE WITH STONE RIFFLE. EXISTING WETLANDS MARGARET PAINTER DAVIS
— / J THALWEG(TYP.) -
— D.B. 2154,PG.874 7721 Six Forks Rd.,Suite 130
�_ , _ r- �� v l _--_\. — �' h P.I.N.:179100-25-2288 Raleigh,NC 27615
__ — — (,� N, -� -1.-N.A. \ (919)614-51 11
2 QO v , 1 �7�. ��-i �,— / ^ — ��.- waterlandsolutions.com
_ -- i- / `^`�^ REPLACED CONSTRUCTED LOG
/ '1` _ ` — _\ \\ \\ — �\ RIFFLE WITH STONE RIFFLE.
;,4, �i� �� - \ 0 P ECT ENGINEER
- t \ \ „ .r` A =�51'5-^ \ �_ 90, -,-- \� i — �� 8/16/2,0�,�CA f��'',,
\ N _ END CONSTRUCTION R4 INSTALLED LOG WEIR WITH CONSTRUCTED ♦♦ -\ RQ' ,jam
_ STATION 33+60
_ STONE •RIFFLE TO PROVIDE GRADE CONTROL ♦ Q -
I�Jy ESSI 9
L TOP O AN OO ° AT EXISTING HEADCUT. `� O A�•:• '
i \ INSTA LED GRADE AS PB �� i c -� � 1, } ♦ \ 04 ��
CONTROfI.J-HO-6P.VAN 4 TYP. \ �•.. 2+I I / ► •:•� '�
(TYP.) \ ,� O 1 .
i �� " - - - - ti r � �4� � \ =; �> — / �O = '•� SEAL _ —
_ _ _ _ — �a� \ /� \ \ \ \ \ R4 °�O /. / = : Doc S ed b —
J/ s --� — — — Y ,. FLOW xO/ i<?t .tiA-.d
o
�/. �_, Q� �, ° , � �� ���' �� EXISTING18O' I 0 7®� �.. ♦♦�
f �� �� ti ` � .. a J CP&L POWERLINE EASEMENT '',i Op HER P'�s'♦
/ _� \ , k, `�°-°:I D.BROAP55505 �O JEERING ERV��`
ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
_/ WLS ENGINEERING,PLLC
\ WATER QUALITY / E VER ENGINEERING
TREATMENT FEATURF,IWITH CONSERPATIOf(J�
D.
WEAVERVILLE, -i 28787
1 � FIRM LICENSE NO P-1480
OUTLET ANNEL EASEMENT(TYP.) /( \ REVISIONS
\ '\�L�.Vc �' L � Y � 7�c. - �- \ ///�yj*,,� A DRAFT MIT PLAN 2-24-20
LQv ` \ \ J `� �93� \ J V ✓� B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5-15-20
1 �F0.� N/F C FINAL MIT PLAN 8-12-20
\/ \ �2FZ— �_��
/ ��\ ^ �� W.ODELL EDWARDS D FINAL MIT PLAN 9-8-20
AS-BUILT IRREVOCABLE TRUST AND
FIELD FENCE ' / MELANIE E.DURHAM E IFC PLANS 10-12-20
(TYP.)
D.B. 03343,PG.0381 F AS-BUILT PLANS 6-14-21
P.I.N.:1 791 00-1 6-8552 G AS-BUILT PLANS(REVISED) 8-13-21
PROJECT NAME
ODELL'S
250 250
♦♦.`\N1CAR0 11. HOUSE
• % % MITIGATION
p-Daea'Signedby: f•, -• pFESSIO4•..1 %. PROJECT
SEAL ••
t•14 ram w Z ?•�L- 5 0 3� 7 JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
' —62C73F441 B864C1:. •'9� `'"0:• : DRAWING INFORMATION
8/16/2021 '��"9•'•9 S U ' .• ' $ PROJECT NO. 18-003
\A\ ♦ FILENAME ASB_03_10_ODELL'SHOUSEPLAN AND PROFILE.DWG
''o;,4I L G• VV ♦♦♦ DESIGNED BY CAT
240 'AI1111\O% 240 DRAWN BY AL
DATE 8-13-21
HORIZ.SCALE 1"=60'
VERT.SCALE
DESIGN
AS-BUILT BANKFULL
BANKFULL
AS-BUILT
�� WATER — , I
SURFACE �
NORTH
t
\ 30 15 0 30 60
230 �� 230 GRAPHIC SCALE
AS-BUILT SHEET NAME
THALWEG
DESIGN
THALWEG R3 & R4
PLAN AND
PROFILE
SHEET NUMBER
220 220
31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00
IAS-BUILT 6

DocuSign Envelope ID:2433D266-3AF6-4253-6076-129O5B233888
/ / \ VP 6 �� \ N/F r--- I
/ "".='\ \ /� / �_ l--'� W.ODELL EDWARDS
/�, \ FLOODPLAIN A. 1� rl IRREVOCABLE TRUST AND
'l " �\\ `� r y MELANIE E.DURHAM 416WATER & LAN D
DEPRESSION(TYP.) I 7' /�
PERMANENT CULVERT CROSSING ""•� \ \ 'L 1 XI D.B. 03343,PG.0381
INSTALL 50 F OF ' HDPE _ r P.I.N.:1791OO-16-8552 `���� SOLUTIONS
INV IN=257.60' / J— — \ \� XI
/ � 5�
INV OUT=253.93' 0 '"+ ,mil �// /"` " / — tSSP��
• , , ° , , // / Yg ^ AS-BUILT / 0 �g 7721 Six Forks Rd.,Suite 130
�(� "' [WETLANDS
\ X ? I END CONSTRUCTION R5 / \ Raleigh,NC 27615
_ ""` " T " T " ` \ [phone] REMOVED EXISTING / I I I _ BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R6
PVC PIPE ��/��/ 1 "" ' ^ �" " I \ --' STATION 14+87 — waterlandso utions.com
0 //// / rt I I �'�� PROJECT ENGINEER
il
)6 \............. , ,7 mil/ • ,r4+0, _i .•. _ T - .� ,,����/16/2021
.si R���
f/ / ." " • - tjvii - :+0 = .T AS-BUILT �` �{�•''.
�.---\ .• —.,.,c,.. �, THALWEGTYP. ••� 1.
- .r'r`" 1 . �.•. \ ( ) AS-BUILT — ••� �l•1 —
l �'•I S C/� r.
J) -S ii f \ `•-�` •��" ,^ I,.•..._.. - 16\+D�"��. TOP OF BANK Docu�ig d by
5 T 4 F43'2 < R5 j X, i ,e .� 6
�� Lei 0+3 r)�', 'FLOW �' ""- ` `. �� L1J1 / I I I III $5f . , :� i "�'.C�.1L-��.d. ci
_� , "' "PEA ANEN4'CULVERT CROSSING C� ` "" " •`F, , "'17',1' �i c' 7 4`d• ��4
�� „n,.. 50 LF OF 36"HDPE I ""J .8o-AY3)4 a46
Atli CE —LOG WEIRS INSTALLED TO PROVIDE X I\I `"^ : ""• `' " ♦♦ "..........• •'\
�� ADDITIONAL HABITAT AND �5� INV OUT=246.38' / X� x " R6'T` ' ,._.a.
'' 7+00 .4.,
; ''1,C/0HE R p" .‘�
A \ .\ GRADE CONTROL. 50 LF OF 24"HDPE FLOODPLAIN CULVERT `g�dW'T." ,��Il�ri�®�\��``
�-\ CE INV IN=250.37' r ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
\ / J I ^`. •'. ` "'F*,, `* , ""` •' WLS ENGINEERING,PLLC
LACED
INV OUT=
C ���\ � �S�\R FF NN ?„, WITH STONEC IFFDL SG TOP OF ROAD ELLEV= 254.29 1<7\--CE
I' I ."\ 4" "1- , " ," '`) "^ � wEnvERVILIE�Nc 28787
^ FIRM LICENSE NO.P-1480
jar REVISIONS
a '� A DRAFT MIT PLAN 2-24-20
+ /-����� CONSERVATION 11\ �.�' �'�\-aG2, <e: '`�'T•\'`T "' "" B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5-15-20
`-'L/n I PROPOSED CHANNEL ALIGNMENT Y T ^ ^ ` T " G-3` ^ C FINAL MIT PLAN 8-12-20
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R5 EASEMENT(TYP.)
STATION 10+65 �� WAS RELOCATED FROM . D FINAL MIT PLAN 9-8-20
X APPROXIMATE STATION 16+00 TO- \.// • T`"^". ^�`,"T`"''. •." ^
"1`c� 17+37 TO MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE E IFC PLANS 10-12-20
"`�� TO EXISTING VEGETATION. AS-BUILT PLANS 6-14-21
AS-BUILT �— �OV ��EXISTING WETLANDS \ G AS-BUILT PLANS(REVISED) 8-13-21
FIELD FENCE(TYP.) PROJECT NAME
10d x _II 10,
ODELL'S
270270
������N'CAR����i, HOUSE
—Deeu€ .ned�y: o�• .•• • •/ti♦♦ MITIGATION
?�.oFEssio47...1 s SEAL PROJECT
ROPOSED 50 L=OF 24"HDPE —62C731-441 Be64E1--: L— 5 0 3 4 JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
INV I N=255.00'
INV BUT=253.60' i ' -,
8/16/2021 ♦ •'9j� `'a0. .. DRAWING INFORMATION
'°�.5/'•• S UR'1`�..• i•��" PROJECT NO. 18-003
PERMANENT CULVERT CROSSING ♦♦/s•'•••••.• V� S� FILENAME Ass_03100DELL'SHOUSEPLAN AND PROFILE.DWG
50 NON36"=249224 ♦'',,,��";;;,�%, DESIGNED BY CAT
260 INV OUT=246.38' 260 DRAWN BY AL
50 LF OF 24"HDPE FLOODPLAIN CULVERT DATE 8-13-21
INV IN_25O.37' HORIZ.SCALE 1"=60'
INV OUT=247.31'
VERT.SCALE
TOP OF ROAD ELEV= 254.29'
I
DESIGN
BANKFULL ./
� �! NORTH
�. -
(111k 30 15 0 30 60
_
250 `----- . \---._-- AS-BUILT WATER _
SURFACE 250 GRAPHIC SCALE
IAS-BUILT SHEET NAME
\ ANKFULL� B
vivo R5 & R6
PLAN AND
DESIGN PROFILE
THALWEG AS-BUILT
THALWEG
SHEET NUMBER
240 240
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00
IAS-BUILT 7

DocuSign Envelope ID:2433D266-3AF6-4253-B076-12905B233888
TIED INTO EXISTING FENCE I I I
pot 40� �
AS-BUILT a01 ao1 àWAR &
LAND
FIELD FENCE(TYP.) 01 < EXISTING WETLANDS SOLUTIONS
J Q END CONSTRUCTION R6/"'* ' L , REMOVED SPOIL PILES AND
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R7 UPPER„ •••'•
/ > STATION 21+,gq, ,_s • ` • FILLED EXISTING POND
r / •••' • ••��• LOD L0C 7721 Six Forks Rd.,Suite 130
/ 2, ✓ / *• ' " • ' .•• •vP$•�•.•••••' LOD Raleigh,NC 27615
� •••• • , (919)614-51 1 1
k� r/ `A *AS-B<�ILT* ,T"N''n,*' 21+i�1 !0 •••• •• � .••••,•.•• �•••'•` , UPPER R7 CHANNEL,ALIGNMENT WAS ADJUSTED DURING Lwaterlandsolutions.com
ry )1,y� � • `34• . • , .`` , , CONSTRUCTION FROM APPROXIMATE STATION 21+25 TO
,,\/ -FOP O,F BA'IK, ' "' ,27+00 TO MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING VEGETATION
/ _ / C �''** ,(TY�J • — ' `:\ • `,•r•• ,AND TIE CHANNEL CENTERLINE INTO EXISTING FLOW PATH. PROJECT ENGINEER
/ AS-BUILT / \ 1, 'r � •:r 'A r• • . "�• - - 8/16/ZOLoilI11A►/
....\ �/P 7 /WE )ANDS �•.,.•
' 'Z' �''6, ••*••*•• ' ,(�c., . € ���•�N 1,ARO-4
/ /--)k
,., _ie... .-
/ ` . (•,, ''•
�(*, • C r•r( '�
1.
• • , • REMOVED LOG WEIRS TO �•••, x• • •. ` • ` . • .'��, •. • C �Q q '.
r \ rrr
• • • • • •• 19 00`y J MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE • {\.�. ,,• •T`=,`• 23y.�i�( T• *� ( `• • • • • DocuSig ed by:
/ • / TO EXISTING VEGETATION. ' (, p • � •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••
'05
�•• `'- ••'4�,a��* . r�—r ti. ` f` �• AS-BUILT / / �s �� *` ` ```•` ` i��pHE R••F�vO��
•(• , • w j •> THALWEG(TYP.) �/ `, • `, •`• ` •`,`•`` •`, • 111 ►t-
1k •`` N j -� Q� ' • ` ' • ` <•`,tp _ ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
���� ••, • �.i�ci, �V EXISTING 180' 1� •, • ���� wLS LLC
6DULASPRI ENGINEERING, D
�� (�o►v ,, m `�-6 j \ ^ CP&L POWERLINE EASEMENT '! `�• `�`` `p�• < .. f 6 VERVIL SPRINGS RD.
• fi�` / ` '• • •'•` wEnvERVI E, c 28787
` /�'F»0 4 3 .7..�• < • ` . R. ^ •,`Vt�G,3 � . ^ < ` D.B.1047 PG.505 �•�• • , a, FIRM LICENSE No P-1480
• <
RW-A-7255 1 • ``
` ,,• • < • • • ' • • ,•+-••` , f2 _ �7t+ `` ,s •-•'* r REVISIONS
• •
• ` `� `,F�-Q `�. ys'•"',`�'s'` / ` • • ••'Sfi < < < < • • o, A DRAFT MIT PLAN 2-24-20
�/`� • ` `,`+ i ` `'� G • < •`•`•<`•<````•`•<`•``•f` • ••1 B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5-1520
�. '` •*�< '� ` i N/F < < < • < < < C FINAL MIT PLAN 8-12-20
ar'`s�• ``� •`�<`�```�`�< `` �`' .+ qg/ -REPLACE L G RIFFLE W.ODELL EDWARDS OMITTED CONSTRUCTEO LOG
•
•
• • • •
• •
• • <
•1•^• • <```� D FINAL MIT PLAN 9-8-20
IRREVOCABLE TRUST AND
RIFFLES AND REPLACED WIT•• a,.. �• < < • < • < •`�````` _ WITH STONE IFFLE <
. x <RLQDPLAIJJ• • f ` \LOG WEIRS ALONG UPPER R7-. < E IFC PLANS 10-12-20
• v� CONSERVATION MELANIE E.DURHAM < < < <•<`
• ••,� <CtEP•RESSI,ON(T•fP•)<`` , ''s1 , 'r ,�j TO MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE <• •. • F AS-BUILT PLANS 6-14-21
D.B.• 03343,PG.0381
-• EASEMENT(TYP.) TO EXISTING VEGETATION.
, .
. •
. < • `•-y • •
< < `< < < `< \ P.I.N.:1 791 00-1 6-8552 \ �'� ` ` CC G AS-BUILT PLANS(REVISED) 8-13-21
• • `<< i` : - I'' PROJECT NAME
l ODELL'S
255 255
�o��HIcA::::� HOUSE
DocuSigned by: ♦ .• �. MITIGATION
Mr. Ul; x �•,,�o�OF�SSIp'r-f\ PROJECT
SEAL
-62-D73F}41 B 364C-1.. �_ 5 0 3 4 : JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
8/16/2021 9 O;
• 'j `' '� DRAWING INFORMATION
D€aI�N , 'I V
BANKFULL I /PS'...........
S UR ••��' PROJECT NO. 18-003
ISyq/• .�AAv ���� FILENAME ASB RODELLSHOUSEPLANANDPROFILEA'NG
4�,,II111;. tOS DESIGNED BY CAT
it-
245 • " -- • AS-BUILT WATER 245 DRAWN BY AL
SURFACE DATE 8-13-21
HORIZ.SCALE 1"=60'
VERT.SCALE
NORTH
DESiG 30 15 0 30 60
THALWEG 11
_� •
235 GRAPHIC SCALE
AS-BUILT
CONSERVATION EASEMENT THALWEG SHEET NAME
BFEAK DUE TO POWERLI E—
EASEMENT BE IN
R6 & R7
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
AS
MENT END = PLAN AND
PROFILE
SHEET NUMBER
225 225
17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00
8
I AS-BUILT

DocuSign Envelope ID:2433D266-3AF6-4253-B076-12905B233888
r--- 1
,, r ,,
'`�.lk®^• F.. „
W6-4
' �Ol) —UPPER R7 CHANNEL ALIGNMENT WAS ADJUSTED DURING C
a,i` _ ; p - ^ CONSTRUCTION FROM APPROXIMATE STATION 21+25 TO WATER & LAN D
.'k- ``` `F'•0,„ \ r �O AND�TIEOGHIANNIELC NTERLINEINTOEXISTINGFLOWTPATOHN 32+58 SOLUTIONS
r • r
O 3C END CONSTRUCTION R7 LOWER ,
�' 2q, 1:'il . STATION 31+48 0 7721 Six Forks Rd.,Suite 130
' * ' *1 ` F ' /�' �" ` Raleigh,NC 27615
[phone]
��Qjo►` As au�T lwr
L's �, Y waterlandsolutions.com
: i,,,,,r:r i \.�' ,::i,:: ;'V '' '' Y �+ O ECT ENGINEER
(F` • k LO 7+9oa �,. - - -- 8/16/2��210 nlll/
lit
F . rr
,�♦.�-\\` C AR pzi'/.
—1 B -' e ��• - '/ .���° ''FESSI�. �y i
_ ic
=5 � ? - R7 °� -EG= /'.� J�� '`� = SEAL l••• -
/ ' `' IidlimFL"OW.• T F�`F Do • e���jy
' .
EXISTING WETLANDS t` r""
-( • ` • F F TIED INTO EXISTING FLOW PATH -\ �'�i,�pHER p"��♦
`OD F VYGS` �F NO WORK CONDUCTED IN LOWER R7 CE -41111111°- ,
\k, , * ' ,')' , , F �_ '". PRESERVATION REACH. ENGINEERING SERVICES By
*Cr ,� ' V '��.���r ' .�r' r -� G. Wb DULAISPRINGS RD.
*" • ' ` , * v ''' - ' • CE \ \ WEAVERVILLE.NC 28787
N
- ' * ' ' ' '��� �', ` - - - - '+�' • \ 9 FIRM LICENSE NO.P-1480
APB' �� ' ,' �' , .AS-BUILT' \/�, REVISIONS
\, , ' " + , , ' • 1.Q/E`fL:ANRS`• /iL,[� A DRAFT MIT PLAN 2-24-20
. (-TY F c CONSERVATION `` B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5-15-20
/ �/\\\�79' '* � ,, ,'� '� •� ,r ,' *' '� ,� - A.
C` EASEMENT(TYP.) W.ODELN EDWARDS \s��C` C FINAL MIT PLAN 8-12-20
' , , " + , A. \� D FINAL MIT PLAN 9-8-20
• ' ' •• ' OMITTED CONSTRUCTED LOG Jr IRREVOCABLE TRUST AND
4@ ' • , • MELANIE E.DURHAM � E IFC PLANS 10-12-20
_ ' RIFFLES AND REPLACED WITH ` - . ' - END CONSTRUCTION R7 UPPER D.B. 03343,PG.0381 T F AS-BUILT PLANS 6-14-21
,• ,* _' 'LOG WEIRS ALONG UPPER R7 TO F BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R7 LOWER \O
C STATION 27+36 P.I.N.:179100-16-8552
MINIMI`LE DISTURBANCE G AS-BUILT PLANS(REVISED) 8-13-21
TO,EXISTING,\NGETATION. PROJECT NAME
ODELL'S
,,0111111/111,, HOUSE
—DocuSigned b .♦,n.\ cAR0I�4.! MITIGATION
M, Ul m°<tsslo;/i• PROJECT
• SEAL
`-62C73F441 B864i1... i•�L— 5 0 3 = JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
1.8/16/2021 �i��j/ �'vQ ��k ,� DRAWING INFORMATION
0,17,0%• S UR •i-' •
PROJECT NO. 18-003
//l' \ ♦• FILENAME ASB_03100DELL'SHOUSEPLAN AND PROFILE.D1'WG
'0,,,41 L••C. ♦♦♦ DESIGNED BY CAT
"'AMMO- DRAWN BY AL
DATE 8-13-21
HORIZ.SCALE 1"=60'
VERT.SCALE
AS-BJILT _
BULL AS-BUILTE
• WATER -
-SURFACE DESIGN I
— BANKFULL
_� STING NORTH
_ ROUND
�� ik 30 15 0 30 60
DESIGN — �- GRAPHIC SCALE
THALWEG J — /
AS-BUILT _ i " SHEET NAME
THALWEG
R7
PLAN AND
PROFILE
SHEET NUMBER
24+00 25+00 26+00 27+00 28+00 29+00 30+00 31+00
IAS-BUILT 9

DocuSign Envelope ID:2433D266-3AF6-4253-8076-129O5B233888
r--- 1
CONSERVATION WATER & LAND
. /EASEMENT(TYP)
SOLUTIONS
?\
eo �j /--- 7721 Six Forks Rd.,Suite 130
Raleigh,NC 27615
[phone]
AS-BUILT waterlandsolutions.com
�� WETLANDS
f
I\ (TYP.) ✓
1� PROJECT ENGINEER
�o `�� f END CONSTRUCTION R7 LOWER 3/16/2021
Z_ STATION 31+48 ���11 1 1 1/I
\'• • e ' • `n• �H CARC�'•
FLOW 32. • -SS/ 9 'i
- 3,;L1� 4 SEAL mil,'
J ," / = ` Do ng.q ,:
\ 'r`TT • A $G16F aB N\��♦
C� 1\—EXISTING WETLANDS
• '''i,upHE R p %.`.
N/F ENGI��RI1 1 1 1ER1��S BY
JAMES THURMAN AND
`,'�/ WLS ENGINEERING,PLLC
V MARGARET PAINTER DAVIS 6 DULA SPRINGS RD.
��/ D.B. 2154,PG.874 LICENSE
WEAVERVILLE,NC 28787
P.I.N.:1 7 91 00-25-2288 FIRM LIC NO.P-1480
REVISIONS
`J A DRAFT MIT PLAN 2-24-20
X,
B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5-15-20
N/F�
W.ODELL E0.1/ARDS /\G C FINAL MIT PLAN 8-12-20
IRREVOCABLE TRUST AND �P D FINAL MIT PLAN 9-8-20
MELANIE E.DURHAM /� E IFC PLANS 10-12-20
D.B. 03343,PG.0381 � F AS-BUILT PLANS 6-14-21
P.I.N.:179100-16-8552
G AS-BUILT PLANS(REVISED) 8-13-21
PROJECT NAME
ODELL'S
250 250
�`��`�N'CAR��I, HOUSE
Doc Si8ned by: ��•��p�• 'Essi'' •%9''- MITIGATION
M� Ui' I.
'• ��• �SEA��'�'% PROJECT
L— 5 0 3 4 ' JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
-6 41-B8644C 1...
1. •;gjtj 40: 4 DRAWING INFORMATION
c-7�/J'�(•(•�•..........
S UV' 0.•\\ PROJECT NO. 18-003
8/16/2021 I "iJ� • • •••�VCD FILENAME ASS03_10_ODELL'SHOOSEPLAN SD PROFILE.DWG
''‘i/qI L••G• VV %* DESIGNED BY CAT
240 �'AII111\���`, 240 DRAWN BY AL
DATE 8-13-21
HORIZ.SCALE 1"=60'
VERT.SCALE
NORTH
30 15 0 30 60
EXISTING
230 GROUN 230 GRAPHIC SCALE
_ _____ /
SHEET NAME
R7
PLAN AND
PROFILE
SHEET NUMBER
220 220
31+00 32+00 33+00 34+00 35+00 36+00 37+00 38+00
IAS-BUILT 10

DocuSign Envelope ID:2433D266-3AF6-4253-B076-12905B233888
z o
IYsJ o / _ :::EcIRAR&0711ND AND
/ 9/ i Ito _ \ LUTINS
` I / N/F I 7721s Rd.,Sui 130
-7
/ / RANDY L EDWARDS AND ,NC 276o;f 1% G_11/ // WIFE RHONDA B EDWARD I 614-5111
"SS �� ,, ❑.B. 04838,PG.740
I wasolutions. omII / 1`` • P.LN.:179100-37-1067 / I
0p�` I\l1 /r \\` 1 - \ / /Lop aoi J,l\ I 1 : `,: `)' 16 2T ENGINEE`\Lob00_ / I1G Z ?.�o::. l / / / �m,—...______------.... \ 1 ,\ ,, i. • y,•6)...„_..:...•• /
.,�� Oj2 END CONSTRUCTION R1 / ,��O ,.•_'••••., /1/#•j,
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION RI ; P ♦\ •
\\ STATION 10+08 °. BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R2 / i
\ ••• SSI�,•1�•• 9�\ j, r .\ �, STATION 14+91 • .�c 'Y�.•Q <00 O° `oa \\\\`2' ._.... ; .s:r`::r::: 1 / : SEAL •'_
\,\ 1f:::::.i.ilii....1.k:.. .....,'::!.:.........1:/.i.i.,
r ' 4. ��... - DocuSigne rz
:
/
', / - 'Vt.LA.a, /o-n,,a,; :
tr \\ , / '! \FA r+ , S''• co
/ — _ j o o � ' I,
/Lt. / , 00 \ " \ -- —'• / ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
WLS ENGINEERING,PLLC
787
Z. / \ y b DULA SPRINGS RD.
WEA00 °O \�n 'b \\ >, / FIRM LAIC NISEENO.P-81480
O
\ e . -`.. . \ \ / N/F REVISIONS
o \ RANDY L EDWARDS AND A DRAFT MIT PLAN 2-24-20
O ° \\ `l\•) " \� ' WIFE P,HONDA B EDWARD I B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5-15-20
O o\\.
/ , l / D.B. 04838 PG 740
.o\, �.' P.LN.:179100-36-0446 I
L A C FINAL MIT PLAN 8-12-20
/ 0O 0\N • �\ i `'\ ID FINAL MIT PLAN 9-8-20
/ o^ / �1 \ V ��� �. } \, \ / E IFC PLANS 10-12-20
N/F O7. \\ (\� \ '� \ i �\ / F AS-BUILT PLANS 6-14-21
W.ODELL EDWARDS ^� \�A� i1 �I. .�"�
/ IRREVOCABLE TRUST AND p0 \\ l +SSL'_ ,'•.� IG AS-BUILT PLANS(REVISED) 8-13-21JECT NAME
MELANIE E.DURHAMAA A� \\ �"k-,, v�S \ \ .l �l� \\\ • ./
&\.:-\\\\ 1r , -41:..
/I/
D.B. 03343,PG.0381 ao� \ + \,.
HOUSE
P.LN.:179100-16-8552 S \\\ \� �� : \ �' _
o � I I \x
I ; \\ /I • • COUNTY,
/ 00 —LOG \I I `r \ /
/
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R5 LOD I N •' •' •
/ / M STATION 10+65 Lop —LOD— '6 + / •.• •
/
//------
/
/ '• • •••':N,
t/ Q ''' ,.::::::: CAT
- \��x END CONSTRUCTION R2 DRAWNAL
• \*. OO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R3/ DATE 8-13-21
DESIGNED BY
r1 M\ �`', ) HORIZ.SCALE 1"=150'
.� A�\ I o STATION 20+78 /
00 ie N \vy, '...::' :.''
72_
`\�`�^j ^d t1 VERT.SCALE N/A
�\ N/F \ I
�F �\ ���::::1\ W.ODELL EDWARDS I1 o
''� VAAA\ IRREVOCABLE TRUST AND ��
/ o l a.\: •.a \�
N �� *y / MELANIE E.DURHAM oT
I IO
r y�1� a D.B. 03343,PG.0381 II, + W I /
I ig, w `
" P.I.N.:179100-16-8552
\‘',,\,'
�x.rTy;•`—•.f.`•.�:'" 00 io / NORTH
77 w /// 75 37.5 0 75 150
/II
2 �� GRAPHIC SCALE
1 Q ^ ✓ �J \\ SHEET NAME
•' /
0 1 1
Lai — / )) A
� -\-'�LOD \',/,I 1111i
I`x_X-X-xX_X -1: `'x � o \.-�° �yg
MONITORING
::: v ,I �. , 1\ v vv ,& h y , PLAN
\ 1 END CONSTRUCTION RS A N. ' \1
,•'i•,J�i::';!:'t•; BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R6 1 ..\ �� �� �2/,
o p•:;:: T STATION 14+87 ) \
:•;'�.,©• IQ 1 /CC'-1 /j.) �~l f SHEET NUMBER
'j!\ '. )I//// j ` �Ili"
{/MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 12 ' 7/L / . . , �„ I I I11
Tri : ..� /J ; / 7i",%- I AS-BUILT

DocuSign Envelope ID:2433D266-3AF6-4253-8076-129O5B233888
r 1
fq,9 .. ,
,_ _
_ _ _ . _ _ _ _
MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET 11T f-' .::: ::si I : or i'
(f 7, .0 WATER & LAND
I N/F o� 1 / ( SOLUTIONS
C_..r. •r W.ODELL EDWARDS /_/ I g/ II/lo i
IRREVOCABLE TRUST AND —7 / k+'1 / 1N/F
• MELANIE E.DURHAM : ' / YL/2'r ///c°N' il
/ RANDY L EDWARDS AND: D.B. 03343,PG.0381 LL / 7721 Six Forks Rd.,Suite 130
W.. ' P.I.N.:179100-16-8552 / 7 /,i i / WIFE RHONDA B EDWARD
W'; / /' 1 D.B. 04838,PG.740 Raleigh,NC 27615
J:1 t / /7 /1 / P.LN.:1791OO-3G-O44G
I (919)614-51 11
'oo°/�1I fU waterlandsolutions.com
rr
T-------
"-/�, : li';:,.' )t ki ,1 ' '1 / PROJECT ENGINEER
frrii :',: 1 // / s/16/2021
;••E �,:�;;r `� END CONSTRUCTIONR6 �; "41 ,���������/////
7 r )1\\,. \ BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R7 UPPER
EXISTING 180' _• STATION 21+11 31}p0 / / �. p��� ARC.%.y'..,
CP&L POWERLINE EASEMENT �'1 L � ) 5 / / ,O/ ? / �� �SS1 '9 ��
D.B.1047 PG.505 • \ / )` A �/ �.•���� ��� .� ��
RW-A-7255 i �' o
+ � ) \ . 32±0 o END CONSTRUCTION R3 = SEAL
N \\„L o ` /r \o / BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R4 DocuSi ned by:
` I, \c F �O� _ / STATION 31+69 / •
(.61_,,,,..4.369,...1J/...„...4-•
Nil
�.,r� /
/ =- csUAA /I•� 3 RANDY L EDVX/ARDS AND � :,,;r�:� C,N
I '0 ✓ M P, .� 1'-'••N ® i / WID.BFE RHO48 •$PG.EDWARD O �'•.�pHE R P;�s‘�
/ P.I.N.:179 00-36-0446
,i,Q `.' : g :�- ENGINEERING SERVICES BY
+Q0 ;•;',', --. WLS NEERING PLLC
6 DU AI SPRINGS RD.
// -/ WEAVERVILLE.NC 28787
\ •••Y` � •''• FIRM LICENSE NO.P-1480
;: O
r 44",•.. . / REVISIONS
\ A DRAFT MIT PLAN 2-24-20
: : : :•:•' O / B FINAL DRAFT MIT PLAN 5-15-20
:iio ..,i;'(;':'::: ::: :: END CONSTRUCTION R4 /
••:: WG,4:::',. I / C FINAL MIT PLAN 8-12-20
STATION 33+60
O::•�:;•:'+.' Li_ D FINAL MIT PLAN 9-8-20
'r��` e to
- E IFC PLANS 10-12-20
7•:. - - -_________ j- F AS-BUILT PLANS 6-14-21
O
O �/ — / G AS-BUILT PLANS(REVISED) 8-13-21
_ PROJECT NAME
/ ODELL S
HOUSE
,r4 0 /i/
MITI ATI N
G O END CONSTRUCTION R7 UPPER::::•:
•'i:•�ai;,: 'rf,:.,'�h;;;;:::r:"•1 o� BEGIN CONSTRUCTION R7 LOWER ' PROJECT
STATION 27+36 /
�y" '.J; •.. JOHNSTON COUNTY, NC
• / DRAWING INFORMATION
/ PROJECT NO. 18-003
•� •• FILENAME SB 11_1P_OOELL'S HOUSE IlONITORINGPLrS.0'i!G
DESIGNED BY CAT
/
DRAWN BY AL
:\"';j :•"�:: \ 0 / DATE 8-13-21
1'{/;i,:•'.'•/ `ice N/F / HORIZ.SCALE 1"=150'
:. JAMES THURMAN AND
MARGARET PAINTER DAVIS VERT.SCALE N/A
/ 'i END CONSTRUCTION R7 LOWER D.B. 2154,PG.874 /
1 I ...1 STATION 31+48 P.LN.:179100-25-2288 /
1 .1
!;•::!\':.O ``��_ NORTH
-' „� ( ,'; -. \ --, 75 37.5 0 75 150
�'i..'::, ..,
( J GRAPHIC SCALE
y } SHEET NAME
\..27,7 4'
~° MONITORING
PLAN
SHEET NUMBER
I AS-BUILT 12

Table 1.Odell's House Mitigation Site,DWR#2018-0200v1,Project Credits
Neuse 03020201-Outside Falls Lake Project Area
19.16394 N Credit Conversion Ratio(ft'/pound)
N/A P Credit Conversion Ratio(ft'/pound)
Subject? Total Convertible Convertible Delivered Delivered
(enter NO if Min-Max Buffer (Creditable) Initial Credit Final Cred'K Riparian Buffer
Credit Type Location Feature Type Mitigation Activity Feature Name Total Area(k�) %FuII Credit to Riparian to Nutrient Nutrient Nutrient
ephemeral or Width(k) Area of Buffer Ratio(x:1) Ratio(x:1) Credits
ditch') Mitigation(kz) Buffer? Offset? Offset:N(lbs) Offset:P(Ibs)
Buffer Rural yes Coastal Restoration 0-100 R1 36,185 36,185 1 100% 1.00000 N/A 36,185.000 No - -
Headwater
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Enhancement via 0-100 R2(right bank) 36,352 36,352 2 100% 2.00000 N/A 18,176.000 No -Cattle Exclusion
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Enhancement 0-100 R2(left bank) 54,325 54,325 2 100% 2.00000 N/A 27,162.500 No - -
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Restoration 0-100 R3 126,221 126,221 1 100% 1.00000 N/A 126,221.000 yes 6,586.386 -
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Enha ncement via 0-100 R4(right bank) 10,360 10,360 2 100% 2.00000 N/A 5,180.000 No - -
Cattle Exclusion
Buffer Rural Yes Coastal Restoration 0-100 R5 28,116 28,116 1 100% 1.00000 N/A 28,116.000 No - -
Headwater
Buffer Rural yes Coastal Restoration 101-200 R5 8,493 8,493 1 33% 3.03030 N/A 2,802.693 No - -
Headwater
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Restoration 0-100 R6 31,084 31,084 1 100% 1.00000 N/A 31,084.000 yes 1,622.014 -
Buffer Rural yes I/P Restoration 101-200 R3 6,320 6,320 1 33% 3.03030 N/A 2,085.602 Yes 329.779 -
Buffer Rural yes Coastal Restoration 101-200 R1 10,456 10,456 1 33% 3.03030 N/A 3,450.483 No - -
Headwater
Buffer Rural yes I/P Restoration 101-200 R7 upper 1,922 1,922 1 33% 3.03030 N/A 634.261 yes 100.283 -
Totals: 349,835 349,835
Enter Preservation Credits Below Eligible for Preservation(ftc): 116,612
Total
Min-Max Buffer (Creditable) Initial Credit Final Credit Riparian
Credit Type Location Subject? Feature Type Mitigation Activity Width(k) Feature Name Total Are'(' Area for Buffer Ratio(x:1) %Full Credit Ratio(x:1) Buffer Credits
Mitigation(k')
Rural yes I/P 0-100 R3(I eft bank) 60,900 60,900 10 100% 10.00000 6,090.000
Rural yes I/P 0-100 R7 lower 42,323 42,323 10 100% 10.00000 4,232.300
Buffer Preservation -
Preservation Area Subtotal(ft'): 103,222
Preservation as%Total Area of Buffer Mitigation: 22.1% TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION(TABM)
Ephemeral Reaches as%Total Area of Buffer Mitigation: 0.0% Mitigation Totals Square Feet Credits
Restoration: 248,798 230,579.039
Enhancement: 101,037 50,518.500
Preservation: 103,222 10,322.300
Total Riparian Buffer: 453,057 291,419.839
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals Square Feet Credits
Nutrient Nitrogen: 0 0.000
1.The Randleman Lake buffer rules al low some ditches to be classified as subject according to 15A NCAC 02B.0250(5)(a). Offset: shosphorus: 0.000
last updated 11/22/2019
4 4

Conservation Easement r �'.
- — Top of Bank µ "." "r
Stream t,Y,` r .n ,
-- Headwater Valley +}�;' //i
Wetland �a' +a �b ` it-- ., // s
• 4 air*,�, . , r _ .' If
Buffer Mitigation • a��.,i ,, - ' ' �° * 4, 1
'!' 1'1 � *l T � `G , t it Headwater,Channel,Ends
I Restoration 0-100ft 'j ' ,4 . {F
L Im
Restoration 101-200ft �' t►fitt c� i
- Enhancement 0-100ft ` ` , , � F
s a 35.71854, -78.35143 i krr- y°
- Enhancement (cattle exclusion) 0-100ft #; _ �, _ 4°1
Preservation 0-100ft t
404/401 Fixed Veg PlotIt. •� R2ni
Culvert ;
as Headwater Channel Ends ��
#,.,w,
- .
t ; . °>'
Z. it
' � s _
-. 'y � 4
0 ...4:..5.,,',..\;):,,,-„-,-:•.'t,If.:e, , ' .it' '- '; - ''' ''''''' N 44° , 1
ast;
""p, °" \. tar M''k- ,* i �`
'
ilt
�� 3 lI
R7 BPPer i/
/ /�/
'(
I
i
t 5 ,
— j
L. R7 Lower _i
_
A .. . , . ,
•* .Yh �# ate'.
0
@IA � Board
250 °o
4
1NAT E R & LAN DM Odells House Nutrient Offset DWR Project Number: DWR-2018-0200 Current Conditions Plan View FIGURE
and Riparian Buffer Project June 2021 Monitoring Year 0
SOLUTIONS Mirrgartonserv;ces Johnston County, North Carolina MY0 NAD 1983 2011 State Plane 3
CNN'I R 0 HNC kl,..*UM ITV
North Carolina FIPS 3200 FT US