20210915 Ver 1_401 Application_20210809

DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form
ID#*
Regional Office *
Reviewer List*
20210915
Version *
Winston-Salem Regional Office - [phone]
Sue Homewood
Pre -Filing Meeting Request submitted 5/7/2021
Contact Name * Jennifer L Robertson
Contact Email Address* [e-mail]
Project Name * Reedy Fork
Project Owner* The Silverman Group
Project County* Guilford
o()aicqt
Owner Address: Street Address
195 Morristown Road
Address Line 2
City State / Province / Region
Basking Ridge New Jersey
Fbstal / Zip Code Country
07920 United States
Is this a transportation project?* r Yes r No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
r 401 Water Quality Certification - I— 401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular Express
R Individual Permit r Modification
r Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
r Yes r No
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Sue Homewood
Please give a brief project description below and include location information.*
The project involves construction of two industrial / warehouse
buildings. Infrastructure also includes sewer improvements, employee
parking lots, trailer parking lots, access roads, and SCM's.
vie id -
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:

• This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
• I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
• I also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature
Submittal Date 5/7/2021

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 201 - 201902059
BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM I I
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Reedy Fork Industrial
2. Work Type: Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government I J Commercial ri
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
Construction of two industrial logistics warehouse building, parking, utilities, and storm water
treatment.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: SL Reedy Fork LLC / Mr. Dan Lacz
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: Atlas Environmental, Jennifer Robertson
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form B1b]:
5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
36.186459° /-79.705720°
8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]: 7888-979-239 and 7898-066-252
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Guilford
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Browns Summit
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: Reedy Fork, WS-V, Index #: 16-11-9
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c]: Haw, 03030002
Authorization:
Regulatory Action Type:
Section 10 n Section 404 n Section 10 & 404
Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit # 39
❑ Regional General Permit #
❑ Jurisdictional Determination Request
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
0 Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

�S'441111114IRONMENTAL
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Mr. David Bailey
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
July 26, 2021
NC Division of Water Resources
401 and Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Mr. Paul Wojoski
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Re: Reedy Fork Industrial - +/- 158.5 acres
5955 Summit Avenue Browns Summit, NC 27214
Nationwide Permit 39 Application
Corps Action ID: 2019-02059 / DWR Project #: 20210915
David and Paul:
Atlas Environmental is submitting the enclosed package on behalf of SL Reedy Fork LLC, Mr.
Dan Lacz, for approval of a Nationwide Permit 39 application. There are ten (10) streams
including two ephemeral streams, twenty-five (25) wetlands, and one (1) open water. There is
7,115 linear feet of stream (CH 100, CH 200, CH 300, CH 400, CH 500, CH 600, CH 700, CH
800, CH 900, and CH 1000) on site. There is 1.466 acres of wetlands (WL 1000, WL 1100, WL
1200, WL 2000, WL 2100, WL 3000, WL 3100, WL 3200, WL 3300, WL 3400, WL 3500, WL
3600, WL 4000, WL 4100, WL 4200, WL 4300, WL 4400, WL 4500, WL 5000, WL 6000, WL
7000, WL 8000, WL 9000, WL 9100, and WL 10000) within the project boundary. Lastly there is
0.609 acre of open water (Pond 2) on site.
The enclosed permit application request is for 488 linear feet of stream (368 linear feet of
permanent impact and 120 linear feet of temporary impact) impacts and 0.193 acre of wetland
impacts in order to facilitate construction of an industrial distribution / warehouse logistics center
(two buildings), truck courts, employee parking, road access around the building, a sewer line,
and three storm water SCM's. Permanent impacts to perennial stream CH 100 of 322 linear
feet and intermittent stream CH 700 of 46 linear feet are requested. Temporary impacts to
perennial streams CH 400, CH 500, CH 600, and CH 900 of 30 linear feet each (120 linear feet
total) are requested for construction of a sanitary sewer line. Wetland impacts to WL 1100, WL
1200, WL 1300, WL 5000, and WL 7000 are requested totaling 0.193 acre. This area is very
attractive for industrial development due to the existing development already present in the
vicinity as well as its close proximity to highways and interstates. The project is visible from
Highway 29 and in very close proximity to Interstates 40, 85, and 785.
All streams on site are unnamed tributaries to Reedy Creek which is classified as a "WS-V,
NSW" water by the North Carolina Division of Water Resources. The Corps issued a
preliminary jurisdictional determination on June 2, 2020. The largest and highest quality
streams have been avoided. The largest and highest quality wetlands have been avoided. No
impacts to open waters are proposed.
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road #411
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (m)
www.atlasenvi.com / Offices in Asheville and Charlotte

VIRONMENTAL
The planned industrial distribution / warehouse buildings logistics park is being constructed with
features and flexibility to attract a wide array of tenants that are interested in occupying this
product type in this location. The buildings will have specific design features to meet the
demand expectations of tenants interested in this location and ultimately attract high quality
tenants that will lease the space over the long term. A variety of businesses across multiple
industries will be able to utilize this development in this location depending on their warehouse
space needs. Business activities among these tenants may include freight forwarding, third
party logistics, food/beverage distribution, light assembly / manufacturing, wholesalers,
etc. Businesses that benefit from logistical efficiencies associated with proximity to population
centers, intermodal hubs, and interstate highways will be especially interested in this
development due to its location to the Greensboro urban core, Interstates 40, 85 and 785, and
Piedmont Triad International Airport.
The proposed industrial use of the property is consistent with the City of Greensboro's adopted
land use plan. Users of such buildings often require anywhere from 100,000 square feet to 2.5
million square feet. While the property's location has certain logistical advantages for industrial
warehouse users, these tenants will require competitive market rents to operate out of these
proposed facilities. Rental rates are directly related to the cost of the land and improvements,
much of which is fixed regardless of the size of the building being developed. These fixed
costs, which this development also will incur, include the land itself, utility infrastructure
improvements, offsite roadway improvements, legal and financing costs, marketing, construction
costs, etc. As these fixed costs are spread over a smaller building, the required rental rates
increase to the point that they are above -market, thus making the investment financially
unfeasible. Furthermore, as building sizes decrease, economies of scale for the physical
improvements are lost. Factoring in the economies of scale, the entire development costs
increase by 30%-35%, driving market rents higher than tenants are willing to pay and making
the development financially unviable.
Wetland mitigation is provided at a 2:1 ratio through KCI's Haw River Arm mitigation bank.
Enclosed is a copy of the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) Section 7 comment letter.
Section 7 consultation with the Service has been satisfied. Enclosed is a copy of the NC
Historic Preservation Office (HPO) Section 106 comment letter. The HPO office had no
comment related to project impacts. Section 106 consultation with the Service has been
satisfied.
Enclosed are the necessary permit application documents and additional information. Thank
you for your attention to the enclosed request. Please contact me if you need any additional
information.
Best regards,
geg+
Jennifer L Robertson
[e-mail]
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road #411
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (m)
www.atlasenvi.com / Offices in Asheville and Charlotte

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
10 Permit
Section 404 Permit • Section
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
01 Yes • No
ld. Type(s) of approval sought from
the DWQ (check
— Regular
— Express
all that apply):
General Permit
►1 401 Water Quality Certification
• Non-404 Jurisdictional
• 401 Water Quality Certification
• Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
IN Yes /1 No
■ Yes
/1 No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance
or in -lieu fee program.
program proposed for
letter from mitigation bank
/1 Yes
• No
lg. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
• Yes
// No
lh. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
• Yes
0 No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Reedy Fork
2b. County:
Guilford
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Browns Summit
2d. Subdivision name:
not a subdivision
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
not a DOT project
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
SL Reedy Fork LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
see the attached parcel reports, SL Reedy Fork LLC recently closed
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mr. Dan Lacz
3d. Street address:
195 Morristown Road
3e. City, state, zip:
Basking Ridge, NJ 07920
3f. Telephone no.:
973-765-0100 x 4063
3g. Fax no.:
n/a
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
• Agent IN Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Jennifer L Robertson
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Atlas Environmental, Inc.
5c. Street address:
338 S. Sharon Amity Road #411
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28211
5e. Telephone no.:
704-512-1206
5f. Fax no.:
no fax
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
la. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
7888-979-239 and 7898-066-252
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.186459° Longitude: - 79.705720°
lc. Property size:
158.5 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Reedy Fork
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-V, NSW
2c. River basin:
Haw, 03030002
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application: a single family residence, an equestrian area, and a large cattle farm
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 1.466 acres wetlands and 0.609 acre open water
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 7,115
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose is to develop an industrial distribution/warehouse logistics
center that consists of two buildings that provides features and flexibility to attract a tenant(s). One tenant is already in
place and several other potential tenant(s) are showing strong interest.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project involves development of the
parcels into two industrial warehouses with associated infrastructure including trailer parking, employee parking, truck
courts, access roads, and three storm water SCM's. Typical construction equipment will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
iI Yes ■ No ■ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
�� Preliminary • Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company: ECS Southeast, LLP
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
6/2/2020
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
■Yes 0 No ■Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
• Yes ►4 No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which
►/
sections were
Wetlands
completed
►1
below for your project
Streams - tributaries
(check
•
all that apply):
Buffers •
Open Waters
•
Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
(if known)
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404, 10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Seep
No
Corps
0.013
W2 P
Fill
Seep
Yes
Corps
0.017
W3 P
Fill
Seep
No
Corps
0.009
W4 P
Fill
Seep
Yes
Corps
0.046
W5 P
Fill
Seep
Yes
Corps
0.108
W6 -
Choose one
Seep
Yes/No
-
2g. Total wetland impacts:
0.193
2h. Comments: The wetlands are medium quality. The site has historically been a cattle farm. The wetlands have been
previously impacted by the land uses.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial
(PER) or
intermittent
(INT)?
3e.
Type of jurisdiction
(Corps - 404, 10
DWQ — non-404,
other)
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
CH 100
PER
Corps
2
36
S2 P
Culvert
CH 100
PER
Corps
5
26
S3 P
Culvert
CH 100
PER
Corps
2.3
260
S4 P
Culvert
CH 700
INT
Corps
1
46
S5 T
Other (Type In)
CH 400
PER
Corps
3
30
S6 T
Other (Type In)
CH 500
PER
Corps
4
30
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts:
368'
permanent
(0.02 ac)
and 120'
temporary
3i. Comments: S7 T Other (Temporary Trench) CH 600 PER Corps 4' 30' and S8 T Other (Temporary Trench) CH 900 PER
Corps 3' 30', CH 100 where the majority of the impacts are necessary for site access is a stream that was relocated during
road construction, impact S3 is in the side ditch of an existing road
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water
impacts:
4g. Comments: no pond impacts are proposed
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f.
Total:
5g. Comments: no pond contruction proposed
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
■ Yes
•
No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.Project is in which protected basin?
•
Neuse •
Tar -Pamlico
• Catawba •
Randleman
■ Other:
6b.
Buffer impact
number -
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total buffer impacts:
6i. Comments: there are no state regulated stream buffers on site
Page 5 of 10
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
6,747 linear feet of streams will be avoided, impacts are necessary to 5% of the streams on site mostly in order to access the
site, 1.273 acres of wetlands will be avoided, impacts are necessary to 13% of the wetlands on site, the steepest side slopes
allowed to obtain local approval has been used to avoid any additional stream or wetland impacts, no open water impacts will
occur
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
numerous steep graded slopes are being used to avoid additioanl stream and wetland impacts, additional trailer parking was
desired but eliminated to avoid impacts
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
11 Yes • No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
• DWQ ►5 Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
fee program
Mitigation
// Mitigation bank
• Payment to in -lieu
• Permittee Responsible
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: KCI (Haw River Arm)
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity 0.39
Quantity none
Quantity none
3c. Comments: none
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
• Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
none linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
none square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
none acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
none acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
none acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
not applicable
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
• Yes ►1 No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
none
none
3 (2 for Catawba)
none
Zone 2
none
none
1.5
none
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
none
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
not applicable
6h. Comments: no comments
Page 7 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
• Yes ►1 No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
■ Yes ■ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
>24% %
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
L Yes ■ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Three large SCM's (water quality ponds) will be constructed. The plan is being approved locally. Storm runoff from the
buildings and impervious surfaces will be directed to the SCM. The wet ponds will be constructed with forebays and
littoral shelves.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Greensboro
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Greensboro
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
/1 Phase II
: NSW
■ USMP
• Water Supply Watershed
• Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
• Yes ►1 No
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
■ Coastal counties
• HQW
• ORW
• Session Law 2006-246
■ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
• Yes /1 No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
0 Yes ■ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
►1 Yes ■ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land?
• Yes ►Z4 No
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
■ Yes • No
lc. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Comments:
■ Yes • No
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
• Yes /1 No
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
• Yes ►1 No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
• Yes ►1 No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
sanitary sewer
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat?
• Yes
No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS conceming Endangered Species Act
impacts?
Yes
■ No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NCDENR Natural Heritage Program Map Viewer and GIS Layer; see enclosed FWS comment letter
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
• Yes
0 No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
https://www.fisheries. noaa.gov/resource/map/essential-fish-habitat-mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
• Yes ►1
No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC HPO comment letter enclosed
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
• Yes 11 No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA floodmaps GIS layer, there is a FEMA floodplain
located on a portion of the project site however no development will occur in this area
Jennifer L Robertson
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
to+o� JR7/14/2021
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
is provided.)
Date
letter from the applicant
Page 10 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
Attn: Mr. Scott McLendon, Chief, Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
-and-
NC Division of Water Resources, Water Quality Program
Wetlands, Buffers, Streams — Compliance and Permitting Unit
Attn: Mr. Paul Wojosla, Supervisor
1617 Mall Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
1, the current landowner, lessee, contract holder to purchase, right to purchase holder, or easement
holder of the property/properties identified below, hereby authorize Atlas Environmental Inc to act on my
behalf as my agent during the processing of permits to impact Wetlands and Waters of the US that are
regulated by the Clean Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors Act. Federal and State agents are
authorized to be on said property when accompanied by Atlas Environmental Inc staff for the purpose of
conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the US subject to
Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899 and Waters of the State induding 404 Wetlands, Isolated Wetlands, and other non-404
Wetlands subject to a permitting program administered by the State of North Carolina. Atlas
Environmental Inc is authorized to provide supplemental information needed for delineation approval
and/or permit processing at the request of the Corps or NC DWR Water Quality Program.
Project Name:
Property Owner of Record:
Contact Name:
Address:
Address:
Phone/Fax Number:
Email Address:
Project Address:
Project Address:
Tax PIN:
Signature:
Date:
sc, Rtf, Fk
56 RtaA, Fwb /LG
bank L t t z--
17.5 Inam3ft/um Acid
&46l)2y Aidp_ iW d ?-MO
175 -7c5- 0/0o x VOg
da44 Lai Q sl tbtemit 44 reap.
1 , 4-
5-5 5,A
f J _ CCIVAd12 A6-
A TLASEnvironmental Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, North Carolina 28211
704-512-1206 (o) / 828-712-9205 (m)
[e-mail]
www.atlasenvl.cont

3/16/2021 Property Report
Guilford County, NC - Property Report Convert to PDF 3/16/2021
Parcel ID Property Address Legal Description
84335 5955 Summit Ave 215.05AC TRACT 1&2
Mobile
Maps
Owner Name
REEDY FORK ASSOCIATES LLC
Owner Information
Mailing Address
PO BOX 49579
City, State Zip
GREENSBORO, NC 27419
Parcel Information
PIN Zoning Use
7888979239- CU-PDM-Planned Development, Mixed- DEVELOPMT
000 Use RESTRICTED
Tax District
0
Parcel Size Appraisal Nbrhood Plat/Condo Bk & Pg
208.34 7898B03 N/A
Recent Sales
Book & Page Sale Date Sale Price Qualified? Improved?
00500101195 4/15/2000 $2,790,000 Yes Yes
Appraisal Values
Land Buildings Extra Features Total Value
$622,900 $0 $0 $622,900
Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document
and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification.
Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document
and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification.
gis.guilfordcountync.gov/PropertyCardjs/Default.aspx?pin=84335&map I mage=_ags_f18982ee5fd 14c9fa 1 e554b2cf86b3b5.j pg&isTinyScreen=false&is... 1/1

5/21/2021
Property Report
Guilford County, NC - Property Report Convert to PDF 5/21/2021
Parcel ID Property Address Legal Description
128019 5963 Summit Ave 8.50 AC HARDIE BK2801-885 US29
Mobile
Maps
Owner Name
MERICKA, MARY J
Owner Information
Mailing Address
5963 SUMMIT AVE
City, State Zip
BROWNS SUMMIT, NC 27214
Parcel Information
PIN Zoning Use Tax District
7898066252-000 AG -Agricultural RESIDENTIAL 0
Parcel Size Appraisal Nbrhood Plat/Condo Bk & Pg
8.50 7899102 N/A
Recent Sales
Book & Page Sale Date Sale Price Qualified? Improved?
00280100885 $0 Yes Yes
Appraisal Values
Land Buildings Extra Features Total Value
$63,800 $161,600 $0 $225,400
Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document
and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification.
Appraisal Detail (Building 1 of 2)
Bldg# Description Bldg Use Yr Built Eff Yr Blt Units
1 01-SFR 01-SFR-CONST 1951 1971 1
Improvement Details
Style Foundation Exterior Wall Air Cond. Type Comm. Roof Struct. Heating Type
1.0 STORY FACE BRK CENTRAL HOT WATER
Heated SqFt Bedrooms Bathrooms Fireplace Building Grade Bldg Value
3,087 3 2.500000 Yes B 125% $136,000
gis.guilfordcountync.gov/PropertyCardjs/Default.aspx?pin=128019&mapl mage=_ags_14afeb9d35c0497fa0b3913432cf35ea.jpg&isTinyScreen=false&i... 1/3

5/21/2021 Property Report
Code
UATO
STPO
PTO()
Attic, Unfinished
Stoop
Patio
Building Area Totals
Description
Sq Feet
852
27
558
Appraisal Detail (Building 2 of 2)
Bldg# Description Bldg Use Yr Built Eff Yr Blt Units
2 01-SFR 01-SFR-CONST 1952 1952 1
Improvement Details
Style Foundation Exterior Wall Air Cond. Type Comm. Roof Struct. Heating Type
1.0 CONC CENTRAL FORCED AIR -DUCTED
STORY BLOCK
Heated SqFt Bedrooms Bathrooms Fireplace Building Grade Bldg Value
600 1 1.000000 No C 100% $25,600
Building Area Totals
Code Description Sq Feet
FEPO Porch, Encl Finish
FGRO Garage, Finished
192
884
Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document
and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification.
g is.guilfordcountync.gov/PropertyCardjs/Default.aspx?pin=128019&mapl mage=_ags_14afeb9d35c0497fa0b3913432cf35ea.j pg&isTinyScreen=false&i... 2/3

5/21/2021
Property Report
8
r FEPO1
8
Co
CV
34
BAS
34
34
FGR01
34
g is. guilfordcountync.gov/PropertyCardjs/Defau It. aspx?pin=128019&map I mage=_ags_14afeb9d35c0497fa0b3913432cf35ea.jpg&isTinyScreen=false&i... 3/3

QRSBORN '° /
ENGINEERING GROUP
605 LEXINGTON AVENUE , SUITE 301
CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
P) 704-749-1432
www.o►sbom-eng.com
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACT OVERALL MAP
REEDY FORK
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA

Impact S5
TEMPORARY 30'
WIDE STREAM IMPACT
,10
‘,(41.Prart
"411(lilI yI (
/ ri
,-
/J
605 LEXINGTON AVENUE , SUITE 301
CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
P) 704-749-1432
www.onbom-sng.com
\\
'i1�36` ` \ i `l� ` i \-�\\'•�%'.// l
/ \-\*T.
1 neaq
--- �/ - - J / -
7- \` /// �� .�� / \ ^ \ \ ` ` \� \�
\`\� M \�� \\\\\\\~i. /
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACT ENLARGED MAP
REEDY FORK
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
�1. „L Z � Impact SB
t jEMPORARY I
�))�WrjpE STREAM IMPACT
,1\��//'/✓�'�/��� _ ,
1V�1 WETLAND
il\ r�
�p�rn(au � �\� � ASV �\
—• _—may 39 ` �� N. \
1Pr
01� Ij� iT�11r�JBV \ \ 0 t
fV ..► try v/i/i
-L-Islc, l'\
�1
,tt
GRAPHIC SCALE
75 150
( IN FEET )
1 Inch = 150 tt

l \ ) s s Ili III III l \ • i( C/ /// i—= �� //// ///��• ^i `��— \~ \\\ \\,11'���
� � \ \ ! / � / � /� I/ ,, • �' � 177�\� \) l SI r I (�l 1\ \��'��\\�\ `1��(1//�..v//" ��—\� l\\`\Il1/<•- > \t��� \ � I r l / / i t �\ \ \ � \)11)/�1\�//
$� /rr �/ / \\\\� �` \� r --
\- 1 l \ ) ? / / / r/ ( y / �+� \ I rl 1 \ 'NI( }I
i/�1� (�\1> \_-\``-- _�,_��� �� t 2\ 1 1 (� \ i
/,�tir/i ��\�1(!(11�(\`/�/!\\\\\ /1 ✓�/i —�\\\\ 111\\!))\£> >' � \ ( J \ 111 \ \ \`ice/
\ \\\ ) s1 i / '' III II1 - -- 1 1 \1 ( ) 1 ) 1 \ c /S i — l I 1 —i i-
\ <�;��.;► II --))1 ))) I tt1\ (I ! 1 � / f \\L�`
} \��. \ ' ��S`' — ii' ..�. lIip \I — 1'\\ 1�( I 11 Il \ \ \ ( 1 \ ( 1 f / I / �i�—� / l I \ \\ �/
\ 1 ��j(i, 1 \�`-- r I I �I )(' r r ' 11 \ \ S/ 9 1\ �i 1 ".'�,
�, •I III lint_„ rr (�/) )! I /r r \ \ ( ! 1 < \
111�)I \ \\\ \ �. /i�i f �It11�i1111 �T
l \\ - ff 4 ,, IOW 11►71\\\`� Tso ur�s�rrrar ra �
ar- -
1\ \\\ • — — ' /� ti :II,6Jh.1�11'I: ��lfl ll\ ,�� vraaw Al it
. \ Nzz
--'���j. ;.�! ►�1 �, ti� �. O 'la� \\\ \\ \ 1 0 —ter _Q,_� �3
N.,.._ ___-_----_-
0
lit'
\ \ �_ �s \Q\\ \� \ `\.-_ .� ,�aow46e�ran ar a ��e �. �u.:�innwi� I•. 4C,. wre-.-c�i �aua.oz�a—i..ems—ia�ii,..,,:
i _� = —. i% 1\ Q�\ `�t� �ll� �����f��}'s`maBC �j �. �,!'c�l \� �l
,�-= ==1 . ��„ � ..r(�.,�.E_��s�i�� i� .Ih�xy�:����.�i.�e��,c��ll����►��r��������y�i�a�ia�e���i��iin�.
�� y � �g� i- wl� ti \mi.� - :ne .. ---...., '-....„,:l. ' - ,:ic..;._ a , . ___....._... _____=____.7.,,,%.____,__-___41,,1714.111:IiITIL.----.:-.L. __----.A,'"Zt'.I'r.":2"C'"f27: ''''11=k:-. 1 -----'7---'-l''..-.'-',-- ,-- --- --''---4-"---- --:---'------:' .
-e:� .o�r��:_��wi�►�LL.�a�_
��Q ` f
J_
-
Ze-
J,� ▪ �� •�` -;,-P
%�� �j==�1��
/ ( (f- )( / J=t-
1 i
I , 1
ORSBORN
ENGINEERING GROUP
605 LEXINGTON AVENUE, SUITE 301
CHARLOTTE, NC 28203
P) 704a48-1432
www.orsbom•eng.com
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACT ENLARGED MAP
REEDY FORK
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
65�
r J Jr
% /( -1 fj / S11<
f �
(//r// ,''_i /
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 75 150
300
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 150 It.

Legend
I= Review Area
Guilford Co. Parcels
Streets
2 Ft Contours
Delineation
Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
Pond
Ephemeral
I= Culvert
I I
„„vid_
RONMENTAL
Page 1 of 7
Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
ILn
Ln
3
3.
Date: May 14, 2021
Sketch Map provided for illustrative
purposes and preliminary planning only.
Not intended to be relied upon for exact
location, dimension, or orientation. All
findings and assessments are subject to
verification from the Army Corps of
Engineers, NC Division of Water
Resources, and/or other appropriate
local authorities. Do not reproduce map
set except in its entirety.

A• uatic Resource Sketch Ma.
Legend
Review Area
Guilford Co. Parcels
Streets
Delineation
Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
Pond
EM Ephemeral
MINI Culvert
I I
f •
0 250 500 750 1000 Ft
AA\
NMI k
11.0_Yi�
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Page 2 of 7
Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
Date: May 14, 2021

Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
A4: WETABUT
WL 1200, - 0.009 Ac
ti: ��
A4: WETABUT
WL 1100, - 0.096 AC
ct.aa,
ay ay
A4: WETABUT
WL 1000, - 0.001 Ac
�� �? q
^ ,,
Legend
Review Area
MN Guilford Co. Parcels
o Streets
Delineation
A2: TRIBPER
CH 100, - 552 LF, 0.043 Ac
Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
Pond
B
B3: Ephemeral
- 18 LF, 0.001 Ac
Culvert
0 50 100 150 200 Ft
Ephemeral
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
�I .11
�`
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
INCA 1 RONMENTAL
_
Page 3 of 7 Detail 1
Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
Date: May 14, 2021

/
A4:VVETABUT
VVL21O0.~O.O6O
/
'
'
'
/
/
`=
\
`
A3:LP|FLOVV
`
'
.\
/
�e
)
Project
Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit,
NC27214
For:
The Silverman Group Attn: Mc Dan Laca
Page 4 of 7
Coordnates:36.1Q668 '7970964
Date: May 14,ZOJ1

Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
A2: TRIBPER
CH 300, - 3538 LF, 0.405 Ac
/
A4: WETABUT
WL 3100, - 0.014 Ac
A4: WETABUT
WL 4100, - 0.076 Ac
A4: WETABUT
WL 4200, - 0.002 Ac
A4: WETABUT
_
A2: TRIBPER
� �'" <
WL 4400, - 0.001 Ac
CH 2O0, - 495 LF, 0.053 Ac
.; '
A4: WETABUT
<
WL 4500, - 0.029 Ac
/�i /,�,
;.
_
A4: WETABUT
,/�,.
„/ ' '
� , - -' i
A4: WETABUT
WL 4300, - 0.020 Ac
�
' /
;�, ,
WL 4000, - 0.080 Ac
R
,
-_:
OA2:�R51BPE0.032
.0 2 Ac
CH 40 F 3
Legend
_
O Review Area
moll Guilford Co. Parcels
r
o Streets
Delineation
A4: WETABUT/
WL 3000, - 0.511 Ac
� i
Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
Pond
N
Culvert
0 100 200 300 400 Ft
Ephemeral
J 1
i.. .. al -' Ilk
161
►
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
NILlai
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
om/�
Page 5 of
_ S-ONMENTAL
7 Detail 3
Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
Date: May 14, 2021

CH 300 Continued
Legend
O Review Area
I I Guilford Co. Parcels
Streets
Delineation
Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
Pond
IIN Culvert
Ell Ephemeral
Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
A4: WETFLOOD
WL 3200, - 0.025 Ac
A4: WETABUT
WL 3300, - 0.089 Ac
A4: WETABUT
WL 6000, - 0.007 Ac
B3: Ephemeral
EPH 700, 33 LF, 0.001 Ac
A2: TRIBINT
CH 700, - 178 LF, 0.006 Ac
A4: WETABUT
WL 7000, - 0.103 Ac
A2: TRIBPER
CH 600, - 521 LF, 0.033 Ac
A2: TRIBPER
CH 500, - 229 LF, 0.014 Ac
A4: WETABUT
WL 5000, - 0.068 Ac
75 150 225 300 Ft
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Page 6 of 7
Detail 4
Coordinates: 36.18668,-79.70964
Date: May 14, 2021

A4: WETABUT
WL 1000A, - 0.023 Ac
A2: TRIBINT
CH 1000, - 84 LF, 0.004 Ac
CH 300 continued!
A4: WETABUT
WL 8000, - 0.010 Ac
A2: TRIBINT
CH 800, - 202 LF, 0.009 Ac
A4: WETABUT
WL 3400, - 0.009 Ac
Legend
O Review Area
Guilford Co. Parcels
Streets
Delineation
Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
Pond
MI Ephemeral
NMI Culvert
I I
Aquatic Resource Sketch Map
A4: WETABUT
WL 3600, - 0.003 Ac
A4: WETABUT
WL 3500, - 0.014 Ac
A4: WETABUT
WL 9000, - 0.008 Ac
A2: TRIBPER
CH 900, - 550 LF
A4: WETABUT
WL 9100, - 0.003 Ac
0 100 200 300 400 Ft
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Page 7 of 7 Detail 5
Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
Date: May 14, 2021

NC WAM FIELD ASSESSMENT FORM
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
USACE AID # 2019-02059
NCDWR#
20210915
Project Name Reedy Fork Date of Evaluation
Applicant/Owner Name SL Reedy Fork LLC Wetland Site Name
Wetland Type Seep Assessor Name/Organization
Nearest Named Water Body
River Basin Cape Fear USGS 8-Digit Catalogue Unit
County Guilford NCDWR Region
Latitude/Longitude (deci-degrees)
Level III Ecoregion Piedmont
❑ Yes ® No Precipitation within 48 hrs?
March and May 2021
1100, 1200, 1300, 5000, and
7000
Jennifer Robertson / Atlas
Environmental
Reedy Fork
Haw 03030002
Winston-Salem
36.186459 /-79.705720
Evidence of stressors affecting the assessment area (may not be within the assessment area)
Please circle and/or make note on the last page if evidence of stressors is apparent. Consider departure from reference, if appropriate, in
recent past (for instance, within 10 years). Noteworthy stressors include, but are not limited to the following.
• Hydrological modifications (examples: ditches, dams, beaver dams, dikes, berms, ponds, etc.)
• Surface and sub -surface discharges into the wetland (examples: discharges containing obvious pollutants, presence of nearby septic
tanks, underground storage tanks (USTs), hog lagoons, etc.)
• Signs of vegetation stress (examples: vegetation mortality, insect damage, disease, storm damage, salt intrusion, etc.)
• Habitat/plant community alteration (examples: mowing, clear -cutting, exotics, etc.)
Is the assessment area intensively managed? ® Yes ❑ No
Regulatory Considerations - Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes ❑No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑ Anadromous fish
O Federally protected species or State endangered or threatened species
® NCDWR riparian buffer rule in effect
❑ Abuts a Primary Nursery Area (PNA)
❑ Publicly owned property
❑ N.C. Division of Coastal Management Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) (including buffer)
❑ Abuts a stream with a NCDWQ classification of SA or supplemental classifications of HOW, ORW, or Trout
❑ Designated NCNHP reference community
❑ Abuts a 303(d)-listed stream or a tributary to a 303(d)-listed stream
What type of natural stream is associated with the wetland, if any? (check all that apply)
❑ Blackwater
❑ Brownwater
❑ Tidal (if tidal, check one of the following boxes) ❑ Lunar ❑ Wind ❑ Both
Is the assessment area on a coastal island? ❑ Yes ® No
Is the assessment area's surface water storage capacity or duration substantially altered by beaver? ❑ Yes ® No
Does the assessment area experience overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions? ❑ Yes ® No
1. Ground Surface ConditionNegetation Condition — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider alteration to the ground surface (GS) in the assessment area and vegetation structure (VS) in the
assessment area. Compare to reference wetland if applicable (see User Manual). If a reference is not applicable, then rate the assessment
area based on evidence an effect.
GS VS
®A ®A
OB OB
Not severely altered
Severely altered over a majority of the assessment area (ground surface alteration examples: vehicle tracks, excessive
sedimentation, fire -plow lanes, skidder tracks, bedding, fill, soil compaction, obvious pollutants) (vegetation structure
alteration examples: mechanical disturbance, herbicides, salt intrusion [where appropriate], exotic species, grazing, less
diversity [if appropriate], hydrologic alteration)
2. Surface and Sub -Surface Storage Capacity and Duration — assessment area condition metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface storage capacity and duration (Surf) and sub -surface storage capacity and duration (Sub).
Consider both increase and decrease in hydrology. A ditch 5 1 foot deep is considered to affect surface water only, while a ditch > 1 foot
deep is expected to affect both surface and sub -surface water. Consider tidal flooding regime, if applicable.
Surf Sub
❑A ❑A
ZB ®B
❑C ❑C
Water storage capacity and duration are not altered.
Water storage capacity or duration are altered, but not substantially (typically, not sufficient to change vegetation).
Water storage capacity or duration are substantially altered (typically, alteration sufficient to result in vegetation change)
(examples: draining, flooding, soil compaction, filling, excessive sedimentation, underground utility lines).
3. Water Storage/Surface Relief — assessment area/wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box in each column. Select the appropriate storage for the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT).
AA WT
3a. ❑A OA Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water > 1 deep
❑B DB Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 6 inches to 1 foot deep
❑C ❑C Majority of wetland with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®D ®D Depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
3b. OA Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is greater than 2 feet
DB Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is between 1 and 2 feet
®C Evidence that maximum depth of inundation is less than 1 foot

4. Soil Texture/Structure - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Check a box from each of the three soil property groups below. Dig soil profile in the dominant assessment area landscape feature.
Make soil observations within the top 12 inches. Use most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils guidance for regional
indicators.
4a. ❑A Sandy soil
®B Loamy or clayey soils exhibiting redoximorphic features (concentrations, depletions, or rhizospheres)
❑C Loamy or clayey soils not exhibiting redoximorphic features
❑D Loamy or clayey gleyed soil
❑E Histosol or histic epipedon
4b. ❑A Soil ribbon < 1 inch
®B Soil ribbon >_ 1 inch
4c. ®A No peat or muck presence
❑B A peat or muck presence
5. Discharge into Wetland - opportunity metric
Check a box in each column. Consider surface pollutants or discharges (Surf) and sub -surface pollutants or discharges (Sub). Examples
of sub -surface discharges include presence of nearby septic tank, underground storage tank (UST), etc.
Surf Sub
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the assessment area
®B ®B Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges entering the wetland and stressing, but not overwhelming the
treatment capacity of the assessment area
❑C ❑C Noticeable evidence of pollutants or discharges (pathogen, particulate, or soluble) entering the assessment area and
potentially overwhelming the treatment capacity of the wetland (water discoloration, dead vegetation, excessive
sedimentation, odor)
6. Land Use - opportunity metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Check all that apply (at least one box in each column). Evaluation involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. Consider sources draining
to assessment area within entire upstream watershed (WS), within 5 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (5M),
and within 2 miles and within the watershed draining to the assessment area (2M).
WS 5M 2M
❑A ®A ®A > 10% impervious surfaces
®B ❑B ❑B Confined animal operations (or other local, concentrated source of pollutants
®C ❑C ❑C z 20% coverage of pasture
❑D ❑D ❑D 2 20% coverage of agricultural land (regularly plowed land)
ZE ❑E ❑E z 20% coverage of maintained grass/herb
OF OF OF >_ 20% coverage of clear-cut land
❑G ❑G ❑G Little or no opportunity to improve water quality. Lack of opportunity may result from little or no disturbance in
the watershed or hydrologic alterations that prevent drainage and/or overbank flow from affecting the
assessment area.
7. Wetland Acting as Vegetated Buffer - assessment area/wetland complex condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
7a. Is assessment area within 50 feet of a tributary or other open water?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 7b. If No, skip to Metric 8.
Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the water body. Make buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland.
Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.
7b. How much of the first 50 feet from the bank is wetland? (Wetland buffer need only be present on one side of the .water body. Make
buffer judgment based on the average width of wetland. Record a note if a portion of the buffer has been removed or disturbed.)
❑A >- 50 feet
❑B From 30 to < 50 feet
❑C From 15 to < 30 feet
®D From 5 to < 15 feet
❑ E < 5 feet or buffer bypassed by ditches
7c. Tributary width. If the tributary is anastomosed, combine widths of channels/braids for a total width.
05 15-feet wide ❑> 15-feet wide ❑ Other open water (no tributary present)
7d. Do roots of assessment area vegetation extend into the bank of the tributary/open water?
®Yes ❑No
7e. Is stream or other open water sheltered or exposed?
®Sheltered - adjacent open water with width < 2500 feet and no regular boat traffic.
❑ Exposed - adjacent open water with width z 2500 feet or regular boat traffic.
8. Wetland Width at the Assessment Area - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric (evaluate WT for all marshes and
Estuarine Woody Wetland only; evaluate WC for Bottomland Hardwood Forest, Headwater Forest, and Riverine Swamp Forest
only)
Check a box in each column for riverine wetlands only. Select the average width for the wetland type at the assessment area (WT) and
the wetland complex at the assessment area (WC). See User Manual for WT and WC boundaries.
WT WC
❑A ❑A 2 100 feet
❑B DB From 80 to < 100 feet
❑C ❑C From 50 to < 80 feet
❑D ❑D From 40 to < 50 feet
❑E ❑E From 30 to < 40 feet
®F OF From 15 to < 30 feet
❑G ❑G From 5 to < 15 feet
❑H ❑H < 5 feet

9. Inundation Duration - assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands)
Answer for assessment area dominant landform.
DA Evidence of short -duration inundation (< 7 consecutive days)
® B Evidence of saturation, without evidence of inundation
DC Evidence of long -duration inundation or very long -duration inundation (7 to 30 consecutive days or more)
10. Indicators of Deposition - assessment area condition metric (skip for non -riparian wetlands and all marshes)
Consider recent deposition only (no plant growth since deposition).
Sediment deposition is not excessive, but at approximately natural levels.
DB Sediment deposition is excessive, but not overwhelming the wetland.
DC Sediment deposition is excessive and is overwhelming the wetland.
11. Wetland Size - wetland type/wetland complex condition metric
Check a box in each column. Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric evaluates three aspects of the wetland area: the
size of the wetland type (WT), the size of the wetland complex (WC), and the size of the forested wetland (FW) (if applicable, see User
Manual). See the User Manual for boundaries of these evaluation areas. If assessment area is clear-cut, select "K" for the FW column.
WT WC FW (if applicable)
❑A ❑A ❑A 2 500 acres
DB ❑B DB From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C ❑C DC From 50 to < 100 acres
OD ❑D OD From 25 to < 50 acres
OE ❑E OE From 10 to < 25 acres
OF OF ®F From 5 to < 10 acres
®G ❑G OG From 1 to < 5 acres
❑H ®H OH From 0.5 to < 1 acre
❑I ❑I ❑I From 0.1 to < 0.5 acre
❑ J ❑J ❑J From 0.01 to < 0.1 acre
OK OK OK < 0.01 acre or assessment area is clear-cut
12. Wetland Intactness - wetland type condition metric (evaluate for Pocosins only)
O A Pocosin is the full extent (>- 90%) of its natural landscape size.
OB Pocosin type is < 90% of the full extent of its natural landscape size.
13. Connectivity to Other Natural Areas - landscape condition metric
13a. Check appropriate box(es) (a box may be checked in each column). Involves a GIS effort with field adjustment. This metric
evaluates whether the wetland is well connected (Well) and/or loosely connected (Loosely) to the landscape patch, the contiguous
naturally vegetated area and open water (if appropriate). Boundaries are formed by four -lane roads, regularly maintained utility line
corridors the width of a four -lane road or wider, urban landscapes, maintained fields (pasture and agriculture), or open water > 300
feet wide.
Well Loosely
❑A OA z 500 acres
❑B ❑B From 100 to < 500 acres
❑C ❑C From 50 to < 100 acres
❑D ®D From 10 to < 50 acres
®E ❑E < 10 acres
OF OF Wetland type has a poor or no connection to other natural habitats
13b. Evaluate for marshes only.
['Yes ❑No Wetland type has a surface hydrology connection to open waters/stream or tidal wetlands.
14. Edge Effect - wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes and Estuarine Woody Wetland)
May involve a GIS effort with field adjustment. Estimate distance from wetland type boundary to artificial edges. Artificial edges include
non -forested areas >- 40 feet wide such as fields, development, roads, regularly maintained utility line corridors, and clear -cuts. Consider
the eight main points of the compass. Artificial edge occurs within 150 feet in how many directions? If the assessment area is clear cut,
select option "C."
OA 0
®B 1 to
❑C 5to8
15. Vegetative Composition - assessment area condition metric (skip for all marshes and Pine Flat)
❑A Vegetation is close to reference condition in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of appropriate
species, with exotic plants absent or sparse within the assessment area.
®B Vegetation is different from reference condition in species diversity or proportions, but still largely composed of native species
characteristic of the wetland type. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clearcutting or clearing.
It also includes communities with exotics present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata.
❑C Vegetation severely altered from reference in composition, or expected species are unnaturally absent (planted stands of non -
characteristic species or at least one stratum inappropriately composed of a single species), or exotic species are dominant in at
least one stratum.
16. Vegetative Diversity - assessment area condition metric (evaluate for Non -tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
❑A Vegetation diversity is high and is composed primarily of native species (< 10% cover of exotics).
®B Vegetation diversity is low or has > 10% to 50% cover of exotics.
❑C Vegetation is dominated by exotic species (> 50 % cover of exotics).

17. Vegetative Structure — assessment area/wetland type condition metric
17a. Is vegetation present?
®Yes ❑No If Yes, continue to 17b. If No, skip to Metric 18.
17b. Evaluate percent coverage of assessment area vegetation for all marshes only. Skip to 17c for non -marsh wetlands.
DA 2 25% coverage of vegetation
DB < 25% coverage of vegetation
17c. Check a box in each column for each stratum. Evaluate this portion of the metric for non -marsh wetlands. Consider
structure in airspace above the assessment area (AA) and the wetland type (WT) separately.
AA WT
o ❑A DA Canopy closed, or nearly closed, with natural gaps associated with natural processes
g El ®B Canopy present, but opened more than natural gaps
U DC ❑C Canopy sparse or absent
o DA DA Dense mid-story/sapling layer
vDB DB Moderate density mid-story/sapling layer
3 ®C ®C Mid-story/sapling layer sparse or absent
1 DA DA Dense shrub layer
t ❑B ❑B Moderate density shrub layer
®C ®C Shrub layer sparse or absent
.n DA DA Dense herb layer
_ ®B El Moderate density herb layer
DC DC Herb layer sparse or absent
18. Snags — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
DA Large snags (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches DBH, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not A
19. Diameter Class Distribution — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
❑A Majority of canopy trees have stems > 6 inches in diameter at breast height (DBH); many large trees (> 12 inches DBH) are
present.
®B Majority of canopy trees have stems between 6 and 12 inches DBH, few are > 12 inch DBH.
❑C Majority of canopy trees are < 6 inches DBH or no trees.
20. Large Woody Debris — wetland type condition metric (skip for all marshes)
Include both natural debris and man -placed natural debris.
DA Large logs (more than one) are visible (> 12 inches in diameter, or large relative to species present and landscape stability).
®B Not A
21. Vegetation/Open Water Dispersion — wetland type/open water condition metric (evaluate for Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh only)
Select the figure that best describes the amount of interspersion between vegetation and open water in the growing season. Pattemed
areas indicate vegetated areas, while solid white areas indicate open water.
DA ❑B ❑C ®D
22. Hydrologic Connectivity — assessment area condition metric (evaluate for riparian wetlands and Salt/Brackish Marsh only)
Examples of activities that may severely alter hydrologic connectivity include intensive ditching, fill, sedimentation, channelization, diversion,
man-made berms, beaver dams, and stream incision. Documentation required if evaluated as B, C, or D.
®A Overbank and overland flow are not severely altered in the assessment area.
DB Overbank flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
DC Overland flow is severely altered in the assessment area.
❑D Both overbank and overland flow are severely altered in the assessment area.
Notes

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 5.0
1100, 1200, 1300, 5000, and March and May
Wetland Site Name 7000
Date of Assessment
2021
Jennifer Robertson /
Atlas Environmental
Wetland Type Seep Assessor Name/Organization
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
Sub -function Rating Summary
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
Function Sub -function
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Sub -surface Storage and
Retention
Water Quality
Habitat
Function Rating Summary
Pathogen Change
Particulate Change
Soluble Change
Physical Change
Pollution Change
Physical Structure
Landscape Patch Structure
Vegetation Composition
Metrics
Condition
Condition
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
Condition
Condition
Condition
Rating
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HIGH
LOW
MEDIUM
Function
Hydrology
Water Quality
Habitat
Metrics
Condition
Condition
Condition/Opportunity
Opportunity Presence (Y/N)
Condition
Rating
MEDIUM
HIGH
NA
NA
MEDIUM
Overall Wetland Rating
MEDIUM

1: CH 100
2: WL 1000
3: WL 1100
Site Photographs: March 12, 2021
4: WL 1200
6: Pond 200

7: WL 2100
8: EPH 100
9: W L 3000
Site Photographs: March 12, 2021
10: CH 200
11: CH 300
12: CH 400

13: WL 4000
14: WL 3100
15: WL 4100
Site Photographs: March 12, 2021
16: WL 4200
17: WL 4300
18: WL 4400

19: WL 4500
20: WL 3200
21: WL 5000
Site Photographs: March 12, 2021
22: CH 500
23: CH 600
24: WL 7000

25: CH 700
26: EPH 700
27: WL 6000
Site Photographs: March 12, 2021
28: WL 3300
29: WL 3500
30: WL 3400

31: CH 800
32: CH 900
33: WL 9000 on bank
Site Photographs: March 12, 2021
34: WL 9100 on the bank
35: WL 3600
36: CH 1000

WL 1200
WL 1100
WL 1000
Legend
O Review Area
Guilford Co. Parcels
o Streets
Delineation
Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
Pond
Culvert
Ephemeral
I I
Photograph and Data Form Location Map
CH 100
DWR Stream ID Form: 16
Ephemeral
Ephemeral
0 50 100 150 200 Ft
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Page 3 of 7 Detail 1
Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
Date: March 17, 2021

Photograph and Data Form Location Map
WL 2100
Legend
O Review Area
Guilford Co. Parcels
Streets
Delineation
Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
Pond
INI Culvert
Ephemeral
I I
Pond 200
0 100 200 300 400 Ft
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Page 4 of 7
Detail 2 Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
Date: March 17, 2021

Legend
O Review Area
Guilford Co. Parcels
Streets
Delineation
Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
Pond
MN Culvert
Ephemeral
I I
WL 3000
WL 3100
WL 4100
WL 4200
1! -� WL 4400
WL 4500
0 100 200 300 400 Ft
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Page 5 of 7 Detail 3
Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
Date: March 17, 2021

Legend
O Review Area
Guilford Co. Parcels
Streets
Delineation
Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
Pond
Culvert
Ephemeral
I I
WL 6000
DWR Stream ID Form: 27
Intermittent
WL 7000
CH 600
CH 500
75 150 225 300 Ft
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Page 6 of 7
Detail 4
Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
Date: March 17, 2021

1
Photograph and Data Form Location Map
CH 1000
ICH 300 continued
CH 800
Legend
O Review Area
0 Guilford Co. Parcels
Streets
Delineation
INN Perennial
Intermittent
Wetland
Pond
Ell Culvert
Ephemeral
WL 3600
WL 3500
WL 9000
3
CH 900
,/
/-
/;'! i�/-
WL 9100
3
75 150 225 300 Ft
—��
abk.
._11VONMENTAL
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Page 7 of 7
Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
Detail 5
Date: March 17, 2021

Requestor:
Address:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2019-02059 County: Guilford U.S.G.S. Quad: NC- Browns Summit
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Reedy Fork Associates, LLC
Attn: Coolidge Porterfield
804 Green Valley Road, Suite 202
Greensboro, NC 27408
Size (acres) —300 Nearest Town Browns Summit
Nearest Waterway Reedy Fork River Basin Cape Fear
USGS HUC 03030002 Coordinates 36.187319, -79.711910
Location description: The project area is located on the west side of Summit Avenue, approximately 0.3 mile south of its
intersection with Brown Summit Road, at 5955 Summit Avenue, Greensboro, Guilford County, North Carolina. The project
area is shown as the red -outlined "Reedy Project Study Area" on the attached sketches entitled "Figure 6", "Inset Map 1",
"Inset Map 2", "Inset Map 3", "Inset Map 4", and "Inset Map 5."
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33
USC § 403). The waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be
sufficiently accurate and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map.
Therefore, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including
determining compensatory mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements,
and other resource protection measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and
wetlands that would be affected in any way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the
U.S. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal
Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by
contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). However,
since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination may not be
used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is merely an
effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which is not
sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters, including
wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a
timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters, including wetlandson the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
❑ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by the
Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated _. We strongly suggest you
have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this

SAW-2019-02059
survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no
change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the Corps
Regulatory Official identified below on _. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may
be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact David E. Bailey at [phone] X 30 or
David.E.Bailev2(aiusace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: See the Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination form dated 06/02/2020.
D. Remarks: None.
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Phillip Shannin, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
,?�'''L'" Date: 2020.06.02 10:09:45
Corps Regulatory Official:-04'00'
Date of JD: 06/02/2020 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at http://corpsmapu.usace.army.mil/cm_apex/f?p=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Jonathan Grubb, ECS Southeast, LLP, 7614 Netherlands Drive, Wilmington, NC 28405
Sue Homewood, NCDEQ-DWR, 450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300, Winston-Salem, NC 27105

Legend
Reedy Project Study Area
Stream Status
Intermittent
Perennial
/2 Potential Wetlands
Ponds
• Data Forms
New Wetland 1
Approx.0.01 Acre
Average Width 8'
Stream 2
Approx. 697
Linear Feet
UP Point
Wetland 3b
Approx. 0.19
Acre
New Wetland 2
Approx. 0.01 Acre
Wetland 2
Approx. 0.04
Acre
I/P Point
New Wetland 9
Approx. 0.002 Acre
New Wetland 10
Approx. 0.10 Acre
Wetland 3a
Approx. 0.06 Wetland 6
Acre Approx. 0.31
...__ Acre
Stream 3
Approx. 1,958
Linear Feet
Wetland 1
Approx. 0.23
Acre
INSET MAP
Wetland 10
Approx. 0.23
Acre
New Wetland 8
Approx. 0.08 Acre
Wetland 3
Approx. 2.92
Acres
Stream 10
Approx. 1,422
Linear Feet
Stream 12
Approx. 335
Linear Feet
Wetland 6
rox. 0.65 Acre
New Wetland 7
Approx. 0.002 Acre
Stream 11
Approx. 575
Linear Feet
of Stream
Stream 7
Approx. 550
Linear Feet
Wetland 5
Approx. 0.05
Acre
Stream 8
pprox. 259
inear Feet
New Wetland 3
Approx. 0.14 Acre
Pond 1
Approx. 0.84
Acre
Stream 5
Approx. 2,389
Linear Feet
New Wetland 5
Approx. 0.01 Acre
Stream 9
Approx, 292
Linear Feet
Client:
Deep River Partners
Wetland 9
Approx. 0.10
Acre
Project:
Reedy Fork Ranch Site
5955 Summit Avenue
Greensboro, Guilford County,
North Carolina
Wetland 7
Approx. 0.16
Acre
Stream 6
' Approx. 1,981
Linear Feet
Wetland 4
Approx. 0.18
Acre
Title:
Potential
Wetlands and Waters
of the US Map
1. POTENTIAL WATERS
F THE US WERE DELINEATED
BY ECS ON
OCTOBER 7-9, 2019
2. FEATURES DEPICTED ON
THIS MAP WERE
VERIFIED BY THE USAGE
ON DECEMBER 10TH, 2019.
Drawn By:
JDG
Checked By:
WBF
Approved By:
WBF
Date:
04/07/2020
ECS Project No.
49:10310
0 250 500 1,000 FIGURE 6
MINI Feet

Legend
oReedy Project Study Area
Stream Status
Intermittent
Perennial
r.//,/ Potential Wetlands
Ponds
• Data Forms
New Wetland 1
Approx. 0.01 Acre
Average Width 8'
Stream 2
Approx. 697 _
Linear Feet
Wetland 1
Approx. 0.23
Acre
I/P point
of Stream 2
New Wetland 2
Approx. 0.01 Acre
0 90 180 360
CC=IFeet
Client:
Deep River Partners
Project:
Reedy Fork Ranch Site
5955 Summit Avenue
Greensboro, Guilford County,
North Carolina
Title:
Potential
Wetlands and Waters
of the US Map
1. POTENTIAL WATERS
OF THE US WERE DELINEATED
BY ECS ON
OCTOBER 7-9, 2019
2. FEATURES DEPICTED ON
THIS MAP WERE
VERIFIED BY THE USAGE
ON DECEMBER 10TH, 2019.
Drawn By:
JDG
Checked By:
WBF
pproved By: Date:
WBF 01/14/2020
ECS Pro ect No.
49:10310
INSE1 MAP

Legend
QReedy Project Study Area
Stream Status
Intermittent
Perennial
'%22 Potential Wetlands
Ponds
• Data Forms
New Wetland 8
Approx. 0.08 Acre
Wetland 2
Approx. 0.04
Acre
I/P Point
New Wetland 9
Approx. 0.002 Acre
Stream 3
Approx. 1,958
Linear Feet
Wetland 3
Approx. 2.92
Acres
UP point
of Stream 3
New Wetland 10
Approx. 0.10 Acre
Wetland 6
Approx. 0.31
Acre
Stream 10
Approx. 1,422
Linear Feet
Stream 5
Approx. 2,389
Linear Feet
New Wetland 4
Approx. 0,05 Acre
0 50 100 200
Feet
lient:
Deep River Partners
Project:
Reedy Fork Ranch Site
5955 Summit Avenue
Greensboro, Guilford County,
North Carolina
itle:
Potential
Wetlands and Waters
of the US Map
1. POTENTIAL WATERS
OF THE US WERE DELINEATED
BY ECS ON
OCTOBER 7-9, 2019
2. FEATURES DEPICTED ON
THIS MAP WERE
VERIFIED BY THE USAGE
ON DECEMBER 10TH, 2019.
Drawn By:
JDG
pproved By:
WBF
Checked By:
WBF
Date:
01/02/2020
ECS Project No.
49:10310
INSET MAP

Legend
llllll� Reedy Project Study Area
Stream Status
Intermittent
Perennial
/% Potential Wetlands
Ponds
• Data Forms
Stream 12
Approx. 335
Linear Feet
Wetland 10
Approx. 0.28
New Wetland 7
Approx. 0.002
Acre
Stream 10
Approx. 1,422
Linear Feet
50 100 200
Feet
Client:
Deep River Partners
Project:
Reedy Fork Ranch Site
5955 Summit Avenue
Greensboro, Guilford County,
North Carolina
Title:
Potential
Wetlands and Waters
of the US Map
1. POTENTIAL WATERS
OF THE US WERE DELINEATE
BY ECS ON
OCTOBER 7-9, 2019
2. FEATURES DEPICTED ON
THIS MAP WERE
VERIFIED BY THE USAGE
ON DECEMBER 10TH, 2019.
Drawn By:
JDG
Checked By:
WBF
Approved By: Date:
WBF 01/02/2020
ECS Pro ect No.
49:10310
INSES MAP

Legend
QReedy Project Study Area
Stream Status
Intermittent
Perennial
22 Potential Wetlands
Ponds
Data Forms
•
Wetland 4
Approx. 0.18
Acre
Stream 6
Approx. 1,981
Linear Feet
0 50 100 200
icIMIIIIINIMEM Feet
Client:
Deep River Partners
Project:
Reedy Fork Ranch Site
5955 Summit Avenue
Greensboro, Guilford County,
North Carolina
Title:
Potential
Wetlands and Waters
of the US Map
1. POTENTIAL WATERS
•F THE US WERE DELINEATE,
BY ECS ON
OCTOBER 7-9, 2019
2. FEATURES DEPICTED ON
THIS MAP WERE
VERIFIED BY THE USAGE
ON DECEMBER 10TH, 2019.
Drawn By:
JDG
Approved By:
WBF
Checked By:
WBF
Date:
01 /02/2020
ECS Pro ect No.
49:10310
INSET MAP

Legend
Stream Status
- -- Intermittent
Perennial
1�/ Potential Wetlands
Ponds
Data Forms
Stream 3
Approx. 1,958
Linear Feet
Wetland 3
Approx. 2.92
Acres
New Wetland 10
Approx. 0.10 Acre
Wetland 6
Approx. 0.31
Acre
Stream 7
Approx. 550
Linear Feet
New Wetland 4
Approx. 0.05 Acre
Stream 5
Approx. 2,389
Linear Feet
New Wetland 3
Approx. 0.14
Acre
0 50 100 200
INIcCom Feet
lient:
Deep River Partners
Project:
Reedy Fork Ranch Site
5955 Summit Avenue
Greensboro, Guilford County,
North Carolina
Title:
Potential
Wetlands and Waters
of the US Map
1. POTENTIAL WATERS
OF THE US WERE DELINEATED
BY ECS ON
OCTOBER 7-9, 2019
2. FEATURES DEPICTED ON
THIS MAP WERE
VERIFIED BY THE USAGE
ON DECEMBER 10TH, 2019.
• rawn By:
JDG
pproved By:
WBF
Checked By:
WBF
Date:
04/01/2020
ECS Project No.
49:10310
INSE E MAP

SAW-2019-02059
eOFiCATUON
°�,s:.a']..
Applicant:
OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND,
s eat x,. � �ea*iu'u .z4a.. .. �"�i4 *�b*k'Ra., ,u�ti dos ?'a�a�#,i+."s@ � §x�i5;;.i, ',S+a.+- a.'.x,=s✓",axttie
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Reedy Fork Associates, LLC (Attn: Coolidge Porterfield) File Number: SAW-2019-02059 Date: 06/02/2020
Attached is:
See Section below
•
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
•
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
0
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION
Additional
or the
I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal
information may be found at or http://www.usace.anny.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatorvProgramandPermits.aspx
of the above decision.
Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

SAW-2019-02059
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT,
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
appeal process you may contact: '
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: David E. Bailey
Raleigh Regulatory Office
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
also contact:
Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD-PDO
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel,
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process.
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investi
and any government
You will be provided a 15 day
ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: David E. Bailey, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North Carolina
28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 10M15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 6/2/2020
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: ECS, Jonathan Grubb, 7614 Netherlands Drive,
Wilmington, NC 28405
C. DISTRICT OFFICE FILE NAME AND NUMBER:
SAW-2019-02059 (Reedy Fork Ranch / 5955� Summit Avenue / Guilford County / Greensboro NC)
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION 5955 Summit Avenue, Greensboro,
Guilford County NC
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: North Carolina County: Guilford City: Greensboro
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 36.187789 Longitude: -79.713607
Universal Transverse Mercator: 18
Name of nearest waterbody: UT to Reedy Fork
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
® Field Determination. Date(s): 12/10/2019
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude (decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non -
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
"may be" subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
10/404)
See Attached Table

Waters_Name
Latitude
Longitude
Waters Size
Type Of Aquatic Resource
Geographic Authority
Stream 2
36.19063
-79.71808
697 FEET
Non -wetland water
Section 404
Stream 3
36.18844
-79.71435
1958 FEET
Non -wetland water
Section 404
Stream 5
36.18493
-79.71518
2389 FEET
Non -wetland water
Section 404
Stream 6
36.18502
-79.70698
1981 FEET
Non -wetland water
Section 404
Stream 7
36.18555
-79.71255
550 FEET
Non -wetland water
Section 404
Stream 8
36.18708
-79.71144
259 FEET
Non -wetland water
Section 404
Stream 9
36.18802
-79.7106
292 FEET
Non -wetland water
Section 404
Stream 10
36.18818
-79.71203
1422 FEET
Non -wetland water
Section 404
Stream 11
36.19057
-79.71038
575 FEET
Non -wetland water
Section 404
Stream 12
36.19
-79.71141
335 FEET
Non -wetland water
Section 404
Pond 1
36.18176
-79.71055
.84 ACRES
Non -wetland water
Section 404
Wetland 1
36.19469
-79.71886
.23 ACRES
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland 10
36.1884
-79.71164
.23 ACRES
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland 2
36.18868
-79.71436
.04 ACRES
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland 3
36.1852
-79.71472
2.92 ACRES
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland 3a
36.1851
-79.7172
.06 ACRES
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland 3b
36.1872
-79.7181
.19 ACRES
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland 4
36.18431
-79.70727
.18 ACRES
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland 5
36.18183
-79.71353
.05 ACRES
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland 6
36.18604
-79.71368
.31 ACRES
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland 7
36.1868
-79.71242
.16 ACRES
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland 8
36.1868
-79.71119
.1 ACRES
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland 9
36.18793
-79.71034
.1 ACRES
Wetland
Section 404
New Wetland 1
36.19363
-79.71943
.01 ACRES
Wetland
Section 404
New Wetland 2
36.19101
-79.71745
.01 ACRES
Wetland
Section 404
New Wetland 3
36.18529
-79.71214
.14 ACRES
Wetland
Section 404
New Wetland 4
36.18617
-79.7123
.05 ACRES
Wetland
Section 404
New Wetland 5
36.18836
-79.71053
.01 ACRES
Wetland
Section 404
New Wetland 6
36.1904
-79.71208
.65 ACRES
Wetland
Section 404
New Wetland 7
36.19058
-79.7097
.002 ACRES
Wetland
Section 404
New Wetland 8
36.18934
-79.71416
.08 ACRES
Wetland
Section 404
New Wetland 9
36.18725
-79.71439
.002 ACRES
Wetland
Section 404
New Wetland 10
36.18612
-79.71453
.1 ACRES
Wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: ECS Figures 1-6
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
0 USGS NHD data.
0 USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
Z U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Figure 2
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Figure 3
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: Figure 4
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMAJFIRM maps: Figure 5
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): Figure 6
or ®Other (Name & Date): ECS Photolog_
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
© Other information (please specify): LiDAR (NC Floodmaps)
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Date:
l g 2020.06.02
09:52:44 -04'00'
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
10/22/2019
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable) 1
I Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form
ID#*
Regional Office *
Reviewer List*
20210915
Version *
1
Winston-Salem Regional Office - [phone]
Sue Homewood
Pre -Filing Meeting Request submitted 5/7/2021
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Contact Name * Jennifer L Robertson
Contact Email Address* [e-mail]
Project Name * Reedy Fork
Project Owner* The Silverman Group
Project County* Guilford
Owner Address: Street Address
195 Morristown Road
Address Line 2
City State / Bovine / Region
Basking Ridge New Jersey
Festal / Zip Code Country
07920 United States
Is this a transportation project? * r Yes r No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
✓ 401 Water Quality Certification - r 401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular Express
Pr Individual Permit r Modification
✓ Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
✓ Yes r No
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Sue Homewood
Please give a brief project description below and include location information.*
The project involves construction of two industrial / warehouse
buildings. Infrastructure also includes sewer improvements, employee
parking lots, trailer parking lots, access roads, and SCM's.
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:

• This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
• I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
• I also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature
eXnerFt ae. f tt kr
Submittal Date 5/7/2021

Nweerami
aim
moindo-
KCIENGINEERS • SCIENTISTS • SURVEYORS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
4505 Falls of Neuse Road Suite 400 Raleigh, NC 27609 [phone] [phone] Fax
July 30, 2021
Mr. Dan Lacz
SL Reedy Fork LLC
195 Morrisville Road
Basking Ridge NJ 07920
Subject: Mitigation Obligation — Corps Action ID — 2019-02059
Project: Reedy Fork
Statement of Availability
Dear Mr. Lacz,
This letter serves to confirm that KCI Technologies Inc. (KCI) has availability of 0.052 riparian wetland
mitigation credits in HUC 03030002 of the Cape Fear River Basin (Haw River Arm) to satisfy a portion of
your obligation for your Reedy Fork project. KCI expects a second credit release soon that would increase
our available wetland credits by 0.40 credits, thus meeting your expected need of 0.39 credits. KCI is willing
to sell these credits at a credit rate of $70,000/credit for a total of $27,300. In addition, KCI has riparian
buffer credits available if your project should require any.
Pending the release of your needed credits, KCI will provide you with a quote for your credits. If you agree
on the terms of the transaction, we will provide you with an invoice. Upon receipt of payment KCI will sign
the Compensatory Mitigation Responsibility Transfer Form (to be provided by you or your Agent) and return
it to you. We will also provide copies to David Bailey and Samantha Daily at the US Army Corps of
Engineers as well as your agents at ATLAS Environmental Inc.
Sincerely,
Timothy J. Morris
KCI Technologies, Inc.
Senior Associate
Cc: Jennifer Robertson

Jennifer Robertson
From: Jennifer Robertson
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 12:53 PM
To: Ellis, John; Mann, Leigh
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] FW: Reedy Fork T&E Report / Consultation for Corps Permit
Thanks John!
Thank you,
Jennifer L Robertson, President
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, NC 28211
[phone] office
[phone] mobile
www.atlasenvi.com
Offices in Asheville and Charlotte
IL j
IRONMENTAL
From: Ellis, John <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 12:20 PM
To: Jennifer Robertson <[e-mail]>; Mann, Leigh <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] FW: Reedy Fork T&E Report / Consultation for Corps Permit
Sorry for the delay. We will send you a letter saying ok with it. Of note, the field edges could potentially be
suitable habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower however it is not found in this part of Guilford Co.
John
From: Jennifer Robertson <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 11:34 AM
To: Ellis, John <john [e-mail]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Reedy Fork T&E Report / Consultation for Corps Permit
This email has been received from outside of DOI - Use caution before clicking on links, opening attachments, or responding.
John,
Just following up with you regarding this project. I will be submitting the permit application this week. Do you
have any comments about it?
i

Thank you,
Jennifer L Robertson, President
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, NC 28211
[phone] office
[phone] mobile
www.atlasenvi.com
Offices in Asheville and Charlotte
From: Jennifer Robertson
Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 7:28 PM
To: Ellis, John <iohn [e-mail]>
Subject: Reedy Fork T&E Report / Consultation for Corps Permit
John,
I hope you are doing well and having a great week! We've got another project in your office's territory (Guilford
County). I will be submitting a Corps permit application soon. Do you know who I need to send the
attachments to in order to obtain concurrence of our findings related to protected species?
Thank you,
Jennifer L Robertson, President
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road #411
Charlotte, NC 28211
[phone] office
[phone] mobile
www.atlasenvi.com
Offices in Asheville and Charlotte
2

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh ES Field Office
551-F Pylon Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27606
July 28, 2021
Jennifer Robertson
Atlas Environmental, Inc.
338 S. Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, NC 28211
Re: Reedy Fork Project - Guilford County
Dear Mrs. Robertson:
This letter is to inform you that the Service has established an on-line project planning and
consultation process which assists developers and consultants in determining whether a
federally -listed species or designated critical habitat may be affected by a proposed project. For
future projects, please visit the Raleigh Field Office's project planning website at
https://www.fws.Rov/raleigh/pp.html. If you are only searching for a list of species that may be
present in the project's Action Area, then you may use the Service's Information, Planning, and
Consultation System (IPaC) website to determine if any listed, proposed, or candidate species
may be present in the Action Area and generate a species list. The IPaC website may be viewed
at https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/. The IPaC web site contains a complete and frequently updated list
of all endangered threatened species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), a list of federal species of concerns that are
known to occur in each county in North Carolina, and other resources.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
1 The term "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation
does not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or
threatened species. However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse
impacts to federal species of concern.

evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above -referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down -gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http://www.fws.gov/raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.

We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at
[phone] ext. 26.
Sincerely,
Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Secretary D. Reid Wilson
July 22, 2021
Jennifer L. Robertson
ATLAS Environmental, Inc.
338 South Sharon Amity Road, #411
Charlotte, NC 28211
[e-mail]
Re: Construct Reedy Fork, two industrial buildings, 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, Guilford
County, ER 21-1512
Dear Ms. Robertson:
Thank you for your letter of June 2, 2021, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have reviewed
the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.review(incdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
/, ' Ramona Bartos, Deputy
L) State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

7888798728
7888864140
Legend
O Review Area
O Guilford Co. Parcels
o Streets
Parcel Map
7888979239
7898066252
7898192361
7898292472
89818898
9818956
981896 8
7898491213
789:38
7898269086
250 500 750 1000 Ft
AS-441%,TLRONMENTAL
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
Date: May 13, 2021

O Review Area
I I Guilford Co. Parcels
Streets
2 Ft Contours
RONMENTAL
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
Date: May 13, 2021

p Review Area
I I Guilford Co. Parcels
o Streets
USGS Topo
RONMENTAL
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
Date: May 13, 2021

Legend
O Review Area
USGS Topo
ONMENTAL
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
Date: May 13, 2021
0.5
1.5
2 Mi

Legend
= Review Area
Guilford Co. Parcels
Streets
0 250 500 750 1000 Ft
IIIM
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
Date: May 13, 2021

Bethany
USGS 1:24,000 Quadrangles
Lake Brandt
Browns Summit
Ossipee
Legend
McLeansville
Gibsonville
O Review Area
I I USGS Quadrangles
0 1 2 3 4 Mi
I I Guilford County
Th
IRONMENTAL
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
Date: May 13, 2021

REFERENCE JIVERS
NFNL Gab Amiable
FIRM Panel 8,undary
LOMB Boundary
SPECIAL FLOOD RRZARDAREAS
1% Annual Chance Food Hazard
Reg4atory Fbodmay
OTHER AREAS OF FLOOD DAZMO
02%Aneue Cho nor Fbadllazard
r are Conanon: I l Pnnua
titi Chane Flool HazaN �o...
#.. Pdu*ees*
RLeaeduced Find Ri>,
,MLgMIt Aea OuKrdedhe02% Annul
-.... Chane Floolplain?,rrcx
aea: of Undeterndned Flood
CROSS SECTIONS t BEES
Grob Stuldnswith 1 M Annual
—.N thane Wain Sudaue Eltvaton
CoaealTnn.ecl
toldallrMfece hotline
Pro%tt Halm.
- Fare Flnnd L ellaynn
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
I.rmd rd'a,d;
lun.lictrnalPnunri,
RONMENTAL
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
Date: May 13, 2021

Legend
Review Area
O Guilford Co. Parcels
Streets
LiDAR DEM (Ft)
690
700
710
720
730
TLAS
IRONMENTAL
Die ital Elevation Model
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
Date: May 13, 2021
250 500 750 1000 Ft

Legend
O Review Area
O Guilford Co. Parcels
Streets
GIS Streams
GIS Waterbodys
I I
UAS
RONMENTAL
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
Date: May 13, 2021

National Wetland Inventory
N��/
�//
1 ♦
i\\V/\(
f
1
a�,
/�� IfI
ceI
ri
f0 0
Legend
O Review Area
I I Guilford Co. Parcels
— Streets
NWI
PEM
A.
mIll PFI/PSS
Js
1 I Freshwater Pond.
I 1 Lake
250 500 750 1000 Ft
I I Riverine
A0
ay
diii,iiidwilik
RONMENTAL
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
Date: May 13, 2021

36° 11' 32' N
36° 1545 N
F
8
6
615
6
615500
1
6156C0
615700
Soil Map —Guilford County, North Carolina
(Reedy Fork Review Area 20210510)
r 71ni1',td?tf ¶ t7 f:c=t.lr
I I
615600 615700
I I
615600 615900
Map Scale: 1:7,060 if printed on A portrait (8.5' x 11") sheet
616103
61600
I
616320
I I I I
616C00 616103 616230 616300 616403 616500
616400
6
8
Meters
A603
0 300 600 1200 1e0F0eet
Map p0Jedion: Web MsoNr Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UiM Zane 17N WGS84
N 0 100 203
400
uNatural Resources Web Soil Survey
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
6
5/13/2021
Page 1 of 3
36° 11' 32" N
36° 10'45"N
IRONMENTAL
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
Date: May 13, 2021

Soil Map —Guilford County, North Carolina
(Reedy Fork Review Area 20210510)
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
ITT Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
0 Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
ri Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
to Blowout
Borrow Pit
X Clay Spot
0 Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
O Landfill
A. Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
0 Miscellaneous Water
O Perennial Water
yr Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
(� Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
A( Sodic Spot
RI Spoil Area
0 Stony Spot
CO Very Stony Spot
1j Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:20,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Transportation
1+. Rails
N Interstate Highways
..,.,. US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
I. Aerial Photography
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Guilford County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 18, Jun 4, 2020
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Oct 24, 2018—Oct
30, 2018
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USDA Natural Resources
Can' Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
5/13/2021
Page 2 of 3
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
Date: May 13, 2021

Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
CaC
Map Unit Name
Casville sandy loam, 6 to 10
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
1.1
0.7%
percent slopes
4.2
CcB
Cecil sandy loam, 2 to 6
percent slopes
2.7%
CeC2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 6 to 10
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
7.4
4.7%
CkC
Clifford sandy loam, 6 to 10
percent slopes
7.9
5.0%
CoA
Congaree loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, frequently flooded
0.4
0.2%
CrB
Coronaca clay loam, 2 to 6
percent slopes
71.6
45.5%
CrC
Coronaca clay loam, 6 to 10
percent slopes
3.2
2.0%
EnB
Enon fine sandy loam, 2 to 6
percent slopes
4.1
2.6%
McC2
Madison clay loam, 6 to 10
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
7.6
4.8%
McD2
Madison clay loam, 10 to 15
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
0.0
0.0%
McE2
Madison clay loam, 15 to 25
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
5.0
3.2%
NaC
Nathalie sandy loam, 6 to 10
percent slopes
4.4
2.8%
PoD
Poplar Forest sandy loam, 10
to 15 percent slopes
33.5
21.3%
W
Water
1.2
0.8%
WwC Wynott-Wilkes-Poindexter
complex, 2 to 10 percent
slopes
5.7
3.6%
Totals for Area of lnterest
157.4
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
lisso Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
IRONMENTAL
5/13/2021
Page 3 of 3
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location; 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Coordinates: 36,18668, -79.70964
Date: May 13, 2021

Kowa Drive NC X
ELI
3hON' Sear_''. "e s',: Its fOr /)GOWd ...
1
Fa 161
Lake Tennserd
m
;
t� M Gate' •, .2mi
Bryan Park
79. 715 36.198 Degrees
Click a stream for more information
❑ X
Surface Water Classifications:
'5-11-(9)
Reedy Fork (Hardys t'
Pond)
escr o or: From Lake Townsend
Dem to Haw R vier
Class f ce - • WS-V;NSW
Date c' ._ _: _ August 10 2009
What does this More info
Class mean?
R ver Bas r•. Cape Fear
Zoom t0
take Townsend Rd
Marcfpwud Dr
N
Y
Hardys
Mill Pond
24
Qv MM.- Pap4a rY State of North C
Red f.oU 2r
ih
e Bra.:
o �
-
S>errtwrrt
Steer (,r
n
Play
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
Date: February 22, 2021

Mears Fork -Haw River
Reedy Fork -Lake Townsend
k-LaI a Brandt
North Buffalo Creek
Legend
O Review Area
HUC 12
I Guilford County
I I
HUC 12 Watersheds
Benaja Creek -Haw River
0 Smith Branch -Reedy Fork
$Guth Buffalo Creek
Giles Creek -Haw River
Buffalo Creek
Lower Little Alamance Creek
ek-Haw River
0 1 2 3 4Mi
TIM
RONMENTAL
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
Date: May 13, 2021

03010103
,VAUpper Dan
Legend
O Review Area
HUC 08
Guilford County
I I
I J
103
!ep
HUC 08 Watersheds
03030002
Haw
,oveilkt
RONMENTAL
Project Name: Reedy Fork
Location: 5955 Summit Avenue, Browns Summit, NC 27214
For: The Silverman Group Attn: Mr. Dan Lacz
Coordinates: 36.18668, -79.70964
Date: May 13, 2021