20130664 Ver 1_401 Application_20130713

201 3066 4
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
0
MEMO
ill
g ►
We Transmit to you Herewith:
[f Drawings
❑ Specifications
❑ Brochures or photos
[� Correspondence
❑ As per your request
Project #: Date: l,�0 1,]
Project Name: K8e,1 IQ. Cornme rCa CJ
File:
❑ For your information and files
[3'*' For comment or approval
❑ Returned for correction, resubmit
❑ Approved as noted
Under Separate-,�:
❑ By mail
❑ By courier
IT By express
Do �
1 •
it enclosures are not as usteo as auove, Kinaiy noury us at once.
,`��
h �0�0-I�t�ilm(n Re6lorsj Dices

20130664
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
June 28, 2013
S &EC Project # 11972
To: US Army Corps of Engineers
N.C. Division of Water Quality - WeBSCape
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Archdale Building — 9"' Floor
69 Darlington Avenue
512 North Salisbury Street
Wilmington, NC 28403
Raleigh, NC 27604
Attn: David E. Bailey
Attn: Karen Higgins
Cc: DENR - Wilmington Regional Office
UT to New River
N.C. Division of Water Quality
Cape Fear see also White Oak
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
Attn: Joanne Steenhuis
C; NSW
From: Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
,
Bob Zarzecki
Re: KOENIG COMMERCIAL, Gum Branch Rd. & Western Blvd., Jacksonville, Onslow Co., NC
On behalf of the owners, John Koenig, Inc., please find attached a complete application and supplemental
information requesting written concurrence from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water
Quality (NCDWQ) that the activities proposed below may proceed under Nationwide Permit 39 and General Water
Quality Certification 3890. Please contact me at (919) 846 -5900 if you have any questions or require additional
information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name
KOENIG COMMERCIAL
Project Type
Commercial /Retail Development
Owner / Applicant
John Koenig, Inc.
County
Onslow
Nearest Town
Jacksonville
Waterbody Name
UT to New River
Basin / Sub -basin
Cape Fear see also White Oak
Index Number
19-(1)
Class
C; NSW
USGS Cataloging Unit
03030001 see also 03020302
IMPACT SUMMARY
Stream Impact (acres):
0.1
Wetland Impact (acres):
0.49
Open Water Impact (acres):
0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
0.5
Total Stream Impact (linear feet):
243
Mitigation — Stream (feet)
486
Mitigation — Riparian Wetland (acres)
0.9
Attachments:
PCN Application Form & DWQ $570 Application Fee
Agent Authorization Form
USGS Topographic Map & NRCS Soil Survey Map
Proposed Plans / Impact Exhibits (3 sheets)
Lowe's Foods Letter 6/26/2013
Alternative Plans #1, 2 & 3
Freeland & Kauffman, Inc. (F &K, Inc.) Letter 6/27/2013
F &K, Inc. - Secondary Wetland Impact Analysis
NWI, DFIRM & SHPO /HPOWEB Maps
Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank Credit Reservation
NC DWQ Stream Form 5/15/13
NCWAM Rating Sheet
SAW -2013 -00578 JD April 16, 2013
Letters of Support (City, County, Chamber & Eco.Dev.)
c__ L1uJ
CD
w LI W

`o�ot W Art9
> g
o <
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
©Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Q Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes © No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
© Yes ❑ No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes Q No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Koenig Commercial / Lowe's Foods
2b. County:
Onslow
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Jacksonville
2d. Subdivision name:
n/a
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
n/a
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
John Koenig, Inc.
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
8:1576 P:737
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mr. John Koenig
3d. Street address:
6432 Yadkin Road
3e. City, state, zip:
Fayetteville, NC 28303
3f. Telephone no.:
(910) 864 -1976
3g. Fax no.:
' send to agent
3h. Email address:
" send to agent
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Mr. Bob Zarzecki
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (a.k.a., S &EC, PA)
5c. Street address:
11010 Raven Ridge Road
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27614
5e. Telephone no.:
(919) 846 -5900
5f. Fax no.:
(919) 846 -9467
5g. Email address:
bzarzecki @sandec.com
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
4368 -02 -76 -5451
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
I Latitude: 34.8 Longitude: - 77.4408
1c. Property size:
37.38 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
UT to New River
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; NSW (Stream Index No. 19 -(1))
2c. River basin:
New (03030001) [Note: also White Oak 03020302]
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The majority of the property was dear -cut as recently as 2009 and has essentially been maintained in an open Geared state since, with the exception
of the drainageways which are primarily forested. The property is bordered on the east and south by major thoroughfare roads Surrounding land
uses include a power substation property, residential development, Geared vacant land, commerdal/retail developments, and forested lands.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 2.43
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 2,700
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to develop a commercial/retail development on the property.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The first phase of the overall project will include a Lowe's Foods store, 2 smaller retail stores, a restaurant, and associated infrastructure
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary Q Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Adam Carter / Bob Zarzedci
Agency /Consultant Company: Wetland Solutions, LLC / S &EC
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Jurisdictional Determination, April 16, 2013, SAW - 2013-00578; N C DWQ Stream Identification, May 15,2013;
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
Q Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
A conceptual plan has been provided for future phases of the development. A future impact of 0.022 acres is anticipated & is requested at this time.
These plans are solely conceptual in nature and could change to include multifamily residential uses, for example.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands Q Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary
W7 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0 339
W2 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.043
W3 P
Draining
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0 076
W4 T
Excavation
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.01
W5 P
Fill
Headwater Welland
Yes
Corps
0.022
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.49
2h. Comments:
Impacts W1 & W2 are for fill associated with the access drive, buildings, parking lot & infrastructure. The "secondary wetland impact" (W3) is
associated with the potential for loss of hydrology to the wetland (i.e., draining) that could occur as determined by the project engineer. No fill to this
area is proposed. The "temporary impact" (W4) is for a utility pipe crossing to the stormwater pond. The "future wetland impact" (W5) is anticipated
and requested at this time, but is not anticipated to be constructed as part of the first phase of the development. (NCWAM Score = "MEDIUM'S
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 P
Fill
Unnamed
PER
Corps
3
63
S2 P
Fill
Unnamed
PER
Corps
3
180
S3 -
Choose one
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
243
3i. Comments:
The USACE verified the stream to be a Relatively Permanent Water (RPW) tributary stream. The USACE and DWQ evaluated the stream using the
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form (Version 4.11) and calculated the score to be 32.5 points or perennial using the DWQ methodology. As such, the
applicant is proposing a mitigation ratio of 2:1 for the proposed impacts.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond 1D number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWO)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
61 -
Yes /No
B2 -
Yes /No
B3 -
Yes /No
B4 -
Yes /No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See attached justification letter from Lowe's Foods and associated alternative plans. The proposed project has been reduced in size and configuration
to avoid and minimize impacts, to include the reconfiguration of the site plan, reduced retail area, a smaller Lowe's Food store size, and use of
retaining walls.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
As stated above, retaining walls will be used to allow for steeper fill slopes and reduced impacts. A bypass pipe will be installed to maintain hydrologic
connectivity through the property and to help ensure adequate hydrology to the retained wetlands Temporary erosion control measures will be
installed around project boundaries to avoid and minimize any indirect impacts to remaining jurisdictional wetlands. Permanent stormwater best
management practices (BMPs) will be used (e.g., wet pond).
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Q Yes ❑ No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
Q DWQ Q Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
Q Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Riparian wetland
Type: Stream
Type: Choose one
Quantity: 0.9 acres
Quantity: 486
Quantity:
(permanent x = + emporary x _ + econ ary x _ . = acres
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
A. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (Stage Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
85%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
0 Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The plan includes the use of a single BMP (e g , wet detention pond) for the entire property that will be initially sized for the first phase of the
development and will be modified, increased in size, as the property develops. The final stormwater management plan will be reviewed and approved
by the City of Jacksonville, a certified local government by DWQ, and will ensure proper treatment for the "C; NSW classified waters. A bypass pipe
will be installed to route water through the development and around the proposed grocery store The pipe will ensure hydrologic connectivity through
the property and adequate hydrology to the retained wetlands and stream. An energy dissipater will be installed to help ensure non - erosive velocities
discharging to the wetland. No new impervious areas will be discharge into this pipe. The BMP will be used to treat the new development areas.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Jacksonville, NC
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
City of Jacksonville, NC
0 Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
Q Other: Coastal Stormwater
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes Q No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
[]Session Law 2006 -246
[]Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
S. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
El Yes pX No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes Q No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑Yes QX No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project as a whole is proposed as the entire property. There property to the north is a power substation. The properly to the west is an existing
residential development, currently under review for an Individual Permit for phase expansion, independent of this development. The properties to the
east, south and southeast are existing commercial/retail developments and vacant commercial/retail land, not anticipated to develop as a result of this
project. Secondary impacts to 0.076 acres of wetlands is possible due to a reduced watershed area, and are accounted for in this application.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The City of Jacksonville has adequate sanitary sewer capacity available for the project and will ensure this through their permitting processes required
for this project.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
Yes No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NHP Map Viewer and online records search. Also, as part of the Individual Permit review process, it was determined that there would be 'no effect' on
protected species for the Williamsburg Plantation development project, for which the review area Included this property.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes © No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA "EFH Mapper' and online records search. Also,this project exists upstream of the Williamsburg Plantation development and It was determined
that there would be no adverse impact to EFH species.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ®No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would Impact historic or archeological resources?
NC SHPO - HPOWEB map viewer and online records search. No structures were found to exist on the property. No records of cultural resources
were found on or adjacent to the property. Also, the adjacent Williamsburg Plantation was found to have no adverse effect on cultural resources.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NC Floodplain Mapping Information System and DFIRM. The FEMA designated floodplain is shown to exist more than 1/2 mile downstream of this
project.
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Bob Zarzecki
June 28, 2013
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
L—C-s4kppic—AIRVAgerffs Signature
Date
(Agents signature is valid only If an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandEC.com
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Landowner
Name: John Koenig, Inc.
Address: 6432 Yadkin Road, Fayetteville, NC 28303
Phone: [phone]
Project Name /Description:
john Koenig_TR3 L37.38 acres), NW Quadrant of Western Blvd. & Gum Branch Rd., Tacksonville, NC
S&EC Project # 11972
Date: November 2012
The Department of the Army
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: David Bailey
Field Office: Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to act in my
behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental
information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. Thy& day of November, 2012.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professioi
government officials to enter the property when accomp.
to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site.
John Koenig
Current Owner's Name
cc:
NCDENR - DWQ WeSCAPe
Archdale Building
512 N. Salisbury Street 9- Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
cc: Mr. Bob Zarzedd
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA

i O yiDEN,DR.
Greenbrian o ��
Z 1
If
i,
r - RA st7
India
Moon
Half
A - , , �{��� ✓ C/�J Springs
=� �5 1 Heights
Hei p
%v v, V J
Westgate
n
�.H61f-Mo
`. Raintree C Creek
J
� ��/
�j - -- — i 4o JACKSONVILLE ` 50�
Deerfield ; sr4 i t
� IIAIMTREERD
v Shamrock t Pa �
Pil'lage �a' SITE
Ra ��'( gLVO DELANEY DR
.y
P
_ ! HOU
Lauradale
O
Cardinal Village
- Q ' Lakewood t
� h
ANTK-

456 FEET IC. M k
1337 GoA
K. .�. ' 'a 1308
AuB Pa x AnB �� o .� NOB U� 'N 08
Mk
GoA Folk
Y •'Mk MBC �� Nob . Ly -
��`•�' Hoff '
+ Moon Nob
NoA St
GoA Crc / r
AuB CI No
AuB 1 No
1311 1 O n
on
F0A
'v MaC Ly Ra i
PC' Goa
AuB
Crc �'.
Cr8 / On
M Nos
GOA Mk "`° k AuB
—' NoB
MaC C i M MaC
k`� �� Crc Cr8 Gal
�' U.
Ly Nof3 " ` rMk,__..� M o Moon ^�
GOA �..5� GOB aC l '�Mk�
�.Ni� f f,•' M Mk �
ap -~ On Pt %r rAuB i• GDB N08
GOA 1
i ! \ NoB
� r
Au8 GOA On NOB
Ly
GoA Au8 AuB l.y Ra MaC
NOB '� GoA Ln Ra NoB
Pa _
GvB j
NoB
qr \ Mac Ly
W \ SITE Ra
NoA
Cr8 /
Ln -- 1
_- Ur Ly
GOB
GoA 1 /
Ln
Bab �� ��i.r 648 Ly ;Cr8
Ln BBB
MaC CrB i
--- Le
gq�
AuB MaC ~, To CrC
Oa / oas
MaC "'- pa Bas GoA Ly CrB
34 °47'30" - __� - - - - -T. �- - -- - -- --
77° 30 "00" - --

1
1
16
1
I
I
I
I
m
D
�z
D�
s
D
6
T G7 m 0 CO D
D M4 ;119Y F-
;t
a
4
K o
�AAD and KAl9tulAN. NC,
n
O
�
D
F-
D
201 South College St., Suite 1300
n
p
oDp.
C.!)
O
fax [phone]
O
DD
npD
n
r3 p
D
c7
7707 (D
RETAIL BUILDING
JACKSOrM1F. ONSIOW COlM1(. NC
�AAD and KAl9tulAN. NC,
Engineers • Londscgoe Architects
O
SOUTHEAST
CROSLAND SOUTHEAST
Greenville 209 was, s +«e Ave" South Cadina 29609
201 South College St., Suite 1300
864 - 233 -5497
C.!)
fax [phone]
m
�r C RO S LAN D
RETAIL BUILDING
JACKSOrM1F. ONSIOW COlM1(. NC
�AAD and KAl9tulAN. NC,
Engineers • Londscgoe Architects
SOUTHEAST
CROSLAND SOUTHEAST
Greenville 209 was, s +«e Ave" South Cadina 29609
201 South College St., Suite 1300
864 - 233 -5497
Charlotte, North Carolina 28244
fax [phone]
� EM
CA
a A
� M9
J
� D
� K7
O
/9
N
w
U
J
00
m�

1 I 2 3 I 4 5 I 6 I 7 I 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
_� i• V l
�,t�A yt jj
VICNTY MAP
(J OT TO SCALE)
TOTAL IMPACTS
AREA: 0.475 AC.
WETLAND AREA, 0.458 AC.
STREAM AREA- 0.017 AC.
STREAM: 243 LF
TEMP. IMPACT: 0.010 AC.
WETLAND IMPACT
MAP
0
Q �
maa��
��UmN
J ffi <
• 3 � o
W
V
� cv
Z O
m
0
D
z U
� Q � m
C) p
z
C48
Ucn
DRAWN
BTS
BrS
DATE
6/26/L3
SCALE
PROPOSED
PLAN

1 2 3 4 5
A
11AL
A PERENNIAL
STREAM
B
CI
u■
E
F
6 I 7 1 8
_, ev
404 SECONDARY
WETLAND WPACT`,
0.076 AC.
9
,.: TEMPORARY
9yOS� ,
WETLAND
WWACTS
61 \. 0,010 AC.
H / // ` PW r
/ TRIBUTARY /
STREAM
0 ,
�q y / // /s • • • - -a • • I START RPW L (�� ���T �If�
O /' �''.`. STREAM RY 404 WET
WPACTS I
/
0.339 AC.
/ M
J START RPW TRIBUTARY END RPW
/ TRIBUTARY STREAM TRIBUTARY
K STREAM STREAM
OTREAM IMPACTS
180 LINEAR FEET
STREAM WPACTS I I --
E 0 63 LW-Q FEET
Im
W
10 11 12 13 14 15
i
1 ' I
1
I I1 I
1 1
I I I
1 1
1 +li y�1�1
1` 1
1
II 1
1 I I
1 1
RETAL TRACT A 1 II
I 3.W AC
1 l
I I
I �
I I 1
I 11 1
I I 1
II 1
I I
1 \
I I I
I
404 WETLAND,
I
IMPACTS 2
I 0.043 AC. W ml I
i
I a
Ln II
1 �tzz�l
I
II
I
11
�1
I
I
IIII II
1 1 I
Ali �
RETAL TRACT
(05 AC
I
END JURISDICTIONAL I I I I
TRIBUTARY DITCH /START i �� I
RPW TRIBUTARY STREAM
i
1
1 +i`► 1 � d
I START JURISDICTI
2 CX-MOT al TRIBUTARY DITCH
ArJ
� I
1 I
1
S 78'55'43" W 567.21'
+�4y111
EKBTW 9314X1
WESTERN BLVD 200' R/W � C
N.C.S.R. 1470
16 17 18 19
� SITE/
{
VICINITY MAP
(JOT TO SCALE)
� = 0.475 AC.
WETLAPD AREA, OAW AC.
STREAM AREA, 0.017 AC.
AM: 243 LF
�.
IMPACT- 0.010 AC.
WETLAND IMPACT
MAP
Q r
&2
6�co
�:F �2
m�4o
h O G
1 N_
oQm
_ -
b
U
0 8
z
Z U
a
� J _
Q O (' O
WW cy o
DC U U
Z
r�y
0
Urn

ofmis
1381 Old Mill Circle, Suite 200
P.O. Box 24908
Winston Salem, NC 27114.4908
June 26, 2013
Bob Zarzecki
Wetlands Department Manager
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
(919) 846 -5900 Office Phone
Love's Food Stores, Inc.
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
RE: USACE Permitting for Lowes Food Stores at Gum Branch Road and Western
Boulevard in Jacksonville, NC
Dear Mr. Zarzecki:
As recommended by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE) and N.C. Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) during your May 15, 2013 site meeting, we have reviewed several
plan options (attached) in an effort to minimize or avoid impacts. I also wanted to take
this opportunity to provide some additional background and information regarding the
project given your involvement to date has been limited to our environmental permitting.
I hope this additional information helps the agencies understand the need for the current
site plan and its proposed impacts.
PROJECT BACKGROUND & DESIGN REOUIREMENTS:
1. C4 Development LLC (aka Crosland Southeast) as agent for MDI Management
Inc. ( Lowes Food Stores) has placed approximately 8.2 acres under contract and
will close on the Parcel subject to all necessary permits to construct a
Neighborhood Shopping Center on the site.
2. The intended use of the land given the zoning and location at the intersection of
Gum Branch Road and Western Boulevard is for commercial development. The
City of Jacksonville concurs via planning staff review.
3. The Parcel is planned for a 55,000 SF grocery store, a 4,000 SF restaurant and a
small amount for -lease shop space (approx. 5,000 SF).
a. Lowes Food Stores does not require additional larger retail tenants to lease
space in the same project (co- tenancy requirements) like other junior
anchor retail tenants (i.e. TJ Max, Petsmart, Michaels, etc). Therefore, a
grocery anchored commercial development will require the least impactful
amount of land area for development.

b. Lowes Food Stores tries to locate their stores at the intersection of two
heavily trafficked roads with automobile counts for average Daily Trips
(ADT) greater than 20,000 ADT's.
i. The ADT for Western Boulevard is 18,000 ADT's and for Gum
Branch south of Western is 20,000 ADT's.
c. The City of Jacksonville as well as Lowes Food Stores require 4 parking
spaces per 1,000 SF of development at a minimum.
i. At approx. 62,500 SF, our proposed development requires 250
parking spaces.
ii. Lowes Food Stores also requires the parking to be within 200 feet
of their main entry due to high percentage of shoppers with
children.
SITE PLANS:
Alternative Plan #1
This was the original site plan developed for the Project. To date, this plan has not
been presented to the USACE or DWQ for review. The plan was our preferred plan
given the parking field for the Lowes Foods Store was uninterrupted by the
restaurant outparcel at the comer of Gum Branch and Western and our store was as
close as possible to the full movement access on Gum Branch shown to the north of
our proposed store by approximately 400 feet.. In an effort to minimize impacts to
the wetlands and streams on the property, we have moved away from this plan and
developed Plan #2, the plan presented to the USACE and DWQ.
PROPOSED PLAN
This is the revised plan and the one used for determining the impacts currently
proposed for the Project. This plan has inadequate parking compared to Plan #1 but
was approved by Lowes Food Store given the reduction in impacts to the wetlands.
This plan was developed as a means to reduce the amount of overall impact the
Project would require through the reduction of building area and thus land area
compared to Plan #1, which has an economic impact on the Project. Plan #2 was
determined to be acceptable, while not desired, by both Lowes Food Store and C4
Development, LLC.
Alternative Plan #2
This plan was developed based on the USACE & DWQ comments during your
onsite meeting on May 15''. This plan is unacceptable to Lowes Food Stores for
several reasons. First, we project a significant negative impact on the number of
customers visiting the store given the lack of visibility of the parking from Gum
Branch Road and the safety issue this lack of visibility creates for the shoppers,
mostly women with children. Additionally, this plan eliminates the free standing

restaurant (shown on Plan #1 and #2 at Western and Gum Branch) which is
required for economic reasons, to make the project feasible. Also, our delivery
trucks would have significant issues accessing the loading which is now abutting
Gum Branch Road which the City of Jacksonville would not approve given loading
is to be screened from public roads. Finally, this plan would not significantly reduce
the amount of impacts as requested with Plan #2.
Alternative Plan #3
This plan was also developed based on the USACE & DWQ comments during your
onsite meeting on May 15'' and this plan is also unacceptable to Lowes Food Stores
for several reasons. First, as outlined above, Lowes Food Stores requires significant
visibility from Gum Branch and Western. The distance of our store from Western
and the lack of visibility our store has, given the buildings located adjacent to
Western Blvd. as well as the avoided wetland/stream drainage, is extremely
problematic. Secondly, the small buildings along Western (assuming they would be
part of this project) would be very difficult to lease given their distance from our
store. It is critical that shops and restaurants be in close proximity to the main
anchor or our store in any Neighborhood Shopping Center to be successful.
This layout would subject our company to a distinct competitive disadvantage to the
Food Lion on the opposite corner which has complete visibility to the shopper and
full going -home access into both main road arterials. The circuitous route required
for our customer to navigate to this store location voids all customer convenience
which is extremely important to our sustainability and success. Finally, we do not
believe we can be successful in this market without putting our "best foot forward"
given the competition that currently exists.
I greatly appreciate your review of this material and please do not hesitate to contact me
or our agent, Crosland Southeast, should you have any questions or comments or need
anything else.
Si ely,
Roger Henderson
VP Real Estate

i
v
v
v
v
1 2 3 4 5 1 6 7 8 1 9 1 10 11 12 1 13 14 15 1 16 1 17 18 1 19
� I 1
ACREAGE SUMMARY
N \
\
� s\
r`
for O scas
E
N yTS 1 PARKING DATA
I I
I 11
� I I
I
_ - PTRMNIAL 4i
ARY
STREAM
\ tREAU T
ttt
\ ttt M
\
�\ stREAU rAar \\ 11 I •.
0 ' N
O
O I I
m I 1
TENANT
ACREAGE
PETAL TRACT
9.29 •%
MU^nw 711
114 •%
21%VLOI TRACT A
zm •I-
R2WX TRACT 8
24$7 H-
TOTAL
3738 •/-
r`
for O scas
E
N yTS 1 PARKING DATA
I I
I 11
� I I
I
_ - PTRMNIAL 4i
ARY
STREAM
\ tREAU T
ttt
\ ttt M
\
�\ stREAU rAar \\ 11 I •.
0 ' N
O
O I I
m I 1
TENANT
AREA 5P
RCS
RATIO
REOLOW
PARKING
PA 0149
PROVIDED
RATIO
FRONDED
RETAIL A
WACO SA
04DOA000
88
58
40OA000
RETAIL 8
06.043 5P
44JDOAOOO
220
271
492ADOO
TOTAL
69A43 SP
•4.00A000
278
329
474/1000
• PEOIJ2ED PARKING INCLUDES- ALLOWAB 20t REDUCTION OUE TO
9NOPPNG CENTER SIZE
OUTPARCEL PARKNIS DATA
TENANT
AREA 5P
REC4fED
RATIO
REOLIRED
PARR'NNG
PARKING
PROVIDED
RATIO
PROVIDED
R$AIRANT
3.965 SP
I T@ BW R TB1-
49
1236/1000
kL IMPACTS
� , 0.689 AC.
WETLMD AREAL 0.672 AC.
STREAM AREA, 007 AC.
.AM I 243 LF
WETLAND IMPACT
MAP
® acae r o0
Zz
:5=:
0p
VH
9
N
�
Q �
�g
U
Q
Q 4m
oho
�c
U E
Zz
:5=:
0p
VH
9

0
0
0
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1 18 1 19
ACREAGE SUMMARY
oa
STR PERD"AL PAQKJ4ry DATA
PEREWSAL PERENN AL
TENANT
AREA SP
REOLARED
RATIO
ACREAGE
PETAL TRACT 8.34 -1-
RESULIAL TRACT A 2.66 -1-
PART"
PROVOED
RATIO
PRONGED
RETAL A
4AOD SF'
*4j00AO00
19
19
4JDOAOOO
PETAL 8
REMJAL TRACT 0 2638 •1-
MAP
220
232
42VKX)O
--
VKWTY
040T TO SCALE)
04JOOAOOO
239
251
TOTAL 37.38 -,-
ON-1-
oa
STR PERD"AL PAQKJ4ry DATA
PEREWSAL PERENN AL
TENANT
AREA SP
REOLARED
RATIO
RECLARED
PARKM
PART"
PROVOED
RATIO
PRONGED
RETAL A
4AOD SF'
*4j00AO00
19
19
4JDOAOOO
PETAL 8
55A)43 BF
04JOOAOOO
220
232
42VKX)O
TOTAL
59843 SP
04JOOAOOO
239
251
4J9AOOO
Op v STKAM STREM
-V
6mmT.W�
REGLXZW PAROC. NCLWES - ALLOWABE- 202 REDLICTM WE TO
SWOPPM C84TER WE
4N VETLAW
WAM
(ULLLOI
on At
summm
ON-1-
sulm
It
0-
A
(D
car_—
LL
TWWAM
A.
1 0.
....
ow x
T4
FtPW
STRE,�TARY
OD
X
SIREAM
i imi i i q
(D
4r
Vft"mm Wo =1 ww
W-% W70 WETLAND IMPACT
MAP
— — ------------ ? To
SCME r - eW
LIJ JB
0
nap
0
Z�
OD
UR
0)
6mmT.W�
4N VETLAW
WAM
(ULLLOI
on At
summm
sulm
V LWA FEET
(D
car_—
(1) 4D 0
1 0.
(D
4r
Vft"mm Wo =1 ww
W-% W70 WETLAND IMPACT
MAP
— — ------------ ? To
SCME r - eW
LIJ JB
0
nap
0
Z�
OD
UR
0)

AI
1 I 2 I 3 ' 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 I 13 I 14 I 15
ACREAGE SUMMARY
B
C N \�
� s\
170'11 � X11 `
oa
E •
0
PEREwaAL I
STREM
y
I
F
GI
HI
mm
JI
K
L
M
t
\ I
16 17 18 19
VICNITT MAP
o V
8
r
04DT TO SCALE)
PARKING DATA
TENANT
ACREAGE
RETAL TRACT A
319 ./.
RETAL TRACT 0
566 •/.
RETAL TRACT C
3.06 •/.
REWAL 12ACr A
266 •/-
WOOL TRACT 8
2261 •/-
TOTAL
3 •%
16 17 18 19
VICNITT MAP
o V
8
r
04DT TO SCALE)
PARKING DATA
TENANT
AREA SP
REOLXW
RAM
REQURED
PAR104G.
PAQKNG
RATIO
PROVIDED
PROVUW
RETAIL, A
A800 SP
04.004=
A
19
4A0A000
RETAL 9
55043 5P
m4.00/O00
210
220
4DO1000
RETAL C
15"W SP
04.00A000
61
93
61=00
RETAIL. D
6X= SP
04JOO/OOO
24
24
4:00/000
RETAL E
4850 SP
0400/1000
20
44
9A711000
RETAL P
IOA00 SP
- 400/1000
40
82
8211000
TOTAL
95,893 SP
6400 11000
384
482
5024000
/ • RE4JRED, PAQKW INOUDE$ ALLOWABLE 201 REDUCTION DUE TO
0 0 S OPPNG CENTER SIZE
O 0 p I 11 111
\ \ h 0 A. 1
1 1
1
C -I
PERQIIOAI 1 ® ° +�1 i i
_ 16 p 1 719'•1- - 1 1
o r 1 1
1 � Y
\\ . -;�'� �• -v • " � � � � � � - 0.031 AG j
O\ O 111 O I1 O // � �/ �' UrfU •� °� 1 �I
STU" lr o 0 1
° 1 II SIRENIIP
/
4R � O // ^9•�;•- �. 1 p � ®�jj'� EAAO ® II 7/ UfJIR FgT
M .r. . .
1
UnowQlltnTfWM
0
_ s 7BW4r • 567 n• 1 1 1 1
' N S2 _ ' _ WETLAND IMPACT
MAP
1 1
O1 1 scA1e r - qo•
�U
a0
6
)
Z°
�w
�y
AGE
U0
0))
N
W C4
R7
Q�g
m
Q� 5
Z VZ
a �m
0 0
rQ
�c
U RA
Z°
�w
�y
AGE
U0
0))

FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
June 27, 2013
David E. Bailey
Regulatory Specialist
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE- SAS -RG -L
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403 -1343
RE: Proposed Lowes Food Shopping Center
Dear Mr. Bailey:
This letter is being provided to provide justification for the 0.022 acre fidure wetland impact shown on the
northern wetland finger of this site. This impact is being necessitated due to the location of the required
full access driveway to Gum Branch Road that will serve the entire +/- 37 acre site.
We have been in conversation and correspondence with both the North Carolina Department of
Transportation ( NCDOT) and the City of Jacksonville (COJ) on an acceptable location for what is
anticipated to be the only full movement access from Gum Branch Road to this site.
Our initial request was to provide the access point further south of the current location (approximately
1200' from the Western Blvd and Gum Branch Road intersection), thus avoiding an impact to the northern
wetland finger. However, NCDOT has approved and is currently designing plans to expand Gum Branch
Road to provide dual left turn lanes at its intersection with Western Boulevard. In connection with these
improvements and since this intersection is of high traffic volume, NCDOT requires that the access point
be located outside of the functional movements of the turn lanes. The preferred location for the access
point was a distance of 1500' from the Western Blvd. and Gum Branch Road intersection. The proposed
plan depicts the required access at a location of approximately 1385' from the intersection and results in
less wetland impact than the location preferred by NCDOT.
It is our understanding that NCDOT has agreed to the compromise location of the access point currently
shown. This access point also addresses a City of Jacksonville concern of providing the intersection at a
point where development on the east side of Gum Branch for a potential residential development could
create the fourth leg of this intersection. It is contemplated that the creation of the fourth leg may result in
a need for traffic signalization at this location, and provides further justification for maximizing distance
from the existing signal at the intersection of Western Boulevard and Gum Branch Road.
We believe that the impacts shown have been minimized and the proposed design has resulted in a balance
between important natural resource and transportation safety objectives.
Sincerely,
f
d Simmons, PE
209 West Stone Avenue • Greenville. South Carolina 29609 • Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone]

FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
Enoaes • L qvs 4PE Awerwrs
June 28, 2013
David E. Bailey
Regulatory Specialist
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE- SAS -RG -L
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403 -1343
RE: Proposed Lowes Food Shopping Center
Dear Mr. Bailey:
As discussed in our meeting on June 21, 2013, we have performed a drainage analysis for the flow to the
wetland head area being impacted by the proposed access road for the development. In that meeting, you
indicated a concern for additional supplemental impacts due to loss of drainage area upon development of
the roadway and outparcels.
Attached you will find a drainage analysis exhibit showing the predeveloped and post developed flows to
the analysis point ( closely downstream to the limits of impact). The following table summarizes the
information shown:
At the analysis point, the available flow and contributing area still retains approximately 25% of both
characteristics and I believe will continue to provide water to the remaining wetland area. Therefore,
supplemental impacts of 0.076 ac have been shown on the application for those areas not being directly
impacted but where flow and drainage area have been decreased by more than 75% of the original.
Sincerely,
d d dL Simmons, PE
209 West 5tone Avenue • Greenville, South Carolina 29609 • Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone]
Area
f 0 Vair Flovii
Predeveloped
2.65 ac
2.41 cfs
Postdeveloped
0.65 ac
0.59 ds
At the analysis point, the available flow and contributing area still retains approximately 25% of both
characteristics and I believe will continue to provide water to the remaining wetland area. Therefore,
supplemental impacts of 0.076 ac have been shown on the application for those areas not being directly
impacted but where flow and drainage area have been decreased by more than 75% of the original.
Sincerely,
d d dL Simmons, PE
209 West 5tone Avenue • Greenville, South Carolina 29609 • Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone]

J
. A
B
I
D
E
F
G
H
J
K
L
M
N
� © ©0 ©0000
ow
IT
_Sq ANALYSIS PRINT , %
PRE- DEVELOPMENT
m
♦
1
1
/
1
11 \+
12 1 13 1 1
r
±0.65 AC.
0(10)=0.59
Q =CIA
C =0.15
t;
_";_. Aiw�
ANALYSIS 701NT
1
v
1 15 I 16 1 17 1 18 1 19
SDI
\ I
, \ 1
1 ` \
1
�
1 �
/ 1
Jr
I\
\S
\
IN a t
PRE- DEVELOPMENT
m
♦
1
1
/
1
11 \+
12 1 13 1 1
r
±0.65 AC.
0(10)=0.59
Q =CIA
C =0.15
t;
_";_. Aiw�
ANALYSIS 701NT
1
v
1 15 I 16 1 17 1 18 1 19
SDI
\ I
, \ 1
1 ` \
1
�
1 �
/ 1
Jr
I\
\
l
St
.5
fit\
/,
``
'/'
/ ' \1 / ' +\ \ \ _♦ ; ^ \/ , r- ,�
rr' I - � �- \ 1 \` - ^__/
X11
,
' `
\y'
♦, •`_--_ /'
` -` -..� ham\,
��, - -54 -^ 1♦
r/\ ,''i
l i_I /i / ,
1" ,
_ ---
cm
PRE- DEVELOPMENT
m
♦
1
1
/
1
11 \+
12 1 13 1 1
r
±0.65 AC.
0(10)=0.59
Q =CIA
C =0.15
t;
_";_. Aiw�
ANALYSIS 701NT
1
v
1 15 I 16 1 17 1 18 1 19
SDI
\ I
, \ 1
1 ` \
1
, LM�D�r�, ♦.
I' 1 1 ♦ `♦ � � � I
"s I'll W
POST- DEVELOPMENT
r
�
1 �
/ 1
0AW
I\
'
l
.5
fit\
/,
, LM�D�r�, ♦.
I' 1 1 ♦ `♦ � � � I
"s I'll W
POST- DEVELOPMENT
r
Q
\\_
OD NOT LEE FOR aar6tQU.'IDI
N
Z
aim
�Q 0 A O
6c U �
�
1 �
/ 1
0AW
I\
'
l
Q
\\_
OD NOT LEE FOR aar6tQU.'IDI
N
Z
aim
�Q 0 A O
6c U �

ntit!�F It�'NfF rrs:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Koenig
Commercial (37 -ac)
National Wetlands
Inventory
Jan 17, 2013
Wetlands
Site
-
Freshwater Emergent
- Freshwater Forested /Shrub
- Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
- Estuarine and Marine
Freshwater Pond
- Lake
- Riverine
Other
Status
Digital
&jjd Scan
Non - Digital
No Data
300 m
000 ft
This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife S-1ce is not
responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All
wetlands related data should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on
the Wetlands Mapper web site.
User Remarks:

KOENIG COMMERCIAL
• Major Cities
Roads
— 100yr Flooding - Poodway (AE)
0 3000 Fe et
t Benchmarks
— NC Highway
10Dyr Flooding - Has BFE's (AE)
4 „R OFIRM Grid
—US Highway
100yr Flooding - No BFE's (A)
— Rivers and Streams
Interstate Highway
® 100yr Flooding - Vebuty Zone
• —•— Transacts ( Cosstal)
Political Areas
- 5ODyr Flooding (Shaded Xi
County Boundaries
Extraterr@onal Jurisdictions
- North Carolina
® coastal Barrier Resource Systems
Coastal Sounds
___ Base Fkrotl Elevation (S~)
- Cross Sections
Floodplain Mapping Program

�\ .,'� "^ i • /' "•' mot_ _.' ...,. - � ".
S
{
t
u.
' S
w
.� • � �� � Rid , �� 4.
F
a
♦ ;E3
sp
•., �o
gl# I

BACHELORS DELIGHT MITIGATION BANK
CREDIT RESERVATION LETTER
June 25, 2013
TO: Bob Zarredd
S&EC
11010 Rover Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Project: Koenig Commercial — Lowes Foods (SAW-2013-00572)
Dear Bob:
FROM: Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank
c/o Land Management Group, Inc.
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 1S
Wilmington, NC 28403
Pursuant to your recent credit request, Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank (BDMB) is providing confirmation
of acceptance to supply stream and riparian wetland compensatory mitigation credits for impacts
associated with the Koenig Commercial — Lowes Foods Project in the White Oak River Basin (conditional
upon receipt of payment as outlined below). Please refer to the table below depicting the type and
quantity of credits requested and reserved for your project.
Mftigation Type
I stream
FNon- Riparian Wetland - -- • - -T -
Riparian wetland - ` ( -
Credits Requested - - i — Credits Reserved +
486 486
-- -
-0.9 — - - - -� -- 0.9 _.
Note that the BDMB provides wetland credits in 0.10 -acre increments. Based upon receipt of your email
and completed credit request form transmitted on June 20 (2013), BDMB has reserved 486 stream credits
and 0.9 rioarian wetland credits. These credits are reserved until September 25, 2013 (90 days from the
date of this letter). Please contact us should you require additional time for the credit reservation beyond
this date.
Upon request for receipt of credit transfer, BDMB will issue an invoice In the amount of $237,654.90.
Upon receipt of payment, BDMB will provide an executed Transfer of Credit Certificate. Note that all
payments must be made with certified funds. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the credit
types and amounts requested are consistent with the compensatory mitigation requirements of the
permit(s) issued. BDMB and /or its agents are not responsible for determining the applicant's mitigation
requirements. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me by phone at
(910) 452 -0001 or by email at coreziosiOlmaroun.net.
Sincerely,
Land Management roup, Inc.
r ��ti)
Chrlstian Prezio
Section Manager

m Y
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: „ 1, }
Project/Site:L„�
Latitude: 3l'1�19 '"�✓
Evaluator:
County: r),, a.,
Longitude: _ 77 wlM%/
Total Points:
Stream is at feast intermittent
Z
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
tf2 19 or perennial If 2 30• -- '
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
e.g. Quad Name:
t ''l. r
A. Geomorphology Subtotal -7-=Ej
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1° Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1 k
`2
0
3. In- channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool sequence
0
1
0
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
.5
2
3
3
5. Active /relict floodplain
0
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
23 Crayfish
2
3
8. Headcuts
A
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
FIT
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
.5
1
.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 4►
Yes = 3
artial ditches are not rated; see dijcussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = "►� S )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
05
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
.5
02
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
i No = 0
es =
C. Biology (subtotal= ,,, ) -'
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
0
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
02
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
1W
% f
1.5
23 Crayfish
0
05
1
11
24 Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25 Algae
0
.5
1
1.5
26 Wetland plants in stream iriv/ -j !r//.rr/
FACW = 0 75;
BL = Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods See p 35 of manual
Notes: Al: o C ok-j lofoal on feel
4s i•. AM ,., Moif `o•e►• M
MrT- & C/.,A' . -poo) pq.4wCy #/G
A, 1 �j .t � �.y.,. � c.'`
/• n�s'
rft root
r41i..- P.- 197
A/ �•G �'l

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name Koenig Commercial / Lowe's Foods Date Spring /Summer 2013
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name /Organization B.Zarzecki / S&EC, PA
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y /N) YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y /N) NO
Wetland is intensively managed (YIN) NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y /N) YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y /N) NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y /N) YES
Assessment area is on a coastal island (YIN) NO
Sub - function Rating Summa
Function Sub - function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
LOW
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Habitat
Opportunity Presence? (Y /N)
YES
Particulate Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Vegetation Composition
Opportunity Presence? (Y /N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y /N) YES
Physical Change
Condition
HIGH
Hydrology
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Water Quality
Opportunity Presence? (YIN)
YES
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Habitat
Opportunity Presence? (Y /N)
NA
Habitat Physical Structure
Condition
MEDIUM
Landscape Patch Structure
Condition
LOW
Vegetation Composition
Condition
HIGH
Function Rating Summa
Function
Metrics /Notes
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
MEDIUM
Water Quality
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y /N)
YES
Habitat
Conditon
MEDIUM
Overall Wetland Rating MEDIUM

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW - 2013-00578 County: Onslow U.S.G.S. Quad: Jacksonville North
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION
Property Owner: John Koenig. Inc. Agent: Wetland Soultions. LLC
attn: John Koenig attn: Adam Carter
Address: 235 Green Street Address: P.O. Box 244
Fayetteville, NC 28301 Bunnlevel. NC 28323
Property description:
Size (acres) 37.38 Nearest Town Jacksonville
Nearest Waterway UT to New River River Basin White Oak
USGS HUC 03030001 Coordinates 34.801449 N - 77.442296 W
Location description: The oroaerty is located on the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Gum Branch Road and
Western Boulevard. in Jacksonville. Onslow County, North Carolina. Parcel ##: 339 -1931.
Indicate Which of the Followins Avoly:
A. Preliminary Determination
Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have this
property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under
the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. Approved Determination
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
X There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWAx33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
_ We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and
verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction
on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period
not to exceed five years.
X The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on 4/16/2013 . Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described property which are subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA). You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at (252) 808 -2808 to determine
their requirements.
Page 1 of 2
ECEIVE -
APR 19 213
i191a.W4
or, Sal 610*01uneatal

Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Mr. David E. Bailey at (910) 251 -4469 /
David.E.Bailev2Ausace.a rLnv.m il.
C. Basis For Determination
The site exhibits features with Ordinary High Water and wetland criteria as defined in the 1987 Corns Wetland
Delineation Manual and applicable Regional Supplements The waters on site include three unnamed tributaries (UTs) to
the New River - all Relatively Permanent Waters (RPWs) which flow to the New River - and abutting wetlands This
determination Is based on a site visit by David E. Bailey of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on 3/12/2013.
D. Remarks
Wetlands and other Waters of the US on the subject vrq"rtv were delineated by Adam Carter (Wetland Solutions) with
changes made in the field by Dave E. Bailey (USACE). -
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular
site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food
Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you
should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to
starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination
you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room IOM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by June 15, 2013.
* *It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence. * *
Corps Regulatory Official: %lit.y %dam_
a
Date April 16, 2013 Expiration Date April 16.2018
Copy furnished:
Joanne Steenhuis , NCDENR -DWQ, 127 Cardinal Drive Extension, Wilmington, NC 28405
J9hn.L..- Piearce & Associates, P.A.,- 09 Johnson Boulevard, Jacksonville, NC 28540
Bob Zarzecki, Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA, 11010 Raven Ridge Road, Raleigh, NC 27614

°< ` 0°m'a1°M�1�
��� ,�1.
'
b- ! +'� "Sf / -' /IAA
n
� M
Oft a�I mw
`�
��
�j�a i N, •z
a�soo -�,►� ®�„mm
A
ter. gm
»>i8a>�
oe>o 7ISlOM
��w
S�OS�I�
�
' I
•fib
WA\.
,YONii A.ilYi03tl
n
or m or
.Md •
' A� 7�¢
?
VA X001 %1 r3ivas
CbE 'IL ID)M11 +311/0 008! -OrC�b 3N0►M
ON= CM1 i114bla xp wo Nosww 00►
SBM1� pl 3911�n YIMOw11 IIIiON
,1� e0N imLL,70S
All A S Oil
NOM MM A OM.11M 3ML VII '�0l111.1OM '91M3q
3w 0317AW6 lON 53oNOMOM a& Via
a.
•�
i'1 i
•
'ro3S • s
ro �aoo tau in�'�uu o �r U
sa Me0n wdi 0a5 M105Ya00�t>b 014 YYO MaLL 110x/
SMfa1 !11! ®m Ol lON 0010ad r IOd IOM >0 A1111
�� f
Aa A M �y
11M lm 110ii0 °
M 7fd is • 71!
.y j� y � y� � �q��
d V V
Qi� SO Mi All M'ibMl 301111
TOM W 1011! IOm= M M m
.
001MMUM M t0/ 1m$ b IOSYIOg0l70 sm '87DLLYf0�1
IAi1D tlD OY1 n Y 0 iLall ia/U01
/ a
�Iqi 10� 11 •O
�Mt MOr d0a0O • °
r7.i N) ?/Qi10 M1M1M
Y aaMaY
�
am lY1d 6Nl AYXI A�UOD 'i'M�d l bOP
40 A. •.•
as •• "kb
11 SM le m A OVA
ar0 sn �o Min= AD ML to o0N0Wf0 w Acv WA
Ilrso Al o ao► loaa3 a rwlam9MS as n au
�
aw ulrao lrM s10 alsl m 3rwlo�orr
��i �
O Y .� _`�
•• !SS3••• •
GRAMS
marlo AmYmDOY Ar7/ asn to A" �► AYILL Qallni
/
X11 ON30�1 NN01`
�O �•
� �,..s
;�.'��,.
J
dql MLVJNr= Sallrn3M ��•
_ — — — —
��
AVV .se
ZIS��NI
oM HDNV a VM I AS
. ..
r°
LIMM
011 Mi14i PmO� ��
w° °
I
I
ERM PAM
0Mm lwwa 00 ON Oonam m
Im wm 10 MA 0057001 Platy M OIM11f mm
C
r
.
•
41a1O
a'm
Lon
� t
AM
La10O
I
.am
am
•ADAM s o
Man
i� Ci -v w Owns �a
w SM • YJw TM
° d Y
m °
4 . n 11
° s
• ±h °
,
r
u� YY�1
I� •1a1MrI1
NO
an.
/07
amt
LIYMd �O
°°
m�i1
VA"ASM
°
sam °
' '
Mlmam
I ' ' YNm
ara
am
m
aa1
4a /1m Im
� wa
am
°n
a °
°
so
I I
I
a�ml
Y4i0Y Md
an
°
• °
-
' aRytO
4/maO
Y►�
*01
mm
a°a7ma
_
MM
01
AM
AJ w
a1/as" arm
YgM.n Y!
� mm
�••A .
M
Man
an
m
�•
°
+
°
At MAM °
° M OO s nam
°
•a ° s
°
I ' I
`
I I
I
auaaaa
1 I ' +W—im
Maa0am
I uMaaom
Lam=
.!ALUM
&Aaj �
0aaa
P��
of
aro
1 o
aN
as1
Obi
m
alp
w�e1
gm
Y1 m�a�
WM %
mama dm
SJUNO at
,ppw am
4aRaa am
ow
an
am
mn
w1
am
•
waf
_
° •
° 1��1My
° ° 't ° AWLYO
I
I
MIIO
4<A0
°Y
a°0aa
M7
am
a
e m
un
Ai4/a1 M AY
4ARAM a
� O
OT
me
al
m an
an
q.
.,m
° s
. °
'
'
♦aaaa.m
4MyMwo
4100
.
.am
m°OS
mm
Obi
ms1
an
an
i im
.waam ae
4a1.m arty
� am
am
w
ee
aua
' I
.IaMarlm
41100
4M0
WIN
om
Wm
mm
up
fm
m
M
=
ams
aue�mam om
a^== am
4RlaO atm
aaam au
q/a/a0 QO
w
b°n
Oat
an
an
a
IM1J55
I O°
uw
I
Om
4mal
at
at
as
'm
(a1
a
�
Oa
Mimam Nm
4am0 No
*ymm a *
.adtw am
n
an
an
a n
on
Lm •Mimi YIfOwO
\O I O
I (
I I I I I 41iw
timarlm
I I 1I u=
I I
am
am
w
am
w1
an
an
auuaaa wa
&WANUM aa°
i �
m
Man
smal
��� Jl�
I
I 1 f a/
1O
KIM
arm
an
ma
amt
� R
wam ma
araam
M
an
an
y
I/C` UUMVV
®'� 0a9*
>MIN IOIm{MM aaa'Iiammi
s
sm
p m a s
m
\
O \
tluoo
aam
raa°'a
on
m
amaa°a a.m
mm1
m
9 \ N
amaalM
a71in r
mwm
as
oO°m
Man
on
w
aaraO m7s
Lupo m amm
amM
an
an
_
°
C
\
Manna.
aaaaow
my
an•
m+
amt
atuna am
Mmu■r. am
m
am
�
LC2
v_
un
urn
an
yamo° am
am
aygaala�s
r
an
aura,
•
Uumlm
a._
ew
aam
awn
yW"
S
f011.
sa
a +°r
a�°1
� a°m
4r� Mot
mmi
m
1 ®
n
01
�Io1
��
Qa0it000
as
awmm
wo %
m
on
on
fas
auanrm am
owi
m1
_
{1r
eMK
wu iO4iialt m
s
amuam
mim
ana
UP
urn
w s "mom
i1
Maaam
SIX
an
Awmam o0m
Mn
m
1 r
i,.
&M AALMM an
MANN
amtmar
:
aas
an
urn
4moM a°oa
arras av
M
w1
ww!
�'
®
Y@ OiQ Mn
SAMAN gn
am �I*kGM 0n
tjmo r
R
cm
on
� aN
�
aural
®
a°
waa5
4m �R on
Mm�
LIawO
aR
a°nn
un
um°m
.M1a®1 wo
M
m
7YM
_ W
071 2Akwin en
MiA >Vtly �' Sal
ialaa0 O
a,Nmam
q�m
olm
oaL 1
am
agail a R
aam
1m'n
an
a.aaa 0
— —
ea ®
_
—�`
Am MR AM sal
5110 L WAUDIM In
a m SACAMM On
sOUY n
sAwili
a.rAMON
SARA=
a almam
111
ME
am
un
urn
09"
LOAM
KIMME sum
YaiO o m
81"n
an
laA3>�t A1D0�aA
-
Q/ I °�
°isw491°Hs
n
w=
vm
am
am1
an
m aw wa
m
/
I
iAaa.s
wa as
wmMO
a qs
wa
wa
a°rma
am
mn
Melarn. as
aaa� WWIN
Mm
m
con
vjk� em
n
ww �a4W� n
IM1► n
M
u
alls
m
a�a+ma :
a
M
1
welol sews an
s0a 351
#ALUm'M
RAMAN
alateo
4aaa°M
41aam
W1aO
gm
aa"" wu
asm
ma
n
mm
INia
POEM
an
GO
am
an
an
an
I
®: %mm
� w
aaaaarm mm
MINIM Maur
aMloea oY
ammam Ina
IWAFAM awn
Wwm mom
m
Mn n
m
m
m
m
mO1
JMM

s0NVILz x,�
City of Jacksonville
Sammy Phillips c,�p
MAYOR lcna
June 20, 2013
Mr. David E. Bailey
Regulatory Specialist
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE- SAW -RG -L
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 -1343
RE: Lowes Food Shopping Center Jacksonville North Carolina
Dear Mr. Bailey:
On behalf of City Council and the citizens of the City of Jacksonville, it is our pleasure to issue
this letter of strong support for the potential development of Lowes Food Shopping Center on
Gum Branch Road within the corporate limits of the City. The proposed shopping center will
bring an important quality of food service to our community. Additionally, it will create 85 to
100 full and/or part-time jobs. The City continues to struggle with economic development and
this center is essential for continued progress in improving the economic picture and job creation
for our community.
From the City standpoint, the center will generate over $60,000 per year in ad valorem taxes,
plus it will generate additional money relative to sales tax revenue for the County and our overall
community.
While we understand there are wetland concerns, the City believes that the good of the
community is essential and that this center will provide an important new element towards our
overall economic development. Your consideration and cooperation is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely
Sammy Phillips
Mayor
Post Office Box 128 + Jacksonville, North Carolina 28541 + (910) 938 -5226 + MD# (910) 455 -8852 + Fax [phone]

i
,794
COUNTY OF ONSLOW
June 19, 2013
David E. Bailey
Regulatory Specialist
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE- SAW -RG -L
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 -1343
RE: Proposed Lowes Food Shopping Center
Dear Mr. Bailey:
This letter is written to express Onslow County's support of the construction of the proposed Lowes
Food Shopping Center. It is my understanding that a group of agencies involved in the planning of this
project will meet this Friday, June 21, 2013, to discuss the project's future. It is my hope that this project
will continue, as its completion will afford employment opportunities for our citizens, taxes to support
our community, and benefits for all.
Thank you for your assistance and we look forward to the continuation of this project.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey L. Hudson
County Manager
JLH:lst
Department of Administration
4024 Richlands Hwy. - Jaeksonvillc, Noah Carolina - 28540
Phonc: (910) 347 -4717 - Fax: [phone]
www.onslowcounq gnv

.T
A
Jacksonville - Onslow
C H A M B E R OF COMMERCE www.lacksonvilleonline.org
June 20, 2012
David E. Bailey
Regulatory Specialist
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW RG -L
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 -1343
Re: Proposed Lowes Food Shopping Center
Dear Mr. Bailey,
The Jacksonville-Onslow Chamber of Commerce encourages you to move forward
with the proposed Lowe's Food Shopping Center project in Jacksonville, NC. This
project will result in 85 to 100 full and part-time jobs for our citizens, increase the
tax base for the city and Onslow County, and bring a good corporate citizen to our
community.
It is the hope of the Chamber that any obstacles regarding this project will be
addressed swiftly, and there will be no more delays to hinder the completion of the
Lowes Food Shopping Center.
Regards,
Laurette Leagon, President
Jacksonville-Onslow Chamber of Commerce
1099 GUM BRANCH ROAD JACKSONVILLE, NC 28541 -0765
(910) 347 -3141 Fax: [phone]

1�
•
��o
JACKSONVILLE, OVSLOW
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
June 20, 2013
Mr. David E. Bailey, Regulatory Specialist
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE- SAW -RG -L
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 -1343
RE: Proposed Lowes Food Shopping Center
Dear Mr. Bailey:
The Jacksonville Onslow Economic Development office strongly supports the development of the
proposed Lowes Food Shopping Center in Jacksonville, NC.
In a community our size, the 85 to 100 jobs Lowes Foods will generate will be significant for our job
seekers. Many of those will be military dependents, where a dual income is necessary to maintain a
reasonable standard of living. Additionally, our market lacks a high -end grocery store. This has been a
negative force in the recruiting of new business and industry as well as medical professionals
considering relocating to our community.
Please do not hesitate to contact our office if we can assist in expediting this project.
Sincerely,
Sheila Pierce, CCIM
Executive Director
1099 Gum Branch Road 1 Jacksonville, NC 28540 1 (910) 347 -3141 ext 230 1 (910) 347 -2842 fax 1 www onslowedc.com

SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA 24797
& Iagl oO Yben�9 Lmrlw rod �tN AppI i c&bin $ ,510.OG * n q qa,. In 4
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, PA
11010 RAVEN RIDGE ROAD
RALEIGH, NC 27614
(919) 846 -5900 1AX: 1919) 846-9467
Lvae l Five- Our d red Stvtnl� QnA
i
PAY J c te-,- L)Ual l'
TO THE N.G. DIV1SIOn
ORDER
OF
24797
i CAPITAL BANK
12217 CAPITAL BLVD. NUMBER
WAKE FOREST, NC 27687
63. 11761670 F
)D/jt)C � [ 8
AMOUhrr
DATE �fa[b 1c DL3 T cjgo. m
f
• JRCGy!
IJP�
(