NC0023965_correspondence_20050110

Re: Wilmington Northside Final -- NC0023965
Subject: Re: Wilmington Northside Final -- NC0023965
From: Joe Corporon <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:10:45 -0500
To: [e-mail]
CC: [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail],
[e-mail], Mark McIntire <[e-mail]>
Hugh, sorry this was not discussed -- a last-minute catch, but previous limits appear to
water is, and always has been, 6.8 < pH < 8.5. I apologize for the surprise, but we have
Thanks for your understanding.
Joe
[e-mail] wrote:
Joe, it has come to my attention that the final version of the referenced
permit changed the effluent pH limits from previous drafts. As best that I
can determine, every draft up to and including the draft permit transmitted
via email dated 09/13/2004 established the limit to be 6.0 < pH < 9.0 (see
below). This is the version that the City accepted. No notice or
justification was given that the limit in the final permit had been changed
to 6.8 < pH < 8.5. This may have just been a typo and we are requesting
that the pH limit in the final permit be revised to 6.0 < pH < 9.0.
Thanks.
Hugh
Hugh T. Caldwell, PE
Public Utilities Director
City of Wilmington, NC
Tel [phone]
Forwarded by Hugh Caldwell/wilm on 12/22/2004 05:12 PM
Corporon
<joe.corporon@ncm
Joe
To:
ail.net>
<[e-mail]>,
"[e-mail]"
Dave Goodrich <[e-mail]>
-- NC0023965
Marshall Hyatt<[e-mail]>
cc: Matt Matthews <[e-mail]>, Ed Beck
Susan Wilson <[e-mail]>,
09/13/2004 01:48 <[e-mail]>,
PM Subject: Wilmington Northside Final
•
be in error. The statewide default for salt
adjusted final limits accordingly.
Marshall, we have completed Public Hearing and Hearing Officer's Report
to the Director. Attached are the final documents, to be submitted this
week with recommendations for his review and signature.
Please note several small changes from, and corrections to, the draft
permit. These are discussed in the permit cover letter. You might
1 of2
1/21/2005 10:47 AM

xe: Wilmington Northside Final -- NC0023965
remember that public concerns focused on stormwater and general cultural
growth (EA and FONSI related) as potential "secondary impacts" of
expansion, and therefore inappropriate for this forum. There were
othewise no objections to this permit.
(See attached file: 23965 -- Expansion Permit & EFF FINAL.doc)
(See attached file: 23965 -- Expansion Cover Letter Final.doc)
(See attached file: 23965 -- New Data for Cu Ag Zn -- RPA test.xls)
(See attached file: Wilmington 23965 Expansion Map FINAL.ppt)
(See attached file: 23965 Expansion -- Fact Sheet Addendum.doc)
2 of 2
1/21/2005 10:47 AM