Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBridge No. 90 over Cabin Creek on SR 12750 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FIELD SCOPING MEETING WORKSHEET Design Build Process WBS No.: 178P.8.R.1 Field Scoping Meeting Date: Division: 8 Location: On -site Route (US/NC/SR): SR1275 County: Moore Project Description: Bridge #90 over Cabin Creek on SR 1275 Tier: SUBREGIONAL Municipality: Attendees Structure No:620090 1 of Name Phone No. E -mail Division Bridge Manager Division Environmental Officer Hydraulics Engineer Geotechnical USACE DENR -DWQ TPMU TPMU TPMU Bridge Management Structure No:620090 1 of Existina Features Feature Bridged. 620090 Bridge #90 over Cabin Creek on SR 1275 Ex. Bridge Clear Deck Width: 21.3 (Ft.) Existing Shoulders: (Ft.) (Bridge 1 Culvert) Length: 181 (Ft.) Deck Width (Out To Out): 22.2 Water Depth: (Ft.) Height Bed -To- Crown: 27 (Ft.) Prior Survey Date: Posted: SV 24 TTST: Superstructure Type: ST M -BM ; Substructure Type: TM Span Type: 1 - 20.3', 1 - 19.9, 2 - 20', 1 - 20.1' 1 - 19.9' 1 - Built '54 20.3', 1 - 19.9', 1 - 20 3' Historic High Water (Elev. To The Existing Structure ): (Ft) Sufficiency Rating: 56.5 ; DP: 1.5 School Bussing crossings per day: Posted Speed Limit In Project Vicinity: (mph / Statutory 55mph) Detour: Off-Site Stage Construction: On -site: If Detour is Off -Site, Provide Description Of Detour Route: 24127- 1276 - 1434 -1002 Approximate Length Of Detour? 9 Miles Improvements Needed To Road(s) On Detour? Div. Traffic Eng. Recommend Off -site detour signing? Improvements Needed To Bridges On Detour? Are Bridges On Detour Currently Programmed On Tip? Are There EMS Or Business Access Issues? Are There Any Railroad Crossings On Detour? Should Work Zone Pedestrian Access Be Maintained During Construction? Overhead Utility Lines In Conflict Power Transmission Lines In Conflict Telephone In Conflict Cable Lines In Conflict Fiber Optic In Conflict Water In Conflict Sewer In Conflict (Ft.) 38 Natural Gas In Conflict Other In Conflict Based On The Past History Near This Project Site, What Is The Estimated Time Required To Complete Utility Adjustments — Months Is There Any Future Utility Construction Anticipated in The Project Area Is A FEMA Buy -Out Property Being Impacted Structure No:620090 2 of4 Hydraulics Will This Project Require FEMA Approval? Y (MOA) Yes Will This Project Require A State Stormwater Permit? N Is There Unusual Scour Potential? Is Protection Needed? Are Banks Stable? Is Protection Needed? Does Stream Carry Appreciable Amount Of Large Debris? Will The Placement Of Bents In The Water Be Allowed: Drop Inlets, Flumes or Funnels? Geotechnical Are There Any Historical And / Or Vibration Sensitive Structures Near By Comments: Are There Any Known Landfills And 1 Or Geo- environmental Hazard Sites At Or Within Close Proximity To The Project Site -- - - - - -- Comments: Are Any Impacts Anticipated To Natural Springs Or Artesian Wells: Comments: Possible Foundation Type: Environmental Wetlands At Site N Comments: Known Endangered Species Populations In Area Comments: No effect Trout County: N TVA County: N CAMA County; N Primary Nursery Area: N Moratoria: If Yes - Duration Permits Required: Water Quality Classification: WS -III; Buffer: Lake Jordan data sheet says none - Cape Fear Will A Coast Guard Permit Be Required No Drainage Basin: Cape Fear Is The Project Site In Or Near Any Of The Following: National Forest No Wildlife Refuge No ; State, County, Or Local Park No Wild And Scenic River No ; Airport No A Lake For Recreation Of Power Generation Water Supply Reservoir No Nutrient Sensitive Waters N ; Public Use Boat Ramp Cemeteries ; Known Or Potential Historic Properties In The Area: Historic Archit. Survey required N ; Archaeology Survey required N. Is The Bridge Structure Itself, Or Any Part Thereof, Considered Historic: No Structure No:620090 3 of Will The Project Impact A Church, Community Center, Or Other Public Facility Is This Project On A Statewide Bicycle Route Or A Local Non - Marked Bicycle Route: Yes Any Clarification Or Comments On Items Above: Items To Be Discussed 1 Resolved At FSM By Attendees Off -Site Detour ❑ Stage: ❑ New Location ❑ Type Of Environmental Document: Low Impact Data Spreadsheet ❑ Minimum Criteria Rule /MC Checklist ❑ Other: Superstructure Type: Number Of Spans: Length Of Spans: ADT: 480 /BIR NHS: 0 Tier: SUBREGIONAL Func. Class: LOCAL Bridge Min. Clear Deck width Recommended by Div.: Per SRTG Minimum Deck Width: Roadway lane width 'with 'shoulders Will Railroad Involvement Be Required: R/W by Others:DBT will be responsible for R/W acquisition and coordination of utility issues. Permits: NCDOT will submit permits as prepared by DS Team. Method of Clearing: Truck Percentage:: _ %; Reasonable Safe Speed: mph Liquidated damages: will be imposed after days of closure. Amt: $ CEI to be done by NCDOT or others: Salvageable materials: Removal of remenant abutments /piers: Additional Comments: Any priority in bridge construction sequencing? Approach slab on skew or perpendicular? Should piles be non - corrosive material? per day Structure No:620090 4 of 4