20061901 Ver 1_401 Application_20061206

2006190
• Versant
~ ~"
-~______
Woodfin, Buncombe County
North Carolina
Individual Permit Report
and
Supporting Documentation
Prepared For:
Mr. Robert L. Richey
Versant Properties, LLC
P.O. Box 31882
Charlotte, North Carolina 28231
Prepared By:
Leonard S. Rindner, PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, NC 28105
[phone]
December 9, 2006

1
~~Q
~~~~~
a~ ~, ti~~6
~~~~~~C.
~.

APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIQ p p g ~ y u ~ OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-0003
/33 CFR 3251 Expires December 37, 2004
The Public burden for this collection of information is seatimated to average 10 hours per response, ahhcugh the majority of applications should require
5 hours or less. This includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data Headed, and
completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send commerrts regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of
information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information
bons aril Reports, 1215 .Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Menagemer-t and Budget,
rwork Reduction Project (0710-00031, Washington, DC 20503. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law,
'~7fo person aheU bs wbject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of informationrf it does not display a currently valid OMB control
number. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having
jurisdiction over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authorities: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protactron ,Research and
Sanctuaries Act, 33 USC 1473, Section 103. Principal Purpose: Ittformstion provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a
permit. Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies.
Submission of requested information is voluntary, however, if information is not provided the permit application cannot be evaluated nor can a permk
be iswed.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instnrctions- and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the bcation of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in fuR will be returned.
1. APPLICATION NO. ~ ~ 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE ~ 3. DATE RECEIVED f 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
5. APPLICANT'S NAME M~. R0~1,LrIT ~•• ~tG.~'1G~ 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE /en anent is notreauiredJ
vGrSA~~' Pr~,~1tiS ~ I.L ~- {~tolnMd S . ~ Ir+dncr~ PwS
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
P o. $o~ ?i~ $6 z 3l1'f SpoJcc<h~,vc. l.rcwr..
C.1~Ic.-lotto.., mac. 28231 !"1/C~'~.rwt, ~- 2lS1oS
a. Residence a. Residence
b. Business 'lob ajij~j '1~0 ~ b. Business ~~ ~~~ y2'7'l
STATE T OF AUT 1ZA
hereby authorize, f j ~ ~~ to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to
furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
L'
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (seemsuucrionsr
Ycrsaw'4', ~/ood~ r ~ ~c c.
13. NAME OF WATERBOOY. IF KNOWN rrr„n,r;,.,rr,.~
tJ"~ O'F '~p~/~IG~A-1~ ~iYC~~ ~ OF
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS rrrei
~t,L a ~~ lou~.~-~-ror. a-~
V ~ c,tn t ~ t~.r a H~.uhf<d . ~d
Un tow~.~i NL O~ ~jq,tt-a! Kl~~r ~~
COUNTY STATE !
!6. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN, rseeinstrucriaul
Su a,~l~c,h~d. Lo lu..~ra~r. ~,..dc Vlc,f.- t~ 11'l~tp a 4f~~-~
17, DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
V 5 ?o ~ 25 u~ , ~'xc-~' 23 D Id vs I ~ -z3 ~' I q hw~ ~ ~-c ~ ~f" o,,.
P>~t'trcf Cow I~a~ • ~ ~l c,lr,~y ~' l.~ I~ rlr~ M~,' .

18. Nature of Activity (t>escrirxron or rxorecr, ineruee err rearuosr
~.cc_ a-E}~a~.~t- do u. -~~' dcSGr~ b ~,• ~v~~l'' a~-o~ ~cc+;.~Fw~s , ,~'rv~>~'
l ~. r ~~ S 1 ~ -[i~-^ , G~r-oc irh v l ~ ~ -~a~ t I `1
,cl v^ ~ ~ w rN- G~wwhvrr u,~(ti, ~ib~.c aj' i ~~. ~.dtc a. Ca'' k. ~S
ia~.~-' ~~ ! ~n~,r,, ; ' 'fi't
19. Project Purpose fDe~scnbe me reason or propose or me projear, see insbuctensl
71.L G~.-~}~t-c%.~- I~. d V t~rrv~N•.~' -~n ~'Nflt~I~.G. Orvrr~ ~ ~ . 1~~ ~~ 1-wG Vd~~-
t ,h r,,.~}- ~GtS . 'Tv G~e.ve.!- +~' "~- j''~- (~et~ ~c~.~ "~"~tCG
ror..C u7+c s -~ ~ acc~crc' dc4c-lv~- P
c,,,., ~ 1 I ~.h~)dUr'~e~~/1d+~'~ e~ G.. frx~r~r~n gal S~'~4nn ~/G I~ti~f~ . "'h1c s'~"«Av~n
20. Reason(s) for Discharge ~^ r ~~ ~u) .~.~~ ~S'
Sty ac ~'~G~t-mot' Crvt~v ~v I~r--~l +mn Decd ('rE~-^a- ~ 1 ~'T/rnn or , .,~.~~,.~ w .~.~t~rc,
+~ ~ L TIM Ot' C~Q MK~ GtrG~"'L ~ M'?t~/ ~v+~M~'C Q~A~' .,b
Ir i~. Cd'b tS 1 S . ~ ~ 4ii~ QrG~- 1S Irv
21. Typels) of aterisl Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Tvoe in Cubic Yards ~C~ VIG~G C-~- ~.1'a,~e~
G•~v~#,..~. d ~ ~ 3 I on cxd s To To t• -f-lw ~~ ~ . 04 arG .
~~. Grrss~ c - yFr~~+i.~-~ ~ (I t li L ~y L`~(bt T-
~ To6 ai ~ vtrc w n~-.~
22. Surface Area in Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled rseeinsr<ucrionsr ~ r„t~/\S M~ 6~ ~ ~V~ 1t'~-(
O.Oti /k., t r 1 kol, ~~ tJr' rfc.~w~, i
t O. S 1 ,dr*•rlf, 11'~ pb,~r¢b~ p, ys',~ t~ ~
23. Is Any Portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes Q No '~ IF YES. DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
-~' ~p/k.- ~ ~•CGV~ Co>Ind~/l~~ ~ n u~~Grol G~GKaS , ,~ jritiGcr~ r !~!~ C ~t-101.
w~~ pNV~d 6~.~ ~d 1~-tv~~. ~vr~'t -~ dtw~a~.t~~- ha ~vark- ~S
hc~.r. cntit~~k.•~ 1,• 4J~.~srs of ~. V.S. 4.~it Iltv~cw ~ «.ii-o Ii~~+^.
Addresses of Adjoining Property Owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins tfie Waterbody (If more than can be entered here,
please attach a supplemental list).
~` Dt,~u.Gh~c.o~(.
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in This Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL• IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
~•c.,~.b4 ~,rc, ~ra...l•. ~ 13q Z !~ti'tos' 7/I >3~~t' 8 ~y /~
Usk NWP ~}sj ZDb{ ~DbO
not restricted to
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work
application is complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the
duly authorized agent of the applicant.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE
s app~ii:ation. I certify that the information in this
I~#ee described herein or am acting as the
.TURF AGENT DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires to undertake
authorized agent if the statement in block 11 has been filled out and sty
proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States
knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or
fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than S 10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.

UJ/ 10/ZVVD ZZ. ~~ tMA GGBLLfA.74VA uavta bivuoviul<V~~~, ~ ~

U.S. ARMY' CORPS OF ENGYNEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Aotion ID. ~85330~,,0 County: Hn^ USGS Quad: Wa~varNlt~e,
GENiI:RAL 1~RMIT tjREGIONAI. AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
PfOpCity tJwnCr / 14utl1tmaDd Agemt+ Debat"an D8va1011Tn6IIt ComDaIItixclG
Addrrss: post tDtQcte Box 31882
cesarltrtte. North Csu-oli„a 2
Telephtmc No.: 704-50z-1U19

size and location of property (water body, road nameJrn3mber, town, etc.): ~'he oroied Bite is located off
>: M~ Core Ros~,}n WoodAo,. Baaco~e Coaaty. North C:raltaa.
Description of Inojecte area and activity:
Applicable Law: ~ 5ectioa 404 (dean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
5ectiao 10 (Riven and Harbess Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorizatioec Regional 4eaetal Permit Nmnber:
Nationwide pernadt Number: 03
•
Your wvdc is authorized by the above aefeteneod permit provided it is app in strict aceoodaace with the
etesehed Nativmwidc and Special conditions, the attache! tJetobat 31, 2005 North Camiima Wfidli!o Resources
Comtoieaion conditions, and yore submitted pious. Any violatieta of the attached caatiibtoas ar dt:viatiorr from your
aubatitted plans may sabjeet the perraitbee to a nop ~k order. a restoratioq order aadlor appropriate legal action.
This vsri5catiop is valid tmlil the NWP +s rnodiiiad, reiswad, yr revoked. All of eta existing NWPe are
scheduled do be modified, reissued, or revoleod prior to March 18, 2007. It is inc~nabeat upon you n remain.
id of changes to the NWPe. wa will issue a public notice whoa the NWPs are mieeaed. Flrtbatm~oa~e, if you
eommenee or are under contract to ~menee this activity bet'ore the date 8nt due relevarrt oationwlde permit is
modiftad m revoked, You will have twelve (I2) months from the data of the modi8oation or revocation of the N'WP
to Mete the acxiv~ity under the precept tarots a~ conditions of this nationwide peanut. If prior do the expiratfon
datc identified below, the natiaawide permit suthoiization is niaeued aadlor rrwdified, this ve:ifieation wi11 remain
valid uptil the expiration date ideadHed bebw, provided it ceatpliea with all now stueLor t»odi~ teaats and
txadititros. The District F,ngineer cagy, at any 1if~ exea~cise his discaetioaary authoaity bo modify, Suspend, or
revoke a case apeeific activity's authorization tinder and NWP.
Acornities subject to Section 404 (ss indicated above) may at+o require an individual Section 401 Water Quality
t„ettifieatioa. Yon should corusct the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone (9 i 9) ?33-1786) to detemodae
3action 401 r~trireraeats.
For activities oeeumag within she twtmry coastal eotmtiee subject m regulation under die Coastal Area
Msaagerpao~t Act (CAMA), prior to begnmirrtg work yon moat t fire N.C. Division of Cosehl Mtntagernent .
This Department of the Army verification loos not relieve the pertisittee of doe reaponarbilitY to obtain any other
required Federal. State or 1oca1 approvalsfpetmits.
Tf there are any questions regarding this voriScsrian, say oFthe conditions of the Pernrit, or the Corps of
fiagiaeers regulatory pmogram, please cotYbict Rebeltah L. Newton at 828.271-7980.
Comps Regulatory O#Bcial >zh L New Date: Aber 1.2005
• Expiration Daze of Verification; 1~nr~! 18.2007

V3/ 1:J/LVVO LL. IJ ~'AA OLOGJJ OY YJ VG`/1J Vi vii VViV li Vlla~ ~ n 4:l vvvt vvv
~ z
Determinatto~ of Jnrladlctioa:

® $asad on preliminary information, there appear m be waters of the US including wetlands within the above
described project area. This pnlimiosry determination is not an appealable action under thtr Regulatory
Program Admiaiatretlve Appeal Process (Refetrooce 33 CFR Part 331).
^ Thexe tare Navigable Waters of the United Stabs within the above dacaibed project area subject to the pec:ttit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rtvesss and Ratbots Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Aat_ Unless
there is a change itt the law or oar published regukttioas, thin deteaninatioa may be relies upon far a period not
m exceed five years firm tye date of this notification
^ There are wagers of flee US and/or weWtnds within the above described project area subject to the permit
regnirementa of Sxtion 404 of the Clara Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the
law or oar published regulations, this detetmiaetion may be relied span for a period not to pttxed five years
from the date of mis nstificatioa.
^ The jurisdiceiaul areas within the above described project seas have been identified under a previous action.
Please reference jn,tisdictional detttminadon issued ,~. Action ID
Basis of Jruisdictioaai Deeetaumtiort: ~V~ a•
Wa r - The uua»med ry Ilowa is 8eay~lydam Creek. wltloh is a Wbutar~tn Hqudnv Ceeelt. Hotnlnv
~gk its a tributary to the Fwmch Broad l~6mr. which ~ a ntu~abk b fact er.
Coops Regulatory Othcial: Rebekah L. Newton
Data l3eenmber 1.2005
Enalosures
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETI.ANU DELINEATXON FORMS, PRO~GT PLANS, ETC.,
MUST HE ATTACHED TO THE FII.E COPY OP THIS FORM, H• REQUIItED OR AVAlZABLE.
Copy Fttrnished~ .. ... .. ... _ . _. _ _
Qary Davis
Davis Civt7 Sohrtians
134-A Charlotte Highway
Asheville, Nvrth Carolina 28803

• LEONARD S. RINDNER PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant 3714 Spokeshave Lane
Professional Wetland Scientist Matthews, NC 28105
Land Panning [phone]
December 8, 2006
Mr. David Baker
US Army Corps of Engineers -Reg. Field Office
151 Patton Avenue -Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801 - 5006
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Division of Water Quality - NCDENR
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27604
Mr. Kevin Barnett
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality -Water Quality Section.
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778
Tel: [phone]
Re: Versant - +/- 397 Acre Site Woodfin Buncombe County, North Carolina
Dear Madams and Sir:
On behalf of my client, Mr. Robert L. Richey of Versant Properties, LLC, I am providing you with the
following information concerning the proposed mixed residential community development in Woodfin,
Buncombe County, North Carolina for your consideration. The proposed project is locally approved and
supported and is currently zoned for this development. T'he project will provide residential including
townhouse, condominiums, and single family residences to this rapidly developing area of North Carolina.
BACKGROUND
Versant Properties, LLC, is applying for a Department of the Army Permit to discharge fill material into an
unnamed tributary and wetlands of Beaverdam Creek (Water Classification C) in the French Broad River
Basin and unavoidable road crossings of the head of a small tributaries of Herron's Cove Creek (Water
Classification C - Tr) in conjunction with the development of this 397 acre site on existing Baird Cove
Road, Woodfm, Buncombe County, North Carolina. The developer has initiated review with the United
States Army Corps of Engineers and the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and has responded to comments regarding avoidance, minimization, mitigation requirements and
stormwater treatment requirements. Site meetings were held during the planning of the project with a
representative of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Mr. David Baker) and a representative of the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (Mr. Kevin Barnett). A Protected Species
Survey and Habitat Assessment, and Aquatic Stream Survey was conducted for the project and presented to
the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission. Based
on a field survey the proposed activity will not affect species, or their critical habitat, designated as
endangered or threatened pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
•

In addition a Cultural Resource Survey has been. conducted and submitted to the State Historic Preservation
Office for concurrence. According to the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places
for the presence or absence of registered properties, or properties listed as being eligible for inclusion
therein, this site is not registered property or property listed as being eligible for inclusion in the Register.
An archaeological survey has been conducted by Cultural Archaeological Assessment Group and has been
submitted for concurrence.
The compensatory mitigation proposal involves an "in lieu" payment to the North Carolina Ecosystem
Enhancement Program. In addition, the reaming perennial stream and the remaining intermittent streams
will be preserved. Enhancement of degraded stream channel areas is proposed to stabilize selected stream
segments as well as for aesthetic purposes. Invasive species will be removed to the extent feasible along the
existing roadway along the stream. Invasive species will not be utilized in project landscaping.
Stormwater management will be conducted for all high density areas of the project that will meet or exceed
NCDENR standards, including the use of bio-retention facilities as well as other Low Impact Development
stormwater treatment solutions. The project has been registered by Audubon International for the Gold
Signature Program and they are working closely with representatives of this organization to meet the
principles of Sustainable Resource Management.
The requested permit has considered an evaluation of the probable and cumulative impacts and its intended
use on the public interest. Based on a comprehensive analysis we believe that this proposal complies with
the Environmental Protection Agencies' 404(b)(1) guidelines. The economic benefits of this project have
been balanced by a mitigation plan to minimize and balance the environmental consequences. The proposal
reflects the national concern for both the protection and utilization of important resources. Relevant factors
included in the proposal include general environmental concerns, wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife
values, land use, water quality, considerations of property ownership, and in general, the needs and welfare
of the people.
PROPOSED PROJECT
Versant Properties, LLC, determined that there was a real estate market to support the unique opportunity to
develop a planned private residential community in Woodfm, North Carolina, just north of Asheville. This
area was selected because of available transportation facilities that include major highways and an
international airport, medical facilities, urban and cultural amenities, as well as its unique mountain setting.
Both the planning and architecture are inspired by European hill towns; a development that seeks to
compliment, not compete with, the existing topography and to seemingly emerge from the ground as if it's
always been there. In order for this project to be successful, the project would require approximately 400
contiguous acres, highlighted by a centralized common greenway. The project site has been rezoned and is
locally supported. The zoning approval allows 171 single family lots and up to 200 multi-family units with
a commercial amenity center. As proof of their determination to develop in a positive and environmentally
meaningful way, the developer has voluntarily chosen to partner with Audubon International to become
certified as a Gold Signature Sanctuary.
In lieu of an amenity such as golf course or a large lake, the higher density residential areas will
acknowledge the central park from one vantage point and views south towards Asheville from another. This
central greenway would be used for community and social events, as well as provide passive recreational
activities for the residents such as active adults. The park is proposed to include walks and paths, park
structures and benches, and activities focused around three small amenity ponds as essential and attractive
amenity. Prior to design, it was determined that these amenity ponds are not on streams designated as Trout
Waters by the NCDENR. In addition to the more "recreational" opportunities afforded by such a greenway
and pond system, the developer will acknowledge their partnership with Audubon International by
implementing various educational components that highlight native plants, ecological features and
information about the property, specifically its history and the developer's intention to create community
based on green and sustainable methods.

These green and sustainable methods are reflected in a plan that is environmentally sensitive. It incorporates
and respects the natural features of mountain environments and seeks to share the majesty of these environs
through education and outreach with those who choose to live there. In order to retain the natural setting of
the site, the developer has chosen to substantially reduce the allowed density of the project well below what
is allowed based on the applicable zoning classifications that lie within the project boundaries.
The site is zoned R-43, R-21 and CS. Through the conditional rezoning process, the overall density of the
development will be less than 1 dwelling unit per acre; including the multi-family components. If the site
were developed in a manner more conventionally associated with those zoning classifications, the overall
density of the site could be much. greater. For example, approximately 120 lots are zoned R-43, requiring a
43,000 squaze foot lot area. The other 51 are in the R-21 zoning which requires each lot to have a minimum
square footage of 21,000. Based on one acre = 43,560 square feet, the developer could have reduced the lot
sizes in the R-43 area to accommodate more lots, but the average lot size in that zoning district averages 1.7
acres, well exceeding what is required by the zoning classification, itself. The average lot size in the R-21
zoning district is .97 acres; what is required in the more restrictive classification! While the approved
zoning allows 171 lots, only 169 are currently proposed. In short, the developer's goal is to create a
thoughtful development, not merely maximize the allowable density on the site.
Because of this commitment by the developers to create an environmentally responsible project, we believe
that the proposed project with the proposed mitigation will not cause significant cumulative impacts to the
ecological functions or values of Jurisdictional Waters of the United States or the State of North Cazolina,
excluding temporary construction and development impacts, The project has. been designed to incorporate
the preservation of streams and wetlands into the overall master plan of the project. A large majority of the
streams and wetlands aze not impacted by the development. There aze no impacts to streams or wetlands to
develop lots, parking lots, buildings, or stormwater treatment facilities. Stream impacts are limited to
unavoidable road crossings primarily conducted at existing road crossing locations and to the creation of
small ponds. A mitigation plan is proposed fora "no net loss" of wetland, stream, and surface water habitat,
value, and function to the extent feasible on this site. In addition to a contribution to the North Carolina
Ecosystem Enhancement Program, enhancement of streams is proposed, including selective removal of
invasive plant species and re-establishment of native species in riparian azeas.
The project includes a comprehensive stormwater management plan that addresses stormwater discharges
from high density areas of the project. The project will use Low Impact Design (LID) techniques to treat
stormwater to the extent feasible. These include bio-retention (rain. gardens), extended stormwater detention
wetlands, and level spreading devices over vegetated buffers. The streams and ponds will be protected by
buffers in common open space and will be protected by deed restrictions or similaz mechanisms. A forested
buffer will be maintained along all streams to the fullest extent feasible as indicated on the attached plans.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The property is located at the end of Baird Cove Road, off of Merrimon Avenue, just outside Woodfm
Town limits in Buncombe County, NC. The mountainous site falls within in the Blue Ridge Physiographic
Province. The majority of the site has been logged and has resulted in mixed pine/hazdwood assemblages.
Numerous logging roads currently exist on the site. Natural communities range from seep/wetlands
associated with intermittent to perennial streams to montane pine-oak-hickory forest along ridges and
slopes. The site is mostly covered by montane pine-oak-hickory forest with low mountain alluvial forest
and low elevation seeps along the streams.
•

• Elevations range from approximately 2400 feet along the main stream (referred to as Baird Cove Creek) to
2960 feet along ridgetops. The topography is moderate to steep including most side slopes and valleys.
The forest communities are successional with a mixed pine-hardwood canopy. Areas along lower steep
slopes, north facing slopes and along streams have a more natural community assemblage, although past
logging has also disturbed many of these smaller communities. The streams and their associated seeps and
wetlands on the site have been disturbed by past timbering as well, but not to the extent of the surrounding
slopes and ridges. The main stream running through the site, Baird Cove. Creek, and its floodplain are of
good quality (except in areas where logging roads have prevented vegetated buffers) and supports a variety
of habitat for flora and fauna. Plant species diversity is good within the alluvial forest and associated
seeps/wetlands. The wetland features associated with the streams are of high quality and include areas
inundated and saturated, and covered with a diversity of hydrophytic vegetation.
Baird Cove Creek is a good quality, montane, perennial stream. The stream is in the Upper French Broad
River watershed (06010105). Baird Cove Creek flows into Beaverdam Creek before draining into the
French Broad River. Beaverdam Creek is Water Classification C. The site also includes the headwaters of
small tributaries of Herron's Cove Creek (Water Classification C - Tr). The French Broad River flows into
Douglas Lake and becomes the Tennessee River after its union with the Holston River in Tennessee. The
Tennessee River flows into the Ohio River, which flows into the Mississippi River which drains into the
Gulf of Mexico.
No evidence of high nutrient or chemical discharges was noted at Baird Cove Creek and all parameters
measured fell within acceptable levels. Numerous macro-invertebrates, amphibians, and other wildlife were
observed in the stream or adjacent to it.
The uplands on-site are primarily dry with steep topography. There is a relatively low diversity of
community types and relatively low species diversity within the largest community type (especially in pine
dominated areas). Pine needle accumulations covering the forest floor have contributed to the lower species
diversity. Species of pine (white, scrub, short-leaf, etc.) dominate most of the site's canopy mixed with
various oaks and successional species. Areas of less disturbance and chestnut oaks dominating the canopy
are of higher quality and have a higher species diversity and abundance. These potential communities are
small and fragmented and have been recently impacted by widening old logging roads. North facing slopes,
especially along the northern ridge, were of good quality and typically maintain a higher plant species
diversity and abundance. The highest quality habitats on the site are the alluvial forests and seeps along
Baird Cove Creek and the other smaller tributaries and streams, and oak-hickory forest and chestnut oak
dominated areas along the northern ridge, and along north facing slopes.
Please refer to the full report "Protected Species Survey, Habitat Assessment, and Aquatic Stream Survey -
Versant/Baud Cove Tract" for more detailed information and results.
Preliminary identification and delineation of the Jurisdictional Waters on the site were determined
according to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1, 1987, with
Appendices. Preliminary data gathering included review and interpretation of topographic maps; USDA
Soil Conservation Survey; aerial photographs, and preliminary site visits to selected areas. Then the Routine
On-Site Determination Method was utilized to determine the upper boundary of the wetlands. In order to
make a positive wetland determination indicators of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soil, and wetland
hydrology must be identified as described in the manual. The wetland boundary and surface waters were
identified in the field and were reviewed and verified by the USACE (Mr. David Baker). This information
has been used for planning and potential permitting purposes.

. Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. and Description
1) Wetland (PFOlA, PSS1A, PEM1C) + 0.8567 acre
2) Streams (+/- 7,000 if "important") + 0.6062 acre
Total Jurisdictional Waters* + 1.4629 acre
NO PRACTICABLE ALTERNATIVF/AVOIDANCE ANALYSIS
Versant Properties, LLC is developing a unique private mountain community within the immediate north
Asheville area due to the availability to transportation facilities such as highways and an international
airport, medical facilities, and urban and cultural amenities. The planning and architecture will be in a
mountain setting inspired by European hill towns. In order for this project concept to be successful, the
project would require approximately 400 contiguous acres with a greenway park as a central amenity. The
planning concept for the project site requires and area of land that consisted of a central valley surrounded
by the privacy afforded by elevation. The site could not be linear and could not include out-parcels. This
site was the only site in this vicinity that afforded the landform required to create the project and the only
site in the vicinity that did not require an assemblage.
In lieu of an amenity such as golf course which would have required extensive grading and clearing, or a
much larger lake which would have required greater stream impacts, the higher density residential areas
would be is planned around a sensitively designed passive central park. This park would be used for
community and social events, as well as provide passive recreational activities for the residents such as
active adults. The park is proposed to include walks and paths, park structures and benches, and activities
focused around three small amenity ponds as essential and attractive recreational amenity. Prior to design,
it was determined that these amenity ponds are not on streams not designated as Trout Waters.
. Prior studies for the project included a much larger lake feature in the valley, however based on a review of
regulatory and engineering implications and preliminary discussions with the USACE and NCDENR the
scope of the lake plan was was reduced to the minimum sizes possible to maintain the concept of the
passive recreation central park amenity far the project. Relocating the ponds off-line would require
significant clearing, excavation and filling of steep side slopes to create the impoundments. Reduction of
scope by eliminating the ponds was also not considered feasible for the development of the Subject
Property because it would negatively impact the marketability of the project by eliminating the primary and
centralized pedestrian oriented space and amenity for the project.
The small dams will be designed to be less than the high hazard designed criteria. In addition the discharge
form the lower pond will be by cold water release as recommended by the NCDENR. The ponds have been
also located at the very upper section of the stream. The spring area and adjacent wetlands have been
preserved upstream of the upper pond. As recommended by the NCDENR trees will be planted around the
pond to shade the water to the extent feasible.
Road crossing impacts have been minimized by utilizing existing road crossings to the extent feasible. They
are proposed to be the minimum necessary to access development areas.
•

•
PROPOSED IMPACTS
Summary of Stream Impacts
Road Crossings (6* each)
(3 locations at existing road crossings to be widened)
+/- 597 linear feet (+/- 0.05 ac)
Dams
+/- 601inear feet (+/- 0.01 ac)
Flooding +/- 596 linear feet (+/- 0.05 ac)
Total Stream Impacts +/- 1,253 linear feet (+/- 0 .11 ac)
Summary Wetland Impacts
Excavation +/- 0.098 acre
Flooding +/- 0.308 acre
Total Wetland Impacts +/- 0.406 acre
MITIGATION PLAN
A mitigation plan is proposed fora "no net loss" of stream habitat, value, and function to the extent feasible
on this site. Project construction will strictly adhere to an approved Sedimentation and Erosion Control
Plan. Best Management Practices will include utilizing siltation trapping ponds and other erosion control
structures where appropriate. Impacts from hazardous materials and other toxins to fish and aquatic life
such as fuels will be avoided by not permitting staging areas to be located near surface waters. As required
by the 401 Water Quality Certification conditions, measures will be taken to prevent "live" or fresh concrete
from coming into contact with waters until the concrete has hardened.
Stream Mitigation
To meet restoration mitigation requirements for stream impacts by grading, the developer is proposing to
contribute to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program. In addition, sections of the streams that
have been subject to headcutting and erosion will be enhanced by the implementation of grade control by
the use of rock cross vanes as recommended by the NCDENR. )n addition, to the extent feasible non-native
exotic species will be removed.
STORMR'ATER MANAGEMENT
The project includes a comprehensive stormwater management plan that addresses stormwater discharges
from high density areas of the project. The project will use Low Impact Design (LID) techniques to treat
stormwater to the extent feasible. These include bio-retention (rain gardens), extended stormwater detention
wetlands, and level spreading devices over vegetated buffers. The streams and ponds will be protected by
buffers in common open space and will be protected by deed restrictions or similar mechanisms. A forested
buffer will be maintained along all streams to the fullest extent feasible as indicated on the attached plans.
The project has been registered by Audubon International for the Gold Signature Program and they are
working closely with representatives of this organization to meet the principles of Sustainable Resource
Management.
The Stormwater Management Plan will be designed and implemented for the project to meet or exceed the
401 Water Quality Certification requirements in NCDENR Stormwater Best Management Practices, April
1999. The project will be developed over several years, therefore a detailed phasing and implementation
plan. will be provided that would allow portions of the project to be developed and occupied prior to
completion of the entire project.
r
~J

THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES
Field surveys were conducted in June of 2006 to assess any potential protected species inhabiting the
VersantBaird Cove site. No protected were observed at the site. Please refer to the full report "Protected
Species Survey, Habitat Assessment, and Aquatic Stream Survey -Versant/Baird Cove Tract" for more
detailed information and results.
CULTURAL RESOURCES
There are no indications of any existing structures or archaeological sites on listed on or potentially eligible
for the National Register within the study area. An archaeological survey has been conducted by Cultural
Archaeological Assessment Group and has been submitted for concurrence to the State Historic
Preservation Office for concurrence.
AQUATIC HABITAT
The aquatic systems in the project area consist of headwater wetlands, intermittent and perennial tributaries.
A variety of wildlife is supported by these systems including mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish,
insects, mollusks, and crustaceans. Therefore strict adherence to an approved erosion and sedimentation
control plan will be maintained during the construction period in order to control degradation of water
quality downstream and protect the areas to be preserved. Impacts from hazardous materials and other
toxins to fish and aquatic life such as fuels will be avoided by not permitting staging areas to be located near
surface waters. Also, as required by the 401 Water Quality Certification conditions, measures will be taken
to prevent "live" or fresh concrete from coming into contact with waters until the concrete has hardened.
CONCLUSION
The 397 acre development will provide important economic benefits to the region and is locally supported.
Based on the value of the jurisdictional waters and wetlands on this site the developer has chosen to balance
the site's economic viability with its environmental value and permitability. The goal of the proposed
stormwater treatment and mitigation measures is to provide a positive balance of environmental protection
and economic development.
Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional explanation. Thank you for your
consideration.
Sincerely,
Leonard S. Rindner, PWS
Environmental Planning Consultant
Professional Wetland Scientist
•

IN'TBRNATIONAL
ng People
~
Ip the Environment
Rob Richey
Audubon irrtemationai Manager /Member
~~ Versant Properties, LLC
'~ ~` R0~ 20b-C Tremont Ave.
se~Ork, NY 12158
Phone: [phone] Charlotte NC 28203
Fax: [phone]
Dear Mr. Richey,
Sustainable Communities
oa"'~ig" Thank you very rrnich for registering Versant in the Audubon Itrtetrtational
P.O. Box 1827
Duned~, Ft.34697
Gold Signature Program Your participation in this program demonstrates your
Pnare: 518-257-6264 w~71tngnes5 to adopt the Audubon International Principles for Sustainable Resource
Fax. [phone] Management.
'~ first S~eP in ~ Process of attaining certification by Audubon International
me Audubon society
of New York state starts with our approval of the proposed land plan for development. As you know,
4s ~~ Road staff of Audubon International has partic~ated in the process of designing the land
selkirk , NY 12158 plan for Versant. This started several months ago with Audubon International staff
Phan. 518-7s7-~51 os the basis for an ecob Kcal desi for Versairt. It was our cal to he ou
l~'oP ~ g~ gn g lP Y
Fax. [phone]o7s retain the principles of that design throughout the land planning process.
awlubon Coopmative We are pleased to report that effective with this letter we are suing the
R~ ""'g designation of Audubon International A~roved Land Plan for Versant. This
seNdrk NY 12156 designation means that Versant is on course for eventually achieving the Audubon
Phone: 5t8.7s7-9051 International Certified Gold Signature Sanctuary designation. The task at hand now
Fa~c 518-767-so7s dudes following our program guidelines through constri~tion, acid passing a frnal
etn%dronmental audit. Ifthis is accomplished Versant can achieve Certification. In
order to maintain Certification Versant wtU be re-evaluated on an annual basis.
Audubon signature
z o ewnd sty We bok forward to working with you through the construction and
suite 311 management phases ofthe project.
Henderson, KY 42420
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Sincerely yours,
Emlromrrerrtal Ronald G. Dodson
Planning i3epaAmeM president atxi CEO
P o. Box 1226 Audubon International
Cary, NC 27512
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
CC: Russ Bodie
Nancy Richardson
u~w~ an~iuhnninlernatinnal.nm
- I ~''llti/C'd'ltd~ t1T0)'L' 4d(Sl"UIiZ(lI?I!' t1ll1)I(111 (didtl Illlful'(tl CfJ111f11llfdIt113ti... (J11t' ~1JBP.SI)td, (J1113 (1~UC£ [l~ [( tdf11L'

•
1L-IO2S-' tOb IOtS : ~ ~ rrsurruntvn cur
J1.J! 1J LIUIUI
~-
,t tam
PROGRAM
Robert Richey
bebaran Versant Properties
PO Hox 31882
Charlene, NC 28231
Project: Versant
December 8, 2006
County: Buncombe

The pttrposc of this letter is to notify you t]tat the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Fleasa note that this decision dons not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact those agencim to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid fa six months from the deco of this letter. 1f we have not received a copy of the issned 404
pernpt/40>t Cert3lieatioa within dais tines hytme, this aecepta,ace wilt expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send
copies of the 404/40]/CAMA permits to NCBEP'. Cnee NCEBP receives a copy of the 404 Pet~t»t atad/or the 401
Cet#it'icatioa antnvoice will be issued and payment must be made.
Based on the information sugplied by you the impacts that may regt>ire compensatory mitigation are summarized in the
followin tabk.
River Basin Stream Impacts (foot) Wetlands Impacts (acres) Buffer 1 Buffer II
~ (Sq. Pt.) (Sq. Ft.)
Cold 1 Warm Ri arian Non-Ri arian Coastal Marsh
I'rcnch Broad 0 1,370 0 0.50 0 0 0 0
03010105
Upon receipt of payment,l?13P will take responsibility for providing the cotnpensawry mitigation for the pormttted impacts
up to a 2: l mittgatioa-to-impact ratio, (buffers, 2ono 1 at a 3: i ratio and Zane 2 ac a 1.5: i ratio). The type and amount of the
compensatory ntiagation will be as specified in the Suction 404 Permit and/or 401 Water Quality Certification, and/or
CAMA Parente. The mitigation will be perforu-cd in accordancx with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C.
Departanent of Et-vironment and Nawral Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4,1998. .
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerel~y~,
I~I~:ul~1f7/ ,~. ~i~
'William D. Crilmore, PE
Director
cc: Cyndi Karoly, Wetlands/401 Unit
Rebekah Nevuton, USAGE-Asheville
Kevin Harnett, DWQ-Asheville
lren Rindncr, agent
File
RP.S>~OYG~ft' ... E11~2~Q~tG/.K~... PYD~UG~I•!~ QGLY .~~t'.

North Cerdir-a Ecoaysten- Enhancerhent Program, 1662 Mail Service Censer, Raleigh. NC 27699-1662 / 819-7t 5-04781 Www.nceep,net

WEAVERVILLE
L
SITE
WOODFIN
ASHEVILLE
TO HENDERSONVILLE
C
~C
N
0
~-
r~~~~+^^
^ ~~~~
f 1 ,~ ^
~ ~^^~~!
• •
` SITE • 397 ACRES
~•
•
,.` ^
- Rd. ~ ~
~ ~^
• ~
~r
~...
.,~
•
Cha.iCite VICINITY MAP
Ralegh
VERSANT • WETLANDS EXHIBIT uso~too N
:ao nth T"°° Str"` DEBARAN o7.2a.as
Sub thou Charbttt NC 28202
~~ 106 3~6~1851 r. ro4 ~:b 1s5t VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. sca~E = NTs
ro~~;<~~,t~o~~.~~

C]
•

•
•
..-~,-,-
~.,. . ~; L
• } ~.~~ ~•
Map center is approximately 35.65774°N, 82.54263°W (WGS841NAD83)
Baird Cove quadrangle
•
Charlotte USGS MAP
8aingh
VERSANT • WETLANDS EXHIBIT #3011.00 N
20° South Tea suet, oz.zs.os
Swte t4°0 Charlotte, NC z82oz DEBARAN
~.~'R ''706 w'ww8ro;e;~~~iua~~~ VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. SCALE = NT5

,..
-- ~....._ i t ,~` i ~
.,... ti ~ -, Pty ;~ ..: ~ ~,,,.v _.---
._
/.
~ kb
iMM _...~-.' ~, S~T ~ ~4 ~ ~ ~ '3,~v~.~
.~ ______~.4~ ~
'~
~-.~. f
~~.~ ~~ ,
~ qy~y'
• T ~ ~` 5 ~~4t ` ~_
.,~ ~ w ^~.,, ~~~ ~~ ~
ti -.". 11
4
4
~~
e.~
~. _.~`/
~~
~( ~
H ,s..
~`- t
i
., Y~ 2t ~ ' *~~~ Yr~ d ' t. ~.P
~ ~• ~ °,,
~' r ~ • ~
1 ~'
~ - -~~- - .. _ J ~ ~ ~~ ~~, `fit ~t
1 `
1 F ~~
w
f ~ kt ,f
~a ~ ~ ~ e~{ Kili~ar~ Kt1O~
l: tiii{{ ~~1~ ~~`'
,_
.. .dye. :.. ~ ~ 1. f'P ': J
... ..e„--.-... €
0 500 1000 2000
I I I
r~r-
( IN FEET }
~~- ~ ~ ~ USDA SOIL SURVEY tBUNCOMBE, 1954)
-^ Kimley-Horn VERSANT, ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
©~ and Associates, ~C1C. FIGURE -SOIL SURVEY MAP o~as~os
• P„ o~~ 6,,.ROO"~`o °~ N0R1F' y ~-~ o VERSANT PRQPERTIES, INC. sca~E = t• = tooo~ F-e

•
•
•
~.
O' ~
o `~
o ~.
0
o --
©~
,,
~_. ,
\I`
1 ~
0
~,
t.
®~

0 0
--._____

Q
~o
,-__..
O
I
---a
J
~O
~;
,.
r (~
i'
~ O
r
~ 1
.~ ~ O
`~
s-
_ ~
O __ _` -
N 0--_
~h>^~r ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS MAP
Pakigh
VERSANT -WETLANDS EXHIBfT aso».oo N
~~~,~hT~,s~«<~ DEBARAN o~.2s.as
Srele L600 Chalbnq NC z87oz ~~~///
~~ /a477G 7851 ~~/06376785t VERSANT PROPERTIES INC. scn~E= r=~ooo~
,.. www.mlrKncstslmr.can r

•
r~

Chadottc
Ralagh

200 South wan srre~r'
Suite 1400 Charbtte, NC 28202
~rrh~e . ~n4a~4~RSr-.~o<»6~esi
.v www.co!e~enesiscone.cam ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS LIST

VERSANT • WETLANDS EXHIBIT
DEBARAN

VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC.

#3011.00 e
07.28.06

SCALE= NTS
KEY' OWNER
A lSHIKIE L FRANKEL $ THELMA ADD SS
f52 BOYDS CHAPEL RO WEAVERVILLE
'NC
28787' PARCEL #
974109072432

B --- --
CLARA GORES
107 STONEY KNOB RD
WEAVERVILLE
INC
28787.
r-
974109171417
--_ -
__
C --_..
_ _
ALTON L REEGE $ RITA A _-_ +-_
i87 STONEY KNOB RD
-- --
WEAVERVILLE
'NC
28787':
974109159765
_____

D
--. --
1ALTON LOUIS REEGE
-----i- -----
187 STONEY KNOB RD

WEAVERVlLLE

!NC
~
28787 !

97410818920
E ROBERT J MCKONE ~72 INDIAN LN WEAVERVILIE INC 28787' 974108284603
F HAL AMMONS $BETHEL I48 RICE COVE RD WEAVERVILLE !NC 28787 ; 974110372181
G HAl AMMONS $BETHEL X48 RICE COVE RD WEAVERVILLE !NC 28787 I 974110462902
H _
.JAMES BIGGS $ ETHEL 136 RICE COVE RD WEAVERVILLE INC 28787 j 974111560976
I 1CYRIL A YOUN4 X25 YOUNG RD WEAVERVILLE INC 28787 974111567593
J IR DENNIS WEAVER 8 SHIRLEY W 173 UPPER HERRON CV RD WEAVERVILLE !NC 28787 4 974111762617
K jAUGUSTUS REYNOLDS MORRIS PO BOX 8157 ASHEVIILE !NC 28814 i 974115730894
L
M . WM B ASHE JR $ PATRICIA PETERSON T 1633 UPPER HERRON COVE RD
!SHERWOOO HEIGHTS INC PO BOX 18289 - _ __ ASHEVILLE
ASHEVILLE NC
iNC 28804 ;
28604 974115621893
874118308107
N IHAYWOOD N HILL 180 ROBINHO00 RD ASHEVILLE INC 28804 ; 974118421361
O ~SHERWOOD HEIGHTS INC IPO BOX 18299 ASHEViLLE INC j28804'', 874118306107
---
P (RONALD AND NANCY EOGERTON 81 11 ELLICOTT LANE ASHEVILLE !NC 28803 ~ 974118218375
Q jFLETCHER SMITH FLYNN II j212 RIDGEWOOD RD CHARLOTTE NC 28209 , 974117116213
R (HENRY HERMAN HARRIS 417 BAIRD COVE RD ASHEVILIE INC 28804
_ 974117118938
_ __
S BAIRD COVE RD M.B.CHURCH
LARRY RODGERS CIO f280 DULA SPRING5 RD

I WEAVERVILLE ~NC 28787 j 974117118938
T iCLARENCE R METCALF $ LINDA IPO BOX 1674 WEAVERVILLE iNC X28787', 974113126585
U _ _
1GEORGE RIDDLE $ ADA LEA __ __-{
1401 BAIRD COVE RD ASHEVILLE NC 28787;, 974113125887
V IELMER DAVID HARRIS LE APO BOX 1$06 WEAVERVILLE ~NC j28787 974113126788
W J A WRIGHT $ JUANITA (TE) 1356 BAIRD COVE RD _ _ _ ASHEVILLE _
INC {28804 ! 974113131167
X (DEAN M BAYNARD $ ANGELA P !PO BOX 152 BARNARDSVILLBNC
- 128709' 974113036369

Y -
IEURALEE RODGERS -__ _-.~_---_____
1312 BAIRD COVE RD ---
ASHEVILLE r
INC ,
128804
974113035876
Z (DALE DEINES IP O BOX 1733 SKYLAND INC 28776 973116947959

• • •
_ CF2 (BEGIN CASCADE FALLS) ~ ;- CF1 (END CASCADE FALLS) ''~'
_ ~ with boulders -- i
•,: ' _`- t F1 (BEGIN CASCADE FALLS)
' '' CF2 (END CASCADE FALLS)
_ ,-
~--.. _: _
- ._ n~ 4 '- l ' I F~
_'.: t Y: R1 (w) SPRING 1 ,~ ~-{~ ` - ff' ~c ~ ~
,ti " S1 (SPRING/BEGIN INTPER ~ ~ _ .~~ ~ t- ~_ ~ ~~ ,~ ~^,~~ ~-- s'"'
' c a IMP. STREAM) 'r _ " ` ._~ _ -' ~'" ~- ~"Y'! •3f
- i ~ x I : _ r ~,`. ` ~a ~ ` r ~ r P1 - 3(w) c* nrt °' t ` ~~i s:-`:J
r ~~ ~ .° SPRING ~ ,~ ~ - t ~ ~. ,~ ~.-.-
L
U1 (BEGIN INT/P ER IMP. STREAM) i {' ' Y `i"~~ % ?'' \ ~ `." "~ ~` f r
x ~" ~~" 11-7 ~ ,
i ~ _
CF3 (BEGIN CASCADE FALLS) - - ~ ` ;~' ~~'- " ~'!
AA7 (SPRING/BEGIN INT. STREAM) a i ~ y ~, f ~~ O 1 4 °,+'~~ ~ ~ ~, ~ '
CF4 (END CASCADE FALLS)
G3 (END TRIMMED~AREAI
CF3 (END CASCADE FALLS)/
GF4 (BEGIN CASCADE FALLS)
wdh boulders
G2 (BEGIN AREA IN CONSTRUCTION)
with trinmed vegetation
:W1-141X1-15
__ ., .
- ~ F
I (BEGIN INT/PER IMP. STREAM)
_._
IMP. STREAM)
,n
,i
FGIN INTIPER IMP. STREAM)
-, ._ ~ '
~~ EPHEMERAL CHANNELIDRAINAGE
APPROXIMATE MAP - WATERS vF rM~ u.s.
FOR SURVEY AND STUDY PURPOSES ONLY
SUBJECT TO U.S.A.C.E. VERIFICATION
Ulada~d I?=11C~12CC5
l~r ` ~
li,,~
6, ;;
~r -
~ :._I
STREAM)
kU~ ~,,• -
~IN INTIPER Ih~1P. STREAMi
1-r25/E1-331
G9 (BEGIN IMP. STREAMI
~A1-4181-6

• • •
~ ~~
~~
Ms \
~j
~xixrv 9sttu ~ »o x.E I
i ~
~ i )
i ~
_ _ «. i ~~
I ~~`
/ / ~ / i
o-a
ae.wa wsn, iv ~ / ~ ~ / / ~~~ ~
___~41 ~F~\_ ~
stir ,~^a nos, vew FeswsM~eza x+z~ai

coma. w.~.
~,=,~°'
~ au~ ~
~.x ..ai r cows or ucx¢ns Aqo..
~N C
::'~~.d~~~'e
A
~ ~~ i
i i i ~
'l1 ~mm ~v rcv. ore ^ 1 c~,P ,ac a
`~ ~~ ~ ~~1F e@d~~a
_ ~~
u
a
9
N
z
_ I-
Z o
wv ~
a
z°g azx~
N
2 ~
~ J Z 3 ~
~ ~ W _O ~ O
~ ~ r
~ W Q w
~ W' w
~ Z a V O
~ ~ w v
a Q O w
~ m U z s
w o
o m
8
~ S m
4~~~~~~
,~ u ~ - -~ - y~ ~
»
~ ~Ed~,
~~ - --
~~ ~~
~~
~ ~l
~~°.,m,a.. ly ~
,.a.~.o.. oa,eoo~.as.,».~ ~ ~ ~
~~

~\ \
...,... ~... ~ ~
~
\
\
~_~ ~
e,... ~
~,
r Nw~:o~n~ow~ ..* w o<.~ ~
m[.u cNw»u vEls _ ,»o ,.rem a~ ,mac s,.,c a. »anw ~ua~».
MEI .PGS v
O
~ ~
~
\
~,. ~ \
__ . - .. _ ~.~ ~---\ `
\~ ~ F V u SAO. Po~~.nw ~ G 6 m
m ~'~
_.
~ S^3vi19.~.~..~ ....
~~ CSC ~ ..e ~e ~i Ew xu ¢ aaa~ k w
si:E.u . u e om :
~ ~
nE"Eiuio .m. a _aP0 3
1 ,.,.m. ~
~ °l.':R.m ~ 1 ~
I fTS~. u 7
I
/ ~
,~,
,a....mE.» ~w»»E~ ~u o,o

», .~.~
a,„ Km
.a,., ~~ MU a.sas, .~wE~
aa. ~» »~
~~,onEw».~4,ma.5 D -1 1 1 6
~ H E ET
\`\ u
oo~~: a-a.m~e ~ ~
..e.a .ca \ ~Oc
/ /\ \
~ s°cf~ ~\
i
/ ~4~~ % ~
s' m, °` / \
i ~ / \
~ / - ~
0.,9 mss. ~
i ~
i
/ i \
~ \
i~ \
/ i,~n~

• •
•
-~ ''_~SS1-SPRING/BEGIN
_ _ -- _ PERSTREAMSECTION
- _ _ ~ ~ -Ij
~ ~ , _ - { ` d
,~~~ :i- ~ - :.
`• ,'~RR1 -SPRING/BEGIN `
.~ J ~~ ~ ~
"PERSTREAMSECTiON
,;. - ~_-_
M
~ ~ I `~ t i
7~ r _
.-PP1-7fQ01 -7
SE EPIS PRING
„~- LL1- S PRINGIBEGI N
~' PERSTREAMSECTION
001- SPRING/BEGIN
_ ,__ 1 _~_.~"; . EE1 -SPRINGIBEGIN PER
a ~~_ s STREAM SECTION } (~;~
~ J
1s ~ ~-~-
>.
'-~ -~, ~ -
-- ~y , , ~ a t-'7
t
,~ .
... _/
- ,-
I } - ` >'
+ = -
.. ,~
- i - 'a-. li ~ ~ -
a4 ~ ~.' K
_ - r _, ,
EPHEMERAL CHANNELIDRAINAGE
NN1 -SPRING(BEGIN
PE R S TREA M S ECTION
1,
BAIRD COVE -VERSANT SITE
Updated 091 1 8/2 006
~~ i ~ ~ ,.
,~ ~-~.,~.. i 1~
- ~ ~.-FF1-17-SPRINGISEEP
_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? + i
~, ., 1 ~' ~-'~L,~.
} t: ~<GG1,HH1 111 SPRING/BEGIN
rt „ ; pERSTREAMSECTiONS
.fir ~ _ r y,.
_ 41
'JJ1 5 i{~_
~.
_,_ -_ --__~,:_KK1-SPRINGfBEGIN
PERSTREAMSECTION
APPROXIMATE MAP -WATERS yr i Mt u.s.
FOR SURVEY AND STUDY PURPOSES ONLY
SUBJECT TO U.S.A.C.E. VERIFICATION

• • •
,..... .,.., ~.~,..,,,~. -..,~~.,. .,m,,~.a v
~c ~ ~~ ~
1~ U v
11 ~~
f ~,
~~ ~` STREAM AREA ~ t} TO PROP. LINE
!1 ~~ 0..0007 Acres
I/ \~ r oa
AREA 18 i ~~ `~ ~
Acres ~~ ~ STREAM AREA 11 oee N•~s
0.0231 Acres ' ~
~~'- ii
t ~. STREAM
..% j ~// °~'° a~ AREA 9 '~
~ ~ „~.~ O,Ofi64 Acres
we
STFtEA ~ ~ 2"CMP LINEAR WETLAND
AREa ~`
0.0042 Acres ~~ a~ STREAM
,. AREa 14
WETLAND AREA 1 0.0019 Acres
0.0796 Acres *~' JJ ~ - ~
N ~,~°'~ STREAM ADJ. WETLAND
~e~..~{ AREA 8
FOR SURVEY AND STUDY PURPOSES ONLY 0,0129 Acres
VERSANT WETLAND SURVEY REVIEW
(NOVEMBER 27, 2006)

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)

L~
Project /Site: VERSANTBAIRD COVE Date: 9/15/2006
Applicant /Owner: County: Buncombe
Investigator: L Rindner J Levi P Kealy State: NC

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID: wtld
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Transact ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X Plot ID: FF
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Saecies Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Saecies Stratu Indicator
1. Betula lenta T FACU 9.
2. H dy rangea arborescens T FACU 10.
3. Lindera benzoin S/S FACW 11.
4. Osmunda cinnamomea H FACW+ 12.
5. Microstegium vimineum H FAC+ 13.
6. I~atiens capensis H FACW 14.
7. Pilea pumila H FACW 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 71%
Remarks: Open, sparse canopy and understory with low diversity. Rocky, boulder seep with surrounding upland
trees providing canopy coverage.
Wetland Vegetation Fresent Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are classified asFAC-OBL in the
National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands.
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks)
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
- Aerial Photographs
_ Other
x No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators:
x Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12"
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of SurFace Water: 0 - 2 (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.)
Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
x Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Soii Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
•
•
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Descriation:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Mois t) Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
0-8 A lOYR 2/1 N/A N/A SILTY CLAY
8-16 B GLEY 1 l0Y 2.5/1 lOYR 2/1 FEW/DISTINCT SILTY CLAY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol _ Concretions
_
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
x Sulfidic Odor x Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
X Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No,
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: This area adjacent to the stream/ wetland complex is classified as a wetland based upon the criteria
set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
•

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project /Site: VERSANTBAIRD COVE Date: 9/15/2006
Applicant /Owner:
Investigator: L ltindner J Levi P Keay County: Buncombe
State: NC

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X Community ID: wtld
Transect ID:
Plot ID: A
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species tratum Indicator
1. Acer rubrum T FAC 9.
2. FraxinusPennsydvanica T FACW 10.
3. Sambucus canadensis S/S FACW- 11.
4. Lindera benzoin S/S FACW 12.
5. Microstegium vimineum H FAC+ 13.
6. Impatiens capensis H FACW 14.
pumila H FACW
7. Pilea 15.
_
$. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 100%
Remarks: Open, sparse canopy and understory with low diversity. Sambucus dominates.
Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are classified asFAC-OBL in the
National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands.
HYDROLOGY
- Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
_ Other
x No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators:
x Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12"
_ Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
_ Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0 (in.)
Secondary Indicators:
x Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
x WaterStained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
_ FAC-Neutral Test
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS

•
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type2 Yes_ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors
Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-12 A 2.SY 4/2 2.SY 6/1 FEW/FAINT SANDY LOAM
12-16 B 2.SY 5/1 2.SY 5/4 FEW/DISTINCT FINE SANDY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosoi _ Concretions
_
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_
_ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
x Reducing Conditions Listed. on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No_.
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: This area at the head of the stream/ wetland complex is classified as a wetland based upon the criteria
set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
•

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
•

•
Project I Site: VERSANTBAIRD COVE Date: 9/15/2006
Applicant /Owner:
Investigator: L Rindner J Levi P Kealy County: Buncombe
State: NC

Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X luo
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? ves No X
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X Community ID:~
Transect ID:
Plot ID: upl - A
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Betula lenta T FACU 9. Pinus strobus S/S FACU
2. Liriodendron tulipifera T FAC 10. Polvstichum acrostichoides H FAC
3. Pinus strobus T FACU 11. Goodyera pubescens H UPL
4. Acer rubrum T FAC 12. Smilacina racemosa H FACU
5. Oxydendrum arboreum T NI 13.
6. Quercus rubra T FACU 14.
7. Quercus prinus T UPL 15.
8. Car~glabra T FACU 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 25%
Remarks: Upland slope area near FF wetlands. Open understory with a mixed pine-oak-hickory canopy.
Wetland Vegetation Absent Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are not classified asFAC-OBL in the
National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands.
HYDROLOGY
- Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
- Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
x No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
- Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations: -Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: N/A (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: N/A (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
- Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: No water table reached below 24". Bedrock at 12 - 24".

SOILS
•

Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Descrirrtion:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inched Horizon JMunsell Moistl (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
0-10 A l OYR 4/6 N/A N/A SILTY CLAY LOAM
10-18 B 7.SYR 5/6 N/A N/A CLAY LOAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
_
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_ Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
_ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Within a Wetland? Yes_ No X
Hydric Soils Present? Yes No X
Remarks: This area adjacent to the FF stream/ wetland complex is not classified as a wetland based upon the
criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
C

•

~ ~
I
EXISTING TIMBER ROADS
/~
r.. ,~~ti~ _- ~.. V ",~
p+r~, ~'. ~ . ~
~: ~, ~~t ~~" ,~ ..t, ~,~ ~`~ ~ `1 ~ : WETLAND
.` i .r,~~,'~~jt ti , ..ya 'a 1
(fl,i,,~ ~ 5~ , ~ ,
_ 1~
.J~lfs t.1
I,'
R IRD ~ r!t` ti ~ ;~!'• \{r, PERENNIAL WETLAND
STREAM
WETLAND
~"
INTERMITTANT STREAM
TOTAL SITE ACREAGE : 397
•
=narione EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP
4al~~ah
VERSANT -WETLANDS EXHIBIT 030».0o N
200 ~°°`h ,"~" SreL DEBARAN o7.2a.os
'w~~e 1 .G7 Cn;r!cite, NC ?8202
~~~ ''°` „'ww o'~~~~ Luo~~78~ VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. SCALE = 1"=1000'

t

^

•
7
.•~"".
_-----_-_____ ,y
.~-
~'I' ~ ~ I d
~~ ~ ~~ d
7 ~~ _

~!--_---
~r
---_a,, ,
,,
~,
~~~ '~ l
~~ ~~3 ; .
~~
~~.
\ ~---+/-
.~
1
,i
y
7
.~
~~~ ~
7
----"~
~
i
~
~~~
-
~~5 i ~t5 ~
~
~
= i y
p~
~ i ~
---- ~
---
~B~
~j9
~,
'~"\' ~
~' ~
~
~'
,.~-,~~ ,
~.
~
.:.,~
`` 99 J 1
R~[ ` T7~
i
/ I
!~ / ~ I
!
~

/ ~
i!
~
~
f
Cnari,-ttc
3a!em+
zrio Snutli trvon ;nccc
S,,,m taa~ :_nadone, u~ ~aaov
:~ loa 77G 7RSt ~~ raa ;75 7551
rvw mlcKn<5[stanciam
qi~~ '"*w
4~~e
~~~~ _ - '1
J-"
J~
/~ ~ i
1 ~~
~ .8~
WATERS OF THE U.S. -SURVEY
VERSANT -WETLANDS EXHIBIT
DEBARAN
VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC.
f~~
~:
1
I~
' ~!
~ --
~' 1 ir--
~ ~ 1~l
1~ ~ i i
~ i ~ ~ Jr
1 ~
7 ., i 1
1
i~
1
~__
1
a
use».oo "
».n.os
SCALE= NTS
u

•
O M Nai O~ 9Y
~~~• I
~ 1; ~ 1 ~~
I' ',1 ~
I; ~
I~ ,_ .~
_~
X11 It ~ ~ ~~
~__`J
a° ,~-
~f~ '~ I
'- I ~~
~~~ ~ ,
. ~
-- -
~~~ ~
,,
! '
. ~
~.~ I
# ~~
A
~ ~.•
_,,y_-- '
1
1
~ ~K
~ i ~~
~,
~ ~j ~, 1 I
~~ ~~ ~ _ 1 ~-~~
~ _ , _ ~ j,t ~~~~
1
~ ~iR 1
~ ~
1 ~ ,,
pR I~ 1
J
.
M ,' 1 '
Q i arm r. «t. r~ ~ I
~ ~ I
d I
,, -"ems. `Y~ / #~ ~a `.~~de .' `~
r ~
R ~ ~ ' ~`
' 1'~,
E ~~ I
~~ ~~ .~
---------~ ~~ I
~t
Ch=runt WATERS OF THE U.S. -SURVEY
Naia9h
VERSANT • WETLANDS EXHIBIT #3o».ao / N
200 South Lyon Stmtt. DEBARAN oz.2s.os ~-}-~
Suite 1400 ChadOne. VC 28201 W
" 106 www~i0![jt OtS[SIOn0.[Orn VERSANT. PROPERTIES, INC. SCALE = NTS

•
•

o~` vim.
F -~
~

Q~ '•
2 ~
1M ~ N ~~ ^ ~ •
~
'~ Q ~ ~
~ ~
tD ~ ~
r 1bb ~ N Q a ~ Q •

~N
Map
~ ~
> 788 ~ ~
Q
a
~a ZO Q
~
ON •
h
O

~ ~
Q~ QO ZO •
O c0
QOQ O~ ~i~I ~
~ ~
M
J Z ~~, J O 3 ~a.I
3
5
~ ~ W
:}
~ ~_
~ ~
~
M b ~ ~
a ~'
~' ~ ~
~
`~

Q Q
~ •

c •~

o a a
~ , ~

~' ~,
3 w
~ ~
g a r ~ In O
1D
h
o r+'D to vl
y , N
~ N ¢ ~
Q u W w
d' Q W y a Q o

~ i~ a V Q~ ~
~ O .-
ZO < Od Wp ~
ec ^ryb
O Z ~ O ~
M ~, ~~~ JO V10 ~
c
DUN
J
J ~ ~ ~
O rt
N
tD~ WQ
~j ~ j rn ~ ~ T7 rn
I~UOpU.
_ o'- `a
ZO io w v
'a
~
,~
.-UN~ Qo ~ +b~ 'a 4
Q ~
m ~ ~
O O
~
~ _
OfZ00.. ; w QO

< 0 m

a
Ty
r- to r. ~
a~ °~ ~ ~
~ _~
mom
m 5 W v tv `~ ~<°a
i
i
~s a~Q a.
Q~ Jr8 o
~i

rr 01 S
ZO wo
~ Q O

i ~ •
'~ 1 ~ f
i
~ i
< 0b ~
~ ~
•
~~ ~

~
U
~ !~
/
...~ •
• f `
~
. ~.• `
o
•• ~ tn~ ~ cxi i

•• m~~o
t
~
~a
n ~ = M
'b ~
`
v
i
r3 rn
^arton~ WATERS OF THE U.S. -ENLARGEMENT A
Nalergh
VERSANT -WETLANDS EXHIBIT sso».oo
20n South Tryon 5treel'
s~,t~ r.~ aadaTy~. N~:e:a~
DEBARAN ~r.ZB.o6
=
'• 7o4376/85~' ic~esKtoneean VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. SCALE = 1"=300'

•

rnc~~
~Z~,
r~
ion
~r~
~ Q N
~ ~
'- J
~- ~ m
nUo
rn
M
m ~ ~
r ~ ~
~O~
~ Q N
I
SNtRLE~ W
R D~NNts ~PVER & ~'~ • r
- r• •
r ~
Y `
/rr
-----------~ • r
^ ~
^ ~
^
r
^ ~~'
r%
.f/
^ ~~
I
^'
r
•
^
0o rl
~ J ~ r
st~m ~rr~~r^irri r^rrr~^r~
rn U p •
^
` ~r~ •
~ ~~, •
t
I '
I r
~ t
I
I I
I
1
1 r
~ f
1
I
r
I
~ ^ /
I
1
r
I r
I '
I
I
I
r
Ir
1
I
.
~ • /!
„=r,~tt~ WATERS OF THE U.S. - ENLARGEMENT C
Ra~eiq~
VERSANT -WETLANDS EXHIBIT #3011.00
t~~~thtry>,~5[.«[. DEBARAN 11.tt.os =~
i-.ate .»Oh _nar~ot[!, ni 282ut
~- ]-0: }76 7&5= - 704 376 1653 VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. sca~E = r'=s00~
waw ca!e~cneststanc <om
^

•
•
•
w
E=- ~ ~
J Z
Q W
W U
_! J ~ 1 J W
J
to ti ^ "
• ~~, ~ I
!k ~~~~. ~ ~~~ t/ ~
t ~ ~ t ,.'~~~ eefa ~ t
1 t, ~ ~
+ 1 ~ ~ /r~r ~'1 ~ b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~rf
~4 ti if
f'~ ~ w
f , , Q
4 ~ ~~ % r _ ~~ SI ' f' ~ r "' cn
r71„~
1 / 7r7 ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ w
j 1
J ~ l<'rIl/~" ' ~~1' i;; g,. , fir; ~ ~ f ~{~~~' = c~
r. ~ ~~. z
~ ~ r~ t! r
~ ` ift ~~ ~ i ~ , ~ F--
r a v ~ . r ~ _ l~ 11r r' I , ~i!(~-' r i~~ ~r4 a , !,; C7 W
~ J
I f~~lf l~~ / f. r ~/,fJ/ !f 1 ` ,'1)11 1
/t f- _ t \~
1 ~~(~ l~lr ~~ ~ ~
7 ~
,~ _ ? ~sl~~ ~, ,,~ ;; ~.
~ I ~; `~ i
~t r `
tlt -~ rr I
.r K f / _'
r i _
~; ~ ~j ~ 1tl ~~` ~.,
~ssf~{ ~ ~, , j ' ~~~~ r~ ~i ~ r ~" ~ ~~ 1~t 1' ~.~
~?,~ -'~' _.Ji. ..I}/ lrill(~ir/°4It1 ...1!i rf._._ ~'a ~ ~~
~ r~~ ~i(f!`' <~~. YCI~ i ~""~ Est -t
~~~'~ ~ 1~~t,17r7~t ~ 1 ~ . ~ ,
Itl~ ~rt(t,l t ~ "~~ ~`~ ~ ~ ~k,
~~1.1. 113 } .Za~Cr a:~r~
~i I tl . ..t~ i
`~` I
ter. ~
t i
jI~ LL ~;
Y Q %; 1
W ~`~ '~
()\~\ .~- -' ~~ G.---`
I \\ ~ r ./
/ ` t
-~ar~~1~ SITE PLAN
a,l~,gn
VERSANT • WETLANDS EXHIBIT #3011.00 "
:°°Sa"th."~°"5""` DEBARAN tttt.os
Sm+e lam Charlotte NC ffi257
;•7743757851°•1043167851 VERSANT PROPERTIES INC. sca~E= t°=soo'
nwx mle~eneststanecam 1

1
^
^

• . .

•
•
•
~.,>~~~ PHASING PLAN
„~~ ~_
VERSANT • WETLANDS EXHIBIT. use».oo rr mImK ll
. ,.,~ ~r,~~r<. ~.< ~~~~„ \\\..1111....~JJJ
~+~ '`°~,~~'fi;' ~ """'~5' VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. sca~E = r~=~ooo~

A

•
•
~, ~, ~,°'
~,
`_ - ,;
1 ~ ~
i ~~
-,~-
! _-,
~ ~->
•
,~,. ~," ROAD CROSSING KEY
~,~~ ~..
VERSANT -WETLANDS EXHIBIT #so~~.oo _l
$J~tf lL;-0 _na~i.:: [. ~~'' 28101
~~"'~ ' '°"„'„"o'''°"'6"5_ VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. SCnIE= Nrs
~es,uxe com

0

•
2611.5
i ~` -~
•
C7
~~'i%
r~
~'
,~
~
--
i ..~"II/mil -
s ~/
i'~i ~~ ~ i
• /~.~~ ~
~
~-
(
/~ /
-~
%
/ ~ / j
1
~~~// >

v ~~ ----
i
~~i'
i
~~ INV.
/--2soo.o /,
-,;,-
.,.
~ ~
i ~/ -~
~~ ,,
t ,,
~-VERSANT
DRIVE
~ ```~
~
~
~ ~
`~ ~-PROPOSED
2stt.5 ~ GRADE
2610 'l EXISTING
~ GRADE
®~~ v
+
~~
sC' ~
s
o
o I
~

~~ i

~ r
HEADWALL 2soo ~'
2600 ~
~y~~,
CENTERLINE -'`
OF STREAM
SECTION A • A
F OF IMPACT TO WETLANDS
• 118 l SCALE: 1' = 60' HORZ.
. 1' = 6' VERT.
~..~~~~, ROAD CROSSING - SECTION 'A'
P3 cigh
VERSANT • WETLANDS EXHIBIT #3611.00 "
'~" "``" ~~~~"'"` DEBARAN o2.28.os
~~"~ "' „'„„~5
< <;;
o~
'~`
~ VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. SCALE = 1" = 30'
~
,
~
,
1
I

INV.
2696.5 ~ m
\~
~!'`\~
•
•
~'" j~ ~~
~ ~
,:
if, ~~`
., ~
.~;
INV. ~.~--_
2692.0 ~~
~~
~, EXISTING
~\~GRADE
~ VERSANT
~\ ~-DRIVE
2700 ~~/~ /-pRC~POSE
\ ~ / GRADE
2888.5 ~~
®`~ : ~'~
90~ A ~`
9 1
2692
2690 HEADWALL ~ ~,
~ ~~
CENTERUNE~
OF STREAM
SECTION B • B
• 98 LF OF IMPACT TO WETLANDS SCALE: 1' = so' HoRZ.
1' = 6' PERT.
h,.~..,. ROAD CROSSING - SECTION'S'
t>..-.
VERSANT • WETLANDS EXHIBIT asott.oo "
?"'°°`h~`°"""` DEBARAN o~.zs.oe
;;'~~~<<~~,,ab',;. VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. SCALE = t° = 30'

•
~~~\ -
~~.`-~ _
~ \~

INV.
2721 .0
INV_
2732.0
C
\~ ~ / -J// ~~~I
~i-~'~ j j//~/
--.--- -
n
i
i
EXISTING \ ~
2740 GRADE- \ i
VERSANT ~~
DRIVE ~
tOPOSED ~
GRADE i
--~~
r
i p
2730 „u, ~

SECTION C - C
-160 LF OF IMPACT TO WETLANDS SCALE: 1' = so' NoRZ.
t' = 6' VERT.
ROAD CROSSING -SECTION 'C'
~ialef•_^.
VERSANT -WETLANDS EXHIBIT u3o».o0 ~
• ~„~ vy~~ ;,.«~ 07.28.06
~~~,~ 1~~~ ,,;,~o,,, ~,_ zszoz DEBARAN
~~~ _. ",: s~s,a,, . ~~<=~srs5, VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. SCpIE = t" = 30'
v~ .v C01!Tnf51X0~~f i0T
~,fi_ ~~~I~~`~jl
1, ~I!~i~~
~ ,
~~~% 1~

1

D
D
INV.
2701.0
\ ~--INV.
2s9o.o
2710
EXISTING
GRADE
•
•
2700
2690
-130 LF OF IMPACT TO WETLANDS
SECTION D - D
SCALE: 1' = 60' HORZ.
1' = fi' VERT.
=,3,~~~~ ROAD CROSSING - SECTION'D'
~a~..,.,
VERSANT -WETLANDS EXHIBIT aao>>.oo N
>.,, ~~~h ,ry,~, ~<«<~. 07.28.06
;,,,~~,<"~ -~~:,"~«_h~ zaz» DEBARAN
~~„"'~ "' "ry'65' ~'""'S "~` VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. SCALE = t" = 30'

i
~\
HEADWALL ~~

•
GRADE
INY.
2630.0
i
/ r~~
INV. /-
2643.5
~i
.~
•
Y
RETAINING ~ v
WALL RETAINING
WALL
0
2660
2650 1`~
2640
® o;~` '
spC~
-o~,
2630 ~2e3o
EXISTING \ ~~
GRADE ~
2620 \~~
SECTION E - E
-104 LF OF IMPACT TO WETLANDS SCALE: 1' = so' HoRZ.
t' = 6' VERT.
~~~~~_~ ROAD CROSSING -SECTION 'E'
~a~~.,h
VERSANT -WETLANDS EXHIBIT aso>>.oo mN
'~°'°""'~°°""" DEBARAN o~.za.os W
~~'""~ '~` ,'.,°s,~,~.~°~u;~' os.', VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. sCALE = r' = so~
i

't~ ~' \\
INV. ~:~
~~ 2739.0 ~ >;,,
_~
.~-.~

/~~
/~~
,,
%//

2750
`\ EXISTING
~ GRADE
~`
`~ CAROLINA
~~ WREN DRIVE
PROPOSED
O~GRADE
®°' ~
99~cA ~
2740
HEAD
WALL 2739
1
1
•
SECTION F - F
- 95 LF OF IMPACT TO WETLANDS SCALE: 1' = so' HoRZ.
1' = 6' VERT.
:,,.~~~~ ROAD CROSSING -SECTION 'F'
da~odn
VERSANT -WETLANDS EXHIBIT a3oii.oo mN
Zr"°"`° ``":°';"`: DEBARAN o~.2a.os ~---}-~
s~.r is~~ ena~oua ec zamz ~1.JjW,J
",w5;'ga;~;:,,~°~.« <' ~5~; VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. SCALE = t" = 30'

•
•

• /,
%~ ~
~ . ___
~~ LQ~ ~ ~~
r.
/J i~
NO IMPACTS TO EXISTING
STREAM. STREAM TO -REMAIN.
<_ ~, / ,
/,J v/ ~,
986 ~' ~~ ~.
/ '
466 ~ ydG -..' - o56p RoA~
to . ~ / ~:
i
III
903 ~ ~ DELI (~IN~- r~OM~ Cam/
I - - -
/ /~. ~ ~
:~... . .
~ _ ;=
..y%~"' 4
~` ~4 1
j ~/'i~ X
~, _ - _
. _1.- `
.. , , , ~~~
~ _~_ ~ ~)
W,~ _ __
~, __ -,
,. I ~ B ~._ _ ~v
~~ ', ,r..)1~ T t l
~~ /
\ ~~ - _
~' ,
WETLAND IMPACTS: 4271 SF 1.098 AC
STREAM IMPACTS: 0 LF
~ha,~at~ 51TE PLAN ENLARGEMENT • GUARDHOUSE AREA
Rale~yh
VERSANT -WETLANDS EXHIBIT usoi~.oo N
20050Ylh tryOn $Ir<cl, DEBARAN o~.28.os
$uRe 1600 Charlotte, NC 28202
~~ "IOC 176 7851 •• 70< 376 7A51 VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. SCALE = NTS
coklencxsr«~eem~

•
•
•
Cv... ~ ~aT ~ -- - -_
~;
r_ "
V \ \ \ ~.
- _.!
~.
~ ri ~ ~ ...
~=:_'
;` f;~ /.
.~
W
P .~ ~ t~
''
/,
I~ //~
I N2 ; I /
NO IMPACTS TO EXISTING
(yp STREAM. STREAM TO -(7EMAIN.
J .a f. /
~~
2
~...
~.
~~'
'~ ,
i '~
..~
9~ ~ ,~
~n5~ f~A~
,, ~:
~' ~
D(LIC INS (Z0~ ~~>
~~
~/
,•
t _~
-----= ,
--~ ,-`
-- 8Xr''
. I I ~ ppvp ~v
I- ~
~U a, , ~
I ~
~ ,J-
WETLAND IMPACTS: 4271 SF l .098 AC
STREAM IMPACTS: 0 LF
Ch.t~atn SITE PLAN ENLARGEMENT -GUARDHOUSE AREA
flaleigh
VERSANT -WETLANDS EXHIBIT Aso».oo \/\//~-7~~~~+~~J.\/{
zo° South tryon Sfaet, D7.28_Q6 W
Smte 14tl° Charbttq NC 282tl2 DEBARAN
~,.,~ ''°43261R5t ''tl4716285' VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. scA~E= Nrs
,. wwwmleKncststmecan

:7
•
•

. o
I ' ~
55 J
b 1
~ ¢

--
~_ W
~Z
i, q
'j~ t~.
'
~ .
~~ ~ ~ ~,
~ i 1i
~'~ t
W
a a
r- o
N
W rZr F fh
QW ~ ~Q
J
as ~ y~
N^ ~ ~w
qQ Z yW
WW K X~
a~ a wl7
`J
~~1 ~-'
__ - __ i i ; -:~
-~ ~ f -~
L_:_ ~''
~`^;
.. e '
JO ~. ~ ', ~r `fie _ _.._-.__ :_._._- ~ .W.~RW'
W N 5 ~ i(~ ~-1( ~ Q
qt7 .. - ..vj - -tl' ki. JZ
' ,; a ~^ z~
O
~ ~ r~ :~~~ t. dJ
° - ~~ . t lr ~i cWi w
i
~ - _ r ~J ~ ' ~~~ ~. ~~ W O
- u 4 ~--...,(
_ ~
r ~ ~
yt ` ~
~ ~ ~,,
i ~ i
~ ,
F`
._ t "4~~ jr'`
Yf~,
~._.___~_,__--__------;~~, fi t., j ~~
4
F- J
W W
~ ~ - _ _ _ ~_,1.,- ~ _
rW _ _
yJ -
- ~~ ~~.-
_t
.- -"-
~.
N W - ~ n
aJ _~'
~ ~ 1 r ~ .
~- t-
IA N
A~ _ '- _
a~ '
0
ChadMte
Ha1o9h
CONCEPTUAL GARDEN TERRACE PERSPECTIVE
VERSANT -WETLANDS EXHIBIT
799 ~°"`° ~"°° "„" DEBARAN
Smr~ ,6DD Chxlotte. llC 78702
„'°"'°'85' ''°° "b'H:. VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC.
w.~ roisi<°~~~««~
N W
Q ~
Q
W ~
K d N
NiW-V
(~HWa
U N
O
O O
F- h- G
,yl-
IW~
Zq
Z
'aQ
N
'qZ
!WQ
~N
~~'l7
~~
O~W
QaW
H
W ~ "Z"
41
aZr~
w°Z~-.
F-l7YJ
W J O d
q J
W
¢3cWno
~~a~~a.
#3011.00 k
07.28.06
SCALE= NTS

•

•
~.
~ ui
~1 ~ ~ 11~~~11
`t ~ ~ ~ ~
,~ -„}
`, ~ ~ ~ ~
`~ ~ d
o0 2 ~
.~ .oUga `~ ^4
~ ~ 4 ~
`ti ~ ~ a
c~ . ~} -z
~;
00 .~.
. ~.. ``os
/~.rl d " ~
_ S ~ ~-J
.~ ~ - .
_;o~ `
~^ ~r\ j
u.a v
,~
~' c
.~ q
,:nadune BMP CONCEPT -CROSS SECTION
Nalergh
VERSANT -WETLANDS EXHIBIT aso».oo
'o° ~°`h try„n s""` DEBARAN o7.28.os
Site 14M Charlotte, i:C 28TaP
~,~.~"~ ''°`. „'wwro'<,~~~ ~u~~'~~ VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. SCALE = NTS

•
•
•
___ ,,
~ k
•t-„~~{-aanon)
W ~( , ~E
~- ~ ~ ° h
~~ fl
.~ --- 'r 1
,~~ o ~
.~ _ _ °~ ~
=o
-- - ~ ~
~ J ~
~.
. ~''~~
_ ~ i ~ '
~ti5 ~ >,~
~~0 e ~ ..
-_~
--.
a~
.q o
' j 2
' 1 __
. ._. _
'~
w
"k (/" v _ f TL ~ J
°ITo ~ ~ * uo * / .
O ,~ ~ $IJ fZ{g ~ f
_._.__ - ~0--- ~- _ ,.. ~ ~
g quo - --- ~
~~ _ --
~ ~ ~ , _ --
. a _ _ `,,
-.
__
.. ~ ~ \
_._~
-;' I' -- _
'-
__ ~ \
- ~
f - ._
~ha~bn< VILLAGE CENTER ENLARGEMENT - 4 OF 4
Ratngh
VERSANT -WETLANDS EXHIBIT nso~i.oo "
290 So°~h'"°° s„"` DEBARAN 07.28.06
Sune i ,00 ~'hnbn.. NC 28202
~.'~""'~ ''°`.;~`V;ro~n~<<s«'"~` VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. SCALE= 1"=100'

•
t __. -~ -"its
,a.
{ w~o.w ` ~ '7 -
-- -
' -- ~ _
~" --
,.
:~ ~~
.o
so
-- -
. g% . ~ - ~ J
- O o
~" ~
_
o°
O, - -- --
__ - v -
~Z
° ~ ~~~ ,~.
'/_ ~~
a ~~o
~ - ~~' ;~ -
~'~~ a - - - q~~ K -
0 0 -- -
-- _
,, q~y o __ -~-,o ,,:
~ -_- _-- -
• .
Q~ o~
` O I ~ i ~ ,~ ~° Q1
i
. .
D __
' ~= Td~N 1 I xq~° ~io~
~J4w- i ~,q~o ~ : "' _ - +97(0
Y
' - '~ ~ , ; 't7O 8
O _ t°l fii° a *t+~s
O p ~ ~ ado _ -__ ___~
o ~~
q~ .
ti --_
`; r
~ ,~~ /~ ~
- -
,,
~~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
,11 ` ~,``\ \ ` \ \ `\\ ` ~ \ _ ~ ,
^a~~t VILLAGE CENTER ENLARGEMENT - 3 OF 4
Raleigh
VERSANT • WETLANDS EXHIBIT #3011.00 ~
2°° sa,ah rrwn 5""` DEBARAN 07.28.06
Smle 1400 CharlOttG ~C 26202
~.~'~"t "'°"'~"~'"'°"75785 VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. SCALE= T=goo'
. wwwmltimt4slonemm

•
•
._ o ~--~-
~`,' 8~m
--__~-,~
.. _
~~'~ __
~~
s .,
~`~„~.
~.
~'o glo - _ 9~ __ - ~`Q
- _ _
- ~ -- ,r .'
y~o . O--
p '-~~ _ ~
`yip - - - - ~ - -
-- - _ _-,.~' o
O©. ~~~ _ - ~ ~ e -
___ ~.
- _ _ ~~ ~
Qo
J -
.
-_ T ~p .Slo _ a , ~ .
_ ,
NOTES: ~1~41~1.. ~p ~.\ .
SEE CONCEPTUAL BMP C zap sF tiP.
STRUCTURE ENLARGEMENT P=~ `~~+`~T''*'= ~,1
FOR CROSS SECTION SKETCH ~!f~ ~ ~TAt
~har~°ttc VILLAGE CENTER ENLARGEMENT - 2 OF 4
Ra!a°h
VERSANT -WETLANDS EXHIBIT aso~~.oo N
7°0 ~a°Ih owe srr«t_ DEBARAN 07.28.06
Swte 1400 Charlotte, h'C 78201
~1r~ ~''°"'„'wwro;t;~ <°;,, `,~'ro ; VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. SCALE = 1~~=~00~

•
•

•
•
`, `', Y'r
- .,_,
vz
y z~ ,
S ~ `~~
~,~~
.>~ ~.
<~ ~`
~~~
i
_ ~~ ~ 4
i "9s
'< ~. ~
J~ `
>~ k~'S i
g
'3
,Y 3
~~.~ j~ tlw1,~,-r
~~~
.e ~_+ ~ °
.~ ~'`J~ ~
f~ ~ ~ ~'
' ~' I
r s. / ~
~ i .~ .~i .
S
"Po ~ o f
,,~ ~ ~.~ ~/i ~ ~
?; d ..~:~;'~ j
~- _ s !
~ ;;~~``'~`~
~:
~~.
~-
4d \L,
1 ~``l ` ~ ~

f-~ t
~..5 i
~ ~~ -
` L
Ir y~ ~~
. 3341 E !3 i~'z i , st i ~ s~ #a
/ '
-_ '"
~~~a.~ VILLAGE CENTER ENLARGEMENT KEY
Ralt+gh
VERSANT -WETLANDS EXHIBIT aso~~.oo N
z°°suu~h r,yn~A~eec. DEBARAN 07.28.06
sma iaa° chui°ne, rzc zaz°z
~'~.~"~ "'°`;„„`~ro;~~MU„«~'ro; VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. SCALE = T' = 250'

•
•
•
--_---_ -
~~ 1
--~.~~~ - - 24
i
~~ ` ~ fI ` it
~ ~
'-~ r ~ \ ~ f
~~~~ ~ ~
< ~.., \~
- ~ ~ ~ ~ A" ~ '~. ~a
`4.
t
~!\
Y !
~_ ,.~ o '
>~ ~ ~
LLT a~ ~ o t
rr~-1
1 ~ fj ~7
~ ,
- ~ .,~ ,-~
T ~~ J~
R ~~ ~ t o'~
1 ~
• , ;.~~ it ° ~ J-,~ 6 $ ~-> ~ o ~f _
? ~ y ~ l~
~ ~ ~ -
2' I •
.;
~ ~ T ~ oQ . ~- ~ w
i ~ t ~~ /,r
j r f=
C
`~ ~.
~?'~ ~~ -rte ~~ S \r r
h o~ 00 ` _~ ~ ~~~
~~ O ~ >
/=/
Charlotte SITE PLAN ENLARGEMENT -VILLAGE CENTER
Ra4igh
VERSANT • WETLANDS EXHIBIT a3ott.oo
z~ ~.rh ~~• s„"` DEBARAN ot.ze.os =~
smle raoo Cnarattc. Rc ze7oz
~~ '. 706 776785'• 704 )767851 VERSANT PROPERTIES INC. Scn~E = t"=250'
.~. rwawro~e,er,eusr«~~~

•
•
•
`~
s:_ ~
~- z
to
~.
V
,~ ~
~- ~- +~~
f,
~_ ,.
I .~
f
~!
!" ,~ "~
~ 's
4. ~.,
J ~ :; +~'
Z ~ ~i I
-~1~~
~. ~ .~-
z ~ ~- ,
o~ ~ ,,
,~
;~
~T' 1
2, ~/l ~,
U ~ t(
IQ ~ ~
~~
~ ` __
nr
~.:
i
1~ J
i
c ~ y' 7
~- E
r r^r~'~~ f fi 1
~r _
..
r
,~„ .
%~ ;~-
/ ' 4
-+Jr t L
f; a
[~ ~1
'`` ~ ~ ,~
~; ~ ~
` 1l\
~_ ~ ~
.g~ ~~
~, . 1 { Q ~.
~/
.~_
ri A
J~
r'
s "J ; f -~.
r
t ~,
~ _ A:~. _ ~~ _r- '
^a,tat~ CONCEPTUAL PARK ENLARGEMENT - 2 OF 2
Raingh
VERSANT -WETLANDS EXHIBIT aso~~.oo
:w so,nn rryatt Stteat.
sa~t< uw charbna uc zez0~ DEBARAN 07.28.06
-~ /08 3~6 78~k~mestAOna Sam VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. SCALE = NTS
}. ~~

•
•
~
U ~
t u
~...
a
~~~
~ ~ ~'~

~ :
t !.
"t -~~~•y C![
~ S
d u-
~.. ' ?
1 --
~'
~~
~,
'
~ ~.
~
~ ,
. ~
~ ~.
. ~ ~,

~
x .z
~~ %'
'°
~ ,
i ~.
~"

z ,~
a
``~ ~' ,,
3 ~ ~`,.
~. ~~~~,
r,
S
ay~ / ~
/ /
Z ,A
t- ~~ L`
~a ., f
<`` ~~ ~~
,rug
u li ,
~' ~,r
~l ~!
.,~ ,, 4
..
,,~
~~ .,~
.~ ~:~M
.,
- Il ~"~
•
Charlotte CONCEPTUAL PARK ENLARGEMENT • 1 OF 2
Raingh
VERSANT • WETLANDS EXHIBIT aso».o°
Z°° ~°`h `"°° srrnr. DEBARAN ot.zo.os =(---I-,~
~.•~,~ ,6~ Chadntto. R~ ?RIU2 ~ j/
~~ '' 705 I767RO'C~^c `~~6t78~1 VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. SCALE = NTS

•
•
0
~_
~ ~
~„ s
d i'-
fl. -R-
'~._
~3
C~
u
LL
r
~,
~~ ~`
~ ~- ~~
~,.
`~~, ~: C
~-
Y ~
a. ~
4 ~ _/
e
`~ :~~ ~ ~
.. ~:~ ~ y
,~~
y ,.,,,
-ri Z. ~ ..~ ~d
ti
t _ !a, _~
r7 ~ ~' ~ ,~!~ 7
ji _
.,~~;
~- ~,
~ i
v3
r~.~
s h
i;
~' i
'~ ~ Wit.
~'
~:.~ ., ~ ,
:~,
~, -~~`
~;_:
7
NOTE:
SEE CONCRETE DAM EXHIBIT
FIGURE - OVERALL DAM
PLAN FOR IMPACT DATA
•
~ha~~a7< SITE PLAN ENLARGEMENT -CONCEPTUAL PARK AREA
Raleigh
VERSANT - WETLANQS EXHIBIT asa~~.oo
zoo 5oom G, s77«t. 47.28.06 =~
5~,7< ~6QD ~7,a~~an<. ~~ 78:07 DEBARAN
~~ ''706367857'•7063767857 VERSANT PROPERTIES, ING. SCALE= NTS
~n.rn!eKrrcstnme.<oar

:. :~..~1~. `~•~
r JCr'~Ar~
~~
~_
1
1=
~ ,
7
SECTION KEY
•
•
Z
O
f=
V
w
N
U
W
Q
H
J
J
w ~ ~ $
3 ~ L9ML
? Q e7erL
~~
W ~~ ezerL
t ~ IN
1
V
1
s ~
z ~
~ S c
~~~
` i
.'~
~~ i I.
qty 4
F
1 sue! S
~~ 30~
u7~4 ~O•
~~~ ~. ,•
1~
S
C-
`~
\ I
a
;~\
J
~ -~--- -
~ ~
<~1~anr
Rafe~~h
20o Sough Iryon yV«t,
iunr 1400 Chailone, t:C 28262
.. 104 716 1851 ~. 104 776 7851
. www.COlc~<nestAane Cdn
IeerL
~~~ 4ZOrt
9'earL
C!a-L
OeaFL
LeorL
cvara
~,., V~ N~ peat

S
~ , ?
~
IX~ eswL
~~
~ L'LerL
~
~, ~ ~ O'LarL
L
Y'6iYl
~.~
~ _ C[OiL
~ avert

s ~ ~. _ aearL
~ _
.
t'LarL
N
N
F
rWYL

i~~t tearL
...,< .~.
• 1 .~
~ N
_ I~1~ ~ - l`MYL
ffSS ,~
r
o~oa-L
r•- wart
aw-z
o,w-L
_,.._
9'(irL
'
I earl
4 W
:..~ O'IerL Z

-
~
- teen N
S~ V .. ~
!'rerL ~
~
'. e'OML
U
4'MiZ
„ e~e-t
GUARDHOUSE AREA • CROSS SECTION 'EE'
VERSANT -WETLANDS EXHIBIT aso~~.oo N
DEBARAN o7.2e.os
VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. SCALE = NT5

•
C]
•
®~aa"
®• o
~~r
~~
r~i
:~~~,
..
• '.
^ ~ _ ..
. •:`
~~ ~ ---
~ ~~ i
~~ ~ f
r ~.
,~
,_ ' ~I
1 ~ ~'
~ _
^ ~ ~ --- ~ ~
\ ~- , _ .
~ ~ i' ~ y
1 _ ~~fl ~
i •\ ~ ~ / /~
/: ~ j
~,- ,-
,-
~?
~_~
;~
',
~,
,.=
,na,~o~,~ SINGLE FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY ENLARGEMENT
Ra~.~.~•
VERSANT • WETLANQS EXHIBIT #3011.00 ~
vrce i<eo •:na~ion<. sc zeza
~Ir~ ""„'~a,'~;~n;`;~o.`~Y9rt`, VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. SCALE= T'=boo'

•
:7

,__
~ ~ ~ ~ __
~ ,
~ ~~ ;
70 POND A~ ~ ~` \~~ "~-~r ~/ i ~\\
` \l~
~ ~~ -
_ ~ - ~ ~ ,~ ~. ~ I ~, - ~ V' ~ --
_ ~ - ~ ` ~ '~
oDSnNCC~+AVaraa~os' ~ ~ ;. ~_..~/~ ~t ~ ' ~., _
- PAVED FOR ~ ~`,,' ~~ ~ ~~ X71 ~_ _ __.
~--
DEVELOp1~NiT. I ~ ~4, :~ _. ,.~~~~~ \~ _ _-~
~~
- .+.` -
,~
y
~ N'_ _-. _
~- ...tea
CO -_ _ - ~ 'iCl?ONQCAREA
I •., ,~
~ ~ ~ AR&1, ~ ~~~ ~ ~ - i A '~ mot. ,..--~
APPROXNIA7E - t ~
' 'JACA710N~ y
.. SI~OF DANA-- .. ~~~, ~--- ~ ~ ~ _~~
b ~f _. ~-.~ ~ ~y yy
f i ~.~
' .
.-- ~ ~ ,
< ,. ~ ,.~
RONDC
--// ` }} f,
EXIST RP1L
-~ ~ APRRO%MIATE -- ~ - ._ ~ ~ i t ~ I
noN~NO -
~, ~~ ,tea-- _ ~ ~ - ~ ~,s~ _ .~. I
,. _
~_
EIifNNCE1ABlf 'c ~ + ~ ;
,~ _ ~
R _
~~ ~ ,~ `" ~ ~ ~~ "~„ _ _ ""`` ~~ s
~. *,.~ k
~,,~ ' \~~ ~ a- _ ~~ ti ~ ~`t' WETLAND
',\~ .,`` S - 'IMRKPLAN CONCEP'R1AL _ _ Y ~ ~/ '
POR '~
L
i,_
``~r ..l ~ ~ ~;s ~
~~ ~ .
->: ~ ~
\\~~ TE i
i
~~ /~ ~ d
~TOPONOB ~ ~)~~ i ~,
~ ~
w~., ~ ff , ~ ~ . ~ / Y ;, 1~
r'
4 E
'~ ~
, ~ r~ /~ `~
\` ` ~
_ _ ~ _ `
~ \ _ ~
i
-- - -
.: ~ L .~ ,~.._, - __.
~ '
.~ ' ~ ~~
NOTES:
POND A
SURFACE AREA: 0.26 ACRES S~U~RF~ACE AREA: 0.54 ACRES
VOLUME DETAINED: 1.42 AC.-FT. VOLUME DETAINED: 3.28 AC.-FT.
DRAINAGE AREA: 40.36 ACRES DRAINAGE AREA: 23.01 ACRES
DAM HEIGHT: 17 FT DAM HEIGHT TO BERM: 17 FT.
STREAM FLOODED: 177.12 LINEAR FT STREAM FLOODED: 210.53 LINEAR FT
STREAM IMPACTED BY DAM: 20 LINEAR FT STREAM IMPACTED BY DAM: 20 LINEAR FT
~~ I~
SURFACE AREA: 0.30 ACRES TOTAL VOL. DETAINED: 6.54 AC.-FT.
VOLUME DETAINED: 1.84 AC.-FT. 0 125 250 500
DRAINAGE AREA: 33.14 ACRES
DAM HEIGHT: 17 FT.
STREAM FLOODED: 207.96 LINEAR FT
STREAM IMPACTED BY DAM: 20 LINEAR FT (FEET)
~°~°~^~°~~ DAM CONCEPT PLAN
^ ~ ~ Kimley-Horn VERSANT -CONCRETE DAM EXHIBIT
~ and Associates, InC, FIGURE -OVERALL DAM PLAN os-os.os
H°oNe° ( 19)6677-2000IGH, NO FAXC(9 9)N677~20503068 VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. F-1

•
•

I I
EXISTING GRAVEL
ROAD

CREST OF DAM
1T HEIGHT FROM
TOE OF DAM
.,
~
/ _
• _.
.REAR FOOTING
PLACED ON BEDROCK
_
I (SEE DETAIL SHEET D-3)
"'' "J "J COLDWATER RELEASE
=~ r "="
•
~
.
.
..(SEE NOTE 8)
ROCK CROSS VANE ~- r
(SEE__DETAIL SHEET. ~ r Y r
w ~ ~ r r
.-~ .- r r
r .-~ .-• r r r r
EXISTING. STREAM 'r r ~ ~ ~ ~ r-. ~ ~ r ... r-.
• r..~ °,~rrr -JNDA~frrrr
CHANNEL ,~ ,~ r-..- .~ .~ r r ^. ,-.
,
~
r.. r r r ,_.. ^. r.. ~. r- ~ r
FRONT FOOTING ~' r r ~ ~" r r `J 'r
.~~.r ,~r~r._.-r-.r
PLACED ON BEDROCK ~' ~ r '" 'J ~-;,,,~, r r r ,~
(SEE DETAIL. SHEET D-3) ^. ,_, „' ,~ r
20 LF OF STREAM IMPACTED BY THE DAM, 177 LF OF
STREAM FLOODED ANO 644 SF OF FLOODED WETLAND
NOTES:
1. SIZE AND FOOTPRINT SHOWN IN EXIHIBIT .ARE FOR A CONCRETE CANTILEVER
DAM WITH BEDROCK ASSUMED TO BE AT A DEPTH OF 5 FEET.
2. THE FINAL DESIGN FOOTPRINT OF THE DAM WILL VARY DEPENDING ON THE
ACTUAL DEPTH TO BEDROCK.
3. LOCATION OF OAM IS APPROXIMATE.
4. ROCK CROSS VANES TO ACT AS GRADE CONTROL STRUCTURES.
5. ROCK CROSS VANES TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITH MINIMAL IMPACT TO EXISTING
VEGETATION.
6. REMOVE INVASIVE SPECIES FROM STREAM ENHANCEMENT AREA, BEFORE
COMPLETING CONSTRUCTION.
7. EXISTING STREAM TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED BETWEEN ROCK CROSS VANE 0 25 50 t00
8. COLD WATER RELEASE TO 8E PROVIDED TO DRAW WATER FROM BELOW
THERMODIVE AND CARRY NORMAL FLOW (FEET)
°~^~°N~°~°~° DAM CONCEPT PLAN
~ Kimley-Horn
VERSANT -CONCRETE DAM EXHIBIT
~ and Associates, ~nC. FIGURE • POND A oe•os~os
PHONED ~919;6677_20A~LE~IGH, NORFA C(919)N677?sososoae VERSANT PROPERTIES, IMC. F-2

•
•

CREST OF DAM
EXISTING STREAM 1 T .HEIGHT FROM
CHANNEL TOE'OF DAM
REAR FOOTING .
PLACED ON 9EDROCK
n.' ' (SEE DETAIL SHEET D-3)
~.
n,, r~ EXISTING GRAVEL
-. ~° ~~ r r r ROAD TO BE
' _ :~ ~_ _ ~ ~ r ~ ~ REMOVED AND
._
' ~ ~~' "" ~ '~ ~" REGRADED
__ r~..,~rrr.
ROCK-CROSS VANE
(SEE DETAIL SHEET
D-1, & D-2)
FRONT FOOTING
PLACED ON BEDROCK
(SEE QETAIL SHEET D-3)
CIRCULATION AND
CONCEPTUAL PLANTING -
DESIGN
. ~ ;_;
' r r ~ PO
r~rr . rr
,,.. r ~-r ,__.
.~ r
r
SEE CONCEPTUAL PARK
PLAN FOR PEDESTRIAN
20 LF OF STREAM IMPACTED BY DAM, 208 LF OF STREAM FLOODED, AND 650 SF OF
FLOODED WETLAND
NOTES:
1. SIZE AND FOOTPRINT SHOWN IN EXIHIBIT ARE FOR A CONCRETE CANTILEVER
DAM WITH BEDROCK ASSUMED TO BE AT A DEPTH OF S FEET.
2. THE FINAL DESIGN FOOTPRINT OF THE DAM HALL VARY DEPENDING ON THE
ACTUAL DEPTH TO BEDROCK.
3. LOCATION OF DAM IS APPROXIMATE.
4. ROCK CROSS VANES TO ACT AS GRADE CONTROL STRUCTURES.
5. ROCK CROSS VANES TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITH MINIMAL IMPACT TO EXISTING
VEGETATION.
f
6. REMOVE INVASIVE SPECIES FROM STREAM ENHANCEMENT AREA, BEFORE 0 25 50 t00
COMPLETING CONSTRUCTION.
7. EXISTING STREAM TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED BETWEEN ROCK CROSS VANE (FEET)
^~°^~°«^~°~°°° DAM CONCEPT PLAN
~ Kimley-Horn VERSANT -CONCRETE DAM EXHIBIT
~ and Associates, ~ nC. FIGURE - POND B oa-os~
PHONE: X(919677-20001GH, NOR~A C(919)N677~20503068 VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. F-3

I~
C7
•
REAR FOOTING

CREST OF DAM ~
PLACED ON BEDROCK
1T HEIGHT FROM -
(SEE DETAIL SHEET D )
TOE OF DAM j
r r r
r~ r~,r r r r
~~rr~
r r r ,_- r ,-- ~- ,-
\ ROCK CROSS VANE -. ~-- -,~ r-r r ~ r ~-~' ~' ~_ ,-' ~' '_'
r r .-.
\ (SEE DETAIL SHEET r r ~C'r ~ r r. r r ,".J "'
~~
~_ -~- r r r

r r r

~s r
\ r
:;~ rpCJr

RONT F00 NG

rr rrrrrrrrrr
~rr
r r ~.. ,_ .~ .~_.~ .-> ,~ ,~ .r r r ,- ,_ ,~
r r r
~~ r^-rrrrrrrrr ~r

r~~
r ,~ r r
PLACED 0 _BED OCK "~ r r r r "J r r r~ r r
(SEE DETAIL T D-3) .... ,-. ,- r r ,-..r .._. ~-
r -.-~::~ r r .-~ -. r r .,
r r .-~ r.r :~_
• ..-r
r. EXISTING GRAVEL _~-+~

~
•' ~' ROAD TO BE REMOVED AND
., ~"
'
•~•• REGRADED
EXISTING \ ROCK CROSS VANE
- STREAM \ (SEE DETAIL SHEET
~
CHANNEL
~ D-1, & D-2)
~•
~
0 25 50 ~ ~ -
~F~,) _..
..~_
20 LF OF STREAM IMPACTED BY DAM AND 211 LF OF STREAM FLOODED, AND 4143 SF OF FLOODED WETLAND
1. SIZE AND FOOTPRINT SHOWN IN EXIHIBIT ARE FOR A CONCRETE CANTILEVER DAM WITH BEDROCK ASSUMED TO BE AT A
DEPTH OF 5 FEET.
2. THE FINAL DESIGN FOOTPRINT OF THE DAM HALL VARY DEPENDING ON THE ACTUAL DEPTH TO BEDROCK.
3. LOCATION OF DAM IS APPROXIMATE.
4. ROCK CROSS VANES TO ACT AS GRADE CONTROL STRUCTURES.
5. ROCK CROSS VANES TO BE CONSTRUCTED MATH MINIMAL IMPACT TO EXISTING VEGETATION.
6. REMOVE INVASIVE SPECIES FROM STREAM ENHANCEMENT AREA, BEFORE COMPLETING CONSTRUCTION.
7. EXISTING STREAM TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED BETWEEN ROCK CROSS VANE
^~°~°NTM~°~°~ DAM CONCEPT PLAN
~ Kimley-Horn VERSANT -CONCRETE DAM EXHIBIT
~ and Associates, ~11C. FIGURE - POND C os-os•os
P ~EOX~919~6677-20001GH. NOR AzC(e,9)N677~20503~6 VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. F-4

•
CONCRETE
CAN TI~EVER
DAM
•

A
17'
A I EXISTING
GRADE
5'
1~
N. T.S.
COMPOUNDED
WATER
::,
` :..
.:~~
~Y
.:..
:. ~
.: ~ir
COMPACTED
~-';~ SUBGRADE
GROBB BECIION A-A
N.T.S.
EXISTING
GRADE
^°~ N ^~ °~ °~° TYPICAL SECTION
~ Kimiey-Horn VERSANT -DAM CONCEPT DESIGN
^~© and Associates Inc. DETAILS o&o3.os
Pi~c~i°en-a"~OHNDR7~iO FAD ~ VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. SCALE= PLTS. p-3
CriF~RI(_ VIE1N OF G_e-.m FVPR CONCAEIE DAM
N.T.S.

~~=
~~~_

~~ ~!l J~ r
,~ s ~ ~

,_.,.x.,~~,.
~~^ Kimley-Horn
~ and0A,Nssociates, Inc.
P/WNBEOx(918 677-2000 ~ I/OR A C(919) sii~io oJ0B8
..,w -~..-. -..~..~.. t. e

STORMWATER CONCEPT PLAN
VERSANT
ASHEVILLE, NC os-os•os
1 OF 3

~ ~ .----_ ACV ~\~ _ ~_ ~ A ~ ' a
~ ~„_ \ ~~
~'~~ ~ ~ \~
~;
_~~
i ~ -- ---_
I -t--
^~~~~~`
\ \~
,~ ~
Q 1 ~ o \_ ~ `~_-
\5 ~
\ '°°
1~° \ ~
~ ~ \,
\. 3. ~~,
.-
a~ ~~
~,
M
\ \ 1-
~ W
W
~' ~ \ ~g N
~' W
~ W
~i '~. ° W
Z
~, J
-~ ~
\ ` o
~.
~~\~~ .~
\ ~ `\ ~ 1
~. ~~
1
~!
\~ , ~ ~
~ ~\ ~~ ,
~i ~ ~
i
20o i- o Boa 200.... aoo _ _ _ ..
FEET
STORMWATER CONCEPT PLAN
~~ ~ Kimley-Horn VERSANT
~^ antl Associates, Inc.
P.O. BOX 13f188 - RMFI(71, NORA1 CAROLNA P638-]088 ASHEVILLE NC os-03.06
PHONE [phone] FAX: (919) 677-N180
7 /~C 7
a.nw ~r~ r rrr. a m

_. .~..
%~-1
I ~ ~ ~~~~
., \-~ ~ ~
~--~ ~
~,
`\~ ~ \\ `~
1~; ~ ~~ ~ /1 ~i /~ ~
,, ` ~ f \
~ ~ ~ ~
~~~ ~" '~
o ~''`~' \
o
O o ~,~,~'
a ~~
N
1- ~ ~ .
W
_ 95y
N 9
W
N o 5 / ~
W
S 95 ~ ~ J -
V
Q F ~~ ~ /
Q /
L p t1'W - '~:' ~ / /
N ~ ~ qas~
bo ` \
~ ~ K
~ ~
//~~ ~ ~ ~
\~,~ fl ,~ ~
200 0 100 200 400
FEET
STORMWATER CONCEPT PLAN
a~^ Kimley-Horn ,VERSANT
~ antl Associates, Inc. ASHEVILLE, NC oa-o~-os
Pi°n~ (9i~s3jeen-m' ~ua'(Rn~ej a~i za~o]ose
30F3
a.......... ~ .~........

DWQ Project No. 3011
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • BIORETENTtON AREA WORKSHEET
PROJECT [NFORMATtON (please complete the lnllowing information):
Project Name : Versant
Contact Person: Todd St. John -Phone Number: (9191 b77-2950
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to: BS-1
Permanent Pool Elevation ft. (elevation of the orifice invert out)
Temporary Pool Elevation ft. (elevation of the outlet structure invert in}
Bioretention Surface Area 180 sq. tt.
Drainage Area 0.09 ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin},
Impervious Area
-
- ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin}
Rational CCoefficient
6~
Size ~° 5 % (either 5°!o in wlsand under drain or 7% in wto)
inlet Velocity fps
lntet fbw depth in
Depth to Ground Water ft.
_
Planting Soil Infiltration Rate ~ in.lhr. (the soil Payer down to 4 feet}
In-Situ Soil lnfiltraalion Rate in.ihr. (the soil layer below 4 feet or below the sand bed)
It. REQUIRED !TENS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. tf a
requirement has not been met attach an expfanatfon of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Aoalicants Initials
TS.T No vertical sand bed is proposed '
The bioretention area is atleast 40 feef by 15 feet. *Bioretention areas will be configured
TS.T Sheetflowisprovidedatinlet. to fit the topography of the area.
TR,j Water table depth is greater than 6 feet.
TS_j Minimum of 6" ponding is provided.
TSJ The ponded area will draw down in less than 4 days.
TSJ Planting soil inflUation rate is greater than 0.52 inmr.
The in-situ soi(infikrafion rate is greater than 0.2 inmr.
A planting plan with species and densities is provided.
Mulch layer is speafied in plans.
Planting soil meets minimum soil specifications (NCDENR Stormwater Best Management
Practices Manual, Aprll 1999)
TS T Plan details for the bioretention area provided.
Plan details for the inlet and outlet are provided.
An operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
Please note that underdrains beneath the planting soil are acceptable in the Piedmont and Mountains
*Blank spaces will be addressed with final design.
•

• DWO Project No. 3011
I. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Versant
Contact Person: Todd St . John Phone Number:
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to:
DIVISION OF WATER QUALRY • 8tORETENTION AREA WORKSHEET
Permanent Pool Elevation
Temporary Paol Elevation
Bioretention Surface Area
Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Rational C Coefficient
Slze
Inlet Velocity
Inlet flow depth
Depth to Ground Water
Planting Soil Infiltration Rate
In-Situ Soil Infiltration Rate
ft.
ft.
400 sq. ff.
0.16 ac.
ac.
0.95
4
(elevation of the orifice invert out)
(elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
(on-site and off•site drainage to the basin).
(on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
(either 5% in wisand under drain or 7% in wlo)
fps
in
ft
4 in.lhr. (the soil layer down to 4 feet)
inmr. (Ihe soil layer below 4 feet ar bebw the sand bed)
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. ff a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal indudes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculatlans, plans and specifcatons showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and wilt substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
AJrglicants Initials
TS_T No vertical sand bed is proposed
The bioretention area is at least 40 feet by 15 feet. *Bioretention areas will be configured
TS.T Sheet flow is provided atintet, to fit the topography of the area.
~J Water table depth is greater than 6 feet.
TS.T Minimum of 6" ponding is provided.
TSJ The ponded area will draw down in less than 4 days.
TSJ Planting soil infiltration rate is greaterthan 0.52 inmr.
The in-situ soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.2 inmr.
A planting plan with species and densities is provided.
Mulch layer is specified in plans.
Planting soil meets minimum soil specifications {NCDENR Stormwater Best Management
Practices Manual, April 1999)
TS.T Pian details for the baretention area provided.
Plan details for the inlet and outlet are provided.
An operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
Please note that underdrains beneath the planting soil are acceptable in the Piedmont and Mountains
*Blank spaces will be addressed with final design.

• DWQ Project No. 3011
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • BIORETENTION AREA WORKSHEET
PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
ProjectNama: Versant
Contact Person: Tod St . John_ Phone Number: f 9191 677-2950
For projects with multiple basins, speafy which basin this worksheet applies to: BR-3 (.erg P Bn i t di ng )
Permanent Pool Elevation
Temporary Pool Elevation
ft.
(elevation of the orifice invert out)
(elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
Bioretention Surface Area
Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Rational C Coefficient
Size °k
Inlet Velocity
Inlet flow depth
Depth to Ground Water
Planting Soil Infiltration Rate
In-Situ Soil Infiltration Rate
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
200 sq. ft.
ac.
0.022,_ ac.
0.~5
5
fps
in
{on-site and off-site drainage to tlTe basin).
(on-site and oft-site drainage to the basin)
(either 5°h in w/sand under drain or 7% in wlo)
4 in./hr. (the soil layer down to 4 feet)
in./hr. (the soil layer below 4 feet or below the sand bed)
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stortnwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fi,uy executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package wll result in a request far
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project
A~alicants Initials
TS.i No vertical sand bed is proposed
The bioretention area is at Ieast40 feet by 15 feet. *Bioretention areas will be configured
TS.i Sheeiflowisprotidedatinlet. to fit the topography of the area.
TSJ Water table depth is greater than t3 feet.
TS.T Minimum of Ei" ponding is provided.
TSJ The ponded area will draw down in less than 4 days.
TS.L Planting soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.52 inlhr.
The in-siiu soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.2 in/hr.
A planting plan with species and densities is provided.
Mulch layer is specified in plans.
Planting soil meets minimum soil specifications (NCDENR Stormwater Best Management
Practices Manual, April 1999)
TS.T Plan details for the bioretention area provided.
Plan details for the inlet and outlet are provided.
An operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
Please note that underdrains beneath the planting soil are acceptable in the Piedmont and Mountains
*Blank spaces will be addressed with final design.

• DWQ Project No. 30 ] l
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - $tORETENTION AREA WORKSHEET
I. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following infonnaGon):
Project Name : Versant
Contact Person: Todd St . John Phone Number: f 9191 677-2950
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to: BR-4 (Large BuildingZ
Permanent Pool Elevation
Temporary Pool Elevation
ft.
(elevation of the orifice invert out)
(elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
Bioretention Surface Area
Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Rational C Coefficient
Size %
Inlet Vebcity
Inlet flow depth
Depth to Ground Water
Planting Soil Infiltration Rate
InSitu Soil Infiltration Rate
100x2 sq. ft.
0.022 ac.
ac.
0.95
5
fps
in
(on-site and ofl site drainage to the basin),
(on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
(either 5% in w/sand under drain ar 7% in w!o)
4 in.lhr. (the soil layer down to 4 feet)
in./tir. (the soil layer below 4 feet or below the sand bed}
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and suppoding documentation is attached. !f a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete sionnwater management plan submittal includes
• a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An Incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Aoolicants Initials
TS.T No vertical sand bed is proposed
The Bioretention area is at least 40 feet by 15 feet. *Bioretention areas will be configured
TSJ Sheet flow is provided at inlet. to fit the topography of the area.
TgJ Water table depth is greater than 6 feet.
TS.T Minimum of 6' ponding is provided.
TS J The ponded area will draw down in less than 4 days.
,WSJ Planting soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.52 inltrr.
The in-situ soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.2 Inlhr.
A planfmg plan with species and densities is provided.
Mulch layer is specified in plans.
Panting soil meets minimum sail specifications (NCDENR Stormwater Best Management
Practices Manual, April 1999)
TS.T Plan details forthe Bioretention area provided.
Plan details for the inlet and outlet are provided.
An operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible parry is provided.
Please note that underdrains beneath the planting soil are acceptable in the Piedmont and Mountains
*Blank spaces will be addressed with final design.
•

• DWQ Project No. 3n t 1
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - BIORETENTION AREA WORKSHEET
I. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name: Versant
Contact Person: Todd St. ohn Phone Number: (9191 677-2950
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to: BS-5
Permanent Pool Elevation
Temporary Paol Elevation
it
ft.
(elevation of the orifice invert out)
(elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
Bioretenfion Surface Area
Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Rational C Caeffident
Size ~°
Inlet Veloaty
Inlet flow depth
Depth to Ground Water
Planting Soil Infiltration Rate
In-Situ Soil Infiltration Rate
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
200 sq. ft.
0.9 2 ac.
ac.
0.9~
5
(on-site and oft•site drainage io the basin),
(on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
(eifher59'o in w/sand under drain or 7% in w(o)
fps
in
ft.
4 in./hr. (lhe soil toyer down to 4 feet)
in.lhr. (the soil layer below 4 feet or below the sand bed)
Initial in the space provided to indicate the foflowing design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. ff a
requirement has not been met, attach an exptana(ion of why. Ai a minimum, a complete skormwater management plan submittal includes
• a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing ail BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional Information and will substantially delay (trial review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
TS.T No vertical sand bed is proposed
The bioretention area is at least 40 feet by 15 feek. *Bioretention areas will be configured
TG.T Sheet flow is provided at inlet. to fit the topography of the area.
~.7 Waterdable depth is greater than 6 feet.
TS.T Minimum of ti" ponding is provided.
TSJ Tire ponded area will draw down in less than 4 days.
TSJ Planting soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.52 inthr.
The in-situ soil infiltration rate is greater lhan 0.2 inlhr.
A planting plan with species and densities is provided.
Mulch layer is specified in plans.
Planting soil meets minimum soil specifications (NCDENR Sformwater Best Management
Practices Manual, April 1999)
TS.T Plan details for the bioretention area provided.
Plan details for the inlet and outlet are provided.
An operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
Please note that underdrains beneath the planting soil are acceptable in the Piedmont and Mountains
*Blank spaces will be addressed with final design.

DWQ Project No. 3011
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - BfORETEHTION AREA WORKSHEET
PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Versant
Contact Person: Tndd St___.Iohn ___ _ _ __ ___ Phone Number: !9191 677-2950
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to: BS-b
Permanent Paol Elevation
Temporary Pool Elevation
Bioretention Surface Area
Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Rational C Coefficient
Size
Inlet Velocity
Inlet flow depth
Depth to Ground Water
Planting Soil Infiltration Rate
In-Situ Soil Infiltration Rate
11. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
300 sq. ft.
n _ r 4 ac.
ac.
0.95
5
fps
in
ft.
4 in./hr.
(elevation of the orifice invert out)
(elevation of the outlet structure invert in}
(on-site and off-site drainage to the basin).
(on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
(either 5% in w/sand under dr~n or 7% in w!o)
(the soil layer down to 4 feet)
in.lhr. (the soil layer below 4 feet or below the sand bed)
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
• a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Apalicants Initials
TS.T No vertical sand bed is proposed
The bioretenfion area is at least 40 feet by 15 feet. *Bioretention areas will be configured
T.4.t Sheet flow is provided at inlet. to fit the topography of the area.
~ r Water table depth is greater than 6 feet.
TS.t Minimum of B' ponding is provided.
TS,I The ponded area will draw dawn in less than 4 days.
TS3 Planting soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.52 inlhr.
The in-silo soil infiltration rate is greater than 4.2 inlhr.
A planting plan with species and densities is provided.
Mulch layer is specified in plans.
Planting soil meets minimum sot specifications {NCDENR Stonnwater Best Management
Practices Manual, April 1999)
TS_t Plan details for the bioretention area provided.
Plan details for the inlet and outlet are provided.
An operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible patty is provided.
Please note that underdrains beneath the planting soil are acceptable in the Piedmont and Mountains
*Blank spaces will be addressed wiCh final design.
•

pWQ Project No. 'iO t t
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - BIORETENTION AREA WORKSHEET
PRQJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name: Versant
Contact Person: T~~lri St. John Phone Number: (9192 677-2950
For projects with multiple basins, speay which basin this worksheet applies to: BS-9
Permanent Pool Elevation ft. {elevation of the orifice invert out)
Temporary Pool Elevation ft. (elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
f3ioreten6on Surface Area 600 sq. ft,
Drainage Area O..~g ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin}.
Impervious Area ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Rational C Coeffiaent 0.9 5
Size % 5 % (either 5% in w/sand under drain or 7% in w/o)
Inlet Veloafy fps
Inlet flow depth in
Depth to Ground Water ft.
Planting Soil Infiltration Rate 4 in.mr. (the soil layer down to 4 feet)
to-Situ Soti Infiltration Rate in./hr. (the soil layer below 4 feet or below the sand bed)
11. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been mat and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been mef, attach an expfanaf<on of why. At a minimum, a complete stonttwater management p{an submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing ap BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
TS.T No vertical sand bed is proposed
The bioretention area is at least 40 feet by 15 feet. *Biore tension areas will be configured
Ts.i Sheet Bow is provided at inlet. to fit the topography of the area.
T.G t Water table depth is greater than 6 feet.
TS_T Minimum of ti° ponding is provided.
rsl The ponded yea wi0 draw down in less than 4 days.
TSJ Planting sail infiltration rate is greater than 0.52 in/hr.
The in-situ soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.2 in/hr.
A planting plan with species and densities is provided.
Muth layer is specified in plans.
Planting soil meets minimum soil specifications (NCDENR Stormwater Best Management
Practices Manual, April 1999)
TS,.T Plan details for the bioretention area provided.
Plan details for the inlet and outlet are provided.
An operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided,
Please note that underdrains beneath the planting soil are acceptable in the Piedmont and Mountains
*Blank spaces will be addressed with final design.
•

DWQ Project No. 3011
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - BIORETENTtON AREA WQRKSHEET
PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name: Versant
Contact Person: Todd St . John Phone Number: (`919) 677-2950
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to: BR-11
Permanent Pool Elevation ft. (elevation of the oriftce invert out)
Temporary Poot Elevation ft. (elevation of the outlet structure invert in}
Bioretention Surface Area 1800 sq. ft.
Drainage Area 1 ac. {on-site and off-site drainage to the basin).
impervious Area ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Rational C Coefficient 0.8
Size % 5 % (either 5% in w/sand under drain or 7% in wlo}
Inlet Velocity fps
inlet ltow depth in
Depth to Ground Water ft.
Planting Soil Infiltration Rate 4 in./trr. (the soil layer down to 4 feet)
In-Situ Soil Infiltration Rate in.lhr. (the soil layer below 4 feet or below the sand bed)
II. REQUIRED (TENS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. ff a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanafron of why. At a minimum, a complete stonnwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and spec cations showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Apalicants Initials
TS.T No vertical sand bed is proposed
The hioretention area is at least 40 feet by 15 feet. *Bioretention areas will be configured
~'S J Sheet flow is provided at inlet. to fit the topography of the area.
_ Ts T Water table depth is greater than 6 feet.
TS.T Mnimum of 6" ponding is provided.
TqJ The ponded area will draw down in less than 4 days.
TSJ Planting sot infiltration rate is greater than 0.52 inlhr.
The in-situ soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.2 inlhr.
A planting plan with species and densities is provided.
Match layer is specified in plans.
Planting soil meets minimum soil specifications (NCDENR Stormwater Best Management
Practices Manual, April 1999)
TS.T Plan details for the bioretention area provided.
Plan details for the inlet and outlet are provided.
operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
Please note that underdrains beneath the planting soil are acceptable in the Piedmont and Mountains
*Blank spaces will be addressed with final design.
•

DWQ Project No. 30 1
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - BIORETENTION AREA WORKSHEET
f. PROJECT INFORMAT[ON (please complete the folowing information):
Project Name : Versant
ConiactPerson: Todd St. John Phone Number. (9191 677-2950
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to: f3R-12
Permanent Pool Elevation
Temporary Poal Elevation
ft.
ff.
(elevation of the orifice invert out)
(elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
Bioretention Surface Area
prainage Area
Impervious Area
Rational C Coefficient
Size
Inlet Velocity
Inlet flow depth
Depth to Ground Water
Planting Soil Infiltration Rate
In-Sihr Soil Infiltration Rate
4400. sq. ft
2:54 ac.
ac.
n_f;
5
(on-site and off-site drainage to the basin).
(on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
(either 5% in wlsand under drain or 7% in wto)
fps
in
ft.
4 in.fir. (the soil layer down to 4 feet)
in.fir. (the soil Payer below 4 feet or bebw the sand bed}
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is aflached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
. a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement An incomplete submfltal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final roview and approval of the project
Apalicants Initials
TS.T No vertical sand bed iS proposed
The bioretention area is at least 40 feet by 15 feet. *Bioretention areas will be canf figured
Ts.r Sheetflowisprovidedatinlet. to fit the topography of the area.
T,cf Water tahle depth is greater than 6 feet.
TS_T Minimum of B" ponding is provided.
TSJ The ponded area will draw down in less than 4 days.
TSJ Planting soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.52 irUhr.
The in-situ soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.2 infir.
A planting plan with species and densities is provided.
Mulch layer is specified in plans.
Planting soil meets minimum soil spermcations (NCDENR Stormwater Best Management
Practices Manual, April 1999)
Tg.T Plan defails for the bioretention area provided.
Plan details for the inlet and outlet are provided.
An operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
Please note that underdrains beneath the planting soil are acceptable in the Piedmont and Mountains
*Blanic spaces will be addressed with final design.
•

OWQ Project No. 301 L
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - 81ORETENTION AREA WORKSHEET
I. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Versant
Contact Person: Todd St. John Phone Number: (919} 677-2950
For projects vrith multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to: BR-13 (Small house )
Perrnanent Pool Elevation
Temporary Pool Elevation
ft.
h.
(elevation of the orifice invert out)
(elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
Bioretentien Surface Area
Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Rational C Coeffiaent
Size %
Inlet Velorafy
Inlet flow depth
Depth to Ground Water
Planting Soil Infiltration Rate
In-Situ Soil InfilUaiion Rate
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
40 sq. 8.
0.014 ac.
ac.
.0.95
5
fps
in
(on-site and offsite drainage to the basin),
(on•s'de and off-site drainage to the basin}
(either 5% in wlsand under drain or 1% in w(o)
4 in.lta. (the soil layer down to 4 feet)
in./hr. (the soil layer below 4 feet or below the sand bed)
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and suppofing documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been mef, attach an exptanatron of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Aoolicants Initials
TS.7 No vertical sand bed is proposed
The btoretention area is at least 40 feet by 15 feet. *Bioretention areas will be configured
TS.i Sheet flow is provided at inlet. to fit the topography of the area.
T5J Water table depth is greater than 6 feet.
'rS.i hGnimum of t3° ponding is provided.
Tg J The ponded area will draw down in less than 4 days.
TSJ Planting soil infilUation rate is greater Phan 0.52 inmr.
The in-situ soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.2 infhr.
A planting plan with species and densities is provided.
Minh layer is specified in plans.
Planting soil meets minimum soil specifications (NCDENR Stormwater Best Management
Practices Manual, April 1999)
~. t_ Plan details for the bioretenGan area provided.
Plan details for the inlet and outlet are provided.
operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
Please note that underdrains beneath the planting soil are acceptable in the Piedmont and Mountains
*Blank spaces will be addressed with final design.
•

• DWQ Project No. ~0 L 1
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • BIORETENTION AREA WORKSHEET
I. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name: Versant
Contact Person: Tnrlrl St _ John Phone Number:
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to: BR-
Permanent Pool Elevation
Temporary Pool Elevation
8ioretention Surface Area
Drainage Area
Impervious Area
Rational C Coefficient
Size
Inlet Velocity
inlet flow depth
Depth to Ground Water
Planting Soil Infiltration Rate
In-Situ Soil Infiltration Rate
REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
ft. (elevation of the orifice invert out}
ft. (elevation of the outlet structure invert in}
200 sq. ft.
0.02 ac. (on-site and off•site drainage to the basin),
ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
0.95
5 °!o (either 5% in wlsand under drain or 7% in wlo)
fps
in
ft.
4 in.mr. (the soil layer down l0 4 feet)
in./tu. (the soil layer below 4 feet or below the sand bed)
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. !f a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
• a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing al{ BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An ir>complete submittal package wilt result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
Aoolicants Initials
Ts.T No vertical sand bed is proposed
The bioretention area is at least 40 feet by 15 feet. *Biore tention areas will be configured
TS.T Sheetflowisprovidedatinlet. to fit the topography of the area.
„ TC T Water table depth is greater than 6 feet.
TS.T Minimum of B' ponding is provided.
~ T The ponded area will draw down in less than 4 days.
TSJ Planting sor7 infiltration rate is greater than 0.52 inlhr.
The in-situ soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.2 irdt-r.
A planting plan with species and densities is provided.
Mulch layer is specified in plans.
Planting soil meets minimum soil specifications (NCDENR Stormwater Best Management
Practices Manual, April 1999}
TS T Plan details for the bioretention area provided.
Plan details for the inlet and outlet are provided.
An operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
Please note that underdrains beneath the planting soil are acceptable in the Piedmont and Mountains
*Blank spaces will be addressed with final design.
•

DWQ Project No. 301 L
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY • BIQRETENTION AREA WORKSHEET
PRQJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name: Versant
Contact Person: Todd St . .tohn Phone Number. j;,9191 677-2950
For projecis with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to: BR-39
Permanent Pool Elevation ft. (elevation of the orifice invert out)
Temporary Pool Elevation ft. (elevation of the outlet structure invert in)
Bioretention Surface Area 2000 sq. ft.
Drainage Area 0.32 ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin),
Impervious Area ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Rational C Coefficient
Size % 5 °k (either 5°k in wlsand~under drain or 7% in w/o)
Inlet Velocity fps
Inlet Aow depth in
Depth to Ground Water ft.
Planting Soil Infiltration Rate a in.lhr. (the sail layer down to 4 feet)
In-Situ Soil Infiltration Rafe in.mr. (the soil layer below 4 feet or below the sand bed)
11. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached. If a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwafer management plan submittal includes
• a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing all BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement. An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay final review and approval of the project.
~olicants Initials
TS.T No vertical sand bed is proposed
The bioretention area is at least 40 feet by 15 feet. *Bioretention areas will be configured
TS-i Sheetfiowisprovidedatinlet. to fit the topography of the area.
TC.T Water table depth is greater than 6 feet.
TS_'(_ Minimum of 6" ponding is provided.
,T~ The ponded area will draw down in less than 4 days.
TSJ Planting soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.52 inltrr.
The in-situ soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.2 inmr.
A planting plan with species and densities is provided.
Mulch layer is speafied in plans.
Planting soil meets minimum sail specifications (NCDENR Stormwater Best Management
Practices Manual, April 1999}
TS.T Plan details for the bioretention area provided.
Plan details for the inlet and ou0et are provided.
An operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
Please note that underdrains beneath the planting soil are acceptable in the Piedmont and Mountains
*Blank spaces will be addressed with final design.

DWQ Project No. 3011
DIVISION OF WATER QUAt.ITY - BIORETENTION AREA WORKSHEET
f. PROJECT INFORMATION (please complete the following information):
Project Name : Versant
Contact Person: Todd St . Tohn Phone Number: 919 677-2950 ____
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet applies to: BR- 2
Permanent Pool Elevation ft. (elevation of the orifice invert out)
Temporary Poof Elevation ft. (elevafion of the auttet structure invert in}
Bioretention Surface Area 800 sq. ft.
Drainage Area 0 • ZZ ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin),
Impervious Area ac. (on-site and off-site drainage to the basin}
Rational C Coefficient 0.95
Size °~ 5 °~ (either 5% in wlsand under drain or 7% in vrlo)
Inlet Velocity fps
Inlet flow depth in
Depth to Ground Water ft.
Planting Soil Infiltration Rate 4 in.mr. (the soil layer down to 4 feet)
In-Situ Soil Infiltration Rate in./hr. (the soil layer below 4 feet or be~w the sand bed)
11. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
Initial in the space provided to indicate the fallowing design requirements have been met and supporting documentation is attached, if a
requirement has not been met, attach an explanation of why. At a minimum, a complete stormwater management plan submittal includes
a worksheet for each BMP, design calculations, plans and specifications showing aq BMPs and outlet structure details, a detailed
• drainage plan and a fully executed operation and maintenance agreement An incomplete submittal package will result in a request for
additional information and will substantially delay fine! review and approval of the project.
Applicants Initials
TS.T No vertical sand bed is proposed
The bioretention area is at least 40 feet by 15 feet. *Bioretention areas will be configured
TS.T Sheet slow is provided at inlet. to fit the topography of the area.
T~ T Water table depth is greater than ti feet.
~~.T Minimum of 6' parading is provided.
TS.I The ponded area will draw down in less than 4 days.
TS i_ Planting soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.52 inltrr.
The in-situ soil infiltration rate is greater than 0.2 inlhr.
A planting plan with species and densities is provided.
Mulch layer is speafied in plans.
Planting soa meets minimum soil specifications (NCDENR Stomtwater Best Management
Practices Manual, April 1999}
TS_7 Plan details for the bioretenfion area provided.
Plan details for the inlet and outlet are provided.
An operation and maintenance agreement signed and notarized by the responsible party is provided.
Please note that underdrains beneath the planting soil are acceptable in the Piedmont and Mountains
*Blank spaces will be addressed with final design.

•

•

----_ ... ~--~-- ... __ .. --A
STREAM EEOw --~~ ~
B
REPUCE INVASIVE ~EQES
N1TH HEW PUN7NGS AS
SPECFlED, TP.
•
REPLACE WvASIVE
s+EaES wTN NEw
PEANINICS AS
SPEdFlEO. IYP.
REMOVE INVASIVE
SPE:GES, TYP.
REMOVE WVASNE
$PECR:S, TYP.
REPLACE INVASIYE SPEOES
YAM NEM PUNTNCS AS
sPEaEIm. TYP.
~~
coNSlRUCnoN aFAmNC ANo
REVECETAnON LRA75
PLANTING NOTES:
t. REMOVE ALL INVASIVE SPECIES FROM FORESTED BUFFER ON 80TH SIDES OF THE BANK AS INSTRUCTED BY A
LICENSED FORESTER.
2. REPLACE INVASIVE SPECIES W17H NEW UNDERSTORY AND SPECIFIED TREES. THE UNDERSTORY SHOULD CONSIST OF
NATIVE RHODODENDRON AND LAUREL PLANTINGS. NEWLY PLANTED TREES WILL REQUIRE 10 F00T SPACING FROM
CENTER.
3. REPLANT ALL DISTURBED AREAS FOR CONSTRUCTION WITH NATIVE UNDERSTORY PLANTINGS AND NATIVE SPECIFIED
TREE PLANTINGS.
PLAN VIEW
TYPICAL ROCK CR083 VANE AND PLANTNVQ PLAN
N.LS
•
°~°'~ M ^~ °"'~ °~° TYPICAL SECTION
~ Kimley-Horn VERSANT -STREAM ENHANCEMENT
~ ^ and Associates Inc. IL oa-o3.o6
DETA S
I
"dw~0i°°en-a"~ °K ND~~ F'~i~w t~ap> VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. SCALE = N.TS.
D-1
`REMOVE WVASP/E
SPECIES. TTP.
(SEE SHEET D-2 FOR CROSS-SECTIONS A-A AND B-B)

•
EXISTING
FLOODPLAIN
EXISTING
FLOODPIAIN
TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION AT ROCK CROSS VANE
•
//--TCP OF

STREAM ROfM ~~ 3' YIN. ROCK
T ,-~--~~ K} .
Y
<
' ;3
..
,
,
2.5 YIN fRl19NE0 SIREAY
~
•.:
r~
y ~_~
/JI I~ 6EW~~
I CRABE

CODR NOTE
BACKEBL MITNJ I~-~ PREWC LO' DEEP (11118UTARIES)
CLASS I, A, AND B E~T~ SD' DEEP (MAIN CNANNEI
RIP-RAP ROCK/SPLASH BELOW BANKFULL FLEVATKNI
PAD. RIXX
910UD BE
PLACED TO PREVEM
TDP ROCK ERCY
SEC110N A-A slBwc vDRwAaD
~r ~i
- 4. ~, ~ ~:
t~
SECTION B-B
•
"~"'~ Y R~ °^'~ °`° TYPICAL SECTION
^ Kimley-Horn VERSANT -STREAM ENHANCEMENT
©- and Associates Inc. DETAILS os-o3•os
PA. BOX 760N - ML,BOIi NOF11F1 CJJiOLNA 17676-~01C
rrEORry MI6> ens FAX (616) sn-zoso VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. SCALE = N,TS. p-p

C
•
:~

- _-

I, i'
E' '
ROAD TO 8E
REGRADED (S~s C'
._, Fg~rs 8) ..,
.\ ..
.'...
~a~

"
'"~
EbSTNiO STREAM
~``~.. CHANNEL H
%,
'

a REA~fENHANCEMENT
°`f
A
'. ~ .
,~
.
.r
~.; -
~+~,~
_ .Rr'.
_ d/~

_.
EJOSIMIC METL.MD
__i''
Rnac CROSS v _ '`
---
(SEE'. DETA0. SHEET __
o-i. ec D-?J _ _ ___ ._.
NOTES:
1. ROCK CROSS VANES TO ACT AS GRADE CONTROL STRUCTURES.
2. ROCK CROSS VANES TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITH MINIMAL IMPACT TO EXISTING VEGETATION.
3. REMOVE INVASIVE SPECIES FROM STREAM ENHANCEMENT AREA, BEFORE COMPLETING
CONSTRUCTION.
4. EXISTING STREAM TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED BETWEE N ROCK CROSS VANE STRUCTURES.
PROPOSED ROCK
A-VANE
o ao 8o iso
(FEET)
~~~~~~ STREAM ENHANCEMENT PLAN
_
Kimley-Horn
~ VERSANT -STREAM ENHANCEMENT EXHIBIT
and Associates Inc. FIGURE -STREAM ENHANCEMENT AREA A oa•os.os
PHONED (919)6677-200pIGH, NOR XC~919~H677~20503068 VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. F-6

:7
,7
•

EXISTING GRAVEL
ROAD TO BE
REGRADED (SEE
'J
->1G~E 8)

~~/ `'~ __
/ /'STREAM ENHANCEMENT
j SITE B ~ _ _ ~--- ... - ~ ...`--~-~` .`
EXISTING STREAM
/ J
CHANNEL / ~. _ ,.
I /
ROCK CROSS VANE /
(SEE DETAIL SHEE
T
D-S, 6t D-2)
/

I I ~..
__
NOTES:
1. ROCK CROSS VAN ES TO ACT AS GRADE CONTROL STRUCTURES.
2. ROCK CROSS VANES TO BE CONSTRUCTED WITH MINIMAL IMPACT TO EXISTING VEGETATION.
3. REMOVE INVASIVE SPECIES FROM STREAM ENHANCEMENT AREA, BEFORE COMPLETING
CONSTRUCTION.
4. EXISTING STREAM TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED BETWEEN ROCK CROSS VANE STRUCTURES.
0 30 60 120
1 I i _~
r~
~ ~~
~~-~~~ STREAM ENHANCEMENT PLAN
~ Kimley-Horn

~ VERSANT -STREAM ENHANCEMENT EXHIBIT
~ and Associates Inc. FIGURE -STREAM ENHANCEMENT AREA B os-o3.os
Pa-waNEeO~. (919877-2WOG"' NOR z~ ss"a"~i-'io~so3088 VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. F'~

•
•
EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD
rte.
EXISTING GROUND
CUT
~~-_-~- EXISTING
BUFFER
NOTES:
t. Road improvements to be made away from stream.
~.~AD
IMPROVEMENTS
2. Existing buffer to be maintained/enhanced.

~~N~~~ TYPICAL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
-^ Kimley-Horn VERSANT -STREAM ENHANCEMENT EXHIBIT
~- and Associates Inc. FIGURE -STREAM ENHANCEMENT AREA B os-o3.os
Pi°a"~ (isj6en-ioo°oa"' "aR z~t~e"an io o~ VERSANT PROPERTIES, INC. N7s F-8

•
PROTECTED SPECIES SURVEY, HABITAT ASSESSMENT,
AND
AQUATIC STREAM SURVEY
VERSANT/BAIRD COVE TRACT
SUBMITTED TO:
Leonard Rindner, PWS
•
BY
Jeffrey A. Levi
ENVIRONMENTAL Patrick J. Kealy
SSESSMENT AND 14 Botany Ct.
LAN N [ N G Asheville, NC 28805
[e-mail]
828-699-3697

C. Reed Rossell, Jr
Certified Wildlife Biologist
239 Moody Cove Rd.
Weaverville, NC 28787
[e-mail]
828-658-3210
•

PROTECTED SPECIES SURVEY, HABITAT ASSESSMENT,
AND
AQUATIC STREAM SURVEY
VERSANTBAIRD COVE TRACT
INVESTIGATORS AND AUTHORS: Jeffrey A. Levi, Botanist/Environmental
Biologist, a-mail: eap [e-mail]; Phone: [phone]; C. Reed Rossell, Jr,
Certified Wildlife Biologist; Patrick J. Kealy, Wetlands and Aquatics Scientist.
DATE SUBMITTED: August 6, 2006.
SURVEY DATES: May 29 -June 21, 2006.
LOCATION: Property located at the end of Baird Cove Road, off of Merrimon Avenue,
just outside Woodfm Town limits.
COUNTY AND. STATE: Buncombe, North Carolina.
PROVINCE: Blue Ridge Physiographic Province.
WATERSHED: Upper French Broad (06010105).
ELEVATION RANGE: Approximately 2400- 2960 feet.
SIZE OF TRACT: 360 acres. USGS QUAD: Weaverville.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Field surveys were conducted in June of 2006 to assess
any potential protected species inhabiting the VersantBaird Cove site in Woodfin, NC.
This included a thorough survey, habitat assessment, and development of observed
species lists, and descriptions and a map of the natural communities on-site. An aquatic
stream survey was also conducted to assess the perennial nature of Baird Cove Creek
(main stream flowing through the site) and its water quality and macroinvertebrate
populations. No protected species were observed at the site. A total of 181 plant taxa
and 59 animal taxa were observed during the surveys. The site is mostly covered by
montane pine-oak-hickory forest with low mountain alluvial forest and low elevation
seeps along the streams. Baird Cove Creek is a good quality perennial stream. No
evidence of high nutrient or chemical discharges was noted. Numerous
macroinvertebrates, amphibians, and other wildlife were observed in the stream or around
it during the survey. Areas along the streams and wetlands, ridges, and north facing
slopes should be avoided if possible to maintain the site's ecological integrity.
•

•
PROTECTED PLANT SPECIES SURVEY AND HABITAT ASSESSMENT
Plant Species Surve
Methods: Field surveys consisted of walking the majority of the site and recording all
plant species observed. Survey emphasis was on the potential occurrence of state- and
federally-listed species and unique habitats. All major roads, ridges, slopes and
tributaries of the property were walked. Recorded plants were organized into natural
communities based upon species assemblages and physical characteristics such as
elevation and moisture regime.
The plant species of concern can be found in Appendix E. This list was derived from
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. 2005. Buncombe county -element
occurrences. December 16, 2005. http://www.ncsparks.net/nhp/county.html., and United
States Fish and Wildlife Service. 2005. Threatened and endangered species in North
Carolina -Buncombe county. Updated February S, 2003. http://nc-
esfws.gov/es/counryfr.html. Only those species with state or federal protection were
included in the revised list.
Results: No state or federally listed plant species, rare plant communities or habitats
were observed during the survey. Potential habitat does exist for several of the species of
concern (i.e. piratebush), but is typically disturbed from surrounding logging.
A total of 181 plant taxa were recorded (Appendix A). This includes 75 woody (trees,
shrubs, and vines) and 106 herbaceous (wildflowers, herbs, and ferns) taxa. The plants
range from typical piedmont species to more montane and low elevation mountain
species. Invasive exotics such as Oriental bittersweet, privet, multiflora rose,
microstegium, and Japanese knotweed have established across the site especially in open
canopy areas and along open edge communities (i.e. along roads). Typical plants
observed in their communities are listed in the Natural Community Description.
Habitat Assessment (Plant Perspective)
The majority of the site has been logged and has resulted in mixed pine/hardwood
assemblages. Natural communities range from seep/wetlands associated with intermittent
to perennial streams to montane pine-oak-hickory forest along ridges and slopes. The
Natural Community Description section discusses these communities in more detail.
Elevations range from approximately 2400 feet along the main stream (referred to as
Baird Cove Creek) to 2960 feet along ridgetops. The topography is moderate to steep
including most side slopes and valleys. The forest communities are successional with a
mixed pine-hardwood canopy. Areas along lower steep slopes, north facing slopes and
along streams have a more natural community assemblage, although past logging has also
disturbed many of these smaller communities. The streams and their associated seeps
•

and wetlands on the site have been disturbed by past timbering as well, but not to the
extent of the surrounding slopes and ridges. The main stream running through the site,
Baird Cove Creek, and its floodplaln are of good quality (except in areas where logging
roads have prevented vegetated buffers) and supports a variety of habitat for flora and
fauna. Plant species diversity is good within the alluvial forest and associated
seeps/wetlands. The Aquatic Stream Survey section describes the water resources of the
site in more detail.
The uplands on-site are primarily dry with steep topography. Surveys reveal a relatively
low diversity of community types and relatively low species diversity within the largest
community type (especially in pine dominated areas). Pine needle accumulations
covering the forest floor have contributed to the lower species diversity. Species of pine
(white, scrub, short-leaf, etc.) dominate most of the site's canopy mixed with various
oaks and successional species. Areas of less disturbance -and chestnut oaks dominating
the canopy are of higher quality and have a higher species diversity and abundance.
These potential communities are too small and fragmented to note and have been recently
impacted by widening old logging roads. North facing slopes, especially along the
northern ridge, were of good quality and typically maintain a higher plant species
diversity and abundance.
The highest quality habitats on the site are the alluvial forests and seeps along Baird Cove
Creek and the other smaller tributaries and streams, and oak hickory forest and chestnut
oak dominated areas along the northern ridge, and along north facing slopes.
•
PROTECTED WILDLIFE SPECIES SURVEY AND HABITAT ASSESSMENT
Wildlife Species Survev
Methods: Field surveys consisted of walking major roads, including old logging roads,
as well as newly constructed roads, and recording all faunal species heard or seen,
including all animal signs (i.e., tracks, scat, etc.). Survey emphasis was on the potential
occurrence of state- and federally-listed species and unique habitats. All major tributaries
of the property were walked, and many of the upland habitats were bushwacked. Road
construction and logging were on-going during some parts of the surveys.
The animal species of concern can be found in Appendix E. This list was derived from
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program. ZOOS. Buncombe county -element
occurrences. December 16, 2005. http://www.ncsparks.net/nhp/county.html., and United
States Fish and Wildli e Service. 2005. Threatened and endangered species in North
Carolina -Buncombe county. Updated February S, 2003. http://nc-
esfws.gov/es/countyfr.html. Only those species with state or federal protection were
included in the revised list.
•

Results: No state- or federally-listed species or unique habitats were observed on the
property. A fist of fauna recorded during surveys is provided in Appendix B.
Overall, the site contains good-quality wildlife habitat. Most of the property is forested,
however, much of the site is disturbed as many of the roads for the proposed development
have been cut in. The site contains primarily young stands of second-growth
(approximately 15-25 years old) trees dominated by a variety of oaks and hickories, white
pine, yellow poplar, black cherry, and sugaz maple. Stands at the lower and mid-
elevations are generally single-aged and contain a larger component of white pine than
stands at the higher elevations. Stands at the higher elevations, particularly those on the
north-side of the ridge, where the topography is steep, are more mature (50-75 yeazs-old),
and are dominated by chestnut oak, red oak, white pine and yellow poplaz. In most of the
uplands, the shrub layer is moderately developed, and the herbaceous layer is sparse as a
result of needle litter from white pines. As a result of past logging, the site is generally
depauperate of large, down woody debris, and contains only moderate levels of snags and
tree cavities, features important to many species of wildlife. A few rock outcrops were
observed, which contain crevices large enough for medium- and small-sized mammals.
No evidence of woodrat activity was apparent at the rock outcrops. Many of the steeper
slopes, especially those on the northern half of the property, contain some areas of loose,
talus rock, which provide good habitat for snakes. Invasive non-native plants, including
Oriental bittersweet and multiflora rose, are prevalent throughout much of the site.
Baird Cove Creek (1-5 feet wide, 1 ~ inches deep) and a smaller feeder stream (6-8
inches wide, 1-3 inches deep) are the two main water sources on the property. Both
streams are fed by several springs and contain small seep areas near their source. A few
vernal pools are associated with seep areas along Baird Cove Creek, as well as some
small channels containing softball-sized rocks, which form good breeding habitat for
amphibians. Baird Cove Creek has a moderate gradient, with a sandy bottom
interspersed with some large rocks, and contains good-quality stream salamander habitat.
Stands adjacent to both streams are generally alluvial hazdwood forests dominated by
sweet birch, yellow poplar, and red maple. The shrub layer along Baird Cove Creek is
moderately developed, and the herbaceous layer is well-developed and rich.
The highest quality habitats on the site aze the alluvial and adjacent forests along Baird
Cove Creek and the oak-hickory forest on the ridge and northern slopes on the
northeastern side of the property. The alluvial and adjacent upland forests along Baird
Cove Creek provide high quality breeding habitats for a diversity of amphibians
including four species of salamanders, two species of tree frogs, and the American toad
(see list for specie's names). These forests also provide good quality breeding habitat for
many neotropical migrant songbirds, including acadian flycatcher, eastern pewee, wood
thrush, ovenbird, hooded warbler, and scarlet tanager. The mature oak-hickory forest
along the ridge and northern slopes provide excellent upland habitat for many species of
wildlife including ruffed grouse, wild turkey, gray squirrel, coyote, and black beaz, as
4
•

L._ J
well as many neotropical migrant songbirds including yellow billed cuckoo, yellow-
throatedvireo, blue-headed vireo, black-throated green warbler, ovenbird, black-and-
white warbler, and worm-eating warbler.
NATURAL COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION
Vegetation was identified and grouped into community classifications adapted from
Sale. M. P. and A. S. Weaklev. 1990. Classification of the natural communities of North
Carolina. NCNHP, NCDEHNR. An observed plant species list can be found in Appendix
A. A map of the terrestrial plant communities can be found in Appendix C.
Montane Pine-Oak Hickory Forest
The pine dominated montane oak-hickory forest covers most of the site. The majority of
the uplands are of this forest type. The forest is in poor to fair condition with evidence of
past logging activities resulting in the mixed pine-hardwood canopy. The canopy is
generally closed with a sparse to dense shrub layer, and a sparse to dense herbaceous
layer. Small areas within this community type are less disturbed and have a stronger
hardwood component. Several small areas of chestnut oak dominated forest exist along
the north facing slope of the northern ridge. These areas are of higher quality including a
more dense and diverse understory.
The canopy supports white pine, scrub pine, short-leaf pine, chestnut oak, white oak, red
oak, black oak, hickory, mockernut hickory, pale hickory, pignut hickory, yellow poplar,
tree of heaven, and a few princess tree, black walnut, and eastern hemlock. The
understory includes transgressives, flowering dogwood, red maple, sourwood, black
cherry, sweet birch, cucumber tree, black locust, honey locust, hawthorne, black gum,
and white ash. The shrub layer supports mountain laurel, great laurel, rhododendron,
blackberry, vaccinium, rose, St. Johns wort, privet, coralberry, Japanese meadow sweet,
red mulberry, serviceberry, wild yam, sassafras, sumac, devil's walking stick, and wild
hydrangea. Vines include Virginia creeper, greenbrier, Oriental bittersweet, poison ivy,
leather flower, and grape. The sparse to dense herbaceous layer supports false solomon's
seal, Solomon's seal, bloodroot, sweet Cicely, honewort, false goats beard, goats beard,
aster, alumroot, black cohosh, galax, agrimony, New Jersey tea, white bergamot,
Canadian black snakeroot, microstegium, richweed, lopseed, greater tickseed, marginal
woodfern, broad beech fern, maidenhair fern, hairystem spiderwort, nodding trillium,
rattlesnake plantain, spotted wintergreen, cinquefoil, Christmas fern, whorled loosestrife,
mayapple, and ragwort.
Low Mountain Alluvial Forest
The low mountain alluvial forest is limited to the floodplain of Baird Cove Creek and its
associated small tributary streams, and small areas along the Northern ridge. The largest
•

and most diverse example is along Baird Cove Creek. This community has a mix of
montane/piedmont species and characteristics. The upper areas along the stream are of
high quality with associated seeps, wetlands, and springs. Plant species diversity is good
with the smaller habitats contributing to overall diversity. The lower areas near the main
road have been bush-hogged and denuded in some areas resulting in a lower quality
forest with little to no vegetated stream buffer. The smaller azeas of low mountain
alluvial forest along smaller streams are of good quality, but are more limited to areas
immediately adjacent to the streams. Many of these areas are less disturbed than upland
communities and should be avoided/protected in the development process.
The canopy supports red maple, green ash, sweet birch, red oak, yellow poplar, oak, and
various pine and hardwood species from surrounding communities. The understory
includes transgressives, ironwood, slippery elm, plum/cherry, black gum, black cherry,
and a few American beech, sourwood, buckeye, and eastern hemlock. Shrubs include tag
alder, witch hazel, elderberry, black haw, Japanese barberry, rose, sweetshrub, spicebush,
and privet. Vines include Oriental bittersweet, Virginia creeper, and summer grape. The
herbaceous layer includes ragwort, smartweed, jewelweed, wood nettle, buttercup,
Newyork fern, Christmas fern, glade fern, cinnamon fern, royal fern, rock polypody,
bedstraw, lopseed, squawroot, Japanese knotweed, windflower, bugbane, Indian
cucumber root, richweed, primrose willow, jack in the pulpit, thoroughwort, cut-leaf
coneflower, and whorled loosestrife.
Low Elevation Seep
Low elevation seeps aze associated with small, steep streams along the valleys across the
site (typically fall within the low mountain alluvial forests or along small streams without
a definitive alluvial forest component). These small communities typically have an open
canopy with some trees from surrounding communities providing cover. The understory
is often relatively sparse especially in inundated/ponded areas. The floodplain and
headwaters of Baird Cove Creek are good representatives of this community type with
seep features also along the smaller tributaries. The quality is higher than the
surrounding communities as logging in these areas can be difficult and is often avoided.
Areas close to heavily logged areas and along logging road crossings are more disturbed
with more species establishing from surrounding communities.
The low elevation seep includes red maple, sweet birch, and green ash in the sparse
canopy. Shrubs include tag alder, elderberry, and spicebush. Vines include greenbrier,
and poison ivy. The herb/fern layer includes cinnamon fern, hay-scented fern, glade fern,
wood nettle, jack in the pulpit, jumpseed, primrose willow, jewelweed, clearweed, cutleaf
coneflower, buttercup, asters, smartweed, soft rush, water horehound, violet, and rock
polypody on exposed boulders.
•

•
AQUATIC STREAM SURVEY
Methods: Three stations were chosen to accurately assess the entire Baird Cove Creek
within the project area. Methods for each of the following categories are listed below:
Phvsical Characterization
Land use was determined by observing whether the surrounding land use was urban,
industrial, residential, heavy agriculture, light agriculture, timber harvesting, or forested.
Widths and depths were measured in feet using a tape divided into tenths of feet. Stream
characteristics (sinuosity, substrate, floodplain, etc.) were assessed through the 3 data
forms completed at each station.
Chemical Characterization
Temperature, pH, Dissolved Oxygen, and Conductivity were analyzed using a WTW
Multiline P4 water quality meter. These measurements were taken at the stream station.
r . m ali ~ ~ Habitat Assessment
Data forms from the North Carolina Department of Water Quality (NCDWQ), "Habitat
Assessment Forms: Mountain/Piedmont and Coastal Plain "and "Stream Identification
Form -Version 3.1 ", and from the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE},
"Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet -Version 06/03 "were completed to assess the
• perennial nature and water quality of Baird Cove Creek and its habitats.
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Biolosical Assessment
A modified version of the NCDENR (2001) EPT rapid assessment method and a Qua15
method was used to sample benthic macroinvertebrate (BMI) populations. Kick samples
were taken from riffle areas using a kick net. Leaf pack samples were taken from random
areas within the ~ 300 foot section of stream. Sweep net samples were taken to get under
root mats and undercut banks. Visual inspections of rocks, twigs, leaves, etc. were done
to cover any areas missed by the above mentioned methods.
Samples were analyzed and sorted by station and order, placed in vials containing 70%
isopropyl alcohol, and transported to the lab. Each specimen within each vial was
identified to Order level and recorded. Abundance (#specimens) of each Order was
calculated and reported. Further taxonomic identifications can be completed if requested.
Results/Discussion:
Baird Cove Creek is the main stream/wetland complex on the site. Several small
tributaries and numerous seeps and springs supply constant flows with good ground water
recharge. The aquatic survey revealed that the stream is perennial with good habitat for
benthic macroinvertebrates and various amphibians. The water quality is good with no
7

•
evidence of high nutrient/chemical discharges. The results of the physical, chemical, and
macroinvertebrate surveys can be found in Appendix D.
Baird Cove Creek is a relatively small (1- 5 feet wide) stream with a moderate gradient
and good sinuosity. The banks are mostly stable, except in areas immediately adjacent to
the road. The substrate is diverse with a variety of rocks, boulders, and cobble rather
loosely embedded in the sandy/gravel stream bed.
The pH of the water is cicrumneutral with a relatively low conductivity (probably the
result of underlying granitic bedrock). Dissolved oxygen levels and temperatures are
within acceptable parameters for supporting aquatic life. The turbidity of the water
increased as one moves downstream, most likely a result of higher construction and
grading activities mid-stream to the bottom of the site. Sediment pollution was evident in
the lower reaches of the project area.
The macroinvertebrate survey revealed a relatively diverse assemblage of orders/taxa
given the small size and available habitat of the stream. Abundance within the orders
was fair to good showing the good health of existing populations and hopefully ensuring
a high reproductive success for these organisms into the future. Overall abundance
decreased slightly at the lower station and is likely the result of higher sedimentation.
The overall quality ofthe Baird Cove Creek and its floodplain is good and is the highest
quality natural area on the site. Caution must be exercised when working and developing
around the stream as any major disturbance along Baird Cove Creek may significantly
• reduce the habitat availability and degrade the existing good water quality.
MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
It is suggested that the forested areas adjacent to Baird Cove Creek and the ridge and
its northern slopes be left undisturbed to protect the water quality of Baird Cove
Creek and to maintain the integrity of the wildlife habitat. Awell-developed logging
road follows the north side of the ridge through the mature portion of the oak-hickory
forest and would make an excellent hiking trail and protected area for residents of the
proposed Versant development.
Smaller habitats including rock outcrops, seeps, springs, lower slopes, and small areas
of chestnut oak dominated forest should be avoided in the development process.
These sensitive communities provide refugia for unique species and do not respond
well to changes in land-use or impacts from development. Given the nature of these
communities (difficulty in developing rock outcrops and steep lower slopes) and the
protection already in place for the wetland and stream areas, these habitats should be
have some protection already. These small, aesthetically pleasing habitats should be
showcased as unique ecological areas within the overall development.
•

C~
• Access roads should be aligned to the current logging roads when feasible.
Especially the main arteries going along the ridges to future homesites. This will
prevent any further fragmentation of the forests and reduce the further establishment
of exotic/invasive species.
Past management for timber harvesting has resulted in pine dominated forests where
hardwood species would be dominating. The overall ecological value of the site
would be improved through removal of dense areas of pine. This includes areas
dominated by white pine, scrub pine, and short-leaf pine. Selective cutting of pine
species would accelerate the succession to hardwood dominated forests and lead to an
increase in species diversity. Left alone these communities may succeed to hardwood
dominated forests over a longer period of time.
•
U

•
APPENDIX A:
OBSERVED PLANT SPECIES LIST
•
•
10

•
OBSERVED PLANT SPECIES LIST
Common Name Scientific Name
Woody Vegetation
American beech Fagus grandifolia
Black cherry Prunus serotina
Black gum Nyssa sylvatica
Black oak Quercus velutina
Black locust Robinia pseudoacacia
Black walnut Juglans nigra
Blackberry Rubus spp.
Blackhaw Viburnum prunifolium
Box elder Acer negundo
Buckeye Aesculus sp.
Buckthorn Rhamnus caroliniana
Chestnut oak Quercus prinus
Chinquapin Castanea pumila
Coralberry Symphoricarpos orbiculatus
Cucumber tree Magnolia acuminata
Devil's walking stick Aralia spinosa
• Eastern hemlock Tsuga canadensis
Elderberry Sambucus canadensis
Flowering dogwood Corpus Florida
Grape Vitis sp.
Great laurel Rhododendron maximum
Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Greenbrier Smilax spp.
Hawthorne Cratageus sp.
Hickory Carya spp.
Holly Ilex sp,
Honey locust Gleditsia triacanthos
Honeysuckle Lonicera spp.
Ironwood Carpinus caroliniana
Japanese barberry Berberis thunbergii
Japanese meadow sweet Spiraea japonica
Leather flower Clematis sp.
Mock orange Philadelphus sp.
Mockernut hickory Carya tomentosa
Mountain laurel Kalmia latifolia
Multiflora rose Rosa multiflora
Oak Quercus spp.
11
•

•
Oriental bittersweet
Pale hickory
Pignut hickory
Pin cherry
Pine
Plum/cherry
Poison ivy
Princess tree
Privet
Red maple
Red mulberry
Red oak
Redbud
Rhododendron
Rose
St. Johnswort
Sassafras
Scrub pine
Serviceberry
Short-leaf pine
Slippery elm
Smooth sumac
Sourwood
Spicebush
Sugar maple
Sumac
Sweet birch
Sweet shrub
Tag alder
Tree of heaven
Vaccinium
Virginia creeper
White ash
White oak
White pine
Wild hydrangea
Witch hazel
Yellow poplar
Herbaceous Vegetation/Ferns
Agrimony
Alumroot
12
•
Celastrus orbiculatus
Carya pallida
Carya glabra
Prunus pensylvanica
Pinus sp.
Prunus sp.
Toxicodendron radicans
Paulownia tomentosa
Ligustrum sinense
Acer rubrum
Morus rubs
Quercus rubs
Cercis canadensis
Rhododendron spp.
Rosa sp.
Hypericum spp.
Sassafras albidum
Pinus virginiana
Amelanchier arborea
Pinus echinata
Ulmus rubs
Rhus glabra
Oxydendrum arboreum
Lindera benzoin
Acer saccharum
Rhus sp.
Betula lenta
Calycanthus floridus
Alnus serrulata
Ailanthus altissima
Vaccinium spp.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
Frazinus americana
Quercus alba
Pinus strobus
Hydrangea arborescens
Hamamelis virginiana
Liriodendron tulipifera
Agrimonia sp.
Heuchera americana

•
American bellflower Campanulastrum americanum
Aster Aster spp.
Beautybush Kolkwitzia amabilis
Bedstraw Galium spp.
Black cohosh Cimicifuga racemosa
Bloodroot Sanguinaria canadensis
Blue cohosh Caulophyllum thalictroides
Blue-eyed grass Sisyrinchium sp.
Bowman's root Gillenia trifoliata
Bracken fern Pteridium aquilinum
Broad beech fern Thelypteris hexagonoptera
Bugbane Trautvetteria caroliniensis
Buttercup Ranunculus sp.
Canadian black snakeroot Sanicula canadensis
Christmas fern Polystichum acrostichoides
Cinnamon fern Osmunda cinnamomea
Cinquefoil Potentilla spp.
Clearweed Pilea pumila
Clustered black snakeroot Sanicula gregaria
Common grape fern Botrychium dissectum
Common plantain Plantago major
Cutleaf coneflower Rudbeckia lacinata
Day lily Hemerocallis sp.
• Dock Rumex sp.
Ebony spleenwort Asplenium platyneuron
Evening primrose Oenothera sp.
False goats beard Astilbe biternata
False solomon's seal Smilacina racemosa
Fire pink Silene virginica
Fleabane Erigeron sp.
Galax Galax aphylla
Garlic mustard Adliaria petiolata
Giant ragweed Ambrosia trifida
Ginseng Panax quinquefolium
Glade fern Athyrium pycnocarpon
Goats beard Aruncus dioica
Goldenrod Solidago sp.
Greater tickseed Coreopsis major
Hairy skullcap Scutellaria elliptica
Hairystem spiderwort Tradescantia hirsuticaulis
Hay-scented fern Dennstaedtia puctilobula
Honewort Cryptotaenia canadensis
Indian cucumber Medeola virginiana
Iris Iris sp.
13
:7

LJ
Jack in the pulpit Arisaema triphyllum
Japanese knotweed Polygonum cuspidatum
Jewelweed Impatiens capensis
Jumpseed Polygonum virginianum
Lettuce Lactuca sp.
Lobelia Lobelia app.
Lopseed Phryma leptostachya
Lyre leaved sage Salvia lyrata
Maidenhair fern Adiantum pedatum
Marginal woodfern Dryopteris marginalia
Mayapple Podophyllum peltatum
Meadow parsnip Thaspium barbinode
Meadow rue Thalictrum sp.
Microstegium Microstegium vimineum
Milkweed Asclepias app.
New Jersey tea Ceonothus americanus
New York fern Thelypteris noveboracensis
Nodding trillium Trillium cernuum
Orchid Orchis sp. (prob. spectabilis)
Oxe-eye daisy Chrysanthemum leucanthemum
Perfoliate bellwort Uvularia perfoliata
Pokeweed Phytolacca americana
Primrose willow Ludwigia sp.
• Ragweed Ambrosia artemesiifolia
Ragwort Senecio sp. (prob. aureus)
Rattle snake fern Botrychium virginianum
Rattlesnake plantain Goodyera pubescens
Rattlesnake root Prenanthes app.
Red clover Trifolium pratense
Richweed Collinsonia canadensis
Rock polypody Polypodium virginianum
Royal fern Osmunda regalia var. spectabilis
Skullcap Scutellaria sp.
Smartweed Polygonum sp.
Soft rush Juncus sp.
Solomon's seal Polygonatum bi florum
Spotted wintergreen Chimaphila maculata
Stonecrop Sedum sp. (prob. ternatum)
Squawroot Conopholis americana
Sweet Cicely Osmorhiza claytonii
Sweet scented joe pye weed Eupatorium purpureum
Thoroughwort Eupatorium app.
Tick trefoil Desmodium sp.
Trillium Trillium sp.
14
•

•
•

Venus' pride Houstonia purpurea
Violet Viola spp.
Water horehound Lycopus sp.
White bergamot Monarda clinopodia
Whorled loosestrife Lysimachia quadrifolia
Wild geranium Geranium maculatum
Wild yam Dioscorea villosa
Windflower Anemone virginiana
Winged euonymus Euonymus alata
Wingstem Verbesina alternifolia
Wood nettle Laportea canadensis
Wood sorrel Oxalis sp.
y~ovy Achillea millefolium
Yellow crownbeard Verbesina occidentalis
Yellow mandarin Prosartes lanuginosa
Zigzag spiderwort Tradescantia subaspera
15

•
APPENDIX B:
OBSERVED WILDLIFE SPECIES LIST

16

•
OBSERVED WILDLIFE SPECIES LIST
BUTTERFLYS
Great Spangled Fritillary (Speyeria Cybele)
AMPHIBIANS
Northern Dusky Salamander (Desmognathus fuscus)
Mountain Dusky Salamander (Desmognathus ochrophaeus)
Redback Salamander (Plethodon cinerus)
Spring Salamander (Gyrinophilus porphyriticus)
American Toad (Bufo americanus)
Spring Peeper (Hyla crucifer)
Gray Treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis)
REPTILES
Ringneck Snake (Diadophis punctatus)
Eastern Garter Snake (Thamnophis sirtalis)
Black Racer (Coluber constrictor)
Copperhead (Agkistrodon contortrix)
• BIRDS
Broad-winged Hawk (Buteo platypterus)
Red-tailed Hawk (Buteo jamaicensis)
Turkey Vulture (Cathartes aura)
Ruffed Grouse (Bonasa umbellus)
Mourning Dove (Zenaida macroura)
Wild Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo)
Yellow-billed Cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus)
Ruby-throated Hummingbird (Archilochus colubris)
Pileated Woodpecker (Dryocopus pileatus)
Northern Flicker (Colaptes auratus)
Red-bellied Woodpecker (Melanerpes carolinus)
Downy Woodpecker (Picoides pubescens)
Hairy Woodpecker (Picoides villosus)
Acadian Flycatcher (Empidonax virescens)
Eastern Pewee (Contopus virens)
Purple Martin (Progne subis)
Chimney Swift (Chaetura pelagica)
American Crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos)
Blue Jay (Cyanocitta cristata)
Carolina. Chickadee (Parus carolinensis)
Tufted Titmouse (Parus bicolor)
17
•

White-breasted Nuthatch (Sitta carolinensis)
Carolina Wren (Thryothorus ludovicianus)
Brown Thrasher (Taxostoma rufum)
Wood Thrush (Hylocichla mustelina)
Cedar Waxwing (Bombycilla cedrorum)
Red-eyed Vireo (Vireo olivaceus)
Yellow-throated Vireo (Vireo flavifrons)
Blue-headed Vireo (Vireo solitarius)
Black-and-white Warbler (Mniotilta varia)
Black-throated Green Warbler (Dendroica vixens)
Worm-eating Warbler (Helmitheros vermivorus)
Hooded Warbler (Wilsonia citrina)
Ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapillus)
American Goldfinch (Carduelis tristis)
Scarlet Tanager (Piranga olivacea)
Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis)
Indigo Bunting (Passerina cyanea)
Rufous-sided Towhee (Pipilo erythrophthalmus)
Song Sparrow (Melospiza melodia)
MAMMALS
Eastern Mole (Scalopus aquaticus)
Eastern Chipmunk (Tamias striatus)
Eastern Gray Squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis)
Opossum (Didelphis marsupialis)
Raccoon (Procyon lotor)
Coyote (Canis latrans)
Black Bear (Ursus americana)
18

•
APPENDIX C:
APPROXIMATE NATURAL COMMUNITY MAP

I9

• • •

•
APPENDIX D:
TABLE 1. CHEIvIICAL/PHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF
BAIRD COVE CREEK.
TABLE 2. BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES OF BAIRD COVE
CREEK.
•
21

Table 1. CHEMICAL/PHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF BAIRD COVE CREEK.
Temperature (C)
pM
Dissolved Oxygen
(mg/L)
%saturation
Conductivity (uS)
Turbidity
Mean Depth (ft)*
existing water
Mean Width (ft)*
bankfull
existing water
NC DWQ Habitat Evaluation Form Score
(Out of 100 possible points)
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Score
(z19 =Intermittent; a30 =Perennial)
USACE Stream Quality Assessment Worksheet
(Out of 100 possible points)
Surrounding Land Use
BCV1 BCV2 BCV3

15.87 16.36 17.36
7.71 7.60 7.76
7.95 8.63 8.25
89.10 95.80 94.50
27 31 50
Clear Slightly turbid Slightly turbid
0.05 0.08 0.07
14.8 21,0 15.1
4.3 4.7 4.9
85 77 68
37.25 39.25 39.75
67 71 60
Forested Forested Forested w/open
road ROW
•

Table 2. BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES OF BAIRD COVE CREEK.

Order Abundance Abundance Abundance
station BCV1 station BCV2 station BCV3
Ephemeroptera 7 11 18
Plecoptera 26 39 30
Trichoptera 32 14 11
Odonata 9 8 4
Diptera 3 3 3
Molluscs 11 13 9
Total # Organisms 88 88 75
•
C~

•
APPENDIX E:
TABLE 1. PROTECTED SPECIES OF CONCERN IN BUNCOMBE
COUNTY (2005).
TABLE 2. EXPLANATION OF STATE AND FEDERAL CODES.
•
24
•

• ~ •
TABLE 1. SPECIES OF CONCERN IN BUNCOMBE COUNTY (USFWS(2005), NCNHP-County (2005)).
Major Grouo Scientific Name Common Name State Status Federal Status
Mammal Corynorhinus rafinesquii Rafinesque's Big-eared Bat T FSC
Mammal Glaucomys sabrinus colorafus Carolina Northern Flying Squirrel E E
Mammal Myotis grisescens Gray Myotis E E
Mammal Myotis leibii Eastern Small-footed Myotis SC FSC
Mammal Myotis septentrionalis Northern Myotis SC -
Mammal Neotoma floridana haematoreia Eastern Woodrat -Southern SC FSC
Appalachian Population
Mammal Neotoma magister Allegheny Woodrat SC FSC
Mammal Puma concolor couguar Eastern Cougar E E
Mammal Sorex dispar Long-tailed Shrew SC -
Mammal Sorex palustris punctulatus Southern Water Shrew SC FSC
Bird Aegolius acadicus pop 1 Southern Appalachian Northern Saw- T FSC
whet Owl
Bird Aimophila aestivalis Bachman's Sparrow SC FSC
Bird Certhia americans Brown Creeper SC -
Bird Falco paregrinus Peregrine Falcon E -
Bird Loxia curvirostra pop 1 Southern Appalachian Red Crossbill SC FSC
Bird Poecile atricapilla practica Southern Appalachian Black-capped SC FSC
Chickadee
Bird Sphyrapicus varius appalachiensis Appalachian Yellow-bellied Sapsucker SC FSC
Bird Thryomanes bewickii altus Appalachian Bewick's Wren E FSC
Reptile Apalone spinifera spinifera Eastern Spiny Softshell SC -
Reptile Crotalus horridus Timber Rattlesnake SC -
Reptile Glyptemys muhlenbergii Bog Turtle T T(S/A)
Amphibian Ambystoma talpoideum Mole Salamander SC -
Amphibian Cryptobranchus alleganiensis Hellbender SC FSC
Amphibian Hemidactylium scutatum Four-toed Salamander SC -
Amphibian Necturos maculosus Common Mudpuppy SC -
Amphibian Plefhodon ventralis Southern Zigzag Salamander SC -
Amphibian Plethodon yonahlossee pop 1 Crevice Salamander SC -
Fish Cyprinella monacha Spotfin Chub T T
Fish Peroina burtoni Blotchside Darter E
Fish Peroina macrocepha/a Longhead Darter SC FSC
Fish Polyodon spathula Paddlefish E FSC
Mollusk Alasmidonfa raveneliana Appalachian Elktoe E E
Mollusk Discus bryanti Saw-tooth Disc SC -
Mollusk Epioblasma capsaeformis Oyster Mussel EX E

• • •
TABLE 1. SPECIES OF CONCERN IN BUNCOMBE COUNTY (USFWS(2005), NCNHP-County (2005)).
Major Grouo
Mollusk
Mollusk
Lichen
Vascular Plant
Vascular Plant
Vascular Plant
Vascular Plant
Vascular Plant
Vascular Plant
Vascular Plant
Vascular Plant
Vascular Plant
Vascular Plant
Vascular Plant
Vascular Plant
Vascular Plant
Vascular Plant
Vascular Plant
Vascular Plant
Vascular Plant
Vascular Plant
Vascular Plant
Vascular Plant
Vascular Plant
Scientific Name
Medionidus conradicus
Paravitrea andrewsae
Gymnoderma lineare
Buckleya distichophylla
Calamagrostis cainii
Euphorbia purpurea
Filipendula rubs
Geum radiatum
Hexastylis contracts
Hexastylis rhombiformis
Hydrastis canadensis
Juncus trifidus
Lilium grayi
Lysimachia fraseri
Monotropsis odorata
Packers millefolium
Pamassia grandifolia
Rudbeckia friloba var pinnatiloba
Sagittaria fasciculafa
Sarracenia jonesii
Saxifrage caroliniana
Senecio schweinitzianus
Silane ovate
Spiraea virginiana
Common Name
Cumberland Moccasinsheil
High Mountain Supercoil
Rock Gnome Lichen
Piratebush
Cain's Reed Grass
Glade Spurge
Queen-of-the-prairie
Spreading Avens
Mountain Heartleaf
French Broad Heartleaf
Goldenseal
Highland Rush
Gray's Lily
Eraser's Loosestrife
Sweet Pinesap
Divided-leaf Ragwort
Large-leaved Grass-of-Parnassus
Pinnate-lobed Black-eyed Susan
Bunched Arrowhead
Mountain Sweet Pitcher Plant
Carolina Saxifrage
Schweinitz's Ragwort
Mountain Catchfly
Virginia Spiraea
State Status
EX
SC
T
E
E
SR-T
E
E-SC
E
SR-L
E-SC
E
T-SC
E
SR-T
T
T
SR-T
E
E-SC
SR-T
E
SR-T
E
Federal Status
E
FSC
FSC
FSC
E
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
FSC
E
E
FSC
FSC
T

TABLE 2. EXPLANATION OF CODES FOR COUNTY AND QUAD STATUS LISTS (NCNHP-
explanation codes (2005)).
The county and quadrangle status lists provided by the NC Natural Heritage Program tally the elements of natural diversity (rare
plants and animals, rare and exemplary natural communities, and special animal habitats) known to occur in all North Carolina
counties and USGS 7.5-minute quadrangles. The information on which these lists is based comes from a variety of sources, including
field surveys, museums, herbaria, scientific literature, and personal communications. These lists are dynamic, with new records
continually being added and old records being revised as new information is received. As a result, a list cannot be considered a
definitive record of the elements of natural diversity present in a given county or quad and should not be used as a substitute for field
surveys.
CODE STATUS CODE STATUS
E Endangered SR Significantly Rare
T Threatened EX Extirpated
SC Special Concern P_ Proposed (E, T, or SC}
C Candidate
NOTE: the definitions of state statuses of plants and animals differ. Below are summaries of the statuses for each group.
Plant statuses aze determined by the Plant Conservation Program (NC Department of Agriculture) and the Natural Heritage Program
(NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources). Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern species are protected by state
law (Plant Protection and Conservation Act, 1979). Candidate and Significantly Rare designations indicate rarity and the need for
. population monitoring and conservation action. Note that plants can have a double status, e.g., E-SC, indicates that while the plant is
endangered, it is collected or sold under regulation.
ODE STATUS DEFINITION
'Any species or higher taxon of plant whose continued existence as a viable component of the State's flora is
E Endan
ered etennined to be in jeopardy" (GS 19B 106: 202.12). (Endangered species may not be removed from the wild
. g xcept when a permit is obtained for research, propagation, or rescue which will enhance the survival of the
pecies.)
'Any resident species of plant which is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future
T Threatened ughout all or a significant portion of its range" (GS 19B 106:202.12). (Regulations are the same as for
ndangered species.)
'Any species of plant in North Cazolina which requires monitoring but which may be collected and sold under
gulations adopted under the provisions of [the Plant Protection and Conservation Act]" (GS 19B 106:202.12).
SC Special Special Concern species which are not also listed as Endangered or Threatened may be collected from the wild
Concern d sold under specific regulations. Propagated material only of Special Concern species which are also listed as
ndangered or Threatened may be traded or sold under specific regulations.)

•
pecies which are very rare in North Carolina, generally with 1-20 populations in the state, generally
ubstantially reduced in numbers by habitat destruction (and sometimes also by direct exploitation or disease).
ese species are also either rare throughout their ranges (fewer than 100 populations total) or disjunct in North
arolina from a main range in a different part of the country or world. Also included are species which may
ave 20-50 populations in North Carolina, but fewer than 50 populations rangewide. These are species which
C Candidate ave the preponderance of their distribution in North Carolina and whose fate depends largely on their
onservation here. Also included are many species known to have once occurred in North Carolina but with no
own extant occurrences in the state (historical or extirpated species); if these species are relocated in the state,
ey are likely to be listed as Endangered or Threatened. If present land use trends continue, candidate species
likely to merit listing as Endangered or Threatened.
pecies which are very rare in North Carolina, generally with 1-20 populations in the state, generally
ubstantially reduced in numbers by habitat destruction (and sometimes also by direct exploitation or disease).
igmficantly ese species are generally more common somewhere else in their ranges, occurring in North Carolina
SR Rare eripherally to their main ranges, mostly in habitats which are unusual in North Carolina. Also included are
ome species with 20-100 populations in North Carolina, if they also have only 50-100 populations rangewide
dare declining.
e range of the species is limited to North Carolina and adjacent states (endemic or near endemic). These are
pecies which may have 20-50 populations in North Carolina, but fewer than 50 populations rangewide. The
L Limited reponderance of their distribution is in North Carolina and their fate depends largely on conservation here. Also
ncluded are some species with 20-100 populations in North Carolina, if they also have only 50-100 populations
angewide and declining.
T Throughout ese species are rare throughout their ranges (fewer than 100 populations total)
_D Disjunct a species is disjunct to NC from a main range in a different part of the country or world.
e species is at the periphery of its range in NC. These species are generally more common somewhere else in
_p Peripheral eir ranges, occurring in North Carolina peripherally to then main ranges, mostly in habitats which are unusual
North Carolina.
O Other a range of the species is sporadic or cannot be described by the other Significantly Rare categories
species which has been formally proposed for listing as Endangered, Threatened, or Special Concern, but has
p_ Proposed of yet completed the legally mandated listing process.
Animal statuses are determined by the Wildlife Resources Commission and the Natural Heritage Program. Endangered, Threatened,
and Special Concern species of mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, freshwater fishes, and freshwater and terrestrial mollusks have
legal protection status in North Carolina (Wildlife Resources Commission). The Significantly Rare designation indicates rarity and the
need for population monitoring and conservation action.
CODE STATUS DEFINITION
'Any native or once-native species of wild animal whose continued e~stence as a viable component of the
fate's fauna is determined by the Wildlife Resources Commission to be in jeopardy or any species of wild
E Endangered 'mal determined to be an'endangered species' pursuant to the Endangered Species Act." (Article 25 of
6apter 113 of the General Statutes; 1987).
'Any native or once-native species of wild animal which is likely to become an endangered species within
a foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range, or one that is designated as a
'[' Threatened reatened species pursuant to the Endangered Species Act." (Article 25 of Chapter 113 of the General
tatutes; 1987).
~'~y species of wild animal native or once-native to North Carolina which is determined by the Wildlife
SC Special esources Commission to require monitoring but which may be taken under regulations adopted under the
Concern rovisions of this Article." (Article 25 of Chapter 113 of the General Statutes; 1987).
•

•
y species which has not been listed by the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission as an Endangered,
eatened, or Special Concern species, but which exists in the state in small numbers and has been
etermined by the N.C. Natural Heritage Program to need monitoring. (This is a N.C. Natural Heritage
Significantly rogram designation.) Significantly Rare species include "peripheral" species, whereby North Carolina lies at
SR Rare a periphery of the species' range (such as Hermit Thrush). The designation also includes marine and
stuarine fishes identified as "Vulnerable" by the N.C. State Museum of Biological Sciences (Ross et al.,
1988, Endan ered Threatened. and Rare Fauna of North Carolina. Part II A Reevaluation of the Marine and
tuarine Fishes .
EX Extirpated species which is no longer believed to occur in the state.
pecies has been proposed by a Scientific Council as a status (Endangered, Threatened, Special Concem,
atch List, or for De-listing) that is different from the current status, but the status has not yet been adopted
P Proposed y the Wildlife Resources Commission and by the General Assembly as law. In the lists of rare species in
_ is book, these proposed statuses are listed in parentheses below the current status. Only those proposed
tatuses that are different from the current statuses are listed.
FEDERAL STATUS
These statuses are designated by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Federally listed Endangered and Threatened species are
protectedunder the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended through the 100th Congress. Unless otherwise
noted,definitions are taken from the Federal Register, Vol. 56, No. 225, November 21, 1991 (50 CFR Part 17).
CODE STATUS DEFINITION
E Endangered taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
taxon 'likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all
T Threatened r a significant portion of its range."
a Endangered Species Act permits the reintroduction of endangered animals as "nonessential
EXN Endangered, nonessential xperimental" populations. Such populations, considered nonessential to the survival of the
experimental population. pecies, are managed with fewer restrictions than populations listed as endangered.
he Endangered Species Act authorizes the treatment of a species (subspecies or population
egment) as threatened even though it is not otherwise listed as threatened if: (a) The species so
lowly resembles in appearance a threatened species that enforcement personnel would have
ubstantial difficulty in differentiating between the listed and unlisted species; (b) the effect of
T(S/A) Threatened due to Similarity is substantial difficulty is an additional threat to a threatened species; and (c) such treatment
of Appearance. f an unlisted species will substantially facilitate the enforcement and further the policy of the
ct. The American Alligator has this designation due to similarity of appearance to other rare
rocodilians. The Bog Turtle (southern population) has this designation due to similarity of
ppearance to Bog Turtles in the threatened northern population.
taxon under consideration for which there is sufficient information to support listing. This
C Candidate. ategory was formerly designated as a Candidate 1 (C1) species.
Also called "Species at Risk"). Formerly defined as a taxon under consideration for which
FSC Federal "Species of
" ere is insufficient information to support listing; formerly designated as a Candidate 2 (C2)
Concern pecies.
PE Proposed Endangered pecies has been proposed for listing as endangered.
PD Proposed De-listed pecies has been proposed for de-listing.
s

~ Background Study of Cultural Resources
Associated with
Baird Cove Road Tract
Buncombe County,
North Carolina.
Compiled for:
Len Rindner
Environmental Planning Consultant
•
By:
Briece R. Edwards, RPA
CRAG Ref No. 06-149
Confidential Document
Cultural Resources Assessment Group:
P.O. Box 12107
Raleigh, NC 27605
A rc h a e o l o [e-mail]
g y (LLC) 919 828-8100 or 919 274-4458
•

INTRODUCTION
Project title: Background Study of Cultural Resources Associated with Baird Cove Road
Tract, Buncombe County, North Carolina (Figure 1).
Location of the project: The tract reported here covers approximately 350 acres situated
on and between Baid and Killian Mountains approximately 1 mile northeast of Woodfin,
in central Buncombe County.
Contracting organization: Mr. Len Rindner, Environmental Planning Consultant,
Matthews, North Carolina.
Principal Investigator and Field Director: Briece R. Edwards.
Field Crew: Matthew Beazley
Dates of field visits: March 2006.
The following sections follow the format of the Guidelines for Preparation of
Archaeological Survey Reports Reviewed by the Archaeology Branch, Division of
Archives and History, North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources and the 1992
. edition of the style guide for American Antiquity (volume 54, number 4). The sections
include a description of the project's physical environment and its probable influences on
past settlement choices and site preservation; an outline of the area's prehistoric and
historic background; a description of field techniques; an inventory of sites recorded
during the survey; a discussion of the archaeological significance of the sites recorded;
recommendations for archaeological management; and a list of sources consulted for the
background research, survey, and evaluation.
This report presents the results of a background search for known cultural
resources associated with the Baird Cove Road Tract (350 acres) on the behalf of Mr. Len
Rindner, Environmental Planning Consultant. Background research was conducted by
Cultural Resources Assessment Group of Raleigh between February and March, 2006
including a site visit on March 23 at the request of Mr. Len Rindner. The initial due
diligence undertaken by the client demonstrates their concern for the potential
sensitivities that maybe found. The purpose of the background research was to identify
all reported cultural resources in the form of prehistoric and historic archaeological sites,
historic structures, and cemeteries on and in the vicinity of the development tract. Of
particular interest are those sites that are potentially eligible for inclusion on the National
Register of Historic Places. In addition, our background research sought to present a
history of the tract in order to identify areas with a high probability for potential remains.
•
2

Our background study of the tracts examined records and maps at the Office of
State Archaeology, Office of Survey and Planning, North Carolina State Archives, and
various historic and modern documents and maps of the region.

•
The following report is comprised of four sections Landscape History,
Background Search Results, and Recommendations. Landscape history describes the
prehistoric and historic settlement of the region as it relates to potential archaeological
remains. Background Search Results is a listing of sites identified and recorded in
various offices of the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources.
Recommendations present a summary statement of the guidelines and criteria for
registering a Site with the National Register as well as our suggestions for future
archaeological investigations on these two tracts.
~P..la I -~ JaLry Y. 1 t _ .;
„ / J { Kepi ~L Cra t .'~ i ,~
1 3 cwl c . I t cnv na xsr uutnn I G„ ~.Mu~~
/~ Y Y~~.#R,~, ~ ~I,,.r A V E R Y ,~~,..,~
1 C
~' c /~ 5 tl ~ Hah ale r F 3 r! xea ~' I
k {M
_ // CllM~n
R~C 'nn
vlB+a ~ ewn `~,~,' Attam Eq¢gn1QR; ._ Rvf~. ~ valYm anay
nn( Rarwvpq
_ ~ 11 ~ / Mgrtim ~ Palla
I nstan0 v, ` _ ~ ~.. BoB O R k' H n u y .ill•.. . J ~a\RtlK ~ Pqf YslMy k nµ
N ~(/\~llnv
\61ti ~auml l Y A N C E Y vJ,,;~LU,a \tal,. L D W eEL L- ,.,
:.. Fausf JSWI56 d vIIl y,~,',,1.W~` 1 n~ C`\ ~ 1 [.. `Collat[sv~ll! VI a ora.e o-.'1.
9atx Croel~ ns ~ Sur \Y ~
w~einur ~- n ~u 'sett n. rain LenoR ~i„ --
~J~aqa! .w~. ~ts ~ ~„a,... Ant :;y 1 _ . -, ~.,a kNMI'
D. (.. L" O N 6gtk !r ~ ~ Pdi tG 0 ., Y' ~ ©GwHilchl f~~}\(~n~A.'hlnrd /t Wklt N
Nslnlt Waverlyt Pensgcglai. ~'IO ~ F_i• n" 'S eh//, / \\~ A!J`t.
L s ~I tt ~. V / ~v
Mx[llan~ ~' \'~j'
Palenbllr -,~ w I ,.' %/ .iblc R![k . G eA {iuAGOt1
vJ ~ ^~ i
icy .. e ~ IAare ttlll ~.. ~ ~ ~
..,hall , -- - Project Vicinity ~ Chlst~.elellE ~, Raton _~a~,, ~ _
~Ilmogta~_
.~~„~,
.,. Q iiu:, ~.. r/. F/
5 c ys
Da4ngham`
g
- ,

r \

7
P~
I'e
f'
L I„
s
e
( ~ Pd ni k
/ 61 ~
Ke
_. ..
i
~
.
w rvecn /
a..
e
, ~.:
~~ ra hq ,r ~~.. ~;;d~~B U g v inn \a'~7~•
r,
0.re antlerr a
~!
~ C Ser
~ s
, ` 11 d D f
rook/
~
~
-
(~,.~ ,,, ~ ~'"
~ I :e S t
elu
~
~ i
S on'
~
~ Mei
~~~
Enul
k~
U N
lY ~t
' O M B .` E, n..{..
E _ L
M .C:,' D O W
R t a PI as~nt
<M,

'~...~ -
~ l - L}
R'q~r ~ ~ f
Fn.~ i ~ Bnntl'eto ~vn
~
GrgY! /
~
c ,mil
. ASHEVILIE~ e`-t,...~,..eiacrt,)i I
~
~ („„
,
~~ a~cK3 ~
t oteln -,. .
,,.
~i-/~ .~ ~ '
f trs
~~i~
_-_
. `4`
-- - v
Hen

outh kom -„ ~ ~

•.a.- .. t
t. . _
... I ......,.
~ ,,_ .. ~ I; ,
r
olgW~ CrasstoaUt ~ F
(,asar
~~
., .
54;nvf{k
/- /~,/
`J •1e nl
.:~.~.. ~~
~
~ /
(/j ,~~~~
u,R i% \~ ~ . I I lay. J
~~ rc.}-i..,
^' ! '.SIR^~ ~l'.
Ir.r Itolliy

1

i

' ;

~
~
l
qq
Fallst
{ qlk II
!!

alts RnAr'
~, .
r
/~~,~
,3 r
,
~
r. R U T F'I, C R`'F
ODD
\
~ aaln
I

\ +..~
~
?
_. ~n
a
B ~ R S C3 N ~

\ R Ihorloi.fl ,` ` ~ ~mc~
~ o•I.

l I Lhaoi ~ .r
~
d~. ~
„~ . ~
"' ,'qRa ~
.,... ~,~. ( ~at~t
n,,, ~ „~,. -_ ,>•licall 1Yago~~pe
J C L E V E L A p~D\

~4
p~.s,- ,,`
Gtr
- ~I'I@nd 56RV JI
/
RiHKr\
F rYt~4Y l; IV
f Il .nl
~

\J I~gUfR
t
.
~
TAT/'
' C
(aYrkl S
i
,
F'
l ~
ti ~
/ }
IuLbsr
~5
1 r
n
a.
r , Allant rl
1+'igure 1. Project vicinity.
3

•
TQPQ! map printed on 02/02/06 from "North Carolina.tpo" and "Untitled.tpg"
ooo+„E, s58ooomE, 3S9ooomE. NAD27 Zone 17S 36100
0
°o
d
M
CZ
G
O
O
O
M
• O
O
(•
m
M
C~
C
O
O
O
O.
CI
.. !r--~ry ~ -' ~ \ 1.
J' ~ <
~RO~ 1I tk ~` '~` ~`"t~I'~ +ii~ ice' h~ ijl~$t) ~xn
$~; ,,
s ~ A ° ~
~r -~ ,~, ,~ ,~--~.--~ _
~ ,_
~ q ,~,~.~
r ~-~ ~ i ~
('~ f~I pJ /'~ y/fV
~t .:~ I'4/ v ~_I ~!I~i!!l:' N~~ ~. ~~ ~" /'.` (J+. .`*' .~' 1 ~ R.l:l 1 J ~II y
i~ ;ia'
~ ~G
O
0
0
In
T
M
y
s,. .~' ' ,r ~ "' 1' . ~ t
Figure 2. Approximate location of Baird Cove Road tract.
~'''.
...'G
~.:
nRN TN
6°
~~,~~~~R,t, 35yuuumt, NAD27 Zone 17S 361ooon,E,
~ .`~ 1 L11EE
®0~6 FEE1 D ;,r,)a tOpp MF,Tf:RS
Printed from TOPO! m2001 National Geograpltic Holdings (www.topo.com)
0
0
0
m
M
CZ
C
O
O
Q.
M
Z
O
P
m
CZ
L
O
O
u)
O+
l`7
Z
7
0
n
T
4

•
"~'he protect area is located within at 1:11e ~NC;ste)°n _.~~cnt s~ °r,1: ;see ~,
`forth ~~'arolina"~ Mize 1~idge lie?t Mo1.lntan physio~raphlc •(;~~i()r~. ~~:rc~ :r _
categ()rized as the '`Asl1e Metamorphic Suite and "t'allus ~alls.l~ormation" l~aa111e~; :° 19
(~~~['), '=NII1C11 teatUry':i nall`1'()W'"1C1~.T,E: S `N1t11 .`ite(;p'`;1dL'(t ~ Ivi'tn.3c',i:~ ~ r ;]1. ~ `17i~ _, .. E''s
addition, the landscape of the project area also resembled that Of the "f,~)~~J ~~i1~~1r1tair
System' only a tew miles to the north and west: high, sharp ridges, steep ~(~ ~recipii:(>~ts
>lot~es, and narrow stream ~~alleys. Most of the .rac, is made ^_lrj :~~ ,:tee ,-~ .:t:l~ y ' ~-? :;
~Nith ~>1()pe exceeding ?5 degrees. l~levations within the ~racl ans,f~ jt(,~.~ ~ ,~.~, ,s~ ~ ;.E~s
?400 feet above mean sea level at the point where 3aird ::reek ::rose 11 c° ~b Ea;;,F
i~oundary, up to about ?300 ~f'eel: at the peak ofl~illian TUloi.ultair3 <~t the, , ~~?:(~ .;~ ~~~ ,el
`hc tract.
Tabl~.l.;'Soils}associated with tract
S~m#aol 1'~e Sloe _
~ Br>«32 j
2 Bradddck.cla:.10: eroded 2 - 6~/0 _
B - 1Qam> eroded °.fo
f,
_ 1;~
~
/ _~
iiµµ'~~ ~~}~ 1F 'fir I', ` ~{
J
~ HNC a_ f~
--- I'?4~~ ---1
_
~eC:2 ':~i~°e~oded r;,=:1'~5°'`o

The landscape at the tract is largely defined by ~larro~.~r -~d~f~~; :1n(t : rF ~~--~.~(~c~~i
valleys with several saddles and few flat terraces or steps e)rl Mop(, ;>i(tc:,. ': ?v(Arall. ~h(
topography ot`the tract can be roughly divided into three a~aLeg(frie;s.
Ta~1e 3. Tract area by slope {based un Mathis Jr. I9A5).
description ~ ~1ope ~ercen>ta~e ~~
__ ~ ~ of tract
- --- _.
' !1liand Slope {f~ - [ ~% slope} "'()`%~
-- ~ - ~ -
,'~teep Slope ' 1 1 S -- 25°~t, sloped ~ 40%__ _
~ler<~ Steep Slope (25°/r and ~reater~~ ~ 40° ~, ~~,
l~rosion in the uplands has been: severe, probably '.rl the '.rtt:ermatll <;i F~~ggi,)~, €,nci
korest tires. Sased on inference from Tremble, this part ofthe state may hav~a hc;(:,~
subjected to a cumulative Toss ol~between se~aen and twelve pills inches +)t ~,~f)F ~,~,(~r =tre
bast. two 1lundre(.l years ("l~rimb[e 19i4). Most otthe narroGV~-id~etopc, a1a5; : :: .~s~f~~.
rTil:o iofgrn', arl(t i1CCess roads. lhls e~atensl`/(' .".VStern 4)f illrt ".i 1(~i `"rc ..~[ . 'I& ? __
>urvev by ~~reating Y~cellent ground ~.~urface ~,~isibility, b1~t the, <;c)nstl•ucu)O11 ~,~} '')~ ~~~~;1(t:-
. .111(1 311e1r `;L1bseC1Llellt '~ros1o11 +1aVC ?rObat)lU +lesll'oVe(i ()r '>er,()o,lr;~ ~' 'lam IL'~:%i€ :~(' ':z+~., t,~1s

..
~,~TSfLtll ;~a~1c, ~it,'~I3 $4~Iln{i [r~i [ tk pare 4~~~~s': LtX3iat1:3 °~ir~.1.,. ~:<.,.,:> <)!~ ~4?... ~"?~~.,,~>~_:~, ;'
,overgrown roads, r~uildo~ed ~;arthen-i~erms, any m~~uma1 aon~;o~i -~ncXi~~r -~~ ~~~ ~~~~"~. ' ~_~
one forested portions of the tract, ~t ~s tike`ty that there has peen ~zrore than ~_1r~~ ~ 1mt, , -. E_
event on the tract. ~_:omments made icy 6ocai resident:; :support ~hi:~. +~ne n~ag4~13~,r
discussed the last egging event lrappemn( ~n ' {~?Os saru! 117at ',i:~ }titiae. ~3acz ` ~E ° ,
the logging team when he was a child.
The area is drained by small tributaries of the French BNOaa` ~Zive~• { ~i~nres~:
and 3). (-Tndernatural:conditions. the local uplancl,forests would include hckary:,white
oak; post oak, scarletaak, southern red,~ak: yellow poplar; Virgirria°piire; shortieafpine,
dogw€~dcl, blac~.:cliem~; y*rape;.greenbrier;_holIy, sassafras, red:~maple, a~d;p©rson ivy.
Tire:wetter^ lo~~~land_fore5ts~ would:iit~lude water,oak,.willow-oal~,,shortleafpine,
.. ,, .
sycatnore,.riverbitefi, reerraslt, ~ellgw poplar; red~maple, black willow, alder,
greenbrier. `rape. anc~ hornbeatu (Ortosky 1989):
~'urrently the tract is used primarily for hunting though them. rta:~ t~e;;n ti~n~~cr~E.~~~:
in recent decades. The majority of the up and ridges have, peen ~~ut anu artx =>~,cupiE ~? r~,v _
access roads providing opportune conditions for identifvins~ ~>ite foci fhmugh -:~urtac~~
exposed artifacts.
•
~/~~ Y
f , ~~: ~~ .~ - ~,~
r e f 3fil` ~ I~ ~
~c~-:y'ra~4 ~ i ~ " ~ ~r~T'- ~ ~a~ ~ ~ ri ~ :~' l
~ ~ ~ ! ~` o~~ ~ Q ,~ ~ ,~_
~~ ~~ ~ ~
o. tY~l ~ ~ ~ ~~ 4~ ~~~,1 x'14 ~~ ~"
~~
v ~~ ~
t i f
,I,
~E ,~ x~R~~l ~,. ~, ~ It
p.z•, ~ p~~~ ~~ d a i -v~ ,(~ t1
,sue ~ ~L ,' } t~r e l
~, i h. ~ f
t'
-~ ~~ ~
~~~~ ~, s
,, .
~.
40 ,.~ , ~ ~- ~ r ~ ...~
,, ~~ , . -
.. . ,
_F-~ .~_~-..~~,
~.,,
a ,~, - ~ - ~.< ~.
~'flga~re ~. 'example of logged and eroded uplands on ~.he tract.
•

Figure 5. Site conditions in the tract's lowlands.
PREHISTORIC BACKGROUND
S The earliest recorded human settlements in the North Carolina Piedmont are
Clovis-period campsites that date from the close of the last Ice Age, about 12,000 years
ago. Fluted Clovis points are occasionally found in surface collections in the region, but
no intact Clovis sites have been recorded in the North Carolina Piedmont. It seems likely
that the County area was occupied by bands of Late Ice Age hunters 10,000 to 12,000
years ago. The oldest excavated site in the North Carolina Piedmont dates from the
Hardaway period, about 10,000 B.C. to 8,000 B.C. (Coe 1964; Ward and Coe 1976). We
know almost nothing about these earliest North Carolinians. They were probably
nomadic hunters and gatherers, but we do not know whether these eastern Paleo-Indians
resembled their Paleo-Indian contemporaries west of the Mississippi River and also
hunted now-extinct big game animals such as mammoth and bison.
The following Archaic period is somewhat better known, but still the subject of a
great deal of speculation because we lack information about major aspects of subsistence
and social organization. Overviews of the Archaic period have suggested that the
Archaic cultures of eastern North America show an evolutionary sequence in which
nomadic or semi-nomadic hunter-gatherers, fishers, and shellfish collectors developed
regional adaptations to the warmer climates, expanding deciduous forests, and smaller
game animals of the Holocene (Willey 1966:60; Caldwell 1958). The Early Archaic
period in North Carolina is sub-divided into a Palmer phase (ca. 8,000 B.C.) and a Kirk
phase (7,000-6,000 B.C.), both characterized by corner-notched points (Coe 1964; Ward
and Coe 1976:11-12). The Middle Archaic period is represented by the Stanly phase
• (6,000-5,000 B.C.), the Morrow Mountain phase (5,000-4,500 B.C.), the Guilford phase
7

(4,500-4,000 B.C.), and the Halifax phase (3,500 B.C.) (Coe, 1964; Ward and Coe
1976:11-12). The Late Archaic, or Savannah River period (4,000-500 B.C.) is
characterized by large, triangular points with broad stems and by large bowls carved from
soapstone (Coe 1964:119; Ward and Coe 1976:1976).
•
•
~ ,~ H illsbaro
Clarksuille ~
Caraway
Ilwhame J
~ ~
° Yadkin
Swannanaa
o ,~~
~.i B actin
Small G3~P~Y
Savannah ,,,, Stermyed
Riper ,;
~'
e
~; ~~ Savannah
~i Riper
Guilford
~ H alifax
a
~~
~ ~11
'~' I Stanty
Morrow Mountain Sterrrrrad
v
a
~ Kirk
Kirk Sterrrrred
Serraited
o ~ Kirk
~- ~ homer-Notched
ao" Palmer
,~ Comer-Notched
~ H archway
~ ~ Side~Notched
~ ~ Hardaway-Dalton
J
a
a ~ = H a~away
Figure 6. Chart depicting the most common projectile points identified in North
Carolina
From: A Review of Archaeology in the North Carolina Piedmont: A Study of Change, by H. Trawick
Ward. In The Prehistory of North Carolina: An Archaeological Symposium, edited by Mark A. Mathis
and Jeffrey J. Crow. NC Division of Archives and History, Raleigh. 1983.
The Woodland period in eastern North America is marked by the appearance of
farming, pottery, the bow and arrow, and in some areas by the construction of burial and
temple mounds. There were two mounds in Buncombe County that were excavated in
the late 19th century by the Smithsonian Institution. Both mounds date to the
8

• Mississippian period (about 1000 A.D. - A.D. 1450). In the North Carolina Piedmont,
the first recognized Woodland period is the Badin (about 500 B.C - A.D. 500), marked by
sand-tempered, fabric- or cord-marked ceramics and large, often crude triangular points.
Its successor was the Yadkin period (A.D. 500-1200), whose ceramics resembled its
predecessor's, with occasional linear or check stamping added to the decorative motifs
(Coe 1964:55). Another difference between the Badin pottery and the later Yadkin
pottery is the tatter's use of crushed quartz temper (Coe 1964:30). After A.D. 1200,
regional differences in the Piedmont appeared in the form of Caraway, Uwharrie, Dan
River, and Hillsborough cultures.
ETHNOHISTORIC BACKGROUND
Although most histories of North Carolina tend to date the first significant Indian
and European contacts to the English coastal explorations and Roanoke settlements of the
1580s, the Spanish had explored western North Carolina and had made an unsuccessful
attempt to garrison the Piedmont over 20 years before. During the 1560s, the Spanish
contingent at Santa Elena (now Parris Island Marine Base in South Carolina) sent an
expedition under Juan Pardo into the western Piedmont and mountains of North Carolina.
According to one interpretation of the Spanish records of these expeditions, the Spanish
soldiers visited Indian villages in the Piedmont in the vicinity of the present-day towns of
Charlotte, Lincolnton, Hickory, and Maiden, and built a garrison on the French Broad
River north of Weaverville( Cauchi) in Buncombe or Madison County. Another garrison
• was built in the vicinity of Salisbury and Marion (or "Joara") near the Catawba River to
the east of our project area. (Joara might also have been the "Xuala" visited by Hernando
de Soto in the expedition of 1539-1540). Unfortunately, the Spanish recorded little
information about the Indians encountered on these expeditions. These garrisons were
short-lived because of hostilities between the Indians and the Spanish, who burned
several Indian towns, and because of the fragile supply lines between the western
Piedmont and Santa Elena on the lower South Carolina coast (Hudson 1976:116-118;
Hudson et al. 1981; Hudson 1990).
Even before the English and Spanish visits to North Carolina in the late sixteenth
century, the Indians of North Carolina may have felt the effects of contact with the Old
World in the form of devastating diseases such as smallpox, measles, chicken pox,
influenza, whooping cough, bubonic plague, typhus, diphtheria, amoebic dysentery, and
tuberculosis. The worst of these diseases was smallpox, which first broke out in the New
World as early as 1518 or 1519. Resistance to these diseases was so low that a single
outbreak of a disease could destroy half the population of a village, and some tribes were
probably wiped out in the span of one or two generations (Hudson 1976:104-105;
Denevan 1976:4-6).
From John Lawson's description of Indian cultures in the early eighteenth century,
we obtain a picture of small, scattered groups of Indians, often living in palisaded villages
of 17 houses or less (Lefler 1967:50,55,56). Although these villages were often
. associated with large fields of maize, the Indians also relied heavily on wild plants
9

• (especially the acorn) and on game for much of their food. They followed a seasonal
round, divided roughly into a winter phase and a spring and summer phase. During the
winter, adult men and women left the main villages to the elderly and the children and
formed satellite camps in the "hunting quarters." From these camps, they hunted and
foraged until spring, when the members of a village returned to it to plant maize, squash,
and other crops. To judge from the comments of Lawson and other travelers, North
Carolina abounded in game: white-tailed deer, turkey, bear, beaver, raccoon, opossum,
rabbit, squirrel, bison, and passenger pigeon. The larger rivers, such as the French Broad
River and its tributary streams, provided many species offish, including the spring runs
of anadramous fish, which the Indians caught with weirs (Lefler 1967:216-218,182).
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
Eighteenth -Twentieth Century
Like much of the western region of the state in the eighteenth century, this region
was `the frontier'. Early Euro-American settlers began making their way into the area by
following the French Broad River. Early settlements extended from the main river valley
into the basins of the larger tributaries.
Buncombe County was formed in 1791 from Burke and Rutherford Counties. It
is named in honor of Colonel Edward Buncombe who was a Revolutionary war hero. A
patriot force took the land, originally occupied by the Cherokee, from them during the
Revolutionary War because of their alliance with the British. One of the first settlers in
the region was a Colonel Samuel W. Davidson in 1784. Indians soon killed Davidson but
that did not stop other settlers from arriving in the years to come. In the immediate
vicinity of the project area a John Weaver and his family were the first to settle in 1787.
There are many Weavers living in the county to this day, in fact the town of Weaverville
derives its name from them. Weaverville was founded in 1832 with the original name of
Salem. It would not be until 1873 that the town's name would change in honor of
Montraville Weaver. Sometime in the 1820's David Crocket came to Buncombe County
and married Elizabeth Patton. Asheville was chartered as the county seat in 1794 under
the original title of Morristown. It would grow to be a large resort and spa town, with the
Battery Park Hotel and Grovepark Inn among others, starting in the 19th century on into
the present.
One of the first industries in the county was livestock herding. Starting around
1800, hundreds of thousands of hogs, cows, and other livestock followed the French
Broad River through the county every month on their way to South Carolina markets.
Feeding the multitude of animals became a prosperous business for a while, until the
local soil became exhausted. Many fields were left fallow and the arrival of the railroad
shortly after ended the need for droving. The railroad did not reach the county until 1880
due to geographical, financial, and political difficulties. This was decades behind the rest
. of the state.
10

•
Local agricultural industry began with Flue-cured tobacco in the 1850's. But the
tobacco industry would disappear by 1900 due to countywide bankruptcy. The tobacco
grower's demise was due to competition with eastern Carolina's strain of bright leaf
tobacco, which was apparently more popular at the time. But growing tobacco would
return in the 1920's with the burley strain and it still thrives alongside poultry and dairy
farming to this day.
RESULTS OF BACKGROUND SEARCH
Background research on the project areas included a review of maps, aerial
photographs, land grants and secondary historical sources in the North Carolina State
Archives. In addition, sources were consulted at the Office of State Archaeology, and the
Office of Survey and Planning.
Cemetery Survey-
The North Carolina Cemetery Survey (North Carolina Division of Archives and
History) had no files indicating cemeteries within the project area or its vicinity.
Office of Survey and Planning
A review of files and maps at the Office of Survey and Planning found no structures or
remains to be recorded within the Baird Cove tract. The closest structure recorded is the
Swain home on Beaverdam Creek a couple of miles away.
-The Swain home is the birthplace of two North Carolina Governors. David L.
Swain and Joseph Lane were cousins born in the same year of 1801.
Archaeological Research in the Project Vicinity
A review of the site files in the Office of State Archaeology shows that no
archaeological sites have been recorded within the project area. Currently approximately
7 sites have been reported in the area in Buncombe County, all of them from the 1940's.
Systematic archaeological investigations in Buncombe County began with Cyrus Thomas
of the Smithsonian Institution. In the 1880's he recorded archaeological sites, primarily
"Mound Sites" in the American Southeast. In his published catalog (Thomas 1891:156)
he reports two sites on the Swannanoa River and Hominy Creek, four miles from
Asheville. There is evidence that the sites were excavated leaving us with a small
description:
•
11

This mound...100 yards from the river, is circular, 80 feet in diameter, and 9 feet high.
A wide trench cut through it from side to side and down to the natural soil brought to light
the fact that it was built partly of stone and partly of earth. The core or central portion, to
the height of 4 feet above the original surface and covering a space about 30 feet in diameter,
was built of irregular blocks of stone, heaped together without order or plan. The remainder of
the mound was made of dark surface soil. The top layer of earth being removed down to the
rock pile, the entire surface of the latter was found to be covered with charcoal and evidences
that it had been burned here. Among the coal were numerous joints of charred cane. The
stones were all removed, but no remains or relics, save a few arrowheads, were discovered.
(Thomas 1891:350).
Also reported in the same Smithsonian volume:
This mound is on the farm of Mr. J.B. Throsh, 1.5 miles from Hominy creek...lt is located
on a ridge, is circular, 33 feet in diameter at the base, and 4 feet high. No remains or
vestiges of art were found in it. Its composition was as follows: First, a top layer, 18
inches thick, of red clay similar to that around it, conforming to the curve of the mound
and entirely covering the bottom layer of black earth which rested on the original soil.
The latter had evidently been carried from the creek, a mile distant. (Thomas 1891:350).
There has not been much archaeological research conducted in the region up to
this point in time. This is mainly due to the lack of large-scale development in the area,
which would motivate research to be conducted. The 7 sites that have been excavated in
the region were done under the supervision of a Mr. Johnston. This fieldwork was
discovered on microfiche and no field report was written so the reason for the
undertaking is unknown.
We define a prehistoric site as an area where we find at least one artifact dating to
the prehistoric period (for example, a flake from manufacturing or repairing stone tools, a
stone projectile point, or a potsherd). We define an historic site as an area containing
patterned evidence of settlement (house foundations or concentrations of building debris
and domestic artifacts, for example) or industry (a mill or still site, for example) dating
between colonial settlement in the mid-eighteenth century and 1956 (the minimum age
for National Register of Historic Places eligibility is 50 years). Practically applied, we
would classify, for instance, the remains of a foundry, a bridge, a mill, or a house dating
before 1956 as an archaeological site. An isolated fragment of whiteware or bottle glass
would not be recorded as a site.
Regionally, many of the larger area surveys have been to the south-east in the
Pisgah National Forest in mountainous terrain similar, though with a greater percentage
of very steep slope, compared to that found in the project area. Those upland surveys
have reported a low density of prehistoric sites (ranging from a maximum of one site per
25 acres to as low as one site per 100 acres), usually small, lithic sites on ridgetops,
ridgetoes, and saddles (Radisch et al 1989; Snedeker et al 1988; Snedeker et al 1989;
Burchett and Snedeker 1994). The report of one of these surveys suggested an upland
site distribution model, in which some the systems of ridgelines and saddles were used as
prehistoric travel routes. The ridges serving as preferred travel routes would have a
higher density of prehistoric sites. "Dead-end" ridges that did not provide easy access to
other areas should have a much lower density of sites (Stephenson 1985). This "travel
12

•
•
•
route" model might help to explain the low density of prehistoric sites in the project area's
uplands (in spite of good to excellent survey conditions).
During the background research of the region, seven sites were identified in the
vicinity of the project. They were located on microfiche and there is very little
information about them.
Site = 31BN-6
PPK, Sherds, Flakes
1940-1964
Site = 31BN-7
PPK, Sherds, Flakes
Site = 31BN-11
Graves- PPKs
Heavy erosion
Site = 31BN-16
PPK, Sherds, Flakes
Site = 31BN-18
PPK, Scraper, Sherds, Flakes
Site = 31BN-19
PPK, Scraper, Sherds, Flakes
Site = 31BN-56
PPK, Scraper, Sherds, Flakes
1940- Johnston
1940- Johnston
1940- Johnston
1940- Johnston
1940- Johnston
1940- Johnston
13

TOPO! map panted on 03/22/06 from "North Carolina.tpo" and "Untitled.tpg"
3570oo,.,E. _ 3S8ooo E 359ooo~„E 360000 E NAD27 Zone 17S 362aaaR,E,
I~ ~`
to -) ~- - ~ L 4~ ~g(~ t L - 1 .;. 1 ~ In
1 ~!
~ >. ~ ~ ~ ~ tit lit-lpm~ n r LE ~ L Mtn- ~ ~', ,~ `i 17~ ~~'PCe;t4agt;GroVVi i t~yy.:i;''
.e om i / U - •Y.w~84 ~-.
y
y ~y~~ '_.~ +.. q/r ""'_ ;~.~ ~ ,~ljr ~~'l i ~ '~`BN38!_ ~13'V ~/
~~ ~ ~r,~gy~m.-` _ ~ ~~. ~^ ~~'B'Y 6 '~ ~- 1 J ~ ~~. o~y, V C~~ )~~_J_, Z
fit` ' ~ =-=~. r
o ~ G . ~ ~I t `~ `~ .fit ~ ~ ~ ~ " "~~~ ~e< ~ ~ 4 i ~~~kL m t~rW~
.; < i
-~ S t
f3tdney~147~oti - ~~~ a .'G+m ~(`~ ~~~ ~, °~ , ~~. '~ ~~~ ~
o "a-
~ 1 Smnev Knob ~, ~ ~.~`. ,trr -~ _~.q~~~~ ~ f~ ~ ~\ n r a
o ' ~` .~+1' ~ry~-~~Q-Q`~n~~1~~~-.um ~ - .__ ',~~1 a. -- 'f r.' l~,r~`~ ~"~'~c` ~ ~~ ...
~,' L f ~ ~ ~~~ ~ n
Z T'~ jt br ~. m ~ ~ f~+,i ' ` ~. ~ r ! i~~ ~Q~~ t' ~ _ ~ - r ~ - 'h ~ c
..~ ,~ --~y.~ ~ 'C~ .` `~7 l` ~,'x _ _.~.i.--js ~."~ ~ ~~~ ~t~,~Q~ _ L5?-~."y ', sr+"r~ ~P
'. /. ~ - ~ 1.x+:.1 ~~'~• \~ -~f ~ _~ l A~ ~ ~.~~~
,~, ~/ s ,~ i ~~~''1 ~.J' ~{ttill t +., t„ -"~'~ ~,~-- -C~,~•~~i ~y.~ ~ -,V ~ ,sue ~,~~'r Q
" - Nl~~ntain y J t ~`~~~w>s~~~~ ~+~ ~' 3 y d~
~ .., i
Z {~ t ~ t~ r ~i Lai ~"~~ / t ~ ~ J` Ti~~ ~j~ ~. f~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~~~ 1 .l``" h i ,~ . i. ~* ~
i4~ i f ~, ' ~ ~ l ~ ~~' l c ~ i v $
< t' ~
g ~~1 ,~c~ ~, ~~ ~~T ~ ~ E i~r ~ ~~ rqf'. g~~~"~~w~~'~ ~. ~ - 11 ~ . ~~ ~~ 1 ,,,,_y I~ \~•~.y ~:.-- 7
~ ~_. ~ 4 ~ ~ , ` ~;.` .a6~ L~ ~~lh~ I A , , ~ g ~-; J^T~~`~7' fj r''r"` 1i~i ?~ '1' 4 ' ~~ _._ ~ ~~~,.ti..... I,;: m
P ,j (Q 8b ~ ~ I y_ ~ q?'~~ ~ ~ ; k l i 11 y H~ i~ gl ~ x
Z n ~; ~'~ ~ 67 mil` -; ~ ~ ihm~ ¢ 'W ,+r i r (_' _
,~ ~ 1 e ~-. ! "Y ~ n9"1 5wrmri 6L ~~.,.ca1,~...~~"' ~ "e '
'~ f ~' t 4 1 .~ I
x ,i f t G" r
F ~S# 'r.' 4 ~ •)' I
d~~ to ~ ~ b ~I ~.va l' ~~~,~~I 1 ~~~ i ~~..1 ~'~ ~~~
~t7~t ~ ~~ ~u e ~ ~ arc ~
i ~ ~f } y Barn GUy_ ~ ~ ~. P ~ ~~ ~o ,
)~ ; t r~/ _ '% ~.(AkE /~~ f_ ~t~rtt`"~GtIM~Qr f ~~ ~ ~~ 9~ ~ ~' o
r 1 ~L ~ I. L.. v~,
'~ ~ ; ~~ ~ ~ t ~' ~ oati .i ~#i ~ r~ ~}v ~ ~ ~ .- I Pf~3e~cu i(gor; .~~ s~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~
a57oao~„E, a58ooo~,E, aS9ooomE, a60oooR,E. NAD27 Zone 17S 362ooo~,E~ M
MN11 TN U S 1 MItE
6' Y D 1~0 fEEi U 50U lWU METFAS
Panted Fmm TOPO! m7A01 National Geognpldc Holdit~,s (www.topo.com)
14

• Aerial Photographs and Maps
As part of our background research of the tract aerial photographs, historic and
contemporary maps were consulted in an effort to identify areas of minimally impacted
or disturbed soils, and possible historic structures or cemeteries. The maps below
exemplify what was found on the Historic maps; that the region was unreported for much
of the 18t"-19t" century. This does not suggest there were no residents in the area, only
that they were not recorded on the maps examined at the NC Archives.
•

1_.: ~/ NI > Y ~
~ `l .
t. ~ ~.tinrb ~a{i~: T1 ~~~ ,~~~~ sr~y . '
t= ~ ~~ ~ r~~` ,~
7R~~ `ifI /.~ ~1 . J •~~~ ,~`~~. jl ~, ,f.; ~. Y3'~~~` `;~iHrk.
If,.- ~
~ , , ~ ~~ ~ ~;<~~ ~,_ t s~{
':ii ~ ..yi~t. ~ ~~ ~~ ~:~A~t ur'~ .~ '- ~- S
S ~ `~ t
~ t ~ ~ `~ ,~' • ~Lt
~~ `~
~,'14.~~ir. ..pj'~i ~~~ 1r i. ~ tit; Z. `~`'``` ~~,`' 1t~'~'` ~1' .\~~t~
,1 _
f ~~,,J Project Vicinity ~ z ~t~~'~~~,~'' `~ '~ ~l ,,~.'`+~t, ``
~/ d. ~,~~~ ~ ~
r i ~i~ ~tNi ~ :. ~ ~, ~
w1~~~ } ~_ i„~~% /~'~r"1 ~ -~t9 a71?~C. ~. `~~/~ "~l ~? t,,, t ~ ~'~~ ~ xr tint cl ~hn"~~
r.. ~.``1~..J~~~ ,. ~ ,,,~<< ~~k ~.
:f~
„~ F~,, ~:
~ ,}~ =, it =-s.ic,,., ~y~t
Y
Figure 9. Detail of 1865 Map of North Carolina (Costal Survey). t , i+~ ~ ',' ,. -,~~,
15

•
•
16

•
•
•
<~ l
. ~

1..' K < <.r' n

i;~ ~ C `~.. , _~,
~ ~
~
x r,
_ ~ .~ -
~
..,, ; , .} , ~ c.

~_ 3~ ,
'!v}
~ ~

t..

µ ~

-.
;-
~ «
~'- _~
.. ~ ~
s ~~
`~,
..~ •
~ + a~ • #
~'
r ~ ~~
J ,,
t .,
~. ~i ,~
.af ~ ;_ ~ ~ ~ a. ~ •
v
- ~ A r,
~ i ~ a Z_ ~
•~ O 1
`+.`, ~ ~ f
~ ' ~~~ 'a~ iFi ~ `~,LyGfJt?Gt~ ~''EAJf
4 a ~~ r '"!gyp`'
~;~,1 a~ ;~ `~
~~
d ~.~ r
.,, .~ .~
Figure 12. 1938 Highways map of Buncombe County ' ~
~`
t-
s
• 1^
~ -
e°
n
,* ..~
#~ •
ao
r '~
17

Aerial photographs of the region were not available for review from the North Carolina
Archives.
The Landscape -
Based on the site visits to the tract it is evident that most of the tract has been
subject to extensive erosion and cycles of timbering.
Areas of sheet erosion with exposed clay sub-soils were evident in several places,
mostly associated with upland flats and saddlf;s. No prehistoric materials were identified
at the time of the site visit. The majority of the upland flat surfaces are very narrow and
generally disturbed due to current and previous road ware.
Site Visit -
The site visit to the tract in March 2006 identified two structure remains. Both in close
proximity to Baird Creek.
Site No. 1 is characterized by stone foundations and a standing chimney. The small
structure once spanned the narrow creek. With the approximately 3/4 of the structure and.
Chimney (Figure 13) on the north side and the remaining on the south. Today the
chimney is standing and appears to have been re-pointed and converted to a `roadside
cook spot'. The banks of the creek at this point have been shored and channeled with dry
stone construction (Figure 14). Based on the maps his site likely dates to the 1930s and
may be one of the `huts' identified on the 1938 county road map.
•
18
Figure 13. Chimney and north foundations at Site 1.

•
Site No. 2. is located approximately 150m north of Site No.l . Like the previous site it
likely dates to the early 1900s and may be indicated on the 1938 County Road map and
the 1920 Soil Survey Map. It is located on the; South side of Baird Creek and appears to
have been heavily damaged by flooding. Local residence describe these sites as having
been temporary or seasonal residences during the summer months. This one in particular
was described as having been a `hut used by the loggers the last time the area was cut
over' according to one local resident.
•
STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Our evaluations of archaeological significance come from the published criteria of
the National Register of Historic Places (National Park Service 1991) for establishing
historic significance for structures, sites, or objects that possess integrity of location,
design, setting, materials, craft, feeling, and association and that:
•
19
Figure 15. Foundations and conditions at Site No. 2

M A. are associated with events that have made a significant
contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or
B. are associated with the lives of persons significant in our
past; or
C. embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or
method of construction or ghat represent the work of a
master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent
a significant and distinguishable entity whose components
may lack individual distinctions; or
D. have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information
important in prehistory or history.
Some types of properties are usually not eligible for National Register status:
properties less than 50 years in age; churches;. cemeteries; commemorative items, such as
public monuments; and structures moved from their original locations or substantially
altered. If these types of properties are an integral part of a larger National Register
district, they might qualify for National Register status (National Park Service 1991).
For prehistoric sites, the most relevant: criterion is "D." Do these prehistoric sites
have the potential to produce significant information and new insights on the region's
prehistoric past? .
In spite of the technological problems for research on disturbed, low density
upland sites, these resources should still be incorporated into a regional research context,
but in ways that recognize our current limitations in extracting information form them.
As other archaeologists have illustrated (Canouts and Goodyear 1985:181), uplands form
the vast majority of the Carolina Piedmont and Mountain terrain, and thousands of
prehistoric upland settlements there must have played an important role in the overall
settlement and subsistence patterns throughout prehistory. Data from these disturbed
upland sites can be used to study trends in settlement location choices, rising or declining
numbers of sites in different periods, raw material use (especially for diagnostic stone
points), reoccupation of particular locations, and other research questions (Canouts and
Goodyear 1985). Some of the data from this survey may eventually be useful in studies
of the late prehistoric early historic settlement patterns for instance. In many cases, most
of these data can be recorded during the initial survey and analysis.
In the case of historic sites the most relevant archaeological criterion is also "D",
and we must ask whether these historic-period sites have the potential to produce
significant information and new insights on the region's history.

20

SUMMARY
Based on the review of records at the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology,
Office of Survey and Planning, State Cemetery Survey and North Carolina Archives it is
evident that settlement and related activities spanning several millennia are present in the
vicinity of the Baird Cove Tract. The landscape is consistent with site location models
indicating that prehistoric archaeological sites are likely to be identified on upland flats,
and terraces near the confluence of creeks and rivers as well as spring-heads. The flood
plain and adjacent terraces are landforms frequently associated with Woodland period
remains. Several sites of this period have already been identified near by adjacent to the
French Broad River and its tributaries. The majority of sites are likely to be identified on
the upland ridges and saddles.
This same tract highlights the settlement pattern of the region by Europeans and
African-Americans beginning in the mid-18t" century. The availability of land grants and
patents give an opportunity to reconstruct the likely owners of potential remains on the
tract. Though no mills have been previously recorded on this tract it is possible that
small family operated ones may have once been present.
Recommendations
Since the sites identified are relatively recent in age and heavily impacted by
flooding we do not feel they are eligible for nomination to the National Register of
Historic Places. However detailed recording may be beneficial. In addition, these sites
and any others in identified along this stretch of Baird Creek are likely to be protected y
falling within the stream buffer.
The limited availability of geological survey information in the area, specifically
Buncombe County, make it difficult to identify potential areas. By undertaking this as a
`Due Diligence' study the majority of sites will be identified and development plans can
take them into account from the outset.
If illegal excavation or vandalism of archaeological sites is observed, or if
unrecorded cultural resources and remains are encountered during project clearing and/or
construction, the developer and/or its agents should immediately contact the following
representatives of the NC Office of State Archaeology:
Human Remains and /or Unmarked Graves - Dr. Steve Claggett, State Archaeologist,
NC Office of State Archaeology, Raleigh, 919.733.7342

21

•
Z
E
0
0
0
m
m
Z
E
0
0
0
m
M
o
0
0
n
m
z
E
°o
M
Z
E
0
0
0
m
m
:7
TC~P4! map printed on 02/02/06 from "North Carolina,tpo" and "Untitled,tpg"
~7ooomE, 358000., E, s59ooar7,E, NAD27 Zone 17S 361000„E
~`~'~ ~ ~~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "~ .~ ~,y~~ - ; ~' =areas of potential site identification
t ~ ~ t °: ti•
t~ ~ ,~; i Yawn ~ ,•~ ~,\l'i ~ i ~_ '~ F~S.~L-^- ,~ -. ~'' '
~2s~` __ ~ ~-•` ~ ' ~- ~ _ -
p ney~Y oti '~ c:apps Cam: '~~ ) ~ `,r..~, `~ ~.i -. ~«
ryt.- ~ ~,'' Stoney Knob J `u _i' ~r~ ~. •~7 ~~ YY a~i lone t~p© ~~ ' ~,r ~r
~ ~r M ~.- I ~Y.I t - Q
a ~ • s*iV7~{, ~ ~
.~.; " ~ ~' r-'
`` ~ i ~ _ _``"' ~ ~--- a~ t~
~' ~ 5'r 'i<. l Ai \5 Y~fi.~ /.f~ ~ i~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~T ., +~` ~ .(<<. ~Q~~`Jt~ ~,~'°~,*r ~ A~'~
f ~ 1.~ / ~' ~,1 h it ~'i _ ~//} ,~~ ,.Y 1 ~ ~t ~ ~ ~ b)
h Qv '' ~ ~' r w ~ / !~ Cl ~~ ~ -~ ~ f ..rr if ~ ~`'' ~t I I ~ t~~.~5' (~ '~~i.
( ~ fJ 1 1
- .l ~ ~ ',sue rtiJ i e~ ~ ~ ' ~~ i ~ ~~wti ('- ~ ~ i ) 4 ~ ay'~ ~~~~~~ ,~~" ~'
ti
J 1 ~ ~~ ~ I s
_ (y 0;
~~ r ~. ~ --'_r`~. h u _ ~L •1f ~ 6~J ~~1,, X111, ~ ~~ ~! ~~,~ ~fr~+:t..
~~ ~ i -~ .' ~ ~ ~ is u;~'~ ~ ~/
22 ,(~~ ~ 4;:r ~ ~ l ~ .r rti~ti• Jig ~~ ~ ~ i r ~ a y a ~
ry ~~ : ~ f ~ ~. ~ ~ ! ~ _ ~ -
yj~-y / v ~ ~ ~ i 1f~{ ~ , ~ ~^ , ~ 7,- ,~ ~
~` ~ 1 ~ ' t~trr'' 11 i f !'~ ~ ,
~ ~ ~~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ P i ~ ~i r / ~ a ate, .. ~ -1' ~~r 9 ~~
~'r'"~~~~~ '"y'~'' r4 r/~Cs ~, ~ ~ ~~ //' ~'~/_/ '1 ~1 Jj !~ f~~ F ~~ f Jlf~s Y`~~ 1'
r I ~ I ~,1_ ,~y7a {rte - ' :'~1~~' f r~ ±-~ { '!f ` tft
` ~~~'~~'` ~ ~ off ~"~~~ ~~~r~ ;~~~.~ .} ~ -} Ir ~ ;_ ~, L.J~' "!r ,r~ 4 .~` ~~~~.S~i i ,"1,,
~ ~ t l ~ ~ ~~, ~ .. ! f r/ ~ ~ ~ ~ w,. ~ / h . f .,
-y8t~~rfc~~ --- r. 1' ' %'N ~ ~Sr = r { ~ ~~ ~~~ e~~ f ~~~ ~~~ ~. ~' ~ IJ~ a ti, I ~ ~ :~i~~ l!~~~ f~~
~ + ~ Be ~ 1.` `~ W c ~ n - ~ ~ .~ ' ~ i
~< _ ~ ~ ~~~
~~: i y, f ~ ~ i`P`~ ~n ~tti ice; ~~ ' ~ - 5 ~ }~l. ~~~ ~ ~_. ~' , '7~ i i~ "`° %e7
fi~ /~ ~ f/vf"- ~ s~ ~~r~ `~ ~ ~ "~ t - ~ti
,'"` ~iEit11.
Figure ??. Approximate location of Baird Cove Road tract. -:~~~ ~" ~, ',~
3570DOmE, 358oo0mE, ~'5yuuumt, IVHUG/ LVfIC lip ~ol,,,.,,~„i
MN TN ~ •5 ~ Pr111E
60~ ®qpq FEEI U 50U =DElEi hsGTE~S
Printed from TOPOI m2001 National Geagraplwc Holdings {www.topo.com)
Z
E
7
7
7~
h
Z
E
7
b
Z
E
0
0
n
m
Z
E
0
0
m
m
Z
E
°o
0
In
M
23

REFERENCES CITED
Adams, Percy G.
1980 Travelers and travel liars, 1660-1800. Dover Publications, New York.
Anderson, David G.
1989 The Mississippian in South Carolina. In "Studies in South Carolina
Archaeology: Essays in Honor of Robert L. Stephenson." Edited by
Albert C. Goodyear, III, Glen T. Hanson. University of South Carolina,
Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, Anthropological Studies 9.
Anonymous
n.d. a The Garden of the Waxhaws and the Historic Waxhaw Settlement. n.p.,
n.p. North Carolina Collection, University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill.
Anonymous
n.d. b Waxhaw, North Carolina: Historic Southwest Corner of Union County.
n.p., n.p. North Carolina Collection, University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill.
Brown, Jane Douglas Summers
1966 The Catawba Indians: the people of the river. University of South
w Carolina Press, Columbia.
Caldwell, Joseph R.
1958 Trend and tradition in the prehistory of the eastern United States.
American Anthropological Association, Memoir 88.
Carpenter, P. Albert
1972 Gold resources of North Carolina. North Carolina Department of Natural
and Economic Resources, Information Circular 21.
Coe, Joffre L.
1964 The formative cultures of the Carolina Piedmont. Transactions of the
American Philosophical Society 54(5):1-130.
Cooper, P. P., II
1977 Historic and prehistoric Archaeological Resources Survey of Union
County 201 Facilities Plan Sites, Interceptors, and Other Lines, Union
County, North Carolina. Ms. On file with the Museum of Anthropology,
Catawba College, Salisbury, North Carolina.
Daniels, R.B., H.J. Kleiss, S.W. Buol, H.J. Byrd, and J.A. Phillips
1984 Soil systems in North Carolina. North Carolina State University,
North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, Bulletin 467.
27

•
Derrick, B.B., and S.O. Perkins
1916 Soil Survey of Union County, North Carolina. United States Department
of Agriculture.
Edwards, B. R.
2003 Site extent Identification and Delineation at 31 UN203, Twelvemile
Creek, Union County, North Carolina. A report submitted to GS Carolina
(LLC), Charlotte, NC
Edwards, I, B. and B. R. Edwards
2001 An Archaeological Survey (Phase I) of the development tract on
Twelvemile Creek and Waxhaw-Marvin Road, Union County, North
Carolina. A report submitted to Starwood Carolina (LLC), Charlotte, NC
Fisher, F. W.
1976a Archaeological Impact Assessment: Sewage Treatment Plant, Twelvemile
Creek, Union County, North Carolina. Ms. on file with Department of
Sociology and Anthropology,. University of North Carolina, Charlotte.
1976b Archaeological Impact Assessment: proposed Wastewater Treatment
Plant Site, Twelvemile Creek, Union County, North Carolina. Ms. On file
with Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of North
Carolina, Charlotte.
Gheesling, F.A., Jr., P.H. Garrow, G.M. Watson, and D. Ettman
1979 Archaeological, Botanical, and Wildlife Survey: Proposed 201
Wastewater Treatment Facilities, Waxah (Union County), North Carolina.
Ms. On file with the Office of State Archaeology, Raleigh, NC.
Hargrove, Thomas
1991 An archaeological survey of proposed improvements on the Gastonia
sewer system, Gaston County, North Carolina. Robert J. Goldstein and
Associates.
1996a An Archaeological survey of the proposed Twelvemile Creek interceptor,
Waxhaw vicinity, Union County, North Carolina (ER 95-7342). Ms. on
file with the Office of State Archaeology, Raleigh, NC.
1996b An Archaeological test excavation of 31UN203, Waxhaw vicinity, Union
County, North Carolina. Ms. on file with the Office of State Archaeology,
Raleigh, NC.

28

Hobbs, Samuel Huntington, Jr.
1930 North Carolina: economic and social. University of North Carolina
Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Hofmann, Margaret M.
1982 Colony of North Carolina, 1735-1764: abstracts of land patents.
Roanoke News, Weldon, North Carolina.
Holm, Mary Ann, and Lautzenheiser, Loretta
2000 Cultural resources assessment and archaeological survey, proposed sewer
line, tributary of West Fork Twelvemile Creek new Newtown, Union
County, North Carolina. Ms. on file with the Office of State Archaeology,
Raleigh, NC.
Hudson, Charles
1976 The Southeastern Indians. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.
Hudson, Charles, Chester DePratter, and Marvin Smith
1981 The route of Juan Pardo's exploration in the interior southeast, 1566-1568.
Ms. on file, Department of Anthropology, University of Georgia, Athens.
H.Y.G.
1989 Waxhaw: 1889 - 1989. Waxhaw Centennial Committee, Waxhaw,
• North Carolina.
Keel, Bennie C.
1990 Salvage archaeology at the Hardins site, 31 Gs29, Gaston County, North
Carolina. Southern Indian Studies 39:1-17.
Keeler, Robert Winston
1971 An archaeological survey of the upper Catawba River valley. Honors
thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill.
Lederer, John
1672 The discoveries of John Lederer, in three several marches from Virginia,
to the west of Carolina, and other parts of the continent: begun in March
1669, and ended in September 1670. Reprinted by Readex Microprint,
1966.
Lefler, Hugh T. (editor)
1967 A New Voyage to Carolina (by John Lawson). University of North
Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
•
29

Louder, Darrell
1964 Appendices to the Survey and Classification of the Catawba River and
Tributaries, North Carolina. North Carolina Wildlife Resources
Commission, Raleigh, North Carolina.
May, Alan
1989 Archaeological Excavations at the Crowders Creek Site (31GS55): a Late
Woodland Farmstead in the Catawba River valley, Gaston County, North
Carolina. Southern Indian Studies 38:23-48.
1991 An Archaeological Survey Reconnaissance of Lake Park Subdivision,
Crooked Creek Watershed, Union County, North Carolina. Report
submitted to Mathison Land Company, Indian Trail, North Carolina.
Mountjoy, Joseph B.
1989 Early radiocarbon dates from a site on the Pee Dee -Siouan frontier in the
Piedmont of central North Carolina. Southern Indian Studies 38.
Munsey, Cecil
1970 The Illustrated Guide to Collecting Bottles. Hawthorn Books, New York.
National Park Service
1991 Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms. National Register
Bulletin 16.
Nitze, Henry B., and George B. Hanna
1896 Gold deposits of North Carolina. North Carolina Geological Survey,
Bulletin 3.
North Carolina Geological Survey
1985 Geologic map of North Carolina. Department of Natural Resources and
Community Development, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Perkinson, Phil H.
1973 North Carolina fluted projectile points -survey report number two.
Southern Indian Studies 25:3-60.
Pickens, Suzanne
1990 "Sweet Union: " An Architectural and Historical Survey of Union County,
North Carolina. Union County Board of Commissioners, et al., Monroe,
North Carolina.
Powell, William S.
1968 The North Carolina Gazetteer. University of North Carolina Press,
Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
30

Redwine, John M.
1925 Union County Rich in Historical Heritage. Monroe Journal, October 23,
1925.
Reid, James Jefferson
1967 Pee Dee pottery from the mound at Town Creek. M.A. thesis, Department
of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Simpkins, Daniel L., and Roy S. Dickens, Jr.
1985 First phase investigations of late aboriginal settlement systems in the Eno,
Haw, and Dan River drainages, North Carolina. Ms. on file, Research
Laboratories of Anthropology, University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill.
Sharpe, Bill
1958 Anew geography of North Carolina (vol. 2). Sharpe Publishing
Company, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Soil Systems Incorporated
1979 Archaeological, Botanical, and Wildlife Survey, Proposed 201 Wastewater
Treatment Facilities, Waxhaw, North Carolina. Soil Systems, Inc.,
Marietta, Georgia.
• Stephens, Ronald B.
1996 Soil Survey of Union County, North Carolina. United States Department
of Agriculture.
Swanton, John R.
1946 The Indians of the Southeastern United States. Smithsonian Institution,
Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 137.
Roberts, Bruce
1982 The Carolina Gold Rush, America's First. McNally and Loftin Publishers,
Charlotte, North Carolina.
Trimble, Stanley W.
1974 Man-induced Soil erosion on the Southern Piedmont, 1700-1970. Soil
Conservation Society of America, Iowa.
Walden, H. Nelson
1964 History of Union County. Heritage Printers, Inc., Charlotte, North
Carolina.
•
31

• Ward, Trawick
1965 Correlation of Mississippian Sites and Soil Types. Southeastern
Archaeological Conference Bulletin 3.
1983 A Review of Archaeology in the North Carolina Piedmont: A Study of
Change. In The Prehistory of North Carolina: an Archaeological
Symposium, edited by Mark A. Mathis and Jeffrey J. Crow. North
Carolina Division of Archives and History, Raleigh.
Ward, Trawick, and Joffre L. Coe
1976 Final report: an archaeological evaluation of the Falls of the Neuse
reservoir. Ms. on file, Research Laboratories of Anthropology, University
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Willey, Gordon
1966 An introduction to North American archaeology: volume 1, North and
Middle America. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs.
•
•
32