20210764 Ver 1_UPDATE PCN_20210812

Strickland, Bev
From: Danielle Clark <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2021 2:47 PM
To: Johnson, Alan; Steve Kichefski
Cc: Matt Bramblett; Todd Simmons; Brock Hennings
Subject: RE: [External] RE: SAW-2021-01215 / DWR #21-0764 - Doosan Plant Expansion
Attachments: Updated PJD Request & PCN - Doosan Plant Expansion (SAW-2021-01215).pdf
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Hi Alan,
Please find the attached Updated PJD Request & PCN package that was resubmitted on 7/30. I'm not sure why it didn't
come through to you — please confirm receipt of this just to make sure you got it. We believe that this submittal
addresses your avoidance and minimization comments, and the stream calls have been revised in this submittal. Please
let us know if you have questions/comments, or require additional information.
Thanks!
Danielle
1111
Danielle Clark, PWS
Senior Project Environmental Scientist
Hart & Hickman, PC
3921 Sunset Ridge Rd, Suite 301, Raleigh, NC 27607
Direct: 704-526-2048 • Mobile: [phone]
www.harthickman.com I El MI
*Please note my change in address
From: Johnson, Alan <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2021 2:40 PM
To: Danielle Clark <[e-mail]>; Steve Kichefski <[e-mail]>
Cc: Matt Bramblett <[e-mail]>; Todd Simmons <[e-mail]>; Brock Hennings
<[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE: SAW-2021-01215 / DWR #21-0764 - Doosan Plant Expansion
We had questions about avoidance and minimization and also some changes to the stream
calls at the site. I haven't received any comments back from the site visit in July or the email I
sent on June 23rd
Thanks
Alan J
1

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Alan D Johnson — Senior Environmental Specialist
NC Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources (NCDENR)
Division of Water Resources - Water Quality Regional Operations
610 East Center Ave., Suite 301, Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation.
From: Danielle Clark [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 11:29 AM
To: Johnson, Alan <[e-mail]>; Steve Kichefski <[e-mail]>
Cc: Matt Bramblett <[e-mail]>; Todd Simmons <[e-mail]>; Brock Hennings
<BrockH @omegaconstruction.com>
Subject: [External] RE: SAW-2021-01215 / DWR #21-0764 - Doosan Plant Expansion
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Hi Steve and Alan,
Good morning. I just wanted to check in on your review for this project to see if we could answer questions or provide
additional information. Feel free to give me a call on my cell number below if needed.
Thank you and looking forward to hearing from you,
Danielle
Danielle Clark, PWS
Senior Project Environmental Scientist
Hart & Hickman, PC
3921 Sunset Ridge Rd, Suite 301, Raleigh, NC 27607
Direct: 704-526-2048 • Mobile: [phone]
www.harthickman.com 003
*Please note my change in address
From: Danielle Clark
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2021 4:08 PM
To: Kichefski, Steven L CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Johnson, Alan
<[e-mail]>
Cc: Matt Bramblett <[e-mail]>; Todd Simmons <[e-mail]>; Brock Hennings
<BrockH @omegaconstruction.com>
Subject: SAW-2021-01215 / DWR #21-0764 - Doosan Plant Expansion
Steve & Alan,
2

Good afternoon. Please find the attached Updated PJD Request & PCN package for the Doosan Plant Expansion project
in Statesville, NC (SAW-2021-01215 / DWR #21-0764).
As you can imagine, the Section 404/401 permits are critical to the project's timely and pending commencement. We
appreciate your help, and we are here to answer questions or provide additional information needed during your review
to expedite this process as possible.
Thank you and enjoy your weekend!
Danielle
Danielle Clark, PWS
Senior Project Environmental Scientist
Hart & Hickman, PC
3921 Sunset Ridge Rd, Suite 301, Raleigh, NC 27607
Direct: 704-526-2048 • Mobile: [phone]
www.harthickman.com 003
*Please note my change in address
3

hart ''19 hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
Sent Via Email
July 30, 2021
US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District — Charlotte Regulatory Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive, Suite 615
Charlotte, North Carolina 28262
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources — Water Quality Regional Operations
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Attn: Mr. Steve Kichefski and Mr. Alan Johnson
Re: Updated Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request &
Updated Pre -Construction Notification
SAW-2021-01215
DWR #21-0764
Doosan Plant Expansion
1405 Glenway Drive
Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina
H&H Job No. OME-001
Dear Steve and Alan:
On behalf of Clark Equipment Co., please find the enclosed updated and supplemental documents
associated with a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) and Pre -Construction Notification
(PCN) for the above -referenced Doosan Plant Expansion project (SAW-2021-01215 / DWR #21-
0764). The documents have been updated to address comments received from you during our PJD site
visit on July 6, 2021. The following documents have been updated and/or supplemented:
• Appendix 2 — PJD Form
• Aquatic Resources Upload Spreadsheet
• Preliminary Wetland Delineation Map
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100 3921 Sunset Ridge Rd , Suite 301
Charlotte, NC 28203 Raleigh, NC 27607 www.harthickman.com
704.586.0007 main 919.847A241 main

Mr. Steve Kichefski
Mr. Alan Johnson
July 30, 2021
Page 2
• PCN Form
• Site Plans prepared by Freeland & Kauffman Inc. dated July 26, 2021
• Avoidance and Minimization document
• Responses from US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) and North Carolina State Historic
Preservation Office (NC SHPO) regarding their review of the site
The developer is proposing to expand the existing Doosan Portable Power facility that is located to the
south of the Site. The facility will be expanded northwards to the subject Site. Based on
recommendations provided by you during our PJD site visit, the Site plan has been revised, and the
developer is currently proposing to impact approximately 0.017 acre of on -Site stream channel and
approximately 0.113 acre of on -Site wetland area to facilitate the development of the facility
expansion. This is a significant reduction in impacts compared to our June 4, 2021 PCN submittal.
The proposed impacts are as follows:
• Impact #1 — approximately 80 linear feet (0.002 acre) to the intermittent portion of Stream
Channel "C" (SCC) in the southwestern portion of the site
• Impact #2 — approximately 97 linear feet (0.002 acre) to the perennial portion of SCC in the
southwestern portion of the site
• Impact #3 — approximately 0.004 acre to Wetland Area "C" (WAC) in the southwestern
portion of the site
• Impact #4 — approximately 0.029 acre to Wetland area `B" (WAB) in the southwestern
portion of the site
• Impact #5 — approximately 0.080 acre to Wetland Area "D" (WAD) in the southwestern
portion of the site
• Impact #6 — approximately 271 linear feet (0.013 acre) to the intermittent portion of Stream
Channel "E" (SCE) in the northwestern portion of the site
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Omega Construction
(OME)/Glenway Dr (OME.001)/Permitting/PCN Updates/Cover Letter - Copy.doc

Mr. Steve Kichefski
Mr. Alan Johnson
July 30, 2021
Page 3
As recommended by you, French drains have been added to the site plan to facilitate continued
hydrology into SCC, WAB, and WAD, and a stormwater pipe has been added to the site plan to
facilitate continued hydrology into SCE where impacts are proposed. Additional information
regarding the impacts proposed above is provided in the attached Avoidance and Minimization
document.
Mitigation for wetland impacts is proposed via the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
(DMS) In -Lieu Fee Program. Based on the North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method (NC WAM),
the wetland quality of WAB and WAD is high, and the wetland quality of WAC is medium. Based on
the overall results of the NC WAM, the proposed mitigation ratio for wetland impacts is 2:1. The
current Wilmington District Regional Conditions for Nationwide Permit #39 require mitigation for
stream impacts greater than 0.02 acre. Because stream impacts are not greater than 0.02-acre, stream
mitigation is not proposed.
H&H is seeking a PJD and Nationwide Permit #39 verification for this development.
Should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact Danielle
Clark at 518-598-2862.
Sincerely,
Hart and Hickman, PC
114e4ille
Matt Bramblett, PE
Principal
Attachments
Danielle Clark, PWS
Sr. Project Environmental Scientist
cc: Mr. Brock Hennings, PE, Omega Construction (via Email)
Mr. Todd Simmons, PE, Freeland & Kauffman Inc. (via Email)
Ad
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Omega Construction
(OME)/Glenway Dr (OME.001)/Permitting/PCN Updates/Cover Letter - Copy.doc

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: May 2021
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Danielle Clark (H&H) 3921 Sunset Ridge Rd, Suite 301 Raleigh, NC 27607
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: SAW-2021-01215
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Iredell City: Statesville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.818013 Long.:-80.864028
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Unnamed tributary of Fourth Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑■ Field Determination. Date(s): 7/6/2021
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
SCA
35.567466
-80.538174
+/- 961 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
SCB
35.815890
-80.867505
+/- 142 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
SCC (Per)
35.815867
-80.866833
+/- 340 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
SCC (int)
-35.815867
-80.866091
+/- 80 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
SCD
35.816433
-80.866750
+/- 147 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
SCE (Per)
35.818793
-80.865413
+/- 626 If
Non -wetland
Section 404

Site Number
Latitude
Longitude
Estimated
amount of
aquatic
resource in
review area
Type of
aquatic
resource
Geographic
authority to
which the
aquatic
resource "may
be" subject
SCE (Int)
35.819420
-80.864582
+/- 271 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
SCF
35.816263
-80.866929
+/- 108 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
SCG
35.818570
-80.866035
+/- 258 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
WAA
35.816323
-80.867587
+/- 0.216 ac
Wetland
Section 404
WAB
35.816254
-80.866867
+/- 0.137 ac
Wetland
Section 404
WAC
35.815766
-80.866541
+/- 0.004 ac
Wetland
Section 404
WAD
35.816491
-80.866637
+/- 0.146 ac
Wetland
Section 404
WAE
35.816904
-80.866985
+/- 0.002 ac
Wetland
Section 404
WAF
35.818314
-80.866120
+/- 0.395 ac
Wetland
Section 404
WAG
35.817450
-80.866538
+/- 0.017 ac
Wetland
Section 404
WAH
35.818289
-80.865821
+/- 0.018 ac
Wetland
Section 404
Pond 'A'
35.817465
-80.866740
+/- 0.854 ac
Non -wetland
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:Preliminary Wetland Delineation Map prepared by H&H dated 7/26/2021
❑E Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Statesville West and East, 2013, 1:24,000
❑m Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey Version 3.1, 5/10/21
❑■ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS NWI Wetlands, 5/10/21
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑■ FEMA/FIRM maps: 3710474500J dated 3/18/08
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
❑■ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
or ❑■ Other (Name & Date): Site Photos, OME-001 5/14/21
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑■ Other information (please specify): Hard copy soil survey, Iredell County, 2011
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
b.,"ae. cep
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Waters —Name
State
Cowardin_Code
HGM_Code Meas_Type
Amount I Units
Waters_ I yE
SCA
NORTH CAROLINA
R5
Linear
961 FOOT
A2TRIBPER
SCB
NORTH CAROLINA
R4
Linear
142 FOOT
A2TRIBINT
SCC (Perennial)
NORTH CAROLINA
R5
Linear
340 FOOT
A2TRIBPER
SCC (Intermittent)
NORTH CAROLINA
R4
Linear
80 FOOT
A2TRIBINT
SCD
NORTH CAROLINA
R5
Linear
147 FOOT
A2TRIBPER
SCE (Perennial)
NORTH CAROLINA
R5
Linear
626 FOOT
A2TRIBPER
SCE (Intermittent)
NORTH CAROLINA
R4
Linear
271 FOOT
A2TRIBINT
SCF
NORTH CAROLINA
R5
Linear
108 FOOT
A2TRIBPER
SCG
NORTH CAROLINA
R4
Linear
258 FOOT
A2TRIBINT
WAA
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
Area
0.216 ACRE
MWETABUT
WAB
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
Area
0.137 ACRE
MWETABUT
WAC
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
Area
0.004 ACRE
MWETABUT
WAD
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
Area
0.146 ACRE
MWETABUT
WAE
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
Area
0.002 ACRE
MWETABUT
WAF
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
Area
0.395 ACRE
MWETABUT
WAG
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
Area
0.017 ACRE
MWETABUT
WAH
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
Area
0.018 ACRE
MWETABUT
Pond 'A'
NORTH CAROLINA
L1
Area
0.854 ACRE
AKPIFLOW

NWPR_Determine_Code I L
Local —Waterway
35.56746600
-80.53817400
35.81589000
-80.86750500
35.81586700
-80.86683300
35.81582200
-80.86609100
35.81643300
-80.86675000
35.81871100
-80.86507800
35.81930100
-80.86464000
35.81626300
-80.86692900
35.81857000
-80.86603500
35.81632300
-80.86758700
35.81625400
-80.86686700
35.81576600
-80.86654100
35.81649100
-80.86663700
35.81690400
-80.86698500
35.81831400
-80.86612000
35.81745000
-80.86653800
35.81828900
-80.86582100
35.81746500
-80.86674000

r _ f
POTENTIAL (NON -WETLAND) WATERS OF THE U.S. (SCE)
I ' 'l ,
-:',
POTENTIAL (NON -WETLAND) WATERS OF THE U.S. (SCG)
0 vl_"s
+� +,
POTENTIAL WETLAND WATERS OF THE U.S. (WAF)
POTENTIAL (NON -WETLAND)
WATERS OF THE U.S. (POND "A")
POTENTIAL WETLAND
OF THE U.S. (WAE)
POTENTIAL WETLAND WATERS
OF THE U.S. (WAA)
POTENTIAL (NON -WETLAND)
WATERS OF THE U.S. (SCB)
POTENTIAL (NON -WETLAND)
WATERS OF THE U.S. (SCA)
Legend
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
H&H IDENTIFIED POTENTIALLY JURISDICTIONAL PERENNIAL STREAM
H&H IDENTIFIED POTENTIALLY JURISDICTIONAL INTERMITTENT STREAM
0 H&H IDENTIFIED POTENTIALLY JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND
0 H&H IDENTIFIED POTENTIALLY JURISDICTIONAL POND
TEST PIT
ENTIAL WETLAND WATERS OF THE U.S.
POTENTIAL WETLAND WATERS
OF THE U.S. (WAG)
' POTENTIAL WETLAND WATERS
OF THE U.S. (WAD) J
POTENTIAL (NON -WETLAND)
WATERS OF THE U.S. (SCD)
POTENTIAL WETLAND WATERS OF THE U.S.
POTENTIAL (NON -WETLAND) WATERS OF THE U.S. (SCF)
17
f
POTENTIAL (NON -WETLAND) POTENTIAL WETLAND WATERS OF THE U.S. (WAC)
WATERS OF THE U.S. (SCC)-V.P -.
POTENTIAL JURISDICTIONAL STREAM CHANNEL
STREAM CHANNEL ID
APPROXIMATE LENGTH (LF)
STREAM CHANNEL "A" (SCA)
961
STREAM CHANNEL "B" (SCB)
142
STREAM CHANNEL "C" (SCC)
80 (INTERMITTENT)
STREAM CHANNEL "C" (SCC)
340 (PERENNIAL)
STREAM CHANNEL "D" (SCD)
147
STREAM CHANNEL "E" (SCE)
626 (PERENNIAL)
STREAM CHANNEL "E" (SCE)
271 (INTERMITTENT)
STREAM CHANNEL "F" SCF
108
STREAM CHANNEL "G" (SCG)
258
ON -SITE STREAM TOTAL
2,933
POTENTIAL JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AREA
WETLAND AREA ID
APPROXIMATE AREA (ACRES)
WETLAND AREA "A" (WAA)
0.216
WETLAND AREA "B" (WAB)
0.137
WETLAND AREA "C" (WAC)
0.004
WETLAND AREA "D" (WAD)
0.146
WETLAND AREA"E" WAE
0.002
WETLAND AREA "F" (WAF)
0.395
WETLAND AREA "G" (WAG)
0.017
WETLAND AREA "H" (WAH)
0.018
ON -SITE WETLAND TOTAL
0.935
POTENTIAL JURISDICTIONAL POND
POND ID APPROXIMATE AREA (ACRES)
*
POND "A" 0.854
I
NOTE:
I�
1. SC -STREAM CHANNEL
LF - LINEAR FEET
i
WA - WETLAND AREA
II�
2. DELINEATION COMPLETED BY H&H ON 3/30/21 AND
I ,
I
4/1/21
!!!!
3. SIZE & LOCATIONS OF SITE FEATURES ARE
APPROXIMATE AND WERE OBTAINED USING
ATRIMBLE GPS UNIT
4. THE FIGURE REFLECTS FIELD CHANGES MADE DURING
A PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
(PJD) SITE VISIT WITH THE US ARMY CORPS OF
ENGINEERS AND THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DIVISION OF WATER
f 4
t1
RESOURCES (DEQ DWR) ON 7/6/21.
APPROXIMATE
0 275 550
SCALE IN FEET
-, TITLE PRELIMINARY WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
C
PROJECT
GLENWAY DRIVE
.!•
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
2923 South Tryon Street, Ste. 100
'%w hickman Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
hart'
P. 704-586-0007 (p) 704-586-0373 (f)
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
6A.
DATE: 7/26/2021 REVISION NO. 1
JOB NO. OME-001
FIGURE NO. 2

a`'pF wArE�Q�
C, vlllt:� Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes X❑ No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Doosan Plant Expansion
2b.
County:
Iredell
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Statesville
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Clark Equipment Co.
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
2808-1560
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Lance Mathern for Clark Equipment Co.
3d.
Street address:
1293 Glenway Drive
3e.
City, state, zip:
Statesville, NC 28625
3f.
Telephone no.:
701-799-8813
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
Same as owner above
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Danielle Clark, PWS
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Hart & Hickman, PC
5c.
Street address:
3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Suite 301
5d.
City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27607
5e.
Telephone no.:
518-598-2862
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
4745774735.000
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.818013 Longitude:-80.864028
1 c.
Property size:
62 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Unnamed tributary of Fourth Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C (Fourth Creek)
2c.
River basin:
Yadkin PeeDee
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The Site consists of one parcel of land located at 1405 Glenway Drive in Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina. The Site consists primarily as
vacant undeveloped land with an utility easement in the western portion of the Site. A dairy farm formerly operated on the Site. A school and
residences are located to the north; I-77 and undeveloped land are located to the east; and industrial uses are located to the south and west.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.935
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 2,933
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project proposes to expand the existing Doosan Plant (1293 Glenway Drive) northwards onto the subject Site.
3e.
The
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
planned development area will be graded with heavy equipment to prepare level building pads. Stormwater BMPs are included.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project includin all prior phases in the past?
0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: A PJD site visit was conducted on 7/6/21.
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
0 Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Julia McGuire and Danielle Clark
Agency/Consultant Company: Hart & Hickman, PC
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
A PJD site visit was conducted with Steve Kichefski (Corps) and Alan Johnson (DEQ DWR) on 7/6/21. PJD documentation has not been issued yet.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
0 Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
Additional development on the site is planned; however, future development will occur solely in upland areas.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.004
W2 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.029
W3 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.08
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.113
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Fill
SCC - Intermittent
INT
Corps
1
80
S2 P
Fill
SCC - Perennial
PER
Corps
1
97
S3 P
Fill
SCE - Intermittent
INT
Corps
2
271
S4 -
Choose one
S5 -
Choose one
S6 -
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
448
3i. Comments:
The stream impacts total approximately 0.017 acre. The stream widths listed above represent the impacted areas of the stream channel.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B 1
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See Attachment
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See Attachment
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑X Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a.
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑X Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.226 acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments: 0.226 acres = 0.113 acre of impact at a 2:1 mitigation ratio
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes X❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
N/A
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
N/A
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
The
site will utilize an underground storm drainage system to convey stormwater to one of two new wet detention facilities that have been designed to
meet City of Statesville requirements.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Statesville
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
City of Statesville
❑X Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑X Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑X Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑X Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed site plan will develop the majority of the parcel. Future upland development is planned; however, no additional impacts to Waters of the
U.S.
are planned or proposed.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater
will enter City of Statesville sanitary sewer infrastructure and will be piped to an off -site City of Statesville wastewater treatment plant.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes 0 No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
0 Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
DEQ Natural Heritage Program and Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) on-line databases and on -Site reconnaissance. A response letter from FWS is
provided in the Attachments.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes 0 No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes 0 No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
The National Registry of Historic Places and NC State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) databases and on -Site reconnaissance. A response letter
from SHPO is provided in the Attachments.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes 0 No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Reviewed FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map ID #3710474500J
U",e_
Danielle Clark
07-27-2021
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.
Page 10 of 10

ROY COOPER
Governor
DIONNE DELLI-GATTI
Secretary
TIM BAUMGARTNER
Director
Lance Mathern
Clark Equipment Company
1293 Glenway Drive
Statesville, NC 28625
Project: Doosan Plant Expansion
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
June 1, 2021
Expiration of Acceptance: 12/1/2021
County: Iredell
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification within this time frame, this acceptance will
expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy
of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must
be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is
calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
8-di it HUC
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Yadkin
03040102
Riparian Wetland
0.39
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
FOR James. B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
cc: Danielle Clark, agent
D E Q North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street 1 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1652
NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental 0uall /`� 919.707.8976

SITE LEGEND
0 PROPOSED 24" CONCRETE CURB E GUTTER, SEE DETAILS
© END PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB E GUTTER WITH MIN. 10:1 VERTICAL CURB TAPER
© EDGE OF PAVEMENT
O EDGE OF CONCRETE
OE EDGE OF GRAVEL
SAW -CUT LINE
© TIE PROPOSED PAVEMENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, MATCH GRADE AND ALIGNMENT
OH 10' THICK COMPACTED ABC
(D RETAINING WALL, SEE PLANS BY OTHERS
OJ HANDICAPPED SPACE WITH SIGN, "VAN' INDICATES VAN ACCESSIBLE, SEE DETAILS
O PROPOSED 5' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK, SEE DETAILS
© 6 HEADER CURB
O DIRECTIONAL ACCESSIBLE RAMP
O 6' WIDE STANDARD CROSSWALK PER NCDOT 1205.07
O 24" PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGN (WII-2)
© TIE PROPOSED 24' CONC. CURB E GUTTER TO EXISTING,
® NOT USED
® TIE PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB E GUTTER TO ROADWAY WIDENING, PROVIDE
SMOOTH GUTTER PAN WIDTH TRANSITION AS NEEDED
SITE LEGEND
0 'STOP" SIGN (RI-1) E STOP BAR, SEE DETAILS
O PROPOSED GUARDRAIL
O TYPE I ACCESSIBLE RAMP IN CONCRETE SIDEWALK W/ DETECTABLE WARNING, SEE DETAILS
O NOT USED
0 6" PIPE BOLLARD, SEE DETAILS
O PROPOSED PUBLIC WATER EASEMENT
O TIE PROPOSED SIDEWALK TO EXISTING
OZ RELOCATED SITE SIGN.
AI PROPOSED SECURITY FENCING IN KIND WITH EXISTING.
BI TIE PROPOSED FENCE TO EXISTING
CI TIE PROPOSED FENCE TO BUILDING
DI GUIDERAIL, SEE DETAILS
EI 24' 'STOP' SIGN 0-0, SEE DETAILS
FI IF PAINTED WHITE WIDE STOP BAR
GI 12' WIDE DOUBLE -HUNG GATE
HI STRIPED ISLAND SWSL/4" ® 45' ® 2' O.C.
II STRIPED ISLAND SWSL/4" ®45° ®15' O.C,
6
\ EXISTING
PO7ND
/ \ .POND 'A' � \
PARCEL NUMBER: 474568115Z000
N/F ZNDUS INC / �a
s
DB 2683 PG 2218
ZONING: LI
WETLAND AREA
1E' (WAE)
/ /♦��P`S BUFFER
/ / ♦ L WETLAND AREA
'D' (WAD)
I \1
EXISTING IMPACT NO. 5 J
ETLAiNDS / ^^wo I WETLANDS IMPACT
CHANNEL) HA""� (WAD) �0.080 AC IMPACT NO' 4 'D' (SCD) - ---
WETLANDS IMPACT \
(WAB) 0.029 AC OPOSED BLFFER
1 I L IMPACT
/ WETLAND AREA
'A' (WAA)
0
EXISTING
WETLANDS
/ STREAM CHANNEL
'F (SCF) J
/ EXISTING 30'
WETLANDS
WETLAND AIT MAB)
REA
STREAM CHANNEL -
'B"
IMPACT NO. 2 IMPACT N0. I
a STREAM IMPACT
z (SCC-PERENNIAL) STREAM IMPACT
I w 1 w ♦ ` \ 97 LF= 0.002 AC 7 SF 80 ( LLFF * I FT = 80)SF
c �' . _ _= 0.002 AC
�
/ ♦ \ ` BUBO � I LIII
EXISTING '' I
4� OWN Nw— �
STREAM (TYP,) `
/ BUFFER
/ STREAM CHANNEL \ 416'12-
e�` •c (SCC) IMPACT NO. 3 WETLAND AREA
STREAM CHANNEL - / WETLANDS IMPACT `C" (WAC)
A" (SCA) (WAC) 0.004 AC J
8A0 PROPOa� a�
845 IMPACT
050 glZ,,y� 16' 16'
EXISTING BUILDING
HEAVY-DUTY
ASPHALT
000-o
G F B
HEAVY-DUTY
ASPHALT
II44T
WEDGING/MLLNG-------------------------
20'R Q
N
20'R
16'
JU O
G F
SITE PLAN NOTES
I, ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY OF STATESVILLE, NC
REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS,
2, CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND
DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS,
PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS,
3, ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE FOUR INCHES OF TOPSOIL, SOD AND WATER,
4, ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL
RADII ARE 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED
OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.
6, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED
TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS E POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED.
ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES SPECIFICATIONS AND
SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.
7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A SURVEY
PREPARED BY REGIONAL LAND SURVEYORS, INC.
8. ALL SIGN POSTS SHALL BE BREAKAWAY TYPE UNLESS LOCATED IN EMPLOYEE PARKING
AND DRIVE AREAS.
9. ALL PAVING MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH CURRENT NCDOT REQUIREMENTS
SITE
LEGEND
EXISTING
PROPOSED
DESCRIPTION
C
10
NUMBER OF SPACES
PER ROW
CURB S GUTTER
HANDICAP SYMBOL
°
SIGN
L�
CONCRETE PAVING
HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT
0 o-
0 o—
SECURITY FENCE
0-
PRIVACY/SECURITY FENCE
+
LIGHT POLE
NAATPI-1-1 lI F_ p —
d a'd° I'. e _ t
Z0' d d a. A d ..° e.. e
d " _.
SWSU4' .. , 4 d �@
a - e dC.. ea d a a. 4
wed' ep .p- ap d - ,,..n\.vnL.i_
de
° 2" DIP ° a d ad e ..
e a p.- ° a: - _ _ _ _ _ _�.d .
` - IEAVYCRETE -DUTY ' d a EXTERIOR DOCK W/ TXT
°R < ° c . ° - ' aa° d. < ° ,_ ° CON°..d : a. d �e (4) DOCK U_VEL62S. RE'
4.
Impact Summary Table
Impact Number
Feature
Stream Footage
(I F)
Stream Area (ac)
Wetland Area (ac)
1
SCC- Intermittent
80
0.002
--
2
SCC - Perennial
97
0.002
--
3
WAC
--
--
0.004
4
WAB
-
--
0.029
5
WAD
--
--
0.080
6
SCE - Intermittent
271
0.013
--
Subtotals
Perennial Impact
97
0.002
Intermittent
Impact
351
0.015
Totals
448
0.017
0.113
Overall Impact
Total to Waters
of the US (in
acres)
0.13
LIMITS OF EXPOSED
FOUNDATION
PC/ EXPANSION
GFA : +426,801
FIFE: 874.30'
d e _
° 4"
d
❑ —0
CI
U
I
0
co -
LQ m
Oco
Q tipLL_ I
UNLESS EXP2ESSLY AUTNNIZED
BY GENERAL CONT�ACTN, ALL
CONST2LCTION EQUIPMENT
USED ON THIS P�OLECT TO BE
MANUFACTL�ED BY DOOSAN,
STANDARD DUTY PAVING -
�'6X2
626g4784
S6842��
69z9
57�8,5�
68\
STANDARD DUTY PAVING -
-STANDARD STANDARD DUTY PAVING—
CI-0
ALWAYS
CALL
BEFORE YOU
DIG
o®o
EVERY DIGGING JOB REQUIRES A CALL — EVEN
SMALL PROJECTS LIKE PLANTING TREES OR
SHRUBS. IF YOU HIT AN UNDERGROUND UTILITY
LINE WHILE DIGGING, YOU CAN HARM YOURSELF
OR THOSE AROUND YOU, DISRUPT SERVICE TO
AN ENTIRE NEIGHBORHOOD AND POTENTIALLY BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR FINES AND REPAIR COSTS.
SMART DIGGING MEANS CALLING 811 BEFORE
EACH JOB. WHETHER YOU ARE A HOMEOWNER OR
A PROFESSIONAL EXCAVATOR, ONE CALL TO 811
GETS YOUR UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES
MARKED FOR FREE.
STANDARD DUTY PAVING —
!
I!
�I
w
�I
o
0
of
Qoa
LL'
o
I
I
I
SITE PLAN 2 OF 3
0 60 120
f, f2EVISIONS
BY
ZL
05-24-2021
CRD
ZL
05-26-2021
CRD
06-16-2021
CRD
06-24-2021
CRD
ZL
06-29-2021
CRD
ZL
07-26-2021
CRD
U
z
Q O
LL Q � �
LL > m
Q) Q Ln
Q O Q` 1 U
6 �
O U
NL a � } 0) Q
0 O
CO
U
� Z
o
''°^^'
CD
Q W
W W
DI
LL
e1 i II j1,
W
,�qj Fir b
07/26/2021
z O
O W
zU
Q Z
x �oN
LU LUC)z �mU
,z0
I0 0
z D1
z > ooLU Wo
Q c)oCO
LU QLLzco
0
Lu<�
�DI(f)
z Q 0 z
Q�
D
0 0
0 W
Q 0
0
DRAWN
CRD
CHECKED
BITS
DATE
05/12/21
SCALE
AS NOTED
SHEET

SITE LEGEND
O PROPOSED 24" CONCRETE CURB E GUTTER, SEE DETAILS
® END PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB E GUTTER WITH MIN, 10:1 VERTICAL CURB TAPER
© EDGE OF PAVEMENT
0 EDGE OF CONCRETE
OE EDGE OF GRAVEL
0 SAW -CUT LINE
© TIE PROPOSED PAVEMENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, MATCH GRADE AND ALIGNMENT
OH 10' THICK COMPACTED ABC
OI RETAINING WALL, SEE PLANS BY OTHERS
OJ HANDICAPPED SPACE WITH SIGN, 'VAN' INDICATES VAN ACCESSIBLE, SEE DETAILS
OK PROPOSED 5' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK, SEE DETAILS
© 6' HEADER CURB
0 DIRECTIONAL ACCESSIBLE RAMP
0 6' WIDE STANDARD CROSSWALK PER NCDOT 1205.07
OO 24' PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SIGN (WII-2)
© TIE PROPOSED 24' CONC. CURB E GUTTER TO EXISTING.
® NOT USED
® TIE PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB E GUTTER TO ROADWAY WIDENING, PROVIDE
SMOOTH GUTTER PAN WIDTH TRANSITION AS NEEDED
OS 'STOP' SIGN (RI -I) E STOP BAR, SEE DETAILS
O PROPOSED GUARDRAIL
O TYPE I ACCESSIBLE RAMP IN CONCRETE SIDEWALK W/ DETECTABLE WARNING, SEE DETAILS
O NOT USED
0 6' PIPE BOLLARD, SEE DETAILS
O PROPOSED PUBLIC WATER EASEMENT
0 TIE PROPOSED SIDEWALK TO EXISTING
0 RELOCATED SITE SIGN.
AI PROPOSED SECURITY FENCING IN KIND WITH EXISTING.
BI TIE PROPOSED FENCE TO EXISTING
CI TIE PROPOSED FENCE TO BUILDING
DI GUIDERAIL, SEE DETAILS
EI 24' 'STOP' SIGN (RI -I), SEE DETAILS
FI IF PAINTED WHITE WIDE STOP BAR
GI 12' WIDE DOUBLE -HUNG GATE
HI STRIPED ISLAND SWSL/4' ® 45' o 2' O.C.
II STRIPED ISLAND SWSL/4' ®45° 0 15' O,C,
6
Impact Summary Table
Impact Number
Feature
Stream Footage
(LF)
Stream Area (ac)
Wetland Area (ac)
1
SCC—Intermittent
80
0.002
--
2
SCC — Perennial
97
0.002
--
3
W AC
--
--
0.004
4
WAB
--
--
0.029
5
WAD
--
--
0.080
6
SCE — Intermittent
271
0.013
--
Subtotals
Perennial Impact
97
0.002
Intermittent
Impact
351
0.015
Totals
448
0.017
0.113
Overall Impact
Total to Waters
of the US (in
acres)
0.13
PARCEL NUMBER: 4745681152.000
N/F: ZNDUS INC
DB 2683 PG 2218
ZONING: LI
POND 'A'
SITE PLAN NOTES
I. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY OF STATESVILLE, NO
REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND
DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS,
PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.
3. ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE FOUR INCHES OF TOPSOIL, SOD AND WATER,
4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL
RADII ARE 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED
OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED
TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS Z POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED,
ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES SPECIFICATIONS AND
SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH, ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.
7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A SURVEY
PREPARED BY REGIONAL LAND SURVEYORS, INC,
8, ALL SIGN POSTS SHALL BE BREAKAWAY TYPE UNLESS LOCATED IN EMPLOYEE PARKING
AND DRIVE AREAS.
9. ALL PAVING MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH CURRENT NCDOT REQUIREMENTS.
SITE LEGEND
EXISTING PROPOSED DESCRIPTION
10 10 NUMBER OF SPACES
PE(2 ROW
CURB E GUTTER
HANDICAP SYMBOL
SIGN
CONCRETE PAVING
HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT
SECURITY FENCE
PRIVACY/SECURITY FENCE
LIGHT POLE
UNLESS EXP2ESSLY AUTNNIZED
BY GENERAL CONT�ACTN, ALL
CONST2LCTION EQUIPMENT
USED ON THIS P�OLECT TO BE
MANUFACTL�ED BY DOOSAN,
ALWAYS
CALL
BEFORE YOU
DIG
EVERY DIGGING JOB REQUIRES A CALL — EVEN
SMALL PROJECTS LIKE PLANTING TREES OR
SHRUBS. IF YOU HIT AN UNDERGROUND UTILITY
LINE WHILE DIGGING, YOU CAN HARM YOURSELF
OR THOSE AROUND YOU, DISRUPT SERVICE TO
AN ENTIRE NEIGHBORHOOD AND POTENTIALLY BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR FINES AND REPAIR COSTS.
SMART DIGGING MEANS CALLING 811 BEFORE
EACH JOB. WHETHER YOU ARE A HOMEOWNER OR
A PROFESSIONAL EXCAVATOR, ONE CALL TO 811
GETS YOUR UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES
MARKED FOR FREE.
SITE PLAN 3 OF 3
f, f2EVISIONS
BY
ZL
05-24-2021
CRD
ZL
05-26-2021
CRD
06-16-2021
CRD
06-24-2021
CRD
06-29-2021
CRD
07-26-2021
CRD
U
z
Q \Q) O
�
LL Q � �
LL > m
Q Ln
_o
a UD c Q
"0
__3 Cn U
3: COU
z
cq �
0 NO c
z (CI)
Q CD
LU
LU
DI
LL
C s �,_ �� 4 'f Y f��•'p �ArJ
07/26/2021
z O
O W
V J �
zU
Q z ��
n off°
x �oN
LU LLI �mU
,z0
�o O
z Z LU 0
0Q_j
Q c)o�\0 (� <LLZCO
LL
W<o0
z Q Ocnz
Q � �
z
U)
O 0
O W
O
O
DRAWN
CRD
CHECKED
BTS
DATE
05/12/21
SCALE
AS NOTED
SHEET
0 60 120
scaF r • 6o•

f`3'��
4-OZ, NEEDLE -PUNCHED,
NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE
(MIRAF1 140N OR S'IM.)
FULLY ENCASING STONE
FREE -DRAINING WASHED
STONE (#57 OR #67)
6-INCH-DIAMETER
PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE
WRAPPED IN NEEDLE -
PUNCHED, NON -WOVEN
G EOTEXTI LE. CRUSH -
PROOF PIPE MAY BE
REQUIRED UNDER
FOUNDATIONS AND
ROADWAYS

UNDIS7URSEI
EAR7H0/
COMP4C7E0FILI
WATER $ SANITARY SEWER LINES
N.T.S.
NOTE.' CL EARANCE BETWEEN PB'E AND TRENCH
WALL SHALL BEADEOU47F TOENABLESPECIFIED
COUPAC77aVBUTNOTLESS 7HAND. S
OVERFILL OR BACKFILL
EXCAVA710NLME
ASREQWRED
DD
COWACT/ONEACHSAX SAME
REQU/REAfENTAS R4UNCN
'LOWG FOUAVA71GV
MN. MIDDLEBEOD/NOLOOSRYPLACED
RIGID PIPE UACOMFACMDEXCEPTFOR TYPE4
N.T.S.
RCP 7RENCHINSTALLA TIONASTM C 1479
NOTE. MIN/MUM TRENCH WIDTH (T.W.) SHALL BE THEGREATER OF (f.25 0.D. + f27 OR (O.D. + 18 )
GENERAL NOTES
T.W.
O
BACKFILL
/N/TAAL
BAd(F/LL
NAl/NCN/NG
�d'BEDOMG
MN
FLE)(IBLEP/PE
N.T.S.
(NUPE) OR (PVC) OR (CUP > 4810)
1. BEDDING SHALL BE DUMPED CLASS FA WORKED BYHAND, OR CLASS FS
L1FT9bVACC0RO4NCEIM7HAS7MD898. CLASSFB,//NAND Nd MATERIALS SHALL
COMPACTED 7095%STANDARDPROCTOR. LOCAL CODEPERM1777NO W M
BECOMPAC7EDNEAROPTIMUMA/OIS7URECON7L-7VT. (t2%)
DEO7Er4Wlr4LENGINEERANDOWNERAPPROVAL,NATNESOILMAYBELOMFOR
B. F/LLSALVAGEDFROMEXCAVATIdVSHALLBEFREEOFDEBRIQORGAN/CSAND
BEDDINGPROVIDEDNAVEETS THEEMSEDA/ENTANDBACKFILL MATERALSBV TABLE
ROCKSLARGER 7HAN3:
1 EXCLUDING CLASS IV -A.
2. HAUNCH/NG SHALL BE WORKEDAROUND THEPIPEBYHAND TO EL/MINA TE VOIDS
9. ALL7RENCHEXC4 VATIONSSIWLLBESLOPED, SNORED, SRFIED,BRACED, OR
AND SHALL BE CLASS AB COMPACTED TO.AS% STANDARDPROCTOR. PEAGRAVEL
DTI/ERWISESUPPOR7EDINCOMPLIANCEW17HOSHAREGUATIONSANDLOCAL
SHALL NOTBEUSEDASA HAUNCHNGMATERML CLASSIIIM47FRIAL SHALL BE
ORDINANCES
ALLOWEDFORRIGIDPIPECOMPAC7EDAT85% STANDAROPROCTOR
10. DES/GNENGMEERSHALL DESIGNATEON 71EPLANS WHERE WA7ER7/GHT✓O1N7S
8. INITIALBACKFILL SHALL RECLASS LB ORCIASSIIIANDICRIV-ACOMPA07ED70
ARE70BEREQULRED.
95%STANLWWPROCTORCLASSFBJNA147ER/ALSHALLBEUSEDFORFLEXIBLE
PIPEWHENFXL HE/GH7SEXCEE08!
11. REPLACE WETOR UNSUITABLESOK ASNECESS4RY TO
4. FAALBACKFXLS/WLLBECLASS LBORCLASSIIIANDVRIV.4COMPAC7EDT095%
S7AND4ROPRx70RBELOW 18BVCHESOFFINAL S(BGRADE. 7HE70P 181AfCHES
SHALL BE COMPACTED 70 100% STANDARD PROCTOR
5. FINAL BACKRLL NOTUNDERPAVEDORBU8J7INGAREASGWBECLASS/VA
COMPACTED 70 BT% STANDARD PROC70R.
6 ALL 44A7ERLLSARE-OASS/F/ED/NACCORD4NCEWITHASTMD2921. (SEETABLE
1)
7. ALL MA7ERMLSSHAIL BEWSTALLED/NMAX/MUMB'LOOSE
PRO KDEA SU/TABLE BASE, AS DIRECTED BYGEO7ECHNM.AL E/1G/AEER OR OWNER.
12 WHERE GROUND WA 7ER IS PRESENT CLASS AA AAA TERLIL SHALL BE WRAPPED W17H
A NON WOVEN GEO.TEX/ILE, EXCLUDAVG BEDD/AG MA TERM BETWEEN 4'8 8'
INICW.
11 CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER 70 GEOTECHN/CAL REPORT FOR SOIL TYPEAND
CL ASS/F/CATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT.
14. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE LA TEST VERSION OFAS7M STANDARDS PROR
70 CONS TRUC77ONANDSHALL CONPL YWITH THESE STANDARDSDURNG
CON 97R CTIOV.
TABLE I. CLASSES OFEMBEOMENTAND BACKFILL MATERIALS
ASTMD2321
MATERNAL
CLASS
AS77WD2487
USCS
SOIL GROUP
MA7ER14L TYPE
%PASSING
AT7ERBERGLINITS
1 112 IN.
NO. 4
NO.200
LL P/
/A
NONE
MANUFACTURED OPEN GRADED AGGREGA TES
f00%
<10%
<5%
NONPLASTIC
/B
NONE
MANUFACTURED DENSE GRADEDAGGREGA 7ES
f00%
<50%
<5%
NONPLAS77C
NN
GW
COARSE -GRAINED SOILS, CLEAN
100%
<50% OF
COARSE
FRACTION"
<5%
NONPLASTIC
GP
SW
>50% OF
COARSE
FRACTION"
Sp
N
GM
COARSE -GRAINED SOILS W/FINES
100%6
<50% OF
COARSE
FRACTION'
12%TO
50%
<4 OR <A'L/NE
GC
<70R>A'LNNE
SM
>50% OF
COARSE
FRACTION"
>4 OR <A'L/NE
SC
>70R> A'L/NE
IKA
Mt
FINE-GRAINED SOILS
100%
100%
>50%
<50
<4 OR <"A"L/NE
CL
>70R> A'L/NE
TRENCH AND BEDDING DETAILS

Appendix C
Avoidance and Minimization
Proposed Doosan Plant Expansion
1405 Glenway Drive
Statesville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. OME-001
Avoidance and Minimization
The proposed development is located southwest of Glenway Drive in Statesville, Iredell County,
North Carolina. The site consists of one parcel of land (Iredell County Parcel Number
4745774735.000) that totals approximately 62 acres.
H&H reviewed State and Federal Threatened and Endangered Species databases for the site and
conducted a screening survey of the site and surrounding area for Federal Threatened and
Endangered Species, and none were identified. H&H also reviewed the National Registry of
Historic Places (NRHP) for sites located in Iredell County, North Carolina; the North Carolina
State Historic Preservation Office (NC SHPO) GIS viewer; and the Site and surrounding area via
visual reconnaissance for the potential presence of historic, cultural, and/or archeological sites.
No recorded sites were noted on or adjacent to the site. No significant structures were observed
on -site. H&H requested comment on the site from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service
(FWS), North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (WRC), and NC SHPO. Agency
responses from FWS and SHPO are attached to this updated submittal indicating no comments
on the proposed project.
To minimize site impacts, the proposed site plan was designed to avoid Waters of the US to the
maximum extent practicable. The site building, parking areas, and stormwater management
areas have been designed to fully occupy upland areas.
Impacts in the southwestern portion of the site (Impacts #1 through #5) involve necessary
grading activities required to facilitate the installation of the main access drive into the site from
Glenway Drive. An access drive into the site from the north is proposed to facilitate two points
of ingress and egress (one from the north and one from the east [an existing roadway on the
1 hart hickman
https://harthick.shmepoint.com/sites/MmterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Omega Construction (OMM)/Glenway Dr SMARTER MI RONM ENTAI. SOLUTIONS
(OME.001)/Permitting/PCN Updates/C - Avoid and Minimize.doc

existing Doosan property]) to accommodate tractor trailer traffic and emergency vehicles as
needed. Because this is an expansion project, the PCA expansion site building is at a fixed
location to align properly with the existing building on the Doosan property to the south. As a
result of this, the access drive in the southwestern portion of the site is also in a fixed location
along the western side of the site building and into the existing Doosan property to the south.
The southwestern portion of the roadway has also been designed in its current alignment to
provide required separation distance between the roadway and the site building. This is required
for tractor traffic trailer and emergency operations such as firefighting.
Additionally, the site design engineer determined that a 28-foot retaining wall would be required
to avoid these impacts; however, a small impact would still be required even with this large
retaining wall. A 28-foot retaining wall is not practical for this development. The proposed fill
slope in the southwestern area of the roadway is due to elevation changes and grading
requirements on the site. As recommended by the Corps and DEQ DWR, French drains have
been added to the site plan to facilitate continued hydrology into SCC, WAB, and WAD where
impacts are proposed. A detail for the French drain is included in the Attachments.
Additionally, as recommend by the Corps and DEQ DWR, the northwestern portion of the
roadway has been realigned to avoid impacts to SCE. However, a guard house is located in the
northern portion of the roadway associated with facility security requirements that requires water
and sewer utilities. Utilities are available along the western site boundary and Impact #6
involves the connection of these utilities to the guard house. Impact #6 also involves grading in
this area to prepare a level building pad for future use. As recommended by the Corps and DEQ
DWR, Impact #6 is solely to the intermittent portion of SCE and the perennial portion of SCE
has been completed avoided by the new design. Furthermore, the site plan proposes to install a
pipe in this area that will facilitate continued hydrology and stormwater drainage into SCE from
Glenway Drive and other upgradient areas off -site. The pipe will be underlain by an ample stone
bedding layer that will act similarly to a French drain and will serve as a conduit for continued
groundwater flow into the remaining portion of the SCE. A detail of the storm pipe is included
in the Attachments.
2 hart hickman
https://harthick.shmepoint.com/sites/MmterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Omega Construction (OMM)/Glenway Dr SMARTER MI RONM ENTAI. SOLUSIONS
(OME.001)/Permitting/PCN Updates/C - Avoid and Minimize.doc

Due to the site plan redesign, originally -proposed impacts to Stream Channel "G" (SCG),
Wetland Area "H" (WAH), and the perennial portion of SCE have now been completed avoided.
Of the 0.935 acre of on -site wetlands, only 0.113 acre of wetland impact is proposed.
Furthermore, with the reduction of stream impact from 577 linear feet to 448 linear feet, impacts
are proposed to only 15% of the on -site streams and only 97 linear feet of that impact is to a
perennial stream channel. No impacts to the on -site open water feature are proposed.
Additionally, a 30-foot municipal buffer is proposed on all remaining aquatic resources on the
site.
The site plan has also been designed to impact the eastern fringes of WAB and WAD to further
minimize impacts by leaving the main bodies of the wetlands intact and maintaining hydrology
through the installation of French drains. Additionally, the impacts to SCC are in an area where
the stream channel has already been historically affected by dumping activities and significant
amounts of trash are located. The majority of the downgradient aquatic resources are avoided by
the development including Stream Channel "A" (SCA), a high -quality perennial stream channel.
During site development, good erosion and sediment control practices will be followed.
Extensive silt fencing will be used on the construction site perimeter and along stream and
wetland boundaries. Stormwater management areas are included as part of the site design. The
current construction schedule for the site plan provided is approximately Summer 2021 to
Summer 2022. This includes executing all the proposed wetland and stream impacts, and
stabilization of the site to prevent erosion. In the near term (less than five years), Doosan will
also be monitoring their truck traffic patterns and consider the addition of additional driveways,
parking lots, and storage areas as the conditions dictate. The northeastern upland area of the site
will be graded into a level building area during the 2021-2022 construction schedule to facilitate
future expansion. This will include land development on the majority of the parcel, excluding
remaining aquatic resource areas; therefore, no additional impacts to on -site Waters of the US
are planned or proposed during potential future expansions.
3
https://harthick.shmepoint.com/sites/MmterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Omega Construction (OMM)/Glenway Dr
(OME.001)/Permitting/PCN Updates/C - Avoid and Minimize.doc
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Mitigation is typically required by the Nationwide Permit #39 for impacts greater than 0.1-acre
of wetlands. Due to the planned impacts to 0.113 acre of on -site wetlands, mitigation is
proposed in the form of purchasing mitigation credits from DEQ's DMS in -lieu fee program.
Based on the NC WAM, the wetland quality of WAB and WAD is high, and the wetland quality
of WAC is medium. Based on the results of the NC WAM, the proposed mitigation ratio for
wetland impacts is 2:1.
The current Wilmington District Regional Conditions for Nationwide Permit #39 require
mitigation for stream impacts greater than 0.02 acre. Additionally, DEQ DWR requires
mitigation for impacts greater than 300 linear feet to perennial stream channels. Because stream
impacts are not greater than 0.02-acre and perennial stream channel impacts are not greater than
300 linear feet, stream mitigation is not proposed.
https://harthick.shmepoint.com/sites/MmterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Omega Construction (OMM)/Glenway Dr
(OME.001)/Permitting/PCN Updates/C - Avoid and Minimize.doc
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

QPP�MENT OF FISH &WILDLSERV
IFE
United States Department of the Interior
o
- ; a9 ' FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
gRCH 31 �� Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street Suite B
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
June 21, 2021
Ms. Danielle Clark
Hart & Hickman
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
Subject: Project Review for the Glenway Drive Proposed Development in Iredell County, North
Carolina.
Dear Ms. Clark:
On June 7, 2021, we received (via e-mail) your letter requesting our comments on the subject
project. We have reviewed the information that you presented and the following comments are
provided in accordance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C.§ 4321 et seq.); the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661 -
667e); the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 703); and section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 - 1543) (Act).
Project Description
According to the information provided, an undisclosed project proponent is proposing
undisclosed development on a 62-acre Glenway Drive parcel in Iredell County, North Carolina.
Your letter did not include specific information or details regarding construction plans, a
description of impact, or construction timelines. The parcel was formerly used as a dairy farm
and is located in a primarily commercial and industrial area.
On June 16, 2021, the following additional project details were provided by email:
• A screening -level survey for the Hexastylis genus was conducting in areas of suitable
habitat. No Hexastylis species were found on site.
Federally Listed Species
Suitable habitat surveys for two species were conducted by environmental specialists with Hart
& Hickman (H&H) in March and April of 2021. The findings were compiled and included in the
letter submitted to our office. The following species and their associated habitats were
evaluated.
Species
Status'
Dwarf -flowered heartleaf
Hexastylis naniflora
T
Northern long-eared bat (NLEB)
Myotis septentrionalis
T
1 T = threatened.

Ms. Clarke — H&H 2
Suitable habitat for dwarf -flowered heartleaf was identified on site; however, due to past land
use habitats on site are altered and degraded. A genus -level survey for Hexastylis was conducted
and no Hexastylis species were found. Based on the negative results of genus -level surveys
conducted in March and April, we would concur with a "may affect, not likely to adversely
affect" determination by the federal action agency.
Your letter indicates the presence of wooded areas and mature trees. Based on this description,
suitable summer roosting habitat for NLEB may be present on the parcel. However, the final
4(d) rule (effective as of February 16, 2016), exempts incidental take of NLEB associated with
activities that occur greater than 0.25 miles from a known hibernation site, and greater than 150
feet from a known, occupied maternity roost during the pup season (June 1— July 31). Based on
the information provided, the proposed development would occur at a location where any
incidental take that may result from associated activities is exempt under the 4(d) rule. Although
not required, we encourage the project proponent to avoid any associated tree clearing activities
during the NLEB active season from April 1 — October 15.
We believe the requirements under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act are fulfilled.
However, obligations under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act must be reconsidered if:
(1) new information reveals impacts of the identified action may affect listed species or critical
habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) the identified action is subsequently modified
in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat
is determined that may be affected by the identified action.
Fish and Wildlife Resource Recommendations
We are concerned about the potential effects the project could have on other natural resources in
area. We offer the following general recommendations for the benefit of fish and wildlife
resources:
• Equipment Use in Riparian Areas and In -Stream. Equipment should be operated
from the streambank. If in -stream work is necessary, stone causeways, work bridges, or
mats (designed for the specific location and type of equipment) should be used. Work
pads on streambanks or approaches to in -stream work areas should minimize disturbance
to woody vegetation. Equipment operated in riparian areas and in/near aquatic resources
should be inspected daily and maintained regularly to prevent contamination of surface
waters from leaking fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
Construction staging, toxic material storage, and equipment maintenance, including
refueling, should occur outside of the riparian area. The project proponent should report
any toxic material spills in riparian areas and/or aquatic resources to the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) within 24 hours.
• Impervious Surfaces/Stormwater/Low Impact Development (LID). Increased
development contributes to the increased quantity and decreased quality of stormwater
entering project area waterways. Additionally, increased development outside the
floodplain increases Stormwater flows already caused by the lack of or loss of riparian

Ms. Clarke — H&H
3
buffers and floodplain development. Recent studies' have shown that areas of 10 percent
to 20 percent impervious surface (such as roofs, roads, and parking lots) double the
amount of stormwater runoff compared to natural cover and decrease deep infiltration
(groundwater recharge) by 16 percent. At 35 — 50 percent impervious surface, runoff
triples, and deep infiltration is decreased by 40 percent. Above 75 percent impervious
surface, runoff is 5.5 times higher than natural cover, and deep infiltration is decreased by
80 percent. Additionally, the adequate treatment of stormwater at project sites is
essential for the protection of water quality and aquatic habitat. Impervious surfaces also
collect pathogens, metals, sediment, and chemical pollutants and quickly transmit them
(via stormwater runoff) to receiving waters. According to the Environmental Protection
Agency, this nonpoint-source pollution is one of the major threats to water quality in the
United States, posing one of the greatest threats to aquatic life, and is also linked to
chronic and acute illnesses in human populations from exposure through drinking water
and contact recreational.
Increased stormwater runoff also directly damages aquatic and riparian habitat, causing
streambank and stream channel scouring. Additionally, impervious surfaces reduce
groundwater recharge, resulting in even lower than expected stream flows during drought
periods, which can induce potentially catastrophic effects for fish, mussels, and other
aquatic life. To avoid any additional impacts to habitat quality within the watershed, we
recommend that all new developments, regardless of the percentage of impervious
surface area created, implement stonmwater retention and treatment measures designed to
replicate and maintain the hydrograph at the preconstruction condition.
We recommend the use of low impact development techniques,2 such as reduced road
widths, grassed swales in place of curb and gutter, rain gardens, and wetland retention
areas, for retaining and treating stormwater runoff rather than the more traditional
measures, such as large retention ponds, etc. These designs often cost less to install and
significantly reduce environmental impacts from development.
Where detention ponds are used, stormwater outlets should drain through a vegetated
area prior to reaching any natural stream or wetland area. Detention structures should be
designed to allow for the slow discharge of stormwater, attenuating the potential adverse
effects of stormwater surges; thermal spikes; and sediment, nutrient, and chemical
discharges. Also, because the purpose of stormwater control measures is to protect
streams and wetlands, no stormwater control measures or best management practices
should be installed within any stream (perennial or intermittent) or wetland.
Where feasible, a rooftop garden, or a "green rooftop," should be incorporated into
building construction plans. Green rooftops have many benefits, including: (1) keeping
'Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group (15 federal agencies of the United States Government).
Published October 1998, Revised August 2001. Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices.
GPO Item No. 0120-A; SuDocs No. A 57.6/2:EN 3/PT.653. ISBN-0-934213-59-3.
ZWe recommend visiting the Environmental Protection Agency's Web site (http://www.0a.,zoElpolluted-runoff-
nonpoint-source pollution/urban-runoff--low-impact-development) for additional information and fact sheets
regarding the implementation of low -impact -development techniques.

Ms. Clarke — H&H
0
buildings warmer by adding a layer of insulation to the roof, (2) keeping buildings cooler
by allowing plants to take in water that evaporates into the atmosphere, (3) reducing
heating and cooling bills, and (4) reducing the quantity and improving the quality of
stormwater runoff because water is absorbed and filtered through plants and soil.
We also recommend that consideration be given to the use of pervious materials (i.e.,
pervious concrete, interlocking/open paving blocks, etc.) for the construction of roads,
driveways, sidewalks, etc. Pervious surfaces minimize changes to the hydrology of the
watershed and can be used to facilitate groundwater recharge. Pervious materials are also
less likely to absorb and store heat and allow the cooler soil below to cool the pavement.
Additionally, pervious concrete requires less maintenance and is less susceptible to
freeze/thaw cracking due to large voids within the concrete.
Use of any of the proposed stormwater collection devices described above will
dramatically decrease the quantity and increase the quality of stormwater runoff.
• Erosion and Sedimentation Control. Construction activities near aquatic resources,
streams, and wetlands have the potential to cause bank destabilization, water pollution,
and water quality degradation if measures to control site runoff are not properly installed
and maintained. In order to effectively reduce erosion and sedimentation impacts, best
management practices specific to the extent and type of construction should be designed
and installed prior to land -disturbing activities and should be maintained throughout
construction. Natural fiber matting (coir) should be used for erosion control as synthetic
netting can trap animals and persists in the environment beyond its intended purpose.
Land disturbance should be limited to what can be stabilized quickly, preferably by the
end of the workday. Once construction is complete, disturbed areas should be revegetated
with native riparian grass and tree species as soon as possible. For maximum benefits to
water quality and bank stabilization, riparian areas should be forested; however, if the
areas are maintained in grass, they should not be mowed. The Service can provide
information on potential sources of plant material upon request.
A complete design manual that is consistent with the requirements of the North Carolina
Sedimentation and Pollution Control Act and Administrative Rules, can be found at the
following website: https:lldeq.nc.govlabout/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources.
• Stream Crossings. Bridges or spanning structures should be used for all permanent
roadway crossings of streams and associated wetlands. Structures should span the
channel and the floodplain in order to minimize impacts to aquatic resources, allow for
the movement of aquatic and terrestrial organisms, and eliminate the need to place fill in
streams, wetlands, and floodplains.
Bridges should be designed and constructed so that no piers or bents are placed in the
stream, approaches and abutments do not constrict the stream channel, and the crossing is
perpendicular to the stream. Spanning some or all of the floodplain allows stream access
to the floodplain, dissipates energy during high flows, and provides terrestrial wildlife
passage. When bank stabilization is necessary, we recommend that the use of riprap be

Ms. Clarke — H&H
minimized and that a riprap-free buffer zone be maintained under the bridge to allow for
wildlife movement. If fill in the floodplain is necessary, floodplain culverts should be
added through the fill to allow the stream access to the floodplain during high flows.
If bridges are not possible and culverts are the only option, we suggest using bottomless
culverts. Bottomless culverts preserve the natural stream substrate, create less
disturbance during construction, and provide a more natural post -construction channel.
Culverts should be of sufficient size to leave natural stream functions and habitats at the
crossing site unimpeded. Culvert installation and presence should not change water
depth, volume (flow), or velocity levels that permit aquatic organism passage; and
accommodate the movement of debris and bed material during bankfull events.
Widening the stream channel must be avoided.
In the event that a traditional culvert is the only option, the culvert design should provide
for a minimum water depth in the structure during low flow or dry periods. Sufficient
water depth should be maintained in all flow regimes so as to accommodate both the
upstream and downstream movement of aquatic species. Water depth inside the culvert
must be adequate for fish to be completely submerged and all other aquatic life to move
freely, even during low flow periods. The culvert should be designed and installed at the
same slope as the stream grade to maintain an acceptable water velocity for aquatic life
passage and for stream substrate characteristics to be retained within the culvert.
Where feasible, we recommend the use of multiple barrels, in addition to a low flow
barrel, to accommodate flood flows. Floodplain barrels should be placed on or near
stream bankfull or floodplain bench elevations and discharge onto floodplain benches.
Where appropriate, install sills on the upstream end of floodplain barrels to restrict or
divert the base stream flow to a single barrel. If the culvert is longer than 40 linear feet,
alternating or notched baffles should be installed in a manner that mimics the existing
stream pattern. This will enhance the passage of aquatic life by: (1) depositing and
retaining sediment in the barrel, (2) maintaining channel depth and flow regimes, and (3)
providing resting places for fish and other aquatic organisms.
Measures to control sediment and erosion should be installed before any ground
disturbing activities occur. Grading and backfilling should be minimized, and existing
native vegetation should be retained (if possible) to maintain riparian cover for fish and
wildlife. Disturbed areas should be revegetated with native grass and tree species as soon
as the project is completed.
The proper planning, design, and installation of stream crossings provide year-round
passage for aquatic organisms and preserve healthy streams. Additional information
regarding stream crossing activities can be found at the following website:
https:llwww.fs fed.us/biology/nsaecTiishxing/.
• Utility Line Crossings. In the interest of reducing impacts to natural resources, utility
crossings (i.e., sewer, gas, and water lines) should be kept to a minimum, and all utility
infrastructure (including manholes) should be kept out of riparian buffer areas. If a utility

Ms. Clarke — H&H
0
crossing is necessary, we recommend that you first consider the use of directional boring.
Directional boring under streams significantly minimizes impacts to aquatic resources
and riparian buffers.
If directional boring cannot be used and trenching is determined to be the only viable
method, every effort should be made to ensure that impacts to in -stream features are
minimized and stabilized upon completion of the project. Our past experiences with
open -trench crossings indicate that this technique increases the likelihood for future
lateral movement of the stream (which could undercut or erode around the utility line),
and the correction of such problems could result in costly future maintenance and
devastating impacts to natural resources. Therefore, as much work as possible should be
accomplished in the dry, and the amount of disturbance should not exceed what can be
successfully stabilized by the end of the workday. In -stream work should avoid the
spring fish spawning season and should consider forecasted high flow events.
Regardless of the crossing method, all utility lines should cross streams perpendicularly.
We strongly encourage that a qualified biologist monitor the work area until the work is
complete in order to identify any additional impact -minimization measures. The Service
may be available to assist you in this effort.
To determine if any maintenance is required, the work site should be monitored at least
every 3 months during the first 24 months and annually thereafter. Moreover, we
recommend the development of a riparian monitoring and maintenance program that
would outline procedures for the prompt stabilization of streambanks near the utility
crossing (should any streambank erosion or destabilization occur) throughout the life of
this project.
Special consideration should be made with regard to sewer lines associated with crossing
areas. These lines should be maintained at all times in a manner that prevents hazardous
discharges to land or surface waters and should be constructed of ductile iron or a
material of equal durability.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to provide these comments. Please contact Ms. Rebekah
Reid of our staff at [e-mail], if you have any questions. In any future
correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-21-109.
Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Secretary D. Reid Wilson
July 22, 2021
Danielle Clark, PWS dclarkgharthickman.com
Hart & Hickman, PC
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28203
Re: Construct development, 1405 Glenway Drive, Statesville, Iredell County, ER 21-1464
Dear Ms. Clark:
Thank you for your email of June 4, 2021, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have reviewed
the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.review(abncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898