20210938 Ver 1_More Info Received_20210810

From:Bodnar, Gregg
To:Currey, Gregory E CIV USARMY CESAD (USA); Dunn, Maria T.; Harding, Kimberlee k; Snider, Holley; Humphrey, Jeremy
Cc:Brock, Brendan O
Subject:FW: [External] Re: 1002 North Shore
Date:Tuesday, August 10, 2021 12:48:07 PM
Attachments:image003.png
Afternoon all,

After consultation with the applicant the lift has been removed from the proposal (see below). This will be
handled via condition on any permit authorized.

Thanks,
Gregg

From: Ben Brink <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 11:38 AM
To: Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]>
Cc: Brock, Brendan O <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] Re: 1002 North Shore

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an
attachment to Report Spam.

Good morning Mr. Bodnar,

Cindy Allen (applicant) has agreed to the removal of the boat lift from the proposal at 1002 North Shore in
Sunset Beach (Brunswick). Let me know if you require any additional information. Thanks in advance.

Best regards,
Ben

On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 4:37 PM Ben Brink <[e-mail]> wrote:
Good evening Mrs. Allen,

After you speak with your husband would you let me know about moving forward with the docking facility
without the boat lift? I brought up the possibility of a sling lift with straps but the Division of Marine
Fisheries was not in favor of that idea.

Ben

On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 11:31 AM Ben Brink <[e-mail]> wrote:
Thank you for the notification of the extension Mr. Bodnar. I will get in touch with the property owners
and get back to you next week with the decision in regards to removing the boat lift from the design.
Thanks and have a great weekend.

Best regards,
Ben

On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 10:45 AM Bodnar, Gregg <[e-mail]> wrote:
Morning Ben,

Please see above for comments from DMF and WRC. DWR is of similar mind, but I do not have any
comments as of yet. In summary, due to the PNA they are objecting to the lift (Slip 2) due to impacts
to PNA. They are ok with the floater on stops due to it being existing and being moved out to deeper
water as impact minimization efforts. My understanding from DWR is a denial of the lift (Slip 2) as
well, though I do not have anything official yet. Options at this point is trending to condition out the
lift on any final decision that results in a permit. In addition, though USACE has authorized under the
GP56, they are concerned as well but are unable to retract the GP-56 after issuance.

Finally, please accept this as notification of the extension of the project. The 150 day is 10/22/21.

Please let me know how you would like to proceed and if the applicant would remove the lift from
the proposal and reduce the project to one slip.

Thanks,

Gregg