SW3210803_Wetland Determination/Report_20210810

CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133 (fax)
April 9, 2021
Kent Olson
Development Solutions Group, LLC.
11121 Carmel Commons Blvd. #360
Charlotte, NC 28226
Subject: Jurisdictional Delineation Report
Old Mill Road Site
Weddington, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2020-0135
Dear Mr. Olson,
The Old Mill Road Site is approximately 12 acres in extent and is located southeast of the
Providence Road South and Old Mill Road intersection in Union County, North Carolina (Figure
1, attached). Development Solutions Group LLC. has contracted Carolina Wetland Services,
Inc. (CWS) to delineate the extent of jurisdictional features within the project area.
Street Address of Project: Southeast of the Providence Road South and Old Mill Road
intersection in Union County, North Carolina.
Waterway: UT to Mundys Run
Basin: Lower Catawba (HUC' 03050103)
City: Weddington
County: Union County
Tax Parcel No(s): 06153009 (partial)
Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: 35.0129330 ,-80.7614620
USGS Quadrangle Name: Weddington, NC (2020)
Current Land Use
The project area consists of undeveloped forested areas, open herbaceous areas and a
powerline Right -of -Way. On site elevations range from 680-720 feet above mean sea level
(Figure 2). Land cover within the project area consists of deciduous forest, mixed forest,
herbaceous areas, emergent wetlands, and woody wetlands.
According to the United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation
Service (USDA-NRCS) Web Soil Survey of Union County2 (Figure 4) and the NRCS Published
Soil Survey for Union County3 (Figure 5), on site soils consist of three different soil types (Table
"'HUC" is the Hydrologic Unit Code. U.S. Geological Survey, 1974. Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina.
2 United States Department of Agriculture, 2019. Web Soil Survey of Union County, North Carolina. Accessed at
https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm
3 United States Department of Agriculture — Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1996. Soil Survey of Union County,
North Carolina.
NORTH CAROLINA - SOUTH CAROLINA
WWW.CWS-INC.NET
Page 1 of 4

Old Mill Road
Jurisdictional Delineation Report
April 9, 2021
CWS Project No. 2021-0001
1). None of the on -site soils listed on the Web Soil Survey are listed as being hydric or
containing hydric inclusions.
Table 1. Summary of Union County On -Site Soils
Soil Unit Name and Description
Hydric
Coverage (%)
ApB
Appling sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
No
27.3
CeB2
Cecil gravelly sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
No
42.7
CeC2
Cecil gravelly sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded
No
30
Total Coverage:
100%
National Wetlands Inventory
Wetlands are an important source of biodiversity and provide a multitude of ecological services.
The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), created by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, is a
program that provides wetland data and analysis to the public. A review of the NWI GIS layer
depicts a freshwater pond in the southeastern corner of the project limits (Figure 6).
FEMA National Flood Hazard
FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer was reviewed for the project area (FEMA Panels
3710447600J. The Old Mill Road site is located within the Area of Minimal Flood Hazard Zone
(Figure 7).
Jurisdictional Delineation
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
define wetlands as: "Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a
frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a
prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions."4 The USACE
uses three parameters to identify jurisdictional wetlands. These parameters are as follows: 1)
hydrophytic vegetation, 2) wetland hydrology, and 3) hydric soils. Except in certain atypical
situations, all three parameters must be present in order for an area to be determined to be a
jurisdictional wetland.
Jurisdictional areas were delineated (flagged in the field), classified, and mapped with a sub -foot
Trimble Geo7X GPS unit using the (USACE) Routine On -Site Determination Method. This
method is defined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Delineation Manual,' with further technical
guidance from the 2012 Eastern Mountains & Piedmont Regional Supplement.' Data
representative of on -site jurisdictional wetland areas and non -jurisdictional upland areas was
collected and reported using Wetland Determination Data Forms (DP; Attachment A).
Jurisdictional stream channels were classified (perennial, intermittent, or ephemeral) according
to the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) guidance based on
biological, hydrological, and physical characteristics. These classifications include sampling
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual," Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army
Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual", Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army
Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
US Army Corps of Engineers, April 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern
Mountains and Piedmont Region. US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
Page 2 of 4

Old Mill Road
Jurisdictional Delineation Report
April 9, 2021
CWS Project No. 2021-0001
with a D-shaped dip net, collecting photographic documentation, and defining approximate
breakpoints (location at which stream channel changes classification) within each on -site stream
channel. NCDEQ Stream Classification Forms representative of on -site stream channels were
used to document stream conditions (SCP; Attachment B).
Representative photographs were taken of on -site jurisdictional features and existing site
conditions (Attachment C). Locations of mapped wetlands and other waters, stream
classification points, Wetland Determination Data Forms, and representative photographs are
depicted on Figure 8.
Results
On March 31, 2020, Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) scientists, Arnie Hoy, WPIT', and
Sarag Ellingson, Staff Scientist I, delineated on site jurisdictional waters of the U.S., including
wetlands. Based on the results of this field investigation, there are three jurisdictional waters of
the U.S. located within the project boundary totalling approximately 0.46 acre. The potentially
jurisdictional waters of the U.S. consist of two wetlands (Wetlands AA and BB) and one
freshwater pond (Pond A). Table 2 summarizes the potential jurisdictional waters of the U.S.
within the property.
Table 2. Summary of On -Site Potential Waters of the U.S.
Jurisdictional
Wetland
Cowardin Classification $
Photograph(s)
Linear Feet
(If)
Acreage
(ac.)
Wetland AA
Palustrine Emergent
1
N/A
0.01
Palustrine Forested
2
N/A
0.06
Wetland BB
Palustrine Forested
3
N/A
0.02
Wetland Total:
N/A
0.09 ac.
Jurisdictional
Water
Cowardin Classification
Photograph(s)
Linear Feet
(If)
Acreage
(ac.)
Pond A
Freshwater Pond
4
N/A
0.37
Pond Total:
N/A
1 0.37 ac.
Total Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.:
N/A
1 0.46 ac.
Jurisdictional Wetlands
Two jurisdictional wetlands (Wetland AA and BB) were delineated within the study area (Figure
8).
Wetland AA consists of palustrine emergent and palustrine forested portions and is located in
the south-central portion of the project limits (Photograph 1; DP1). The emergent portion of
Wetland AA is dominated by soft rush (Juncus effusus) and shallow sedge (Carex lurida) in the
herbaceous layer.
Wetlands BB and a portion of Wetland AA are palustrine forested wetlands located in the
south-central and southeastern portions of the project limits (Photographs 2 and 3; DP3). The
forested portion of Wetland AA and Wetland BB are dominated by sweetgum (Liquidambar
' Wetland Professional in Training, The Society of Wetland Scientists Professional Certification Program.
8 Cowardin et al. Classification System, 1979.
Page 3 of 4

Old Mill Road
Jurisdictional Delineation Report
April 9, 2021
CWS Project No. 2021-0001
styraciflua), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) in the sapling/shrub stratum, and soft rush,
shallow sedge, sweet gum, and rattlesnake fern (Botrypus virginianus) in the herbaceous layer.
Jurisdictional Open Waters
There is one jurisdictional open water feature (Pond A) located within the property.
Pond A is located in the southeastern portion of the project limits, and is approximately 0.37
acre in extent (Photograph 4). Pond A discharges via a pipe into Wetland BB.
Non -Jurisdictional Areas
No additional jurisdictional waters of the US were delineated within the project area (Figure 8).
A Wetland Determination Data Form representative of non -jurisdictional upland areas is
attached as DP2 (Photographs 5 and 6).
Recommendations
CWS recommends submitting the results of this delineation to the USACE for verification.
Wetlands and other waters are present on the site, which are regulated by the USACE and/or
NCDEQ. The jurisdictional delineation provided by CWS represents our best professional
judgment regarding the boundaries of on -site wetlands, streams, and other water features that
can be used for preliminary project planning. However, until a Jurisdictional Determination (JD)
is issued by a regulatory agency (USACE), the delineation can only be considered preliminary
and is not an official governmental approval. CWS recommends that before any construction or
other earth disturbance activities occur on site, a formal JD should be obtained.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services on this important project. Please do not
hesitate to contact Aliisa Harjuniemi at 980-259-1222 or [e-mail] should you have
any questions or comments regarding this report.
Sincerely,
Arnie Hoy, WPIT
Project Scientist
Attachments: Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Figure 2: USGS Topographic Map
Aliisa Harjuniemi, PWS
Senior Project Manager
Figure 3: Aerial Map
Figure 4: USDA-NRCS Web Soil Survey of Union County
Figure 5: USDA-NRCS Published Soil Survey of Union County
Figure 6: National Wetlands Inventory
Figure 7: FEMA National Flood Hazard Map
Figure 8: Jurisdictional Boundaries
Attachment A: USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms (DP1-DP3)
Attachment B: Photopage (Photographs 1-6)
Page 4 of 4

�tl
e
A rd re y 1pw
Kell High
ry • 4
k-aeS' f
F
Cabnel
Franc r6 Bea
tty
eatty r
Regional F'afk choshrul4n
r. r
ICA
Mar.�•aa
r
r
' a
� a
r �
r
Ff �
r r
0
r �
f �
ySxm,t► � t+
Clubat 19
Longvavv 4i0
f �
Weddington °sRd
�' � Old Mill Road
r
r �"o
r f Raj Rd I
TF O q
lu n
L]4 Y
•r �
Marvin
µow rawn Rd
' 0nCrr
s T
ns,n
REFERENCE: BACKGROUND VICINITY MAP PROVIDED BY ESRI, 2020.
SCALE: DATE:
1 inch = 5,000 feet 3/22/2021
CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY:
2020-0135 ALH
COORDINATES: CHECKED BY:
35.012933,-80.761462 AVH
!0
4
Is
CAROLINA
WETLAND SERVICES
�a�Es{f
Jk,
ryl�
Legend
Project Limits (12 ac.)
5,000 2,500 0 5, 000 Feet
FIGURE NO.
Vicinity Map
Old Mill Road Site
Union County
Weddington, North Carolina
G:\Shared drives\Consulting Team Drive\2020\2020 Consulting Projects\2020-0135 Old Mill Road Site\JD\ArcGIS\Figurel_Vicinity.mxd

4. 1 .. H f ";' FR L N FMAh "•.�
Q
- l
ti
I � C N a•� •�Y,
—" "'
lfunrfuty 1 ake
rf
�i;te LPeek
6.
c
OR
�55 Fp
B(Ui.s❑Ar
h'IdI'rjq
v r•L
O nr
3
ry
K!F.
� tR
( ♦
FOdf
i
hL,QC a
�
'NedduwJi c�i
- iFlf ISI1•YI
'�
l,190;It') G'--� vanb Lake
-
Lr
�'rH
EtC11
VAL
.p
- •
.
- dT
Rea view
r
Weddington
1 . �LVA1• r,.
� o r1Ari,
F� -
d
a
. ; SrrERRINGH�*! fVq y
'11
C-.
F'•' .Acru P1antagiuz5
tit•.. Lake Nzviiber• One
5 5r5N i']IINR 1 --• OLTS
4
till
- - j•- _p1NKsl .
f/ C � • r z Legend
Project Limits (12 ac.)
Qa _ 2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet
REFERENCE: USGS 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE(S): WEDDINGTON, NC (2020).
G
SCALE: DATE: FIGURE NO.
1 inch = 2,000 feet 3/22/2021 USGS Topographic Map
CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY:
2020-0135 ALH Old Mill Road Site
COORDINATES: CHECKED BY: CAR ❑ L 1 N A Union County 2
35.012933,-80.761462 AVH VIETLAND SERVICES Weddington, North Carolina
G:\Shared drives\Consulting Team Drive\2020\2020 Consulting Projects\2020-0135 Old Mill Road Site\JD\ArcGIS\Figure2_USGS.mxd

i a T14 w
}K 1 ■i F`�.L a
♦
e
14
dL
r ,
1 ' j
i f
k
'A M ..'
i •� 1-
Ir
x
_ � r
Legend
Project Limits (12 ac.)
Roads
Tax Parcels
REFERENCE: BACKGROUND AERIAL IMAGERY PROVIDED BY ESRI, ACCESSED 2021. '� 150 75 0 150 Feet
BACKGROUND GIS LAYER(S) PROVIDED BY UNION COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED 2021.
SCALE: DATE: FIGURE NO.
1 inch = 150 feet 3/22/2021 Aerial Map
CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY:
2020-0135 ALH Old Mill Road Site
COORDINATES: CHECKED BY: GAR ❑ L I N A Union County 3
35.012933,-80.761462 AVH WETLAND SERVICES Weddington, North Carolina
G:\Shared drives\Consulting Team Drive\2020\2020 Consulting Projects\2020-0135 Old Mill Road Site\JD\ArcGIS\Figure3_Aerial.mxd

W v
N o �a
a C-D
ApB m��
m
c
CeC2
�. as
LdB S�q) CeB2
ApB 4
Old Post -Rd Weddington Church Rd �a�.
CeC
Lenn,, Stadler Wa
y a
o�
as
Larkfield Dr
Bluebird Ln
a
CeC2 c-i Qi
a CeC2 m�
g
CoA a° cy
Cl)
HeB
CeC2
O/01 CoA
po Rea Rd ApB Q01 o
canton gbbey Q
a
E �
t6ca
°
C U
Ohara CeB2
bay/ayha w
ay
�IatlrkaWay t-n Oxfordshire Rd
CoA
B2
Lochaven Rd ShippO
Cottonfield Cir huh
eB
C
Ce
HeB Legend
Sherri
Soil Unit Name and Description Hydric Coverage (%) 0
�i D Q Project Limits (12 ac.)
ApB Appling sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes No 51.2 l,6 a
CeB2 Cecil gravelly sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded No 38.6 6� CIDRoads
CeC2 Cecil gravelly sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded No 10.2 -Y
Total Coverage 100.0 C' N
rAL 1,000 500 0 1,000 Feet
REFERENCE: USDA-NRCS WEB SOIL SURVEY OF UNION COUNTY, NC, DATED 2021
Ta
SCALE: DATE: USDA-NRCS Web Soil Survey FIGURE NO.
1 inch = 1,000 feet 3/22/2021 Y
CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: of Union County
2020-0135 ALH Old Mill Road Site
COORDINATES: CHECKED BY: GAR ❑ L I N A Union County 4
35.012933,-80.761462 AVH WETLAND SERVICES Weddington, North Carolina
G:\Shared drives\Consulting Team Drive\2020\2020 Consulting Projects\2020-0135 Old Mill Road Site\JD\ArcGIS\Figure4_Current.mxd

MOB
r. An
..cL
lrL?
�y 0.
r- r,
1�1�� F: tliEit Clr,! Ce%7 E' Ape
Sti IPA e
ITA
r
We�i�ton
+rA
I
i C.t.
'f
Providence Road S du +r,,L
i:et:1
C.:,r, f
fiJ7 I r r a,
nr
A,,.. C `
I;cA
A.
Old Mill Road
it r t4 _
i
CeSi $
]31G � Cpr!7 i
4l'iif
iJ-b
+i C:'
rA10 F`
tip:= is r r,ra r, r7 }tt,0
Ap8 ` - —
tit wr
I_`• 1r7� rf �e8� Tab 12C Ge5 r +hr a.
!+a8.
112$ HeB� Tag
Ta R i 1697
LA'9: Irn �1. fin" �• I+;
-
_c�At, PiA Legend
Soil Unit Name and Description
Hydric
AiDB AiDdina sandy loam 2 to 8 percent slopes
No
CeB2 Cecil gravelly sandy clay loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded
No
CeC2 Cecil gravelly sandy clay loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, moderately eroded No
Ps t
Q• At a~ Project Limits (12 ac.) 1
1 Nn8 � rl'
5
idc
2,000 1,000 0 2,000 Feet
REFERENCE: USDA-NRCS PUBLISHED SOIL SURVEY
OF UNION COUNTY, NC, SHEETS 16, 17, 21, AND 22, DATED 1996.
SCALE: 1 inch = 2,000 feet
DATE:
3/22/2021
USDA-NRCS Published Soil Survey
FIGURE NO.
of Union County
CWS PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
Is
2020-0135
ALH
Old Mill Road Site
5
COORDINATES:
CHECKED BY:
GAR ❑ L I N A
Union County
35.012933,-80.761462
AVH
WETL-AND SERVICES
Weddington, North Carolina
G:\Shared drives\Consulting Team Drive\2020\2020 Consulting Projects\2020-0135 Old Mill Road Site\JD\ArcGIS\Figure5_HistoricSoil.mxd

Old Post -Rd_ Weddington C.1ucl Rd
��nnY Stadler
Larkfield Dr f
Bluebird Ln
- ya
Q)
U
C
a
4O
v
o �a
CDs��'
CD�
C�
a`
a
A
ell
s
�a . 0`91
a c�
Nnton Rea Rd Nz�
Abbe
a
E 0
ca N
ca
0 . --,,
r-1
0
e�
LL,,han Rd
Natha`Na
Oxfordshire Rd
Legend
Q Project Limits (12 ac.)
Roads
National Wetland Inventory
Sherring4Wy- Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Cd� D� Freshwater Pond
n
m - Riverine
REFERENCE. NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY DATA PROIVDED BY UNITED STATES FISH AND N
WILDLIFE SERVICE FOR NORTH CAROLINA, ACCESSED 2020. 1,000 500 0 1,000 Feet
BACKGROUND LAYER(S) PROVIDED BY UNION COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED 2021.
SCALE: DATE: FIGURE NO.
1 inch = 1,000 feet 3/22/2021 National Wetland Inventory
CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY:
2020-0135 ALH Old Mill Road Site
COORDINATES: CHECKED BY: GAR ❑ L I N A Union County 6
35.012933,-80.761462 AVH WETLAND SERVICES Weddington, North Carolina
G:\Shared drives\Consulting Team Drive\2020\2020 Consulting Projects\2020-0135 Old Mill Road Site\JD\ArcGIS\Figure6_NWl.mxd

G:\Shared drives\Consulting Team Drive\2020\2020 Consulting Projects\2020-0135 Old Mill Road Site\JD\ArcGIS\Figure7_FEMA.mxd

N
O
Freshwater Pond A
0.37 acre
710
2
1 inch = 100 feet
REFERENCE: BACKGROUND GIS LAYER(S) PROVIDED BY UNION
COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED 2021.
NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DELINEATED (FLAGGED
IN THE FIELD), CLASSIFIED, AND MAPPED USING A SUB -FOOT CAPABLE GPS
UNIT BY CWS, INC., ON MARCH 31, 2021. JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES HAVE NOi
BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE.
SCALE: DATE:
1 inch = 200 feet 4/9/2021
CWS PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY:
2020-0135 ALH
COORDINATES: CHECKED BY:
35.012933,-80.761462 AVH
Wetland BB
0.02 acre
Is
CAROLINA
WETLAND SERVICES
Wetland AA
Emergent: 0.01 acre
Forested: 0.06 acre
• DP2
P3
1 inch K2,6 feet
Legend
Project Limits (12 ac.)
® Emergent Wetland
® Forested Wetland
Freshwater Pond
7 Pipe
Roads
= Tax Parcels
ODP Data Point
N Photo Location and Direction
200 100 0 200 Feet
FIGURE NO.
urisdictional Boundaries
Old Mill Road Site
Union County 8
Weddington, North Carolina
G:\Shared drives\Consulting Team Drive\2020\2020 Consulting Projects\2020-0135 Old Mill Road Site\JD\ArcGIS\Figure8_JD.mxd

Old Mill Road
Attachments
April 9, 2021
CWS Project No. 2020-0135
ATTAC H M E N T A:
USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms
(DP1-DP3)

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Old Mill Road Site City/County: Union Sampling Date: 3.31.2021
Applicant/Owner: Development Solutions Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: DP1
Investigator(s): ALH/SLE Section, Township, Range: Waxhaw
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2-5
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.012933 Long:-80.761462 Datum: NAD-83
Soil Map Unit Name: Cecil gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded NWI classification: Not Mapped
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of emergent portion of Jurisdictional Wetland AA.
According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, Union County had normal conditions during the site visit.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP1
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.01
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Liquidambarstyraciflua
10 No
FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Juncus effusus
30 Yes
FACW
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Carex lurida 40 Yes OBL
4. Dichanthelium clandestinum
15 No
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5. Botrypus virginianus
5 No
FACU
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
100 =Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
50 20% of total cover:
20
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
100% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-2
7.5YR 3/2
100
Loamy/Clayey
2-4
7.5YR 3/2
98
10YR 5/1 2 D M Loamy/Clayey
4-12
10YR 5/1
70
Loamy/Clayey Co -matrix 7.5YR 3/2 30%
12-20
10YR 5/1
100
Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are present.
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Old Mill Road Site City/County: Union Sampling Date: 3.31.202'
Applicant/Owner: Development Solutions Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: DP2
Investigator(s): ALH/SLE Section, Township, Range: Waxhaw
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.012665 Long:-80.761451 Datum: NAD-83
Soil Map Unit Name: Cecil gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data point is representative of non -jurisdictional upland areas.
According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, Union County had normal conditions during the site visit
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) —True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
—Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are not present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP2
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1
Number of Dominant Species
2.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 3 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
=Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
)
FACW species x 2 =
1. Juniperus virginiana
10
Yes
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
5
Yes
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9.
3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.01
15
=Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
8
20% of total cover:
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. Liquidambarstyraciflua
2
No
FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2. Juncus effusus
2
No
FACW
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Lespedeza cuneata 2 No FACU
4. Danthonia spicata
15
Yes
UPL
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
9
(1 m) tall.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
21
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
11
20% of total cover:
5
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
33.3% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-8
2.5Y 6/3
90
10YR 4/3 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Distinct redox concentrations
8-12
2.5Y 6/3
60
Loamy/Clayey Co -matrix: 2.5Y 4/3 40%
12-20
2.5Y 4/3
100
Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are not present.
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Old Mill Road Site City/County: Union Sampling Date: 3.31.202'
Applicant/Owner: Development Solutions Inc. State: NC Sampling Point: DP3
Investigator(s): ALH/SLE Section, Township, Range: Waxhaw
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.012568 Long:-80.761446 Datum: NAD-83
Soil Map Unit Name: Cecil gravelly sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data point is representative of forested portion of Jurisdictional Wetland AA and Wetland BB.
According to the Antecedent Precipitation Tool, Union County had normal conditions during the site visit
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) —Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
—Moss Trim Lines (1316)
X Water Marks (131) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134) _Other
(Explain in Remarks)
_Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
—Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0.5
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 6
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 2
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Indicators of wetland hydrology are present.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP3
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. 4
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
50% of total cover: _
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1. Carex lurida
2. Juncus effusus
3. Smilax rotundifolia
4. Liquidambar styraciflua
5. Lonicera japonica
6. Woodwardia areolata
7. Botrypus virginianus
8.
9.
10.
11.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
_=Total Cover
20% of total cover:
15 Yes FACU
45 Yes FAC
60 =Total Cover
30 20% of total cover: 12
50% of total cover: 16
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
10 Yes
OBL
5 Yes
FACW
2 No
FAC
5 Yes
FAC
2 No
FACU
2 No
FACW
5 Yes
FACU
31 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 7
5 Yes FAC
5 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
71.4% of dominant vegetation is FAC or wetter.
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71.4% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_3 - Prevalence Index is !-3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Types
Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-1
10YR 2/2
100
Loamy/Clayey
1-6
10YR 5/1
85
2.5Y 6/1 15 D
M
Loamy/Clayey
6-14
2.5Y 6/1
98
5Y 7/2 2 C
M
Loamy/Clayey
14-20
2.5Y 6/1
85
5Y 7/2 15 C
M
Loamy/Clayey Faint redox concentrations
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Sandy Redox (S5)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Indicators of hydric soil are present.
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Old Mill Road
Attachments
April 9, 2021
CWS Project No. 2020-0135
ATTACHMENT C:
Photopage (Photographs 1-6)

Old Mill Road
Attachment C: Photooaae
April 9, 2021
CWS Project No. 2020-0135
Photograph 1. View of emergent Wetland AA, facing northeast (DP1).
ti , ens
c �Y.
•�: - �/�.-h' �►�-ii r - aV, Thy �•''. �1. , �
� �. �Gi:-•- - ... .yam",¢ .�- ,�; �1 �#*
Photograph 2. View of forested Wetland AA, facing southeast (DP2).
Photopage 1 of 3

Old Mill Road
Attachment C: Photopage
April 9, 2021
CWS Project No. 2020-0135
Photograph 3. View of forested Wetland BB, facing northwest.
Photograph 4. View of freshwater Pond A, facing northeast.
Photopage 2 of 3

Old Mill Road
Attachment C: Photopage
April 9, 2021
CWS Project No. 2020-0135
Photograph 5. View of non -jurisdictional upland areas, facing northeast (DP2).
Photograph 6. View of non -jurisdictional upland areas, facing northwest.
Photopage 3 of 3