20210836 Ver 1_ePCN Application_20210805

DWR
Dlrlslon of Water Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
June 1, 2021 Ver4.1
Initial Review
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
r Yes
r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Change only if needed.
BIMS # Assigned
20210836
Is a payment required for this project?*
r No payment required
r Fee received
r Fee needed - send electronic notification
Reviewing Office*
Fayetteville Regional Office - [phone]
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
Cedar Creek Road Commercial Project
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
Kim Williams - Land Management Group
1b. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
8/5/2021
Nearest Body of Water
Locks Creek
Basin
Cape Fear
Water Classification
C
Site Coordinates
Latitude: Longitude:
35.011142-78.830429
A. Processing Information
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Cumberland
Is this a NCDMS Project
r Yes r No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
r Yes r No
Pre -Filing Meeting Information
Version#*
1
What amout is owed?*
IT $240.00
r $570.00
Select Project Reviewer*
Chad Turlington:eads\ccturlington
1c. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
Is this a courtesy copy notification?*
r Yes r No

ID#
20210836
Pre -fling Meeting or Request Date
4/23/2021
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request here:
nick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Pre -Filing Request.pdf
File type must be FCF
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
V Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
r Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?*
r Yes
r No
1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
W Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r Yes r No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
fJ 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
r Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
Version
1
39 - Commercial/Institutional Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
48.48KB
r 401 Water Quality Certification - Egress
r Riparian Buffer Authorization
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
r Yes r No
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
r Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
r Yes r No
B. Applicant Information
1d. Who is applying for the permit?
r Owner W Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
r Yes r No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
KUS Properties LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
r Yes r No
r Yes r No
2c.Contact Person:
Joe Riddle

2d.Address
Street Address
4200 Morganton Rd, Suite 150
Address Une 2
City
Fayetteville
Postal / Zip Code
28305
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
Fayetteville Cedar Creek 2019, LLC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
2c.Contact Person:
c/o Joe Riddle (under contract)
2d.Address
Street Address
109 Still Wild Lane
Address Line 2
City
Elgin
Postal / Zip Code
29045
2e. Telephone Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Mr. Joe Riddle
3b. Business Name:
Riddle Commercial Properties LLC
3c.Address
Street Address
4200 Morganton Road, Suite 150
Address Une 2
City
Fayetteville
Postal / Zip Code
28314
3d. Telephone Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
ridd lecomme rcia I @aol. com
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
Kim Williams
4b. Business Name:
Land Management Group
4c.Address
Slate / Rmince / Fbgion
NC
Country
USA
2f. Fax Number:
State / Ravine / Rion
SC
0—y
USA
2f. Fax Number:
Slate / Rmince / Region
NC
Country
USA
3e. Fax Number:

Street Address
3805 Wrightsville Avenue; Suite 15
Address tine 2
City
State / Rwince / Ifgion
Wilmington
NC
Postal / Zip Code
Country
28403
USA
4d. Telephone Number:
4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
FC. Project Information and Prior Project History U
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
1c. Nearest municipality/ town:
Fayetteville
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
0455097082000;0455181931000
2c. Project Address
Street Address
Cedar Creek Road
Address Line 2
City
Fayetteville
Postal / Zip Code
28305
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Locks Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030300040707
4. Project Description and History
2b. Property size:
7.38
State / Rwince / legion
NC
Country
USA
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The site is undeveloped and forested. Uplands support a canopy of red maple, loblolly pine, and black cherry vdth privet, water oak and svveetgum in the shrub layer. Jurisdictional
vmtlands epst in the northern part of the site and a stream runs through this area. Ajurisdictional ditch is located in the eastern portion of the site and runs north into the wetlands. A
non -jurisdictional wetland is located in the western part of the site. Wetlands support mostly red maple, sweet gum, and privet. The tract is located off of Cedar Creek Rd. Surrounding
land use is mostly forested. Some commercial development is located just east of the site and residential use is further to the north.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
f Yes r No r Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
- 2 acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
- 190
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
The purpose of the project is to construct a commercial development to serve the shopping and dining needs of the residents of Fayetteville. Jurisdictional ditch and non -jurisdictional
vmtland impacts are needed to construct buildings and parking.
41. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*

The project consists of the construction of two restaurants, an auto parts store, associated parking, stormwater, access points, and utilities. Proper sedimentation and erosion control
devices will be installed per the applicant's S&EC permit. The limits of disturbance will be cleared of vegetation. Accessways and utilities Will be installed. Then building construction will
occur. Track hoe, loader, dump truck, bob cat, and other standard construction equipment will be used.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
r Yes f No C Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
C Preliminary C Approved r Not Verified r Unknown C N/A
Corps AID Number:
LMG delineated the larger 6.06 acre tract (attached is JD request package). Another consulting firm
delineated the adjacent tracts.
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Cameron Owens
Agency/Consultant Company: Land Management Group
Other:
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
C Yes r No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
No
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
r Wetlands r Streams -tributaries r Buffers
W Open Waters r Pond Construction
4.Open Water Impacts
$a. Sited
1 development P Fill # 4af. Impact Reason 4b. Impact type 4c. Name of wat,rbody 4d. Activity type 4e. Wate rbody type 4f. Impact area
for develoWA Fill D0.12 itch
4g. Total temporary open water Impacts: 4g. Total permanent open water impacts:
0.00 0.12
4g. Total open water impacts:
0.12
4h. Comments:
Additionally, 0.62 acre of non -jurisdictional wetland impacts are proposed.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
The ditch bisects the tract and impacts are unavoidable. Because large buildings with parking are proposed, it was not possible to minimize this impact
any further than depicted.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
A stormwater permit and sedimentation and erosion control permit will be obtained prior to construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
C Yes r No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Impacts are to a jurisdictional ditch and non -jurisdictional wetland. The non-jd wetland impacts are belowthe threshold for needing a permit or mitigation from the NCDWR.

F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
r Yes r No
If no, explain why:
Site is located within the Cape Fear River Basin
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
r Yes r No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
r Yes r No
2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SNIP) reviewed and approved under a state Stormwater program or state -approved local government Stormwater
program?
r Yes r No
r NIA - project disturbs < 1 acre
2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply:
r Local Government 9 State
State Stormwater Programs
W Phase II r Coastal Counties
r HWQ or ORW r Other
Comments:
Engineer is currently preparing a stormwater plan.
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
r Yes r No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? *
r Yes r No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
r Yes r No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Project will not provide access or utilities to adjacent tracts. No future impacts to jurisdictional features are anticipated.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
r Yes r Nor NIA
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated
at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
Project will tie into the municipal wastewater treatment facility.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
r Yes r No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
r Yes r No
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
r Yes r No r Unknown

5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
(^ Yes r No
5f. Will you cut anytrees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?
r Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
r Yes r No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?'
r Yes r No
51. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
(^ Yes r No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
The NC Natural Heritage Program database website is currently unavailable. The USFWS IPaC website was used to determine federally listed species
that may occur in the area (attached). The site does not appear to provide suitable habitat for any of the species listed in the letter. Therefore, no
impacts to federally listed species are anticipated.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
r Yes r No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA EFH Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
r Yes r No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
The NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS mapping resource was used to determine the presence of cultural or historic resources. No
resources are noted within or adjacent to the site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?*
r Yes r No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
FEMA Flood Map Service Center website
Miscellaneous
Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one
file when possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
dick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
Cedar Creek Rd PCN Attachments.pdf
File rrust be R7F or ME
Comments
Signature
W By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
10.65MB
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowedge and belief; and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request Within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act"),
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
Kimberlee C Williams
Signature
vtyrord�2lrn � j�%llCc."eror�7
Date
8/5/2021

Cedar Creek Rd Project
PCN Attachments
Table of Contents
1.0 AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
2.0 SITE MAPS
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Topographic Map
Figure 3. Soils Map
Figure 4. 2020 Aerial Photograph
Figure 5. Site Plan Showing Proposed Impacts
3.0 JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION REQUEST PACKAGE
4.0 RARE SPECIES INFORMATION

1.0 AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM

?q
wLMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY. company
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
I/we, the undersigned, hereby authorize Land Management Group to act as our agent in the
preparation and representation of information related to the Section 404/401 permit application
for the Cedar Creek Road project located in Cumberland County, NC. All questions regarding
this project should be directed to Land Management Group.
Sincerely,
Riddle Commercial Properties, Inc.
Applicant
J_oseoh P. Riddle III
Print Name
-�f ZQZ
Date
www.imgroup.net • [e-mail] • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15 • Wilmington, NC 28403

2.0 SITE MAPS
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Topographic Map
Figure 3. Soils Map
Figure 4. 2020 Aerial Photograph
Figure 5. Proposed Site Plan

s
m
7
ƒ
R
3 ,
c
/\
(D
LLJ
CL�
j0
CL
3=
o
,
R
C
\
\\\
£�3
2
.( /§
\
k -+
LU
o
/oe
z�
�-
x
/
�
6«#
U)
."D
3a°
{)/
,
+ %mom _\
U
PN w_wr
LU
_
\
\�E
§ »
,°r
.
\ƒ(
\
m _#q m
e,e
(>/�
e2\m0
§4=/9
)
$)j
\
�0)
/
\ k
r
-4
j
�
\
.
0
cok
\ 2
m�u
»!
3 0
)\
\ co
Z
J�
I E
U)/ U\
�E qN
\ Co I
� Rco
5.
`
2I=$
U Q
wirninsn
\d\
2 6N
-_
ƒ J'\/
7 2
S0
.
C)
� E n
gd -
/M6e±
U
Q Co
Ĥ\L)
z \
51�
/ O % §
co 7
® ®�
ƒ 7
#
.
x=o=
`�aQEI

a�
0
7 bbI6
R
i
3
)
O
•
U
Q
_.
Q
Rn
- C-
O
N
C
V
f
J
O
U
O
CY)
L
Q
.�
0
7
C
L
W
Q
1
•�
. I L
LLLI
O
•'
L o
�
V W
ti
i
1
\%L
a
%
]
00
R
"
oa�o
+`
7
ti _
��
W
.-Z O
N
%6
• •
w
C IN
O V
�O
d
EP
Iz
LO
�
y
a
ai
i
_
'
o
N O
17 co
't
N
O
1
r
2!
o
U) aa)
w
J C
Z
0
.�
U) a c
�.
N N
co
}
r
r
o `o��
Z�coQ
J °' ) co
70 co
L2:3 -x
a) o
LU
U�
L
Q�
N
-
W
Q
0�
cu 0
D N
� �
0J
r
NO 0-
-
U E
Q
cu
•
U��'10 �
U
•
0Yco
Z a� U)
• ' Y
U
�Ucoo
. z u
w -70U)
70 = a
1_
W o co
Um�!

_ o
�
O LL
O
Iq
- - U
11 N
N
C
U)
CL
M
p•
O
O
. �
• f w
w
w
z-IK
Va�'o
" a Q 'o
F
w
+> Z N
h
W N � N
t O
11Z
-
rn rn o
��rn
jams
�Lo
IZ ��
a
O)
O
fA
coN
co
O
N
O
0 O
- -- -. ..- -- - - o
cm
i c
(n a)
U
Z
o —
w
N
o f
J_
L
N
c
co Co
N
N 0 co
T
"O
Cco
zCoo
(1)U Q �
L
co
Q /
J °) °) 'o
U 70 C\4
co
co
w�E-a
cc E
CIU
E
��
CD
`0
0 U
(n�Q'z
U
co
QY co
z a) U)
O
Q O) O) i
U) m
JU'= O
r E
�
w L��
C
VJ LL
= a
O) O co
U CO

s• °"
1
O LL
O
w
5coCL
tG
O
If
Cc�
O
O
O
z
iL
yet
O a� � O
'
fi.r
� N V
_
;)r
UO
W-Z
N N
_
W
c7 O v
rn rno
3: .� rn
N—
Iz ��
�
a
ai
o
N O
co
co
�..
0 o
a
c
co
U
=
w
o
s
J a i
70 >;
NN
�-
��c�
0�0
co E
N O Q
-
Zco —
Q/ O 7
(DU
L < r
. 70 Co O
wE3:
c c6�
x U)
o
-0 L J
N N
.:'.
N Oa0
U� Q
Co
CD
c
W
Co
Z a O
W'Q
J j
y•
wUcoo
L 70 U)
co c
Worn
Uoo2!

�333333333?+�w
w
ww
w
z
�9��333P333P�3w
�a;s�co
m %zz�zz%
m�F'hM'
yz-zzzzzz&y�H�����y�yizz��z'zzzzz
eg
o
6�eS.ryam�a-
f�78n�m"gry
m'aae�me4im
aSo
N��W�h�^�J
=^�°�
qe�G
�__%«ssim
a
n�nrvrvM'^^�p
U U
Q
N N
0o w
g.
U rNN 99-
n°i (0,
Cum Z�
O O Y a�
--- ffim
fQ xa ¢
a J
LU
Izz z 30� Fv--
U U Vl z
3 e�' 3 ramaa xz �a m m z Q U
ai"� 3 - C.N QHQW _1
Pe .5e. z�°aF �"<° _ off` E `� F W J a
o
i9t si Jai xooa o�z G C z (�
ILLJ
S22'43'54W sti O N 551.37' �� 0 L1J F- C J
Wx 3 �woOC Jo b
O F ^> W Y
D- }Lu
Q G w m Z
NN C _ N CYJ Lv I a. w LL.I aa
Q U
a c� LO y 'r- L1 �-
wd1 51415vW wzz— a�?
w o � Z � w L`
.r 'N SWWO 110 pf°
ay H7 a Q>
XJq� � il` t� � ✓��yyi C� - � O
N23'3035 E
ire
e n d A o' x�
A
>s 0
PQ
mme
3 ? M O 3
N
� M
a
a
O M dLq
amN m � aw
z i o
-
ro
tisy�
n n
ma } a
>n �
n u _
— � Fo
m u
J m ` a x 3a
_ 0 d ` rc m £ P. R a
J LU C � g N £Q69dd c f
m
QUA Qs° 00
O w J$ z oQ N lC
Rou Sa o
C
�h�
LLJ___ �o Z
= � v IO-�l
U o 2
LLU
X °
a �N G1a<
s,: e a�7
—•..r:r�-� 56'U1H 3wa� E \ r..rrr,F o� 9.0
.UCZN0Effm 6ax��Z ¢
a.H M � ow� rcY�
oyl�o u°ny3b �xa�2w 1��Ama�q°"F� z
°oog IN Pad' a x�°'�Zar"�ga�^=momaw�� w _ziaz a �xz'o
I
� a w o dwwm<w �� soaaoo _ j ®� =�F�� ono
5®a xx�� a oaw �x�
agwog�o�oo� o Nam = \LL=HO
oorrt •saraar •r`v ossz�e rzoz/r/a •a„p-ream sarrrryax - say�sa\aMP\aaaao anaao m aar ozo-rza\�uro\ava\aa aaaao avaaa m aar ozo-rzaVa

3.0 JD REQUEST PACKAGE

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Cedar Creek Road
City, State: Fayetteville, NC
County: Cumberland
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0455-09-7082
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Cameron Owens - LMG
Mailing Address: 3805 Wrightsville Ave. Ste 15
Wilmington, NC 28403
Telephone Number: 910-452-0001
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultanti
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: KUS Properties LLC
Mailing Address: PO BOX 53729
Fayetteville, NC 28305
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations. if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a dttly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
K&Js Properties, LLC_& TPGM Properties, LLC
Print Naine
Capacity: ❑./ Owner ❑ Authorized Agent'
-1-4-zozl
Date
E
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources sunder Corps authority.
0 I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on due parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the ciurent NCDOTIUSACE protocols, ship to Part E.
3 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
S Must provide agent authorization fornAetter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminM JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
✓❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓� Size of Property or Review Area -6.06 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.011477 N
Longitude:-78.830086 W
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than I Ix 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. hM2://www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Missions/Regulatoly-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F4Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDS• please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'.
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
F4 USGS Topographic Map
0 Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
hJ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/readocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App A Prelim _JD_Form fillable.pdf
8 Please see hM2://www.saw.usace.4M.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

LMG
LAND MANAGEMENT GROUP
a DAVEY*. company
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
I/we, the undersigned, hereby authorize Land Management Group to act as our agent in the
determination of jurisdictional wetland boundaries on the subject property, Cedar Creek
Road Tract. By way of this form, I/we additionally authorize access to the site by
representatives of the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or the NC Division of Coastal
Management for the purpose of reviewing the flagged wetland boundary and providing a final
jurisdictional determination. Any questions regarding the jurisdictional wetland determination
should be directed to Land Management Group — A Davey Company.
Please provide the following information:
Property Address and Parcel ID Number: Cedar Creek Road: Fayetteville, NC: 0455097082000
Current Property Owner Name: K&JS PROPERTIES LLC;TPGM PROPERTIES LLC
Owner Address, Phone Number, & Email Address: PO BOX 53729; FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28305
Notice: This authorization, for liability & professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government officials
to enter the property when accompanied by Land Management Group staff. Please call LMG to arrange a
site meeting prior to visiting the site.
Joseph P. Riddle III _
Print Owner's Name
(A"14 1,6 �
ner's Signature
P - q- Z n z(
Date
www.im5!roup.net • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
3805 Wrightsville Avenue, Suite 15, Wilmington, NC 28403

s
m
7
ƒ
R
3 ,
c
/\
(D
LLJ
CL�
j0
CL
3=
o
,
R
C
\
\\\
£�3
2
.( /§
\
k -+
LU
o
/oe
z�
�-
x
/
�
6«#
U)
."D
3a°
{)/
,
+ %mom _\
U
PN w_wr
LU
_
\
\�E
§ »
,°r
.
\ƒ(
\
m _#q m
e,e
(>/�
e2\m0
§4=/9
)
$)j
\
�0)
/
\ k
r
-4
j
�
\
.
0
cok
\ 2
m�u
»!
3 0
)\
\ co
Z
J�
I E
U)/ U\
�E qN
\ Co I
� Rco
5.
`
2I=$
U Q
wirninsn
\d\
2 6N
-_
ƒ J'\/
7 2
S0
.
C)
� E n
gd -
/M6e±
U
Q Co
Ĥ\L)
z \
51�
/ O % §
co 7
® ®�
ƒ 7
#
.
x=o=
`�aQEI

a�
0
7 bbI6
R
i
3
)
O
•
U
Q
_.
Q
Rn
- C-
O
N
C
V
f
J
O
U
O
CY)
L
Q
.�
0
7
C
L
W
Q
1
•�
. I L
LLLI
O
•'
L o
�
V W
ti
i
1
\%L
a
%
]
00
R
"
oa�o
+`
7
ti _
��
W
.-Z O
N
%6
• •
w
C IN
O V
�O
d
EP
Iz
LO
�
y
a
ai
i
_
'
o
N O
17 co
't
N
O
1
r
2!
o
U) aa)
w
J C
Z
0
.�
U) a c
�.
N N
co
}
r
r
o `o��
Z�coQ
J °' ) co
70 co
L2:3 -x
a) o
LU
U�
L
Q�
N
-
W
Q
0�
cu 0
D N
� �
0J
r
NO 0-
-
U E
Q
cu
•
U��'10 �
U
•
0Yco
Z a� U)
• ' Y
U
�Ucoo
. z u
w -70U)
70 = a
1_
W o co
Um�!

! °
to
�
o Li
' `•
o
CL
M
o
o
M
+
N
L
4
�
F.)w
E
o
O
LL 0
J
a � -
U)� 4v
as
° .o
w_
b
O
{
}
w
e
•�`
fl
ch
d 'o
v 0
a�i
�Q
F ('40
..
wU00
ZC— Z
> N
O
LO —_
_
❑ .
.
I A W
(h
.
-•
a
• �J .
..
'lam
�
p . e�
a)
+J
i O J
O
co0 J
L
N -
(� O C)
�N
Co c
U) (1) (1)
W E
Z
�
O
U) c co
N
� co coC
N O co
z��
(1)v Q�
J
_
Co C
W �F�
L � 04
y--r
(6
�.1
LO
��.xL
-0 L J
o
N
°'
0° 0 0-
(1) Q
U
N
C)
E (6
(y a U
o
pQ�z
U
2
J
z a) U)
YI
P
,
Q .� L
U O
~ O
L 70 U)
J
o
(2) co
Uoo2

_ o
�
O LL
O
Iq
- - U
11 N
N
C
U)
CL
M
p•
O
O
. �
• f w
w
w
z-IK
Va�'o
" a Q 'o
F
w
+> Z N
h
W N � N
t O
11Z
-
rn rn o
��rn
jams
�Lo
IZ ��
a
O)
O
fA
coN
co
O
N
O
0 O
- -- -. ..- -- - - o
cm
i c
(n a)
U
Z
o —
w
N
o f
J_
L
N
c
co Co
N
N 0 co
T
"O
Cco
zCoo
(1)U Q �
L
co
Q /
J °) °) 'o
U 70 C\4
co
co
w�E-a
cc E
CIU
E
��
CD
`0
0 U
(n�Q'z
U
co
QY co
z a) U)
O
Q O) O) i
U) m
JU'= O
r E
�
w L��
C
VJ LL
= a
O) O co
U CO

s• °"
1
O LL
O
w
5coCL
tG
O
If
Cc�
O
O
O
z
iL
yet
O a� � O
'
fi.r
� N V
_
;)r
UO
W-Z
N N
_
W
c7 O v
rn rno
3: .� rn
N—
Iz ��
�
a
ai
o
N O
co
co
�..
0 o
a
c
co
U
=
w
o
s
J a i
70 >;
NN
�-
��c�
0�0
co E
N O Q
-
Zco —
Q/ O 7
(DU
L < r
. 70 Co O
wE3:
c c6�
x U)
o
-0 L J
N N
.:'.
N Oa0
U� Q
Co
CD
c
W
Co
Z a O
W'Q
J j
y•
wUcoo
L 70 U)
co c
Worn
Uoo2!

�UiT
N
_ .o
LD cc Q
In
:..
00 LL
c—U)
c
o
0�
Q
a) �
�
t
co 0
(I)-O-c co
.. . ':
r
c Co co
co 0- > +J
0.—
-
-
CD
O
C
U) U)
NCo
,
0 0
'
��
CD•i
(o
Gi
r
co co a) LO
E L
CD
0 •_ O
;
W
z�
Q c co c
(2)
�
�0co0-
�
O N -a N
�- _'-
co
Co
} L (2) U)
C n E
M)
0
E c W
~
O 0
W
o
0= 0
L 7 QK.
U) L
[
E a) 0
V G N V
C7 > 00
Z
0
co
W z
z
w ) E 'n
rn
U
(o
I-
I-
0
L
2
co
�
c
N
U a?
co
I o
o
>U
J
n; U)
N
>
c
O
L
co -0
co
U
io
(1)
m
t
N -0 Co
0 O L
O
_
E
O
0
(o
o
cu
(D
U)a`5i a
U
o
j
.2
�'
E—
Z
o
V)
U
J
— L.L 0 '2 �
0
N CO
-.. a
M
(D
U
co
N
�
?
`'
U)
cZ co co
Q N�
a)O
N U ON
c
JO
�
J 0- c
U-0 N
''R4ac'
(o
(o
c
Z
rn
-Ew
"-
�'
co E
x
L O O
(6 LO
2
O
>'
CU
co —
...
0
Q
L
O
(o
(o
U) N L N
co
Z U)
z
0
Co
LLJ U)
i L O Co
�Um�

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Cedar Creek Rd City/County: Fayetteville/Cumberland Sampling Date: 4/27/21
Applicant/Owner: Riddle Commercial Properties State: NC Sampling Point: DP1-UP
Investigator(s): Cameron Owens - LMG Section, Township, Range: Fayetteville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 137 Lat: 35.011477 Long:-78.830086 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Roanoke and Warne Soils NWI classification: Uplands
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ShallowAquitard (D3)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP1-UP
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Acer rubrum
25
Yes
FAC
2. Pinus taeda
10
Yes
FAC
3. Prunus serotina
10
Yes
FACU
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 23
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Ligustrum sinense
2. Quercus nigra
3. Liquidambar styraciflua
4. Quercus laurifolia
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 18
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Microstegium vimineum
2.
Quercus falcata
3.
Liquidambar styraciflua
4.
Ilex opaca
5.
Carex rosea
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover: 17
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Lonicera japonica
2. Vitis rotundifolia
3. Smilax bona-nox
4. Gelsemium sempervirens
5.
45 =Total Cover
20% of total cover: 9
15 Yes FAC
10 Yes FAC
5 No FAC
5 No FACW
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index
= B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is !2.01
35 =Total Cover
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
20% of total cover:
7
20 Yes
FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
5 No
FACU
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5 No
FAC
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
2 No
FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
2 No
FACU
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
34 =Total Cover Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
20% of total cover: 7 height.
20 Yes
FACU
20 Yes
FAC
5 No
FAC
10 No
FAC
55 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 28 20% of total cover: 11
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP1-UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-12 10YR 4/1
Sandy
12-24 10YR 5/1
Sandy
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
—Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
—Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 15313)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
—Marl (F10) (LRR U)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_Iron-Manganese
Masses (F12) (LRR O, P,
T) (outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
—Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_Anomalous
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain —Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Cedar Creek Rd City/County: Fayetteville/Cumberland Sampling Date: 5/4/21
Applicant/Owner: Riddle Commercial Properties State: NC Sampling Point: DP1-WET
Investigator(s): Cameron Owens - LMG Section, Township, Range: Fayetteville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 137 Lat: 35.011142 Long:-78.830429 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Roanoke and Warne Soils NWI classification: PFo1A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_Water Marks (131)
_Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
X Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ShallowAquitard (D3)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 12
Water Table Present? Yes X
No Depth (inches): 16
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP1-WET
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Acerrubrum
25
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
20
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 8 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
45
=Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
23
20% of total cover:
9
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
FAC species x 3 =
1.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
15
Yes
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
2.
Ligustrum sinense
15
Yes
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
3.
Acerrubrum
5
No
FAC
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is !2.01
35
=Total Cover
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
18
20% of total cover:
7
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Carex grayi
20
Yes
FACW
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Microstegium vimineum
10
Yes
FAC
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Carex rosea 5 No FACU
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
35
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
18
20% of total cover:
7
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Campsis radicans
15
Yes
FAC
2.
Smilax glauca
10
Yes
FAC
3.
Vitis rotundifolia
5
No
FAC
4.
Lonicera japonica
5
No
FACU
5.
Hydrophytic
35
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
18
20% of total cover:
7
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP1-WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-24 10YR 3/1
Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
—Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
—Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
—Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 15313)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
—Marl (F10) (LRR U)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_Iron-Manganese
Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
(outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
X Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
—Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_Anomalous
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain —Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Cedar Creek Rd City/County: Fayetteville/Cumberland Sampling Date: 4/27/21
Applicant/Owner: Riddle Commercial Properties State: NC Sampling Point: DP2-UP
Investigator(s): Cameron Owens - LMG Section, Township, Range: Fayetteville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 137 Lat: 35.011477 Long:-78.830086 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Wickham fine sandy loam NWI classification: Uplands
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ShallowAquitard (D3)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP2-UP
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Pinus taeda
2. Quercus laurifolia
3. Prunus serotina
4. Liquidambar styraciflua
5.
6.
7.
8.
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
% Cover
Species?
Status
60
Yes
FAC
10
No
FACW
10
No
FACU
5
No
FAC
85 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 43 20% of total cover: 17
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 12 Yes FAC
2. Morella cerifera 10 Yes FAC
3. Diospyros virginiana
4. Nyssa sylvatica
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 16
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Quercus nigra
2. Rhus copallinum
3. Quercus laurifolia
4. Nyssa sylvatica
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
50% of total cover: 3
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1. Lonicera japonica
2. Vitis rotundifolia
3. Smilax rotundifolia
4. Parthenocissus quinquefolia
5.
5 No FAC
5 No FAC
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 71.4% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index
= B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is !2.01
32 =Total Cover
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
20% of total cover: 7
2 Yes FAC
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2 Yes UPL
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
1 No FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
1 No FAC
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
6 =Total Cover Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
20% of total cover: 2 height.
20 Yes
FACU
10 Yes
FAC
5 No
FAC
5 No
FACU
40 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP2-UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-6 7.5YR 5/6
Loamy/Clayey
6-16 7.5YR 5/8
Loamy/Clayey
16-24 7.5YR 4/6 90
7.5YR 7/8 10
Loamy/Clayey
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
—Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
—Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 15313)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
—Marl (F10) (LRR U)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_Iron-Manganese
Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) (outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
—Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013) _Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_Anomalous
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain —Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT:
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Cedar Creek Rd City/County: Fayetteville/Cumberland Sampling Date: 4/27/21
Applicant/Owner: Riddle Commercial Properties State: NC Sampling Point: DP2-Wet
Investigator(s): Cameron Owens - LMG Section, Township, Range: Fayetteville
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1-6
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 137 Lat: 35.011162 Long:-78.830911 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Wickham Fine Sandy Loam NWI classification: Uplands
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (Al)
_Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3)
_Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_Moss Trim Lines (1316)
—Water Marks (131)
—Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
—Sediment Deposits (132)
—Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
—Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
—Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_Thin Muck Surface (C7)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_Iron Deposits (135)
_Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ShallowAquitard (D3)
—Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
X Sphagnum Moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP2-Wet
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1.
Acerrubrum
60
Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2.
Liquidambarstyraciflua
15
No
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
3.
Quercus laurifolia
20
No
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Pinus taeda
10
No
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 77.8% (A/B)
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
105
=Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
53
20% of total cover:
21
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30'
)
FAC species x 3 =
1.
Acer rubrum
15
Yes
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
2.
Vaccinium corymbosum
10
Yes
FACW
UPL species x 5 =
3.
Quercus laurifolia
10
Yes
FACW
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Quercus nigra
5
No
FAC
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is !2.01
40
=Total Cover
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20
20% of total cover:
8
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Panicum spp
15
Yes
Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
2.
Juncus canadensis
5
Yes
OBL
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Campsis radicans 2 No FAC
4.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
5.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
6
height.
7.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
8.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
9.
10.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
22
=Total Cover
Woody Vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
50% of total cover:
11
20% of total cover:
5
height.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
Lonicera japonica
15
Yes
FACU
2.
Smilax glauca
5
Yes
FAC
3.
Rhus radicans
5
Yes
FAC
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
25
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
13
20% of total cover:
5
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP2-Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Types Loc2
Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 3/2
Loamy/Clayey
4-14 10YR 5/1 85
10YR 7/8 15
Loamy/Clayey
14-24 10YR 6/1 60
10YR 6/8 40
Sandy
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
—Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—Barrier Islands 1 cm Muck (S12)
_2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
—Black Histic (A3)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
—Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
(outside MLRA 150A)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18)
—Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(outside MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, T)
—Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_Anomalous Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 15313)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
—Marl (F10) (LRR U)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)_Iron-Manganese
Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) (outside MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
—Barrier Islands Low Chroma Matrix (TS7)
—Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
—Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
(MLRA 15313, 153D)
_Sandy Redox (S5)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013) _Other (Explain in Remarks)
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Bright Floodplain Soils (F20)
_
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)
_Anomalous
(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
(LRR S, T, U)
_Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
wetland hydrology must be present,
(MLRA 138, 152A in FL, 154)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-2-SG, JUL 2018 Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain —Version 2.0

4.0 RARE SPECIES INFORMATION

IPaC Information for Planning and Consultation U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
IPaC resource list
This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat
(collectively referred to as trustresources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS)
jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list
may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be
directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood
and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional
site -specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project -specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of
proposed activities) information.
Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS
office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that
follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional
information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section.
Location
Cumberland County, North Carolina
Local office
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
[phone]
JEJ [phone]
MAILING ADDRESS
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
PHYSICAL ADDRESS
551 Pylon Drive, Suite F
Raleigh, NC 27606-1487

Endangered species
This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project
level impacts.
The primary information used to generate this list is the known or expected range of each species.
Additional areas of influence (AOI) for species are also considered. An AOI includes areas outside of
the species range if the species could be indirectly affected by activities in that area (e.g., placing a
dam upstream of a fish population even if that fish does not occur at the dam site, may indirectly
impact the species by reducing or eliminating water flow downstream). Because species can move,
and site conditions can change, the species on this list are not guaranteed to be found on or near the
project area. To fully determine any potential effects to species, additional site -specific and project -
specific information is often required.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary
information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area
of such proposed action" for any project that is conducted, permitted, funded, or licensed by any
Federal agency. A letter from the local office and a species list which fulfills this requirement can only
be obtained by requesting an official species list from either the Regulatory Review section in IPaC
(see directions below) or from the local field office directly. '
A N
For project evaluations that require USFWS concurrence/review, lease return to the IPaC website
and request an official species list by doing the following: -0
1. Draw the project location and click CONTINUE.
iZ4
2. Click DEFINE PROJECT.
3. Log in (if directed to do so).
4. Provide a name and description for your project.
5. Click REQUEST SPECIES LIST.
�i
Listed species
and their critical habitats are managed by the Ecological Services Program of the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the fisheries division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA Fisheries ).
Species and critical habitats under the sole responsibility of NOAA Fisheries are not shown on this
list. Please contact NOAA Fisheries for species under their jurisdiction.
Species listed under the Endangered Species Act are threatened or endangered; IPaC also shows
species that are candidates, or proposed, for listing. See the listing status page for more
information. IPaC only shows species that are regulated by USFWS (see FAQ).
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
The following species are potentially affected by activities in this location:

Birds
NAME
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776
Clams
NAME
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
Wherever found
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The ca o t
critical habitat is not available.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164 COO
Flowering Plants
NAME
American Chaffsee chwalbea americana
Whereve� found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecas.fws.gov/ecp/species/1286
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Pondberry Lindera melissifolia
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1279
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia
Wherever found
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
STATUS
Endangered
STATUS
SAT
0
STATUS
Proposed Threatened
STATUS
Endangered
Endangered
Endangered
Endangered

Critical habitats
Potential effects to critical habitat(s) in this location must be analyzed along with the endangered
species themselves.
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS AT THIS LOCATION.
Migratory birds
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act
and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act=.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory
birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing
appropriate conservation measures, as described be ow.
1. The Migratory Birds Treaty Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern htt ://www s. bi s/�mana ement/mans ed-s ecies/
birds-of-conservation-concern.php
• Measures for avoiding and minimizin im*cts to birds
http://www.fws.gov/birds/management/project-assessment-tools-and-guidance/
conservation-measures. php
Nationwide conservation measures for birds
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the USFWS Birds
of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your project location. To learn
more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this list is generated, see the FAQ
below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location, nor a guarantee that every bird on
this list will be found in your project area. To see exact locations of where birders and the general
public have sighted birds in and around your project area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip:
enter your location, desired date range and a species on your list). For projects that occur off the
Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing the relative occurrence and abundance of bird
species on your list are available. Links to additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and
other important information about your migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and
use your migratory bird report, can be found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to
reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY at
the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project
area.
NAME

BREEDING SEASON (IFA
BREEDING SEASON IS INDICATED
...........................................................................................
FOR A BIRD ON YOUR LIST, THE
.....................................................................................
BIRD MAY BREED IN YOUR
PROJECTAREA SOMETIME WITHIN
.............................................................................................
THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED,
WHICH IS A VERY LIBERAL
ESTIMATE OFTHE DATES INSIDE
.......................................................................................
WHICH THE BIRD BREEDS ACROSS
ITS ENTIRE RANGE. "BREEDS
ELSEWHERE" I N DICATES THAT TH E
BIRD DOES NOT LIKELY BREED IN
YOUR P ROJ ECT AREA.)
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to Jul 31
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but
warrants attention because of the Eagle Act or for potential
susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development
or activities.
https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1626
ll
Eastern Whip -poor -will Antrostomus vociferus Breeds May 1 to Aug 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout i r
the continental USA and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea i Breeds Apr 1 to Jul 31
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and A aska
t
Red-headed Woodpecker Jerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to Sep 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
o hrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to Aug 31
his is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in
the continental USA and Alaska.
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize impacts to all birds at any
location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly important when birds are most likely to occur
in the project area. When birds may be breeding in the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and
avoiding their destruction is a very helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur
and be breeding in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of infrastructure or bird species
present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCCI and other species that

may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian Knowledge Network
(AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets and is queried
and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects,
and that have been identified as warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle
(Eagle Act requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your project area. It is not
representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list of all birds potentially present in your
project area, please visit the AKN Phenology Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds potentially occurring
in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing collection of survey, banding, and citizen science
datasets . i
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information becomes available. To
learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and how to interpret them, go the
Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me about these gr phs" link.
R
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering, migrating or present year-round in my project area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding, wintering, migrating or year-
round), you may refer to the following resources: The Cornell Lab of Ornithology All About Birds Bird Guide, or (if
you are unsuccessful in locating the bird of infj
st there ), the Cornell Lab of Ornithology Neotropical Birds guide. If
a bird on your migratory bird species list hasseason associated with it, if that bird does occur in your
project area, there may be nests presentt snt within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is
indicated, then the bird likely does not breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Ranvide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern throughout their range
anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation Regions (BCRs) in the
continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on your list either because of
the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles) potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from
certain types of development or activities (e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made, in particular, to
avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC species of rangewide concern. For
more information on conservation measures you can implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts
and requirements for eagles, please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species and groups of
bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal
also offers data and information about other taxa besides birds that may be helpful to you in your project review.

Alternately, you may download the bird model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS
Integrative Statistical Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use throughout the year,
including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this information. For additional information on
marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Loring.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid violating the Eagle
Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of birds of priority -
concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for identifying what other birds may be in
your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in
my specified location". Please be aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km
grid cell(s) that overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existencFthe "no data" indicator (a
red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey effort i high, then the probability of
presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In contrast, a low survey effort bar%r no data bar means a lack
of data and, therefore, a lack of certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting
point for identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might be there,
and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you know what to look for to
confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize
potential impacts from your project activities, should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation
measures, visit the FAQ "Tell me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to
migratory birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.
0
Facilities
Wildlife refuges and fish hatcheries
REF E AND FISH HATCHERY INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME
Wetlands in the National Wetlands Inventory
Impacts to NWI wetlands and other aquatic habitats may be subject to regulation under Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal statutes.
For more information please contact the Regulatory Program of the local U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers District.
Please note that the NWI data being shown may be out of date. We are currently working to update
our NWI data set. We recommend you verify these results with a site visit to determine the actual
extent of wetlands on site.

This location overlaps the following wetlands:
FRESHWATER FORESTED/SHRUB WETLAND
PF01A
A full description for each wetland code can be found at the National Wetlands Inventory website
Data limitations
The Service's objective of mapping wetlands and deepwater habitats is to produce reconnaissance level information
on the location, type and size of these resources. The maps are prepared from the analysis of high altitude imagery.
Wetlands are identified based on vegetation, visible hydrology and geography. A margin of error is inherent in the
use of imagery; thus, detailed on -the -ground inspection of any particular site may result in revision of the wetland
boundaries or classification established through image analysis.
The accuracy of image interpretation depends on the quality of the imagery, the experience of the image an ts,
the amount and quality of the collateral data and the amount of ground truth verification work conduc
Metadm
ata should be consulted to determine the date of the source imagery used and any ma r le
Wetlands or other mapped features may have changed since the date of the imagery or fieldwork. Th e maybe
occasional differences in polygon boundaries or classifications between the information depicted on the map and
the actual conditions on site.
Data exclusions 011m, \3�e
Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping progrY because of the limitations of aerial
imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged
aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and nearshore coastal waters.
Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory.
These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery.
Data precautions
0
Federal, state, and local ulatory agencies with jurisdiction over wetlands may define and describe wetlands in a
different manner Aan tha used in this inventory. There is no attempt, in either the design or products of this
inventory, to dine he limits of proprietary jurisdiction of any Federal, state, or local government or to establish the
geographicaLo ope of the regulatory programs of government agencies. Persons intending to engage in activities
involving modifications within or adjacent to wetland areas should seek the advice of appropriate federal, state, or
local agencies concerning specified agency regulatory programs and proprietary jurisdictions that may affect such
activities.

D# * 20210836
Version* 1
Regional Office * Fayetteville Regional Office - [phone]
Reviewer List* Chad Turlington
Pre -Filing Meeting Request submitted 4/23/2021
Contact Name* Kim Williams - Land Management Group
Contact Email Address* [e-mail]
Project Name* Cedar Creek Rd
Project Owner* K&JS Properties LLC
Project County* Cumberland
Owner Address: Street Address
4200 Morganton Rd #150
Address Line 2
aty
State / Province / Pegion
Fayetteville
NC
Postal / Zip axle
Country
28314
USA
Is this a transportation project?* r Yes r No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - F- 401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular Express
F- Individual Permit F- Modification
F- Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
C Yes (-- No
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Chad Turlington
Please give a brief project description below and include location information.*
Proposed retail development. Final site plan is still being developed.
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.

• I understand by signing this form that Icannot submit myapplication until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
• I also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature
Submittal Date 4/23/2021