Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWQ0003396_Staff Report_20201216ROY COOPER Governor MICHAEL S. REGAN Secretary S. DANIEL SMITH Director Memorandum NORTH CAROLINA Environmental Quality December 15, 2020 To: Lauren Plummer Water Quality Permitting Section -Non Discharge Branch, Central Office From: Eric Rice WQROS, Raleigh Regional Office Through: Vanessa Manuel, Assistant Regional Superviso WQROS, Raleigh Regional Office Subject: Major Modification Arauco Moncure WWTF 985 Cornith Road Moncure, N.C.- Chatham County Permit # WQ0003396 Enclosed is the regional staff report regarding the submittal of a major permit modification for the Arauco Moncure WWTF facility. The submittal is regarding the request to raise the berm two feet above the one hundred (100) year floodplain for pond 5D. A site inspection was conducted as part of the review process. Please contact me at (919) 791-4242 if you have any questions. cc: file Attachment: WQROSR form DepartmentNorth Carolina RaleighRegion, :00 Barrett DriveRaleigh, North I Carolina09 State of North Carolina Division of Water Resources Water Quality Regional Operations Section Envilronmenuil Staff Report Quality Date: December 15, 2020 To: ❑ NPDES Unit ® Non -Discharge Unit Attn: Lauren Plummer, Water Quality Permitting Section Non Discharge Branch From: Eric Rice Raleigh Regional Office RE: Major Permit Modification I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION 1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or ❑ No a. Date of site visit: December 4, 2020 Permit No.: WQ0003396 Facility name: Arauco - Moncure WWTF b. Site visit conducted by: Eric Rice and Lauren Plummer (CO) c. Inspection report attached? ❑ Yes or ® No d. Person contacted on site: Savannah Carroll (Arauco) and Eric Messina (Civ. & Env. Consultants) (980-260- 2131) 2. Site inspection observations/notes: The permit modification request is for the raising of the berm elevation of pond 5D two feet above the 100-year flood plain. Ponds 5D and adjacent Pond 5C were inspected by walking around the perimeter of the ponds. The north and south ends of the ponds as well as the eastern sides were observed. The western side was not inspected due to the operation of equipment in that area. What appeared to be wetland areas lie near the eastern boundary of the ponds. It was stated that earlier in the week the Army Corp of Engineers had been on site to inspect the wetland areas. It was indicated that approximately one half acre of wetlands would be impacted by the permit modification actions. Arauco staff indicated that the EMC meeting scheduled for January 2021 is important to a decision regarding impact to site wetlands related to the permit modification. The modification of the 5D berm will result in the loss of some portion of Pond 5C. At the time of the inspection it was indicated that 5D had 1.1 feet of freeboard and 5C had .9 feet of freeboard. Spray fields are nonoperational and the ability to activate the spray system has been nearly disabled. Raising the berm will require disposal of some volume of pond solids. Disposal methods for the solids had not been determined at the time of the inspection. The facility connected to municipal wastewater in October -November 2020. It should be noted that a Special Order by Consent (SOC) is active for the facility due to earlier actions at the site. H. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non -Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an additional information request: Item I Reason Resolution to what method/s of disposal of the pond solids should be resolved prior to approval I' + : • impact issue �i Necessary information FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 1 of 2 The material that will be utilized to raise the berms should be identified and evaluated so that if can be confirmed that the source is free from any Necessary information contaminants, etc. If there is some question about the quality of the source, then testing should be considered. #3 of part VI. of the application was not Required completed #8 of part VI was answered as unknown for depth to bedrock. In the second part of the question the applicant indicates that the bedrock is not less than four feet. Depth to bedrock Required or a depth that defines where the bedrock is greater than the depth explored should available in the well borning logs of the LMW wells. #9 of the application is answered as N/A but the mean seasonal high water Required table is not provided. Provide mean seasonal high water table value . Recommendation: Recommend moving forward with approval after the preceding questions have been addressed and any issues related to the SOC align with the modification approval. 3. Signature of report preparer: Signature of regional supervisor: _ Date: M. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 2