20210925 Ver 1_More Info Received_20210804

Carpenter,Kristi
From:Conchilla, Ryan
Sent:Wednesday, August 04, 2021 1:46 PM
To:Parker, Jerry A; '[e-mail]'; Archer III, Wright
Cc:Wanucha, Dave; Carpenter,Kristi
Subject:NWP 3 - NCDOT Div. 7 / Bridge 584 / SR 3412 / Tabernacle Church Road / Guilford
County; SAW-2019-00875
Attachments:Tabernacle Church Rd Permit Drawings.pdf; 2017NWP03.pdf
Jerry,
The PCN and permit drawings (attached) for the project above have been reviewed.
Updates are requested to the wetland impacts and wetland mitigation sections in both the PCN and Plans (clarify
between hand clearing and/or mechanized).

Section 6 in the PCN lists parallel buffer impacts and bridge impacts (parallel impacts would only be listed if there is an
intermittent or perennial stream that flows parallel to the road, crosses into the buffers and that is impacted by the
project—is there one?). Impacts related to bridge crossings are exempt from mitigation per the buffer rules unless there
are parallel stream impacts in play, if so, those parallel stream impacts would require mitigation. Temp. wetland
impacts are listed in the buffer mitigation section (are they permanent or temporary?)

Wetlands may be located within the stream buffer, but we cannot see them on the plans— did they not include the
wetland layer for the buffer plans? (wetland mitigation would not be required unless impacts exceed wetland
thresholds -- 0.1 ac,-- if that was the case, mitigation would be required as part of the 401 permit, not as part of our
Buffer Certification. In this case, none are required.

Stream impacts (temp and perm impacts listed in the PCN and Plans do not match).
The permit drawings and buffer drawings do not depict the same wetland boundary (WLB) (no wetland boundaries show
on buffer plan maps). The labeling and boundaries of Wetland WLB and WLC depicted on the permit drawings do not
match the wetland delineation map.

Please update these items and resubmit a new PCN.
The new PCN for the Corps, can also include our revisions requested above.
Let me know what questions you have.
Thanks-

Ryan Conchilla, PWS
Environmental Specialist II
401 and Buffer Transportation Permitting Branch (DOT Divisions 7+8)
Division of Water Resources, NC Department of Environmental Quality
[e-mail]

From: Bailey, David E CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 7:04 AM
To: Parker, Jerry A <[e-mail]>
Cc: Conchilla, Ryan <[e-mail]>; Della Moore <[e-mail]>; Archer III, Wright
1

<[e-mail]>; Carpenter,Kristi <[e-mail]>
Subject: \[External\] NWP 3 - NCDOT Div. 7 / Bridge 584 / SR 3412 / Tabernacle Church Road / Guilford County; SAW-
2019-00875

CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.

All,

Please reference the PCN and plans received from your office on 6/23/2021 requesting use of Nationwide Permit (NWP)
14. However, based on the revised plans (attached) received via email from your office on 7/28/2021, the above
referenced bridge replacement project is authorized under NWP 3 and does not require notification. If use of NWP 3 is
acceptable to NCDOT for this project please let me know, and notify NCDWR as well for the purposes of their 401 Water
Quality Certification.

Please note that the project must be accomplished in strict accordance with the attached conditions and your submitted
description, and any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted description may subject the
permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action. Attached is a copy of the NWP 3
and the applicable permit conditions. The Action Identification Number for this project is SAW-2019-00875.

Note that NCDOT is still responsible for the following conditions pertaining to the Northern long-eared bat and (LIST ANY
MUSSELS SUBJECT TO THE APPLICABLE MUSSEL PBO), as this project occurs in NCDOT Divisions 1-8:

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS’s) Programmatic Biological Opinion (PBO) titled, “NCDOT Program Effects on
the Northern Long-eared Bat in Divisions 1-8”, dated November 6, 2020, contains agreed upon conservation measures
for the NLEB. As noted in the PBO, applicability of these conservation measures varies depending on the location of the
project. Your authorization under this Department of the Army permit is conditional upon your compliance with all
applicable agreed upon conservation measures in the PBO, which are incorporated by reference in this permit. Failure to
comply with the applicable these conservation measures would constitute non-compliance with your Department of the
Army permit. The USFWS is the appropriate authority to determine compliance with the terms and conditions of its PBO,
and with the ESA.

Please let me know if you have any questions regarding the above information.

Sincerely,

Dave Bailey

---
David E. Bailey, PWS
Regulatory Project Manager
US Army Corps of Engineers
CE-SAW-RG-R
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Office: [phone], Ext. 30.
Mobile: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

We would appreciate your feedback on how we are performing our duties. Our automated Customer Service Survey is
located at: https://regulatory.ops.usace.army.mil/customer-service-survey/
2

Thank you for taking the time to visit this site and complete the survey.

3